Florida Sheriff Declines Invitation to Attend NAACP Banquet

Mike Scott, County of Lee, July 16, 2013

This is the full text of a remarkable letter from Sheriff Mike Scott of Lee County, in which he blasts the NAACP for ignoring black violence but making a national commotion over the Zimmerman trial. It is unusually frank and to the point.

Lee County Branch NAACP
3903 Dr. Martin Luther King Boulevard
Fort Myers, FL 33916
Attn: President James Muwakkil

Dear President Muwakkil:

I have been invited to the NAACP Freedom Fund Awards Banquet and have been asked to sponsor the event financially. I will not be doing either but wanted to explain my concerns and the reasons for my decision. Frankly, I believe the NAACP locally and nationally loses credibility when it picks and chooses which issues it rallies around and embraces what often appears to be a double standard relative to race and ethnicity. I am citing two (2) local and recent examples of my concern.

Tragically, record numbers of young, black males have been gunned down in the streets of Fort Myers in an epidemic of alarming proportions over the last few years. In virtually every instance the killer was also black and the majority of those cases remain open. Many more black citizens have been injured and were lucky to survive similar circumstances. To date, I am unaware of any appreciable attention or public outcry the NAACP locally or nationally have afforded these issues in our own, proverbial backyard.

Conversely, you immediately inserted yourself and the Lee County Branch in the matter of Trayvon Martin’s tragic death in a city hours from ours and publically declared that matter to have been mishandled by the police while expressing your intention to travel to Sanford sporting a “hoodie.” I suspect that when you said that, you had not examined any of the evidence or specifics of the incident; and I am certain you would not have reacted that way had George Zimmerman been black or Trayvon Martin white.

The fact is that Zimmerman is half Latino (Peruvian mother) but was portrayed early on by media and others as being “white.” That seemed to fit better for a “white/black” contrast much like the media altering of the 911 recordings helped fan the flames of racism early on. Ironically, President Obama is half white but is generally referred to as being “black” and so there appears to be an inclination among some to insert ethnicity as it fits with their agenda.

Fast forward to the trial and verdict which resulted in Zimmerman’s acquittal . . . the same trial, verdict, and in fact justice system that you would have applauded had it convicted him. A leading cause of death for young, black males across our nation is murder and an astounding percentage is being murdered by young, black males. The noticeable lack of involvement and attention given those tragedies by the NAACP begs the question why in my mind. Black on black and black on white seem to illicit far less emotion than the proportionately occasional white on black examples like Zimmerman–who as noted earlier is actually only as “white” as President Obama.

Finally, I find your resurrected fixation with the portrait of Robert E. Lee and the demand for its removal regrettable. The timing so proximate to the Zimmerman race baiting is certainly suspect. While I am not black, I continue to be amazed by what is deemed “racially offensive and/or insensitive” and what is not. For example, the rampant use of the word “nigger” in the wildly popular hip-hop culture that floods the ears of youth across this nation and is comprised primarily of black artists apparently stirs little to no emotion among blacks but the portrait of General Lee does? I am fifty (50) years old, and I have heard more black people (including top, black comedians being funny) utter the word “nigger” in my lifetime than I could have ever fathomed. I continue to wonder why the NAACP does not publicly decry this trend and advocate its cessation. It is for these reasons that I feel your focus on the Lee portrait amounts to little more than unrealistic posturing that serves to further a divide and promote a double standard. After all sir; our county is named after General Robert E. Lee and his portrait is far from the only reference to him, so I am left to wonder where this agenda stops.

I consider you a friend and hope my candor does not ruin that; however, I simply find myself unable to support your professional agenda, which I believe actually contradicts the end goal of eliminating double standards.

Warm regards,

Sheriff Mike Scott

[Editor’s Note: Readers so inclined can write and express their support for Mr. Scott at [email protected]]

Topics: , , , , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Puggg

    People are naturally tribal. Outgroup on ingroup criminality (or “criminality”) generates more outrage from people in the ingroup than ingroup-on-ingroup crime. This is the why the NAACP is more outraged over the “crime” of George Zimmerman defending himself against Trayvon Martin’s criminality than every black-on-black crime ever committed.

    • BlarneyMiller

      “People are naturally tribal.”

      Absolutely. Except one group of people have been stripped of their natural instinct due to a multi-decade, multi-faceted campaign to strip them of this natural instinct that is accepted and even encouraged in other groups.

      • Puggg

        Well, even among us, our tribalism, even as some have tried to suppress it, shines through. In my example, I know that black on white crime outrages me more than white on white crime. Then again, I embrace my inner tribe.

        • BlarneyMiller

          I’m the same as you, but I’ve been attacked for calling attention to black-on-white crime on other sites. The attacks have always come from white Liberals. Other races don’t deal with this. At least not to the degree that whites do.

          • Liberals like to say that the majority of crime, in this regard, is mostly black on black. My answer, this will not cause me to believe in their ‘inherently’ kind or peaceful nature.

          • Michelle

            i hope those white liberals get robbed by a black street thug, or are a bystander at a black flash mob of wild running beast.. Or experience one of the many violent volatile occurrences of black on white crime,I know personally I wasn’t born racist,and i certainly and unfortunately didn’t learn it from my parents.. There once was a time when i was queen of liberalness. Noone had stronger liberal equality views than me,im Canadian by the way,liberal is pushed on us.. Anyway,but than blacks proved to me they’re not humans, they have no soul and theyre most defiantly Not equal to us. All it takes is one really bad tramatic incident involving a black to open a liberals eyes. In most cases. I know there’s a few who still won’t get it and will make lame excuses after being attacked by a black,but anyone who’s not a complete moron and ignorant, would change their views.. So i hope those liberals get their eye opening experience :p

        • Jefferson

          One of the ways my tribalism shines through is that I refuse to support any sports in the U.S where Blacks outnumber Whites. That means I do not watch any NFL and NBA games. I do not go to any of their games and I do not purchase any of their merchandise.

          • Romulus

            That makes two of us!!! I refuse to enrich those that wish my extirpation.

      • Sick of it

        Sadly, that one group is taught to hate itself and to desire to remove itself from existence.

    • 48224

      I agree with the Sheriff but he’ll be lucky if he isn’t fired.

      • Creepy as crackers!

        I think he will win reelection or maybe run for higher office.

    • [Guest]

      Are white people tribal? If so, why hasn’t there been national outrage over black-against-white violent crime?

      Whites’ lack of racial self-interest generally seems to be the result of LACK of tribalism.

      • Puggg

        Not enough white people are tribal. That’s the problem.

        Why not? Partially because of a deliberate attempt to suppress white tribalism, partially because so many white people are hung up on distractions and diversions like sports, hobbies, religion, ideology.

        • Stentorian_Commentator

          I think you have it right. One of my maxims is that concerted action usually whips individual effort. Whites are encouraged to be atomized, not to have a group identity, to be nonconformists, to stand out from the crowd, etc. If a black or hispanic does that, they get smacked hard and quick.

  • David Ashton

    Let’s hope he gathers support and others follow his example, rather than that he is penalized for his outspoken comments.

    • Charles Martel

      If you would like to help with this support send him an encouraging e-mail.

      • Romulus

        Great screen name!

      • Alexandra1973

        This lifelong Yankee plans to. 🙂

      • David Ashton

        Have done so. Hope others follow suit in an appropriate tone.

  • He seems like the sheriff we used to have in El Paso County, Colorado.

  • Luca

    The NAACP is no longer looking to advance “colored people”, they are looking to race hustle and create the illusion of a victim-hood environment, therefor perpetuating the ills of the black community that they claim to care about.

    • Sick of it

      They also push forward crooked politicians who not only have no intention of helping their community, but seek to keep them impoverished and ignorant. They support injustice on a routine basis. They are liars and thieves.

      • Luca

        Correction: They are lawyers and thieves. Basically the same thing, the only difference between a lawyer and a liar is the pay and the educational requirements.

        The NAACP, like the ACLU lives to sue everyone, hoping a few cases stick or they are given shakedown money to go away. It’s a lawyer’s way of staying in business. Instead of chasing ambulances they chase imaginary racists.

        • Sick of it

          Yep, most lawyers aren’t worth the waste of air they breathe.

          • David Ashton

            “The first thing we do, let’s kill all the lawyers” – Shakespeare, another Dead White European Male (reportedly not gay either).

          • Boris_baiter

            What do lawyers use for birth control?

            Their personalities…….

          • Sick of it

            That’s a good one. Will have to pass it along.

  • MekongDelta69

    And he’s White (albeit sort of dark-skinned.)!
    And a Republican!
    (Will wonders never cease!)

    And of course the NAACP called him a ‘racist.’
    And they want his head on a platter.

    • jane johnson

      That’s probably why they invited him to their banquet in the first place: he was supposed to be the main course in a “roast” without the humor.

      • Romulus

        Exactly right!!!

    • Non Humans

      Is it any wonder at all? Could have seen that one coming from more than a mile out. That’s typical for this racist organization. Just like the libtards, when they can’t refute a point or fact, their dirty little ‘R” word comes out. Too bad for them that less people, by the day, are rattled by it.
      This guy doesn’t seem to be the type to be shaken by being called a “Waycisss”.

  • [Guest]

    Regards to Sheriff Mike Scott for daring to speak some truths that we all know full well but that few of us dare to speak.

    • Creepy as crackers!

      Hear, hear!

  • WmarkW

    Why couldn’t this have appeared two weeks ago, so I cross-post it under all the “Trayvon Tragedy” commentaries?

  • YourMOMA

    NAACP and similar organizations are irrelevant in the 21st century. Blacks don’t like to see the obvious: Blacks kill blacks on the streets of every major American city. That’s not what NAACP wants people to know. Instead, they want to find another Zimmerman to go after.

  • Dave4088

    It’s nice to see a white sheriff flipping the bird to the NAACP. And his objections are based on race no less. This is a watershed moment in the “race doesn’t exist/doesn’t matter” American paradigm that so many whites have bought into lock, stock and barrel.

    • jane johnson

      It’s the only way that they can remain semi-relevant.

  • This is the guy who referred to Obama by his middle name at a rally for McCain-Palin.
    Will the GOP support him, or will they wring their hands because they are AFRAID of the NAACP?

    • exLibtard

      I’ll put my money on the GOP publicly trashing him to show off how “anti-racist” they are.

    • David Ashton

      We need cops like this in Britain.

  • exLibtard

    Blacks need to get used to hearing White people say “No.”

    • 1gravity

      Riots and aggravated criminality will surely follow the “No”, interspersed with pleas for peace and understanding. Are we whites ready for that?

      • Once you oust the white liberals from BOTH parties, what kind of real threat are blacks anyway?

      • Non Humans

        Those of us not living in a state of cranio-rectal inversion are way past “Ready”. Let the nonhumans riot! It will only serve to bring more whites to what we realized a long time ago.
        If it ends up hitting close enough to home for the terminally libtarded, it’s doing us another favor.

      • LaSantaHermandad

        Whites need to be ready to defend themselves.

        The minority cannot control the majority if the majority refuses to cooperate and the majority must send out the message that there will be high price to pay for any violence attempted against us.

  • NancyJewel

    Great that he dared to defend General Lee!

    • Strider73

      The county is named in his honor. Those residents who find that fact offensive should leave. They will not be missed.

    • Romulus

      Love him or loathe him ,still one of the greatest people America has ever produced!!! One of my personal favorites!

      • Sick of it

        I wish he’d have fought a guerrilla war until even the scum in the Northeast got tired of the whole ordeal and left.

  • Spartacus

    “Many more black citizens…”


    I wasn’t aware “black” was a nationality….

    • I have no intention of calling them “Americans”.

      • Alexandra1973

        You’re either African or American the way I see it.

  • dd121

    Democrat memo to media: “Finally somebody speaking the truth on race and violence. Destroy him”.

  • Easyrhino1

    One wonders what the NAACP etal will do when the “White guilt” well runs dry completely and they’ll be forced to survive on their own merit

    • Sick of it

      When that well runs dry, these criminals will flee to another country to avoid arrest.

    • Non Humans

      What merit? Since when did they have that? That’s not something that you can steal, by my recollectoion.

  • Leroy Goldberg

    Bravo sir………BRAVO!

  • JohnEngelman

    The civil rights movement won when the civil rights legislation was passed during the 1960s. Since then white have had no further obligations to blacks.

    Blacks have had the obligations to take advantage of the opportunities that have been opened to them, and to disprove the arguments of opponents of the civil rights legislation who argued that if it was passed public schools in the United States would be damaged, and black rates of crime and illegitimacy would increase.

    Civil rights organizations like the NAACP should do what opponents of the War in Vietnam said that presidents Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon should have done. They should declare victory and go home.

    • We did declare victory and go home, and the results in 1975 were predictable.

      • MBlanc46

        That’s a cute phrase, I suppose, but it’s a misrepresentation of what happened in Indochina in the sixties and seventies. After failing to defeat the forces opposed to the Diem and then Thieu governments, despite the commitment of over half a million troops at one point, bombing the place into the Stone Age, and taking almost 60,000 killed, the US declared Vietnamization and went home.

        • The ARVN could have done it.

          • MBlanc46

            I’m not sure what you mean by that. The US sent in all those soldiers and dropped all that ordnance because they weren’t doing it. And when the US withdrew, they collapsed. When could they have done it and why didn’t they?

          • JohnEngelman

            A complaint made by Americans throughout the War was, “Their Vietnamese fight harder than our Vietnamese.”

          • The ARVN kicked NVA up and down the boulevard: 300,000 military dead versus 1.1 million military dead. One of my best friends was there, and said the Nungs and Hoa-Haos were excellent.

            When China tried invading Vietnam in 1979, they got their behinds righteously kicked. Nobody jacks with Mr. Nguyen.

          • MBlanc46

            But in 1979, it was the northerners in power.

          • Luca

            The ARVN weren’t much better than underpaid mercenaries. Most Viet’s didn’t care who was in charge they were just sick of fighting foreigners trying to control them. The Chinese, the French, the Japanese and finally the Americans all fought over that real estate and the end result was the same.

            Though the ARVN often displayed uncommon valor they required constant US air support and advisers to to keep them viable. A few good battles does not win a war.

          • Jim Henry

            To quote Animal Mother from the flick Full Metal Jacket “We’re fighting the wrong gooks”.

          • In 1975, the ARVN was down to an average of 20 rifle cartridges and 2 hand grenades per soldier. One ARVN division stopped and broke two NVA divisions outside Hue in 1975.

          • evilsandmich

            I’m sympathetic to the argument that all we had to do was bomb the North’s columns a couple times and then South would have been set; but that ‘just a little bit more help’ argument was worn thin at that point since that’s what got us into the war to begin with.
            Even with double hindsight, the cost of a few sorties may have been cheaper than absorbing the mountains of ‘boat people’ that had to be settled in the U.S.

          • Sick of it

            We could have annihilated their command structure…but played with kid gloves. Why? It was a political war.

      • JohnEngelman

        The War in Vietnam was unjustifiable for reasons I could easily explain, but that is not the topic of this thread. Send me an e-mail message if you want, and we can continue this discussion offline.

        • It was an ugly thing, but it was justifiable. There was no excuse for the West’s turning its back on Croatia. Cowards did that, but the good guys won through. I call that blood well-spent.

          Would you have shirked with South Korea as well? Maybe France, Belgium or Holland? I doubt you would fight under any circumstances, while I would do it for three hots and a cot. Sure, I was scared. I vomited like a dying dog most mornings, and I usually fought while drunk. I have a major crease on my scalp from something that bounced off the ground and took my helmet off. One of my arms is longer than the other, and you still get traction for being a coward runaway.

          The Commies won in Vietnam, but we helped Taiwan and South Korea.

          • JohnEngelman

            Would you have shirked with South Korea as well? Maybe France, Belgium or Holland?

            – Michael Christopher Scott

            No. No. No. No.

            The Korean War began with a conventional invasion. The superiority of the government and economy of South Korea to what exists in North Korea demonstrates that the war was worth the effort.

            The United States and Great Britain could have avoided World War II. I am glad we did not. The Germans would have conquered the continent of Europe and killed another six million Jews. The Japanese would have conquered China.

            These empires would have been as predatory as the Assyrian Empire.

            The War in Vietnam happened because the United States refused to sign and honor the Geneva Agreement of 1954. That agreement called for elections to be held in July 1954 to unify the country. It said that the division of Vietnam was temporary. It forbade the entry of foreign troops into Vietnam.

            Vietnam was unimportant to America’s economy or security. President Eisenhower acknowledged that as many as 80 percent of the Vietnamese supported Ho Chi Minh.

            If you wish to discuss the War in Vietnam further, please send me an e-mail letter. It is not the topic of this thread.

        • LaSantaHermandad

          Especially since the ” incident” of the Gulf of Tonkin was a LIE. All those dead and maimed, both Viet and American for absolutely nothing. The bombing of the Maine was another phony. It really happened except that it wasn’t the Spaniards.

          • Creepy as crackers!

            I agree, it was all for nothing. I served proudly in the USMC. I wish I only knew then what I know now.

          • Luca

            At least the bombing of the Maine was actually a mystery at the time, the Gulf of Tonkin was almost completely fabricated.

          • The second Tonkin “incident”, at night and in rough weather was the result of electronic confusion: false radar returns. President Johnson wasn’t up to coping with uncertainties, and both the navy and the NSA issued their reports with this in mind.

      • Luca

        No. We declared “peace with honor” and abandoned a lost cause that should have never been started.

        The four things that helped destroy America were put into place during the LBJ years. The War in Vietnam, which helped bring the Leftists out of the closet and into mainstream media while dividing us, the War on Poverty which made the black problem in America ten times worse, and the Immigration Act of 1965 which needs no explaining here, and finally the Civil Rights movement that quickly spiraled out of control and help prompt the excesses and riots.

        • Creepy as crackers!

          Luca I agree and I have been saying the exact same thing for years. Of all those you mention, I believe the Immigration Act of 65 inflicted the most damage on our nation though the other factors definitely took their toll.

  • This is just more verbal legerdemain. The talk about black on black crime is a way to sidestep the issue of black on white crime.

    • KittyAmerica

      At least he slipped it in there, more than most will venture. I for one think his letter is remarkable; no it’s not the whole kit and caboodle but publicly turning down this invitation is refreshing.

    • JohnEngelman

      Let’s talk about white on black crime. Have you ever heard of a white man who mugs blacks?

      Neither have I.

      • Jefferson

        A Black person being robbed at gunpoint while at an ATM machine by a White thug is about as common as Haitians who were born with blue eyes.

      • Non Humans

        Most nonhumans have nothing to steal. They either squander what they do have, do not take care of it, or sell it for drug money.
        Any thief knows that your mark has to be worthwhile. The chances of nearly any nonhuman having anything to risk life and limb over is usally slim. The one exception being the drug dealing nonhumans.

        • rememberwhatbushdid

          Wow…Non-Humans. Your name more accurately reflects you than an entire race of citizens you try to demonize. Do they have schools in Florida?

  • The Final Solution

    General Lee had prophetic wisdom about blacks that has not changed a bit since his time:

    “I have always observed that wherever you find the Negro, everything is going down around him, and wherever you find the white man, you see everything around him improving.”

    • Webspin

      and 150 years later most whites still refuse to admit this evident fact.

  • IstvanIN

    How long will he keep his job after this?

    • Creepy as crackers!

      I say he keeps his job for as long as he likes.

    • That’s up to the voters in his county.

  • Jackryanvb

    Really great. Looks like we have a second fair, tough White law man after Sherrif Joe A in Arizona. Let’s run this Sherrif Scott for governor of Florida.

  • Dave4088

    Upon further reflection the sheriff pulled many punches. He forgot to include flash mobs, the knockout king, polar bear hunting, and the disproportionate black on white rapes, muggings, assaults and murders.

    The NAACP should have their tax deductible status rescinded until they answer for the innumerable crimes of their race.

  • negrolocaust

    the one positive thing that i can say about the election of barak obama is that it opened my eyes as to how racist and hateful black people are. their level of hatred and racism toward whites is about 50 times what i had assumed. i am glad that i now have this knowledge about these hateful violent people.

    • rememberwhatbushdid

      That a public official would use a taxpayer website to inflame racism is beyond reprehensible. This sheriff is a divider, an old fashioned cracker and does not understand the responsibilities of a public servant. A private letter to the leader of the NAACP would have been within his right, but to make the letter public was pure race-bating for political gain. I think anyone reading the letter anywhere in America would think poorly of Fort Myers and probably the whole state of Florida.

  • Evette Coutier

    I don’t agree with sheriff Scott. If the NAACP and the black community does not care about black on black crime why should I? They certainly don’t care about the safety of whites.

    • NotThatGuy

      They don’t care about the safety of whites, because they know that blacks victimize whites at any given chance.

    • I don’t care about black-on-black crime, either, but then I am also not an elected county sheriff with the responsibility for black constituents. This other Mike Scott is.

  • logwarrior

    Sheriffs are truly our last line of defense and it seems there are some very good ones across the country.

  • It is an unfortunate name.

    • Creepy as crackers!

      Poor guy!

  • Macman1138

    I am very pleased to see that someone has the guts to stand up to the NAACP.
    Thank you and God Bless the US!

    • The NAACP put sheriff Scott in a bad position. If he had attended this awards banquet, he would have been allowing them to use him as a stage prop to further their anti-white, pro-entitlement, pro-crime, anti-gun, anti-Constitution political program. I’m as big a fan of a catered dinner and a few glasses of wine as the next guy. The problem is that as a US county sheriff he occupies an awkward middle-ground: a law-enforcement official, but an elected one, and the NAACP was expecting him to participate in a political agenda (anathema to honest law-enforcement) he did not set (anathema to an elected official).

  • Alexandra1973

    How long before they demand that Lee County have a name change? After all, this sheriff pointed out that the county was named after General Lee.

  • WR_the_realist

    America — where the sheriffs have stones and the politicians are eunuchs.

  • Rusty Shackelford

    The best part is that the gentleman to whom he wrote the letter was outraged that the Sheriff used the full, unabridged version of the N word, but said nothing about the actual content or the points the Sheriff was trying to make. That says it all, folks.

    • Creepy as crackers!

      I was surprised to see the whole word and I applaud the good Sheriff for his choice of words.

  • Creepy as crackers!

    If you go to this Sheriff’s web-site, you can read the letter he sent to Obama telling him he wasn’t going to enforce unconstitutional gun laws in his county.

  • Puggg

    I wonder what it would take to get Mike Scott to move to Jefferson County, Missouri and run for Sheriff.

  • Charles Martel

    The letter is legitimate. I just wanted to informed everyone that I did send the sheriff an e-mail of encouragement. Here is his response.

    “The letter is legit Douglas, and I stand behind it 150%. I can also assure you that an apology from me is NOT forthcoming.”

    • Alexandra1973

      Good, I hope he does NOT back down!

    • Is it just me, or are whites starting to run out of patience with the poverty pimp crowd?

      • Sick of it

        Tell us, you’re in Colorado. In my part of the country, many have been sick of it for decades.

        • I’ve been sick of it since I was about 14, but unfortunately, Colorado has this great, big metastasizing, gangrenous, maggot-ridden, pus-dripping tumor we call “Denver”.

  • Romulus

    Absolutely excellent letter. Clear, concise and directly to the point!! A verifiable gem! A masterpiece.

    I cant help but gush praise for this man. I will extend praise and thanks to his email address!!

  • Romulus

    Spartacus and I have several “ideas” Fight fire, with fire!!

  • Michelle

    Its makes me smile when i hear of a white standing up against black BS. Just the fact that there are 2 articles posted in 1 day,that are about whites standing up for our race, im referring to the college students who put together the white student union,shows that more whites have revoked their black tolerance card. I think the good that came from the zimmerman trial,was it gave whites who didn’t relize before, an eye opener. It made alot of us feel like That’s enough. We let them get away with so much, and would say or do nothing for fear of being called racist. But the zimmerman trial was the Last straw.. They made it seem like white people should be fear,that were dangerous, when we All know who the dangerous ones are. We watched a mans life Ruined by the NAACP,the black president and thousands of other blacks,for defending himself from physical assault,making us feel like our rights will be taken away if we react lawfully in defence against a black violent attacker.Then we watched as flash groups of anger wild black animals took to the streets attacking every white person in sight,all while the media could care less,theyd only be interested if whites were attacking blacks in flash mobs.. And that was the end of our black tolerance. Even someone with liberal views,who thought we’re all equals had to have had an eye opening experience after the trial. I think that was the start of change. The blacks race card has been revoked. Im sure these stories we’ve read this week about not tolerating blacks BS anymore and sticking up for our race,is just the start of many more incidences like this to come. its unfortunate zimmerman had to be sacrificed,for us to have this eye opener,but im glad good things for our race has come from it:)

  • Boris_baiter

    I think what you’re fishing for is the method Zimmerman used…

  • rememberwhatbushdid

    He’s the opposite of brave. He is a small, hate-filled, race-bating politician. He is unAmerican and unChristian. This sheriff should be arrested. The best thing that could happen to Lee County would be for minorities to become the new majority and for the media outlets to be black owned. They would not treat the white minority with such evil as this sheriff is treating black citizens he is also sworn to serve and protect.