Court: School Can Ban US Flag Shirts for Safety

Paul Elias, AP, February 27, 2014

Officials at a Northern California high school acted appropriately when they ordered students wearing American flag T-shirts to turn the garments inside out during the Mexican heritage celebration Cinco de Mayo, a federal appeals court ruled Thursday.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the officials’ concerns of racial violence outweighed students’ freedom of expression rights. Administrators feared the American-flag shirts would enflame the passions of Latino students celebrating the Mexican holiday. Live Oak High School, in the San Jose suburb of Morgan Hill, had a history of problems between white and Latino students on that day.

The unanimous three-judge panel said past problems gave school officials sufficient and justifiable reasons for their actions. The court said schools have wide latitude in curbing certain civil rights to ensure campus safety.

{snip}

The case garnered national attention as many expressed outrage that students were barred from wearing patriotic clothing. The Ann Arbor, Mich.-based American Freedom Law Center, a politically conservative legal aid foundation, and other similar organizations took up the students’ case and sued the high school and the school district.

William Becker, one of the lawyers representing the students, said he plans to ask a special 11-judge panel of the appeals court to rehear the case. Becker said he would appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court if he loses again.

“The 9th Circuit upheld the rights of Mexican students celebrating a holiday of another country over U.S. student proudly supporting this country,” Becker said.

{snip}

Topics: , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Fighting_Northern_Spirit

    Another “level-headed” ruling from the Ninth Circus.

    • John Smith

      and imagine if the races were reversed. people were “concerned” about racial violence from a bunch of whites…the media creatures would have a field day…non stop interviews with the ADL and SPLC.

      sickening

      • WhiteGuyInJapan

        For that matter, why do they assume that Mexican students would get angry? Seems a bit racist to me.

        • bilderbuster

          Of course it’s racist.
          Everyone knows the offspring of the Brown Squats of the Occupation Army of Aztlan hate Whites & the USA & will get violent at the sight of an American flag.
          No has to worry about the Irish attacking or even being offended by students wearing or displaying an American flag on St. Patrick’s Day.

      • LACountyRedneck

        “…imagine if the races were reversed. people were “concerned” about racial violence from a bunch of whites…” I hope I see that before I’m gone. What respect I would have for our brothers. Can you imagine 10 million Whites that have had enough to the point where they take physical action. What pride that would create.

    • sbuffalonative

      This is an admission by ‘progressive’ liberals that Hispanics are violent and dangerous and that we need to take precautions.

      • bilderbuster

        Hispanic’s are violent & dangerous criminal minded & shouldn’t be allowed to enter this nation except as visitors & even then only for business & kept on an extremely short leash.

  • RegisterToPost

    Might as well be waving the white flag. They’ve won.

    • thomas edward

      You might as well forget about “white flags” fella. This is for all the marbles. They’re not going to be happy with “winning.” These filthy slobs will try to tear the skin from your ones, and your family as well.

    • DonReynolds

      The Ninth Circuit merely gave the hispanic school administrators the ability to make and enforce this rule. They have only won if the students go along with it. My guess is…..there will still be students who miss school on Stinko De Mayo. The flag will be there anyway. That is what they can never stop.

  • LACountyRedneck

    The F’ if my kids would have ever attended a school like that.

  • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

    A disturbingly under reported aspect to this story is all the hateful bullying the white students had to endure from Hispanic students. The Washington Times version of this story has some of it:

    www [dot] washingtonpost [dot] com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2014/02/27/not-safe-to-display-american-flag-in-american-high-school/

    • willbest

      pfft that is just kids being kids. When white people do it, its an epidemic though.

    • antiquesunlight

      “Principal Miguel Rodriguez.” It all makes sense now.

      • Nancy Thomas

        Anti-white filth.

  • D.B. Cooper

    Come on, republicans!! Why aren’t any of you making any motions to remove Judge M. Margaret McKeown? Hmm, no mention of a husband, kids, and a type of hairstyle I see women of a certain persuasion wear.

    • Dave4088

      Looks like a card carrying member of of the Janet Reno club.

      • D.B. Cooper

        That it is. Its name was even listed among potential Obama Supreme Court picks. Give her credit because the Republican Party sure seems deathly terrified of doing anything about her.

    • Luca

      Her husband is a PhD from Berkeley. However, I’m sure there is some role reversal going on here in a marriage of convenience.

    • https://politicallogical.wordpress.com/ WideBridge

      I don’t think the hairstyle indicates any kind of “persuasion.”
      But definitely work for her legal removal from the court.

    • IstvanIN

      Sad thing is even if she is gay and you want to blame that on being the reason she ruled against the flag the simple truth remains is that, in all likely hood, a heterosexual, White, male judge would have ruled the same way.

  • dd121

    We’re being enslaved in the name of “safety” and the “good of the children”. Barf.

    • Conrad

      A slight suggested correction here. We are not being enslaved, at least not yet, we are being displaced. Enslavement & genocide comes next.

      • Jesse James

        How many months did you have to work this year to fund the Federal governments cornucopia of benefits for blacks, hispanics and other non-whites? Did you give all that money to the government of your own free will or because if you didn’t they would send men with guns to your house to drag you off to jail, after of course spending months tormenting you with the IRS? So you are happy with the state of your “freedom”?

        • Conrad

          How many months? This debt won’t be paid off for generations.

          • Nancy Thomas

            No….the debt will NEVER be paid off.

    • Talltrees

      We’re corned tigers. This tiger’s going to show his claws soon.

      • Nancy Thomas

        I keep hoping….

    • DonReynolds

      No…..we are being enslaved by cowardice. We must submit to what blacks and hispanics want, or else they will get violent…..so lawful authority orders us to bend over and spread them, so the minorities will be placated. We definitely need to change that situation.

  • http://www.departmentoffreespeech.com/ James Boom

    Spring is coming!

    • Geo1metric

      “Broken arrow” was a code in the DOD about lost n. weapons.

      • M&S

        >>
        “Broken arrow” was a code in the DOD about lost n. weapons.
        >>
        USAF Terminology does include that reference but is usually with regard to a threat of weapon detonation in a non war-initiating condition. Lost or stolen weapons are Empty Quivers and all nuclear related incidents are two-term prefixed with Pinnacle to denote increase command notification priority.

        The nuclear event was the sole associated use of the brevity code in the 1980s and 1990s. I believe they have been changed in modern use.

        In 1965 however; Broken Arrow was an Army term that meant a unit about to be overrun was requesting all available support and Colonel Hal Moore issued it on November 15, 1965 as such, in the famous battle of LZ XRay in the Ia Drang valley.

        What is interesting (given the nature of the Mel Gibson film) is that the call was sent, not once, but -twice-.

        Moore’s 1st Battalion 7th Cav got the snot kicked out of them at LZ X-Ray on the slopes of the Chu Pong massif where the better part of 2 regiments was stacked up. This was not a random event but the result of COMINT and other intel tricks that pinpointed the 66th and 33rd regiments against which Moore’s unit was sent in what we would call an ‘external’ in modern parlance or a ‘spoiling attack’ more generally. In that attacks on the Laotian border greatly reduced NVA sponsored activities in SVN.
        The common excuse of the attack on the Special Forces camp at Plei Me was not the reason.

        After insert on November 14, Moore made mistake after mistake in losing control over his leading company elements who rushed to contact and not calling in fire support early to secure the LZ proper (because he couldn’t fix his own positions). Men charging up the slopes met determined, well sited fire from the NVA and were pushed back and fragmented in a fall back condition which ended back at the LZ only because nobody wanted to be caught in the open.

        This led to the second day’s action wherein the famous call was made as the NVA composite assault battalions tried to fix 7th cav at the same time they rolled up their left flank. Moore, down to 340 men from his insert force of 450 (itself 50% short of battalion effective strength) faced the better part of 2,000-2,500 North Vietnamese regulars.
        He finally gave the Broken Arrow call sometime around midafternoon as his lead company was under threat of overrun and his A/B companies were cut off from each other.
        Like his famous predecessor, Moore was slow in getting on the ball and during the first night showed minimal initiative in sweeping under flares or pushing out supported OPs to use the massive artillery support he had available, the previous night.
        He was a diurnal fighter prepared to bleed for dirt as the LZ at a time when his Hueys couldn’t come in and so he missed the opportunity to aggressively patrol to break up the NVA massing.
        When you are massively outnumbered, you don’t thin the lines to hold an untenable position, you keep massed up and you sweep.
        Failure to do so let the Viets infil their units, very close, using a couple river beds which is something true cavalry units would never allow to happen because their MISSION JUSTIFICATION is to act as the screening force to make the enemy deploy into battle early and thus clumsily signal/slow their advance while MFE units ready themselves.
        In any case, the Viets made their own mistake in fighting through the open areas of the LZ the next morning which cost them, badly, as it provided U.S. air and artillery support with fully registered targets in the three hour pitched battle.
        Late in the day 2nd Battalion, 5th Cav walked in from Firebase Columbus (sp?) and 2nd Battalion, 7th Cav arrived from a remote LZ (Albany) that had been blasted out of the bush to relieve Moore’s group and together, they ‘rescued’ the lead company’s islanded Platoon that had actually done the right thing in forming a strongpoint which the enemy had to flow around to attack the main LZ force (if they had had a working radio they would have been great artillery observers).

        The third day, the Viet commander came at them the same ol’ way, making the mistake Moore had in lacking good nighttime patrol and reconnaissance discipline to detect the arrival of the new units. In a two hour battle, the properly dug in and crossfire linked battalion forces all but wiped out the enemy force coming off the Massif.
        After which, what should have been done all along happened: a B-52 carpet bombing raid. Which required the evacuation of all American forces across a safe FSCL.
        Moore was then ordered out and left while his dead were being evacuated and once this was done, 1/5 Cav and 2/7 Cav began their own march back out.

        5th Cav made it back to Columbus but 7th were hit just short of Albany on a segment of trail with elephant grass on either side. The combined arms Mortar and Machine Gun attack drove the Americans into the bushes where all unit cohesion broke down and men killed each other at ‘bad breath’ range, including multiple instances of fratricide.
        Once again, the call was put out for everything everyone could muster and frag was used as a giant weedeater to clear out sections of the trail into which Americans could flow.
        Fighting remained brutal and short range due to the restricted lines of sight and while limited perimeters were cleared at both ends of the column, the middle continued to be a slugfest for most of the night.
        The next day, the Americans had 121 dead and another 50 or so wounded were hauled out and the field yielded to the NVA who, it is estimated, lost somewhere around 400-500 troops.
        Some Spoiling Attack eh?

        I believe the Army Broken Arrow term has since been changed to Slingshot but like all brevity codes, the usage is subject to individual operational variation due comsec considerations and briefed as such with substitutions as necessary (when threat communications monitoring/spoofing is a concern).
        Lessons Learned:
        1. Bleed for time. Bleed for lives. Bleed for victory. But never Bleed for dirt. Holding a position solely to ensure ownership of it when you -don’t- need it is stupid.
        2. Always keep your maneuver elements closed up in a short range fight so that you don’t lose track of them.
        3. Always have your fire missions ready and use them preemptively to drive threat response (hopefully to displacement) rather than after contact when forces are mixed.

        What I don’t understand is the implied meaning. A ‘unit overrun’ call, by whites, would not mean what the poster suggests but rather that a mass murder of our people was underway by presumably California Hispanics.
        Why would that be something to cheer about?

  • Pro_Whitey

    I do believe the Ninth Circuit also ruled that racially segregating California inmates in a lockdown situation was constitutionally impermissible. Is that because there is less of a threat of violence from inmates of different races (and likely different racial gangs) being thrown together in a lockdown? I cannot think of a better example of how they run roughshod over the law to destroy this country.

  • Luca

    How much longer before Whites have to sit in the back of the bus due to concerns over racial violence?

    • D.B. Cooper

      No whites mean no busses, or at least ones used with actual gasoline.

  • antiquesunlight

    Why don’t they expel the Mexicans for aggression? That would make more sense. But no, we must punish Americans for being American. This makes me very angry.

    • http://www.amren.com/ Berserker

      Whites being judiciously forced to surrender.

      The characterization is always the same: Whitey’s fault!

    • Zaporizhian Sich

      This will make the inevitable armed conflict between white Americans and these brown invaders even more violent than it would otherwise be. I personally think no number of dead Mexicans and their enablers, no utterly burned out cities, and no tactic is too high or too brutal for us to get our nation back.

      • Conrad

        I’ve said many times, we aren’t going to talk our way out of this.

        • Zaporizhian Sich

          We are going to create piles of dead bodies and leave cities as totally burned out, maybe even radioactive or toxic wastelands too. That is what it will take to get our country back.

    • Long Live Dixie

      I think you have your priorities a little mixed up. The US flag is incompatible with Southern freedom. It does not negatively affect us if it can’t be displayed at a school in California. I only wish it was banned from being displayed here.

      • antiquesunlight

        I don’t know. If America were run the way it’s supposed to be, there would be no need for the secession, I don’t think. The South could be the South without any trouble and still benefit from the Union. Theoretically, I’m fine with the Union. It’s just that they are clearly not fine with us. That’s why we must separate. In any case, while I am a Southerner, I am also white, and I dislike anything that unjustifiably harms white people. I see no reason why I can’t be pro-South and against the Mexican Invasion at the same time. After all, I was born into the Union. Though I daily feel less and less loyalty to it, because it has BETRAYED ME, it nevertheless angers me that it is being thrown away to the Munchkins.

        • Long Live Dixie

          If America were run the way it’s supposed to be, there would be no need for the secession, I don’t think.

          Sure there would be. The union has never been in our interests. It was always a union with strangers. We always had to compete with them for power. We were always outnumbered by them. We had long been a different civilisation from the Puritan/Quaker North.

          The point of Southern independence is not as much that it will allow us to be politically Southern as that it will allow us to live among our people, separate from the strangers of the North. Of course, it follows from that that an independent South will be politically Southern.

          The South could be the South without any trouble and still benefit from the Union.

          When was the South ever able to be the South within the union?

          I see no reason why I can’t be pro-South and against the Mexican Invasion at the same time.
          Every person I know who is pro-South is against the Mexican invasion. But declaring our solidarity with the occupier’s flag that makes possible the Mexican invasion is the wrong way to go.

          • antiquesunlight

            But the only reason we can’t live just as effectively separate from within is because America isn’t run the way it was intended to be run. We are incessantly intruded upon by the national government. But that’s not the way it’s supposed to be. It was set up with the thought that we would be essentially autonomous but strategically united. We must secede because history has made it abundantly clear that Northern political philosophy and tendency is inherently flawed and will forever flare up and snatch our rights and culture from us.
            I think we pretty much have the same thoughts on this, but I’m still a little attached to the USA. I think it is sad that they continue to ruin themselves (and us) for no good reason, and it frustrates me that they force us to go to extreme measures of secession just to preserve our people and ways. It isn’t right. They need to put a boot on those Mexicans’ behinds and tell them to get out.

          • Long Live Dixie

            America isn’t run the way it was intended to be run.

            It doesn’t matter. The point I am making is that America never should have been. Why should we have subverted our interests by joining into a union with people of a different civilisation who have never liked us (and the feeling was mutual)? It doesn’t matter how such a union was supposed to operate on paper. It was destined to be a train wreck from the very beginning. I absolutely do not think that our ideal situation is to be connected to the Yankees and that independence is only a last resort to protect our political interests. Independence is necessary first and foremost because we are a distinct folk who ought to have an independent homeland and self-determination. I simply don’t understand nostalgia for a union that was wrong to begin to with and that has caused our people so much suffering and loss. I do admit, though, that near the beginning of my political awakening I was also more in line with were you are today in regards to the original union and I believed that there was a time when the union was in our interests. I have learned a lot since those days and so I hope you keep an open mind on this subject.

          • dd121

            I know that AmRen doesn’t focus on the divisions that created the WBTS but what would our world be if we conservatives and freedom lovers could go to a place that fought a war for independence to create that kind of society?

          • Long Live Dixie

            As long as you’re talking about Southerners coming here to create that kind of society, then I’m all for it. I don’t want the Southern cause to be misunderstood as a call for conservative whites of all origins to migrate here. Since your picture is of a Missouri battle flag, I assume you’re a native Southron.

          • dd121

            Yes, I am. My ancestors rode with Quantrill and Anderson. I just wish I had a homeland where I could retreat.

          • Einsatzgrenadier

            You don’t need anywhere to run. It is the 3rd world invaders who need somewhere to run when the time comes to get rid of them. Not having anywhere to run means that your struggle will be a glorious fight to the death.

            The invaders are driven by selfish greed and narrow, short-term thinking, but you fight for blood and soil. You have the moral advantage. The Europeans are masters of violence. When they strike, the brown parasites will be instantly destroyed.

          • DonReynolds

            Either we stay here alive, or we stay here dead. There is no place to run, nowhere to hide. Either we prevail in this place or we will not. Words are not going to accomplish that fact.

          • DonReynolds

            You are already in it, bud. This is your country and you have no other country. If you plan to keep it, for yourself and your children, you must keep others from taking it from you. If they can, they will.

          • antiquesunlight

            Yes, it does matter. The only reason the Union isn’t ideal is because it’s with the politically stupid people of the North. In my lamenting the state of the Union, I am not thereby declaring that it is ideal as such or that it was ever likely to succeed but that its constituents are so stupid that they force us to separate definitely. I don’t see the Mexican Invasion of the Union as a good thing. I see it as another sign of the North’s (and increasingly the South’s, for that matter) stupidity and cowardice. And that frustrates me.

          • Long Live Dixie

            We disagree on this. The reason the union isn’t ideal is because it is a union with people of a different folk. All the other differences, including the political differences (which clearly existed at the time of the original union) stem from the difference in folk.

            Put yourself in the late 1700s. There are several colonies to our south that are populated by people of the same ethnic stock and religion and of very similar mannerisms, customs, outlooks, economy, industry, and politics. What’s more, many mainland Southern families trace their recent roots to those colonies and many still maintain close ties to the people of those colonies. There are also several colonies to our north that have none of those similarities. In fact, not even 150 years earlier, during the English Civil War, our ancestors had come to blows with theirs. Now, ask yourself, which colonies are best for us to form a union with? Which ones will be a good match for a blending of peoples? Which people will likely live with us in peace as blood brethren and which will be at our throats in a mere 80 years?

            I think the key to understanding Southern nationalism is the understanding that we and the Yankees are a different people and that we were a different people even on the first day of the American republic. Once understanding of that comes, then understanding that we need an independent Southland for far more fundamental reasons that political disagreements follows.

          • antiquesunlight

            For some reason you think I am claiming the union was a good idea. I’m not. I am lamenting the fact that it is impossible. That’s not the same thing.

          • Singh1699

            Sir, just a question: The south is more scottish and welsh while the north english?

          • Garrett Brown

            There are many, MANY other reasons the union has failed other than the north and it’s liberal population.

          • DonReynolds

            There is no peaceful solution other than complete surrender.
            There are no words that we have left out of the conversation that would diffuse the situation and resolve the problems.
            We are incompatible people, no matter what issue you care to point at. Either we get an uncontested divorce or we will have domestic violence. Afterward, we can both seek happiness in our own way. Women can understand this.

          • John K

            You are correct. I thought about what you said in another thread, and really started to pay attention to certain discussions and interactions, points of view, and I have to say you are right.

          • dd121

            I’m certainly not attached to the USA. I didn’t leave it, it left me. I would gladly be sitting under a magnolia tree, sipping a mint julep in my beloved CSA, which unfortunately didn’t survive the murderous invaders from the north.

      • Talltrees

        Actually, the flag does represent freedom…freedom that has been hijacked. Can’t blame the flag for that.

        • Long Live Dixie

          Clearly we’ll never agree on this issue. I certainly don’t think a flag that was flown by the invaders and capturers of my native land represents freedom.

          • Talltrees

            We’re somewhat on the same page. We both share the 1965 Immigration Law which angers me as much as your history angers you. Can’t speak about it without losing my composure.

          • DonReynolds

            The Union was a combination of filthy compromises between people who were fundamentally different. The Union was a weak one, each of the states were free to go their own way in most things, AND there was a balance between the regions. We did not dominate them and they did not dominate us. When that all changed, there was secession and civil war. Since then, we have been an occupied people and subject to their increasingly reluctant approval. The Federal collar around our necks has gotten tighter every year of my lifetime. If it gets much tighter, it with threaten my life. We need to take off the Federal collar.

      • bilderbuster

        This is about race.
        The Browns were yelling & cursing at “White Boys”.

        • Sick of it

          Brother, you know that an independent Southern nation would never have allowed such people to flood it. We fought against virtually everything the current United States is pushing.

          • bilderbuster

            And that’s just one more reason to despise Cinco De Mayo.
            That foreign holiday is where Mexicans (In parts of Mexico anyways) celebrate the defeat of the French at the Battle of Puebla on May 5, 1862. Had the French won it’s long been speculated that they would have aided the South against The War of Northern Aggression.
            The Mexican invaders here celebrate it as a La Raza holiday.

          • Talltrees

            Maybe, we should begin wearing European shirts and wave their flags.

          • Garrett Brown

            If anyone wants even more proof of how retarded mestizos are, they celebrate a battle that was subsequently followed up by their complete and total domination by the French army (all the way to their capitol). It’s not even considered a war by the French, they just rolled over every single attempt that Mexico threw at them. But hey, at least they won that little battle at Puebla eh senior???!!!!

          • Talltrees

            There was a time when this wouldn’t have occurred anywhere due to the fact laws prevented zillions of them from coming here.

  • Spartacus

    Those judges should be killed .

  • JSS

    Of course expressions of Mexican pride are encouraged and protected by law. Any White people who can’t see that this country hates them are hopless.

  • willbest

    Just one more stone on the mountain of evidence showing that the US is a worldwide market w/police force where people happen to live rather than a country.

  • Extropico

    The court is allowing these foreigners to create a hostile academic environment. The military should have been brought in to deport any who can’t stand the sight of the Stars and Stripes.

  • D.B. Cooper

    It starts with the schools, then, the entire state will ban Americans wearing anything patriotic on the weekend of may 5. Sorry ladies, but the state of Mexifornia does not want you to display any pride for your country. Anyone interested in seeing Judge M. Margaret McKeown at the beach?

    • David Ashton

      Presumably these ladies should simply remove these offensive items.

      • Geo1metric

        My thoughts exactly! I am truly offended by those flags. :)

    • dd121

      I’m starting to salute. I can’t help it.

      • Alexandra1973

        Settle down there!

  • Who Me?

    “…curbing certain civil rights to ensure campus safety.”

    Reminds me of another quote, “Those who give up liberty for safety deserve neither.”

    That aside, the schools should institute a strictly enforced rule that NO student touches another student, at all, for any reason, regardless of the date on the calendar.

    • Singh1699

      Then how would the 13 year Olds have babies? :(

      • Who Me?

        Oh that, well just another point in favor of the no touching rule.

  • Truthseeker

    I look on the bright side of this story: At least there are white kids who respond with American pride when Mexican pride is shoved in their faces. If they were completely whipped into self-hating submission, this wouldn’t even be an issue. Group identity is part of human nature, and no matter how much you try to indoctrinate our youth, there are still many who refuse to comply.

  • dave

    The judge should be arrested for treason. How do you rule in favor of a Mexican holiday on American soil. Political correctness is destroying this nation. When will the white men rise up and say enough is enough

    • John Ulfsson

      “When will the white men ”

      That’s just the thing, very few white men run anything nowadays. Go onto your state website and look at the appointees. It’s either butch lesbian white women, chosen people, women of color or the odd man of color. At least that’s how all the appointees in my state go.

      • dave

        I wasn’t referring to the traitors in the Gov’t. I am still hoping many whites will wake up and topple these traitors and sellouts.

      • Geo1metric

        Which state do you live in?

      • IstvanIN

        But they count the chosenites as White when it comes to statistics on how many White people still run the government, such as when Obummer was criticized for having too many Whites in his cabinet and among his czars (a term that truly insults the legitimate government of Russia).

  • Geo1metric

    Impeachment sounds about right. The 9th circuit obviously does not understand the constitution.

  • Dave4088

    I thought the media, Communist Party USA, RINO’s and Rand Paultard tell us that mestizos love America and want nothing more than to be good Americans. If so, then why would the sight of an American flag enflame them?

    This ruling is a$$ backwards as they say. Since this is our country, the sight of mestizos and their filthy flag offends and enflames me, so they should be arrested and deported for offending the sensibilities of the American majority.

    • sbuffalonative

      I want to strangle the apologists who say, ‘they love America, they want to be Americans, they want to learn English’.

      If they want to learn English, why do the demand their children be taught in SPANISH?

      • Sick of it

        Having lived in a neighborhood taken over by these people, I can assure you that they do not think of themselves as American in the slightest.

  • Garrett Brown

    Why would anyone wear the bars and stripes now anyways? This country is no longer affiliated with what that flag means.

    • LACountyRedneck

      I’ve had that flag on my property and it’s so wind blown and tattered there’s almost nothing left. I won’t be replacing it with the same flag. I have little to no respect for my government at the city, state, or federal level. I have seceded. I’ve misplaced my money, arms, and respect. If I get another flag it’ll likely be “Don’t tread on me”. It’s amazing what these scumbags at the city level try to choke out of you if you own income property or a business. I wish I had the ability of those that live completely off the grid out in the woods. I could never be like that nut Mick Dodge or those living off the grid in Alaska or out in the woods, but I respect them for their abilities and they seem very happy. Looking forward to hiding out somewhere in Wyoming. When property value tops out, I’m gone. Respecting the U.S. flag means respecting the government. I can’t wait till Whites stop being so f’ing passive. Such a waste with all those arms and ammo.

  • Geo1metric

    These judges have it exactly backwards. Free speech is ALL about offensive speech. No one is going to object, or be offended by mild speech.

    Oh and by the way, there is nothing in the constitution guaranteeing a citizen’s right not to be offended.

    • JohnEngelman

      Liberals claim to favor free expression. In practice they are only interested in protecting obscenity, blasphemy, and desecration of the American flag.

      They persecute those who tell the truth about blacks, and do everything they can to prevent the dialogue on race they hypocritically pretend to want.

  • WR_the_realist

    The U.S. flag has been banned at just about the time I’ve decided I’d never want to display it anyway. There is no longer a functioning nation to be proud of.

    OTOH, if Sam Dickson ever visited my home in the frozen north I’d be happy to put up the stars and bars in his honor.

    • Conrad

      I’ll say it again, although I don’t know why. WE need a new flag. One that represents white racial loyalty and can & will be used by racially loyal people all over the world.

      • Guest

        Here you go.

        • Geo1metric

          That flag has become a world-wide symbol of rebellion. Bobby Lee would be proud.

        • dd121

          To me that’s the real symbol of freedom. Of an infant slaughtered in the cradle.

          • Singh1699

            Infants have a tendency to become real big men.

        • Singh1699

          Sir, while I don’t support slavery I would have gladly laid down my life for the South.

          Look up Alexander Gardner the soldier.

          The best thing about the South, is that they’re honest. They put death, above dishonor; something these money first societies will never understand.

          Long Live Khalistan and The Confederacy.
          ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂ ਜੀ ਕਾ ਖਾਲਸਾ ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂ ਜੀ ਕੀ ਫਤਹਿ | |

  • Zaporizhian Sich

    All this is going to do is inch us towards the day of the rope and bayonets just a little more quickly. I think whites have a duty to defy these rulings issued by judges who are not Americans, but have loyalties to a desert death cult instead.

  • Truth Teller

    Morgan Hill is a wealthy town in Silicon Valley east of San Jose. It is 65 percent White, 10 percent Asian and rest Hispanic. 2 bedroom condos go from $350.00 to $600.00. There are a few cheap homes at a bit less than $500.000, but there are plenty of 8 million dollar homes and estates as well. It is where the rich Whites of Silicon Valley have been moving for years. It is of course a very liberal town and totally in favor of immigration, both for Indian and Asian tech workers and Hispanic day labor, household help and restaurant jobs. Many of the homes are new, built by Hispanic immigrant day laborers. Cleaning, repairs,, remodeling and gardening are done by Hispanics.
    The children of the rich Whites cannot escape the consequences of their parents liberalism any more than can the children of poor formerly working class Whites. I say formerly working class because there is no White working class left in California.

    • Conrad

      That is just what happened in S. Africa. A lot of whites that just could not make it without their colored folk doing their work for them. That worked out real nice, didn’t it.

      • sbuffalonative

        It’s a pity it takes a couple generations to learn the lesson. Then it’s too late.

      • Sick of it

        They were doing just fine until foreign whites took over their country and told them to do everything differently.

  • JohnEngelman

    The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the officials’ concerns of racial violence outweighed students’ freedom of expression rights. Administrators feared the American-flag shirts would enflame the passions of Latino students celebrating the Mexican holiday.

    - Paul Elias, AP, February 27, 2014

    Do Mexican Americans who display the Mexican flag on July 4 get beat up? I have never read of it.

    • antiquesunlight

      They’re probably praised for their cultural pride and contribution to the diverse educational environment. I bet if I wore a Confederate belt buckle to my college, there’d be hell. Nobody wants my diversity…

  • Dave4088

    The lesson here is that the freedom of expression of whites will be curbed so as not to offend non-whites. It just goes to show you where we stand in the racial hierarchy of “free and equal” America.

    • Singh1699

      Bro, the only difference in the world is between warriors and non-warriors; because warriors respect and don’t miscenegate.

  • Conrad

    I am curious to know when white students will possess the proper level of hormones so that they will become enflamed and passionate about those things that pertain to their race & nation?

  • soul hunter

    This reasoning and banning on our flag in any measure is anti American

    • Long Live Dixie

      The US flag offends me. Do you think I should be deported?

      • soul hunter

        My countryman, your homeland is overrun with the enemy . . .you and your family are surrounded from all sides and when they start ethnic cleansing in your neck of the woods, your “Southern Cause” will be imaginary..
        You need all the friends you can garner .. even if they are Yanks..

        • Long Live Dixie

          1) The situation you describe is one created by Yankees.

          2) If ethnic cleansing of whites starts, Southern identity will increase, not decrease. The idea that national identity will or should fade on account of a non-white presence makes no sense.

          3) We will not need all the friends we can get in the North and we will not likely get more than a handful of friends in the North. Instead, the millions of Yankees who live here will act as a fifth element, much like the ethnic Russians in the Ukraine are today. They will oppose us at every turn and if it hits the fan here they will likely form pro-US militias. I am fully supportive of looking to Europe for allies.

          4) You need to get your loyalties figured out. The US flag is the flag of the empire that killed 250,000 Southrons and that continues to deny us our freedom to this day.

          • Sick of it

            Let’s not forget their encouragement of black men raping white women both during and after the Civil War.

          • IstvanIN

            The total was a lot higher the 250,000.

  • Bon, From the Land of Babble

    There is not a day in America where an American flag cannot be displayed on American soil.

    When it becomes illegal to display an American flag on American soil lest someone is ‘offended’ or you could get your face stomped on, it means there IS no “America” left.

    May 5th should be remembered as Mexican Flag Burning Day.

    Tell these guys they can’t display an American flag:

    • sbuffalonative

      We should spread these stories on military websites.

      • Sick of it

        They would remove such stories when ordered to do so and continue to follow orders, as usual. I have not seen that change during my lifetime.

  • Tom_in_Miami

    “The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the officials’ concerns of
    racial violence outweighed students’ freedom of expression rights.”

    I suppose the Mexican flag would be banned on the 4th of July. No? The Latinos just naturally erupt into violence at the sight of an American flag but the white students are civilized and respectful of others’ rights and don’t get violent at the sight of a flag? It’s good to be part of the civilized race.

    • Singh1699

      All wars are about erupting at the sight of a flag. This whole I’m more civilized notion, is holding you guys back.

      If what’s in your blood is steel, then draw on it. Otherwise, you’ll go the way of the yankee..

  • Truth Teller

    I don’t want to disparage any patriots, but the US government declared war on me and all other White Americans in 1968. The government is winning and soviet style genocide will occur in the next 50 years.
    The flag is the symbol of our enemy, just as the soviet flag was the enemy of the non communists and Islamic flags are the enemy of Christianity.

  • me

    California–nothing but a s#%thole of Socialist dopeheads running the state. Hope that California IS divided into smaller states, to give the remaining patriots a haven from the madness.

  • A Freespeechzone

    The failure of the masses to actually do anything, politically or otherwise–up to and including the violence, as is threatened by illegals, misfits, gays and anti-Americans only emboldens the courts, the government and the media to side with evil.

    • MBlanc46

      I would certainly counsel against violence, as it would do more harm than good. But we do need to take our grievances to the streets.

  • MBlanc46

    If there were any racial violence, it would be on the part of the Mexicans, yet it’s native-born Americans whose rights are violated.

  • Uncle Bob

    So, violence can be tolerated but the wrong colored clothes is an offense? (Fashion 101) This website can sure stir a wide range of emotions and attitudes. What a Hoot!

  • Truth Teller

    We do need a new flag. The most beautiful flag ever designed has a red field with a blue X
    No white stars though, too reminiscent of the US flag.
    Or maybe a White or pale background with 2 beautiful blonde children trampling the USA flag into mud.

    • Talltrees

      The flag doesn’t represent the traitors running the country. It does, Founding Fathers, Constitution, Europeans who built her, and those who died for her. Think of five Marines and one Navy corpsman lifting the flag during the battle of Iwo Jima.

      • Talltrees

        Remember

        • Sick of it

          I do remember that unnecessary war which led to the current downward spiral for white people and European culture generally…

          • Talltrees

            While I agree with you about the war, to me, the flag represents the people, not leaders who misused it.

            Don’t you think those six military members raised the flag in good conscience out of love and protection for Americans and their country, not for governing elites who led us into hell?

            Regardless of what our leaders do, I think there always will be members of the military who love the flag because of what it means to them. In fact, even more so in the face of corruption.

            Your Southern history was different than mine. But, some of our history was similar. Can we agree to disagree on good terms?

          • Sick of it

            I see where you’re coming from, but consider – Who turned their guns against their fellow Americans? And not just in the 19th century. Until these men become heroes and NOT soldiers/mercenaries, they will only do the wicked deeds they are ordered to do. Villainy deserves approbation not applause.

            And yes, some of those men fighting over there could have been considered heroes, I just think they were looking at the wrong enemy. I’ve made it clear that I am not a fan of Soviet America, the USSA, or whatever other name you’d like to grant the modern monstrosity.

          • Talltrees

            “consider – Who turned their guns against their fellow Americans?”

            Agree it was despicable. At the time, unforgivable. I would hope our current military would side with us. At least most of them not following orders to fire on us.

            “I just think they were looking at the wrong enemy.”

            They WERE looking at the wrong enemy. Today, with historical hindsight, we recognize that. Military members couldn’t foretell 20 years into the future let alone 65 years. Today, we can predict many things, not with certainty, but could we ever have predicted the 1965 Immigration Law?

            During World War II, all they had was the media, radio, movie news, and what their leaders told them…all propaganda. They also were drafted, then. I’m sure some of them wised up, but couldn’t do anything about, just as our hands are tied, today.

            It’s interesting that much of Hitler’s speeches were boosting the morale of the Germans, not preaching hatred for others. Non-Germans of the day had no idea what he was saying other than his speaking in German at such a high pitched frenzy sounded evil. Americans were not told what he was saying. Hitler was made to look bad, thanks to the media and governing leaders of the day. We know who the enemies were, but very doubtful military members did at that time.

            Europeans are historically known for fighting each other in senseless wars, trivial arguments, generally seeing each other as the enemy and responding in kind.

            As Jared Taylor, Kevin McDonald, and others say, we really do lack “White Identity.” Being a minority may be the only cure.

          • Ella

            I read years back that Hitler mentioned USA would not last more than 80 years with its multicultural society. America could have developed a “white Identity” if Americans have not become a liberal polyglot boarding-house for the World. We will bury ourselves in failed ideology; at the same time we have to learn our final lessons.

        • MBlanc46

          One of those Marines is a distant cousin of mine.

          • Talltrees

            Glad I posted it, then.

    • antiquesunlight

      What about your State flag? What is failing utterly is the renegade National Government. The States can assert themselves again. I don’t know. I’m just thinking out loud.

      • Long Live Dixie

        National means of the nation. Nation means people, tribe, or folk. Hence the government in Washington is not a national government. It is international to the core.

        • antiquesunlight

          I just meant that the central government is out of control, which it clearly is.

          • Long Live Dixie

            I know what you meant. I was just letting you know that it is in no way a national government. Most people misuse the words “nation” and “national”.

          • antiquesunlight

            I think you’re being slightly pedantic.

          • Long Live Dixie

            No, it’s an important distinction to make. Nationalist-minded people should know what a nation is and what a nation isn’t.

        • Sick of it

          It IS a national government, but the nation/tribe in charge is not our own.

          • Long Live Dixie

            That’s an interesting way to look at it. It’s certainly not our national government. What’s clear is that Southerners need to stop thinking of events in Washington DC and outside the South as “national” from our perspective.

  • Talltrees

    It’s against the law to desecrate the flag on AmRen.

  • Reverend Bacon

    Isn’t this purely an admission that we have handed our country to savages? Savages who, once offended by reminding them that it’s our damn country, will riot? And said riot causing the imposition of martial law, including the suspension of civil rights?

  • Talltrees

    2014

    • Geo1metric

      If you read about the more radical Mexican immigrant groups, that is exactly what they are about and they make no secret of it. Our government is either complicit with that goal, are ignorant of it, or don’t care. Take your choice.

      • Singh1699

        The government thinks it can enjoy the free labor now and beat them militarily later.

        Or that the elites of that society can be bought, crippled through banking, or that a north mexico would have less restrictions and more exploitation opportunity.

        It’s already happening do you really think some illegal food inspector is gonna care?


        It’s impossible to be ignorant when the president of Mexico says it’s his goal.

        Tl dr they know, mexi pres says it openly. They think they can win or profit off it somehow.

        This is why a king should rule aka a man O f character, even elected. A landowmer, tax payer, etc.

        The business class will always screw everything for the dollar.

  • RexRazor

    Goodbye America. This is certainly what the greatest generation fought and died for. Sorry Grandpa.

    • Sick of it

      Grandpa should have turned his gun on Ike, not the white people of the South. This is what you get.

    • Singh1699

      The south will be fine, the north, Canada, and basically everything inside the hajnal line..

      Not so much.

  • Truth Teller

    It was a 3 to 0 decision. The administrator who ordered the White American students to turn their shirts inside out was the vice principal Rodriguez an affirmative action hire, probably making around $100,000 per year of White American taxpayer money. Becker made the Argument that the American flag flew on school grounds that day but the court deemed that argument irrelevant
    That is what affirmative action has been all about since 1968. Filling every government agency from police to schools with black and browns who hate and are determined to destroy Whites.
    There have been similar problems in the Los Angeles public schools during Cinco de Mayo between black and Hispanic students.

  • Truth Teller

    I do hope that no amremer will watch the academy awards this Sunday. It’s going to be a pro black hate non chosen Whites fiesta.

  • soul hunter

    If it’s that dangerous to go to school, maybe White kids should just boycott May 5th . . ,.Really though, are Chicano kids willing to hurt White kids because of self expression of wearing the flag they love, and the flag their forbearers fought and died for..
    Then this is a gross social problem within the Latino populace and needs to be addressed with visits to the Doctor’s for psychoanalysis and anger management .. why punish White children ??

    • Geo1metric

      “Then this is a gross social problem within the Latino populace and needs to be addressed with visits to the Doctor’s for psychoanalysis and anger management .. why punish White children for being
      Patriotic ??”

      These immigrants’ goal is to take back what they firmly believe was stolen from them…namely Aztlan. No amount of psychoanalysis will work.

    • Singh1699

      The north is economically, latins racially, the south stratified by land.

      The majority of kids may want a normal American Life. A minority aztlan, a smaller minority are violent about it aka gangs.

      The structure of their society means tyranny is easy to establish.


      The north has an easy time establishing democracy and socialism. While any society based off land has the one that plato considered the highest.

  • 2eRep

    So the court has admitted that minorites engage in anti-social criminal behavior.

    • kikz

      and apparently sanction it….unquestioned.

  • introspection

    This is wrong. I can’t imagine why any race would be offended by an American flag t-shirt. This is going too far by any standards.

    • Geo1metric

      It is merely a skirmish in the opening moves of a long range strategy to take back what they believe has always been theirs…Aztlan.

      • prunepit

        The Indian tribes of the north have never welcomed an invasion of the tribal peoples of the south or the mixed race peoples of Mexico. Atzlan is a fantasy.

        • Geo1metric

          I understand that.

          • Singh1699

            Do these idiots, really think they’ll get it without a shot fired.

  • Ograf

    I would like for every White parent have his/her child wear an American flag to school on that day. Also make sure the media is there and the police. White Americans could make a good showing for patriotism and not accept this govt favoritism over another race and country. If any of the other side is wearing a mex flag I would make sure we raise 13 kinds of hell about that, and if I lived where this school is I would be trying to do just that.

  • http://www.presstitutes.org/ ms_anthro

    Why should we run? We built California. Why should we cede it to invaders? It’s replete with natural resources and a vital strategic piece of our continent. Perhaps it’s where we should make our stand.

    • Sick of it

      If the South ever did secede, we could once more make our claim to California and the Southwest generally. We were the original founding stock.

  • D.B. Cooper

    Your favorite female gym teacher wouldn’t happen to be one Coach Beulah Balbricker, by chance?

  • D.B. Cooper

    Getting rid of Judge McKeown would solve the problem as effectively as hiding dirty dishes in the pantry when company comes over.
    First, you need to get rid of timid republicans, who expect your vote because you are a useful tool.
    Second, elect appropriate people in the GOP.
    Third, replace liberal democrats with conservatives.
    Fourth, clean up the messes your parents helped create either by their Woodstockian actions, or their inactions.

    • Singh1699

      Realistically you need to end women’s suffrage or partition America. Aka south secede and take all up to cali.

      Go see how fertility declined and government expanded with women’s suffrage.

      Women voted hitler and mussolini in and propped up the soviets, etc.

      Women do well under tyranny; women from ditsy central and western European plus English culture that is.


      The spectrum has shifted so far left that Republicans want to lock men up for fighting. Think about that,

      Men can’t compete in the economy because with women in it, there’s no point. Even if you win, your status remains unchanged.

      If they fight they are socially outcast and kept away from women. Defeated the whole reason they were bred for it.


      That’s the problem, it’s against nature. Women don’t choose, only the smart ones stick with a winner. Men competed or fought and the winner got his take.

      The woman who rooted for him became wife, the others came after.

  • kikz

    let the mexicans threaten violence…….if the local pd can’t handle it, call in the natl. guard. someone should have a ‘word’ w/that judge………

    • Sick of it

      The national guard will likely only be deployed to kill white Americans.

      • kikz

        sadly, you’re probably correct…sigh..

  • Talltrees

    This offends some people here, but it brings tears to my eyes because we lost it.

  • Talltrees

    Are you serious or a paid troll?

    • Geo1metric

      “What we have here are the nonsensical ravings of a lunatic mind.”

  • disqus_irCdmAu8It

    Send the wetbacks back to the nation they love, Mexico. There are in the USA just to suck up welfare money.

  • DonReynolds

    Using this logic…..the courts should order all females to wear veils and burkhas so as not to provoke felony rape.
    This violates our system of laws. If banks keep getting robbed, we do not close down the banks. If punks steal gold-rimmed wheels from cars, we do not ban gold-rimmed wheels.
    I reject the idea that the non-violent students must submit to the will of the violent students in order to make the schools safe.
    Defiance is the beginning of Freedom.

  • Nancy Thomas

    mexicans can wave their flag and have riots and get free stuff, but real Americans can’t wear a flag t-shirt. Insanity.

  • Truth Teller

    Maybe I’ll go visit my relatives in the area. I’ll buy one of those 500 minute cell phones for cash. The entire week of Drunko de Mayo I’ll run around Morgan Hill calling the police to report that Hispanic students are beating and terrorizing White students and teachers.
    The White parents of the school should keep their children out of school the entire week on the grounds of safety concerns.

    • Singh1699

      Emergency is free, don’t even need sim I think.

  • A Freespeechzone

    Only vile, anti-American, traitorous liberals and their stacked courts would rule that Americans should be denied their First Amendment right to display the American Flag on a T-Shirt because illegals and mexicans who take from this country, yet, hate the Flag and the people that they take from.

    Until Patriotic Americans stand up and stop this crap, the anti-American liberals, illegals and mexicans who despise America will take this even farther.

    WHAT are YOU prepared to do to take a stand against anti-American liberals, illegals and the courts?

    • Singh1699

      Not liberals, a liberal is a lady who thinks you should love everyone.

      Even given the vote she can be swayed by a strong male candidate quite easily.

      -
      You mean cultural marxists or communists. They been here for over 50 years.

  • antiquesunlight

    I agree with all this, except the factual point that Clarence Thomas is a Southerner on the Supreme Court. And even though he’s black, he’s quite conservative.

    • Long Live Dixie

      You’re really stretching if you count our ex-slaves as members of our folk.

      If Southerner means “someone born in the South” then it is a meaningless identity. That would be a Yankee way of viewing identity. In actuality, Southerner means “someone born into the Southern nation” which is descended from the Anglo-Celtic settlers of the South and from the small number of very similar people who have been assimilated over the centuries.

      Calling Thomas quite conservative is another issue. By whose standards is he a conservative? Certainly not by Southern standards.

  • IstvanIN

    I don’t know how much freedom a student should really have in school during school hours, probably not much. Education requires a great deal of discipline and today, in my opinion, students have too much power and teachers too little.

    Lets look at the situation from a purely practical point of view. Do we really want American high school students beat up or even possibly killed by rampaging hispanics? I wouldn’t. I don’t consider the ruling so much as anti-American as just practical. The judge can not order national guard troops in to keep the peace and, in this particular situation, can not order the hispanics, who were probably US born, to be deported. She had to rule based on the situation as it currently exists. She was trying to avoid kids involved in confrontation.

    The situation should be handled by the students parents and their American elected officials. The parents of the American students should insist that NO foreign holidays be celebrated in a US school. They should also in insist that an anti-American principal, who can not ensure the safety of American students in a US school be terminated. They should lobby their elected officials, the mayor, school board members, their state government representatives, federal representatives, demanding that foreign holidays be banned. We don’t celebrate the Queen’s Jubilee or the founding of the People’s Republic of China, why are we celebrating Cinco de Mayo in a US school? You can not be both Mexican and American, you can only be one or the other. And since this is still nominally the USA, Mexican holidays are not appropriate.

    The simple fact remains is that we have been invaded and largely conquered with the total support of our fellow White, male, Christian elected officials. The government that began all this treason, back in the 1960s, was dominated by White, male, Christians. You can certainly blame the Jews, they, as a group, or at least organized Jewry, are not our friends, but did we have to listen to them? No. Did our elected officials? No.

    Can we blame blacks for this? No, they were fighting for what they thought was right for them, they weren’t, as a group, plotting or supporting the take-over of the US by the Third World. If anything they were dupes, pawns in bigger game. Can we blame gays? No, they were completely powerless and persecuted in the 1960s. Feminists? Nope, they didn’t hold the power, either (although Feminism seems to have been a largely Jewish phenomenon).

    Can we blame liberals? Well, maybe the modern version, but being a liberal does not mean one must lose all sense of loyalty to one’s people, or to legislate for the destruction of their own people and country. To denigrate and destroy one’s own culture. People who do that are more properly designated traitors, not liberals.

    In summation, I have seen the enemy and he is us.

    • soul hunter

      White students should Boycott May 5th . . . end of line …

    • Einsatzgrenadier

      America was destroyed by white race traitors and Jewish liberals. She will never again rise to a position of global dominance because of massive 3rd world immigration and multiculturalism. What we are seeing is the last gasp of an empire that began promisingly enough as a constitutional republic for white male property owners. The classical civilization of the old America is in the process of giving birth to an entirely new order of things, known as Murrica, a 3rd world multicultural hell on earth.

      Goodbye, America.

  • gubblerchechenova

    Why libertarianism is poison. By being individual-centric, it ignores the racial, cultural, and ideological differences & fixations of groups.

    In a perfectly libertarian world, each person would only see himself/herself as a free individual, but in the real world, people are social creatures and think in terms of groups. Also, different groups have group differences in many traits. An average Nigerian individual isn’t interchangeable with an average Hong Kong individual. Not in sports, not in math.

    Some say the West should go for greater immigration to try out a grand experiment of what greater diversity will bring. Maybe it will be good, maybe bad, but we should at least take a chance to find out cuz unless we try it, we won’t know for sure.

    Well, the answer is already there for those with eyes. If Europe keeps taking more Africans and Muslims, it will become like North Africa and Yemen where the whites, blacks, Arabs, and others are all mixed together. That experiment has been done already. So, is North Africa and Yemen economically and politically better off than Europe? No.

    And we don’t need an experiment to find out what more mestizo, Indian, and black immigrants from Latin America will produce. The evidence is already in Mexico, Venezuela, Peru, Colombia, Brazil, and etc. Despite their economic improvements in recent yrs, they are still messy, corrupt, and dysfunctional nations.

    So, it should be obvious that US and Europe don’t have much to gain by greater ‘diversity’. The result of such evidence is plain to see in Egypt, Libya, Yemen, Morocco, Algeria, Mexico, Venezuela, Peru, Argentina(its southern Italian immigrants didn’t have wasp elites to show them the way). Even Jews in Latin America and North Africa surely know rule of law is much weaker there, thereby undermining even Jewish achievement.

    But idiotic libertarianism provides a BS explanation as to why North Africa and Latin America have lagged. As that neocon whore Niall Ferguson lays out in the series about ‘killer apps’, it’s ‘total rubbish’ to focus on group differences in race or biology. It’s entirely the result of culture and laws. So, if Latin American Indians/mestizos and North African blacks and mulattos all somehow imbibe the Protestant work ethic, rule of law, and consumerism, they’re gonna be just like Germany and US. (Yeah, if blacks in Detroit finally read Ayn Rand, they will become Bill Gates and George Soros).

    I wonder if Ferguson really believes this or is he just a whore who tries to push his more controversial theories under the mask of PC.

    • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

      Even if we could get beyond the propensity of libertarian ideology to wreck the social fabric of groups of people that have something innate in common, there’s still another problem with libertarianism in its practical manifestation on the other side of that hurdle:

      Libertarian adherents, like most people, (so it’s not just a libertarian problem), project themselves on everyone else in the world. The libertarian adherent of legalizing all drugs right now would say that he would never do them because he can easily read The Lancet and figure that using these all of a sudden legal substances are bad for you and have very drastic medical and biological consequences. That’s because the typical libertarian who makes that argument is several sigmas to the right of the IQ mean and middle aged, so he presumes that everyone in the world is 50 years old, has an IQ of 140 and reads medical literature. He cannot fathom that there are people in this world, in fact lotsa lotsa lotsa lotsa people in this world, who are 20 years old with IQs of 90 who don’t and will never read medical literature.

      Again, that’s not just a libertarian problem. It’s also a problem with most ideologies, which the people who believe them formulate around their own habits and propensities and folkways, forgetting that most of the people in this world are not them.

    • Einsatzgrenadier

      In defense of libertarian ideology, individualism and racialism are not necessarily irreconcilable. Treating someone as an individual involves attending to each person’s unique constellation of “predictively valid traits”, such as temperament or motivation. Because race is correlated with such things as intelligence, crime and illegitimacy rates, it must be considered a valid, reliable predictor of various life-history outcomes. Therefore, treating people as individuals involves judging people on the basis of race, as well as many other predictively valid traits. Of course, we are perfectly justified in relying on a statistical generalization of trait possession or rational stereotyping, especially when forced to make split second decisions and relatively little is known about someone’s other predictively valid traits. However, when further information becomes available, it would be irrational to continue judging that individual on the basis of race alone.

  • Truth Teller

    Long Live Dixie
    What will you do about the millions of whites in Louisiana with French names? Will Texas be part of the new south? The first non Hispanic Whites brought there were Germans from East Germany and Bohemia 20 years before Sam Houston and the anglo celtic immigrants came. The majority of Texas Whites are descended from Germans. That is why Texas has all those tall blonde Miss Americas.

    • Long Live Dixie

      What will you do about the millions of whites in Louisiana with French names?

      Millions is an exaggeration. There are not even three million whites in total in Louisiana.

      I say the Cajuns can have semi-autonomy within Acadiana.

      Will Texas be part of the new south?

      Texas will remain part of the South.

      The majority of Texas Whites are descended from Germans.

      Untrue and irrelevant. I have already answered your questions about Southrons of German descent elsewhere. Your attempts to portray me as anti-German are a lie.

    • Talltrees

      It appears AmRen’s posters have become promoters for The Southern League, which means the Anglo-Celts remain the majority at all times in the South post secession. Northern Anglo-Celts will not be permitted to move South. Neither are any other Europeans. According to Long Live Dixie, Hispanics and Blacks will be deported. Other Southerners say Blacks will stay.

      At one time Germans were 36% of Texas’ population. Now, they rank the third-largest national-origin group in Texas.

      English, Hispanic, German, Black.

  • Truth Teller

    I’d like to see all White students stay away from Live Oak school the entire week of Drunco de Mayo citing safety concerns. Let them lose the state money. Then I’d like to see the Whites boycott the school during the state achievement testing. The Whites and Asian children of tech workers and professionals being the test scores way up. Leaving only the Hispanic kids would bring test scores way, way down.
    If the White parents are anything like most well educated prosperous Whites in California they still believe in the value of education and would never agree to such an effort to fight back.
    I’m sure that many of the Mothers of the Whites work in HR where they are more than happy to comply with the goverment’s laws against hiring Whites, especially White men.

  • Truth Teller

    it was an affirmative action hire Rodriguez who ordered the Whites to submit to Hispanic bullying. Here is an example of another affirmative action hire who makes more than the President and 3 times as much as the average Dr. Centinela school district covers Lawndale and Lennox, 2 poverty stricken Hispanic communities in the blighted southern suburbs of Los Angeles. His pension will probably be $500,000 per year paid for by the few White working taxpayers of California.
    In another example of local city officials grossly abusing government funds, the Centinela School District Superintendent was berated by justifiably angry citizens over his enormous salary. The small California community has been shocked to discover that in addition to the $663,000 compensation package granted to Jose Fernandez, he also received a monumental loan from the school district of $900,000 at 2 percent interest over 40 years, even though he had already declared bankruptcy twice! Unfortunately, there is no indication that any illegal act was committed, and shockingly, the superintendent actually defends his salary, saying he took over a district that…

  • http://leftistconservative.blogspot.com/ Leftist_Conservative

    shoving the american flag in the faces of our immigrant friends might
    make them feel unwelcome. And if they feel unwelcome, they might not
    encourage their foreign friends back in their homelands to come here to
    america.

    And if less foreigners come here to america, then america will have less growth.

    Less growth means a lower GDP, and a lower GDP means lower corporate revenues and profits.

    Lower corporate revenues and profits means fewer billionaires!

    Won’t someone please think of the billionaires!?

    Growth is imperative.

    GDP Uber Alles!

    Seig Heil!

    Growth Uber Alles!

    Seig Heil!

    Mass immigration Uber Alles!

    Seig Heil!

    Ve shall put the racists in ze camps because they might slow down immigration and that slows down growth!

    Ze racists to ze camps!

    Multiculturalism Uber Alles!

    Seig Heil!

    GDP Uber Alles!

    Seig Heil!

    Growth Uber Alles!

    Seig Heil!

  • John K

    Here’s a great safety measure: allow any student attacked to unmercifully beat the Mexican savages. Or better yet, deport them as they do not belong here in the first place. For anchor babies, revoke their status and deport them with their worthless parents.

  • Ella

    This seems to happen only in America. School board would be more offended if someone wore a t-shirt saying, “Proudly made in the USA.”

  • Angermanagement

    Country wide stand against illegal border trash, traitors, anti American liberals, Communist. Display Your Stars & Stripes, wear your patriotic Clothes, Flags and plaster our country and what we are all over the USA. May 5, 2014. Please pass it on. Across the entire country. Thanks

  • Truth Teller

    Long Live Dixie
    OK, you are going to confine the Cajuns of Louisiana to semi autonomous reservations in Arcadia. Will you round up the Cajuns residing out of the reservation area and deport them to Arcadia? What about all the French people living in and around New Orleans and in the rest of the state? Will a separate semi autonomous reservation be set up for them somewhere? If so where? Or will they be confined to the Cajun reservation. Will French people be allowed out of the reservation?
    Your posts imply that the anglo celts will live with the blacks. Is it right to assume the anlo celt Whites of the south prefer to live with the blacks instead of Whites with French names?
    Louisiana is about 59 percent White, 39 percent black and Hispanic. Once the anglo celts have removed the French, how many anglo celts will remain to keep the black and Hispanic savages under control?
    You do realize that the New Orleans area French arrived more than 100 years before the anglo celt Kentuckians arrived? That the Cajuns arrived in the 1760′s about 40 years before the first trickle of anglo celt Kentuckians arrived?
    Will you abolish the oldest and most exclusive social club in America the St. Cecilia Society of Charleston S. Carolina founded in the 1760′s by French protestants?
    The Bonfils family arrived in Kentucky from S. Carolina in 1820 and are still prominent.
    Will every state of the new southern nation have semi autonomous areas for people with non anglo celtic names?

    • Ella

      What some Celtic descent Americans may not know is that the Normans had a presence in Wales, Scotland, Belgium and Switzerland before coming to America because of religious persecution. I think some of our ancestry is more blended due to migration and of course tribal invasions in Europe than what individuals know. They also may not research their family genealogy to understand their relative’s migratory routes. I respect the French but morn the loss of their cultural achievements as we ALL decline in the same manner. French people like the Irish got a bad deal under British rule. Celts migrated across Europe into France and Northern Spain so there is not much difference to me. In the Alsace region, French and Germans intermarried often. Overall, we are Anglo Saxons?

  • Truth Teller

    Long Live Diixie
    What will the new southern nation do with people whose paternal grandfather had a German or French last name but the other 3 grandparents had anglo celtic last names?
    Will the Irish Irish be counted as celts? Or is that privilege to be reserved for the Scots Irish who lived in Ireland for less than 100 years before they left for America?

    • dd121

      TT, I think you’re splitting too many hairs and over thinking this. Generic WHITES are in danger of extinction everywhere. Let’s just try to figure out how to save what’s left of our pan-European heritage.

  • Truth Teller

    Long Live Dixie
    Ever heard of de la Salle, Marquette, Joliet and their Companions who discovered the Missouri Mississippi river system, one of the greatest riparian highways of the world? There are plaques and statues of those explorers all up and down the rivers. Will you tear them down? What will the New Southern Nation do about Louisville, Nashville, New Orleans, Baton Rouge, and all the other southern towns with French names will you change those names
    Scarlett O’Hara is the epitome of southern romantic nationalism. Her Mother was French and her Father Irish Irish, not descended from some Scots border bandit tribe deported to Ireland by King James 1 for cattle rustling, raiding and pillaging..

  • Truth Teller

    The Mexicans won the battle of Puebla but lost the war. It was the first battle shortly after the French landed. The French were laid low with Montezuma’s revenge when they met up with the Mexican army. A week later the French recovered and easily occupied the country.
    The French left because the union won the civil war. Our state department informed the French that we would invoke the Monroe Doctrine, invade Mexico and drive then out.
    Before he died Lincoln ordered troops to the Texas Mexico border ready to invade.
    The French left only because of the threats from America.
    American schools including universities teach that the Drunco de Mayo battle was the battle that drove the French out of Mexico. Like most every liberal belief, that is wrong..

  • Malgus

    Can’t wear the flag of the Republic on a shirt on Stinko de Mayo because of the overt threat of violence from mongrel illegal infiltrators…

    Soooo, in effect, they are holding white citizens hostage the same way Negroes are holding us hostage – that is, with the Negroes it’s payola, bribe money – enwich we give the Negroes their monthly protection money (welfare) or they will riot, loot, burn down our cities, etc…

    With the mongrel invaders, it’s them holding white citizens hostage over some slight that we would DARE give them by wearing the flag of the Republic on a shirt while they were literally celebrating a failure (their defeat by the French)… in other words, behave like we tell you to, or there will be violence…

    Either way, I’m tired of being told what to do, backed up with threats of violence… want to wear a flag? Then wear all the flags you want on Stinko de Mayo. Who gives a shyte what the mongrels threaten? Same with the Negroes too… tired of being held hostage by lesser beings…

  • John R

    “And the court ruled that Mexican students can not display their flag, out of fear of violence from white students…” Yeah, that would NEVER happen! If any group of Whites ever committed violence against one of the left’s sacred “minorities” they would call out the Army, the Marines, the National Guard to protect them, rather than ask the poor “persons of color” to make their behavior less offensive to Whites. The hypocrisy of the Leftists, and double standards, are just so overwhelming.

  • Rusty Shackelford

    I love it when the masks slips and liberals show you what they really think of their minority pets…American flag shirts must be worn inside out because they are afraid the Mexican students might react with violence..funny, liberals will go on and on about whites and violence when there’s a school shooting but otherwise seem to think whites are a pretty docile bunch. They’re essentially admitting the minority propensity for violence. Same thing when the knockout game stories starting spreading everywhere..their collective shoulder shrug showed that they KNOW how violent garden variety blacks can be, they just don’t like talking about it.

  • Truth Teller

    DD
    I’m not splitting hairs and over thinking, Long Live Dixie is. I would like to see all American Whites band together and fight back. I doubt it will ever happen as too many Whites, especially women believe in the religion of liberalism as much as the most devout Christians
    believe in their religion.
    There are plenty of things we could do, but they are all illegal and require vast amounts of money and men.

  • PROUD TO BE WHITE

    As an Australian of European descent, that is white European
    descent, I am disgusted that a school in the United States would ask its white
    students not to display the flag of their beloved nation. I am more than happy
    to display all flags of all European nations and those nations white Europeans
    settled by intellect and industry. If Mexicans are so offended by the “Stars
    and Stripes” why settle in the USA at all. Why not go to Nicaragua or Guatemala
    or Chile? Why? Well, because those countries do not care about freeloaders
    after food stamps and other welfare entitlements. So to all my fellow cousins
    in the USA – be proud of your flag and your heritage, and show others that you
    are proud to display the flag. If they do not like it, they can “pi## off back
    to Mexico.” Period!

  • Singh1699

    It’s not that they’re not your ally, it’s the baggage.

    People share who they are with others. The reason you can’t trust a warring group in a cold war, is because for every one good there will be 10 bad.

    His relatives will still be idiots and bringing you closer to them is counterproductive.