Rename Washington

Gregory Hood, American Renaissance, June 19, 2014

The nation's capital is no longer worthy of the name.

The Washington Redskins should be renamed. Not just the Redskins part–the city Washington, D.C., itself should be renamed.

After all, it would fit into a trend. The US Patent and Trademark Office canceled federal trademarks of the Washington Redskins, claiming the name was “disparaging” to Indians. Actually, I probably shouldn’t say “Indians,” because the Cleveland Indians are probably next.

The opinions of unelected bureaucrats on what is offensive and what isn’t override property rights and trademarks. What passes for law is going to get only worse.

Small business owners in this country are sentenced to mandatory “anti-discrimination” training if they dissent from the ideology of egalitarianism by refusing to bake a cake for a homosexual marriage. Supreme Court Justice Sonya Sotomayor is already arguing that whites do not have the right to vote against anti-white racial preferences. And this is only the beginning.

Egalitarianism, especially racial egalitarianism, is the governing ideology of our entire system. It’s something far more important and salient to how we are governed than “limited government,” the English political tradition, or the Constitution of the United States.

It’s striking how irrelevant the topics discussed by the Founding Fathers are to the issues that face us today. Questions such as states’ rights, the powers of the federal government, or the meaning of small-r “republican” government have been utterly swept aside.

Today, the federal government is actively involved in the lives of every single citizen, and insofar as there is opposition, it is mostly focused on securing “rights” to explore new varieties of substance abuse and sexual deviance. The taxation of George III would seem almost utopian by today’s standards, and even the colonial subjects of 1775 America probably had more control over how they were governed than the voting citizens of our proud democracy.

Instead, what governs us today is multiculturalism. Every single white person who lives in this country, no matter how rich, powerful, and well-connected, can be destroyed for racial thoughtcrime. The lie of white privilege conceals the reality that no powerful white person uses his power in defense of his own people–or else he wouldn’t remain powerful for long.

The result is a country united only by hypocrisy, as white Americans of all classes build their entire lives around the necessity of avoiding vast numbers of their “fellow citizens” and desperately trying to remain unnoticed by volunteer commissars eager to enforce their totalitarian creed.

What does such a “nation” have to do with the vision of George Washington? He was the one irreplaceable man during the struggle for American Independence, the president who united all factions during the dangerous years of the early Republic, and the statesman who set the precedent of voluntarily relinquishing power that spared America the fates of revolutionary France and the Latin American republics.

What greater dishonor can we give him than associating him with the gaggle of plutocrats, criminals, and traitors who presume to rule us? What greater proof can we show of the ultimate failure of the American Revolution than how we have turned his name into the epithet on the lips of millions of white Americans?

Anti-white radicals are right when they argue that this “white slaveowner” has nothing to do with our multiracial democracy. One of the great causes for George Washington’s backing of the American Revolution was his support for western expansion, which was checked by the British government. He waged effective war against Indian tribes that threatened white settlers. Though a Freemason and an opponent of monarchy, he defended social distinctions and the rule of law, and he opposed abolition.

He was an elitist. He was a nationalist. He was a white patriot. What does such a man have to do with this crumbling Third-World embarrassment that passes for a country?

Besides, it’s only a matter of time before America’s capital is renamed anyway. No amount of public opinion, established tradition, or indisputable legality seems to stand in the way of the slow retreat of the United States away from Western Civilization. The emerging majority in this country had no part in the accomplishments of the historic American nation and they exist only to plunder the remnants. Why wait for their inevitable cries that a majority non-white America “can’t relate” to a capital city named Washington? They can’t. No matter what kind of “citizenship” they are given, they aren’t Americans in any traditional sense.

George Washington once said, “Let us raise a standard to which the wise and honest can repair.” The government in the city that bears his name has failed the test the Father of Our Country set for it. These newcomers cannot identify with him.

Let’s honor the memory of George Washington. Let’s rename the capital. He deserves better.

Topics: , ,

Share This

Gregory Hood
Mr. Hood has been active in conservative youth movements in the US.
We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • D.B. Cooper

    Let’s name it Obamaville. Half the whites in this country will totally approve of it.

    • NoMosqueHere

      It about 30 years it won’t matter if whites approve of it. The US will be dominated by blacks and browns.

      • D.B. Cooper

        If they lay down, bend over, and die without a fight, I can’t feel sorry for them.

      • 1stworlder

        That is if the foodstamp card keeps working.

        • r j p

          That stops working the day we go majority black/brown.

      • DonReynolds

        ……you left out…..”if we do nothing”.
        I cannot speak for everyone, but I can speak for my own Scot-Irish relatives. There will be a fight and no matter how it ends, we will be free of their domination. Either we stay here alive or we stay here dead. There is no place to hide and nowhere to retreat. If we resist the invasion we may die but if we do not resist, we most certainly will.

    • Magician

      Washington P.C. ( Washington Politically Correct )
      The new name for the NFL franchise – Washington Rednecks

      • MekongDelta69

        Washington P.C is perfect…

        • NoMosqueHere

          Clever!

      • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

        This fits the current state of affairs well. Washington P.C., as in Politically Correct.

    • Alexandra1973

      Obamaville, DC–District of Criminals

    • Manaphy

      There will always be that percentage of whites which agree with the /Viggers controlling our government no matter what they do.

    • Dave4088

      Race sell outs like Rand Paul and John Boehner would probably author the bill to change the name in a craven attempt to win that ever elusive black vote.

      • dean53

        Boehners daughter married an nword.

        • IstvanIN

          A rasta no less.

      • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

        I don’t think so. Blacks are still only 13% of the overall population. It is more likely it would be something like “Citadel Mexico Neuvo,” Citadel de Hispaniola.”

    • LHathaway

      If the name fits. . . .

    • maxsnafu

      How about “Diversityville”?

    • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

      Let’s not. But a more likely new name that others would vote for might be something like Kingsburg, or Martinton.

  • Dave4088

    I think D.C. should be renamed Obamagrad in honor of the mulatto Marxist who intends to murder the old (white) America.

    • MathFaithWorks

      How about Sotobamagrad? With Whites only allowed to vote in favor of preferences for non-Whites? In fact, mandatory.

    • JDInSanD

      Obama-stan also works for the same reason.

      • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

        “Stan” means nation, while “bad” is city.

    • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

      Marx didn’t speak Russian, he spoke German and English and lived in London when he wrote, “Das Kapital.” On top of that, Russia is showing up to be more racially and nationally conscious than any nation in the West. The old Cold War stereoptypes no longer fit. “Obamabad,” is more likely and more fitting. Especially with ISIS on the rise and no good plan to deter it. All the Western nations will soon be on the defensive, internally. But at least those here who vehemently hate Israel and the notion of Jews with a homeland might find their fondest wishes finally fulfilled by the ISIS, which as today secured control of the Iraq/Jordan border.

  • http://saboteur365.wordpress.com/ bigone4u

    I was thinking about this idea last week. Washington will be renamed because the city is named after a slave owner. The Cultural Marxists will demand it, just as there are demands for renaming everything. The entire history of the US is being distorted and/or obliterated in the schools now. It’s inconvient to have the names of Jefferson, Washington, etc. pasted on cities and towns. Give it a few years and ALL our history will be excised, leaving only the indoctrination based on the hatred of whites.

    • Oil Can Harry

      Not only was Washington a slaveowner but he opposed gay marriage!

      Neither was he a vegan! He also believed men and women should have different restrooms; thus, he was transphobic.

      How can our nation’s capital be named after such a monster?

      • Tarczan

        And all those campfires at Valley Forge proves he was a climate change denier.

        • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

          Silly

          • Tarczan

            On the surface perhaps. The reality is that without the institutions created by the white man there would be no discussion of theses things, only a struggle for survival.

      • Dave4088

        Oh c’mon. Everyone knows that George Washington was a cross dresser and had a black mistress in addition to owning slaves. Racist historians have just kept this from you.

        • DonReynolds

          Having no natural children of his own will lead to all kinds of convenient conclusions. The same was true of Andrew Jackson.

      • 1stworlder

        Don’t forget he did wear a wig.

        • http://www.ambrosekane.com/ bluffcreek1967

          Yeah, good point. I’ve always been suspicious of that wig thing he wore all the time. I think he was a cross-dresser.

      • Puggg

        Lots of transphobia in the Continental Army.

        • DonReynolds

          The rags they wore were not actually a fashion statement.
          Ha Ha.

      • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

        He probably also believed that Negroes should have separate toilet facilities, due to their high prevalence of venereal diseases. This was a very sensible measure, one of many sensible segregation measures taken in the South in the old days.

    • The Verdict of History

      The War on History.

      I call it psychological warfare, since it is designed to demean, intimidate, humiliate, embarrass and disorient European peoples in the United States.

      The first thing that Marxists do when they overtake a nation, is obliterate any sense of connection to a people’s shared past, cultural ethos, by denigrating national monuments.

      That is why the Bolsheviks utterly destroyed holy sites in Russia during the early 1920s. The same process occurred during the 1930s, when Marxist militia rampaged through the country-side pious Spaniards

      And that is why modern day American leftists demand that southern schools, built in honor of Confederate heros, be re-named in honor of leftist heros.

      The intent and effect is to make the social terrain seem as alien and unfriendly as possible in order to effectuate displacement.

      • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

        The Bolsheviks did not destroy “holy sites” in the 1920s. They merely closed the churches down. They did loot the valuables inside, but that is understandable, since the vast sea of peasantry had lived for centuries under church supported serfdom and flourished while the people starved. They also arrested and executed most church leaders and clerics over a 20 year period. But in 1940, Stalin re-opened the churches and allowed the Orthodox faith to be practiced again. Here is a cut and paste from a Wiki article, but don’t just accept that, look it up elsewhere;

        “After Nazi Germany’s attack on the Soviet Union in 1941, Joseph Stalin
        revived the Russian Orthodox Church to intensify patriotic support for
        the war effort. On September 4, 1943, Metropolitans Sergius (Stragorodsky), Alexius (Simansky) and Nicholas (Yarushevich) were officially received by Soviet leader Joseph Stalin. They received a permission to convene a council on September 8, 1943, that elected Sergius Patriarch of Moscow and all Rus’. A new patriarch was elected, theological schools were opened, and thousands of churches began to function. The Moscow Theological Academy and Seminary, which had been closed since 1918, was re-opened.”

        Similarly, you are incorrect about the Spanish Civil War. It was the Nationalists that went from village to village killing people and it was the German air force that bombed Guernica to ashes, killing almost everyone and even destroying the church there. The Spanish CW had a long prodrome, reaching back into the 19th century and Anarchists were a big part of it. But Franco, the fascist ultimately won and he did so by recruiting non-Spanish troops, especially from Morocco, to slaughter Spaniards. War is war, but Franco massacered far more unarmed people than the CNI or the Anarchists.

        If you knew anything about the Orthodox Church, whether in Russia or Serbia, it was long paired with nationalism. When I was in Slovenia, I asked a Serbian friend to take me to a Serbian Orthodox church service, because I wanted to understand more about the culture. That is exactly what I found. In fact, they go as far as to have practically made Prince Lazar into a King and next to Jesus, almost the same person. His icon is set opposite of Mary Magdalene’s (there hasn’t been much resistance to the notion that Jesus was married to MM in the Orthodox Church, just that it is a point of contradiction of doctrine).

        That is just history, which you are pronouncing important. You can look it up for yourself. The verdict of history of those who twist and falsify it goes both ways and adds up to both sides wrong and everyone worse off.

        • The Verdict of History

          From Wikipedia, and in direct refutation to your claim that the Marxists in Russia did not destroy holy sites:

          “The state was committed to the destruction of religion,[2][3] and destroyedchurches, mosques and temples, ridiculed, harassed and executed religious leaders, flooded the schools and media with atheistic teachings, and generally promoted atheism as the truth that society should accept.[4][5] The total number of Christian victims of Soviet state atheist policies, has been estimated to range between 12-20 millions.[6][7][8].”

          http://endotwikipediadotorg/wiki/Persecution_of_Christians_in_the_Soviet_Union

          ————

          On Spain:

          “It was the Nationalists that went from village to village killing people.”

          Yes. I know of the so-called “White Terror”… but…

          Ever heard of the Red Terror during the Spanish civil war?

          The Marxists in Spain targeted clerics and fervent believers in the country side, and the Nationalists responded accordingly. Also, see photo below, which encapsulates the radical Left’s hatred toward religion.

          Since you are keen on Wikipedia, I suggest that you read this. But don’t stop there:

          “The Red Terror in Spain (Spanish: Terror Rojo)[3] is the name given by historians to various acts committed “by sections of nearly all theleftist groups”[4][5] such as the killing of tens of thousands of people (including 6,832[6] members of the Catholic clergy, the vast majority in the summer of 1936 in the wake of the military rising), as well as attacks on landowners, industrialists, and politicians, and thedesecration and burning of monasteries and churches.[6] News of the military coup unleashed a social revolutionary response and no republican region escaped revolutionary and anticlerical violence.”

          “Some estimates of the Red Terror range from 38,000[11] to 72,344 lives.[12] Paul Preston, speaking in 2012 at the time of the publication of his book The Spanish Holocaust, put the figure at a little under 50,000.”

          http://endotwikipediadotorg/wiki/Red_Terror_(Spain)#Nationalist_side

          Also, I’m well aware of the relationship between clericialism and nationalism, particularly in pre-Communist Russia and within the Spanish right.

          None of your assertions undermine my contentions.

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            You seem more worried about being right than historical truth. But I can’t go along with you in defending Franco.

            I never said that NO sites were destroyed. You said that they were all totally destroyed which is false. First contention of yours destroyed – CHECK

            Stalin restored the Church as noted. No one would have gone if all the Christians in the USSR had been murdered earlier.

            It is also well known that after the Revolution and the civil war,
            people who wished to remain religious were allowed to, but they were not
            active members of the Party and they worshiped in private. This is at
            least partially illustrated at how quickly the churches filled up after
            they were reopened in the last days of the USSR.

            I have worked in a formerly communist country and I know that most of the people remained religious during the period of communism and were NOT persecuted. In fact, there was a shrine of Mary nearby where I lived that old ladies had been going to since forever, crawling around it, praying for cures (that never came). No one interferred with this ridiculous display of religious superstition, ever. This claim of widespread persecution of Christians is a Western Christian LIE – Second CHECK

            Second contention destroyed.

            Wiki is a site that anyone can post. I will look at this one you list, but from the extremes it claims 20 million Christians milled, going against all history I have ever read, it seems that the 20 million purged are being claimed by some Christian posters as having been killed primarily because they were Christians, which isn’t true at all. Such posts on Wiki usually have credential notices. I bet this one does.

            As far as the Spanish Civil War goes, Franco was far bloodier and had to
            get recruits from Morocco to kill Spaniards. I have never read of the Left or Anarchists being called “The Red Terror.” This seems to have been made up lately. They all committed
            atrocities, but the Spanish Leftists did not kill the common Spanish
            people, Franco did. I think the Spanish Civil War is too complex for you to make one sentence conclusions from, especially you.

      • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

        You are absolutely right about this. White youth grow more and more like Negroes culturally and morally with each new generation. The Leftists do indeed welcome our dispossession. I’ve heard White Leftists speak of how they look forward to Whites being a minority in America. These Leftists have assumed that all behavior is learned, that we are all a blank slate upon birth. They think that believing in inborn behavioral differences between races is “racism”. Their thinking is warped and stupid, but it is nevertheless what they believe.

    • JDInSanD

      Will all of the black people named Washington and Jefferson be changing their names too?

      • r j p

        On the same page with you.
        Presidential last name almost screams negro.

      • Katherine McChesney

        Also Jackson.

      • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

        Washington is already a common Negro last name in America. Names like Dontavius Washington scream Negro with a capital N.

    • r j p

      Funny thing is, look at the last names of blacks.
      They all seemed to take the names of dead presidents when freed.

      • DonReynolds

        Many of them took the last name of their former masters. In the Scot-Irish and Welsh South……you still find a lot of Jones, Williams, Reynolds, Campbell, and et al.

        • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

          Very true, and it was because they loved their masters. Yep, … anyone can access the Smithsonian archives online and listen to the recordings of former slaves talking about their slave days. Most loved their masters and report being treated well, with only minimal exceptions. I guess soon, those tapes will have to be destroyed.

          (Harsh treatment of slaves increased as the Abolitionists influence grew. More slaves were enticed to run, which resulted in harsher treatments. That ended up becoming an intolerable situation for everyone).

          • DonReynolds

            We have all heard the horror stories and no doubt there were some horror stories to tell…..but in the main, slaves were much too costly to waste. Much more expensive than an automobile today, and yes, there are occasions when people deliberately destroy their own vehicle….but I would describe it as rare.
            At the end of the civil war, it was somewhat certain that all slaves would be released, confiscated as contraband, or otherwise a complete loss to the owners. Had these owners been harsh and cruel people, as they are presented, they most certainly would have destroyed their property rather than have it stolen. That would have been my own conclusion, and I am not considered a harsh person, but I do not have a personal relationship to overcome, as many of the slave owners did.

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            The other little truth they don’t want us to hear is that in the colonial period, when whites were indentured servants, slaves by contract, they were used and abused much more harshly than the blacks were. They were used for dangerous and risky work such as clearing swamps and logging operations. Why? Because they were free and the black slaves were expensive.

            White slaves contracted for passage for a period of time, usually seven years. But after seven years were up, they usually had accumulated debts, which were used to extend their servitude. Many, never saw freedom, but death first. It’s time someone wrote a book and made a film about THAT.

          • DonReynolds

            It is impossible to learn history from Hollywood, but it would make a good movie.
            The closest movie I can think of (and it is excellent) is the Gary Cooper movie “Unconquered” in 1947.
            Look it up. It is terrific.

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            There haven’t been too many accurate historical films out of Hollywood, but they never have seen that as their job.

            I will look the film up. I have always liked Gary Cooper films.

    • KevinPhillipsBong

      In the dystopian novel “Utopia X” the dominant leftists rename the city Kingstown after St. Martin.

      • Georgia Boy

        That’s who I think they’ll name it after. Obama they’ll give the state to.

    • Katherine McChesney

      Sounds like China. Destroying their history.

      It could happen.

      • bilderbuster

        It’s BEEN happening for decades.
        Where have you been?

        • Katherine McChesney

          I’ve been around much longer than you have. I’ve watched America crumble for more than sixty years.

          • bilderbuster

            I thought so but you said it COULD happen.
            Please don’t upset me like that :)

  • http://www.thetrollhouse.net/ dale hale

    Something Apocalyptic..Bartertown.

    • Kenner

      Considering all the back room deals, Bartertown is perfect.

      • r j p

        Barter?
        Nah.
        negroes don’t barter. They scam, cheat, and steal.

        • Kenner

          …White pols selling out white interests.

        • Spikeygrrl

          Alinskygrad?

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            If Obongo had his way, they would probably rename Washington Sharptonville, and rename the White House the MLK house.

          • r j p

            Is that a positive or negative comment?
            I do live in Chicago BTW.

          • Spikeygrrl

            You’re kidding, right?

          • r j p

            No, I do live in Chicago.
            But don’t understand the comment.

          • Spikeygrrl

            And I don’t understand your question. Please forgive my ignorance. Would you mind rephrasing?

          • r j p

            It was about the Alinskygrad comment.
            I am familiar with Alinsky, but not a grad.

          • Spikeygrrl

            OH! So sorry. My hamfisted attempt to portmanteau Alinsky’s despicable tactics with the communist regime from which they sprang (e.g., Leningrad).

          • r j p

            Not a problem.
            Thank you for the response.
            Wow, knows how use portmanteau ….

    • Sick of it

      Leviathan

    • Spikeygrrl

      Barter is a GOOD thing; I’ve been doing it for decades in both personal and professional life. Everybody gets what they want on terms they agree to…and NOT ONE RED CENT goes to Nanny Sam!

      • Katherine McChesney

        You may think what you’re doing is cute but it is theft and not to be admired.

        • Spikeygrrl

          Since you enjoy paying taxes to support the indigent underclass, you have my full permission to pay mine too. :)

          • Katherine McChesney

            What a ridiculous statement.

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            Some of these posters haven’t thought about what it’s going to be like when the SHTF. Whites will have to participate in commune like governments and coops simply to survive.

      • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

        My experience with bartering is that many people overvalue what they have to trade in exchange for what the other has. But if it was more standardized, it could work. And by standardized, I don’t mean by the government, but at least by those in a community who are participating.

        • Spikeygrrl

          “Standardization” bastardizes the whole concept of free markets.

          Austrian School Econ 101: A free market transaction will not take place unless EACH party believes s/he is gaining value by it, IOW “What I’m trading to you is of less value TO ME than what you are trading to me.” This is possible ONLY BECAUSE each individual’s “market basket” is DIFFERENT, not only from individual to individual, but also day to day or even moment to moment in the same individual! This is the direct antithesis of “standardization.”

          It is also the bedrock of arbitrage: in direct contradiction to Austrian School principles, almost every other school of economic thought includes as an initial axiom that all market participants have “perfect knowledge” and make economic decisions on a strictly rational basis. Of course even one day in the real world blows that nonsense outta the water, lol! Real-world market information is notoriously “lumpy,” so there will ALWAYS exist opportunities for The Dude With The Data to connect buyers and sellers who will each walk away from the transaction thinking “I won!” but still plenty left on the table for Data Dude to walk away satisfied too. :)

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            Are you saying that it is good to confound capitalism through bartering? I can’t make much useful sense out of what you are writing here. I am not talking about “free markets” as they exist today anyway, but a situation where no cash standard exists (or is recognized) and people must trade goods and services in order to survive. No need to launch into stock market economics analysis because it doesn’t apply.

            There are many application variables in bartering or trading sans currency. If each party gets what they want for something they don’t want or that they have an abundance of, they might both think “they won.” But if successful social function is valued there has to be more than that as a goal. I never thought of bartering or trading as a system where one must loose and another win. You seem to say that “Austrian School Econ 101″ is about the art of scamming, not trading sans currency. If I grow a crop of grain and want to trade a portion of it to a grist mill for producing flour for me, it’s a trade. The question is how much of each is fair? If it isn’t fair, I will go off and make my own grist mill and that guy will go without grain. In my own experience, when I felt certain that the value of the trade I took a few times was inflated to take advantage of me, I stopped trading with that individual because I did not need his goods to survive. This is a simple concept not requiring a broker or agent in the middle of the transaction. But if there were one there, that person would have to be operating by an accepted rule or standard of fairness to both parties as a broker. Otherwise, there is no value in the broker because people in a community can find one another by themselves and engage in fist fights or little wars if they feel cheated (or courts depending on the level of social organization).

          • Spikeygrrl

            Precisely. I don’t see what you’re disagreeing with. If you as an individual don’t think the exchange a barter partner proposes is “fair” (whatever that means in a world where everyone’s preferences are not only highly subjective but also changing over time) you counterpropose/negotiate until you reach an exchange you’re both happy with, or you barter with a different person/entity, or, as you correctly pointed out, you decide to make it for yourself. In such pure barter transactions, no money changes hands: “Will you fix my computer for a bushel of homegrown zucchini?” “No, but I’ll fix it for a bushel of homegrown tomatoes.” “You’ve got a deal. Let’s shake on it.”

            Arbitrage only inserts a thin layer of “lumpy knowledge” into this transaction. “Will you fix my computer for a bushel of homegrown zucchini?” “Nah, my family is kinda zucchinied-out this year…but I know someone who’ll fix it for a bushel and a half of homegrown tomatoes.” “That works! Go ahead and set it up.” Act 2: “Hey, I know a guy who’ll trade you a bushel of homegrown tomatoes to fix his computer. Are you interested?” “You bet I am. Go ahead and set it up.” Win/win/win: the guy withe broken computer gets it fixed for a bushel and a half of tomatoes, a transaction he’s happy with. The computer jock puts in 20 minutes of what for him is easy work, and he gets a bushel of tomatoes which HE’S happy with. And the Dude With The Data gets half a bushel of tomatoes for matching willing barter partners. Now, could either or both the primary parties go out and build from scratch the kind of knowledge network that could cut out the middleman? Sure. But not very many will, just like not very many in the pure barter example will, because (once more with feeling!) you can save yourself a LOT of time and effort paying a small price for knowledge which already exists.

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            I guess. If the “network” is actually that large. It’s your economic fantasy, after all. Mine isn’t that complex and I want to talk to the one I am trading with myself. If someone tells me about a friend of theirs with what I want, I’ll return the favor some day. See, middlemen historically are where the problem of graft began. I want things simple. I want to look the holder of the goods in the eye, not a professional representative.

          • Spikeygrrl

            That’s always the ideal. But you’d be surprised at how many businesspeople are unwilling to invest the time to build that sort of network from the ground up. I spent ten years building such a network…and reaped the benefits for the following ten years. “You want [x]? Call Spike, she’ll know somebody. Spike knows EVERYBODY.” ;)

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            I was a business “person.” If bartering is a business, something is already wrong. I traded my services for goods at times. Sometimes it went well, others not. I don’t think I’d want to be in a bartering network with people I did not know because such a situation has nothing to do with building an actual community or survival. In fact, if you check the IRS rules, bartering is illegal because transactions are happening but no tax is being paid. It’s a risky thing to do very much of as long as taxes are being collected in a state. That’s traditionally called, Black Market.

          • Spikeygrrl

            What planet do you live on??? Clearly not one where “I’ll write the copy and design the layout for your next brochure advertising your print shop if you’ll print OUR next brochure advertising our marketing communications services.”

            OF COURSE it’s technically illegal! But who is ever going to know? And that’s where we started this pointless conversation: barter whenever you can, so Nanny Sam won’t get his corrupt, greasy mitts on ONE RED CENT that YOU worked hard for!

            Unbelievable. If you get such a kick out of paying nine dozen layers of coercive taxation to support a wilfully indigent permanent underclass, you have my full permission to pay my taxes too. Knock yourself out. Have a blast! Goodness knows you deserve to. :)

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            You’re a real case. Whipped yourself up real good each time. Having a big conversation, mostly with yourself.

            For me, the conversation was about bartering in a SHTF situation, not seeing if I can get out of paying taxes. My comment on the present day situation is that bartering isn’t worth the trouble for that grimy RED CENT you’re saving yourself. That’s the experience I had on this planet.

            So your an economic anarchist, good for you. As long as you don’t get caught.

            If you can locate, fix and lasso the tax dollars that will be spent on a wilfully indigent underclass, maybe you can also make sure you barter those particular taxes off the list. Now you knock yourself out trying to do that, sister.

          • Spikeygrrl

            I’m surprised that a cookie-cutter liberal such as yourself finds this board congenial. Anywhere else I would have recognized your claim to genuine confusion about my posts as the typical liberal deliberate “provoke an attack and then declare yourself a victim” tactic that it is and stopped responding to you many posts ago.

            And although I’m flattered that you’d attempt to claim kinship which does not in fact exist, if I’m your sister I have a fool for a brother.

            No more kibble for you. Go pick on a mental midget your own size. I find no intellectual stimulation in engaging in a battle of wits with an unarmed opponent.

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            You think you’re a conservative or race-realist? I’ve been posting on the Amren board since 2006. I could be described as some things, but lastly as a cookie cutter liberal or conservative. I saw you cocked and ready to go off, so I responded to every over-reaction you posted to me.

            I knew you were nothing but a “conservative for convenience” when you used the term “businesspersons,” a dead giveaway of feminist leftist training (or at least brainwashing). You’re just an outgrowth of the cyber scam generation. A scammer is a scammer, pretending it has some political point or purpose is a cheap and phoney argument.

            You are referring to Critical Theory, which was taught by the Frankfurt School member Herbert Marcuse to be used by the Civil Rights Movement, and the Women’s Movement, among others.

            You were/are reactive and combative from the start and I just played along, curious to see how excited you could become.

            But what I learned NEWBIE, is that you are a phoney conservative and not a patriot (as most posters here claim to be and Amren presents itself). You are a Gen X opportunist who has no idea of why you are a conservative or what it is or what critical thinking is about. You attack whatever you think is resistance to your ideas, missing the point.

            If you are out to save the country, first you have to care about it and work within its systems to change it to your likings. I don’t think that can be done which is why I was speaking of a barter situation after a collapse, not as a way of avoiding paying taxes. I pointed out to you that you cannot designate what part of your taxes you can refuse to pay to those parasites you resent so much (not guessing you might soon become one of them yourself as the non-white mobs take over). You have to do that via the system and the vote. If you are committed to saving the system, then you must, to be ethical and not a hypocrite, pay your taxes. Which is why I say you are nothing but an opportunist attempting to use a shallow political rationale for your tax evasion scam.

            You have admitted on a public posting board that you have engaged in tax evasion, setting up a barter system over ten years. That is a felony punishable by imprisonment and fines.

            That’s reality. Just hope that no one who works for the IRS reads these threads. So now, who’s the fool?

          • Spikeygrrl

            I subscribed to AmRen in print gift virtually since its inception. I only very recently rediscovered it online. If you believe ANYONE here has ANY sympathy toward your lickspittle endorsement of coercive statist taxation, you are pitiably tone-deaf.

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            Not only are you a transparent liar, you are filled with delusions of grandeur, imagining you speak for all posters.

            You will never find a place to live where you can have a government of any sort that won’t tax you. Check the history books and reality.

          • Spikeygrrl

            Oh, and you were absolutely correct when you put “free markets” as they exist today in quotes. Any transaction which employs state-issued currency is BY DEFINITION not a free market transaction.

    • Reverend Bacon

      Only if we can implement, “Bust a deal, face the wheel.” Obammy would have faced the wheel dozens of times.

  • Frank_DeScushin

    There was once a proposal to rename a city “X” after Malcolm X. City officials even printed off maps with X on it. They had to scrap the plan, though, after thousands of blacks, with map in hand, showed up and started digging up the city. They wanted to be the first to find the treasure buried under the X.

    • 1stworlder

      Your story isn’t believable it requires one to believe that thousands of blacks could read a map & would be willing to work for treasure.

      • KevinPhillipsBong

        Haha, that story had spades with spades in spades.

        • Spikeygrrl

          I like your style :)

  • John R

    This is why we must shun conservatism and embrace race realism. Conservatives are good people; don’t get me wrong. Their hearts are in the right place. But, inevitably, they are at a disadvantage when debating a White cultural Marxist, or a minority racist. Example:
    “You do realize that this country was founded on slavery and white supremacy?”
    “No, it wasn’t.”
    “Yeah, then how come most of the founding fathers were slaveholders; how come slavery still existed after the revolution; how come we slaughtered the indigenous people of this land…”
    “Uhhh, well, I uhh, am not sure…”
    Now, if I were involved in that same debate and the comment was made, “This country was founded on racism” my reply would be, “Yep, and it sure was a better country then, too. And what totally non-racist country has been a fit place to live in for long? What country are Negroes better off to live in than the United States? Why did so many Negroes migrate from black ruled countries to the ‘racist’ country of South Africa….?”
    I may offend a lot of people, but I would win the argument.

    • Sick of it

      Conservative people are not hippies pretending to be conservative. These new age, multiculturalist hippies could not honestly be considered conservative by any standard.

    • Spikeygrrl

      You really don’t get it yet, do you? THEY DON’T CARE if you “win the argument”!!!

      One wins an argument by marshalling data and deduction germane to the topic at.hand then lucidly and appropriately deploying it to counter your opponents’ position(s). That sentence I just wrote is as incomprehensible to the MultiCult as if I’d written it in Venusian.

      “Data? What data? Data is true when a lot of people believe it.” (Cf. Anthropogenic Global Warming.)

      “Deduction? What’s deduction? Stuff just happens, dude, it’s karma.” (Cf. LBJ’s “Great Society.”)

      “What do you mean, ‘what do you mean’? Words mean what we want them to mean at any given moment.” (Cf. “liberal,” “progressive,” “discriminate,” “rights.”)

      I saved my favorite for last: “What is ‘freedom FROM’? The only freedom.that matters is ‘freedom TO’!” (Cf. OWS and most of the 1960s.)

      Go ahead, “win” all the arguments you want to. _Pace_ Heinlein, “…and the pig enjoys it.”

    • DonReynolds

      Conservatism is race realism. The biggest threat to race realism comes not from the Marxist and Leftist minorities. It comes from the egalitarian Religious Right, who have recently decided that Christ was a hippy who preached universal peace and love, wore beads and strummed on a guitar. We get a lot of Libertarian Leftists from that weed patch.

  • Truth Teller

    How about Camp of the Saints?

    • 1stworlder

      They are turning our military bases into places mentioned in that novel.

  • 1stworlder

    Someone once told me that he wishes the founding fathers could have gotten into a time machine to see what today would be like so they could stop it. I told him they did that’s why they made the bill of rights.

  • dd121

    If Mr. Hood decides to run for any office, let me know. I would like to vote for him.

  • kjh64

    How about rename it Mexiafriasiastan?

  • MekongDelta69

    Thank you Mr. Hood for writing such a perfect article…

  • Tarczan

    This article sums up my feelings about Washington. It is now the enemy of traditional Americans.

  • LACountyRedneck

    N*****ville.

    • r j p

      Bingo! (has a name Oh!).

  • Blackhawk

    The elevated train stop in Chicago at the downtown Harold Washington public library was originally named just “Library”.

    Then it was renamed “Harold Washington Library”.

    I assume this was so no one would confuse it with that silly old White man George.

    • r j p

      What a disgusting “library”.
      Been in it once – had two hours to kill.
      More security guards than librarians.
      Bunch of negroes using books as nose props to sleep.
      Other blacks in library were young bucks on the patrol for things to steal.
      After enough of the atmosphere, I thought I might urinate and leave.
      I opened the mens room door and the smell that hit me was beyond disgusting.
      I did not go in and have never been back.
      Harold Washington Library is a SH.

    • bilderbuster

      Black people should be issued T-shirts that read” Shhh! They’ll think you’re thinking”.

  • IKUredux

    Amen, brother. And, while we are at it, let’s get rid of the Washington monument too, or, better yet, let’s rededicate it to the gays, you know, a giant phallic symbol, we could even recast the top, to look, you know, more realistic, and, let’s repaint it in rainbow colors!!!! And, of course, why the hell does the Statue of Liberty look like a White chick? How racist were the French to even provide this statute, in the first place, and how freaking racist were we to accept a statue portraying “liberty” as a White? Holy Cow! Based on this flagrant disregard for equality, you would almost think Whites came up with the concept of “liberty” to begin with! Or, you know, making monuments in metal. And shipping across the ocean. And, of course, last, but not least, having the engineering skills to erect said Ms. Honkey Liberty”. Let’s get a jump on the future, and change every White visage that appears ANYWHERE in the U.S. After all, we need to be more inclusive. When we Whites are the minority in this ex-country, there will be no need to even acknowledge that we were ever here. And, frankly, when we become the minority, we wouldn’t want to. My God, people, fight back with microaggressions, you know, the crap we are constantly being accused of anyway. Do it for real. Perhaps a macro aggression along the way, would be appropriate.

  • IstvanIN

    You know something, Obama is so classless he would accept the renaming of the capital for himself, he accepted a Nobel Prize for doing nothing.

    • DonReynolds

      Presidents have received the Nobel Peace prize before. Perhaps Obama should be celebrated for being the LAST president to ever be considered for the award.

      • IstvanIN

        At the start of their administration??????

        • DonReynolds

          Of course not….they actually had to do something to get the award.
          Theodore Roosevelt brokered the end of the Russo-Japanese War in 1905.
          Woodrow Wilson helped to create the League of Nations and got the award in 1920.
          Jimmy Carter got the award more than 20 years after leaving office in 2002.
          The same rules never apply to Obama. I thought you knew that.

  • KevinPhillipsBong

    Right. The problem with the Washington Redskins isn’t that the name ‘Redskins’ demeans the team. The problem is that the name ‘Washington’ gives them too much credit.

  • Truth Teller

    Blackhawk
    By downtown Chicago library do you mean that glorious building with the Louis Tiffany domes once named the most beautiful public building in America? Is that the one named after Harold Washington?
    They will probably name the Picasso sculpture in city hall plaza after some black politician and all the historic buildings after more of them

  • http://www.amren.com/ Michael Christopher Scott

    I’m going to suggest “Nuevo Harare” if there is ever a write-in campaign for this.

  • Stephen Wordsworth

    I am surprised that just like all roads in America they have not renamed the city Martin Luther King already.

  • Pro_Whitey

    Joe Sobran once suggested Barryville. It has an African flavor.

    • bilderbuster

      I liked his take on nature shows.
      “Whenever I see a reptile fighting a mammal. I take the mammal’s side”.

  • AmericanCitizen

    As a white American I feel the way the last Romans must have before the gates were kicked in the final time and the barbarians finished the job. The sacking of America has taken decades and has decades more to go but the end result is the same. A once great people beaten down and the barbarians breaking and destroying what they have found. Like the barbarians of ancient times these modern hordes will have no connection to the culture or civilization than produced the cities they desecrate.

  • 1069rhythm

    How about “TheirSpace”?

  • Reverend Bacon

    I suggest, “West Zimbabwe.”

    • PvtCharlieSlate

      …or “Zimbabwe Parvus”?

  • Dr. Cramden

    Call it, Black Gomorra.

  • WR_the_realist

    My proposed name for what was once Washington, D.C.: Mordor

    • http://www.amren.com/ Michael Christopher Scott

      While we’re on the fantasy-horror subject, I recently found this online:

  • Black Plague

    How about…. Trayvonville?

    • Katherine McChesney

      That would be honoring a dead thug.

      • Black Plague

        To people like me and you, yes. To the liberals who would be making such a decision, it would be honoring… a victim of racism; befallen hero; pillar of society; someone who was turning their life around and was ready to make a real difference in the lives of those around him.

  • Uncle Bob

    Why should we let our sacred halls, shrines and burial grounds be overrun by Power-Hungry Demons and their Orcish army that dwells in the city around them? We need to send in an army with fire hoses to clean that mess up.

  • Mark Caplan

    “Washington” is fine — it’s one of the most popular African-American surnames. However the “DC” part has got to go. It’s offensive to the LGBT community. We should rename it Washington AC-DC.

  • Pilgrim786

    The author is spot on except for one grave omission:

    it seems to me that he is conveying the idea that whites are being attacked by non-whites.

    Nothing could be further from the truth. W**s, g***s, b****rs, n*****s, k***s, and other non-whites have no power except such that is granted by white men.

    In the final analysis, all power arises out of a well-trained, heavily armed (mostly) white men.

    It is these whites who are the enemy. As long as multi-culti is supported by heavily-armed and well-trained white men, change is impossible.

  • [Guest]

    >>>No amount of public opinion, established tradition, or indisputable legality seems to stand in the way of the slow retreat of the United States away from Western Civilization.

    That is true and well put.

  • Francis Miville

    It could be renamed Casablanca, or Dar el Beida, which means White House in Arabic, and would remind the renowned movie as well as the Moroccan city of the same name, so as to mean also the city’s third word nature. It could also be renamed MLK, or Martin Luther Kingston. New York should be renamed New Haifa. Los Angeles should be renamed Los Demonios. New Orleans should be renamed New Haiti.

  • http://www.amren.com/ Michael Christopher Scott

    They should have pooled together to buy the aforementioned twit a large supply of diapers and told him to cope.

  • DonReynolds

    Excellent article by Gregory Hood.
    I have noticed the Leftist Liberals have a new complaint against Conservatives…..they claim we are “anti-science”. Yet they cling tenaciously to their own centerpiece…..the capstone of their own ideology…..which is egalitarianism (and the political manifestation, which is democracy). I can think of nothing more “anti-science” than to insist (regardless of all scientific evidence) that every human being is equal and is of equal value. All of the human differences are glossed over with the same mantra…..”everyone is equal”…..and where they are not, the Leftist Liberals will go to any length to see that they are (somehow). This is “anti-science” and it is “unnatural”. Even if there were no scientific disciplines, there would still be nature…..quietly building what is potentially an infinite human variety, from one generation to the next.
    What is important about human life is not it’s sameness but it’s uniqueness. We are not all valuable because we are clones. We are valuable because we are unique, and being unique we are rare, and being rare we are precious. The Leftist Liberals see everyone as a potato peeler, with no potato peeler better or worse than another. The extraordinary human potential lies in many but not all. A place where heroes exist, that rise above ordinary men. Where great leaders have great followers and it matters very much who (and what) those great people are.

  • DonReynolds

    Do not leave one stone atop another and sow the ground with salt.
    That was what the Romans did to Carthage after three wars.

  • AndrewInterrupted

    Why is this brave European-American man fighting valiantly for that Cultural Marxist turd standing behind him. What is he fighting for? Is he fighting for our right to secede–like he should be?

    • bilderbuster

      Powerful question!

      • AndrewInterrupted

        ‘Convictions are prisons’
        –Friedrich Nietzsche

        That’s not a Congressional Medal of Honor, that’s a noose.

        • bilderbuster

          I watched that on TV and heard the man talk and while looking into the soldier’s eyes the same thought occurred to me.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            He was quite likely thinking he was fighting for the America that was. Not the Marxist occupied country that it now is. My relatives were fighting for a different country. The former country known as the United States of America. This poor soldier lost his eye for an occupation government. It’s time guys like him joined militias and applied military discipline and theory there where it matters.

  • NoMosqueHere

    The Washington Red Lobsters.

  • bilderbuster

    We need to stop pretending that this won’t get messy and just get it started.
    Open up all the armories and turn on all of those silly Amber Alert signs to read “Welcome to Obammyland! Free Liquor!

  • bilderbuster

    The Baboondocks?

  • Hillbilly

    Herseyville named after the candy bar. Everybody likes chocolate,even Ray Nagin. Of coarse the title would truly represent it’s population 70% chocolate 30% nuts…………

  • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

    When the time comes for the Cleveland Indians, some might point out that it is now a tribute to the rising nation of India and that Amerinds have long pointed out the incorrect use of the appellation, “Indian.” It was based on the mistake of that most awful of all white men, Christopher Columbus.

    It’s not that unlikely. After all, King County, the county in which Seattle, WA is located was rededicated to MLK, not King George lV who was the British monarch at the time that the Pacific Northwest territories were British.

  • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

    I approve of this useage!

  • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

    Hmmm. Some appropriate sports teams names: Cleveland Co@ns, Detroit Degenerates, Chicago Chicanos, Baltimore Bantus, Philadelphia Felons

  • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

    Obongo would probably prefer Sharptonville, or Trayvonburg.

  • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

    Exactly. In 50 years, if Negroes had their way, the 100 dollar bill would feature Tupac Shakur, the 50 Snoop Dogg, and the 20 Puff Daddy. Trayvon Martin would probably be featured on the dollar bill. With Hispanics taking over, at least this will not happen. Maybe the 10 will feature a Chalupa, and the 5 dollar bill will show Fried Ice Cream.