“By Giving a Definite Answer, People Will Say ‘Racism, Racism!'”

Henry Wolff, American Renaissance, May 14, 2014

Nicholas Wade discusses the implications of his book.

Why are some countries rich and others poor?

Why can’t countries in the Middle East import Western institutions?

Why was China the first modern state?

What was the cause of the Industrial Revolution?

With these questions, Nicholas Wade opened a talk last night at a book signing in Washington, DC. He pointed out that anthropologists, economists, and social scientists who raise these questions all ignore genetic factors, and that in the wake of the Human Genome Project, there is no longer any excuse for this approach.

For the most part, Mr. Wade reiterated the thesis of his remarkable book, A Troublesome Inheritance: Human evolution has been recent, copious, and regional, leading to clear racial differences that have civilizational significance. This direct assault on the prevailing taboos of our age has so far been met with a guarded response, but if anyone can shift the debate it is this erudite, soft-spoken Englishman.

During the question period, I asked Mr. Wade about the implications of his book:

You mentioned that Western institutions couldn’t be transferred to tribal societies, Middle Eastern societies, partly because of genetic factors. Do you expect that if large numbers of non-Western immigrants arrive in Western countries that those Western institutions would still be preserved, or do you expect that they might be changed as well?

Mr. Wade pointed out that genes affecting our social behavior are not deterministic—they “give little nudges” that can be powerful in the aggregate. He said that when people come to the US from other countries, the instinct to conform takes over, “so people from China or Japan who come to the US don’t build little Chinese-type political structures within the US. They follow the same rules as everyone else.” For that reason, Mr. Wade said, “I don’t think it should matter what kind of society a person comes from.”

I then asked about substantial populations shifts. I noted that California has gone from 90 percent white to less than 50 percent white in about 30 years. Wouldn’t that change institutions?

Mr. Wade answered:

You know I suppose if the shift were large enough, yes it would. And I think we’re obviously getting into a very dangerous area and by giving a definite answer, people will say ‘racism, racism!’ But I think it’s a very reasonable question and we should surely be able to find some way of looking at it in a dispassionate, non-racist way and saying, well, ‘what is the answer?’ My suspicion is if you have an awfully large proportion of people from a tribal community–suppose 90 percent of people in Minnesota came from Somalia–I guess you might start having problems if they start to organize themselves in the ways they are most accustomed to. But that hasn’t happened anywhere in the US so far as I’m aware. So I think we have to say that while it is possible, it hasn’t happened here.

I asked about Detroit. Mr. Wade replied:

Detroit? Well now I think now we’re getting into slightly different . . . [inaudible] . . . sort of violent social transitions as a whole industry collapses and reorganizes itself . . . so I think . . . you’re putting me on the spot here. And good for you, right? If we say there’s a sort of genetic component in here we need to be very careful about using it as an explanation for any sort of current social problem. I’m much happier painting with a broad evolutionary brush stroke. I just can’t guide you when it comes down to the fine details.

There were several other questions, including one from a cultural anthropologist who accused Mr. Wade of erecting a straw man by suggesting anthropologists ignore genetics. The most interesting question was posed by Jason Richwine, who lost his job at the Heritage Foundation last year after publicity about his Harvard dissertation which mentioned the genetic contribution to group differences in IQ.

Dr. Richwine noted that many people have lost their jobs for discussing the topics covered in Mr. Wade’s book. “How confident were you,” he asked, “that writing this book would not result in the loss of your livelihood?”

Mr. Wade answered:

This is a subject that is very difficult for academics to discuss. In fact, I think academics steer way clear of this subject. I found in writing stories about the human genome, anything that touched on race, for example, just petrified the academics I would speak to. I thought it was very sad, that we would have intimidation in this country. So I thought there was an opportunity, maybe a duty to write this book and to break the ice and try to discuss some of these issues.

As for my own job, most of this book is based on articles that I wrote for the New York Times, and I never had the slightest problem putting them into the paper. It’s just that I happened to be a reporter covering genetics, so this is the way I wrote the stories. I prepared them exactly like any other story would be prepared. They went through the Times’ elaborate editorial system without anyone raising the slightest objection, so I’ve never had any fear that the Times would be pissed off by these articles. I don’t know what they think about the book. They probably don’t have a position. But there’s not anything racist in the book, so as far as I’m concerned there’s nothing anyone should object to.

It certainly was courageous of Mr. Wade to write A Troublesome Inheritance, and to cover genetics research as frankly as he has for the Times. It was clear from his answers to my questions that he is, himself, subject to the same pressures felt by academics. As he noted, “By giving a definite answer, people will say ‘racism, racism!’ ”

That is what orthodoxy has done to our country, and Mr. Wade has struck an important blow for the truth. All praise to him. He has helped clear the path for other truth-tellers to follow.

Topics: , , ,

Share This

Henry Wolff
Henry Wolff is the assistant editor of American Renaissance.
We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • paul marchand

    The interview shows that Mr. Wade does not have ” an agenda”, but simply looks at facts, and let’s them do the speaking.
    I guess that would be called * scientific analysis*.

  • KevinPhillipsBong

    Wolff, Richwine and Wade…wish I’d been there.

  • Jacobite2

    The ultimate question for Americans ought to be: discussion of scientific issues is constrained by political/cultural/economic pressures that rule investigation into racial differences out-of-bounds. Leftists in power then base the latest round of anti-white legal discrimination on “disparate-impact analysis” which has only one basis — the legally-determined fact that there are NO DIFFERENCES among races. Now, whites still being a majority in the US, where does the power come from to control scientific research and popular discussion in the US? Obviously, whoever is wielding this power is not white and does not wish whites well. How does this happen? You best find out — ASAP.

    • [Guest]

      >>>Obviously, whoever is wielding this power is not white and does not wish whites well.

      What purpose does it serve to ignore widespread lack of racial self-interest (and a whole lot of racial suicidal inclinations) among white people? Even if nonwhites were responsible, how do you account for the fact that the white majority has permitted the fundamental transformation?

      • Jacobite2

        I have no good ideas. Water fluoridation?

      • BillMillerTime

        That really is the key question. Why do so many white people feel inclined to swallow the guilt pill and shut off critical thinking? They’d better refuse any more guilt pills or else they might very well end up blended out of existence.

        • Geo1metric

          It is not so much guilt as it is fear.

          Anyone who speaks out honestly about race in America will immediately lose their livelihood.

          • Sick of it

            Quite a few would like to do more than speak, but they fear the United States military. They are the lynchpin of this tyrannical state.

          • Geo1metric

            In prior revolutionary situations, large parts of the standing military, if the conditions were right, would defect to the revolutionary side.

          • Sick of it

            The British military did not defect. Not even when we cut them down in droves. At the start of a general revolution in this country, I expect American soldiers to massacre our people just like they do various other peoples overseas. In time, maybe, some would get the memo, but those who participate in the initial massacres should be treated as targets and enemies rather than potential recruits. I’d dare say the only people who would switch sides are the ones who would refuse to show up for duty on Day One ala the American Civil War. It’s very American to choose a side right off the bat and stick with it until the end.

          • Geo1metric

            It wasn’t racial either. I think that if the conflict were primarily racial, things would be different. At least I would surely hope so.

          • bilderbuster

            And get a visit from the IRS just to make sure others don’t make the same mistake.

  • Anna Tree

    “so people from China or Japan who come to the US don’t build little Chinese-type political structures within the US”
    –> Yes they do!

    “suppose 90 percent of people in Minnesota came from Somalia–I guess you might start having problems if they start to organize themselves in the ways they are most accustomed to… So I think we have to say that while it is possible, it hasn’t happened here.”
    –> Yes it has happened here: no need of 90%, even 5% is enough, with all the “useful idiots” helping. Western countries are morphing as we speak, due to demographic changes.

    • silviosilver

      suppose 90 percent of people in Minnesota came from Somalia–I guess you might start having problems

      Yeah, you “might” start having some problems. But who can say? Certainly don’t want to jump to any conclusions now.

  • Garrett Brown

    Nicholas Wade, one of the last TRUE scientists in the main stream.

    • tetrapod

      Mr. Wade has indeed opened the door enough for a tiny sliver of light to shine through. But the full power of the MSM can still extinguish it in two ways. They can attack head-on and render Wade’s thesis “controversial”, therefore relative, and therefore powerless. Or, they can simply ignore it and instead keep us all up-to-date on the Kardashians.

      We’ll know we’re truly free when we can openly discuss The Culture of Critique.

  • Geezo, I was ready to turn Nicholas Wade into a big hero.

    Turns out he’s just as clueless as anybody.

    Has he never heard of Chinatowns? Is he not aware that there are large parts of Minneapolis and St. Paul that are recreations of Somalia?

    Late breaking news: One of the Boston Bomb brothers, the Tsarnaevs, got the gun he used in the shootout from a Somalian gang in Portland, Maine.

    This part is interesting:

    He said that when people come to the US from other countries, the instinct to conform takes over

    I don’t think there’s really a powerful self-internalized instinct to confirm, I think there is outside social pressure to conform, or, to use a better word, assimilate. The problem with saying that these days is that the informal social and cultural mechanisms of the past that forced immigrants to assimilate are now either discouraged or outright illegal civil rights violations. Throw on top of that that before 1965, almost all new immigrants were white, after, almost all were/are non-white, so you have new immigrants now that are unassimilable even if we tried.

    • paul marchand

      I think he did right. Whereas you and I come from a different empirical perspective ( say racial crime stats, IDU stats, education performance stats) that aint Mr. Wade’s forte, so he doesn’t go there. Which lends to his credibility, as he is “disinterested” as to making results fit his perspective. NOW, if his results conflict with out empirical stats, questions abound !

    • Sick of it

      If immigrants in the past who started out different were so apt to assimilate, we would not have had socialism in these United States. The people who assimilated best were people like those already here.

    • tetrapod

      ” …The problem with saying that these days is that the informal social and cultural mechanisms of the past that forced immigrants to assimilate are now either discouraged or outright illegal civil rights violations…”

      There are also economic forces that discourage assimilation. I used to work for the largest bank in the US, and I recall the urgency with which it adopted bilingual services for Hispanics. I also recall seeing a document describing the trillion dollar profit potential within the Hispanic community.

      Never under estimate the power of the queer-for-money crowd to destroy our country.

      • David Ashton

        And don’t forget the money-for-queers crowd.

    • [Guest]

      I believe Mr. Wade is onto something concerning genetics but is blowing smoke regarding assimilation. If there is indeed an “instinct to conform” among new arrivals from alien cultures, it’s quickly quashed by identity politics.

      When a Somali gets off the plane in Minneapolis, he finds a welcoming party from any one of various Somali advocacy groups wearing familiar garb and speaking the familiar language. He soon learns where to get his benefits, how to vote (for Keith Hakim/Keith Ellison-Muhammad), and where the nearest mosque can be found.

      • Guest

        “Instinct to conform”? What “instinct to conform”?

        • David Ashton

          “Aaah, aren’t they sweet?”

          (Sarcasm.)

          • captainc

            Why aren’t they? These girls would be the next Miss America.

          • BillMillerTime

            Repeat after me: they are all just Anglo-Saxons wrapped in dark skin. What, do don’t accept that? Who are you going to believe? Me, or your own lying eyes?

          • Geo1metric

            Don’t know. Never tasted one. Never want to. 🙂

      • Nancy Thomas

        Yeah, I’ve noticed the tendency for Mexicans to conform to the gang life by dealing drugs and doing drive by shootings and tagging every wall in sight.
        Nice “conformity!!!!!!

        • You forgot cock-fighting, dog-fighting, selling home-made, unpasteurized “bathtub” cheese, peddling home-made tamales and the like in public without a food-vendor’s permit, driving drunk without licenses or insurance and raping underage girls. There are also the zoning laws they ignore by packing 20 or 30 people into single family homes. Let’s not forget their penchant for dumping old car tires and filthy, worn-out mattresses anyplace they find convenient.

          If this is what constitutes “assimilation”, I would hate to imagine what things would be like if these greaseritos y greaseritas came here and remained a bunch of dumb, dirty, lazy Mexicans!

          • Kenner

            Thanks for getting that off my chest!

          • Nancy Thomas

            Eloquently stated sir, and very thorough. It seems that you know the breed.

        • Gabe

          Drug usage when discussing about races is always controversial.
          -Mexicans are more likely to go to prison for producing drugs.
          -Black are more likely to go to prison for selling drugs.
          -Whites are more likely to to to prison and/or rehab centers for consuming drugs.

          it is a vicious circle, you cannot blame a certain race when it comes to drugs since apparently everyone wants them.

          • Sick of it

            We can blame the tribe who started the international drug trade and their royal friends.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            Exactly. Weak willed Whites comprise most of the victims, while predatorial Bantus make sure to keep the addicts addicted. This is why, in the old days in some cities, The Mafia kept drug dealers out of White neighborhoods. Unfortunately, Leftist Libtards made sure to break the back of The Mafia.

      • Garrett Brown

        That’s terrifying.

    • dd121

      I was disappointed by his assertion that immigrants want to conform as something that is transparently, not true in many cases. That might have been true when the white Europeans were populating our continent. Not so with the dark skins.

      • dean53

        Exactly. What is there to conform to? The feds have essentially outlawed (formerly) mainstream majority American values that pre-1965 white European immigrants once conformed to. Now people can be charged with hate crimes, penalized or jailed for thinking, acting, or expressing the values that most Americans once held, and many secretly still hold on to.

        • Sick of it

          They take your children away, take your guns away, seize your property, destroy your ability to find work, etc.

      • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

        Mr. Wade is blissfully stuck in the past with this. He is thinking of European immigrants who came before 1920. Assimilated so well because of all being from a common racial stock, and sharing common European Christian cultural values. Middle Easterners who came were mostly Christian back then. America was building it’s racially Caucasian, culturally European core back then.

    • TruthBeTold

      Let’s not throw the baby out with the bathwater.

      The important thing here is not to dismiss Wade because he doesn’t live up to your standards but to utilize the information he provided.

      • David Ashton

        This is the sensible approach. Our opponents have used the incremental approach against us. We should use it against them.

        • Grantland

          We don’t have 50 years. I’m sick of the wimpy, effeminate cowardice masquerading as prudence, strategy, “reaching out”, and the like. ENOUGH!

          • David Ashton

            You may or may not be “sick”. On another blog site I have just been accused of “racist cowardice”!! I resent your implication that with my frank and active record I am an effeminate wimp. Yes, it is indeed late in the day, but we need an intelligent and interactive strategy at all levels of productive combat. This does NOT entail the bombing of Chinese restaurants, Indian shops, Muslim mosques, Jewish synagogues or Black churches. We have the moral and rational high ground, and should not sacrifice this position to impatience or violence, which is what our “rulers” would like most of all.

          • Grantland

            Just one credible leader standing up and speaking TRUTH, no Wade-like simpering and equivocation; and devil take the consequences. Just one.

          • David Ashton

            Carlyle once said the hour does not always find the man, but you have more chance in the USA than in my British Alcatraz.

          • Grantland

            And Churchill once spoke of a thin layer of morality covering a bottomless morass of funk. Me? No, I’m not “credible”. How about you?

          • David Ashton

            I am younger than Churchill when he last became PM and said he could not get his Cabinet to agree about the great imminent danger of Afro-Asian immigration, but he already had a great parliamentary record for good or ill, and did not have cancer like me. Mosley, Powell and General Walker are long gone, Tebbit is elderly and committed to his wife whom the IRA paralyzed from the neck down, while Griffin and even Weston have experienced the “political policeman’s knock” (which Churchill said we fought a world war to prevent). Farage is our “right-wing Kerensky” but there is no sign of a “white nationalist Lenin”.

            All I can do now is to push out ideas, information, arguments and suggestions in the hope that they fall on fertile ground, and my own nation does not disappear altogether before I do!

          • Grantland

            If you want to beat the cancer, fast for 24 hours, then eat only lauric acid (coconut oil) in small quantities for 24 hours. Then refrain absolutely from any and all carbohydrates until the cancer disappears – 3 months plus. Plenty of oil, fat, a little protein. Substitutes/supplements for the missing veg.

            ‘Old Klingon remedy. Good luck.

          • Geo1metric

            Carbs are indeed killers.

          • Grantland

            Cancer feeds and grows on glucose.

          • Geo1metric

            Yes.

          • David Ashton

            Thanks for your thoughtful advice.

            I have two possible “Lenins” in mind, whom I propose to approach confidentially.

          • Grantland

            Stolid Anglo-Saxon common sense, delivered with fiery rhetoric.

          • Sick of it

            I’ll definitely agree with a comparison of Farage and Kerensky, though not in the way you intended. Politics today is firmly left wing…even in the so-called right wing.

          • David Ashton

            I understand your point entirely. I don’t know, by the way, if Farage is a mason. His campaign is likely to lose steam before the Euro Election. He has obligingly paraded his ethnic candidates and stated that he is not against immigration, for all the good that it has done with his Finkelstein foes and Aaronovitch adversaries at The Times, for example; and of course his economic policy takes a damaged island out of the Brussels frying-pan into the Global fire. The Kerensky aspect I have in mind is the symbolic impact of his imminent initial limited success as a nationalist protest, however mistaken in the respect you suggest, against a corrupt and cosmopolitan establishment. What happens next depends on others – and us.

          • Sick of it

            It always does, David. Evil triumphs when good men do nothing.

          • Einsatzgrenadier

            The tyrannical mass immigration and multiculturalism regimes in Washington, Canberra, Ottawa, Brussels, Westminster &c. are both ideologically and fanatically committed to the demographic transformation of the west into an extension of the third world. Their goal is to make us thoroughly multicultural and they will not be stopped except through crippling economic depression or acts of war. This means that they are bound to become increasingly totalitarian in order to see their globalist project through to the bitter end.

            The regimes will continue overpopulating our societies until land, housing, food, water and job shortages lead to widespread rioting among our third world populations and sensational racially motivated killings all across the west. The religion of Islam will become a powerful influence throughout Europe and professional jihadists will take advantage of the chaos and disorder to establish Islamist theocracies on European soil. Whites will become minorities in their own countries, surrounded by hostile non-white foreigners with historical grievances against the white race.

            The question of violence is not one of if, but when. Our sociobiological, evolutionarily informed understanding of human social behavior leads us to the conclusion that massive third world immigration and multiculturalism will eventually lead to widespread, brutal violence, followed by the permanent extinction of western civilization.The physical extermination of the white race and Islamist aggression on a worldwide scale are the inevitable outcomes of globalism, universal egalitarianism and neoliberalism. The coming of widespread, brutal violence and chaos to Europe and North America isn’t a possibility, but a certainty. White nationalists would be foolish not to prepare for this eventuality, regardless of what strategy they adopt in the interim.

          • LovelyNordicHeidi

            DA: “and should not sacrifice this position to impatience or violence,”

            Most important of all, violence converts no one. What Breivik did is not good for us. We have to emphasise that violence is neither going to do our public image any good nor is it going to convert anyone. Breivik thought that he was going to make a difference. He did not. He failed and killed dozens of people. That should teach us something.

            DA: “We have the moral and rational high ground”

            About 15-20 years are needed (according to communist sources) to achieve the full conversion of a whole society to a new ideology. We still have that time, but we must not waste it. As you suggested or alluded to, we have to exploit our moral and rational high ground as much as we can. We can do this. I believe we can, otherwise I would not be here.

          • Sick of it

            David, the places you mentioned are pointless targets. The homes of those behind the entire scheme would make for more logical targets. And I don’t mean front-men like politicians. A very small number of individuals run the whole show. Cut the head off the snake and it starts to rot. This is of course a hypothetical discussion.

          • Geo1metric

            I have often thought the same strategy. Finding “the heads” is the problem. Then getting access is the next problem.

          • Sick of it

            You can find books written about quite a few. They aren’t hiding very much anymore.

          • David Ashton

            Gated communities, expensive yachts, concealed finances and control of the means of communication and patronage – all admittedly difficult to unseat. Breaking windows in expensive shopping centers or even Wall Street would not be logical, since at best the protesters lose cover. I repeat my advice, in reverse order: Master the technology as well as content of cyberspace; secure the heritage safely; raise more white children. Better suggestions most welcome.

      • JMorphy88

        Exactly right. The idea that Wade’s contribution is not valuable because he’s not a died-in-the-wool anti-immigration crusader is absurd. We should be taking a longer view and remember that it’s a war on all fronts – intellectual, cultural, political.

        • David Ashton

          We should learn from the communist all-front strategy – and PDQ.

    • Nancy Thomas

      He’s not clueless. He’s protecting his behind.

    • Ed

      If you can read between the lines he did fine. You have to be deft with these things in today’s climate.

    • Einsatzgrenadier

      Today’s politically incorrect iconoclasts are generally very watered down versions of yesterday’s race realists. This is especially true of the ones who garner attention in the MSM. Too many of them hide behind politically correct smokescreens in order to continue on with their life’s work, without having to endure the constant barrage of leftist and anti-racist criticism. For example, I’m reminded of Italian population geneticist L.L. Cavalli-Sforza who, after developing a genetic map that depicted global variation in gene frequencies among the world’s populations, still denied that race was a meaningful taxonomic category. That’s why I always supplement my reading of modern population genetics with the classical physical anthropology of C.S. Coon, the eugenics of Sir Francis Galton and the Social Darwinism of T. Lothrop Stoddard.

  • Mary

    I know that Mr. Wade is courageous in pursuing this, even though some of his responses are an annoyingly little milquetoast. Newcomers may conform to a degree to their host society, but once they reach critical numbers, this will fall away substantially. This is increasingly apparent in America, and will grow exponentially. Conform to us? We’re dying off!

  • chris8lee

    “To
    believe that philosophic and religious doctrines create morals and
    civilizations is a seductive error, but a fatal one. To transplant the
    beliefs and the institutions of a people to new regions in the hope of
    transplanting thither their virtues and their civilization as well is
    the vainest of follies. . . . The greater or less degree of vigor in a
    people depends on the power of its vital instinct,
    of its greater or less faculty for adapting itself to and dominating
    the conditions of the moment. When the vital instinct of a people is
    healthy, it readily suggests to the people the religious and moral
    doctrines which assure its survival. It is not, therefore, because a
    people possesses a definite belief that it is healthy and vigorous, but
    rather because the people is healthy and vigorous that it adopts or
    invents the belief which is useful to itself.”
    By Rene Getard

  • Ngati Pakeha

    “I’m much happier painting with a broad evolutionary brush stroke”.

    So am I sir. I quite agree that there is no need to get into the weeds and look at the causative reasons why certain sectors of the community do not feel a need to conform. Succintly, some are just incapable (Detroit etc) and others just don’t feel the need. We of the liberal democracies have just been too compliant when rolling out the welcome mat. The old; ‘we are nations and forged from immigrants” position is getting really old. The real difference is that we will be the first group that simply just let it happen. The North American Indians, Zulus and others at least put up a fight.

    • Sick of it

      Technically, the Zulus were invaders/conquerors. They just ran headlong into a more powerful Empire.

      • Ngati Pakeha

        Agreed, lots of supposedly indigenous groups displaced others. Do you agree however that we are collectively doing nothing? At least our leaders are not.

        • Sick of it

          We don’t have leaders, we only have thugs with guns telling us what to do. When we have enough of it, we will get rid of them and decide what we want to do going forward.

          • wretchedwhiterabbit

            We, the U.S., have a dual citizen problem.

          • Sick of it

            It’s sad we have to use so many alternative phrases to refer to the problem.

          • ThomasER916

            That’s why Amren is fking useless the moment Jared allow genocidal Cultists to control the discussion.

            Go ahead and leave this message up or delete you “moderate” losers. It really doesn’t matter anymore. We know the game.

          • Nancy Thomas

            Exactly. We don’t really have any leaders at all. Taylor and Duke and MacDonald are brilliant but they have no political clout. Essentially we have no power whatsoever, and that is why we are headed for a bloodbath. Force is the only way they will listen.

      • Grantland

        I recently read a 30’s South African novel called Turning Wheels by Stuart Cloete about early Boer treks into the interior. A very clear distinction is made between “kaffirs” (whom the Boers killed just about on sight, in reaction to the TNB) and “Zulus”, who were seen as a deadly threat. On one occasion the Boers planned a punitive attack on a kaffir village who had killed some Boers, only to find that the Zulus had got there first. Not a soul was left alive, not even the dogs and livestock . The Zulus depopulated vast areas of land by genocide of the kaffirs; only when they met White men were they tamed.

    • [Guest]

      >>>…We will be the first group that simply just let it happen. The North American Indians, Zulus and others at least put up a fight.

      We (if by that you mean white people in nations founded and built by white people) are not just letting it happen; we’re MAKING it happen. And we’re conducting a mighty fight, it’s just that it’s been one of self-destruction.

      To me, the question is how white people lost their instinctive racial self-interest and their will to survive.

      • wretchedwhiterabbit

        I’m not making it happen. I oppose the anti-White proposition every day.
        The answer to your question of how Whites became demoralized is found in the constant promotion of a controlled message of anti-Whitism in the education system and popular media of White countries. It’s being done on purpose by “our” leaders, who are not really *our* leaders, at all; they have other interests.

        • [Guest]

          The fact remains that a lot of the anti-whitism comes from the hearts and minds of white people. Even if that were not true, it is true that white people have accepted the message of suicidal self-loathing.

          Regardless of whether we prepared the poison, we have drunk it.

          • Nancy Thomas

            No, it doesn’t. It comes from the crew that controls the money and uses money as a form of control. They hate us and mean to destroy us. They are NOT white.

          • [Guest]

            Nonsense. If we’re victims, we’re victims of our own inability or unwillingness to remain racially aware and to exercise racial self-interest despite the efforts of the enemy.

            We should be above playing the victim card.

      • connorhus

        Feminism pure and simple. It split the White race almost in half as it encouraged the Women to become just another minority looter group. Get rid of Feminism and watch how fast things would change.

        • ThomasER916

          Get rid of the Culture of Critique and Feminism dies with it.

        • Geo1metric

          Divide and conquer. The dems and the repubs are another example.

      • Geo1metric

        “To me, the question is how white people lost their instinctive racial self-interest and their will to survive.”

        Whites have not lost anything. We have been blinded and made deaf.

        We are blinded by the shiny baubles of consumerism.

        We are made deaf by the blare of Hollywood and tv.

        Those of us who still have some sight and hearing are made impotent by not allowing a stage, megaphone, or meeting house to organize, plan and act.

        • [Guest]

          I’m sure you understand the point, though. White people have permitted themselves to be indoctrinated; lulled into racial unawareness; made deaf, dumb, and blind to racial self-interest.

    • Anna Tree

      Dr. David Yeagley, another brave man who contributed to the white racialist movement, was the great-great-grandson of the legendary Comanche chief Bad Eagle, not that this matter, just a Native American with an opinion: he laments that whites, a people he admires, have lost their fighting spirit and appear “headed for the reservation,” as they face displacement from Third-World immigrants. He knows what the whites did to the Native Americans and therefore he doesn’t want the same thing to happens to the whites. He says he supports our cause out of loyalty to America: “How can you give this land you took from us by force to Muslims? I won’t let you do that.” He says he cannot understand why the white man has turned his back on his warrior past. He says we should defend what is ours because it is ours, and never apologize for what we have achieved at the cost of our own blood.

      The Western non-European nations weren’t forged by immigrants but European settlers. Big difference! The native people they found, lived in very small and definite areas; on the contrary, the Europeans settled everywhere and most importantly, created the institutions, laws, industries etc. that made their new nations. After that indeed everybody moving there is an immigrant.

      • tetrapod

        In the same way dinosaurs were better adapted than mammals as a result of the Permian mass extinction, so Europeans were better adapted to exploit indigenous peoples as a result of science and industry. Time will tell if Asian or Ashkenazi intelligence will achieve dominance over Europeans. Given that possibility, whites should expand their planning horizon not by years or decades, but by centuries. We should become more Jewish as it were, and promote marriage and high fertility between the best and brightest of our own kind, for example.

        • ThomasER916

          What’s stopping Europeans is our Post-Christian Universalism. If Whites weren’t Christians or Secular Post-Christian Universalists we’d simply kill them and shrug our shoulders. I know I would.

          Right now those among our biggest enemies include Zionist Christians.

          • Sick of it

            Zionist Christians are not Christian. Often they embrace a number of heresies.

      • Ngati Pakeha

        Spot on Anna, which makes it even more ridiculous that it is all being given away. I had to go to my local doctor the other day and the waiting room was full of people in African garb. The place I go to has always been for ‘locals only’, until now, due to government decree the medical centre must accept all. The real kicker is that refugees don’t pay a cent/penny! I felt like Michael Douglas in Falling Down. A must see if you haven’t already.

        • Anna Tree

          I don’t know what to say, I am so sad and angry… I know something has to happen or it will be more difficult or worse, too late… On the other hand, I know more whites are awaking… Anyone joining our camp make us stronger and the other camp weaker…
          I am a woman, I fear for my kids, but I know there is no choice. We didn’t want this to happen, but we have no choice but to defend ourselves:

          I am sorry to repost this (I know some here don’t like Churchill) but it is a truism:
          “If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood
          shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too
          costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.”

  • [Guest]

    >>>So I thought there was an opportunity, maybe a duty to write this book and to break the ice and try to discuss some of these issues.

    “Duty” is the right word. Sadly, almost no one is willing to tend to that duty.

    >>>My suspicion is if you have an awfully large proportion of people from a tribal community–suppose 90 percent of people in Minnesota came from Somalia–I guess you might start having problems if they start to organize themselves in the ways they are most accustomed to.

    If the organization of that 90 percent causes a problem (and “problem” is an outlandishly mild word for it), then an organized 5 percent, 15 percent, 33 percent, or 51 percent will cause problems, especially when members not of that group (the armies of multiculturalism and diversity), contribute.

    My regards to Mr. Wolff. Good questions.

  • Still have some respect for Nicholas Wade, but how disappointing, yet somehow not surprising, that someone who is said to be bravely challenging racial-genetic PC has to turn himself into such a comical thought pretzel not to further offend his PC overlords.

    If 90 percent of Minnesotans came from Somalia, Minnesota would BE Somalia, even if temporarily buoyed up by the rest of the US, if a majority or plurality of Western institutions and taxpayers were still holding on by their fingernails.

    And “organize themselves”?! Even without some National Association for the Advancement of Somali People, they would obviously simply use the current electoral system–undoubtedly warped by their violent and corrupt traditional practices–to elect their own people. Wade has never heard of elections? Get ready for the Congressional Somali Caucus.

    Finally, the collapse of every US (and world) city where blacks congregate, Detroit, Flint, Camden, Birmingham, etc, etc, are “fine details” we need not discuss? Not surprising, considering where Wade works, but how darkly comical and sad, sad, sad.

  • dd121

    Lefties aren’t going to change their views just because the science has advanced. If they were to admit any of this to be true, it would kick away most of the support structure for their ideological beliefs regarding race. They’re convinced that all of our social problems are caused by “white racism” rather than genetic factors inherent to blacks.

    • Nancy Thomas

      Truth is truth. They can’t really deny it.

      • JohnEngelman

        They will suppress it as long as they can. Eventually the constraints of political correctness will fall as abruptly and totally as the Berlin Wall. Then it will be safe to say in public what we have always known to be true.

        • Lower your expectations.
          There will always be consequences for saying politically incorrect truths.

          • BillMillerTime

            I tend to agree with JohnEngelman on this: science and truth will eventually win out in the long run. Today’s liberal shibboleths will become grist for tomorrow’s comedian. The question remains: will it win out *in time*?

          • Unlike the Soviets, our Marxists have been importing their own millions of voters.

          • ThomasER916

            Importing millions of low-IQ non-Whites is precisely what the Litvaks did to South Africa and now it’s gone forever. Once the Culture of Critique leaves the “people” have to clean up the mess. When the mess includes Negroes then the “people” have a permanent problem that needs to be removed completely in order to be prosperous, safe and free. Looking at Poland and Hungary they’ve been spared of mass immigration and they have a chance to prosper again. America succeeded because it wasn’t “catholic” or “universal”. America succeeded where Mexico and South America failed because America was White.

            America never miscegenated as a papal blessing. The Catholic Church operated much like all Western governments today – promote miscegenation, Diversity, and redistribute wealth from Whites to non-Whites. There’s a blogger Chechar who is of European stock and lived his entire life around the Mestizo and Amerinds. His knowledge and conclusions of Mexico’s history is spot on. Meso and South America were lost the moment the Catholic church baptized Amerinds and blessed miscegenation in the 16th Century. The secular attack on the Catholic Church is really a competition between two Globalist worldviews fighting over the same socio-political niche – one traditional and the other modern. Both are equally destructive in their competition to gain absolute power over the “souls” of the earth through miscegenation and a complete erasure of identity.

          • Yes, we need some White homelands in the US, and then peacefully and persuasively push those boundaries outward with carrot and stick repatriations. Geographically the US is still overwhelmingly White. So let’s say a lot of Whites start congregating in the Pacific Northwest or, say, Tennessee, does that mean, like a bunch of weenie wimps, we just wave goodbye to Montana, the Everglades, Maine, Yosemite, Kansas, Yellowstone, the Dakotas and the Grand Canyon? Hell no.

      • You underestimate the ability of the Leftist to blame Whitey for the ills of the world.

      • Yes they can, because for the modern left, political ideology has morphed into something more akin to a religion. Precisely as with a religion, the basic assumptions are not subject to debate; they’re dogma.

        • Sick of it

          Their ideology is more of a cult, as they kill you for disagreeing with them, rather than just rolling their eyes at you.

      • dd121

        I respectfully disagree. I think their capacity to deny reality to validate their ideology is without bounds.

        • Nancy Thomas

          Then force will have to be employed.

    • bbshaw

      It would also kick away all the jobs (their livelihood) that are based on the assumption that their theories are true.

  • TruthBeTold

    You mentioned that Western institutions couldn’t be transferred to tribal societies, Middle Eastern societies

    On a sort of side issue.

    The NeoCons have long sought to destabilize the Middle East by imposing western -style democracy.

    Iran, Iraq, Libya, Egypt. Afghanistan. They’re still trying with Syria.

    Authoritarian governments can act quickly, decisively, and unilaterally without input from the people.

    Hence, they need to be replaced with lumbering democracies.

    And since they can’t work for these people, these nations are going to hobble along until they break out in civil and religious wars.

    Win-win for the NeoCons.

  • Martel

    He is honest about his anxiety over these issues, which I can respect.

  • tetrapod

    Regarding the impulse of immigrants to “conform”, the main concern has not been immigration as such, but limiting the rate in order to force conformity. In addition, the optimum rate for each group is also a function of the group’s cultural distance from that of the host. A million Brits or Swedes all at once would produce a feeling of well-fed contentment, whereas 25 thousand Somalis would lead to bloody diarrhea and unending flatulence.

    • Nancy Thomas

      Right, numbers are the main issue. We used to open the door a little and then close the door to allow assimilation. Now the door has been left wide open for the last 50 years and our country is being RUINED.

      • Ella

        Powers to be try to force their citizens to conform to their agendas and social engineering. They do not care about culture/heritage but care only about money and power. So, they don’t care if the faces completely change or replace their own native populations if it is Sweden, USA, Britain and so on. It explains their disdain and distrust of their own citizens.

        • Nancy Thomas

          Well…the crew that’s running the show isn’t white.

  • JohnEngelman

    I would rather live in a Hispanic neighborhood than a black neighborhood.

    • TruthBeTold

      Have you ever lived in a Hispanic neighborhood?

      Crime may be slightly lower but the quality of life is just as bad.

      • JohnEngelman

        I am not disputing what were probably bad experiences you had.

        I moved to San Jose, California slightly before the Vietnamese influx. There were lots of Hispanics in San Jose. I enjoyed their presence, just as I enjoyed the presence of Chinese, Japanese, and Greeks in the San Francisco Bay area.

        A local Greek Orthodox church hosted a Greek Festival every year. I began a life time habit of attending Greek Festivals.

        • rowingfool

          The only issue I have with those Greek Festivals is that they never have the real deal of meat broiled on a spit to serve up in their Gyros.

          • Nevsky

            Greek fast food is a breath of a fresh air amid various third world fast food restos.

        • The Fathers Initiative .

          are you really telling me that you enjoy being surrounded by Hispanics and Vietnamese? Or perhaps, they don’t actually live in your community.

          • FeuerSalamander

            A DINGO ATE HIS BABY!!!!

          • silviosilver

            What the hell is wrong with you?

          • JohnEngelman

            I loved living with Vietnamese. I have never lived in a Hispanic neighborhood, but I have never had any problems with Hispanics. I enjoy patronizing a nearby Mexican restaurant. Unfortunately the city I live in now does not have much of a Hispanic presence.

          • Viv J

            “Unfortunately the city I live in now does not have much of a Hispanic presence.”

            Unfortunately? I grew up in a largely Hispanic are. We were across the street from a few Hispanic families crammed into one house. When their plumbing broke, they dug a trench out to the ditch, allowing all of their bodily waste to flow out to the neighborhood. Oh my god, the smell.

            Several times a week, usually around 3:00 am, we would see them return home with their stolen haul. Once they came into my house and took my sister’s purse as she lay there sleeping. My dad woke up and they fled before he could shoot.

            They fought pit bulls right out in the open. I saw a dog get ripped to shreds as I watched from my window.

            I was first sexually propositioned by a grown man when I was about nine. He offered me $22 to come sit on his lap. (A generous offer, but I declined. At least he spoke English though). The men are perverts. Anyone who has a daughter should be wary.

            But hey — burritos are delicious.

          • JohnEngelman

            I am sure that what you say is true. Fortunately, my experiences have been different from yours, and positive.

          • Viv J

            Yes, I’ve met some very nice Hispanic individuals, especially now that I’m in a mostly white neighborhood. They’re much nicer to be around when they’re in the minority.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            That has been my experience as well. Hispanics are usually very nice when they are in the minority, such as when running a nice restaurant patronized mostly by Whites. It is a different world when they are the majority, very scary for a White person.

          • JohnEngelman

            That is true of blacks also.

          • The Fathers Initiative .

            I could set you up with an apartment in The Bronx!! If you like living amongst Hispanics; you could be surrounded by them for 30 miles in every direction. They’ve ruined almost every village in lower Westchester county too.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            If you had to sell your house because the neighbor was selling drugs, and you were awoken by screaming in Spanish more than once to discover a knife fight in the street in the wee hours of the morning, I think that you would move, and would not be too happy. It is not fun taking a loss on a house to get out of an unsafe neighborhood.

          • Sick of it

            Those of us who have lived around them don’t ever want to again. I left the state of Texas to get away from them.

          • mobilebay

            Help! you left me here….

          • Sick of it

            Sorry, needed sleep really bad after several years of nightly siestas.

          • Viv J

            One of these days I hope to do that too. Texas is my home, but they’re taking over too many formerly nice areas. I won’t miss the humidity and bat-sized mosquitoes either.

          • Sick of it

            Well, I went back where I came from originally (Louisiana), so the mosquitoes are larger and the humidity is worse. We still have malaria outbreaks from time to time.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            Exactly Viv. Mexican food can be excellent, and I have a couple of Mexican restaurants in my area that I really enjoy. These restaurants, though, do not offer so much as a clue as to what it is like to live around Hispanics. They are not as violent as Blacks, but that is about all we can say. I know of neighborhoods that have turned Hispanic. Whites moved out for the same reason we move away from Blacks. Drug dealing, fights, and, especially, sexual harassment of women. Just because they are not as bad as Blacks means nothing. Black live like savages.

          • The Fathers Initiative .

            and, funny thing is: Rabbis no longer shop in the Hispanic malls. they’ve all fled to the predominantly White Malls. God’s honest truth. I’m not lying.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            I’ll bet!! I can just picture Hasidic Jews being harassed by Mestizoes. The Mestizoes, once they are a majority, will Pogromize Jews far faster than Europeans ever did.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            Being around small numbers of Hispanics, and enjoying good Mexican restaurants, is a different ball of wax from trying to live in a Hispanic Barrio as a White person. Mexican restaurants that cater to a mostly White clientele are not a measure of what life for a White person in a Hispanic Barrio would be like. Such restaurants may have great food, yes, and gracious service. You are patronizing a business, though, so the employees have a reason to be gracious.

        • Nevsky

          You ever rode a bus in SF? Chinese and Spanish are now official languages in the city. Even bus announcements are in English, Spanish and Chinese.

          And then I saw some government ads saying that no one is allowed to discriminate based on poor command of the English language.

          • JohnEngelman

            I enjoy the sight and sound of foreign languages. I wish I was more skilled in learning them.

        • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

          The presence of Greeks and their culture is indeed appealing. Amazing food and music. Greeks are also strongly law abiding, and very gracious by and large. Like Italians, they do not tolerate Blacks and their ignorant behaviors in their neighborhoods. My guess is that Hispanics were in smaller numbers in that neighborhood, and they knew better than to make a lot of trouble.

      • DennisDale

        Crime is not slightly but significantly lower and the quality of life significantly better. Hispanic neighborhoods are dull and dingy, but never so chaotic as the black ghetto. The barrio is like war–boredom occasionally interrupted by terror. The ghetto is more like the post-apocalypse.

        • captainc

          I think for male, it is tolerable but for female and children, it is as just dangerous, as the other author mentioned about life of Public Prosecutor that Hispanics have weaknesses in impulsive forced sex.

        • Kenner

          That comparison is brilliant. War v Apocalypse….

      • Stan D Mute

        See my comment above. It depends *entirely* on which Hispanics live in the neighborhood. And yes, I’ve been the only white in an African war zone neighborhood with daily stabbings/shootings nearby and I’ve lived in a few neighborhoods where I was the only native English speaker. There is simply no comparison between Africans and mestizos or Indians.

        • TruthBeTold

          In New York, we get Puerto Ricans.

          They march up and down the street with their Rigger Rican garb. I was coming home from the store and one guy was on his mini-bike that was meant for a kid and he was doing his ‘riding into traffic and doing wide spins on his bike’.

          We’ve had a number of large scale drug busts and they’re the ones doing the perp walk.

          A couple years back, two of them did a home invasion on an 80 year old man beating him up in the process.

          They’re always prowling the streets; they look like they’re looking for action.

          Two families moved in next door to each other and their houses look like a mishmash of gaudy, trashy lawn landscaping.

          One family is openly operating a car shop. Lots of cars pull of for service. Pickup trucks deliver parts like bumpers.

          I reported it and 6 cop cars showed up. I didn’t see him for a couple weeks but he came back. He stopped for awhile and started up again.

          The wife sits on the porch all day or sits in the house looking out the window.

          • Alexandra1973

            My uncle-by-marriage is Puerto Rican. Used to be I hardly ever saw him sober.

            Since he’s been living with one of my cousins, though, he’s been shaping up, she told me he’s now down to maybe a drink a day.

            That’s part of the reason why I took Spanish in school…so I could figure out what he was saying.

          • NeanderthalDNA

            Many “boriquas” (Puerto Ricans) have lots of African blood in them. Not all, but those in the streets are more likely to be simply light skinned blacks with a mushmouth Spanish accent.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            True. The Puerto Ricans are Los Negros, frequently, so they are just Mulattoes. No surprise they are so uncouth. Dominicans are mostly Negro as well.

          • NeanderthalDNA

            Dominicans are funny. Some with obvious black features insist they are White, and though I know there are plenty of hijo de puta negros among them, their unique history of being overrun and ruled by HAITI for a few decades…

            Many Dominicans of a little African heritage detest “blacks” and try very hard to “be White”.

            Quaint if weird these days…

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            The Dominicans in Hazleton, PA, seem to be quite enamored of their Negros ancestry. The Dominicans have destroyed that town. Gangs and drive-by shootings, old time locals are living on the edge, or moving out. This is a town that had almost no crime at all when it was 98 percent White, just a handful of years ago.

          • NeanderthalDNA

            Really? That’s too bad. When Whites weren’t demonized all sorts of blacks actually tried to emulate White behavior, but now that we beez the source of all deys problems…

            Guess blood be thicka dan malt licka, eh? Or something like that.

            Yep…having lived in Latin America, I gotta say…fair amount of White folk down there in all but the very least White. They run the places and usually don’t emigrate.

            Southern South America, especially Argentina, holds great promise as a White refuge-homeland, I think. Climate’s nice, too.

      • Gabe

        Probably you had bad experiences because i wouldn’t compare a well organized latino neighborhood with a black ghetto.

        • Sick of it

          Well-organized Latino neighborhood? Latin America is like a gigantic barrio in so many places.

          • Nevsky

            Chili,.Uruguay and Southern Argentina are quite decent. They are like 85% white.

          • Sick of it

            We don’t have problems living around other white people usually.

        • bilderbuster

          You might in Miami where the Caribbean, Central and South American ones mix together into an unpleasant, brownish mush, but walk the same walk and yack the same yack.

      • Sick of it

        The noise can be unbearable if one has to get up early the next morning.

    • Nancy Thomas

      Damning with faint praise. You would NOT want to live in an Hispanic hood.
      Trust me.

      • David Ashton

        Does anyone really care where one person called John Engelman wants to live except John Engelman? The United States of America or the Autistic State of Autobiographica?

        • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

          Mr. Engelman would probably do best living in Chinatown. He seems like a good guy, just very factual. He certainly respects Asians and their culture. I could picture him hanging out with a group of older Chinese guys

          • David Ashton

            From his earlier statements “old men” would not probably not be his first preference in Chinese towns.

      • Stan D Mute

        I have and I would MUCH rather live in a neighborhood with mestizos and Indians than live among Marxist whites.

        • Einsatzgrenadier

          With all due respect, you’re far more likely to be raped, robbed and murdered in a barrio filled with mestizos and indios than in a neighborhood filled with white Marxists. At least white Marxists do not live anywhere near diversity, despite what they preach on a daily basis.

          • Stan D Mute

            I’m not going to be robbed, raped, or murdered. I’m from Detroit. And Flint.

            But that’s not my point.

            The Marxist whites are just pure evil. The mestizos are just regular people with a high concentration of Indian genes. And in my social/economic bracket the mestizos are mostly families and either professional or self-employed. The neighborhoods are tidy and houses very well kept. Crime is non-existent. I’m not comparing a barrio to a gated subdivision, but one gated sub to another with different population in each.

        • Sick of it

          American Indians (ours) are less likely to bother you…but they still commit more crimes than white people on average. Including sex crimes. Anyone from South of the border? Hell no.

        • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

          I’ll take the White Libtards any day. They are usually nerdy milktoasts who are the last people who will break into your house, or attack. As long as they cannot get me in trouble at work, I enjoy getting a rise out of them giving examples of why racial realism is so important.

      • captainc

        do you get harrassed?

        • Nancy Thomas

          Notebooks full.

    • Mike Smith

      Agreed. But I think everyone has a right to live in peace without being violently driven from their neighborhood by hostile ethnic groups. That shouldn’t happen in a First World country.

      • It already has happened here. Reclaiming our own neighborhoods and eventually entire cities – by any means necessary – would be, and I hope will be an entirely moral thing for whites to do.

        • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

          Whites in the Midwestern cities were very much dispossessed from their city neighborhoods by Southern Negroes 40 to 50 years ago. Most Whites who were dispossessed had families who had come to America after the Civil War leaving poverty behind in Europe, and had worked very hard to build nice city neighborhoods. The Blacks left people no choice but to leave for the suburbs, due their extreme violence. Few of the residents of these neighborhoods had ancestors who were even in America when slavery occurred, but this certainly didn’t stop Blacks from bullying these decent, hard working folks out of their neighborhoods.

      • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

        I agree. This is why segregation, and controlling immigration from non-White countries is so essential. Birds of a feather flock together. People who live near each other should be of the same race, and from similar cultures. When this is not true, conflict is inevitable.

    • Dave4088

      That’s too close to call although in most cases you are less likely to get violently attacked in a mestizo dominated neighborhood (or barrio).

    • Stan D Mute

      Having been raised in close proximity to African city/states like Detroit, Pontiac, and Flint, and having now lived in South Florida (Central America) for decades, I will unequivocally say that living amid mestizos is *infinitely* better than living amid Africans. There is simply no comparison whatever.

      It’s also important to note, as most here already know, “Latino” is not monolithic. The upper middle class and above are European Spaniards and other whites (many many Irish) while middle class is mestizo (Indian/white mix) and lower is primarily Indian. Thus, in better South Florida neighborhoods, everyone is white and nobody speaks English while in the barrios (or Hialeah as we call it) it looks like the native precolumbian population.

      And since the Marxist white guilt/hate hasn’t really infected Latin America, you don’t see as much of the open hatred for whites as it appears only from those raised in America. The foreign born are very respectful even if they don’t speak English.

      Finally, I’ve seen the same dynamic in other occupied territories like Houston, San Antonio, Los Angeles, and San Diego. The mestizo and Indian immigrants are pretty decent while their children mimic Africans insofar as attitude toward whites.

      • Sick of it

        “And since the Marxist white guilt/hate hasn’t really infected Latin
        America, you don’t see as much of the open hatred for whites as it
        appears only from those raised in America.”

        I’m pretty certain that every Latin American country is at least a Socialist nation, while some are outright Communist nations. They don’t hate us? Those who flooded Texas sure as hell do. I’ve seen the hate in their eyes. The ones who grew up here often act more like Americans and marry white Americans, usually letting their old identity go.

      • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

        I’d be shocked, actually, if they were as bad as the Michigan Afro-Welfare enclaves you mentioned. The only White person that belongs in those places is a big, muscular White dude with a gun, like Schwartzenegger in the terminator movies.

    • Anon

      You aren’t allowed to live in either. If you try, you’d be lucky to catch a beating that involved your pants down around your ankles. More likely, random people will attempt to murder you until one of them succeeds.

    • Einsatzgrenadier

      I’d rather live around neither. Choosing between the Congo and Mexico is not an option for me, nor should it be an option for any racially conscious white man. Living around either blacks or “Hispanics” would entail significant disadvantages because both groups recreate their failed third world societies wherever they go. In a sane world, assuming that the 1950s were the pinnacle of American sanity, the blacks would be physically segregated and the mestizos and indios would be south of the Rio Grande, where they belong.

      • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

        I agree. The Mestizos should have stayed South of the Rio Grande, and the Negroes should have stayed South of the Ohio River. Working people in the North never wanted the Negroes moving to our cities. It was the greedy factory owners who were at fault for so many of them moving North.

    • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

      There is less crime in a Hispanic neighborhood, that is true, but it is still no place for a White person to live. Being the “Gringo” in one of their Barrios is not a position any decent White person deserves to be in.

  • Nancy Thomas

    Lowlife Mexicans have TAKEN OVER California and they are racist as hell.

    • coco bongo

      The ability to view others as individuals without regard to race is common only to the white race. All non-whites habitually view others collectively through a race-based lens. This is a problem for the white race because it is not reciprocated by non-whites. Whites are continually taken advantage of by non-whites who very clearly see and acknowledge race in their daily lives.

      • Nancy Thomas

        Exactly right. Our altruism and kindness is weakness when dealing with tribal groups that are out only for themselves. They are wrecking this country and taking us to certain civil war.

        • Ringo Lennon

          We are on the losing end of the immigration fight. As long as there are votes to be had, the more powerful Democratic Party will continue to import these ugly, fecund arrogant invaders.

          • Nancy Thomas

            The Dem party is not the more powerful party. The GOP runs the House. Amnesty has not passed yet. The fight isn’t over.

        • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

          Exactly. When dealing with Blacks or Mestizoes, we should view them a through the lens of that race first.

      • Sick of it

        It’s a rather recent change amongst white people when you really think about it. Compare 19th century literature to the 20th. Particularly before 1848.

        • Grantland

          Yes but that was when they thought “The wogs begin at Calais.”

  • Romulus

    ” Assimilation occurs due to the pressures to conform??!!” Seriously?!?

    I hope he’s kidding. If assimilation were true, there wouldnt have been millenia of ethnic conflict in the human spectrum.

    Only those of the same blood and soil can truly assimilate, both culturally and racially.

    Appears nicholas didnt want an escapade at the book singing. Still, he has lit the fuse. It will start off burning slowly while the awakenings gain traction. All the more so as dispossession increases rapidly.

    Kudos to Mr. wolf for his very cleverly worded inquiry.

  • Dave4088

    You can count on most Marxist media dolts to dismiss any work on race that doesn’t favor non-whites as “racist” and closet white supremacy. If Wade doesn’t want to delve into the “fine details” of black Detroit’s failure then fine as there’s plenty of information elsewhere as well as our own common sense to fill in those gaps.

    • Martel

      I don’t mind his approach. It would sicken me if he would dismiss the questions as “racist” or “ridiculous”. He simply states its a difficult subject, which it is, if your job is on the line.

      • Kenner

        Strategy, at this point, is a must.

        • ThomasER916

          I prefer the Kevin MacDonald approach – become the tenured thorn in their side.

          • Kenner

            If only that opportunity were more widely available. A race realist would have to start dissembling at puberty to get a toehold in one of their ivy-covered outhouses.

          • ThomasER916

            I believe it is available but we need to steal it.

  • shawnmer

    I would imagine the lefty blogs that cover this will soon be humming with the theme that Mr Wolf, contributor to the notorious “white supremacist” organization American Renaissance, demonstrated how very “dangerous” Mr Wade ‘ s work is by his framing of those questions based on its logical implications.

  • dewdly

    In this book Wade gives effusive praise to Ashkenazi intelligence and accomplishments, it could be that his book was released when the “no genetic basis for race” gambit was wearing thin but racial conflict is still being facilitated by massive Third World immigration into every white country. “Ashkenazi ‘intelligence'” is best seen in their ability to get others to fight.In other words, there is a genetic basis for racial difference, so “let’s you and him fight.”

    • coco bongo

      MacDonald quotes Jewish scientists in his field quite frequently. It would seem some of them have useful intelligence.

      • Sick of it

        Obama was given a Nobel Peace Prize. Case closed.

  • TL2014

    Cop-out on Detroit! You CAN guide us, Mr. Wade. Your book answered the question of how to explain Detroit.

    • Ike Eichenberg

      He certainly could, but discretion is often the better part of valor.

      By chipping away a little at a time from the “race is a social construct” deception, he can continue his work.
      Answering the Detroit question head on would lead to the racism accusation and his efforts at the truth would be marginalized.

  • Medizin

    “people from China or Japan who come to the US don’t build little Chinese-type political structures within the US. They follow the same rules as everyone else.” For that reason, Mr. Wade said, “I don’t think it should matter what kind of society a person comes from.”

    They must follow the rules, initially, until changes are made through NAACP, LaRAZA, ADL, SPLC, ACLU. AIPAC, CAIR, Muslim Brotherhood, Arab American Institute, American Jewish Congress, Congressional Black Caucus, Muslim Affairs Council, Amnesty International, Hispanas Organized for Political Equality, Mexican American Legal Defense Fund, and so on. So, what’s that again about not building political structures? Soon sharia law, if not already, will be implemented in Dearislam and Minnesomalia.

    Wolff: “California has gone from 90 percent white to less than 50 percent white in about 30 years. Wouldn’t that change institutions?”

    Wade: “You know I suppose if the shift were large enough, yes it would.”

    Ha! He supposes? Listen, we have a minority group of 2-3% that has been instrumental in changing our entire country (Kevin MacDonald). Each individual minority alone in the U.S. has more influence than the White majority!

    • coco bongo

      And why is that? That is the key question.

      • Medizin

        My question is why didn’t the constant drip of educational, media, and entertainment exposure affect pro-Whites? It can’t be because most of us are conservatives. Too many are OK with multiculturalism. It’s unfathomable to me that they would willingly hand their country to non-White, third-world foreigners, who hate us. I don’t understand ‘guilt,’ or ‘White privilege,’ either. Of course, there should be ‘White privilege.’ It’s our country!
        Those of the 60’s generation, now running the government, didn’t and don’t recognize their enemy, the one causing them harm. Many Whites aren’t aware of the seriousness of our situation and never will unless they look it up on the internet or is passed on to them by pro-Whites. What would cause someone to look up White genocide unless there is an external comment or event that would prompt them to do so? There’s nothing in mainstream media, education, or entertainment warning of danger.
        We have discussed this many times here. Kevin MacDonald has interesting thoughts about individualistic Northwestern Europeans, particularly, British (English, Irish, Scottish), and Germans, the majority White groups, being open to strangers more so than tribal groups, blacks, Jews, Muslims, Mexicans.

        • coco bongo

          Nearly all of us are of Northwestern European ancestry in the U.S.
          Kevin makes a very good point about our inclination toward viewing others and ourselves as individuals. An interesting fact is that this is only common to the white race. All non-whites view others collectively as members of racial groups. This is very dangerous for whites. It is manageable but only when the number of non-whites living among us is kept very small. That isn’t the case anymore.

          Things are going to change for whites for the better, but only after we have suffered enough to draw us together as a racial group — just like all of the non-whites. At some point we will demand and achieve racial seperation from non-whites and live among ourselves as nature or God intended. Nations have always had borders for a reason, namely, to keep racial aliens out. This is the key to the survival of any and all races.

          • Chasmania

            Which video do you mean ? Seems there are literally hundreds.

      • ThomasER916

        The New School, Christianity, and WW2.

        • Sick of it

          When we were Christian, we did not put up with this either here or in Europe.

  • Anon

    “so people from China or Japan who come to the US don’t build little Chinese-type political structures within the US. They follow the same rules as everyone else.” For that reason, Mr. Wade said, “I don’t think it should matter what kind of society a person comes from.”
    The more I hear about this book the worse my opinion. This statement here is a bald faced LIE. It’s simply ludicrous and strikes right to the heart of the main problem with immigration. Because, yes, as should be OBVIOUS, various races come to the US and to Europe and create colonies, even no-go areas. They infiltrate, sometimes completely dismantle government and replace our rule of law with racial solidarity. MANY places in California, for example, there is no government at all…..that is recognizable as American, that is. What we would call the criminal element rules there. Except “criminal” in this case is a euphemism for the fact that hostile immigrants have installed their own government and what they consider law applies there while American law is irrelevant, missing, or mysteriously, always goes their way no matter how blatantly that is inappropriate. Quite frankly, it is obvious, that every white nation on the planet is on the cusp of WAR over the issue.
    We don’t have immigrants so much as we’ve lost territory to hostile, evil foreign invaders.
    I can’t emphasize enough that this book is a severe type of anti-white propaganda. The reality of race will be ignored. The genetic arguments are weak at best, pathetic at worst and are strawmen. The point is to reinforce INSANE suppositions like this one.
    Assimilation…..multu-culturalism, diversity…..these things don’t exit. Non-white immigration means only one thing….BALKANIZATION. Hell…the US we have overt ethnic cleansing going on as various hostile non-whites wage genocide against each other in order to take over various regions.
    Parts of LA, for example, used to be 100% black. Now they are 100% Mexican. How did that happen in a short span of about ten years? Simple….Mexican gangs prowled those neighborhoods and would grab random people off the street, drag them into an alley and murder them, execution style with a bullet to the head. Repeat a few thousand times and, even though the media absolutely will not cover it, one racial group flees for the hills while the other pours into the area and makes liberal use of the freed up welfare.
    Does this sound like following “the same rules as us”.
    Wow.

    • Sick of it

      Evil should receive more emphasis. We don’t seem to import many decent folk.

  • Guest

    What I find as a matter of curiosity is how intellectuals generally and scholars of American life in particular from other nations–especially relatively racially homogenous nations–view
    Mr. Wade’s book–and indeed the precursor works. Media in their nations have no sufficient
    reason to review the book. But, if enlisted, there are dozens of outstanding intellects that
    have long given regard–and an abundance of café discussion–to America’s layered racial
    dilemma. English is the international language and is common currency among academics
    in other nations. Of particular interest would be (say a voice-disguised audio recording) a
    discussion among intellectuals and relevant scholars in Japan, Saudi Arabia, China, Russia,
    and certain other nations.

  • cecilhenry

    Those who hate you, want to replace you.

    Its that simple.

  • Gabe

    I wouldn’t like to live in a poor neighborhood even if it is black, latino, asian or white.
    I can easily compare a redneck neighborhood with a latino hood

    • ThomasER916

      You can’t “easily compare” those hoods. If you could have you would have. The fact is you’re a liar. You’re not White so you need to lie and use the “Redneck Defense.” There isn’t a “redneck neighborhood” on earth that compares with the typical “latino hood”.

      “Redneck hoods” have given rise to Philo Farnsworth, Samuel Langhorn Clemens and countless others. They came from small redneck towns that are still small to this day. Hispanics and blacks have NEVER produced anyone even remotely as useful, industrious, creative or intelligent – hood or city. Whites who live in slums do so because governments hold them down. Hispanics and blacks live in slums because their genes hold them down.

      • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

        Exactly. A Redneck neighborhood is a place of lower incomes, but not of low intelligence and lack of couth. Herein lies the essential difference between poor Whites, and poor Blacks and Mestizoes.

    • Geo1metric

      So can I. “Redneck” (meaning Whites who are not especially rich, may work with their hands, may not have much “formal” education, and may actually do something productive) neighborhoods are typically safe, quiet, well kept, and friendly.

      Latino neighborhoods are trashy, loud, high level of sex crime, drug crime, and violent crime, stinky, dirty, and generally unsafe for Whites.

      You sound, Gabe, like someone I would despise because you’re probably overweight, greasy, slothful, and too talkative, with bad breath and stinky feet. And you probably live in a toilet bowl like NYC.

    • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

      Not so. There are some poor Whites who are criminals and druggies, yes, but they do not get social approval from other poor Whites. Poor Whites also do not have an inborn pre-disposition to violence, like Negroes and Mestizoes.

  • LHathaway

    If California has gone from ’90 percent white to less than 50 percent white in about 30 years’ and you’re worried that this might ‘change institutions’ you’re worried about entirely the wrong thing. . .

  • Geo1metric

    There’s a lot of truth in what you say.

    I’ve just finished reading about the communist takeover of Russia in 1917, and how they subjugated Ukraine and destroyed, or tried to destroy, Ukrainian nationalism. “They” are using exactly the same tactics , or have been now for some time, in the US.

    Communism is not an economic system, it is a system used by a small minority, under the guise of economics, to wrest control of countries away from its normal inhabitants.

    • They also tried to destroy Polish nationalism in 1939-1940. The reason the Soviets massacred 22,000 Polish officers in Katyn forest is that any able-bodied Polish male with a university degree was automatically commissioned as a reserve army officer. By killing off the Polish officer corps, the NKVD was wiping out Poland’s educated class.

      • Geo1metric

        Yes. The bolsheviks used the same tactics in 1917 that Pol Pot used in Cambodia in more recent years, and it’s the same tactic you describe.

        I suspect that at the pivotal point, they will try the same thing in the US. They want to disarm us first.

  • Bill_der_Berg

    Nicholas Wade has two articles in this week’s on-line Spectator. He also features in a podcast discussion there. It seems that he is still admitted to polite company.

  • benvad

    IQ and genes and a culture if delayed gratification.

  • WR_the_realist

    I think Nicholas Wade goes as far as he can without making himself a pariah in the mainstream media. And while some might criticize him for not going further, ask yourself, what good would it do to have another “disgraced” person who says what is true but is utterly ignored by the media that 95% of the public pay attention to?

    That said, it is obvious a culture will change drastically long before it goes 90% Somalian. A 20% black population is enough to marginalize the schools and make people afraid to go out at night. California will never vote for a real Republican again at the state wide level. And look at how eagerly Democrats are waiting for all those Texas anchor babies to reach voting age so that that state goes blue.

  • silviosilver

    He’s referring to anti-white “cultural marxism.” I’m sure it will penetrate there too. As much as I utterly despise them, I have to admit these bastards are on a roll at the moment.

  • Stan D Mute

    I’d punch the ticket to Chile. It’s whiter than any place you mentioned.

  • Nevsky

    I always got along better with all sorts of Latinos than with whites, majority of whom are Marxist egalitarian.

  • Geo1metric

    “.I’ve also never seen guys with skullcaps and beards selling ten dollar bags of crack on MLK boulevard in Miami…”

    That’s way too dangerous.

  • Geo1metric

    The Gulags.

  • Geo1metric

    “How is the truth a violation of a policy?”

    When it contradicts the narrative “they” are promoting.

    There is no truth, There is only the narrative.

  • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

    That is a huge factor. The males love to hassle White women who are alone. They are flirtatious at best. I say this as a man who loves his wife. My wife feels very, very uneasy around Mestizo men.

  • Fathers Initiative

    Facebook is the most intolerant mainstream network on the internet. Compare them with Yahoo or Youtube, where the latter 2 allow free commenting. But, Facebook has suspended accounts literally for no reason whatsoever. There are a bunch of punks moderating their site. and they tend to remove anything which they disagree with. It wouldn’t be bad IF they removed opinionated pages regardless of viewpoint. BUT, some are accepted despite being left winged extremists.

  • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

    I’m trying to picture Hasidim actually selling illegal narcotics, LOL!!! That makes about as much sense as Amish guys selling drugs, or little old Ukrainian ladies in babushkas!! My guess is Manischewitz is about the only mind altering substance most Hasidim would sample.