White House Petition Against Black-on-White Crime

White House, December 9, 2013

Whereas, according to FBI statistics, more than two million white Americans are victimized by black perpetrators annually;

Whereas the majority of the victims of interracial violent crimes are white;

Whereas federal policies are a major factor in the current rates of black-on-white violence;

Whereas President Barack Obama is the head of the federal government, and;

Whereas he has addressed the issue of interracial violence when he perceived that a black person (Trayvon Martin) was the victim of said violence;

Therefore be it resolved that President Barack Obama shall make the termination of black-on-white interracial violent crime a national priority and shall formally address the issue during his upcoming 2014 State of the Union Address to be delivered to a joint session of Congress.

[Editor’s Note: Interested readers can sign the petition at the link below.]

Topics: ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • dubyasee

    Whoa! To have that sock puppet speak on this issue in his State of the Union Address?! Yow-suh!! That’s about as likely as him ordering the Treasury Department to start issuing Treasury Notes to supplant Federal Reserve Notes. Nice to dream about though.

  • D.B. Cooper

    Meanwhile, millions of white people under 25 will be protesting how racist the white petition signers are.
    I think I’ll pass. This is nothing more than hand delivering to the White House a list of white racists the government needs to keep an eye on.

    • Is it really that much more useless than commenting on the same kind of subjects and stories, on a website seen by people who already share your views?

      • D.B. Cooper

        Actually, “Time”, some of you do NOT share my views. A lot of you are blind republicans to the end. The GOP can line up half of you to the gas chambers, and you will still support the Republican Party.

        Amren is NOT the only site where I can be seen. I’ve been known to get triple digit thumbs down on some of these sites frequented by the pansy white boy democrat, racist minorities, and girls without a clue.

        • I’m not Republican. I don’t even consider myself conservative. I’m more of a liberal. A very, very racist one.

          • Rhialto

            A racist Liberal! That’s a true oxymoron, like a celibate prostitute. Perhaps you erroneously consider yourself liberal because you are opposed to an economy run for the benefit of Billionaires (or wannabes), or believe that environmental considerations should influence government policies, or that financial aid to the deserving is a proper government function.

          • No, I know what liberal means. You probably don’t. Many of those that pretend to hold “liberal” views are nothing more than Leftists. A person with a liberal view values truth, and has a much more fluid understanding of right and wrong. A Leftist pays no attention to truth or facts, and only uses those facts if it furthers their agenda. They are purely agenda-driven, and they afford you no divergence.

            To prove you probably don’t have a good understanding of what liberal means, why not try and tell me when a conservative stops being a conservative and starts being a liberal.

          • You’re swimming against a strong current, CT. If you want to communicate effectively you must either a) use words the way others understand them, or b) give others your (re-)definitions before you use the words.

            “Liberal” means something completely different today than it did in 1776. You may not like that but you have to live with it if you want people to understand your posts.

          • Then take the challenge that others seem to shy away from: When does a conservative stop being a conservative, and when does a liberal stop being a liberal?

          • I don’t like word games and I’m not going to step on your punji stake traps. Why don’t you tell us?

          • You are the ones telling me it’s an oxymoron and I can’t be who I say I am. The ball is in your court. If you can’t even explain where the line is drawn when talking about conservatives and liberals, then you really have no business making comments about what something means in a modern context.

          • Okay, I’ll play …

            ————————

            “You are the ones telling me it’s an oxymoron and I can’t be who I say I am.”

            Nobody said any such thing.

            ————————

            “The ball is in your court.”

            Actually, it’s not. But I wouldn’t want the readers of this site to think that I’m chickening out so, as I said above, I’ll play …

            ———————–

            The terms “conservative” and “liberal” have lost all meaning today just as “racist” has. That said …

            Conservatism is the school of thought that opposes a) statism, b) redistribution of income and property, c) large government at all levels, local, state and federal, d) involvement in wars where US interests are not at stake, e) the constant erosion of personal liberty, f) the constant erosion of self reliance, g) h) I) j) blah blah blah.

            In contrast, Liberalism is in favor of everything that I and other true conservatives are opposed to, the main ones being listed in the previous paragraph.

            In 1776 “liberal” meant something along the lines of what “Libertarian” means today.

            ===================

            I’ll give you the last word. Try to say something intelligent.

          • You listed mostly economic stances, and I didn’t see anything about Conservatism or not being a conservative being directly tied to race.

            From what you’ve listed, I oppose a, b, c, d, e and f. That still doesn’t change the fact that I consider myself more liberal. I don’t chain my more liberally-minded views to that of isms. If I did, I would probably be a Leftist.

            Libertarian might be just as correct to describe myself. But most of the Libertarians I know consider themselves to be true liberals, not Liberals or Leftists.

          • jane johnson

            Classical Liberalism, maybe? Something like individual freedom can only be secure when the power of the state is limited?

          • Sort of. But I also believe that the state has a duty to serve and protect its citizens in a larger capacity than most Libertarians. For instance, something like universal health care doesn’t make me cringe and curse. I think it’s a brilliant concept, but not in a multicultural/multiracial society where diversity is unchecked, and where there exists so many factions of competing and diametrically opposed people. I think there are many concepts and policies that have great potential if only they were outside of a state where certain people are born and bred to abuse, mismanage and cheat the system.

            Truth be told, I tend to get along with National Socialists(not the costumed ones) much more than Republicans or Libertarians or Liberals/Leftists. I’m just not anywhere close to being the kind of Statists they are.

          • jane johnson

            I can understand that, since, as your statement on universal healthcare indicates, you are aware that no form of socialism, not even the (formerly) Scandinavian model, can work in a multiculti PC society. Do you agree that is a legitimate, and even moally imperative, function of the federal government to defend our borders?

          • Defending borders is the primary function of the federal government. I think the only healthy and long-term solution would be to allow your citizens to grow and develop at their own pace. Give them enough room to fail, but never enough room to put the rest of your family in danger. Give them the tools to succeed and let them supply the initiative. Those with the initiative, drive and ability will naturally rise to the top. I don’t think money should ever get in the way of developing an individual’s talents and abilities. As such, I don’t think an individual’s motivations should be solely focused on money. That’s not how a family truly functions.

            None of this works or works smoothly in a multicultural and multiracial society. Never has, never will.

            I guess I see my ideal of a federal government as more of a Family State than a Nanny State. Some people might not see the difference, but I do.

          • Terra Magnum Imperium

            CT that’s where I disagree, Government is at best a necessary evil.
            I personally feel that a libertarian style Federal Government is the most efficient way to run a large diverse country like the USA.
            Like you stated before your idea might work in a more homogenous country perhaps in a country like Iceland.

          • Jesse_from_Sweden

            And by that, you are handing over victory to the “liberals”.

            If you control how people use language, you control how they think.
            That’s why certain groups are so fond of re-defining some words and outlawing the use of other words.

          • “If you control how people use language, you control how they think.”

            [sarcasm]
            You’re absolutely correct. In fact, locomotion is essential to the anti-poverty curative powers of balsa wood containers built for poltical cover by religious freedom purveyors wearing armor.
            [/sarcasm]

            Having made myself perfectly clear by your standards of “words mean whatever I have in mind but won’t tell you”, I will now give you the last word.

          • Jesse_from_Sweden

            And apparently you fail to see the difference between a words original meaning, it ‘s re-defined meaning and a meaning you just made up on the spot…..

            And I’ll leave it at that since I’m feeling gay today (look up the original meaning of that word, and wonder why a certain group re-appropriated it and what that meant).

          • Rhialto

            A Conservative stops being conservative when he/she supports massive, population changing immigration policies. Whether that constitutes Liberalism or not, I don’t know or care. I do know and care that such people are working for the destruction of Western civilization.

            The Lexonaut comments express my views pretty well

          • Mergatroyd

            You, of course, are correct. Leftists are not classical liberals, there is a huge difference, that’s why I call them what they are: leftards, leftoids or pro-marxists.

          • Northsea

            That’s an error in my own past, thinking that support for government spending on domestic issues constituted liberalism. Was always queasy about social liberalism (progressivism) however. Finally discovered there was no logical disconnect when re-examined under the mantle of Traditionalism.

          • Jesse_from_Sweden

            No, what is an oxymoron is a liberal who believes in big government and socialist policies.

            It all probably harkens back to the McCarthy-era, when everything connected to socialism was branded as communist and what is the US equivalent of European socialdemocrats no longer could call themselves that and so had to pick another word.

            So they choose liberal for some reason, possibly because that word has positive connotations in american history.

            But US liberals are essentially social democrats, as seen in many european political parties.
            Parties that have been very succesful and created succesful societies.
            Succesful homogenous societies, like the scandinavian countries etc.
            Societies that are now failing because socialdemocratic policies are relying on everyone having a common culture, values, ethics and goals, which aren’t working when the societies are no longer homogenous.

            And liberals are trying to push that on USA, which never had the homogeneity to build on that european countries once had.

        • Mergatroyd

          Why do you and Engelman automatically assume that the vast majority of white race realists are republicans? I do not support the republican party; with few exceptions, they are aiding and abetting our demise.

          Stop assuming that all whites who aren’t democrats are automatically republicans.

          I see very little support for republicans on this forum.

    • nicholasstix

      Is it not possible to sign the petition using a pseudonym?

      • Mergatroyd

        Yes, it is. I sign those petitions all the time. As it is, look at how few have signed, how scared people are. What have we got to lose at this point…our country? our lives?

    • Talltrees

      The petition only shows initials. Who cares if the government knows?

    • AutomaticSlim

      There’s plenty of them over 25 too.
      The former hippies from the 60s.

      • RisingReich

        Those people are the WORST – as reality (literally, sometimes) pummels them into the pavement, they continue to agitate for those who would love nothing else than to exterminate them.

        That’s one thing I agree with them on – exterminating leftist White fools is priority 1. Expulsion is good, but leaves room for the snakes to slither right on back in at a later time.

      • MBlanc46

        You might be surprised how many of us are race realists.

    • “This is nothing more than hand delivering to the White House a list of white racists the government needs to keep an eye on.”

      Correct. In fact it wouldn’t be a stretch to guess that the petition was drafted by DOJ.

    • MBlanc46

      “Meanwhile, millions of white people under 25 will be protesting how racist the white petition signers are.”

      They can kiss my coat-tails. I’m not sure I’ll sign either, but I doubt the efficiency of the Obama administration to retaliate any signers.

    • Mergatroyd

      So let’s just give up and call the petition racist while we’re at it. Might as well join our enemies if we’re not going to fight back, right?
      We whites don’t deserve to protect ourselves and our loved ones from vicious blacks so we should just lie down and take the beatings, we deserve it for past bad acts like slavery and Jim Crow.

      Let’s turn our homelands over too and all of our wealth to those who are smarter and better than us…oh wait. We whites are already doing that.

  • Extropico

    A beer summit with all the powerful gangsta rappers is the key to ending the cycle of violence.

    • Mergatroyd

      It’s worked well before, so why not?

  • Druid

    waste of time…

  • bigone4u

    I view the petition as a propaganda pushback by our side. We know Obozo will not act, but the point is that if we get the petition to his desk, he can’t pretend he doesn’t know how white people really feel. I have mixed feelings about signing it because you have to identify yourself, and I can’t help but think that the IRS is going to take a strong interest in signers. Unless millions sign, in which case the IRS, which is going to be dealing with the Obamacare mess, will be sidetracked. On balance, I’m leaning toward signing.

    • libertarian1234

      “I view the petition as a propaganda pushback by our side.”

      That’s the first thing that crossed my mind also.

      It is part of building a case that could be the basis for justifying vigilantism as well.

      Also, I view failing to admit to a racial basis by the MSM, who call the black on white attacks a game is not absolutely vital at this point. Rather it’s just another step in building a case, also.

      We’re getting the camel’s nose under the tent anyway.

      • Mergatroyd

        Vigilantism will happen. It is inevitable when the rule of law breaks down, which is has. There is no longer justice or equality in the application of law in this country, it’s as plain as day that blacks and other non-whites, even newly arrived illegal immigrants receive unfair, special treatment over whites.
        Let’s hope the breaking point comes soon, I’d like to get this over with.

    • Zaporizhian Sich

      The best way whites can demonstrate how they feel is to kill any and all blacks who attack them without provocation, without exception or mercy. Nothing sends a message better than bullet shattered corpses in morgues.

  • LIBERTYSINCURSION

    He doesn’t speak on the fact that 90% of all interracial violent crime between blacks and whites. Has a black perpetrator and a white victim, for a reason. He doesn’t see a problem with it!

  • Spartacus

    When your ancestors had a problem with a tax on tea, they did more than sign a petition…

    • Alexandra1973

      They tried to grab our guns over 200 years ago too, and they got a huge beatdown.

    • Mergatroyd

      There will be a pushback and backlash at some point, it is inevitable, and when it comes there will be a payback the likes of which no one has ever seen before.

      I only hope the main enemies are targeted first for elimination.

  • Homo_Occidentalis

    Obama has made it quite plain after the Trayvon Martin shooting that HE IS NOT ON WHITE AMERICA’S SIDE (no matter what the facts or the juries say). He will side with blacks 100/100 times, regardless of whether or not they are in the wrong, because like all blacks he is afflicted by the same tribal mentality. It’s time for whites to wake up and adopt a tribal mentality of our own before they wipe us out for good.

    • Mergatroyd

      Same for Eric the Red Holder’s DOJ which stated that whites are not covered by hate laws.

  • IstvanIN

    Why would he try to stop something he and the Missus supports?

  • Alexandra1973

    That’s like having a petition asking Hitler to release the Jews from concentration camps.

  • GOD

    Is this real?? If so, who started it? Something is not adding up here.

    • Mergatroyd

      The person that started this is legitimately concerned that black-on-white crime is being ignored by the media and DOJ, while the reverse (Trayvon Martin) garners headline news for months on end.

  • GOD

    I see a lot of California sigs. Didn’t the Mexicans chase out all the blacks from there already??

    • Katherine McChesney

      They’re from all over the country, the North, NW, So. and West. I signed it.

    • “Didn’t the Mexicans chase out all the blacks from there already??”

      They’ve won in Compton. I don’t think they’ve won anywhere else just yet.

      • Mergatroyd

        South Central LA, once known as the black paradise of “Watts.” It is now majority Hispanic, as is the school system.

  • Puggg

    Our sworn enemy isn’t going to help us.

    • Mergatroyd

      Agreed. Then we need to start helping ourselves and this is a beginning.

      What would you suggest? We sit back and do nothing while our homelands are being wrested from us and anti-white policies continue to be enacted and enforced?

      If we don’t save ourselves, who will? No. One. Imagine the world that will be left to our white posterity.

  • Like POTUS O gives a stain in his undershorts.

  • RisingReich

    Only thing Obongo will do is ENSURE this trend stays on it’s current trajectory.
    Of course, if we ever accomplish the unthinkable and oust him, that’s when the real fun starts.

    • Rhialto

      Your president will be ousted in 2016, and replaced by H. Rodham-Clinton in 2017. Then there may well be a Final Solution to the White man problem.

  • 1stworlder

    isn’t this just a sign up list to be audited by the IRS?

    • Alexandra1973

      I tend to be cautious about signing anything.

      Then again, “they” could be monitoring this site (I’d about guarantee they are) and they’ll figure out who everyone is.

      Wave to the feds now….

      • Mergatroyd

        You don’t have to use your real name to sign these particular petitions.
        Hell, at this point what have we got to lose?

      • emiledurk16

        Like Robert DeNiro did in GoodFellas.

  • John K

    I doubt that they’ll get anywhere with a black racist in the White House, but whoever put their names on that petition better get ready for one hell of an IRS audit. The black racists will attack you financially, too. No one will oppose the Race Card Administration.

    • Talltrees

      You can be assured AmRen is monitored as all other White sites. It’s too late for you, so why not sign the petition.

      • Ella

        They probably wrote us off as a bunch of angry White people behind computer keyboards.

        • MBlanc46

          Which, after all, we are.

  • MBlanc46

    It won’t go anywhere, but why not?

    • Mergatroyd

      We should never stop putting up anything that mocks and ridicules the left and points out the anti-white policies that we whites are forced to live under.
      I cannot load the petition, maybe it’s already been taken down?

      BTW, I happen to know the author of this petition and he works tirelessly day and night to write, post and gather signatures so they will get the attention they deserve. . He is concerned about assaults against whites by blacks that are being completely ignored by the media along with the growing loss of white homelands. He says he does this for ALL whites, everywhere but has a lot of trouble convincing other whites of the perilous situation we are in.

      Please sign it, if all of us did, it would get a lot more attention, as it is, our legitimate concerns are dismissed as silliness or lunacy, which they are not.

    • Jackryanvb

      Why

      • MBlanc46

        I don’t see how signing a petition against black-on-white crime has the characteristics that you subscribe to it.

  • Ella

    It is insane to ask a broken government to fix itself.

    • I never allow myself to issue warnings anymore, so while I think the federal government is being silly in this respect, I will sign no petition.

  • dd121

    There have been a bunch of these petitions that ridicule the left in one form or another. Just like news stories that put the lefties in a bad light, these “petitions” seem to disappear down the memory hole.

  • Garrett Brown

    I bet he read this and laughed, if it even garnered enough signatures.

  • Alec Smart

    82 signers. Not looking good.

  • Massif1

    There should be a petition to move all liberals like Rachel Maddow into a black neighborhood (hood). I’m tired of liberals parading their “equality” messages and still living in nice houses and condos without any black neighbors. Liberals need to get a taste of diversity.

    • Alexandra1973

      Especially make the anti-gun nuts live there. And don’t let them have guns.

  • Jackryanvb

    Can we get contact information on the people who signed this petition? If not, these petitions are pretty much worthless.

  • MekongDelta69

    To paraphrase a very well known book:
    The Road To An IRS Audit And Jail Is Paved With Good Petitions

  • Jackryanvb

    I checked out the original petition – just anonymous initials, list the town, state.

    Same old, same old failed American Conservative, patriot actions, like the same old, same old 3rd party Libertarian Constitutionalist President campaigns.

  • The Final Solution

    I sure would love to go back in time and show this to Abe Lincoln. Then make him choke on it.