From Germany to Mexico: How America’s Source of Immigrants Has Changed over a Century

Jens Manuel Krogstad and Michael Keegan, Pew Research, May 27, 2014


With more than 40 million immigrants, the United States is the top destination in the world for those moving from one country to another. {snip}

But today’s volume of immigrants, in some ways, is a return to America’s past. A century ago, the U.S. experienced another large wave of immigrants. Although smaller at 18.2 million, they hailed largely from Europe. Many Americans can trace their roots to that wave of migrants from 1890-1919, when Germany dominated as the country sending the most immigrants to many of the U.S. states, although the United Kingdom, Canada and Italy were also strongly represented.

In 1910, Germany was the top country of birth among U.S. immigrants, accounting for 18% of all immigrants (or 2.5 million) in the United States. Germans made up the biggest immigrant group in 17 states and the District of Columbia, while Mexico accounted for the most immigrants in just three states (Arizona, New Mexico and Texas). Behind Germany, the second-most number of immigrants in the U.S. were from Russia and the countries that would become the USSR (11%, or 1.6 million).


Today, five times as many immigrants in the U.S. are from Mexico than China, the country with the second-highest number of immigrants (5% of all immigrants in the U.S., or 2.2 million). Mexico is the birthplace of 29% (or 11.7 million) of all immigrants in the United States. {snip}



Topics: , , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • propagandaoftruth

    These Mexicans sure aren’t Germans.

    • Don’t you ever read the NYT? Mexicans are the New Italians.

      • propagandaoftruth

        You have Netflix? I recommend “Last Stand”, Arnie’s return to action hero movies. Cheezy and schlocky but fun. Interesting comment he has at the end vis-à-vis the German/Mexican immigrant thing, lol…

        • kikz2

          or as the grinning racist latina sotomayor would say..’netflik’…………….

      • Shadow

        Mexicans aren’t the New Italians,they’re the New Plague!

      • cranky_1970

        Does that mean 1/2 of them are going back to Mexico after failing to adapt to American culture and society.

        • Terra Magnum Imperium

          Nope, the 1/2 you speak of have failed to adapt in Mexico…

      • Shadow

        Mexicans are decidedly NOT the New Italians,they’re the New Plague.

      • Dave West

        Maybe in thirty years there will be a Mexican-american version of the Jersey Shore show. The Mexcian one will include even more drinking, more fighting, more baby daddies, more dirve-by’s, more loudness, and more utter stupidity. It will be MTV’s most entertaining show ever.

      • Al Rex

        You must be kidding!!! Mexicans…the New Italians??? Never. Mexicans are immoral,vicious,vindictive,ugly,welfare dependent,street people,loud same as all the other “Hispanics”. There is no comparison.

        • rowingfool

          Every Mexican city and town I have visited (a lot) has fouled its public water spaces. They use lagoons as the town’s dump. Vile and disgusting sight and smell. I’m talking about lagoons on the Pacific that may well have been the single most attractive feature of the place 200 years ago. Fed by a stream, ringed by palm trees, an oasis of cool and shade.

          Mexicans need stern instruction, training really. They keep themselves immaculately clean but just drop their litter everywhere. This shows that person to be totally self centered. How do you make a dent in a totally self centered person?

          • Lt. Greyman, NVA

            You don’t.
            Whites owe the other races NOTHING. Our attempts to “make” them into little Englishmen or Americans or even civilized was what got us here in the first place. It is not our duty or responsibility or even advisable for us to try to “alter” the other races. Star Trek had it right with the “prime directive”. Return them to their place of origin and let them grow as they were meant to, not as “we” would wish.

            “”The Prime Directive is not just a set of rules. It is a
            philosophy, and a very correct one. History has proven again and again that whenever mankind interferes with a less developed civilization, no matter how well intentioned that interference may be, the results are invariably disastrous.” J.L. Picard

            Look at the interference Man has had with Homo Africanus just with food supplies and antibiotics. Where there were 40 or 50 million negros in Africa, you now have nearly 1 billion, all starving and wanting more. The colonies of Rhodesia and South Africa, failed, the Whites dead or driven off.

        • John R

          Mexicans are the new Italians. Yeah, that is why all the banks had signs saying “One for English and two for Italian”, right? And of course, out of sensitivity, all the crime dramas NVER gave the impression that there was ANY connection between Italians and crime, right? (Remember “The Untouchables”? all those Al Capone movies? The “Godfather”? etc.) And of course, we all know that just saying “dago” or “WOP” was a vicious hate crime, huh? You would get shot saying that, right? (Sarcasm, I went to Catholic school, and we always called the Italian kids WOPs and dagos. btw. Yeah, the “legacy of racism” has sure hurt the Italians, right?) No, this is BULL! Italians are Europeans, and in the end assimilated quite well in America, without any special entitlements.

    • cranky_1970

      You should reserve judgement about Mexican immigrants until you have visited an amusement park in TX or CA. The experience is a terrifying peek at what happens to humanity without selective genetic pressures. It’s similar to what happens when the transporter malfunctions on the Starship Enterprise during beam up.

    • rowingfool

      But they brew good German beer.

  • O! what I’d give to trade Mexicans for Germans.

    • Shadow

      I,myself,would trade Mexicans for almost anybody,just as long as they’re not Central Americans,Muslims,or,God help us,Africans!

    • SentryattheGate

      Mexico quadrupled her population in 50 years, while the US population didn’t even double, including all the immigrants we take in! Meanwhile, it’s sad to see how low the German birthrate is!

      • rowingfool

        Don’t be sad. Germany is doing very well by keeping its population growth within the limits of sustainability. It has also made a great effort to become energy independent. Ultra-insulated homes, wind and solar etc. It had plans to install a huge solar/thermal farm in the Sahara that by 2050 would meet 25% of its energy needs.

        Germany does not want to be dependent on either American (i.e. Middle East) or Russian natural gas and oil in the future. Don’t worry. As a nation they have just about the highest IQ in the world. They can look out for themselves.

        It’s our nation that will be a train wreck as we find it impossible to employ millions of cretins in a 21st century economy.

        • NotYouNotSure

          Germany is facing the same demographic doom like most other Western nations, that means the native German population will decline endlessly, replaced by a non German population. How a big thermal farm in the Sahara is going to save things is beyond me.

          • rowingfool

            You’re right. I just looked up the demography of Germany. I had no idea that they rank third in the world in percentage of foreign born within their borders and that their native birth rate was so low.

            Son of a gun.

          • SentryattheGate

            Germany has a large Muslim Turk population. Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan , while visiting them a few years ago :”“The mosques are our barracks, the domes our helmets, the minarets our bayonets and the faithful our soldiers…”

          • M.

            You have to make children to keep the civilization going. What good are solar farms and technological achievements if they won’t profit our own descendants?

            In these times of growth, white countries are expected to grow in numbers, with or without whites.

            Investing your money in having many children is as much beneficial for your race and country as starting a business with them.

  • What a difference a century makes.

    I wonder if there was some kind of event, or sea change, about half way through this hundred year time period, that could explain the difference.

    Yeah, 1965 is about halfway between 1910 and 2010, a little more, but hey, close enough for government work.

  • JackKrak

    Funny how “(insert anything) to Mexico” makes it clear that something has badly declined.

    • propagandaoftruth

      Number one Mexican export – Mexicans.

      • rowingfool

        As were Africans when their surplus was exported as a cash crop by their own tribal leaders. The slave trade and its extensive infrastructure of harvest and transport from the interior was monopolized by a few dominant Kings in Africa.

      • M.

        Making copies of themselves is what they make best.

  • MekongDelta69

    “From First World to Third World: America’s demographic destiny”

    And there ya go. The America in which I grew up is dead.

  • Sharps Rifle

    Dang! Filipinos in ALASKA???? Can’t even get away from them up there!

    • Bossman

      Yes, Filipinos are everywhere. Prince Phillip of the UK asked the question some time ago. So many of them are in the UK, he wondered if there are any left in their home country.

      • LHathaway

        Not many women. . .

      • benvad

        Funny thing about the flips is the really want to be white. They try to play up Spanish ancestry even though they’re racially the same as neighboring Malays. They’re kind of like Dominicans, which means white is right. Trujillo could’ve saved the European jews had he’d been given a chance to.

    • As far as I can tell, we don’t have many of them here (Georgia), praise the Lord. We have a lot more than our fair share of blacks and Mexicans, though.

  • 11 million Messicans? Try again. There must be nearly that many in south Texas alone. And they’re going to stay Messicans, never assimilating because of the way their minds work. Wherever they go, there’s spray painted “art” on everything, noise, trash, and classy latrino broads in skin tight jeans, platforms, huge dangly earrings, and tramp stamps all over their big-butted bodies. Ugh!!! The ugliness is as bad as the ignorance.

    • Yes, they dress like hookers. It’s disgusting. I was at Six Flags with my family on Memorial Day and I couldn’t help but notice the differences in dress between blacks, Mexicans, and whites, especially among women. On average, the white women dressed comfortably, maybe a little “sexy,” but decent. The Mexicans literally dressed like hookers. The blacks weren’t much better, but I think the Mexicans even had *them* “beat” by a small margin, believe it or not.

      • SentryattheGate

        I’ve noticed the same thing at DisneyWorld; sleazy dressed Hispanic women, especially the Ricans!

    • kikz2

      …and the screaming hordes of wild-assed kids…….sometimes it’s a tie w/blacks on that aspect…..of their cultural beauty….

  • JSS

    The fact that Americas decline corresponds with its favoring 3rd world immigrants over European is purely coincidental.

  • JohnEngelman

    The Washington Post May 10, 2013

    Jason Richwine, the co-author of a controversial immigration study released this week by the Heritage Foundation, tells Post Politics that he has resigned his position with the organization…

    The study written by Richwine and Robert Rector argued that the immigration reform bill would cost $6.3 trillion, but it was widely panned by conservative groups pushing for immigration reform as not accounting for the economic benefits of immigrants.

    Complicating matters were a series of revelations about Richwine, including that he had written a doctoral thesis at Harvard University arguing that the United States should focus its immigration efforts on those with high IQs.


    In the Star Chamber of political correctness truth is no defense. The more true one’s statement is the more serious is the offense, and the more severe is the punishment.

    • rowingfool

      ” The more true one’s statement is the more serious is the offense, and the more severe is the punishment”

      And the converse is true as well. The greater the lie they tell, the more strictly they enforce compliance. And as (was it Solzhenitsyn?) said, some of the lies are so outrageous that they are insulting to the intelligence–but that is the very point. By acquiescing you debase yourself in your own eyes. Realizing that you lack the courage to resist, you find yourself the object of your own scorn and consequently are utterly humiliated and dispirited.

      Just as they had intended.

  • dd121

    It didn’t have to change to Mexicans. That’s the result of our leftist elites who want to turn our country brown.

    • Einsatzgrenadier

      Multicultural propagandists like to present globalization as a natural phenomenon, as fulfillment of the laws of history.

      “The whole world is becoming one,” they say. “We are becoming a global village. There’s nothing that anyone can do to stop this mass migration. The future is brown.”

      They neglect to mention that mass migration is in one direction only, from the third world to the first. There is also a racial dimension to the mass migration. It is almost entirely nonwhite. Whites from Europe cannot migrate to the countries of the Anglosphere, which are reserved by transnational elites for nonwhite settlement and colonization only.

      Transnational elites prey on the greed and selfishness of the middle classes of the third world, uprooting them from their homes and driving them northwards in search of first world incomes and consumer-driven lifestyles. These nonwhite foreigners would not be here if our borders were strictly policed. Sometimes the elites send out search parties looking for potential nonwhite colonizers and even use white taxpayer money to fly nonwhites in. And make no mistake, this is being entirely orchestrated by the ruthless psychopaths we call “leaders.”

  • shmo123

    I wonder how Mexico would handle 2 million Yanks crossing the border illegally every year?

    • Put them in jail, strip them naked, tie them to their beds in their jail cells.

      Look up Andrew Tahmooressi.

    • Bossman

      Tens of thousands of Yanks poured into Mexican territory in the early 1800s. So many of them poured into Mexico that they felt safe to take the entire Southwest away from Mexico. So if you’re wondering, it has happened before.

      • kjh64

        Nice try, but America didn’t “take” the Southwest from Mexico, Mexico sold it to the USA. The Southwest was a very sparsely populated region and Mexico considered it a wasteland. As such, Mexico sold it to the USA for a very large sum of money. It was only much later, after Whites turned the Southwest into a success, did the Mexicans come up with the “stolen Southwest” lie in order to guilt trip Whites so they could use Whites

        • Bossman

          Really? So there was no Mexican-American war? Why did the USA declare war on Mexico if not to take their land? What was that all about?

          • JDInSanD

            Mexico and the US had a dispute over where the southern boundary of Texas was. The US said the Rio Grande and Mexico said the Nueces River. Mexico refused to negotiate and in fact saw the offer to negotiate as a sign of weakness. Mexico fired the first shots. We won the war but paid them for the land and reparations for damage done in Mexican territory because, as you all know, the winning side always pays the loser.

            From Wikipedia: “President James K. Polk ordered General Taylor and his forces south to the Rio Grande, entering the territory that Mexicans disputed. Mexico laid claim to all the lands as far north as the Nueces River—about 150 mi north of the Rio Grande. The U.S. claimed that the border was the Rio Grande, citing the 1836 Treaties of Velasco. Mexico rejected the treaties and refused to negotiate; it claimed all of Texas. Taylor ignored Mexican demands to withdraw to the Nueces. He constructed a makeshift fort … on the banks of the Rio Grande opposite the city of Matamoros, Tamaulipas.

            Mexican forces under General Mariano Arista prepared for war. On April 25, 1846, a 2,000-strong Mexican cavalry detachment attacked a 70-man U.S. patrol under the command of Captain Seth Thornton, which had been sent into the contested territory north of the Rio Grande and south of the Nueces River. In the Thornton Affair, the Mexican cavalry routed the patrol, killing 16 American soldiers.”

            Much later we made the Gadsden Purchase and the Mexicans again laughed at us for buying wasteland and again promptly squandered the money.

          • Do you know why we did the Gadsden Purchase? Mexico may have been laughing, but we were too, all the way to the bank.

            I happened to be in Arizona on the sesquicentennial of the GP, was there visiting a great uncle, and there was a not well attended ceremony (though attended by me) to mark the anniversary, south of Phoenix on the Gila River, which was the international border before the GP. Then-Gov. Janet Napolitano was there, and I don’t really know how much of a pleasure it was, but I did meet him, tell him hello and shake his hand.

          • Petronius

            In the 1820s American settlers were invited into the Southwest by the Mexican government.

            When Texas won its independence (1836) the Rio Grande River was recognized as the boundary by the Treaty of Velasco. The Republic of Texas also included large parts of what is now NM, CO, UT, WY, OK, and KS.

            When Mexico reneged on the Treaty, the Mexican War was the result.

          • SentryattheGate

            And US settlers were invited by Mexico into the Southwest to act as a buffer against the vicious attacks of the Comanches, who also chased/brutalized other Indian tribes out of the Southwest area. Mexican Pancho Villa’s raids on Americans also helped start the Mexican-American war.

          • Bossman

            How did Texas win its independence? Was Mexico happy about that? The truth is Mexicans were naive and trusted the Anglo-Americans and the result was the loss of the entire Southwest.

          • Petronius

            Are you being deliberately obtuse, Bossman?

            Texas won its independence when Sam Houston and the Texas army defeated the revolutionary general Santa Anna at the battle of San Jacinto. The Treaty of Velasco was the immediate result of this victory.

            Those Mexicans who lived in Texas were happy with the result, including six Mexicans from San Antonio who gave their lives for Texas independence at the Alamo.

            Whether the Mexican governors were happy with the result is of absolutely no concern; the Mexican rulers brought it upon themselves, less through their naiveté than through their customary methods of governance: oppression, brutality, and corruption.

            Mexico was a vast, grandiloquent, and bankrupt empire, troubled by constant revolution, civil wars, massacres and reprisals, and incapable of defending any part of its territory. Its rulers hoped that American pioneers would provide a buffer in this wild, disordered, and sparsely populated region, which was constantly subject to Indian attacks. Indeed, the Texans suffered continued depredations––murder, robbery, horse-stealing, cattle-killing, destruction of hogs and crops.

            The Mexican governors added insult to injury––settlers’ land titles were dishonored; forced conversion to Roman Catholicism as the sole religion; widespread corruption, senseless cruelty, gross brutality, and tyrannical acts by officials of the Mexican government; no right to trial by jury or habeas corpus; no right to peaceful assembly to seek redress of grievances; resettlement of Mexican convicts into Texas; military occupation and rule by martial law by convict-soldiers; harsh trade restrictions and high taxes.

            The Mexican system became a sort of perpetual revolution, with the dictator Santa Anna given extraordinary powers. Such oppression and abuses were eventually bound to meet with resistance.

          • rowingfool

            Very good Petronius. Solid history.

            “Mexico was a vast, grandiloquent, and bankrupt empire…..incapable of defending any part of its territory.”

            It has always been a source of wonder to me how some people, especially today’s enlightened atheists, swallow whole hog the notion that huge parts of the North American continent belong to Mexico just because some guy stepped ashore from a boat in 1509 or thereabouts, planted a flag and declared “I claim this land in the name of Queen Isabella of Spain!”.

            In the next breath these same people will scoff at the notion of the legitimacy of Royalty.

          • kjh64

            Texas was an independent country and not part of the US at that time. The Mexicans invited the Anglo-Americans to Texas in order to use them. The Anglos later rebelled against Mexico’s harsh treatment and broke away into the Republic of Texas. The rest of the Southwest, which had nothing to do with Texas at that time, was sold by Mexico to the USA and Mexcio /USA agreed on borders. Anglos in Texas didn’t cause Mexico to lose the Southwest, Mexico sold it.

          • RisingReich

            Dude, please get off of it already and just move to sh!ta$$ed Mexico and enjoy the squalor you so desire and stop agitating to bring the squalor here.
            You make yourself sound like a fool keeping on with it here.

        • Alexandra1973

          Yeah really. And if it’s the Southwest they’ve got their beady little eyes on, why am I seeing them here in Ohio? Last time I checked that was the Midwest.

          All they want to do is come here and mooch.

      • Dave West

        Yeah your right we did take it, but it appears that Mexico didn’t really find any use for the land to begin with, given that less than one percent of the Mexican population lived in territory that comprised over half of the country of Mexico. Mexicans are bad bad losers, even if that land did remain with Mexico I’m convinced the “little brown ones” would still be clamoring across the border to reap the benefits of a white nation.

        • Almost all Mexican immigrants we get are from southern Mexico, and any non-Mexican Hispanics are from south of Mexico. Yet they’re all supposed to have this grudge for the United States “stealing” territory they never even laid eyes on before they trekked north to sneak across the border?

    • propagandaoftruth

      They’d be a first world nation within a decade even in our current civilizational stupor. Heck, if they continue sending US their worst, could happen in two decades…

      • Terra Magnum Imperium

        Agreed, the Landfill USA, dumping ground for the worlds trash…

    • Ike Eichenberg

      Belt fed machine guns.

      • PvtCharlieSlate

        Water cooled, belt fed machine guns.

    • mobilebay

      I don’t know many Yanks who would want to cross the border to find the answer to that question. I think Mexico should be boycotted in every way until the imprisoned Marine is freed.

  • Dave West

    It’s amazing to me how libtards through their support of mass non-white/third world immigration are amplifying if not even outright creating all problems they claim to be against. High income inequality, high rates of poverty, shootings/crime, and America falling behind in educational and innovation standards. An increasing non-white America is really the gift that keeps on giving for socialists because it makes the problems they see in society more and more relevant.

    All the problems I mentioned above are most prevalent in states with high minority/immigrant populations like Arizona, Texas, Mississippi, and Florida; all states that favor republicans. Of course liberals have a field day with this by pointing out that this must be due to republican leadership while casually forgetting that California has the worst schools and income inequality in the nation and that mostly white/heavily republican states like Montana or Kansas have virtually none of those problems mentioned. It really puzzles me how all white North Dakota manages to get buy with no diversity or “family-values” illegal immigrants, I just can’t put my finger on it.

    • kjh64

      While it’s true that liberals have contributed greatly to this problem, you can’t say that the neo-cons ,as well as greedy American business people, haven’t also contributed heavily. The neo-cons, are in with big business. Big business wants to flood this country with cheap labor and the republicans go right along and support it. Greedy Americans hire this cheap labor. So there is plenty of blame to go around.

    • Al Rex

      Look at Canada,Europe,New Zealand and Australia. All invaded by ugly,thratening third-world scumbags. It’s not only here in the United States and if is bad now just imagine how it will look like her in 50 years let alone 100 years. Our politicians,Democrats and Republicans are seloing us out. They think that we will all be a family, nice-nice, all getting alone with each other among the different races but they’re wrong. The frightening thing is that all of these people are waiting for us to become a minority so they can push us aside and take over all of our institutions and do whatever they want and as they all have ancient hatred toward us for one reason or another it’s not going to end up good. I’m glad that at least in Europe they’re waking up though but here I don’t see a national movement against this massive non-White immigration and every day this once Great Country gets darker and darker and many Whites in Congress want more third world skunks? We need national movement of action and not just writing and take back our Country. Just see how the Europeans are doing and it must be done here.

      • Dave West

        At least in Europe the worst countries are still only 10 to 15 percent non-white and many are only 2 to 4 percent. America is coming up on 40%. Saving the country as a whole might be beyond reach at this point, territories that are mostly white should be the focus at this point. I just got back from CA, more specifically L.A., in a state that is only 40% white. In and around nice areas like Santa Monica one might get the impression that diversity actually works, but even in those nice areas the vast majority of the residents are white and the minorities present are just there for the day to shop, hang out, or do whatever the hell they do. Traveling down interstate 405 through the city, if one ignores the terrible pollution and 70 ft palm trees and looks off to the side of the highway they may catch a glimpse of the real, third-world Los Angeles .

        • kjh64

          Have you been to Europe lately? Western European cities are FULL of Muslims and others. Like the USA, many of these countries could become majority Muslim in the future IF things don’t change.

          As for the USA, nobody knows what the racial percentage of Americans are because the census counts EVERYONE residing on US soil at the time of the census, regardless of whether or not they are citizens. The forty million or so illegals are counted as “Americans”, so are the millions of foreigners here on student or work visas. Ironically, American nationals living abroad, and there are a couple of million, are NOT counted in the census. This is done to give minorities a boost when it comes to how much money and political representation their districts get despite the fact that it gives a totally false percentage of American citizen racial breakdowns.

          Only the racial percentages of American citizens should be counted in racial percentages. This would give us an accurate number as only US citizens are Americans. The millions of non-citizens should be counted as foreign nationals residing on US soil.

          • rowingfool

            Since 1985 I’ve made 4 longish trips to Europe. I love European culture.

            On each of these trips, the only hassles I experienced or eye witnessed others experiencing involved Muslim males. As street swindlers, train robbers, train station robbers and just general rudeness and violence in cafes, every case involved a Muslim male or males.

  • Ahnenerbe ᛟ

    Het that’s what the Hart-Celler judeo-marxist Act of 1965 was designed for. Destroy European Americans

  • DLRisVH


  • kenfrombayside

    Stop the Mexican invasion.Keep the pressure on your reps in congress. Giving 11 – 30 million (nobody knows for sure) criminal lawbreakers legalization pure insanity. Plus, they could sponsor their relatives; that would bring the total up to about 50 million aliens in our midst. Of course, these new citizens will vote for the vile democrats and their socialist giveaways. Most of them will be unskilled, uneducated, low IQ etc. Stop this outrageous bill now. Don’t sit on the sidelines.You are not wasting your time. The American people don’t want this bill. You have to do all you can do to stem the third world assault:
    – Contact your 2 US Senators and rep in congress.
    – after biz hours, leave a message on your DC rep’s voicemail. All US Senators have multiple offices so it would be a good idea to hit all of the. Remember, be civil and don’t threaten
    – go to NUMBERSUSA then go to the take action button. You will be able to send faxes to your 2 US Senators and congressional for free. (I also gave a $50 donation).
    – use Business Reply envelopes to state your opposition to America’s insane immigration policies and the proposed amnesty. Don’t give the parties any money.
    – join an immigration group like FAIR. Strength thru numbers!
    – go to the RNC & DNC sites to email them.
    – Use the media: call a talk radio program; write a letter to your local paper. If the media outlet is liberal, then talk about economic impact of massive third world immigration.

    • Terra Magnum Imperium

      Hmmm, Armchair activism 101…

      • kjh64

        Well, it’s better than nothing.

      • Romulus

        Diminishing those who would use one of the few remaining mediums to disseminate the critical information necessary to the survival of the indigenous people of Europe and their descendants is “armchair activism?”

        What would YOU have us do ? Simply lay down and Die?!

        If you have a better solution, I’m all ears!

        • Veni Vidi Vici

          Hmmm maybe better then ignorant sheep but the cow that moo’s still gets slaughtered.

    • Martel

      Every sensible American should spend at least one or two hours a week doing this.

  • Bossman

    What are Filipinos doing in Alaska? Sex workers? Toilet cleaners? Kitchen helpers? Fishermen?

    • Dave West

      Asian massage parlors for all the oil rig workers.

  • LHathaway

    I have to admit, I admire women of color, but the lower map could almost be a map to where the hot babes are located.

    • Yeah, anywhere outside the Southwest. 1910 American men were pretty lucky.

      • RisingReich

        and 2010 men extraordinarily unlucky.

  • Einsatzgrenadier

    How is the United States going to feed itself when it becomes a Spanish-speaking, predominantly Catholic, mestizo-majority nation? Man cannot live on food stamps alone. This is not going to end well. Only war can avert this grim fate.

  • M.

    Yeah, well, white countries aren’t producing enough copies of themselves anymore. They can barely fill their own demographic gaps, let alone export to other countries.

    In 1910, Germany’s fertility rate was at around 5 ch./woman (the mortality rate was a little higher too). In 2014, it’s at 1.43. There just aren’t people to export anymore. They don’t even have the proper workforce to keep up with their own economic growth.

  • Demo P. Seal; PouponMarks

    If you get out a bit, travel around, you will see what the graphs and numbers explain. In the New Jersey towns along the East River like Bergen, Jersey City, etc., you will see the old, magnificent churches and homes made out of stone and rock, soaring magnificently toward the Heavens. These were constructed by high quality European immigrants that flourished in “The New Magic Land”, where there hard work, applied intelligence, and fealty to God, Family, Country produced an economy that beat all world comers. These guys, and the industries they worked for, were indomitable. Pictures of Detroit auto factories of the 1930s show these dedicated men, ordinary looking focused and intense on achieving excellence. Their communities reflected their morality and centered comportment.

    Today, their neighborhoods are inhabited by decidedly inferior sub normals. They are an area of study for anthropologists who might chronicle the decline and abandonment of a once great, powerful, and Godly people to a now jungle-vined, incoherent, baseline, retrogressive random atoms, with random direction and mostly entropy.

    Visit the Pyramids, and the grand old buildings of Baltimore. Obviously, the present population of the Dark Persuasion had nothing to do with its former glory.

    • CallahanAuto

      I live in NJ, and I think we have the worst cities in the country, just for the simple fact that we have so many of them that are hellholes and drug dens. My wife has several relatives in their 60s and 70s from Paterson, the city right next door to us. White people aren’t from Paterson anymore. The white junkies go there for dope.

  • John R

    Ignoring race for a minute, have you noticed that the very years-from 1950 to 1970-that saw the smallest percentage of foreign born happened to correlate perfectly for the very times that the nation was most prosperous, particularly for working class people? Sort of blows the whole idea that immigrants helped build this nation, huh? Only the very rich benefit from immigration. (And liberal politicians, but that is another story.)

  • John R

    Read his book: Churchill, Hitler, and the Unnecessary War. “How Britain lost her empire and the West lost the world.”

    • Romulus

      Even a moron who has never read a book! Should have been able to see that a blonde haired blue eyed germanic is the same damn race, no matter whether they lived in NZ, AUSTRALIA,USA,CANADA,BRITAIN, IRELAND,DEUTSCHLAND OR THE OTHER NORDIC COUNTRIES.

      Says something about the effing retards that instigated a war to pave the way for industrial democracy, eh?
      So we commited to the slaughter of our own genome for “others” who were only marginally European?

  • IKUredux

    My ancestors came to this country way before Ellis Island. You know, when I was a kid, I grew up with people who were100% Polish and 100% Italian. Kids would ask me what I “was”. I would reply that there was so much, I didn’t feel like going into it. As an adult, I traced my family. It’s exactly as I was led to believe by the adults. I am German, French, Austrian, Scottish, Irish, Norwegian. And that’s only going back to the 1840’s. My point in bringing this up is this: I think an American is a White European from everywhere. Because of our mixed ancestry here in America, I think that Americans have their own special look. Come on, you know we do! I seriously can see an Englishman, and know right off that he is! When I was in Peru, I was talking to a man who told me more than anything, he wanted to live in America. I said to him: “So, you want to be an American, do you?” He replied:” Well, only White people can be Americans, I just want to live there”. Mind you, as a liberal at the time, I told him that anybody who lived in America was an American. He stopped at that point and said:”Yeah, I know you consider Blacks as Americans, but trust me, everybody else in the world thinks that an American looks like you”.

  • American_cavalier

    Reading articles like this I am always disappointed by the complete and total dismissal of the real native Americans, people like George Washington. There are at least 85,000,000 people who are purely native American, descendents of the colonial settlers who carved the country out of a state of nature and savagery, brought their British traditions of fair play, justice, local autonomy, freedom, liberty and representative government and then cemented it into the greatest constitution in the Western world in 1789. To put that in perspective, consider the aforementioned demographic data. The first point of reference was from 100 years ago in 1910. George Washington’s family had already been in this country longer than those rif raf whose families arrived on our backs back in 1910. In other words, native Americans like us had already placed our lives, our blood, our families, our properties, our laws, our legends, our myths and folktale deeper into this country back in 1789 than some Bernie Bernie Weinbaum whose anti-Christian family who got here in 1910. Time for such so called white people to remember one thing: You all came here as guests and pledged your posterity to follow us native Americans, aka British Americans, aka Wasps, etc. So remember, guests can always be kicked out.