What the Unearthed 1995 Video Tells Us about Obama

Jack Cashill, American Thinker, April 16, 2015

A professionally shot video of Barack Obama from 1995 has recently surfaced. Shot at the Cambridge, Mass. Public Library, the video captures a skinny, youthful Obama promoting his then newly released memoir, Dreams from My Father.

In this hour-long presentation, Obama openly talks about his relationship with his mentor, Frank Marshall Davis, a Communist and pornographer. Perhaps more importantly, Obama gives us a much clearer picture of who he was in 1995, on the cusp of his political career, than we had seen before. Some observations:

The Obama of 1995 was not a very good speaker. He had a halting delivery, stuttered, was obviously nervous, and, although congenial enough, could not tell a joke. What Obama did do well was read. He read a dramatic passage from his book for a full fifteen minutes uninterrupted and used multiple voices halfway credibly.

Over the years, Obama’s handlers have exploited his ability to read and sheltered him as far as possible from impromptu speaking. Had Obama’s teleprompter malfunctioned during his breakthrough speech at the 2004 Democratic National Convention, he would not be president today. He has always depended on the eloquence of others, and he still cannot tell a joke.

The Obama of 1995 was not a firebrand, at least not on the surface. He presented himself to the small, roughly half-black Cambridge audience as an optimistic, easy-going liberal. In the question-and-answer session, he distinguished himself from the more obviously angry black professor Cornel West. “Cornel West has to go back to his Bible. Got to have faith,” said Obama in a black accent almost as cringe-inducing as the one Hillary rolls out on occasion. In fact, Obama turned that accent on throughout the presentation, especially when answering questions from black women.

Obama’s allusion to the Bible was purely metaphoric. He made no reference to his much bruited Christian faith. He made no reference to Islam, either. Despite his concession that white Americans were “basically decent,” Obama did not think they were “making a serious effort” to compensate for the “brutal experience” of black history. That “was going to cost some money,” and, according to Obama, “Americans don’t like to sacrifice.”

Obama made the supersized claim that “American culture at this point, what is truly American, is black culture to a large degree.” As evidence, he cited Pulp Fiction, a pop-art gangster movie with a surfer music sound track and an Italian-American director.

Obama’s “angry black man” is largely fictional. The one and only passage that Obama read details how he came to grips with the reality of being a black man in America. Much of it is fabricated, especially the part about his brooding black friend “Ray.”

Obama-friendly biographer David Maraniss tracked the real “Ray” down. His name is “Keith Kakaguwa.” Two years ahead of Obama at Punahou, Kakaguwa is only about one fourth black. Maraniss describes Ray as the “first of several distorted or composite characters” in Dreams. According to Kakaguwa, he and Obama lived close to a carefree Hawaiian existence, not at all the tortured, race-scarred one Obama imagined.

The second of Obama’s guides to black life is more legitimate. Interestingly, Obama introduced him by his full name, Frank Marshall Davis. In that Obama wrote two adolescent poems about Davis–and Davis likely one about Obama–Davis may be the most real character in the book. It is a shame no one in the major media–not even Maraniss in an extended Washington Post series–thought to mention Davis before the 2008 election.

In the cited passage, Obama tells the story of how a “very aggressive” panhandler harassed “Toot,” his diminutive white grandmother. “Gramps” then tells Obama that Toot felt threatened because the aggressor was black. “The words were like a fist in my stomach,” wrote Obama. In 2008, he would compare Toot’s alleged racism to Jeremiah Wright’s to save his candidacy.

After this incident, Obama visited “Frank” to get the lowdown on white people. “What I’m trying to tell you is, your grandma’s right to be scared,” Davis tells Obama. “She understands that black people have a reason to hate. That’s just how it is.” With these words of wisdom ringing in his ears, Obama heads into the night “utterly alone.”

Obama finished reading his passage with those two words. They were his way of telling black American audiences that their experience was his experience. He has never been very convincing at that. He keeps trying, however, even if it means yielding to every destructive race hustle the Jacksons and Sharptons of the world can conjure up.

{snip}

Topics: , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Herman

    Has any black person on the planet even benefitted more from his race than Obama?
    Yet he always has a chip on his shoulder.

    • Hmmmm….Oprah, maybe? Your point is well taken, though; good question.

      • Fathercoughlin

        Oprah was molested and abused by just about every black male she encountered. She fueds with her mother and father both. Yet she hates…white folks. An overweight ugly monster.

        • Rob

          And it is foolish white women that watched her show and made her a TV icon. Black women would not even care to watch the silly Oprah show.

          • The Worlds Scapegoat

            Whites are their own worst enemy.

            Who made black athletes rich and famous? The husbands of those foolish white woman that watch Oprah.

          • Jon Doe

            but who will entertain us? 😉

          • ElComadreja

            We used to entertain ourselves quite well.

          • Speedy Steve

            Learn to play the mandolin.

          • Speedy Steve

            We can watch Irish tap dancers. From whom did you expect the African to steal?

          • Rob

            Yep and now I guess they wonder why the blacks still hate them after they spent all that money and time giving these blacks fame and fortune.

          • Earl P. Holt III

            How about all those moron “whiggers” who insist on buying their $200/pair tennis shoes…?

          • ElComadreja

            The lowest of the low. Blacks are naturally stupid violent indolent criminals. they don’t know any better. These sorry excuses for white people aspire to be like them.

          • Earl P. Holt III

            I hate the way you tiptoe around the truth. (Reminds me of myself…)

        • Earl P. Holt III

          A+

        • Earl P. Holt III

          They must have had very low standards to match their very low levels of character and “intellect”…

        • slobotnavich

          What do you expect. What white, Asian, or Amer-Indian male would have any sexual intentions toward that fat and ugly sow. Oprah would have hard time getting molested on Devil’s Island.

          • Speedy Steve

            She doesn’t swing toward men, if you catch my drift.

          • Earl P. Holt III

            Or in a male prison…

    • Alexandra1973

      That’s a way of life to them.

      From “Negroes in Negroland”–

      The negro has been, and still is, thoroughly misunderstood.
      However severely we may condemn the horrible system of slavery,
      the results of emancipation have proved that the negro does not
      appreciate the blessings of freedom, nor does he show the slight-
      est feeling of gratitude to the hand that broke the rivets of his
      fetters. His narrow mind cannot embrace that feeling of pure
      philanthropy that first prompted England to declare herself
      against slavery, and he only regards the anti-slavery movement
      as a proof of his own importance. In his limited horizon he is
      himself the important object, and as a sequence to his self-conceit,
      he imagines that the whole world is at issue concerning the black
      man. The negro, therefore, being the important question, must
      be an important person, and he conducts himself accordingly, —
      he is far too great a man to work. Upon this point his natural
      character exhibits itself most determinedly. Accordingly, he
      resists any attempt at coercion ; being free, his first impulse is to
      claim an equality with those whom he lately served, and to usurp
      a dignity with absurd pretensions, that must inevitably insure the
      disgust and abhorrence of the white community.”

      I just got through flipping through that book online and I was thinking that whoever compiled those quotes for that book must be spinning in his grave.

      • Damn! Whoever wrote that book-I think it was from the 1860’s, btw-was so spot on about black behavior and psychology. Remember, this book was written before “political correctness” before Marxism, before Cultural Marxism; and before the study of race became a taboo subject. People just wrote what they saw and observed. I need to look up this book and read through it. Thanks for copying that quote.

        • Alexandra1973

          Just Google it, you can read the whole thing online.

          When it comes to blacks and TNB…nothing new under the sun, that is for sure!

          • anony

            If you can, buy books since they will not be online forever.

          • Zimriel

            Download and store them. I’ve accumulated a large library of 1800s-era literature that way, which includes Nehemiah Adams’ “A Southside View of Slavery” (thanks Moldbug!).

          • anony

            Excellent idea, I’ll do both. Thanks.

      • propagandaoftruth

        Hinton Helper was a horrible writer but that little anthology of other people’s first hand accounts is PRICELESS.

        And very funny when one compares and contrasts…

        1. Primeval Negro

        2. Pre-Civil Rights/African Liberation Negro, and…

        3. Negrotis Modernus

        I like pictures. Never comes out in the intended order, however…

        • Deacon Blue

          Flav is hysterical. Isn’t there some TV show about him and his
          20+ kids and 7-9-50 “baby mommas?”

      • Earl P. Holt III

        …but should have received a Nobel Prize for something…!

      • Albert

        I actually enjoyed that book. It was interesting to read accounts of the race by authors who could voice their honest opinions completely unfettered by “pc” thought. Had they been, they would have been tripping over themselves in the monumental effort to rationalize negro behavior in an honorable light. These early authors were not corrupted by the false idea that all cultures are created equal.

    • SirMarlowe

      Frank Marshall Davis is Obama’s biological father. See the video documentary by Joel Gilbert “Dreams from my Real Father.” This video is available through World Net Daily and other sources for about $20. It is 90 minutes long and very well done.

      Ann began her relationship with Davis by listening to jazz albums. She then began posing nude for him; he was an amateur photographer, and he photographed various women. He then sold the photos to girlie magazines. Nude photos of Ann are available online and in Gilbert’s documentary. She was just 17 and had a petite figure.

      After the nude photo, sex followed. Ann Dunham began fornicating with Davis in the autumn of 1960. When she got pregnant, her father and Davis came up with the idea to find a “fall guy” to pose as the father – for a fee, of course. The Kenyan Goat Herder, Barack Obama, Sr. was their choice. There weren’t many young Blacks to choose from.

      Davis, then 55, was married to a white woman, Helen Canfield, and they had five children. He said he couldn’t afford the scandal of being divulged as Obama’s father. Stanley Dunham had his reasons for the cover-up; he was reportedly an agent for the FBI, and the fact that the main Communist organizer in Hawaii impregnated his daughter would have cost him his job.

      Ann Dunham was about 5’ tall. The Goat Herder was about 5’ 5”. Obama is 6’ 2”; Davis was exactly 6’ 2”. Obama is left-handed; Davis was left-handed. Do an online search for Frank Marshall Davis and Ann Dunham. There are photos that show a comparison of facial features between Davis and Obama.

      There are no photos of any type of relationship between Ann and the Goat Herder during the time that the two were “supposedly” going together in the fall of 1960. It appears that they didn’t even know each other.

      The first photos of Ann and the Goat Herder were taken in 1971 when the Goat
      Herder visited Ann and Barack in Hawaii; the photos were taken at the airport.
      Barack junior was 10 years old. The reason that the Goat Herder was visiting
      was because both parents had to appear at the private school where the
      grandparents wanted to enroll Obama. The Goat Herder was paid handsomely for
      this visit.

      High School girlfriends of Ann relate that she did not go out with regular white guys. She was a political radical and a rebel; in the late 1950s, rebels often embraced communism. Davis was a flaming communist.

      One reason that Ann was an outsider is because her father insisted that she be named after him. He was off in WWII and afraid that he might not come back. He wanted his
      name to be carried on. Her given name is Stanley Ann Dunham. No wonder she didn’t
      like white guys.

      I have concluded that Ann flew to Kenya to have the baby in 1961 in order to solidify the sham story that the Goat Herder was the biological father. There are eye-witness reports that she gave birth in Kenya. These people were hushed up.

      • “Ann Dunham was about 5’ tall. The Goat Herder was about 5’ 5”. Obama is 6’ 2”; Davis was exactly 6’ 2”. Obama is left-handed; Davis was left-handed. Do an online search for Frank Marshall Davis and Ann Dunham. There are photos that show a comparison of facial features between Davis and Obama.”
        I don’t know you. I skimmed over what you wrote. A tiny bit of feedback on getting your ideas out to the world. For me, the above paragraph stood out, memorably. So I would say, include it often in what you write.

        • EuropeanIdentity33

          I’m surprised he wasn’t a Muslim. Ann sure seemed to be a glutton for punishment and for unhealthy, unstable relationships with third world men who just wanted to use her and throw her away. Which is pretty much her life story in a nutshell.

          • De Doc

            She seems to have been the breed of anthropologist that couldn’t separate the personal from the professional.

          • Just a horny version of Jane Goodall.

          • KevinPhillipsBong

            ^Excellent!!!

        • Luca

          Do you have a reference for the height of the goat herder? I have been looking for that fact for quite some time as I feel FMD is a good candidate for baby-daddy.

      • Lexonaut

        “Ann began her relationship with Davis by listening to jazz albums.”

        And everyone knows how corrupting that can be. I mean, it turned Dave Brubeck from black to white, and it caused him to count to five instead of four.

        • EuropeanIdentity33

          Jazz is just early to mid 20th century rap with some trumpets thrown in. It’s not surprising that it is just as degenerate as its successor.

        • Earl P. Holt III

          It’s not the music that is corrupting, it’s the nigras…

      • Earl P. Holt III

        Another reason Obama’s mother pursued a phony “baby-daddy” was that Frank Marshall Davis was a Soviet Spy.

        Fearing that her mixed-race child by a Soviet Spy — out of wedlock, no less — might face “discrimination,” Obama’s mother shopped the continents of Asia and Africa looking for someone willing to play that role in return for a ticket to the U.S.

        For the rest of his life, the CPUSA opened doors for Obama, including admission into Harvard Law.

        I have a close friend whose brother was on the Harvard Law Review when Obama was its “Editor-in-Chief.” Regarding Obama’s role on the Law Review that year, the brother contends “…I never met him, he never came into the Law Review offices, and I have no idea what his work product was…”

        • There was no work product; Obama didn’t write anything at all for HLR.

          • Earl P. Holt III

            How do you know? I suspect you are correct, but do you know something more?

            If there is something in the HLR with his name attached, I suspect it will have been written by that Jewish communist who got him his admission to Harvard Law…

      • Anglo

        Thanks for the information, but I don’t understand why her father couldn’t have simply arranged for her to get an abortion. It would have been the right thing to do.

        • SirMarlowe

          I think that abortions were illegal at that time (1961); additionally, they were also considered to be dangerous for the woman.

        • Anglo

          I’m not a young woman. I know exactly what it was like before abortion was legal, but where there was a will or a need, women got abortions.

          Abortion was legalized in Sweden in 1938 for medical, humanitarian, or eugenical reasons; later augmented in 1946 to include socio-medical reasons, and again in 1963 for risk of serious fetal damage. Sweden’s 1938 law, alone, would have covered Ann Dunham’s situation well enough. Ann’s father, Stanley Dunham, was not an uninformed man; he would certainly have known of Sweden’s law.

          To my point, if Ann’s father could find and pay a Kenyan goat herder – Barack Obama, Sr. – to marry and pose as the father of Ann’s bastard child, then surely it would have been no problem to make arrangements and buy Ann a plane ticket to Sweden rather than this elaborate cover-up, or am I being too logical? Ann and both her parents were atheists, were they not? I couldn’t imagine any religious objections. Is there more to this conspiracy than we know? I think, perhaps, yes.

          • SirMarlowe

            Ann Dunham was a rebellious, defiant young woman. Her female
            high school classmates have stated that she didn’t go out with traditional white guys. We know that she married an Indonesian – Lolo Soetoro – and we know that she had a Negro baby. This means that she was fornicating with a Negro.

            Just because her father and Frank Marshall Davis did not
            want it to be publicly known that Davis was the father, doesn’t mean that she did not want to have the baby. Ann is likely the one who made the decision to have the baby and there was no way her parents could force her to have an abortion. The compromise was to find a fall-guy to pose as the father – enter the Goat Herder.

            What better way to show defiance to white men than to have a
            black baby. If her father could insist that she be named “Stanley,” then she could flaunt the fact that she had fornicated with a Negro. Ann was asserting her independence.

          • Anglo

            Yes, it’s obvious Ann was rebellious and, unfortunately, very foolish; but the more I learn about her parents, I don’t think the apple fell far from the tree. I appreciate your information and thoughts on this matter.

    • Realist

      The black descendants of American slaves are the the luckiest blacks on the planet.

      • slobotnavich

        I’ve often said (not publicly) that every American black should get down on his knees every and thank the God that made him that his slower ancestors got caught by his faster ancestors and sold into slavery, else he’d still be living in that leprosy and malaria ridden, snake infested hellhole that is sub-Sahara Africa.

    • Fathercoughlin

      He is basically a POS

    • ElComadreja

      Just a typical black person.

    • Earl P. Holt III

      He benefited more from his membership in the CPUSA…

  • Oil Can Harry

    Obama’s mentor Frank Davis wrote a memoir where he boasted that after a black single mother asked Davis and his wife to babysit her 13 year old daughter Mr. and Mrs. Davis would regularly have threesomes with the girl.

    • Alexandra1973

      There’s evidence that Frank was Obama’s “babydaddy.”

      • Johann Wald

        Obama looks like Davis a lot more that he does his “babydaddy of record”. My vote is for Davis. A comparison of the two’s photographs is all the evidence I need. From features to coloring, its all there.

        • slobotnavich

          At first glance I thought the picture of Davis was one of Sonny Liston early in his career. In any event, some of these posts reflect more conspiracy theorizing than one would find among a group UFO wackos. Obama is simply a far-left liberal academic who can speak with reasonable articulation and who managed to become president largely because of his non-threatening demeanor (“He seems like such a nice Negro!”) whom white moderates could feel comfortable voting for, especially after the embarrassing spectacle of the Bumbling Bushes. Like all Democrats, he’s damaged our republic, this time to a point that might now be irreversible and could actually lead to the break-up of the US. But in truth Obama inflicted no more damage on our nation than did the arch-incompetents FDR, JFK, or certainly LBJ. The all-time cartoonish buffoon Jimmuh Cottuh might well have finished us off had he not got blown out by RR, who rapidly proceeded to restore America’s greatness and prosperity and broke the USSR in the process.

          • SirMarlowe

            Conspiracy theorizing? UFO wackos? Simply a far-left liberal academic? I must disagree.

            Did you see the DVD by Joel Gilbert? Did you read Jerome R. Corsi’s book, Where’s the Birth Certificate? Do you think a 5′ 5″ male and a 5′ female can beget a 6′ 2″ male.

            Do you deny that Ann had a relationship with Frank Marshall Davis? Have you seen any photos of the Goat Herder and Ann together during the time that they were supposedly “going together” in 1960?

            Does Obama look more like Davis or the Goat Herder? Ridiculing the facts will not get far with those of us who are not afraid to voice the truth. Ridicule has been a tactic used by Obama’s handlers and the mass media.

            The actual conspiracy is the cover-up that was perpetrated by Obama’s handlers and the mainstream media.

            Fact is, Obama is an “imposter” and he should be impeached by the House, convicted by the Senate, and expelled from office for lying to the American people.

          • slobotnavich

            Well, I agree with you on one thing – I seriously doubt that Obama was born in this country or that he was an outstanding student from wherever he supposedly graduated, else why would all these records be sealed and hidden from public view? In any event he’s a far-left Marxist (picka)ninny and I find it a rather frightening commentary on the character and intellect of our body politic that he got elected not once, but twice, though given the precedence of the limp, bumbling, and insipid Bush Squish Family I can at least understand (or rationalize) how it happened.

          • slobotnavich

            Well, my 5’8″ father and 5’2″ mother begat me, a 6’3″ son. I do seriously doubt that Baboona was born in the US, however. As for impeachment, a more appropriate punishment for his transgressions against our nation and its constitution would burning at the stake by slow fire, with the remnants fed to ravening junkyard dogs.

          • smrstrauss

            Re: “doubt….born in the US…”

            Obama has shown both his Hawaii short-form BC (the Certification of Live Birth, COLB, which is the OFFICIAL birth certificate of Hawaii, used by thousands of people to get their US passports every year, and, BTW, he showed it way back in June 2008, five months before the election), and he has shown his long form Hawaii BC.

            And the officials of BOTH parties in Hawaii have repeatedly confirmed that they sent them to him, and that all the facts, repeat ALL the facts, are exactly the same, repeat, EXACTLY the same, as what they sent to him. The fact that Hawaii issued a birth certificate for Obama in 1961 (when Hawaii was not allowed by its law to issue birth certificates to children born outside of Hawaii) is also confirmed by the public Index Data file and the birth notice in the “Health Bureau Statistics” section of the newspapers (which ONLY the DOH could send birth notices to) and by the INS inspector who checked on Obama’s father’s status and wrote: “one child, born in Honolulu”—and by the Hawaii teacher who wrote home about Stanley having a baby.

            And there is no indication whatever that Obama’s mother even had a passport in 1961, and very very few 18-year-olds did at the time, and EXTREMELY few women traveled abroad in the last few months of pregnancy. Yet birthers hope a few GULLIBLE people will just assume that both of those happened and that Obama’s birth certificate is forged and that the officials of both parties are lying, and that the Index Data and the birth notices are forged, and that the INS inspector made an error in his “one child, born in Honolulu” note, and that the teacher who wrote home was lying. But you’d have to be terribly GULLIBLE to think that all of that happened.

          • slobotnavich

            Frankly, I’ve never much cared whether Obama was born in the US or Georgetown, Guyana. I never even understood why that was ever a requirement for the presidency in the first place. We’ve had our own fair share of home-grown knaves, ne’er-do-wells, and incompetents as president; why naturalized citizens should be excluded has always eluded me. Obama, wherever he was born, is a dedicated socialist committed to the destruction of this nation as it was originally constituted. We’ll likely never recover from the damage this buffoon’s inflicted on our country.

          • smrstrauss

            Now you say that you do not CARE, but earlier you said that you doubted that he was born in the USA. I was responding to your doubt. It is an unfounded doubt.

            Re “socialist” etc. He’s too far right for some of us, we cannot even get a government option on healthcare. So you think he is too far left and some of us think he is too far right, and that is how elections are won and lost. YOUR side lost. Tough.

          • SirMarlowe

            The questions as to where Obama was born and whether there
            is a valid birth certificate are both “red-herring” issues; these issues have been used to deflect attention away from the fact that Obama’s biological father is Frank Marshall Davis. Obama knows who his biological father is, and he’s been lying to the American people about it for years.

            Where are any photos of Ann Dunham and the Goat Herder
            during the time they were supposedly “going with each other” in the autumn of 1960? Where are the baby photos of Ann, the Goat Herder, and Obama? Ann and the Goat Herder were supposedly married on February 2, 1961 when she was three-months
            pregnant. Where are the wedding photos? Where is the marriage certificate? None of these items exist; it’s a huge “fairy tale,” and the American people are either too apathetic or too scared to demand a showdown.

            Obama should be ordered to give some DNA material to officials, and some DNA material should be taken from a couple of Frank
            Marshall Davis’s five children. If there’s a match, this proves that he has been lying; this is grounds for immediate impeachment by the House, conviction by the Senate, and expulsion from the office of the presidency of the United States.

          • smrstrauss

            Re: “attention away from the fact that Obama’s biological father is Frank Marshall Davis.”

            First, you do not really know that. You are relying on the mere speculation of BIRTHER sites (now, I wonder what their motive would be?) and that speculation is based on a single photograph

            Second, IF it were true (and that is a very remote possibility because Obama looks like Obama senior too), it would not mean a God damn thing. Not a God DAMN thing.

            Why not? Because, wait for it, you cannot inherit political or moral leanings through your DNA (Did you think that you could? If so, check out the number of minister’s kids who did not follow the straight and narrow path).

            Third, IF you are dumb enough to think that claims by an enemy of a candidate are evidence of that candidate’s real father—well, perhaps you did not know the real father of Cruz and the real father of Rubio and the real father of Bush (hardly a real Bush?) and the real father of Walker, etc, etc. Yeh, that’ll be what the Democrats will claim. And they’ll ask Cruz and Rubio and Bush and Walker etc etc to provide DNA evidence.

            In short the “Davis is the real father” story is dumb.

            If this is

          • Earl P. Holt III

            That is a very simplistic (and simple-minded) interpretation of a great many puzzling facts, which you are entitled to harbor so long as Obama and “Useful Idiots” like yourself do not totally destroy the Constitution and Rule of Law, as it appears you are much inclined to do…

          • slobotnavich

            Actually, Earl, I’m a hard-right libertarian conservative constitutionalist who’s actually done a bit of fighting for this country (Vietnam ’65-66, ’67-68 5th Special Forces Gp) and still carries around enough iron in this old bod to set off airport metal detectors. Had I the power I’d repeal every constitutional amendment, starting with the federal income tax to the present, and return to the original document as drafted by the founders.

          • Earl P. Holt III

            If you would repeal the Bill of Rights — particularly the First, Second, Fourth and Tenth Amendments — then you need to read and study the Constitution more. (I do NOT disagree about the Income Tax!)

            Thanks for your service, anyway: You are probably better cast as a man of action…

          • slobotnavich

            Actually, I’m now a man of sloth, indolence, and ne’er-do-wellery.

          • Earl P. Holt III

            THAT, I don’t believe…

          • anony

            He said repeal them STARTING from the federal income to the present. I agree.

          • smrstrauss

            YOU have the right to dislike Obama and think that he is destroying the Constitution. But that is not proof that he was born in a foreign country or that he is not eligible to be president.

          • Earl P. Holt III

            You moron, I never said anything of the sort, although I believe both to be true. You are merely engaged in the typical diversionary tactic of the juvenile and idiot left.

            I was commenting about the fact that his college transcripts have been sealed by Obama, himself, and at considerable cost to his campaign. Why they are sealed is legitimate grist for speculation. (If I am wrong, tell me about his grades at Occidental or Columbia…)

            You are a living, breathing example of why the Framers of the Constitution did not include Womens’ Suffrage in the original document…

          • smrstrauss

            You said that you were commenting on the alleged fact that “his college transcripts have been sealed by Obama, himself…”

            But that is only a birther myth. They are not sealed. They simply have not been released. Mitt Romney and John McCain and Clinton and Gore and Bush41 and Reagan and Carter and Ford and Nixon did not release their transcripts either. What makes you think that presidents and presidential candidates normally release their transcripts?

            And, BTW, NONE of them are “sealed.” They all are covered under the normal state and federal privacy laws, the same laws that prevent your transcripts and my transcripts from being released by educational institutions.

            Re: “at considerable cost….”

            THAT was made up by birther sites.

          • Earl P. Holt III

            Then show me his grades. Simple enough for normal people…

          • smrstrauss

            YOU don’t read very much, do you?

            In the posting above I said: “They are not sealed. They simply have not been released. Mitt Romney and John McCain and Clinton and Gore and Bush41 and Reagan and Carter and Ford and Nixon did not release their transcripts either. What makes you think that presidents and presidential candidates normally release
            their transcripts?

            And, BTW, NONE of them are “sealed.” They all are covered under the normal state and federal privacy laws, the same laws that prevent your transcripts and my transcripts from being
            released by educational institutions.”

            In other words, the reason that I cannot show Obama’s transcript is the same reason that you cannot show Mitt Romney’s transcript. Neither of them were released.

          • Earl P. Holt III

            The difference between their being unavailable because they are sealed by court order, or whether they remain closed by order of the Bolshevik-in-Chief, himself, is immaterial: In both instances, they are being withheld from the public because they contain information that is damaging to this communist and Islamic Marxist that idiots like YOU helped elect.

            Until they are released, and I am proven wrong, I will continue to allege that Obama fraudulently applied as a “Foreign Student,” that he failed most of his courses except those concentrating on Marxism in one form or another, and that — and this is the obverse of the “Foreign Student” fraud claim — he is not and never was an American Citizen, and is Constitutionally ineligible. I also believe he is an Islamist, and I know he is a Pathological Liar by ANY clinical definition.

            If you do not approve of my approach, I invite you to kiss my *ss, because I have wasted far too much time on you and other traitors who first elected and now defend this absolute, utter catastrophe…

          • smrstrauss

            They have not been “withheld.” Obama simply did not release them—since previous presidents and presidential candidates did not do so either.

            Re: ” I will continue to allege that Obama fraudulently applied as a “Foreign Student,””

            Answer: And that will show that you are truly loony because the story that Obama applied as a foreign student CAME FROM AN APRIL FOOL’S article.

            BTW, you or anybody sensible (not necessarily you of course), can check on whether the April Fool’s article was right or whether Obama did not register as a foreign student by doing something very very simple—–calling up Occidental and Columbia and ASKING.

            (They cannot tell you Obama’s grades but they can and will tell you whether or not Obama was a foreign student—and he wasn’t.)

            Re “wasted too much time…”

            Too bad, there may still be a few sensible people who read this site, and they might be interested in your input. All that I do is respond with the facts. The facts show that Obama did not release his transcript because other presidential candidates and previous presidents did not do so either. And the facts show that Obama was not registered as a foreign student, and if anybody believes that I am not telling the truth—well, you have the right and the ability to CALL Occidental an Columbia and ask for their PR Departments and ASK.

            Here is the telephone number of Occidental:

            (323) 259-2677

            Here is the telephone number of Columbia:

            (212) 854-1754.

          • Earl P. Holt III

            yawn…)

          • smrstrauss

            Notice that Earl P. Holt III did not reply to one single fact. Well, too bad for him. You’re not going to convince anyone that way. For rational people who are interested in knowing what is true and what is false, the facts are shown above and there is a way to check on them as well.

          • Earl P. Holt III

            I’m NOT trying to convince silly, dizzy “Democrats” who are skilled at obscurantism: The latter are hopeless, and I have written them off completely. If they were salvageable, they would not have re-elected America’s first communist President.

            Let me share one little piece of information with you, which convinces me beyond any doubt that I will eventually be vindicated in all my beliefs about the illegitimacy of Barack Hussein Obama in all the contexts his legitimacy has been questioned:

            A friend of mine had a brother on the Harvard Law Review when Obama was the nominal “Editor in Chief”. Regarding Obama, the brother stated:

            “I never met him, he never came into the Law Review offices, and I have no idea what his work-product was.”

            Like every other aspect of Barack Hussein Obama, his life is nothing but mirrors and obfuscation. And, you are an enabler of such…,

          • smrstrauss

            The claims or lack of memory of the brother of a friend about Obama’s work habits at the Law Review is not proof that Obama was born in a foreign country or his birth certificate forged or that he registered as a foreign student at college or university (which, BTW, came from an April Fool’s article.).

            As for your not desiring to convince some people. Well, you’re not convincing ANYBODY. The reason that Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan and Karl Rove and Gingrich and Santorum all say that they do not believe the birther story is that they know that the birthers are willing to lie on the subject and because the facts showing Obama being born in Hawaii include:

            (1) his Hawaii birth certificate and (2) the confirmation of the facts on Obama’s birth certificate by the officials of BOTH parties in Hawaii including the former Republican governor and (3) the birth notices sent to the 1961 Hawaii newspapers by the DOH of Hawaii (and only the DOH could send birth notices to that section of the newspapers, and it only did so for births in Hawaii).

          • Earl P. Holt III

            The anecdote is evidence that practically every aspect of Obama’s life is clouded in questions and mysteries. Nothing is as it seems or as it is claimed to be by Obama and his enablers, such as yourself.

            Many Republicans fear raising the issues surrounding Obama’s mysterious birth and early childhood because they would be descended upon by the very same Corrupt Leftist Media which showed absolutely no interest in pursuing those issues, themselves, even when the “Birth Certificate” displayed on the White House website was demonstrated to be fraudulent, and consisted of a composite involving at least seven layers.

            I KNEW you would prevaricate, dissemble, engage in mendacity, and just plain lie. I really proffered the comment to get you to show your true self, which you have done…in spades!

          • smrstrauss

            Re: “The anecdote is evidence that practically every aspect of Obama’s life is clouded in questions and mysteries. Nothing is as it seems or as it is claimed to be by Obama and his enablers, such as yourself.”

            The “clouded in mysteries” is a claim by birthers, and they claim it over and over and over and over—for their own obvious motives. The “questions and mysteries” that you refer to were mainly created by birther LIES.

            There is nothing whatever mysterious about Obama’s birth. He really was born in Hawaii, and the officials of BOTH parties in Hawaii have repeatedly confirmed it.

            And the birth certificate being “demonstrated to be fraudulent” is just one of the standard birther iies—done for the same motives as the claim that Obama’s Kenyan grandmother said he was born in Kenya (she really said that he was born IN HAWAII in three interviews, of which birther sites showed their readers only part of one, cutting off the interview tape just before she said: “In Hawaii, where his father was studying at the time.” And for the same motives that birthers lied and said that Obama’s transcripts were “sealed” and that he registered as a foreign student. And for the same motives as the three forged “Kenyan birth certificates” and videos in which he is supposed to have said: “I was born in Kenya—but you cannot see his mouth move.

            People who would do that would lie about Obama’s birth certificate being forged too, and they did.

            With the single exception of Reed Hayes, who has not proven his expertise in examining digital documents (he is a specialist in documents on paper, and he has not seen the paper copies) and who admits he has not seen the research on the way that the Xerox WorkCentre works, ONLY birther “experts” have called Obama’s birth certificate forged. And they have not shown that they are even experts, much less fair and impartial. Those are two reasons why they are not believed by Ann Coulter, Glenn Beck or the National Review (or by Mitt Romney or Paul Ryan or Gingrich or Santorum or Huckabee).

            One proof that Obama’s birth certificate is not forged is Obama’s short-form birth certificate.

            Short-form birth certificates are created by a clerk reading the information from the document in the file, and filling out the computer form that generates the printed short-form birth certificate. The officials in Hawaii have confirmed that they sent a short-form to Obama. So, unless they are lying—and they were Republican officials–the only way that Obama’s birth certificate could have been forged was that it was forged in 2007 and slipped into the file just before the clerk looked at the file. That is not very likely, is it? And it is especially unlikely since at the time Obama was not even the candidate of the Democrats. He was still in the primaries at the time, and he was only a junior senator from Illinois.

            And birther sites have not shown you these real experts.

            Dr. Neil Krawetz, an imaging software analysis author and experienced examiner of questioned images, said:“The PDF released by the White House shows no sign of digital manipulation or alterations. I see nothing that appears to be suspicious.”

            Nathan Goulding with The National Review: “We have received several e-mails today calling into question the validity of the PDF that the White House released, namely that there are embedded layers in the document. There are now several other people on the case. We looked into it and dismissed it.… I’ve confirmed that scanning an image, converting it to a PDF, optimizing that PDF, and then opening it up in Illustrator, does in fact create layers similar to what is seen in the birth certificate PDF. You can try it yourself at home.”

            John Woodman, independent computer professional, who is a member of the Tea Party (who says that he hates Obama’s policies but found no evidence of forgery) said repeatedly in his book and in various articles on his Web site that the claims that Obama’s birth certificate was forged were unfounded.

            Ivan Zatkovich, who has testified in court as a technology expert, and consultant to WorldNetDaily: “All of the modifications to the PDF document that can be identified are consistent with someone enhancing the legibility of the document.” And, by the way, when WND received Zatkovich’s article that said that he found nothing wrong with Obama’s birth certificate, WordNDaily simply did not publish it.

            Jean-Claude Tremblay, a leading software trainer and Adobe-certified expert, who has years of experience working with and teaching Adobe Illustrator, said the layers cited by doubters are evidence of the use of common, off-the-shelf scanning software — not evidence of a forgery.“I have seen a lot of illustrator documents that come from photos and contain those kind of clippings—and it looks exactly like this,” he said.

            Birthers’ claim that Obama’s birth certificate is false is well understood to be caused by their own motives—they hate Obama and would like to harm him.

            And it is irrational (to say the very least) to think that Obama’s relatives had enough money (Obama’s grandfather was just a furniture salesman and his grandmother a low-level employee in a bank at the time; and his father came to Hawaii on a free flight) or crazy enough to spend LOTS of money on a long and expensive and risky (incidents of stillbirths were high at the time) overseas trip for their pregnant daughter—–when there were perfectly good hospitals in Honolulu, Hawaii.

            Also, the government of Kenya has said that it investigated the “born in Kenya” claim, and that it did not happen.

          • smrstrauss

            Re: “a composite involving at least seven layers.”

            Answer: That is what NORMALLY happens when a complex document is scanned, optimized compressed and put into a pdf file, and then the file is opened with Adobe Illustrator. That is what is supposed to happen. It takes a particularly gullible person to think that Illustrator would not show layers when it opens a complex PDF document. This is how the National Review puts it:

            “We have received several e-mails today calling into question the validity of the PDF that the White House released, namely that there are embedded layers in the document. There are now several other people on the case. We looked into it and dismissed it.… I’ve confirmed that scanning an image, converting it to a PDF, optimizing that PDF, and then opening it up in Illustrator, does in fact create layers similar to what is seen in the birth certificate PDF. You can try it yourself at home.”

          • Earl P. Holt III

            You have the convenient ability to dismiss any issue you dare not scrutinize by simply labeling its messengers with the dreaded “birther” stigma.

            This may be be reassuring to the tiny minority of Obama supporters remaining outside of prison and graveyards, but to most decent Americans, it is not considered conclusive proof of anything except that it’s employer is a stooge for the new communist party, sometimes known as “Democrats.”

            Tell me: When Iran finally succeeds in nuking Israel, will you continue to blame George Bush and deny that Obama and his henchmen made it all possible, or will you recognize that “useful idiots” like yourself are entirely culpable…?

          • smrstrauss

            Re” “You have the convenient ability…

            The facts shown above show that it was THE NATIONAL REVIEW that dismissed the “It was layers” story because it is normal when documents are scanned, optimized, put into pdf and then the pdf file is opened in Adobe Illustrator, that layers are created. THAT is a fact.

            No matter how much you dislike Obama or worry about his Iran policy, it is still a FACT that layers are normal when a complex document is scanned, optimized, compressed and put into PDF and then the PDF file is opened in Adobe Illustrator, that there are layers.

          • Earl P. Holt III

            An Israeli scientist also found the same thing, along with Joe Arapio’s select team of investigators. The fact that the Corrupt Leftist Media ignores such things — as it has done from the beginning — does not mean that such claims do not have legitimacy.

            Your ideology — and that of your party — apparently thinks that if a tree falls in the forest and no one is present to hear it, it only happened if it is covered by the NEW YORK TIMES or AP…

          • smrstrauss

            What was the NAME of the alleged “Israeli scientist”—and what were that scientist’s credentials in document analysis?

            Sheriff Joe is hardly an impartial law enforcement official, since he has tangled with Obama in the past, and NONE of his claims have been proven. In fact, he has been shown to have lied about the numeric codes. Moreover, recent reports indicate that he only got into the business of claiming to have investigated the matter as a way of raising campaign cash.

            He has not convinced the attorney general of his state or any attorney general to take any action because they know that there really isn’t any evidence and that he has an axe to grind. Nobody rational believes him.

            The facts remain that birther sites have not shown their readers that the officials in Hawaii of both parties have repeatedly confirmed the facts on Obama’s birth certificate. It is significant that birther sites did not show their readers that (now, I wonder why not?) and for the same reason they lied and asserted that Obama’s Kenyan grandmother said that he was born in Kenya (when she really said in three interviews that he was born IN HAWAII—I wonder why they did not show their readers that?). And for precisely the same motive—the same motive that makes some HIGHLY GULLIBLE people say things like “he was registered as a foreign student” (when it would be easy for them to check by simply calling the university and asking), zealots like Sheriff Joe and Paul Irey and Doug Vogt (who, BTW, has claimed that he found the “original Altar of Abraham”—but never showed it, I wonder why not?) have all claimed that Obama’s birth certificate is forged.

            Well, it isn’t forged. Layers are normal when a complex document is scanned, optimized, compressed and put into pdf and then the result is opened in Adobe Illustrator. And other alleged “anomalies” have all been explained by the research on the way that Xerox WorkCenter scanners work (which birther sites have not even shown their readers, much less replied to).

          • Earl P. Holt III

            I would say that all of Arpaio’s claims have been proven beyond any doubt, whatsoever. His findings approach epistemological certainty.

          • smrstrauss

            And do you also believe in the tooth fairy?

          • Earl P. Holt III

            When I meet a liar, I feel no compunction about responding “in kind”…

          • smrstrauss

            So you can say “in kind” to all of the following:

            Birthers said that Obama’s draft card was forged, but Obama did not post his draft card, nor did any representative of Obama—so, if it were forged, who do you think forged it? (Okay, I’ll make it easy—the guy who posted it.)

            (2) Birthers have said that Obama became a citizen of Indonesia—but a telephone call to the Indonesian Embassy shows that he was never an Indonesian citizen. Why do you suppose that the birthers did not call the Indonesian embassy to check? The same goes for the claim that Obama went to Pakistan on an Indonesian passport. It is easy the check with the Indonesian Embassy whether Obama ever had an Indonesian passport—they will tell anyone who calls that Obama never had an Indonesian passport because he was never an Indonesian citizen.

            (3) Birthers said that Obama’s Kenyan grandmother said that he was born in Kenya—but the transcript of the call shows that she said that he was BORN IN HAWAII—why do you suppose they did not quote her accurately and in fact cut off the tape recording of the call on their sites just before she said “born in Hawaii, where his father was studying at the time.” Why do you suppose they did that?

            (4) Birther sites did not tell you about SS Administration clerks making lots of mistakes and that a single digit entered wrong in the zip code would generated a SS number from a place other than where it was applied from. Why do you suppose they did not tell you that?

            (5) Birther sites did not tell their readers that the Kenyan government said that Obama was NOT born there. Why do you suppose they did not tell their readers that?

            (6) Birther sites did not even tell their readers that there is no evidence that Obama’s mother had a passport in 1961—or how very few 18-year-olds did in those days, or how EXTREMELY few women traveled abroad late in pregnancy in those days because of the high risk of stillbirth. Why do you suppose they did not tell you that?

            (7) Birther sites posted videos of Obama that claimed to show that he said “I was born in Kenya”—but you cannot see his mouth move and the originals of those videos have been found, and they do not say “I was born in Kenya..”” Why do you suppose that they forged and posted those videos? (Ditto, by the way, for three forged “Kenyan birth certificates.” And what do you suppose was the motive for forging them??)

            (8) Birther sites said that Obama spent “millions” on hiding his birth certificate. But Obama showed his birth certificate and did not spend a cent on hiding anything. And in fact, as birther sites did not tell their readers, there wasn’t even one lawsuit for Obama’s birth certificate or for records, not one. There were lawsuits to keep Obama off of ballots, but NO lawsuits for his birth certificate or records of any kind. Why do you suppose that birther sites implied that there were lawsuits for Obama’s BC—when there weren’t ANY???

            (9) Birther sites said that Obama’s records are “sealed,” but they are not sealed. They are covered under the ordinary state and federal privacy laws, and Mitt Romney and John McCain and previous presidents did not release similar records either.

            (10) The claim that Obama went to Pakistan on an Indonesian passport is also a LIE. As the facts show above, Obama never had an Indonesian passport. Moreover, he did not need an Indonesian passport or any other passport than an ordinary US passport because it is a LIE that Pakistan was on some kind of a no-travel list when Obama went there or that Pakistan kept US tourists from visiting. NEITHER is true. When Obama went to Pakistan, the country was relatively peaceful, and it encouraged tourists to visit, and so did the US government because at the time Pakistan was a US ALLY (Remember the movie “Charlie Wilson’s War?”) So, it is LIE that Obama went to Pakistan on an Indonesian passport. He never had an Indonesian passport, and he didn’t need one.

            And (11) the constant repetition ‘the birth certificates are forged,” and “anyone can see that the birth certificates are forged”—are all birther lies too. And they have the same motives as the lies shown above.

            Birthers have not shown all the real experts who have said that there is nothing wrong with Obama’s birth certificate, nor have they told the readers on birther sites that the officials in Hawaii of BOTH parties have repeatedly confirmed that they sent the birth certificates to Obama and confirmed ALL the facts on the copy that the White House put online are EXACTLY the same as on what they sent to him. And they have not explained the research on the Xerox Workstation either:

          • Earl P. Holt III

            So, from now on, NATIONAL REVIEW is considered an impartial and objective source for all disputes between decent Americans and you Bolsheviks, right?

          • smrstrauss

            The National Review does not lie, but birthers HAVE.

            Some examples of classic birther lies:

            (1) Birthers said that Obama’s draft card was forged, but Obama did not post his draft card, nor did any representative of Obama—so, if it were forged, who do you think forged it? (Okay, I’ll make it easy—the guy who posted it.)

            (2) Birthers have said that Obama became a citizen of Indonesia—but a telephone call to the Indonesian Embassy shows that he was never an Indonesian citizen. Why do you suppose that the birthers did not call the Indonesian embassy to check? The same goes for the claim that Obama went to Pakistan on an Indonesian passport. It is easy the check with the Indonesian Embassy whether Obama ever had an Indonesian passport—they will tell anyone who calls that Obama never had an Indonesian passport because he was never an Indonesian citizen.

            (3) Birthers said that Obama’s Kenyan grandmother said that he was born in Kenya—but the transcript of the call shows that she said that he was BORN IN HAWAII—why do you suppose they did not quote her accurately and in fact cut off the tape recording of the call on their sites just before she said “born in Hawaii, where his father was studying at the time.” Why do you suppose they did that?

            (4) Birther sites did not tell you about SS Administration clerks making lots of mistakes and that a single digit entered wrong in the zip code would generated a SS number from a place other than where it was applied from. Why do you suppose they did not tell you that?

            (5) Birther sites did not tell their readers that the Kenyan government said that Obama was NOT born there. Why do you suppose they did not tell their readers that?

            (6) Birther sites did not even tell their readers that there is no evidence that Obama’s mother had a passport in 1961—or how very few 18-year-olds did in those days, or how EXTREMELY few women traveled abroad late in pregnancy in those days because of the high risk of stillbirth. Why do you suppose they did not tell you that?

            (7) Birther sites posted videos of Obama that claimed to show that he said “I was born in Kenya”—but you cannot see his mouth move and the originals of those videos have been found, and they do not say “I was born in Kenya..”” Why do you suppose that they forged and posted those videos? (Ditto, by the way, for three forged “Kenyan birth certificates.” And what do you suppose was the motive for forging them??)

            (8) Birther sites said that Obama spent “millions” on hiding his birth certificate. But Obama showed his birth certificate and did not spend a cent on hiding anything. And in fact, as birther sites did not tell their readers, there wasn’t even one lawsuit for Obama’s birth certificate or for records, not one. There were lawsuits to keep Obama off of ballots, but NO lawsuits for his birth certificate or records of any kind. Why do you suppose that birther sites implied that there were lawsuits for Obama’s BC—when there weren’t ANY???

            (9) Birther sites said that Obama’s records are “sealed,” but they are not sealed. They are covered under the ordinary state and federal privacy laws, and Mitt Romney and John McCain and previous presidents did not release similar records either.

            (10) The claim that Obama went to Pakistan on an Indonesian passport is also a LIE. As the facts show above, Obama never had an Indonesian passport. Moreover, he did not need an Indonesian passport or any other passport than an ordinary US passport because it is a LIE that Pakistan was on some kind of a no-travel list when Obama went there or that Pakistan kept US tourists from visiting. NEITHER is true. When Obama went to Pakistan, the country was relatively peaceful, and it encouraged tourists to visit, and so did the US government because at the time Pakistan was a US ALLY (Remember the movie “Charlie Wilson’s War?”) So, it is LIE that Obama went to Pakistan on an Indonesian passport. He never had an Indonesian passport, and he didn’t need one.

            And (11) the constant repetition ‘the birth certificates are forged,” and “anyone can see that the birth certificates are forged”—are all birther lies too. And they have the same motives as the lies shown above.

            Birthers have not shown all the real experts who have said that there is nothing wrong with Obama’s birth certificate, nor have they told the readers on birther sites that the officials in Hawaii of BOTH parties have repeatedly confirmed that they sent the birth certificates to Obama and confirmed ALL the facts on the copy that the White House put online are EXACTLY the same as on what they sent to him. And they have not explained the research on the Xerox Workstation either:

            In short, that also is just another birther lie. And what do you suppose is the MOTIVE for all of those lies?

          • Earl P. Holt III

            (yawn…)

          • smrstrauss

            Notice that Earl P. Holt III has not responded to the facts shown above. (Now, I wonder what the reason for that might be??)

          • Earl P. Holt III

            1) “..the most transparent administration in history”…
            2) “…you can keep your doctor…”
            3) “…will save each family of four $2,500 per year in premiums…”
            4) “…ObamaCare is not a Trojan Horse to eventually arrive at a single-payer system…”
            5) “The death of Ambassador Stevens at Benghazi was because of a video about Islam…”
            6) “Shovel-Ready” jobs…”
            7) 5.4 % Unemployment
            8) “You didn’t create that…”
            9) “I don’t remember any Rev. Wright…”
            10)”… 3.5 % growth 4Q of 2014…”
            11) “If you like your health insurance plan, you can keep it…”
            12) “I said Benghazi was a terrorist attack from the beginning…”
            13) “Fast & Furious was begun under the previous administration…”
            14) “My budget will cut the deficit by $4 Trillion over the next ten years…”
            15) “I’ve done more for Israel’s security than any other President…”
            16) “The fence between the U.S. and Mexico is practically complete…”

            etc., etc., etc., etc.,..

          • smrstrauss

            Politicians lie—so what else is new?

            But the lies shown above are not proof that Obama was born in a foreign country or that his birth certificate was forged or that the following are not lies:

            Birthers said that Obama’s draft card was forged, but Obama did not post his draft card, nor did any representative of Obama—so, if it were forged, who do you think forged it? (Okay, I’ll make it easy—the guy who posted it.)

            (2) Birthers have said that Obama became a citizen of Indonesia—but a telephone call to the Indonesian Embassy shows that he was never an Indonesian citizen. Why do you suppose that the birthers did not call the Indonesian embassy to check? The same goes for the claim that Obama went to Pakistan on an Indonesian passport. It is easy the check with the Indonesian Embassy whether Obama ever had an Indonesian passport—they will tell anyone who calls that Obama never had an Indonesian passport because he was never an Indonesian citizen.

            (3) Birthers said that Obama’s Kenyan grandmother said that he was born in Kenya—but the transcript of the call shows that she said that he was BORN IN HAWAII—why do you suppose they did not quote her accurately and in fact cut off the tape recording of the call on their sites just before she said “born in Hawaii, where his father was studying at the time.” Why do you suppose they did that?

            (4) Birther sites did not tell you about SS Administration clerks making lots of mistakes and that a single digit entered wrong in the zip code would generated a SS number from a place other than where it was applied from. Why do you suppose they did not tell you that?

            (5) Birther sites did not tell their readers that the Kenyan government said that Obama was NOT born there. Why do you suppose they did not tell their readers that?

            (6) Birther sites did not even tell their readers that there is no evidence that Obama’s mother had a passport in 1961—or how very few 18-year-olds did in those days, or how EXTREMELY few women traveled abroad late in pregnancy in those days because of the high risk of stillbirth. Why do you suppose they did not tell you that?

            (7) Birther sites posted videos of Obama that claimed to show that he said “I was born in Kenya”—but you cannot see his mouth move and the originals of those videos have been found, and they do not say “I was born in Kenya..”” Why do you suppose that they forged and posted those videos? (Ditto, by the way, for three forged “Kenyan birth certificates.” And what do you suppose was the motive for forging them??)

            (8) Birther sites said that Obama spent “millions” on hiding his birth certificate. But Obama showed his birth certificate and did not spend a cent on hiding anything. And in fact, as birther sites did not tell their readers, there wasn’t even one lawsuit for Obama’s birth certificate or for records, not one. There were lawsuits to keep Obama off of ballots, but NO lawsuits for his birth certificate or records of any kind. Why do you suppose that birther sites implied that there were lawsuits for Obama’s BC—when there weren’t ANY???

            (9) Birther sites said that Obama’s records are “sealed,” but they are not sealed. They are covered under the ordinary state and federal privacy laws, and Mitt Romney and John McCain and previous presidents did not release similar records either.

            (10) The claim that Obama went to Pakistan on an Indonesian passport is also a LIE. As the facts show above, Obama never had an Indonesian passport. Moreover, he did not need an Indonesian passport or any other passport than an ordinary US passport because it is a LIE that Pakistan was on some kind of a no-travel list when Obama went there or that Pakistan kept US tourists from visiting. NEITHER is true. When Obama went to Pakistan, the country was relatively peaceful, and it encouraged tourists to visit, and so did the US government because at the time Pakistan was a US ALLY (Remember the movie “Charlie Wilson’s War?”) So, it is LIE that Obama went to Pakistan on an Indonesian passport. He never had an Indonesian passport, and he didn’t need one.

            And (11) the constant repetition ‘the birth certificates are forged,” and “anyone can see that the birth certificates are forged”—are all birther lies too. And they have the same motives as the lies shown above.

            Birthers have not shown all the real experts who have said that there is nothing wrong with Obama’s birth certificate, nor have they told the readers on birther sites that the officials in Hawaii of BOTH parties have repeatedly confirmed that they sent the birth certificates to Obama and confirmed ALL the facts on the copy that the White House put online are EXACTLY the same as on what they sent to him. And they have not explained the research on the Xerox Workstation either.

            In short, that also is a lie, and done for the same motives as caused the other lies shown above.

          • Earl P. Holt III

            I’m not even gonna read beyond the first sentence: I am disinterested in anything you have to say. (yawn…)

          • smrstrauss

            I post the facts for rational people. Those who want to see them can see them above. Earl P. Holt III does not want to see them (now, I wonder why?), but other people have the right to see them, and unless Earl P. Holt III is the only person visiting this site, they will.

          • Johann Wald

            That’s the perfect MSM argument almost verbatim. The only thing it lacks is the pejorative “birthers” thrown in. Real world example. My father had to replace his driver’s license in WV. To do so, he had to pony up more documentation, including birth certificate, that anyone in this country does to normally get a passport. So now this hapless, numinous Negro sits in the oval office with less proof of eligibility that the average American has at home filed away. That’s a fact. Not a “theory”. 2nd. Obama is a front. A sock puppet equivatlent to the Wizard of Oz. He’s manipulated from behind the curtain. Consider his “roots”. Obama was mentored in politics by David Axelrod. He got his start in Chicago in Axelrod’s house and was supported by wealthy Chicago Jew Betty Lu Salzman. His largest corporate sponsor in his first run for the President was Goldman Sachs and Jews voted for him at a rate of 70% or better in both elections. His first white house chief of staff was dual citizen Rahm Emmanuel, a certified nutcase (see Rolling Stone article on his post election behavior)son of an Irgun terrorist and a fanatical (some would be kind and say “strictly observant”) Orthodox Jew, who personally volunteered service with the IDF (not the US Army) during the first Gulf War and habitually spends his free time in Tel Aviv. The MSM gave Obama a free pass on his credentials as well, which were none, when a white candidate would have been crucified. Now, given that he’s been surrounded and supported by Jews at close quarters for years, he’s either a super smart trickster that fooled all these (as they claim) real smart Jews or there’s something else going on here. I don’t think it’s that this obviously stupid mulatto was clever enough to fool so many for so long either. I think the deal was “we’ll make you the first (and only) black president but reserve the right to throw you under the bus when the time is right’.

          • slobotnavich

            There’s no doubt that Obama has escaped, totally, the scrutiny that any other presidential candidate would have had to endure. I wouldn’t believe much of anything in his record; nor would I attempt any conclusions about the truth of his past. We can assume the MSM will not make the appropriate inquiries and actively persecute anybody trying to do so. Of course, this is nothing new. They did the same for every Democrat, from FDR, to JFK, RFK (both thankfully assassinated), the cartoonish Jimmuh Cottuh, Teddy “The Cretin” Kennedy, who killed Mary Jo Copechne, RFK, Jr., who killed himself and two others through clearly incompetent piloting (and was cremated only minutes after being brought to the surface, in total violation of FAA regulations requiring any PIC to undergo a toxicology test after any fatal accident – conclusion: the family assumed he had cocaine, heroin, or some other narcotic substance in his body), and always run cover for the Democrats, to the extent of shouting down and ridiculing anybody trying to reveal the truth. The MSM in our nation is little more than the propaganda arm of the Democrat Party, just as Pravda was an arm of the Kremlin, specifically the GTU and the KGB.

          • throttler

            It was JFK, Jr. who died in the plane crash.

          • thomasdosborneii

            You wrote, “RJK, Jr., who killed himself and two others through clearly incompetent piloting”…I think you meant JFK, Jr., right? On one hand, you are trashing the MSM, yet on the other, accepting everything they say or attempt to get you to believe.

            I have long smelled a rat regarding John Junior’s death, because of a bizarre coincidence. You may remember that Jackie, John’s mother, was married to Aristotle Onassis, who owned an airline and a shipping line (among other things). Onassis, himself, was a very good pilot and he possessed a cherished seaplane, one of his first (or perhaps very first) airplanes. After several decades, that seaplane was pretty old technology, but still Onassis cherished it. He had it sent to a special restoration company somewhere in Europe for complete refurbishing. After many months of repair, it was finally ready for pick-up. Onassis was too busy to go get it and fly it back home, so he sent his son to fly it for him, describing his son as the “only pilot I would trust with that plane”, and this is coming from someone who owned his own airline, so he certainly had tons of competent pilots at his command.

            But upon take-off, the newly refurbished plane did a nosedive and the son was killed right there at the airport. How? For “some reason” the cables that control the direction were “reversed”, so when the son moved the stick to go to, say, the right, the plane went to the left. Since he would have no expectation that the cables were reversed, he moved the stick even further in the direction that he wanted, which, of course, was too much, increased the plane going in the opposite direction causing it to nosedive and crashed on the tarmac, killing the son instantly. That really does not sound like “an innocent error”; it sounds like a clear sabotage. Was that murder meant for Onassis himself, or was it meant for the son for some reason? Who knows? There are plots and subplots and sub-sub plots that go back further than anyone can imagine.

            But after understanding that Onassis’s son, a top pilot, was killed in the seaplane, when I heard about Jacki’s son being killed while flying over the ocean, I sensed a connection. I don’t care about those stories about “they weren’t the right conditions for flying but he went flying anyway” or whatever the news media said, and now with your statement that the body was cremated immediately, I can only see a cover-up. I am sure that John, who was a competent sailor and athlete and good in several other things would in any way shape or form be an “incompetent”, “dangerous”, or “risky” pilot.

            Why would anyone want both of those sons killed, I haven’t the slightest idea, but one certainly isn’t going to get a clue from the MSM. You will only get red herrings.

          • slobotnavich

            Well, among other things in my largely misspent life, I am a pilot with about 5,500 hours, with instrument, multi-engine, and commercial ratings, and the typically stupid and youthful Kennedy’s crash is hardly any sort mystery. The dummy was not an instrument-rated and qualified pilot and flying over water on a moonless night,with no visual references, is a virtual invitation to spatial disorientation, followed by complete loss of control. A dark and moonless night, over either water or uninhabited terrain, gives the pilot almost no visual references, and is almost certain to end with spatial disorientation and a fatal crash, in fact one of the foremost causes of general aviation fatalities, perhaps the foremost. I haven’t flown in some years now, but I believe I could get in my old Aerostar, review the panel for a few minutes, fire it up, and fly it away, return to the airport and squeak it on. One thing I could not do is fly it on instruments – for some reason that that skill simply evaporates without constant practice. Young Kennedy was not instrument-rated, and his body did not undergo the FAA-required toxicology autopsy required of the pilot in command after all fatal crashes, being in the crematory oven perhaps minutes after being recovered, doubtless to avoid any potentially embarrassing findings.

          • Earl P. Holt III

            You beat me to it. (I thought they were buried at sea…)

          • Earl P. Holt III

            The flight was delayed because one of the three passengers ( or perhaps all three) had to make a cocaine connection in New York City, which delayed the flight by several hours. They eventually took off much later than their scheduled time and, unfortunately, the Sun was beginning to set.

            The crash was almost certainly attributable to the fact that John Jr. was a novice pilot, and was not certified to “Instrument Fly.” It is almost certain that he failed to trust his instruments, and took the craft into the water at several hundred miles per hour.

            The “giveaway” is evident in the fact that all three were buried at sea, so that no toxicology could be done on John Jr. or any of the passengers. Nor could their belongings be searched for the drugs they purchased.

            It was a typical Kennedy weekend outing: Lots of irresponsibility, illegality, arrogance and carnage…

          • The temperature and humidity were just about at the dew point, so fogs and mists could suddenly develop. JJ was not instrument-certified, so he didn’t know what to do, and porked the airplane.

            One of those other inbred Kennedy Massholes showed similar bad judgement and karked himself on a ski slope in Colorado by running into a tree while tossing a football back and forth with his idiot coke-head friends.

          • Pilot error. One always checks those things.

          • Stop noticing! It’s not okay to notice. Perhaps you need a therapeutic visit to a Museum of Tolerance, Comrade. Never forget…

          • Johann Wald

            You have a rare sense of humor for a woman. Pity you don’t hold seminars on same. I’d enroll my wife in a heartbeat and drag her down to it whether she wanted to go or not.

          • We can laugh while we fight or we can curl up in despair and die with a hopeless whimper. I choose the former.

          • smrstrauss

            Re: “less proof of eligibility that the average American has at home filed away.

            Answer. Obama has shown both the short form and long form birth certificates of Hawaii, and the officials of both parties in Hawaii have repeatedly confirmed that they sent them to him and that ALL the facts on the copy that the White House put online are exactly the same as on what they sent to him.

            In sum, Obama’s birth in Hawaii are shown by the following facts:

            (1) his Hawaii birth certificate and (2) the confirmation of the facts on Obama’s birth certificate by the officials of BOTH parties in Hawaii and (3) the birth notices sent to the 1961 Hawaii newspapers by the DOH of Hawaii (and only the DOH could send birth notices to that section of the newspapers, and it only did so for births in Hawaii) and (4) the letter that the Hawaii school teacher wrote home to her father, named Stanley, after being told of the birth in Kapiolani Hospital of a child to a woman named Stanley. Moreover, birthers have not even shown that Obama’s mother had a PASSPORT in 1961—-and it would be highly unlikely that she did since so few 18-year-olds did at the time, And even fewer women traveled abroad in the last few months of pregnancy due to the risk of stillbirths in those days.

          • Johann Wald

            Thank you Mr. MSM. The “birth certificates” you reference has been shown to be, by digital forensic analysis, to be fakes. Troll elsewhere please. Joseph M. “Joe” Arpaio (born June 14, 1932) is the six-time elected sheriff of Maricopa County, Arizona and it was his office that did a lot of this type of work.

          • smrstrauss

            Re: “Thank you Mr. MSM. The “birth certificates” you reference has been shown to be, by digital forensic analysis, to be fakes.”

            Answer. That is what birthers claim, and they claim it over and over and over and over. Now, I wonder what the motive of birthers could be?

            Here are the facts. Obama really was born in Hawaii, and the evidence for that is overwhelming. The claim that his birth certificate is forged is a LIE, and Sheriff Joe and the other birther “experts” who claim that it is forged, are lying—for their obvious motives, the same motives that caused birthers to LIE and say that Obama’s Kenyan grandmother said that he was born in Kenya, when she really said over and over (in three interviews, of which birther sites showed only part of one) that Obama was BORN IN HAWAII. People who are willing to lie about what someone says and to cut off what she actually did say, would be willing to lie about a birth certificate being forged too.

            THAT, of course, is why Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan and Karl Rove and Gingrich and Santorum and Huckabee and Ann Coulter and Glenn Beck and the National Review do not believe the birther claims.

            Moreover, the birther sites have hidden virtually all the facts from you.

            With the single exception of Reed Hayes, who has not proven his expertise in examining digital documents (he is a specialist in documents on paper, and he has not seen the paper copies) and who admits he has not seen the research on the way that the Xerox WorkCentre works, ONLY birther “experts” have called Obama’s birth certificate forged. And they have not shown that they are even experts, much less fair and impartial. Those are two reasons why they are not believed by Ann Coulter, Glenn Beck or the National Review (or by Mitt Romney or Paul Ryan or Gingrich or Santorum or Huckabee).

            One proof that Obama’s birth certificate is not forged is Obama’s short-form birth certificate.

            Short-form birth certificates are created by a clerk reading the information from the document in the file, and filling out the computer form that generates the printed short-form birth certificate. The officials in Hawaii have confirmed that they sent a short-form to Obama. So, unless they are lying—and they were Republican officials–the only way that Obama’s birth certificate could have been forged was that it was forged in 2007 and slipped into the file just before the clerk looked at the file. That is not very likely, is it? And it is especially unlikely since at the time Obama was not even the candidate of the Democrats. He was still in the primaries at the time, and he was only a junior senator from Illinois.

            And birther sites have not shown you these real experts.

            Dr. Neil Krawetz, an imaging software analysis author and experienced examiner of questioned images, said:“The PDF released by the White House shows no sign of digital manipulation or alterations. I see nothing that appears to be suspicious.”

            Nathan Goulding with The National Review: “We have received several e-mails today calling into question the validity of the PDF that the White House released, namely that there are embedded layers in the document. There are now several other people on the case. We looked into it and dismissed it.… I’ve confirmed that scanning an image, converting it to a PDF, optimizing that PDF, and then opening it up in Illustrator, does in fact create layers similar to what is seen in the birth certificate PDF. You can try it yourself at home.”

            John Woodman, independent computer professional, who is a member of the Tea Party (who says that he hates Obama’s policies but found no evidence of forgery) said repeatedly in his book and in various articles on his Web site that the claims that Obama’s birth certificate was forged were unfounded.

            Ivan Zatkovich, who has testified in court as a technology expert, and consultant to WorldNetDaily: “All of the modifications to the PDF document that can be identified are consistent with someone enhancing the legibility of the document.” And, by the way, when WND received Zatkovich’s article that said that he found nothing wrong with Obama’s birth certificate, WordNDaily simply did not publish it.

            Jean-Claude Tremblay, a leading software trainer and Adobe-certified expert, who has years of experience working with and teaching Adobe Illustrator, said the layers cited by doubters are evidence of the use of common, off-the-shelf scanning software — not evidence of a forgery.“I have seen a lot of illustrator documents that come from photos and contain those kind of clippings—and it looks exactly like this,” he said.

            Birthers’ claim that Obama’s birth certificate is false is well understood to be caused by their own motives—they hate Obama and would like to harm him.

            And it is irrational (to say the very least) to think that Obama’s relatives had enough money (Obama’s grandfather was just a furniture salesman and his grandmother a low-level employee in a bank at the time; and his father came to Hawaii on a free flight) or crazy enough to spend LOTS of money on a long and expensive and risky (incidents of stillbirths were high at the time) overseas trip for their pregnant daughter—–when there were perfectly good hospitals in Honolulu, Hawaii.

            Also, the government of Kenya has said that it investigated the “born in Kenya” claim, and that it did not happen.

          • Johann Wald

            I didn’t read your much of your crap, just enough to know that apparently you believe all of Obama’s numinous negro BS. That’s fine. That puts you in an ever decreasing minority who are of the opinion, and rightly so, that believe the way to tell when a Federal Government employee is lying is that their lips are moving. Apparently you’re one of those disingenuous white liberals that are fine with an inexperienced 1/2 breed nitwit with no credentials other than financial backing and silence of the part of your “go to” guys, the MSM. Peddle your snake-oil down the road. I’m not buying. In case you hadn’t looked around recently, us “birthers” are on the ascendent and numbskulls like you are in the decline.

          • smrstrauss

            Johann Wald said: “I didn’t read your much of your crap.”

            Answer: I did not expect you to. I post the facts for rational people. The facts are very simple. Obama really was born in Hawaii, as his birth certificate and the confirmations of the officials of BOTH parties and the Index Data and the birth notices in the 1961 newspapers all show. And the birthers who claim that his birth certificate is forged are highly motivated to lie on that subject and have proven that they are willing to lie about Obama’s background many times. That is why Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan and Karl Rove and Gingrich and Santorum and Huckabee have all said that they do not believe the birther story, and it is why Ann Coulter, Glenn Beck and the National Review have all called birthers CRAZY.

          • Johann Wald

            You post lies for the benefit of your fellow travelers. Are you a Jew by any chance? MSM employee or Fed? You sound like all of the above. Any one of which has zero credibility in the truth departments.

          • smrstrauss

            Facts remain facts regardless of who says them. Notice that Johann Wald has not responded to one single fact.

        • Earl P. Holt III

          Since absolutely nothing in his “record” is reliable or accurate, it is probably safe to assume that Frank Marshall Davis is the real father of the Bolshevik-in-Chief…

        • The Worlds Scapegoat

          If is mother Stanley was a US citizen and Frank Davis was a US citizen, what does that make Obongo?

          .

          • Earl P. Holt III

            Another black bastard. (If he applied to Occidental Columbia and Harvard as a “Foreign” Student, what does THAT make Obongo…?

          • smrstrauss

            Re: “(If he applied to Occidental Columbia and Harvard as a “Foreign” Student,…”

            Your saying it makes YOU gullible since the story came from an APRIL FOOL’S article and has never been confirmed by anyone. Moreover, all you have to do to check whether Obama was registered as a foreign student is CALL up those institutions, ask for the PR department and ask whether or not he was registered as a foreign student (he wasn’t). BTW, they cannot tell you his grades under the normal state and federal privacy laws. But they can tell you whether or not he was a foreign student—-and he wasn’t.

          • Earl P. Holt III

            You silly, dizzy ass! It is a FACT that Obama has paid his legal team about $3 million to prevent the release of his student transcripts from Occidental, Columbia and Harvard Law. Those monies were spent to PREVENT the release of ANY of Obama’s student records.

            Are you as stupid, ignorant and dishonest as you sound? If so, it is obvious WHY you voted for this communist and Islamic Marxist twice…

          • smrstrauss

            Re: “It is a FACT that Obama has paid his legal team about $3 million to prevent the release of his student transcripts from Occidental, Columbia and Harvard Law.”

            ONLY in the mind of nuts like you.

            First, none of those institutions can release any transcripts of anyone, and that person or Obama (or you) don’t have to pay a cent to protect that right because it is written into federal and state privacy laws. (The Federal version of which was created by a great Conservative legislator, the late Senator James Buckley, the brother of William Buckley of the National Review.)

            So Obama’s transcripts were not protected by Obama’s lawyers because neither Obama nor the colleges and universities had to give them out. (And, BTW, Mitt Romney and John McCain and Clinton and Bush41 and Reagan and Carter and Ford
            and Nixon did not show their transcripts either—so why should Obama?)

            So, you have already shown how poorly informed you are.

            As to the $3 million. That is your fantasy. The total cost of ALL legal expenses of the Obama campaign in 2008 was about $1,4 million and another $2.8 million in the two years after that election, but NONE of it was for defending lawsuits for Obama’s transcripts or for any documents. THAT is obvious because, wait for it—-there WERE NO lawsuits for Obama’s transcripts or for any documents.Not one.

            (There were only lawsuits to get Obama off of ballots, and Obama spent some small amount on winning them [it does not cost very much to file the same legal papers about the plaintiff not having standing over and over]—and he won every one. But there were no lawsuits for transcripts or for documents, so Obama did not spend one single penny on lawsuits to hide documents or transcripts.)

            That also is a standard birther LIE.

          • smrstrauss

            Some of the standard birther lies:

            (1) Birthers said that Obama’s draft card was forged, but Obama did not post his draft card, nor did any representative of Obama—so, if it were forged, who do you think forged it? (Okay, I’ll make it easy—the guy who posted it.)

            (2) Birthers have said that Obama became a citizen of Indonesia—but a telephone call to the Indonesian Embassy shows that he was never an Indonesian citizen. Why do you suppose that the birthers did not call the Indonesian embassy to check? The same goes for the claim that Obama went to Pakistan on an Indonesian passport. It is easy the check with the Indonesian Embassy whether Obama ever had an Indonesian passport—they will tell anyone who calls that Obama never had an Indonesian passport because he was never an Indonesian citizen.

            (3) Birthers said that Obama’s Kenyan grandmother said that he was born in Kenya—but the transcript of the call shows that she said that he was BORN IN HAWAII—why do you suppose they did not quote her accurately and in fact cut off the tape recording of the call on their sites just before she said “born in Hawaii, where his father was studying at the time.” Why do you suppose they did that?

            (4) Birther sites did not tell you about SS Administration clerks making lots of mistakes and that a single digit entered wrong in the zip code would generated a SS number from a place other than where it was applied from. Why do you suppose they did not tell you that?

            (5) Birther sites did not tell their readers that the Kenyan government said that Obama was NOT born there. Why do you suppose they did not tell their readers that?

            (6) Birther sites did not even tell their readers that there is no evidence that Obama’s mother had a passport in 1961—or how very few 18-year-olds did in those days, or how EXTREMELY few women traveled abroad late in pregnancy in those days because of the high risk of stillbirth. Why do you suppose they did not tell you that?

            (7) Birther sites posted videos of Obama that claimed to show that he said “I was born in Kenya”—but you cannot see his mouth move and the originals of those videos have been found, and they do not say “I was born in Kenya..”” Why do you suppose that they forged and posted those videos? (Ditto, by the way, for three forged “Kenyan birth certificates.” And what do you suppose was the motive for forging them??)

            (8) Birther sites said that Obama spent “millions” on hiding his birth certificate. But Obama showed his birth certificate and did not spend a cent on hiding anything. And in fact, as birther sites did not tell their readers, there wasn’t even one lawsuit for Obama’s birth certificate or for records, not one. There were lawsuits to keep Obama off of ballots, but NO lawsuits for his birth certificate or records of any kind. Why do you suppose that birther sites implied that there were lawsuits for Obama’s BC—when there weren’t ANY???

            (9) Birther sites said that Obama’s records are “sealed,” but they are not sealed. They are covered under the ordinary state and federal privacy laws, and Mitt Romney and John McCain and previous presidents did not release similar records either.

            (10) The claim that Obama went to Pakistan on an Indonesian passport is also a LIE. As the facts show above, Obama never had an Indonesian passport. Moreover, he did not need an Indonesian passport or any other passport than an ordinary US passport because it is a LIE that Pakistan was on some kind of a no-travel list when Obama went there or that Pakistan kept US tourists from visiting. NEITHER is true. When Obama went to Pakistan, the country was relatively peaceful, and it encouraged tourists to visit, and so did the US government because at the time Pakistan was a US ALLY (Remember the movie “Charlie Wilson’s War?”) So, it is LIE that Obama went to Pakistan on an Indonesian passport. He never had an Indonesian passport, and he didn’t need one.

            And (11) the constant repetition ‘the birth certificates are forged,” and “anyone can see that the birth certificates are forged”—are all birther lies too. And they have the same motives as the lies shown above.

            Birthers have not shown all the real experts who have said that there is nothing wrong with Obama’s birth certificate, nor have they told the readers on birther sites that the officials in Hawaii of BOTH parties have repeatedly confirmed that they sent the birth certificates to Obama and confirmed ALL the facts on the copy that the White House put online are EXACTLY the same as on what they sent to him. And they have not explained the research on the Xerox Workstation either:

          • Earl P. Holt III

            None are so blind as those stupid, insipid, dishonest and ignorant trash on the left who elected this communist…

          • smrstrauss

            YOU are entitled to your opinion, and millions of people share it. But it is not proof that Obama was born in a foreign country or that his birth certificate is forged. And your opinion about Obama does not show that he spent $3 million or anything hiding any facts. THAT is simply a standard birther lie. Here are some others:

            (1) Birthers said that Obama’s draft card was forged, but Obama did not post his draft card, nor did any representative of Obama—so, if it were forged, who do you think forged it? (Okay, I’ll make it easy—the guy who posted it.)

            (2) Birthers have said that Obama became a citizen of Indonesia—but a telephone call to the Indonesian Embassy shows that he was never an Indonesian citizen. Why do you suppose that the birthers did not call the Indonesian embassy to check? The same goes for the claim that Obama went to Pakistan on an Indonesian passport. It is easy the check with the Indonesian Embassy whether Obama ever had an Indonesian passport—they will tell anyone who calls that Obama never had an Indonesian passport because he was never an Indonesian citizen.

            (3) Birthers said that Obama’s Kenyan grandmother said that he was born in Kenya—but the transcript of the call shows that she said that he was BORN IN HAWAII—why do you suppose they did not quote her accurately and in fact cut off the tape recording of the call on their sites just before she said “born in Hawaii, where his father was studying at the time.” Why do you suppose they did that?

            (4) Birther sites did not tell you about SS Administration clerks making lots of mistakes and that a single digit entered wrong in the zip code would generated a SS number from a place other than where it was applied from. Why do you suppose they did not tell you that?

            (5) Birther sites did not tell their readers that the Kenyan government said that Obama was NOT born there. Why do you suppose they did not tell their readers that?

            (6) Birther sites did not even tell their readers that there is no evidence that Obama’s mother had a passport in 1961—or how very few 18-year-olds did in those days, or how EXTREMELY few women traveled abroad late in pregnancy in those days because of the high risk of stillbirth. Why do you suppose they did not tell you that?

            (7) Birther sites posted videos of Obama that claimed to show that he said “I was born in Kenya”—but you cannot see his mouth move and the originals of those videos have been found, and they do not say “I was born in Kenya..”” Why do you suppose that they forged and posted those videos? (Ditto, by the way, for three forged “Kenyan birth certificates.” And what do you suppose was the motive for forging them??)

            (8) Birther sites said that Obama spent “millions” on hiding his birth certificate. But Obama showed his birth certificate and did not spend a cent on hiding anything. And in fact, as birther sites did not tell their readers, there wasn’t even one lawsuit for Obama’s birth certificate or for records, not one. There were lawsuits to keep Obama off of ballots, but NO lawsuits for his birth certificate or records of any kind. Why do you suppose that birther sites implied that there were lawsuits for Obama’s BC—when there weren’t ANY???

            (9) Birther sites said that Obama’s records are “sealed,” but they are not sealed. They are covered under the ordinary state and federal privacy laws, and Mitt Romney and John McCain and previous presidents did not release similar records either.

            (10) The claim that Obama went to Pakistan on an Indonesian passport is also a LIE. As the facts show above, Obama never had an Indonesian passport. Moreover, he did not need an Indonesian passport or any other passport than an ordinary US passport because it is a LIE that Pakistan was on some kind of a no-travel list when Obama went there or that Pakistan kept US tourists from visiting. NEITHER is true. When Obama went to Pakistan, the country was relatively peaceful, and it encouraged tourists to visit, and so did the US government because at the time Pakistan was a US ALLY (Remember the movie “Charlie Wilson’s War?”) So, it is LIE that Obama went to Pakistan on an Indonesian passport. He never had an Indonesian passport, and he didn’t need one.

            And (11) the constant repetition ‘the birth certificates are forged,” and “anyone can see that the birth certificates are forged”—are all birther lies too. And they have the same motives as the lies shown above.

            Birthers have not shown all the real experts who have said that there is nothing wrong with Obama’s birth certificate, nor have they told the readers on birther sites that the officials in Hawaii of BOTH parties have repeatedly confirmed that they sent the birth certificates to Obama and confirmed ALL the facts on the copy that the White House put online are EXACTLY the same as on what they sent to him.

          • Earl P. Holt III

            Google: “Sealed Obama college transcripts,” and then continue to lie and dissemble…

          • smrstrauss

            I have, and by far most of the articles are BIRTHER crap.

            Obama did not “seal” his college transcripts because they are covered under the normal state and federal privacy laws—one of which was pressed for by the late senator James Buckley (the brother of William Buckley). Since federal and state laws prevent transcripts from being disclosed by colleges, Obama did not have to have his sealed.

            He simply did not release his college transcripts because it is not normal for presidential candidates or presidents to do so, and in fact the transcripts of Mitt Romney and John McCain and Clinton and Gore and Bush41 and Reagan and Carter and Ford and Nixon, etc., etc. were never released. (What gave you the idea that presidents and presidential candidates release their transcripts???)

          • Earl P. Holt III

            You are a hopeless moron: Believe whatever you want. My comments were directed at people capable of serious analysis, not idiots like you. A pox upon you…

          • smrstrauss

            Notice that Earl P. Holt III did not reply to the facts shown above. (Now, I wonder why not?)

          • Earl P. Holt III

            You wouldn’t know a “fact” if it were inserted in you by the neuro-proctologist you desperately need…

          • smrstrauss

            Notice that once again Earl P. Holt III has not responded to the facts. (Now, I wonder what the reason could be for that?)

          • Johann Wald

            Good question. His whole stack of cards would come down. As Ricky used to tell Lucy..”you have some ‘splainin’ to do”.

      • listenupbub

        Yes, and here are the pictures

        • paul kersey

          garbage in garbage out

    • Jason Lewis

      Obama’s mom took some nice pics with Uncle Frank.

      • SirMarlowe

        True; they are available online: do a search for Ann Dunham and Frank Marshall Davis. Also order the DVD by Joel Gilbert, “Dreams from my Real Father.” It’s 90 minutes long and very well done. It is available through World Net Daily and other sources online. It costs about $20.

    • Deacon Blue

      Tell me you’re really shocked that a NAPA like Frank Marshall Davis would not try to get his “muh dik” on with in a menage au trois with a 13 year old girl and her
      mother? He BOASTED about it! He’s nothing but another yard ape.

      If he had a menage au trois with a 13 year old boy and his father none of us
      would be shocked…

      • Oil Can Harry

        Of course I’m not shocked. Davis was also a “down-low brutha” and a communist although he wasn’t as awful as Bill Cosby the Rape Ape.

  • Publius Pompilius Quietus

    “The Obama of 1995 was not a firebrand, atleast not on the surface. He presented himself to the small, roughly half-black Cambridge audience as an optimistic, easy-going liberal. In the question-and-answer session, he distinguished himself from the more obviously
    angry black professor Cornel West. … Despite his concession that white Americans were “basically decent,” Obama did not think they were “making a serious effort” to compensate for the “brutal experience” of black history.”
    —————————-
    Barack Obama probably fits in better at an editorial meeting at the “New Yorker” than he does with racial arsonists like Cornel West. Ignore Obama’s complexion, and he’s basically an ordinary suburban liberal.

    • Oil Can Harry

      “All historic sins that white civilization has committed has also been committed by non-whites” TO A FAR WORSE DEGREE.

      Fixed.

    • I disagree. Obama is NOT “an ordinary suburban liberal.” He has enough White blood, and is just intelligent enough, and has been around Whites enough, to pull off the reasonable calm act. No. He HATES White people and this country, but he generally knows how to hide it. That is why he has proven to be far more dangerous than Al Sharpton or Lois Farrakhan.

      • Mangosteen, $1000 chair

        Any mixed person always, ALWAYS, hates their white side. The non-white blood is always dominant (their appearance proves this) and non-whites always hate whites. Once again, it’s in their blood. The inferior always hates the superior, it’s an immutable law of nature.

        I don’t think I have ever known ONE mix, of any race, that ever identified with their white side and wasn’t ashamed of it. They always turn on the white parent, no matter that it’s usually the white parent that is the nurturing, loving one.

        • Maybe that’s why they turn on the white parent. Non-whites seem to regard altruism, mindless, unconditional love, and other white Western virtues as weakness.

          • Mangosteen, $1000 chair

            They really do seem like weaknesses when applied to non-whites. It’s pearls before swine. It’s like those fools who “love” wild animals, then they get eaten or mauled because they mistake temporary docility as the animal “loving” them back. It’s their instinct, their blood, their very nature and white blood can’t turn them white, any more than “love” can change the nature of any predatory animal. Not PC, not “nice”, but IMO, very true.

          • Earl P. Holt III

            Those are some of my favorite bed-time stories. Surely you have heard the story of “Timothy Treadwell” and his bear friends, haven’t you?

          • Mangosteen, $1000 chair

            Oh YES! That guy and his girlfriend, might possibly be some of the dumbest people ever. They deserve the grand prize Darwin Award!

          • Earl P. Holt III

            I feel nothing but sympathy for the girlfriend: She was naive and clueless. But that fraud “Treadwell,” his demise is what we in Texas call “Poetic Justice”…

          • Mangosteen, $1000 chair

            I don’t know much about it other than they were eaten because he thought he was some kind of bear whisperer, but what kind of adult woman doesn’t know bears are dangerous??

          • Earl P. Holt III

            She wanted to be with her boyfriend to the bitter end…

          • Earl P. Holt III

            “Bear Whisperer”…that’s original (isn’t it?) and quite clever…!

          • Mangosteen, $1000 chair

            Thanks…I haven’t heard or read it anywhere else so it’s original as far as I know.

          • Earl P. Holt III

            Blacks have under-evolved Frontal Lobes, where those higher-order and more complex emotions and impulses originate. Altruism, empathy, humanity, compassion and even sympathy are as alien to most nigros as hygiene.

            A light-skinned black teacher once told a friend of mine that blacks have “lizard brains,” which I interpreted to mean that their brains consisted of not much more than the Medulla Oblongata…

          • Whenever you see a crowd of blacks rioting, looting, or attacking a lone white (or even hapless fellow black), many of them will be grinning from ear to ear, clearly having the time of their lives. They enjoy causing suffering and pain. It took me a long time to fully accept that, but it’s true. It’s not just a lack of empathy. They actually like hurting others. In the recent article about black anti-immigrant riots in South Africa, there’s a photo of a gang that just tried to rob a passing motorist. The female’s jovial smile as they run away from the scene of the crime says it all.

            People who spend a lot of time around blacks often share similar stories of blacks hooting with laughter and glee whenever a traumatized person relates a horrible experience, or is beaten to a pulp right before their eyes. They not only tolerate evil and sadism but embrace it. It’s as natural to them as building great civilizations is to us.

            There’s something deeply disturbing about that. It would be frightening if they weren’t incompetent in virtually every other way. There are good ones here and there, just as there are sociopathic serial killers among white folks here and there, but by and large black people cannot be trusted to do the right thing, or even the neutral thing. This makes them totally incompatible with our way of life, as Dr. Schweitzer and many others famously observed.

            I hate to admit these horrible things because the multikult lie is so soothing, so comforting, and because I have met many fine blacks over the course of my life. But we can no longer afford to choose the soothing lies over the harsh truth. White people globally are fighting for our very survival, even if most of us don’t realize it yet. We don’t have the luxury of lying to ourselves anymore.

          • Bon, From the Land of Babble

            Rioting, burning, looting, stealing – that is what they do; it is secondary.

            Assaulting, torturing, stomping, murdering Whites – is their favorite activity..

          • A Freespeechzone

            Moreover, having the govt, media and liberals encourage, embold & protect criminal negroes–and prosecute any victim who invokes self-defense.

          • Earl P. Holt III

            My life and attitudes changed the day I saw an 8 mm film secretly shot by a Swedish film crew of a black South African crowd “necklacing” a black woman.

            She was being burned to death, slowly, but they were “humane” enough to finish her off with a large rock to the head after 10 minutes. The crowd was having a grand old time.

            Every White person in America should be required to view that film and write a narrative about its meaning…

          • “I hate to admit these horrible things because the multikult lie is so soothing, so comforting..” And because as Whites, we instinctively like to believe the good in people-another of our weaknesses.

          • Tarczan

            Nicely said.

          • pcmustgo

            Certainly is a certain sadism to Black women I knew , and the poetry reading Angry Blacks who make every (shock value) poem about demonizing white people as rapists, sexual deviants, etc… it’s pure sadism… the hateful dirty looks too… the nasty remarks.

          • pcmustgo

            These are gifted, talented, Middle Class Blacks too.

          • Probably enough to fill up medium-sized apartment building.

          • David Ashton

            Also emotional immaturity frozen in time. White children get fun out of bullying but grow up and grow out of it, except for sadistic psychopaths. I do think the inability to empathize is a major factor. I have known Negros who are not like this, but a reliable friend told me how a largely black audience roared with laughter at a movie scene of the Crucifixion. Some of the worst atrocity photos of nigger-baiting in the southern states are more than matched by those of the burning-alive of dissidents by laughing ANC supporters in South Africa – low IQs a factor in both cases.

        • Earl P. Holt III

          Don’t you think that phenomenon is because mixed-race individuals always experience greater PHYSICAL threats from blacks, and little or none from whites? In other words, the nigros FORCE them to choose, because of all those “tribal” instincts and impulses they seem to have retained…?

          • No. They hate Whites even if, like Obama, they have had little contact with blacks. Obama was not picked on in some inner city black public school. That is not the explanation. I think they just hate what they know they can never be part of, that’s all. They hate the fact that they will always be seen as black and only be part of a race that they themselves secretly despise.

          • Earl P. Holt III

            I find your theory quite reasonable, but why must there be only one explanation? (After all, Obama’s upbringing was probably unique in world history: He is hardly typical…)

          • Don’t mean any disrespect, but I just disagreed with your explanation. I think if you have a black, or half-black in your White family, no matter how good you are to them, and no matter what environmental factors they encounter, they will resent you. I don’t believe it is because “The blacks forced them to chose…” Obama didn’t grow up around any blacks. He lived a privileged White existence in Hawaii. Then he grew up in a prosperous family in Indonesia. He knew nothing of true “black” culture. I and many here knew a lot more about blacks than Obama did! But still Obama grew to hate Whites. He knew he could never be White, so hated us for it.

          • Mangosteen, $1000 chair

            I have considered that, but I really do think it boils down to blood. “Nature vs nurture”, and they are what they are.

        • pcmustgo

          Yeah, I’ve been meeting more and more half white/half hispanics and half white/half asians lately who are ashamed of being half white and even lie about it … BUT, I am not sure their reasoning- I think it has more to do with getting affirmative action for their non-white side, being ashamed of being half white as most whites are ashamed of being half white and the entire culture revolves around that, so it’s understandable…. convenient.

          • Mangosteen, $1000 chair

            Well, back when white culture was dominant, the lightest mixed people would try and “pass”. Some of them probably did. But it didn’t make them white, and they could probably act white in public, but I doubt they did in private. It’s all speculation on what they did back when whiteness was a good thing, but I really do think blood and ancestry is more of an influence than culture. But I really don’t know, just seems that way to me.

        • HE2

          Have found this to be true, even among Asian-Anglo mixed individuals raised as exclusively White.
          My Jap/Anglo tennis doubles partner and medical colleague, as far as he is concerned, is 100% culturally Japanese. Home decorated with nothing but Japanese iconography, art, furniture, statuary, floor and wall coverings. Not an Anglo relic in sight.
          Some with other Asian/Anglo bi-racials of my acquaintance.
          The inclination for denial of White heritage among bi-racials cannot be blamed entirely on anti-White inculcation; it also seems to fall within the realm of atavistic tribalism.

        • David Ashton

          Not always the case in the past. The Anglo-Indians were desperate to identify with their white British side. Human “hybridity” is however a problem, at worst resulting in outbreeding depression and at best in problematic psyches and bad examples.

    • Petronius

      Nerobama is the most dangerous man on the planet since Lenin.

      And not even Lenin with his entire team could destroy America, whereas Nerobama has almost succeeded.

  • In this hour-long presentation, Obama openly talks about his
    relationship with his mentor, Frank Marshall Davis, a Communist and
    pornographer.

    “Mentor,” and maybe also something more.

    The Obama of 1995 was not a very good speaker. He had a halting
    delivery, stuttered, was obviously nervous, and, although congenial
    enough, could not tell a joke. What Obama did do well was read. He read a
    dramatic passage from his book for a full fifteen minutes uninterrupted
    and used multiple voices halfway credibly.

    How is that any different from today?

    He presented himself to the small, roughly half-black Cambridge audience
    as an optimistic, easy-going liberal. In the question-and-answer
    session, he distinguished himself from the more obviously angry black
    professor Cornel West.

    That’s because the Obama of 1995 was either still in or was fresh out of Harvard Law, where he was adulated as a light skinned black with a high enough LSAT score and therefore the potential first black President. Obama never was ghetto or hood or street or “real,” and failed every time he tried to be that. Including his failed attempt to oust Bobby Rush out of Congress in 2000. He never was going to launch a political career being the the black man’s black man, so he had to be the white liberal man’s black man.

    Obama’s allusion to the Bible was purely metaphoric. He made no
    reference to his much bruited Christian faith. He made no reference to
    Islam, either. Despite his concession that white Americans were
    “basically decent,” Obama did not think they were “making a serious
    effort” to compensate for the “brutal experience” of black history. That
    “was going to cost some money,” and, according to Obama, “Americans
    don’t like to sacrifice.”

    I take Obama as basically secular who takes on the veneer of leftist Christianity and superficial Islam combined.

    • propagandaoftruth

      The long legged Mac Daddy is a great orator to his zombies. I once thought he was a good public speaker.

      His voice is not unlike scratching a chalkboard these days.

      I’m considering stinking up the Republican party again. I like our dusky governess – libs hate her so much, I like her. SC pol – evil too.

      Politics is especially evil in Lee Atwaterland.

      • Chip Carver

        If you’re not good with extemporaneous speech, you are not good orator. Obama is awful without a script. Everyone has seem him flounder without a teleprompter. Just another overrated puppet.

        • propagandaoftruth

          The last prezzy that could speak extemp pretty well was slick Willy.

    • So, Obama thinks that White Americans are “basically decent”? Well, like a good ol’ “Uncle Tom” White guy, I will just reply, with a grin, “Why thank you, suh, missa boss Obama. I show do thank ye fa sayin’ dat. Yessir Mistah Obama suh!”

    • Earl P. Holt III

      I don’t think we really know that Obama had a “high enough LSAT score” to get into Harvard Law. I have read articles which name the Jewish (and CPUSA) faculty member who got him in despite his academic record, which remains sealed to this day…

  • libertarian1234

    Every bit of information that comes out about this man verifies that integration has been an absolute failure and that having blacks in this society has created an enemy within much more dangerous than even jihadists or an outside enemy force.

    And when black crime and violence enters the picture, along with low black intelligence, which has dumbed down the school system, then it becomes readily apparent to people with good sense that we cannot continue with this pretentiousness that all people are the same without causing irreparable deterioration to this culture, which is bound to eventually cause a societal implosion.

    The situation is going to result in a separation of the races for the most part, and it will be accomplished via peaceful means…..which is highly unlikely…..or by civil conflict or secession. People who are on the level of hunter/gatherers cannot successfully integrate with anybody.

    • More than that. The Obama years have taught me, if I still needed taught, that there is absolutely no placating blacks. They will NEVER be satisfied that Whites have done enough. No other race of humans has so little gratitude. No at all.

      • tetrapod

        Well … maybe one other, but I agree.

        Wasn’t affirmative action only supposed to last 10 years, enough time for AA’s to catch up? Now here we are, over half a century later, and they still can’t cut it. In fact they’re losing ground. There is no public policy solution to this problem. No tidy resolution where each faction goes its own way with health and wealth intact. There will be blood and hunger and destruction. And afterward, one side will prevail, and the other will either be annihilated or utterly subjugated.

        Hate to be so pessimistic, but I don’t see any other final solution.

        • Oh, please! Yeah, all the solutions from the sixties, that we were assured, would only be temporary. Geeze, don’t get me started…I know I repeat myself, but that is why I love to say: “America’s fifty year social experiment is over, and the results are in..” Even liberals have got to know, that after half a century, and a BLACK PRESIEDENT, that we must admit that blacks are just NOT like us, and NEVER will be. This is denial in the highest degree. Insanity, I believe, is defined as doing the same thing over and over even though it never works. That is the definition of liberalism as well, in my opinion. (See? You got me started and I said NOT TO! LMAO)

      • Cindy

        I’ve learned the same thing. And it’s not just blacks that will NEVER be satisfied, it’s any non-White, gays and feminists. They want life to be “fair.” That’s impossible. So the whining will never end.

    • kenfrombayside

      I post again:

      Dear white people,

      Your government no longer represents you.

      – They applaud your demographic annihilation.

      – They confiscate TRILLIONS of dollars from you via taxation – and do they use that money to help you? No. They give it to blacks and browns so they can outbreed you.

      – They not only allow but they actively encourage and engage in discrimination against you.

      – They allow the beautiful cities YOUR ancestors built to be stolen from you and turned into third world style war zones – courtesy of your hard earned tax dollars.

      – They bring the full weight of the federal government against any of you who dare to defend yourselves.

      – They import million of third worlders in order to displace you and steal your jobs.

      – They demonize you and call you racist while supporting racist organizations such as La Raza and the NAACP.

      – They ignore hundreds of thousands of yearly black on white crimes while making national sensations out of comparably few white on black “crimes” (many of which are complete fabrications).

      – They discourage you from reproducing by filling your children’s heads with feminist nonsense.

      – They threaten to disarm you because blacks and browns can not behave responsibly with weapons.

      And, after all of the above, they insist that YOU are the problem.

      They want you DEAD.

  • TomIron361

    I understand o’bama has Irish in him. His grandfather ate an Irish missionary.

    • I was about to reply to that first sentence, being of Irish decent myself, and was about to say that you shouldn’t associate us Irish Americans with him. Then I read the second part and just laughed. Funny!

    • Speedy Steve

      And there are all those “pick-up basketballs games” at Man’s Country. I dread to think what else he has had in him.

  • Obama’s goal is to destroy traditional America, turning it not just nonwhite, but also into a weird fascist/Trotskyite police state. He’s a tool of the power elites, no more a friend of blacks than of whites. He’s that smiling, good natured, lying sociopath who boasted: “I’m really good at killing people.” And who claimed he didn’t know what Rev. Wright was preaching.

    Really, the video is a curiousity, not telling us anything we didn’t already know.

    • Alexandra1973

      How can you sit in someone’s church for 20 years and not know what they preach? I’ve been going to my own church for a little over a year now and I know exactly what’s preached.

  • Ograf

    I often wonder how the ignorance and just plain stupidity that a large number of people that voted for this ; aww forget it, there is a sucker born every minute.

    • Petronius

      The American idiocracy’s appetite for crap sandwiches is insatiable

  • Evette Coutier

    At this point I really don’t care who Obama was. We all know what he is, and we all want him out.

    • Alexandra1973

      Not my president. As far as I’m concerned we really don’t *have* a president.

      • tetrapod

        In the immortal words of “Snake” Plissken, “I don’t give a f**k about your president.”. That’s how I feel regardless of who buys the office.

    • George Moriarty

      From what I have observed about your presidential elections the media usually try and crucify all potential candidates, they will even bring up a 30 year old parking ticket if they feel this would discredit the candidate. Yet Obama was given a dream run by the media despite all the obvious questions that should have been asked, including about his middle name. I understand that the media had an agreement of some sort NOT to mention “Hussein”. Certainly there were no pictures of his past as a fuzzy haired black student radical.
      It will be very interesting to see how the media treats Hillary. Personally I feel her biggest problem will be over exposure, she is already too well known.

      • Evette Coutier

        I agree. Democrats in America get the red carpet treatment, and Hillary will too to some degree. However, she’s boring and wore out. It will work against her

        • tetrapod

          I hope you’re right, but I have an unshakable faith in the stupidity of the American people and how easily they can be manipulated by “their” media

          • Evette Coutier

            There’s no argument there. But it’s not just Americans. There’s a lot of chumps in Europe, Canada, and other nations that have bought into the multicultural propaganda hook, line, and sinker. My faith in people’s critical thinking skills has been decimated.

          • Speedy Steve

            Media = propaganda machine = Ministry of Truth.

        • Ograf

          Also remember that Bill Clinton was our first black president. Hillary strikes me as weird. I wouldn’t vote for her if she were the only one running.

          • Evette Coutier

            Hillary is a pathological monster. Odd that liberals, who all claim to be humanists, would pick a sociopath for their president.

          • It doesn’t strike me as odd, since liberalism is necessarily totalitarian and oppressive. It takes lots of violence to enforce the egalitarian lie and a sociopath is just right for the job.

          • Evette Coutier

            You are correct, of course. Double think is a genetic necessity to be liberal.

          • slobotnavich

            Well spake. It’s hardly a mere accident that all the greatest mass slaughters in human history have been the work of Leftist regimes. The worst alleged crimes of the Nazis don’t begin to compare with the unimaginable body counts of stacked up in the 20th Century alone by Marxist regimes, though we’re endlessly reminded of the so-called Holocaust practically 24/7.

          • Perhaps because the bloodthirsty Marxists and Holocaust hustlers are the same people.

          • slobotnavich

            Sad but true.

          • AmericanRemnant

            Your descriptive is too kind. She demon incarnate I think would be closer.

          • JohnEngelman

            Hillary is nothing of the sort. I alike her because of the low quality of her enemies.

          • Evette Coutier

            That’s a bizarre comment.

          • slobotnavich

            Liberals, by deed and definition, are sociopaths.

          • Speedy Steve

            Many liberals claim to be Christian. Usually of the protestant stripe, but not exclusively.

          • Evette Coutier

            Liberalism is the emotionally immature worshiping the manipulative sociopath.

      • AmericanRemnant

        There’s enough known about her that would rightfully have her in prison.

        • Deacon Blue

          I think her Huma Abedin connection will blow up soon enough.

          • AmericanRemnant

            Actually, I think the lesbian angle would be a benefit to her given societies level of dementia. The more debased the more embraced.

        • Mangosteen, $1000 chair

          And none of it will be mentioned!

      • InAFreeCountry

        The media got Obama elected because they think he is the Chosen One. No hard questions for him, no big dig into his past, without even proof of his being born in this country. Always showing his best side, here are some photos in which he literally has a halo.

        • George Moriarty

          That looks like Kirilian photography, still very controversial…
          But regarding President Obama; You will not get the top job if you have not got what it takes, you will not get the top job if you are stupid or incompetent, and you will certainly not get that top job without having the generally left leaning media on side.
          I personally feel that your president got where he is because he represents the spirit of the age. He was able to totally upset the whole USA political establishment, this has made him a hero to many many people..
          He will be a hero and loved by 99% of blacks in your country, possibly 97% of other minorities and even 60% of USA whites. He will continue to be a hero to gays, feminists, student radicals, the Teamsters Union, communists, the UN and to most of the media. He is a hero in the whole of black Africa and with his Muslim credentials he will certainly be popular in the Arab world. He will be popular in the rest of the world wherever there are those who don’t like America.
          In office he has printed money and appointed his own to all top jobs just like most African dictators do. He has over-ruled your elected government on issues like 3rd world immigration, again the actions of a dictator.
          But as I said earlier, he represents the spirit of the age, I doubt he will be impeached and he will remain very popular at home and world wide.
          Thinking people, especially whites do need to be concerned about the future of the USA. Do you have a presidential candidate who can stand up to what BHO is all about? I think you need another Ronald Regan.

        • The Worlds Scapegoat

          Both political parties do that.

          .

          • Margaret Falkenberg

            Exactly, though Obama got sold more strongly to the weak minded this way.

            This represents “the media” (and who controls those?) playing on Christian whites’ hunger for salvation. That is why I am not a Christian. I consider it a Jewish heresy that exists to install in every man and every woman a hunger for outside agency to control them. Protestantism managed to push the message that salvation is a gift from god, not from other humans.

            But those who control the media know that those buttons have been installed in whites. Particularly Christian whites like liberals who rejected their families’ religions. (Sometimes for very good reason.)

            These are the “push buttons” that have been propagandized into all of us. In my view the whole point of being a racial realist is to give people somewhere to stand as they try to unwire those buttons. It can be very scary for them, because to challenge their indoctrination can have severe consequences.

  • Tarczan

    When O was in the first primary, there was a video of him and hillary at an event where the Pledge of allegiance was said. O refused to put his hand over his heart and turned away from the flag. Hillary put on the patriotic act, but O didn’t even pretend. The video has since been scrubbed, but it was very damning. I always fretted over why the Repubs didn’t just run an ad with that video.

    • John Smith

      This one?

      • Tarczan

        Similar, but not the video I saw, but in this one he also doesn’t pretend to show patriotism.

    • AmericanRemnant

      Just more evidence that the fix was in and it is all rigged and an utter sham

  • Jason Lewis

    Glad he thinks we’re basically decent.

    • John Smith

      I don’t believe it.

    • Cindy

      Yes, I’m *blushing* that he considers me “basically decent.”
      Oh, Obama, I do declare….

      • Jason Lewis

        His wife is finally proud of the country too!

    • Deacon Blue

      Yeah me too. That makes it all better now.

  • SirMarlowe

    Frank Marshall Davis is Obama’s biological father. See the
    video documentary by Joel Gilbert “Dreams from my Real Father.” This
    video is available through World Net Daily and other sources for about $20. It
    is 90 minutes long and very well done. Ann began her relationship with Davis by
    listening to jazz albums. She then began posing nude for him; he was an amateur
    photographer, and he photographed various women. He then sold the photos to
    girlie magazines. Nude photos of Ann are available online and in Gilbert’s
    documentary. She was just 17 and had a petite figure.

    After the nude photo, sex followed. Ann Dunham began
    fornicating with Davis in the autumn of 1960. When she got pregnant, her father
    and Davis came up with the idea to find a “fall guy” to pose as the father –
    for a fee, of course. The Kenyan Goat Herder, Barack Obama, Sr. was their choice.
    There weren’t many young Blacks to choose from.

    Davis, then 55, was married to a white woman, Helen
    Canfield, and they had five children. He said he couldn’t afford the scandal of
    being divulged as Obama’s father. Stanley Dunham had his reasons for the
    cover-up; he was reportedly an agent for the FBI, and the fact that the main
    Communist organizer in Hawaii impregnated his daughter would have cost him his
    job.

    Ann Dunham was about 5’ tall. The Goat Herder was about 5’ 5”.
    Obama is 6’ 2”; Davis was exactly 6’ 2”. Obama is left-handed; Davis was left-handed.
    Do an online search for Frank Marshall Davis and Ann Dunham. There are photos
    that show a comparison of facial features between Davis and Obama.

    There are no photos of any type of relationship between Ann
    and the Goat Herder during the time that the two were “supposedly” going
    together in the fall of 1960. It appears that they didn’t even know each other.
    The first photos of Ann and the Goat Herder were taken in 1971 when the Goat
    Herder visited Ann and Barack in Hawaii; the photos were taken at the airport.
    Barack junior was 10 years old. The reason that the Goat Herder was visiting
    was because both parents had to appear at the private school where the
    grandparents wanted to enroll Obama. The Goat Herder was paid handsomely for
    this visit.

    High School girlfriends of Ann relate that she did not go
    out with regular white guys. She was a political radical and a rebel; in the
    late 1950s, rebels often embraced communism. Davis was a flaming communist.

    One reason that Ann was an outsider is because her father
    insisted that she be named after him. He was off in WWII, and he wanted his
    name to be carried on. Her given name is Stanley Ann Dunham. No wonder she didn’t
    like white guys.

    My conclusion: Ann flew to Kenya to have the baby in 1961 in
    order to solidify the sham story that the Goat Herder was the biological
    father.

    • Alexandra1973

      Given that Davis is the father (one for Maury), would that actually make Obama a US citizen?

      To me, though, that’s moot. I don’t think a black person has any business being president of a White nation, and vice-versa.

      • SirMarlowe

        “Given that Davis is the father (one for Maury), would that
        actually make Obama a US citizen?”

        Good point. Yes, technically, Obama would have to be recognized as a U.S. citizen if it were claimed that Davis was his biological father. This can be scientifically proven through DNA.

        However, Obama’s handlers decided to stick with the phony story that the Goat Herder was his father. Had it been divulged that Davis was his father, he would not have had much of a chance for political office of any kind, let alone president.

        His handlers figured – correctly – that they would be able to skirt the issue of citizenship by refusing to confront the issue of a birth certificate. With the help of the pro-Obama media, they were able to do this. Citizenship questions were usually ridiculed or ignored.

        The question of citizenship was actually a “red herring” since the real story was that Obama’s biological father was not only the chief communist organizer in the Hawaiian Islands, he was also a lecher and a pornographer. He wrote a pornographic book entitled “Sex Rebel: Black.” Most of the copies of this book have been bought up – probably by Obama sympathizers.

        The last time I checked, a copy was selling for about $700. Do an online search for “Frank Marshall Davis” Sex Rebel: Black.

        Obama learned that Davis was his biological father when he was about 12 years old. The reason that Davis was Obama’s mentor was because Ann wanted him to establish a relationship with his biological father. She arranged to have him visit with Davis on a regular basis.

        Under ethical circumstances, Obama should be impeached, convicted
        by the Senate, and expelled from office for lying to the American people.

      • InAFreeCountry

        His mother was a citizen, therefore he is. The question was about where he was born, as one is ineligible to be President if he is born on foreign soil.

        • ShermanTMcCoy

          I don’t think that’s correct. My son was born in Germany to me (a serviceman) and my US citizen wife. I believe a “report of birth to American citizens abroad” is sufficient documentation for my son to run for president (were he so inclined).

    • listenupbub

      pictures:

      • SirMarlowe

        Good job, Listenupbub. Notice the round head of the Goat Herder. Notice the Goat Herder’s fat lips and the very wide nose. There are few similarities in the facial features of the Goat Herder and Obama.

        • The President and Davis have exactly the same cheekbones.

          • listenupbub

            Oh yes, and the same head shape, temples, philtrum (look at how wide Barack Obama Sr.’s philtrum is), jaw, and eyes.

      • Tarczan

        They all look the same to me. Ugly.

      • Rob

        Obama looks like both of them. I think Stanley Ann Dunham has some splanin to do.

    • journey

      On American Thinker, very recently, an article discredited Joel Gilbert and his theories concerning little barry.

  • Caucasoid88

    I wonder when he’s going to release his next memoir: “Dreams From My Mother: Becoming the Next Jenna Jameson.”

  • rebelcelt

    Who the hell speaks well of the SOB that takes and publishes porn of his own mother.

    • Alexandra1973

      Someone who’s morally bankrupt, I’d imagine!

  • journey

    Putting a black in the WH was the ultimate plan of the elites to have the whites get used to images of non-whites in power. Of course, the brainwashing precursor was fantasy (Hollywood).

    Whatever delusions of the elites are coming to fruit as the whites are rapidly becoming a minority in their own countries.

  • Light from the East

    We should annotate – “This presentation demonstrates Barack Obama’s view about America but not white Americans and others.”

  • Eagle1212

    No wonder why America is already sinking even further, you have this scumbag promoting a book of lies while he continues to do the same rhetoric until this day. A true pathetic joke of what America has become.

    • Rob

      White people are their own worst enemy.

      • Ringo Lennon

        We let liberal Marxists take over our newspapers, TV stations and academia. They were taking over these institutions while we were drinking beer and watching sports. We deserve it.

        • Rob

          Don’t forget the funny papers. That is why I do not look at sports because it is a Marxist tool to keep the lemmings busy that everything is fine while these Marxists take over and destroy us,

  • JohnEngelman

    President Obama wanted to be a post racial president. He knows how it feels to be black. He needed to learn how it feels to be a white victim of black crime, forced school busing, and affirmative action.

    • throttler

      The white people who voted for him wanted him to be a post-racial president. Obama himself never wanted that. He wanted to divide and destroy America, which he is doing.

      • JohnEngelman

        Ever since Barack Obama was inaugurated president Republicans have tried to stop him from doing anything. His health plan is nearly the same as the plan Mitt Romney introduced in Massachusetts. That plan is popular there.

        I am disappointed with Obama. I never thought of him as the Messiah. Nevertheless, I will vote for a yellow dog before I vote for a Republican.

        • Augustus3709

          In 2010 Massachusetts was 80% White. The per capita personal income in 2012 was estimated as 3rd highest in the nation.

          You can’t really compare a wealthy, White state whose citizenry decide to socially organize its money for the common good, with a nation struggling with broken borders, exploited by millions of welfare tourists.

          • JohnEngelman

            The poorer a state is the more it needs universal health care.

      • JohnEngelman

        You are projecting your hostility for President Obama onto the President. I do not recognize the President in your description of him.

        I do recognize symptoms of Obama Derangement Disorder.

      • JohnEngelman

        Think throttler, think. Why would any president of the United States want “to divide and destroy America?” He would have to be pathologically evil, and President Obama is not.

        Even Adolf Hitler did not want “to divide and destroy Germany.” Joseph Stalin did not want “to divide and destroy” Russia.

  • Who Me?

    I, and I suspect many other Americans, had never heard of this freak with the weird name before he became a contender for the primary candidate for president. After he was elected, I was utterly sickened by the many videotaped and published example of schoolchildren, both black and white, singing praises to Obama as if he were the incarnation of the second coming of the Lord! NEVER had I heard or witnessed such adulation for a newly elected president who hadn’t done anything yet–except being gifted the Nobel Peace Prize for what the committee HOPED he would do…. The hopey/changey boy is an empty glass in which anyone can imagine they see anything they wish but it is all illusion and no substance.

    • throttler

      Those videos showing children singing about how great Obama is are disgusting and creepy. I would have never let my child participate in that.

  • Hilis Hatki

    Obama is just your typical black person.

    • IstvanIN

      He is a little bit smarter, not as much as the press would have us believe, but a little bit more. Unfortunately he is not smart enough to know his limitations.

  • Hank chinaski

    We elected this guy. It’s in the history books. Try to focus more on why white America is loony and less on the hutu. The hutu is not worth thinking about.

  • Fathercoughlin

    White people have a reason to hate.

    • Ringo Lennon

      They totally destroyed my white neighborhood in the early 70s. Had to leave.

  • Spikeygrrl

    “He has always depended on the eloquence of others, and he still cannot tell a joke.”

    He does not have to tell a joke. He IS a joke.

    • Roninf9

      The joke is on us.

    • Alexandra1973

      And a sick joke at that.

  • Earl P. Holt III

    Tribe wasn’t the guy who got him in, and he has had an “epiphany” of sorts, if Jews can have epiphanies. The guy who got him into Harvard Law was more obscure, and a generation earlier than Tribe…

  • Earl P. Holt III

    Dems likes to heer dem crys o pane dat dem victems be makin…

  • NoMosqueHere

    I doubt Larry Tribe was or is a mossad agent. He seems to be a liberal jew who sides with the palestinian cause. Most US jews are secular, intermarried, and increasing intolerant toward israel.

  • Guest

    Fascinating piece. What strikes me is his very obvious articulateness way back in 1995, quite a departure from even an “educated” American black. He is definitely something different it’s understandable how so many whites were taken by him in 2008. But like all blacks there is a paranoia that undermines their personalities and a deep seeded hatred defect of perceived injustices that make them in my view incapable of leading an entire nation.

    • Rob

      Please there are many conservative whites taken by Dr. Carson as well. I say no thank you to these white people when they ask me if I support Dr. Carson because I do not want 4 to 8 more years of socialistic black rule.

  • Rob

    …Junk. There I said it.

  • NeoconsNailed

    “The Obama of 1995 was not a firebrand”…. that’s supposed to be a surprise, is it? For all the cant about his looks, charisma, speaking ability etc, he remains a total, absolute zero. There’s simply nothing there. He’s an ugly, lifeless, very willing stuttering tool of subversive evil.

  • Augustus3709

    I watched some of that video but had to shut it off.

    Young’bama makes a false equivalency, when he says black people “endure” a White majority, but Whites can’t do the same with a black majority.

    That’s not the same thing at all. Blacks benefit tremendously from a White majority, whereas Whites surrounded by blacks just know by cosmic instinct that something is probably terribly wrong.

    • Hank chinaski

      The best you can say about a black majority is that some people can endure it.

    • Sam

      Obama himself has never had to endure a black majority, and it seems unlikely he has any desire to. Certainly none of his vacations have been taken where there’s a black majority — probably not even to a place where the negro population exceeds 20%.

  • slobotnavich

    The Panama Canal Zone was officially US sovereign territory until the arch-cretin Jimmuh Cottuh idiotically surrendered it to the the so-called Republica de Panama, for reasons that continue to elude me. The nation of Panama owes its very existence to the canal – until it was built the ithsmus of Panama was virtually uninhabited wilderness, with only the small settlement of Colon on the Atlantic side and a relatively small city on the Pacific side, now called Panama City. I lived there for two years in the early Seventies – loved the place, the climate (there’s no such thing as too much heat and humidity), and the shopping. BTW, McCain wasn’t insane, just the sort of dirt-bag who’d hit on your wife in the O-club while you were out on cruise or deployment.

  • Earl P. Holt III

    If I had the authority to do so, I would award you an Honorary Doctorate of Sciences in Nigrology, as I possess…

  • Earl P. Holt III

    …not to mention, an instructor (of sorts) at the University of Chicago School of Law…

  • slobotnavich

    Good post. Obama comes across as so “reasonable,” someone who people across a fairly broad political spectrum could vote for. “He seems like such a nice Negro!” He’s not threatening, vitriolic, or dangerously subversive-looking. And after the dullards of the Bush family any reasonable-sounding Democrat would have won. The Bushes, Jeb included, should he hooted out of the Republican Party and sent back to their oil properties. Should Jeb be the nominee this time around, many good and staunch conservatives (including this one) will simply sit out the election. I mean, why waste the gas or risk getting a door-dent at some crowded polling place? And as to the tired old argument, “If your side loses you’ll have nobody to blame but yourself,” I say, if he loses by one vote nationally I’ll commit hara-kiri by way of contrition.

  • EuropeanIdentity33

    Jazz opened the door for other kinds of music like rap and hip-hop by promoting the “urban” lifestyle of the early to mid-twentieth century. I’m not saying that some Jazz isn’t decent or complex music. I’m just saying it paved the way for the modern popular “music” we have now.

    • Lexonaut

      ” …the modern popular “music” we have now.”

      Tell your children to stop buying this degenerate filth so that the problem will stay in the ghetto where it belongs along with the crack cocaine they buy. The demand for both commodities is in the suburbs. The supply for both is in the ghettos.

      And jazz didn’t lead to rap, funk did. But funk isn’t rap and I’m still listening to James Brown.

      • EuropeanIdentity33

        I think you are missing the entire point I was making, Jazz led to funk which in turn led to hip/hop and rap. Ultimately they are all black forms of music that have the same “Urban” message and promote the same degenerate life style. I don’t really care what kind of music you like, it’s relevant to the topic at hand.

        • Lexonaut

          Gospel led to the blues led to soul led to funk. Gospel and blues were rural southern music. Elvis started as a gospel singer.

          James Brown did indeed have a message — kids, stay in school and get an education.

  • What difference does it make what obongo thinks?
    he only does and says what his yid masters tell him to.

  • paulharveydubois

    Perhaps a devil’s advocate should show up for the file and ongoing debate on President Obama’s paternity. If as many contend now that Obama was not born of the Kenyan, Obama Hussein Sr., but of a liason between Anne Durnham and William Marshall Davis, then that would mean that President Obama is American, would it not? Those who have gone to such measures to prove President Obama’s illegitamcy as President of the United States do nevertheless have a point: that the people’s choice must be someone of the people, the American people, born of American parents, as prescribed in the founding document the United States Constitution. But in doing so, they seem to lose sight of the real issue surrounding President Obama’s successive administrations: that his policies, when they are not often exclusively sectarian, are not even in the interest of American society in general and often are inimical to the aspirations of the American nation and its calling in the dialectic of history.

  • Speedy Steve

    The Obama of 1995 was not a very good speaker.

    He still isn’t. He pauses inappropriately at the end of each line on the TelePrompTer. He says um and er and ah more than a good speaker should. But that doesn’t stop the fawning, craven, gutter press from try to tell us that he’s the cleverest knee grow ever in the universe.

  • Speedy Steve

    I say jazz is boring. Does that make me ignorant, too?

    • Lexonaut

      No. As a musician friend of mine put it, taste in music is like taste in food — no justification required.

  • 1CEO

    Barry Hussein despises our white Founding Fathers, the Constitutions and our traditions. His deep resentment and hatred is reflected directly in his promise to “fundamentally transform America”.

  • ChangeThis

    MICHELLE OBAMA: “Barack knows that we are going to have to make sacrifices; we are going to have to change our conversation; we’re going to have to change our traditions, our history; we’re going to have to move into a different place as a nation.”

  • Speedy Steve

    Well. That’s enough about me. How do you feel about me? This fits into my theory that blacks demand neither respect nor equality. They demand that Whitey worship them as gods.

  • Guest

    testing

  • Canadian Friend

    If whites had not invented the piano, the electric guitar, amplifiers and speakers and microphones and recording devices, and the radio and the television, and later the synthesizer, blacks would have never come up with jazz or blues or rap.

    You may not be ignorant about jazz but you are selective about facts which is worse than being ignorant.

  • Keepin’itREALISTic

    Awed by these insights, Margaret Falkenberg.

    Not just one, but two, the preliminary being “their cruelty to their own children.” That is so true. Interested to know if you gained this insight from interface with blacks or if their sky high abortion rates and what is obvious from a distance of how black adult promiscuity puts their children through the Trayvon / Mike Brown experience of the child’s parents not being married or staying married to each other and all the subsequent romantic partners of each parent being subtle torture to the child.

    Their thanklessness I’ve always attributed to their relentless demands for more, constant self advocacy which they fear would be diluted by any show of appreciation or acknowledgement of anybody doing any better than constantly victimizing them. But you may be right. It may be more basic than that, an inability to conceptually appreciate. That’s actually less culpable than conscientiousness false accusations of mistreatment.

    I think blacks are id monsters, totally id driven out of selfishness with no regard to truth or fairness. Id urges unchecked by the socializing psychological inhibitors normal to non blacks. So I have assumed they ignore the benevolence of others so as to continue to complain to demand. But you may be right that they are incapable of recognizing the benevolence of others.

  • smrstrauss

    Re: “the Davis scenario is not dumb at all, it is the truth,”

    Sure it is—and do you also believe in the tooth fairy?

    When people who hate another person show one single photo and say–“look at this, this PROVES that this guy, who looks sorta like him, is his father,” rational people will realize that that claim comes from the hatred, not from any real proof.

    But, don’ t worry. Two sides can play at this game. I wonder who the real fathers of Rubio and Walker and Jeb Bush and Cruz might be?

    BTW, were are the photos of the romantic relationships of all those people’s alleged fathers and mothers?

    Finally, and once again, a person’s “real” father does not affect one single thing for legal purposes (the legal father is what counts, of course) or for political purposes because it has been proven that you cannot inherit either political or moral leanings through DNA.

    In other words, once again, the story is DUMB.