Majority of U.S. Citizens Say Illegal Immigrants Should Be Deported

Rachelle Younglai, Reuters, February 20, 2013

More than half of U.S. citizens believe that most or all of the country’s 11 million illegal immigrants should be deported, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll released on Wednesday that highlights the difficulties facing lawmakers trying to reform the U.S. immigration system.

The online survey shows resistance to easing immigration laws despite the biggest push for reform in Congress since 2007.

Thirty percent of those polled think that most illegal immigrants, with some exceptions, should be deported, while 23 percent believe all illegal immigrants should be deported.

Only 5 percent believe all illegal immigrants should be allowed to stay in the United States legally, and 31 percent want most illegal immigrants to stay.

These results are in line with other polls in recent years, suggesting that people’s views on immigration have not changed dramatically since the immigration debate reignited in Congress last month, according to Ipsos pollster Julia Clark.


Attitudes toward immigration are polarized by party, according to another the Reuters/Ipsos poll. Seventy-five percent of Republicans think all or most immigrants should be deported, compared to 40 percent of Democrats who think the same.


Wednesday’s Reuters/Ipsos poll was conducted Friday through Tuesday and surveyed 1,443 Americans over the age of 18.

The precision of the Reuters/Ipsos online poll is measured using a credibility interval. In this survey, the poll has a credibility interval of plus or minus 2.9 percentage points.

Topics: , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • The__Bobster

    When the question is posed properly, this is the result you always get. But you can bet the libtard MSM hide this poll as they press for amnesty for the ugly squat monster invaders.

    • jambi19

      The media will see this and understand that the message is not getting through to us sheeple. They will refrain the message in a new way in the hopes of convincing our self deposition while at the same time doing a full press legislation effort. I can see amnesty passing Dec 24 at 11:59pm with some parliamentary loop hole they have used before. The libs are as machiavellian as they come.

  • Expect Hollywood to produce some tear-jerker movies about dispossessed illegal immigrants and their evil white tormentors. In time, minds will change.

    • So CAL Snowman

      Ernesto Unchained?

      • Felix_M

        Ain’t gonna work this time. As soon as audiences leave the theater, they’ll see the people adversely effected by this invasion of illegals, the families homeless because the parents’ jobs were taken by Nacho and Lupe, the old people who have to endure cuts to the medical programs THEY paid into. Many of those who have worked hard and played by the book will have to let the millions of children of the illegals cut in line in front of them for preferential treatment.

        All we have to do is say 1986, (that should be our rallying cry), and every argument they make for another amnesty falls apart.

        • Cheri Rodriguez

          1986 and Reagan? 1954 and Eisenhower sounds better. Ike was the last president with a spine and deported illegals en masse with “Operation Wetback.”

          • Anon

            You guys seriously misunderstand the nature of the problem. There will be no rallying cry. It’s they who intend to attack US. We are no longer allowed the luxury of starting it. Only finishing it.

            In other words, you won’t have to convince your neighbors that something has to be done about all the non-white invaders in town. Instead, your neighbor will be over at your house desperately seeking help as his own burns to the ground.

            Choose your future? Too late. You already have.

          • Felix_M

            Too many kids today don’t know history. Saying 1986 will force them to go look up what happened in 1986 that was so horrible. O’ course we could also say Simpson-Mazzolli *vomit*, but 1986 is easier to remember.

          • kjh64

            “they’re admitting to trying to amnesty 11 million today, though that’s the same number they’ve been using for the last 7 years”
            Actually, they’ve been using the 11 million number since the mid-70’s. I saw an article one time from 1976 talking about an estimated 11 million illegals. That was 36 years ago so you can imagine how many there really are. I’d say there are likely 11 million in California alone..

          • Tucker

            I am convinced that the true number of illegal, law breaking, border jumping, criminal aliens is easily between 30-40 million. And, remember – if these law breakers get amnesty – it will include very liberal family reunification provisions that will let them import every member of their family tree, who will in turn, import every member of their extended family tree, and so on.

            This is a Genocide War being waged, full scale, and right out in the open – and the race in the cross-hairs of the genocidists are White European people. John McCain is fully aware of the evil he is involved in, and so are the rest of these despicably evil RINOs who are trying to cut deals with the Communist Democrats.

            I had a long chat with a staff worker in my Congressional district office the other day, and I pointed out that this current battle that the left is waging against the 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms and the issue of continuing to allow massive invasions of our homelands by third world aliens, and in particular – Hispanics – are intimately interwoven and cannot be separated. I pointed out that not one single Hispanic controlled nation from Mexico all the way down to the tip of South America has anything like a ‘U.S. Constitution’ and nor do they have anything remotely similar to our ‘Bill of Rights’ – and, most importantly, not one of those nations has a 2nd Amendment which ensures its citizens the right to own firearms, so as to enable them to resist tyranny from their governments. I went on to ask this staff worker why any American of White European descent should believe that their precious and sacred Constitution, Bill of Rights, or 2nd Amendment rights would be preserved if, and when, our brainless and treasonous ruling elites allow our nation to absorb the entire Hispanic population of Mexico, Central, and South America and then America becomes a Hispanic dominant and Hispanic ruled nation?

            I also pointed out how, during my study of the history of the Republic of Texas – our White European ancestors who were invited and encouraged by the Mexican government to move into the Texas territories in order to help them populate and improve these areas soon began to chafe under the pressure of having a Mexican boot on the backs of their White necks – and eventually, this alien race ruling over them became so intolerable that it lead to a bloody war that ended in our White ancestors achieving their independence. Clearly, this very same thing would result if our elites allow Hispanics to take control of America and then place their boot on the back of the neck of White European men and women.

            I concluded my chat with this staff worker by flatly stating that I would NOT be ruled by Hispanics, and if I had such a desire – I would attempt to migrate into a Hispanic dominant nation. I also reminded this staff worker that these Hispanics and other third world aliens, if they ever become the majority, would immediately move to abolish the Constitution and the Bill of Rights and then try to disarm White Europeans – and this would guarantee a coast-to-coast bloody civil war.

          • Even Newt Gingrich, during the amnesty debate in 2007 or so, said 36 million or so illegals presently in country.

            Mexico theoretically has something like a 2nd Amendment. But when you’re dealing with an Indo/Meso population base, you can have all the fancy words on paper that you want, they’ll be ignored. The more of them you import here and let stay here, even if they’re never allowed to vote, the more our own Constitution will become meaningless words on paper.

          • Cannot Tell

            I recently read After America by Mark Steyn and Suicide of a Superpower by Patrick Buchanan. Both authors are skeptical of whether the U.S. will make it to 2030. I was skeptical myself, but I still believed that although we’re deteriorating, we might survive. Your comment has changed my mind. I never thought about how Mexicans might brink their families to the U.S. if they’re given amnesty. If that happened, whites would practically be reduced to minority status over night!

            I honestly believe it may be too late to save the U.S. Whites should be planning on fleeing to Eastern Europe.

          • Birger_Skruddusvingen

            “I honestly believe it may be too late to save the U.S. Whites should be planning on fleeing to Eastern Europe.

            Not only the USA. Alas, not only the Western world. It may be too late to save Eastern Europe as well. More and more countries joins the EU. Which is pretty much akin to abolishing their cultures, peoples and civilisation, or the countries themselves, really.

            No, you better stay where you are and fight. Secession seems to be the answer. Perhaps it’s still possible to found a new republic called Northwestern America. With “We aren’t even nearly stupid enough to believe that alll men are equal” in the declaration of independence.

          • LHathaway

            hehe, I’m predicting a vote for racial partition during the presidential election of 2044. It could take much longer than that, but that’s my guess. I honestly don’t know if it will be racial separation, or if ‘Whites’ will vote for a reservation for their group in the Pacific Northwest. Be interesting to see who would flee where., in either case.

            If I were you, I wouldn’t take ‘race realism’ too seriously. It’s mostly a crock. Just because those who profess to represent it (or because race realism’s ideas) make a lot of sense, and in fact, are obviously true, does not mean ‘race realism’ has all the answers. I would say a lot of it wishful thinking. Heck, I’ve heard it said humans have only one instinct – a fear of falling. Sometimes caring for children on the part of human mothers is considered an instinct.

          • thomasdosborneii

            LHathaway–I’ve read a couple of books on “the race war”, that the authors are serious about believing that will happen. I don’t believe it, myself, but who knows. Anyway, they seem quite clear as to how the country would be divided up, and since I love geography, that subject interests me just for that discussion alone. The Southwest, including the southern half of California, would be Hispanic, the Southeast (except for Southern Florida, which would also Hispanic–Cuban) would be Black, the Northeast would be White–Jewish, and the Northwest, Northern California, and Middle America would be non-Jewish white.

            This makes a certain sense based on the populations that are in those zones already, but I see lots of problems with it. For one thing, all kinds of people live all over the place, so lots and lots of people would have to “be moved” and they would be very unhappy (me, too; if I wanted to live in the Pacific Northwest, I would be there already, but I don’t like constant rain). For another thing, the Southern states, while they have the largest concentration of Black people, also have the most tightly fused to the land White people of all. I would almost imagine that if there were this “race war”, then the Whites of the South would kill every single Black person rather than have those Southern lands become the Black country and make those Whites move somewhere else.

            Another monkey wrench in those works are the mixed race people. I don’t know how many there are, but I think quite a few, and where are the supposed to end up? Families with mixed marriage children or relatives are not going to want to be broken up. Also, Asians are left out of the equation, and for that matter, Moslems, Indians (dot) and Indians (feather).

            Outside of the idea of a race war, but considering that this country may want to “send people back to where they came from”, American Blacks do not have any more claim to living in Africa than I would, say, to living in the British aisles. Except for actual born-in-Africa immigrants living in the US, Blacks in America, on the whole, have been in the US since the 1600s. If we are on the side of the Afrikaners in South Africa who say that THEY belong in their homeland in South Africa where they have been as long as White colonists have been in North America, then Blacks have as much of a home in North America as the Whites do.

            Separations may work out by neighborhoods, or city subdivisions, or counties, but I don’t think much grander than that. It wouldn’t be like the Czech Republic and Slovakia, or Yugoslavia, for example. Maybe more like the Dominican Republic and Haiti, or Borneo where you have Brunei, Malaysia, and some of Indonesia on the same island, or Papua New Guinea and also another portion of Indonesia. Speaking of Indonesia, it is amazing that it has remained “one country”. I wonder how long that will last?

          • LHathaway

            I’m more interested in the race vote , , ,

      • Jefferson

        Who would play Ernesto ? George Lopez ? Antonio Banderas ? Danny Trejo ? Jay Hernandez ? Michael Pena ?

        • StillModerated

          Emilio Estevez!

        • Felix_M


    • Luca

      Remember the headline story about an illegal immigrant who became a brain surgeon? I remember thinking at the time, My God, they actually found the one person who in 20 million to do a story about. Think of the tens of thousands of drunk drivers, drug dealers, car thieves, burglars, murderers,rapists and their victims that never get mentioned. What the Liberal press forgets to highlight is that Dr. Hinojoso looks almost European and went through the proper channels to become legal in 1997. Instead, they are leading the sheep to believe what a good thing illegal immigration is and how everyone is entitled to a better life over here.

      They have no shame…only an agenda.

      • newscomments70

        And let us not forget pedophiles. Several children are raped in the US every day by illegal aliens. I don’t know the exact number, but it is staggering. I think it is about 120 per day.

      • Greg Thomas

        For every potential brain surgeon who violates our sovereignty, we get hundreds of thousands of dead beats and gang bangers, who only come here to take and leech off the American people.

    • JackKrak

      I can see it now – Morgan Freeman as the President whose conscience drives him to make a stand for what’s right and show us the true meaning of America as the music swells when he signs an order abolishing our national borders. Beyonce as the Haitian immigra……….undocumented worker who spends 32 hours a day sewing American flags in a sweatshop run by Leonardo DiCaprio so she can take care of her chirren and send money back to her 64 relatives so they can keep a health clinic/school/orphanage running. Eva Longoria is the Mexican field worker who actually keeps Tom Cruise’s farm from going under because he is so incompetent (and corrupt, arrogant & cruel).
      Directed by Steven Spielberg.

      • StillModerated

        I smell Oscar!

  • It’s time for me to start preparing my list of fake republicans, so I can vote them out at midterms next year.
    Better yet, it is probably better to just vote straight ticket democrat, except the few hard core right wingers.
    Are you listening Republican Party? I know you have your spies keeping an eye on us racist, bigots here. Keep ignoring this issue, and you will be targeted for the unemployment line, where an affirmative action hire will deny you benefits.

    • C_C_Conrad

      I did that in the last presidential election.

      • StillModerated

        I’d rather the system go down the toilet with a socialist at the helm. It might take 4 or 5 flushes and some plunger action, though.

      • george00

        So you voted for Obama.

        • C_C_Conrad

          Yes. I am of the belief that people will not get off their seat & on their feet until they HURT. Worse is better in my book.
          Jack’s War

    • Will White

      White republicans don’t care about their race.fake or non fake.

      • george00

        But the Democrats are worse.

        • Nathanwartooth

          How exactly?

          At least Democrats are open about hating Whites and wanting to import millions of non Whites.

          • Bad_Mr_Frosty

            I always said the Republicans were worse. The Democrats are wolves, the Republicans are wolves in sheep clothing.

          • george00

            This is in reply to kjh64, Nathanwartooth and Bad_Mr_Frosty:It is a fact that without the Republicans voting against the Dream Act and the last Amnesty bill those two bills would have passed. Did you want those two bills to become the law of the land? Yes there are some Republicans that are just as stupid as Democrats regarding immigration but that does not change the fact that Republicans are better for our side than Democrats.

          • Republicans on the back bench level have pretty good if not perfect instincts on immigration. Except they pay too much attention to BAPF pied piper think tanks (Heritage Foundation) that have been bought and paid for by the parts of the cheap labor lobby that would rather have their cheap labor have legal immigrant visas rather than be illegal at first then later amnestied.

    • george00

      It was mainly Republicans that kept the last amnesty bill from passing and kept the “Dream Act” bill from passing. Unless you want more nonwhite immigration and Affirmative Action your ideas are apparently based on ignorance or stupidity.

      • kjh64

        While the republicans on average aren’t as bad as the democrats on immigration, there have been plenty of pro-amnesty republicans. Dubya was the one that wanted the last amnesty attempt and Reagan was the one that gave us the “one-time amnesty”. Many republicans are in with big business that wants to drive down labor and lower wages. Many republicans think amnesty will be the way for them to get the “latino vote”.

      • Bill

        The ONLY way we are ever going to return this country to what it was, is to KILL the Republican Party by fleeing it for a viable, STRONG, pro-white third party led by an intelligent, articulate, acceptable, rational, and Pro-White truly conservative leader. I am NOT talking about the Constitution Party which always promotes some unknown loser as their candidate, nor about the Libertarian Party which is fiscally conservative but liberal in every other way. As long as we only have the ability to pick liberal lite or Liberal Exponential as our choices, The Liberal Exponential will always win, and the liberal lite will keep betraying us. We NEED a Tea Party with GUTS. One which will form AS A PARTY and not stand around as a bull horn for the Republican Party’s conservative base. One which will NOT be afraid to stand on common sense platform of conservative planks like America for Americans, Deportation of All Illegal Aliens, Secure Borders, Divestiture of Thrid World parasitical nations looking for handouts, Absolute Adherence to the Bill of Rights, etc. The time is NOW. We need such a party established and out there for the next Presidential election…….IF there ever is one again.

        • Peoplesjustice

          The American Freedom Party, previously known as the American Third Position. It is still small, but growing and dignified through its leadership (not a bunch of losers).

  • MekongDelta69

    At the risk of repeating myself (from yesterday):

    Operation Wetback” under Eisenhower.

  • white man awakening

    Let US do to mexicans as Mexico does to US Americans. Throw them out~ They have invaded us.

    • C_C_Conrad

      You hit the nail on the head. Give that man a ceegar. This has never been an immigration problem, it’s an invasion.

  • JohnEngelman

    What part of the word “illegal” don’t the leaders of both parties understand?

    • So CAL Snowman

      the “ill” part?

      • JohnEngelman

        Let me spell it out for them: i – l – l – e – g – a – l.

        • Son of Lurch

          Wrong Mengleman. They are undocumented democrats. Enjoy the richness of diversity.

      • DudeWheresMyCountry?

        The Mexican part. Essentially the entire immigration issue is about the Mexican invasion of The USA. Cockroach infestations are difficult to ignore.

    • jambi19

      That’s why they are trying to turn “illegal” into a PC no – no. “How can you say Pablo is illegal? No one is illegal. You must be racist.”

      • Felix_M

        Ain’t working any more. With forms of communication now available to us, we’re able to have an honest conversation with each other. We no longer depend on official channels to control the conversation.

      • Peoplesjustice

        Pablo is illegal.

    • a multiracial individual

      “Non-documented, economy growing associates”

      I just made that one up. Think the PC crowd will send me a check?

      • JohnEngelman

        Congratulations! That is even better than “undocumented workers.”

    • Nathanwartooth

      Shouldn’t you be thrilled?

      Your democrats will become the only party of a one party state.

      • JohnEngelman

        Like a number of posters here I welcome the demise of the Republican Party. During an era in which most Americans decline economically while the rich get richer the Republican Party promotes policies that increase the wealth and power of the rich.

        • mobilebay

          And the Democrats would like to give away all our wealth to the foreign invaders. If I had a choice, I’d rather see Americans get rich, than those who break into our country and laugh at our laws. Both parties have many sins to atone for.

      • a multiracial individual

        Everyone in the GOP should make the switch to the Libertarian party. After this, more democrats will abandon their prosperous, yet corrupt ship out of principle. I’m dreaming of course, but it would be nice.

        • BeyondLivid

          No way, there is this self-destructive streak in the libertarians that I have met and it goes kind of like, “Everyone has a right to be here.”. No way! No how! We ought to treat citizenship like a country club membership. We have around 50 million undesireables in this country, we don’t need anymore.

          • a multiracial individual

            Okay, so the GOP can give up on: Climate change, abortion, and gay marriages. There I secured a few million more votes for the GOP.

          • Or, start appealing to white people as white people. There, I just got 10 million or more votes out of the woodwork of the universe of white people that doesn’t vote because they don’t think they have a dog in the race nor a real choice on the ballot.

          • a multiracial individual

            You may be right, but I think most young whites are not ready to be racially conscious. I really think subterfuge is necessary.

          • Funny thing happens to young whites. They almost all turn into middle aged whites.

          • a multiracial individual

            I’m sorry, I meant that few whites my age will EVER become race conscious, and GOP is close to losing this generation forever.

          • Chicken little ramblings we hear every generation. Yeah, the GOP as currently constituted is on its way to becoming a non-entity, because of and only because of racial demographics and their desire for gibsmedat welfare.

          • a multiracial individual

            Of course, the Hispanization of America is not helping the GOP any. Your observation is accurate. Although, I think that the GOP needlessly alienating too many Whites.

            [If Gov. Romney had secured 2-3% more of the White vote he could have won]

            -Jared Taylor, 1:47, “The 2012 Election: What it Means for Whites”


            Are there White gays, environmentalists,and feminists that are troubled by racial displacement, but not more than these other issues? Of course there are. Are there enough that would have voted GOP if the party was more friendly to gays, women, and environmentalists? I’m not sure.

          • White gays, environmentalists and feminists already have a perfectly good political party for which to vote to serve their interests. It’s called the Democrats.

            So where do we get our extra votes? Easy, from the universe of white non-voters. But remember, I’m using “our” very loosely in this case, because I’m not in this just to play partisan “yay red team boo blue team” or “yay blue team boo red team” games. Proof of that is that I’ve only been a paid campaign staffer four times in the ten biennial election cycles that have occurred since I turned 17 years old (not that that’s a legal age minimum, but that’s when my political beliefs started to harden). One of those four was not for a Republican candidate, but instead for a Constitution Party candidate, which meant the goal wasn’t winning, but surpassing a certain percentage threshold. It’s just that I knew the candidate and he knew me both mutually for quite a few years, and we both know we knew what we were doing.

            If I wanted to be a mere Karl Roverrated style barnacle in the barnacle class all along, I could have been that, but that would have required me to have been nothing more than a partisan. But I’m in this “business” to see certain things done, not just to cheer for people wearing a certain color kit.

          • ConcernedYoungAmerican

            Bingo! Myself and so many other younger white people would vote Republican if they gave up on the archaic social conservatism.

          • a multiracial individual

            I have been harrased significantly here for suggesting that we should allow gays to get married. Many of my opponents think young whites will return to social conservatism, they are daydreaming. It is impossible to exaggerate how much young people dislike most of the GOPs social platform.

          • ConcernedYoungAmerican

            I personally think allowing gay marriage should be a conservative stance, as it strengthens the relationships of many good people and therefore strengthens society. Some of the gays/lesbians I know are extremely race-conscious as well. Those who oppose it will be on the wrong side of history, just as those that attempted to forge an artificial, multicultural society will be on the wrong side of history as well.
            And you’re absolutely right about the vast majority of young people finding social conservatism abhorrent.

          • concernedcollegekid

            I just saw this conversation and totally agree with both of you guys (you and a multiracial individual).

            I have a very smart gay cousin who sort of indirectly admitted to race realism when we were talking about politics over Christmas. We were talking about the ethics of doing research into the heritability of intelligence or something, and he said something very close to “They’re going to avoid it for longer than they should because they’re afraid of what they’re going to find and they know they’re not going to like it.”

            Anyone who met him would assume he was a liberal, although he describes himself as “kind of a libertarian”. I think a lot of smart young white people who aren’t super into PC, even fairly liberal-minded ones, are starting to understand what the actual deal is with race…

          • ConcernedYoungAmerican

            That’s a very astute and, of course, correct observation on your cousin’s part. The differing opinions on gay rights is totally a generational thing (even though my parents’ generation has come around to supporting them), but race consciousness is definitely cross-generational and will always be so. I wish the older folks would realize that gay people just want to be left alone for the most part and be treated equally under the law; they should also realize the net-benefit they are to society: Many are race-conscious, are rich, and have led the charge to reverse-colonize cities by gentrifying them and making them safe for other whites that actually do want to live in urban areas.

          • “Harassed,” as in criticized.

            And again, a funny thing happens to young white people — Almost all of them become middle aged white people.

        • Birger_Skruddusvingen

          “Everyone in the GOP should make the switch to the Libertarian party.”

          But aren’t Libertarians gernerally pro-free immigration?

          No, switch to the Constitution Party instead. That’s the party I think I would vote for if I had the misfortune of living in the USA (Useless Shambles of Apathy).

  • bigone4u

    I’m a friendly generous fellow. When the time comes, point me to the nearest deportation center and I’ll help them pack their bags.

  • CaptainCroMag

    I’m tired of the term illegal immigrant. They are not immigrants. They are foreign invaders. I wonder what the poll numbers would show if people were asked if we should deport all foreign invaders? Call them what they are. I’m sick of the distortions.

    • mobilebay

      We should be very glad that this, and several previous administrations, were not in charge on Dec. 7, 1941. The white flags would have been waving all over DC.

    • Felix_M

      I’m old fashioned and prefer the standard tried and true term. They’ll always be illegal aliens to me.

  • Bordertown Bill

    We no longer have a representative government. The will of the people is ignored. Those toads we sent to Washington must be held accountable for how they vote! Such arrogance must not go unpunished.

  • Felix_M

    Americans see that a 2nd amnesty is not just an outright betrayal of the country’s citizens, but of previous generations and of the children to come of the lawful citizenry.

    People who can think clearly, (which excludes professional politicians, professional community activists and leftists in general), see that this debate over amnesty is a FARCE. With regard to a 2nd amnesty, Marx got it right: History does repeat itself, first as tragedy [1986] and then as farce [2013].

  • Felix_M

    There is discussion on Capitol Hill about cutting Social Security and Medicare to future recipients. While that may be a topic for a different forum, to even consider these things while demanding we amnesty tens of millions of illegals, who’ll take trillions more from the public coffers than they ever put in is insane and immoral.

    At this juncture, everyone who opposes amnesty should regard everyone who supports it, unless they pay for the benefits of illegals out of their own personal wealth, as a traitor to the country.

    • mobilebay

      Felix_M…I like your use of the word “immoral.” I’ve long known continuing to allow the invasion of our country was insane, but I never thought of it as immoral. However, you’ve nailed it. Its defination is – not following accepted rules of right or wrong behavior. Our elected officials certainly do not follow the right behavior when it comes allowing the destruction of our nation, therefore they are an immoral lot. Let’s keep reminding them of that.

      • Felix_M

        Our “leaders” may not have ever considered it but their hold their offices in trust to the public, and not just in trust to this generation but to the people who worked for this country in previous generations and for the future generations of Americans. In giving away their country’s patrimony, something they don’t own but which is entrusted to them, they are effectively surrendering to robbery without firing a shot in defense.
        This issue is MUCH bigger than just another amnesty. It’s about whether the rule of law survives and whether a country’s leaders will uphold the rights of its citizens or whether or not they will succumb to political expediency.
        1986 was only the opening act. We all knew that eventually act II would follow, which was precisely why so many of George W. Bush’s own party would have happily strung him up (slowly even) when he tried to ram amnesty through in 2006.
        That our “leaders” are now even discussing an amnesty is such a farce And, the entire world knows that when/if they surrender this time, it’ll only be a matter of time until they surrender again. When they surrender, we’ll all know that the US’s transformation to a banana republic is complete.

    • Birger_Skruddusvingen

      “At this juncture, everyone who opposes amnesty should regard everyone who supports it, unless they pay for the benefits of illegals out of their own personal wealth, as a traitor to the country.”

      Why the “unless” part?

      • Felix_M

        Why the “unless” part?

        I want to see them back down when they refuse to put their money where their hypocritical mouths are. Playing Good Samaritan on someone else’s dime is too easy.

  • C_C_Conrad

    “They have no shame…only an agenda.”
    The agenda is white genocide, it always has been. Read Revolution from Above.

    jack’s War

  • guest

    “The will of the people isn’t even an option on the politicians’ table.”
    As if the politicians ever really cared about the people. All they really want is money and power, they don’t care about the well-being of this country and the people.

  • DudeWheresMyCountry?

    Whenever I hear Libs or Mexican nationals spew their vile rhetoric I think we should start an organization titled something like, “Nigerians to Mexico, for diversity” and just pump up this idea that Mexico isn’t diverse and that it needs millions of Africans and South Asians to utilize their infrastructure and influence their culture and economy. Make them answer why they aren’t for this… and watch the rats squirm for cover.

  • NYB

    All of the forecasts predict mass immigration into Europe and America will continue through 2030 and beyond – banks and governments are setting lending and borrowing policies based on this.

    The contrary opinions of citizens mean nothing to them. They scoff at ‘the will of the people’ as a quaint notion which they’ve trampled over with impunity.

    • Nathanwartooth

      That’s because they have rigged the election system and I’m not talking voter fraud.

      You or me can’t run for office. We don’t have enough power or influence. Maybe for mayor of a small town or at the most state senator.

      Anything higher? Forget about it. They have made it so that it costs so much money to run that the original intent of the government is gone.

      They know that the masses can’t run for office, only vote. Basically stripping us of most of the power. If we vote out one traitor there are 10 more lined up to take their place.

      • Bad_Mr_Frosty

        exactly, it costs at least a billion dollars to run for president. Only the ultra-wealthy donors have enough money (influence) to decide who gets to run. You’ll notice a lot of corporate donors fund both campaigns.

  • kjh64

    We don’t need to “fix” our immigration system, just enforce our immigration laws. If we do this, these 35? million illegals will mostly deport themselves.

  • concernedcollegekid

    White Americans are not bad people. But if several million of us flew to Japan or China, demanded that they grant us citizenship, and refused to leave, the Japanese or Chinese would have the right to resort to drastic measures to get us out of their country. It wouldn’t mean they were “racist” against white Americans, it would mean WE were ILLEGAL INVADERS.
    What, exactly, is different about this situation?

    • bigone4u

      Look up the book Camp of the Saints by a French authorJean Respail. It describes what happens when hundreds of thousands flee India on ships bound for Europe. Take em in or turn em back? Often described as racist, which it’s not, the book is available as a free pdf here:

      • Felix_M


    • Felix_M

      Well said.

    • Ssd

      But White Americans ARE “bad” by anyone’s metric. Lefties think white Americans are evil for using black slaves, I think they’re evil (maybe “damned” is a better word) for giving feral blacks full civic rights, after slaughtering their countrymen that opposed them. Abolition was original sin on a national level coupled with Cain killing Abel. Were we supposed to be heroes for freeing Negroes? Instead of being known as the only society to end slavery we became known as chumps more than willing to slaughter eachother over abstract concepts and the benefit of racial strangers. White Americans have been an easy mark ever since.

      Mexicans are not only “not bad people”, they’re arguably more value to society than blue state white atheist liberal faggots, certainly more valuable than the blacks that white people worship. Mexicans have God, a slightly bastardized yet still pleasant romance language, spicy food, good work ethic, family values….. Pretty much everything blacks and whites lack.

      • DudeWheresMyCountry?

        Family values? That is hilarious.

        • Felix_M

          Family values to republicans must now mean two unmarried people siring 12 children and expecting the public to pay for them.

          Democrats don’t even know the term family values.

  • a multiracial individual

    Only citizens can vote so what is the problem with being strident about immigration?

    • GeneticsareDestiny

      Only citizens can legally vote. But don’t think that stopped Jose and Sanchez from casting straight-ticket Democrat votes during the last election. Obama and most Democratic politicians know they have a massive bastion of support among illegals, one that could potentially give them control of the country forever, as long as they do the requisite pandering and try not to get caught before passing amnesty.

      That’s why they’re so ardent in their opposition to any kind of voter-ID laws. They know that they can’t win elections (particularly presidential ones) on white support alone, and having the blacks as their perma-voting-block is no longer enough now that they’ve lost a large portion of the white working class. They need Hispanics, and as many of them as they can get.

      They’re counting on that massive Hispanic birthrate and continued rates of immigration. But they also need to legalize the illegals before conservative whites can convince enough liberal whites that voter-ID laws are necessary.

      Therefore, it’s full-speed ahead on amnesty.

      • David Ashton

        How you can get across this painfully obvious stuff to stop the development?

  • libertarian 1234

    This government…from Congress to the Oval Office….. has become unresponsive to its citizens……..and ineffective also.

    The best that can be hoped for when writing any of them is a form letter in return, and sometimes no reply at all.

    The only truly effective government would be one that was set up to vote on issues by referendum. Let the people decide what they want.

    Since we’ll never ever be able to manage that, the only other option is secession into sovereign areas according to race and politics.

  • StillModerated

    More than half of U.S. citizens believe that most or all of the country’s 11 million illegal immigrants should be deported …

    So, in this wacky democracy where the crude lead the crud, our leaders will do the exact opposite. The jury box and the ballot boxes have failed, reach for the cartridge box.

  • LastBastionOfHope

    I wonder what the Mexicans would say in Mexico if we invaded their borders, took over towns, whistled at their 13 yr old girls and loitering at night being all shady. I wonder what Mexicans would say if we got free healthcare, free money, and free education there. I wonder what they would say if we stole their jobs, refused to speak Spanish, and waved American flags around claiming Mexico was our land and we had a right to it.

    • kjh64

      They would be furious but THAT would never happen. Mexicans aren’t that stupid to allow this.

    • Greg Thomas

      Mexicans would NEVER allow that to happen. They take their soverenghty serious. Thye have always believed that mexico is for mexicans, Their constitution makes that very clear.

      • ConcernedYoungAmerican

        Exactly. What’s highly ironic about Mexico is that they have built a wall between themselves and Guatemala, believing the Central Americans to be the “true peasants.”

  • potato78

    If not deported, what’s the point we call them illegal immigrants.

  • sbuffalonative

    Polls in the past have been in the 80% range favoring deportation. I suspect they’re refining the questions to lower the numbers but they still can’t get the numbers to a clear minority.

  • Jefferson

    Puerto Ricans are considered “legal U.S citizens” so the issue of illegal immigration is not really important to them because their status in this country is considered secured. Puerto Ricans never have to worry about being deported by ICE.

    So how does The Stupid Party a.k.a the GOP, explain the fact that over 80 percent of Puerto Rican voters still continue to vote Democrat in presidential elections ?

  • Anon

    This isn’t news. It’s not news because any doubt that it was true was pure fantasy and propaganda (propaganda put out by who will answer who the next world war is going to be fought against). Almost all whites have wanted almost zero immigration, from the very beginning of this country. Or rather, the ONLY immigrants anyone has ever wanted are the useful ones that are almost exactly like ourselves.

    Yet, despite that several hundred years intense resistance, we have balkanization of this country. That is the story that needs to be told, spread far and wide…and, quite frankly, the reason why Americans are stocking up on military grade weapons (the real reason). What is know to a few must be known to all so that we can fight back effectively and with reason.

    Failure to do so will mean a GENOCIDAL war. Us or them. Americans need to wake up but not for the reasons you probably think. We need reasonable solutions to the inappropriate behavior of a few. The longer we go without them, the more likely the matter will be handled with slaughter and mayhem. Which is A solution. Not the best one, not even a good one. But it is A solution. After that slaughter, whites will no longer go along like sheep but will learn to defend our territory like wolves. What might we lose if we become that?

    • Bad_Mr_Frosty

      I honestly believe we are already way beyond the point of peaceful resolution. If we made major changes decades ago we probably could have avoided bloodshed. Non-Whites are being used as biological weapons against the native White populations. When enough White people wake up to the fact, it’s going to get really ugly.

  • generalquagmyer

    The attittude of even the basically good-natured illegal immigrants I deal with on a daily basis is this:
    “You gringos can make your laws and argue about them and talk yourselves blue in the face. We’ll just hang around until, inevitably, you decide it’s too much trouble to deport all of us and we get amnesty again. It’s kind of crazy to go to such a fuss when everyone knows from the start what the end result will be, but go ahead and chatter to your hearts content. We’ll wait you out.”
    They’re not quite as articulate as all that, but it’s a fair summary of the sentiment. I’m not sticking up for them by any means, but can we really blame them for feeling that way?

    • GeneticsareDestiny

      I’ve known (otherwise) conservative whites who have a similar feeling about it. “Well, sure, it would be nice to get rid of the illegals…but you know liberals are never going to let us do it. Eventually they’ll convince enough Republicans to go along with it and they’ll pass an amnesty. Why even bother fighting about it?”

      They’ve bought into the MSM’s constant chatter about how wonderful immigration of all kinds is that they seriously believe most of the country is against them. If there’s one thing I can say for liberals: they’re extremely good at propaganda.

    • kjh64

      “I’m not sticking up for them by any means, but can we really blame them for feeling that way?”
      Also, if we are willing to give our country away to them, can we really blame them for taking it? Why should they respect us when we just hand over our country, jobs, money and everything else? If a man opened up his home and told the public, “come on in, take whatever you want”, wouldn’t people do it? Could you blame them?

  • rightrightright

    The fears and wishes of Americans will be derided as “populism”. This is happening in the European Union already. The Eurocrats also smoothly talk of the “post democratic age”. Much easier to slither away from democracy if the populations are imported from the third world and have no knowledge of or interest in democracy in the first place. These millions of imports will happily sell their vote in someone else’s country for a mess of pottage.

  • Token Finn

    I’m not sure if this relates to this directly but I seem to remember a 60’s movie starring Rock Hudson or some other male sex symbol of the era. It had plenty of mexicans in it and there was a scene where a restaurant owner refused to have mexican customers, so what happened? Hudson or related star was depicted as pummeling the ‘evil racist’ to a pulp in a heroic fashion, in his own restaurant if memory serves. So it goes back a long time. In 1970, Finland took away the right of private businesses to discriminate by ethnicity, which made it easy for gypsies (our diversity of the time) to steal, trash and intimidate business owners.

    • Unperson

      You are describing the final scene from the movie Giant, from way back in 1955. The movie is a very early example of Hollywood pushing an “anti-racist” agenda. The Texas diner owner doesn’t want to serve Rock Hudson and Elizabeth Taylor’s Mexican daughter-in-law and her mixed-race baby. Hudson gives this “bigot” — who was, after all, only exercising his rights in pre-Civil Rights Act America — a long and thorough thumping with which the audience is invited to sympathize. Afterwards, Taylor gushes to Hudson how she’d never felt prouder of her husband or more in love with him, than when he was giving that nasty ol’ racist what-for. Then we get a long, lingering shot of a white baby and a Mexican baby sharing a crib, representing the biracial nature of Texas’ future. Fade out. The End.

      …Which is too bad, because prior to that sappy, propagandistic ending, the film (which was James Dean’s last) is really very good.

      • Bossman

        I got some news for you: Both Elizabeth Taylor and Rock Hudson could have had a touch of the native in their backgrounds. That is the great and hidden story of America. Mexico is part of native America. The story continues.

  • Anan7

    I am in this majority of Americans. I do not relish how our people (the people who made this nation great) are viewed as “racists” while others enjoy the benefits of affirmative action at our expense.

    If I were president, shipping the Mexicans back to Mexico would be my top priority.

    We should also ban immigration from Puerto Rico and make them independent.

    • DudeWheresMyCountry?

      Ban virtually all immigration. Immigration, what a funny word. They used to have another word for this… it is conquest.

  • sickandtired

    I think that all people that are in this country illegally should be sent out of the country and not be able to apply for legal entry for a set period of time. The hoopla about calling them illegal or aliens is a bunch of leftist crap used to provoke emotions. Those people ARE illegal. The yeither snuck acrooss the border or they over stayed their visa…the document that allows them to be here legally for a certain period of time.
    This new push for amnesty is simply to buy votes…..bribery if you will.
    Illegal aliens are bringing in diseases that we practically eliminated in this country where as legal immigrants have to undergo physical exams and testing for diseases.
    This administrtion is so bold and in your face about breaking the law that they had KNOWN illegal aliens at the state of the union address…..and the news reported on it.

  • Bad_Mr_Frosty

    The media and government are talking to themselves. The White population never wanted any of this. Even segregation was supported by the majority of people. When the laws were passed, the media made it seem as if segregation supporters were a minority. The same is happening here, by saturating the media with pro-amnesty sentiment, they are trying to make anti-immigration patriots seem like a minority.

  • Nemo

    You won’t see this reported in the media. In fact, yesterday USA Today had front cover which proclaimed that the public supported Hussein on all issues. 1. None of those issues they polled showed the emperor receiving majority support 2. When asked about this issue itself without including his majesty, a majority of the public (and a much larger number of white Caucasians) oppose him, as evidenced by this poll. All USA today’s poll did was show how woefully incompetent and uninformed the average voter is.

    Do not ever let anyone tell you that we don’t have a state-run media. We essentially do. The same people who run the government also run those disinformation factories.

  • PesachPatriot

    It seems that after all these years president lincoln’s opposition to the mexican-american conflict in 1845 when he was an Illinois senator was correct and far thinking. The pols of the time only saw the land and riches, not the insoluble long term conflict and tension it would create.

    The 11 million number is definitely inaccurate considering that number was thrown around while bush was still the president. Its probably closer to 14 or 15 million today with at least half under the age of 18. The problem boils down to borders being just lines drawn on a map by politicians and generals. Now that transportation is fairly cheap people in 3rd world countries will always try to sneak into humane western countries with semi-decent economies and generous welfare benefits. Europe will always draw people from asia and africa, but they at leas have the mediterranean to slow the tide down, anyone from mexico to the very bottom of south america can simply start walking slowly north. The very worst thing that will happen is being placed in a relatively safe american jail where they are provided food and medical care, then being returned to mexico to try again next week.

    • DudeWheresMyCountry?

      Don’t get too carried away with giving their fake historical grievance over The Southwest any credence. The Spanish Empire claimed and colonized The Southwest, not Mexicans. Mexicans were never in The Southwest and have to cultural or ethnic ties to it. Mexico, upon independence from Spain had these lands by de facto on a map but had less people on these lands than Americans even did, and they only had pseudo control of these far off lands on their maps for less than thirty years.

      Remember if there was no America and these Mexicans were running into The Southwest (they wouldn’t without the Western welfare state and technology anyway) they would have been scalped by the Apache, Ute and Comanche Indians in those areas.

      No ties to this land at all. It is a fantasy of the left and La Raza.

      • PesachPatriot

        I’m sorry if I was misunderstood…I believe very firmly that the southwest and texas belong to america and we don’t need any more illegal immigration, but unlike Israel which is very small and has the political will to defend its borders, the american-mexico border is gigantic and also a vital corridor for a multi-billion dollar illegal pharmaceutical industry. Large businesses here crave cheap illegal labor so they have no interest in purchasing politicians to build a fence. I know how strict mexico’s laws against illegal immigration are. We simply need to enforce those same policies.

      • Bossman

        What exactly is a Mexican? A Mexican is a North American. North America is not only the U.S and Canada; it includes Mexico too. Most Mexicans are native Americans or partly native Americans. North America is their continent.

  • Guest

    I used to be somewhat liberal. I even voted for Gray Davis (liberal, communist CA governor). After living in California for 15 years, the only candidate I would vote for any office would be David Duke.

  • ConcernedYoungAmerican

    It’s not just whites that want them gone; I had a conversation with a tame black person the other day, and he said that Mexicans are driving up black people’s unemployment rates and ethnically cleansing blacks from neighborhoods in Los Angeles and Oakland. Why doesn’t Obama want to help “his people”?

    • Bossman

      Hispanics are his people too. They voted overwhelmingly for him. They don’t practice genocide on Blacks; they just screw them to produce more Hispanics.

  • John Galt

    I have said it a number of times ….. BOUNTY! Yes; a $500 a head bounty, dead or alive, on these illegal invaders.