Power Struggle over Indian Tribe Splinters into Violence in California

Ian Lovett, New York Times, February 28, 2012

For two months, after a disputed election, the fight for control of the Chukchansi Indian tribe was a standoff: two groups claimed to be the rightful tribal council, each holding separate meetings and appealing to the Bureau of Indian Affairs for official recognition. But the bureau said it was an internal tribal matter, and the two sides had to work it out on their own.

Here is what working it out on their own looked like: supporters of Morris Reid, who said he was elected the new tribal council chairman in December, cut locks and smashed a window to gain access to one of the tribal government offices early Monday morning.

Then late that night, across the street from the glittering Chukchansi Gold Resort and Casino, supporters of Reggie Lewis, the council chairman before the election, tried to smoke Mr. Reid out. Power to the building was cut. A window was broken. Bear spray was discharged into the building. A smoldering log was thrown inside. More windows were broken, and objects were thrown from the building.

The sheriff kept watch, but no arrests were made—on Indian land, he said he had no jurisdiction to deal with property damage.

The standoff finally ended on Tuesday, after a melee outside the building involving at least 20 people from the opposing sides. One man was stabbed in the abdomen, though he was expected to live, while a security guard was bashed over the head, and two suspects were detained. Only then did the local sheriff’s department come in from the sidelines, with more than 100 officers from multiple agencies, and begin clearing the premises. By day’s end, neither faction had control of the building.

“The Bureau of Indian Affairs said it was an internal tribal matter and we had to resolve it through a tribal process,” Mr. Reid said. “That means we had to take possession, and we tried to do that without breaking any laws.”

The fight for control of the Chukchansi is only the latest—and among the ugliest—in a long string of power struggles in tribes across the country. Whereas courts swiftly step in to decide disputed elections in most of the country, federal courts have no jurisdiction over Indian tribal lands, which are considered sovereign nations, while the Bureau of Indian Affairs, the agency responsible for maintaining the relationship between the federal government and Indian tribes, is hesitant to intervene in tribal squabbles.

With no external government agency to enforce the law, tribal elections frequently resemble elections in developing countries—sitting chiefs refuse to give up power, struggles for control sometimes turn violent and possession is at least nine-tenths of the law.


Nedra Darling, a spokeswoman for the Bureau of Indian Affairs, insisted that the tribal members would have to resolve the issue themselves.

“We hope the tribe will work through their tribal government issues and come to their solution soon,” she said.

Topics: ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Ah, the proud Indian names of Chief Morris Reid and Chief Reggie Lewis. I can’t blame the Indians for having a hard time choosing. I’m having a rather rough go of it myself.

    What a swindle. These Indians shouldn’t get one more penny from Whites. It just makes them lazy, entitled welfare bums. If it was supposed to do anything for the Indians the past century plus of reparations and concessions would have.

  • crystal evans

    Whites are spending tons of money at Indian owned casinos throughout this country. Control of these casinos is probably at the heart of the problems within the Native American tribes. I believe that the federal courts can intervene in tribal matters. For example, federal courts ordered the Cherokee Nation to reinstate decendents of Blacks who were once owned by the Cherokees onto their tribal rolls after the Cherokee Nation voted to remove them from the rolls.

    • Casinos only benefit the connected and the top tier of the Indians. The 1 percent if you will. There will always be the tribes getting big time money off it and almost all of it goes to the top. A tiny little sliver of wampum goes to the rest of the Indians but the ones at the top live like kings.

      This is provided that the tribe is well-connected enough politically to even get casino rights. Most aren’t.

      • crystal evans

        I read once where the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians have a casino in Cherokee, NC. They wanted to remove people from the tribal rolls who they felt were not Indian. This tribe is unique in that 50% of the earnings of the casino are given back to tribal members once a year as per capita money. Adults get a check  every year and children have their money placed in a trust fund for their education. The main issue here is that they wanted to remove people so that more money can given to the remaining members.

  • JackKrak

    Ah, yes, the proud & noble people who were living in peace and harmony with nature and each other when the white man cruelly took everything from them.

    Do Indians ever make the make the news for anything apart from the casino business or something related to the terrible pathologies that exist in EVERY Indian community in America?

  • crystal evans

    Asians usually go to Las Vegas rather than Indian casinos.