Immigration Bill Could Exclude Many

Erica Werner, AP, April 12, 2013

A bipartisan immigration bill soon to be introduced in the Senate could exclude hundreds of thousands of immigrants here illegally from ever becoming U.S. citizens, according to a Senate aide with knowledge of the proposals.

The bill would bar anyone who arrived in the U.S. after Dec. 31, 2011, from applying for legal status and ultimately citizenship, according to the aide, who was not authorized to discuss the proposals before they were made public and spoke on condition of anonymity.

It also would require applicants to document that they were in the country before Dec. 31, 2011, have a clean criminal record and show enough employment or financial stability that they’re likely to stay off welfare.

Those requirements could exclude hundreds of thousands of the 11 million immigrants in the U.S. illegally from the path to citizenship envisioned by the bill, the aide said.

{snip}

The new details emerged as negotiators reached agreement on all the major elements of the sweeping legislation.

After months of closed-door negotiations, the “Gang of Eight” senators, equally divided between the two parties, had no issues left to resolve in person, and no more negotiating sessions were planned. Remaining details were left to aides, who were at work completing drafts of the bill.

“All issues that rise to the member level have been dealt with,” Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said in a statement Thursday. “All that is left is the drafting.”

Democratic Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois said the bill probably would be introduced on Tuesday.

The landmark legislation would overhaul legal immigration programs, require all employers to verify the legal status of their workers, greatly boost border security and put millions of immigrants living in the U.S. illegally on a 13-year path to citizenship. {snip}

{snip}

Once the legislation is introduced, it will be considered by the Senate Judiciary Committee, which has scheduled a hearing for Wednesday and likely will begin to amend and vote on the bill the week of May 6. From there, the bill would move to the Senate floor.

{snip}

Topics: , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • The__Bobster

    The bill would bar anyone who arrived in the U.S. after Dec. 31, 2011, from applying for legal status and ultimately citizenship, according to the aide, who was not authorized to discuss the proposals before they were made public and spoke on condition of anonymity.
    __________

    BFD. The squat monsters will just have some fraudulent papers printed up, just like they did in 1986.

    And why 2011? These stubbies didn’t even have time to put down roots.

    • bigone4u

      No need for fraudulent papers if the feds take their word for the date of their border crossing. They’ll just lie. But your point is on the money. The Dec 31, 2011 date is just window dressing to lull the sheeple into complacency.

  • Bollocks. If it gives them work permits right away or in very short order, then the if/when of formal citizenship is irrelevant.

    • Luca

      Not only that, but look beyond the obvious. Whether or not they ever become citizens is ultimately irrelevant. Their children born here will not do the hard work they were suppose to be doing but they will vote themselves more benefits. Within ten years there will be a deafening chorus of Democratic politicians telling us we are not paying our fare share.

  • mobilebay

    They won’t care. They’ll get to stay in any event and continue receiving the goodies. This is the biggest flim-flam ever put over on the citizens of this country.

    • Paleoconn

      Not bigger than Ted DUI Kennedy and LBlowJ’s act of 1965, with the explicit promise that it would not affect our demographics one iota.

      • Skincognito

        Don’t give the hideous Jew Emmanuel Celler posthumous amnesty for his role in drafting and passing this bill of global historical significance.
        Ted Kennedy was scum, but his father knew who the real enemy was.
        Clear thinking racialists must acknowledge the awareness of Jewish otherness expressed in the 1924 Johnson-Reed Act. Therefore, the conspicuous centrality of prominent Jews in promoting third world immigration in the 60’s ( coincidentally a time of general socio-political and cultural distress ) must be critically examined. Don’t exclusively blame an Irish-American alcoholic and a Texas Anglo-Saxon for undermining European hegemony in this once great nation.
        Furthermore, demographic change was the primary objective, not an unintended consequence of “reform,” then as now.
        Chuck Schumer valiantly continues to wage the struggle for HIS people’s survival.

        • Anon12

          EXACTLY. Wish Whites would wake up and do some real research for once.

      • Anon12

        Don’t forget the real scammers…Emanuel Cellar and Jacob Javits and all their ilk whose real agenda was to destroy the White race and America. It was a planned and deliberate act. Do some real research on the who and the why as to the motive to destroy the White race worldwide.

        • blight14

          You mean ‘Never Again’? This utter mess is certainly not a coincidence…..we’re just not supposed to discuss it……….

  • E_Pluribus_Pluribus

    Time to refresh our memories as to how Congress and President Reagan screwed over the American people with the 1986 amnesty (IRCA, the Immigration and Control Act of 1986).

    Otis L. Graham, professor emeritus of history at UC Santa Barbara and author of Unguarded Gates: A History of America’s Immigration Crisis (2004), sums up what happened after IRCA — with its amnesty and promise of work site enforcement — became the law of the land:

    The Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) . . . [was] a public policy failure of major proportions. Sanctions on employers of illegal aliens entered American law . . . but a proposed system of worker verification based on a computer registry of Social Security numbers was defeated by objections to “a national ID card” (which was never proposed), and the claim that Hispanics would be “singled out” for special scrutiny.

    The final measure allowed employers to accept as proof of legal residence any two of a wide range of documents, most easily counterfeited. “The change in farm labor market made by IRCA,” wrote economist Philip Martin, “is the switch from undocumented workers to falsely documented workers.” For this toothless provision, Congress traded an unprecedented amnesty for illegal aliens who had been in continuous residence since 1982, plus a special program to legalize already present illegal agricultural workers. The double amnesty was justified on the theory that blanket legalization was preferable to mass deportation, and that the problem would not build up again because the magnet [jobs] would be inactivated.

    Almost nothing promised by the legalization turned out as expected. The amnesty covered . . . 2.7 million people who could then apply for visas for their relatives . . .

    For illegal aliens who were ineligible for amnesty, . . . document fraud quickly became almost universal . . . pp108-109

    Sidney Weintraub of the Center for Strategic and International Studies: “The ’86 law is dysfunctional because we didn’t want it to work. We passed legislation . . . that we knew was unworkable because we aren’t willing to take the steps of identifying who is an illegal. The (members of Congress) knew that when they did it.”

    • Erasmus

      That was the beginning of the end. It is because of what happened then that so very many Americans are so bitterly opposed to a repeat of that farce.

    • Non Humans

      Wouldn’t it be nice, if somewhere in our government there existed a system and official/s to prevent this kind of betrayal of the American People? Wouldn’t it be nice if that system and official/s actually did their jobs and 1.) Allowed ICE and other law enforcement agencies to deport every last illegal freeloader 2.) Charge the libtards and other idiots preventing their deportations with Obstruction of Justice, Harboring Criminals, and whatever other laws can be thrown at them for these crimes, 3.) Patrol the border with Armed Predator drones until a sufficient fence is erected and maintained to keep freeloaders from returning.
      .
      Wouldn’t it be nice?

      • lily-white

        excellent… and we could call it “the dream act” …

      • David Ashton

        IMPEACHMENT?

    • potato78

      Both party are progressively, little by little screwing up the country.
      Just little by little, little by little.

  • bigone4u

    If I were in Congress or someone with scruples were in Congress, the bill up for consideration would be focused on using the military to deport those who refuse to leave voluntarily.

    • Erasmus

      Someone with scruples in Congress? How many would that be? 5? 6?

      • IstvanIN

        My, aren’t you optimistic!

      • bigone4u

        Can you name the 5 or 6?

        • The__Bobster

          http://www.vdare.com/posts/rep-steve-king-and-other-border-stalwarts-present-anti-amnesty-arguments

          On Thursday, several of the more spine-enhanced members had a low-key presser, called a “pen-and-pad” by Roll Call (new scribbler shop talk to me). Organized by Congressman Steve King (R-IA, pictured), the event included Michele Bachmann (R-MN), Lou Barletta (R-PA), Louie Gohmert (R-TX), Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA) and Mo Brooks (R-AL).

          • Now you know why I started the Presidential campaign season in 2011 with Michele Bachmann as my preferred candidate of all the ones that declared. Foreign policy, history and religion are not her strong suits for sure, and she wouldn’t have any real credible Presidential chances until she wins some statewide office at least once, but she votes right on immigration most of the time (Lifetime NUSA rating: A, 94%).

          • Crystal Evans

            She made an idiot of herself when she was running for president.

          • robinbishop34

            Any more than Joe Biden? She really didn’t, she was just in the media crosshairs because they simply cannot risk an influential conservative, white women gaining any ground in the political sphere so they made a point of focusing on any little gaffe she made and blowing it up.

          • TeutonicKnight67

            Biden is clearly a buffoon who would probably be very entertaining down at the local tavern but is a dangerous moron in a position of power,,,,thanks to the media commissars who put him in power.

          • Like I said, she dillied around on issues she either really knew nothing about or thought she knew more than she actually did: History, religion, foreign policy. That’s why she made an idiot of herself. She should have stuck to immigration and certain domestic issues.

          • The__Bobster

            No, the press made an idiot out of her because they feared her.

  • David Ashton

    What happened to the 100,000 Chinese smuggled in 1992 mostly to NYC to provide sweatshop labor, &. Can AmRen’s resident Sinophile, John Engelman, enlighten us?

    • a multiracial individual

      Their children are citizens who will never go on the dole, or commit violent crime, they may pay taxes though. Of course, the parents should have still been deported.

      • The__Bobster

        No, they’re not. You’re misinterpreting the 14th Amendment.

        • a multiracial individual

          [All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the
          jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the
          State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which
          shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United
          States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or
          property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its
          jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.]

          You cannot deport “anchor babies.” Of course, you can certainly deport their parents, which usually means they will take the (citizen) child with them. When the child is 18 they will likely be permitted to return to the US. Do I think this sucks? Of course, I do. However, it is the law.

          Also, if a White-German woman enters this country illegally then gives birth, is her child an American citizen in your eyes.

          • tremendouscoast

            If the 14th amendment which was adopted in 1868 had been interpreted to give citizenship to all persons born afterwards in the United States, Congress would never have passed the Dawes Act of 1887 or Indian Citizenship Act of 1924. Indians were regarded as citizens of their seperate tribal nations and not under US sovereignty. Look these acts up for yourself. It is only the modernized, bastardized interpretation that gives that amendment its current meaning.

          • TeutonicKnight67

            The 14th Amendment was designed to keep the Bantu from being repatriated back to its spawning grounds. And we have suffered for it ever since.

          • Crystal Evans

            When the kid turns 21, they can sponsor their illegal immigrants parents for a green card. Granted, they may have to wait a decade or more to be able to enter legally.

          • IKantunderstand

            First of all, a German IS WHITE. So, White German is redundant. There IS NO other kind of German. Please provide all your data on the number(s) of illegally entered pregnant German woma(e)n. Secondly, according to your own (wrong) definition: DUH, of course her child is an American citizen. According to my interpretation of the 14th amendment, NO children of illegal alien invaders, OR people on valid visas, or anyone who is not an American citizen prior to the birth of their child, should be able to claim American citizenship for said child. Oh, and Multi, American citizenship is on a downward spiral in value, exactly because of people who think like you.

          • a multiracial individual

            White is a race. German is a nationality. The actual (likely non-existent) number of illegal German trespassers is irrelevant to the point I was trying to make. I was trying to see if Bobster would consider the child of an illegal German, a citizen, but not consider the child of an illegal Mexican, a citizen. Citizenship is not dictated by race. Of course, I agree with your sane desires for immigration restriction. They should change the legislation to explicitly state those criteria for citizenship.

          • Wayne

            That’s like saying Japonese can be any color, or Chinese can be any color. It’s pure bunk and you know it. Only a white person can be a real German, Irishman, Englisman, Frenchman, etc. non-whites in Germany are paper aka fake “Germans”.

          • Wayne

            Germany is a tribe of Europe, based on blood, specifically Nordic blood. It is genetic.

          • a multiracial individual

            I know that German is also an ethnicit. I do, in fact, have significant German ancestry.

          • Wayne

            But you are not German and never can be, you are multi-racial. Like for breeds of dogs, Germans would be Dobermans, you a garbage diving mutt.

          • Wayne

            Answer: an illegal REAL German should be allowed to stay. Mestizos should be sent back. America was founded of by and for Europeans. It is that simple.

          • a multiracial individual

            Just wanted to confirm my suspicions that some would be willing to employ double standards.

          • Wayne

            Yep! America is a Western nation, always was meant to be. Western = white. No sane nation would willingly make their descendants minorities in their own country. We have no moral obligation to any outside group, we can admit or not admit who we choose.

          • Jefferson

            I wouldn’t employ double standards when it comes to illegal immigrants if I were POTUS. I am against giving U.S citizenship to any anchor babies, no matter where they come from.

            If a Swede entered this country illegally, he or she is just as much of a criminal as a Somali or Mexican who entered this country illegally.

            The U.S should should be a country of law and order

            Now if you are talking about legal immigration, that is where my bias would kick in. If I were POTUS, I would obviously give Europeans top priority over Latin Americans for example. Heck I would even give Asians priority over Latin Americans.

          • Skincognito

            You’ve planted a stake on one side of the civic versus primordial nationalism divide. Outside of Europe, this a relatively easy slippage, but if one accepts that the US, Canada, Australia/NZ, White regions of South America, and of course, Southern Africa are pan-European states, entirely dependent on an otherwise unlikely amalgam of European peoples and their naturally endowed productivity, creativity and morality, then there is no double-standard. We build, you take.
            Pardon my run-on, but sincerely, the time has long since passed when the nations of European diaspora must explain to racial aliens, like yourself, why we want to survive in recognizable form.
            All the best.

          • Bossman

            That is somewhat paradoxical because the Founders also believed that all men were born free and equal endowed with certain inalienable rights by their creator. There is just no way that the United States could become a nation based on race. All the wars and battles of the past would become meaningless.

          • David Ashton

            Maybe not “all men” (and women) as now supposed.
            You and John the Jared-quoter should read “What the Founders Really Thought About Race” by Jared Taylor, February 17, 2012, http://WWW.NPIAMERICA.ORG

          • Bossman

            Jefferson believed that all men were born free. Slavery was a condition imposed from without and was arbitrary. If they were born free then they were born equal. The educated men of the 18th century had a great respect for logic.

          • Wayne

            Wrong again. The “all men are created equal” line is the same bunk you anti-whites try to pass off as some great guiding principle, like the screed about “send us you poor, you Commies, blah blah, blah”. It was simply a flourish prior to entering into the body of complaints they held as British subjects expected to be treated equally with other subject. Remember the “no taxation without representation” thing??? But since you brought it up, at no time was the false god of equality worshipped more than in the French Revolution, and still the National Assembly guillotined the army officer who lost the plantations of Santo Domingo. Even the French Jacobins didn’t believe in the modern definition of equality.
            Equality does not exist–it is a false god. There are no two equal people on this Earth, no two equal civilizations.

          • Bossman

            OK, if equality does not exist, why don’t you start enslaving all those that are not your equals. You could start with your wife or girlfriend. Remember, when the Founders spoke of equality, they were thinking in absolute terms; Freedom and slavery.

          • Greg Thomas

            I don’t want to “enslave” anyone, I just want them to crawl back to their corner of the third-world where they belong. What’s so unreasonable about that?

          • Wayne

            Bossman: let’s be honest here. Not all men are born free and equal. My children in no way were born with equal opportunity to those of Warren Buffet. I am in no way equal to Tiger Woods in golfing skills. A mentally ill person is not given equal punishment to normal defendants. Only in the eyes of God are we equal, maybe. But who speaks for Him? Slavery, like war is a natural state of human kind. Hate, like love, envy, and gratitude are natural human emotions with a purpose. Our Constitution is a piece of paper that has not given rights to one soul. Our freedom was earned by my white ancestors. Any of us could be slaves at any time, but not for force. My white ancestors fought against chattel slavery for ALL people worldwide (lots of thanks we get), now there is a new slavery called debt slavery, the slave quarters are so much better but the end is the same–we work our life away for someone else. Get a grip, Bossman

          • TeutonicKnight67

            Excellent points. The Constitution is simply a list of SOME of the freedoms granted Man by his Creator. The document itself grants nothing.

            As for slavery…you are spot on! No people has done more to end chattel slavery worldwide than White Christians yet we are continually pilloried for it. And while we still labor under the delusion of spreading “freedom” throughout the world we are being shackled into indentured servitude in our own lands.

          • Wayne

            There is no such thing as born free. Mankind functions as part of society. They are born to parents who have total authority over them. Bunk!!
            The Founders believed that Constitutional Monarchy was one of the best forms of government ever devised. They committed treason and secession with a very heavy heart, it was not a small thing to break those ancient bonds of blood.

          • Non Humans

            “If they were born free then they were born equal.”
            .
            Woah, easy there. Apples and Oranges. Equal? Hardly. Even though the Science of Genetics did not exist back then, it doesn’t take an educated genius to see that nonhumans lack a helluva lot of brain cells, and never has.

          • Bossman

            Non-humans like freedom too. When you put a bird in a cage, it will try its damnest best to escape. Jefferson used that analogy to make his case for personal liberty.

          • Wayne

            Are you now saying no humans aka animals are equal too? Free the chickens! Down with KFC and the fast food holocaust! Poultry of the world, UNITE!

          • TeutonicKnight67

            Except they didn’t regard Negroes as “men” with rights. They were regarded as a lesser, undeveloped race.

          • Wright

            Wrong! The founders (all white and British) believed all British men were equal. They were in rebellion because they felt their rights as British subjects was being usurped. They fought for independence and a nation for Themselves and their POSTERITY. Not for a world doormat or garbage chute, which it has become today.

          • Bossman

            Not true at all. The men of the 18th century thought in absolute terms. You were either a free man or a slave, nothing in between. Slavery was something that was imposed from without; no one was born a slave. In some states, if a mulatto had a white mother, he could never be a slave but if he had a white father and black mother, he could be a slave for life. Jefferson found all of this to be arbitrary and meaningless. This is the origin of the idea that all men are born free. If they are born free then are born equal.

          • Wayne

            Are you saying a child born a free Siamese twin is equal to a healthy birth?? Nature does not recognize equality, and men are not born free, they are born to parents and under their authority. Equality–nice sentiment, totally bunk.

          • Wayne

            And stop with the guilt trip. We owe Mexico nothing. I love how you anti-whites always hold America to unnatural standards when the turd world nations you come from get a free pass. Let’s talk about Mexico and how they treat Guatemalans, their first cousins. Lets talk about how the Spanish not only killed your your grandfathers, but raped your grandmothers. Lets talk about how Mestizos own all of Central and South America and have created NO first world nations. Lets talk about how the Indians used to rape and plunder one another, especially the Aztecs. America white settlers were SAINTS on the global scale. Had Muslims or Chinese found America first, don’t think you would have fared better. Mestizos and whites are different and deserve separate countries. Mestizos have all of Mexico. Our children should have America, it was built for them.

          • Wright

            Bossman: my white ancestors, who by and large fought every war this nation ever had, did not fight so their children could be displaced. Nobody fights for that. They fought so their POSTERITY might prosper in their own land. The Civil War was fought to keep the States together, not for some insane idea of equality. Read the Gettysburg Address, it is quiet clear. Rubber Legs and his Emancipation Proclamation were to stir up rebellion I. The South, and put a moral veneer on the bloodshed. Bossman, you know jack about our history.

          • Bossman

            Lincoln and Jefferson were educated men with great respect for logic. They knew that slavery was unsustainable. As for white people being displaced, they never thought of that because at the time, the country was being flooded with European immigrants who were moving westward killing Indians and stealing their lands and annexing Mexican territory.

          • Wayne

            Slavery was never unsustainable, only the North had a much cheaper and efficient system of it. It is now, thanks to equipment. Even your hero Marx wrote extensively about how much worse the white child labor in factories was than the bucolic patriarchal slavery practiced in the South.

          • TeutonicKnight67

            “Citizenship is not dictated by race”.

            Sadly you are correct, but it SHOULD be.

          • IKantunderstand

            If that’s the case, why didn’t you ask how Bobster felt about a black German citizen illegal alien? Wouldn’t that be more to your point? In truth, you wanted to see if race would be a factor. Why didn’t you just ask that, instead? By the way, you can be a German citizen nowadays no matter what you look like. But you can’t be German unless you are White and your ancestors came from Germany. Period. Do you call Nigerians living in China, Chinese? Do you call Chinese living in Nigeria, Nigerians? Do you call Chinese living in Malaysia, Malaysians?

          • Wayne

            I’m not against immigration, I’m against non-white immigration. High quality Asians help too, it reasonable numbers.

          • Greg Thomas

            The 14th Amendment specifically excludes U.S. citizenship to children born to foreign diplomats (who would have been in the country legally at said time of birth). So, how could any reasonable person deduce that same amendment would extend U.S. citizenship to the spawn of two illegal invaders; who slithered across our border under the cover of darkness, in violation of our immigration laws, as well as sovereignty?

            The answer is, it would not. It defies logic and common sense. The truth of the
            matter is out 14th Amendment has been hijacked by the diversity loving, White
            hating Marxist.

          • The__Bobster

            In the 14th Amendment, the dependent clause in the first sentence specifies “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof”.
            _______

            Therefore the children of all squat monster invaders (and German invaders too) are not citizens.

          • Anon12

            You know nothing. They are NOT under our jurisdiction, period!

    • Greg Thomas

      They are still here no doubt.

  • NeanderthalDNA

    Hate to admit it and still opposed but…

    This may not end up as bad as it could be. I’ve heard that there will be provisions to pay back taxes and many other hurdles that could result in many illegals being deported or returning on their own eventually regardless. Depends on how it is enforced.

    Still prefer an “Operation Wetback” but hoping this may end up as a stealth operation wetback regardless. Hey, sometimes good things happen, right?

    • Bill

      And they’ll do all those things, why? They aren’t doing them now, they don’t want citizenship, they want our bennies and jobs with NO taxes, no restraints, and don’t want to become Americans. They want America to become Mexico. Much of California and other places ARE already pretty much Mexico. I have a firm rule when getting any work done around our home….be it roofing, lawn care, painting, driveway, etc. NO MEXICANS. I tell every contractor that I will NOT allow Mexicans on my property. If the contractor lies and shows up with Mexicans on his crew, even ONE, ALL get sent packing. Works well for me!

      • NeanderthalDNA

        Yeah yeah yeah guys, not saying I’m happy about it. Just trying to squeeze a little lemonade out of these lemons.

        It’s like asking blacks to have a picture ID to vote. One would think this would not be an obstacle to any non retard who really wants to participate in his/her civics, but apparently according to liblefty excuse makers it is an INSURMOUNTABLE OBSTACLE. Well, irony is for many blacks apparently it IS.

        If commission of crime is also a reason to deny citizenship for petitioners…

      • The Last White Man Standing

        I agree 100%. How can the IRS calculate how much these illegal invaders owe in back taxes? They are common criminals, who don’t care about our immigration laws, so why should they care about the tax code? I remember reading an article where illegals were getting fraudulent refunds from the IRS by using individual taxpayer identification numbers, and claiming refunds for dependent children that they didn’t have. The part about paying back taxes is a smoke screen to get gullible Americans to support the bill.

    • lily-white

      DHS has recently released thousands from detention centers
      and ICE agents have been told to “take shelter” from a protest by illegals at
      their DC headquarters… possible amnesty
      for millions of “stumpies” just around the corner… now tell me again that “things
      may not end up as bad as it could be”…

      http://www.amren.com/news/2013/04/homeland-security-tells-agents-take-shelter-as-illegal-aliens-protest-outside-ice-headquarters/

      http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2013/03/obama-dhs-will-release-3000-more-illegal-immigrant-criminals-from-prison-in-march/

      • Sloppo

        Perhaps we just need a few North Korean consultants to teach us about border management.

        • lily-white

          now THERES an idea …. ; )

        • The__Bobster

          Or Israeli ones.

      • NeanderthalDNA

        Yeah I read the article here. Hey Obongo – look at all them illegal’s protesting right in front of the HS office! There they are! Right there. See? A bunch of ’em! Right…there…see?

        Oh… I see.

  • MekongDelta69

    The first sentence SHOULD read:

    “A bipartisan immigration bill soon to be introduced in the Senate could exclude hundreds of thousands of white immigrants here legally from ever becoming U.S. citizens…”

  • Grim Jim

    I don’t what it’s going to take to get it through people’s heads but facts and reality no longer matter in the tyranny we now live under. You can be assured it will only get much worse from here on out. No one can save this country from the path it’s on, no one.

    Isn’t now time to concede the loss and now prepare for the storm and to start picking out the alternatives to save our race–because our race is the target for extinction by the radical left in charge of both parties–BOTH parties! Let that sink in.

    There is a real, detailed, coherent plan with all the variables worked out: THE NORTHWEST IMPERATIVE, look it up now and at least find out where you’ll be running when things really go south. Whether you ike it or not, believe it or not, someday, sooner than later, I will be shaking the hands of a great many of you in the new republic!

    • Non Humans

      I will see you there, brother.

    • Crystal Evans

      Personally, I would love to see all Mexicans move to the Southwest. They claim to be native to that area so let them have it. We would all be better off if that happened.

      • Greg Thomas

        I would like to see them move to southwest mexico!

      • Fighting_Northern_Spirit

        California is still a jewel just for the land and the climate. I loathe living in this multiculti hell, but I don’t think it should be ceded to such a cowardly and useless race as Mexicans. Believe me, if bullets flew then this toilet would flush…downward.

      • The__Bobster

        But they’re not native to that area. American Indians would run them out every time they tried to invade it.

        • Bossman

          Many of those Mexicans are nothing but Spanish-speaking Indians so it would be just nothing but tribal warfare. White people should stop being so afraid of Mexicans. The ancestors of the Mexicans were savages who practiced human sacrifice and ritual cannibalism but now their descendants speak Spanish and are of the Christian religion. The job of the white man is to further civilize them.

          • Wayne

            So what you are saying is that our children are responsible for theirs, even though mestizos of not of our culture and don’t want to be. Drop the white man’s burden, it only weighs down our posterity.

          • ms_anthro

            No. The job of the White man is to leave them to their squalor and savagery and take care of our own kind. We owe them nothing.

          • Non Humans

            The white man’s job is to kick them out of our country and then prevent them from ever returning. We could send them back with some “Slaves” too. Heh-Heh-HEH!!

          • Bossman

            No! That aint possible. They are North Americans and their ancestors were here first and they know it. Our government has established all manner of trade and defense alliances with them. For better or worse we’re joined to the hips with them.

          • Wayne

            It is possible. Nature does not condone a lie, especially a lie of enequality. Mexico for the Mexicans. They already have a large, very rich country polluted only by the people themselves. We owe them nothing. But since you brought it up, are you suggesting that whites live with mestizos in a superior-inferior relationship???

          • ms_anthro

            Speak for yourself.

          • Anon12

            You are so wrong, I cannot believe what you wrote. THEY did NOT build nor create AMERICA! Not even close. As antro said, we owe them nor any other race one darn thing and it is IMMORAL for our race to give away any part of their land to any nonwhite period. Yes, IMMORAL. To take away the birthright and the inheritance of their White children and give it to mexicans or any other nonwhite is the most immoral, unchristianl act a White person could ever do.Hope you are not White nor have White children if this is how you think.

      • Bossman

        They will eventually take over the Southwest. White people love warm and sunny places but they don’t like doing the hard work that’s involved in living in those places.

        • ms_anthro

          Do you even read your own posts before submitting them?

        • Wayne

          You really don’t have a clue! Those who adapted to warm climates did not have to plan ahead, make heavy clothing, hunt in groups, build shelters, etc. Their evolutionary tactic was sex early and often with as many women as possible, with little to no paternal care post-birth. In the north, those genes and behaviors were killed off quick. The annual winter culled those unable to meet the requirements. Whites evolved in such a climate. Whites versus equatorial people is like ant versus grasshopper.

        • The__Bobster

          Which is why the cities located in those climes were built before the squat monster invasion?

          • blight14

            Bobster, that’s my favorite term for these cretins, squat brown monsters….

        • TeutonicKnight67

          What a joke! By hard work do you mean founding cities? building dams and aqueducts? irrigation systems? paved highways? railroads?sanitary sewage systems? None of these magically appeared due to the hard work of swarthy lettuce pickers and gardeners.

          • Bossman

            So what has happened? I was in downtown LA sometime ago and saw only 2 blond white men in a whole day. The Caribbean is extremely beautiful, lots of white tourists but very few white people want to live there.

          • Ironically, you’re all for importing more Hispanics and essentially amalgamating the United States into Mexico. The Downtown Los Angeles with “only two blond white men in a whole day” is the consequence of what you want.

          • Skincognito

            The Anglo-Saxon planters of Jamaica and the French in San Domingue might have had something to say about this phenomenon.
            Unfortunately, like the Boers today, they were raped, tortured and mutilated by sub-Saharan savages.
            White men can survive any clime. Diversity is our greatest threat.

          • Bossman

            What do you expect? Slavery was the most brutal in those places. In Spanish America and Brazil, there were no slave revolts because they were treated better there.

          • Anon12

            You are nothing but a troll and a liar. Give it up

        • Anon12

          Spoken like a true NON White person, right “bossman”? Guess you never heard of the “okies” working the fields? They didn’t sell and bring drugs into our country, they didn’t get fs or welfare, they didn’t form vicious Zeta and MS13 gangs, they didn’t rape, rob, kill while driving drunk, etc etc. How about Whites who cleared this land and built, civilized this land and invented all machinery? How about those settlers and how hard they worked. How about the Puritans, the Pilgrims and all their hard work and sacrifices? The list is endless.

          Go back to that hell hole called Mexico and live among your own kind. That is what the mexicans CREATED. No one to blame but yourselves.

      • Anon12

        No way! The Southwest is OURS…ALL of America is OURS.

        You never change do you? They get NOTHING. This is OUR land, WE created and built it, no other race has any dibs on MY country. no one! Let them go to Japan. How would you like that Crystal?

  • Luca

    With unemployment, crime, food stamps,welfare, school failures, and hospital costs at record highs, I have an outstanding idea that makes perfect sense. Let’s legalize 11-million illegal (mostly hispanic peasants) aliens. And don’t you dare leave out those 100’s of thousands who got here a little late while the bill was being formulated.

    Adios amigos. It’s Apocalypse Now.

    As Jim Morrison said “This is the end, my only friend, the end. Of our elaborate plans, the end. of everything that stands, the end. “

  • George White

    Don’t accept that this is a done deal. Get on the phone and raise hell with the Senate and Congress. I leave longass messages and let them know how angry this makes me. You should too.

  • SoCal LoCal

    Immigration law could exclude lawbreakers from unearned benefit. That is the correct translation of the PC opening lines of this report.

    Orwell reigns. We cannot even speak or write clearly on topics our elites wish to obfuscate..

    • ms_anthro

      Yes we can. Do it. What stops you? Do it loudly and proudly. Say whatever you like in mixed company. It starts with each one of us.

      I have been threatened with physical violence for speaking my mind in a calm and rational fashion. Mr. Taylor and other prominent realists have suffered tremendously for their courage and yet they persist in shining light on the cockroaches that hate our people and want us to accept our extermination with a smile.

      Do not be afraid of the Left. Fight them instead. If they’re going to hate us and want us dead, we might as well give them a reason.

      • SoCal LoCal

        Overstatement to make a point. As you yourself say, taking a view contrary to PC dogma will provoke outrage among even reasonable people. The indoctrination is such that certain lines of thought are blocked regardless of merit. The bien pensant are captive to our foes–and theirs.

        • ms_anthro

          I agree, but the only way to get through to reasonable people is to lead by example. You must be an upstanding citizen, a normal productive person, who openly holds unpopular views. The more of us who lead this way, the easier it is for the silent majority to voice their own unpopular views (i.e. discontent and outrage about PC gone amok).

          We are awake and aware. It’s our responsibility to our kinsfolk to bring them out of universal deceit and back to reason and truth.

      • Wayne

        Right on! Silence is consent!

      • Anon12

        You also have to fight the Right! They are as bad as the left is. They will call us all “racists”, nazis, bigots, etc” if we dare oppose giving our country freely to the nonwhite hordes of this insane world. Haven’t you heard them all on TV and talk radio and how they abhor us White “racists” out here?

  • Bill

    Right. And how will they KNOW they got here after that? ALL of them will say they got here before that, and Obama’s stooges will buy it. That little rule is just to put Americans at false ease.

  • JDInSanDiego

    The only hope for a fix without eventual civil war is a military coup.

  • Crystal Evans

    I read where the Border Patrol arrested an illegal who said Obama would allow him to stay. These illegals are being told by the smugglers that if they can make it to the US, they will get asylum. This proves what I have said about illegal immigrants, if they hear anything about changes in immigration law, they believe that they would be eligible and try to come to the US. I believe that if the Dream Act has passed, we would had more illegal immigrants trying to come here because their kids could qualify for legalization. They did not know that they would have to be in the country for five years to apply for the Dream Act.

  • ATBOTL

    It’s likely that the establishment, including the GOP and conservative infotainment types, will try to portray the amnesty bill is being strong on enforcement and tougher than it really is.

    Did anyone esle notice that the Nation Review editors are now endorsing amnesty?

    • Considering what NR has been for a long time, I think they’ve for quite some time been for amnesty and open borders when you get down to the bare metal of the hard drive, and that any insinuation on their part that they are otherwise is pure dishonesty for the sake of keeping their circulation and subscription numbers high.

    • Anon12

      ALL so-called conservatives have endorsed it and always say “we cannot deport “11 million” illegal aliens”……says who? I could and would in ONE week.

  • IKantunderstand

    As per usual, it is all lies, subterfuge, and obfuscations. The goal of the United (for now) States of America is to remove/replace Whites(Americans). They will do or say whatever it takes. They will lie in bills, or, if the bill passed is the truth, it will not be enforced. It is all a charade, perpetrated on Whites to make them think all is well. Of course, I am referring to your regular Whites, who are busy working, taking care of their family, and actually, having drunk the kool-aid, volunteering and giving back to the community! So, tell me, how many Blacks, Hindus, Arabs, Mexicans, do you ever see volunteering to do anything in your community? Including, but not limited to: cleaning up the environment(guess who litters and makes it trashed filled in the first place?), running marathons, participating in walks for a myriad of diseases? Contributing to food banks? Working in soup kitchens? Housing the homeless? Tutoring the illiterate, despite the fact that said students went to school for twelve years in the United(for now) States of America? Nobody with a functioning brain can actually think White countries will be improved by removing Whites. So, the question to be asked is, who benefits from removing White Christians from the world? Again, as per usual, follow the money trail. There are no other trails to follow.

    • Anon12

      Go to the Bible. It will tell us all we need to know. But, only if the White race knows who they really are in the Bible and who their enemy really is. But with the psuedo mainstream Christian pastors and churches today will make sure that the White race never finds out they have been lying to us for ages. God will take care of them in the end.They (churches)are all ” love everybody, be all inclusive and praise all diversity” as if our God EVER condoned our mixing with any other race on earth.

  • Crystal Evans

    What amazes me is that the federal government is current in sequestration, which means that there are budget cuts and potential days off without pay for most federal workers. At this time, instead of taking care of this problem, they instead spend more time on immigration reform, which hurts mainstream America more than it helps. Obama spends more time on gun control. I told my husband last night that I would love to see Obama go to the south or to Texas and try to sell his gun control nonsense. He probably would not make it out alive.

    • Non Humans

      Yeah right, Obama isn’t going to go to Texas. Nonhumans are superstitious. JFK was shot in Dallas, Texas beez raaaaycisss!!

  • Greg Thomas

    These traitors do not enforce the current law against illegal invaders. What would lead any
    reasonable person to believe this time will be any different? Here’s an idea.
    How about deporting anyone who violated our sovereignty after 1986, which was
    the last act of treason, I mean amnesty; whereby some 5 million illegal
    invaders were rewarded with amnesty.

  • The__Bobster
    • TeutonicKnight67

      I’m so glad a Rothsch..er I mean Zuckerberg wants to “revamp” our immigration policy.

    • No surprise that modern robber barons want more immigration.

  • KingKenton

    This is a little off topic, but since this article is about immigration I thought I would share the following with you as I think you will find it both amusing and uplifting… I came across a post by a Canadian wanting information about immigrating to Russia. A Ukrainian replied with a lot of advice including the following:

    If you are not white do not go there. They do not want black people there I repeat they do not want black people there. Look in the mirror if you dont not look like a white canadian YOU WILL BE DISCRIMINATED AGAINST AND BEAT UP. MANY BLACK PEOPLE HAVE BEEN KILLED AND RUSSIANS HAVE NO SENSE OF BROWN RACE you are either BLACK or white in their eyes. If you are little bit brown learn some Italian words and make up a story that you are itallian-canadian. If you get attacked (also buy some pepper Spray) scream “im italliano”

  • Xanthippe2

    “Could” not “Would.” And even if it was an absolute “Will.” It will be “Will NOT.”
    How many times has this happened in the past?

  • Bobby

    Taken in another way, it’s already excluding many………European-Americans, both on “official” immigration policy and otherwise. None of these traitorous “representatives”, give a sh-t about the citizens, who are definetly being excluded. LOL…….