Will Republicans Ever Understand?

Jared Taylor, American Renaissance, April 23, 2014

This Saturday, Republicans will hold a primary to choose the party’s candidate for Virginia’s 10th Congressional District. On April 13, five of the candidates were at a town-hall meeting where they spent an hour and a half bragging about how conservative they were. When it was finally question time, Jared Taylor asked about immigration.

The answers were such rubbish that one frustrated member of the audience shouted that 70 percent of non-whites vote Democrat, so it is “crazy” to keep letting them in. He got a gratifying round of applause, but the candidates carried on like lemmings.

This is why the great Sam Francis called the Republicans “the stupid party.”

Topics: , , , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Garrett Brown

    Every single idiot dodged the question. You can claim to be “color blind”, but you cannot be blind to racial statistics.

    • Nancy Thomas

      They’re color blind only where whites are concerned, because PC dictates that we don’t even exist.
      For those of you who are new to WN, there is a great clip on YT called, “Minority Rule; The Rise of Political Correctness.”
      I think it’s about 50 minutes long, and it’s the best explanation of cultural marxism that I have found.

      • Garrett Brown

        Huh, wonder who’s been paying all of the bills the past 6 decades?

      • JohnEngelman

        Republican politicians are not motivated by political correctness, but by the desire to make it easier for their contributors in the business community to lower wages.

        The Republican Party has always been dominated by the business community. Even before and during the Civil War factory owners wanted to end slavery because many freed slaves would move north, and apply for jobs as factory workers. This would allow the factory owners to lower wages.

    • Bon, From the Land of Babble

      Yes, you can depending on who is funding you and what he wants you to say.

  • james kelch

    ONE after ANOTHER stated their complicity in Genocide

    Jared THANK YOU for doing that – but PLEASE start calling it what it is

    • So CAL Snowman

      Closet White, now that’s pure gold my friend!

      • james kelch

        We MUST start SHAMING THEM

        Oh are you still in the closet? Think nobody knows yer white?

        • M&S

          >>
          We MUST start SHAMING THEM
          >>
          Until what? They give in to those who dared to interrogate them, openly? Two Men, from a crowd of a hundred and a standing line of at least 10 people.
          Beyond which, how much voice did they have that they had to practically shout from across the hall to be recognized in their followups? Townhall be hanged, Mr. Taylor will be lucky to get invited back. Names go on lists and if you aren’t invited, you don’t get in. Terrorist precaution don’tcha know.
          America has the best government money can by and if you aren’t one of the undersigned as guarantors for that check, you don’t get to pick the candidates which means you don’t get to say who gets voted on. Which is why, every one of those clones could be relied on to vote a certain way _and make no difference_. Since the Bills they vote on are also predetermined.
          Topics don’t get picked based on bringing the outlier opinions to light in informing a majority view but solely upon the basis of conjoining the middle-acceptable (moderate and centrist) views that is existing thought on known topics under a single group-moo of herd approval.
          In this, _it doesn’t matter_ who votes what percentage of demrep. It’s the same unstated agenda regardless: World Rule of an Elite Class which destroys nations and builds Continents, thinking that they can get along anywhere.
          Which is where Democracy falls on it’s face as a function of exposure to Centrist rule by other group elites who ARE very much caste, class and racially aware. As with the Color Continuum in Mexico.
          In another piece on this site: ‘The Son Also Rises’; it is made clear that class is a genetic outcome deriving from likely superior groups going back centuries if not millennia (likely best hunters = most protein = uncatchable head starts as brain food etc.), yet nobody links the two concepts and DARES to ask-
          1. Do you think whites would do as well exploiting an alien environment of non-white majority political system like Mexico, making promises they cannot keep in a society which /murders/ their own political class for daring to do less than deliver? How would they get to power, who would nominate them as an outsider? This is the result of a 2065 Hispanic majority United States creating an Anschluss with Mexico: Hispanic rule overall.
          2. Do you think men like this group would willingly interbreed or cause their daughters and sons to do so, by exposure to elevated Hispanic and Black hypergamous advantage, _if they thought that it would bring them or their descendents immediate SES advantage_, even knowing that it destroyed genetic potential that had built up over millennia??
          I frankly don’t believe any of these men are wise to the stats. I thing they live in a world that is so rarefied as a cloistered monastery of power politicking that any mention of race leads to an instant ‘eternal sunshine, spotless mind’ response of “Nyah, nyah, nyah, not hearing you!” closed wills. Because telling or admitting the truth about the subject buys them no leverage worth investing in.
          I also believe that _if they could be made to see the demographic destiny_ which they and their kind have engendered upon fellow whites, they would act no differently than thousands of years of their white ancestors did in bending the rest of us over for their own, temporary, convenience. Indeed, I believe these candidates would still choose present political advantage over genetic potential. Because ‘Social Competence’ is not about leadership qualities. It’s about fitting in.
          This is why Politicians never ask or answer questions which are not already in the public conscience. This is why their cookie cutter stamped answers to Jared’s question is Xeroxed to include ‘we don’t want to hurt anyone’s feelings’ provisos about racial color blindness.
          And it would not matter to them if the WHOLE AUDIENCE stood up and cheered. Because they would not know what to do with that vox populi writ of legitimized discrimination anyway. They live in a world where doing favors gets favors as the undertow corrupt influence of Democracy by the weak, for the weak. They have no comprehension of benefits to be derived by formatively, doctrinally, refusing entirely, as a group, an idea in being.
          If we immediately shut down immigration by moratorium for a century and returned to whites only economic and class benefits based exclusively on their having large families which contributed to the U.S. as a white culture, where would there be something to prostitute or debate as pretense before trading away? That’s a cultural thing and culture cannot be bought or sold, only given away.
          This is why representative Democracy is wrong because it puts interlocutors for evolutionary patterns as genetic algorithms of survival modes into power where short term trades are the norm.
          Men who get rich by trading away that which is not theirs to lose have no reason to suddenly become farsighted.
          This is why Nietzsche` was right: Good is what works for the strong who directly benefit from it’s engenderment. It is a principle that must never yield that which is solely beneficial to itself.
          Whereas Weakness is that which can only reflect moral good, not create or know it, because it lacks the strength to produce it and hence can only envy, not value what it doesn’t identify as it’s own.
          By accepting representative Democracy, we have accepted weakness as the indirect beneficiaries of what others hand back to us from our own work product.
          The collapse of the political class as dispensers of other people’s good fortune from hard work will only happen with the collapse of the monetary system which lets them live separate outcomes from their choices.
          “You can ignore reality but you cannot ignore the consequences that derive from ignoring reality.”
          By then, it will be too late for the rest of us.

      • Nancy Thomas

        Love it. Will remember. Got one the other day that I love, “Diversity is division.”
        This mantra stuff really works if you make it a point to spread them around.

        • Kenner

          ‘Diversity Divides’….we can out sloganeer Revrums Jesse and Al.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            That is actually pretty good. <;-D

        • Bon, From the Land of Babble

          “Diversity”= White Genocide.

          Exactly like that.

          Short, as few words as possible, honed down, pertinent and everyone understands it.

          Pass it on and keep it going.

          • JohnEngelman

            Slogans only appeal to those who are already convinced.

        • bilderbuster

          Diversity is divisive and that should be obvious to anyone with a grasp of the English language.
          “Diversity is our strength” is a propaganda slogan that the anti Whites at the ADL came up with to be taught in the government schools.

          • Geo1metric

            “”Diversity is our strength” ”

            It’s surely an oxymoron and almost a non sequitur.

            Diversity Divides. I like that.

    • NeanderthalDNA

      “ONE guy seemed like a CLOSET WHITE though – but he screwed it up at the end with the same “skin color doesnt matter” cliché”

      If I had any inkling that these guys understood what is going on and were simply mouthing platitudes and trying to do something productive in fact…

      I’d have some respect. As it appears, though, looks like either they are as bought into the democratic totalitarian ideal as much as the crypto-Marxist Dems, or they know the Truth and don’t care about anything other than carving out their pathetic little lapdog/kicking dog place in the new order.

      It would be nice if they took a “merit” based approach to the situation. This route could allow them to talk out of both sides of their mouths constantly and work to alleviate our genocide at the same time. They could crow til the cows come home about how open minded they are, thereby establishing non-“racist” creds.

      This is about the most we can hope for from them, realistically, which is why we still need a Phalange-like overtly a-political organization to more properly represent the specific interests of us “evil” Whites…

      • AndrewInterrupted

        I like how Jared framed the question.
        They had no where to go.
        They must have all soiled their thongs.

        If Ann Coulter were on that panel and was asked the same question last, she would turn to those poodles and say:

        “…You diversity poodles are all race traitor pussies…!…”

  • Hood ornaments that repeat mantras (not Bob Whitaker’s mantra, unfortunately) and parrot slogans and bromides. Five people, and not an original thought between them.

    Howie Lind’s analysis of the political calculus and some of the on the ground conditions are right, but even he genuflects to this “color blind” nonsense.

    Bob Marshall talks about Bob Dornan. Dornan was the one who said that he didn’t care if white people become a minority in their own country. It wasn’t but a few years later that Hispanics in his own district voted him out.

  • MekongDelta69

    Q. “Will Republicans Ever Understand?”

    A. NO.

    (But thanks for giving it the old college try J.T.)

    • Borachio

      They do understand. That’s even worse.

      • me

        What they understand is who’s bribery money is getting deposited in the Rhino’s offshore bank account. The thing that they DON’T understand is this: Selling out your country, your race, and your children and grandchildren’s future for a few pieces of geld is going to leave you with a zero sum ‘win’–all bribed up and wealthy with nowhere to run, nowhere to hide, nowhere to spend your ill-gotten gains, and no decent place to live. Plus, the very real threat of your genetic bloodline/ family disappearing off the face of the earth.

        • I am an agnostic, and while my wife is a banker and my mother is a retired banker, I had to save that one. Thank you!

          • evilsandmich

            Working at a bank does not make one a “banker” per se.

          • Geo1metric

            That would be B A N K S T E R.

        • Alexandra1973

          Jesus was no hippie, that is for sure!

  • italian guy

    My God that question ahah their heads were imploding (did Mr. Taylor made too much sense with his question?).
    I know this is a simplistic approach to the problem and I’m an outsider so i don’t know too much about your politics, but why don’t you form a political movement Mr. Taylor? Is it illegal to make a pro-White political party in the U.S? I know for certain it would struggle to get approval from the people thanks to the anti-White media, but at least you would plant the seed on the back of White people head i.e “there are White people who want to preserve their heritage and majority status, you are not alone”.
    Someone like you as president of the U.S.A would mean freedom in all the Western world!

    • Nancy Thomas

      We have one but it’s little known.

      • Anna Tree

        Tell us who! 😉

        • Nancy Thomas

          I believe it called the American Third Position. Kevin MacDonald is on the board. The changed their name to the American Freedom Party and the SPLC calls them “racist skinhead white supremacists.” Funny. Ridiculous.
          Look, no third party will ever gain the approval of the media and will always be ignored and marginalized. It’s going to take an armed uprising to change things.

          • Anna Tree

            They may not get many votes first, but they will get some and get media coverage eventually. Rome was not built in one day! I mean, look how those little pro-white parties are getting bigger and bigger in Europe!

            I also fear violence… But I am also optimist that good things can happen. People are awaking, a tiny tiny tiny awaking but it is a start. I couldn’t believe one of my last conversation with one of my liberal leftist friend (they all are, this is the people type where I live) when for the first time she agreed that too much diversity is not good, that she wants only a little diversity. It may sound nothing but those people are die-hard leftists, always praising multiculturalism and all the other liberal leftist dogmas. The fact that she came to realize and agrees that too much diversity is bad, is a baby step, but a step anyway. I have my foot on that door opening I tell ya LOL

          • The good news is that our viewpoint is so obviously correct that any white person with sense and honesty will know we are right once we explain ourselves to them. The real difficulty lies in getting them to speak up about it.

  • dcc2379

    If you can’t elect Democrats, elect a new people.

  • Jesse James

    These clowns will keep believing that race doesn’t matter until not one white man holds political office anywhere. If there is one thing that we know for a fact by looking at elections held anywhere in the world where diverse races are sharing the same space is that in the end the most indicative factor as to who votes for whom is race.

    • Conrad

      It also leads to war.

  • WR_the_realist

    We get the usual rot about how Hispanics are Christian and socially conservation and blah, blah, blah. Well the truth is that those socially conservative Hispanics produce half their babies out of wedlock. And two thirds of them vote for the party that will give them the most entitlements and public benefits, even while it advocates gay marriage and abortion. (Hint: That party is not the Republicans.)

    Republicans are stupid, so they are happy bringing in more stupid people.

    • Nancy Thomas

      The Hispanics are NOT conservative. I worked with them for 25 years. They imitate blacks, listen to hip hop, dress like blacks, have illegitimate children like blacks, do crime like blacks, etc., and they HATE white people the same as blacks.

  • NoMosqueHere

    It shows just how pervasive the PC mentality is in America.

    • Capt. Bryant

      The left seems to have won

      • Nancy Thomas

        Yes, we are a conquered people.
        At this point, I fear that violence is the only hope for real change. For the benefit of the DHS I am not advocating violence, but I think it’s coming because white people HAVE NO VOICE AND NO REPRESENTATION.

        • LACountyRedneck

          I’m advocating defending ourselves physically from what is happening to us. We are armed and plentiful. We simply need organization. A plan. They want us to remain passive and so far we have been and it’s killing us. Revolution works.

  • Greg Thomas

    Notice how each of these traitors squirmed in their seat, dodged the question by spouting the typical multiculturalism and diversity hogwash. It took one member of the audience to utter what everyone in that room was thinking, which brought applause from the crowd. These traitors need to be made uncomfortable with the question until they get it!

    • Nancy Thomas

      To be fair, none of them want to be the first white advocate because it will mean loss of face, loss of work, loss of social position, because the MSM will murder anyone who dares to speak up for white people. The tribe has totally demonized the very IDEA of white advocacy.

      • Greg Thomas

        I have little faith that our salvation will be accomplished via the political process. The way in which these turncoats responded to Jared’s question proves that. Nevertheless, I want these traitors to feel uncomfortable at every opportunity. I want them to have a guilty conscious and I want them to know that people are paying attention.

        • Nancy Thomas

          Yes, we have to continue raising hell, I just made a bunch of calls.
          And I agree that the political class is spineless and bought off and useless. However, I’m certain that there is a HUGE difference between what these guys SAY and what they really FEEL. They are governed by moneymen and constrained by intense fear of the media, but they are still human beings. I think that some of them might even be on our side but would NEVER say so in public. For instance look at Rand Paul. He learned how to play the game by watching how they marginalized his father. Do you think that he is really that much different than his father? He probably holds all the same views, but he’s learned to play the game and say the right things so that he is allowed to participate in the game. And I’ve been a very harsh critic of Rand Paul and I’ve even called him a sellout.
          Politics is a VERY expensive game, so naturally the moneymen can easily gain control of the entire process and ruin it for everybody.
          Ultimately, the wheels are coming off this thing and we are headed for bloodshed, UNLESS the evil elite backs down for FEAR of civil strife. And it would have to be fear for themselves, because they obviously have no love for the American people.

          • Greg Thomas

            I do understand that money, prestige and power are more important to these people than following their true convictions.The ability to participate and win the game is all that matters. That’s what makes them all the more revolting. The game itself is the problem and is what’s destroying us.

          • Einsatzgrenadier

            The multicultural elite will never back down. They are brutal totalitarians who will not hesitate to use the might of the police state to crush all white resistance, with deadly force if necessary. The elite will never allow anything to get in the way of their blind obsession with money and power. They are extremists who believe that America and other western countries must become diverse, even if it kills us. Their radical demographic transformation of the US is always presented as something that is inevitable, as something that cannot be stopped. For them, mass immigration is a law of nature. Apart from a crippling economic depression, our only other hope is revolutionary armed struggle on a national, and perhaps international scale.

      • I am not at all sympathetic to these vermin. No one is entitled to a job as a professional politician, particularly when they are working to demographically destroy there own grandkids’ grandkids.

  • willbest

    How competitive is the district? Because if it is less than R+5, then Zuckerberg and the Amnesty lobby will drop 10 million of hate on them if they take anything other than a moderate position on it.

    • Brady

      It’s not even that. Their big GOP donor will just stop giving them money. The big problem that the GOP has is a huge disconnect between its voters and its donors.

      • Nancy Thomas

        Exactly. The gap is the size of the Grand Canyon. The GOP “leadership” is pro-amnesty, but the rank and file are most certainly NOT pro-amnesty.

  • Lion’s Mane

    Bob Marshall is a prime example of one Rebublican weakness: “If you can believe that there’s a God who is a Creator who gives us rights — rights don’t come from government — you can come from Nigeria . . . you have to have the values rather than the geography or the individual racial background.” So, we should not have let Albert Einstein in, as he did not believe in the Creator-God? So, believing in this God is a litmus test as to whom we allow in?

    (Oh, that’s right, Bob, perhaps you also subscribe to the belief we are all descended from Adam and Eve [who, according to Bishop Ussher, were created in October, 4004 B.C.]?)

    “. . . no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.” U.S. Constitution, Article VI, paragraph 3.
    Should a religious test then be applied to prospective immigrants?

    My primary point is this: Rejection of belief in Evolution by Natural Selection is one issue among Republican elites, many of whom believe, or at least pay lip-service to, the Creationist dogma. Bringing religious ideology into the immigration equation raises the unanswerable question of just what “God’s will” regarding immigration would be. How can we know whether this God supports the multiculturalist, colorblind agenda? Many Christians used not to think so. Moreover, using a religious test as a basis for deciding who can come here violates the clear intentions of the Founding Fathers as quoted above and would necessarily exclude many of the brightest scientists who might actually have something of value to offer our country.

    • I don’t think he actually believes that. I just think he said whatever he thought would sound good coming out of his mouth and also would sound good going into the ears of people listening to it.

      The RINO establishment is really hypocritical on this section of this issue: Out of one side of their mouths, the tell us to let in more Hispanics for their “natural social conservatism.” Out of the other side of their mouths, they’re telling us to drop the social issues.

      As far as Bob Marshall’s point, the obvious rejoinder is this: If values and not individual racial background are paramount, then why does the Nigerian have to leave Nigeria and come here to have his precious Divinely-granted rights? Can’t he have them in Nigeria?

      That said, I’m going to post under the asterisks the best part of Sam Francis’s column/essay in the February 1995 issue of Chronicles, entitled “Racialpolitik.” It addresses some of the points raised by you and others in this thread. Commit this to memory for when you have to use them in an argument.

      ****

      Of course, not all whites supported [California Proposition] 187, and most prominent among those who actually attacked it were presidential perennial Jack Kemp and Bill “Mr. Virtue” Bennett himself. The two neo-conservatives hastened to California to harangue the masses with their insight that “the American national identity is not based on ethnicity, or race, or national origin, or religion. The American national identity is based on a creed, on a set of principles and ideas.” Of course, that is a common view of the American identity, one that has been repeatedly expressed throughout our history, though there are at least two problems with it. In the first place it happens to be untrue. In the second place it happens to be a dangerous and even suicidal claim.

      It is untrue because the major fact about American national identity is that it is an identity created by British settlers and later European immigrants and therefore is almost exclusively the achievement of whites. Whatever wise pleasantries of universalism may turn up in the patriotic oratory and public documents of American history, no one can claim that the American identity is really the kind of watery abstraction the Kemp-Bennett statement purports it to be. Behind and beneath those pleasantries lie the concrete identity, experience, and aspirations of a homogeneous people “of a common blood,” as Jefferson put it in his draft of the Declaration of Independence, and to reduce that essentially racial as well as cultural heritage to the bloodless “principles and ideals” that Mr. Kemp and Mr. Bennett busy themselves tooting is not only a confession of the most dismal ignorance but also a trumpeting of the most brazen betrayal.

      Moreover, the Kemp-Bennett claim is dangerous because it fundamentally misunderstands the nature of a nation or of any collective political identity other than a debating society. If indeed being an American were “based on a creed, on a set of principles and ideas,” then any person in the world who adhered to that creed would be an American. That might be fine with the open borders crowd whom the Kemp-Bennett statement was designed to please, but it also means that any person who does not adhere to the creed is not an American, and in asserting the credal identity of the United States, the Kemp-Bennett statement comes close to formulating the grounds of a new totalitarianism. The Soviet Union was “based on a creed,” and Russians who dissented from the creed were punished severely. How else indeed could a state defining itself through a creed cohere? So far from opening the national gates to anyone who wants to come here, defining American national identity in terms of a creed actually guarantees a closed and perhaps brutally repressive regime and implies nothing whatsoever about what kind of welcome we might give to immigrants.

      In the first place, if you believe in the Creed, you can be a perfectly good American in the slums of Buenos Aires or the jungles of Rwanda, just as you can be a perfectly good Christian or a perfectly good libertarian or a perfectly good communist, and there’s no reason at all for you to come here or go anywhere. In the second place, if adhering to the Creed is what makes you an American, then why not give creed tests to all immigrants, or indeed to native Americans, and if they don’t subscribe to the Gospel according to Jack and Bill, round ‘em up and send ‘em back.

      No one knows what any of the immigrants to this country, legal or illegal, past or present, believe or have believed, and there is no reason for anyone to be examined or tested as to what they believe before being admitted. The credal basis of national identity that Mr. Kemp and Mr. Bennett blather about may sound both high-minded and broad-minded, but upon any but the most superficial examination, it (like so much else of what they have to say) turns out to be transparently false and, if it were taken any more seriously than most of the slogans and bumper-stickers that pass for high political theory among neo-conservatives, could serve as the basis of a far more restrictive regime than any nativist has ever conceived.

      ****

    • John R

      Yeah, use the religious test for immigration. Makes sense. After all, I am sure that most members of Al Qaida are indeed VERY RELIGIOUS.

  • WR_the_realist

    While whites may claim to be color blind and may genuinely believe in that as a matter of principle, the fact is that blacks aren’t color blind — they care most about other blacks. Hispanics aren’t color blind — they care most about other Hispanics. Muslims aren’t color blind, they care most about other Muslims. If you have one group that refuses to act in its own best interests while every other group acts strenuously in favor of its own interests, you don’t need a degree in population biology to see which group will lose.

    • Nancy Thomas

      The non-whites are not only not color blind, the non-whites actively HATE whites and have no shame in making it known. I have seen and heard it, years and years of anti-white hatred. This is what they are taught in ethnic studies classes. Anti-white hate is mainstream and accepted.

      • [Guest]

        >>>…The non-whites actively HATE whites….

        True. But the demographic downfall has taken place under the leadership of WHITE PEOPLE. The root of the problem is evidently white people’s suicidal self-loathing.

        • Bob Dole

          Engineered by a media controlled by hostile aliens. If White people’s suicidal self-loathing was natural, we would have died out a long time ago.

          • [Guest]

            Even if the suicidal inclination has been introduced from outside, the fact remains that white people have permitted themselves to be manipulated into racial unconsciousness and then pushed to self-destruction. It’s not that an overwhelmingly white nation is being murdered; it’s killing itself. The video shows that process in action.

    • MikeofAges

      That’s precisely the point. When someone attacks you based on some characteristic you have, especially one that is immutable, it is hard not to respond in terms of that same characteristic. Everybody else does it.

  • D.B. Cooper

    Remember their names come election day.
    Oh, don’t forget to boot them out too.

    • WR_the_realist

      If you’re going to vote at all remember to vote in the primaries. It will do little good to replace John McCain by a Democrat, since that Democrat will vote the same way as John McCain. Likewise with John Boehner. This guy is running against Boehner in the primaries:

      http://gurrforcongress.com/category/positions/

      He’s not perfect but would certainly be an improvement. Of course running against an incumbent who is also speaker of the house is fighting an uphill battle.

      • Nancy Thomas

        Sadly, incumbents win 90% of the time because they have deep pockets from having been long ago bought off.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      You’re letting McCain share space with your boy?

  • Where is Jared Taylor from, I can’t place his accent?

    • Asterion

      Japan, the son of missionaries.

      • BonV.Vant

        His accent is a very waspish accent. The “Thurston Howell the Third” accent on Gilligans Island was a parody of the waspish accent.

    • Mr. Taylor sounds like a very refined mid-Atlantic states WASP to my ears. My own accent is vaguely US network standard, but I’ve lived in too many places for me to sound completely like Tom Brokaw, who is from Nebraska. Some Oxford English has gotten into my spelling, and I inadvertently use a lot of Ockerisms in normal speech, which never quite left, though I returned home from Australia almost 16 years ago.

      I was chatting with a nice Arkansas couple on the bus last winter, and his father said that I didn’t sound like a northerner, but also that he couldn’t place my accent. I normally use “howdy” as a greeting, but also always say “no worries”, whenever someone else says “excuse me”.

  • Ed

    You really didn’t expect one of them to say they’d only allow immigration from Europe? A better question to ask if they’d support enforcement of our immigration laws, including mass or self-deportation and a reduction in legal immigration.

    Gotta speak in code.

    • LACountyRedneck

      I was hoping there was one guy who’d be honest. Can you imagine the support he’d get?

      • Nancy Thomas

        Yes, but can you imagine the invective he’d get from the MSM?

        • LACountyRedneck

          Of course they’d hammer him but so what. Some White should run for some office knowing he won’t likely win but making a statement and opening doors for future race realist leaders.

          • Nancy Thomas

            The American Freedom Party is doing that.

    • shawnmer

      You can bet they grumble about it in private with their strategists. As others on here have pointed it, they simply HAVE to go on mouting these platitudes because of what donors want and deathly fear of the scarlet “R.” But I can’t imagine there isn’t a sense among the strategists along the lines of, “Are you kidding me??” in being tasked with continuing to eke out majorities in an increasingly adverse electorate.

    • Nancy Thomas

      Fear. Sheer blazing red hot fear of the tribe and the tribe run media.

      • Dubyasee

        Finally! Someone who will speak of the cause and not the symptoms. Negroes and Hispanics are an easy target, but they are harmful to Whites, only because they are enabled by the Tribe and the Tribe media. Jared never impugns the Tribe for the harm they bring to White Europeans the world over.

        • Nancy Thomas

          And I respect that as a choice and strategy, and generally I try to walk softly here.

          • Dubyasee

            Wise counsel on your part Nancy Thomas. History is littered with the charred remains of those who openly challenged the Tribe.

          • Nancy Thomas

            Except for one notable exception….

          • Dubyasee

            I think the deletions are instructive.

          • Nancy Thomas

            I was referring to Jesus Christ….the only winner and the only way to win.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      Yes, an immigration moratorium would be colorblind.

  • BonV.Vant

    This is a very good example of “The Party Line”. IT is a statement, position, that is held by those who unthinkingly conform to what those on the top have decided. They can not explain it, they can not defend it, they can not make sense out of it. It is a position that exists because it benefits those at the top and costs everybody else. Those who are only interested in in SERVING those at the top, those who do not have any principals other than their own advancement, those are the people that tow the party line. WE see here they can not understand that what they say makes no sense. They only care about their “positions” within the party. They have been told that if they want to get ahead, they have to have the “correct” position on immigration. The republican party is pissing on the people in this matter. It is showing the ultimate disdain for the people of this country. No matter what ANYONE says, it is time for a new party, don’t believe anything else! HERE’S YOUR PROOF!!!!

    • Nancy Thomas

      Yes, you got it. It’s top down stupidity, paid for by the Sheldon Adelson’s of the world.

  • Washington is ruled by oligarchs, according to a new Princeton U. study. They pay zero attention to what the average citizen wants, unless it aligns with the oligarchs. On the 21st, I wrote on my website that this is the most important idea I have ever written about:
    “Within the last two weeks an academic study has been posted on the Internet that shows the absolute truth of that claim–oligarchs really do rule the USA.

    The study is called Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens. The authors are Martin Gilens of Princeton University and Benjamin I. Page of Northwestern University. The paper will be published in the Fall 2014 issue of the scholarly journal, Perspectives on Politics. A link to the paper is at the bottom of this post.”

    The paper is long and technical, but I’ve summarized it on my site. Summarizing even more, do not expect Washington politicians to respond to your wishes. They respond ONLY to the power elites.

    • Nancy Thomas

      Yes, I noticed that on yahoo two days ago and i was totally shocked that yahoo would for once in many years of pushing lies, for once they actually printed something that approached the truth. It was a Princeton/Northwestern study and it stated that we have no power at all and that the elites do whatever the hell they want. Funny thing, when I say this I’m labeled a conspiracy theorist with a tinfoil hat.

      I think this is why in the last couple of weeks I have concluded that the only way to save our country is violence. The threat of violence and civil strife is the only way that the elites will ever be stopped from pushing their anti-white schemes and programs. Again, I am not advocating violence or saying that I will do violence, and I am not hoping for violence, but it’s become crystal clear to me that we are dealing with an elite that despises us and means to eliminate us. This is not a game but a very real and sad reality.

      • I was already a conspiracy “realist” (not theorist–I don’t write about shape shifting reptiles ruling the world or underground Nazi UFO bases) but this study is a game changer. Now there’s confirmation from reputable academics that we conspiracy realists know what we’re writing about. I share your conclusions about what is necessary.

      • tlk244182

        I’m fighting mad, but premature (or perhaps immature) violence has the opposite effect from the one intended. Headline: ‘Crazy White Racist Opens Fire, etc.’ The Left gains strength when it can publish stuff like that.

    • Medizin

      No one had to do a study on this. It’s been quite obvious.

      • Yes, the value is that now we have the proof from academics who used statistical methods to get the results. There’s still much we don’t know. For example, does the System respond to the top 5 percent, top 1 percent or tope 0.1 percent. I suspect it responds to just a few thousand of the superrich power elites, but we’ll have to wait for proof.

        • Rhialto

          If 5% of the White male sheeple who still vote repub (because they’re the lesser of the two evils), stopped voting for these scum bags, the repubs would respond.

          • That is exactly why if the GOP nominates Jeb Bush in 2016, I will vote for Shrillary Clinton.

          • RisingReich

            Is there any difference between the two?

          • shmo123

            Why? Why would you vote for that witch? If anything just wait and vote for a third party that more accurately reflects your ideological leanings. I do it all the time. In fact, I haven’t voted for a winning Presidential candidate since Jimmy Carter, and I’m embarrassed to admit I voted for that moron– I was young college kid though, and didn’t know squat.

          • tlk244182

            Did the same thing. My very first vote was for Carter. I was a liberal then. What a schmuck….

        • Geo1metric

          “I suspect it responds to just a few thousand of the superrich power elites, but we’ll have to wait for proof.”

          And I suspect that not all of the power elites that they respond to are US citizens. Let’s face it, our government is “owned” by these power elite.

          I believe it was Pres. Wilson who said that “Wall Street” had long ago “bought and paid for” the government.

          Observe the fact that a newly minted congressman will last only about one term unless he/she “plays along”.

    • Geo1metric

      What is your site address?

  • Nancy Thomas

    This is top down stupid. The RNC has instructed these dimwits to repeat the word “inclusion” so that nobody can throw the R word at them. They fear the R word more than they fear terminal cancer.

    • Professional politicians don’t need RNC instructions to be stupid, cowardly and dishonest.

      • Nancy Thomas

        That made me laugh, thank you. You’re right, stupidity seems to be part of their genetic makeup.

  • Stan D Mute

    In any other nation, this is called genocide. Arabs invading Afro country? Genocide. One tribe of Afros invading another tribe’s country? Genocide. Chinese invading Mongolia? Genocide. But we aren’t even permitted to NOTICE that America is being invaded and the founding population subsumed. No, we must be COLORBLIND when it comes to our own genocide!

    I think I’m going to be sick now..

  • Nancy Thomas

    Initially I might have agreed with you, but if you actually delve into it, and review the effects of the massive invasion from a genetic standpoint, it really IS genocide by the UN definition.

    • Cecil Broomsted

      Correct. Watch the Paul Weston video if you haven’t already seen it. It is excellent.

      • Anna Tree

        PLEASE Amreners! Do watch the video, Cecil Broomsted posted it a few posts below (in his answer to Rob). Amazing! I am sending it to all my British friends (and all the others).

        • robinbishop34

          Can you provide a link?

          • Anna Tree

            amren(dot)com/news/2014/04/will-republicans-ever-understand/#comment-1352850797

        • Garrett Brown

          A French Celt conversating with British Celts? Blasphema!

    • Brian

      It is genocide, but the average kool-aid drinker is not ready to hear it framed so starkly. If there’s to be any chance of ‘conversion’, they need to be introduced a bit more gently instead of being thrown into the deep end, or else they’ll just react and recoil. Taylor is making a tactical maneuver to get traction.

  • John R

    Problem? Despite all the evidence on immigration and its effect on the demographics of the electorate, the greatest fear that Republican politicians have is being accused of being racist. So, the Democrats are gleefully playing that race card to its fullest.

  • shawnmer

    Re: the last few seconds, I don’t blame you, Jared, I would have left, too. If there was any intelligent life there, they were clearly not willing to show it.

  • ricpic

    Hemingway, when asked about his bankruptcy said, “First I went bankrupt slowly, then I went bankrupt fast.” This is the fate of the United States. We are all sliding under and we know it but so far the angle of descent has not been steep. Then, suddenly, it will be steep. And here’s the worst part: I don’t expect whites to unite and fight back even when they are being hunted by blacks and browns. I know enough of upper and upper-middle class whites’ absolute anathema for middle and working class whites to know that they will endure anything rather than join forces with “them.” So, for those comforting themselves that we will slide into Brazil-like status: no. It will be the hell of being hunted. Maybe, just maybe, in the chaos and slaughter some whites will resist and breakaway from the horrific “minority” dominated United States and form and then defend a territory wrested from part of that killing machine.

    • Medizin

      “form and then defend a territory wrested from part of that killing machine.”

      If the militia come out in support of us as they did for Bundy. 50,000 in Oklahoma, alone, are supporting him. Some from as far away as New Hampshire and Florida. Some are guarding the Bundy Ranch as we speak. All Whites.

    • Bon, From the Land of Babble

      You’ve written an excellent post with many important details like this one:

      I know enough of upper and upper-middle class whites’ absolute anathema for middle and working class whites to know that they will endure anything rather than join forces with ‘them.’

      I suspect many of them have guns — but publicly are anti-gun. According to Charlton Heston’s autobiography, Steve Speilberg owns one of the finest gun collections in California but never refers to it or shoots them.

      Heston also related this tale from the 1992 LA Riots:

      “During the Los Angeles riots in 1992, a good many of these folk (über-wealthy, Hollywood-type anti-gun crusaders) suffered a change of heart. As smoke from burning buildings smudged the skyline and the TV news showed looters smashing windows, laughing as they carted off boom boxes and booze, I got a few phone calls from firmly anti-gun friends in clear conflict. ‘Umm, Chuck, you have quite a few . . . ah, guns, don’t you?’

      ‘Indeed.’

      ‘Could you lend me one for a day or so? I tried to buy one, but they have this waiting period . . .’

      ‘Yeah, I know. I remember you voted for that. Do you know how to use a shotgun?’

      ‘No, I thought maybe you could teach me. This is getting a little scary.’

      ‘I noticed. It does that sometimes. I could teach you, but not in an hour. You might shoot yourself instead of the bad guys. The Marines are coming up from Pendleton; that’ll end it. When it does, go buy yourself a good shotgun and take some lessons.’

      My friend writer-director John Milius got more calls than I did. His answer was more forthright: ‘Sorry. They’re all being used.'”

      Those wealthy Hollywood types think they’re safe behind their fortified homes surrounded by iron fences with security systems; they aren’t, I think they’ll be the first ones attacked.

  • Luca

    Professional politicians have abandoned the concept of serving the people or sticking to their party platforms. They are engaged in a self-enriching project whereby they are trying to please everyone while offending no one, which of course is impossible and creates a stalemate. They also sell their souls to highest bidding lobbyists.

    In the end, only the politicians win with their salaries, expense accounts, benefits and insider information and deals. No politician leaves office poorer than he went in unless he leaves in handcuffs and that doesn’t happen often enough.

  • DLRisVH

    Traitors to their race, every last one of them!!

  • Conrad

    The only way that anti-whites will see ‘color’ is to pull their heads out of their asses. Yes Republicrats are anti-white.
    Ted Kennedy said that the 1965 immigration law changes would not change the racial demographics of the USA. AND if it did we could just change the law.
    Ronny Raygun said in the 1880s that after his amnesty bill past that NEW immigrants would have to obey the laws.
    HMMM.

  • Dave4088

    Not one of those men answered the question. If immigration policy should be color blind, as one man stated, then why does our current policy favor non-whites from the third world to the tune of 90% annually? I know the answer, but these conservative con artists are painstakingly careful not to say anything that could tar them as “racists” and cause the RNC and Sheldon Adelson not to donate to their campaigns.

    If our future is entrusted to flim flam artists like these politicians then it is a dark one indeed.

    • Geo1metric

      Right now, it is.

  • Dave4088

    How depressing to watch these guys squirm. Non-whites have hardcore racial nationalists as representatives while we get mushy, anti-racist moderates. It’s time to deep six the CONservative establishment.

  • Medizin

    When Jared Tayor said Hispanics will be the majority, he failed to state Hispanics, Blacks, Muslims, and Asians only look out their own groups and cultures, not everyone and our culture. Hey, we have to give it to him, though. He tried.

    Look, even if any one of these guys was on Jared’s side, does anyone think he would say so publicly? It would be suicide. Who knows what goes on behind the scenes. Maybe, Jared should have tried to meet with them behind closed doors.

    • Doubtful. If one had agreed, he probably could have dodged the question with a little more dignity.

      • Medizin

        Hollingshead actually changed the subject, caving in at the end. All Republicans can’t be that blind not to see what is occurring.
        I admit, it looked like four Democrats sitting there.

        • “it looked like four Democrats sitting there.”

          Well put. The extra-pathetic thing is that they all know that White people have no one else to vote for and at the same time are embarrassed by the fact that they get so many White votes–the second problem being easily remedied. On that subject, I can definitely see myself voting for or contributing to a border-enforcement third-party candidate that would ultimately make it easier for a Democrat to win in the general election, especially if it were one of the Gang of Eight. If all eight of those scoundrels were defeated, even if some of them by open-borders Democrats, it would be a shot heard round the world.

  • AndrewInterrupted

    Did you see that contemptuous glare from that race traitor woman in the front row.
    Wow, she was drunk on the diversity Kool-Aid.

    • Alexandra1973

      Yeah, I noticed that…she turned her head like “Great, another white supremacist.”

      Probably cares more about the lineage of her AKC-registered dog than that of her children.

    • You still think the GOP is planning massive deportations after they win the next elections?

      • AndrewInterrupted

        The mass deportations start in 2017 when my girl, Queen Ann Coulter, stages a coup. She’s gonna de-limb that Hillary Godamn Clinton.
        .

        • ‘Queen Ann Coulter,’ I like the sound of that.

          • jayvbellis

            We don’t have a monarchy in this country. Be realistic!

            There will be no White savior let in to power at the top.

            Go state and local.

            Once we get power somewhere at the state and local, we can make realistic efforts to break away, same as Lithuania broke away from the break up of USSR.

          • Queen Coulter may be a bit tongue-in-cheek, leave your sense of humor in your other pants? It is hard to say where the real first spark will take place. I think the county level is a possibility. The state level is almost as hard to see as DC. I’m still waiting for one of the proud defiant ‘Southern red states’ to have at least one state government controlled by paleoconservatives.

        • jayvbellis

          We need to take control of a few states and break them away from the hopelessly corrupt Dis United States if America.

          Check out the Northwest front dot org

          We simply can’t take back all of America the same as we can’t take back Rhodesia or Algeria. There are no Whites there, same with lot’s of places in the USA. Same with the MSM, Harvard Law School.

          • Brian

            There were no whites in America either, until there were. I bet 25,000 determined, armed white men could take South Africa right now…not apartheid, but ‘goneheid’.

        • Brian

          I didn’t used to like her no-shades-of-grey bomb-throwing approach, but I’ve warmed up to her, at least on many fronts. She’s one of the only people out there with significant media traction who’s talking about demographic replacement. The hour is late, and we can use more bomb-throwers.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            I agree. She would be a quick jump, since she has been solid about race from the beginning, with her: “America didn’t vote to become Mexico” type comments, etc. She’s on “hot standby”. Everybody knows her, knows where she stands. She’s the only America First candidate there is.

            And, now that the Cultural Marxists got their Black social engin-eering experiment out of the way, they have a hankering to install a female next.

  • kjh64

    Both the republicans and democrats are corrupt and useless, we need a third party, a party for the people that puts the rights of the American people first and foremost. The dems want all these Latinos for their votes and the reps are in with big business that wants to use them to drive down wages.

  • BillMillerTime

    O Republicans, foolish and without understanding; which have eyes, and see not; which have ears, and hear not. (Mutatis mutandis, Jeremiah 5:21, King James Version)

  • Diamond_Lil

    Really sad to see how PC-whipped these guys are.

  • Nancy Thomas

    If the 12 million illegals were white Christian patriots, Obama would have them all deported IMMEDIATELY.

    • NoMosqueHere

      Obama would deport illegals from any of the above-mentioned classes of people.

  • NoMosqueHere

    Immigration laws can be changed; they are not permanent. They were changed in 1965; and they can be changed again, say, in 2015. Blacks, gays, hispanics will take to the streets and tell their elected officials plainly what they want. Whites don’t, and won’t. That’s the problem. Whites are their own problem.

  • Alexandra1973

    After the first two I couldn’t listen anymore. They’re not only colorblind, but willfully blind!

    • jayvbellis

      Don’t quietly listen. Get in their faces and politely explain the facts of life.

      703 853 4213

      Bob Marshall

  • OhWow

    Imagine just for one second that a hispanic guy from Mexico stood there telling a room is other Mexicans that he doesn’t care if white people invade the country. He would be booed off the stage. It would be the nuttiest thing.

    The bottom line under all of this anti-white hate is the fact that many in this country (usually liberals but as we just saw republicans too) think that the only way whites can atone for “our” sins from 400 years ago is to allow ourselves to be subjected to hatred, racism, violence, and ultimately the loss of power. The problem is that no white person today is connected in any way to those days. It’s like blaming your unborn son for something.

    It’s very clear that people want less whites in America.

    • Geo1metric

      “It’s very clear that people want less whites in America.”

      What people? What people want less Whites in America??

  • Alexandra1973

    What cracks me up is “we’ll even take them from the Soviet Union.” (Bob Marshall)

    Actually, Bob, I’d prefer Russians over Nigerians any day!

    • jayvbellis

      Make the call to Bob Marshall, send him an E-mail.

      Tell him how you think.

      Be polite, but firm. Don’t threaten, but …

      Tell him how you feel.

  • Vercingetorix

    It deeply saddens me…but America is finished. Even IF we were to stop all legal immigration today, the problem wouldn’t be fixed. With traitors like these guys, who are either disingenuous or actually this stupid, there is no chance.

    • Geo1metric

      You may be onto something. I would agree that the America I grew up in is gone, but that’s a long way from saying Whites are gone.

      We need to stake out our territory just like a dog does.

  • MBlanc46

    A lot of people seem to forget that the corporate Repubs, the guys who pour hundreds of millions of dollars into the Party’s campaigns, strongly support mass immigration.

  • Extropico

    The corrupt fellas on that panel are weapons grade stupid. They’ll support preemptive perpetual bellicosity for the foreign military industrial complex and unilateral racial disarmament for the banker deindustrial social construct complex. They don’t belong near a BB gun or a legislative body.

    • Geo1metric

      Well yes, but their focus is self-aggrandizement not patriotism or concern for their race.

    • “The corrupt fellas on that panel are weapons grade stupid.”

      Perfect.

  • Rhialto

    You’re correct; it’s a matter of tactics to use when dealing with people who have been Liberal indoctrinated. With these folks, I have had some success in stressing environmental consequences of massive immigration, greedy billionaires, and even the “disparate” effect on the “African-Americans”.

    In any event, always consider your audience, what can achieve with them, and what are your best tactics.

  • NoMosqueHere

    JT needs to explain his views to a bigger audience. We should start a letter writing campaign to get him on FoxNews.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      It was well-worded question. Why shouldn’t the European-Americans be on the same inevitable majority glide path? And why wouldn’t maintaining our majority be equally celebrated. He bonked them with hypocrisy right on the nose.

  • Puggg

    I’m surprised some news program or article somewhere (MSNBC) hasn’t already gone wall to wall with a story that sound like this:

    Mouth foaming rabid Nazi screams xenophobic rants at moderate Republicans at Virginia town hall.

    • Vercingetorix

      Haha, yes that sounds spot on

  • Cecil Broomsted

    The problem was immediately identified: every one of them wanted a “color blind” immigration policy. That is the problem with these leftist traitors. We need an immigration policy that fully considers race so that we don’t become a 3rd world hell hole. ONLY whites have this “color blind, good” mentality. Every other race on the planet is acutely aware of race, all the time. We must be also or we’re doomed!

    • AndrewInterrupted

      A moratorium would be a safe, colorblind compromise.

      • Cecil Broomsted

        I believe we are well past compromising. Up until 1965 your country used a normal and healthy race-based immigration policy designed to preserve the country for your posterity.

  • Andross

    Genocide literally means “nation-killing”. The concept of nation has strong racial connotations. What do you suggest we call the elimination of white people in America?

  • Petronius

    The Republicans have lost their sense of smell.

    Personally I’ve gone Galt. And I’ve also gone Winchester, Ruger, S&W, Colt, and SIG Sauer. And I’ve made a mental note of every house in my neighborhood that had an Obama-Biden sign on the lawn. When the time comes, your house is my re-supply depot. I’m going to do some redistributing of my own.

    And lately I’ve been noting the houses with Republican signs, too.

    Lieut. Gonville Bromhead: “Sixty! We dropped at least sixty wouldn’t you say?”
    Abendorff. “That leaves only 3,940.”
    – Zulu (1964)

    Do you think the day is far off when the Democrat candidate for president is unable to speak or debate in English? Perhaps they will need to bring in an interpreter for him. No, strike that –– they will need two sets of interpreters, one set for the Democrat and another for the Republican candidate, each set consisting of dozens of interpreters, several for each of the diverse voting blocks, documented and undocumented, with all of their mysterious tongues and multitudinous dialects. But not one for English.

    No, not English. English will soon be a thing of the past. Like Latin, a dead language.

    Romanus orbis ruit.

    • jayvbellis

      I wouldn’t stockpile guns. It looks bad when you are raided. Just have say three guns for yourself and each responsible member of your family. They should be guns that have some practical use, guns you can train with and guns that responsible neighbors would not consider weird, crazy.

      Suggestions

      22 plinker riffle for target practice, shooting varmints. Good for training children gun safety.

      12 gauge shot gun for home defense, street riot.

      38 revolver concealed carry, short range defence/offense.

      Join with other responsible gun owners in your area, get to know them and you they. Have the club be non racial.

      Stay positive, don’t give in to gloom and despair. Things have been worse in past times and places.

  • White Demographic Genocide. Call it what it is. The media doesn’t need more ammo.

  • François

    They ARE the Stupid party, and have been for decades! Time for a new party, not just a political movement like the Tea Party.

  • Garrett Brown

    Somebody needs to look up the definition of genocide. It doesn’t matter how the “nation killing” is done.

    • Bon, From the Land of Babble

      There are laws to enforce integration in White nations, by gunpoint if needed.

      White people have not consented to having their borders opened to non-White immigration…period. This is something that has been FORCED down the throats of White people and ONLY White people. We have been systematically targeted for a particular form of genocide, in this case a force-assimilation. White people have not consented to being assimilated out of existence, that’s what makes this a genocide.

      Genocide is genocide, whether accomplished by bullets, mustard gas, or mass immigration and social engineering.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      I see ‘genocide’ as a relatively quick event (months, years) and ‘race replacement’ more as describing the slow rot (decades, centuries).

      • Garrett Brown

        Genocide has no time frame.

        • AndrewInterrupted

          I just don’t like giving Libs the hot words they’re looking for. They like it when race realists use it because the word has been overused, overdone. It neutralizes your position. The Libs can’t fire-off a bumper sticker comeback as easily with “race replacement.”

          Just as the Libs have worn out the word “racist”. Saul Alinsky actually had that as one of his rules. Forgot which one.

          ‘…If a tactic drags on too long , it’s just a drag…’

          • LovelyNordicHeidi

            One of the best strategical points raised against the concept of “White genocide” that I have seen so far, even though the concept of “White genocide” is quite defendable, logically speaking.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Waarom dank u, mijn Duitse prinses. <;-D

          • LovelyNordicHeidi

            Nobele heer, het was mij een genoegen om u een gemeend compliment te geven!

          • Kathy M

            What really makes us look like complete wacko zombies are the people on here writing, “Hitler was right.” Yeah, we support one of the biggest mass murderers in history, right. I am beginning to think the person writing this here is deliberately trying to sabatoge this website, turning it from an intellectual realist site into a low-gutter neo nazi site.

          • coco bongo

            Good point there. Suppose an average white person out there heard Jared speaking somewhere for the first time and believed what he was saying was right. Being curious now, average white person decides to check out American Renaissance and lo and behold, what does he see…… “HITLER WAS RIGHT.”

            Agree with you about the sabotage. Good point.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            We are speaking Dutch, but I like doing it just to make Morris Dees look. Made you look, Morris.

          • Bob Dole

            Mao killed 90 million Chinese, not history’s greatest monster
            Stalin killed 60 million Russians, not history’s greatest monster
            Hitler killed 6 million Jews, MOST EVIL MAN EVER!!!!

            Hypothetically, if Hitler had never killed the Jews, what would you think of him?

          • Nevsky

            you still believe in 6 million fairy-tale?

          • JohnEngelman

            Yes.

          • JohnEngelman

            The Second World War in Europe, which Hitler provoked, killed an estimated 40 million people.

          • Garrett Brown

            I don’t care what libs think of me. You shouldn’t either.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            We have a long way to go with you, soldier. Read some Sun Tsu.

          • Garrett Brown

            Read it twice. Sun tzu says be a thoughtful strategist without being a coward. You should read it again.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Are you calling Jared Taylor a coward??
            I beg your pardon, young fella.

            ‘Convictions are prisons.’
            –Nietzsche

          • Garrett Brown

            I’m implying you and anyone else who cares what others think about you are cowards.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            “Coward” is projection. The word is “wise”.
            There’s more to winning than puffing out your chest.

          • Garrett Brown

            Coward is te correct term for anyone afraid to speak their mind in front of anyone. I win because I puff out my chest.

  • François

    What term would you use, then?

  • Paulie Boy

    The republican party has to die. Hopefully, once Adelson pays for Bush’s nomination those of you that are deluded enough to still believe change can be brought about within the existing political structure will WAKE UP.

    • jayvbellis

      The Presidential elections are fixed against us. Adelson’s $ and other donors like him are a big part of the Monet, so is anti White domination of the MSM (mainstream media) where the MSM carefully gives us fake Conservatives like Newt Gingrich, Mike Huckabee, or now Amren’s 2013 traitor of the year Rand Paul.

      Way too many racial realist White Americans waste all their time and money on the cursed presidential election where the whole thing is fixed and then when we lose, they give up, don’t participate in state and local elections where can win and can build local power organize to challenge, win up the chain.

      suburban Detroit has a county board chairman who has been outstanding, few if anyone in the larger country know his name or what he did and what others can do.

      Instead we just get endless presidential talk, talk, talk where traitors and cowards pander, pander, pander.

      Our people act like beaten dogs and insist on 3 and 1/2 years of endless Presidential campaigns where the likes of Rand Paul, Mike Huckabee, Paul Ryan boot lick and apologize to Black, brown mobs, plus also take both sides in the Muslim vs Israeli conflict.

      Bobby Kennedy got killed for doing the same.

  • Anna Tree

    It applies to the whole white world!!

    Thank you Cecil!

    Amreners, watch this video if you didn’t, and send it to everybody you know!

    Paul Weston starts very smoothly, but then his message gets stronger and stronger and to the point. Any smart and sane person should get awaken, the least Weston will plant some seeds, that can later germ with more coverage.

    • I just heard that Paul Weston was arrested yesterday for publicly quoting Churchill about the nature of Islam and Muslim countries. Very, very sad.

      • Anna Tree

        I couldn’t find any link 6 days ago but Sangraal just posted a link alternative-right blogspot co uk/2014/05/weston-arrest-makes-fox-news.html

        “While largely ignored by the mainstream media in the UK, Paul Weston’s arrest for quoting Winston Churchill, while out campaigning for this month’s European elections, has been picked up by the US media, including Fox News. Rather than showing sympathy for British nationalism, this merely reflects the genuine shock that Americans feel when they are made aware of the complete absence of freedom of speech in Britain.”
        or in the US re. Sterling, for private conversations.

        • Thanks a lot for the link. I’m tickled pink that Fox did such a long, thoughtful segment on the incident.

          Here’s the whole passage that Weston read. Sounds like the truth to me.

          “How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property – either as a child, a wife, or a concubine – must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the faith: all know how to die but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith.”

          • Anna Tree

            I sent the link to Amren, maybe they will publish it Monday.

            I know that quote, I was a member of FaithFreedom(dot)org for years (as Anna Doe). Actually it is following finding out the truth about islam that I came to realize how much we are brainwashed in so many issues by the elites, family, media, friends, school and of course by even ourselves, because of greed, naivety, taught self hatred, projection, wishful thinking, pathological altruism, ego etc. I went through all my opinions, checking arguments from different sides and I indeed changed my mind in many of them, including race.

            And yes, that Churchill’s quote is the truth.

  • It was like watching a surreal car crash, except that we Whites are in the car. Jared Taylor has got to get more national air time. I wouldn’t wish such an ordeal on anyone, but I kept wondering how wonderfully uncomfortable the media and the GOP would have been if someone like Taylor had been sitting up there at the table with the other candidates and getting enthusiastic applause with just about every statement, while the others embarrassingly received only a smattering of obligatory hands clapping. With all deference to Sam Francis, a hero of mine, I believe Stupid Cowardly Party is a more accurate term. Finally, keep in mind that this is in Virginia, but could have been GOP congressional candidates in San Francisco.

  • rightrightright

    Try using the expression “bloodless genocide”. Although not true as White blood is often shed, it makes the authorities uncomfortable.

  • Northern American-Nationalist

    Those answers were actually BETTER that I expected! I’m surprised they could muster some semblance of a rational argument as opposed to just talking mindlesly about being a nation of immigrants.

    Still not what we need though… This is why I’m no longer a Republican, but a Constitution Party member.

    Whites will have to suffer immensely (as a nation) before they wake up it seems…

    • jayvbellis

      The US Constitution and Declaration of Independence are not pro White documents.

      They were written by Free Masons.

      Wealthy slave owners of Black Africans mouthing race denying nonsense that it’s some TRUTH that all men are created EQUAL.

      (Anytime over enthusiastic White Americans start shouting race denying nonsense that they and only they know THE TRUTH watch out. There is no trying to use reason with TRUTHERS)

      • Alexandra1973

        Freemasons did not create America as part of some experiment (I’ve heard that nonsense myself).

        Yes, Washington *was* a Freemason…but he never set foot in a lodge the last quarter century of his life. So he was more or less inactive.

        Furthermore, he was baptized by Baptist preacher John Gano.

        George III was a Jesuit puppet.

      • Northern American-Nationalist

        Many of the men who signed off on or added to those documents also produced the Naturalization Act of 1790, which declared that only “free, white men” could become naturalized citizens of the United States of America.

        The U.S. Constitution was racially neutral until the Fifteenth Amendment, but it was meant to be the blueprint for a government that would represent a nation of Whites with few exceptions.

  • LACountyRedneck

    The average person, Rob, doesn’t know the true definition. Many will learn. I looked up multiple sources for the term, and it fits. It doesn’t matter that they don’t know what it means. They’ve been brainwashed into thinking it only relates to the Jewish Holocaust. So we’re here passing the word along with other sites. Whites are waking up. The ones that deny any genocide are typically the ones that want or are content with what is going on in our countries.

    • Bon, From the Land of Babble

      We have the high ground, anti-Whites do not; it is immoral and evil to bring about the end of the White race, which is exactly and precisely what massive 3rd world immigration in White lands does, genocide the White race.

      Anti-Whites receive standing ovations when they call for the killing of Whites (“I get to kill all the White people?” How great is that?” — Jamie Foxx)

      I am asked to “care” about “genocide” in Dafur and Tibet, yet when I talk about genocide of the White race, I’m called a Nazi who wants to Clone Hitler, and worse and my job is threatened.

    • Sheik Yerbouti

      “The average person, Rob, doesn’t know the true definition”…. Precisely his point. Instead of jumping to the theoretical end result, the message needs to be applied in stages. This is exactly what got us to this point.

  • POLARBEAR MAXIM

    I still think Michael Jackson did the best job at hiding his true stripes ..
    but the GOP runs a close second, As far as the Grand Old Party goes . . . .
    Good Luck . . . . . . You’re going to need it !!!

  • MikeofAges

    You would have pre-industrial society and worldwide feudalism, without the white European race. For the East and South Asian the prospect of a return to the traditional way of life I think would be less disturbing than it would be for us. But I’ll tell you what. If there is an ET out there watching us, ET would be happy. Our violent planet no longer would be a source of concern.

    • Grantland

      It would be a slave planet ruled by Jews. A global USSR. And that is precisely the goal.

      • MikeofAges

        There wouldn’t be the worldwide communications necessary to have a global USSR. What I am talking about is going back to the world before 1492. That’s what some people want, isn’t it?

        This is an topic I actually have thought about. Some things would survive the collapse of industrial and post industrial civilization, I believe. Printing. Transoceanic travel and commerce. Telegraphy, in limited networks. Spark gap (wireless) telegraphy on a very limited basis, allowing the possibility of real time worldwide communication. The steam engine. and the railroad, but only on a extremely limited basis. DC power generation and distribution, but only on an extremely limited basis. Firearms.

        I can’t rule out the possibility of various cabals attempting to influence the world in its entirety. There could be a Jewish cabal, that is true. But most likely any cabal would have to act in alliance with other cabals. A feudal world is one which is ruled variously by warlords, oligarchies, chieftains, dynasties, titled nobility. Always the possibility of a republic here and there. But republics in a feudal world usually are oligarchical. Those republics that are not oligarchical, but composed of free tribesmen, likely have an elected king or chieftain.

        The growth of world population and the facts of its composition could bring about the downfall of industrial, cybernetic and biotechnic civilization even without the complete downfall of the white European race. Everybody thinks the orange ball (my favorite metaphor) always will just get bigger and bigger and higher and higher. Each for his own reason, maybe. But all believe it. No reason why it has to be so, however.

  • Einsatzgrenadier

    No, not calling it what it is – genocide – makes you look incredibly foolish. Here’s the definition of genocide from the Jew who coined the word “genocide”, Raphael Lemkin. In his book “Axis Rule in Occupied Europe” (1944), Lemkin wrote:

    Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation. It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves. The objectives of such a plan would be the disintegration of the political and social institutions, of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of the personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups.

    According to the UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1948), genocide is:

    any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: (a) Killing members of the group; (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

    Massive third world immigration and multiculturalism satisfies (a), (b), (c) and (d) of the aforementioned criteria. Whites are being ethnically cleansed from their own communities by massive third world immigration. Whites are being reduced to minorities in their own countries. Whites are being slowly killed off through black-on-white crime and miscegenation. Totalitarian bureaucrats are deliberately placing whites at the mercy of dangerous minorities who not only nurse various historical grievances against whites, but will kill them off when they become majorities in previously all-white nations (especially Muslims and Hispanics). Furthermore, massive third world immigration intensifies competition for available jobs, puts downward pressure on wages and living standards, and makes affordable housing scarce. This depresses the white fertility rate, ultimately preventing whites from giving birth. White culture is also being wiped out through multiculturalism, which tells whites that they have no culture. In short, diversity is white genocide.

  • IA_Adam

    When any politician or administrator demonstrates obvious obtuseness and complete obliviousness to an obvious truth, then there is only one reason why: Money. These GOP candidates are getting huge chunks of cash from businesses desperate to drive the cost of labor down into the dirt, period.

  • johningermany

    Tony Blair is part of the Bilderberg Group. I think they are the ones behind this s–t.

  • Well done for going into the bear-pit Jared – and it was a good question……which if people listen closely, they will know that none of them actually answered. Not a single one actually discussed what you were saying. They went on to auto-pilot about general immigration, living by “laws” and all the rest of it. That is a different matter to the question being posed.

    I have to say that, compared to Britain, the audience and the panel seemed much more adult and capable of discussion. Here, I am sure Jared would not have even been allowed to finish asking the question without being howled down by the audience – before recieving curt replies and feigned disbelief that anybody could ask it in the first place.

    • DA

      Remember Enoch Powell ? He gave warning regarding this situation and no one cared.

      • Remember him? Of course! The man is even featured as my Discus avatar.

        I’m not sure it is fair to say that nobody cared. In fact, some documentaries and reports suggest that he commanded the desires and views of around 75-80% of the electorate, from all political backgrounds.

        The main ones who did not care were ‘the usual suspects’, the (thus following) media outlets, and the political establishment.

        It was they who had the reign of power and rode roughshod over the electorates desires, who continually hoped that it would slow down, stop, or otherwise be dealt with…… which of course in hindsight they were foolish to expect.

        Today’s Britain is unfortunately not even the same country. It is a different land and a different calibre of people that is just geographically docked in the same place.

        After 50 years of brainwashing and mass immigration, many would no longer care and/or have switched off from it. However, the population and their sense of self / sense of views in the 1950’s to 1970’s was a very different matter.

        It will be the same in the United States. Would people listening to Jared heed his warnings? Maybe, maybe not – but like with Enoch, at least somebody was speaking up. They cannot say they were not told.

  • Hunter Morrow

    Why would anybody be in favor of legal immigration? The country has added more
    than 70 million people in less than 30 years. I don’t want ANYBODY coming into this country. Not for work, or school, or family or ANYTHING! If you stop letting people in,
    eventually we will start having more abortions and deaths than births and immigration and it would be phenomenal. Which would you rather have?

    400 million people at each other’s throats here as “legal immigrants striving for the American dream” or some other nonsense or just 200 million people?
    Gimme 200 million, please.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      Yes, an immigration moratorium is a politically safe, colorblind stop-gap.

      • DiversityIsDeath

        No, liberals would be screaming that since most immigrants are people of color, ipso facto an immigration moratorium is racist. (C’mon, we already know how the pro-immigration crowd would spin it.)

    • Bossman

      What about tourism? Many universities depend on foreign student enrollment to keep them afloat. The USA is one of the hardest country to immigrate to legally. It is far easier to immigrate to Canada, Australia, the UK and many other advanced countries than it is to immigrate to the USA.

      • evilsandmich

        T.F.B.

      • Hunter Morrow

        If it is so hard, why has it happened more than 1 million times a year
        since Clinton? Hard! Ha!

        • Bossman

          Most of that 1 million have been waiting years, sometimes as much as twenty years to enter the U.S. Many others are young women who marry decrepit old Americans so that they can have a chance at the American dream. Some are desperate refugees, others are very rich investors.

          • Hunter Morrow

            Screw ’em and screw anybody who wants immigration into this country.

    • DA

      You can place this immigration disaster at the hands of Teddy Boy Kennedy in 1965, this Judas is responsible for this situation.
      Remember the greatest enemy of the white race are white Marxists and white fools.

      • Hunter Morrow

        No. It was a jewish operation and Teddy Kennedy was just the figure head.
        Come on, people. Truly know your history!

  • Sloppo

    These politicians are completely ignoring the fact that law-abiding immigrants can come here, reproduce at high rates, become a majority, vote in new laws, execute every one of us, and completely erase our existence without ever breaking a law.

  • Roninf9

    The GOP Establishment is not stupid. They know EXACTLY what they are doing. What they are doing is what their anti-White, anti-Western civilization, Globalist Bankster paymasters commanded them to do.

  • Bossman

    The USA couldn’t pretend to be a champion of freedom and be the leader of the free world and at the same time have a whites-only immigration policy. The rest of the world would be pointing at that hypocrisy everyday.

    • jayvbellis

      That terrible lie that Conservative a White Americans had to be race denying leaders of “the free world” that lie led to us wasting the last 75 years fighting our kinsmen the Russians.

      Even as a young teenager I could clearly see that White Indo European Russians were “my people” , while brutal Black criminal underclass Americans or just Lib Dem Blacks and their enablers were not my people.

      Any Amren readers still think we should have taken the side of nasty, dark, hairy Muslim Jihadists in Afghanistan in the 1980s over our kinsmen the Russians?

      Any Amren readers still scared that Russians like Maria Sharapova and Anna Kournikova will come ..

      Get them?

      I wish they would come get me!

      • DiversityIsDeath

        I know! I thought the same thing. I WISH all those evil enemy Russians would invade America. Russians are attractive, intelligent, of Nordic race. The American gene pool would be vastly improved with an infusion of Russian blood. In 21st century Russian men have remained proud and manly, whereas too many American males are now weak, guilty, emasculated, frightened, liberal-indoctrinated. Remember when Republican men had swagger, and radiated power? Well just observe them in this video to see what wimps even they have become.

        Please Russia, come rescue White America! Invade us!

        • jayvbellis

          Russia under Czars, Commissars and now Putin had exactly one “liberal” leader – Krensky. Few if any Russians ever suffered racial suicidal tendencies.

          Somalian Pirates have learned the difference between messing with the Russians and other types of soft Whites.

    • A “whites-only immigration policy” is about the last thing we need to worry about in recent decades, since such things as unsecured borders and endless amnesties and ‘chain migration’ have meant an almost anyone-but-Whites immigration policy. Besides the fact that the “rest of the world” would be laughably hypocritical. How many tens of millions of White immigrants would be welcome into Mexico, China or Nigeria??

    • Alexandra1973

      Shouldn’t we be free to determine who gets in and who doesn’t? Our sandbox, our rules.

      Do you or do you not have rules as to who gets to enter your home? If you don’t allow an intruder, are you not denying them freedom?

      I don’t care about being “leader of the free world” myself. Then again I am an isolationist. Other nations should be able to look to us as an example.

  • Bon, From the Land of Babble

    Rob:

    It IS genocide.

    What is happening to the White race IS genocide according to the definition the UN uses to define genocide.

    Section C of the 1948 United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide:

    ( c ) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part

    Section C applies to what anti-whites are doing to the White race:

    Flooding our countries with non-Whites, force integrating our communities, encouraging us to blend ourselves out of existence and attacking anyone who opposes these things are imposing conditions of life calculated to bring about the physical destruction of my race.

    It’s genocide.

    Also Whites ARE being systematically slaughtered in South Africa by blacks — while the Western Press AND UN look the other way.

    • DA

      Also when white stupid women marry Blacks they do not produce white children… take a look at the character in the white house.

      • Bon, From the Land of Babble

        Yes. Only Whites can preserve and pass along White DNA.

        If we don’t , who will?

        • I love how they found the picture of the black baby looking really angry. That’s hilarious.

  • refocus

    Don’t call it genocide.

    This is a good and valid point. But, the hoi polli are programmed to reject the concept of genocide being committed against the white race. Its a politically incorrect concept.

    Perhaps noting that we will become a minority in our own country could gain us some mileage … but again the hoi polli, concerned primarily with the big tv show, cannot be expected to respond in the correct manner.

    So calling it genocide is the only viable tactic. We, and those like us, are the only ones that count.

    • Bon, From the Land of Babble

      Use these powerful graphs as much as possible.

      They visually and quickly show what is happening to the White and ONLY White race — more powerfully than words can….

      Post them wherever and whenever you can without apology, of course.

      I do, until they’re taken down or I’m banned, both of which have happened.

  • jayvbellis

    Communicate your views stated here directly to his Congressional staff. Post your comments on this guy’s Facebook Page, others will join in and their will be a revolt and he will change his stated immigration position same as Se. Rubio did.

    Don’t just give up.

    • evilsandmich

      I know that my (R) despite being browbeat by local farmers and poverty pimps has said “enforcement first” constantly. Yeah I’d like to have more, but at least that is progress.

  • Brian

    Taylor was on point, as usual. The panelists are as useless as tits on a boar.

    People are not fungible commodities. Any fool can see that an Englishman and an Italian act differently at a funeral, and that’s just within Europe. We don’t see Magna Carta and Jeffersonian democracy springing organically from the soil of Guatemala, Vietnam or the Congo, because the mindset necessary for it correlates more with the personality type of northern Europe. And yet these knuckleheads think you can replace the stock of a nation and keep it the same, economically and politically. To them it’s just a trivial matter of salsa overtaking ketchup. IDIOTS!

  • jayvbellis

    Berniegoetzfan

    Please contact Bob Marshall directly and politely expressed your strong displeasure with his immigration stance.

    Need help finding a State Agency? Click here to do a search.

    Feel free to fill out the form below to contact me regarding any issues, concerns, or questions.

    Robert G. Marshall
    Delegate of 13th District
    P.O. Box 421
    Manassas, VA 20108

    703 – 361 – 5416 (office and fax)
    703 – 853 – 4213 (cell) (preferred)

    • jayvbellis

      I made the call to Marshall’s cell phone, left a polite but concerned message.

      Please make the call use *67 to block your ph number and location.

      Be polite, don’t threaten, don’t ramble, don’t talk too long.

      Be firm to the point.

      Mass immigration from Nigeria would, will be extremely damaging to our country. If Marshall continues to promote insane, crazy immigration policies, his political career is over.

  • MystiKasT

    Agreed. It is genocide, but people will automatically think we are nuts.

  • Boris McGuffin

    I am of the mind that if, when the day comes, there is a limited amount of rope, we hang the Republicans first, and then if there’s any rope left over we move on to the Democrats.

  • jayvbellis

    Very well said Mr. Taylor, as usual.

    But, I just have to say….

    I’m one more bad date away from giving up on White American college miseducated women. The latest attempt was pure gold digger thievery! Black gang banger robbers with guns would be more respectful to my property!

    If we face impending Hispanic rule, we might as well try to make Hispanic rule Whiter, get some of our guys in on the takeover. Whites in Mexico and South America don’t live so badly.

    I see a lot of good White (guy) Hispanic (women) marriages in my area. The children are definitely White, with dark eyes, not blue – very handsome, like Northern Italians or higher caste Persians.

    The situation might be similar to Whites losing Central and Eastern Europe to the Communists . Whites there adjusted, and from my perspective East Germany and Poland and Russia looked and worked very White in the 1970s and 1980s.

    • KevinPhillipsBong

      The hell’s wrong with you?

      • jayvbellis

        Much better White Hispanic than Black underclass, Muslim Pakistani gangs sexually grooming poor English girls. Muslim terrorists on tourist visas planting bombs at the Boston Marathon.

        There are much worse people than higher caste White Hispanics.

        Yeah, sure I prefer Northern European Americans who are racially conscious. 1st wives, girlfriends should be this way.

        I am now 51′ healthy, wealthy looking to have more White children, start a second family. I see pretty close to zero good dating, mating options with local college educated women in this large Northern city I live in can’t seem to escape.

        I have been at this thing for quite awhile and have come to the conclusion that some dying Confederate soldier or Wermacht soldier put a curse on college miseducated Northern American women.

        Does any man on planet earth want to mate or even date with the likes of Hillary Clinton.

        • Geo1metric

          She’s not a woman.

        • BonV.Vant

          “Much better White Hispanic than Black underclass” wow, you are now choosing which form of death is preferable!

          • jayvbellis

            Beauty contestants from SouthAmerica look very pretty and rather White.

            I have to say Chile’s great save the day Gen. Pinochet is the kind of leader most Amren readers want.

            And folks….

            Ain’t nothing “chilly” about the women from Chile.

        • BonV.Vant

          I think your days of reproduction are over unless you pay a woman to bear your children. No female will marry a 51 year old out of “love”, especially when you declare YOUR motivation is children, not love. You complain that you are running into “gold diggers” yet you offer no currency other than money. Not youth, not attractiveness, not even a desire for romance.
          Your approach is strictly businesslike. You want something- more children. I think you could pay several females to birth fetuses that you could conceive with eggs purchased from a suitable female egg donors. This would be MUCH cheaper than marrying and then divorcing. You would never have the threat of divorce hanging over you and you would never be in danger of having the mother take the kids from you and alienating them from you.

        • DA

          Yes, Billy Bobo Clinton… and he deserves her.

    • Bossman

      The term “Hispanic” is neither here nor there and as a racial classification it is bogus. This term gained currency only since the 1970s.

    • Northern American-Nationalist

      That already happened in Miami…

      Clearly, race matters, but culture matters too, and their correlation doesn’t necessarily make them completely dependent on eachother, meaning we have to take care of both not just one or the other.

  • scutum

    Genocide of the White Race. The New World Order. The Global Economy. International Banking. We all know who is behind this, yet if you bring it up you are shouted down with accusations of discrimination. When it comes to race and White genocide, the emperor has no clothes.

  • Alexandra1973

    Apparently Cliven Bundy’s one of us: http://news(dot)yahoo(dot)com/list-cliven-bundys-supporters-now-know-hes-pro-133625625.html

    Now the feds really hate him, no doubt….

    • Medizin

      The message Bundy attempted to convey is true, but he has a way of saying things that can be misconstrued. This was one of them. He needs a good spokesperson.

      The fact that Republicans jumped on the leftist bandwagon is to be expected.

      • Alexandra1973

        And it hit me that the AmRen conference is this weekend. Hm. Interesting timing.

        Sadly I won’t be able to go, though.

  • DA

    The republicans are not just stupid but spineless, Just take a look at the last two presidential elections and the republican candidates. Now we now see them speaking out when it means nothing. I am ashamed that many white men have been emasculated and left with no spine.
    Diversity is madness , nations should be homogenous where there is no possible racial conflicts. Caucasians are a minority in the world and not reproducing.
    South Africa’s present is our very near future.
    If the white race is gone from this nation it will die.

    • DiversityIsDeath

      Just check out their body language. Instead of stepping up and answering Jared Taylor’s question honestly they all want to run away and hide like fairies. Gad, even “conservatives” and “Republicans” have been made into cowardly, emasculated white men.

      • Correction: I saw no men on that panel. White men wouldn’t be offering up their wives, daughters, sons and other family as a kind of chattel or barter to grease the system and satisfy their Gods of Political Correctness. Men don’t do that. Hell, even boys will stand up and fight for their families if pushed into a corner. Whatever these clowns are, the last thing they should be called are men.

        • Grantland

          Sociopaths are not lemmings, and they cannot be told what to think. They feign the prevailing lemming delusions, but they value only personal profit and advancement. Like lemmings, they have no souls.

  • DA

    I must disagree with your premise that Genocide is accomplished through violence.
    The communists like to use food as a weapon. Take a look a Stalin’s treatment of the Ukraine in 1932, he used starvation to kill 15 million Ukrainians.
    Although he did not exterminate them, it is an example of how you can accomplish genocide.
    Obama care is an attempt to commit genocide against the elderly (mostly white) in this country through death panels.

  • Yeah, 70% of 10% that is 4 1/3rd of infinity squared… but, but, but it’s really a complex issue… Christian, religious…blah blah bah. Who cares what country they come from or their history or statistics that prove how wrong I am. Did I mention Christian, religious, blah blah blah? Doesn’t the fact that I just said Christian, religious, blah blah blah make you all tingly and see that the statistics you just cited are irrelevant and inconsequential to race and nation?

    Racist/Racial Nationalist > Democrat
    Racist/Racial Nationalist > Republican

    Conservative and Liberal are antiquated labels in a world where neither recognize race.

    • BonV.Vant

      whites should abandon the republicans completely. Let them disappear! Let the leftists think they have everything. They will never have our minds nor our guns nor the loyalty of the majority of white soldiers. When there is no more pretense of a party that represents the interests of whites, whites will create a party, or a movement, that really does do this. Nothing will ever change the republicans into a party for whites, they are sell out, they are bought out. They are EXACTLY who we DON’T want !

  • jeffaral

    Republicans are worse than communists!

  • DiversityIsDeath

    Taylor should ask these side-stepping sell-outs point blank- “Why do you Republicans WANT your own White descendants to live surrounded and outnumbered by blacks and browns? Why are you Republicans doing everything in your power to make USA a minority white nation? Do you have any fears or concerns for your children and grandchildren living as a minority in a non-white nation under non-white rule, like South Africa?”

    • Alexandra1973

      The thing is, they believe the lie that we’re all equal so therefore it shouldn’t make any difference.

    • Ellis Kurtz

      This is going too far too fast. The best way to begin is to point out how immigrants vote and show how this will eventually doom the Republican Party. For example, in the 2012 election Romney got ~60% of the white vote, which would have given him a landslide victory in 1980. In the event, he was defeated by Obama’s overwhelming majority of the non-white vote.

    • Equal Parenting -Fathers Initi

      The most important point you made was [Why are you doing everything in your power to deliberately make USA a minority white nation?] because this tackles the issue head-on. I like to avoid issues which suggest that USA should have predominantly white immigration. (although I agree with that fact.). But, THE MAIN ISSUE is how our government is deliberately going out of their way to ethnically cleanse our people. That’s a perfect way of saying it. Even better than Jared Taylor’s comment.

      • Medizin

        “Why are you doing everything in your power to deliberately make USA a minority white nation?”

        “how our government is deliberately going out of their way to ethnically cleanse our people.”

        Excellent. It would have been difficult for them to sidestep those questions.

        • Equal Parenting -Fathers Initi

          exactly. I think, he’s found the perfect argument here. DiversityIsDeath has pinpointed a main focal point. because it takes all attention away from issues such as Non-white immigration or whites becoming a minority. More Specifically, there’s an organized effort to completely change the demographics of all White homelands. They are attempting to encourage their births while discouraging our populations from reproducing. These are perfect arguments.

  • Homo_Occidentalis

    Whites will go from a supermajority of 90% in 1950 to a minority of less than 50% by the early 2040s. That’s 90 years (i.e. one lifetime). What does one call such a radical cleansing of the white majority by forced integration if not genocide?

    • I think the sticking point with the word genocide is that it isn’t clear that the elimination of the white race is the *purpose* of the immigration and integration. It could just be a side effect of stupidity. I think it is deliberate in some cases, but not in others.

      • Einsatzgrenadier

        The purpose of massive third world immigration is to race replace Europeans, whose birth rate is declining. According to globalists, we need more and more non-whites to outbreed us and support our aging population in order to prevent the pension system from collapsing, or some such nonsense. No, the elites have made it very clear that this is a deliberate policy of genocide. They just prefer using terms like replacement migration and other euphemistic expressions, instead of calling it what it is: brutal, murderous genocide, ethnic cleansing.

        • Replacement to pay for pensions may be ridiculous and stupid, but it is not the same as genocide. That is the issue.

          • Einsatzgrenadier

            But it is genocide because it ultimately results in the national and ethnic destruction of the white race.

          • It’s only genocide if it was *meant* to result in the destruction of our race. Otherwise, it’s just incredibly stupid and wrong policy, but not genocide.

            It’s like the difference between manslaughter and murder.

          • Einsatzgrenadier

            But it IS meant to result in the destruction of the white race because whites are not allowed to retain their distinct cultural, national, ethnic and racial identity. How can whites survive in a hostile world if they have no cultural, national, ethnic or racial identity of their own? There can be no white survival in the absence of a unifying cultural, national, ethnic and racial identity.

            Make no mistake about it. Massive third world immigration is an act of brutal, murderous genocide being perpetrated against the white race by a vicious totalitarian elite.

          • I think there is a percentage of evil individuals who are working for our genocide. For example, those who want us all to mix with blacks or whoever so we can solve the race problem. There is no other word for that but genocide. But I don’t yet see a good reason to think that is generally the case.

            All of what you described above could simply be the result of stupid, non-genocidal policy. Ideology that results in our nonexistence is different from ideology that purposefully works for our nonexistence.

          • Einsatzgrenadier

            The United States is demographically projected to become a majority-minority nation in 2043 and a Hispanic majority nation sometime after 2060. In other words, whites are being reduced to a small, vulnerable minority and the US is being transformed into a typical Latin American oligarchy. This is not happening by accident. This is a deliberate, calculated policy to physically exterminate the white race. There is no other word to describe this other than genocide.

            I understand that there are many well-meaning individuals in the US federal government who genuinely believe that there are no such thing as racial differences and that the US is well on its way to becoming a colorful multicultural utopia. But these people are really just useful, low level idiots. The people actively working for our destruction dominate the upper echelons of the federal government and they will not rest until the white race is totally wiped off the surface of the earth.

          • “This is not happening by accident. This is a deliberate, calculated policy to physically exterminate the white race. How is the deliberate destruction of the white race in America not genocidal? There is no other word to describe this other than genocide.”

            If it’s deliberate, it is genocidal. But that’s the whole point, I’ve seen no reason to think that it is. I’m open to considering it as a possibility, but it sounds like conspiracy theory to me.

          • Einsatzgrenadier

            There is no conspiracy. They’re outright trying to get rid of us and we can’t do anything about it (at least for now).

          • Well, we can agree that our race is being destroyed and that we need to fight against it.

    • Geo1metric

      I think using the word “genocide” will cause many people to immediately classify the user of that word as a “nut-ball” and close their mind.

      Whereas, the use of “softer language” may very well win converts.

      We need to be smart about this work.

  • Cool video. I’ve been watching Weston’s videos for a little while.

    • LovelyNordicHeidi

      Interesting point, but do not forget that if Whites have 1-2 children, that also has an effect on the percentile growth of Muslims.

      • He was probably just including parents. If you include grandparents, it would be an even higher percentage. But you are right.

      • He’s a politician, so of course he picks the more dramatic number… 🙂

        • LovelyNordicHeidi

          We all like a little bit of drama…..

  • Ellis Kurtz

    First panel respondent: “I’m not really concerned about different groups have majority status as long as everyone is obeying the law.”
    So you are not concerned whether immigrants vote for your party, only whether or not they obey the law. You are not at all concerned that California, with its 55 Electoral College votes, has become an indelibly blue state as a result of immigration, and that Texas, with 38 votes, will follow in due course.

    • Equal Parenting -Fathers Initi

      yea. And, the question is WHAT LAWS will we be obeying 50 years from now? and, what type of politicians will they vote for? The future of elected politicians might make Al Sharpton look like a saint.

  • BonV.Vant

    Incase whites have not noticed, the two party system has been a con job. Democrat Republican, Democrat Republican, and whites always lose. Time for whites to abandon the republican party altogether. Let it crash and burn burn burn. At that moment, there will be a need for a REAL representation of white interests, not a snow job that assures their eventual destruction! DON’T VOTE!!!!!

  • Pax Romana

    Wide spread corruption, from top to bottom. Most politicians are not in it to preserve the nation. They are in it to get their palms greased. They would sell their mothers if the price was right.

  • tlk244182

    A “must see.”

  • Looking at 5″ of the video (I could not stand to watch more), it appears that all the candidates have been strictly advised to avoid supporting Nazi White Supremacists. It’s apparent that as soon as Jared began talking they immediately labeled him as such. This is why all said they “were blind to color”.

    I think their answers in this case were scripted out in advance just like someone stating… well quite frankly, I can’t think of anything more untouchable than white racists. Even born-again convicted mass murderers are more acceptable in polite society.

  • Whether or not it’s purposeful is important because it is damaging to our reputation and effectiveness if we misuse the word genocide.
    But aside from that, I agree with you.

  • Kenner

    White Nationalism and ‘Whitey’.

  • Grantland

    The masses of the people think what they are expected to think. When Kings, Priests, Nobility, role-models in their village tell them what to think, then that is what they think – whether it’s burning heretics or invading a neighbouring tribe.

    Today the mass media of news and entertainment tells them what to think; and a hostile alien enemy owns the mass media.

  • CourtneyfromAlabama

    Traitors like these are the ones we should be the most angry at when examining our current state of affairs. It would be far more constructive to be angry at them as opposed to minority groups and soft hearted white women (the latter vote more closely to white men than any other group by a long shot). Without people like this in power in white nations going back centuries, we wouldn’t be where we are at today (speaking in regards to whites all around the world).

  • Geo1metric

    How and where?

    I have many friends and acquaintances who would be completely disgusted if I blurted out that Whites are being subjected to genocide around the world.

    However, if I started talking about the demographic decline of Whites around the world and the long-term consequences, many of them would join in the conversation and probably learn something. This approach will bring them slowly into our orbit.

    As I said, we need to work smarter. Our approach so far is not working very well for us.

  • bilderbuster

    Alright then.
    How about “Diversity = Detroit” ?

  • Texan1st

    And there you have it, folks. The reason why we are doomed. Not ONE of these idiots had the courage to be forthright and say, “You know what? You’re right, Jared.”

    • Ellis Kurtz

      If he did, his candidacy would be doomed. There must be a constituency among the voting public before a radical new idea can become part of respectable political discourse. JT’s ideas are currently at the Unthinkable end of the Overton window spectrum:

      The Overton window is a political theory that describes as a narrow “window” the range of ideas the public will accept. On this theory, an idea’s political viability depends mainly on whether it falls within that window rather than on politicians’ individual preferences. It is named for its originator, Joseph P. Overton (1960-2003), a former vice president of the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. At any given moment, the “window” includes a range of policies considered politically acceptable in the current climate of public opinion, which a politician can recommend without being considered too extreme to gain or keep public office.

      {snip}

      Overton described a spectrum from “more free” to “less free” with regard to government intervention, oriented vertically on an axis. As the spectrum moves or expands, an idea at a given location may become more or less politically acceptable. His degrees of acceptance of public ideas are roughly:

      Unthinkable
      Radical
      Acceptable
      Sensible
      Popular
      Policy

      The Overton Window is an approach to identifying which ideas define the domain of acceptability within a democratic republic’s possible governmental policies. Proponents of policies outside the window seek to persuade or educate the public in order to move and/or expand the window. Proponents of current policies, or similar ones, within the window seek to convince people that policies outside it should be deemed unacceptable.

      wikipedia

  • MikeofAges

    Standing ovation. But even the standard ovation would have been better than nothing.

  • Epiminondas

    I guess we now know who is bankrolling those candidates. The Republican “party” is sooooo over.

  • My approach? You mean the approach of using words correctly? Every definition of the word I’ve ever read, including the beloved UN definition, requires intent.

    We do have a reputation. Race realists are always confused/equated with neo-Nazis and KKK. People automatically tune us out. That’s bad for us. If we use explosive words, like “genocide,” incorrectly, we aren’t helping ourselves. But even if we don’t already have a reputation, we don’t want to build a bad one.

    “we must assume that they intend the ordinary and predictable consequences of their actions.”

    Right, you are making an assumption.

  • “Your problem is that you don’t understand the simple fact assumptions about the mental state required for culpability is almost always inferred, as it must be, from overt actions.”

    Not necessarily. You can make reasonable inferences from statements, also. Anyway, if there is an opposing explanation that is equally plausible, or more plausible, you cannot infer culpability.

    “Moreover, you have consistently refused to adress the fact that mainstream academics acknowledge colonial genocides without proof of intent.”

    All this shows is that anti-white academics, if they can get away with it, are more than willing to make white people look worse than they really are. Do you want to imitate the unscrupulous tactics of anti-whites?

    If you are going to use a word loosely because others do, fine. But don’t pretend like you aren’t using it loosely.

    Furthermore, if you are using it loosely, do not use the UN definition of genocide, since it is a strict definition, not a loose one. (I’m assuming you use the UN definition, like most do. I don’t know.)

  • Involuntary manslaughter is accidental, unintentional killing. Voluntary manslaughter is “fit of rage” deliberate, non-premeditated killing. First degree murder is premeditated killing. Second degree murder is similar to voluntary manslaughter. What I was talking about was involuntary manslaughter.

  • bernicegreenbaum

    This was an embarrassing scene if you ask me. Mr. Taylor was clearly scoffed at this forum of pompous fools. They’re mocking him just made them look insecure to me. Quite audacious!

  • Geo1metric

    I’m not telling “the rest of us” anything. I am merely expressing my opinion about which approach I think is more effective in furthering our work.

    BTW, how do you know that your way is “much more effective”?

  • The reason second degree murder is considered murder rather than manslaughter is because it is judged that the person was conscious of a serious risk to someone’s life but ignored the risk (i.e., premeditated). There isn’t exactly an intent to kill them, but there is an awareness that they will or will likely kill them and an indifference to that fact. So the question is whether the average stupid liberal policy maker is conscious of and indifferent to a serious risk to the continued existence of the white race. I don’t doubt that some are guilty of “second degree genocide,” but I suspect that it is more like involuntary manslaughter in most cases.

    But you certainly have a much stronger case with “second degree genocide” than “first degree.” However, most “white genocide” people I’ve ever encountered do not talk about it in that sense.

    Genocide is not the best word. Most people who aren’t already on our side will hear that one time, think it’s ridiculous, and never give it a second thought.

  • Why do you think it is a good idea to act recklessly? If you were in a fight, would you fight recklessly or strategically? We are in a fight.

  • I didn’t realize that aborigines had such low IQs. Isn’t anything below 70 legally considered retarded? That’s astounding.

  • Funruffian

    Republicans. are the party of denial. Many of them ARE stupid, but some simple are too cowardly to honestly express the race reality that threatens their platform.

  • And nothing I’ve said advocates sitting around. However, being scrupulous is generally a good idea, especially when one’s views are considered highly taboo.

  • I agree that those who want us all to mix are encouraging genocide, but I don’t think that is as widespread among the movers and shakers as you seem to think. Maybe I’m wrong, I don’t know.

  • MooTieFighter

    It’s so hard listening top their meandering comments. We have become so weak that we are afraid to speak truths and only discuss unviable options, as if they could save America. Politicians now are simply looking after themselves and their families. This is no longer about saving America, it’s about saving themselves. These politicians are not ignorant. They know that more immigrants equal the demise of their own political party/country, but if they carefully surf the waves they can stay upright and at least keep their own jobs. We have very few in office now with any balls, to really stand up for Americans. We have been sold out.

  • Grantland

    It’s all about money in the US. And media. We all know who has the money, and who owns the media.