Julia Jacobs, New York Times, June 28, 2018
White supremacist groups are increasingly using propaganda like fliers and posters to spread bigoted messages on college campuses, a new report by the Anti-Defamation League found.
In the past academic year, 292 such incidents were reported — a 77 percent increase from the previous year, according to the report, which was released on Thursday. The stickers, banners and other physical materials included racist and anti-Semitic messages and often targeted Muslims, nonwhite immigrants and L.G.B.T. people.
Spreading propaganda across college campuses has become a popular tactic for white supremacist groups in recent years, said Oren Segal, the director of the A.D.L.’s Center on Extremism.
As part of this strategy, white supremacist groups try to expand their reach by encouraging anyone with internet access to download the materials and spread their messages, he said.
White supremacist groups have also rallied at multiple colleges in the past year in conjunction with speakers like the white nationalist Richard Spencer, events that often intentionally drum up outrage and prompt protests that draw national attention.
Since September 2016, the Anti-Defamation League has recorded 478 instances of white supremacist propaganda at colleges and universities, according to the report. Texas and California were the most frequently targeted states, which the league attributes to more concentrated membership in those states from the most active white supremacist groups.
The anti-immigrant group Identity Evropa was behind nearly half of the 478 reports recorded by the A.D.L. Identity Evropa describes itself as “a fraternal organization for people of European heritage located in the United States that participates in community building and civic engagement,” but the A.D.L. classifies it as a white supremacist group and the Southern Poverty Law Center describes it as a white nationalist group.
The new report documented racist fliers covering photos of black historical figures outside the University of South Carolina’s African-American studies program, as well as fliers at multiple schools encouraging students to report undocumented immigrants to Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
At Texas A&M University, Corpus Christi, the administration drew criticism this year from students for its initial response to anti-immigrant fliers posted around campus. Kelly Quintanilla, the university’s president, said in a statement to the campus community that such incidents were the “price we pay for our precious right to freedom of speech,” prompting demands from student activists for the university to investigate and find who was responsible.
Farther north, administrators at Texas A&M’s campus in College Station this year changed the university’s policy to heavily restrict the placement of fliers and posters carrying any message — whether it is filled with hate toward a group of people or simply advertising a new club.
In creating its report, the Anti-Defamation League relied mostly on complaints, news reports, and posts from the extremist groups themselves, which often publicize these activities, Mr. Segal said. The A.D.L. also aimed to establish the credibility of the reports through photos and confirmation from third parties.