Assimilate This

Dolores Prida, New York Daily News, February 12, 2009

After practically vanishing from the presidential campaign in its waning days, the immigration reform issue is again the topic du jour among anti-immigration fire-breathers.

Trying to regroup after their loss, some Republicans wasted no time and just one week after the inauguration of President Obama met in Washington to argue that pandering to pro-amnesty Latino voters is not the way to go forward.

A press release listing their topics of discussion, includes this: “Whatever gains, if any, pandering to Hispanics gives is greatly outweighed by loss of the White Vote, which is more important.”

Driving immigrants out and sealing the border are the best arguments to win future elections, according to the report “Immigration and the 2008 Republican Defeat,” also discussed at the Washington gathering, issued by the group American Cause and authored by Marcus Epstein.

The larger pool of white voters they’re after get, in sizable numbers, their world view from conservative talk radio and Internet publications, where hate-mongering thrives, unchecked and unchallenged.

To their ears, the words “immigrant” and “Latino” are usually followed or preceded by adjectives such as “criminal,” “illegal,” “drug smuggler” or even “potential terrorist,” as well as accusations of refusing to learn English or assimilate.

Immigration reform advocates, particularly Latino activists, are falsely characterized as advocating “open borders” and “blanket amnesty.”

These comments constitute “hate speech,” as defined in a preliminary report on a pilot study conducted by UCLA’s Chicano Studies Research Center.

Hate speech leads to hate crimes. No argument about that. {snip}

Based on this and other reports, the National Hispanic Media Coalition has filed a petition with the Federal Communications Commission, asking it to examine the extent, nature and effects of hate speech, the role of the media and possible options to counterbalance its negative impact.

{snip}

Hate speech should have no place in a nation of immigrants that pays a lot of lip service to its racial and cultural diversity.

Neither should other kinds of speech that, though perhaps not be categorized as “hate speech,” certainly qualify as “ignorant speech.”

The aforementioned Mr. Epstein, writing in an anti-immigration blog and quoted in a recent New York Times editorial, said: “Diversity can be good in moderation–if what’s brought in is desirable. Most Americans don’t mind a little ethnic food, some Asian math whizzes or a few mariachi dancers–as long as these trends do not overwhelm the dominant culture.”

{snip}

Mr. Epstein, assimilate this: There’s no one American “dominant” culture. {snip}

{snip}

[Editor’s Note: “Immigration and the 2008 Republican Defeat: A Comprehensive Analysis of All Lost House Seats,” by Marcus Epstein, can be read or downloaded as a PDF file here.]


“My basic point was merely that a white vote is just as important as a Hispanic vote, [VDARE.com note: actually far more important.] and that no thanks to current immigration trends, whites still make up 13 times more of the electorate than Hispanics. Therefore, it is stupid to alienate millions of white voters with a pro-Amnesty Martinez with the hope of gaining a few extra points of the Hispanic Vote.”

Topics:

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.

Comments are closed.