‘Every Man His Own Commissar’: Jared Taylor and the Politics of Race

Jeff Lipkes, American Thinker, April 24, 2014

Good manners are infectious. Jared Taylor’s civility and dapper appearance impress even those sending him death threats: the most recent one addresses him as “Mr. Taylor.” In an age when even upper-class Brits loosen the upper lip and revert to first names after one email exchange, we remained “Mr.” and “Mr.”

Taylor, founder of American Renaissance and New Century Foundation, usually appears in public in a jacket and tie, though he sheds the latter for his infrequent speeches on campuses. Men at the annual Am Ren conference are also required to wear jackets and ties, the women, dresses. “It acts like classical music at a mall,” Taylor says.

His accent is hard to place. He aspirates the “h” in words like “white,” a genteel habit that went out of fashion in the ‘60s. He does not quite sound like a contemporary American; his diction is a little too precise.

But then he didn’t grow up in this country. The son of missionaries, Taylor spent his first 16 years in Japan. He speaks that language like a native–he is still mistaken for Japanese over the phone.

Taylor was raised a liberal, and four years at Yale did nothing to disillusion him. After graduating with a degree in philosophy, and already fluent in French, he went on to the prestigious Sciences Po in Paris (l’Institut d’Etudes Politiques de Paris–fewer than 10% of applicants are accepted), where he studied international economics and received adiplome, the equivalent of a masters. Taylor worked as a banker and journalist, serving as West Coast Editor of PC Magazine, and is now a private consultant for firms doing business in Japan.

For his many critics, the civility, reasonableness, and impressive c.v. are all a veneer. Beneath the polished exterior beats the heart of a racist. Taylor denies the charge: he is a “race realist” not a “racist.” But this is a distinction without a difference to opponents. He believes the differences in White and Black crime rates, academic and intelligence test scores, and other variances in behavior and outlook are largely attributable to genetic differences, the result of adaptation to different environments over the course of 50,000 years. This, of course, is heresy. It’s compounded by his conviction that the civilization created by Europeans during the past 2500 years is jeopardized by an unprecedented influx of non-Europeans into the European homelands.

There was no single epiphany after Yale and Sciences Po. “I clung to liberal fantasies as long as I could. It is pleasant to feel oneself superior to mean-spirited conservatives. Agreeable delusion fought a slow, losing battle against disagreeable reality.”

But he later recalled one turning point: a conversation with an African student at the University of Monrovia in Liberia in 1975.

“I had just come from the Ivory Coast, which, by West African standards, was wealthy and well run. As soon as I crossed the border into Liberia, the road was full of huge potholes, the buildings were shacks, and the people were in rags.

“I always made a practice when visiting a new country to go to the main university in the capital and find smart people to talk to. At the University of Liberia, I asked a student why Ivory Coast was well run but Liberia was a wreck. Without a pause, he said, ‘It’s because we did not have the benefit of being colonized by the French.’

“At that time I was still a liberal on race, and his answer hit me like a thunderbolt. I took it for granted, as liberals do, that colonialism was exploitation, but here was an African calmly telling me that it explained why Ivory Coast was more advanced than Liberia.”

His experience growing up as a Caucasian in race-conscious Japan may not have affected his views on race, but it did give him a more nuanced perspective on the Japanese than most American scholars and journalists, misled by the fondness of the natives for Beethoven and scotch, and convinced they were thoroughly Westernized. Taylor’s first book was a jaundiced look at the Japanese Miracle. Shadows of the Rising Sun was well-timed. Within less than half a dozen years, the bubble burst.

Four years later, in 1992, Taylor published Paved With Good Intentions.

The book is an exhaustive indictment of Affirmative Action both for its effect on Whites, its invisible victims, and on African-Americans.

Taylor describes the unfairness of reverse discrimination, the wholesale abandonment of tests for applicants to police and fire departments, and the subordination of test results by admissions officers at colleges and law schools–tests that are non-discriminatory and excellent predictors of performance. (In 1982, the National Academy of Sciences undertook a thorough study of standardized tests and found no cultural biases.) But the most depressing chapter documents the life of the African-American underclass. After 25 years of a cornucopia of social programs–federal spending on education soared from 2.8 to 6.8% of GDP in just 15 years–most Blacks were worse off than before the Civil Rights Act of 1965–which, of course, had promised only to end discrimination against minorities, not to introduce preferential treatment for them. The book shows graphically just how grim life was for children growing up in the nation’s ghettos, c. 1990. (When 5 hours elapsed without a murder in New York City one day that year, it was headline news.)

Taylor was interested in the demonization of whites that was the justification for the continuation of failed policies, and the double standard that permitted Blacks to speak freely and abusively about Whites, but gagged the melanin-deficient. There’s also a brief mention of immigration, an experiment in “multi-racial nation-building that is without precedent in the history of the world.”

It was these issues that would be explored in his next book, White Identity, but nineteen years would elapse before he would publish it.

In the interim, Taylor founded the New Century Foundation and launched American Renaissance. Why not an organization working directly for his political goals, ending racial preferences and reducing immigration?

“The decision probably reflects my own nature. I like ideas, and I like reading and writing. If I were, by nature, a community organizer I would run an activist organization–heck, I might be President.” There will be no political change, he felt, “until we have been more successful in education.”

AmRen began as a monthly magazine and became a website in 1996. The printed magazine was dropped in 2012.

The site combines original articles and book reviews–five current ones appear on a slider across the top–and news articles for viewers to comment on, à la Free Republic. It also produces videos. The most recent one is on the history of immigration policy in the U.S.

The original articles range widely. Recent subjects include “Hip Hop Hegemony,” Black coaches in the NFL, and Enoch Powell. About half, though, are book reviews. Currently up: a history of Liberia, a biography of the explorer H. M. Stanley, and a new book by UC Davis economist Gregory Clark, The Son Also Rises, attacking the consensus about social mobility. Just displaced was a long, thoughtful review by Taylor himself of N.Y. Times science reporter Nicholas Wade’s forthcoming book, A Troublesome Inheritance: Genes, Race, and Human History.

The linked news articles include research by geneticists, behavioral psychologists, and demographers; reports from European sources on nationalist movements on the continent; and, occasionally, opinion pieces from elsewhere. There are also stories about flagrant impositions of political correctness, or the loopy opinions of pop cultural icons and politicians. But a good number, and those attracting the most comments, are reports of particularly brutal crimes or other pathological behavior by African-Americans, Hispanics, or Muslims.

One of the services of the internet is to make local news national news. Most of the crime stories are submitted by readers from local media. A surprising number, however, come from the Daily Mail and other UK papers, which are much less inhibited in reporting such subversive information–and the grim news from South Africa as well.

Asked about the difficulties of administering the site–preserving First Amendment rights that are almost non-existent outside of the internet, but eliminating offensive comments, and then asked to define “offensive,” Taylor preferred to talk about good manners.

“When people can post comments anonymously, they often write crude, offensive things they would never say to someone’s face. At first I was surprised and disappointed–how could people who generally agree with us be so uncivilized?–but every website has this problem. Most of our commenters learn good manners eventually; those who don’t get the boot.”

But if commenters don’t use vulgar language, they are free to say what they like about African-Americans, and of course the stories of heinous crimes are red meat to readers. While it may be cathartic for Whites to write things they are unable to say in public under the multicultural regime, the comments on the news stories undoubtedly lend credence to the familiar accusation of “hate-mongering.”

The crime stories sometimes inspire more interesting comments: accounts by readers of their own experiences with minorities and with the enforcers of multiculturalism. Blacks, just under 13% of the population, commit 52% of murders and still higher percentages of other violent crimes, and about 90% of all inter-racial violence is attacks by Blacks on Whites. So lots of readers have first-hand experience of the subject. Some have written about the transformation of their neighborhoods or towns. Other news stories generate more amusing anecdotes: tipping by Blacks in restaurants, adventures at the DMV, etc.

Still, the stream of abuse is depressing, and it troubles Taylor.

“I wish our commenters were better behaved. I agree that they are sometimes mean-spirited, and I wish nothing ever appeared on the site that was mean-spirited.

“On the other hand, I don’t like censorship, and deleting comments is a kind of censorship. This is a dilemma faced by all sites that permit commenting.”

Derogatory comments about Asians, less frequent, naturally, sometimes elicit counter-attacks by others. One of the divisions among readers seems to be between “White Nationalists,” who want to see the return of a White ethnostate, and color-blind “race realists,” who admire East Asians for their high IQs and test scores and low crime rates, and, occasionally, Hispanics for their work ethic. The defenders are are usually outnumbered and outgunned.

Some stories inspire outbursts of antisemitism. The comments receiving the most positive ratings on a recent report about research on the slave trade in early medieval Eastern Europe blame this on the Jews and defend pogroms. In fact the trade was carried out by Scandinavians, the original “Rus,” who founded the great entrepôts of Novgorod and Kiev and shipped blondes along with grain, furs, wax, and honey down the Volga and Dnieper to the Caspian and the Black Sea.

Like the vilifications of Asians, negative comments on Jews will also sometimes get sharp responses. From the occasional complaints of those making antisemitic comments and the sly and oblique way Jews are referred to, one gathers there is some censorship of antisemitism.

On “the Jewish question,” Taylor seems to walk a tightrope.

On the one hand, he has written, “People who are constantly talking about and complaining about Jewish influence remind me of blacks who think that everything that’s ever gone wrong for blacks is because of white racism. I think that blacks need to be responsible for the their successes and failures and whites do as well.” About half the speakers at the first AmRen conference were Jewish, and Jews continue to attend conferences and support the organization. Antisemitic intellectuals like Kevin MacDonald do not write for the site nor are invited to conferences. (There are, incidentally, occasional Black, Asian, and American Indian contributors of articles. These tend to be unusual individuals.)

When David Duke rose from the audience at the 2006 AmRen conference and addressed members and was rebuked by a Jewish participant, physicist Michael Hart, Taylor’s response was regarded as too tepid by Hart’s defenders, while fans of the former Grand Wizard thought he’d come down too hard on their man. The antisemitic right considers him a panderer.

Taylor acknowledges the animosity of a lot of his followers toward Jews: “Racially conscious whites tend to be suspicious of Jews for two reasons. First, Jews have been prominent in the effort to demonize any sense of white identity. Second, Zionist Jews support an ethnostate for Jews–Israel–while they generally promote diversity for America and Europe. This is annoying, but understandable for historical reasons.”

With 1.7 million Arabs, over 20% of the population, Israel is of course hardly an ethnostate. There was good reason these citizens, almost alone in the Middle East, took no part in the “Arab Spring”: they have all the rights of Jewish Israelis except the obligation to serve in the army and have no wish to be governed by the brutal and corrupt “Palestinian” parties. And many more American Jews are leftists rather than Zionists, and a number have been vocal critics of Israel. It is certainly true, though, that Jewish organizations have strongly supported open borders, ignoring the fact that the values of the 21st century’s “huddled masses” don’t bode well for Jews. And organizations like the ADL have led the attack on First Amendment rights.

Is Taylor then a “White Nationalist”?

He rejects the term: “To me, it has an unpleasant whiff of gunpowder. One thinks of Basque nationalists and Kurdish nationalists. But,” he adds, “I entirely agree with the concept of an ethnostate that reflects the heritage and aspirations of a people.” He prefers the French word “identitaire,” but there’s no English equivalent.

“There is no good term for racially conscious white people. This is because their views were taken for granted and needed no name. How did contemporaries characterize the racial view of Thomas Jefferson–or those of Abraham Lincoln or Teddy Roosevelt or of Woodrow Wilson? There was no word for someone with their views for the same reason there was no word for someone who expected the sun to rise in the East or who loved his own children more than he loved the children of strangers: Our language does not need words for unnecessary distinctions.  My views on race are natural, normal, healthy, and entirely moral, just as Lincoln’s were.”

But can they be the basis for a political movement?

When the Prussian General August von Gneisenau wrote a passionate letter to King Frederick William in 1811 urging that he call a levée en masse and wage a war of liberation against the French occupiers of Prussia, the King wrote back, “Good, as poetry.”  Gneisenau heatedly replied: “Religion, prayer, love of one’s ruler, love of fatherland–these things are nothing else than poetry. There is no lifting of the heart that is not attuned to poetry. The man who acts only in accord with cold calculation becomes an inveterate egoist. Upon poetry is founded the security of the throne.”

Is there poetry in the word “White”? Or is it a term that defines one only in relation to non-whites, something to check off on an application? Whites may prefer to live and work among other Whites, but do they feel for them the kind of emotional bonds that are necessary for a successful political movement?

Such bonds no doubt exist among the descendants of Europeans emigrating to the U.S. after the mid-19th century. A believer in the influence of biology on behavior should not be surprised that Italian-Americans, Polish-Americans, etc. would identify with their fellow ethnics, with whom they have a genetic affinity. Even if the identity rests only on a taste for the foods one ate as a child, the first phrases and gestures one learned, etc., these are powerful influences. But Taylor has a more traditional take:

“The United States actually had a melting pot that produced a new, American alloy so long as the ingredients were European. After three generations, European immigrants were largely indistinguishable in average income, education, and likelihood of marrying across European ethnic groups. Today, being Italian or Irish is not a full-fledged identity for many Americans; only a pleasant tingle on Saint Patrick’s Day or when the Italians make it to the World Cup final.”

Hyphenated Americans will have to decide for themselves the validity of this. It does mean that the access to campus for Taylor’s supporters is limited. You can set up a table for an Irish-American club or Italian-American club and maybe even a European-American club alongside the tables for the Hispanic, Asian, and Muslim organizations, but it’s going to be a lot tougher getting official recognition for a White Students’ Association.

Bonds that united White Americans are fraying in other ways. For 200 years, until the end of the ‘60s, schoolchildren learned about the heritage of Greece and Rome, read Caesar, Cicero, and Tacitus in Latin, etc. When Americans wanted to build a new city hall, bank, or post office, they constructed a Greek temple. They also studied the ideas of the Founding Fathers and learned about the unprecedented achievements of America during its first two centuries. The history of the country now taught in most schools is a litany of crimes and misdemeanors.

Taylor is both optimistic and pessimistic about the future.

On the one hand, he sees a growth of “race-realism.”

“There are two very clear signs of this. One is the comments sections of mainstream Internet news sites. More and more Americans are pointing out the obvious so long as they can remain anonymous.

“The other is the reaction I get on radio call-in programs. Years ago, I got many hostile calls. I still get hostile calls, but I am almost as likely to have to fend off flattery.”

But this doesn’t seem to be the result of cause célèbres like the Zimmerman case.

“Surprisingly, public events do not seem to change many peoples’ minds. We have published many reader accounts of what led them to shed their illusions. A few people mention the O.J. Simpson verdict or the Los Angeles riots, but most people’s eyes are opened by personal experience. There are many paths to enlightenment.”

He takes heart from the events of 1989:

“History is full of surprises. Who would have predicted the French, Russian, or American revolutions? More to the point, who predicted the collapse of Soviet Communism? Like the United States today, the Soviet Union was built on a misreading of human nature. Like America’s current orthodoxy, Communism seemed impregnable. And yet, as soon as the regime began to crumble, support melted away.

“As Horace pointed out, ‘You can drive out Nature with a pitchfork, but she always returns.’ The Soviet Union proved that a society built on illusion can last far longer than it deserved to, but people can be tricked for only so long into pretending that they are on their way to a classless society or that diversity is strength.

“It is impossible to predict what form the collapse will take. Marxism, for example, disappeared practically overnight in the Soviet Union but still survives in American universities. No system so thoroughly based on illusion can survive for ever, so American orthodoxy will collapse eventually.”

Nationalist parties are thriving in Europe, and AmRen provides good coverage of them. Interestingly, while many of Taylor’s “paleo-con” and “alternate right” allies are nearly as hostile to Israel as the American left, these parties, in Western Europe, are much more supportive of the Jewish state than mainstream parties.

“Muslim immigration explains most of the difference. Muslims are behind much of the anti-Semitism in Western Europe today, and this gives European Jews a realistic perspective both on non-European immigration and on the nationalist parties that oppose it. Muslim immigration also shapes the European nationalist view of Israel as a land of fellow Westerners fighting a hostile Islamic tide.”

But the American political system works against the creation of viable third parties here.

“The United States is one of the least democratic of democracies, in that our system practically bars the door against anyone not a Republican or a Democrat. Who is served by such an oppressive system? Why, the very Republicans and Democrats who pass our laws and the lobbies that cultivate them. It is this closed political structure, not a lack of racial identity, that prevents political progress.

“Imagine a system of proportional representation, and a list of attractive race-realist candidates. How many votes would we win? Fifteen percent? Twenty percent? A majority of the white vote in the rural South? As parliamentary democracies in Europe show, numbers like that have a powerful impact on policy.”

So what will the U.S. look like in 2034?

“Mark Twain pointed out that it is difficult to make predictions, especially about the future. I can imagine a rapid disintegration of illusions, perhaps stimulated by nationalist breakthroughs in Europe, but I can also imagine marching down the road to nowhere for another 20 years.

“By 2034, if current trends continue, the United States will have a bare majority of whites, many of whom will be elderly. The working-age population will be heavily black and Hispanic. To give you an idea of what sort of country we will have, I could cite endless statistics on rates of crime, AIDS, diabetes, poverty, welfare dependence, etc. but I’ll cite just one figure. By the time they graduate from high school, blacks and Hispanics are reading and doing math at the level of the average white 8th grader. That will not have changed in 20 years, and it will mean we are well on our way to becoming another Brazil.

“We will have a painfully stratified society, run by a mixed elite that keeps the masses of poor browns and blacks at a safe distance. Our rulers will continue to mouth slogans about equality and redemption-through-diversity but their lives will be even more hypocritical than they are today. They will live in fortified enclaves, and will increasingly see America not as a beloved nation whose destiny they hold in trust but as a herd to be milked. In 20 years, their cynicism will have begun to dull the patriotism even of Southern whites.

“Our increasingly Third-World and unproductive population will force more cities into bankruptcy, and the federal government will lurch from crisis to crisis. Our decline in world stature will not be graceful.

“There will still be pockets of white civility, but only for the wealthy. The middle class will shrink, as school quality declines and more and more whites are forced into low-wage service jobs. Marriage will increasingly be a relic practiced only by the elite, and more whites will copy the degenerate behavior of the black and Hispanic underclasses.

“We will slowly lose the public trust and moral infrastructure that prevents bribery, nepotism, kickbacks, and government looting. Politicians will begin to buy and rig elections, especially at the local level. Fewer people will feel they have a stake in society, so there will be less volunteer work or charitable giving.

“Too pessimistic? Show me trends that prove me wrong.”

Taylor’s views, according to political elites, their media allies, and the indoctrinated, are not only wrong, but evil.

“When I began this work 25 years ago, I was naïve enough to think that because I am right and have a pure heart, I could reach and persuade ever larger numbers of people. I did not understand the forces opposed to me or how fearful Americans have become.

“There are powerful organizations, such as the Anti-Defamation League and the Southern Poverty Law Center, that do their best to silence me. If I am on a television or radio program, they call the producer to explain that despite my reasonable tone I am a ‘hate-monger’ who must not be allowed on the air again. If they learn that I have been invited to give a talk, they call the organization that invited me and try to persuade it to cancel the talk.

“At first, I was astonished by this kind of thuggery. Americans claim to be devoted to free speech, but they are not. It is disgraceful that organizations whose purpose is not to refute their opponents but simply to squash and silence them have any credibility at all. And yet the media routinely cite these groups as if they were so blissfully wise that they can read my mind and tell you what I really think.

“People who immigrated from the Soviet Union were amazed to find that Americans are more afraid of the ‘diversity’ regime than Russians were of the Communists. And at least under the Soviets there was a clear enemy: the censors and the secret police. In America–the land of the free–every man is his own commissar.”

When they are not abruptly cancelled, Taylor’s appearances on campus have been disrupted. When the organization tried to place ads in more than a dozen college newspapers saying simply “Is diversity a strength? We think not. For an alternate view: AmRen.com,” no paper would run the ad. New Century Foundation holds an annual conference in April. This year’s is the 25th through 27th, outside Nashville. In 2010 and 2011 it was scrubbed at the last minute because of threats to the hotels hosting the events. The website was taken down by hackers just last Sunday.

Though his first two books had received glowing reviews from the likes of the Wall Street Journal and sold well, two agents were unable to find a publisher for White Identity. NCF published the book. Taylor is not in bad company: the foundation is the publisher of what is easily the best book on Affirmative Action in college, law and medical school admissions, The Affirmative Action Hoax by former Professor of Classics at University of Witwatersrand in South Africa, Steven Farron. But Taylor’s book has not received the attention it would have if it had been released by a commercial press.

Even those who question the viability of White nationalism or disagree with it in principle, and who would argue that creed is more important than color and that they would rather spend an evening with Thomas Sowell, Walter Williams, Clarence Thomas, etc. than with any White liberal, have to be troubled by the machinations of the P.C. regime.

The First Amendment was the first Amendment for a reason. It will not be defended in federal courts until a Republican President is willing to appoint judges who respect the Constitution. I’m told there are a few out there.

In the meantime, those who value free speech ought to think about doing what they can to retire the word “racist.” A member of La Raza is not a racist; a European-American who questions preferential treatment for minorities is. The word is a slur, with all the sophistication and precision of “commie” or “Nazi.” Today it says more about the intelligence of the accuser than the sins of the accused.

Topics: , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • dd121

    May his “racist heart” beat strongly for many years to come.

    • MekongDelta69

      “Race realist” heart!

    • Berkeley Guy

      Indeed. It should not be against any policy anywhere on Earth that our absolute right to free speech is impinged, unless it is very special circumstances that would override someone’s absolute right to life or liberty (very difficult to think of edge cases).

      I am taking PHIL 138: Philosophy of Society right now, and we are learning about John Searle’s distinction of positive and negative rights (Chapter 8 of Making the Social World). Human rights entail obligations by every other human to recognize those rights. Examples of positive rights include the right to housing, education, food, and other things that would force obligations on all of us to provide those things for every other human being. Searle asserts, and I agree, that such positive rights are ridiculous because they impinge on our negative rights. Negative rights require that they are collectively recognized, no laws may be passed against them, and that basically you are ‘left alone’ to exercise those rights, such as the right to free speech, free expression, privacy, freedom of action and travel.

      Notice that rights are against someone or something. Our right to free speech is against the power of our government to make laws against it, and it is against other people from impinging on it. Positive rights would create a mess due to this fact–someone’s right to food would be against my family’s cupboard.

      People who try to actively suppress free speech and free expression eventually fail. Today in lecture, Searle notes that when Berkeley was the first campus to implement Affirmative Action, he asked one of the key people involved if white males will be specifically discriminated against. Searle then went on to say that he was lied to, and that indeed white males were discriminated against. And AA has changed definitions: once it was that people who formerly could not compete in particular areas in society will be encouraged to compete, but now the definition is that some “other” people are discriminated against so that whoever benefits will benefit from the discrimination against “others.” AA has failed at Berkeley, and it is no longer implemented.

      • There can be no such things as “positive rights,” it’s a contradiction in terms. I can have all the free speech I want without affecting you one bit. But if it’s said that I have a “right” to “housing, education, food,” etc., it means that someone else has to pay for it if I can’t do so myself. Another problem is that thinking of both negative liberties and positive “rights” as the same thing creates legal contradictions and paradoxes that means you’ll have either fewer negative liberties or fewer positive “rights.”

        Keep in mind that the empty suit taking up space in 1600 Penna Ave right now has this kind of mentality, and I don’t mean mine:

        www (dot) youtube (dot) com/watch?v=2jr9mLB3yKs

        • Berkeley Guy

          That there can be no positive rights is basically what I am arguing. I believe we are in agreement. There can be the idea of what a positive right is, but it is not the intuitive definition of “positive” that some would, on the face of the expression “positive rights,” believe to be the case. Positive rights entail that I have obligations, and so do you, to every other human being on Earth such that we provide them with clothing, shelter, housing, etc. ad nauseum. No one is allowed to impinge on our negative rights (here negative means that no action is necessary to have these rights–we are born with the ability of speech, action, etc.) to satisfy their positive rights (positive action would be required by us).

          What is required by negative rights is that we are left alone to exercise our right to free speech or to bear arms, and no laws can abridge them.

          • Geo1metric

            “… but it is not the intuitive definition of “positive”…”.

            I’m not sure there is an “intuitive” definition of positive. Most understand what positive means from context and from 5th grade “spelling” class.

            To use the word the way Searle uses it, seems to me to be one of those academic obfuscations to purposely confuse the issues.

          • Berkeley Guy

            Intuitive definitions are debatable.

            The las thing Searle wants to do is to purposely confuse any issue. From Chapter 8 of Making the Social World:
            “Furthermore, there has been a subtle shift since the eighteenth century. At the time the American Declaration of Independence and Bill of Rights were written, the rights that were supposedly self-evident were all negative rights. That is, they did not require any positive action on the part of the state or anybody else. They simply required that the state not interfere in such things as free expression or the keeping and bearing of arms.”

            Read Chapter 8 for yourself, and see if he tries to obfuscate any point.

          • Geo1metric

            “That is, they did not require any positive action on the part of the state or anybody else.”

            That’s what “endowed by their Creator” means. Inborn, innate, unalienable.

          • Berkeley Guy

            Yes.

            I am not religious myself, and know a lot of people who are not religious. There seems to be a large secular group of Europeans and European Americans who could possibly be swayed by fallacious arguments against human rights such as free speech or freedom of associaition. Maybe modern discussions by Searle and others will help them see that human rights should be recognized as universal. New York gun laws seem to me to be a great example of what happens when states impose their will on basic human rights.

            These are just my tentative thoughts on the matter. What do you think we should do? I think it would be a mistake to ignore Euro/Euro-American atheists.

          • Geo1metric

            I’m not particularly Christian/religious myself. Being “religious” is something else.

            I would not “ignore” anyone who is contributing to the fight for White interests.

            I also think that those basic “human rights” apply to all humans. I think the writers of the Declaration of Independence thought so too.

            Those “founding fathers” were not all Christian, and I think that Jefferson, the author of the Declaration, would have said that these “unalienable” rights were for all humans. The “Creator” part was to emphasize that these rights were not “given” by any State (political entity).

          • Berkeley Guy

            Nicely put.

        • sbuffalonative

          I don’t know the origins of ‘positive rights’ and how long the idea has been around.

          I do see this idea increasingly co- opted and promoted by the ‘progressive’ left.

          It’s an idea which needs to be addressed, challenged, and pointed out as a fallacy whenever it is uttered.

          • Berkeley Guy

            It is fallacious to assert that I must give you a bite of my sandwich since you have a right to food. Or even that I must spend my energy by giving you a ten-finger boost into the apple tree to grab some food. Or more generally that I must spend my time and resources in helping you to secure food since I would have the obligation to do so.

          • Geo1metric

            “…since you have a right to food.”

            Is that an unalienable right?

          • Berkeley Guy

            That would be what the fallacious argument would assume: that every person has an inalienable right to food. No such right exists or even could exist, for one reason because of the nature of competition between organisms. This is why communism and socialism fail–the implementation will always lack an understanding of our competitive nature. Capitalism will always trump communism and socialism due to this inherent failing.

          • Geo1metric

            Agree. “…by the sweat of your brow…”

  • I’m surprised. American Thinker was a publication that at least in the past tried to distance itself from “evil racists” like us.

    • ricpic

      Ditto. Really surprised at how tempered the comments were over there. Encouraging.

    • Jesse James

      American Thinker is a tribe site, I was a bit surprised but remember that Jared Taylor has always been open minded regarding those folks. I made a post on that thread this morning, it would be a good idea if we all checked in over there to add some good vibes and truth to the discussion. It is very interesting that Jared is got such a good intro over there as it may introduce Amren in a positive way to a whole new crowd.

      • QuinnTheEskimo9

        I read a sneering, contemptuous tone from the author.

        But why should he care? He’s not White and it’s not happening to HIS people.

        • Jesse James

          Like I said Quinn, American Thinker is a site that caters to a conservative Jewish perspective. I have read it for a number of years and there are definitely a lot of comments and essays that I don’t agree with. It does have a lot of regular slightly to the right of moderate people who would provide valuable perspective and might be interested in checking out what Amren is all about. To me this is a good recruiting opportunity to help spread some of the ideas and concerns that most of us share. I agree with you about the tone being a bit snarky but imagine what type of self righteous condemnation you would get from a mainstream conservative type like Shaun Hannity for a bit of perspective.

          • QuinnTheEskimo9

            Hannity is completely irrelevant. He is not pro-white and is doing the bidding of those who pay him.

            He is pro-open-borders which makes him an enemy of White Americans and part of the opposition. No wonder he’s falling in the ratings.

          • BonV.Vant

            I can not bear to listen to it.

          • sbuffalonative

            Hannity sounds like someone who would say anything for the right amount of money.

            I wouldn’t be surprised if could be bought out and began speaking out about how he was ‘blinded by the right’.

          • RisingReich

            I refer to his show as ‘The Hannity Propaganda Hour’.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            I find American Thinker overly religious in general.
            TakiMag is in my top 5 lately.
            Conservatives need to lighten up on Bible thumping a little.

          • Brutus

            On the contrary, a non-Christian conservatism is a conservatism in search of something to conserve.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            FISCAL CONSERVATISM

        • BonV.Vant

          he can always benefit from that “law of return” which only applies to jews…but israel is not an “ethnostate” don’t you know

        • sbuffalonative

          I picked that up a couple of times but I believe the author may be trying to create a bridge between AR and AT.

          On balance it’s pretty evenhanded. I wouldn’t nit pick or make an issue of it.

          Let’s not create enemies.

      • LovelyNordicHeidi

        I was away for a few days, because I was reading some books and reflecting upon some heavy stuff, but I have decided I will come back a few days to help you recruiting on that site. I was actually surprised by that article. I will start with commenting later today. I first have to finish what I was doing, and thereafter I will try to put out a good word for our folks.

    • NeanderthalDNA

      I thought it was a remarkably fair appraisal.

      “There was no single epiphany after Yale and Sciences Po. “I clung to liberal fantasies as long as I could. It is pleasant to feel oneself superior to mean-spirited conservatives. Agreeable delusion fought a slow, losing battle against disagreeable reality.”

      I love JT. It’s uncanny how similar some of his ideas are to mine. So American Thinker – non-race realist types? Just conservatives, libertarian types? Yeah I know, google it.

      Very good, accurate, exhaustive appraisal. Refreshing.

      Identist? Identitist? “Identist” sounds like “dentist” but “identitist” has the word. “tit” in it. We appear linguistically challenged in finding an identity, eh?

      • There’s another point. JT himself said that racial egalitarianism is just another moral superiority fashion accessory, a status symbol.

        • AndrewInterrupted

          Yes, but how much ‘Passover Syndrome’ (Jim Goad), too?

      • sbuffalonative

        I was surprised to learn Mr. Taylor was a former liberal. This is the first time I learned the origins of his views.

        • NeanderthalDNA

          Me too. Never knew. Perhaps there’s hope for me too, lol…

          • LovelyNordicHeidi

            There’s always hope for Neanderthals.

            Once I was a liberal too, but then I became pro-Neanderthal.

            I became one of ’em realist Neanderthals, ya know.

          • NeanderthalDNA

            You’re a pure delight and your intellectual blossoming has been a thing of beauty and inspiration. If I’ve helped in any way, I’m honored and blessed, Valkyrie.

        • I started from the other side. As a young man, I was much like Mr.Spartacus. When I was 30, my mother showed me family pictures – Daguerrotypes – of ancestors. Two women and a man looked completely Amerind. One of the women looked like Geronimo in drag. She fought alongside her husband for the Confederacy. I have fair skin and pass for a Celt, but I tan very easily.

          I once thought druggies should all be executed: the users and not just the dealers. I have moderated (pun intended). My cellmate at the Federal Detention Center started using methamphetamines because he never got over his mother dying of cancer. Thankfully, my own mother is still alive. I’d rather die first,

          I was once a fascist, probably very much like Mr. Spartacus. I was never a member of the Klan, Aryan Nations, or even later in federal prison the Aryan Brotherhood. Hate and anger were, however my old addictions.

          To the extent that I have recovered, I am delighted. To the extent that Mr. Taylor has recovered, doubtless he is also happy.

          • NeanderthalDNA

            Sparty. Haven’t seen him for a bit. Hope our resident Dracula is doing ok.

          • Sangraal

            Apparently he was banned…

          • The Verdict of History

            J. Eng. may also have been removed… he’s been entirely absent as of late.

          • NeanderthalDNA

            I doubt it. He’s been published here. It would have to be really bad for YJ to get bum rushed.

            Sparty? Love the guy but…pushed the borders relentlessly, lol…not so surprised there…

            Hey Sparty. I know you’re still out there. At least you’re notorious now. Hope you’re OK.

            I think he’ll be OK. Tough kid, and “banning” is ultimately a form of time out. He should come back as “Decebulus”, king of Dacia. More Romanian.

      • Sangraal

        ‘Identitarian’ works well. I also prefer it to ‘White Nationalist’, which to me has a distinctly American context.

        • NeanderthalDNA

          Identitarian? That sounds good. Better than my musings. I have no problem with “racialist” or “race realist”, but that’s rather generic, in that my primary loyalty is to my own.
          a
          “White Identitarian”? Polysyllabic mouthfull but sums it up pretty well.

        • Brutus

          “Identitarian” sounds too generic, as if it supports people in having identities. “White Christian Conservative” works for me.

        • Anna Tree

          Like NeanderthalDNA, I have no problem with racialist and race realist, but I don’t mind identitarian.

          “White indentitarian” is used by Ryan Andrew in his book The Birth of Providence (see Amren article).
          French Alain de Benoist also uses it in “identitarian feminism”, the good feminism as per Mr. Benoist.

    • Conrad

      Maybe someone over there is starting to wake up.

    • sbuffalonative

      I have sent AR many a piece from AT that share similar themes but none are ever posted.

      I hope the two can work in conjunction and find common ground. We may not agree on every issue but AT does share and advocate many of our views; if expressed in slightly different terms.

      • Geo1metric

        “We” will never agree on “every issue” and if we let that keep us separated, we will never, ever be successful in saving ourselves. This is, for me, one of the things I worry about with our cause.

  • Kathy M

    A pretty accurate and fair article for a change. Words of wisdom by JT as always. We do need some kind of political organization though. We need large numbers of whites to become more aware of racial realities, how these things affect whites, and where it is leading to. Just need to keep the neo Ns at bay so that we can attract more whites.

    • MBlanc46

      Absolutely. We’ll never achieve a hearing in the public sphere until we start appearing in public.

    • QuinnTheEskimo9

      What is your definition of a neo-Nazi?

      • So CAL Snowman

        Anyone that disagrees with the view that the Nazis were the most evil and terrible organization in the history of the world, evah.

        • QuinnTheEskimo9

          But not Stalin. Uncle Joe helped to slay the evil Nazis, who were trying to stop him and his murderous programs, so therefore HE gets a pass in the history books.

        • Kathy M

          It is all I can do to keep from revealing who you actually are to the group here.

          “Hitler was right.” — So CAL Snowman

          You are trying to sabotage this site in my opinion. Try getting any kind of political movement started with statements like that.

          • BonV.Vant

            grow a set, you are way past menopause already anyway

          • Katherine McChesney

            Your comment is similar to the ones that fueled feminism. It’s sexist and exposes you as a verbally abusive man.

          • BonV.Vant

            your comment is an example of why men should ignore women when they open their mouths

          • NeanderthalDNA

            It’s really a way of hitting below the belt for a woman. Verbal donkey punch. Mean. Makes girls cry. Probably will get moderated.

          • Laika

            In many instances, Hitler WAS right.

            His purpose was to create a homeland for HIS people, get out from under the truly unfair Versailles Treaty, stop the banksters from raping his country and, importantly, to stop the march of communism in Europe.

            He was anti-Communist and pro-German. He wanted a homeland for the Jews just as he wanted one for his own people. He created an economic miracle in Germany that hasn’t been duplicated to this day, in a country that was starving and inflated to death after Versailles. He put people back to work and created a pro-German banking system while FDR’s policies made Americans poorer.

            What was wrong with that? Better that we supported Stalin and his bloodthirsty Reds who used food as a weapon in the Ukraine?

            You need to go back to your professors and get your money back, you’ve been taught revisionist, statist history where Nazis were responsible for ALL atrocities ever in WW II and fought only to kill off the Jews, but Stalin is the good guy.

          • Alexandra1973

            The Holocaust was no more than an Inquisition. It wasn’t just Jews that were slaughtered, but all other kinds of “heretics,” including priests, monks, nuns, etc., that wouldn’t go along with Mama Church.

            http://www(dot)remnantofgod(dot)org/nazircc.htm (Disclaimer: I do not endorse all that is taught on this site, but this particular section I find pretty good.)

            And a REALLY good article: http://www(dot)arcticbeacon(dot)com/confessions/29-Oct-2006.html

          • Anna Tree

            Laika, I think So Cal Snowman was sarcastic.

          • Laika

            I was not replying to So Cal Snowman. If you look directly right of my avatar you’ll see I was replying to Kathy M.

          • Anna Tree

            Oops, my bad, I apologize: I saw a coma where there was none 🙂

          • Dr. Möbias

            Congratulations. I was wondering when someone would invoke Goodwin’s Law to divert and deflect the thread.

            You’ve reduced the rest of the thread to “Reductio ad Hitlerum”

            IOW, People who resort to Godwin’s Law are just like Hitler.

          • HamletsGhost

            Well, Hitler seemed to have quite a movement going for a while. Maybe speaking the truth to people instead of lying to them will earn you their respect instead of their contempt.

          • NeanderthalDNA

            He lied often. Sometimes purposely, sometimes he seemed to believe his lies very strongly.

            He mixed ideological truths with real truths as much as did Stalinists.

            He was insane and the opiate-like effect of absolute power was too much for him. He made massive, hubris enabled strategic errors and time and again contravened the judgment of his best generals, resulting in the capture and loss of perhaps over a million of Germany’s most effective and well trained soldiers.

            By the time Rommel and company tried to blow him up many of the general staff detested the man and I understand why.

          • HamletsGhost

            When and where did he lie? Did he lie about the Jews, or are the Jews lying about him? Look up the origins of the Big Lie in MK and compare it to the kosher send-up of it today, and you’ll know who’s lying.

          • NeanderthalDNA

            Maybe lots of people lied.

            He lied to his own military, promising them to not begin the big war until 41 or 42. He lied to Mussolini in similar fashion. He lied, or had his propaganda ministry lie about what was happening in concentration camps.

            I suppose we’re accepting as fact the protocols of Zion stuff, which I do not accept as fact.

            I don’t ascribe any kind of saintliness to the Hebrews. I have noticed that when one population of people appear to have about 15 points of IQ over another and materially prosper thereby, they always seem to be used as rich, evil, scapegoats for all the problems suffered by the poor, good folk.

            Like how American blacks blame Whites for all their problems and pathologies.

          • He lied when he said that the Czech Sudentland would be his last territorial demand. He took all of Bohemia and Moravia and then invaded Poland.

          • tlk244182

            I was very surprised at the personality I met in Mein Kampf (Manheim trans.) Not at all what I had been led to expect. I used to view him as Satan’s secular counterpart (to borrow from Irmin Vinson.) Now I see him as the protagonist of a great tragedy, who started out to save his people and ended by nearly destroying them. Stalin has replaced him, in my mind, in the role of quintessential villain.

          • So CAL Snowman

            Yes Hitler should have listened to his generals regarding military strategy and tactics. His failure to reinforce Rommel with a Panzer division in North Africa, his failure to take Moscow, and his failure to retreat the 6th army at Stalingrad ultimately cost Germany the war. However, World War 2 history is so convoluted that I don’t think we can lay the military defeat of Germany solely upon the shoulders of Adolf.

          • NeanderthalDNA

            That’s a good question – probly can’t be answered, just guessed at. Hitler certainly had a powerful charisma and was masterful at gaining and holding power. I wonder if he could have done it sans demonization of “the Jews”? Guess that’s the question, eh?
            Could Hitler have risen to power and so mobilized his (amazing) folk without selling the Jews to the devil along with his non-existent nihilistic soul? Mussolini managed without “going there”. Franco too. Guess there were just too many 115 average IQ types in Ashkenaz dominating various cultural and professional niches and supporting ideologies the overly IQ gifted fall for in droves sometimes…
            Seriously. If I were Hitler, I’d probably arm Euro-Jews, send them to boot the Brits out of the ME and deal with crazy Africanized muzzie Arabs in exchange for cheap oil, and let ’em be. Maybe even keep up amicable exchanges and trade, celebrate cultural commonalities and crap like that – I don’t know.
            But you know what? How many years did his thousand year Reich last, eh? And, no dissin’ the Nips, but Germany was the big dog of the Axis, and AH was at the helm and pretty well in control of a heckuva lot. Respondeat superior, eh?

          • So CAL Snowman

            Hitler was a Christian. Seriously read Mein Kampf and you will have a very clear understanding of who Hitler really was. Note that it took the combined might of the US, England, Canada, and The Soviets to defeat the tiny nation of Germany

          • Note also that the Hitlertard declared war on the United States a few days after Pearl Harbor and had earlier invaded the Soviet Union.

          • JSS

            Germany would have ended up fighting us eventually anyway because Roosevelt was desperate to get the U.S. into the war. Roosevelts open support for the Allies and Bolshiveiks and constant provocations against the Kreigsmarine in the Atlantic could only end one way.

          • If I had been Hitler, I would have danced with glee after Pearl Harbor and kept my mouth shut.

          • So CAL Snowman

            Of course, the USA was aiding the British like crazy. It was inevitable that the US would enter the war at some time or another. I see no real issue with Hitler invading the Soviet Union, I mean look at how far into the heart of Russia the Germans pushed the Soviets with their blitzkrieg. The Germans had an insanely high K/D ratio against the Soviet army. In my opinion they were TOO successful because they moved too far too fast. The German military also underestimated Soviet technology like the T-34.

          • Beloved Comrade

            The Soviet Union was heavily armed by the United States. If not, Germany would have destroyed the USSR. Too bad. We sided with the wrong allies.

          • I don’t think the Germans could have beaten the USSR. Slavic – but especially Russian – soldiers are very, very stubborn. Scots are probably the best at attacking, with Irish a close second. I once fought Serbs, and that was most unpleasant.

          • NeanderthalDNA

            I guess I’ll have to reread it. Been a while. I remember being initially enthralled. Very reasonable, pretty well written for a personal political diatribe. Reminded me a bit of “Thus Spake Zarathustra” (I prefer the archaicized translation), a work I like a lot, actually, taught to high school students for fun. But then there came a point where it started getting subtly…kind of…evocative of messianic craziness and some actual, well thought out and forcibly presented…craziness. Very subtle, but very obvious to me.

            Guess I’ll have to reread it.

          • Whitetrashgang

            Yes all jew controlled , most people are idiots. The only none jew controlled country Germany, people should think about that.

          • Whitetrashgang

            You are missing the point, but being Dutch Mennonite and my great grand parents being billionaire textile owners in Russia you have no real idea how bad the Jewish controlled government was .Your in a knife fight do you wait 2 years for a gun? As my grandmother use to say, animals their all animals, Jew and slav.

          • NeanderthalDNA

            If the average Ashkenazi Jew has a 115 IQ and the average Russian has 15 to 20 points less (the nobility and later non-Jew capitalists probably comparable to the Jews) then how could Jews not be over represented in certain higher IQ, money making endeavors?

            And let’s be honest, eh? EVERYONE hates bankers no matter what the ethnicity. Especially when they owe the dirty interest charging bastards the bling, HA HA!

            Even the best of folks are a-holes, you know? Nasty, short, and brutal…

          • The problem in North Africa is that the Italian navy started the war with 1.8 million tons of fuel oil and used 1/3 of that in the first six months: 600,000 tons. Supply of the Afrika Korps became impossible once Rommel outran his own lines of communication.

            The failure to withdraw the Sixth Army from Stalingrad is harder to explain. It was an exposed salient, and the Russian air force had recovered, so aerial resupply would not be easy the way it had been a year earlier outside Moscow. The Tenth Army under Hoth was supposed to help, but became bogged down at Sevastopol. They took Sevastopol, but couldn’t shift east fast enough.

            Corporal Hitler was brave enough during World War One, but that experience was on a nearly static front. His experience was thus limited to just that.

            I am very glad that while George Bush I played the United Nations like a fiddle, he gave Norman Schwartzkopf free rein in Gulf War One. The politicos get to make the decisions as to whom and where, but never how.

          • So CAL Snowman

            Rommel basically handed Hitler Egypt on a silver platter. The Afrika Korps were within striking distance of the Suez Canal and the Brits were getting their butts kicked in Libya and Greece. There’s no way the Brits survive an attack with armor and they could not have launched a counter offensive from Tabruk(?) I think was their main base there. Instead of concentrating manpower in Greece, Hitler should have just used those forces in North Africa. Germany could have taken the British completely out of the Mediterranean and rolled into the Middle East to resupply the oil they desperately needed.

          • The Afrika Korps was a bad dog on a short leash. The Italian navy needed more fuel oil to get the job in the central Mediterranean done: 100,000 tons a month.

            Kesselring wanted to take Malta, and was necessary as well.

          • So CAL Snowman

            Kathy I am but one of MANY who understand the truth. Open your eyes girl. I’m not a political leader and this war will not be won by a political party. Stop living 20th century delusions. 21st century problems require 21st century solutions.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Kathy is on a Hitler kick lately. But, I see your point. If the Libs effectively use certain words against you, don’t use them. You are aiding and abetting the enemy. That’s why I don’t describe the attack on European America as “genocide”, because the Libs know you take yourself out of the conversation when you do. They couldn’t be happier that you use a word they trained their poodles to snap at. When you use “race replacement” their poodles tilt their heads.

          • Cecil Broomsted

            The moderator seems to have inadvertantly deleted my comments while allowing the one accusing you of being past menopause was allowed to remain. Interesting.

            In any event, I was speaking of Hitler’s mental psychosis and was challenged to produce anything.

            Well, Psychoanalyst Dr. Walter C. Langer prepared a report for the OSS in late 1943. The purpose of the report was an in depth pschoanalysis of Hitler which was to be used by Allied Forces to predict Hitler’s future actions in the war. Another report was prepared by fellows from my home country, Britain, for the Psychological Warfare Department which reached similar conclusions as Dr. Langer’s OSS report.

            There were many findings that revealed Hitler’s inner machinations. One such finding that may interest you is that Hitler was a sexual masochist and derived “sexual gratification from the act of having a woman urinate or defecate on him.”

            This is a small nevertheless revealing aspect of the mass murderer’s psychosis.

          • NeanderthalDNA

            I have sometimes wondered about that poopy peepee thing. Pretty salacious stuff. Sounds suspiciously like Freudian mumbo jumbo. They were just discovering sex back then, you know, on the verge of a Boasian negrification of the understanding of all human sexuality.

            Of course maybe he was a perv. Germans have a reputation for that stuff.

          • Geo1metric

            War propaganda can be vicious.

          • JSS

            As well as being a psychoanalyst filth peddler Langer was also not an eskimo. How utterly predictable.

      • LACountyRedneck

        Anyone that talks about Jewish trouble-makers is a nazi. 😉

        • Alexandra1973

          What kind of Zionist are you referring to? There’s more than one kind. 🙂

    • NeanderthalDNA

      Are you Hitler bashing again, Kathy? He should have armed the European Jews and sent them to kick the Brits out of Egypt and given them Palestine. Here Jews, enjoy your crazy Africanized muslim buddies and give us a big discount on any oil you conquer.

      Instead he enlisted Arab Muslims into the Waffen SS. Check out these Aryans…

      The “Black Pete” one is my favorite. Nazis – saviors of the race…

      • JSS

        It’s so ironic that the evil racist Nazi war machine was more diverse then the Israeli army ever will be.

        • BonV.Vant

          There were even about 150,000 soldiers in his army that were half jewish.

          • Dr. Möbias

            In the high command too. But that will never be in any American history book.

      • coco bongo

        Are you praising Hitler again, NeanderthalDNA? It is stunning how you and your Hitler groupie’s comments are allowed to remain on this site when they so clearly clash with what Mr. Taylor believes and has so stated. Anyone praising one of the biggest mass murderers in human history obviously has mental issues.

        • Laika

          What is it he’s said that is untrue?

          Have you read the Jefferson comment at the top?

          Why you are you trying to silence anything or anyone’s opinion YOU don’t like?

          Instead of calling NeaderthalDNA a “Nazi” – typical tactic of lefties and Obama voters to silence opposition – how about telling him where he’s wrong exactly. How about debating instead of trying to silence? You’d have to ditch your Zinn history book, though, he’s been proved a fake and a fraud.

          I defy you or anyone else on this thread to disprove anything anyone here has said about Hitler or the Nazis.

          Bring it on.

          • NeanderthalDNA

            I was assuming he was being sarcastic, but now admit to a little ambiguity. I’ve never been a fan of Hitler.

            You know, you can go out to a bar and yell out , “Hail Satan!” and get more than a few chuckles, yuk yuks, and satanic hand signs. “Woot!” Hail Satan, man!”

            But bust out a “heil Hitler” and…

            They think yer a Satanist!

            That’s not my major problem with the guy, by the way, but it IS why hitlerphilia is doomed.

          • LACountyRedneck

            I highly doubt even in today’s ridiculous level of accusations that he’s ever been accused of being a Nazi.

        • Dr. Möbias

          “Are you praising Hitler again…”

          Reductio ad Hitlerum: I have no counter argument, therefore resort to calling adversaries Nazis or Hitler to silence them.

          IOW, People, like you, who resort to Godwin’s Law are just like Hitler.

        • So CAL Snowman

          The United States of America has killed more people than Nazi Germany could every dream of. Since the end of World War 2, the USA has been responsible for over 60 million deaths world wide.

        • Anna Tree

          Coco Bongo, NeanderthalDNA wasn’t praising Hitler (read other of his posts). His first sentence was to tease Kathy.

        • Geo1metric

          “Anyone praising one of the biggest mass murderers in human history obviously has mental issues.”

          Typical communist ploy: “anyone who disagrees with our “collectivist thought” must be insane”.

      • David Ashton

        There are several things that Hitler “should” and/or “could” have done, or not done.

        At this time long after WW2 it should be possible, however, to obtain a fairly accurate idea of his personality and policies. But a debate about the pros and cons of Hitler himself, a complex character who was neither the most evil man who ever lived nor the great savior of the white race, is not particularly suitable on this site. What is relevant is the extent to which Jewish fears about racial persecution, and their propensity to seek influence, are a major factor in the support that many of them have for multicultural societies and multiracial immigration, which can be legitimately opposed, and what should rationally be done about it.

        • HamletsGhost

          Jews in the USA already had widespread acceptance and influence by 1965 when they pushed to open the floodgates of immigration.
          Twenty years earlier their tribal kin were blessing the US GIs that rescued them from the concentration camps. Their children would later denounce the children of those same soldiers as baby-killers and war criminals.

          The same Jews who badgered the British to form a Jewish brigade to help fight the Germans would turn their guns on their former comrades in 1945 in Palestine before the fighting in Europe had even ended.

          Jews are incapable of feeling any lasting gratitude towards their benefactors. They’ll turn on anyone and everyone who counts them as a friend.

          You can’t pet a rattlesnake.

        • NeanderthalDNA

          “What is relevant is the extent to which Jewish fears about racial persecution, and their propensity to seek influence, are a major factor in the support that many of them have for multicultural societies and multiracial immigration, which can be legitimately opposed, and what should rationally be done about it.

          I agree, sir, though I nonetheless think it’s still a legitimate topic of conversation. Unavoidable ultimately. The key – which I’ve not always used myself – is to keep it as polite and…scholarly as possible. Within reasonable bounds for an article response section on a website, of course.

    • JSS

      If you want to keep fighting the good fight against the imaginary “Neo Ns” you should go join the FBI or SPLC.

      • coco bongo

        I think Mr. Taylor’s views are very close to what Kathy has posted here and not with you and your neo buds.

        • Laika

          How about pointing out exactly where JSS and anyone else on this thread is wrong instead of trying to silence anyone YOU disagree with by calling them a “Nazi” or neo-Nazi.

          Have you read the quote at the top? What is it you are afraid of that you need to silence someone?

          If JSS or anyone else on this thread is wrong, then it should be child’s play to disprove what they’re saying, instead of using the old lefty tactic of silencing your enemies by name-calling.

          That makes you a lefties akin to the Soviets who killed those whose opinions they didn’t like to silence them forever.

        • Dr. Möbias

          “not with you and your neo buds.”

          Reductio ad Hitlerum: When you have no counter-argument, data, or fact, no debate, no challenges, scream “HITLER” and “NAZI” to get your adversary to STFU.

          People who resort to Goodwin’s Law are just like Hitler.

          • tlk244182

            ISWYDT 😉

        • HamletsGhost

          So what? JT used to be a liberal until he saw the light. Maybe with time he’ll see the error of his ways with regard to the tribe.

      • BonV.Vant

        ABC, NBC, CBS, MGM, BBC, 20th Century FOX, NYT, etc…..

    • Bob Dole

      The brainwashing is strong with this one…

    • Cecil Broomsted

      Hitler was the logical conclusion of a conspiracy theorist gone mad. Amazing that he has supporters lurking about here. Like all mass murderers, Stalin, Pol Pot, Idi Amin, Talat Pasha, Genghis Khan, Mao Zedong, and others, Hitler had mental problems that worsened over time. These murderers were notorious for their megalomaniacal illusions of grandeur coupled with a complete lack of human empathy. They were not normal human beings.

      Hopefully, people visiting American Renaissance for the first time won’t be driven away by some of the deranged comments they see here that praise Hitler as some kind of hero.

      • Alexandra1973

        Hitler was just plain evil. I can understand–to a point–why a few here admire him. But genocide is not the solution.

        I for one am not about to jump on the “Jews run it all” bandwagon. That’s the only thing that irks me. If people actually woke up and did a bit of research, they’d find that that’s just a smokescreen. And Jews need to wake up and burn that damnable Talmud, and get a copy of the Torah. Better yet–get a New Testament (King James version) along with it.

        • saxonsun

          No way. If they got a NT, they wouldn’t be Jews anymore–which they have a right to be in their own way.

          • Alexandra1973

            There’s Judaism as a religion…then there’s being a racial Jew as in being descended from the house of Israel. Jews are not Caucasians or a subset of the White race.

            I was friends with a family of Messianic Jews when I was a child.

          • Katherine McChesney

            I have Hebrew friends in Nashville and Beverly Hills who are Messianics. They read the Torah during their Sabbath meetings but also use the New Testament as well. They, despite what saxonsun says are Jews to the core.

          • Alexandra1973

            A friend of mine has a message board set up for Jews, to bring them to their Messiah. I attended a church that supported missionaries to Israel.

            The problem is too many Jews think Catholicism is Christianity. They know who was behind the Holocaust. So you can imagine where things go from there.

          • Katherine McChesney

            I agree with you. There are people who deny the fact that RCC priests and a pope were Hitler supporters. But, it is a fact that their members are sadly unaware of their ‘church’s’ murderous history.

          • AutomaticSlim

            Most religions have a “murderous history”, unless you are Amish or something like that.

            Yes, my Church did some things in the past, some of them pretty bad, but the Protestants were no angels either. Ever heard of Oliver Cromwell?

          • Who Me?

            Any church or religion that professes belief in Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior is by definition “Christian”. So Catholics are by literal definition, “Christian”. (Now whether they follow His teachings or not, is another matter, and we could use the same yardstick on most if not all the Protestant religions, too.) No, I’m NOT a Catholic, nor am I a Christian of any sort, and sadly all too aware of the faults of any group (religion) that professes to believe in “pie-in-the-sky-bye-and-bye”.

        • HamletsGhost

          “Burn the damnable Talmud” eh?. Careful there, you’re about to get the Nazi tag from the Mo’ Dees.

      • LACountyRedneck

        It’s not so much Nazi supporters on this site as it is those that refuse to acknowledge the role Jews play in destroying White non-Jew societies. We focus on the role non-Jew Whites play and others but anyone talking about bad Jews here is too often being accused of being a Nazi. People doing that lose all cred. Leave the discussion to ALL those involved in destroying White societies. No one is doing more harm to us than our White traitor leaders and those they cater to including powerful Jews. This comment may be deleted solely because of one particular group I mentioned where had I substituted it for any other group, it would stay. What does that tell you?

        • NeanderthalDNA

          I’m not saying your points are invalid. I hate that too many Jews feel they have to support messianic democratic totalitarianism, and that many of these Jews control a lot of wealth.

          It’s just that you’re coming very close to what appears to be a quasi-conspiratorial blanket indictment of the Jews – partly for being successful in many endeavors and thereby having influence in whatever society they inhabit.

          I think it’s a person’s God given right to hate or love anybody, any group, but considering the history, even a reasonably watered down and polished up history…

          The topic is a very delicate one here. Rightfully so.

          I tell you what I don’t like. I don’t like messianic passive aggression regardless of source, and ironically I find it in hard core denialists and conspiricists in this regard.

          Here’s an interesting treatment of this…

          http://alternative-right.blogspot.com/2014/04/the-problem-of-passive-aggression-in.html

          • LACountyRedneck

            “It’s just that you’re coming very close to what appears to be quasi-conspiratorial blanket indictment of the Jews-partly for being successful in many endeavors and thereby having influence in whatever society they inhabit.”
            Please give me one example of what I’ve said that comes anywhere near what you mentioned here. Nowhere near anything I’ve said related to Jews have been quasi-conspiratorial. The fact is making statements regarding the damage involving Jews and what they are doing and have done is practically forbidden here. When I’ve mentioned many times that our White (non-Jewish) leaders are our biggest problem, or what blacks are doing, or what illegals or Hispanics, or any other group are doing that does us harm, I get no criticism.
            If a powerful group of Jews are doing White non-Jew society harm, I will hammer them. Instead of refusing to regularly talk about the harm they have done and still do, or simply not talking about them or suggesting others not talk about them, perhaps yourself and Kathy M should come out and educate others here and allow those that are educated to speak freely. I don’t belong to stormfront or any Nazi or skinhead groups. I enjoy this site because of Taylor and the civilized debate.
            Our biggest problem are our White traitor leaders. And those Jews that are involved by no means get a pass. I will talk about them just as much as I talk about any other trouble makers, and let the Am-Rem moderator decide whether or not it should stay. Now, Neanderthal, I ‘d like that example. One would suffice.

          • NeanderthalDNA

            “Now, Neanderthal, I ‘d like that example. One would suffice.”

            Keep your shorts on there Jr! What? Let me read that…

            OK, let me try this. And understand I find this distasteful, suspiciously similar to “kommissar work”, you know, parsing out damning phraseology and speech patterns in a Mephisophelean accusatory and morally unassailable manner that clue into deep, dark, evil thoughts…but then speech is documentable evidence of thoughtcrime, so let me parse this passage out, for instance…

            “The fact is making statements regarding the damage involving Jews and what they are doing and have done is practically forbidden here. When I’ve mentioned many times that our White (non-Jewish) leaders are our biggest problem, or what blacks are doing, or what illegals or Hispanics, or any other group are doing that does us harm, I get no criticism.”

            OK, pretty solid and devoid of suspicious thoughtcrime flags, except for “the damage involving Jews and what they are doing” might be juxtaposed with the fair number of Jews who post here and contribute here and consider themselves White.

            I guess it’s more of a courtesy thing. I’ve gone there a lot myself, so I’m REALLY not “witch hunting” you (a popular liblefty passive aggressive pastime), more just trying to figure out where – if anywhere – we are in substantive disagreement.

            You need a better avatar, by the way, ha ha.

          • LACountyRedneck

            I don’t see much if any disagreement between us other my being slightly more talkative about Jewish involvement in the matter. Bottom line is we’re both activists in trying to find a cure for our woes. There’s plenty of damage being done and too many of us are way too passive about it. Fight on, my friend.

          • NeanderthalDNA

            I agree. I love good, civilized, even if hard argued, debate. Consider it a very “White” trait.

            See ya in Valhalla, brother man. And here, lol…

          • Sangraal

            Damn I didn’t even realise alt-right had survived the radix-transformation in blogspot form. Looks like I have some catching up to do lol.
            That said, it’s probably for the best that I wasn’t aware of it. Internet commentary is not the best use of my (or the movement’s) time. It’s spring now, the unconquered sun has returned, the maidens are flowering, time to get some fresh air…

          • NeanderthalDNA

            Yes. Pollinate maidens. Important vernal pastime. I had to take a little break myself. Not the worst thing.

            I stumbled onto altright following a fellow Amren commenter. Pleasant find.

          • Beloved Comrade

            It didn’t. Don’t bother, there is heavy moderation going on there and few posters, most left after the split. Also, all the threads were purged at one point except comments made by John Engelman. That’s when I left for good, it told me everything I needed to know about what that site was about. Don’t waste your time.

          • Sangraal

            I’m not averse to a little moderation (in moderation, as it were…). The way the comments threads would go, I think a bit of purging was in order. I don’t need to read about people’ sex lives and ‘look how Nazi I am’ posturing from keyboard warriors. Odd that they would leave the Engelmann comments though, I wouldn’t have thought Colin Liddell and Anry Nowicki would go in for something like that.
            Did you used to post there under a different name?

      • NeanderthalDNA

        Precisely. Something happened to him when he got gassed in WW1. Had hysterical blindness, a long dark tea time of the soul, and when he emerged, he blamed the Jews for Germany’s defeat, and by extension, every other bad thing that ever happened, like perhaps being rejected by the Vienna Art school – a possible factor in his later vehemence against what he called (sometimes correctly I’d opine) “degenerate art”.
        But many Jews had fought and sacrificed their lives and fortunes for the war effort, of course. His argument makes little sense, smacks of something a little beyond the rational, shall we say?
        The hitlerphiles have some valid points. A number of folks of Jewish blood did escape the concentration camps, somehow, often, like General von Paulus’ wife, half Jewish, through connection with a powerful Nazi or military or industrial person.
        Furthermore his characterization of the Slavs – conveniently dividing them based on their utility and the desirability of their real estate – in essence a low scale genocide of many fellow White populations…suggests to me a certain plain old sociopathic evilness beyond the natural brain produced opiates that come along with absolute and godlike temporal power.
        If anything, he is more responsible for worldwide White genocide than any leftist imaginable. A more Franco-like approach might well have succeeded in toppling the communists in Russia, a less power besot mind may have realized limitations better. Who knows? He blew it – epically.

        • Even Mussolini had his good points. An Italian Jewish widow was sent to Ravensbruck when she went to visit her late German husband’s family in Germany. B.M. told A.H. that as the widow of a decorated Italian officer, he would make a separate peace if she was not released right away. She was.

          • NeanderthalDNA

            The Italian fascists included a fair number of Jews and Mussolini only went there when big bro Hitler started putting the ideological screws on him.

            Franco’s Spain (ironically, considering their history) also helped a lot of Jews and appeared to differ significantly on the topic from the Nazis. Some Spanish Falangist doctors had been shown what was really happening to the Jews by a Nazi who mistakenly assumed they would approve, divulged this to Franco upon their return. From this point on Franco increasingly distanced himself from Hitler, appointing Anglophile Falangists over Germanophiles and paving the way for the survival of his regime, post war.

            Franco hated the commies, though, and allowed Spaniards to fight in the German Army as long as it was on the Russian front, where the Blue Division of Spaniards proved it’s worth with a horrific sacrifice of blood while never willingly yielding and inch during the siege of Leningrad.

            From one of Hitler’s “table talks”…

            “To troops, the Spaniards are a crew of ragamuffins. They regard a rifle as an instrument that should not be cleaned under any pretext. Their sentries exist only in principle. They don’t take up their posts, or, if they do take them up, they do so in their sleep. When the Russians arrive, the natives have to wake them up. But the Spaniards have never yielded an inch of ground. One can’t imagine more fearless fellows. They scarcely take cover. They flout death. I know, in any case, that our men are always glad to have Spaniards as neighbours in their sector.”
            He considered them the only Latins who could really fight well.

          • The Spaniards fought plenty hard in 1588 as well.

          • NeanderthalDNA

            Estremadura, poorest region of Spain, a country that was strangely poor even at it’s apex as a result of the never ending wars she engaged it. Estremadura, almost a desert, where many spaghetti westerns were filmed, also was home to most of the soldiers and conquistadors who conquered the New World.

            The Spaniards had some epic failures, sure, but seem to me the closest modern incarnation of ancient Rome in scope and military character. The Tercio was an ingenious and brutal innovation until Gustavus Adolphus introduced shallow line volley formations in the 30 Years War.

            Gustavus Adolphus – great Swede there, by the way. I’m about a quarter Swedish, so big shout out for ol’ GA there.

          • Andross

            The Spaniards also taught Napoleon the true meaning of fear. 😉

          • NeanderthalDNA

            Hitler, to his credit, did quickly dismiss any talk of invading Falangist Spain when things started “going south” with their relationship.

            Franco had early on cagily outmaneuvered AH by presenting barely absurdly high demands for entering the war on the Axis side. Hitler specifically ridiculed the idea of replaying the Napoleon shuffle in Spain as well as Russia, so Franco had the best of all worlds for a “fascist” in 1940-46.

            Can’t blame him. Look at how it turned out for poor ol’ Benny, eh? Plus, Spain had just ceased bleeding PROFUSELY its own blood for almost four years, so…

            No way, Jose. Smart move, Franco. And he destroyed those idiotic anarcho-syndicalists. Mussolini could be such a barking buffoon, such a drama queen. Franco had reserve, dignity.

            Certainly more humility than Il Drama Queen, you know?

            Smart guy.

          • Hitler later wrote that a day at his dentist’s office was more pleasant than one with Franco.

            Franco once also wrote that he liked Mussolini and wasn’t afraid of him, but that he didn’t like Hitler and was scared of him.

          • NeanderthalDNA

            Franco was more interested in opposing crazy ideologies than indulging in them, I think. He was a military man, more classically “conservative” than “fascist” in many ways.

          • Guest

            Perhaps because he was Catholic?

          • NeanderthalDNA

            Indeed, Decebalus.

            He fought for his people’s right to be Catholic. Eslsewhere he may have been Orthodox.

            A nice example overall.

          • BonV.Vant

            and Pelosi is a descendent of those jews, she is a marrano, married to a jew.

        • So CAL Snowman

          You know NOTHING of the Fuhrer and quite frankly it’s embarrassing to read this. He certainly did not consider the Slavs to be sub-humans. He did however consider the Bolshevik elites and their administrations that ran the Slavic countries to be sub-human.

          • NeanderthalDNA

            Good point, but how did it play out in practice? Actually rather goes along with what I said, I believe.

            Anyway I never knew the guy but I might know a thing or two.

          • So CAL Snowman

            Sorry my man, if you want to bash a great White leader you are going to get the horns at some point. I respect just about everything you post, but I draw the line at revisionist history.

          • NeanderthalDNA

            Where was I being revisionist? Just curious.

          • So CAL Snowman

            “”Furthermore his characterization of the Slavs – conveniently dividing them based on their utility and the desirability of their real estate – in essence a low scale genocide of many fellow White populations…suggests to me a certain plain old sociopathic evilness beyond the natural brain produced opiates that come along with absolute and godlike temporal power.

            If anything, he is more responsible for worldwide White genocide than any leftist imaginable.”

            Stalin and Lenin were responsible for more White deaths than Nazi Germany. Fact.

          • JSS

            Come now Snowman, surely if we keep bashing Hitler then eventually the people who want to see our obliterated from the pages of history will give us a fair hearing. And surely those timid Whites who are scared off by imaginery “Neo Ns” are going to be our greates allies and so we should keep basing Hitler until they turn off Hannity and the History and join us.

            It’s insane to me how apparent White nationalist can bash the one leader who almost freed us and hold him up to never ending scrutiny. Then they will talk about “well I know they aren’t the best but I vote Repunlican because blah blah or I think we might be able to work with libertarians or Jews or Asians”.

          • NeanderthalDNA

            Yeah, why not? Exactly. He’d bash the heck out of you or me if he had to. You think he cares about being bashed?

            For me, whereas some may see him as a positive example in general, I see him as a tragic negative example, as well as a cascading PR fiasco if taken seriously and embraced, and an UNBEATABLE (or eminently beatable as the case may be) fetish on which to blame all our problems.

            I argue this is pretty close to correct, therefore if our polite rantings here are to mean anything more than Ozymandian death rattles for our Folk, that…why not beat up on AH all we want?

            Hey! I blame that guy (HITLER) for all our problems. BURN HIM! It’s great. It’s cathartic. It hurts nobody.

            It hurts nobody. Unlike him. He hurt a lot of people he did not need to hurt, too many, and even if it is say…25% exaggerated, say…

            He still hurt a lot of people he did not need to hurt in order to save the world from Godless communism and nascient messianic democratic totalitarianism.

            He lost moral high ground pretty early in my estimation.

          • JSS

            I don’t get the moral high ground thing. We are talking about our race perishing or surviving. Hitler hurt to many innocents? Yeah Dresden, Hamburg and all the German cities that were fire bombed in 1945 when Germany was already beaten were necessary. All the German POWs starved on purpose and German women raped were necessary. No one had moral high ground. It was war. Anyway we aren’t living in 1933 Germany and I’m not advocating dressing up and playing Nazis. But Hitler did come the closest to throwing off the non Eskimo yoke that’s killing us. He isn’t the problem. What do you mean PR disaster? You really think of we just throw him under the bus some more that our enemies will let our race have its own homeland? I normally agree with you but I just don’t think we’re going to see eye to eye on this one.

          • BonV.Vant

            Germany did quite well after the war, without the non eskimos that are supposed to be essential (according to themselves) for economic development. Before the war Germany was totally infiltrated with jews. They made up hugely disproportional segments of their media, their courts, their teachers, their medical professionals. After the war, Germany managed to have all of those things, without any of the non eskimos. Weimar Germany was a very decadent place. The decadence in Germany today is solely a result of American influence and American culture is dominated by the non eskimos.

          • JSS

            Yeah it’s almost like we don’t really need them and they really need us.

          • BonV.Vant

            well, they invented advertising didn’t they. Make someone think they need something, build it up to be more than it is.

          • JSS

            Yeah ill give them that. They have basically convinced us cancer is good for us and that if we don’t want it we are bad people. Apparently it has even worked on some of our fellow posters here at amren.

          • NeanderthalDNA

            That’s a obverse cumbayah moment there. Proud of you, ha ha.

          • Geo1metric

            “They made up hugely disproportional segments of their media, their courts, their teachers, their medical professionals. ”

            That sounds familiar.

          • NeanderthalDNA

            OK, forget morality. It is such a slippery slope.

            “We are talking about our race perishing or surviving.”

            How was our race doing pre-Hitler as opposed to how it is doing now? Better, or worse?

            I think Hitler latched onto some ugly stuff that is not properly necessarily “European”, saw himself as infallible, was not, had absolute power, bet the farm, rolled the dice and lost.

            Lost bad, and it’s been rough on our people, our race. I don’t think anti-Semitism is intrinsically European and I think…I think…Hitler was pretty anti-Semitic.

            I like to think one can be pro Aryan without being anti-Semitic, cumbayah…

          • JSS

            As far what kind of person he was we can only speculate based on mostly very biased sources. The trouble our race is in today isn’t his fault. Personally I think most of the history channel nazi narrative is lies. You can disagree with that but I don’t see how anyone can say the modern PC anti white culture/pro diversity religion is anything other then a bunch of lies and filth. The nazi narrative is an essential part of that. You can dislike and blame the man for our troubles today if you want but in my opinion your playing right into our enemies hands when you do that.

          • NeanderthalDNA

            “As far what kind of person he was we can only speculate based on mostly very biased sources.”

            Good question. How biased? Are almost all sources biased, or are all sources biased? This gets close to a logical fallacy, the one that claims there is no Truth or the Truth is impossible to ascertain, hence…

            I mean, don’t get me wrong – I am NEVER not amazed at how thoroughly and brutally messianic democratic totalitarianism has covered up the Truth in order to further its ideological MANDATES. So much better than clunky Goebbels stuff and Mussolini-esque barking buffoonery, so much subtler.

            But I don’t think the holocaust was much overblown, in terms of its moral implications. Some, sure. Jews are smart and creative folk and have always been active in the arts, which today include the media. Is this a big Hebrew multigenerational conspiracy? I don’t know, they ARE pretty smart…

            I don’t think so. I think Hitler murdered a lot of people, including a lot of Jews, and it’s pretty well documented and has reverberated, yes, because Jews “control Hollywood”, perhaps?

            I think talking about Hitler is fun.

          • So CAL Snowman

            “Furthermore his characterization of the Slavs – conveniently dividing them based on their utility and the desirability of their real estate – in essence a low scale genocide of many fellow White populations…suggests to me a certain plain old sociopathic evilness beyond the natural brain produced opiates that come along with absolute and godlike temporal power.

            If anything, he is more responsible for worldwide White genocide than any leftist imaginable.”

          • NeanderthalDNA

            I also like Assyrians. High opinion of them. Not as sympathetic to all Palestinians as I was when I was a libtard.

        • David Ashton

          It is far from perfect, but one of the relatively few “good” books about Hitler’s ideology is Richard Weikart’s “Hitler’s Ethic”, which I would recommend to ALL interested in these discussions.

          • tlk244182

            Thanks.Will put it on my list. My somewhat sympathetic view of AH and the Third Reich is probably a reaction to the propaganda I was fed in school and at the movies. I hate being manipulated like that.

          • NeanderthalDNA

            I understand completely.

            I still play WW2 wargames from time to time and admit I prefer playing the Germans.

            In strategic recreations, like the Hearts of Iron series, the fun is in getting right what he screwed up. I almost always like to go for a western/Med strategy, delay Barbarossa a year, until Britain and/or Gibraltar get taken down, then turn east, possibly with a second thrust/threat from the Caucasus or Iran. Tactically, except for the T-34/KV-1 in 41′ and early/mid ’42, German equipment and general troop quality is tops. Fun facing quantity with quality, I think.

            Finally with Hugo Boss as their tailor, the German military had style, reserved style. From the feldgrau field uniforms to formal, those guys ALWAYS looked good, LOL.

      • ricpic

        Frankly, the fact that Hitler was a mass murderer should end the discussion. How does anyone support a mass murderer, be he Hitler, Stalin or Mao?

        • BonV.Vant

          How about Abraham Lincoln?

        • tlk244182

          Some people would include Churchill and Truman. Just saying….

      • So CAL Snowman

        Why don’t you actually read something the man wrote instead of just vomiting up History Channel infotainment talking points. What “mental problems” did Hitler have Dr. Broomsted? Are you qualified to make such a medical statement? The purpose of American Renaissance (in my view) is to enlighten people about the truth. To avoid discussion on a topic because YOU personally find it uncomfortable or you believe the matter to be settled is grossly anti-intellectual and border line Bolshevik.

        • Cecil Broomsted

          I won’t spend much time on you because you seem rather hard headed, if you don’t mind me saying so.

          Psychoanalyst Dr. Walter C. Langer prepared a report for the OSS in late 1943. The purpose of the report was an in depth pschoanalysis of Hitler which was to be used by Allied Forces to predict Hitler’s future actions in the war. Another report was prepared by fellows from my home country, Britain, for the Psychological Warfare Department which reached similar conclusions as Dr. Langer’s OSS report.

          There were many findings that revealed Hitler’s inner machinations. One such finding that may interest you is that Hitler was a sexual masochist and derived “sexual gratification from the act of having a woman urinate or defecate on him.”

          There’s more. Much more for you to admire?

          • JSS

            Are you for real? Can you back up any of your claims with anything other then psycho babble? You know the Soviets also used psycho babble from their state psychologist to have people locked away and killed. Your literally spouting crude and disgusting wartime propaganda as fact. Congrats. Im sure you think the lamp shades and shrunken heads are real to.

          • So CAL Snowman

            You are sick and need help. I’m sure you could find gainful employment with the ADL. You are correct in that I am very opionated Dr. Broomsted

      • LACountyRedneck

        I know for a fact that many have been driven from this site for it’s reluctance to allow talk about the damage Jews have caused to non-Jew Whites. I am not referring to anti-Semites. Simply to those such as the ones making comments here that have done the research and educated others. When someone makes a comment, instead of making their narrow minded little Nazi accusations, they should first do the research.

    • Laika

      Where oh where would you lefties be without your precious Nazis to bash us White people with?

      You bring up “Nazi” to silence those YOU don’t agree with which makes you akin to the Soviets.

      Fact is Hitler was a buffer against the bloodthirsty Commies in the East. Taking out the Nazis gave the Soviets free reign in Eastern Europe to continue their murderous Commie agenda. General Patton figured this out toward the end and wrote about it in his diary and letters home to his wife. His FUEL supply was cut off so the Soviet could overrun Berlin and rape, pillage and murder the German populace and enslave whatever was left. Patton threatened to tell what he knew when he returned to the U.S., he felt we’d fought on the wrong side. Wise man, he, with a front row seat no less. A convenient little accident in Italy silenced him and the rest, as they say, is history – history written by the likes of Zinn and other of his ilk.

      But facts don’t seem to matter to you, nor does history except what you learned from your statist professor in college, i.e., “All Whites are responsible for All Time for Nazi Atrocities and must Pay Israel in Perpetuity.” You want to scream “Nazi” at those with whom you disagree because you learned that from your professors.

      Fact is, Hitler is still Hitler even with his name spelled backwards, Reltih. Reltih, LOL.

      • Alexandra1973

        Nazis vs. Communists? I call it pro wrestling on a global scale. One gets to be the “face,” the other the “heel.” But in the end the same guy signs their paychecks.

        I don’t care for either one.

        • HamletsGhost

          I’m sure the commies will be duly impressed by your not caring for them.

          • Alexandra1973

            Nazis vs. Communists is like today’s left vs. right paradigm.

          • HamletsGhost

            Only if you don’t know history. Stalin & his toadies were already piling up corpses by the millions before anyone ever heard of the Nazis.
            Subject: Re: New comment posted on ‘ Every Man His Own Commissar’ : Jared Taylor and the Politics of Race

      • So CAL Snowman

        Rommel also came to the same conclusion as Patton at the end of the war. Rommel believed that Germany and the USA should have fought on the same side against the Red menace.

  • So CAL Snowman

    Oh I am definitely “guilty” of being mean spirited and for that I will not apologize. Our enemies see us as toothless cowards. I like to remind people that our race is still full of deadly venom and we remain coiled like a serpent, ready to strike at a moment’s notice. As far as the non-eskimos are concerned, their double standards aren’t merely “annoying” as Mr. Taylor suggests, their double standards are genocidal for the White race.

    • Lewis33

      “Some stories inspire outbursts of antisemitism. The comments receiving the most positive ratings on a recent report about research on the slave trade in early medieval Eastern Europe blame this on the Jews and defend pogroms. In fact the trade was carried out by Scandinavians, the original “Rus,” who founded the great entrepôts of Novgorod and Kiev and shipped blondes along with grain, furs, wax, and honey down the Volga and Dnieper to the Caspian and the Black Sea.”

      Aren’t we just the naughty children being asked to stay after school! I’ve tried to educate the author on the original post in a polite manner, lets see how long he stands up for the First Amendment or if I get the boot.

      • So CAL Snowman

        People like us stand for the TRUTH and will accept nothing less. I consider the people that run from the truth because it makes them uncomfortble to be the biggest traitors to the White race.

        • jane johnson

          They are cowards.

          • Dr. Möbias

            They have no facts, data or empirical evidence to back up their claims so they resort to the Marxist bromides that have been planted in their heads.

            When that doesn’t work, scream NAZI or RACIST at your opponent to get him to shut up and threaten his job.

            These are corollaries to Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals.

          • jane johnson

            See my comment re Alinsky and ridicule.

        • David Ashton

          Truth above all. But people can reasonably disagree about the facts.

          It is wrong when, for example, people who “simply” wish to protect the white nations from mass immigration and miscegenation are screamed at as “Nazi racists”. But it is not wrong when totally uncritical defenders of the Nazis are so described.

      • curri

        It’s an unpleasant fact that Jews were heavily involved in the medieval slave trade. Christians were abducted and trafficked into Islamic Spain by Jewish slave traders.

        • BonV.Vant

          well, the jew, Jeff Lipkes, says otherwise, wonder why?

      • BonV.Vant

        Look at the name of the author, of course he will try to posit a lie concerning jewish involvement and of course he would try to intimidate us by saying we are “crude” and “impolite”. The reality is that almost ANYTHING, no matter how it is phrased, that conflicts with the multi-culti, PC, media generated ideology of today is called “hate speech” which automatically brands it as unacceptable.

        • Dr. Möbias

          The first thing I did upon encountering this article was to check the author’s surname and wasn’t surprised by what I saw. I knew after that the article would be patronizing to Mr. Taylor and it was. I forced myself to read it because I have such great respect for Jared Taylor even though some topics are forbidden to discuss here.

          Anyway to get the word out to fellow Whites even in such a patronizing manner will only help our cause and bring more Whites to this site.

          If only we were allowed to discuss those forbidden topics here.

          • ThomasER916

            I do the EXACT same thing.

            We live in a world today where ethnicity is such an accurate predictor of ideology I really don’t need to know anything else.

      • BonV.Vant

        why should we even try to be polite when no matter what, we are already guilty of “hate” because of what we believe?

        • Laika

          I notice a lot of opposition on this thread by lefties who throw out the term Nazi at people they don’t like or opinions with which they disagree.

          The misinformation some posters here believe is stunning, and the fact they’re trying to silence and censor people shows their true motives.

          • BonV.Vant

            yes, and being called a nazi made me examine things much more closely, and I found out that much of what is said about the jewish involvement in what has happened in this country, and others, turns out to be TRUE! Someone once pointed out to me that the NAACP was founded by jews, I thought that was ridiculous, but it turned out to be true, and it also turned out to be true that the whole civil rights campaign was organized and agitated for by jews. Someone once stated that the change in immigration laws in this country was brought about by jews, I disputed this, but it turns out that in fact, this is the case. They were the ONLY groups that campaigned, and campaigned PERSISTENTLY for this.I once was arguing with someone from Norway, telling him I did not see how jews could possibly be controlling the media there. He corrected me by telling me they own all of the big newspapers except ONE! So she I was someone that would call others “NAZI” I was someone that was ill informed, and someone who RESISTED truth. Accepting truth now makes ME a target of that name calling! So I was arguing from ignorance like so many who have the knee-jerk, programmed reaction against anything critical of jews. I recognized how my behavior was programmed and went from there, looked at things objectively. This required recognizing and guarding against my programming . I had to recognize how I reflexively reacted,trying to shut my eyes and not even listen to things that contradicted my programmed thoughts. This is how I found true freedom. Those in cages resent the freedom of those who are not in cages. These are the people who are their own personal commissars. They are on guard against anyone who does not have the same shackles on their thinking that they are burdened with.

          • Dr. Möbias

            Include a link to Culture of Critique whenever and wherever you possibly can. It disputes everything the brainwashed deny. Tell ’em not to post again until they’ve read it cover to cover

            httpCOLON//wwwdotprometheismdotnet/library/CultureOfCritiquedotpdf

          • ThomasER916

            Thanks for posting this!

      • sbuffalonative

        It’s generally a tactic of the ‘progressive’ left to throw in a ‘fact’ to ‘set the record straight’.

        I’m not accusing the author of being a leftist but that comment stood out like a sore thumb.

    • JSS

      We are dealing with a system that wants to see us raped and dead. Their gloves are off, so ours should be to. The rarest thing in the world now are White men who unafraid and willing stand up and face the storm thats coming. I admire what Taylor is doing very much and I know he has suffered for the stand he has taken, but none the less this isn’t going to end in a polite divorce.

      • coco bongo

        But Taylor does not praise Hitler and is not a Nazi, neo or otherwise. Perhaps you and the other neos could actually watch some of Mr. Taylor’s videos and acquaint yourselves with the facts?

        • BonV.Vant

          The fact is that a white ethnostate is compatible with national socialist ideology. The fact is that until the later part of the 20th century, all white nations were in fact “ethnostates”.

        • Laika

          That is your OPINION.

          What is this fascination you have with the Nazis? Are you a closet Nazi or are you using that term to silence those of us whose opinions YOU disagree with.

          Go back and read the quote at the top, re-read the article where Jared talks about Jews and zionists and stop trying to silence those with whom you disagree by calling them Nazis.

          Fact is Hitler is still Hitler even with his name spelled backwards, Reltih. RELTIH, LOL.

        • Dr. Möbias

          “But Taylor does not praise Hitler and is not a Nazi.”

          You appear to have no understanding of Hitler and the Nazis and resort to that tired, silly meme whenever something is said that you don’t like.

          You need to educate yourself about who and what the Nazis were about before you run your keyboard again otherwise you appear silly and foolish, like those who wish to silence whites by screaming NAZI at them.

          • We’re not Nazis. I prefer elected governments. What they’re saying is that they have no useful arguments against genuine conservatives.

    • Jesse James

      My position with the Jews is that they don’t deserve free passes anymore than anyone else. Just like everyone else they stand accountable for the things that they do and the ideas that they support. No I don’t think all or even most Jews are part of some evil conspiracy but I do think that the Anglo-Jewish & American bankster elites who are the rulers and the architects of the New World Order are our mortal enemies. I am part Slovak so I would have difficulty aligning myself completely with someone who holds with all of the National Socialist restrictive racial policies however, anyone who bothers to actually read some of Hitler’s speeches and writings can’t help but notice that many of the problems that the German people were faced with between the World Wars were extremely similar to what we are dealing with today. A hostile Jewish minority were attempting to control the German education system and government. The Weimar Republic was a cesspit of perversity, communism and socially destructive art and literature. The communist takeover of Russia and the destruction of the Tsar , the Russian aristocracy and the middle classes was beyond a doubt a Jewish project in the first couple of decades just like the American Revolution could be described as a project of the Scottish Freemasons. The German people were being ruthlessly exploited by the globalist bankster elites of the day on one level and were facing communist created chaos in the streets. As to the Holocaust I don’t deny that it happened but have to ask why do we never see films about the Ukrainian Holodomor? The German people seem to be expected to forever bear the weight of the Holocaust to their last generation but if that is true shouldn’t the Jews answer for their leading role in perpetrating the deliberate starvation of 2.5 to 12 million Ukrainians (dependent on who is doing the estimate) ? Not to mention the millions of dead civilians during the Russian Revolution and subsequent purges. We don’t see films about the Holodomor of course because Hollywood is not under the tight control of Ukrainians. As to our own country the Jews were at the forefront of the lobbying for the disastrous 1965 Immigration law that has been slow motion death for the traditional white America. Yet we are expected not to notice these things and not to dare mention them not less question them.

      • JSS

        Jesse I think your being to generous. The problems faced by the Germans between the world wars is the problem the whole White western world is facing today. The holocaust narrative is a tool that is used to disarm us and bludgeon us into guilt ridden apathy. It isn’t just the Germans that are supposed to bear the guilt, now days all of us are supposed to feel guilty for it. I don’t want to get into a whole debate over whether it happened or not, though I don’t believe it happened in the way Spielburg says it did but of course dead Ukrainians don’t matter. Everything is always about them and controlling us. While not every single one them is in on a grand conspiracy they do act as a group, just like every other race except us. A non Eskimo is always a non Eskimo first.
        Anyway Im not criticizing your post at all, I pretty much agree with it. You pointed out that everything we are fed from you know who is hypocrisy filth and lies. Nothing good comes from them, so don’t take their word about the holocaust at face value either.

      • Jesse_from_Sweden

        That means that you don’t know all that much about national socialism.

        National socialism isn’t just for whites. The idea behind it is that each people should have their own country and their own leaders.
        “Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Fuhrer” – “one people, one nation, one leader”.

        The holocaust was the final solution. The solution they resorted to when all other solutions had failed.
        Their objective was to create a Germany for germans, where there was only germans and all other peoples should be evicted to their own nations.

        The jews didn’t have a nation.
        So the nazis actually tried to create one.
        Look up the Madagascar Plan and the Haavara agreement on wikipedia, two of the first “solutions” they attempted.
        The nazis were heavy supporters of a creation of a jewish homeland, that which after the war led to the creation of Israel.

        They harassed jews and deported them, in order to get them out of the country, since they saw it as natural that each people would work for the good own their own people over others.
        Something that holds true for all peoples except whites.

        The holocaust only became a reality after the war broke out. Because when it did, the british navy controlled the seas which locked the germans in.
        There were no longer any place they could deport the jews to. They couldn’t be put on ships and sent to the palestinian mandate or anywhere else (the british heavily worked against jewish immigration there anyways).

        So with the goal of cleansing jews, gypsies and others from german land and with nowhere to send them. They invented their own place to send them. To camps with crematoriums.
        But that was the final solution, where all others have failed.

        National socialism is in no way limited to whites.
        If anything, you can take a look at Israel and see that the national socialist policies are alive and well there, all that has changed is “Aryan” and “Jew”. Who is the “people of the nation” and who is the problem that should be gotten rid of.

        National socialism is a hated ideology in the west, because it’s a nationalistic ideology that advocates for a racially, culturally and religiously homogenous country, and is the exact opposite of todays multiculti dream-state.
        The big difference is of course that national socialism created a nation where germans were happy, while multiculti creates a nation where the original inhabitants suffers.

        • Laika

          Yours is the most important post on the thread. The Madagascar Plan needs wide dissemination, especially amongst the crowd who wish to silence us by screaming Nazi! in our faces.

          • BonV.Vant

            Was it something that was actually considered? It doesn’t sound practical to me.

          • Dr. Möbias

            I am familiar with the Madagascar Plan, it IS something that was not only considered, it was to be implemented.

            Please look it up and then start telling everyone you know. There is SO much misinformation about the Nazis out there.

          • David Ashton

            I would be interested in an informed comment on the authenticity and implications of Hitler’s reply to Horthy when he asked what happens to Jews deported to the wartime camps: those refusing to work are killed, and those who cannot work succumb like animals.

        • Alexandra1973

          Funny thing is, Hitler was Austrian.

          • BonV.Vant

            IT is a German ethnic group. They are basically Bavarians and Swabians.

          • Alexandra1973

            I’m just saying…like it would be a bit strange for a Canadian to come over here and do the same with America.

            I’m not all that familiar with all the ethnic groups…should be interesting to study.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            What was the name of his birthplace that he razed and erased?

          • Jesse_from_Sweden

            Austrians are ethnic and cultural germans.
            What we call Germany today was created in the 1870s, from a multitude of german states which in turn came from the Holy Roman Empire (of german nation).

            One of the first things he did was to annex Austria.
            One people, one nation, one leader…..Remember?

            It’s a bit like talking about english as being Northumbrians, Cumbrians and Wessexians.

            Remember, Texas was once it’s own nation as well.

        • Jesse James

          I admit that I don’t know as much about National Socialism as I should but I do read a lot of history, especially the WWI to WWII era and am trying to get my head around things. Anyone that has studied 20th Century fascism and National Socialism has to admit though that it is a strange mixture of ideas and competing state organizations. Some people say that the strange and often contradictory and overlapping organizational structure of National Socialist Germany was the partial result of Hitler’s tendency to promote Darwinist competition within his own inner circle and between the primary governmental agencies. The SS vs the OKW command of the traditional Army, Navy and Air Force is one of the simplest examples. The deliberate construction of competing power groups and individuals with seemingly deliberately overlapping and confused lines of control and responsibility is seen at many different levels both in military and non-military organization.

          Another interesting aspect of National Socialism in practice is the way it developed many parallel ideas that were also being used by the Communists of the day. Propaganda and patriotic art and film are of course on example. Another is the use of political officers, the Soviet Union had their political commissars while the Germans had the NSFO (National Socialist Führungsoffizier). The SS itself was an attempt to create an order similar to the Jesuits. Look at the swastika, that mysterious ancient symbol, that was lifted from the murky Aryan past but was mostly seen at that time in the east. National Socialism seems to be an ideology assembled a la carte from the menu of mankind’s known history at the time.

          One thing that I notice seems consistent up until the current day, anything or anyone that threatens the Anglo-American Jewish financial domination of the global economy is rapidly targeted for destruction. The most recent manifestations of this was the take down of Libya after Khadafi started working to set up a competitive currency, the gold backed Libyan dinar that he wanted to use as the currency of transaction for the sale of Libyan oil. America’s man in the middle of the Middle East, Saddam Hussein, got invaded and stretched after attempting to sell Iraq oil using the EU as the currency of transaction. The whole global financial scam depends on the USD remaining the world’s reserve currency and the currency of transaction for all OPEC oil sales at least for the immediate future. After turning WWII into a crusade to save Soviet Communism, the Cold War only became a reality when Stalin refused to allow the globalist bankers to dominate the Soviet Unions economy. I believe the real cause of the Second World War was when Hitler took control of the German economy and attempted to create a national financial system for the good of the German people The generally accepted explanation is that Hitler invaded Czechoslovakia and Poland and that aggression caused the war yet if that were so then why did the Anglo-Americans not bat a eye at the end of the war when they delivered both countries into the hands of Stalin?

          So yes I have a lot to learn still but I am working on it.

          • Geo1metric

            “One thing that I notice seems consistent up until the current day, anything or anyone that threatens the Anglo-American Jewish financial domination of the global economy is rapidly targeted for destruction.”

            If you haven’t already read it, I recommend you read the authorized bio. of the Rothschilds, and Engdahl’s A CENTURY OF WAR. Some excellent context and insight.

          • Jesse James

            I will put those three works on my reading lists. Thanks.

          • Jesse_from_Sweden

            Competing structures in organizations vital for power in a society is something that most dictatorships use.
            It’s a balance to prevent too much power coming into the hands of a few who might think they will make for better leaders than the current ones.

            Read “why arabs lose wars” and you’ll get some insight into it.

            The growth of SS also had a lot to do with the leader of SS, Himmler, who extended his own personal power by increasing that of the SS.

            As for the Swastika, it’s an ancient germanic symbol which can be found in many places in Sweden. Companies used it on their logos, it’s common in old rune carvings and it still exists on monuments and buildings.
            It’s just that it fell out of use in the middle of the 30s due to political reasons.
            The nazis got the symbol from Goebbels, who in turn got it from his swedish wife, who was of noble birth and had a swastika on her family crest/escutcheon.

        • Geo1metric

          ” To camps with crematoriums.
          But that was the final solution, where all others have failed.”

          There exist some logistical studies that strongly imply that it was impossible to accomplish the holocaust in the allotted time and with the allotted facilities.

          • Jesse_from_Sweden

            But it is an undeniable fact that they were sent to camps with crematoriums.

            The debate is wether there were also gas chambers there and how many people died there.

            As a comparison, the death rate in german prison camps for soviet PoWs was somewhere around 50% and yet noone has claimed that they were death camps intended for eradicating those sent there.
            (And the death rate for german PoWs taken at Stalingrad was something like 95%….we never hear much about that, do we?)

          • Geo1metric

            True enough. Have you heard/read about the Morgenthau Plan? Utterly insidious.

          • Jesse_from_Sweden

            Yes, I have.

            Look up JCS 1067 which is how it was implemented after it first got shot down when the american people realized just how draconic it was.

  • Eagle_Eyed

    Great article, good to get the exposure.

    Race realism is liberating and meritorious because it is true. Once one understands the biological evidence for racial differences he no longer feels the need to blame inequality on spurious reasons like Jim Crow laws or big-government Democrats. As Jared pointed out, the truth cannot be suppressed forever. I do not know when the mass awakening on race will come, or what form it will take; but clearly the current model is unstable.

  • dd121

    Some of my posts may appear to be “mean spirited”. I hope nobody’s terribly offended. Later on in the article the author talks about the thuggery used by the left to silence Mr. Taylor. Readers of AmRen, our opponents are not gentlemen. Sometimes you have to raise your voice.

    • ncpride

      Sometimes, it’s very difficult to contain the anger and frustration after reading articles on this site, and I know I’ve lost my cool more than once. There are times when I won’t even comment because my righteous hatred makes it impossible to say anything civil. However, considering the abuse Whites take everyday, our bitter rage is totally justified.

      • dd121

        NC I like your comments so feel to make them whenever and however you want.

      • Laika

        How are we supposed to feel when our homelands are being wrested from us? Jump up and down and cheer about our genocide?

        Righteous anger is NORMAL as to what we’re facing as Whites.

        • BonV.Vant

          YES righteous anger is normal, retribution is just!

      • AndrewInterrupted

        How are you feeling these days, NC?

        • ncpride

          Much, much better, my friend and thank you for asking. It feels wonderful not to be in so much pain all the time anymore. It was a major surgery, but I’m happy I had it done. It’s been well worth it.

    • During our hike about Palmer Park, you came off as anything but thuggish.

      • dd121

        I believe that one reason people post on AmRen is that they care deeply about our civilization. It’s very painful to see it all slipping away. If people respond passionately, I for one can forgive it.

        • Dr. Möbias

          I do care deeply about our civilization as others here seem to, the ones who don’t attack other whites, that is and call them Hitler and Nazis.

          We respond here passionately because if we do so publicly about what we are losing – our homelands, way of life, the 1st world civilization we created – we are threatened into silence and called Hitler, Nazi and Racist. That’s why it is so frustrating to see it practiced here, on these threads,on a supposed pro-white site.

          This is like an oasis for us pro-whites where we CAN be passionate and vent our many grievances, including at times grievances against those who are doing this to us.

          Really, there are few other places in this PC reign of terror that has descended upon us whites.

          • dd121

            We do have the occasional leftist troll. The best thing to do is flag the post and then ignore it.

          • I would rather criticize their argument and convert them.

          • Geo1metric

            Some are just too far gone down the old rabbit hole.

  • Lewis33

    “The antisemitic right considers him a panderer.”

    I don’t think that at all. I appreciate Mr. Taylor’s efforts even if they do not coincide exactly with my own. I think most of us realize we are a minority within a minority and have no desire to throw the baby out with the bathwater. All in all, American Renaissance is a wonderful place with a lively, diverse following.

    • Martel

      Same here, in discussions on Amren, frontpagemag, and other places I am often referred to as an ”antisemite” by uninformed opposition, but I will never have any issues with Taylor refusing to touch the Jewish question. He supports free speech which is what matters. I do find it a shame that Macdonald is not allowed on Amren Conferences, even though his work is appreciated by Byron Roth, who spoke at last year’s event.

      • BonV.Vant

        Macdonald will be mainstream thought within ten years. I predict someday Amren will have him speak at the conferences. It is nice that there are jews who appear to be on our side but something will happen that will test their loyalties. They will either form a splinter jewish identity, one that renounces judaism and it’s ethnocentric agenda, one that will be at odds with what organized jewery is doing, or they will decide that organized jewery was right after all. They can not sit on the fence forever.

        • Laika

          It’s amazing how mainstream KMac has already become. When I first started reading his site and books, back when comments were allowed, it was an outpost of realist information that was attacked almost every single day.

          Now, I’m seeing links to his site and books frequently. Word is getting out and it needs to be further spread before the Soviets that control the media and government silence us for good. The target of our wrath and who and what we must stop MUST be placed on the root of the problem, all else are merely branches that will grow back.

          • BonV.Vant

            HE states the truth, and it is powerful.

          • Dr. Möbias

            KMac has paid a very very heavy price for telling forbidden truths and not baking down. The SPLC’s Heidi Bierich personally flew into Long Beach where KMac works at a local university to try to get him fired from his job. She should be roundly condemned and sued for defamation and harassment. KMac said he was only saved because he has tenure. Imagine being harassed at your place of business in your classroom in front of your students and no one does anything about it. This is what has happened to KMac who is desperately trying to get the white genocide message out and WHO is doing this to us.

            He is a brave soul and hero for doing what he does and deserves our support, the support of ALL Whites.

          • BonV.Vant

            Stories of behavior like this will be taken into account when jews are judged in the white ethnostate.

          • ThomasER916

            It will become our people’s history and identity – never again!

            And never stop hunting.

          • Geo1metric

            “You shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.” KJV.

      • Dr. Möbias

        David Duke as well who used to regularly attend AR conference. It is at an AR conference where I first met Mr. Duke and became aware of his books, articles, etc.

        httpCOLON//daviddukeDOTcom/an-open-letter-to-my-friends-attending-the-american-renaissance-conference/

        • Martel

          I understand banning Duke, he poses a more difficult question, but Kevin Macdonald is another matter. I dislike Duke for his stance on Islam, few European nationalists will be able to swallow this.It reminds me of other white nationalists who care little about us drowning in Eurabia. I’m sure I am somewhat biased about him, but me feelings about him are negative.

  • tetrapod

    After reading this article I now understand why my more vitriolic comments have been removed. I also must admit JT’s magnanimous posture toward the tribe has taken me aback somewhat, especially considering the nefarious attacks he’s sustained from their ADL and SPLC Gestapo.

    Perhaps I should reconsider my own position in that regard, both out of respect for JT and because I see in him aspects of a magnanimity I myself once had before I became “darkly enlightened”. And, perhaps I’ve been seduced by the lucid J’accuse of Culture of Critique. Perhaps, perhaps, perhaps.

    • Bob Dole

      There’s a point where not acknowledging an enemy is an act of treason. It’s a messy issue and I’m still not sure if JT is doing the wrong thing or just not doing the right thing. Of course I appreciate all he has done, but if our enemies go unnamed, they will also go unresisted.

  • JSS

    Good manners are only infections amongst good people. Our enemies aren’t good people. Im not advocating being overly patronizing to fellow Whites who have hope, you can convince and wake them up over a few beers in my experience. The non eskimos and their useful idiots on the other hand don’t deserve your courtesy, they want you dead.

    • Our Politically-Correct enemies not only aren’t good people, but they have actively attempted to kill off civilized discussion on the matter. The Obama regime keeps pushing what it describes as a “national dialog” on race, but has made it crystal clear that it really wants a one-sided narrative, in which the cultural Marxists will do all of the talking, and we will quietly listen to our scolding as if we were children who have misbehaved.

      Good manners will not convince the opposition, but perhaps some of the fence-sitters will be swayed, and that alone makes politeness worthwhile.

    • QuinnTheEskimo9

      Agreed. How exactly should we feel toward people who wish to genocide our race?

      Who cheer on our demographic demise? Who encourage other minority non-whites to hate, despise and dehumanize us? Reason with them? Try to talk them out of their hatred of the White race?

      Has that ever worked?

      We face a merciless, heartless and cruel enemy who is destroying our children’s homelands, forcing criminals blacks into our schools and neighborhoods and openly legislating against us.

      It is crucial, as Alinsky told his minions: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it. Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy and then hurt him.

      • jane johnson

        Ridicule is a powerful weapon. Wielded ruthlessly, it can silence an individual enemy as quickly as the race card can silence some of our more timid brethren. Alinsky was aware of this. What makes it so diabolically effective is the fact that any attempt to defend against, or respond to, intelligent ridicule only makes the target look even more ridiculous. The barb must: 1) be intelligent; name-calling doesn’t count (that’s their game); 2) Delivered in such a way as to imply that ANY thinking person would see the ridiculousness of the target’s position, ideology, etc.

        • BonV.Vant

          Shock has also been one of their successful tactics. They have the whole media under their control and they continually shock the public until what was once shocking becomes boring. That is how they make the unacceptable palatable. For decades the media was flu of gay gay gay gay gay, civll rights civil rights civil rights, abortion abortion abortion, drug your kids ADHD, drug your kids ADHD ,drug your kids ADHD ,drug your kids ADHD.

          When whites take over we can do the same thing: deport, deport, deport, deport, segregate, segregate, segregate, segregate, ban certain groups from govt, law, education and media,govt, law, education and mediagovt, law, education and mediagovt, law, education and mediagovt, law, education and media, etc etc. What the left has declared “unacceptable” will be easy to make acceptable.

        • Geo1metric

          Thus we have the “late night comedians” virtually all spewing forth ridicule of us and all we stand for.

    • ThomasER916

      Whites need to identity anti-Whites and turn on them like wild animals. The anti-Whites want to wipe us out. The genocide they want for us is the genocide they deserve.

      No politeness. No mercy. Give them nothing. Take everything.

  • This article should be “stickied” somewhere on site rather than being rotated to the archives like the rest, where it will be largely unseen. The reason is it explains so much that newbies to the site ought to know. I learned a lot and I’ve been posting for at least a year.

    As to the commenting policy here, look at Infowars and Zerohedge and how ugly they get and ask yourself if that’s acceptable. It’s not to me.

    • Martel

      Zero hedge has a specific button/mail to report discrimination, not vulgar language in general, no, discrimination.

  • Luca

    I don’t like his analogy on the Jewish question, I don’t think it is a fair one. Personally, I don’t find them responsible for all the ills of the world or for everything that has gone wrong, but I do find them in disproportionate numbers among Hollywood, MSM, finance, the Democratic party, liberal academia, the legal system and within the ranks of the immigration cheerleaders.

    I also find that with their enormously disproportionate numbers in these fields they control the dialog, specifically through the suppression of free speech and the promotion of pro-liberal propaganda.

    I find this to be a realistic truth.

    • So CAL Snowman

      Which pay master would you rather grovel before, George Soros or Sheldon Adelson?

      • I groveled before my ex-father, wife-beater and child-abuser, and instead of the $625,000, I received a 3 year federal prison sentence. I am out of the grovelling business.

        • BonV.Vant

          You have a good book inside you. You need to get this on the market

    • Alexandra1973

      Who’s recruiting all these Jews though? Yes, they are there in disproportionate numbers. I don’t dispute that. But who’s putting them there…and why?

      I believe they’re willing puppets…not the puppetmasters.

      • Katherine McChesney

        Is the phrase Papal Court Jews familiar to you? Those are the ones who have willingly served Rome.

        • Alexandra1973

          I believe I heard that phrase reading the late Sherman Skolnick’s site (it’s still up). So yes, it’s quite familiar!

          Mr. Skolnick was a Jew too. And he was into busting corrupt judges.

          • Katherine McChesney

            That’s where I read about them. Ole Sherman was a force to be reckoned with.

      • Luca

        They were sent here by European Jews like Morganthau, Rothschild, and Warburg. The US accept massive amounts of eastern European/Russian Jews during the great migration 1890 -1924. Through a combination of hard work, intelligence, education and tribal nepotism they have positioned themselves to protect and promote their own interests, many times at the expense of our White Christian, heterosexual, male dominated society and culture.

  • QuinnTheEskimo9

    “People who immigrated from the Soviet Union were amazed to find that Americans are more afraid of the ‘diversity’ regime than Russians were of the Communists. And at least under the Soviets there was a clear enemy: the censors and the secret police. In America–the land of the free–every man is his own commissar.”

    Diversity and Communism are the same thing. When diversity is shoved in our faces, in our neighborhoods, our schools, our workplaces and down our throats, without our permission and against our wishes, and our livelihoods are threatened if we object, we are NOT our own commissar; we are at the mercy of a hegemonic, anti-White, tyrannical government that won’t stop until every White is wiped out.

    The Soviet Commies did the same thing to the White Russians and Kulaks, and approximately 60 million of them were KILLED before communism imploded in on itself. We are headed in the same direction.

    A glimpse of our future? South Africa, where Whites are being outright murdered.

    NO wonder more and more are saying “Diversity is a Code Word for White Genocide.”

    • So CAL Snowman

      I agree 100% Quinn. We are dealing with the result of a largely silent Bolshevik revolution that has taken over the Former United States. We are the Kulaks and the supporters of the old order (the Tsar) and they are the Red demons hell bent on liquidating us to establish their new order of global communism.

      • QuinnTheEskimo9

        Same group that brought about the Russian Revolution is busy at work here in the U.S. destroying what we Whites created. It is unimaginable what we are losing: Our liberty, property, including savings and eventually our very lives.

    • Einsatzgrenadier

      Diversity isn’t a code word for genocide. It is white genocide.

  • curri

    Jews made up the bulk of the intellectual vanguard that created the present ideological climate. They still form the bulk of the cultural Marxist intellectual leadership even today . Look up “Frankfurt School” and “The Authoritarian Personality.” Also see the video “Minority Rule: The Rise of Political Correctness” on you tube.

    • richard garyson

      I am not familiar with the reasons why some white nationalists don’t have a great love of Jews. I do want to point out though that Jews don’t destroy neighborhoods, rape white women, flash mob, or randomly assault hapless gentles for thrills. Jews have contributed immensely to European civilization. While I agree their tendency to embrace the left is troubling, it is worth pointing out that there are many conservative and libertarian Jews who have contributed to those political philosophies.

      • IstvanIN

        Perhaps it would make more sense if you think of organized Jewry and not individual Jews. Organized Jewry has long worked against our best interests. There are individual Jews who are quite nice and don’t have a chip on their shoulders when it comes to Christian Whites and are fiercely loyal to the US. But organized Jewry is quite the opposite. Most black destruction is not organized but the result of their primitive way of thinking, which is what makes the Jew a much more formidable foe.

        And quite frankly we would have done quite well without the Jewish contributions.

      • Bob Dole

        I recommend visiting “the Occidental Observer” website. Kevin MacDonald has many well written essays about the negative influence of Jewish elites.

      • Martel

        Separation and its discontents by MacDonald can be found on the web as PDF. Its quite interesting, balanced, and surely worth the time.

        In general it boils down to, Jewish communities have historically for both legitimate fears and prejudices been, trying to shape society to their benefits, gentile communities for similar reasons have tried to do the same. These interests clashed. A more sensible view than claiming Europeans hated the Jews because of ”inbred racism” or because Jews ”killed Christ”, such accusations make no sense.

        • BonV.Vant

          one can look at the history of Europe and the USA and see that various white ethnicities have accepted and been assimilated by or assimilated with various other white ethnic groups. Even many jews assimilated into the greater white nationalities so their descendants today are not aware of any jewish ancestors. The ethnocentric jews on the other hand, have been hostile to their host nations, either openly or covertly.

        • Dr. Möbias

          “Separation and its discontents by MacDonald can be found on the web as PDF. Its quite interesting, balanced, and surely worth the time.”

          Culture of Critique is also available as a PDF: httpCOLON//wwwDOTprometheismDOTnet/library/CultureOfCritiqueDOTpdf

          C of C is vitally important for every single white person to read. It makes clear why the white race is being genoicded, by whom and why.

      • Luca

        We are being raped at the banks, assaulted over the airwaves, robbed at the polling booths, destroyed by immigration and our children are being corrupted at schools and movie theaters.

        This is all being orchestrated by power-hungry Liberals. And among those Liberals is a particular sect that leads the herd in disproportionate numbers.

      • Dr. Möbias

        It is those who ALLOW blacks to destroy neighborhoods, rape white women, flash mob, etc.

        Those whose hands control the levers of power in this country and the media that report and that is disproportionately Jews who do this. They even boast about it.

        Just in case you retort with “Jews don’t control the media,” I’ll post this:”Of the twelve(12) senior executives of the “Big Six” media corporations, nine(9) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 75%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the “Big Six” media corporations by a factor of 37.5 times(3,750 percent).”

        Hollywood: “Of the sixty(60) senior executives of the major Hollywood studios, trade unions, and talent agencies, fifty(50) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 83%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the major Hollywood studios, trade unions, and talent agencies by a factor of 41.5 times(4,150 percent).”

        • BonV.Vant

          W.D.Griffith pretty much started the modern film industry. He produced what are arguably STILL some of the best movies ever made. He was not jewish, but he invented the modern form of the media. Then the whole thing was taken over.

          • Dr. Möbias

            Thomas Edison started the industry and patented his movie camera. It was stolen from him by Jews who absconded with the equipment to the West Coast, to get out from under having to pay Edison for his invention. The rest, as they say is history.

        • Mason Gull

          The Jews are much more than 2% of America’s population. The census only counts religious Jews, while many people with a Jewish background practice other religions or are not religious.

      • HamletsGhost

        The Jews didn’t just embrace the Left. They CREATED the Left. You shouldn’t be “troubled”, you should be alarmed!
        The Jews who identify as conservative or libertarian are just playing the good cop to their co-tribalists’ bad cop.
        If a pack of savage beasts are causing mayhem in your neighborhood, do you blame them, or the people who unleashed them on you?

  • QuinnTheEskimo9

    Who do you think brought about the anti-White changes in the U.S.? The immigration flood bill? Codified and enforced discrimination against Whites known as Affirmative Action? Anti-White political correctness? Anti-White media including TV shows and movies that show Whites as evil and corrupt or violent and genocidal?

    You need to read up on the Frankfurt School, Boaz anthropology, Freudian psychology and Marxist thought, all anti-White movements that have overtaken the U.S. government, media and schools

    Who do you think is behind these movements? Hint: It wasn’t other Whites.

    • The immigration flood bill was written by Senator Teddy Kennedy, a Catholic of Irish descent, and not Jewish at all.

      • Pro_Whitey

        Ted was never that bright. Look up Emmanuel Celler.

        • IstvanIN

          The Kennedy’s were Anglo-hating Catholics who brought their Irish hate of the English and Protestants to America and set out to destroy the WASPs in the US, and thus America. Just as American Jews maintained a hatred for Whites in the US because of what did or did not happen in Europe, irregardless of the fact that America was not only the best country in the world for Jews (Israel included) but also the country that freed them from the Nazis.

          Not all Irish, and not even all Jews, but there seems to be a common thread of hating Anglo-America.

          • Katherine McChesney

            This immigrant push for Mexicans and Central Americans to come to America is an effort to destroy Protestant America. Father Charles Chiniquy cites the churches intent in his book “50 Years in the ‘church’ of Rome”. Under RCC control America will become as corrupt and poverty ridden as all other RCC controlled countries. The Jesuits are the puppetmasters behind RCC rule.

          • Alexandra1973

            And Chiniquy warned Lincoln about the Vatican’s involvement in the Civil War/War Between the States.

            Samuel Morse, inventor of the Morse code, was in Rome in the former part of the 19th century and overheard a plot to destroy America…using the WBTS. And I believe it worked. Lincoln was against the 14th Amendment, I think (which was “ratified” in 1868). That amendment helped centralize power.

            There were also agitators on both sides…again, like pro wrestling.

          • HamletsGhost

            France, Austria and Bavaria were staunchly Catholic kingdoms that were not poor or corrupt. Please tell us how the Catholic church is trying to destroy these Catholic societies.

          • BonV.Vant

            I have experienced the Irish hate of the WASP, it is like seeing a persons brain fall out of their head and what is left becomes a mad frothing beast.

          • Dr. Möbias

            How little they know. They’ll go down with us, labeled as “White” as they are. Another group of useful idiots bringing about the demise of the white race, including themselves.

            Payback’s a bi***

          • Katherine McChesney

            Have you noticed how much publicity the pope gets? He’s the ‘spiritual’ head of the New World Odor. Protestants don’t get the publicity that the Roman Catholics do. It’s as if the Catholic and Papal Court Jewish controlled press is trying to elevate him to the role of God on earth. Sooner or later his public profile will crack and his ‘saintly-ness’ will expose him as a servant of the devil himself.

          • I have about as much Irish ancestry as Scottish, and that was Catholic. As an agnostic offspring of a failed Catholic and a failed Methodist, the notion of hating another white person over a matter of religion seems as absurd to me as hating them over their choice of laundry detergents or pizza toppings.

          • BonV.Vant

            The Irish hatred of the English is about more than just religion.

          • As is the loathing of the English by the Scots. The problem in Ulster was that it was Catholics against Protestants. Protestants, and not Anglican English. Those Protestants are Presbyterians, which means ethnic Scots. Since one would have difficulty finding to peoples more closely related than the Scots and Irish, I have to regard The Troubles as a complete tragedy.

          • Alexandra1973

            My birth father is a Polish Catholic and my mother identifies as Methodist. I identify as independent fundamental Baptist.

            The thing is with Catholicism…they tell you “go do this or you’ll end up in hell because the pope says so.” With actual Christianity, all you have to do is believe that Christ died and rose again to pay for your sins, and you won’t go to hell. The Reformation broke the pope’s power over the people. The truth set people free. The Jesuits were formed as a form of counter-reformation.

          • With agnosticism, one just gets up every day and does the best job possible – or not. I like Buddhism, but much like Ghengis Khan once did, I regard the attempt at perfection as a philosophy, rather than a religion. If God is omniscient, then He will either Forgive me or not, but I can’t take those mistakes back.

            I like being happy. I was very happy working as a chemical engineer, but I was working for the wrong reason: because I wanted money, rather than simply because laboratory work was enjoyable. I was mistaken. I was really just a recreational shooter who worked in the microelectronics industry in order to pay the bills.

          • Pro_Whitey

            The Kennedys are scum in their own class, but I agree that there are some disturbing political aspects of Irish-Americans. it is disturbing to look back and see how much James Michael Curley spoke like Coleman Young of Detroit with Irish in place of black. A couple of economists at Natl Bureau of Economic Research authored a paper on The Curley Effect, which was how Curley molded city policies to drive non-Irish out of Boston, and was almost “successful” enough to wreck the city. Only the end of his influence and Irish assimilation kept him from succeeding. I think Ted Kennedy was trotted out to lie through his teeth on the Senate floor because Irish-Americans are way too trusting of their own kind, and Ted’s lies disarmed them, as they would not suspect that he would stab them in the back. Irish and other Catholic ethnics would not have responded well to a New York Jew like Celler telling them what kind of deal he had for them.. A disturbing number of Irish Americans are with the enemy, but I still think the majority are on our side, just not engaged enough to frequent forums like this for doses of the truth.

      • QuinnTheEskimo9

        Not true. Ted Kennedy did not write the bill, he was the front man only.

        The 1965 Immigration Flood Act was written by by Norbert Schlei who was Jewish, and its official name is the Hart-Cellar bill; Emmanuel Cellar spent his entire career in Congress as a leader in opposition to immigration restriction, beginning with his hostility to the 1924 law which enshrined quotas favoring Northwestern Europeans.

        One should also mention the role of Jacob Javits in the Senate. As soon as the bill was passed, Jewish organizations focused their efforts on increasing the numbers of immigrants. Ted Kennedy may not have lied when said the bill would not change America. But in conjunction with the later efforts of Jewish activists, demographic change was inevitable.

        Schlei also wrote the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, BTW.

        httpCOLON//wwwDOTtheoccidentalobserverDOTnet/2013/05/ted-kennedy-did-not-pass-the-immigration-act-of-1965/

      • Strike_Team

        Absolutely incorrect Michael. Teddy didn’t write one word of the Immigration Act of 1965. It was Schlei as noted by others, along with Emmanuel Celler (and Javitz, Hart and a flotilla of ADL lawyers). It’s noteworthy that so group-oriented is our enemy, they will allow one man (Schlei) to take credit for their group effort. People should look up the video of him talking about the “act”. He is absolutely demonic in his gloating. These people hate us. I respect Jared Taylor, but they never will. And they will never, ever be on our side.

        Ted Kennedy was a spokesman for the law. As many have only half-joked, Ted was likely pulled into a dark room and shown the Zapruder film as a warning of what would happen to him if he didn’t step up and toss his “support” behind the most traitorous, racist and hateful legislation of all. The real reason Ted was the front man? Doubtful it was the “Anglo-hating Catholic” thing. His family was too far removed from that petty crap. Something else was at work.

        • Does one of us have any proof?

          Teddy later said in front of TV cameras that if he had known what would happen, he would still have done it.

          • Strike_Team

            Proof of his being coerced? Who knows? But it is a fact he didn’t write the legislation. As far as his remarks go later in his career – look at how the country has gone, how the Democratic Party was functioning. He was just kissing tail and making sure he was still “relevant”.

          • BonV.Vant

            He was a drunk reprobate that was an easy target for control. He wanted a “position” and “identity” as a politician. He was too stupid to be aware, he was too weak and lazy to look into anything. They handed him an identity and an agenda and said “we can make you a star kid”. All he knew was that he had to tow a line and that he would get praise and applause from one section for this, and that those who control the media would take care of all of his opponents for him. He was a waste as a human being, a typical spoiled rich kid that wanted everything the easy way so he could go through life drunk.

          • BonV.Vant

            he knew who had the real power, those that control the media. THEY were his audience and he played to THEM!!! IT is no accident then that after Chappaquiddick, the oh so righteous, oh so moralistic, nay the self same, self appointed very VANGUARDS of our public morals gave him the biggest and most OUTRAGEOUS pass in modern history. He was THEIR man, he was their drunk shabbas goy at the ends of their strings. All he cared about was his next drink and what the next female his handlers could coral for him looked like.

          • Dr. Möbias

            He was most likely blackmailed by those who wanted that bill shoved through. There were a LOT of skeletons in Ted Kennedy’s closet at the time that could have easily ruined his political career on the spot. The media was standing by to report as I’m sure he was told.

            After being front man and later taking full blame for the results of the 1965 Act, old, fat, drunk Ted was given a pass to do anything he wanted including letting a young girl die in a pond while HE walked away, survived and continued on with politics as usual, including whoring around, openly doing drugs with his nephews and being drunk. Any other White politician would have been utterly destroyed.

          • BonV.Vant

            Probably correct, perhaps the Tedd Kennedy body count is larger than we thought. Or perhaps they were going to do stories on how his father made his money.

          • Dr. Möbias

            Really at that time, in the 60s drugging, whoring, and heavy drinking while in office and on official business was not taken too lightly at the time.

            The media has been known to slaughter people TPTB don’t like or anyone who calls out the wrong people. Ask Mel Gibson and the 29 others that have been “crucified,” so to speak, httpCOLON//wwwDOTtomatobubbleDOTcom/zio_steamrollerDOThtml

          • No proof but still a fact? The man was awful. Teddy cheated on his wife and killed a young lady.

          • Strike_Team

            True. And he was the main gentile front man for the most traitorous piece of stealth legislation our enemies have ever pushed through the halls of DC.

          • Strike_Team

            Given how the country went after the law was passed, the way the Democratic “Party” operates among other things, Teddy Boy was likely just trying to stay relevant.

            Was he coerced? Quite possibly. The man was an incredibly self-centered coward and certainly not the sharpest knife in the drawer.

          • Dr. Möbias

            A link was provided for you above. Did you bother to read it?

            I’m surprised to see this written by someone like you as smart and educated as you are. Here’s another link that provides all the proof anyone needs who still thinks Ted Kennedy wrote the 1965 Immigration Act that has lead to the destruction of White America.

            The part about the Jews’ role in forcing through non-White, 3rd world immigration beings on page 230, Chapter 7, “Jewish Involvement in Shaping U.S. Immigration Policy.” You’ll find all the footnotes at the end of the PDF.

            httpCOLON//wwwDOTprometheismDOTnet/library/CultureOfCritiqueDOTpdf

            Any dissent, direct to Kevin MacDonald at The Occidental Observers. He wrote C of C in 1994 and welcomes corrections to his research.

          • BonV.Vant

            The man was never sober a day in his adult life.

        • Katherine McChesney

          Kennedy was Jesuit controlled. He attended confession every day of his life. I believe he was receiving instruction for how to destroy Protestant America through immigration. Kennedy’s wife repeatedly used the phrase “to whom much is given, much is required” which is Biblical. I also believe the Kennedy wealth was increased by the church in exchange for their following church orders to systematically destroy our country.

          • BonV.Vant

            I doubt this very much. Between trapping women on his boat and making “waitress sandwiches” in Washington bars, when did he have time for confession?

          • Once a week. This phenomenon has been described as “God’s man on Sunday and the Devil’s the other six”.

          • Yes, and the Jesuits are not Jews.

          • Katherine McChesney

            No, they are governed by the ‘black pope’ Adolfo Nicolas who has more power than the ‘white pope’. They are the military arm of the vatican. They are quite intelligent but are dangerous men. Their group is the so-called Society of Jesus. THEIR Jesus is not the true Son of God Jesus Christ as HE would not condone their behavior and policies.

          • Strike_Team

            The Jesuits might be the Pope’s Storm Troopers ( well, used to be) but I have no doubt at all that they had nothing to do with the Kennedy family’s political leanings or adventures. Once the Catholic Church was sunk from the inside via Vatican II, its days of exerting tangible control over any major areas of US politics was over. The giant Bolshevik revolution hit the US and other areas in the 1960’s, and they won. You think “hippies” for instance, came about by accident? “They” – the red diaper kids and red diaper grand-kids – had all sorts of targets, and grabbing the minds of the young was key.

  • Evette Coutier

    Polite and courteous are good, but sometimes you must fight fire with fire. You must be willing to accept this reality and know when and how to use the right methodology at the right time to win. I am sorry that this upsets many people’s sensibilities; however, if you are race realists then you need to extend the notion of realist to politics and to social evolution.

  • curri

    “The United States is one of the least democratic of democracies, in that our system practically bars the door against anyone not a Republican or a Democrat. Who is served by such an oppressive system? Why, the very Republicans and Democrats who pass our laws and the lobbies that cultivate them. It is this closed political structure, not a lack of racial identity, that prevents political progress.

    “Imagine a system of proportional representation, and a list of attractive race-realist candidates. How many votes would we win? Fifteen percent? Twenty percent? A majority of the white vote in the rural South? As parliamentary democracies in Europe show, numbers like that have a powerful impact on policy.”

    Pick one likely state with referendum and initiative and try to get it to adopt proportional representation for state and local legislative offices. It’s not like most people have much love for the two legacy parties. But you’d likely need a renegade billionaire like Peter Thiel to finance the campaign.

    • IstvanIN

      Is proportional representation constitutional at the state level? A state may not have a system like the Feds. States can not have one senator representing each county and then a general assembly with districts apportioned by population.

  • Daniel Schmuhl

    You shouldn’t be any nastier than you have to be. Some people here engage in completely unnecessary name calling and over the top rhetoric.

    My position on the Jewish question is more Kevin MacDonald than Jared Taylor. I try to be fair and balanced on the topic, but that usually means walking a fine line.

    • ShermanTMcCoy

      My nastiness comes from anger, frustration and experience.

  • Berkeley Guy

    From health matters concerning bowel movements to ethnic tensions, nothing should be off-limits in our society to discuss openly in public. Our right to free speech and free expression is not only absolute, but should be cherished by all. No negative stigma should be attached to people who speak out on issues that are important to them.

    The culture of omission due to lobbying groups and institutions is disgusting, but eventually we will win. We will win because we are already, here on this site and others, discussing things that some people would attempt to shame us into a closet over. Since they cannot do that to all of us, they try to block people from speaking at Universities, amongst other places. This is the attitude of the current loser: fearful of open, public debate. If discussing differences in ethnic test scores is so very wrong, why not debate us in public and tell all who attend why it is so very abominable? I am disgusted by anyone who would try to silence me by utilizing typical media tactics and fallacious arguments–no discussion should be off-limits.

    • Bob Dole

      Well said. If someone truly has a ludicrous, worthless and needlessly offensive opinion, why silence him? Let him speak and destroy his own credibility. The mere fact that you try to silence him proves that you are afraid of what he has to say.

      No topic, no discussion should be censored, ever. That was the whole point of the 1st amendment, which is a shadow of its former self at this point.

      • Martel

        Comments should never be deleted simply ”hidden” so you can open it if you wish. Youtube used to do something similar ”this comment has numerous down votes, do you wish to open it either way?”. Something to that effect.

        • BonV.Vant

          they don’t even allow down votes anymore. Those who control the media do not want a TRUE picture of public sentiment getting out.

          • Katherine McChesney

            I agree with you. Eliminating down votes is a way to attempt to control the way we think. It’s similar to losing our First Amendment rights.

          • BonV.Vant

            I agree with you, but I wish I could down vote you, just to be able to do it!

          • So CAL Snowman

            Disqus said the reason they were getting rid of down votes was to “encourage polite discussion.”

        • Medizin

          Amazon does that.

          • Martel

            It allows users to make up their own mind about the comment, and safeguards free speech. Good system.

    • Medizin

      “This is the attitude of the current loser”……………..and the guilty.

  • Anna Tree

    Hi Virgil, welcome!
    You don’t need to agree with everything, Amreners are a diverse crowd, but a skeptic, critic and open minded person has everything to gain and nothing to lose by being tested, isn’t it so?
    Enjoy!

  • Cool. Welcome.

  • I dream that one day there will be an article like this in a major newspaper. Then we’ll know we’re getting somewhere.

    • BonV.Vant

      Jews own the papers, it won’t happen.

  • “Racially conscious whites tend to be suspicious of Jews for two reasons. First, Jews have been prominent in the effort to demonize any sense of white identity. Second, Zionist Jews support an ethnostate for Jews — Israel — while they generally promote diversity for America and Europe. This is annoying, but understandable for historical reasons.”

    I would say, for one thing, that an ethnic community that was most key to the passage of the 1965, and later, legislation that flung open our borders to the Third World and is responsible for our ongoing inundation and demographic genocide is a tad more than “annoying.”

    However, there were probably at least a couple of issues over which I would have strongly disagreed with George Washington. If he walked by outside right now I would still stand up, take off my hat and put my hand over my heart. Of course I am speaking of Jared Taylor, but would do the same for Washington.

    Overall: Bravo! (squared)

  • [Guest]

    >>>“Too pessimistic?”

    No. Too accurate for comfort.

  • Anna Tree

    Maybe it is because you posted links? If so, those posts are not deleted just moderated to check those links, they will show up.

  • jane johnson

    The Thomas Jefferson quote on AR’s homepage pretty much sums up the philosophy here (if I may be so bold as to speak for our group). Welcome, Virgil.

  • Bob Dole

    It can be a lot to take in, discussions can get pretty intense here. Sometimes it’s compared to taking the “red-pill” and discovering how far down the rabbit hole goes.

  • watson800

    I like Amren and admire Jared Taylor, but the Jewish
    question is seldom if ever candidly addressed on this site.

    The attempt to analogize blacks blaming whites and whites
    blaming Jews, fails. First, the matter of blacks blaming whites. Whites have
    sacrificed the welfare of neighborhoods, schools, and cultural norms in an
    effort to integrate blacks into white society. Blacks have benefitted
    economically though affirmative action and the last four decades of integration,
    mostly to the detriment of whites. Some blacks continue to blame whites because it
    bears fruit, it is socially acceptable, and because it alleviates frustration
    that results in cases of their own failure. If blacks and whites were left to their own devices, I think they would substantially self-segregate. A voluntary self-segregated society might be a workable solution. But the Jewish leadership would never allow that because it would diminish their own power, so aggressively forced integration continues.

    The matter of whites blaming Jews is not analogous. Whites have not benefitted from Jewish control of or our domestic agenda. Whites do not benefit economically or socially from criticizing Jews. Jewish influence in Hollywood is very real, and they use the power to their own advantage. They put out film after film portraying whites as the perpetrators of evil upon blacks. Much of the film and media purposely antagonize blacks towards whites. They love making films about American slavery,and the films, of course, omit any mention of the Jewish involvement in the slave trade. Many Jewish organizations view integration of whites and blacks as a divide and conquer tactic that
    enhances their own political power. In the political arena, any politician that criticizes Israel will be in for a rough ride. The aims of diversity,immigration, secularism, that Jewish organizations espouse for white European nations are resoundingly rejected by the same Jewish leadership when talking about Israel.

    In fact, I would say whites do not blame Jewish influence enough. Most whites do not want to deal with the Jewish question, or they just see the symptoms of a society in distress, but not the cause. Most politicians will gladly speak to Jewish groups and listen to Jewish concerns and interests, but those same politicians would not ever consider speaking in front of a white audience addressing issues that are of concerns specifically to whites.

    • BonV.Vant

      You must understand what is happening, why this piece was written. It was written by a jew. The reason it was written is because there is a tidal wave of awakening whites that is headed their way. They are trying to co-opt and neutralize someone they see as a threat. They are playing “nice” at the moment because the demonization did not work, in fact it attracted many people to race realism because they know something is wrong, they know that the powers that be have been feeding them lies, and they know that if something is denounced by those powers, then there must be some merit to it.

      The crux of the matter, what can not be at all denied was stated by Taylor ” First, Jews have been prominent in the effort to demonize any sense of white identity. Second, Zionist Jews support an ethnostate for Jews–Israel–while they generally promote diversity for America and Europe. “……

      BUT, they are USING his good manners to try to brush aside concerns — “This is annoying, but understandable for historical reasons.”

      What they are attempting to do is “neutralize”. They see what is happening in Europe and they don’t want anything like that happening here. They own the media here, the networks, the papers, the movie studios, the whole kit and caboodle. BUT they DON’T control the internet. Things are slipping out of their control. Their response is to play the game the hijackers on 911 played on the people on the planes “Sit back, relax, and everything will be OK. Co-operate with us and no one will get hurt”. They want us to go on being democrats and republicans and with each passing decade as we swat that ball back and forth we become a smaller and smaller minority in our own land.

      • Martel

        See this is paranoia. I don’t know this writer, but American Thinker isn’t part of the mainstream media, it always publishes articles which the MSM doesn’t like.

        Not every Jew is the same, that makes no sense. Jews, like blacks and Asians are more ethnocentric then Europeans, besides some minor but somewhat understandable fears, this is why they tend to follow their ”own”. That doesn’t mean there is not plenty of room for exceptions.

        Do you have any facts which support the writer as some Jewish strategist or agent or is it simply because he is Jewish?

        Byron Roth is Jewish, and he surely could articulate my concerns perfectly as he also admires Macdonald, and has written an amazing book on the ”perils of diversity”.

        You also talked about ”whites morale”, but you can’t even have joy in seeing Taylor pushed in a favourable light on front of a new audience, the first thing you do is claim alterior motives. Let us on Amren be glad with this article. Its normal to be wary, but when you muddy a great article simply over the ethnic background of the writer, that is a shame.

        • BonV.Vant

          Taylor’s beliefs are not being pushed in a favorable light. His “manners”, or his “method” is . I know not every jew is the same, but I do NOT see ANY of them admitting that it was the jews, their actives, and their movements that have done this to us. Not even the conservative ones will do this.

          • Martel

            I don’t see why anyone reading this article would leave with a negative impression of Taylor, which is what matters, quite the opposite, any reader who feels there is something about race he is not being told would find Taylor accessible. AT does not even blame him for his posters, but allows him to make a sensible statement about this matter. Taylor also gives sensible reasons for ”antisemitism”, but as usual, does not make too much of it, for reasons stated here and elsewhere. As long as he doesn’t tarnish every ”antisemite”, that is a positive.

            You can’t expect AT, not willing to throw their usual readership into the deep end, to convert on the spot. I would be thrilled if such an article appeared in a major newspaper(i know i know) but im glad with this too. We are a besieged political minority, that is reality.

          • BonV.Vant

            I will grant you that they are not denouncing Taylor as “hater”. Nevertheless, the implied message here is that they can tolerate “politeness” and that one must not be critical of the jews because that is impolite” I do give taylor Kudos for gingerly handling the subject, expressing some truths that are sure to make many very uncomfortable. Personally, I would like to see many jews splinter off and make loud public statements of disagreement with groups such as the ADL, the SPLC, and make LOUD denunciations of the affirmative action state of affairs, and make LOUD statements that segregation is right for THE US the same as it is for Israelis. I would like to hear some splinter group of JEWS come out and ADMIT what their brethren have DONE. THEN, and ONLY then, would I trust them.

          • Martel

            I consider this simply ”baby steps”, I think they pushed it as far as their own sensibilities and readership would have allowed them. We must remember that even though the political pressure is great, the main strength from political correctness comes from the fact that the writer and his editors simply fear to be labeled a ”racist”. I’m sure if AT readers come across a video of his, this article provides a good impression on which they may decide to actually view it.

            I mostly agree with you about a need for political diversity amongst Jews. But in my view, I simply want them to understand that, their lifes will never be more comfortable then in a world run by Europeans. A world run by Arabs and Blacks, is certainly no place for a Jew. We certainly must continue to convinces gentiles, primarily, and Jews, secondarily, about the need for a balanced view of history.

          • BonV.Vant

            This will lead to nothing. Like I said earlier, a few may break away, mentally, for a few seconds but in the end they will stick with their ethnocentric view. I will believe a reformation of the jewish consciousness when I see it.

          • Martel

            Its fine not to believe it, but recognising what ethnocentrism is, you also see its not simply about ”hate”. Take the Chinese, they stick with other minorities simply because they see whites are failing, its astrategic decision. forcing this is possible.

          • BonV.Vant

            I understand it is not hate, but hostility and a clash of interests are not hate either.

          • Martel

            A clash of interests provides strategic leeway. As long as we prioritise:
            1. A secure future for our people.
            2. A fair reading of history. No one was perfect.

          • Grantland

            I won’t believe it when I see it. Chameleon trickery, always.

          • Dr. Möbias

            I got a very negative impression of Jared Taylor from the article, not positive at all. It was exactly as I expected written from a biased POV from an author who is neither white nor pro-white. I thought the author’s contempt for a pro-white came came through strongly in the writing.

          • Martel

            I don’t recognise this at all. Look at the description of his books, all positive. He is allowed to fully explain where he comes from, and all would see he is not the irrational biggot the SPLC makes him out to be. I hope you will see it from a different perspective, we are often so vilified it is difficult seeing good news.

          • We are very often the product of our own parents. My ex-father long said that I reminded him of a combination of himself and Norman, my mother’s father. My mother agrees. I can’t argue: I am Norman all the way through in most respects. The only time I annoyed Norman, he scolded me for arguing with my mother, and held nothing back. He was infuriated, but kept his calm and scolded me instead. That hurt more than any beating. It hurt, but I kept calm.

            He finished with “You’re a man now, so act like one.” I never argue with my mother anymore.

            I sure miss him.

          • Your father in law was trying to tell you in a roundabout way that women never lose arguments with men.

          • He was my grandfather on my mother’s side, and no, women never lose arguments with men.

          • Kenner

            Men are always at a disadvantage– we’re expected to make sense.

        • Kenner

          His book is a must for Amrenners. It summarizes the ‘Perils of Diversity’, as the title reads.

      • AndrewInterrupted

        I have a different take on that topic. This is what I wrote to Virgil on another post:

        “Jews used to vote “white liberal” categorically (Democrat) until Obama started pushing them out of the grievance industry nest. No room left after the LGBTQ Nation and the Feminist Nation demanded their taste.

        The Jews used to register 90% Democratic, but they see which side their bread is buttered on now, with respect to how multiculturalism ends. They saw that in South Africa. They don’t differentiate between yamakas and baseball caps. You have white skin? You’re out.

        The Jews aren’t “playing nice”, they’re switching sides.

        • Ella

          Jews have the means to be accepted as “White” but they also enjoy the minority category simultaneously.

        • BonV.Vant

          WEll, I’d like to believe that. In fact, I do believe that many have, many individuals that is, people I know. When I say the collective jews, I am talking about the core of marxists who it seems will never switch sides. They make up a large percentage of jews. They include people like Speilberg and other hollywood types as well as all of those that make up the various organizations. Those organizations have NOT switched sides yet.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Very good point. And those you mention, the Hollyweird types, are very ‘useful idiots’ for the Cultural Marxists. They know the non-whites will eat them last (well, maybe their children).

            ‘An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last’.

            Winston Churchill

        • Grantland

          Chameleon trickery, swallowed by the gullible goy.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Oy, chameleon is my word to describe the tribal ones!
            You can’t have it.

        • Beloved Comrade

          They’re also making aliyah to Israel after they’ve ruined one white country after another. They consider Israel their homeland and it is being reserved for their people and ONLY their people.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            One poster here said that there is evidence of emigration from Israel. The ones with the financial means are moving away from what will eventually be ground zero for Pakistani or Iranian nukes. Tel Aviv will turn into a silicon parking lot pretty quick after a 50 kiloton nuke pays a visit.

          • Grantland

            No they’ll bristle with neutrality under their shield while they get the goyim to blow each other up. Then they emerge.

      • Ella

        Burnout breeds apathy which can be dangerous for Whites as they retreat into their media world.

    • Andross

      Interestingly, Jared Taylor says that the greatest obstacles he has faced are the machinations of the ADL and SPLC (organizations that promote the interests of powerful Jews). So he understands the power of Jews in stifling the success of any “race realist” movement. Those people most responsible for silencing him are powerful, influential Jews. And he basically admits that in this article. I don’t necessarily blame him for side-stepping the Jewish issue, though.

      • Ella

        Why should Jared deal with the Jewish question when you have other individuals who approach the Jewish question. We can blame as many corrupt gentiles as Jews for these social and political problems. I think some Jews are genuinely scared of how far they have pushed the majority group.

        • Andross

          You are right. JT doesn’t need to discuss Jews; there are others out there focusing on that side of the situation. Kevin Macdonald’s Occidental Observer comes to mind. Jared Taylor manages to discuss race realism in a variety of public forums, serving our cause immensely. If he started talking about the Jews I doubt he would be able to make any statements in public at all.

          • Beloved Comrade

            How often does Jared Taylor speak in public now? How often is he invited onto the major networks to speak up for white rights? I see Potok of the SPLC on all the time talking about White supremacist terrorists and that something must be done to stop them How often do major newspapers run Jared Taylor’s opinion pieces or editorials, like they do for the SPLC?

            What does Jared Taylor have to lose? He’s not often invited to speak in public on a major forum right now. He’s already known as a white supremacist nazi hater by the likes of the SPLC and physically attacked when he goes onto college campuses.

            If that statement is true at the top, then the Jewish question should be discussed to get at the truth, right? Otherwise what is AR afraid of?

          • Andross

            “Anti-semite nazi” sounds a lot worse than “racialist” or “white supremacist”, to be honest. JT even managed to ask a question at a town hall meeting in Virginia this week.

  • ViktorNN

    I’ve said some nasty things from time to time, but here’s the thing:

    Read any of the big left-leaning blogs and news outlets like Salon, Huffington Post, Gawker, Slate etc. and you will routinely read so many out in the open racist slurs against white people it’s unbelievable. So many that it becomes commonplace and accepted. Constant bashing of “angry white men.” Constant bashing of non-liberals as “ignorant white trash” or “old white people.” Also, lies like “white men are more likely to be pedophiles” (false – blacks are) and “white males are the only spree shooters” (false again). The slurs get repeated so much that it becomes the cultural air they breathe, where they don’t even see the racism in what they’re saying.

    The interesting thing about how progressive lib sites tolerate and encourage anti-white racist speech is that there’s an odd intersection of non-whites who say racist stuff about white people because, well, they genuinely hate white people, and white libs who join in, in effect bashing themselves as if that makes them somehow more pleasing to non-whites or morally superior to other whites. If you pay attention you can start to see who’s who. It’s always so odd to me how many white liberals join in on hating themselves. They think they’re being hip and ironic, when the joke is really on them. Non-whites hate them just like they hate ALL whites.

    Long story short, if I say something nasty now and then it pales in comparison to the kind of anti-white racist stuff I read on left-leaning sites.

    • BonV.Vant

      Youtube let’s blacks call for white genocide. I took a screenshot of just such a post.

      • Dr. Möbias

        While countering videos and any about White Genocide are taken down constantly.

        • RisingReich

          Right. But there’s NO conspiracy at all. Just coincidence – that lasts forever.

    • Geo1metric

      I hope you counter those anti-White comments!

  • Taylor denies the charge: he is a “race realist” not a “racist.”

    So that would make Mr. Taylor an anti-racist? I meet “racists” every single day.

  • Jesse James

    Use old school methods, small private invitation only meetings, pass around recordings of speeches and discussions, follow up on the old Soviet era samizdat techniques for sharing banned ideas and literature but update it using the latest technical methods.

  • BonV.Vant

    hmmm, a poster called Engelman was allowed to post statements saying that whites were “biologically inferior” to jews and asians, and that post was never deleted, and Engleman was allowed to continue to post such statements. AMREN is NOT a white nationalist site.

    • Martel

      Amren promotes white identity and race realism, it also tries to promote the notion of race realism amongst those not attracted by white nationalism.

      • BonV.Vant

        oh, so it is just an academic intellectual enterprise? This is all for nothing really important?

        • Martel

          No, promoting White Identity, as Taylor has done with his latest book, is incredibly important. I’m quite sure it is me who made JE uncomfortable on Amren, that doesn’t mean I consider the fact that his anti-white comments are not deleted as proof that Amren is something opposing its declared mission. The notion of white identity is continually promoted in reviews, videos, and implicitly by the selection of news articles. Most commentary on the articles also strongly advocate white nationalism.

          • BonV.Vant

            I’m sure I made him more uncomfortable than you ever did.

          • Martel

            I have not noticed this, quite sure I was quite consistent in my takedowns and his increasingly disjointed replies to me were quite telling, before he departed to catch a break, but I’m glad if you did. Want to measure who spits further now?

            His book White Identity is all about white morale, you can do your own work in pushing up morale in the comment section or otherwise, as I often try to do.

          • BonV.Vant

            did you have a different name? Were you booted? Alright then.

          • Martel

            Plenty of folks got booted, this is not a measurement, its a shame Spartacus was kicked out for example, even though he refused to tone down his aggressive language.

          • BonV.Vant

            My point is that it is wrong to treat the survival of the white race as an academic intellectual exercise, that to allow posters like Engleman was very damaging.

          • Martel

            I see your point, especially because someone told me, perhaps it was you, that some valuable posters left because of his antics. Partially i think disparaging whites should be off limits on Amren as there are few places for rational discussion of white interests, even though I have no issue with claims that Asians or Jews may have higher average intelligence then whites. Evolution is not fair, nor gentle, so this may be the case.

          • Anonymous

            You are entitled to your opinions of what to do with non-Dutch people, as you are Dutch and live in the Netherlands. The only problem I have with you is that you like to refer to White people as a monolithic bloq. You especially, should know better as you are Dutch and not a White American. I don’t like how you think that just because you are White that you can butt into issues that only affect White people outside of the Netherlands, or White people who are non-Dutch. If you really care about your ethnic group there is plenty you can do inside the Netherlands; you can also advocate for the Afrikaner people since they are genetically Dutch.

          • Martel

            I advocate for white Americans as they are treated by their political regime no different then I am, for the same reason, which is our common ethnic heritage. I don’t tell you what to do, you clearly enjoy diversity, which is fine, and am therefore not interested in where your choices lead you or those dependent on you.

            Most of what is happening to my people on the Netherlands has little to do with events in the Netherlands, the ideology was imported from the united states, enforced by the UN, and supported by the international political community. To claim its a Dutch problem while being blind to the same issues in other European nations or the US means you are out of touch with important events. Also, its not up to you to decide where I raise my voice, it takes a totalitarian mind to even assume such a right .

          • LovelyNordicHeidi

            Good comments, Martel! Keep it up.

          • Martel

            Thanks, I like the reception at AT, most have shaken off the chains of “political correctness”.

          • Ella

            To Anonymous poster, with Globalism, it is a world elite problem. They (corporations and/or individuals) use American government to force agendas down our throats as well as pressure Europe to follow our path. The coincidences on both side of the Atlantic are just too great.

          • Medizin

            It pleases me that Europeans join us. Are we not Europeans in the same predicament as our countries of European ancestry. We learn from each other what might work.

          • Ella

            Try Europeans in diaspora who left to colonize their so-called foreign nations. There is no mistake when I see my Germanic children among hoards of nonwhites. Many European Whites married Whites until recently.

          • Grantland

            This is nonsense. We are all Whites. That’s who we are.

          • Flanders21

            That’s exactly how i respond to White southerners who claim being of southern heritage an ethnicity as if somehow they are more Whiter than us born to a different geographical location….absolute nonsense indeed!

          • BonV.Vant

            I think white people are in one sense, a monolithic block, and should act like one. I have no problem with Martel giving his take on what is happening in the US.

          • Anonymous

            Also, I don’t tell you what to do with the non-Dutch people inside the Netherlands; please don’t tell me what to do with the non-English people in England or the non-White people in America. If I am okay with non-Whites continuing to live in America I have the right to vote accordingly. You, however, cannot and should not vote outside of the Netherlands.

          • Martel

            I cannot vote, but I can raise my voice and engage in political activism. A bit like La Raza, if you will. And I do so, and will keep on doing so, its incredibly important. To respect borders when the people inside are not even respected by their governments is nuts.

          • Grantland

            We are the Whites. Nationality is secondary. Bon, are you feeling alright?

          • Bon, From the Land of Babble

            Grantland:

            Do you think I wrote that anonymous post? I assure you I did not.

            Or perhaps you are referring to another poster who goes by BonV.Vant?

            I notice people are referring to him as “Bon” which is how I’ve been known here going on 9 years.

            Please everyone, to make matters clearer as to whom you’re referring please use “BonV” for “BonV.Vant” and “Bon” for me.

            Otherwise, I’ll have to do what Whiteplight does and use “Formerly Known as Bon.”

          • Grantland

            You upvoted both posts. An error?

          • Grantland

            I know that, Bon. I was just surprised to see you (and Mergatroyd) upvoting that anon post. Are we Poles and Swiss and Americans and blah blah blah? Or are we Whites, all of us, united against a common, global foe? I say the latter.

          • Bon, From the Land of Babble

            Check again. Must have been a temporary lapse of sanity.

            Yes, of course we are all Whites united against the same, common, global enemy.

            Bon

          • Grantland

            Murgatroyd, et tu? Have I mined a deep vein of disagreement? Are we Poles and Germans and Americans and English and .. and..

            Or we Whites?.. we band of Brothers.

          • Mergatroyd

            I’ve read many posts on other forums from former regular posters to AR who left precisely because of JE being allowed to destroy thread after thread with his anti-White posts. Some said that they’d been banned because they complained about JE.

          • Engleman was harmless because nobody here much trusted him.

          • Einsatzgrenadier

            This is only because the people who post here on a daily basis are well-acquainted with Engelman’s shenanigans. He was harmful because race realism neophytes viewing his comments for the first time, especially about Asian and Jewish supremacy and how great Obama’s presidency is, would have gotten the wrong idea about this site.

            That said, I would take one Spartacus over a thousand JohnEngelmans.

          • BonV.Vant

            Englemen baited people into being uncivil. Calling people “biologically inferior” is not going to help maintain a civil atmosphere.

          • Ella

            Engleman had his racial pecking order much like the elites. In some weird way, we have been made into the “middleman” or social offering to minority groups if we want the roles or not.

          • Mergatroyd

            He was not harmless. He was subversive and did everything he could to divert, distract and deflect discourse about Whites issues

            He had been booted off other White forums and even bragged about it. This should have been another one he’d been booted from.

          • ThomasER916

            Amren trusted him enough to moderate these posts.

          • FeuerSalamander

            You are talking about posters, but we don’t know how many read posts but do not make posts. His agenda seemed to be to sow doubt and disillusionment and create a fatalistic zeitgeist around the whole issue of the survival of the white race.

          • Mergatroyd

            Hear, hear. Never could understand it. I constantly asked why I should donate to a site that allowed someone like JE free reign to demoralize Whites at the expense of Asians, especially when my comments that rebutted his Asian love were deleted. Comments with profanity or racial slurs should be taken down but mine were always civil, well thought out and well within the parameters of AR’s posted commenting policy.

            Did JT start this site to promote Asians over Whites? If not then why was JE allowed to wreck nearly every thread and divert and disrupt the discourse. I have read poster comments on other threads that stated they left because AR wouldn’t do anything about JE.

          • BonV.Vant

            One can’t ask a warrior to be a florist

          • I got booted once, It was depressing, because the tone of conversation on this site is very comfortable for me. I wouldn’t be much good for Stormfront, and certainly wasn’t any use to the American Nationalist Union (where I was called a “crypto-Jew”).

            I’m sorry about Spartacus as well, and begged the mods to let him back. They wrote me a nice reply, and Sparty’s (deleted) calls for violence must have placed AmRen in an uncomfortable legal position. Tom Metzger lost his home to an $PLC lawsuit after someone read something he had published and then killed an Ethiopian. I don’t see eye-to-eye with Mr. Metzger, but taking a fellow’s house over something he wrote is too much, and this is one of the tools the opposition uses to silence us.

            I suspect that if one of us wrote something sufficiently inflammatory here and it was left unmoderated that the $PLC would go after Mr. Taylor’s assets as soon as some hot-head did something.

          • Martel

            I definitely understand the worries of the moderators, Spartacus was too hard headed to see it for himself, I’m sure his Romanian background had not given him the ability to see the sensitivity of such matters. He is also in his early twenties I believe.

            I do enjoy the tone here, I say pretty much everything I want, despite a few minor run ins with the mod over my debates with JE and my discussions about ethnic activism amongst Jews or Asians,but those are negligible. In reasonable terms, , anything can and should be discussed.

          • So CAL Snowman

            I did not know that Spartacus was banned. If he was banned, I’m a bit surprised that I have not been banned or at least warned by the mods. I know the path I tread, and I know many here disagree with it, but Mr. Taylor and the other Amren stalwarts must feel that my rhetoric (not trying to pat myself on the back) adds something of value to the overall discussion. It is not my intention to subvert this site as Kathy M would have you believe. I just cannot in good faith stifle myself when it comes to what I believe to be the truth.

          • NeanderthalDNA

            Engleman and Sparty? Wow. I take a couple months sanity break and all sorts of stuff changes.

            Guess folks thought I got axed too, lol.

            Of course there was a reason for the “sanity break” and perhaps the high inflammatory nature of the rhetoric may have played into my decision to cool off and come back fresh and level headed, you know?

            Regardless, insightful analysis. I’m out of the loop. Engleman?

          • BonV.Vant

            Ah yes. One can not sink the ship. He will have to learn to control his energy and save it for a day when such things will no longer be taboo.

          • RisingReich

            It’s ridiculous he was booted. I swear, it was just because he had a rather negative view of the tribe. That was the only sin, from my seat anyway.

          • BonV.Vant

            I loved reading his posts. The guy is awesome!

          • So CAL Snowman

            I considered Spartacus to be my brother in arms. Spartacus carried the fire that is absent in so many White men.

          • I think it was a complete shame.

          • Mergatroyd

            Spartacus was not afraid to tell the truth, I never read one of his posts that were anything other than truthful.

            He was actually very restrained here compared to when I encountered him on another forum that didn’t moderate. His posts were unrestrained not in language but in content where he was allowed to speak more freely than here.

            I also spotted him over on Alex Jones’ site which baffled me. Jones is a shill if ever there was one.

          • IstvanIN

            I liked Spartacus despite the fact that once Europe was freed of non-whites he wanted to kill all the Hungarians in Romania. He was intemperate is some of his comments.

          • Martel

            That is quite simplistic indeed, there is absolutely no need for internal wars. My personal experiences with Hungarians have been good, but I can’t stand their bond with the Turks. The Turks today are aggressive imperialists who wish to dominate Europe through immigration and openly promote this movement, I don’t consider them European either.

          • IstvanIN

            That has been around for a long time and is a fringe way of thinking, although Jobbik seems to embrace it. Most Hungarians consider themselves European and Christian.

          • Martel

            Odd they chose to embrace something so out of touch with their constituents.

          • Kenner

            He chased tangents like he had a bad case of ADD.

          • I’m quite sure it is me who made JE uncomfortable on Amren, that doesn’t mean I consider the fact that his anti-white comments are not deleted as proof that Amren is something opposing its declared mission.

            You can’t gauge intent by simply focusing on what is allowed and not deleted. You find context and compare what is allowed to flow freely vs what is contained, scrubbed and guided into a certain direction. Yellow John’s opinions and zealous lust for Asians and Jews have been treated as somehow paramount to a discussion about White Identity, while various truths and diametric views and contradictions negating Yellow John have been much more thoroughly sanitized.

            That kind of process has nothing to do with Truth, and it really has nothing to do with White Identity as a platform to any kind of meaningful action.

            Do you judge a place like Stormfront or VNN by what they are claiming to be their message and platform? Or do you judge those types of entities by what is allowed and not allowed? If you scrub comment sections of voices that say Jews and Asians are inferior to Whites(along with deleting various historical and statistical truths), but allow free reign to voices that say Whites are inferior to Jews and Asians, then what is the most logical conclusion I could make?

          • Martel

            The most logical conclusion you could make is that we live in a hypocritical world, and Amren simply tries to make the best of the cards we have been dealt. I actually know next to nothing about Stormfront or VNN, I do read C-C, but what I do know doesn’t suit my interests, so I could not tell you.

            I have constantly discussed the works of Macdonald on Amren, and defended the reality of Jewish ethnic activism. Only few of my comments have been deleted. When commentators start yelling slurs, or claim every Jew is the same and its a purely evil race or people, I completely understand why Amren doesn’t want to be associated with this. These people are counter productive and should find other ways to vent their frustrations before discussing such serious matters. Naturally, Taylor who does recognise legit arguments for ”antisemitism” also has no intentions of frightening of Jewish readers, who naturally feel uncomfortable amongst whites calling for revenge, I would too if I would be Jewish.

            Ethnic conflict is a delicate matter, we should never deny the truth, but we have the ability to take into account the impact our words have where this doesn’t effect our argument.

          • BonV.Vant

            Let the truth be told about where we are and how e got here, who is responsible. If jews try to suppress this, then they will only confirm their guilt , and they will confirm the belief that this was all intentional. Their actions will decide their fate.

          • RisingReich

            They confirm their guilt daily.

          • When commentators start yelling slurs, or claim every Jew is the same and its a purely evil race or people, I completely understand why Amren doesn’t want to be associated with this.

            You’ve pretty much done exactly what the mainstream media does whenever a White person speaks about black crime. You’ve set the stage for a slippery slope that always leads to a bunch of disgruntled White people picking on poor Jews, right? I’ve made my opinions and views pretty clear in the past. I don’t tolerate conspiracy theorists, and I don’t throw any kind of support behind people that make sweeping generalizations and blame Jews for every problem in the world.

            I do, however, find it a little odd that you think tiptoeing around the delicate sensibilities of Jews is somehow natural and productive, but a rabid Asiaphile yapping endlessly about Whites being inferior to Asians and Jews doesn’t create an environment that would be conducive to “frightening of White readers.”

            I mentioned context to you, right? Okay, why have White readers been subjected to this kind of double standard coming from an entity that purports to be about White Identity?

          • Martel

            You make claims about me which are simply incorrect. JE didn’t call me a bully for no reason, and I did what I could to make him realise such views are not welcome here, and he should alter his tone if he wishes to post and discuss here. I acknowledged that I am unhappy about the fact that whites nationalists left Amren because they saw him berating whites, and this should not have happened.

            I don’t tiptoe around anything, else I would not be called an antisemite everyday. I do consider it more productive then making sweeping generalisations or calling for revenge, though I understand the frustrations of many white nationalists.

          • You make claims about me which are simply incorrect.

            I made no claims. I used your exact slippery slope argument against you after you said:

            that doesn’t mean I consider the fact that his anti-white comments are not deleted as proof that Amren is something opposing its declared mission

            and then went on to insinuate that AmRen only deletes comments because of unhinged crackpots who aren’t productive to any meaningful conversation. Okay, again, what has been the net gain or productive aspect of allowing Yellow John to spew his “White people are inferior to Jews and Asians” diatribes?

            Just so we are perfectly clear, I have seen some extremely benign comments deleted. I have personally had some extremely benign comments deleted and sanitized. But Yellow John kept on rolling.

          • Ella

            Jewish sites freely talk about Gentiles with some real animosity, stereo-types and abundant accusations of being “Godless” and greedy. They do not have their comments deleted. I don’t believe in ignorant name-calling posts or deprecating comments since it conflicts with any authentic discussions or learning from others. You can tell the difference between questioning sincerely and blatant rudeness.

          • BonV.Vant

            They are extremely hostile to any politician that is a devout christian. This was their one big hangup with bush. IT really stuck in their gullet.

          • RisingReich

            The fact they delete my post anytime I bring up the tribe just reinforces the fact I’m on to something truthful. GOT to repress the truth.

            It makes me believe sites like this are here for the purpose of venting (controlled opposition) so Whites don’t blow their collective tops.

          • Beloved Comrade

            All viewpoints on Jews, both pro and anti, should be welcomed in the spirit of intellectual inquiry and to arrive at the truth.

          • RisingReich

            Probably the same one I’ve made.

          • Mergatroyd

            Exactly as you stated. It is what is allowed to stand and what is deleted in the comments section that is telling.

          • Ella

            I think having White Identity will promote some nationalist feelings if it takes alignment with an American or European-descent identity. It does not mean oppression or even being a war-monger. It think many Whites fear a strong White identity due to the continual conditioning with racist or “Nazi” name calling. We are weak in spirit and “poetry” at this time.

          • Martel

            Too many whites fear it indeed, unfortunately it is also quite important. Some “anonymous” poster berated me for assisting white Americans, but they are discriminated solely because they are descended from Europeans. The fact that our governments have chosen to discriminate against their white citizens, means it is a international problem, and can therefore only be solved internationally.

          • Mergatroyd

            I wouldn’t trust it to be solved “internationally.” The UN and silly “world court” believe that White nations should take in tens of millions of non-Whites from Africa. They also look the other way as Whites are being systematically slaughtered in South Africa against the UN’s own credo on genocide.

            There’s your “international” and the solution: Flood White nations and ONLY White nations until Whites are genocided off the earth

            Whites and ONLY Whites will be able to secure the only thing that matters: A White-ONLY homeland where we Whites can preserve our culture, heritage, history and provide a safe place for our children to secure a future for our children. WE are asked to secure a future for the children of Tibet and Nepal from Chinese hegemony but for our own children? Well, to the globalists and one-wolders WE are the problem (because we challenge them) and must be eliminated.

            All empirical evidence points to this and if you are in the Netherlands you certainly know this to be true as your own country is overrun with 3rd world Muslims. Anyone from the UN trying to stop THAT? Politicians? Anyone making headway as Muslim fertility ensures that your people will soon be a minority in a homeland they have occupied for thousands of years? Any outcry from human rights groups? Didn’t think so.

            Really, what is more important than securing a homeland for our people and if we don’t do it you can be sure that NO ONE ELSE WILL.

          • Martel

            With internationally I mean Dutch activists like me and presumably American activists such as yourself. The UN will never aid us, it is filled with globalists from top to bottom.

          • Grantland

            We should be the globalists. A global White movement of White Men. Who shall stand against us?

          • Martel

            To let borders constrain us while our opponents don’t is incredibly foolish, besides, I am as concerned about the European people in the US as I am for the people here, these mutual concerns should be stimulated.

          • We Whites already have ancestral homelands, and most of us still live in them. It is time to take them back.

          • Beloved Comrade

            Taking them back, at least in the U.S. will not be possible at this point, it is far too late and all efforts to organize a pro-white movement have failed. Our enemies have seen to it that we are kept separated and atomized, which means helpless and defeated.

            Defeatist? No, reality – and a waste of time. How about another way?

            The only thing that will work at this point is to carve out living space and resources for ourselves, fence it off, and guard it with deadly force from non-whites. This is what South African Boers have done in South Africa because they realized the government would never be taken back by whites and that they were at the mercy of a murderous regime who wished to eliminate them and IS genociding them.

            I believe at this point it is far too late to hope for a resurgence of a large pro-white movement in the U.S. to take back our government. If it happens, great, but our enemies, who control the government, military, treasury, banks, media and academia, will prevent us from forming advocacy groups. They already do as much and Jared Taylor and others like him who speak for up for whites are physically attacked and threatened.

          • Mergatroyd

            Nothing made JE uncomfortable. He was attacked on here relentlessly for his anti-White, pro-Asian views. He felt every White would be far better off when our culture, heritage, history and WE ourselves were race replaced by Asians and Jews. He had no understanding of either race and was sure they’d be “nice” to us when they had control over ALL of our resources. Yeah, just as the Jews are “nice” to the Palestinians and the Japanese were “nice” to the Chinese in Manchuria. Only a cultural marxist believes that, but for YOUR race, not his.

            He prattled on about this here for years and was completely impervious to criticism, data and facts. They meant nothing to him. He’d ignore it all and move on to the next thread and take up again. Repeat for years and years.

            What did he care? He got to bash Whites and tell us how inferior we are and his comments were never deleted.

          • Martel

            Everyone has a chink in his armour. It was quite clear from his reactions before he left that he lost control of his composure, when he returns I plan to continue our therapy, as me and JE like to call it.

          • LovelyNordicHeidi

            our therapy

            This is one of the reasons I like reading your comments, and I hope to see JE convert if he decides to return.

          • Beloved Comrade

            Engleman has been presented with facts, data and evidence for years and years now and has not converted. In his case, conversion is not possible and he gloats on this site about agitating whites.

            Why anyone here would waste their time on such a fruitless effort is beyond me. Call him what he is, an anti-white, and move on. Not all whites are worth saving.

          • BonV.Vant

            Loss of composure means he started having doubts about what he believed. His life apparently was built on those beliefs.

          • BonV.Vant

            I’ll have to get that book.

          • Martel

            It contains a wealth of information and is definitely of use for anyone who wishes to protect and promote white ethnic interests. Taylor is often underestimated as a writer.

    • Katherine McChesney

      Engelman has been noticeably absent for several weeks. It is refreshing to not have to endure his racism against the White race. The guy is a leftist, a Democrat and an obama fan.

      • BonV.Vant

        Let’s see, I had to suffer him for about ten months or so. So when another ten months are up, and I have not had to suffer him during that time. I will start donating again. For all we know he is recovering from a bad case of take out.

        • RisingReich

          Or malaria.

          • BonV.Vant

            yellow fever

        • Mergatroyd

          He has yellow fever. I hope he doesn’t recover and finds a home on Asian Nation where he can post his statist drivel amongst those he loves about race replacing Whites.

      • Alexandra1973

        I am okay with admitting Orientals have a larger brain capacity. Doesn’t bother me.

        I’m not okay with anyone advocating that they replace or mix with us.

        • I’m even OK mixing with an Asian, as I started out 3/16 Injun. Replacing whites? Never. The only one of you who has ever met me is Mr. dd121, and he would say I pass for white. I can write extemporaneously on lots of different subjects, but I can’t be white for the racial purists among us.

          It hurts, too. I’d like to be 100%,

          • POLARBEAR MAXIM

            Even being white cannot open all doors. . .
            don’t stop commenting Mr Scott . . . ..I enjoy you post ..

          • Kenner

            3/16 is nothing, Michael.

          • LovelyNordicHeidi

            Not even to mention that there is a reasonable likelihood that he is actually close to 100% White, because his 3/16 Amerindian figure is inaccurate, as I explained in another post in this thread.

          • Grantland

            I would very much like to be a Boer. Being unable to dissemble my agnosticism, unfortunately makes that impossible.

          • Mergatroyd

            Let me ask you this: Would you be admitted into Oriana? Or is that for Boers and Boers only?

          • Grantland

            I don’t think I’d be welcome. The Boer war concentration camps are still bitterly remembered amongst the hard-core.

          • BonV.Vant

            I’m still on their side even if they decided I could not live there.

          • Grantland

            Me too.

          • Geo1metric

            Would you settle for being a Bore? Just kidding. 🙂

          • Grantland

            Tradition is commonly perceived as boring. But tradition is biting the bullet and overcoming adversity.

            Tradition

            When evening falls upon the shore
            You smell the salt, and hear the roar
            Of surf that breaks in spumes against the reef.

            The sun is low, the breeze is cool
            The waters hiss, the seagulls call,
            The sand is warm and gritty soft beneath your feet

            You draw a breath, and close your eyes
            And raise your face and clench your teeth
            And feel your spirit spread its golden wings and soar

            How good is calm
            The calm of peace
            How good is life
            The all in all
            And yet you know, one day
            A storm will come
            and sweep it all away.

            “Unbending intent and impeccability of spirit”

          • Geo1metric

            Excellent!

          • ThomasER916

            Bazinga!

          • LovelyNordicHeidi

            I’m even OK mixing with an Asian, as I started out 3/16 Injun.

            I understand that you are a perfectionist. I like the fact that I am 100% White. Heck, I’m even 100% East Frisian. But if I would have been 3/16 German and 13/16 East Frisian, would that have disqualified me to have a relationship with a 100% East Frisian?

        • IstvanIN

          Giving away one’s nation away voluntarily to an alien people is never a good thing. Ever.

      • Ella

        Maybe, he went on vacation to Florida.

        • Geo1metric

          Israel or China or both would be more likely.

        • BonV.Vant

          Boca Raton no doubt.

      • His pet hate was criminals, and as a felon, I tried to talk him into a different mood.

        • Mergatroyd

          He was an Asia-phile and anti-White and said as much on nearly every thread. His posts were tiresome and repetitive and can be summed up thusly: Asians superior, Whites inferior. I couldn’t understand why he wasn’t banned or his demeaning, demoralizing comments removed yet when I countered his comments, asked why he was posting such drivel on a pro-White issues site or why he posted what he did, my posts were removed, not his.

          His Asian love posts do not belong here; they are distracting to say the least. We Whites are in the process of losing our homelands, culture, heritage and history and he seemed to be all for it, to be replaced, according to him, by Asian or Jewish superior cultures.

          Is that really what this forum is about or what Jared Taylor wishes for the White Race?

          If not then why was this poster allowed to prattle on about White race replacement by Asians and Jews?

        • LovelyNordicHeidi

          And did you have any influence on him?

          • Mr. Engelman would start to turn, and then some other poster here would put him down and cause him to dig in his heels.

            The one I really miss is Margaret.

    • Dr. Möbias

      Engleman’s anti-White, pro-Asian posts were NOT taken down and left to stand yet any rebuttals or refutations to his anti-White screeds WERE deleted. That’s why so many here think he was a mod.

      I’m surprised he’s not all over this thread but I’m grateful that he’s not. He’s an anti-White to the core and believed the world would be a better place when Whites are replaced by Jews and Asians. He said as much on almost every thread.

      I checked and he’s been gone for 23 days but I doubt he was banned simply due to the fact that his anti-White posts were always left to stand.

      • RisingReich

        He calls himself half German, too. Disciple traitor.

        • BonV.Vant

          most likely someone with a guilt complex for the wartime activities of a grandparent.

    • LovelyNordicHeidi

      AMREN is NOT a white nationalist site.

      I think that the above article is quite revealing on this issue.

      We will prevail anyways.

      We have already proven ourselves capable of fighting against all odds.

      • I regard it as a Western Civilization site. This civilization was created by whites, and I believe this must dominate, though it need necessarily be exclusive.

        • LovelyNordicHeidi

          I regard it as a Western Civilization site.

          I am not sure whether JT endorses that idea. That does, however, not reduce my satisfaction that you regard it as such.

          though it need necessarily be exclusive.

          I do not need to endorse anti-universalism for race realism, because I advocate the emigration of all non-natives from all our White homelands, and especially from Europe and Germany.

          Whether that emigration be in the form of repatriation or self-deportation does not matter to me.

          What matters to me is that we turn back the clock to the pre-multiculti era: I want the old demographic situation.

          • I’m 3/16 Amerind, so while I am bright enough, I am racially tainted. I accept this without complaint. This is nothing that I deliberately did to myself. I even pass for 100% white. It was an accident I did not cause.

            I’ve never met Mr. Taylor, though I would like to do so, preferably over a nice dinner.

          • Kenner

            He’s quite down to earth, not at all aristo, so for this blue collar guy, dinner was a pleasure.

          • LovelyNordicHeidi

            I’m 3/16 Amerind

            I can tell you now, I doubt that you are 3/16 Amerindian. What you think is mistaken. By saying that you are 3/16 Amerindian, you mean to say that 3 of your great-great-grandparents are Amerindian. This says little to nothing about YOUR percentage of Amerindian DNA. You know that you get about 50% of your parents’ DNA, right? But you do not know which part you get! You might even be 100% White, because if many of your ancestors are 100% White, there is a great change that nothing is left of your great-great-grandparents’ Amerindian DNA. Why? The more often the DNA of your ancestors has been split in half, the more likely it is that the Amerindian DNA is not included in the two halfs of DNA that you got from your parents. Saying that you are 3/16 is of little to no value. It is more correct to say that you have some Amerindian great-great-grandparents, but to know whether you have Amerindian DNA, you have to take a DNA test. I will be more interested in hearing the results of your DNA test than in hearing that there is a slight chance that you might have some low percentage of Amerindian DNA.

            This is nothing that I deliberately did to myself.

            But it will take about another 4 generations (if it more or less) to make your family White again. You know that I support you and your family, I love the fact that you have a daughter and wife who are probably as bright as you are, and you also know that I do not support miscegenation. Life is hard, and I have already had my share of it. We all make mistakes. I think that various factors led you to having a mixed child. I remember that you said that no one ever mailed you in prison. If I had been older and known you personally, I would have done it. We cannot change the past, in any case. We have to live with the fact that your child is mixed. I have peace with that fact, and it does not change my stance on foreigners in the West. Interracial relationships are the greatest social problem that we will have to talk about the future, but now we should first get every foreigner out of our countries to make sure that interracial relationships will not be possible anymore. The offspring of the ones that are already here can be slowly reassimilated into the White community and be made true Whites again in a few generations. We can still stop the trend now. If we take too long to make all foreigners to emigrate, then the amount of interracial relationships will rise and rise and rise up to a point where it will no longer be possible to assimilate the offspring of the interracial relationships back into the White community, and if that happens, we will meet so much resistance to pro-White activity that we will be doomed forever. In that case, we will simply have to give up.

            So, just a quick review of what I am saying: I have empathy for your situation, and I know what must be done, and if we do not do this soon, we will reach a point of no return.

            It was an accident I did not cause.

            I understand how sad you feel about the fact that you have Amerindian ancestors. Do you not think that everyone deserve ancestors from a single racial background so that things are not that complicated? Do you not think that this should be a “human right” – so to speak?

            I even pass for 100% white.

            Maybe you are 100% White. If you look 100% White, then it might mean that you are really 100% White.

            I’ve never met Mr. Taylor, though I would like to do so, preferably over a nice dinner.

            Although I do not always agree with JT, I admire him for the fact that he fights against all odds for the sake of race realism. So, I wouldn’t not mind joining you guys for that dinner. <;-)

          • BonV.Vant

            I agree with everything you say except one point, that being that it will take 4 generations to make his descendants white. Japan is a nation with two phenotypes, the jomon and yayoi. The jomon can look quite European. They are thought to be descendants of the Ainu people that were absorbed by the Yayoi, who came from Korea. The Samaurai warrior class was made up of these Jomon types, and later the military elite was also made up of these types. Michael has given background on his wife and she comes from this class. It is possible that his child could look as European as Keanu Reeves.

          • LovelyNordicHeidi

            I agree. There is a slight misunderstanding. You are talking about his child’s looks, but I was talking about his child’s DNA, as I was especially focused on the genetic composition of his family. It is interesting that his child might look quite European, but it will take about 4 generations – if not more or less – to make the DNA of his family almost completely White again. If what you say is true, then his child is about 50% Jomon, and if his child marries a White male in the future and gets children with him, then her children’s Jomon DNA can theoretically reach from 50-0%, although the percentile extremes are statistically less likely than the percentages more towards the mean.

          • oddball1776

            (Moin, moin – Heidi – Google have temporarily suspended my e-mail account due to ‘suspicious sending of large amounts of data’ – lol – will resume as soon as possible – it says the suspension might be for 24 hours – :-))

          • oddball1776

            Everyone else – Extreme leftist moderation at the DT – I think Fabs has a new job !!

            What do ??

          • What Fabs used to do was come back to old threads days later even and try to knock out the top rated comments, the ones she’d already reported and failed to get scrubbed. Her tactic was to revisit these old threads and purport to ask a question, clarifying the poster’s meaning, “You mean white people, don’t you?” That sort of question. Then, armed with any reply that suited her narrative she would then report the top comment again, with added context. That’s how your top comments and Valkoth’s top comments get scrubbed even days later, after they’ve already been made number one comments.

          • oddball1776

            (I have a reply pending modding Augs)

          • LovelyNordicHeidi

            Too bad, Odd. I think that perhaps it is better to change the file names of the books, so that it looks less suspicious, as I suspect that one or more of the file names might have caught their attention.

          • oddball1776

            It will be all academic/literature/novels from now on – I think that is all the political stuff, that will fit 25mb e-mail limits, sent.

            🙂

          • BonV.Vant

            OK, I see what you are saying. There is one thing I wish to add though. Something upwards of 90% of everyone’s DNA is identical. It is a very small portion of our DNAs which is ethnic specific. I would suggest therefore that looks are the best way of determining race. IT is through the DNA that determines a person’s looks that we judge their race. If a child is 50% jomon, upwards of 90% of that DNA is identical to white DNA. So the amount of DNA that needs to be bred out is much smaller than the actual 50%. WE are talking about replacing one piece of DNA with an identical piece in upwards of 90% of DNA. Only the small fraction of DNA that is different from one group to another, or “group specific” is important.

        • BonV.Vant

          If an individual can blend in, then they can fit in. Another thing to consider is that no population nor ethnic group has ever been hermetically sealed. A white country can absorb a small amount of non whites over time. The non white’s ethic traits will disappear, be bred out, sometimes in only a couple generations. I have met people who are half chinese that don’t look asian so sometimes it can happen in one generation, sometimes it takes many. What we are concerned with is protecting the integrity of our ethnicities. A purist approach is not necessary. The problem is have large numbers arrive and what happens then is that every generation after mixing with a white is with the nonwhite ethnicity. In that case, the white ethnicity gets bred out of existence.

          • IstvanIN

            There has been ethnic and racial mixing for quite a long time, no doubt since long distance travel became possible by either horse or ship, but the mass dilution of an entire race of people has only been encouraged for a half-century or so. So, yes, I agree that a little bit of mixing will cause little long term harm but the long term mixing of the races is a recipe for disaster. Latin America is the most notable example. Had the Spaniards brought women with them and created settlements, like the English did in North America, Latin America would be far more civilized than the mongrel society it is today. Another example are the Arabs, so mixed with blacks that whatever civilization they did create is gone forever. The Philippines is fairly mixed as well and that doesn’t seem to have done them any favors.

          • BonV.Vant

            A little admixture over a long term will not change the race. ti will be absorbed and bred out. It seems there would be a threshold, above which, the race is in danger. I am not sure what that threshold is. There are many people who have an Amerindian ancestor yet they are in fact total European phenotypes. A race realist nation will state what that threshold is and require minorities to remain under that threshold.

    • amen, why he slams Dr. MacDonald is beyond me. he is a real professional guy and talks the truth.

      • ThomasER916

        Why? Because this site is owned and operated by the Culture of Critique.

        Kevin MacDonald is the best thing to happen to Whites in my lifetime and probably in the past 200 years. Better than all of the inventions. Why? Because at this point in our people’s history our inventions, our labor, everything we’ve done is being auctioned off to the Turd World.

    • RisingReich

      I couldn’t even welcome a poster who lamented about deleted posts. I said I sympathize, everytime I talk about the tribe – delete.

      And then they deleted that post.

      • BonV.Vant

        yes, I have noticed an inconsistency in the way things get deleted, especially when engleman was posting.

        • Martel

          Too be fair, BerniceGreenBaum, presumably a troll, send me a message about whites being intellectually inferior to jews and asians a few hours ago, and it was deleted.

          • BonV.Vant

            a yes, but the engleman could do this and not get deleted. Even after the comment was flagged, even after an email was sent to the site.

          • Martel

            True, they didn’t always make the right calls.

    • Stan D Mute

      I don’t recall any specific post by engleman stating a biological superiority, but it’s pretty well established science that Jews and East Asians have IQ higher than the white average. Engleman had some really asinine opinions I think, but you could choose to engage and argue or simply ignore them.

      As for whether Mr Taylor is a “white nationalist,” I think that depends on how you define the term. He’s not a Metzger proposing to turn the northwest into some sort of whites only outpost, but I think he would be happiest in a nation 90+% white. He’s intelligent enough to know that we are badly losing in the court of public opinion and that our opponents control most of the means of broadcasting propaganda. Our people are completely brainwashed and so he appeals to what a rational man can appeal; simple fairness and science. Both are on our side if we would just stop running from the pejoratives (“racist!”) and demand fairness. Mexicans already have a perfectly good country of their own, why should we give them ours? Africans have significant cognitive deficit and propensity for violent crime, let’s face that fact and deal with it rationally. Culture is indivisible from tribe or race, so let’s allow all people self determination in their *own* lands. These are all things that can and should be openly and rationally discussed, let the other side act like ignorant louts trying to stifle debate.

  • BonV.Vant

    As white hegemony in formerly white nations disappears, it will be evident WHO did this. This “uncivilly” is just getting started folks. Treachery always demands a heavy payback.

  • BonV.Vant

    So the “POLITE” JT plays the “good cop’ and us mean posters play the “bad cop”. Neither the good cop nor the bad cop are as effective by themselves as they are when they team up.

  • Alexandra1973

    I think he scares the diversity crowd because he doesn’t fit their mold of a “racist.” I believe the fact that he looks and acts every bit the gentleman does it. He’s not some raving maniac spouting obscenities and slurs. It unnerves them, from what I can see.

    Maybe it’s because people are more likely to listen to a gentleman than a raving maniac. Said maniacs are “safer” because fewer people are likely to listen to them and consider what they say.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      That was my biggest regret with Andrew Breitbart. He weaned himself off the Liberal Kool-Aid so well, but he stopped short of embracing Jared. I think if Andrew had lived another 10 years he would have seen the Jared Taylor light.

  • Luca

    Pretty much. They are basically cult members.

  • “He believes the differences in White and Black crime rates, academic and intelligence test scores, and other variances in behavior and outlook are largely attributable to genetic differences, the result of adaptation to different environments over the course of 50,000 years.”

    The differences between whites and sub-saharan blacks go deeper than that.
    The North Africans who left the continent to become Europeans and Asians
    had already evolved substantially away from the sub-saharan black norm.
    It’s not like Kunte Kinte left North Africa 50,000 yrs ago. Rather, those who left North Africa were already proto-caucasoid and looked distinctly different from blacks in the subcontinent.

    So, whites and Sub-Saharans could be divided by 100,000 yrs.

  • Dr. Möbias

    What have we gained from any of the following Jewish intellectual movements? Explain in detail what we’ve gained. All were started by Jews to destroy Whites and White Western Civilization:

    1. Classical Marxism

    2. Revolutionary internationalism

    3. Critical Theory

    4. postmodernism, anarchism

    5. Freudianism

    6. Second-wave feminism

    7. Second-wave libertarianism

    8. Open Society

    9. Gay Rights/LBGT Rights

    10. American Civil Rights

    11. Human Rights

    12. White Privilege/White Abolitionism

    13. Agitation for open borders and mass immigration

    14. War-mongering neoconservatism

    15. Academic race-denial

    16. Encouragement for white race-mixing

    17. Exploitation of the Holocaust narrative

    18. Israel Lobby

    19. Promulgation of hate speech law.

    These things are for Whites, not their own people, for US, to destroy US and it’s working as our numbers fall precipitously and we are overtaken by 3rd world hordes.

    Islam is nothing. Anybody who understands what is happening in the West today knows that Moslems are simply the tool of other forces. If we were free to pursue our own interest we could deal with them in five minutes.

    • BonV.Vant

      The movie “Aunti Mame” is an interesting look at how these things infected the greater society. It is a story of a rich wasp Aunt who takes in her orphaned nephew and takes place between 1929 and about mid 1940s. It pretty much covers all of those things as the aunt was a “free spirit” who indulged in all of those things. Whether a movement was just mentioned in passing in referring to a character or whether it was treated in depth, it was all mentioned. What this piece of propaganda did was it painted all who opposed such things as narrow minded, stuffy, angry, unhappy, mean etc whereas the people involved in those things are all presented as lively, bubbly, smart, witty, kind, sincere etc.. IT was pure propaganda but it did have it’s effect. Simple minded people left the theatre wanting to associate themselves with Mame, and what was “jewish intellectualism” before the movie, became hip waspish after the movie.

  • Dr. Möbias

    They are what the Soviets called useful idiots, doing their masters’ bidding without realizing they’ll NEVER be a part of the masters’ class and will, in fact, be shot and killed when the times comes, just as useful idiots were shot and killed by the Soviets.

    We are dealing with the same exact master class that White Russians had to deal with, a class that thought nothing of reducing White Russian numbers by the tens of millions by withholding food and outright killing them. We’re on the same road as the Kulaks of Soviet Russia.

    • HamletsGhost

      In Orwell’s 1984, there was the Inner Party and the Outer Party. The latter was employed in making the machinery of the Party run, but the Inner Party had the ideological foundation kept firmly under guard in “The Book”.
      The Outer Party handled the “how”, but the Inner Party understood the “why” of the Party’s iron grip on the hapless citizens of Oceana.
      White liberals comprise the Outer Party. Their Jewish masters comprise the Inner Party.
      I’ll let you guess what their “Book” is.

  • Garrett Brown

    That was quite the lengthy article, nice read.

  • Alexandra1973

    One of my great-grandparents came from Belarus. This makes me happy to be one-eighth Belarussian!

  • HamletsGhost

    It was strong-minded whites who DIDN’T allow this to happen. You know, the ones the Frankfurt School members had to flee from in a hurry in 1933.

  • HamletsGhost

    The main motive of white liberals, as Jared Taylor noted, is their need to feel morally superior to other whites. Truth be damned, but heaven forbid that they not be seen as ethically elevated souls with hearts of pure gold.

  • Hal K

    I have been reading and commenting at American Thinker regularly for the past couple of years. This is the best (from a pro-white perspective) article I have seen there, besides “The GOP Outreach that Dare Not Speak Its Name” by Robert Weissberg from last year. I would like to think that this article is a sign that some in the mainstream conservative establishment are rethinking the effective ban on white identity politics and race realism, but it seems that National Review, which recently dropped John Derbyshire (and also Robert Weissberg), is committed to going in the opposite direction.

  • Katherine McChesney

    I have heard one interview with John Todd. He claimed to be from an Illuminati family didn’t he. That’s interesting about JFK. I wouldn’t be surprised as he refused to allow the pope to instruct him in how to govern America. There is one thing, however, JFK made it clear that he would NOT speak in churches that were NOT blessed by the pope. At any rate, this video is amazing.

  • LovelyNordicHeidi

    Welcome! Our political opponents can only make ad-hominem-style attacks on us and use stereotypical non-arguments, because their ideology is not based on reality and they hate those who remind them of reality.

  • Your lifeboat is doomed.

    Because you invited me onto it.

  • Berkeley Guy

    I upvoted you, but this is difficult to believe. Who are “they.” Now, I know I am being provocative, and it may be that a person or a group of people thinks that they can control the Internet, but I really doubt the implementation. Much talk over the past two decades has been bandied about by people trying to invoke fear. The same tactics are used for gun control advocates. Both have failed.

    I will say that I will do whatever I can to oppose any control of our human rights of free speech and free expression. If laws are passed against human rights, then civil disobedience is mandatory.

    • BonV.Vant

      This will ASSURE that there will be violence, and individuals will not be sorted out.

    • Geo1metric

      ” If laws are passed against human rights, then civil disobedience is mandatory.”

      I agree. I think that any attempt to stifle free speech will result in massive civil disobedience. It certainly should. I lived through the anti-war protests of the ’60s, and I think these would be even more widespread and larger.

  • Berkeley Guy

    I remember the feeling when I found a link to this site. Many articles here have raised questions about issues that few are willing to discuss openly in public. It is a relief that somewhere people are unafraid to exercise their rights to free speech and freedom of expression.

    I also remember feeling trepidation, since probably my university may monitor the sites that I visit while logged into their network as I am now.

    • If someone calls you into an office and gives you the “Third Degree”, explain that you were curious about what was being said. Obviously, you were.

      • Berkeley Guy

        If someone were to call me in to discuss my browsing activities, then they better have a very good reason for that decision. I would, however, be delighted to engage with anyone at my university–student or faculty–who wishes to discuss the issues that this website reports and opines on. So if the reason is curiosity on their part, then I’m all for it. If someone calls me in to try and make me feel guilty, or argue against this site’s purpose, or to try and use scare tactics, I would also be delighted to engage them. Win, lose or draw I benefit since I am always on the lookout for a good philosophical debate, and since it would give me practical experience in defending my rights.

        One thing I want to make clear to anyone anywhere is that I will not be made to feel guilty, I won’t be bullied into turning away from this site, and it will only increase my justification for seeking knowledge and alternative opinions whenever someone tries to make me seem ‘controversial.’ The best defense against someone like me is the old ‘ignore and be indifferent to his arguments in hopes that not more people are attracted to what he is doing’ strategy, where I also win since I am left alone to pursue the truth. No type of bullying, censorship or indifference will halt the progress being made by us.

  • Jesse James

    I say look for the Don’t Tread on me flag, it is pretty good indicator. If things get really bad we might have to scratch it on fence posts like hobos.

    • Jesse James

      Look Nancy there may be a patriot hiding in the culvert….

  • Evette Coutier

    Speaking of race politics, I finally got banned from the Atlantic website. I am having a celebration tonight. Please everyone have a round or two this weekend to share in my jubilation.

    • sbuffalonative

      My first and on disqus ban came a couple months ago on a website about a story on the Swiss had turned back immigration.

      The Swiss were congratulating themselves on their victory when I wrote something like, ‘don’t be led to a false sense that you’ve won. The left will push this issue until they get what they want’.

      I was banned for warning the Swiss about the goals and tactics of the left.

      • Evette Coutier

        My ban was nothing so noble. A negro posted a comment and refered to the prior post as white man. So I posted referring to him as black boy. He was not banned but I was. I love the liberal racial hypocrisy because now I can and will point this out to everyone I come across online and in person. Black preach a color blind society but don’t practice it. Liberals only want equality for minorities, not whites. I celebrate my eviction because it is tangible evidence of the subtitle but ever present bias against whites in today’s America. Their acts of inequality show that they have no interest in fairness, equality, or even common courtesy. Every little bit of evidence helps people see reality.

        • Mergatroyd

          I asked a vicious non-white on what I thought was a neutral forum to explain why White and only White nations are mandated to take in massive hordes from the 3rd world and pay for it all.

          He didn’t get a chance to answer before I was banned. The poster I asked was most likely a systems admin who found it easier to ban me rather than answer the question.

          • Evette Coutier

            Wear it with pride and honor.

        • Who Me?

          Many blacks are ever so touchy about being called “boy”. My husband inadvertently addressed a 15-year-old inmate as “Boy”, who then went screeching to report him. My husband said, “Well, he IS young enough to be my grandson…”. The supervisor agreed with my husband’s reasoning and filed it under “unfounded”.

      • ThomasER916

        “I was banned for warning the Swiss about the goals and tactics of the left.”

        I was banned from a Swiss site for pointing out a change in teaching their history classes had nothing to do with accuracy and everything to do with Cultural Marxism. Just because the exact date isn’t known doesn’t mean the event never occurred or the people never existed.

    • MBlanc46

      Cheers!

    • Mergatroyd

      Badge of honor. I’ve got a few myself.

      • Evette Coutier

        Some folks hate and fear the sting of battle. I love it.

        • Geo1metric

          I want you at my side when it happens! 🙂

          • Evette Coutier

            I’ll be there.

    • kikz2

      i had a good run of fun over there the other day as well, but apparently have yet to be banned.. 😉

      • Evette Coutier

        Getting banned is a badge of honor for me. Keep up the fight.

        • AndrewInterrupted

          What is the attraction to the Atlantic these days?

          • Evette Coutier

            I like to find liberal blogs that are hypocritical and post fact. I did it at the HuffPost, but their readership is so low it is a waste of time. Liberals like this are not going to alter their views. However, some moderate read there, and every little fact or thought that casts doubt is a potential convert. Plus, I just love making these fools look stupid. There’s a little bit of Spartacus in all of us.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            I see that willful blindness at a lot of Libtard sites, too. There’s an old Biblical saying that goes something like:
            ‘…No man is blinder, than he who chooses not to see…’.

  • sbuffalonative

    Moderated on this site or AT?

    AR is generally open to well-reasoned arguments.

    I agree with Mr. Taylor that I would like to see fewer inflammatory and uncouth comments but when it comes to free speech, you have to take the good with the bad. I believe most commenters mean well even if their phraseology is found to be crude at times.

    I also believe that many of the obnoxious comments are those of provocateurs intent on proving their point, through deception, that AR is nothing but a site for racists.

    It’s easy for anyone on the ‘progressive’ left to post, ‘I hate Jews’ or ‘I hate n-words’ and then run off to other sites and say, ‘See this comment I found on AR? This is what they really think!’

    • LHathaway

      They deleted all the (well written – and well argued) comments by a pseudo afrocentrist on here a few weeks ago. To be honest, they may have thought he was a WN pretending to be an afrocentrist. Don’t know why all his comments were deleted. You used to get deleted a lot on this site, your comments would never appear, if you said anything remotely liberal.This was before disqcuss. Back then all the comments appeared at once, delayed. I’d never been to a website before where they banned, or rather, censored you, for something appearing to be liberal.

      Back then, it appeared about 20% or more of the ‘comments’ were made by moderators. Who knows how busy Mr. Taylor really is. This is likely something other publication do also. They are businesses. And of course, ‘the people need to know the right information’. There was A LOT of irony in many of the comments before.

  • sbuffalonative

    Which is why his enemies are intent on convincing people he is.

  • RisingReich

    Yes, it seems the quote of Thomas Jefferson at the top of the page is true – but only if we’re not talking about the tribe. If we’re talking about the tribe – all bets are off on here.

  • RisingReich

    Disappearing posts? I’m sympathetic, believe me! It typically means you’re hitting awfully close to home. I take it as a compliment, but admittedly I get irritated sometimes about it, too.

  • IstvanIN

    You have just made my argument, the individual versus the political/pressure groups.

  • AndrewInterrupted

    Just got home after a 15 hour day of field service, but I had to get my AmRen fix.

    And I just gotta say: You rock, Jared Taylor!

  • RisingReich

    Can’t even welcome a new poster here without you clowns deleting my post.
    Says much about you.

    • BonV.Vant

      maybe it is your screen name.

      • Martel

        I suspect this as well. I have not seen RisingReich saying anything much “worse” then I say. The National Socialist association may be too much.

        • AndrewInterrupted

          Some days the Moderator has a hair trigger.

          • Martel

            Some days indeed, most of the time its fine.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Hi Marty! Always a pleasure. How’s the weather in Europa?

          • Martel

            The weather is pretty good, either hot sun or drowning in summer-rains. May i ask why your profile is private, I intended on following your account a while ago.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            I poach Libtard sites regularly. Like Polsh*tico, MoJo, big networks, etc. I don’t want the Libtards following me back here and repaying the poaching favor. <;-D

          • Martel

            Very wise ^^

          • MekongDelta69

            When AmRen went online, I used to know the Mod, as well as a couple of people on the staff. Same when they went to Disqus.

            Then the Mod changed, but at least when you asked him a question, he would sometimes answer and then either delete your post – or the entire thread. That was the case with every Mod – until the present Mod.

            I’ve said some utterly benign things that NRO wouldn’t delete – and poof – they’re gone. Then I’d ask why – what are the new ‘rules’? – and poof – I would notice it would say ‘Removed’ in my Disqus account with no explanation whatsoever.

            Beats me…

          • AndrewInterrupted

            AmRen is very good about letting people vent some steam on ‘the tribe’. You just have to be fact based and provide a little documen-tation. I usually back up tribal comments with this link.

            httpCOLON//wwwDOTdemocratic-republicansDOTus/neanderthals-and-semites

          • MekongDelta69

            Actually, the benign deleted comments I mentioned above, had nothing to do with Jews or Asians or anything even remotely close to that.

            The reason I know is that Disqus logs (and keeps) every comment, whether it goes through, is ‘Pending,’ or is ‘Removed.’ I’ve reread some of them, and to this day, I don’t have a clue in the world why those were deleted, and most others weren’t.

            Hell, I’ve never even replied to Engleman! Not once…

            P.S. Whatever happened to Bobster and Spartacus? There also used to be some VERY cool women who posted on here.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Bobster’s disappearance is a big mystery. Spartacus, on the other hand, was banned. I chat with him over at TakiMag from time to time. Too much tribal militancy. A good example of the gamut of Moderator responses ‘tribal’ talk will get you.

          • MekongDelta69

            See? Look up. I still don’t have a clue why.

            No explanation…

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Notice a certain word missing in my post that survived?

          • Mergatroyd

            My God, What was deleted?

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Tribal criticisms mostly. It’s all in the wording.

    • Strike_Team

      We’ve all been hit by the “delete” hammer.

      • BonV.Vant

        My excuse was that I had a couple drinks and let something fly that I knew was not going to be appreciated.

        • Strike_Team

          LOL.

          I’ve fired off things knowing they would be deleted. But the chance to vent was worth it. And sometimes the statement ended up being visible just long enough to no doubt get through to someone.

          Disqus is probably logging all our remarks so they can be turned over to the “proper authorities” if and when the (white) population is totally disarmed . ; )

          • BonV.Vant

            well if that is the case then I am already on a list, why worry about it eh? Apres Nous le deluge!

  • AndrewInterrupted

    Jared Taylor is European-America’s Rock of Gibraltar.

  • Martel

    Too others, this individual is a legit troll, you may feed him up-votes if you want to, but you have been warned ^^

  • BonV.Vant

    really dear? That’s nice, tell us more about yourself, it is so scintillating.

  • BonV.Vant

    well, another post that starts out talking about…. YOUUUUUUUUU!

  • So CAL Snowman

    I dont think they are but they have something else in common 🙂

    • Geo1metric

      :).

  • AndrewInterrupted

    Jews used to vote “white liberal” categorically (Democrat) until Obama started pushing them out of the grievance industry nest.
    No room left after the LGBTQ Nation and the Feminist Nation demanded their taste.

  • RisingReich

    As I have said many a time here, this clinging to ‘civility’ in the face of utter wickedness is not only HOW we got here, but WHY we are STILL in this miserable situation.

    • True civility requires the moral fortitude and courage necessary to denounce evil and its perpetrators, loudly and sternly. What we have now is cowardly submission, not civility.

      • Geo1metric

        Some of us, and I suspect many on this site, are not submitting in any way; I spend a lot of time writing, phoning, etc. every time I hear a White racial slur.

        I see it now as having nothing to lose, and everything to gain.

      • Grantland

        I love you ms_anthro; and I always will.

  • puffdaddy

    I am sure Mr. Taylor knows this, but one reason some people are sometimes less than civil here is because people need to vent once in a while. It is stressful living in a world where you cannot say anything without being accused of “micro- aggressions” and our stress levels are very high.

    • Mergatroyd

      How can we be civil and “nice” given the conditions under which we are being forced to live?

      We must walk on eggshells constantly in public and at work lest we lose our careers because we offended some non-White, even in the most banal manner.

      We must sit by as urban blacks are imported into our White neighborhoods to surround our elderly and ruin our schools through Section 8 housing.

      We must bite our tongues as we are passed over for career advancement and promotions repeatedly at our jobs by lesser qualified blacks and browns.

      We must not say anything as our children’s schools are overtaken by blacks or non-English speaking non-Whites who then get all the resources that are taken from our own children so they can “catch up.”

      We must suck it up when our own children are passed over for scholarships and university admissions while those with lower GPAs and test scores are given admittance and full rides to major in black or Chicano studies.

      We are forced to pay onerous taxes so brown people can outbreed us all while on government entitlements.

      We mustn’t offend non-Whites when we watch them fill their grocery carts with all kinds of crap and then use SNAP cards to pay for it all.

      How in the hell are we supposed to feel about these things knowing that if we protest we put our jobs in jeopardy, jobs that are near-impossible to come by for us due to preferences, H1-b visas, AA, quotas that are deliberately against White people?

      This is OUR homeland and we are being discriminated against. Any White who isn’t angry needs his head examined.

      • Stan D Mute

        All true. But to the suburban soccer mom whose head is filled with Oprah mush, you will come off as a skinhead who wants people in mass extermination ovens. Do you see that? And do you see we MUST deprogram that soccer mom and make this personal to *her* and to *her* children?

        This is a PUBLIC forum. If soccer mom is somehow led here by a comment on a news story of interest to her, which is more likely to cause her to stay and learn more? Ranting and raving? Or calm rational exposition of the facts germane to *her* family?

        Remember the *vast* majority of whites don’t have the direct personal knowledge and exposure to Afro and mestizo behavior that we have, but *do* have a lifetime of media programming and conditioning to disguise the truth and engender white guilt. We must turn the table and show our enemy as the hate filled madman and ourselves as the rational protectors of all that is good and wholesome for our people.

        • Beloved Comrade

          Then leave ’em behind. Those whose heads are filled with mush from Oprah deserve the fate that awaits them. Instead of trying to convince brainwashed whites, plan to save yourself and your loved ones and don’t worry about the rest.

          Trying to save the mass of whites or convince them of what they face is not possible. We are one minute to midnight and do not have time to overcome the extreme brainwashing that our people have been subjected to. Not all whites are worth saving.

    • FransSusan

      It’s also very stressful to realize that we productive white citizens are the ones being forced by a corrupt government to support every third world parasite on the planet—not just the parasites and interlopers in the US that are devouring the host, but billions in aide is sent to third world countries. Whites need to object to this abuse.

      • Beloved Comrade

        We need to separate ourselves from this abuse.

        We need self-governance, not to be lorded over by a hostile, alien, non-white elite who wish to drain us of everything we’ve got and hand it over to non-whites while discriminating against us and our children.

        We need an area to be free and separate from non-whites, their demands on us and insistence that they are victims of our oppression. I do not wish to live in a society lorded over by non-whites which is what we have now. There will be no going back, we are too far down the paved road and we must deal with the circumstances at hand rather than try to change the entire system.

        The only thing that will work for us to save ourselves is to separate ourselves completely from non-whites so as not to be at their mercy or have them steal what we have earned. We will have an area of our own where we can live as we desire as whites without non-whites and their problems.

        It has, can and will be done.

  • puffdaddy

    Welcome Virgil, the first article I read here was an e-version of a print version of a teacher’s experience in a southern black school. It blew my mind. I have been a loyal reader ever since. It is called “What it is like to teach black students” by Christopher Jackson, from the July 2009 issue, which is available in Am Ren’s archives. I recommend it.

  • MBlanc46

    And too high end for most of us here (former Stamford resident).

  • JTK

    The article about Jared Taylor generated, so
    far, more than twice as many comments on this site as compared to American
    Thinker. I regularly read articles posted on both sites. The only
    problem I have with American Renaissance site is the presence of Neo-Nazis in
    the comment section, but I have to agree with Voltaire when he said “I disagree
    with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it”

  • NeanderthalDNA

    “I consider myself to be a race realist and find most of the articles and comments here to be an accurate representation of what I see and hear when conversing with white people.”

    And you, sir or m’am? Are you White?

  • you are starting to catch on about democracy and the parliamentarian vs federalist/separation-of-powers governmental structure. Good for you. But you have a ways to go.

    Or perhaps you understand more than you let on. Perhaps you hide that knowledge in order to cater to your audience. I wonder…

  • MBlanc46

    I lived in Stamford for only a year several decades ago; definitely in the low-rent district. Compared to Greenwich, and New Canaan, all of Stamford seemed like the low-rent district. Passed through Bridgeport–what a storied name in American history–on I-95, but never went into the city.

  • Evette Coutier

    I noticed a number of folks opine that impolite comments were due to high levels of frustration. I think we all appreciate that. I would like to offer that we should place ourselves for a moment in Jarred’s shoes. He has placed himself in the limelight of an American anti-hero. No matter how polite, rational, or factual he is, he is under constant attack from all angles. I am sure he has paid a great personal price too. In all that he maintains a level of self-control and dignity that is unbelievable. He is vilified for his loyalty to western culture, and yet he remains calm and reasonable. He walks a tight rope every day, and yet he shows no sign of public frustration or the need to vent any private frustrations. I want to express my thanks to Jarred for being the person that I could never be at a time when it is desperately needed.

    • BonV.Vant

      NO!!!! NOT WESTERN … CULTURE!!! European ethnicity!!!! WHY do you turn right around and try to strip all meaning out of this enterprise!!! CULTURE is PROPOSITIONAL. Don’t you get it yet? That is what we are fighting AGAINST! We are fighting against the idea that there is no white American ethnicity and that we can be REPLACED by blacks and browns and it won’t make a difference because they can adopt our CULTURE!

      • Evette Coutier

        I disagree. It’s a cart before the horse issue. White ethnicity builds white culture. Black ethnicity cannot create white culture or maintain it. Detroit is the classic example.

        • BonV.Vant

          What we are trying to preserve is the number of whites, the number of white homelands. Africans moving into England are not English just because they adopt western culture. Yes, blacks never do succeed in understanding nor maintaining white cultures, neither do browns. Yes, we all follow our inner natures which ids determined by race. Why do we have to be shy though, about speaking about our RACE! It is RACE, not culture! Culture seems to some from race, but in todays world we are told that there is no connection between the two. So when someone talks about preserving western CULTURE, they are avoiding the mention of the REAL TREASURE- our ETHNICITY, our RACE!

          • Evette Coutier

            Avoidance of race was not the intent. I was simply expressing my gratitude to Jarred for his efforts on our behalf.

          • Evette Coutier

            There, Bon, I changed the word culture to people just for you.

          • Mergatroyd

            It’s important to note that massive non-White immigration is only being forced on White and ONLY White nations. No one is demanding that Japan or Thailand open up its doors wide to a flood of destitute Africans until the Asians in those countries are small, hated minorities.

            This is a war against the White and ONLY White race and it is genocide. It cannot be repeated enough. We are in a fight for our survival and people are arguing about what is culture, etc.

          • FransSusan

            I agree that we need not be shy about speaking about our race. Also, we whites must stop fearing being labeled racist. There’s nothing wrong with being racist. Look up the word in the dictionary. It describes how we normal, productive, intelligent whites feel about being white. It’s not a bad thing.

        • Mergatroyd

          I will add this. I am not in a fight with any culture or any people. They are at war with me because I am white.

          You had better start fighting back. The people who at war with you are completely ruthless and will not stop until the last white is wiped off the face of the earth. Their pogrom is one of white genocide. There’s no playing nice-nice with these types because they would likely kill you rather than look at you.

          It will be kill or be killed. If you don’t know the history of the Soviet Union I’d suggest studying up on it because we are being subjected to the same exact conditions as the White Christian Russians and Kulaks who were liquidated by the non-Whites that controlled the government. Some sources report up to 100 million liquidated before it was over.

          It will be no different here in the U.S. where blacks are being used as a battering ram against Whites by these same anti-White cultural marxists.

          They not only mean you and yours harm, they mean to liquidate you and they’ll do it.

          • Evette Coutier

            If you ‘re-read my post you will see that was my point. That despite if we are at war or not, they are with us and we will go extinct if we do not defend ourselves.

          • Mergatroyd

            Living in self-defense will not protect of preserve our DNA.

            We must completely destroy those who wish to genocide our race. They are relentless and ruthless against us and will not be stopped until and unless they are completely destroyed.

          • Evette Coutier

            I appreciate your passion and enthusiasm. However, you may wish to temper your online rhetoric unless you want the Feds knocking on your door.

          • Medizin

            The people who at war with you are completely ruthless and will not stop until the last white is wiped off the face of the earth.

            Those here who want more aggressive action, get it. Time is passing and nothing is being done.

      • So CAL Snowman

        BonV. Vant – I admire your passion and your fire. People like you give me hope that the fight is not over until WE say it is.

      • Stan D Mute

        The point Jared makes is valid. Successful political movements are not based on ranting and raving. The unconverted see only a wild eyed fanatic and want to be as far as possible as they can be from its source. This must begin with educating the masses on what is really going on. On why their parents moved to the suburbs. The overwhelming majority of whites innately know to avoid Afro ghettoes, but they are utterly blind to the daily race war committed against us. Step one is making the victims personal. Who are they? Who are their families? What was taken from them? This is all done via propaganda. Race shouldn’t even be mentioned. Just victim, loss, location, and attacker. There’s a reason news media stopped telling us who the criminal is! And *everyone* wants to know about crime because FEAR is what drives us. So we must begin by doing the job the media refuses to do and tell the stories of crime. After a few years of this, begin telling the stories of culture and how the invaders refuse to assimilate. Tell about Santeria and anti-western behavior. Etc.

        Absent a major uprising by Afros as a spark, there will be no quick fix here. It’s a LONG LONG process if successful. And the end game is simply separation and self determination for ALL peoples. Rants about “eliminating” another race are extremely counter productive.

        • Medizin

          “Successful political movements are not based on ranting and raving.”

          It worked very well for gays. Those who speak the loudest and the longest, frequently win.

          Those that speak and walk softly get lost in the shuffle. Exactly, what is happening to us.

  • dewdly

    Isn’t “anti-semite” a pejorative in exactly the same way “racist” is? Shouldn’t both be called “race realists”?

  • Einsatzgrenadier

    Liberals, in their stupidity and wild-eyed naivete, like to promote the view that America will become a tolerant, harmonious society through massive third world immigration, where the founding stock and the descendants of third world immigrants will live side by side with each other in the absence of conflict. However, this flies in the face of not only thousands of years of recorded human history, but also the tremendous amount of empirical evidence gathered from sociobiology and ethology. Humans, like primates and other mammalian species, share a common “biogram” or genetic predisposition to certain behaviors. Fundamental features of this biogram include dominance-related behaviors, a strong tendency toward status hierarchies, territoriality and xenophobia.

    Whenever human beings coalesce into larger social formations, they spontaneously organize themselves into status hierarchies based on dominance-deference patterns of behavior, with alphas on top, betas in the middle and omegas on the bottom. Humans monopolize territory among themselves in order to minimize competition for scarce resources and successfully rear offspring. Dislike of strangers ensures national and racial survival, allowing the group to propagate itself indefinitely.

    Based on these fundamental principles, we can easily see what happens when genetically and culturally dissimilar humans are allowed to compete with each other in the living space of a single dominant native ethnos. They will struggle among each other for dominance and access to scarce resources. As the foreigners grow in size, the struggle for dominance and access to scarce resources will intensify. Eventually, the natives will be absorbed by the invaders through miscegenation or they will be marginalized and eventually die off because of excessive competition. More commonly, they will be simply killed off when the invader is powerful enough to dispense with the host.

    How can anyone not see that the future of multicultural America is one of cultural chaos, political instability, economic deterioration, eventually leading to violent wars of secession? The future of multicultural America is Lebanon during much of the 1970s and 1980s. The time will come when the foreign invaders foolishly welcomed into our midst will take up arms against us. There will be widespread racially motivated killings. Disaster is just around the corner. It is quite simply astounding that the elites refuse to acknowledge this or that the white masses continue to silently acquiesce in their own socially engineered destruction.

    • Mergatroyd

      Our entire current “culture” – if you can call it that – is built upon a pack of lies: that all people are equal, all cultures are equally valid (including cannibals, I assume) so no harm in mass immigration from Somalia because, hey, they’re just like us with the same IQs and everything.
      Lies that are being used against the White West to destroy it.
      All human nature can be boiled down to a competition for resources to preserve oneself and one’s DNA, i.e., his own children, it is ingrained in us and the cultural marxists have done everything in their power to tell us to listen to their lies and not our own inherent nature. Eventually, the lies will collapse and be seen for what they are but by then, our nations will be overrun completely with non-Whites, but then that was the point, right?
      Our race is in a fight for our survival against those who are wish to steal resources that belong to Whites and White children and give them to 3rd world non-Whites.

      What I can’t understand is why so few Whites see this and prefer to believe the lies of the Marxists.

      • Stan D Mute

        The biggest reason is that nobody is selling an alternative. Race realists do a HORRIBLE job with propaganda. Unbelievably bad. One must actively search to find out about atrocities committed against us on a daily basis. Then, when newly awakened whites do find there is a culture of like minded people, they see grotesque extremes like skinheads rather than rational adults like at AmRen. Step one should be nothing more than awareness. Step two a rational discussion of simply separating the human tribes. Humans are innately fair and an appeal for all tribes to have unmolested self determination is tough to argue against when weighed against the real results of forced integration. But again, it starts with propaganda as all successful political ideas must. We fail before we even begin.

        • Beloved Comrade

          We’ve already tried all that and it didn’t work. In fact, our opponents are more entrenched than ever that we whites remain divided and without a group we can turn to for political advocacy and support, as does every other racial group.

          Best thing would be to emulate what has been done in South Africa and separate ourselves in an exclusive, without excuse, in small, family and like-minded groups. Like Oriana, only our people would be admitted into the area, no others except whites under any circumstances and then go from there. I am tired of trying to convince other whites of our plights and feel at this point that millions will have to be left behind. It’ll be like Noah’s Ark all over again with our race and there WILL be a great culling.

    • Excellent.

  • Jon

    In dealing with Japan and why they their crime rate is so low, that is because they control immigration and have racial solidarity. Nation that have an open door on immigration will begin to have a large crime rate. I really like the talk about how the Ivory coast is a lot better run than Liberia because of the French. Most liberals can not deal with the truth and that is why they resort to personal attacks.

    • IstvanIN

      Their crime rate is low in large measure because they are Japanese. An all bantu society wouldn’t be so crime free.

  • NorthernWind

    A relatively fair article I suppose, although the author’s bias was easily detectable.

  • jeffaral

    Being racist is the key to survival.

    • Ella

      Being prejudice means we favour our own ethnic group. Isn’t that awful????? lol

      • BonV.Vant

        Today I was at a college event where novelty items were being given to the students. The staff in the cafeteria, all of them recent immigrant, none of them white, jumped right in the line, as if they were paying students. None of them are students. To make matters worse, one of the kitchen staff had called his family and had them come to get “free stuff”. Not only were five kitchen staff in line, which meant they were not working, but one also had several family members there too, and they were talking about getting multiple items whereas everyone else could only get one. Keep in mid these people were interlopers. They are not going to be tens of thousands of dollars in debt, and possibly without job prospects. They are aware of this, but they don’t care, they don’t care that they elbowed students out of the way, took product that otherwise would have gone to students. I brought this to the attention of one of the students that was running the program. He was too afraid to do anything about it. Things got even worse because they did not put the breaks on this. More and more staff came out of the kitchen demanding that the company doing the novelty program stay later and make them an item. It became a game to them to send people out to harass the novelty contractors as they were trying to pack up. It was, in short, totally disgusting.

      • Beloved Comrade

        Nonsense. Every other racial group is prejudiced and anti-white and even cheer openly about it as in black power, chicano pride, etc.

        If it is OK for them then in the name of social justice it is OK for us as well, especially as we are becoming the minority. No need to explain why it is OK to be proud to be white. WE have a lot more to be proud about than do blacks, chicanos, africans or any other racial group. WE put men into space and created the technology they use, they did not.

  • AndrewInterrupted

    We had a John Engelman frequenting this site for years.
    He’s been noticeably absent the last few weeks.
    Ever hear of him? See him elsewhere?

    • Mergatroyd

      Please don’t conjure him up. It’s great to read threads without having to see his anti-White/pro-Asian, unreasoned posts running down the entire length of the thread.

      • AndrewInterrupted

        Bernice seems like a nice alternative.

  • Mergatroyd

    Biased article. But it gives Jared Taylor a forum to get the word out about issues facing the White race. As they say, by any means necessary.

    Excellent job, Mr. Taylor, especially that you didn’t say or do anything that could be used against you later. I’m sure they were watching your every move and measuring your every word to use against you later in out-of-context quotes about white supremacist, anti-semitism, nazism, etc.

    • emiledurk16

      Jared has been a staple in my family for a while now, tantamount to professor Pierce.
      The slav vs slav conflict concerns me. (as an aside). Notice how the pols said “color doesn’t matter” when asked on immigration by Jared. They are true cowards and traitors.

  • Ella

    Can Whites have a TRUE identity without being approved by certain aforementioned groups? Minority groups do not pander for our approval if they like what we think, say, or do.

  • Bon, From the Land of Babble

    I was informed in a private e mail that there was a reference to me by you on this thread and I assume this is the one.

    There seems to be some confusion on this thread as to who “Bon” is and whether it is I, who Live in the Land of Babble or another who goes by BonV.Vant who is also being referred to as “Bon.”

    I’ve asked other posters to please refer to him as BonV and me as Bon. I would hate to have to change my handle to “Formerly known as…” or for him to have to do so, although I agree with much of what he posts.

    If you are referring to me in the above post, I think it’s critical that like-minded people band together for protection against the dark forces, advocacy and mostly for survival because that’s what it will come down to, our very survival. I’d add Michael C. Scott (ask him to bring his weapons) and rjp because of his obvious cunning and intelligence.

    If you meant the other “Bon,” BonV. that is, well, you’ll have to take it up with him and from what I’ve read in his comments, he’d be all too glad to take up with your group.

    • Since I can not be fired from the job I do not have, my simple solution is to post under my own complete name. Unfortunately Michael is about the most common male name in the USA and Scotts are a dime-a-dozen, so I include my middle name for good measure.

  • There’s no such thing as a money tree.

    But hustling houses in Greenwich, Connecticut is probably the closest possible thing.

    A town full of people that preach the MORONtras our diversity is our strength, racial equality, open borders, growth for the sake of growth, yet Greenwich, Ct. barely grew in population between 2000 and 2010, but probably did grow very much in terms of household income and real estate values.

    Proving that the aforementioned MORONtras aren’t taken literally by the people who wield them, they wield them as sociopolitical weapons for their own enrichment and empowerment.

  • Until it doesn’t.

  • Yes, but what kind of fuss would you and your friends kick up if someone used a common slur against Jews in your presence? Somehow I doubt it would be so breezily tolerated as “goy,” which is short for goyim, which means “cattle.”

  • dewdly

    How can Taylor complain about censorship and allow this website to be heavily cenosored?

  • Geo1metric

    The things I admire about Jews, in general, are their business acumen, their general intelligence, and their ethnocentric nature. I wish that Whites could be as “tribal” as Jews are.

    Our question in every policy issue should be,” is it good for Whites”?

  • Grantland

    I think that question needs to be thrashed out.

  • Why would anyone want to do that. It is still effectively communist, with rigged elections and violent police oppression of any political opposition to president Lukashenko, who has been in office for 20 years.

    • Geo1metric

      Because it’s a 100% White country? Politics can be changed; it’s obviously harder to change a multicultural conglomeration.

      Besides, it was simply a statement not to be taken too literally.

  • Geo1metric

    Divide and conquer.

    Haven’t we Whites been playing that game for a bit too long?

  • Martel

    I’m sure that is the reason you are not a WN^^
    I respect US grassroots conservatives, but I also support white Americans against the fatal decisions of their government.

  • Evette Coutier

    There is somewhat of a discussion going on here about how hard to push. I am not boot licking here. Jared is correct in his approach. We cannot allow our frustrations to be used against us and be labeled extremist. The political principle behind this is known as median voter theorem. Essentially, MVT states that people will support others who they view as less extreme and more moderate than themselves. Most people will not support others who they see as being more extreme than themselves. Those folks are viewed as unreasonable and irrational. What Amren is doing is showing that we are not part of the lunatic fringe, but normal mainstream folks just like you and your friends. We are one of you. It’s in our nature to be birds of a feather. We have been labeled as extremist wackos driven by hatred. Amren is working to redefine the stigma associated with racially aware white people. Our message needs to be mainstreamed and legitimized if we are to build support.

    • Geo1metric

      Agree completely. I see the position the cause is in now as recruitment. The ideas are developed, the books have been written. Now we must build the base. The best way to do that is to be ATTRACTIVE. Salesmanship.

      • Evette Coutier

        Agreed. But we are already attractive. We are loyal. We are polite. We want a society without violence, and we are rich in culture and heritage. We care for our family and our friends, and we want them to have a safe and prosperous life. We want good homes and good schools for our kids. We want young folks to have a better future than we did. We help our friends and neighbors when they are struggling. We enjoy good company and lively conversation. We believe in strong communities. We want to enjoy life. We see a bright young person at work and we take them under our wing because we prize hard work, motivation, and talent. We hurt when our friends and family hit roadblocks or suffer hardships. We want a society that is fair, that rewards merit over politics. When we take stock of who we are, we are an easy sell.

        • Beloved Comrade

          NO, we are not an easy sell. We’ve been trying the polite tactic and played nice for 50 years and it has gotten us nowhere. Those who wish to genocide us do not deserve politeness or gentility, ditto for Whites who refuse to wake up, listen or accept what is happening to their culture and homeland. Leave ’em behind and move on. Those who desire to build a white homeland will do so.

          Oriana in South Africa proves it can be done and it WILL be done in the U.S. and other White homelands. This is what we must work for with like-minded people, the carving out and construction of a homeland for Whites and Whites only, as in Oriana which does not allow blacks in AT ALL. Those who choose to live there accept that NO blacks are allowed as residents OR workers. It can and will be done here.

          Not all Whites are worth saving.

          • BonV.Vant

            I’m with you. The republicans have been “nice” and look where it got them.

      • BonV.Vant

        No, you are behind the curve, and perhaps so is JT. There is no need to recruit when hordes of people are fleeing the current group think and looking for an alternative. The alternative they are looking for is one that is much more confrontational. Look at the support that came out of nowhere for Bundy. There is a HUGE number of whites that are chafing at the bit, looking for someone that will bring the fight to the enemy. Christie’s original appeal was that he did not pull punches, but he turned out to be a beached whale that rolled over for the enemy. IT was all bluster, all an act. WE are looking for the REAL DEAL but we keep getting disappointed. Ironically, JT is in fact the closest we have right now, He is saying the things that no one else dares to say. Someday someone else will pick up that flag and run further with it, and if they are willing to offend, to be rude, to be crude, they will carry the flag further. Just as there is a time for diplomacy and a time for war, there is a time to be civil, and a time to bloody the enemy.

        • Geo1metric

          I take your point; I think we are disagreeing on the degree to which militancy should be exhibited.

          I too am looking for a leader who will further the cause; my leader, however, will not be some “skinhead” who goes out and bashes heads on Friday night.

          • BonV.Vant

            Yes, we are disagreeing on the degree to which militancy should be exhibited by the spokesperson. The posters are here to vent and to feel a sense of community. Their militancy can make JT look all that much more genteel by comparison. Nevertheless, there needs to be limits on how militant posters are.

        • RileyDeWiley

          So why isn’t Alex Linder president, then?

    • Beloved Comrade

      Our enemies are going to label us extremist and part of the lunatic fringe, and worse, no matter WHAT we say. That is why they are our mortal enemies. They deserve no mercy.
      I am sick and tired of being put in a groveling, defensive position lest I offend someone. Time for the gloves to come off against these tyrants who see us the same way the Bolsheviks looked at Kulaks: In need of elimination.

      • BonV.Vant

        I personally think that creating as much controversy and discomfort as possible does more good.

        • Beloved Comrade

          As I wrote below: Now all White are worth saving. Concentrate on those who desire to create and preserve a White homeland by any means necessary including guarding it with deadly force.

          Oriana in South Africa proves it can be done. This country (the U.S.) is gone, there is no hope for Whites ever recovering the government and culture. It is kaput. Our only hope is to carve out a homeland for ourselves and our posterity and guard it with everything we’ve got. This is what Oriana is doing in SA and it has become prosperous.

          We either do that or we are at the mercy of forces who wish to purge all White from the face of the earth.

        • LACountyRedneck

          Exactly. Being passive does nothing. We need to make a huge stink, stand out, and spread the word.

      • Evette Coutier

        You are correct. Our enemies are extremist fanatics who hate us. My comments concern working with reasonable moderate folks. I don’t consider being reasonable as groveling. Moreover, if you follow my posts you will see I am very willing to take aggressive stances against opposition. I see no value in taking an aggressive posture against friends and potential friends. I see no benefit in alienating moderate future race realists with things they are not ready for.

  • At the first AmRen conference HALF the speakers were Jews.

    This tells you everything you need to know about Taylor and AmRen.

  • NeanderthalDNA

    I apologize if I appeared rude. My slightly dyslexic brain saw “berniegreenbaum” and your picture did not look like a “Bernie”, unless Bernie’s a night club owner or in the music business, maybe.
    But later perusal my brain got it right and then I felt bad about the faux pas, lol.
    I consider most Jews “white” and regardless of their political attitudes the vast majority I’ve known have considered themselves “white”. With exceptions like those fake-o Ethiopian “Jews” and a Sammy Davis Jr. here and there, I consider most Jews to be White.
    Semitic White, which is almost extinct with exception of Jews and a few Assyrians and such throughout the ME. Of course you guys have a genetic mix which although the Jewish remains dominant, reflects quite a patchwork of whoever you guys were living amongst.
    My philosophy is that pro-Aryan does not mean anti-Semitic, cumbayah, you know?
    Found a Jewess in my woodpile some time ago, lol. Sephardic too, darn it! Old Charleston, SC types here since the mid eighteenth century, bedrock of our heritage and community.
    Regardless, welcome to the forum and apologies if I offended, lol. Dylsexia, you know?

    • LovelyNordicHeidi

      I’ve seen many commentators in this thread whom I’ve never seen before. Good sign, isn’t it?

      • NeanderthalDNA

        This is still Thor’s day’s edition, is it not? Not Frig’s day? Yeah. These avatars are small unless you blow the up.

        But yup – it is encouraging. And it’s Spring!

        • LovelyNordicHeidi

          It’s Sunday here already, Thor. I like the spring, but I like the autumn more, because I just love cold weather. I have always loved autumn and winter ever since I was a little girl. Ehh, I meant to say “ever since I was a little Valkyrie.” How about you?

          • jeffaral

            Bist du noch wach Heidi? Wenn ich jetzt einschlafe, ich werde von dir traumen. Dein blondes Haar… deine blauen Augen….. und deine Erdebeerenlippen…Und du kanst von von meinen gruenen Augen traumen…Gute Nacht Heidi..

          • Sweet-talker.

          • BonV.Vant

            HEY! FINGER WEG! Sie ist SCHON ferhairatet!

          • NeanderthalDNA

            Yes, Autumn. I love it. End of the heat, crisp, energetic. Spring is number two, though. Beyond allergies, nice to see some sunlight. Thanks, Frey!

            Halloween is lots of fun here, end of October. Warming up now, but not yet AC weather, so nice.

  • AmRen cares more about heavy censorship and protecting JT’s false claim that Jews are white than about discussing the fact that the massive third world immigration faced by white countries was, like gun control, forced upon our white countries by Jews who gleefully do the exact opposite at home.

    • Grantland

      We can pretend to give them the benefit of the doubt. Or we can give them the benefit of the doubt. The message is catered to the audience, and the audience varies.

    • Which Jews are you talking about?

      http://jpfo.[org]/rabbi/rabbi-bloomberg-letter.htm

    • IstvanIN

      With all due respect, and recognizing that organized Jewry loves to undermine the societies that allow them entrance, we shoulder the bulk of the blames for going along with a small minority’s plans for our genocide.

      • Evette Coutier

        That is an interesting observation. What evidence can you cite to support it?

        • ThomasER916

          The Culture of Critique.

          • Evette Coutier

            Thank you for the reference. I will do some reading.

          • ThomasER916

            It’s a three part series. If you want specific information read Cultural Insurrections.

          • Beloved Comrade

            It can be found online in PDF form, http(colon)//www(dot)prometheism(dot)net/library/CultureOfCritique(dot)pdf

          • ThomasER916

            Thanks!

            I’m going to be sharing this a LOT.

      • Einsatzgrenadier

        White race traitors and Jewish leftists with autocratic tendencies are entirely responsible for the decline of American civilization. The ordinary white man had nothing to do with it. His government was hijacked by a parasitic elite.

  • IstvanIN

    I do think it is wrong to use words like “[email protected] because words like that are crude and, to my way of thinking, and in concert with the way I was raised and raised my own daughter, the sign of an ignorant man who knows no other way to express himself. Should words be banned or should individuals suffer ruination over the occasional slip-up? Absolutely not, but we should, without penalty of law, show some common decency and self-restraint.

    When Whites ask why they shouldn’t be allowed to use the N-word when blacks can, I usually respond with “because you are better than them”. Blacks shouldn’t use the N-word, but I suppose they can not help themselves.

  • IstvanIN

    He was truly a disaster that helped pave the way for Barry.

  • ThomasER916

    “Antisemitic intellectuals like Kevin MacDonald do not write for the site nor are invited to conferences.”

    Kevin MacDonald is far more important to Whites than Jeff Lipshitz.

    • jeffaral

      Professor Kevin MacDonald is one of many freedom fighters for our people on the intelectual front and deserves our full support!

    • BonV.Vant

      It is filling a need for the moment. Many of us see that there are self imposed limits on what this site will accomplish. Genteel gentleman do not fight the fight, but JT is laying groundwork for the fight.

    • Cecil Broomsted

      Kevin McDonald is not the problem. Kevin is a scholar and an excellent writer. He has laid out various facts in his works that are indisputable. I personally like Kevin and my estimation of him rose considerably when he disabled all comments on his website. I am not for censorship per se and neither is Kevin, but the comments on his site became so thoroughly vile and disgusting, so engrossed in the wildest conspiracy theories that the mind of an intelligent reader was left reeling. So wild and exaggerated were many of those comments that one could only conclude that some of the commenters had to have been mental patients.

      And therein lies the problem. We are unable to have a calm and rational discussion about the role of Leftist Jews in Western societies without the conversation quickly devolving into fantastic delirium-filled exaggerations of Jewish conspiracies to literally destroy the entire Western world along with its native peoples. Nevermind the non-Jewish whites involved in the exact same mentally disturbed practices of Leftism as these Jews and who have caused even more harm to their own people, they are to be ignored or considered as merely generic Leftists.

      Kevin McDonald presents us with a body of facts but careful and reasonable conclusions must be drawn from those facts not unsupported delusions attributing almost supernatural powers to an ethnically small and well-educated group of people.

      So far, I have yet to see any website capable of having such a reasoned discussion on this topic.

      • LovelyNordicHeidi

        I found this website through TOO, and I found TOO after reading KMac’s Culture of Critique. I read TOO regularly, and mainly perceive it as a way to learn more about what kind of racial strategies we can apply. It is depressing to read through all the facts about the tribe, so one has to find something constructive to focus on while reading the facts. I can understand why many get stuck in delusions. I think that some of the few commenters here who can deal with the facts rationally are Martel and David Ashton. I admire Martel and David Ashton for the fact that they tirelessly try to encourage rational debate on the facts concerning the tribe.

        • Ella

          Those who control the media will control the Nation. To add more injury, look at the Federal Reserve Board members and its private lend-loaners. Where did the WASP people go?

      • Having a specific website revolve around reasoned discussion regarding a specific topic will always gravitate toward the unreasonable when that specific topic is a negative. If this ideal website’s premise is to promote a positive atmosphere to foster White identity, AND if it gives its members and supporters an actual outlet to productively channel all of the positive and negative energy, then reasoned and rational discussions about “negatives” can be achieved more easily than if it were simply a website for people to vent their frustrations.

        There’s a lot of psychological and sociological triggers involved, but I don’t have the time or patience to write it all out right now. All I will say is that if you take a mass of people, rouse them with even a hint of negativity, and then put them in an environment that is closed off and incapable of producing practical, real-world applications, they will almost always gravitate toward a negative and base their views on that alone. When something good is happening to you or you are focusing on positives, you tend to internalize everything and attribute that positivity to your own set of values and principles. When something bad is happening to you or you feel trapped and unable to produce positives in the real world, then you are much more prone to project onto others and try to find an external reason why you failed or are in the position you are in. The last person you end up blaming is yourself. Most White Nationalist “leaders” are a perfect illustration of this.

        What you end up with is a reality of saying, Okay, we’ve highlighted Jews and blamed them for some problems. Now what? No practical applications? Okay, let’s find some more problems[Jews].

        But this is all just the way I see things, and I’m sure there are plenty of others who have their own opinions and views.

      • ThomasER916

        “Kevin McDonald is not the problem.”
        Let me quote the article AGAIN…

        “Antisemitic intellectuals like KEVIN MACDONALD do not write for the site nor are invited to conferences.” (my emphasis)

        All I heard from you was BS.

        • coco bongo

          “The conscious decision to ban Kevin MacDonald says that Amren belongs to the Culture of Critique. After all, if Amren is Politically Correct then what’s the point of being here?”

          Don’t let the door hit you on your way out. Kevin McDonald has his own website and this ain’t it sparky.

          • BonV.Vant

            People need to calm down. Kevin MacDonald can not be jettisoned as he states things that are just simply true. If Amren does not think it is wise to include him at the time, then that is Amren’s prerogative. Both Amren and MacDonald have value, no need to choose one over the other, nor is there a need to force a choice at this time. It is the misfortune of MacDonald that what he has said has been eagerly seen as a justification for something that scares manny people.

          • Kathy M

            Bingo! Great point. Here is another — there can be absolutely no doubt that Jared would have an enormously larger appeal to your average white person who needs a little nudging to wake up and join the rest of us. McDonald appeals to a much smaller, and somtimes violent, fringe group of whites.

            I want the great masses of our people to wake up, smell and perhaps drink the coffee, and join us. That way, a new political party has at least a chance. One that supports our views.

          • BonV.Vant

            For the time being MacDonald’s audience is smaller. Mr. Taylor makes a valid point though about how the resistance to a white identity and ethnostate comes mainly from the tribe. The thing is that the more success Mr. Taylor has, the more resistance and the more vocal a certain segment of the tribe will be. That in turn will validate MacDonald and many more people will take an objective look at the points he has made. MacDonald is here to stay I a m afraid, and the tables have been turned. It is THEY who are REACTING to us now. MacDonald has put US on the offensive and they are now reacting. This is a good thing. Jarred Taylor need not mention nor discuss MacDonald. The more successful Taylor is, the more exposure and successful MacDonald will be. I only heard of MacDonald because of race realists.

        • Cecil Broomsted

          I posted this comment at the top of the thread. How it ended up as a reply to you I don’t know. I didn’t even read your BS.

      • BonV.Vant

        I think the problem is that there are some personality types that just want to hurt people and they find an ideology to justify this lust. For some it is right wing, and for others it is left wing. The leftists of this bent have been given free reign at the present. Mr Taylor, and MR. McDonald recognize that the right has people like this as well . It is not wise to let them characterize the movement. They are dangerous for us at this time in a different way than they would be dangerous for us when we are the dominant force in America.

        Let me explain why. Quentin Crisp actually nailed it. He was a strange personality in prewar and postwar Britain, and later, around the 70’s he moved to the US. He was compelled, for whatever reason, to break social mores about gender roles, in other words, he was a cross dresser. In England at that time, that was not at all accepted, in fact, it was violently rejected. He was regularly assaulted and pummeled when he ventured outside.He states that it was VITALLY IMPORTANT that he never fought back when he was being beaten, because this meant that he would have been killed. He said the beatings were most often not too serious, he was just roughed up a bit, people wanted to express their displeasure, their rejection, but if he fought back, then he would have confirmed their fears that he was indeed a dangerous person with evil motives and they would have killed him.

        Am I suggesting we accept beatings? NO, am I suggesting we surrender? NO. I am suggesting that we acknowledge the present circumstances and realities and realize that outright hostility will only benefit our enemies and will ultimately set us back. WE must ENDURE, because in the end, that is the real victory. Crisp endured the beatings, but he did not change his behavior. Eventually, he was not so shocking anymore, he endured, and they became accustomed. IN other words, boredom set in We NEED them to become BORED with the idea of race realism, because then they will have submitted to it, accepted that it is inevitable. The emotional reaction that prevents them from objectively considering it’s merits will have vanished. Endurance is important and we must not precipitate a crisis when we can not win.

        Now, there is one more thing to consider. When we DO win, does that mean we can vent our hostility and pursue “vengeance ? NO! Not in the manner that manny on here want to . It is understandable that someone who has been persecuted wants to do the same to his persecutor . We must recognize that to gain satisfaction from beating the enemy is not good. (Nor Christian) It is an ironic reality that when one savors something too much, it becomes poisonous. WE must do what we need to do and do it in a detached manner or it will corrupt us and lead once again to our downfall. Victory is always ever temporary. It is like balancing on a surfboard, one can not go crazy once one is up and standing or one will fall, one must always be focused and balanced. Letting lose a campaign of violence will satisfy those amongst us that have chosen THIS side as an excuse to be cruel and destructive, but it will lead to a reaction that is similar to what happened to white people after the orgiastic killings of the NAZIs.

        For now, it is better to concentrate on enduring. Mr Taylor seems extremely adept at this. He is able to maintain the message while never returning hostility for hostility. His message, at it’s core, also is totally lacking in hostility. The call for the preservation of white homelands and the white race is not a hostile message at all. There is nothing negative in it that is aimed at any other race or ethnicity. Wanting a white only world for whites is a totally benign concept. It is only the rhetoric of the left that has been able to characterize this as evil. WE must just keep stating what we want, and accept the abuse for now. Eventually, the emotional reactions will subside and people will be able to consider the matter rationally. That is when we win because our cause is extremely rational. The contradictions are all on the left.

        • Grantland

          I’m sure you think that made a lot of sense.

          • Guest

            You have a problem with that?

          • BonV.Vant

            People like you want to fight, but you don’t have any idea how to win.

          • Grantland

            Oooohh

          • Grantland

            PS – Your name is too similar to Bon’s. If you changed it to “Bonny” it would be less confusing. };-)~

          • BonV.Vant

            What I said was basically “this is not the time for open hostilities”, ” We can persevere in getting our message across , we can act in a way that evades the “immune system” of the liberal “body politic””
            and that ” When we do become dominant, it will not be wise to engage in an orgiastic campaign of violence that will ultimately make even most whites reject us again”

            Can you honestly say that this does not make any sense? What would you do differently, What do you suggest? I see this as a good plan of action and I see JT’s success as justification of it, as he is getting his message across and is successful in evading the macrophages of the liberal body politic.

            I agree with MacDonald though. I do not though, in any way, desire a wholesale slaughter of the tribe. I thick a calm, firm, statement by the authorities of the new white nation, a statement that details the activities and the machinations of the tribe, is needed by the new government. With that statement they are to be cut off from the “White European American Alloy” and have different rights and restrictions in the white ethnostate than Those of the White European “Alloy” that was forged here in the past two hundred years.. Media ( including advertising) Entertainment, Government, Law and Education are all to be strictly forbidden to them in this ethnostate.
            They can cry bloody murder, and we will just then once again detail what they did here, or tried to do. They will have to accept it or move.

          • Grantland

            I’ve had enough of the tribe.

          • BonV.Vant

            Well, I can not fault you for that sentiment. There are times when I feel the same. There are times when many people have had enough of their spouses. The best plan is divorce them, not kill them. There is nothing wrong with calling for an “amicable divorce” and then stating the rules that they will have to obey when they visit.

  • dewdly

    Where do the genuine “race realists” have uncensored discussions about all important racial groups? Doesn’t the word, ‘genocide’ refer to the killing of a genetic group or race? The word was invented in reference to one particular race of people and yet “race realists” are prohibited from mentioning them.

  • dcc2379

    Hate crimes mean some murderd are worse than others. Whites murdered are less dead than all other people. Equal protection of the law!

  • One helpful development would be some networking beyond this excellent site and Amren’s very fine yearly conventions. There was once something called Friends of American Renaissance. Maybe that withered away after the print publication ended, but something like that would be very useful. There might be quite a few of us in a larger city. In a rural area like mine, there might be enough for a small tri-county group. People living in the same community or region could email each other once in awhile, “You won’t believe what our Mayor Doodles announced today!” These informal groups might eventually meet now and then over a cup of coffee or stronger refreshment. What we do here, thanks to Jared and others, is extremely important, but having small face-to-face groups would be at least as important and would create an invigorating multiplier effect, speeding the eventual White Awakening.

    • Kenner

      I remember the Amren chat site. I was able to swap emails with another person, and we’ve stayed in touch.

    • Martel

      Face to face meetings are far more important then meetings here, they inspire creativity in ways the internet will never do.

  • Intrep1d

    The establishment being ultra PC is one thing, but AmRen’s message doesn’t have much traction to begin with. It doesn’t resonate with the typical white family or individual. I think there needs to be some introspection first. Just who is the “average” white nationalist? Unfortunately, the answer to this question might be part of the problem.

    From informal polls on other forums, WNs more likely tend to be younger, single, and blue collar. Simply put, the people this movement attracts are disproportionately dis-enfranchised. Most aren’t intellectuals or professionals. Very few have any significant influence. Networking is limited. Unless all this changes, it’s going to be an uphill battle in more ways than one.

  • M&S

    Mr. Taylor is too much a member of a Higher Order for his or our own good I sometimes think.
    Listening to him, in his occasional videos, you gain an opinion of the man as someone who has had all his rough edges removed and having passed through the fire of his own forging, has nothing to prove but much to say.
    This is good in the way of an eccentric uncle or tenured professor.
    But I think it speaks above the level of immediate concerns (what does this obsession with new-blood immigrants, given preferential treatment, do for my union job?) as reflective angst of the average white who holds these feelings of uncertainty within their heart and is hurt (and angry) by the inability to speak of them.
    Sometimes, for that, less urbane, group, a certain amount of cultural ‘juxtapositional logic’ gives a rock for their inner concepts of fair play and final outcomes to grind against and sharpen unfocussed beliefs into something personal.
    I’m not saying that we need a propagandist but we assuredly need to have a way to communicate with whites of all classes and acculturated belief systems about the issues facing our people which acts like a prism of shared beliefs: from all perspectives, one belief.
    Sufficient to bring into sharpened focus all that we MUST protect, to remain ourselves.
    Not a panoply of hate against competitor races nor of their offenses against us. But just a few concepts whose total ontology illustrate an alternative vision which says: “If you remain true, this is what your future could be like. If you do not, this is the level you will fall to, likely never to come back up to.”
    Whites are idealistic dreamers more than any other thing. And if you give them solid, worthwhile, goals around which to focus their core beliefs, they will move the world.

    • Evette Coutier

      Your thoughts are well presented. However, we need both perspectives. We need the intellect of JT doing exactly what he is doing, and we need a separate voice that has an appeal as you suggested. JT cannot be both. All political movements have a variety of needs in leadership. You clearly have a good grasp on many of the aspects of the situation, have you considered taking a leadership role and become a public spokesperson to address that market?

      • Grantland

        “..However, we need both perspectives”

        That’s what Spartacus was for.

        • BonV.Vant

          Yehhhh-ahhhhhhh but someone pointed out that Spartacus crossed a line and was putting this whole operation in danger, making it vulnerable to charges that could shut it down. A good soldier knows how to hold his fire until the right time.

          • Evette Coutier

            True, but it was entertaining to read his thoughts.

          • BonV.Vant

            I liked him.

          • Grantland

            Hey Kenner, what would De la Rey have thought of such a tight-arsed person such as yourself?

        • Evette Coutier

          I miss Spartacus. I loved his humanists world view.

      • BonV.Vant

        I think that the crude, rude, angry statements of some of the comments has the effect of making Mr. Taylor look all the more acceptable by comparison. I think you are correct, while some of us may resent the enforced civility, it has the effect of making this whole enterprise credible.

        • Evette Coutier

          I agree. When emotions are high, having a calm voice of reason is what the doctor ordered.

    • Medizin

      “I’m not saying that we need a propagandist”

      A ‘marketing strategist’ would help.

  • NeanderthalDNA

    When he was fund raising around here he met with my all time hero, legendary wrastler, Ric Flair – the Nature Boy who’s signature “Woo!” is known to millions of boys from multiple generations – at a local GOP bigwig’s. According to my source, W disappeared with Mr. Flair into a back bedroom, from where over the next few minutes multiple “Woo’s” were heard from Mr. Flair and the Prez, , after which they exited laughing and W got uncomfortably touchy with the hostess and then left with a fat donor check.

    I wonder if his vacuity was more an act. Perhaps he was just a rather bright, lazy, personable and somewhat contrarian frat boy? Kind of saw everything as a cosmic joke.

    In which case he was correct, but I impute.

    Even when I was a sick libtard though and hated him, I always thought it would be fun to hang with the guy out on his Crawford spread, no cameras, no mikes. And no Dick Cheney shootin yer arse, LOL!

  • NeanderthalDNA

    I taught a very Aryan looking young Jewish man years ago, his mother a fellow teacher at the school. He used to like to tell me gas house Jewish jokes and I called him “Jew Boy”. I couldn’t bring myself to respond with gas house Jew jokes – makes me uncomfortable, you know, the pizza and ashtray jokes, real crude stuff?

    Well, “Jew Boy” took great pleasure in telling me those jokes and watching my reaction, lol.

    Anyway, here’s my Jewish joke I made up all by myself and told him. He liked it and ran out of my room to tell his mom, which turned out nicely in the end.

    How do you play the Jewish defense in American football?

    Nickel and dime ’em until you get the quarterback. Ba dump bump!

    Gotta go…

    • Sangraal

      Heheh I used to know a few Jews like that. My favourite was:
      ‘What do you do with a Jewish kid with ADHD?’
      ‘Send him to concentration camp.’
      I don’t really get your one because I understand neither American football nor currency. But I get the gist of it ;).

      • NeanderthalDNA

        Nickel and dime, pass defenses. Take out one, then two linebackers (medium sized guys in middle) replace with smaller, quicker guys. Usually means your looking to defend against pass, but, you can throw those extra fast little guys in to get the opposing team’s quarterback and clobber him before he passes.

        Which has almost nothing to do with the joke, come to think, ha ha.

        Somewhere in Europa I assume?

        • Sangraal

          Aye, England.

        • tlk244182

          Never was a fan, but thought I more or less got the gist of the game, ’til just now. But the gag was funny.

  • Who Me?

    Nancy, your idea is a good one, however, Utah is not the Northwest. The Northwest is Washington, Oregon, Idaho and the western half of Montana. If you are relocating, why not go all the way and move to the REAL Northwest? Oh, by the way, since you ask, there IS a flag.
    Find it at Northwestfront(DOT)org.

    • Geo1metric

      Nice flag.

      Wyoming has all that good coal; wouldn’t you want all that energy?

  • Capt. Bryant

    2014 AMREN conference me (Captain Bryant) with Mr Taylor

    • Martel

      Great pic

    • Kathy M

      Two handsome gents I must say.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      Jared has a little more gray, but he looks good.

    • Romulus

      Great pic CAP! 😉

  • BonV.Vant

    One needs to realize what audience one is playing to. Mr. Jared Taylor seems to understand this and that is the secret to his success. White people naturally like CIVILIZED behavior. Black people like uncivilized behavior. Black culture glorifies thuggish rap artists, it glorifies arrogance, hostility and violence. Black culture detests rules of conduct and logic. Black culture values pure emotionality. White culture values reason.

    Mr. Taylor acts in a reasonable manner, states reasonable arguments, and his nature is totally civilized. Whether the left likes this or not, this is the special coating on the surface of his cell which enables it to evade and endure attacks by the immune cells of the liberal body politic ( media). IT also is the key which opens the portal to the mind of the white individual. It enables the message to evade the liberal programming of minds. After the message enters the mind, a starts a process of awakening, eventually destroying the programming.
    Those who advocate violence and in a bombastic manner, are more likely to close off portals to the minds of those whites who are programmed. Unless whites are in the same state of anger and frustration the “crude” and “rude” comments and their message, no matter how valid, will not be allowed to enter. Mr Taylor is able to open up minds and implant thoughts that the liberal immune system wishes to eradicate.

  • FeuerSalamander

    His father was an idiot too.

  • Tim_in_Indiana

    I think one of the reasons why white consciousness has failed to get very far is that while our enemies on the left are almost 100% united in their goals and their strategies of dismantling the white race, we on the race conscious right are constantly bickering and squabbling with each other as to how to best counteract this trend, and this thread is a case in point.

    Here we have a generally favorable article and nobody seems to be happy about it. Plus, the comments on this article have been turned into an excuse and an opportunity to criticize and attack American Renaissance for its strategy in trying to awaken white people.

    My message to those of you who don’t like this website is to go and post somewhere else! There are plenty of other white nationalist websites that address the question from different angles. If you like them better, then go post there! The whole purpose of the site is to address the problem from its own unique angle.

    By the way, I wish there could be one thread in which John Engleman isn’t mentioned. Honestly, I think that those who most complain about him are, despite their protestations, the most disappointed that he doesn’t seem to be posting here anymore.

  • LHathaway

    This is one of Jared Taylor’s better interviews. He got to say more, for one thing. Jared Taylor’s ‘banned in halifax’ might be better than any interview. The ‘racist easter egg’ story reminded me of Taylor’s banned in halifax speech. Mainstream Canadian newspapers, for the most part, condemned Mr Taylor’s views in their editorials. But they were writing their editorials about Taylor’s right to speak. And oh what readers heard if they read the speech the to-do was about.

    I think Mr Taylor kind of underplayed his statement in the speech saying, by all evidence, the only thing whites stand to gain by diversity, and then more and more of it, is more and more accusations they are racist.