Posted on September 6, 2011

Academics Dub Tea Partyers Devout, Racist

Stephen Dinan, Washington Times, September 4, 2011


Gathering this weekend in Seattle for the annual American Political Science Association convention, several professors argued that tea party Republicans are more likely than other voters and more likely than most others in the GOP to harbor racial hostility, as judged by their answers in a broad pre-election survey administered in October.

“Tea Party activists have denied accusations that their movement is racist, and there is nothing intrinsically racist about opposing ‘big government’ or clean-energy legislation or health care reform. But it is clear that the movement is more appealing to people who are unsympathetic to blacks and who prefer a harder line on illegal immigration than it is to other Americans,” Gary C. Jacobson, a professor at the University of California at San Diego, wrote in his paper, “The President, the Tea Party, and Voting Behavior in 2010.”

In another paper, Alan I. Abramowitz, a professor at Emory University, crunched the numbers from the American National Election Studies’ October 2010 pre-election survey and drew up a portrait of tea party voters that found they are more likely than other Republicans to be registered to vote, to have contacted a public official or to have donated to a campaign. They also are generally older, wealthier and more likely to be evangelical.

Like Mr. Jacobson, Mr. Abramowitz also said they were more likely to harbor racial resentment, which he judged based on their answers to questions such as whether blacks could succeed as well as whites if they “would only try harder,” and whether they agreed with the statement that Irish, Italians and Jews overcame prejudice and “blacks should do the same without any special favors.”

Mr. Abramowitz said tea party supporters were substantially more likely than other voters to question how much effort black Americans are making to advance themselves, versus being held back by social factors.

“Tea Party supporters displayed high levels of racial resentment and held very negative opinions about President Obama, compared with the rest of the public and even other Republicans,” Mr. Abramowitz wrote. “In a multivariate analysis, racial resentment and dislike of Barack Obama, along with conservatism, emerged as the most important factors contributing to support for the Tea Party movement.”


52 responses to “Academics Dub Tea Partyers Devout, Racist”

  1. Anonymous says:

    Quite a list of elements to define racism. These profs don’t get out much. I wonder how they would define things if they had to run a business outside of the protected walls a academia.

  2. Sincerely Concerned says:

    So, now, they’re trying to make it academic that some whites are racist but especially those in the Tea Party. I cannot WAIT until the word “racist” becomes as ugly as the “n” word. Well, I better not wait at all. That’ll never happen. Actually, I should take this report as a positive. At least someone is finding out that white, male, wealthy, evangelical people still exist in this country and have a voice, however much they may disagree with them.

  3. Anonymous says:

    The professors are not tolerant of the diversity of thought exhibited by Tea party members. Ironic.

    Let’s summarize; hard working, politically active, successful, supportive of communities (including financial contributions). Apparently Tea party folk are somewhat older, tend to vote. The new, new racists.

    To me we are witnessing the equivalent of the Protestant reformation. Dissension within the ranks for a new system. Its not perfect, but its happening even if long overdue. Tea party members are non-violent but active. They have high expectations of all people.

    Equally important, the world can no longer tolerate supporting dysfunctional social policies funded with debt. Not just the US but the all the Western world. Change happens when the money runs out.

    Many characteristics of a functional black community have worsened since the formation of the Great Society. A dependent class has formed to where there is no striving. Entitlements have lead to groups becoming disabled. It can’t continue.

  4. E Pluribus Pluribus says:

    Academia is the theoretical arm of the Democratic Party. That a gathering of the Amerian Politial Science Association would present survey results purporting to show that “tea party Republicans are more likely than other voters . . . to harbor racial hostility” is perfectly predictable.

    It’s good to know, however, that there are occasional rebels in the liberal monolith that is American “higher” education. The “most talked about speech” of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology conference in San Antonio in January, for example, was by University of Virginia social psychologist Jonathan Haidt, who observed:

    “The fight for civil rights and against racism became the sacred cause unifying the left throughout American society, and within the academy . . . If a group circles around sacred values, they will evolve into a tribal-moral community. They’ll embrace science whenever it supports their sacred values, but they’ll ditch it or distort it as soon as it threatens a sacred value” (“Social scientist sees bias within,” New York Times, Feb. 7).

    Haidt illustrated by asking attendees how many considered themselves politically liberal. “A sea of hands appeared” among the 1,000 psychologists. When he asked for the conservatives, “he counted a grand total of three.”

    So it must be so with the American Political Science Association. The exchange of unkind words about Republicans would be as natural as breathing in such a setting.

  5. jack in chicago says:

    Can some of Amren’s loyal Jewish readers please contact Gary C. Jacobson, a professor at the University of California at San Diego and Alan I. Abramowitz, professor at Emory University and attempt to set them straight about racial realities, RACIST realities in America? Please share some hard facts about inter racial crime/rapes, and some personal experiences – the Crown Heights Pogrom in New York City ion August 19-21, 1991. These types need to be straighten out or marginalized and it is always best for various White groups to discipline idiots/traitors in their own community.

  6. HH says:

    Well, there it is in black and white – if you are realistic about the issue of race you are, by modern definition, a “racist.” In other words, play the Left’s game without question or dissent, or you will branded a bigot – it’s that simple.

  7. Anonymous says:

    Calling another a racist has become an over-used tactic to taint and subdue those who disagree with you. A test would be to have a conversation with someone, but prohibit the words racist, racism, bias, diversity and tolerance.

  8. Anonymous says:

    The Democrat Party is targeting the TEA Party because they see it as a treat to business as usual.

  9. Anonymous says:

    Liberals like to believe they have total racism immunity. And that the entitlement programs are a way to a better society. meanwhile the low expectations and funds transfers are bankrupting the country. And they are not helping those with limited human capital to do better. The time is over for knee-jerk altruism without contemplating the consequences. The leadership however with not come from our great universities.

  10. Anonymous says:

    Note the names of the researchers. That says it all.

    As for the Tea Party, they have not said or written one word about black on White crime or affirmative action.

    They are just one more conservative organization like Fox news that is no help whatsoever to White Nationalists.

  11. white is right, black is whack says:

    How dare anyone suggest you work hard, be responsible, not sleep around and not be a criminal or a lowlife. The nerve of some people I tell ya.

  12. Lucky Fiberals says:

    Aside from the “wealthy” part of the description, that’s pretty much describes me and how I think and I really don’t care anymore. If that’s what puts the “bigot” category on me…so freakin’ what.

    I’m sure the two “unbiased” authors of the studies live in close proximity to blacks with all the rich diversity trimmings that come with a neighborhood like that. Ya think?

  13. True Blue says:

    “…which he judged based on their answers to questions such as whether blacks could succeed as well as whites if they “would only try harder,” and whether they agreed with the statement that Irish, Italians and Jews overcame prejudice and “blacks should do the same without any special favors.”

    So, believing that someone should Not get special favors based on the color of their skin is the new definition of ‘racist’? And this is a ‘professor’? What does he teach, Orwellian NewSpeak?

    …and the sparks fly up.

  14. Joseph says:

    I wonder if they’d offer the same assessment of the:

    Congressional Black Caucus, NAACP, ADL, La Raza, M.E.Ch.A. and every other (non-White)race specific group.

  15. ExiledWhite says:

    What individuals like these liberal professors can’t SEE (since they cannot perceive reality clearly through their liberal idea-haze) is that Tea-Party members hold themselves to these same standards as they expect from African-Americans: everyone is better if they “work harder” and succeed without “special favors”, this is how NORMAL PEOPLE approach life, and expect the same from others.

  16. Anonymous says:

    Why do they call these commie infiltrators of academia, “academics?” Their ideology cancels out the objectivity required to be an intellectual or considered truly, an “academic.”

  17. BO_Bill says:

    Race Realists were first called ‘ignorant’ and then ‘bigoted’ by those preaching the New World Order gospel. These preachers could be countered with statistics and made to look foolish so the label applied to Race Realists was changed to ‘scared’.

    More accurate words would be ‘disinterested’, or ‘fed up’, or ‘angry’ depending on how close a person is to the impacts of 3rd World populations. Judging by the comments on Tea Party websites, there is a growing state of awareness in this group, and a significant percentage of Tea Party comments would not pass the decency filter here.

    Black behavior, the excuses for black behavior, and the impacts of 3rd World immigration are what they are. The Tea Party is positioned to observe, learn, and eventually develop policy proposals that reflect the interests of its membership. The reason that the establishment sees the Tea Party movement as a serious threat is because it is.

  18. Anonymous says:

    Poster 10, you are so right. The usual suspects, as always. Tea partiers are so scared of being called racists, they will keep very quiet on issues like immigration, anti-white violence, affirmative action, etc. I’m sure they’re being infiltrated by establishment types. Like Dick Armey, open-borders guy.

  19. Anonymous says:

    Maxine Waters, Jesse Jackson and now these pointy-headed intellectuals smoking their pipes, looking over their glasses and proudly pronouncing The Tea Party…racists! That does it, now I’m gonna join up. I enlisted once to help my country and I’ll do it again. Fellow racists, here I come!

    John from Arkansas

  20. Free State Paul says:

    “Lucky Fiberals” has the right idea. We must stop worrying about being called “racists.”

    There is nothing more pathetic than a white groveling to persuade a liberal that he is not a racist.

    If we called liberals “traitors,” do you think they’d lose a moment’s sleep?

  21. whiteraven says:

    Generally academians are about on a par with used car salesmen anymore. Whether it is due to repetitious brainwashing during their youth or just simply air headedness it is a fact that academia is responsible for some of the greatest politically correct liars in the country today.

    They also have a large number of educated morons as well, and it is blaringly apparent when they conduct research and studies. For example, study results revealed that poor whites did better academically than wealthy blacks, and the researchers were beside themselves with perplexing wonder as to how that could be, and they were ready to investigaste every unrelated possibility rather than admit the truth that blacks are genetically less intelligent, even when other data tells them the same thing.

    And why? Because their ideological mantra is that we are all the same. That is such a universal truth to them they can’t conceive of it being untrue. They can’t seem to be able to understand that they’ll never arrive at accurate assessments if their premises are based in lies.

    So they happily skip along in la la land, holding on to the same inaccurate knowledge ready to demonize anybody who presses them to tell the truth.

    I’m sorry. But, for the most part, academics are worthless ideologues who are about as objective and open-minded as a jihadist.

  22. Buster says:

    I don’t get it. If I think that Blacks could improve their lot without the help of Whites, that means I harbor racial resentment? So anyone who thinks that systematic oppression is not the only factor accounting for black unemployment, poverty, incarceration, etc., is automatically racist?

  23. Anonymous says:

    0 — Anonymous wrote at 7:22 PM on September 6:

    Note the names of the researchers. That says it all.

    As for the Tea Party, they have not said or written one word about black on White crime or affirmative action.

    They are just one more conservative organization like Fox news that is no help whatsoever to White Nationalists.


    I couldn’t agree more with your post.

    The TP are as clueless as the White libs when it comes to racial awareness. They will now begin to bend over backwards to “prove” they are not racists.. No, I think they have already done that since the beginning of their movement. They slobber all over Allen West and Herman Cain, the two black “conservatives”..That told me all I wanted to know about the TP.

  24. CDE says:

    Isn’t it interesting that these two “academic” Jews have a special racism detector but apparently didn’t see the black flash mobs attacking whites all over the country. Are they oblivious to the Muslims gaining power and influence in America? There are real threats to this country, and these dimwits are focused on the Tea Party. Pathetic!

  25. Lollard says:

    @3 — Anonymous, who wrote “…we are witnessing the equivalent of the Protestant reformation.”

    I very much agree. This is a major societal change, in which brave people are stepping forward, and a new and better world is beginning to emerge.

    And the bravery–in the end it consists mostly of shrugging off the fear of being called “racist”.

  26. Anonymous says:

    Shocking that the people who get to define what “racism” is would ask people about whom they’ve already made their decision anyway a series of loaded questions, and lo and behold, RACISTS ALL!

    That’s fine. No matter what you do they’re going to think that of you as long as you espouse conservative values without crawling at the feet of the statue of the black god Martin Luther King Jr.

    Frankly I think the Tea Party and others who are routinely tarred with the brush should step up and own the label. There are far worse things you can be in my opinion. Then we can turn it into our own term of endearment like the blacks and their N-word and the gays and their F-word. I don’t see how embracing the term could do any more damage than it already does while we spend all our time trying to deny it. I think if more people did embrace the term whites on the fence would see the world fail to come to an end and start to wonder what the whole big deal was for all those years.

    Could be a watershed moment.

  27. Anonymous says:

    Many Tea Partiers, being basically sensible people about affairs of state (certainly compared to leftists and even many ‘mainstream conservatives’ – what Lawrence Auster calls ‘right-liberals’) are indeed incipient Race Realists, even if they are unfamiliar with the term or wouldn’t accept it if they were familiar with it.

  28. sbuffalonative says:

    They are academics after all. They are said to be smarter than us, right?

    This is just another attack on the Tea Party.

    I remember the initial attacks on the Tea Party with unsourced claims that they were less educated and less intelligent. Even the New York Times couldn’t support that lie:

    Tea Party supporters are wealthier and more well-educated than the general public, and are no more or less afraid of falling into a lower socioeconomic class, according to the latest New York Times/CBS News poll.

  29. Anonymous says:

    These anti-white activist/academics betray themselves by pointing out the natural racial homogeneity of those opposed to policies which effectively enslave whites for the benefit of blacks (and anybody else that can be thrown onto the pile that is smothering the life out of white civilization).

    Tea Party types simply haven’t realized (or are so thoroughly brian-washed that they cannot see) WHY opposition to the policies they oppose puts them on “racist” ground. It is because those policies are the sinister machinations of anti-whites engaged in the destruction of white people worldwide.

    Opposition to the policies of white genocide MUST be racial, because race is the real issue from the very beginning. Being unaware of this is just like being unaware that continued breathing constitutes opposition to death. It’s a given, whether one thinks of it or not, or even if one denies it.

  30. Anonymous says:

    Wow he’s a genius! It appeals to people who are “unsympathetic to blacks”. That’s amazing!

    I have infinitely more sympathy for blacks than George Geovonni “Detroit” Thomas, Letalvis “Rome” Cobbins, Lemaricus Devall “Slim” Davidson, Vanessa Coleman, and Eric DeWayne “E” Boyd have for whites. That’s still not much sympathy but it’s still infinitely more.

    Why should I be sympathetic? They’ve swallowed up literally trillions of our tax dollars, and have made absolutely no progress, and would revert to a third world lifestyle within months of withdrawal of those funds which gush forth in the form of EBT cards, Section 8, AA government make-work jobs, and all these other racial wealth transfers.

    So yeah, I have sympathy, I wish they would and could improve themselves and join the rest of American society, but my sympathy stops when it comes to redistributing my wealth (such as it is) to them. No more from me, thank you!

  31. Anonymous says:

    The question is, friends; WHY SHOULD WE CARE?

    The lame epithet, “racist,” is dead.

    Racist means having an opinion and a preference. more than 90% of the world is racist.

    Most liberal whites are racist by their private feelings.


    I’m racist, and I’m proud.


  32. Anonymous says:

    Number 14… joseph…

    Would you *please* refer to these groups properly?

    They are Black Supremacist groups. Or, in the case of LaRaza, Hispanic Supremacist.

    Repeat it over and over, every time you hear NAAPC, shout BLACK SUPREMACIST GROUP!

    When you hear Black Caucus, shout BLACK SUPREMACIST GROUP!

    When you hear La Raza, shout MEXICAN SUPREMACIST GROUP!

    Everybody now! All together! Shout BLACK SUPREMACIST GROUP!

    Perhaps we’ll hear the end of everything being called a White Supremacist Group.

  33. Question Diversity says:

    Let’s look at this from a more practical angle.

    The American Political Science Association is a group of professors. They draw paychecks from either a public university heavily dependent on government, or a private university which gets a good share of its money directly or indirectly from government, save the few Hillsdale and Grove City type institutions which fastidiously avoid government money. I think they think the TPM and its smaller government agenda is a direct threat to their pocketbooks.

    The philosophical angle is that in spite of the TPM’s race problems (see 10 Anonymous and others above), the TPM is the closet thing to a direct full frontal threat to the way the ruling class does business, a threat to the big government/big business/big academia/big foundation/big culture mega-slopolis.

  34. Cui Bono? says:

    Tea Party supporters displayed high levels of racial resentment and held very negative opinions about President Obama.

    I have new found respect for the Tea Party Movement.

    As for the White-hating “professors”:

    Let me get this straight, MM. Jacobson and Abramowitz:

    If we Whites wish to preserve and advocate for our own race, the White race, that is “racist” and wrong? Is that what you’re saying MM. Jacobson and Abramowitz?

    Whites who resent our homelands flooded and ruined by destitute, low IQd nonwhites from the Third World are “racist”, right, MM. Jacobson and Abramowitz?

    Whites who object to paying for schools their own children cannot attend due to nonwhite violence, that is “racist”, correct, MM. Jacobson and Abramowitz?

    Whites striving to prevent a genocide that is descending worldwide on our people is “racist”, is that what you’re saying, MM. Jacobson and Abramowitz? It is, isn’t it?

    According to you, we “racists” are to shut the hell up and do what? Roll over and accept the genocide of our race while sending our young off to fight endless wars in the Middle East?

    You both are preaching pro-White genocide from the safety of your ivory towers, untouchable and protected by tenure. A genocide that won’t touch either of you. More are becoming aware of what you’re trying to do to our people judging from the comments above and elsewhere.

    I would say the following, but #10 has already stated the obvious:

    Note the names of the researchers. That says it all.

    And, always ask Cui Bono? There you’ll find the answers.

  35. Anonymous says:

    “They are just one more conservative organization like Fox news that is no help whatsoever to White Nationalists.”

    White citizens forming political blocks and petitioning for their own self-interests is white nationalism lite, and that is a good development even if we are not in full agreement with them on every issue. Smaller government overall benefits whites and limits assistance to non-whites.

  36. MAJ says:

    The Tea Party represents an economic threat on 2 levels, as #33 points out.

    There is the poverty industry where billions are spent to basically pay white caretakers to “help” blacks when the entire approach is flawed and counter-productive. Rather than address the problem they perpetuate the system and end up wasting everyone’s resources, productivity, and money.

    Brainwashed white social workers, family therapists, counselors, etc…are spurred on by justifications based on false pronouncements from idiots with titles like the ones who wrote the above paper.

    As for blacks, I doubt they really know the difference between the Tea Party and an Eighth Grade Graduation party, although no one gets shot at the former.

    What they do know, through white enablers, is that the Tea Party’s political beliefs means a possible big-time cut in freebies and entitlements. Blacks live off the government – that’s basically their livelihood – and thus they may have to work or live without cell phones or cable TV. They have become so dependent on this they basically have no clue as to how to survive should EBT cards and groveling white liberals disappear.

    On some level they know this is more serious than idle threats of the past. And, if they try and rebel, through riots or marches or screams of racism, this time they will be neutralized and locked down in a ghetto, or prison.

    To end black parasitic behavior and at least stabilize the dysfunctional black culture and return it to circa 1930, to some degree, you have to cut off the heads of the enablers, like the anti-white bottom feeders who came up with this nonsense study about the Tea Party.

    Remember, any cut in black benefits = racism and that’s why they are screaming. Blacks have no loyalty to the nation or sense of history or a shred of an idea of doing what’s best for their own problems. Being unable to look beyond tomorrow they only see less of what they have been handed and this frightens them.

  37. why so many blacks on TV? says:

    As a proud Tea Partier, I refuse to go to any more Tea Party rallies. First was in Atlanta, and was huge. Then Obamacare passed, and the second in Atlanta was a bust. You could feel the spirit crushed out of White Humanity. The loudest cheers were for that jivey Herman Cain.

    We are sold out today to Diversity just like the segregationist guv’nahs sold us out to federally mandated integration. “Integration today, Integration tomorrow, Integration fo’evah, cause we just can’t afford to make it so hard for dems po’ little black boys to gets dare hands on yo’ whitey white daughters!”

    The Tea Party will succumb to Diversity. Just watch how they do it. You will have Whitey TP leaders complaining on FoxNews that they aren’t seeing enough “people of color, gays, and women” at TP rallies. “We must do more, reach out more, include more, welcome more.”

    I predict that the next feeble TP rally in Atlanta will be the last. Good. Why should Whiteys have any organized presence at all. Do you think TP members will EVER demand an investigation into the exclusive and racist Congressional Black Caucus, or demand that the CBC become welcoming and inclusive of ALL?

    The TP is worthless. They’ll lose on the tax battles, because taxes help blacks, and the TP will never hurt a black.

    Here’s the future of the TP:

    Look at what the Whitey liberal elites at UGA are doing- a total embracing of their own displacement and dispossession of the career hopes of White academics(we don’t care- White academics are liberals, so if they get fired so a Diversity can have their job, we say good riddance!)

    Read this report- WHITE MEN NEED NOT APPLY- notice how they never actually define “diversity” or “differences,” and they only use the word “minority” once.


    Diversity plan approved for dissemination, August 29, 2011

    A diversity plan prepared by the Diversity Advisory Council has been approved by Provost Jere Morehead for dissemination to academic units that report to the provost. “I believe this plan will help the University of Georgia remain a community of vibrant, diverse and inclusive communities of faculty, staff and students who are reflective of and responsive to the diversity of the state of Georgia,” Morehead said. The plan outlines five goals that relate to institutional climate; recruitment and retention of diverse students, faculty and staff; diversity-related research and program initiatives; and accountability.

    end snip

    Then we have a Whitey liberal elite with the Ga. Historical Society groveling to blacks and erecting expensive markers all over Ga. to proclaim the “proud contributions of African Americans to their own advancement and achievements.”


    Markers illustrate overlooked stories

    Historical Society offers a ‘broader’ 
Civil War picture

    Q: Are these markers, in a way, as much civil rights markers as Civil War markers?

    A: Those markers that tell stories about African-Americans actively struggling to secure their freedom certainly are.

    end snip

    Well, as an AmRener and former TPartier, I’m always on the lookout for RR news, and the AJC just couldn’t help give us this gem that glitters most bright and brilliant junk pile of “diversity and inclusion” news and pro-Afro Civil War markers:


    In the mid-20th century, The Bluff was a middle-class neighborhood populated by educated African-Americans. Over the past few decades, as it became a magnet for people seeking and selling heroin, it has become a pocket of poverty marked by boarded-up homes — more than 460 of them — and lacking chain grocery stores, social services and schools.

    The 1.5-mile area is bordered on the north by Donald L. Hollowell Parkway and on the south by Martin Luther King Jr. Drive. Its east and west boundaries are Northside Drive and Joseph E. Lowery Boulevard respectively.

    end snip

    That’s the story of America- mobile “educated” blacks move in and diversity a formerly White neighborhood, then their nature takes over and crime and drugs infest the formerly White neighborhood, thanks to Diversity. Same story every time.

    White academics churn out books demanding that Whiteys “recognize their complicity in the community’s decline because they abandoned the public space when blacks graciously consented to move in and lessen the toxic and virulent Whiteness of segregated neighborhoods.”

    When blacks fail, blame Whites. Same story every time.

    If the TP makes any difference for the better, such as holding Obama in check, then every forthcoming black failure will be blamed on them, thus proving they are racist.

    I’m RR, which means the TP makes me feel unwelcome. Let’m have Diversity, but they won’t have me!

    Why so many blacks on TV? Because they are all portrayed in commercials and as newscasters as articulate speaking middle class white people. In other words, they are just like us, so nothing to fear from Diversity. It’s a projection of a vision of the future when Whites aren’t allowed to notice when blacks act black.

    Read Anthony Jacob’s White Man Think Again!

  38. Anonymous says:

    “You both are preaching pro-White genocide from the safety of your ivory towers, untouchable and protected by tenure. A genocide that won’t touch either of you. More are becoming aware of what you’re trying to do to our people judging from the comments above and elsewhere.”

    If we assume these professors are Jewish, actually a white genocide will result in their genocide as well. Isreal is only supported by what is left of a white America. White guilt supports Isreal and gives them extraordinary special privileges. That is rapidly deteriorating as non-whites are taking over the US. Obama was the first President to take a stand against Isreal. That would be unheard of in the liberal Bush and Clinton administrations. This defiance will continue and turn into an outright boycott as America loses its white majority. Isreali politicians are now actually allying themselves with far-right parties in Europe. They are so desperate, they are allying themselves with people that the MSM considers nazis.

    Racist non-whites in America attack Jews without hesitation. In random attacks, they don’t ask what church you attend, they just attack. Politically, many blacks are aligned with Muslims and actually hate Jews. Mexicans only care about amnesty and Mexico, not about Isreal and what happened 70 years ago in Europe. Jews are on the same sinking ship as whites. In Israel, they starting to see reality. The sassy girls on “The View” are still in La La land. The are so full of hatred for conservatives, they cannot see that they are supporting their own genocide.

    If you want proof of my hypothesis, research what happened to Jews in South Africa. Better yet, ask a South African Jew about their experiences. The “evil” version of South Africa was a close ally of Isreal. SA Whites and Isreali Jews were in a similar situation…a small civilized minority surrounded by millions of non-whites who hated them and wanted to destroy them. Apartheid South Africa and Isreal exchanged weapons, technology, and trade. The large Jewish community in South Africa provided volunteers for the Isreali army. The end of apartheid completely destroyed this relationship.

    In SA, it is now actually punishable by imprisonment to support the Isreali military. The new black government HATES Isreal. They side with Palestine, as they are muslim and muslim sympathizers. SA Jews have consequently left in droves to escape the horrific crime and racial hatred…as well as the anti-Isreal policy.

    A Jewish friend of mine from Cape Town joked, “In SA, when the Jews leave, you know it’s time to go. When the Portuguese leave, you know it’s already too late.” (he said that, not me).

    Yes, I have Jewish friends. I am not a nazi. I actually have friends from most races. I am not a radical and I am only being realistic. Not all Jewish people are stupid liberals, many are realistic as well. I have this message to Jewish liberals: white conservatives are your only friends left. If you want us to lose our countries, our identity, our power, you will die as well. There will be no one left to support you and protect you. You will be devastated by a third nightmare, along with us. It may even be worse for you. Radical muslims want all of you dead. You are facing a new Jewish holocaust, if whites become a minority in the Western World. (For some reason, like most liberals, I don’t think they will heed my warning until it’s too late.)

  39. Anonymous says:

    #5 and all the other commentators who are commenting about the fact that these are Jewish academics –

    I’m a Jew. And yeah, it sucks to see how many of my fellow Jews are so screwed up and hostile to Western civilization and the white race that created it. It makes me angry. I could write a long essay, or even a book, explaining how this disease of Jewish thought took hold over the past 200 years, and maybe I should write it, but I can’t fit it all into this comment.

    Very short summary, Jews in Eastern Europe were excluded from the power structures, societies and economies they lived in. Part of this exclusion was voluntary self-isolation, but a lot of it was because the rulers (the czar etc) didn’t trust this strange group that has its own religion, language, etc. That distrust was not unreasonable, but it did have the unfortunate consequence that Jews started to be attracted to anyone who promised big big changes, like a total reshaping of society, into something that might have more of a place for Jews. Jews embraced Socialism and liberalism (Socialism-lite).

    This was a terrible mistake. It made Jews hated by everyone from the Czars to the German business owner class to the KKK in America. For good reason! Many Jews embraced a philosophy which sought to wipe out the entire Western economy and social structure!

    It was also a tragic mistake for Jews because, in fact, Socialism is utterly incompatible with Jewish ethics and the Talmud. Absolutely, utterly incompatible. The result was Jews had to give up on those things and become self-hating “Reform” Jews, who rejected the entire body of Jewish law and ethics.

    That’s the short summary. As a Jew who can see it and who deeply loves both Judaism and Aryan civilization, this situation sucks! I can never vote for any Jewish candidates and I am enraged to hear these treasonous horrible statements from so many of my “fellow” Jews.

    You can see that Israel suffers a similar problem. I’m pro-Israel but they should have purged Socialism from their society in 1948. Unfortunately they did not and it has poisoned Israel.

  40. Question Diversity says:


    Like I implied in 33 above, just because the TPM is a threat to the ruling class doesn’t mean it’s entirely on our side. I finally got around to reviewing the Angelo Codevilla book based on his essay of last summer, about the Ruling Class. One of the problems with both his book and his essay, (essentially the same material), is that we can’t assume that anyone outside the ruling class clique is automatically our friends.

    That leads me to one more thing, maybe a bit OT for this thread, but your words made me think about this. The one big white elephant in the room problem for the Republicans running for President in 2012 is that whoever wins the nomination will be a white man or woman (*) who will implicitly (unfortunately, not explicitly) be asking the voters to take the Presidency away from the first black President and give it to him or her. I think that’s why Obama isn’t all that worried about re-election, because he knows like most people reading my words know that save Ron Paul, who would campaign on pure ideology, devil may care about anything else (note to Jack in Chicago — That’s not a personal endorsement), all the other ones will inevitably shrivel up like a desert carcass, out of fear of being called “Racist.” The only hitch in my theory is that by the fall of next year, the economy might be so bad that nothing else will matter.

    * – Herman Cain won’t win the nomination. In spite of the TPM gushing over him, he probably won’t get more than 5% of the vote in any one Republican Primary state, less in most.

  41. fred says:

    Let’s break this down. On one side you have the progressives and on the other side you have the tea partiers. The progressives are big government, socialist, Democrat types. Whereas the tea partiers are small government, capitalist, Republican types. Since blacks tend to underperform financially, the progressives have long since sought to use them as shocktroops in promoting their big government, socialist programs. And now they’re surprised that those who don’t want big government, socialist programs don’t like having blacks incited against them?

    Come now, Mr. Abramowitz. I think you’re being a little bit modest by not admitting the role you and your academic/political colleagues have had in fostering so much of this “resentment” you now decry. Among blacks as well as whites. Only your dialog didn’t mention black resentments now did it? Oh, well. Perhaps you don’t find that topic as interesting.

  42. ITMS says:

    Alas, Tea Partiers, you may as well fold your tents and quietly leave the field. Salon (a website that apparently caters to members and would-be members of the national elite) has given your movement the coup de grace. They have uncovered the cruel truth that your movement is a “Southern” movement. No more need be said. The taint is ineradicable.

  43. Alien says:

    According to academia the white race is the only race capable of racism or hate crimes. Their definition of racism automatically excludes minority races, even though these same minorities may be a majority worldwide and commit tremendously disproportionate numbers of violent crimes against whites. I am personally tired of seeing white people apologize for any imagined offense to a minority. If white people do not stand up for their rights soon we will either be dead or slaves in a brown skinned, Muslim dominated world.

  44. Sincerely Concerned says:

    Here are the words, names, descriptors, or labels that now conjure up fear in the hearts of, really, every child and most young adults in this country unless or until we stand up for ourselves:






    Tea Party (especially this one)







    It’s late and I am tired, or else I would add many more. In my job I see and talk to 50-100 or more different people every day and IF I am ever lured into a discussion about society or our country in general, I say little and listen a lot and more and more, I realize that government school and state university indoctrination has resulted in making virtually every single person I know under the age of 35 a complete liberal extremist. Sad.

  45. Rebelcelt says:

    I noticed these people are in Seattle..nuff said.Do as I say not as I do.

  46. Cui Bono? says:

    If you want proof of my hypothesis, research what happened to Jews in South Africa. Better yet, ask a South African Jew about their experiences. The “evil” version of South Africa was a close ally of Israel.

    Oh, I know plenty about the alliance between SAs Whites and Israel.

    Israel only supported the white apartheid SA government when it was to their political and economic advantage to do so.


    After the Six-Day War, world opinion of Israel became polarized. The Israelis found themselves in the same situation as the Whites in SA, as both were surrounded by hostile non-whites who wished to destroy them. The 1967 conflict had also left the Israeli economy reeling.

    SA possessed platinum, chrome, ore, gold and uranium. Israel developed an arms market in high tech weaponry.

    “By 1979 South Africa had become Israel’s largest arms client… These deals included tank engines, aircraft, and nuclear technology.”

    As world opinion became increasingly critical of SA apartheid, this alliance fell apart as Israel distance itself from its former “ally” and trade partner:

    “In 1986 the United States passed the Comprehensive Anti-Apartheid Act. The Israelis, afraid of losing American aid, promptly issued their own sanctions and vowed to cut off any new deals. By the late 1980s the secret ‘alliance’ was nearing an end.”

    All quotes taken from the book The Unspoken Alliance by Sasha Polakow-Suransky.

    I’m pro-Israel but they should have purged Socialism from their society in 1948. Unfortunately they did not and it has poisoned Israel.

    Ironically, because it is under an increasing threat of a growing Palestinian population, Israel will either have to implement apartheid, or a two-state solution. It cannot have both.

    Israel is only supported by what is left of a white America. White guilt supports Isreal and gives them extraordinary special privileges. That is rapidly deteriorating as non-whites are taking over the US.

    Germany too, another large source of support. Would that more Israelis understood what is in store for them with our demise: Our fate will yours as well. Please help spread this message through your community as much as possible. We whites are NOT your greatest threat.

  47. Frank Jones says:

    Tea Party, La Raza all of these groups whether left or right basically are sponsored by wealthy individuals or organizations.

  48. dtb says:

    call me a nazi and a racist and i will call you a traitor.

  49. Gold Bug says:

    Israel is only supported by what is left of a white America. White guilt supports Isreal and gives them extraordinary special privileges.

    I find the words White guilt infuriating! This expression is used by blacks to justify massive transfers of money to them from white taxpayers, none of whom were alive during the time of slavery.

    White guilt is used by Latinos to justify their LaRaza reconquista fantasies.

    White guilt is also used to support Israel, you say, and I have no doubt that you are correct.

    Accusations that White should feel “guilty” and therefore ‘owe’ something should be met with an immediate counter attack.

    Not one White on the face of the earth should feel so much as an iota of guilt or remorse about a single thing his ancestors might or might not have done 100+ years ago. We have nothing to atone for.

    As Christian Miller says:

    “We must vociferously condemn the use of any White racial slurs.”

    Other races should be thanking us for creating the modern world, sacrificing 200,000+ of our young sons to “free” Europe from the Nazis, and for our unending fiscal generosity.

    No one has the right to make us feel guilty about things for which we are not responsible. There is no such thing as “racial guilt” so stop buying into it.

  50. Spirit Wolf says:

    Oh, well, I brought up a Polish immigrant to Canada in news comments the other day, arguing that if he had brought with him a translation dictionary that would have enabled him to translate simple signs (like “Information” and “Exit”), the RCMP would never have been called on him, and he wouldn’t have had a problem finding his mommy. I reposted my argument here:

    Original story here:

    I figured it’s a good thing to make sure the Queen is prominent in our Embassies, it might remind people what language we speak here (except in Quebec).

    Do you know how mad people got at me for saying that? It was like people were arguing that newcomers to Canada should not feel the need to learn English at all – yet I’m pointing out that this was the guy’s problem in the first place.

    To them, it seemed, he was right in not making any effort at all to learn anything about Canada or its official languages before coming.

    I’m wondering if the offended parties are Snowbirds who spend their winters in Mexico without wanting to learn Spanish, the lazy dogs?

  51. Anonymous says:

    I’ve never understood why Western countries don’t require immigrants to speak English BEFORE they arrive. With BBC radio and TV available all over the world, along with the internet and American TV and movies, etc., someone who is truly motivated to learn English should be able to do so. Those who are NOT motivated to learn English do NOT intend to work once they arrive, and those who cannot learn English undoubtedly have an IQ on the left-hand side of the bell curve. Neither of these two groups is an asset to the host country.

  52. Anonymous says:

    48 dtb; Call them what they really are: Communists.