Craig Bodeker to Speak at Texas A&M

American Renaissance, March 15, 2013

On March 20, political activist Preston Wiginton will be hosting Craig Bodeker at Texas A&M. The event will be at Rudder Tower room 701 on from 7 pm to 10 pm.

On February 7, Texas A&M’s SGA Diversity Committee hosted an event called “Do We Live in a Post-Racial America” where Dr. Joe Feagin said white people invented racism and only white people can be racist. Preston Wiginton thinks students need a different perspective. Dr. Feagin later stated that if other groups are racist they got the idea or ability to be so from white people.

For the event on March 20th, Craig Bodeker’s film, “A Conversation About Race” will be shown. Craig will give a brief speech, followed by a true forum discussion about race relations.

Directions to A&M’s campus and to the event room can be found here. Contact Preston Wigington for more information at [email protected]


Topics: , , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • On February 7, Texas A&M’s SGA Diversity Committee hosted an event called “Do We Live in a Post-Racial America” where Dr. Joe Feagin said white people invented racism and only white people can be racist.

    This is the garbage that the young heads full of mush are being taught in colleges today. It can take me years to deprogram them.

    • This garbage you speak of comes from the “ERRORS OF RUSSIA” that now have America by the throat. Simply put, It is now white mans turn to be in the barrel.

      • TeutonicKnight67

        The Culture Destroyer is powerful. Be careful Brother Gillilan.

  • Winston Merryweather

    Very interesting indeed. Jared, is there any chance that CSPAN could be invited to cover the upcoming Amren conference? Or will there be too much truth for them to handle? I think it would be excellent if they would cover the conference.

  • Winston Merryweather

    After a cursory inspection of the books written by Mr. Feagin I can say without hesitation that this man has few if any rivals as an undisputed leader in the anti-white/white guilt movement. He makes Tim Wise look like the half brother of David Duke.

    Mr. Feagin’s warped perspective on thewhite race must be challenged at every opportunity. The man is an enemy of white folks on every continent.

    • plaintruthforidiots

      You should continually ask Mr. Feagin who gave HIM the right to tell YOU who you have to live with? Ask him if he’s heard of ‘Freedom of association’. Ask him why he doesn’t want to live in Haiti. If he claims he doesn’t care where he lives, tell him you’ll go and buy him a one way ticket today.

    • Nate Miller

      The more I read, research and actually think about it, the more it makes sense. I usually oppose the obsession on Jews as the creators of all calamity, which seems popular among the anti-Semitic crowd i.e. Muslims, Neo Nazi, Conservative white Christians and almost all white nationalists. But the more I think of it, the pattern emerges and there comes a point beyond which you just can’t ignore. Joe Faegin, TIm Wise, John Stewart, Lewis Black, Steven Spielberg, Sumner Redstone, Nate Silver, David Silverman, Morris Dees, Michael Eisner, David Pakman, Mila Kunis and the list can go on and on and on….
      What do all these names have in common? What are they actively trying to propagate? Why is it taboo to discuss this on Amren? Btw, I am a big supporter of Israel and I hope Israel maintains it’s national and ethnic sovereignty just like white nations should maintain there’s!

      • sbuffalonative

        One correction. Mr. Dees was reared as a southern Baptist.

      • John

        Speaking of John Stewart, I recently noticed that he is threatening to leave Mexifornia over the states surging taxes. Leftists and egalitarians like Stewart represent the epitome of all ironies. They constantly drive their disgusting egalitarian views into the face of America, yet when it comes time to pay for the harvest of the seeds they’ve sown, while America reaps the rotten fruits of their labors (e.g., the undesirable consequences caused by the presence of Blacks, Mestizos, and illegals), they’re the first ones to turn tail and run! It happens without fail.

      • TruthTeller

        “Why is it taboo to discuss this on Amren? ”
        I’ll answer your question:
        Jared Taylor, AmRen, Guillaume Faye, EDL and other similar pro-white activists and organizations only exist to create a kosher “fake nationalist” alternative to the real non-zionist white nationalism that’s taking over Europe (North-America after that?).
        And by “non-zionist”, I don’t mean that they want to commit genocide against anyone or that they advocate the destruction of Israel, that’s just jewish propaganda. It just means that they want a white Europe free of jewish cultural, financial and genetical influence.
        At the moment, AmRen serves our purpose to some extent, but there will be time when a split will ensue.

        “I am a big supporter of Israel and I hope Israel maintains it’s national and ethnic sovereignty just like white nations should maintain”

        You’ve heard jews always call anyone who criticizes them “anti-semitical” and that’s because they don’t consider themselves to be white. Semites are arabic non-whites from the middle east.
        Of course, most modern jews, especially the ashkenazi, are not semitical at all. The reason they call themselves semitical is because that was one their main arguments to justify the creation of Israel. (Another argument was the Holocaust, but I can’t talk about that in AmRen or I’ll get blocked – so much for free speech).
        I also don’t understand why you’re a big supporter of Israel, you’ll find jewish people right at the back and the center of the global anti-white effort. These people, however, only preach anti-nationalist propaganda in western nations; In Israel, they “suddenly” become more racially conscious than Hitler and will go to any length in defending Israel’s jewish genetical and cultural identity.

        In my opinion, the white nationalist effort doesn’t need any jewish people, they are very detrimental to our cause and they already have their own nation anyway.

    • 48224

      Speaking of Tim Wise, Black folks call race traitors “Uncle Toms”….what doWwhites call them….Uncle Tim ???

      • anonymous

        Self-hating whites, parasites, hypocrites, peddlers, ignorant of reality, etc.

      • Savant


  • ncpride

    Really wish this guy could speak at UCCS after their ‘White Privilege’ brainwashing sessions, to deprogram any silly young Whites who fall for that nonsense.

    • The truth is that these students confuse privilege with expectation. Like MLK said – Judge them by the content of their character. We are all judged in this way. This is why whites are treated differently, people expect better things from us, not the raping, murdering & rioting.

      • LastBastionOfHope

        Well said. We all know the saying you are what you eat. Well, you are how you act. And blacks act like a bunch of baboons then demand respect.

  • E_Pluribus_Pluribus

    It’s been about a year since I first watched Bodeker’s A CONVERSATION ABOUT RACE. It’s a most compelling — and entertaining — production. Time to dig out the DVD and watch it again.

    • The Ice Queen

      Thanks for the link. I hadn’t gotten around to watching A Conversation About Race before last night. I found the full version online, but I think I want to add the DVD to my library. It is an excellent production.

    • ncpride

      I watched his video this afternoon, and he does an excellent job of pointing out the absurity and double standards of the word ‘racism’……. but it’s also sad to see how thoroughly brainwashed these seemly otherwise intelligent Whites are on the issue of race.

      • liberalsuck

        Remember, it’s in Colorado. Lots of liberals there, especially in Boulder or parts of Denver. I hear the towns are conservative in Colorado and that lots of the liberalism in Colorado happened when lots of the leftists left California and moved to Colorado in the 70s.

  • joesolargenius

    The human race has always viewed those different than them with a certain prejudicial distrust and as all human contact is abrasive there is no wonder that those whom don’t defend themselves get hurt. Every day at least one hundred white women are raped by black guys and the reason is usually because they were stupid enough to party with them .Fifteen years ago I stopped having anything to do with black people whenever I could and my life got immensely better for doing so !

    • Felix_M

      “Fifteen years ago I stopped having anything to do with black people whenever I could…”
      One of the best things you can do to improve your health and well-being. Any downsides (and I can’t really think of any) will be far out-weighed by the benefits.

    • Bobby

      And not ONLY the “human race.” The same goes for animals of every kind.l

  • Tom Iron

    There’s really nothing left to go to colleges and tlk about. There’s no room left for this being thought as some sort of intellectual exercise.

  • FoxxRoxx

    Nice feminine haircut

  • Paleoconn

    What nationality is Feagin, I wonder

    • gemjunior

      I was wondering that too. Are you thinking the same nationality of the bearded scoundrel in Oliver Twist with the retinue of pickpockets that he trained to a life of crime in exchange for some rags, scraps of food and a place to squat for the night? Hmm…….

      • Paleoconn

        I actually thought he might be Amish 😉

    • Milton Keeney

      He is apparently the inspiration for ‘ Montgomery Burns’ from the Simpsons.

    • Athling

      Mr Feagin is Irish. One of the most evil anti-whites I have ever seen. One gets the impression he could have easily taught the New Black Panther Party everything they know. I kid you not.

      Discover The Networks, a site that keeps dossiers on radical leftists, has an eye-opening profile on this maniacal white hater, link here…

      • Paleoconn

        Thanks Athling. Some of the biggest traitors have been Irish Catholics, Ted Kennedy, Joe Biden, Paul Ryan, the Church itself and its pro-immigration crusading.

        • TeutonicKnight67

          Before you lump in “the Church” take care to remember this, almost all of the original Protestant sects were Nationalist/Ethnic based. The C of E, and Evangelical Lutheranism has been every bit as damaging to this country if not more. Catholicism refers to itself as the “Universal” Church and is being true to form. If Anglicanism is supposed to be the Church of the English and Lutheranism the German National Church then why pray tell are THEY encouraging non-white immigration? Simple answer: all of Christendom has been infected by the near-asian Bolshevik virus. It is a tricky disease however. Slow-growing and hard to detect until it’s almost too late.

          • Paleoconn

            Nope, what those Catholic church leaders like Dolan and the Mexican archbishop of LA and others are favor is NOT being true to Catholicism’s form. Christ never rejected nationhood. Remember render unto Caesar.


          • TeutonicKnight67

            Glad to see we’re on the same page Paleoconn!! I have never accepted the libtarded taint in the Church. And Jesus was NOT an “illegal immigrant” despite their insistance. Besides, Joseph eventually WENT HOME to Nazareth.

          • Paleoconn

            Thanks TK67. I’m glad we agree on this. Btw, PJB’s article on the new Pope is a good one. I was afraid Francis would be a left-leaning pontiff on social issues at least like homosexuality and abortion, but it appears not. God bless the Church and the Pope.

          • TeutonicKnight67

            Indeed! I was afraid of him being a Jesuit since they are prone to Liberal-itis. It appears he is not one of THOSE Jesuits. Thank God.

          • I’m just happy it’s an identifiably white man. The media amaze me — After Cardinal Bergoglio was elevated to Pope Francis I, the media went on and on about how this is going to be a boon to the poor of Latin America. I fail to see how a white man of Italian ethnicity who just happens to have been born of Italian immigrant parents in a South American country is instantly going to make all the impoverished low IQ Indos and Mezos from Tijuana to Patagonia rich.

        • liberalsuck

          Not necessarily. There were Catholic churches that did not let blacks sit in the front pews and the Catholic Church of Spain viewed the Indians as savages. There Irish Catholics rioted with blacks in NYC during the 1863 riots. I think the Catholic sects in the US tried to support blacks in certain areas since they felt discriminated because of their religion.

      • TeutonicKnight67

        Yet another disgraceful excuse for a Celt. I have always found liberal Irish to be the most vile of all. Worse than liberal Jews even. Racially aware Irish are as right-wing as they come however. It seems my ethnicity is given to extremism, cuiously enough.

        • pcmustgo

          well, I’m half jewish and I’m on here.

          • Oom Paul

            I am probably going to open a can of worms with this post but I can’t fight the urge to ask you this. I have noticed many of your post and I do enjoy reading them and I do agree with most of your opinions. I have seen a handful of Jews that have very conservative opinions with which I agree with, but why does it seem like the majority of Jews tend to support very left and liberal causes?

            I saw this clip on youtube. It is a speech by Dennis Prager called “Top 10 Ways Liberalism Makes America Worse”. I agree with EVERYTHING said in that speech. It was just funny that in the middle there is a part where he talks about how conservative Jews tend to be, but how they always support very Liberal causes for other people. Why is this? This is, according to me, the main reason for the mistrust of Jews. They come across as always having ulterior motives for doing things.

            Another example is here in South Africa. During apartheid the Jews lived amongst the Afrikaners(Boere), and only after apartheid has it become apparent how many of them actually helped and supported the Communists. It is also funny that the Jewish population in the country shrank from 120 000 to 70 000. Now that the country went down the drain they left for Israel. Things like this make me very suspicious of Jews.

            Perhaps you have another perspective on these things. I would really be interested to hear your views. I don’t mean my post to be hostile towards you, I am just sincerely curious.

        • liberalsuck

          The problem with Jews is that even though a lot of them don’t have politically correct views on race, they force whites to be multicultural, to race mix, socialism, laziness, and to accept perversions that debase, demoralize and reduce the number of white people (abortions, homosexuality, promiscuity, drug use, the Pill, racemixing, transgender) Israel doesn’t take in non Jews and they sterilize the Ethiopians.

          • Felix_M

            Calling them hypocrites is simply stating the truth.

    • Raydonn

      That was the first thing I thought about…….he certainly ‘fits’ all of the criteria……….

    • liberalsuck

      Oh, Feagin is “an Irish Catholic”? Sure. (sarcasm)

  • bigone4u

    This is the same Texas A&M that was featured in an Amren story last month. I think I recall that 70 percent of the courses featured a racial sensitivity/white privilege component. Mr. Bodeker’s lions mane of a hair style may symbolize Daniel walking into the lion’s den. However, I taught there back in the 80s. The students were polite, conservative, and Christian back then. I hope Amren does a followup.

    • KittyAmerica

      A&M still has the reputation in Texas as the conservative counter to UT, that it’s the school for redneck ag boys. Rick Perry went there so the libs in Austin hate him and A&M.
      Of course we know that there is no conservative college, as far as the faculty goes anyway.

  • MekongDelta69

    I’ll just echo what Winston said below. This guy (Feagin) is an all-time loser.

    White people invented racism and only white people can be racist.
    (Nice way to deflect ANY criticism coming your way by proactively making up excuses for any factual arguments against your stupidity.)

    Let’s see. I was bored one day, and AmRen had no new articles up and other websites were sort of dead. I paid all my bills, took care of my family, did everything I needed to do on my ‘To Do’ list, had an off day from work, so I puttered around.

    First, I invented the printing press, then the light bulb, then jet engines, then stealth technology, mathematics, industry, advanced civilization, and a million other things. I was running out of things to invent.

    Oh wait… I know… I think I’ll “invent racism.” Yeah, that’s it. My work is done here. I’m gonna go have a beer. Be right back…

    • George

      Shame on you, Mekong. Restricting the patent and licencing rights to Whites Only.

      That wasn’t very nice of you. See the mess you’ve gotten us all in?

      The next time you get a day off work, can we team up and create an Open Source Racism 2.0 so the others can get some?

  • JohnEngelman

    The argument that only white people can be racist is known as a circular argument. One asserts what one needs to prove, then one assumes that one has proven it.

    First, one defines “racism” in such a way that only white people can be racist by the distorted definition. Then one condemns whites for corresponding to the definition.

  • MobyWhite


    Long live racism!

  • 1776is1984

    it was Craig who woke me up more than all of the so-called ‘conseratives’ combined, highly recommened his film to anyone!

  • pcmustgo

    Prepare for shrill, sheltered, no-black-friend having White Liberals to storm the stage and scream “racist” and get violent even.

    It’s just the cool hip thing to do, and all college students do anymore is talk about race. I mean white racism.

    • Gerónimo Anónimo

      I don’t doubt that Mr. Bodeker will be able to get one word out. The leftists will use the old Sturm Abteilung tactic of shouting down, threatening and I wouldn’t be surprised if they resort to violence.

      • Gerónimo Anónimo

        I meant to say that I DO doubt.

      • Tucker

        Sadly, Geronimo is right. The more examples that I see where the sane, well-meaning, well intentioned, White race realists on our side of this issue make an effort to reach out and have the “conversation about race” that Obama and Holder sarcastically advised was necessary, the minority infested left and the self-hating White liberals will react in the exact manner that Geronimo describes.

        These people do not want any part of any such conversation – because I believe that they instinctively realize the weakness of their position and the hypocrisy of the double standard that they are so desperate to cling to and maintain.

        This is not really a bad thing, however. The intolerance of our racial enemies – and, make no mistake – “racial enemies” is exactly the proper term to use when describing these people and especially the mouth pieces who comprise their leadership (Tim Wise, Abe Foxman, Mark Potok, Fiegan,etc.) – this intolerance is probably the absolute best thing White race realists having going for us. How so?

        Simple. This intolerance factor is a gift to us because it is the most effective recruiting tool we have available. Many Whites seem to be afflicted with the fatal disease of ‘fairness’, which is a quality that has thus far been capitalized upon by our racial enemies and used to browbeat Whites into making concession after concession. I suspect, however, that this same ‘fairness’ obsession of our fellow Whites can be turned to our advantage – and once Whites begin to realize that our racial competitors have no intention of treating us fairly, that the light bulb will finally come on over their heads and they will realize that total, permanent, non-negotiable geographic separation from non-whites and from self-hating, Cultural Marxist brainwashed White liberals is the only possible solution that will guarantee a future for White European people and their children.

        The top priority for White Nationalists and for White race realists has to be the creation of an exclusively White Ethnostate. We cannot continue to procrastinate on this issue, friends. Once we are reduced to a minority inside what was once our native homelands, the chances of our non-white parasitic rulers voluntarily and amicably deciding to let us go our separate way in a peaceful, non-violent fashion will be zero. We will become their prisoners; we will become tax slaves and forced to toll as such until such a time as we are burned out, used up, and of no further use to our parasitic minority masters. We will have what’s left of the Constitution and Bill of Rights that our 100 percent White European Founding Fathers gave to us stripped from us – and we will be disarmed and rendered defenseless. That is a guaranteed certainty, Folks.

        Hence, we have to stop trying to ask minorities for their permission and/or their blessing, with regards to the perfectly legitimate, perfectly justified, and morally imperative matter of pursuing White European specific ethnic interests. This is matter of our racial and cultural survival and we will never get the blessing of our racial enemies on this issue. And, the time and energy and resources we squander in pursuit of this unachievable fantasy — is time, energy and resources not spent to pursue our exclusively White Ethnostate.

        • pcmustgo

          Hey, I’m half jewish and I am on here… just letting you know, when you reference our “non-white parasitic rulers”. Jews experience reverse racism too and are viewed as white.

          • HowardMauer

            Please join the Matt Drudges, Paul Gottfrieds, and Ilana Mercers of the world. We need your help. Thanks so much for your support.

        • Liberalsuck

          Who knows. This is in Texas. Lots of good ole’ boys and I’m sure there a fair amount of young Republicans there willing to listen to him and, hopefully, will stand up to the intolerant, nasty, crybaby liberals there. Craig having long hair and looking like a hippie might get some of these liberals to think, ‘Hey, this guy doesn’t look like a right-winger…” Let’s hope there is security there and that Mr. Bodeker understands how nasty liberals can get.

        • I choose to take the argument to the universities. There are many whites looking for leadership their. But I agree. When I am at a leftist event on campus they do not let me participate in any fashion. Really it has pissed off many students, even not whites. It is backfiring on the left.

        • I agree with you 100% on the White Ethnostate. Please contact me at [email protected]

      • We don’t have that at A&M. In fact a black girl that was on the SGA Diversity Committee is the guest of honor. Note I said WAS. She quit them after the event, “Do We Live in a Post Racial America” because she saw through them and that they only hated white people and did nothing to promote diversity.

  • “Because he is ideologically a Marxist, Professor Feagin’s explanation of the causes of American inequity is rooted in Marxist doctrine.” Why am I not surprised that Feagin is a dedicated Communist, can you say Frankfurt School? He will not be happy until all white people are dead. Five will get you ten that he does not live in the black part of town.
    “Feagin told the Texas A&M student newspaper in October 2004: “There are two types of white Americans: racists and recovering racists.”
    I agree with one thing, there are two types of people: pro-white and pro-white-genocide.

    I hope that Craig Bodeker does well at this meeting, but I am concerned that our side goes into these things trying to make logical points to the EXCLUSION of the emotional. The emotional argument reaches and persuades the listener faster than logic.

    Let’s see how things turn out.

  • LastBastionOfHope

    His film is just a PERFECT representation of anti-white attitudes so prevalent today in America. It was a great documentary that would have gotten millions of views and promotion on talk shows, CNN, MSNBC, etc. if it was depicting whites of being racist against blacks.

  • Thank God somebody is coming out to say something, way out in the open.

  • Yawn…………Who CAN’T we criticize? What owns the media pushing the poison on us? What do ALL the gun grabbing politicians have in common(no, its not that they’re Democrats)? THIS IS THE PROBLEM.. You won’t say because they are funding YOU…..

  • Felix_M

    The word “racist” is now become as meaningless as the word term “anti-Semite.” George Orwell would be proud. Along with “Celebrate Diversity!”, both terms are now thread-bare.

    • liberalsuck

      The liberals and anti-white people overplayed their hand by throwing around those words. As more white people hear blacks and dumbass liberals calling the NRA ‘racist’ or calling the entire English language ‘racist’ or calling someone a Nazi all because they don’t approve of having our money and military take care of other countries they notice these words ‘racist’ and ‘anti semite’ are just thrown at us to shut them up.

  • purestocles

    Here is a sample of Dr. Faegin’s thinking and writing which includes all the usual suspects; equality defined as same percentage outcome, pleas for yet more money to reconstruct the urban environment Blacks themselves destroyed and blanket, unsubstantiated accusations of oppression with the concomitant assertion that the legacy of that oppression is the key reason Blacks lag in performance today. In short, Pseudo Science.

    “The National Urban League’s 2009 State of Black America report is just out and shows, yet again, the longterm consequences of systemic racism as it impacts African Americans. The Urban League has developed what they term an Equality Index, a statistical measure of white-black inequalities in the economy, education, health, community engagement, and the “justice” system.

    According to their press release, the 2009 summary index shows a little decline in the overall position of African Americans relative to whites, in their terms from 71.5 percent in the 2008 report to 71.1 percent in that 2009 report. The trend line over the five years between 2003 and 2007 shows greater inequality:

    Even as both groups made progress in educational attainment, the progress was slower for blacks. During the same period while white children saw increases in “preprimary” enrollment of about 3 percent, black children saw a decline of about 1 percent, causing the education gap to grow, not shrink.

    The executive summary of the report adds the inequality measures for subareas:

    Economics remains the area with the greatest degree of inequality (from 57.6% in 2008 to 57.4% in 2009), followed by social justice (from 62.1% to 60.4%), health (from 73.3% to 74.4%), education (from 78.6% to 78.5%) and civic engagement (from 100.3% to 96.3%).

    The State of Black America report ends with important suggestions for job/economic policy such as these:

    1. Increase funding for proven and successful models of workforce training and job placement for under-skilled workers between the ages of 16 and 30 such as the Department of Labor’s “Responsible Reintegration of Youthful Offenders.”
    2. Direct a percentage of all infrastructure monies to job training, job placement and job preparation for disadvantaged workers;
    3. Target workforce investment dollars to the construction industry jobs that an infrastructure program will create and, where reigniting the construction industry is a goal, pre-apprenticeship programs must be funded in that sector;
    4. Fund infrastructure development for public building construction and renovations of schools, community centers, libraries, recreation centers, parks, etc., that will rebuild and revitalize urban communities;
    5. Re-establish a temporary Public Service Employment (PSE) program aimed at creating 150,000 – 200,000 jobs in urban areas to forestall a reduction in public services and an increase in job losses.

    The report has not yet gotten much attention, but Leonard Pitts Jr., the black Pulitzer-Prize-winning columnist and author of Becoming Dad: Black Men and the Journey to Fatherhood, wrote a recent article arguing that these data will not be welcome to

    Americans who convinced themselves in November the country had entered a “post-racial” era. Those Americans will be overwhelmingly white and will resist with mighty determination the report’s implicit argument: that we have not yet overcome, not yet reached the Promised Land, not yet come to a point where race is irrelevant, Barack Obama notwithstanding.

    He then chides African Americans for not dealing with their own problems:

    African-Americans do not, after all, need its policy suggestions to fix many of their most intractable problems. We do not need a government program to turn off the TV, realizing it’s hardly coincidental that people who watch more television per capita have poorer academic performance.

    But then adds these savvy words:

    Once you’ve turned off the television and encouraged black children toward academic excellence, you still must contend with the fact that their schools are too often crumbling, underfunded and staffed with inexperienced teachers. Once you’ve gotten black women and men to raise their children in the context of families, you still have to deal with the fact that those families need places to live, jobs to support them and doctors to keep them healthy….

    Overall, Pitts accents some findings of psychological researcher, Richard Eibach, that
    judging racial progress, white people and black ones tend to use different yardsticks. Whites use the yardstick of how far we have come from the nation we used to be. Blacks use the yardstick of how far we have yet to go to be the nation we ought to be. . . . There is value in the yardstick white Americans use. . . . But there is value in the yardstick black Americans use, too, the measure the National Urban League provides in its annual studies. . . . We have not yet reached the Promised Land and we all have a moral responsibility toward that goal. But before we can fulfill that responsibility, we must learn to speak the same language where race is concerned, and to mean the same things when we do.

    Even good critical analysts like Pitts seem to feel a great obligation to “balance” the views (yardstick) of most black Americans about their oppression and its redress—people who have been the targets of racial oppression at the hands of whites for four centuries and whose current unjust impoverishment is the cumulative result of that extensive oppression—with the typical blame-the-victim, moralistic views (yardstick) of many white Americans. Indeed, there seems to be an unwritten rule in the mainstream media, and in too much academic scholarship, that one should not name and critique whites for systemic and institutional racism too openly and honestly–and another unwritten rule that if one does critique white Americans for some racism, one must then “balance” that critique by clearly mentioning something negative about people of color or something else positive that whites have done in the racial arena. The frequent obsession with “Balance” here signals once again how whites really run this country and even control how we can publicly think and write about matters of systemic racism.

    One can certainly counsel African Americans to do this or that to improve communities and conditions, but the greater moral responsibility obviously lies on those who created the 400-years of racial oppression, not those who have had to endure it now for four hundred years.”

  • Thor Bonham

    Test ..

  • Tucker

    I wish Bodeker would get himself a hair cut. Call me old fashioned, if you want. But, I just cannot get used to seeing guys with hair so long they look like girls from behind.

    Not talking a crew cut or US Marine style white walls, or anything. Just try to look like a dude, okay?

    • TeutonicKnight67

      I agree. If he’s cultivating some sort of “viking” look then at least sport a beard, man.

    • Bantu_Education

      I agree, I think he loses credibility with that look. He looked great when he made the video – his hair was quite long then, but not girly long. He must have been growing it ever since – weird..!

      • Nate Miller

        The worst part is that his hair is NOT hep at all. He even combs his hair like a girl. I swear I thought that was a 50 year old blonde woman when I first saw that photo. The hep look today is closely cropped short hair or the more grunge look (if you choose to have long hair)…the kind of long hairstyle Bodeker has is clearly outdated and belongs in the late 60s-70’s.

        • Sue

          I don’t think it’s any of those things. This guy’s face doesn’t support his hair. Some people would look great with it, he doesn’t. Learn what looks good on you.

    • Unperson

      I respectfully disagree. Having a few nonconformist or hipster looking people under our tent is actually a benefit. Young white people — our most important potential audience when recruiting for Race Realism — raised on MTV will be inherently suspicious of any movement that’s exclusively middle-aged white guys with short hair and unremarkable clothing. Yes, that’s still going to be most of us — but having someone with a more hippie look like Mr. Bodeker could be the thing that makes a few white students agree to listen to a message they wouldn’t otherwise listen to.

      So don’t worry about the filmmaker’s “girlish” hair. Think of it instead as the mane on a Trojan Horse.

      • Liberalsuck

        Perhaps, but there were times when white men had long hair (the Viking days, Braveheart, 300, the Old West) and they were real white men then. They worked, they had large families, they took care of their kids, they destroyed their enemies.

  • Seek

    Back in grad school as part of my suggested sociology reading list, I read the racial “wisdom” of Joe Feagin. He was rotten then; he remains rotten now. He’s the essence of white self-hatred.

  • Whirlwinder

    I think Feagin could learn about race if he studied Islams conquering hoards for the last 1400 or so years. They enslaved millions on their march against civilizations and they enslaved millions of white Europeans! Feagin is a fraud and A&M should be castigated for hiring him.

  • Bill

    All I have to do is look at his picture to know where he is coming from. If I want to hear an HONEST conversation about race, I’ll go to CWNY, as I do, on a weekly basis. You know when we can have an honest discussion about race in America? When the blacks can be honest about their own behavior, criminality, intellectual deficiencies, parasitic nature, and their penchant for hating us, but never allowing us to LEAVE THEM, following us everywhere and ruining cities on a scale of the bombing campaign against Germany in WWII.

  • SargeInCharge

    “Dr. Joe Feagin said white people invented racism and only white people can be racist.”

    Jewish thinkers invented the concept that whites are racist and racism is evil. “Racism”, or the ability to discern race differences and prefer certain races over others based on those differences did not need to be invented. That’s natural. Blacks do it every bit as much as any other race.

    • George

      Ask any Jewish mother her reaction when she found out her son was to marry a goyim.

  • MobyWhite

    I start my conversations about race with a reminder that my White privilege obligates me to racially profile myself for White privilege and to judge myself guilty of the crime of White privilege without ever considering the power black privilege has to destroy my Whiteness, just like Brittny Watts never considered it, because she was too busy “just embracing all different kinds of people.”

    I say this to myself every day, and sure enough, I can feel my White privilege disappear:

    “Ask people of color about heir experience and bewilling to accept their experiences as true, real,and accurate.”


  • Unperson

    I had never heard of this Dr. Joe Feagin before today, but he may be even more virulently anti-white than the notorious Tim Wise. Truly odious.
    From Prof Feagin’s Wiki listing, here are some of this eminent educator’s 50 (!) published nonfiction books. Please note that in this sampling of a dozen Feagin titles ALL BUT TWO include the words “White”, “Racial” or “Racism” (and the other two imply it). In short, this man is FANATIC:


    He is author of over 190 research articles and 50 plus books on racial, gender, and urban issues. Among his books are:

    Systemic Racism [3] (Routledge 2006),

    Social Problems: A Power-Conflict Perspective (6th ed., Prentice-Hall, 2006);

    Liberation Sociology, with Hernan Vera (Westview, 2001);

    Racist America[4](Routledge 2000);

    The First R: How Children Learn Race and Racism, with Debra Van Ausdale (Rowman & Littlefield 2001);

    Racial and Ethnic Relations[5], with Clairece Booher Feagin (8th ed.; Prentice-Hall 2007);

    The Many Costs of Racism, with Karyn McKinney (Rowman & Littlefield 2003);

    White Men on Race, with Eileen O’Brien (Beacon 2003);

    Black in Blue: African-American Police Officers and Racism, with Kenneth Bolton (Routledge 2004).

    “The White Racial Frame: Centuries of Racial Framing and Counter-Framing ” (Routledge, 2010.)

    “Yes We Can: White Racial Framing and the 2008 Presidential Campaign.” with A. Harvey-Wingfield (Routledge, 2010.)

    “White Party, White Government: Race, Class, and U.S. Politics” (Routledge, 2012)

    In 2007 he finished a book titled Two-Faced Racism[6](with Leslie Houts Picca, Routledge, 2007) dealing with how whites act differently in public and private on racial matters.

    • Bantu_Education

      His books and articles seem to imply that only whites can be racist, and that therefore whites have lower moral standards than blacks. I don’t suppose it ever occurred to him that those who hold such opinions must themselves be racists, by their own definition?

  • robinbishop34

    Mr. Bodeker (kind of looks like a young Greg Allman) has some good interview videos on youTube with John Derbyshire, Steve Sailer and others that are really pretty good. Worth looking into.

  • whiteuncleruckus

    This is off topic but I want to talk about it. Last night I found out that the woman I’m dating had a prior relationship with a black guy. After having a few drinks with him, we said our goodbyes. As I was leaving he kissed her hand and for no reason at all he said if I didn’t “take care of her,” he would “take care of me,” which I took to be a threat. On top of that she seemed to be ok with it. Idk what to do. If I stay with her, it’s one less White girl with a black, but after that, I don’t think I can ever look at her the same way again. This is the SECOND White woman I have dated who had a prior relationship with a black guy AND was still on good terms with him. All I know for sure is I hate diversity so much I can taste it.

    • Tim jones

      Find a new one man. There’s plenty of fish in the sea, and you don’t need that person in your life at all.

    • Definitely off topic, and there isn’t a question mark to be found. Were you looking for very random advice or fishing for the right responses?

      • whiteuncleruckus

        I’m sorry, I just needed to vent and I felt safe doing it here. I guess my question would be, “What would you do if you were in this situation?”

        • Bantu_Education

          Tell her the truth.

        • I wouldn’t be in that situation, simply because I’ve learned that I am completely incompatible with anyone who doesn’t see eye-to-eye with me on the race issue.

          If you’re debating on being with someone because you believe they’ve changed, then only you can determine whether or not you can overlook their past. If, however, you are debating on being with someone because you believe you can change them, then you’re with the wrong person.

        • Grim

          Good grief, is that the only woman you can land? You are going to reduce yourself to taking sloppy seconds after a negro? Other than the fact you are in desperate need to get a bitch slap to smack some sense into, just how long do you expect this D.O.A. relationship to last?

          It’s sure good not being you. After this lunacy falls apart on you, as it surely will, will you learn your lesson or not?

          It also sounds like the woman and the negro have full intent on doing the dirty behind your back while you pay the bills for her.

          Find some self-respect and move on as fast as your feet can carry you away from that nightmare.

    • dump her like 3rd period French. Once they go black, we don’t want ’em back

  • For Immediate Release

    Preston Wiginton
    [email protected]


    Screening of the film, “A Conversation About Race” and round table discussion to take place.

    Preston Wiginton, political activist, will be hosting Craig Bodeker author of the film, “A Conversation About Race”. The event will take place at Rudder Tower room 701, from 7pm to 10 pm on Wednesday March 20th, 2013.

    Mr. Wiginton invites all, but especially students to participate in a screening of Mr. Bodeker’s film followed by a true round table discussion about racism.

    This event is a response to a recent event hosted at Texas A&M by the SGA Diversity Committee, “Do We Live in a Post Racial America”, where Neo-Marxist Dr. Joe Feagin claimed that white people invented racism and only white people can be racist. Dr. Feagin further promotes that if non white people are racist then they got the idea from white people, hence white people are the sole and only cause for the “evil” of racism.

    Please note Dr. Feagin is on Harvard Professor David Horowitz’s list of 100 most dangerous (to Western Civililation) professors in America.

    Mr. Wiginton not only hopes to expose white hating radical leftist, but to bring people together where we can truly put effort into solving problems that affect society.

    Cameras and recorders will be allowed at this event.

    Please join the Facebook group about this event.

  • Young Werther

    Sounds like a fun night to me. The SPLC certainly does not fancy Mr. Bodeker. If the Arabs were the first to enslave Africans, would that make them racist slavers long before the white man got the idea?

  • Funruffian

    I watched his documentary and it’s done tastefully with intellectual honesty. He should do a fine job this Wednesday at Texas A&M addressing all the cultural myths. Go Graig!!

  • Only 3 students showed and only 3 drove in to see Mr. Bodeker. I think we should really start celebration white genocide. White students don’t care and there is not enough pain yet to push people away from their keyboard.