Making Money on White Displacement

Robert Bloch, American Renaissance, August 21, 2014

An insider’s story.

Ten years ago I worked for Ocean Tomo, which styled itself with more enthusiasm than precision as “an intellectual capital merchant bank.” Ocean Tomo’s founder and CEO, and my boss, was Jim Malackowski who drove race cars, owned the most expensive single-family house in Chicago at the time, and, being fashionably ultra-liberal, helped bankroll a promising Democratic Senate candidate he insisted on calling “Baruch” Obama.

Jim wanted to make money from white displacement. He would not have used the phrase “white displacement;” he preferred speaking of “preferences.” After all, everyone has preferences.

The United States government makes no secret of its racial preferences. It prefers to give its business to companies run by non-whites, and that increases the value of those companies. Financial markets in this country (of the “free minds and free markets” that had long been the battle-cry of the old Chicago Board of Trade) are quiveringly alert to the weight of the government’s thumb in assessing valuations. Jim (who is both white and gentile, to anticipate curiosity on that point) concluded that the government’s racial preferences could have an impact on the value of certain assets. But how to identify the assets and profit from that increased value?

This was a novel insight for a man who had amassed a sizable fortune based on another novel insight–about the value of patents. He had seen that the government and the courts were shifting from policies that made it easy to invalidate patents towards polices that made it easier to enforce them. This was going to make patents more valuable, so, using a private equity vehicle, he bought up a lot of them at low prices and later sold them for a lot more. He even saw an abstract connection between patents and minority preferences: A government-enforced monopoly makes patents valuable; government preferences for minority companies make them more valuable.

My boss established a “diversity” business silo–with all the vagueness the term implies; we weren’t sure exactly what we were going to do–and in a brilliant move, recruited a fashionable, attractive, and articulate Muslim woman, rather than the expected black woman as our diversity czarina. Fatemeh Hall (that was her married American name) had recently arrived from Iran, and she had a matchless zeal for uplifting African-Americans in particular. She had made this her life’s mission after reading Uncle Tom’s Cabin in high school. The business elites of Chicago were desperate to recruit Muslims and show how unprejudiced they were towards them. Doors opened magically for her.

Fatemeh unaccountably decided she liked me, even though I made no secret of my admittedly neutered Republicanism. Before long, I was her official mentor, and diversity initiatives were added to my portfolio. My mission was to find a way to make money from racial preferences.

In laying the groundwork for our “diversity” business silo, I learned that corporate America has undertaken white displacement seriously and efficiently, and even more so than is generally realized. However, there are hard limits to the nonsense our commercial overlords will tolerate, even in the sacred name of diversity.

Our work started, very modestly, by advising minority-owned companies on how to get contracts with Fortune 500 companies. My boss’s rolodex of names at big companies was a great help here. The contracts were supposed to help the companies sell equity stakes. At the time, Ocean Tomo had an advisory arm and could expect to be compensated in both fees and warrants if a client went public. However, IPOs seemed to me to be of limited profit potential because the companies would need to maintain their minority status if they were going to keep getting Fortune 500 contracts. Going public and selling stock would mean they would no longer be minority owned. But this approach was a way for us to get into the game.

For the next few months, I spent perhaps 10 hours of my workweek in minority business conferences graced with high-profile speakers and earnest, usually white, and surprisingly senior corporate executives. Fatemeh proved to be a tireless conference organizer and a genuine political genius, cultivating an alliance with Emil Jones, the African-American Illinois Senate President at the time. Emil, whose career obsession was getting black men more construction jobs, managed to connect us to an endless pipeline of aggrieved and ambitious minority business owners.

Emil Jones

Emil Jones

Because Fatemeh had read Uncle Tom’s Cabin and cultivated Senate President Jones, our minority contractor pipeline was predominantly black. In Chicago at least, it seemed that black businesses disproportionately cashed in on Fortune 500 minority preferences, but a few Hispanic companies attended our conferences. Female-owned businesses get preferences as well, and we got a smattering of them.

It’s my impression, however, that white female-owned businesses can be competitive without preferences, and thus tended to under-use the preferences available to them. This may not reflect intrinsic nobility as much as it does the fact that preferences are, paradoxically, not without cost. Time must be spent on forms and propaganda and interaction with more than ordinarily useless bureaucrats. Competent white women might have thought the return was not worth the cost. For the incompetent, of course, preferences represented the best potential investment of time.

When it came to pitching minority suppliers to major companies, I had been hopelessly stuck in the 1980s. I expected to be dealing with low-level minority bureaucrats, a limited budget, and much eye-rolling from senior management. Things are very different now. Relentless, ruthless intelligence has gone into minority supplier programs. They are supported at the board level, and thus have significant input from white men.

Corporate America’s campaign of white displacement faces a serious obstacle: There are many roles minority vendors cannot fill, especially in technology. However, white vendors who cannot easily be replaced can be forced to replace their white vendors.

There is considerable ingenuity in this approach. Ford and GM, to cite prominent examples, have minority contract portfolios in the billions of dollars. These are “tier 1” minority vendors. Ford and GM also compel white suppliers who are not immediately replaceable to prefer minority vendors and to force their suppliers to prefer and seek out minority vendors. These would be “tier 2” and “tier 3” minority vendors.

In other words, when it is impossible to discriminate against whites, it is possible to require those whites to discriminate against other whites. This discrimination is monitored closely. White vendors are expected to implement ambitious minority supplier recruitment programs (from templates created by the Fortune 500 customer) and are required to report progress in excruciating detail. Excuses are not accepted. (This has the collateral effect of imposing burdensome compliance costs on productive whites.)

Racial preferences thus permeate the supply chains of virtually all Fortune 500 corporations. The policies are intentional, calculated, and effective. Diversity policy is no longer formed in a corporate backwater but by the best and the brightest.

GM’s Chief Diversity Officer is a white man and a retired Navy Captain, Kenneth J. Barrett. Mr. Barrett was the Navy’s Chief Diversity Officer, and if there are medals for discriminating against whites he presumably wears them proudly.

I should note that my experience with corporate diversity took place during George W. Bush’s second term, not during the Obama presidency. President Bush was certainly not hostile to the concept of affirmative action, though it seems that President Obama prioritizes it much more highly. The point is that the massive corporate investment in racial preferences that I describe came during a period of relatively low government activism. The executives who spoke at Fatemeh’s conferences–top-level white guys, rather than black diversity officers–emphasized that they thought diversity was a desirable end in itself and they were eager to do more than the government required. I came to believe them.

Of course there seemed to me to be no coherent shareholder-value argument for preferring minority contractors. I am therefore not able fully to explain what I observed. It is true that market value does not invariably track intrinsic value, and by the second Bush administration, corporate Americans behaved as though minority vendors (chiefly black vendors) had genuine value. Perhaps this reflected the market’s perception that Republicans, who never cut back affirmative action, are followed by Democrats who always ratchet it up. Perhaps it reflected a belief that corporations can be punished for not preferring blacks, and will never be punished for displacing whites. All I can do is report what I saw, and offer guesses for the reasons behind it.

I, of course, found this system appalling. I was in an environment in which the only permissible criticism of any diversity initiative was that it was insufficiently radical. Fatemeh had a stock speech for every meeting. She would hold up a pen and say: “If you buy this pen from a white guy, what have you got? You’ve got a pen. If you buy this pen from a minority, you’ve got a pen plus diversity.” Sometimes she would say “diversity points.” Her minority audience would beam with delight. They deserved the business because they offered more to the buyer than a white man could offer. I always wondered whether some satirist had scripted this bit for Fatemeh. I certainly hadn’t written it and I did most of her writing. Yet I never dissuaded her from making the pen speech, since I found it delightfully and unabashedly absurd.

The quantitative-minded among you will naturally ask how much more the pen is worth if it is sold by a minority vendor. Corporate American quantifies everything so there are undoubtedly formulas for the amount a company will invest, in terms of increased costs and lower performance, in order to corral a minority vendor. These formulas are guarded closely and regarded as trade secrets.

Having done a bit of actuarial work in an earlier life, I tried to model the cost/benefit calculation. Assume a company like GM has the option of buying a special insurance policy to cover the payout on a catastrophically large racial shakedown. If what GM pays for diversity in the form of higher prices and lower performance is less than the reasonable premium for a racial incident insurance policy, preferences are arguably rational. Only arguably rational, however, since even the most blood-thirsty preferences do not guarantee a favorable outcome in a “racism” lawsuit, and the creativity of the people who manufacture racial incidents is not to be underrated.

I suspect that the internal models for valuing minority preferences include variables for their impact on brand value because, seemingly absurdly, a vigorous white displacement policy appears to burnish the value of the corporate brand even among displaced whites. Readers who doubt this should check Vault.com and other “insider” reviews of businesses; a “pro-diversity” policy is thought to make a company a more desirable employer, even presumably for pre-displaced whites.

Despite the fun of running numbers and spinning rationales there was something fundamentally humiliating about calling for discrimination against whites. I also began to feel acute discomfort on another front. Our czarina was beguilingly charming, but as I spent more time with her I learned that she was very much a mainstream Muslim. For example, she insisted that literal impalement was the proper sanction for ridicule of the Prophet. At the time, my religious views made Christopher Hitchens look Amish, but not only was I obliged to demand more and more radical racial preferences, I was forced into professions of reverence for Islam. I felt like a broken-spirited POW, broadcasting an endless stream of lies scripted by a totalitarian enemy.

I began socializing with upper class blacks, occasionally from the right end of the Bell-curve. The admonition to cultivate successful black friends was a neglected nugget from John Derbyshire’s version of the Talk and his prescience is uncanny. A black male friend is positively aphrodisiacal (Afrodisiacal?) for white female urban professionals. This was the sole consolation of a degraded period.

Of course, my boss Jim was not primarily interested in uplifting blacks. Uncle Tom’s Cabin did not have the same life-changing effect on him. His liberalism was cheerfully exploitative. He wanted a way to turn mass psychosis into profit and, for a time, we both thought we had found one.

Despite massive preferences, the performance of black vendors is–let us say–volatile. The only permitted explanation for this was that they lacked access to capital. Because blacks had been discriminated against for millennia, they lacked the contacts, family resources, expertise, and relationships to get enough funding for their businesses. This was considered so obvious as to be beyond discussion.

We started holding “Access to Capital” seminars in which we trained blacks to talk to bankers and prepare supporting documentation, such as balance sheets. However, a Fortune 500 customer or a major government subdivision might have hundreds or even thousands of minority vendors, and getting bank loans for them one at a time seemed inefficient.

I finally hit on the idea that was going to make money for us. It is a well-known financial technique–actually, as it would turn out in the 2008 crash, a dangerously over-used one–called securitization. The concept is to create marketable securities based on high-quality contractual cash flows.

Say our black vendor has a contract with GM that should be good for steady payments that added up to, say, $1 million over five years. The idea is to sell the right to that income stream on the open market. An investor would pay a discounted lump sum, say, $700,000 today, the intermediaries would take their fees, and the minority vendor would get the rest–up front, right now. He would then, presumably, invest the money in added productive capacity.

The market would require that the vendor contracts be with reliable payers, and in our case they were with solid Fortune 500 companies. The contracts would have to be made attractive–guaranteed durations, for example–and they would have to be bundled to reach the $50 million level before an issue would be really attractive to the markets. Fortunately, we already had ready-made pools of minority suppliers whose contracts could all be spiffed up simultaneously and bundled together in the form of bonds.

There is an argument to be made that this was not a very good deal for the minority supplier. He was borrowing money on the strength of future income, but because of the discount rate, he was getting a good deal less than if he patiently fulfilled the contract. But the attraction was the pile of cash up front, not the deal’s internal rate of return. It was like a pay-day loan. You are going to get a paycheck for $400 in two weeks, and the loan shark offers you $340 today in exchange for the entire $400 in two weeks. You’re paying an effective annual interest rate of almost 400 percent, but you get the money today.

The deal for the minority vendors wasn’t quite that bad, of course, and there was no other way they were going to get a pile of cash, so they were mesmerized from the outset. It was astonishingly easy to sell our minorities on accepting large piles of cash; in short order they focused on nothing else.

The other thing that naturally occurred to us was the potential for moral blackmail in marketing the bonds. What institutional bond-buyer wouldn’t want to load up on diversity-bonds? The minorities themselves were so distracted by the prospect of that immediate pot of gold that they wouldn’t notice the high effective rate of interest they were paying. That high rate would mean a decent return for the bond-holder, with the added moral sheen of a minority-friendly investment.

It seemed to us that my idea had a lot going for it. It would supply growth capital for minority companies in a way that did not dilute their precious minority-ownership status through a public offering on the stock market. My CEO was quite pleased by the concept. It was impossible for Fatemeh to understand financial concepts, but she was pleased by all the excitement and attention the idea was getting (to be more precise, all the attention she was getting, which was considerable).

For weeks thereafter, I was hip-deep in rhetoric about “access to capital” and, even more misleadingly, minority vendor growth rates. You could put together tables suggesting that the rate of growth in spending on minority vendors since, say, 1983 represented a Silicon-Valley-type opportunity. Never mind that this was not a function of increased minority-vendor competence but of the government thumb pressing harder and harder on the scale. Throw in mumbo jumbo about “high-yield/low-beta” and you had the makings of a successful alternative investment.

Of course, like Albert Speer writing from Spandau, I must confess now that I enjoyed moments of lucidity. One of the members of my team had been a senior member of the JP Morgan Enron deal team. He was based on the East Coast and had the job of actually structuring our Rube Goldberg mechanism.

He would fly in for sloshy dinners, where I ribbed him that few professionals had two opportunities single-handedly to destroy the American economy within a five-year period, and that he’d better make this one count. He would then speculate in more and more horrific yet somehow hilarious detail about the infrastructure consequences of minority contractor growth. Yes, we were bad, but this is how men sometimes talk in the capital markets. After two drinks they revel in their cleverness and their parasitism.

The City of Chicago awards hundreds of millions worth of minority vendor contracts every year, and wanted to be the test case. We lined up Fortune 500s and eager borrowers, but there were many layers of sign-offs before we could launch.

In Chicago there is a particular law firm that is not the best or biggest law firm in the city (though they are easily in the top ten in both categories) but that nonetheless dominates securitization. I decline to identify the law firm out of a healthy respect for their litigation department. At any rate, they were the final gate-keepers on the deal, and I thought we had a stacked deck. The partner in charge of their securitization practice was: (a) female, and (b) a prominent fund-raiser for Barrack Obama’s 2004 Senate campaign. I found myself on a conference call with that partner, my Enron expat, and Fatemeh. We went through our unstoppable pitch about how we could get “5-7x” (a lump sum of five to seven times the annual contract revenues) for our minority vendors. She stopped me.

“So the goal is to get them a pile of cash upfront?” This was easier than I’d anticipated. “In a word, yes.”

In the next moment, I heard the voice of the market itself; which may as well have been the voice of God.

“I am not going to hand hundreds of millions of dollars to these scumbags.”

Fatemeh momentarily went into catatonia. I was blindsided. I had never before heard anyone speak so candidly about preferred minority vendors. But in a moment, it was blindingly obvious. Most of the minority vendors were not really entrepreneurs interested in building businesses though “access to capital.” They were looking, quite literally, for a pay-off. Hand them the pay-off up-front and the vendors would disappear, or the money would disappear, or both. The markets, even in the form of this cultural Marxist, intuited this fundamental reality.

Fatemeh recovered sufficiently to gasp that the partner had referred to minorities as “scumbags.” The partner, in a way that would have been overwhelmingly refreshing had it not dashed my short-term career hopes, did not back off. There was little more to say; the conversation ended. The project was still-born. There were many other lawyers in the city of Chicago, but in this most political of cities, to make a new kind of deal work, we needed the green light from this lawyer from this firm, and she courageously withheld it. She is an unsung heroine of the bond markets.

In my view, the lesson from this episode is that what race realists mistake for elite psychosis about minorities is actually elite cognitive dissonance. They chant the mantra that minorities are wonderful, irreplaceable, and invaluable. Yet the persistence of the “access to capital” problem suggests that somewhere out there is a core rationality that resists reprogramming. At some level, the markets realize that giving these darlings a lot of money is not a good investment.

We took a run at one or two other ideas including the deliciously conceived “diversity-linked-notes.” I won’t go into detail, but the idea of “linked notes” is to hedge against a known risk. In our case, it was the risk of losing the benefits that come from diversity. However, in order to engineer financial protection against loss of a valuable asset, the asset has to be valued. We had to know how much diversity was worth.

CFOs squirmed trying to articulate the positive balance sheet impact of diversity. It was funny watching them; after such meetings, an increasingly cynical Fatemeh would laugh uncontrollably. She was starting to understand how America worked.

We kept running into the same wall: Corporations loved minorities; the marketplace hated them. I suspect the dichotomy was due to differences in who gets compensated. Corporate actors could expect bonuses for increasing minority participation; financial gatekeepers anticipated losses on investments in minorities.

Fatemeh was jettisoned in relatively short order after it became clear we couldn’t make money on diversity, but this was the best thing that could have happened to her. She formed her own conference company, which extorted large sums from Chicago-based corporations to hold pro-minority Nuremburg rallies. She fulfilled at least one lifetime dream by snagging Bill Clinton to speak at one of her conferences. Harriet Beecher Stowe was unavailable. My Enron expat was eventually accepted back into the fraternity of structured finance.

Moral of the story: There will be limits imposed on diversity mania whenever the vital interests of our commercial overlords are threatened. Thank God, the bond markets will be protected.

Readers may argue that displacing white employees and white contractors is not rational, but there is another way to look at the costs of diversity. The markets may have simply decided that there will be no decrease in profits if whites (and presumably Asians) are worked harder and paid less.

I suppose, on balance and in context, this is good news. At the very least, our doom will be deferred for some time to come.

Topics: , , , ,

Share This

Robert Bloch

Mr. Bloch was a founding Managing Director of Ocean Tomo and Managing Director for Johnson & Higgins Insurance Brokers. He has four issued United States patents covering financial methods and products and has lectured and published extensively.

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • JohnEngelman

    Rich whites are not threatened by affirmative action, because they already have it made. For them affirmative action is a sort of riot control.

    • LHathaway

      That’s true. Those running they system are never the losers, or have reason to voice disproval, do they? There’s also the idea that those who heartily voice approval of affirmative action, make it.

      • JohnEngelman

        Affluent white liberals love to think of sacrifices for white blue collar workers to make on behalf of blacks. They advocate forced school busing while sending their children to all white private schools.

        When I pointed this out on the website of Nation magazine they blocked me from posting comments. Still, they keep trying to get me to subscribe to their magazine.

        • Fighting_Northern_Spirit

          I subscribed in the early ’90s for Alexander Cockburn and Christopher Hitchens, so I read Hitch’s article about the 500th centenary of Columbus hot off the presses. If you’ve ever seen a chicken get kicked, that was the same sort of hysterical response that rippled through the Left.
          .
          1492 was a very good year and deserves to be celebrated with great vim and gusto…[T]hose who view the history of North America as a narrative of genocide and slavery are, it seems to me, hopelessly stuck on this reactionary position. They can think of the Western expansion of the United States only in terms of plague blankets, bootleg booze and dead buffalo, never in terms of the medicine chest, the wheel and the railway… But it does happen to be the way that history is made, and to complain about it is as empty as complaint about climatic, geological or tectonic shift.

          • JohnEngelman

            I am not proud of the Indian War. The Indians never had a chance.

            On American Renaissance I read complaints about race displacement and genocide. The only people who have the right to complain about race displacement and genocide are American Indians.

          • silviosilver

            The only people who have the right to complain about race displacement and genocide are American Indians.

            Definitely being added to Johnny Engelman’s greatest hits collection.

            Whites are not being displaced and eliminated from America (and planet Earth), or if they are they have no right to complain about it. I see.

          • JohnEngelman

            What you perceive of as race displacement and genocide I perceive of as academic and economic competition. I am opposed to affirmative action. You appear to advocate affirmative action on behalf of white Gentiles.

          • Fighting_Northern_Spirit

            We could compete with Asians in their own countries, Jews in Israel. I don’t think we’re afraid of competition. We’re afraid of losing the countries that we built for ourselves and our descendants. Nationalism != affirmative action.

          • Roger Noah

            Say what you may, but it is important to separate futuristic fantasies from actionable insights.Segregation, de facto or de jure, is not going to return in any meaningful way. However, the points I made are still relevant and necessary:

            Let us get rid of all affirmative action.

            Also let us balance ‘free trade’ with reciprocal import tariffs.

            Let us limit legal immigration to geniuses, spouses and children.

            Let us not grant automatic citizenship to a child born in the US unless one of the child’s parents is an American citizen.

            Let us make our corporate tax competitive with other nations.

            Let us impose stiff penalties for hiring illegals.

            Let us, especially European-Americans, foster a culture of life where people marry early and have lots of children.

            And let us remove ‘child-worship’ from our culture where
            having even one child is, at present, perceived as a terrible emotional burden.

          • ShermanTMcCoy

            And I like the idea of replacing the income tax with tariffs.

          • silviosilver

            Although I personally prefer not to use the term genocide, I would agree the gradual but intentional elimination of whites from the earth qualifies as a sort of ‘soft’ genocide. Such a term is much more appropriate than silly and tortured euphemisms like “academic and economic competition.” Not getting into Harvard or a job as a bus driver is not wiping out white people. Whites are being wiped out by having their territories flooded by endless mass immigration, by prohibition of white identity and white racial interests across all important institutions, and by blanket denial that any of it is occurring or has any negative consequences.

          • M&S

            Put another way: Feel free to genocide the 2% of the world elite who, largely white, are destroying the rest of us through ownership of all the world’s process manufacturing systems while degrading the value of ALL labor to levels where Whites cannot ‘compete’ at more than mutual enslavement levels.

            These white elites seek their own suicide by assuming that, sans <1 billion working whites, the rest of the world will 'find a place' for their own extant, ennobled, existence when they have possession of all that wealth control as purely soft capital say-so.

            Oh so not true. White wealth is the SYSTEM of our existence, not the copyright, patent or numbered stock certificates.

            And the wealth class seeks to destroy this by disintegration of our unified societal structures in favor of mass immigration.

            Not even -exploring- the possibilities of things like robotics to enable small, sustainable, white-only populations to achieve the same work product which lets the rest of the planet get their collective currencies off their knees as purchasing power.

            While still keeping white economic base powerful through ownership, not of process but of _non sentient labor_ that allows one man to do many more things in a day than he normally could.

            This should be the revelation point that tells the rest of us just how much contempt we are held in by our own elites. That they will not yield up their processes control to the planet (they still profit from ownership as long as the paper is held good by military force). But they will instead seek to reduce our 'impact' on the world consumption indexes, not by making us more efficient as labor producers.

            But by replacing us with _more consumptive_ (higher TFR = higher base population X consumer multiplier = more profitable) stupid populations instead.

            Populations who will continue the fine tradition of ditch digger menialism, huge families and massive social welfare dependent support.

            Oh yes. Our elites are a fine bunch.

          • Raymond Kidwell

            I’m going to have to copy this and use it in some form. Well said.

          • Epoche

            John a lot of these problems could be solved be getting rid of the laws against racial, social and economic segregation. While we are at it lets get rid of all funding of higher education entirely – we dont care what scholarship you think you qualify for – how many bad loans should be issued by the way? Scrap the welfare state entirely including getting rid of subsidized daycare, earned income credit, let old people fend for themselves after they have used up whatever they think they have “paid” into a bankrupt system including throwing old people out of homes and into the streets. And for people who disagree with us why not allow us to form our own organizations to not have to deal with blacks, asians or jews? Do you know how we are going to bring back racial, social and economic? By burning down the North American Continent like the blacks did in the 1960s – we shall overcome!!

          • JohnEngelman

            It is a good idea for a political activist to get into the habit of looking at political opinion polls. There is little support for repealing the civil rights legislation that was passed during the 1960’s.

            One does not get places in politics by promoting unpopular causes. One gets places by getting in front of popular demands.

            Social Security and Medicare are even more popular than the civil rights legislation.

            Attempting to burn down the North American Continent will result in a left wing backlash, just as the black ghetto riots that happened from 1964 to 1968 resulted in a right wing backlash.

          • Epoche

            So in other words there is no reason to not get rid of laws against racial, social or economic segregation other than it would be unpopular. A holy place for faggots, women with children who dont want to live in the same house as the men they sleep with as a family and people who make a living decrying the usage of the IQ tests. The other day I was reading a thesis by a Jewish lesbian that it would be inhumane for us to not mortgage our future by printing our way into prosperity. We cannot know how coordinated arson would lead until we try LOL.

          • M&S

            You lose all relevance the moment you mention politics as the action of the populist achieving the possible rather than the right.

            You have forgotten what made America great was our separation from the European corrupt influence of a classist system, not a racial one.

            Racial alignment is a group benefit. Class alignment is a group fragmentative decline.

            If you cannot see this, then all your other spew has not point of real reference. That some things underline -everything- else.

            The left wing are cowards who use other races to do their fighting for them because they cannot stand to live outside the comfort zone of what they claim to despise yet look so much like as ‘White American Privilege’.

            But what happens if we refuse to acknowledge them as a unified Horde? What happens if we Five Ring their worthless behinds and take the head off the snake?

            Does the left survive as a _counter_ identity movement when the conglomerate they so arrogantly claim to represent is thrashing about as the headless snake it could easily be rendered?

            I have never seen a ‘leftist backlash’ that wasn’t carried on the shoulders of stupidity. Be it Reds in Russia enjoying a little wholesale slaughter and looting of the landed classes they had envied for centuries. Or Flower Children in 60s campuses looking for social relevance as power and calling it morality as they lived in the shadow of The Greatest Generation.

            But whereever there is thuggery in the name of ‘social change’ there are also a few smart people manipulating a mindless mob whose slogan chants mean nothing as logistics and organization.

            THOSE are the weak links whose end has come as the inceptors of a ‘backlash’ whose whiphand needs to be cut off.

          • Epoche

            You lose all relevance the moment you mention politics as the action
            of the populist achieving the possible rather than the right.

            You
            have forgotten what made America great was our separation from the
            European corrupt influence of a classist system, not a racial one.

            Racial alignment is a group benefit. Class alignment is a group fragmentative decline.

            If you cannot see this, then all your other spew has not point of real reference. That some things underline -everything- else.
            ———————————————–
            Exactly either private property, liberty of contract and freedom of association are sacrosanct or they are not. Seeing as they cannot get rid of affirmative action politically we demand the right to form our own organizations to give people enough autonomy to sidestep the process altogether. Why would you assume goodwill and motives of people who would go as far as banning intelligence in large orgamizations? Charles Murray is an intelligent scholar but his works show to me that people are not interested in truth. We need action.

          • M&S

            You are aware that when trade agreements limit the number of factories which can ‘compete’ to provide superior goods by dint of simple geography, what you are doing is not in fact competitive at all, right?

            I mean, thermodynamically, it costs more to dig up the resources, transport the raw materials to ten countries for manufacture into base materials and then send it all on to four more countries for fabricative manufacture into parts and components for final assembly into goods which are sold, principally, in two major regions.

            You recognize that if all the intermediate steps in the process chain were broken and the chain shortened to ‘straight to market’ equivalents of refinement, fabrication and assembly, the efficiency losses _which drive competition down_ would be removed?

            You recognize that the way these efficiency losses in sheer transportation distances and handling are made good is by reducing the manufacturing LABOR costs to a level below the base poverty line of a couple bucks a day?

            And that the megarich who already have more virtual wealth than they can possibly know what to do with ‘find room at the top’ for increasaing numbers of 1s and 0s like themselves by creating these inefficiencies as stock ownership opportunties?

            Stocks. As in pillories. As in what happens to a man who refuses to engage ih slave labor for the benefit of those above his station since he cannot possibly work hard enough to raise his own?

            Where ONE group has the aesthetic, intellectual and trust based social hierarchism to lever each other out of the mud of primitivism, why is it that the rich refuse to ‘compete’ with the havenots who when they can screw over their own?

            What is your definition of ‘competition’ sir that you can actually advocate the rise of whole societies which are hostile to the racial Genetic Algorithm by which whites and whites alone live past the tribal standard of ‘nobody gets ahead based on their own merit’?

            It smells an awful lot like suicidal hypocrisy to me.

            And if you’d ever traveled to ethnically homogenous nations, you would see the future death of white privileged classes in their utter lockout of foreign influence peddling amongst their own.

          • Roger Noah

            Let us get rid of all affirmative action. Also let us balance ‘free trade’ with reciprocal import tariffs. Let us limit legal immigration to geniuses, spouses and children. Let us not grant automatic citizenship to a child born in the US unless one of the child’s parents is an American citizen. Let us make our corporate tax competitive with other nations. Let us impose stiff penalties for hiring illegals. But most importantly –

            Let us, especially European-Americans, foster a culture of life where people marry early and have lots of children. And let us remove ‘child-worship’ from our culture so that having even one child is perceived as a terrible emotional burden.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            If I were elected President, I would close the EEOC and the OFCCP in the first 100 hours of my presidency. Then give all those anti-White scum in those federal buildings jobs driving Mexicans back across the border.

            And, yes, “Free Trade” has always been a lie. The tariff system kept the nation-takers honest. We are long overdue for returning to a tariff based system.

          • Epoche

            I think that a lot of our problems could be solved by getting rid of the income tax. We should support the Fair Tax program, its better than anything else we got.

          • JohnEngelman

            The earth is already over populated. I regret that the least desirable populations are the most prolific. I am also glad that the birth rate for whites has declined.

            A major reason for the decline in the white birth rate is the fact that it is more difficult for an American man to support several children and a wife who does not need to work at a middle class standard of living than it was in the past. The major reason for this is the higher U.S. population.

          • Raymond Kidwell

            There are two types of competition though. You have “zero sum” competition in which the person is simply out to tear everyone down below their own level and you have cooperative competition where the best are made to shine.

            Zero sum competition is the behavior of dysfunctional third world societies. It leads to collective failure. Cooperative competition leads to first world and dominant societies. The United States has shifted from cooperative competition to zero sum since about the 1950s.

            They are not simply giving people I.Q. tests and promoting those who score highest, or rewarding those who work hardest etc. Instead they seek out to oppress and destroy everyone else to maintain their own power and privilege. Of course I want no part of this sort of “competition” it’s a race to be last. I don’t need to work somewhere that is going to do everything it can to make me fail, simply so the boss can comparatively look good. I don’t need to live around people who will burn my house down so that by comparison they can now have the best house on the street (until someone burns that down). That’s crime. I would rather live in a society that is benefiting its members and simply promotes the most capable.

          • Raymond Kidwell

            And this is basically how the elite have shifted their behavior. A lot of Jews seem to be working in zero sum mode too, but maybe not as much. Affirmative Action is definitely a product of zero sum mindset. This has manifested in crony capitalism and other forms of dysfunction and has led a widening gap between rich and poor (economic disparity).

            Basically now if you are born into the right circles, or a member of the tribe, you can be a complete idiot and get high paying jobs. You can become a CEO of a company, completely mismanage it, run it into bankruptsy and get a $5 million bonus. Not salary- bonus.

            By contrast you can start on the bottom bagging groceries and have the I.Q. of albert einstein, be the hardest worker there, increase sales and customer service and you’ll never get paid a penny more than the mental retard standing next to you doing no work (who also benefits from a government check and tax subsidies). You won’t get a promotion or any opportunity.

            This is more of a class and race based system rather than one based on merit. The “competition” mostly involves those people in power maintaining their power through whatever means necessary. A lot of these people are not very competent. They had a great grandfather who was brilliant and worked hard and now they just do whatever possible to keep the money in the family and maintain their royalty status. When people like me simply say “stop discriminating against me. Give me opportunity to rise up based on my own abilities rather than making college prohibitively unaffordable then giving free money to those you like. Pay people an honest days salary for an honest days work” etc. the response is “oh you’re just weak. You’re just a loser. You want charity”. Really?

          • Raymond Kidwell

            I agree though that extreme nationalism as represented by a lot of these people does seem like a desire to not compete with others. I don’t see any need to have an all white country. I just think a person shouldn’t be “investigated” for forming a white community, when Jewish communities, black communities, asian comunites etc. are subsidized by the government. Academia shouldn’t constantly attack the idea of whiteness and hate on white communities etc.

            A community is not a bunch of individuals but rather a group. The group must somehow regulate itself. So we must remove criminals, incompetent people, non-conforming people etc. to some degree in order to work cohesively as a team. By this I mean you can’t have one person that believes in beheading non-believers and another person that believes in freedom of thought. The two inherently conflict with each other and cannot work on the same team. By simply having a community or nation with some common identity and certain minimal shared beliefs or traits is not affirmative action, but a more efficient way for communities to operate.

            Why have a Jewish state? Because it’s easier to be a Jew in a Jewish state. It’s also easier to accomplish things when working with similar people. Why have a white community or some white state? Similar reasons. I don’t feel any need to remove all non-whites from the nation. I don’t think that’s possible anyway. I don’t agree with some of the extreme comments here but I can see why a nation would want to have a particular identity and make some effort to segregate those who don’t conform. That’s basically what a prison is for by the way. It’s necessary to segregate people at least in some capacity if they do not operate properly in a community.

          • David Ashton

            I think the Chinese-loving Episcopalian Nordic who comes on American Renaissance to tell us that in his own personal opinion he is “glad that the white birth rate has declined” is probably only referring to the people he regards as the totally inferior “white gentiles”. He is against American nationalism in America, but not Jewish nationalism in the Middle East.

          • David Ashton

            Not a new statement from that quarter.

            There are many people with the right to complain about race displacement, such as the Palestine Arabs.

          • Conrad

            There is another element that needs to added to the story of whites coming to America. The persecution of Protestants by the Catholic Church (today another anti-white group). Known to those Protestants as the Antichrist. See –
            http://amazingdiscoveries(dot)tv/c/121/Rekindling_the_Reformation_-_English/

          • kjh64

            Not so. While what happened to the Indians was bad, invasion, conquest and killings were committed by every race and nation when the world was being settled. . As a matter of fact, that is how the nations we have today came to be, wrong though it was. Whites were also victims of this down through the ages. However, this has nothing to do with countries or immigration and people today. Whites today have every right to complain about race replacement and immigration just like anyone else does.

          • stephengreen

            “who have the right to complain”

            From whence are these rights derived?

            When does this supposed ‘right to complain’ come to exist? After five hundred years, a thousand? Are American Indian’s ‘rights’ to complain, at all challenged by any past action?

            Are European Americans, descended from historical American stock or not, beholden to some metaphysical contractual relationship with long distant racial brethren on whose behalf they have a debt or obligation?

            Do dominant group collectives eventually come to be able to determine what happens in their territory?

            I could go on, but I now I’m typing, I can’t much be bothered.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            The grievance industry will stop complaining when people stop listening.

          • Epoche

            Maybe we need more strong comedy to attack the grievance industry.

          • Fighting_Northern_Spirit

            There are plenty of other peoples who have been displaced or invaded worldwide, it’s the history of the species. The only difference is Whites are the only ones expected to feel guilty about it, and not resist it when it happens to us.
            .
            When Indians are consistent and complain about other Indian tribes who displaced them before and after 1492, then I might take their claims seriously.

          • anony

            “The only people who have the right to complain about race displacement and genocide are American Indians.”

            Had the Indians embraced their betters, they would have greatly benefited from the migration of Whites into their midst.

            Instead, they decided to fight these people who were obviously far superior to them in civilizational development. They lost. We won. End of story.

          • silviosilver

            Indians were clearly afraid of the academic and economic competition posed by whites. Engelman should be celebrating their demise just as he celebrates whites’.

          • M&S

            Total Rubbish.

            Whites didn’t want the Native Americans who MOST emulated them. By adopting static agriculture, written laws and inventing an alphabet.

            Where it was once acceptable to have a native sexual toy so long as you didn’t try to bring the product of your dalliance into proper society, it is now claimed as some kind of exotic wild-child pedigree.

            Not knowing how savage stupidity can be.

            Whites breed up. Through beauty and intellect. Native Americans, with IQs in the high 80s to low 90s offered neither while their skin marked them as distinct from the _small_ white endogroups that moved into dominant native population territories and would have been lost had they not formed island cultures of territorial, technological and genetic protection.

            Stop trying to sell racialism as a Disney Film. It is a brutally harsh selection criterion by which being part of the endogroup brings privileges ONLY insofar as it’s members share the basic responsibility of exclusionism towards all outsiders.

            That is why American became white. _Not_ because ‘1/64th of your ancestry is Cherokee Creek Sioux’.

            Respect success. Every other race does. That is why they want what we have and we are fools for giving it to them.

          • anony

            Nice rant.

            Point out where I have ever suggested race-mixing or shown any sympathy toward those Whites have displaced.

            “Had the Indians embraced the Whites” was intended to mean embraced the technology we offered. Perhaps I should have been more specific.

          • M&S

            And you miss a vital point.

            The Indians were a native population numbering in the millions. Had we arrived BEFORE the Columbia Exchange brought-

            measles, scarlet fever, typhoid, typhus, influenza, pertussis (whooping cough),tuberculosis, cholera, diphtheria, chickenpox

            We would have faced a force much harder for whites to expand into, using **period 1700s** warfighting technology. Most of which we were denied the industrial base to manufacture for ourselves.

            Had we tried to reach accommodation and trade base diplomatic ends, American would have remained fragmented and not been able to sponsor white technological innovation sufficient to take over and push out to full effect the industrial revolution which is ALL that sustains the modern global population, including our own 314 million.

            Imagine Indians, just as innately aggressive and lacking in fundamental intelligence as blacks using the same mechanisms of “You don’t like us at all! Waaaah!” victim entitlement to shape the nature of our society towards the socialist tribal culture their own Genetic Algorithm dictated and away from that of personal excellence and organized labor through hierarachial achievement:reward that white societies bring.

            The one lesson the Native Americans can teach us is what happens when a combination of unintended biological warfare, resource depletion and social displacement leaves you a minority population in your own homelands.

            This is because only whties have the ability to conceputalize long term predictive outcomes that don’t start with “Everything that is, is.”

            Cell Phones will always come from China because that’s just what the Chinese do. Oil will always come from Saudi because that’s just the way things are.

            This kind of absent conscious mentality as to cause:effect driven outcomes in scalar systems of commerce and trade is how you non-white societies will destroy themselves once they no longer have whites to compete with.

            Or organize and supply their needs.

            The difference is that we have taken a very wrong step down a bad road towards global interdependence with inferior peoples.

            We _can_ innovate the future. We -can- organize that futures progress through industrial manufacture and engineering. We -can- make medical and social systems which reflect the needs as well as benefits of those systems.

            On our own. For ourselves alone.

            The notion that we ‘must find a place at the table’ for all the other races is one which derives from the wealth classes’ inability to do anything useful with an already established system instead trying to expand their influence as ‘markets’ by creating unnecessary contiguity between groups.

            Linkages which ordinary whites find burdersome because they have to work hard to sustain their existence and improve towards wealth-threshold themselves. And which allows the wealth classes to create dependent management conditions where whites have to accept the loss of their productivity and rates of social advance so that these outsiders can be managed at least possible interactive inconvenience.

            “We’ll keep them away from you, but you have to give us money to protect you from them.” is the second oldest racket in the world.

            Nobody has the testicular fortitude to outright SAY what would happen if U.S. (and BRIC) military power was used to simply harvest resources from the third world while paying a minimum in equity trade to SOME groups (tribal leaders as head men) to keep their people at bay.

            IMO, there would be no sudden, disastrous, moral judgment for our supposed sins of insular racism. Instead, there would simply be a fading of the lost tribes of man whose Genetic Algorithm didn’t have the unique character traits to carry forward into a new future dominated by non hunter-gatherer driven skillsets.

            That this would, at one time, solve for our social problems (no more welfare for useless breeders, much higher wages for low-fertility white labor pools), our global population problem (calories/watts/gallons of water per day) and our futures investment strategy (Hey! A Space Program of our very own!) cannot be ignored.

            And it all comes from shedding the residual White Guilt at realizing the nature of fitness for selection and Darwinian principles. To simply be who we are:

            Successful.

            On our own.

            In this, it is always liberals who feel it necessary to share ‘how bad they feel’ about losers on the evolutionary backtrail of life. As a precursor to holding forth their liberal hand insisting that we pay not to do it again.

            Liberals who give away other people’s money to salve the consciousness of their own hypocrisy have no place in a world where all must agree to be responsible for genetically impoverished before ONE can be asked to pay for it’s eternal victim entitlement.

            When whites become the new Indians, we will be destroyed because no other race on this earth has the same fundamental evolutionary flaw that we do in feeling sorry for the weak when you can take from them instead.

            Not. One.

          • LHathaway

            “there would simply be a fading of the lost tribes of man whose Genetic Algorithm didn’t have the unique character traits to carry forward into a new future dominated by non hunter-gatherer driven skillsets”.

            Fading of lost tribes? That sounds like you, not them. I see you turn it around and Get to that later in your exposition.

          • Glen

            John Bloch writes:

            “Moral of the story: There will be limits imposed on diversity mania whenever the vital interests of our commercial overlords are threatened.

            ‘I suppose, on balance and in context, this is good news. At the very least, our doom will be deferred for some time to come.”

            I want to thank Bloch for sharing his story. I want to thank M&S as well, for providing excellent insight on what Bloch’s article means. Unfortunately, I think many AmRenners – like Bloch – have latched onto the idea that this is about cognitive dissonance. It is not.

            The interests of our commercial overlords – that is, its relatively non-ethnocentric gentile component – are limited to the here and now.

            For elite gentiles the longterm effect of bringing “the brightest” non-whites to the western table is miscegenation and reduction of Darwinian fitness to compete in what is, essentially, an ongoing race war between white gentiles and non-gentiles.

            Many will deny the reality of this race war, but there is no denying the reality of relatively high ethnocentrism among non-gentiles compared to the low ethnocentrism among gentiles.

            The elite’ ethnocentric non-gentiles will not mix with “the brightest” non-whites to anywhere near the same degree as the elite’s gentile component. It is simply not in their interests to do so.

            Why? Well, of course, the ethnocentrism mentioned above plays a part. This ethnocentrism has yielded proven results over the millennium; e.g., the acquisition of extensive social capital, no fratricidal wars. But so does knowledge about the heritability of IQ. There is a reduction to mean IQ between populations when an intellectually superior population mixes with an inferior population.

            There is no denying the higher, one standard deviation difference in verbal IQ of non-gentiles in the diaspora compared to white gentiles. How much greater is that difference when compared to non-white gentiles imported for “diversity”?

            Non-gentiles breeding out with white gentile populations remain socially and politically useful to the inner core of the former – those not breeding out – for several generations, but eventually are lost. There is simply no reason to believe that offspring resulting from unions between white and non-white gentiles of high IQ will remain socially and politically useful to white gentiles. Nor will the high IQ of the parents be retained from one generation to the next.

            Per Bloch, the elite’s white gentile component realize this. Yet they persist in importing “diversity.”

            Diversity for Thee, Not for Me. This is about greed, self-interest, and “screw you I’ve got mine and want your’s too.” It is evil. There’s no converting them and it’s foolish to try.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            “Moral of the story: There will be limits imposed on diversity mania whenever the vital interests of our commercial overlords are threatened.
            ‘I suppose, on balance and in context, this is good news. At the very least, our doom will be deferred for some time to come.”

            Mr. Bloch is missing one critical point. The diversity demons impose and apply anti-White sharia law evenly. The EEOC and DOJ have no concern for corporate interests. And corporations bow to them. Also, so-called business leaders know that their competitors are forced to engage in the same diversity dumb-down-drill.

            And, since 99% percent of them are non-White, H-1B visa holders exist for the sole purpose of diversity pie chart touch-ups.

          • ShermanTMcCoy

            Can you say, “South Africa?”

          • Westphilo

            So what. What relevance is it that Indians never had a chance? If you are so upset, leave this country. To do otherwise is hypocritical, you want to continue to live here and benefit from Manifest Destiny. You can logically do both!

          • Cid Campeador

            The Indians were not treated well but the majority of today’s White Americans had kinship with neither slave owners nor with those who fought the Indian Warsl

        • WR_the_realist

          [Gomer Pyle Voice]Surprise, surprise, surprise![/Gomer Pyle Voice]

          You tell the truth in the comments section of a lefty rag and get banned. Who’d a thunk?

          (Of course the same fate occurred to pro-Bill of Rights and pro-peace conservatives who posted favorable comments about Ron Paul to Red State.)

        • Simba8

          You mean like the private school where Obama sends his girls. Michele attacks children’s lunches in public schools, while her kids are fed by a chef.

    • M&S

      >>
      Rich whites are not threatened by affirmative action, because they already have it made.
      >>

      Utter Rubbish.

      Riot control assumes you know whom your enemy is and are not sending out Einsatz Batalions to /make them/ by squashing white interests.

      Riot control assumes that if you break enough teeth and poison enough respiratory systems with OC and CN they will ‘give up and go back to work the next day’.

      What happens when whites become violent because they see it works? And don’t stop -being- violent until racism as a group collective payoff again benefits them more than outsiders?

      What happens if the opposite occurs and whites work themselves to death doing more and yet -numbering less- because they want a life and they cannot afford one and replacement level kids both?

      Doesn’t profit slip then as well?

      What happens when these elites decide they want to have more of themselves and cannot breed with up and coming white success stories because not just the population but the -entire system- which makes white success ‘marketable’ is defiled to the point of destruction?

      What happens when, sans the white majority who are a standing army of political conservatism, there is no ‘markets have spoken’ control rod on upfront payoffs of huge monetary capitalization to ‘scumbags’?

      Finally, what happens, long before any of these events, when other races and nation groups, of equal financial mass and purchasing power, simply outstrip the value of the dollar altogether, rendering whom you give it to a moot as shared toiletpaper because _no one will accept the monetization of debt_ inherent to USD exclusivity in trade of real assets with real value, like oil?

      Do you think that our military will secure the USD forever when our tech base as the ability to qualitatively and quantitatively produce superior killing machines is LINKED TO THE GENETICS OF WHITE INNOVATION?!? And we have killed off and choked up the pipeline for smart white advancement in ‘preference’ for minorities?

      Please. Only a psychopath would attempt to downgrade his diagnosis to mere ‘cognitive dissonance’ when what he is PAID TO DO is create success based on futures investment and he has chosen to elect and enforce the policies of _racial failure_.

      Of course I knew this from the moment I heard this clueless doofus actually say:

      “My boss established a “diversity” business silo–with all the vagueness the term implies; we weren’t sure exactly what we were going to do–and in a brilliant move, recruited a fashionable, attractive, and articulate Muslim woman, rather than the expected black woman as our diversity czarina. Fatemeh Hall (that was her married American name) had recently arrived from Iran, and she had a matchless zeal for uplifting African-Americans in particular. She had made this her life’s mission after reading Uncle Tom’s Cabin in high school. The business elites of Chicago were desperate to recruit Muslims and show how unprejudiced they were against them. Doors opened for her magically.

      Fatemeh unaccountably decided she liked me, even though I made no secret of my admittedly neutered Republicanism. Before long, I was her official mentor, and diversity initiatives were added to my portfolio. My mission was to find a way to make money from racial preferences.”

      It is not ‘a brilliant move’ to hire a charming stupid person from a totalitarian state to uplift the equally inane of your own population. Because predatory charisma is not the same as understanding that you may climb and climb until you are the last person that goes down with the ship. But if you pull the stop-cocks that guarantees the sinking will happen, you are NOT going to enjoy your status or regret the actions which initiated the last-drowned-rat consequences.

      What I think is that the uber rich are also the uber mechanized. They have so reduced their ontological dataset to the level of a RISC processor understanding of how to make money that they are both easily duped by those who have a heart to go with the brain. And unable to express their own perspective valuing of that empathy except through their ability to manipulate objects with machine like lack of understanding to the consequences.

      Where this is undertaken by a sapient as much as sentient creature, there can be no splitting hairs between ‘knows no better’ and ‘knows but doesn’t care’.

      Because a lack of knowing (as direct experience of the consequences) why you DON’T betray your kith and kin is no excuse for doing it and laughing about it afterwards.

      As this little bit of ‘Greed is Good’ (for some of us) reality check shows:

      “He would then speculate in more and more horrific yet somehow hilarious detail about the infrastructure consequences of minority contractor growth. Yes, we were bad, but this is how men sometimes talk in the capital markets. After two drinks they revel in their cleverness and their parasitism.”

      They know what they do is going to be bad for themselves and for the society they support. They do it anyway because they would rather have secure route to high income lifestyles using the skills they know than refuse to be part of the rape of America.

      That is a deliberate choice derived from sublimated awareness that is brought to conscious spew by alcohol. That is psychopathy.

      Another word for which is Evil.

      My definition of evil is the destruction of that which one depends on, hoping someone else will step in to stop the process of degradation /after/ the evil person has made their cut and are safely retired. But the damage is cumulative and can only be reversed, over the same period of time, by ceasing to add to the exploitation vector that says the -next- generation is authorized to use the same skills, the same way, to ensure their own favorable outcome.

      And why should they? Just because they are another step nearer the abyss?

      Please.

      Rich whites will not survive in a non-white world except through genetic oblivion because wealth is just just 1s and 0s on a bank computer and if you don’t or can’t contribute your warped, destructive, skills to the leveraging of your own society, why should (nominally successful, in the Darwinian sense of still surviving) other’s let you exercise them in their own?

      Being racially aware, they have no reason to want to create or support a ‘rich’ white enclave in their own group. Why should they, when they can predatorily annihilate the whites without hurting their own social bond group AND be richer for it by looting the fallen’s soft capital?

      Evil is wrong because it is so stupid it doesn’t realize who feeds it and thus has no clue who will eat it when the beast it has consumed no longer protects it’s interests.

    • Reverend Bacon

      Very true, and well said. When you’re as rich as Buffett and Gates, all you care about is what business schools refer to as “government risk” or “nationalization risk,” that is, that all your assets will be confiscated by what Wolfe called “the Steam.” Steam Control is therefore very important. Why not pay a small fraction of your wealth for what is essentially insurance? Especially if you can get the working stiffs to pay alongside you, essentially subsidizing your insurance premia.

    • T_Losan

      Chateau Heartiste has an interesting post on this. The “I made it, screw those who didn’t” attitude is extremely damaging but fashionable and effective in the short term.

      • JohnEngelman

        The “I made it, screw those who didn’t” attitude motivates libertarians, and economic conservatives.

        Regardless of what Republican politicians say when campaigning, it is the attitude that motivates the Republican Party.

        The GOP exists to advance the economic interests of the richest ten percent of the American population. If you keep that in mind you will not be surprised by anything the GOP does. I hope you will be angry, but you will not be surprised.

  • Adolf Verloc

    Mr. Bloch, this is one of the most brilliant pieces of writing I have seen for a long time! To make the greatest impact, I would say both a nonfiction book like “Adam Smith’s” “The Money Game” and a fiction book like “The Bonfire of the Vanities” are called for. You have the writing talent to do both, and I hope you will give it due consideration.

    • Fighting_Northern_Spirit

      And you might need to find another source of income after revealing this much corporate cynicism.

      • bilderbuster

        It seems to me he should be quite wealthy by now profiting from White suffering by enriching non White “scumbags” with White people’s money.

        • jabowery

          And this sort of “hypocrisy” is exactly what ethics call for: If there is a weakness in the system available for profitable exploitation by the virulent, the civic minded will exploit it to remove those benefits from the virulent and then use the benefits to expose the weakness.

          BRAVO Mr. Bloch!

        • Fighting_Northern_Spirit

          The point of the article is that the scheme he helped cook up was rejected. So while he tried to profit from White suffering, at least in this instance he failed.

  • TL2014

    Wow. Just wow.
    How else can this info be made public?

    • LHathaway

      Read a corporate mission statement. Like certain parties before them, they are proud of their efforts and often put it in writing. Discrimination against whites is the law.

      • Raymond Kidwell

        It’s not the law, that’s the point I’m trying to make. It’s illegal to discriminate against whites, but this seems to be largely ignored by everyone.

        • AndrewInterrupted

          No, it’s perfectly legal. Quotas were established by the SCOTUS ruling: Griggs versus Duke Power – 1971. A case brought by the minority occupation government i.e. the EEOC and a fake White lawyer, Alfred Blumrosen.

          If the proportion of White is unusually high, they are free to displace you. But, you won’t see that disproportion (because there isn’t one) of “Whites” because many non-Whites are allowed to masquerade as White in diversity pie charts and the census.

          • Jo

            Maybe, it’s time to call ourselves Europeans rather than Whites.

  • Kathy M

    Not surprised. From presidents to corporate elites, our worst enemies and those most responsible for harming the white race are our own kind.

    • ncpride

      All for greed and profit, no less. Despicable people, but I firmly believe in Karma.

      • Rick O’Shea

        Karma does not exist, but vengeance does.

        • Periapsis

          Vengeance and karma go along hand in glove.

      • AndrewInterrupted

        They are cowards, too.

        • Roger Noah

          What about the white masses who are asleep and who let this be done to them even when they had all the power in the 1960s and 1970s? Maybe because they were too stoned on weed and too preoccupied with sex? If there is one generation responsible for the demise of the West, it is the damnable baby boomers.

          And they racked up this multi-trillion dollar debt for future generations. No wonder many of them did not reproduce. This way, they did not have to worry about the national debt, did they? Apres moi, le deluge.

        • Usually Much Calmer

          Yes. It is not about profits, it is about minimizing risk (preempting a shakedown and exchanging a known loss for a variable one).
          Cowards overestimate risks.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            “A coward dies a thousand times before his death, but the valiant taste of death but once. It seems to me most strange that men should fear, seeing that death, a necessary end, will come when it will come.”

            ― William Shakespeare, Julius Caesar

          • Usually Much Calmer

            Ah, I love that quote. But in this instance no one’s in mortal jeopardy. The only consequence to individuals within companies of playing chicken to win are. . . the loss of a job or equity, that’s it.
            These yes-men are cowards in a field of cowards.

  • JP Rushton

    This was one of the best and most informative pieces that I have read on AmRen.

    Thanks for telling your story.

  • Rhialto

    Since the first anti-discrimination laws of the 1950’s, America has come a long way: A long way down for the average White man.

  • MindHead99

    Good article Mr. Bloch. Many businesses take advantage of White Displacement. I know of a company owned by a white man who married a black woman so he was then able to bid for minority contracts and get college preferences for his children. I did some consulting for this company but got replaced by a minority owned competitor.
    I believe there is a nexus between the federal government and universities to institute social engineering policies that collude against poor/middle class whites. Corporate executives are indoctrinated by universities and threatened by Federal lawsuits.
    Thank you for sharing your knowledge.

    • Usually Much Calmer

      Are his children also her children or were they from a previous marriage?

    • AndrewInterrupted

      I know of a company who “bought” a Black man for the same purposes of keeping government cash coming in. The “Black owner” just lays around his McMansion collecting checks. Gold plated welfare. Someday he wants to have as many McMansions as Saddam Hussein had.

  • LHathaway

    “Fatemeh Hall (that was her married American name) had recently arrived from Iran, and she had a matchless zeal for uplifting African-Americans in particular”.

    The amusing thing is, hiring brainy and educated people of color from all over the world, as part of fulfilling diversity obligations, discriminates against people or color who were Born in this country. I suppose, if white men are being discriminated against even more so, it must make it worthwhile.

    This story reminded me of hearing Pat Buchanan on TV several years ago. We’ve read the entire article, and what actual product, creation (even a virtual one, at this point) is ever discussed? Is it auto glass? Is a company going to supply auto glass to GM? Would they make a door handle? Paint? Money is being shuffled around regardless, or irregardless, of manufacturing and building. There was this quaint sign up in the offices of a factory I used to work in that read, “profits are made on the production floor”.

    The other thing that occurred to me to say, even before the article gets to it’s ‘happy ending’ was to say something like (and only intended it to be half-serious),

    ‘This article just shows the need for the nationalization of industry and commerce. The people owning industry is the only way to get things done’.

    • M&S

      ‘This article just shows the need for the nationalization of industry and commerce. The people owning industry is the only way to get things done’.

      Not just the industry but the labor.

      Not to go all Commie on you but the proletariat really is what controls how economics work on the simple basis that (for a human) there is more energy in a candy bar than their is in a stick of dynamite as a function of calorie conversions of the sugar.

      The proletariat is stupid, shiftless and easily satisfied with basic levels of material wealth and does not greatly improve itself or it’s offspring by using those ‘privileges’ to make better genetic/epigenetic (experience driven = mind opening) choices.

      But the world moves on and manufacturing becomes more automated which leaves them with skills they can’t sell and debts they can’t pay in a society where the cost of manufacturing has to fall with the increase of populations to maintain ‘affordability’ and this in turn leads to wage stagnations, relative to entropic inflation.

      Now stop.

      What if the man cannot better himself because his genes have hit an endflux point where he cannot move up because he cannot make the kinds of labor profits _period_ (using just two hands) to garner better mates as genetic access to the kinds of wealth enablement skills which will drive his genes past the threshold of riches?

      Indeed, what if, through lottery or luck or some personal skill, he DOES make it but the random fluctuation of genetics sends his kids back down to the median point between his own intelligence and that of his base population in a society where entropy has made it harder to compete anyway (i.e. today dad couldn’t make it, either)?

      You can make -him- better by insisting that he have the right to ONE child whose chances will be genomically enhanced by both the downwards migration of successful genes from richer couples who HAVE TO have 2-3 kids. And by giving him ‘persistant ability’ as the control of robots doing multiple task service jobs which have higher payoff than individual labor in an industrial capacity.

      So now he can afford to attract a hypergamous mate and have a guarantee that their children will be better, genetically, for want of being -fewer-, legally, as a continuing inclusionary process with higher level members of the same society.

      Owning industry is a figment of imagination. You ‘own’ a piece of paper that says no one else can make the same widget with the same process or face civil dispute. In your own lands.

      But in a foreign land, like China, this respect for a competing societies’ copyright/patent/stock ownership laws is simply not functionally useful to a society getting off it’s dirty subsistence agro knees as licensing arrangements etc.

      Which means you are left with the need to police introduction of -other- people’s patented machine tools, vehicles, power sources etc. to prevent the standup of mirror image industry without your permission.

      And that is, essentially, setting the rich against the rich by which ‘the agreement is’ nobody makes a profit so that somebody doesn’t get raped.

      And that can only end in betrayal when somebody decides to break the pact rather than go poor themselves.

      But as a friend of mine used to say: “As long as people gotta eat, there will always be a need for a plumber.”

      And where you have robots that can download tradeschool level ‘skillz’ in an instant but have no way of knowing how to bid online for a job, where the job is, how to drive there, or whether/where to plug in for a recharge/fresh download after completing the job. There you have an ability to control society through the kinds of labor taskings that still take a man all day to accomplish (anathema to the wealthy) but which are nonetheless sufficiently varied that there is literally an ENORMOUS carrying capacity of ‘dump trash one day, fill potholes the next, pick lettuce the third.’, short term, contracts to keep oneself well employed and fulfilling demanding (menial) social contract labor roles without being reduced to a motor-skills dead head of brain damaged tool.

      Because it is your bots which are taking the hits.

      If whites would agree to own labor, our elites could no longer own us because we would set the value of labor on a random, day to day, basis of fulfillment and _never work_ for people we didn’t like or who didn’t strike us as socially conservative with our best interests at heart.

      And we would no longer have to grin and bear it when some mouthpiece for the far left said: “Jobs Americans won’t do.” As though we were too good to get our robots dirty.

      These two methods would enable the perfectly synch process by which whites could kick out unwanted non-whites as wage slaves of the leftist elites. Because it would no longer be ‘beneath us’ to do manual labor which had high investment rewards.

      They would have to find a new excuse to displace us using our own tax money.

      Robots + Genomics make for the perfect proletariat/managerial class interlink.

      • LHathaway

        My ‘statement’ was meant to be mostly facetious. I could just see someone reading this and saying, “this shows we need to be able to do even more” in order to subsidize diversity and make sure it gets fully done right. This thought occurred even to me, anyway, while reading the article. I didn’t mean to set you off on the analysis of modern labor.

        The robots thing did remind of socialists and leftist I’ve listened to before. Instead of robots, the felt that ‘owners’ had more or less access to Human robots who worked all day, for them.

        Interesting that you mention ‘owning industry’ because I remember a time when the far leftists claimed that ‘owning the land’ was the key to all. This is no longer true at all. It is now about who owns the machines. You may be onto something much newer than this idea (of mine).

        How will us whites ‘agree to own our labor’ as a means of reaching a nationalist utopia?

  • CallahanAuto

    This article is fascinating. I had to read certain graphs more than once to be sure I understood it, but this is a detailed look at the ability of very smart people to exploit diversity for big bucks. I wanted to read more.

    • Eagle_Eyed

      Absolutely. Being a race realist and finance major in grad school, it was really fascinating.

  • Funruffian

    White displacement is now a business among government officials. Who would have ever thought that the system can be so rigged against Whites that they in turn can force certain Whites to discriminate amongst each other. No wonder there are so many self-loathing Whites! They are competing just to keep their jobs and salaries.

    • Periapsis

      It is certainly official foreign and domestic policy at all levels of the U.S. government. Engineering our displacement at home, while aiding and abetting a Jewish junta that is slaughtering them in Ukraine is precisely that. So is bombing Serbian civilians, and leaving white South Africans at the mercy of hordes of hostile blacks. No, the U.S. government is hip deep in the blood of whites, directly and indirectly.

  • Pro_Whitey

    Dang, you would think the law partner would try to make it work, but her insight that the receivables would never materialize, due to nonperformance of contracts, after the minority vendors got their upfront cash is pretty much irrefutable. Probably the way to make it work is for the minority vendors to be mere fronts for non-minority vendors who could be counted on to do the job if offered a sufficiently substantial back end payment.

  • WR_the_realist

    Wow.

    This is the sort of article every American should read, but only appears in American Renaissance.

    • silviosilver

      I wonder if he shopped it around to mainstream outfits first. If he did, I’m not surprised they didn’t touch it – a smoking insider-tells-all about the anti-white diversity racket, who’d want to read about that? (Snicker.)

      • AndrewInterrupted

        Probably not. More likely, he has a few lawyers in the family who agreed to defend him from all the frivolous law suits. There would be many more displays of this type if not for the silencing effect of the so-called legal system. The 1st Amendment died long ago.

  • Spikeygrrl

    Brilliant. MORE LIKE THIS, PLEASE!!

  • Jo

    This is why we need a civil rights organization.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      “We” as in European-Americans, I presume?

      • Jo

        Yes.

    • M&S

      This is why we need separation into enclaves, regional shift away from non-whites into high density white territories and secession from America into an all-white new nation state.

      With corruption at this level, there is no way to clean out the system short of writing laws which specifically condemn the guilty for their exploitation of our race. Since that would mean acknowledging that ALL the hustle from hollywood to highest academia has been basically a fraud perpetrated by a THIRD race, we would never be able to make it clear that this is unacceptable by punishing the applicable parties.

      Which means we can only write in new laws which explicitly forbid such actions and that can only be as a function of ‘not a reversal but a new idea’ explicitly white ethno-state.

      We should never have to explain to our children why we ever allowed laws that condone this kind of activity. Instead we should be able to point towards yet another classist precursor state that whites separated from when it became too hostile to our very existence.

      This will mean territorial losses (which have effectively happened already in the West and Southwest and most of the South and East) but such would act as an eternal monument to the stupidity of 1960s white revolutionary culture in starting a self-destructive trend which only ended when we decoupled from the train before it blew up.

      • Jo

        “We would never be able to make it clear that this is unacceptable by punishing the applicable parties.”

        Think ‘BIG.’ Taking on the government, major corporations, colleges and universities, Holder, anti-White immigration law, black on White crime, etc, is not small potatoes. Federal judges would rule against us. Take it to the Supreme Court. If they rule against us, we have sufficient reason for drastic measures. We need to do it while we have the numbers. If we don’t demand White discrimination stop, it will continue to get worse.

        “Which means we can only write in new laws which explicitly forbid such actions.”

        Anti-discrimination laws do forbid such actions. They aren’t applied equally to Whites.

        “we need separation into enclaves, regional shift away from non-whites into high density white territories and secession from America into an all-white new nation state.”

        White flight or moves to certain regions, northwest, for example, create temporary White communities. With corrupt feds forcing non-Whites into
        those areas using anti-discrimination laws against us, I don’t see how that would lead to a permanent White enclave or region. Few have moved to the northwest, for example. Meanwhile, more non-Whites are colonizing than Whites moving to that area. Secession would have to occur now in the northwest to preserve it for Whites.

        Think about it. How would you keep an enclave all White? Are you willing to throw all non-Whites living there out? How would the U.S. government react to that? Would it militarily take over the region if that were attempted? Without
        leadership and enough Whites supporting a White enclave or region, secession will not happen. A civil rights organization would not handle that, but a White interests one could.

        Even after the revelation by John Bloch, Whites still want to slink away with their tails between their legs like abused dogs.

        See Periapsis: “We need to use it (anger) to change our situation, anger is after all basically an indication there are a lot of problems that require correction…”

        • Antarctica here we come !!

        • Raymond Kidwell

          What I don’t understand is why all this talk about starting your own nation or other high minded ambitions, but not even the tiniest steps towards accomplishing basic goals. Why not go build a PLE or start a law firm that takes white civil rights cases pro bono? Why not do something realistic? I would rather see someone take the tiniest effort and do something real than continuously babble on about what he would do if he ruled the world

          • Jo

            There is more enthusiasm for a civil rights organization on other pro-White websites than on Amren. Not sure why that is except every site attracts different mindsets.

            “Why not do something realistic? I would rather see someone take the tiniest effort and do something real than continuously babble…”

            Agree.

  • Fighting_Northern_Spirit

    I must admit that I saw the outcome coming when I read this sentence:
    .
    The deal for the minority vendors wasn’t quite that bad, of course, and there was no other way they were going to get a pile of cash, so they were mesmerized from the outset.
    .
    What self-respecting minority wouldn’t simply abscond with that cash, and what investor would believe that they would continue to do the work? Minorities are not in business to work, and if you give them the carrot and take away the stick they’re not going to continue to do so. Even with the carrot and the stick don’t count on much productivity.

  • Rick O’Shea

    The articles here at Amren keep my blood at a roiling boil.

    • benvad

      Ditto

      • Roger Noah

        Is there any chance of collaborating with intelligent non-whites who have a stake in this country and who realize that a European majority is necessary for the health of this nation? Who are committed to minimal government, and to Western traditions?

        I would think so, and I know a few such non-whites (though too few, I must admit).

        We probably do not need non-white allies (such as Michelle Malkin and David Yeagley), but why not engage such allies as exist?

    • Periapsis

      Indeed, after reading some articles posted here sometimes I feel like the reactor at Chernobyl, moments before it exploded. The caps on top of the control rods were dancing from the rapidly increasing steam pressure below, and each one weighed at least 800 pounds.

  • silviosilver

    Depressing as the subject matter is, this was a cracking good read. I’m so accustomed to the relentless stream of bad news that the uplifting turn near the end (“scumbags”) caught me completely by surprise. Made my week, actually.

    As for Fatemeh’s pen, the one purchased from the white man represents an exchange made on the free market; the one purchased from the minority supplier represents state-sponsored anti-white discrimination.

    Is it really going too far to describe America as an officially anti-white country? It seems to me that’s precisely what it has become. As I see it, a pro-white activist could not possibly enjoy better returns on his time and energy than beating the drum against anti-whitism. From anti-white education to anti-white media; from anti-white employment policy to anti-white immigration policy; it’s a target-rich environment as far as the eye can see.

  • kjh64

    Fatemah Hall, formerly of Iran, is so concerned about African-Americans because she read Uncle Tom’s cabin? Well, let’s see, she comes from a country that today, still publicly hangs gays in the town square, holds a 9 year old girl responsible if she is sexually abused by an adult man and has abysmal human rights. As to Blacks, they wouldn’t be allowed to immigrate to Iran, much less be treated equally.

    • IstvanIN

      But she believes those terrible things are the RIGHT thing to do. She is probably pro-black slavery as well but that doesn’t go over quite as well these days in America.

      • Roger Noah

        No, she is not Muslim any more. She is Zoroastrian.

        • AndrewInterrupted

          Her “Muslim” is in her DNA.

    • Roger Noah

      BTW, no self-respecting African-American would want this woman’s pity, let alone have a positive regard for “Uncle Tom’s cabin”. This book is rightly criticized for treating blacks as less than human.

  • Franklin_Ryckaert

    This only shows that the greatest enemy of the white man is the white man himself when he uses his ingenuity to harm himself. This sort of behavior is pretty structural in most white societies nowadays. It started as outreach to minorities, it is now in full suicide mode.

    • Periapsis

      It’s more akin to murder-suicide. Whites are being led by the nose to murder each other today, just as they were time without number over the past century. Because outside parties are behind this, it’s mass murder disguised as mass suicide. Driving people to suicide is the same as killing them yourself.

  • stephengreen

    What an excellent article. Has now got me thinking how this plays out in the European heartland, particularly the United Kingdom.

  • david dorian

    Great article. But remember its not ‘displacement’. Its Genocide.

    And that’s a crime.

  • guest

    That’s a really great article.

    To sumarize: Steve Jobs types may be very eager to hire more diversities, because he gets social value from it, but the bond markets are not eager to finance diversities, because they do not get financial value from it. It may be possible to force or persuade whites to hire diversities but it’s not possible to force a market valuation to change.

    • The diversities that Steve Jobs and his ilk want to hire aren’t the same kind of diversities throwing a bongo party in Ferguson. Jobs, Zuck, et al. want inexpensive code slaves from the Asian continent.

  • jartaylor

    This is the kind of piece I love to publish: the inside story from from a guy who is not afraid to tell us what really goes on–and who can write, too.

  • Having done a bit of actuarial work in an earlier life, I tried to model the cost/benefit calculation. Assume a company like GM has the option of buying a special insurance policy to cover the payout on a catastrophically large racial shakedown. If what GM pays for diversity in the form of higher prices and lower performance is less than the reasonable premium for a racial incident insurance policy, preferences are arguably rational. Only arguably rational, however, since even the most blood-thirsty preferences do not guarantee a favorable outcome in a “racism” lawsuit, and the creativity of the people who manufacture racial incidents is not to be underrated.

    That and firms that pander are more likely to be hit by these racial shakedown lawsuits and activism more often.

    Say our black vendor has a contract with GM that should be good for steady payments that added up to, say, $1 million over five years. The idea is to sell the right to that income stream on the open market. An investor would pay a discounted lump sum, say, $700,000 today, the intermediaries would take their fees, and the minority vendor would get the rest–up front, right now. He would then, presumably, invest the money in added productive capacity.

    The paragraphs that followed that were not surprising to me, though I would have guessed that the way it worked out in the end is that the black vendor blew the 700 big ones on luxury cars instead of capital investments in his business which is serving GM. And that when those holding the rights to his income stream from his big fat GM affirmative action contract wanted it, he didn’t think he had to give it to them because he didn’t realize he signed it away to get the $700K up front.

    Also note that trading $700K in present value for $1M in future value over a five year time span is an effective 141% interest rate. And you wonder why Bell Curve City Ferguson is full of check cashing joints and payday loan joints instead of real banks.

    Fatemeh momentarily went into catatonia. I was blindsided. I had never before heard anyone speak so candidly about preferred minority vendors. But in a moment, it was blindingly obvious. Most of the minority vendors were not really entrepreneurs interested in building businesses though “access to capital.” They were looking, quite literally, for a pay-off. Hand them the pay-off up-front and the vendors would disappear, or the money would disappear, or both. The markets, even in the form of this cultural Marxist, intuited this fundamental reality.

    I spoke too soon.

    In my view, the lesson from this episode is that what race realists mistake for elite psychosis about minorities is actually elite cognitive dissonance. They chant the mantra that minorities are wonderful, irreplaceable, and invaluable. Yet the persistence of the “access to capital” problem suggests that somewhere out there is a core rationality that resists reprogramming. At some level, the markets realize that giving these darlings a lot of money is not a good investment.

    It’s nothing more than the fear of fear itself. These corporate munchkins fear their own shadows, succumb to the cultural Marxist programming that served as their education, and they fear the Federal alphabet gang and the Sharpton & Jackson Justice Brothers style shakedowns.

  • IstvanIN

    Will there even be enough rope for all the Whites who actively sold us out?

    • VladimirKnopka

      I was thinking of having a website called “The Guillotine List.” It would just be list of the names of people who gave the marching orders on White Genocide. [Not the peons who were ordered to ‘make it work’, just the decision makers.] Their names would be linked to articles that expose what they did.

      Then I remembered… I don’t know how to administrate a website. So if anyone wants to take this idea and run with it, feel free!

  • Shooga J

    I always knew of “AA”…Give more blacks government jobs. Force big companies to have a quota of face legal slaughter. But never, ever, could I have imagined it is embedded this deep in American Corporate society. Perhaps they like “White Displacement”. I simply prefer the term “racist”.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      It’s a study in Overton Window movement.

      The Overton Window essentially states: “How much bad behavior can I get away with until I have to stop, wait, then try again?”

      Using a word like “preferences” was completely taboo 10 years ago. Now they can use the word without objection.

      Same idea with the nation-making tenet of “most-qualified”. At federal agencies and contractors, the scheming DC think-tankers removed the term. Now it’s just “qualified” or “un-qualified”. This was done also for “White displacement” reasons. Reason being: “most-qualified” usually meant a hetero, White male.

      The Overton Window was moved: “most-qualified” being erased from the American employment lexicon, and no one noticed. A major silent victory for the “White displacement” devils. They slither like snakes–in the dark.

  • Prospero

    This is one of those Horatio Alger stories that reminds me of all that is best about America. The old-fashioned themes are all there: the love of liberty, the Protestant work ethic, the can-do attitude, and of course, the plucky courage of simple folk, drawn from all corners of the earth, united by the common dream of building a better tomorrow.

  • Paul Lycurgues

    I have to say this has to be one of the most horrendously candid, terrifyingly honest and blatantly apocalyptic article I have ever read on Amren. It explains a lot ; thank you.

  • GeneticsareDestiny

    This article is incredible. Thank you, Mr. Bloch, for writing it. I don’t know much about corporate financial matters, but you wrote this article eloquently and made it easy for people like me to understand what you’re talking about.

    “Yet the persistence of the “access to capital” problem suggests that somewhere out there is a core rationality that resists reprogramming. At some level, the markets realize that giving these darlings a lot of money is not a good investment.”

    This is reassuring. Sometimes I wonder just how far it’s possible to push the PC envelope, but it looks like the market is capable of protecting itself, at least to a certain extent. I hope this doesn’t change.

  • AndrewInterrupted

    “…My boss established a “diversity” business silo–with all the vagueness the term implies…”

    “…Vagueness?…” No. Deliberate ambiguity. Subterfuge. The necessary smoke and mirrors to hide your Cultural Marxist crimes.

  • AndrewInterrupted

    Hopefully she will need to move to Iran to embrace it fully. She isn’t welcome in the U.S.

    • Roger Noah

      She would be executed if she moved back to Iran. However, I agree that immigrants who work against the interests of the historic American nation are not welcome here. If only she were not such an Affirmative Action enthusiast, I would not mind her living among us. Looking at her company’s website, she hasn’t given up on Affirmative Action advocacy yet.

      • AndrewInterrupted

        Iran would doing us a favor. Just as ISIS is doing us a favor by threatening to blow up Chicago. I think they’re trying to get on our good side. <;-D

        • watling

          You obviously haven’t seen the film Source Code, in which a non-Muslim, white guy tries to blow up Chicago, and a whole bunch of previously suspicious minorities are revealed to be wonderfully talented, law-abiding folk. Oh, and the brains behind the whole operation to catch the white bomber is … black.

          Hollywood dances to the same tune as Corporate America.

  • Periapsis

    Then there is a price on her head, literally for apostasy.

  • LHathaway

    I’m guessing there wont be studies or hand wringing about my great, great, great grandfather coming down with jock itch, or any other illness or injury, 400 years ago.

    I always felt the whole ‘blankets’ thing was a kind of ‘inverted’ history; revisionism, or an invention if you will. Not just because I believe nothing, or because so much else turns out to be a lie? But because the main dagger word thrown about is always ‘smallpox’. The only thing I know for Sure about smallpox is that Western medicine eradicated smallpox.

    I would like to believe I do understand something of the (elite) liberal mind. I imagine it works something like this. The idea whites eradicated a disease like small pox from the world, that could give people the wrong idea, and be bad for some folk’s esteem. So instead of that, or reality, we will say whites eradicated others with smallpox. In this form, fighting stereotypes and all, it’s esteem building, and it’s also consciousness raising, and no ones feelings are hurt. At least, no one’s feelings who counts to them as a human being.

    Regardless of what I think of the issue, you’ll hear people seriously arguing both side of the extermination issue, like is done with so much else? Personally, it’s an issue I would prefer to ignore, preferring to talk about something else.

    One thing is for sure, no one ever argues over my theory.

    • Jo

      “you’ll hear people seriously arguing both sides of the extermination issue.”

      I’m one of them. Only one side, though.

      “The idea whites eradicated a disease like small pox from the world, that could give people the wrong idea, and be bad for some folk’s esteem. So instead of that, or reality, we will say whites eradicated others with smallpox.”

      Perfect. You understand the liberal mind.

      I’d like to know how many Indians there were when Europeans landed and how many remained when they were placed on reservations. Actual deaths caused by Europeans, not from diseases. Knowing those figures help determine whether Indians were genocided. One thing, for sure, there are over 5 million in the U.S., more not indicating their Indian status. Hardly, what I’d call genocide or extinct.

      How many Europeans did Indians kill? Quite a few. If there hadn’t been an ample supply of Europeans in Europe coming to America, I’d say the Indians were genociding Europeans. That might not be a good argument considering Europeans invaded land Indians claim was their own. Whether Indians actually owned the land is a discussion for another time about Solutreans.

      • LHathaway

        There’s no way to put a positive spin on the displacement of American Indians and Slavery. Hence, I generally try to avoid discussing those issues. Colonialism, overall, likely had a positive aspect. It certainly put us where we are now. How do you want to look at it? Do you want to take credit for the trains, jet liners, cars (which are mostly Toyotas now), high rises, and medicine and electronics in Africa, or do you want to say Africa is a perverted dump? Depends who your audiences is, perhaps.

        Slavery and genocide have likely Helped put a negative spin on colonialism, something that likely was a positive thing (at least something that puts us where we are now). Africans, for their own part, have spent the best part of the last 50 years thinking they are morally superior to us colonial powers in the West. I suspect this belief has been the ‘only thing that has civilized them’. We have our own beliefs on this site.
        Being exceptional Americans, we have a unique way of looking at colonialism. We defeated it. Our efforts provided inspiration for anti-colonial efforts across the globe. We ourselves passed, and enforced, the Monroe doctrine, the worlds leading anti-colonial document. Don’t expect to learn anything about that attending school. The USA has been turned into the worlds leading colonial and imperialist power. If you loan money to them, you are exploiting them and discriminating against them. If you don’t loan money to them, you are exploiting them and discriminating against them. I do believe, they would prefer it if you don’t breath their air. I do believe, that they would.

    • LHathaway

      When I discus the ‘elite liberal mind’ perhaps that deserves it’s own discussion or explanation?

      Does it include the (extremely well-read, with communist leanings) editor in chief of the local university newspaper who understands public perception is being invented, and goes along with it, because it must be for a good cause?

      Does it include many who post on AmRen (possibly even most) who likely have their own agenda?

      I wouldn’t say it includes ‘Jews’. There IS conspiracy to place jews as the cause of all world problems (instead of whites). As I’ve written before, likely the idea is that ‘Jews’ are getting revenge for the holocaust. But this is foolish notion, for intelligent girls could never be impressed by multi-generational efforts at revenge? Oh, no one thinks they are getting ‘revenge’ now! Too much into white supremacy, perhaps. Anyone going on about jews is likely part of the conspiracy, or a dupe of some kind. I don’t necessarily object to their screeds, I just wish they would write about (this important issue to them) someplace else. In the here and now it just makes us look like Nazis (likely what they are hoping to do).

      Does it include columnist George Will. A columnist who nearly always takes our side and has done more for our cause than any of us, who never-the-less on occasion will promote the idea of white guilt?

      Does it include presidential candidate Newt Gingrich? Believe it or not, Gingrich reviews books on amazon under his own name. In at least on of his book reviews he promotes an idea of white guilt, that I would assume, he absolutely knows not to be true. I’m guessing, that apparently he thinks that if whites feel guilty about whatever crimes of their in the present and past, it will defang them or arrest them or prevent them committing violence of some kind in the here and now? Is Gingrich part of some kind of conspiracy? When he runs for office and is on TV, I’m guessing he is. Much of it likely scripted. When he writes his book reviews, is he doing so as part of some kind of conspiracy, or is it monkey-see, monkee-do, is he just repeating something he’s seen others do, and what is apparently accepted practice? I’m actually guessing the later.

      The actual conspirators are likely at the national level. Perhaps relatively few in number. I think most just go along with it. If you want to be one of the elites yourself, it would be best to just shut up and study well in school. I suspect some of the ‘smart’ or aware elites will be those who will eventually take our side
      To be honest, the national leadership has seemed to favor us and our ideas the last 20 years or so. People can sense something is going on and this is no coincidence.

      TheI agree with others who have spoken here recently. It will change. Peoples beliefs will change. But this will take place over time. It will take another 50 years to undo ‘the damage that has been done’ .

  • LHathaway

    What was the one where the lady joined a big NYC non-profit organization and then told her story. The story was so good, you had to wonder if she took the job in the first place (likely with approval/awareness of higher ups) in order to write an expose’ afterward? I think I like this story better, but it’s been awhile since I read the one from the lady who was disillusioned and nearly contusioned while working for a non-profit.

  • somebody, somebody must have one time or another seen this coming . . . .

  • anony

    White whiners? show me where I am whining. On the contrary, I have no sympathy for any peoples we have displaced. It’s part of the natural evolution of the races.

    My motto has been, and continues to be, if you can take it, and hold it, it’s yours.

  • Usually Much Calmer

    Yup, we really screwed up. Even the commenters at Seeking Alpha are predicting a collapse at this point.

    Hang on tight!

  • Raymond Kidwell

    What I encountered is major corporations like Proctor and Gamble have nearly 100% black employment in regards to non-educated, entry level jobs that pay reasonable wages. They will not hire me at these jobs, which is something the FBI is supposed to go after. I will have the FBI on speed dial soon as I report endless amounts of anti-white discrimination but they seem to ignore it even though it is stated as the top priority on their website (fighting discrimination that is). I guess discrimination against whites doesn’t count, or against males, but we’ll see. But the higher level people are almost entirely college educated whites. So when they turn in their paper work they can say “we have 17% minority employees”. Yet nearly all of those are entry level grunt work. They don’t seem to be displacing their own jobs but rather displacing people like me who don’t have the family connections etc. that they claim minorities lack. And if you go online and complain about these people breaking the law, the FBI will probably investigate YOU and ignore actual crimes happening. I smell lawsuit.

  • Raymond Kidwell

    I was actually denied the ability to finish an associate degree after I finished all my classes because the head of the program says she hates men. She has 100% females every year. This is supposed to be a top priority for the FBI. I have told them multiple times. All I have is a number. I will be calling and reporting when I’m ready to go back to school. If the FBI does not do a real investigation I will be putting this in all the papers and making sure people know about it and probably filing lawsuits. What really irked me is I have never committed a crime, never made any intention to commit a crime, but I have been contacting by the FBI and apparently watched by them simply for visiting websites such as this one and on these sites I have many times listed specific people, specific companies and specific instances of discrimination against me which they are supposed to investigate. I am seriously considering moving to a different country if I can find one that is not hostile against me because of my race but I am having trouble finding one. My advice would be convert to Judaism if possible, you might enjoy protection of law in that case.

    • LHathaway

      I certainly feel for you!

      Cheer up. Once white men are denied ‘affirmative action’, too, it will spell the beginning of the end for the preference industry as it is exposed here. Wonder if any of it will survive? I certainly hope not.

      Then you might be able to go out there and find a girlfriend, maybe. Correction, the semi-white male children of these affirmative action females, will likely be able to find a girlfriend.

      You know, I wonder if what we are really doing is buying their votes? No mere packs of cigarettes for these voters. They’re just too smart for that.

      • Raymond Kidwell

        Let me be clear. I’m not talking about affirmative action. Affirmitive action is a policy put in place that is illegal but has been upheld in strict cases by the court (strict scrutiny). Mostly what I have experienced are clear civil rights violations against white males. These are not isolated incidents but represent a culture of discrimination. They are clearly illegal and violate civil rights laws and fall under the FBI’s jurisdiction. I have reported these things to local police, education authorities, FBI, wrote about them online, talk about them on my web-site etc. No police action has been taken to stop the discrimination.

        I have been denied an education first with job corp which threatened me with violence because I was white (taking place in roselawn, a part of Cincinnati) and Cincinnati State College denied me the ability to finish my clinicals citing that I was a male. In the first case 100% of the students were black and in the second case 100% of the students being accepted were female so it’s not like I’m just making things up here.

        I’m not asking for affirmative action but rather to live under the rule of law. And I don’t care if the FBI wants to watch people on a website, what I care about is when they willfully ignore crimes that are supposed to be a top priority for them and the reason for them ignoring it is because the victim is a white male.

        • Raymond Kidwell

          Secondly I feel like some attempt has been made to intimidate me into not going on these websites and not speaking up about crimes that have been committed against me. I do think some of the things on these websites are absurd. I don’t hate black people or anything like that and I see a lot of offensive and threatening comments made. But I do believe that white people should enjoy the same rights and privileges as everyone else and taking this stance seems to put me at the “extreme” end of the ideological spectrum, even though my beliefs coincide with U.S. law.

          It seems to me that to some degree “color of law” is used to intimidate white people who express dissident beliefs. However the FBI agent I talked to was polite and professional.

          What is odd is I keep hearing in the media that police just go out and beat people and arrest people for no reason. Most people on the street hate cops and believe the same thing. And I agree the police seem to focus almost solely on drug arrests and traffic tickets while ignoring murders, arson, vandalism, theft etc. But mostly what I have done is report endless strings of crimes and local police ignore them and do nothing about them. Then again, I report and make known publicly numerous civil rights violations and these are ignored as well. I guess my attitude of rule of law is fundamentally unamerican. I just don’t see how it benefits society to have so much crime going on. It could easily be remedied. A simple investigation would probably put enough fear into schools to get them to stop committing crimes.

          I also had to read college text books that said white people are inferior in the fact that all whites are racist and responsible for most of the problems in the world. I had teachers stand in front of the class and say that women are superior to men. The discrimination I have experienced stems from a common ideology and they promote it through what is effectively hate speech, in the guise of school curriculum.

          And when they bash on whites it usually has nothing to do with the curriculum. I can take a math class and it will say something like “3 million blacks are starving in the African Savanah as a result of European colonialism. 1 million white people are living in wealth as a result of white privilege. Calculate the ratio of white oppressors to their victims” that may not be the exact wording but that is generally the type of things I encounter repeatedly in certain textbooks while teachers periodically state that men are inferior, white men are irrelevant, whites are oppressors etc. And then they cross the line from freedom of speech to real law violations when they deny people education or job opportunities.

          Proctor and Gamble is also violating the law in their hiring practices although they out source this to labor agencies I guess to shield themselves from liability. Other major companies are doing the same thing. Job Corp is a government program and should be subjected to an internal investigation and removal of parties involved.

          • Jo

            “I also had to read college text books that said white people are inferior in the fact that all whites are racist and responsible for most of the problems in the world.”
            Do you remember the titles of these textbooks?

          • Raymond Kidwell

            One book is “Teachers, Schools and Society” for those studying to teach. It’s available on amazon. It states that non-whites should segregate away from whites, then says that when whites segregate it’s racist. “We should not give whites what they want” is one quote from the book. Radical feminism accompanies these statements of course. I would say about 1/4 of all the college textbooks I was assigned had similar racist statements in them, but in this particular book the racist ideology seemed to be the central thesis. All you need to do though is go somewhere in which you can get out of date second hand college textbooks like goodwill or somewhere and pay 50 cents each and start reading them. Most often the racism will be in language arts books or sociology, psychology etc.

            What was odd about a lot of the books also is that they always assumed the reader was a middle class white person. As if no minorities ever go to college (and no poor people). I found that most weird of all, considering how they talk so much about how stereotyping is wrong. They also assume that you have never been exposed to minorities. Being poor and living and working in majority minority areas, as well as enduring a lot of anti-white discrimination myself, I found the assumptions and statements of most of these books to be completely out of touch with reality. But I guess all the Marxists that write them are wealthy and live in all white neighborhoods. I wish they would come live among the rest of us once in a while before they start trying to make social policies or mold society in their image.

          • Jo

            I suppose the latest 2012 edition would be best, but it’s about $150.

            I can get an older edition, 2010 for much less. What edition did you use?

          • Raymond Kidwell

            All the editions are very similar. I think is was 2012. I sent out a mass e-mail to the class quoting the specific statements and saying that I found it offensive. This was when the school told me not to come back to class and finish with independent study. I talked to the president of the school and other people about it and they said they would consider not using the book. Then I wrote a negative review about it online and it was followed by a lot of other negative reviews from other people. I’m not sure if they still use this book at Edison.

            There was another book I read once in English comp, well assigned reading and it told the story of a puerto rican girl who came to New York and got odd stares because of how she dressed. It said the white people were racist and culturally incentive for not understanding her culture. Then the next story was about a white guy that goes to puerto rico and he doesn’t fit into the native culture when he’s there. Thus he is racist and culturally insensitive and the moral is we need to learn to accept other cultures.

            Wtf? So non-whites must never respect white culture or learn about it, but whites must always accept other’s culture. I found that one to be very obviously hostile but it was so long ago I can’t remember what the book was.

            Why do you want the book anyway? To show it to non-believers? The school even agreed with me that it was racist and offensive now that they look at it my way.

          • Jo

            “Why do you want the book anyway?”

            Evidence. It might be used in other colleges.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            I don’t know why race realists like those at AmRen are so reluctant to see the full conspiracy. Race is a component, but European-America’s enemy is a composite, and amalgamation. I routinely state here that the LGBT Nation and Feminist Nation are aggressively collaborating in the anti-White war.

            Just as most other sites don’t touch race, the people at AmRen don’t want to criticize the axis of evil that comprises the Left, just the racial component. Fatemeh Hall is an example of the amalgamation enemy of the West. Her gender, religion, and DNA are anti-West.

          • Raymond Kidwell

            Feminism is part of cultural Marxism or what they call “radical leftism” as is white guilt and hating white people. It’s the exact same ideology. The other component is hatred towards those with high I.Q.s hatred towards the rich (although if you are a rich leftist you get a free pass), hatred towards America, hatred towards athletes, attractive people, winners etc. Basically they seem to hate anything that seems superior or enviable in some way, but the primary focus is on men and white people, especially white men.

            I think a lot of it is a distraction. It’s just a philosophy made up by rich Jews who think this is the way the average person (i.e. loser) feels anyway and it redirects their anger away from Jews for one, but also just distracts the down trodden. As has been pointed out most of these leftists live in white only communities, are rich etc. they are everything they hate. But a lot of people seem brainwashed by this ideology as well, especially females who seem more easily influenced.

            The main reason I have a problem with the ideology is it has been used to deny me jobs, deny me education, encouraged minorities to physically attacked me, it has sparked race riots in Cincinnati, led to economic stagnation etc.

            Once the leftism starts to impede on the masters wealth and power then they strike against it and contain it. The same people that promote leftism also promote the right. It’s all a game and the key is to see through it.

            You must ask yourself though why no leftist text is going to mention Jews as being benefactors of privilege or having higher test scores or larger incomes. Or why very few leftists criticize Israel’s racist policies etc. There are a few leftist who I think are genuine to some degree and not too bad like Noam Chomsky, but most of it is a ruse.

            I think the earlier used term “riot control” is a good way to paraphrase it. Minorities are a victim of the system, but rather than really empower themselves with true knowledge, they learn to hate their white neighbor or their husbands or whatever. Then a small handful of them get sprinkled into high positions or given some high paying hollywood job to placate the other 90% who are wage slaves. Keep the goyim fighting among themselves.

            I don’t think this is true, but in the eyes of the elite masters it also gives legitimacy to their brainwashing centers (i.e. colleges) among us dumb folk. That is, when we go to school it appears that they are “on our side” in regards to sticking up for the loser.

            The thing is not all poor people are dumb or losers. Not all minorities are morons. The elite who manufacture leftism don’t seem to realize this.

        • AndrewInterrupted

          It’s Peter Brimelow’s “….(permanent) minority occupation government…”

          Some brotha with a “degree” from a diversity diploma mill like Harvard is chuckling at what you’re writing. He’s saying:

          “That White boy doesn’t know we’re a parallel government and we do as we please. That silly White boy thinks America still exists. He crazy like dat”.

          • Raymond Kidwell

            It seems to have a lot to do with where you live and who you deal with. Most places America is gone. Cincinnati here has about 30% of the population living in poverty about 25% incarcerated, pretty much everybody commits crimes so they have to just slap people on the wrist or incarceration would be somewhere near 95%. Once the average I.Q. drops over a certain point and the average criminal tendency/corruption index gets so high, its impossible to maintain a civilized culture other than in enclaves.

            I have talked to police officers about this. They say the jails are too full. There isn’t room to fit more people in it. When one fourth of the population is in jail and that still isn’t housing all the criminals, I think we have something more than a simple social problem. It seems to have a genetic component.

            I think the FBI also realizes they would need an army to come in and jail all the anti-white “racists” so it’s easier to go after the civilized, well mannered, generally law abiding “white supremacist” as per the ADL’s orders who trains and advises law enforcement and has an astute policy of only allowing ethnic Jews (as defined by ancestry, not belief) to be members of their organization. The wolf is guarding the hen house on this one.

            Nonetheless I need to put my foot down with Cincinnati State. If they will not allow me to finish my degree I will need to fight them tooth and nail.

            Most of the anti-white racists are white people though which is one of the many unexpected facts in my experiences. The reason is simply because people are afraid to discriminate against minorities because the FBI etc. will come after them. They can attack and abuse whites all they want and seemingly get a smile and a nod from politicians and law enforcement.

            Here in Cincinnati a lot of black people have a game where they punch white people in the face and try to knock them out. Even this level of absurdly racist violence is barely investigated or pursued by police. It is per sued but not with any strong vigilance.

            Yet I don’t have much problem with regular people. The main racism comes from FBI, Colleges, Government agencies etc. It is all coming from the top down and almost always Jewish people behind it at the highest levels.

      • AndrewInterrupted

        People posing as “White men” : Persians, Armenians, North Africans, Semites, all get magic carpet rides in the AA area. AA concessions, but listed as White in the census, therefore there is nothing to technically address.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      I tried involving the FBI in my EEOC/Boston case, with respect to acts of corruption and obstruction. They laughed. Half of them are obsessed with tracking Muzzies and the other half are completely corrupt. America is over, brother. The FBI won’t help you. OSHA has also been completely corrupted.

  • AndrewInterrupted

    A nice job of whistleblowing here, but some conclusions fall short. Here Bloch speaks of racial preferences:

    “….My boss established a “diversity” business silo–with all the vagueness the term implies; we weren’t sure exactly what we were going to do–and in a brilliant move, recruited a fashionable, attractive, and articulate Muslim woman, rather than the expected black woman as our diversity czarina….” (using my czarina term)

    That’s old anti-American oppression. The evolved hatred exclusively hates hetero, western European-American males. That’s probably why this Jim Malackowski is such a diversity poodle. He feels the pressure. I saw cowards like him all day long where I worked.

    It isn’t just racial preferences, it’s demographic preferences. That includes Middle Easterners and Semites (not much difference, but usually hidden on the diversity pie chart as White), but more importantly, women. Preferably, gay women. The LGBT Nation and the Feminist Nation have long since jumped on the diversity band wagon against western civilization. They have joined the grievance industry shake-down machine and have aggressively demanded their quotas be filled. One of the four people it took to replace this White guy at a defense contractor recently was a lesbian; with all the incompetence and obnoxious trappings you regularly encounter with that demographic.

    And this:

    “….may have simply decided that there will be no decrease in profits if whites (and presumably Asians) are worked harder and paid less…”

    Standard procedure for White guys top carry a heavy load of “diversity darlings”, but again, problems. “Asians” like southeast Asians get a kid glove magic carpet ride at federal contractors. What “Asians”? Maybe it’s the difference between the left coast and the right. The left coast has many more Chinese, Japanese, etc.

  • LHathaway

    “I’m not asking for affirmative action but rather to live under the rule of law”.

    Affirmative action is the law. Since it is, It might be a good idea to ask for it for yourself. Maybe they’ll give it to you but I suspect doing so will get a guerilla off your back.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      Ask the minority occupation government? Or maybe, the grievance industry occupation government. If you ask the fox guarding the henhouse “What happened to my chickens?”, what do you think his answer will be?

      • LHathaway

        We’ve seen the beginnings of it in these students trying to form white student unions on campus. As of yet, for the most part they deny them. We should stay ambitious. The longer they are kept out, the more grounds we have to ask for positive action to make up for white students were denied this kind of activity. Why stop there? If we model ourselves after the civil rights movement, we can stigmatize and criminalize, condemn and close down all the different special interest groups for everyone who isn’t a white man, at the same time we form groups like this for the benefit of white men. We’re just making up for lost time. Conceivably, this could be an area where white men could possibly receive concessions for past injustice. I don’t imagine this would be the major thrust or grounds to call for affirmative action for white men, never-the-less we should agitate along all avenues.

        • AndrewInterrupted

          If there were Affirmative Action for hetero, White men there wouldn’t be any demographic left to exclude.

  • AndrewInterrupted

    I empathize with your video. Like you, I was raised neutral many years ago, but gradually, sometimes quickly, my experiences radicalized me. I had your Proctor & Gamble experience at a defense contractor recently. And, yes, the old White managers will sacrifice as many struggling White people as is necessary to save their own hides.

    • Raymond Kidwell

      What video? I have a list of videos on my website. There are a lot of young white managers as well, although a lot of white professionals are being replaced with Asians and Indians. It just seems like if you are upper middle to upper class white the only real racism you must deal with a little bit of affirmative action in college admissions and I think that is why this issue has gotten so much attention. But as a poor white person living in any area with a significant minority population you will be denied nearly every decent paying job, educational opportunities will be denied, they’ll try to deny you any welfare you may qualify for, you will be denied SBA business loans etc. Nearly every effort imaginable is put in place to make you fail. Nonetheless it is still possible to do well if you have an above average intelligence, considering your competition. Then when you still succeed despite massive discrimination against you, this is used as justification of “white privilege” “See white people are still graduating at higher rates and earning higher incomes. We need to ratchet up the white guilt and affirmative action to even higher levels than before.”

      If you go to a four year college nearly everyone is white or maybe east asian. If you go to a wealthy neighborhood it is going to be 98% white and east asian. The upper class is probably not even aware that the discrimination exist, which is why they believe the white guilt stuff. Even the young ones have every opportunity other than maybe a small percentage of college slots being closed. You don’t even need college if you can afford to own a business or two.

      I remember in college a black girl from the ghetto writing about how bad her neighbors acted and how their bad behavior caused them to never be successful. The white teacher shook her head no in disappointment and wanted to let the class know that rich people and whites are responsible for the black ghetto. I think it’s less of a racial divide and more of a class divide. Rich people live in some insulated bubble of reality and are out of touch with the reality of the streets or even the reality of working for a living.

  • Mrfinoni

    Good article! even the elite know there is a limit to the foolishness. Contractors for cleaning, or shoveling snow or sh-t … yes!, At a core level the elite know, really know that the Blacks don’t have the know how to provide high quality products for the 21st century.

  • [Guest]

    This would be a fine article to mention whenever someone pukes up the phrase “institutional racism,” as if the entire system were working overtime against nonwhites.

  • Mark Hillyard

    I was business neighbors with a HVAC company owned by one black guy and one white guy. My x-wife was secretary and had to keep tabs on all the government jobs they were getting which meant, “How many minorities work there?” She showed me the paperwork. We all knew who ran the business but the other guy had his white Cadillac and seemed to be pleased with the situation.
    I made one attempt at getting a government contract and after looking over the paperwork I figured that I’d need to hire a lawyer, a staff and someone to count the minorities I’d be required to hire. So I’m as near broke as I ever was, but being part of that was to much for me…seemed kinda corrupt. That was circa 1970’s.

  • dd121

    I am strangely comforted to know that the liberals who count are even more cynical than I.

  • Chas Ellsworth

    American has surpassed the definition of Minority .

  • Cid Campeador

    Fatemeh “snagged” Bill Clinton and he “shagged” her.
    Almost a sure thing.