Mass Immigration Is Destroying Our Once Great Nation

Leo McKinstry, Express (London), December 30, 2013

The day of destiny has almost arrived. Another stage is about to be reached in the destruction of national identity and our existence as an independent country. From the beginning of January, all restrictions will be lifted on immigration to Britain of people from Bulgaria and Romania. Under European Union free movement laws, the 28 million citizens of these two countries will have the legal right to settle here.

The vast new influx of eastern European migrants will be the next step in the revolution that has engulfed our country in recent years. A relentless flood of arrivals, running at a rate of more than 500,000 a year, has already transformed the very fabric of our society. As a result of our open borders Britain is now the most overcrowded nation in Europe. By 2015 our population density will be twice that of Germany and more than four times that of France.

With five million foreigners arriving here since 2001 the pace and extent of the demographic change has been phenomenal.

At least a third of all babies born in Britain have at least one foreign parent, a figure rising to an astonishing 90 per cent in some London boroughs.

In several of our urban conurbations, such as Leicester, Slough and Luton, white British people are significantly in a minority. It is no wonder that many ordinary Britons now feel like aliens in their own land.

What is so sickening is that we never voted for this upheaval. Mass immigration and the creation of a multi-cultural society have all been imposed without a shred of democratic consent. Opinion polls show that the overwhelming majority of the public want tighter border controls.

Yet this natural instinct is treated with contempt by the bullying ideologues of the proimmigration brigade, who hurl accusations of racism and xenophobia against anyone who dares challenge their project.

Even the very limited lastminute moves by the Tory-led coalition to impose some checks on the right of migrants to claim certain welfare bene-fits has been hysterically portrayed by some as a form of vicious bigotry. It is unlikely that the Government’s hastily introduced measures will do anything to stem the surge of arrivals from Bulgaria and Romania.

Britain will be one of the favourite destinations for these migrants, partly because our economy is stronger than the failing Eurozone, partly because our welfare system is more generous.

The respected think tank Open Europe has estimated that 620,000 may come here, while a survey conducted in the two countries for the BBC in March 2013 put the potential figure much higher, with 9.3 per cent of Bulgarians and 4.6 per cent of Romanians saying that they would consider a move to Britain. That would ultimately mean 1.6 million migrants.

The pro-immigration ideologues tell us that our economy will be boosted and our culture enriched by this new influx. But that is just more hollow propaganda.

Their economic arguments are completely bogus. Mass immigration imposes a phenomenal burden on the civic infrastructure, as was admitted by an official internal report by the University of Reading for the Government that was leaked to the press over the weekend.

The Reading study, commissioned by 74 local authorities in the South-east, warned of overcrowded schools, overstretched hospitals and “increases in welfare payments”. Moreover, through the aggressive exploitation of cheap labour, uncontrolled immigration drives down wages, lowers living standards and pushes up unemployment.

But contrary to the incessant mantra of the immigration enthusiasts, not all new arrivals come here to work. Many are drawn by the honeypot of our lax benefits system. Already, one-third of Big Issue vendors are Romanian, because through selling the magazine they can claim self-employed status and thereby gain access to welfare cash and housing.

The problem of freeloading is particularly acute among the Roma people, of whom there currently at least 200,000 in Britain, a number that is bound to rise dramatically from January.

“The Roma will be the real danger for your social system next year. While other people come to work, the Roma will come for your benefits,” warns one Romanian lawyer.

AND that goes to the heart of the problem. Mass immigration smashes the social contract on which civilisation depends. A nation can only function successfully when its people have shared values, a mutual sense of belonging and a universal moral code. But multi-culturalism and open borders promote division, segregation, and hierarchies of victimhood based on ethnic identities.

The higher the rates of immigration, the harder integration becomes. We are now a land scarred by practices that would have been unthinkable 30 years ago, such as forced marriages, urban shanty towns, predatory grooming gangs, genital mutilation and tribal gangsterism. But such problems could just be the precursor of what is to come. “You Western Europeans have not quite registered the level of criminality you are about to face,” says a retired Bulgarian colonel.

The EU and the self-styled progressives do not care about any of this. Mass immigration and the abolition of nationhood are central to their goal of a new federal entity in Europe. But the rest of us can only feel despair at what we are losing.

Topics: , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • JohnEngelman

    Immigration should be restricted to those who have jobs lined up in advance.

    • Max Krakah

      Immigration should not be allowed at all at this point! The ethnic composition of a country must be closely guarded!

    • Manaphy

      Immigration should be restricted. Period.

      • Katherine McChesney

        The bulk of immigrants should be deported. Employment and entitlements should be refused to them. Then, perhaps they’ll return to their countries.

    • Manaphy

      No non-whites should be allowed to immigrate to white countries.

    • ben no

      “Immigration should be restricted to those who have jobs lined up in advance.”

      But then that would defeat the objective of immigration which is to insure impoverishment of the white working class while also being reduced to an alienated minority in their homeland.

      I think what is happening to British, is an evil beyond comprehension.

      • JohnEngelman

        In the United States Republicans want to “insure the impoverishment of the white working class.”

    • No, we should have guest-worker immigration – like China, Taiwan and Korea; immigration where the immigrants must eventually go back home (rather than be handed passports).

      • SoulInvictus

        No. Period.
        This would exacerbate our illegal alien situation even worse.
        They wouldn’t even have to sneak in anymore. Just get a guest worker visa and disappear into the woodwork. Then wait for amnesty, not like your kids won’t be legal citizens anyway. The anchor baby phenomena would explode the immigrant population.

    • Alexandra1973

      More like, have a moratorium on immigration, only accept asylum cases (no non-whites). Kick out any illegals.

      After the dust settles, if it’s determined we can take more aboard, only accept Whites.

      • Brian

        The only people I’m interested in taking are Afrikaaners.

        • SoulInvictus

          Someone should set up a concerted effort to marry and immigrate them en masse that way. Even if only a short term mail order bride type arrangement, I wish we were unified in an effort to save our kin there from the inevitable. I’d set up a website if there was interest.

          • Brutus

            I’d marry an Afrikaner woman.

          • SoulInvictus

            Excellent! The more I think about this, the more I like the idea.
            Maybe it’s something other people would want to get behind as well.
            In case some might be embarrassed to say so here, and for when the thread gets locked, I’ve created an email address to gauge interest.

            If you’re interested, or know someone who might be, or would potentially be willing to financially support such an effort, then send a contact email or pass the address along. If you see a relevant place to post it, please feel free to do so. If I see enough interest, then I’ll look into setting up a website. Maybe even setting up a 501c if we could get some financial support. I’ve done web and graphic dev for Fortune 500s and charities before, so this isn’t something new to me. Might as well do it for a good cause. 🙂

            Afrikanerrailroad@gmail.com

            You know you love the name already. 😉
            Brutus and anyone else that has liked this, make sure you send an email.

            You’ve talked the talk, now put some action behind it. Bring our brothers and sisters back into the fold and help our own cause in the process!

          • SoulInvictus

            Hey Brutus, I’ve tried multiple times to post a response but it seems like it’s getting filtered out…
            If interested in this, or supporting such an endeavor financially, respond to this email address. AfrikanerRailroad At Gmail.
            You know you love the name already. 🙂

          • Brian

            We need to get the Afrikaner men out too though. There are some single white women who could use a good husband, and we could all benefit from their racial awareness, farming expertise, etc.

            I do like the name; very fitting. I’ll get in touch.

          • SoulInvictus

            I agree completely. The more detailed post I kept trying to respond with wouldn’t make it through moderation for some reason.
            Being old fashioned though, the whole women and children first lifeboat philosophy comes to mind.
            I think it could be a great project with a lot of potential. Aside from the moral good, the social impact of dropping even a million of these folks into the US, with the experience they’ve had, could be a game changer.

          • Brian

            Let us know when the website is online. Looks like it’s just a placeholder for now…

        • SoulInvictus

          I’ve tried multiple times to post a response but it seems like it’s getting filtered out…
          If interested in this, or supporting such an endeavor financially, respond to this email address. AfrikanerRailroad At Gmail.
          You know you love the name already. 🙂

  • Max Krakah

    I see the day when the streets of Britain will be lined with the heads of the traitorous left on stakes. When the BBC will be surrounded by stakes with the heads of it’s vermin on stakes. There are still a lot of English, Welsh, and Scotts, and they will not lay down and die. The treachery and INTENTIONAL policies of infiltrating Britain with foreigners has been documented and revealed. It is only a matter of bringing the traitors to justice. I see the day when football games will be played with the heads of the traitors and the infiltrators. I see the day when no stories that sympathetic to the traitors or the infiltrators are allowed.

    • ZeitTrash

      I see many more days on into the future where people sit on their couch in front of their tellys and say, “Meep.” Heads on stakes? Fat freaking chance. Not in the US and not in the UK. Whites will continue to blather about how much they love “diversity” while it slits their throats and destroys their lives, families, and societies, just as they’ve been brainwashed and intimidated into doing.

      Campaigns against people like the Duck Dynasty patriarch aren’t just meant to slap him down. They’re meant to threaten and intimidate the public. They want you to think “If a wealthy old geezer like that can get his life messed around like that, imagine what they could do to me!” This stuff may not work on you or on many others who read this site but it doesn’t have to. It has to work on the majority. And it does. People are confused, weakened, and afraid just as the “elites” want them to be.

      So, bloody revolution? Not bloody likely. I’m not saying things are completely hopeless but pro-white mayem is not in the cards.

      • Charles W.

        It kills me because Britain actually had a fighting chance.

        In the U.S. they used the “we are a nation of immigrants!!” line to hoodwink us before anyone realized what was happening.

        • CoweringCoward

          We always have been “A” melting pot, we took peoples from all over Western Europe. To throw in dog crap, is not going to make a stronger steel as it were, is it?

        • Rex

          The “immigrants” and I call them builders, where all White Europeans and nobody else in massive numbers was ever allowed. Just a few Chinese laborers 100 years ago for the construction of the railroad in the West and the Black slaves who counted zero. and the few native Americans. This was basically an all White Country. Any place you went you only dealt with Whites and only Whites.. Until all hell broke loose after the passage of the anti-White immigration act of 1965 when traitorous Whites in Congress opened the doors of this once great Country to millions and millions of savages who instead of thanking us for our generosity toward them all they want is to see us dead and gone.

      • Max Krakah

        that old geezer just got his way. You expect things to be easy? You are the fat thing sitting on a couch!

    • Charles W.

      But they are laying down and dying.

      Even those f*****s in the “English Defense League” turned tail and ran when they were called “bigots” and “racists” by the controlled media.

  • Puggg

    First, they should have been worrying about this starting in 1948, when the first boat load of blacks docked in London.

    Second, by “Romanian” here, I bet they really mean Gypsies. I’m thinking that because I saw on CofCC a story about blacks versus “Romanians” in Houston, the “Romanians” they showed looked rather tan and dark.

  • Romulus

    I have dreamed of a unified Anglo/Norse/ Celtic alliance all my life. Identification by blood ancestry. A rebirth of the barbarian heroes of old that will finally purge Europe of the stench of the infiltraitors.
    YOU KNOW of WHOM I speak. They are the SC*m of the earth and have destroyed every nation they’ve ever gone to, using the browns as muscle. It goes all the way back to Egypt.

    • Pro_Whitey

      Funny, you use “infiltrators”. That’s the word Israelis use to describe illegal immigrants into their country. We must follow their model of protecting our own, even if that means going after some of their scumbag cousins in other countries.

  • shawnmer

    I’m tempted to say they should count their blessings. At least their mass immigration has a large portion that are white, Eastern European Christians instead of African and Middle Eastern. Every country has the right to control its borders, but at least their foreigners don’t have quite the “darkening” and displacing effect the U.S.’s does.

    • shawnmer

      Ok, never mind, these are Gypsies, not white Christians. Never comment after a skim, always read first!

      • Pelagian

        Wiki seems to be confused on this issue. I count a minimum of 123%:

        More than three-quarters of Bulgarians subscribe to Eastern Orthodoxy.[264] Sunni Muslims are the second-largest community and constitute 10 per cent … Less than three per cent are affiliated with other religions, 11.8 per cent do not self-identify with a religion and 21.8 per cent refused to state their beliefs.[264]

    • Truth Teller

      Do you consider elite and often Christian families from the Middle East to be comparable to Africans? In other words, do you consider someone such as Marlo Thomas to be like a mulatto?

      • shawnmer

        White Christians are white Christians. The Middle East does have a few, I’m aware of that.

        • jackryanvb

          Algeria and Lebanon were part of France in the 1950s. Majority of people in Algerian and Lebanese cities were White in the 1950s.

          Lot’s of sexy women.

          Mountain Muslim women ain’t sexy. They also tend to breed throat cutting terrorists.

          • Brian

            The family that owns one of my favorite bars in Atlanta (since the 50’s), Manuel’s Tavern, is Lebanese Christian…last name Maloof. They look white to me…a little on the swarthy side like southern Italians, but still.

          • SoulInvictus

            Nothing wrong with a little Monica Bellucci/Jessica Alba type “swarthiness”. 😉 I used to live in Sandy Springs, still in ATL occasionally. Will have to check that place out.

          • David Ashton

            Isn’t Monica Bellucci a European, and quite beautiful?
            Some natural blondes can have quite ugly faces.
            No-one can help the race or looks they are born with, but people can help how they choose to breed.

          • SoulInvictus

            Well, Bellucci likely owes her dusky beauty to sicilian descent.
            But I’m not as stringent as a lot of the folks as my tastes aren’t usually for bleach white alabaster skin. And if they can’t look at that golden creature and see beauty, then I’m not the one with a problem, and leaves more for me besides.
            Beauty is beauty, and there are exceptions to every rule.

    • David Ashton

      No, most of the immigrants to Britain have been from Asia or Africa. This lot is ON TOP. Get facts from MigrationwatchUK on-line.

  • Marc Zuckurburg

    The time has come today to fix our broken immigration system with comprehensive immigration reform.

    Comprehensive immigration reform will raise wages and salaries, strengthen national security, prevent terrorism, enhance our domestic crime-fighting ability, ensure that we continue to encourage the best and brightest to partake of the American dream, enhance our competitiveness and our ability to innovate, and make America more prosperous.

    Make my immigration reform comprehensive, please!

    • Puggg

      Make my coronary artery bypass surgery quadruple, please!

  • bigone4u

    Scouring the country of its traitors and its foreigners will not be an easy task, but unless it is done, the sacrifices of the WWII generation will have been in vain. Here’s hoping a new nationalist government that has the guts to do the job is installed in Britain soon.

    • Sick of it

      That’s about as likely as a pig growing wings.

      • bigone4u

        I read an article today that argued that UKIP was going to win the election next year. Of course, the best we can hope for even from them is a reduction or immigration freeze.

      • CoweringCoward

        Your Avatar kinda speaks to something that while dormant is still part of our makeup (in need of a wakeup).

        • Sick of it

          As much as some here may favor the Prussian Kingdom/Empire, they failed our kind in a multitude of ways. Even before they allowed those who must not be named to take over Germany piece by piece, to launch revolutions with little in the way of punishment, etc., they destroyed the Teutonic Order by turning the lands of the Order into a personal fiefdom. Such a fiefdom should not be held by gutless wretches who give in to an overly aggressive alien population. Charlemagne would spit upon these people for their weakness.

      • SoulInvictus

        I don’t think folks here get it. It’s done.
        We mostly have ourselves to blame. Infighting from Rome to WWII has taken its toll and just by breeding alone, no warfare needed, we’re done.
        There will be isolated enclaves like Ireland and Australia… but give it time and those too will fall.
        My picture of western Christendom is through the microcosm of South Africa.
        Liberalism + numbers= demise of western civilization.
        It’s not that I like it, I just perceive reality with no delusions of grandeur.
        White people are great, but even lions can get overtaken by army ants.

        • ricpic

          None of us know what those up against the wall have the stomach for until we and they are up against the wall. Although I share your pessimism, there is a chance that when the great implosion (economic and societal) comes and the few choices left are brutal, well, that under that grim circumstance the stomach to do the necessary will return.

          • SoulInvictus

            I think it’s a safe bet to say, that when you’re pinning your hopes on a (hopefully brief) return to dark age chaos (like I unfortunately see in most forums), then prospects are grim.
            It’s not like the vast majority of whites are any better prepared for it than anyone else. Yeah, there might be a drastic reduction in overall world population, but that just means a roughly equal percentage drop across the board. Same problems, just a critical mass date reset for a few hundred years.
            If nothing else, we’ve demonstrated that national unity is no longer our strong suit.
            I truly hate being pessimistic about the perpetuation of my kind, and I welcome any info or realistic strategy towards better results. But I’m fairly bright, and I don’t see it. There does seem to be a shifting tide of general sentiment, but I don’t foresee that reaching any kind of meaningful counterbalance to the pro-diversity culture.
            Hell, you can’t even discuss it without being labeled Nazi or supremacist. That carries no weight with me in a stupid internet debate, but it will absolutely destroy any politician. In the NSA age, I’m rightfully paranoid that even posting here will eventually land me on some sort of Southern Poverty Law Center type hate group list. Then you’re definitely never holding public office.
            The only feasible route, that could fly in current politics, would be a collaboration of wealthy patrons. You’d need a few billionaires willing to buy up property, build up some sort of sustainable industry, and begin relocating people en masse. A type of reservation I guess. Pay people extra for every birth. Start in a small state, one with a lower population (preferably of the same ethnicity) so that once you’ve reached numbers great enough you can hold sway over every election. Then you could stealthily implement law and tax policy that would further the cause.
            Barring a focused investment of resources like that, then I don’t see much hope. If there are any wealthy folks out there who would be interested in real action, feel free to respond and I’d happily help how I could.

        • Sick of it

          Technically, the Apollo program was a culmination of the scientific work performed in Germany before and during WWII. We reached our pinnacle before the 60s. Everything since then has been a disappointment (sorry that I don’t get excited about a new application for old radio technology).

          • SoulInvictus

            True about the rocket science. But I meant more across the board.
            The rest of the world was still pretty primitive or recovering from the war, the west still riding a tide and mentality of strength, innovation, and exploration. Then globalism hit and rapid descent began. Other than in genetics (the irony…) we’ve stalled out since Tesla.
            Then add in the disparity of population growth compounded by insane immigration policies and the downward slide accelerates….

    • Kevin W. Cornell

      The U.S., Britain and France should never have declared war on Germany. The war wiped out legions of our best people and ultimately paved the way for the multi-cultural neo-communist hell we are experiencing now.

      • SoulInvictus

        Short term damned if they did, long term damned that they didn’t.
        Life under a fascist German empire wouldn’t have been pleasant. If so, the eastern Europeans and French wouldn’t have fought it. You also might want to contemplate that the western US likely would have been kneeling to Hirohito. Stuff like that is why I never get on board with people praising Hitler as being a bastard, but Our bastard. You’d be dead or subjected to Japanese Imperial or NAZI rule. Neither of which do I find particularly appealing.
        Long term though… dominant western civilization continues for 1,000 years.
        Tough call and an impossible one to make for our WWI era ancestors without having a crystal ball. How could they have ever foreseen the stupidity of modern liberalism and the demise of nationalism. It would have been inconceivable only 50 years ago.

        • Sick of it

          Long-term, I could see Hitler and company hanging from the gallows. People may not have been as free as in old America, but look at Europe today.

          • SoulInvictus

            There’s no way of knowing with no lengthy post-war german occupation to indicate how even whites of different nationality would have been treated.
            I’m going to err on the side of badly. The thinking seemed to be more, thanks for the new breeding women, and maybe we’ll let you live. Otherwise wouldn’t have things worked out more as a pan European alliance to begin with. It’s pointless (but fun) philosophical masturbation to begin with, but I see no indicators that Hitler had any interest in improving anything but Germany.
            Subsequently, the whole “he was for white power and thus pro-me” ideal has never swayed me. He would’ve happily run you over with a Panzer too and it’s historically proven stupid to think otherwise.

          • Sick of it

            Considering the numerous assassination attempts, including the collusion of his own generals, I repeat that Hitler would likely not have survived very long. Nor would his cabal. On the other hand, the extraordinarily intelligent men busily turning out scientific breakthroughs would have survived to help create a better future.

          • SoulInvictus

            I’m not really sure where you’re going with that.
            Even if he’d been killed a little later by his own, that wouldn’t have prevented Allied intervention and invasion of Berlin. Personally, I think there’s a decent chance it wasn’t his body they found anyway. Regardless, it wouldn’t have changed anything.
            As far as the science, they seemed to have continued on just fine in the US aeronautics industry.

          • Sick of it

            I’ve complained about our level of technology today often enough. The German scientists were theorizing things far ahead of everything we have done since that time, which has generally been a slight improvement upon what had already been done before. NASA was the exception until it became the rule (see our space program today).

          • SoulInvictus

            Well, feel free to post some links as that’s one of my favorite subjects. I’m just not aware of anything all that groundbreaking beyond what they already had produced. I know they had primitive stealth, even though it was likely accidental because aluminum was in short supply. And I know they were working on VTOL aircraft. Other than that, Von Braun and company pretty much got to carry on development here unhindered.
            Their crude genetic theory and work wasn’t advanced in the least, so nothing lost in the eugenics field.

            I’m much more interested in things that didn’t get the experimentation they deserved like Project Orion and
            Wardenclyffe Tower. Both way cooler and more advanced in concept than anything the Nazis every dreamed of, IMHO anyway.
            It’s hard to beat city sized spaceships powered by nuclear bombs and a global wireless electric/communication/defense grid powered by manipulating harmonics with Earth’s magnetic field.

  • D.B. Cooper

    Your country has become a dirty mess. Most of you Brits are too stupid to even know who is doing to you. You blame the foreigners, but WHO let them in to begin with?
    The ultimate goal of these foreigners? I’m sure they want to infect your bloodline.
    Harry’s future wife?

    • frederickdixon

      It was the Blair government which threw open the floodgates at the beginning of the millennium. The officials with immediate responsibility were Jack Straw (Home Secretary), Barbara Roche (Immigration Minister) and Jonathan Portes (Home Office adviser). None of these are, er, of native Anglo Saxon or Celtic ancestry.

      • ViktorNN

        It always seems to be the same group of people… it’s as if they have a group interest in seeing white countries flooded with non-whites…

        • Pro_Whitey

          Definitely worth more study. I have speculated that some push for it because it maximizes the return on rental real estate, but I think ultimately it is a tool to undermine white solidarity, and allow instead a certain other well-organized and coordinated group to exercise influence and control.

  • Luca

    “As a result of our open borders Britain is now the most overcrowded nation in Europe. By 2015 our population density will be twice that of Germany and more than four times that of France.”

    Well apparently Britain, Western Europe and the US need leaders with at least as much testosterone as Margaret Thatcher.

  • Pelagian

    Cue Doris Day, “The Party’s Over”:

    “From … January, all restrictions will be lifted on immigration to Britain of people from Bulgaria and Romania. Under European Union free movement laws, the 28 million citizens of these two countries will have the legal right to settle here. ….. next step in the revolution … relentless flood of arrivals, running at a rate of more than 500,000 a year, ………. ….. now the most overcrowded nation in Europe … population density… twice …Germany and more than four times that of France.”

  • Spartacus

    In other news, they released the information from the latest census here a few days ago. The gypsy population had the fifth consecutive year of decline. “How can that be”, you may ask, “since they breed like cockroaches ?” It’s quite simple, really – they’re running away from people like me, and towards people like mister Ashton, who are too “civilized” to keep the critters in line with violence. Good luck with that…

  • Charles W.

    I’ve had many intense arguments with Brits online about this.

    Really is amazing how so many people can be brainwashed into cheering on their own destruction.

    • The Verdict of History

      I’m sure that the destroyers are totally amazed themselves.

      No matter – one wouldn’t want to offend the dignified “Asians” pouring into Lon-dum.

    • CoweringCoward

      They can only remain self deluded for so long, and right now the discussion has not even started. DIEversities will see to it that we are forced to have these discussions. After the “correction” it will be a century or more, if ever, that finds Saxons willing to listen to the equality tripe again. Just my wishful thinking? Maybe.

  • Charles W.

    Of all unlikely people to have predicted the current mess in Europe and in particular the UK, the late Sir James Goldsmith put a lot of effort into urging Brits to not allow their island to be converted from a nation into a “populated space” through mass immigration.

    Below is a very interesting lecture by him circa 1993 warning what was to come in Europe:

    sirjamesgoldsmith dot com/#thinker/3

  • CoweringCoward

    They setting the stage worldwide for a new ULTRA_HITLER.

    • Kevin W. Cornell

      I had a similar thought earlier today. When enough Anglo-Saxon-Celtic people finally decide to heed the call of the blood, it’s all over. The current reigning consensus will crash like dominoes.

    • SoulInvictus

      I don’t see it. Even post 911, the west was barely able to stomach a retaliatory war on Islam. And not only that but still allowed muslim immigration and freedom to organize here. That’s just nuts…
      So… if an open act of war and mass murder doesn’t instill cultural/national cohesiveness, I definitely don’t see a slower boiling of the frog like Britain’s immigration situation doing it.

  • IstvanIN

    The real British are those who cheered the Queen Mother on her 100th birthday mourned her passing, celebrated the Queen’s Jubilee and Prince William’s wedding. A nation is an extended family that celebrates the same holidays, the same triumphs and the same tragedies. Small numbers of immigrants, from racially, religious and culturally similar ethnicities can be absorbed as long as those immigrants must foreswear the former allegiances and adopt the customs and language of their new land. No nation can survive an inundation of millions of radically different peoples. Environmental Scientists call these sorts of invaders “invasive species” and document the amount of damage they do to the native wild life. Why are we any different?

    • ben no

      The real, ethnic British, particularity the English are the most self-destructive people on the planet. They will suffer and suffer and suffer and suffer to no end, and never fight back. They will even let their children be horribly molested and still have the “Oh, well attitude” to Muslim immigration. English people are sad and pitiful, and need to be rescued from themselves.

      It’s almost abnormal. I don’t think there are another single people on earth
      who are that tolerate of their own suffering. When there isn’t anyone to turn
      to, when there is unpredictability of danger and no outlet, aggression is suppressed; it turns inwards and results in depression. These people are heading for the biggest epidemic of post traumatic stress disorder on record. Not too mention a rise in suicide as well. The youth of the future will curse in agony and absolutely hate and spit on their older generations now.

      • Kevin W. Cornell

        Very interesting commentary. Any theory as to why the ethnic British are so particularly self-destructive? Are they too inbred? Reminds me of a statement I once heard from a pro-white thinker that the goal should be a healthy (European) race as opposed to a pure one.

        • ben no

          Did you not read what I said. “They will suffer and suffer and suffer and suffer to no end, and never fight back. They will even let their children be horribly molested and still have the “Oh, well attitude” to Muslim immigration.”

    • Katherine McChesney

      A friend in Birmingham, England once told me that the Queen Mother was a virulant racist against blacks.

      • Alexandra1973

        I’ve heard about some of Prince Philip’s gaffes, too. A lot of them actually made me chuckle.

        • IstvanIN

          I like Prince Philip. His gaffes were minor, amusing and what most of us actually think. Any reports against him were WAY overblown. Too bad the Royal family are not allowed to express their actual opinion.

          • Lagerstrom

            Me too. He’s quite a laugh. Wouldn’t even know what “PC” stood for.

      • Sick of it

        And yet her family supports every vile aspect of globalism/multiculturalism. They are the enemy.

    • jackryanvb

      Have to say this Queen bares a lot of the blame for the changes in Britain from the 1940s to now. Is this Queen ever going to die?

      • IstvanIN

        No monarch has had any real authority since before Queen Victoria.

      • Laura Dilworth

        think her replacement will be any better?

  • The Final Solution

    This is what the English get for opposing Germany. They had the answer to the gypsy problem. They had the answer to all non-white problems.

    • ben no

      No, not English, but BRITISH. English is in reference to ancestry and culture, but it is not a suitable words to use nation-wise or government-wise. What is that you don’t understand? English haven’t ruled themselves for 350 years or so. British rule nowadays is extremely anti-English to the point of being immensely abusive, oppressive and genocidal. About WW2? British rule under a part-Jewish prime minister decided to appose Germany at the expense of Gentile English lives being bombed away. Churchill was paid by Jewish Marxism to appose Germany and English civilians were the piggies, forced to fight and naturally thinking they were saving themselves from Nazi rule.

  • The Final Solution

    Maybe some of these new arrivals can enrich Oxbridge.

    • Katherine McChesney

      Jesse Jackson would love that, wouldn’t he?

  • M.

    The Brits never flooded their colonies with their folk if that’s what you’re referring to.
    The Indian culture and descent today are intact. Same for Bahrein, Egypt, Malaysia, etc. Administering a country and physically invading it is not the same. The latter leaves indelible scars, and bastardizes a nation forever.

  • ben no

    You obviously misread. I specifically said “English is in reference to ancestry and culture…”

    If you make English a nationality, you allow anyone to become English and British, thus making the true English essentially nothing. There is ONE a nationality – British, regardless of where you are born in Britain. This prevents just anyone from claiming to English, Scottish or Welsh. HENCE British passport, British army, British navy, British television, British subject.

    If you are ethnic English, it is no wonder you are doomed considering the fact that you can’t even recognize the fact that you stopped ruling yourself 350 years ago or so, which is also exactly when English as a official nationality died along with the Kingdoms single rule. It is very simple to understand and you have to accept it because it is the truth!

  • watling

    I don’t think Jack Straw, Barbara Roche or Jonathan Portes had much to do with Labour’s open door border policy. Those responsible were Blair, Brown, Mandelson, Campbell and Philip Gould – the architects of New Labour.

    Ultimately the voters who persisted in supporting Labour in 2001, 2005 and 2010 must take the blame. And for what it’s worth I don’t give any credence to this Jewish conspiracy nonsense. As someone once said, if the Jews are running things why is [insert country name here] in such chronic debt?

    • Alexandra1973

      Good question.

      My best friend in high school was Jewish and her parents fit the miserly Jew stereotype.

      Yeah, Jews are everywhere, it seems, fingers in a lot of pies…but the question to ask is, who put them there, and why? I’ll give you the why–it’s to get the anti-Semitism going.

      • watling

        Or maybe the Jews are just cleverer on average and have therefore naturally risen to the top, just like the immigrant Indians did in Fiji.

  • jackryanvb

    Britain has lot’s of great writers who tell it like it is. So why doesn’t the British public vote nationalist in anywhere even close to France, Holland, Switzerland?

  • jackryanvb

    Amren has solid Jewish readers, supporters. But, on immigration, Jews outside of Israel tend to be horrible, overwhelmingly on the other side. The worst (Sheldon Adelson, Mark Zuckerberg, CA and New York Senators) are filthy rich.

    Time for some direct action, reason, polite discussion doesn’t work.forget gun fantasies. Use force the way the Left does, destroy some careers, make it so immigration traitors un your tribe pay a heavy personal price for destroying our countries.

  • SoulInvictus

    Hey! The Brits finally get to enjoy the American experience.
    Viva la Diversity!
    Right! Right?
    😉
    Wonder how long it will take them to try and seduce Australia into joining the EU.
    Much longer than the .00001 nanoseconds it will take the Aussies to tell them to F off I’m thinking.

  • SoulInvictus

    I’m increasingly of the opinion that this is the case.
    Problem being is if it comes later rather than sooner.
    Less of us there are, and completely without unity, less likelihood of success no matter how many bullets and canned peaches you have…

    ” has the flag of ethnic unity to rally to when the time comes.”
    I’ll believe that when I see it…

  • jackryanvb

    Also, just consider the idea that certain people tend to be good and bad at different things. I’m Midwestern WASP, we haven’t had many successful comedians – Johnny Carson, Bob Newhart being the only two I can think of (both good, very Midwestern White). Do I get all bent out of shape that “my people” aren’t very good at comedy? Is it all about discrimination? No.

    With Jews, I advise just accepting the sad truth that Jews outside if Israel tend to be really bad on immigration, or just bad in politics in general. Jews in New York pretty much did this when they voted in Guliani in the early 1990s and White civilization was restored.

    Jews in the US aren’t even 2% of the US population, so why worry too much about electing a bunch of crazy open borders immigration Jews.

    Amren’s loyal Jewish readers should work to elect tough Italians like Tancredo or Sherrif Joe. A or Phily’s immortal police chief/mayor Frank Rizzo.

  • David Ashton

    The National Party and its predecessors supported Separate Development, first baaskap and then apartheid, before, during and after WW2. The British government fought a rearguard action to restrain the Soviet directed attack on the Simonstown naval base, and the sanctions supported by the Soviet Block and the UN majority. There is some truth in your account of the Boer War, which was opposed by many English people, but it is a very one-sided account. Many of us in Britain supported both Ian Smith and Dr Verwoerd, and still oppose the “libtards” here, in the west, AND in South Africa. Personally I admire the Afrikaners.

    • Brian

      Many Americans don’t much about Afrikaaners or Boers beyond apartheid, but I’ve been reading about them lately and there are some similarities to the Wild West pioneers, cowboys and Indians, etc. I find myself resonating with their history.

  • MBlanc46

    Hear, hear.

  • Sick of it

    Actions speak louder than words.

  • SoulInvictus

    Funny, I’ve always seen Luthor as the Zionist metaphor personified in that story.

  • SoulInvictus

    Swaying your brethren to turn off the anti-white media machine would go a looong ways towards earning trust. Then go to work on the international bankers. Unless your last name is Rothschild, I’m doubtful you’ll have much success.
    I’ve seen a trend of conservative jews trying to align with Christians.
    You can see this on sites like United West.
    But to me it always reeks of hypocrisy because they’re reaping the rewards of their own cultural sabotage here. America is going to be in no position to help Israel (not like that’s a particular desire of mine to begin with) once the white population is decimated.
    We fall, Israel is screwed. But hey, even their own government is having to fight against liberal stupidity (especially regarding immigration) there now because they’ve pushed it so much worldwide that they’ve drunk the koolaid too.

  • Lagerstrom

    They’ve “Stayed too long at the fair”.

  • Lagerstrom

    Oh, I don’t know about that Mr Lindbergh. Who did all the dirty work involved with gaining the ’empire’? A small group of geniuses?
    Long live Wat Tyler!

  • Brian

    Who does more damage? A carjacker or Bernie Madoff?

  • Brian

    Some of us are capable of making a distinction between Richard Feynman and Jonas Salk, vs. Joe Slovo and Ed Miliband.

  • David Ashton

    O’Malley has his own agenda, and previous links with Mandela.

    I have not denied earlier British reluctance to impose an “enfranchised” Bantu population on the Whites and Coloureds, but drew attention to the interest of the Afrikaners in preserving their own self-government under Strijdom and Verwoerd. The NP and HNP had quite different views from the more English-identified United Party and Liberals. I have discussed all this with well-educated Afrikaners apart from my own reading of SA history.

  • David Ashton

    The white people of England and north America are racially related and have much in common, but they are not descended from the Hebrews of the Old Testament.

  • ben no

    You CAN’T deny your nationality you moron. Han Chinese do not
    get to say, “I’m Han, not Chinese.” This would be just as ridiculous as saying, I’m English, not “British or “I’m Scottish, not British”. Its not about liking it – its about accepting simple fact. Come on…wake
    up for heaven sake!

  • Brutus

    “Zimbabweans?” I always say “Rhodesians.” Zimbabwe isn’t a thing, as far as I’m concerned.

  • Lagerstrom

    Good quote. I suppose all the elites have ever done was ‘harness the scum’.
    I think it was Churchill that said the British Navy was kept together by ‘rum, sodomy and the lash’.

  • M.

    Africans had languages, but not written ones. As for the Anglo wars you mentionned, well, they were wars.

    I agree with the rest.

  • Romulus

    That is,of course, your prerogative. I’ve never said that there aren’t GOOD and bad people of every stripe. Quite the contrary. Their are several posters here that embody western allegiance.

    It pays to know the history. Perhaps these two authors will help
    1) Michael Knopf
    2) prof. Kevin MacDonald
    These books: The atlas of christianity
    The atlas of judaism
    There are many more that chronicle the history. This is a good start.
    Thank you for your consideration.

  • David Ashton

    Most of this as I said before is correct. However, the Afrikaners did not want to be ruled by the Bantu any more than by the British. The Tomlinson Commission plus Verwoerd’s proposal that the former protectorates should be added to the homeland confederation formed the possible basis of a racial partition, which allowed the Afrikaans-speakers to have hegemony in the white area and to free them from the Soviet-supported ANC-SACP terrorism with its “Kill the Boer” song. The UP supported integration on an “ability franchise” unwanted by the Afrikaners and Blacks alike. One major factor in destroying Afrikaner nationhood was the descent of Britain and the USA from “racist imperialism” to “multiracial egalitarianism”.

  • SoulInvictus

    Man… all that and what you took from it to respond to was a nonexistent endorsement of the eye candy’s lifestyle?
    I don’t know anything about the people.
    They were pretty, that was the whole of its purpose.