Europe’s Shocking and Unsettling Future: White Pride

James Poulos, The Week, April 13, 2015

Here in the U.S., it’s hard to imagine that Europe could go back to its old muscular and expansive ways. But the Continent is turning in that direction–and it’s a move that carries huge and unsettling implications.

In all likelihood, what happens to Europe in this regard will freak us Americans out. It will make us painfully, perhaps angrily, aware of our differences. It will throw our similarities into doubt. But if it happens, we’ll be stuck with it. We’ll have to figure out how to deal.

Because here’s the thing: Europe is on track to rediscover what looks to us like a highly unsettling form of white pride.

The demographic tale is straightforward. As of 2010, Pew has noted, 13 million Muslim immigrants resided in the European Union. That year, their median age was 32, eight years younger than the median for all Europeans. According to Pew, “the Muslim share of the population throughout Europe grew about 1 percentage point a decade, from 4 percent in 1990 to 6 percent in 2010. This pattern is expected to continue through 2030, when Muslims are projected to make up 8 percent of Europe’s population.”

{snip}

One path to Europe’s troubling destination is already being carved out by Europe’s far-right parties, many of which are implicitly or explicitly ethnocentric. At a gathering last year, France24 observed, Dutch party chief Geert Wilders captured the mood. “‘Just like you, we don’t want foreigners to tell us they are masters in our country. We say: Kick the criminals, the jihadists, the illegal migrants out,’ he told the entirely Caucasian audience to rapturous applause.”

{snip} In France, the National Front has rapidly transformed from a backwater for old reactionaries into a category-scrambling destination for citizens who want what the EU can’t and won’t provide.

The shift has not been neat and tidy. Any European political organization that intentionally evokes fascism is certain to set off the racism alarm, among fellow Europeans most of all. The transition is also far from complete. But it reflects a sweeping shift in Europe away from the bland, safe ideology of post-Cold War officialdom, and toward something much more assertive and proud.

{snip}

These epiphanies mark the beginnings of a European exodus across a huge psychological and cultural bridge. From an American standpoint, it’s a spectacle of European governments and nongovernmental organizations working together to encourage white Europeans to be fruitful and multiply. After all, they’re the ones who need the motivation. In countries like Britain, immigrant birth rates have been the only demographic bright spot. The disparity in birth rates is so clear that in other European nations, like Italy, when immigration dips, the birth rate sags apace.

Seeing politicians open the door to the return of history’s most frightening prejudices makes Americans not just queasy but angry.

We have a hard enough time tolerating the persistence of Confederate memory here at home. What could be more offensive and unnerving than seeing the Old World half of Western democracies slip back into the ancient pattern of demographic expansionism?

True, Europe could boost its national populations just enough to keep their willfully bland and impressively meaningless social democracy trundling along without breaking the bank of its welfare superstate. But the more likely possibility, given what we know about European civilization and its long tradition of “extremism,” plays right into our worst fears. Europe will very probably rediscover Eurocentrism–not just as an abstract idea, but as an imperative for survival.

Some analysts will observe that, in a way, this is actually good news. Fact is, the U.S. really is in trouble if Europe withers away as a cultural and political force. We just can’t compensate all on our own, and the American people would never accept such a deeply uncharacteristic mission even if we could.

But regardless of that important silver lining, it’s going to get scary for us to watch the world’s longest-running white societies get more prideful, assertive, and, from our standpoint, statist.

{snip}

Topics: , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • baldowl

    Let us hope beta male James Poulos isn’t losing too much beauty sleep over these shocking and unsettling developments.

    • a1781054

      And if he is losing sleep now, he will be losing a whole lot more very soon.

    • John Smith

      Biting his pillow as we type….

    • Rob

      He should move to Africa and get his beauty sleep among the natives he loves.

  • IstvanIN

    It isn’t scary or unsettling to me. The only scary thing is how long it is taking for people to wake up. This clown is an a$$.

  • Chip Carver

    Europe is sliding to the right. It’s inevitable. The continent will save itself. The usual suspects will give it one last, huge, hurrah, as they always overreach. But at a certain level they’re frustrated, hence the acceleration of activities in America designed to finish off the former USA. If nothing else the responsible parties will be able to congratualate themselves on destroying what was for a time the best White country.

    • DonReynolds

      They can congratulate each other while they are standing against the same wall…..just before the officer gives the order for the firing squad to shoot. They won’t be able to pat each other on the back, because their hands will be tied behind their backs, and they won’t be able to wink, because of the blindfolds…..but they can give each other words of encouragement over the roll of the drums.

      • Xerxes22

        A firing squad is a soldiers death. This ilk doesn’t qualify for that kind of death.. Hanging from the nearest lamp post or a bullet to the back of the head would be a much better option.

    • Sparky

      More ficticious BS. Every GD story on here you turn into one of your tales of Talmudic conspiracy showing your paranoia and inability to grasp reality. Lay some facts on us to prove me wrong and you right. Name some names rather than your, “usual suspects”.

      • Dwight

        Pretty sure he himself is a member of the “usual suspects” trolling and working both sides.

      • JSS

        The European Jewish congress and European Jewish parliament openly push for open borders for Europe. The ADL is an international organization that does the same things in Europe that it does here. If you care about the origins of the EU look up Jean Monnet, Richard Kalegri, Alterio Spinelli, Karl Deutsch, David
        Mitrany and Ernst Haas. Those men are are considered to be the architects of the EU and every one was an anti White jew. I suspect you are a jew your self though because you have been given names and evidence before and brushed it off and abused whatever posters disagree with you (I’m assuming your’re diversity fatigue, if not I apologize).

        • Sparky

          The European Jewish Congress and Parliment don’t control anything. The ADL doesn’t control this government either. Nor do any of the patsies you named. Get a grip on reality. Barack Hussein Obama is the president of the US of A, not Hiram Bloomberg. Stop listening to those little voices and do some actual study on who controls what. The powers that be are right in front of your eyes and they ain’t Talmud toting Jews.

          • Cecil Broomsted

            Amazing the stories people will believe. They simply have to have a bogey man they can point to, some evil and unseen force controlling everything from behind the scenes. It is the only way they can make sense of a world that seems beyond their control.

          • propagandaoftruth

            All the bogey men you need consist of Marxists. Sure, lots of Jews have gone there, but so have non-Jew Whites.

            There have always been Jews like John Milius and David Cole and even Ben Stein who have bucked Marxism. Some have suffered for it in their careers and personal lives.

            I’m sick of crypto-Marxists of all backgrounds.

          • JSS

            If you think that the people who run and own the media have no power or influence you are living in a fantasy. If you think the people who run and the control the backs don’t have power your being deliberately misleading. You think the people at the think tanks and the donors have no input? Really? Like usual you have been given names and organizations and disregarded them and responded with insults.

          • Sparky

            If you think the media controls the government you’re insane. If you think the American and European citizens don’t vote for and elect the officials who do control the government then you’re even more insane. Government officials duly elected by the citizens pass and enforce the laws of the land. That’s where your blame is, right there. They control the media and the banks. We don’t need some invisible hand from fantasy world to blame for everything. Wake up and smell the reality.

          • JSS

            I have heard lots of weird stuff from supposed pro Whites but the theory that the only powerful people are elected officials is a new one. So your brand of kosher advocacy holds that control over media and finance doesn’t equal power or influence. And your calling other people crazy.

            Voters having the “freedom” to vote for people who don’t actually represent them doesn’t equal power at all in my view. As a Jew I can see how you would feel differently as there are candidates here and in Europe who do represent your interest.

          • Chip Carver

            One of the best ways to see what’s going on is obvious; don’t listen to what people say, watch what they do. An old saying that still holds true today; watch who our politicians bow to, pay attention to which lobbies have the politicians lining up to bend over and kiss their collective derrieres.

          • Alexandra1973

            Exactly.

          • panopticon1984

            Sheldon Adelson has far more influence on U.S. politics than the Pope. Legions of faux conservative Israel First pols make the pilgrimage to kiss his ring and collect their shekels.

          • Susan

            I don’t understand those gestures. If you’re not a catholic that man is just a another man.

          • John Smith

            The govt. sure doesn’t like negative publicity, so they allow themselves to be controlled, but they also control the media by the same token, providing it with information.

          • Theo Bombast

            Correct. They “… don’t vote for and elect the officials who do control the government…”.
            Britts/English however do have to pay for their own displacement and off-shore shenanigans.

          • Weisheit77

            I think I’m quoting Mencken here, but democracy is the belief that my vote and Rockefeller’s are equal. Updated for modem times it’s the belief that my vote and Sheldon Adelson’s are equal.

            You’re not fooling to many people.

          • David Ashton

            Now come on. In the US the Zionist voters are small in number, but the Zionist constituency cash and media-influence are quite large. Look at the names and details given by James Petras on the “left” and Kevin MacDonald on the “right”. I have mixed feelings about Israel, and I thought Bibi actually made a good speech in Washington, but the way he got everyone up and down like puppets on a Tel Aviv string told its own story – cue “stormy applause, all rise” in Moscow after a Stalin speech!

          • JGTThrasher

            I would disagree on one small point, “In the US the Zionist voters are small in number,” which leaves out the Christian Zionists who see themselves as the replacement for and continuation of Israel, with the goal being Israels protection and the re-building of the Temple for their “Last Days” to be fulfilled.

          • David Ashton

            Yes, a good point.

          • hastings88

            Ridiculous, sparky. The media can and do smear or ignore candidates they don’t like. Evidence: Pat Buchanan’s campaign. He racked up a primary win, and they just never covered him again. Evidence: BHO. They could have emphasized his total lack of experience as an executive, but completely ignored all that and were totally in the tank for him in both campaigns. The hands that rule us are not “invisible.”

          • Rob

            I agree with you. Do not listen to Cecil and Sparky. They are just brainwashed.

          • panopticon1984

            Brainwashed? Perhaps. More likely, they are doing their job (if you know what I mean. Nod, nod, wink, wink).

          • tetrapod

            In your opinion, who are the powers that be?

          • Sparky

            It isn’t my opinion at all. It is reality. As in Europe, our elected officials control all aspects of the government. They regulate everything and/or appoint others that do. Ruth Bader Ginsberg didn’t just magically appear on the US Supreme Court. She was put their by the politicians that you and I, or other citizens elected for public office. Orin Hatch is one of the traitors that put her there and Orin Hatch wad elected by the ordinary citizens of Utah. The primary blame goes there. None of these things are done secretly, they are done right in front of our eyes. There is no Jewish plot to destroy the white race. It’ BS. Period. Influence isn’t control. We can correctly blame Obama, the Demoncats, and many Republicans for the mess we’re dealing with now. There is no need to start in with the Free Masons, Trilateral Commission, or some secret group of people controlling everything. Santa Claus is for children.

          • Trevor Pilsbury

            Well said. Like Dwight, I am beginning to think these commenters are not who they are posing as.

          • John Smith

            And they might just be the ones protesting the “anti-semitism.”

          • Rob

            Why would they do that????

          • John Smith

            Plants.

          • JSS

            Your’re making a straw man argument. I never said anything about free masons or whatever. I also never said there was some Jewish master plan to destroy the White race that every jew is following. I do believe jews are not White and like any other racial group they have their own interest which are counter to ours. They do view us as an out group and none of them care about White survival and many are hostile. As far as I can tell the one thing that they all do agree on is open borders for White countries.

            Your agenda is pretty transparent. Call anyone who suggest that Whites don’t control their own country’s “crazy” and tell the goy “just vote the rascals out of office” as if any candidate who were pro White would survive the media lynching. That’s a good recipe for White extinction.

          • Sparky

            Try to understand this. You and Chip are making us look like kooks here. Here is an example right out of your own mouth:

            “As far as I can tell the one thing they all do agree on is open borders for white countries.”

            Now, slowly scroll up the page here and look at the books for sale. You will see The Perils of Diversity: Immigration and Human Nature by Dr. Byron M Roth. This is an excellent book written by a Jew who makes the case for why open borders is a nation-destroying proposition. On the very page you are reading your statement is proved false. You and Chip should buy and read Dr. Roth’s book instead of constantly planting the conspiracy obsession.

          • JSS

            The dishonesty of your debating style is so typical. You scoured my posts looking for one thing that wasn’t literally true and jumped on it as if it in anyway invalidates my argument. I suppose I could have said “almost all” instead of all I but the fact that this what your’re reduced to illustrates the bankruptcy of your position. You are literally nit picking over petty stuff at this point.

            What you are doing is the equivalent of liberals finding the very small handful of intelligent blacks to prove that they are all on average as intelligent to us. The existence of Roth in no way disproves that the policies pushed and financed by organized Jewry have been disastrous for Whites. It only proves that one statement in one of my posts wasn’t literal but rather true in general.

            And I’m not speaking for any nebulous “us” and I find it really presumptuous of you to imply that your opinion is some how the only correct one to have lest “we” be seen as kooks. Who appointed you the official voice of the comments section? And please stop your silly tactic of constantly attaching the “conspiracy” label to me. Your just acting like a leftist who throws around “racist” to shut down debate.

            Is black and brown behavior a “conspiracy”. No it’s just them being who they are. Jews aren’t White and their race has certain distinct behavioral characteristics like any other. One of those characteristics is that as a group they undermine their host nations. It’s just what they do.

            You have outliers from all races. Roth is one them. Implying he is typical is dishonest and you know it.

          • David Ashton

            There are a number of able Jews opposed to multiracial mass-immigration, for whatever reasons. As the Jewish Joke puts it, for every Jew there are three opinions. Jewish sympathy for multiculturalism over years is quite comprehensible, arising basically from their predicament as a people scattered across the national homelands of other peoples. There is no need to write another book on antisemitism on this thread, except to point out that post-WW2 “Never Again” is a driving force among Jews. They are alert to anti-immigrant nationalism in case they are on the receiving end once again; of course, there is an element of self-fulfilling prophecy here (as even with their prewar anti-Hitlerism). However, it is not in the Jewish interest in the long run to flood western democracies with Jew-hating settlers and it is not in the White Gentile interest to make Jews fear that they are to become victims of another persecution by White Gentiles.

          • tetrapod

            I agree with you … up to a point. Even intelligent and informed people can get caught up in paranoid delusions. You’re also correct about the ordinary citizens of Utah.

            But you also need to admit that ordinary citizens everywhere are generally stupid, and subject to manipulation. How else can you explain the ability of a heavily funded politician to salvage a lost election by pumping $millions into a media campaign?

            Regarding the chosen. I’ve never seen a thoughtful critic of their behavior suggest the Juden get together to concoct nefarious plans for the destruction of all that is good, true, and beautiful. What they do suggest, however, is that the chosen all share an ethos of hyper-ethnicity and historical rootlessness which can make them insensitive, indifferent, and at at times hostile to the surrounding culture. Combine this with their wealth and power and anyone with good instincts would take note.

            I’ve read enough intelligent, informed commentary on this matter to convince me there’s an element of truth in the notion that the sons of Noah have had a pernicious (but not necessarily premeditated) impact on our country. In addition, the sheer volume of journalistic attacks against me and my “kin” (to use a good Anglo-Saxon word) by Juden further reinforces that opinion.

            .

          • Sparky

            The problem here is one of degree. Perhaps you are not familiar with the ideas that Chip proposes and where he got them? I’ve read the same books and material he has so I know where he and his mentors are coming from, and yes, they actually believe that Jews are deliberately conspiring to destroy the white race. Forget about Israel having the same porn and filth pumped out of the sewer of Hollywood, forget about most Jews being devout atheists and could care less about the Talmud (let alone being guided by it to destroy us), forget about the far-left politicians in Israel who would destroy that country just as ours here would if given free reign. Some of the biggest anti-Israel, BDS kooks, I’ve seen are Jews. Things have gotten so far out of hand now that some of Chip’s mentors are actually supporting Arab Muslims and their flooding into our countries because these Islamians hate Jews. Blinded by their seething, fanatical hatred of Jews, they are taking the side of these alien throat-cutters who are no ally of the white race. Their Jew hatred is an obsession. They are consumed with it and want to spread their delusions here. There will never be any kind of white racial solidarity on a large scale with these people among us. They are rightly seen as nutjobs in my opinion.

          • JSS

            Who are Chips “mentors”? Kevin Mac Donald? David Duke? Who? Sense you are claiming to be familiar with Chips mentors books I take it you are talking about them.

            Having read them can you please back up your claim that they support Muslim immigration to Europe? Since you are the arbiter credibility around here I assume you can back that up.

            And how would not being a supporter of Israel imply that we approve of Muslim immigration to the west or were actually pro Islam in anyway?

          • Rob

            You are partly right.

          • JSS

            He is far more wrong then right. Look up a group called GEMJL. That stands for the gathering of European Muslim and Jewish leaders. It is exactly what it sounds like, it’s a group of influential Jews and Muslim leaders committed to fighting islamophobia and anti semitism. It is in practice just another very well funded group of anti white, anti European trouble makers.

            Sparky speaks of people like me or chap and his “mentors” being so “hateful” that we are pro Islam with no evidence at all. Yet here we have the organized Jewish community openly supporting the Muslim flooding of Europe. Many of these Jews are also associated with or members of the European Jewish congress or parliament. These Jews are not anti Israel by any means, both those groups are supportive of Israel.

            Just because Jewish Hollywood pop culture isn’t doing Israel any favors by exporting it’s filth over there doesn’t mean that Jews in general are our friends. It just proves that even though they often aren’t on the same exact page all the time in Europe, America and Israel that they are pretty much always bad for us regardless. No mass conspiracy is necessary, they just are who they are.

          • Rob

            I agree with you JSS. I was just agreeing with Sparky in his comment to Tetrapod that white people who vote traitorous white gentiles to power are also the problem. Other than that I disagree with Sparky.

          • David Ashton

            Protocols-of-Zion conspiracy is not valid. Disproportionate Jewish lobby influence in Anglo-American politics is valid. Quite apart from any “Jewish” aspect, this account of “elected officials” so far as the UK is concerned, is exceedingly naive, and the bogus party manifestos and PR stunts in our current “election” campaign are a minor illustration of this.

            You can certainly blame the Democrats and Republicans in Congress and Senate for the “mess” rather the “the Jews” or “the Masons” or “the Illuminati” or “the Lizards from Lemuria”, but what about those voters who elected them in good faith? Where does “democracy” go all wrong? And why?

          • baldridge999

            Blaming “The Jews” for our ills is counter-productive, since for every subversive Jew, there are a thousand white traitors. I don’t absolve those Jews from blame, hardly, but am merely pointing out that a small number of subversive Jews would have no success without the support and cooperation of a much greater number of white traitors and sell-outs. I just classify them all as anti-white and every anti-white is the enemy. That way none of the culprits escape exposure and criticism. Hopefully, one day they’ll all be standing before genocide tribunals ran by our people who will dispense appropriate justice to these rats.

          • SoulInvictus

            “Protocols-of-Zion conspiracy is not valid. Disproportionate Jewish lobby influence in Anglo-American politics is valid.”

            Any degree of acknowledgment is more valid than the nothing to see here/it’s a racist myth fantasy. While the Protocols likely were never a legitimate historical document, more of its goals have been realized than not. If not legit, it is certainly someone’s informed display of the general thought process held by those it very accurately describes.
            Similar could be said about the stated goals of Communism, and we know the origins there.

            Do we (the vast majority of readers anyway) not gather here to observe the slow motion passing of our race into extinction (or in hopes of its revival)? It isn’t exactly rocket surgery to see how it was not a suicidal self inflicted wound.
            It’s more confusing to me how this stuff is even debated any more.
            They saw it accurately in early Europe, prescribed mild protections against it in the Magna Carta, and then open rebellion against it erupted worldwide some 70 years ago. Yet, somehow..in the age of information… with the full history of banking, psychiatry, communism, and modern media at our fingertips, we still allow it to be verboten despite the obvious.
            That truly is the mindset of cattle.

          • David Ashton

            I have outlined my personal views on the PoZ and its “fitting the facts” in several posts here, which not printed but were relegated to the Disqus archive. One brief addition: the “rebellion” failed, partly because of its inhuman excess, and subsequent “Never Again” has simply reinforced the “banking, psychiatry, and modern media” problems we face in European preservation (if no longer “communism”, since allegiance has switched from the New Jerusalem in the USSR to the Old one in the Middle East).

          • SoulInvictus

            For a moment I thought you were referring to the Priory of Zion and my mind went down a whole different rabbit hole.
            You know, I was mostly just turning a phrase in describing it as rebellion before. But in reading you repeat it, the irony really sinks in.
            The modern archetype of all things evil, the uniforms, stormtroopers, arch-villains… what a powerful twisting of reality. Masterful.
            Not Stalin, not Mao, not Pol Pot. Instead, the people that fought the bankers, pioneered virtually every modern innovation, and were broken on an iron cross standing against the murderous tide of Communism… they are the devil to be eternally feared beneath the surface of any slight resurgence of European unity and perpetually alluded to in art to remind all that any semblance of it is to be reviled. That it is to be hated, mocked, feared, crushed, and worst case scenario, to be fought with world ending weapons.

            The symbols of, as you said, inhuman excess. Not the traitorous allowed destruction of Pearl Harbor, firebombing of Dresden, or atomic annihilation of masses of civilians, twice. God it is laughably absurd when you step back and admire the handiwork of the deceiver.

            Thanks for the unintentionally thought provoking comment.

          • David Ashton

            It is quite possible for me to see both good and bad in National Socialism. I have actively opposed communism in all its forms all my life, and was responsible, for example, for a multi-national commemoration of the victims of the “red holocausts” in London’s Albert Hall 50 years after the Bolshevik revolution. I agree with what you say about Pearl Harbor and the mass-incineration of German and Japanese civilians, but I do not exculpate Hitler from a primary share of war guilt and war crime. I still support what Oswald Mosley said about all this, and about European resurgence in the future. We should put aside arguments about dead Nazis, and unite with a clean conscience on the moral and rational high-ground of defending and promoting the civilization created by the white nations.

          • SoulInvictus

            Oh, I don’t disagree at all. It’s barely possible to even have a rational discussion with someone on that with the well as poisoned as it is.
            And I don’t see that era or that movement as some utopian perfection. They were people, warts and all. I would imagine the government would have been far more totalitarian than I would have ever desired to live under, though it’s hard to know what a peacetime Germany would have been like since it didn’t make it that far. Taken to its extreme though… would it be any worse than our world today? Would Europe be facing the same problems, whites in general for that matter? Probably not.

            Regardless of the fact you’ll rarely win friends and influence people with it, internally it is ground I hate to cede, despite its faults, much as with the Confederacy or Revolutionary- era America.
            To some extent I do think writing those pieces of our heritage off is a source (or result) of weakness, rather than strength. The people it offends were never friends to begin with and it helps along their agenda of dissolving our past and cohesiveness.

          • JGTThrasher

            My father worked in intelligence. He says the tri-lats are real.

          • curri

            The “elected officials” theory sounds purposefully silly. James Burnham, Sam Francis and Paul Gottfried locate power in the West in a “managerial elite.” Moldbug and the neoreactionaries identify the ruling elites as a network of high-level govt bureaucrats, universities and media with a common universalist ideology.

          • anony

            Have you ever heard of lobbyists? Politicians rarely listen to their “constituents, they do, however, listen to those who give them $$$, and those whose money determine whether they get re-elected. Those two groups are rarely their constituents.

          • hastings88

            You are creating straw men to beat down, Sparky. White Nationalists don’t claim that there is a “secret plot” along the lines of the fictional “Elders of Zion.” Jews IN REALITY do overwhelming support leftist candidates with their considerable campaign funding (George Soros and Sheldon Adelson, anyone?), and they do own most of the major media–TV networks, newspapers, film studios. They all overwhelmingly support high legal immigration, amnesty for illegals, diversity hiring, and just about anything that goes against the interests of whites. If you don’t see this, it is you who are out of touch with reality.

          • Northern American-Nationalist

            There IS a Jewish plot to protect Jews (and Judea) though…AT ALL COSTS.

            The thing is that most peoples are that way with their own kind and what they perceive as theirs; The Jews just have the influence (power) to do so effectively.

            Also, Jews tend to be radical idealists for various reasons not necessarily exclusive to their ethnicity, which is always destabilizing for the host society by definition.

          • John Smith

            Neither does the $PLC, but they have the ear (maybe more) of those in power.

          • silviosilver

            It comes down to a conflict of interests and a set of double standards. These in themselves may not ‘control’ or determine everything but why should it be immoral to note the forces that oppose you? That makes no sense at all.

          • David Ashton

            Google “Jean Monnet Jewish”. Truth is, however, that the EU was quite mixed in its origins. Whereas some conspiracists see it as a “neo-nazi” operation involving Prince Bernhard and the basis of a German comeback, realists see it initially as a French attempt to control the armament-resources of Germany. There was a concomitant European idealism, opposed to communism and working towards a Eurafrican “empire”. I found as a student that pro-Common Market people were divided between those who loved the European cultural heritage and those who saw it simply as a stage towards international institutions; it was noticeable that Jews were more interested in the latter, and quite understandably so. However, the whole thing is quite complex, and a simple-minded single-cause global-explanation antisemitism is a misguided interpretation, especially in view of the mass-immigration of Muslims.

            What we do need today is a Union of Europeans to supersede the so-called “European Union”. Get my drift?

          • hastings88

            “Control” isn’t necessary, sparky. They have undue influence and have used it to promote third world mass immigration. That is the reality.

          • panopticon1984

            Dodge, deflect and obfuscate. You have learned your lessons well.

      • Diabolus Candidus

        I think I left my oven on… on a real high temperature. Let me turn off my oven. I’ll get back with you after I turn off my oven.

      • 李冠毅

        I once asked why AmRen seems to have a habit of removing comments which say bad things about Jews. Here is the reply I received. I think it describes the situation quite well.

        ==========

        “My take is this. Jews are a bright and talented people. They tend to rise to the top in any field (including academia, the media, and behind the scenes in politics). They also seem to be a people acutely aware of how they’ve been persecuted in the past, and paranoid about something like the Holocaust happening again – as a group of people, they are prone to being liberal and attacking things like race realism (because the history of acknowledging racial differences is so closely tied to things like slavery and the Holocaust). So yes, I think if you poke around a bit, you will discover that most liberal ideas have a lot of Jewish influence at the point of their conception and are pushed by a lot of Jewish people today.

        Where you go from there varies. Some people have decided there is some sort of Jewish conspiracy to wipe us out. Let me say: I think if you are looking for a conspiracy, you will find one. Indeed, you may even find Jewish people in some position of power who are radical enough to want to wipe us out. There are White gentiles who are that radical too, though, and even if such a radical conspiracy existed amongst ALL Jewish people to eliminate White gentiles…they are a minority of the population, and could hardly do much without us letting them.

        I’m under the impression that AmRen’s official stance is that individuals Jews can be race-realist and nationalist and therefore allies; that carrying on about them “controlling” us is defeatist and refusing to take accountability for our own stupidity in going along with liberalism; that many other sites exist on which to agitate about “the Jews”; and probably also that doing so undermines the credibility of this site, which they would rather not have.

        THAT BEING SAID. If the mods here would really not like to fuel any conspiracy theories, they really should not be deleting even the mildest criticism of the Jews like oversensitive children. That actually probably serves to make some people who would not otherwise think so wonder if the puppet-strings theories are all correct. I don’t think that was the goal here.

        My experience here is that even good-faith attempts to discuss the issue at all are deleted.”

        • Sparky

          That is an intelligent position to take. I share those views. If the people here making sweeping allegations of grand conspiracies are not challenged on the basis of fact and truth then our credibility becomes questionable. There are many websites out there who specifically cater to their fantasies. Why they insist on taking every white racial realist down that dead-end, do-nothing, path of obsession speaks for itself and pushes the great majority of whites away. Nearly all of these people are compulsive atheists, and to be frank, creepy.

          • george00

            Hey Sparky, answer the question that JSS asked you. Who are the mentors of Chip and JSS that hate jews so much that they are in favor of Muslim immigration into Europe and America? I noticed you haven’t answered the question yet. Is it because you were lying?

        • Robert Smith

          Very interesting take. Of course, there is no such protection afforded to anti-Christian comments here. I think if Jews were more proactive in attacking their own problem people it would take the heat off those on our side. Avoiding the issue and criticizing those who notice Jewish connections get us nowhere. If you look at the logical outcomes of both positions we get 1) Jews call out their own, unite with the non-Jewish right and save our lands, or 2) we continue to slide into a brown communism. I think the greater risk for the Jew is 2, as it is for us.

          One other observation, claiming that those on the right think there is a conspiracy of ALL Jews is ridiculous. I have read many opinions but I’ve never seen that one that keeps getting trotted out here and many other places, especially left leaning sources.

          The idea that there is a Jewish conspiracy of elite Jews has many adherents. These elite Jews would sacrifice the small Jew just like the elite white would sacrifice the common white.

          • Enticer26

            “These elite Jews would sacrifice the small Jew just like the elite white would sacrifice the common white.”

            Not exactly. The elite Jews would sacrifice the small Jew for world dominion while the elite White would sacrifice the common White for financial security. Without elite Jews influence over elite Whites, elite Whites would have no incentive for sacrificing common Whites and elite Jewish conquest for world dominion would fall like dominoes.

            Suggested viewing…Synagogue of Satan full Documentary by A.C. Hitchcock…1876–2006…5hrs and 30 minutes–Youtube.

        • Alexandra1973

          While I believe there is a conspiracy, I believe any Jews involved are more puppets than puppeteers. The late Chicago-based judge-buster Sherman Skolnick described them as “papal court Jews.”

          They’re selling out to the detriment of their own people from where I sit.

    • Irish

      When you say “Europe will save itself” , do you mean Europe will eventually cut off immigration?
      Or do you mean the mother continent will start deporting those immigrants who are not her children..Without the later our homeland (as we are) is doomed in time.

    • Peters

      White Europe will go the way Greece did. Perhaps you are aware that at some point long ago the Greeks were Da Man. They were a real competition to, arguably more powerful than the Jews. And look at the “Greeks” now. The country is a joke, and after all interbreeding it is unlikely any original greek genes can be found in this Turkish-African mix that keeps calling themselves Greeks.

      The same will happen to Denmark. The adminstrative unit called Denmark will remain, but the people that will call themselves Danes in 2100 will be dark and brown-eyed. It may take a little longer than in the US, but Europe as a continent is lost for White people.

      • Ella

        In the US, white people in smaller cities or towns do not recognize the current take-over of Southwestern States by many brown, sometimes hostile, peoples as whites isolate behind their own doors of out of cowardice and denial. One-half of US is already lost to nonwhites as many government systems and monies cater to them.

  • RebelliousTreecko

    What was that again about “being on the wrong side of history?”

  • james AZ

    Europaistan

  • DaveMed

    This article is so full of absurdities that, if I didn’t know anti-Whites better, I would think it was parody.

    Here in the U.S., it’s hard to imagine that Europe could go back to its old muscular and expansive ways.
    ____________________________________________________________________
    Oh, no! They’re becoming muthcular again! Eek!!!

    This pattern is expected to continue through 2030, when Muslims are projected to make up 8 percent of Europe’s population.”
    ____________________________________________________________________
    He says this like it’s no problem. Like it’s something that we should relish. Really? Has he read any headlines recently?

    We say: Kick the criminals, the jihadists, the illegal migrants out,’ he told the entirely Caucasian audience to rapturous applause.”
    ___________________________________________________________________
    There is literally not a single word here that any sane person could find objectionable. Unfortunately (for him), he unwittingly reveals the fact that Caucasians are the only people in Europe who care about law and order.

    But it reflects a sweeping shift in Europe away from the bland, safe ideology of post-Cold War officialdom, and toward something much more assertive and proud.
    __________________________________________________________________
    Again – only an anti-White could be loopy enough to consider “assertive and proud” to be negative adjectives.
    Also… aren’t they always calling upon people of color to adopt these characteristics (as if they don’t already have them)?

    • tetrapod

      This article is almost too good at portraying the progressive inversion of reality. What a waste of a good parody.

      • propagandaoftruth

        Progressivism – our version of Marxism-Leninism.

    • tetrapod

      Is it possible this article is actually a subterfuge? The author succinctly touches on growing Eurocentrism, white ethnic pride, baleful demographics, dismal white birth rate, and our survival being at stake. These simply must resonate favorably with common white people. Yes, he casts these notions as evil, yet he’s presenting them within a mainstream forum nevertheless, getting them “out there” so to speak. Given the current climate, how else could he? Maybe the whole thing is dripping with irony.

      Just a thought.

      • DaveMed

        Unlikely, but anything is possible, of course.

        The notion may be our best tactic for getting our ideas into the marketplace.

        • tetrapod

          Agreed. Not likely, but the tactic itself could be effective. Maybe the excessive power of certain groups could be highlighted in the public dialogue by singing their praises just short of obvious parody.

          For example: X are such a magnificent people. Look at their wealth and power. Look at their influence in education, finance, media, and government (“all of it good, by the way”). Yet they only make up a tiny fraction of the population! We should be greatful that such intelligent, resourceful people make so many decisions for us. What would we do without X. They are truly amazing.

  • Red

    Seeing politicians open the door to the return of history’s most frightening prejudices makes Americans not just queasy but angry.

    Not angry, but excited!

    We have a hard enough time tolerating the persistence of Confederate memory here at home. What could be more offensive and unnerving than seeing the Old World half of Western democracies slip back into the ancient pattern of demographic expansionism?

    If it makes you feel any better, Mr. Poulos, this old Confederate descendant will happily go over there and help them out if they do slip back into that pattern.

    I guess the author doesn’t mind when ‘demographic expansionism’ come at the expense of Western Civilization.

    • listenupbub

      Count me in, too!

      If some Americans like us bring a hopeful, can-do attitude, we could really revamp Europe.

    • John Smith

      White Americans may find that the “old country” is the new promised land after we implode in an orgy of multiculturalism and diversity.

  • This fool can’t figure out whether he’s more offended that Europe has welfare states that sometimes benefits its native born white population or if white people in Europe might actually start thinking of themselves as white people with race-based interests.

    Another annoying thing about this missive is that he presumes that: (1) Europe is an American colony, and (2) All Americans are anxious about growing ethnonationalism in Europe.

    • Sparky

      Agree, but what I find shocking is his complete lack of racial consciousness and inability to grasp the situation. Europe is the ancestral home of white people. Not Africans, Orientals, nor the sand-dwelling Arabs. Europe is being colonized by Third World aliens and whites are supposed to quietly fade away, handing over their nations without a whimper? The man is insane.

      • Cecil Broomsted

        Quite obviously insane. This man, brainwashed and stripped of any racial identity, is in for a rude awakening if he supposes that whites will continue their sleep-walking forever. As we continue down this darkening path of racial suicide, more whites will awaken. And it will necessarily begin in Europe where the smaller geographic boundaries greatly intensify the effects of diversity.

        • tetrapod

          Maybe the limp-wristed Mr. Poulos is excited by the swelling numbers of all those swarthy muzzies, and the firm growth rate in members of the African community.

  • Jason Lewis

    “and the American people would never accept such a deeply uncharacteristic mission even if we could.”
    Wrong.

  • baldowl

    This great fear that whites will take pride in their race and cultures, that in doing so they’ll put the welfare of their own above the welfare of non-whites–doesn’t it just smack of white supremacy?

    • DonReynolds

      Naaah…..it just makes whites exactly the same as every other ethnic population in the world……interested in their own survival and prosperity.

      • baldowl

        Sure, but when we do it everybody else loses their sh*t. Clearly, whites who are willing to be Whites are fearsome to other races.

        • The Dude

          That’s because the last time we did we pretty much took over the entire world.

        • george00

          Nonwhites know that getting help from Whites is a matter of life and death. When Whites hint at removing this help nonwhites naturally get nervous and scared.

  • DonReynolds

    Naaah……Americans won’t get queasy, or angry, or annoyed at a dash of white pride in European countries.
    (The author is apparently one of those ultra Leftist communists, who despise everything about the South……but bubba, you need to keep a sharp eye out. Your kind probably won’t last long.)
    Personally, I can hardly wait for the long retreat to end.
    Better to make stand than to retreat one more step.
    Surprise them.

  • Steve_in_Vermont

    In summary: Muslim pride good. White pride bad. Got it.

    • John Smith

      This magazine is published by leftists and the editor is a Muslim-convert and apologist/propagandist.

  • Bossman

    Europeans should get assertive and work to preserve their ethnic identity. If not, they will drown in an Islamic and Afro-Asian tidal wave.

    • And maybe also an Indio-Hispanic tidal wave.

    • USofAntiWhite

      A third-world horde of cultural darkness and ineptitude, yes.

  • Dutch party chief Geert Wilders captured the mood. “‘Just like you, we don’t want foreigners to tell us they are masters in our country. We say: Kick the criminals, the jihadists, the illegal migrants out,’ he told the entirely Caucasian audience to rapturous applause.”

    best news I’ve in a long time, bald owl is spot on, beta male is the best description here.

    • USofAntiWhite

      What is disturbing about the self loathing author is that he thinks what Wilders said is in the least bit controversial. He needs to be made to answer what part of that was nefarious, as he disingenuously suggests.

  • wildfirexx

    Does PCorrect James Poulos think that only indigenous europeans are not worthy of their historical roots, and ethnic pride, while all other races and cultures are encourged to celebrate theirs?
    Hogwash!
    Why the Double Standard ?
    The european’s first people (where ever they live) have every right to protect and perserve their heritage and racial and cultural idenity, just like everyone else.

  • Biff_Maliboo

    “Highly unsettling form of white pride” a/k/a any form of white pride.

  • BTW, this very same publication, The Week, (should that be The Weak?), has all but endorsed Marco Rubio for President.

    • John Smith

      It was founded by a leftist environmentalist in the UK, is now owned by a environmental charity he set up and the US edition is edited by a leftist Muslim convert who has produced numerous PBS documentaries about Islam and Mohammed. Wonder why they’d be so opposed to white Europeans boosting their demographic replacement rate and embracing pride in their heritage?

      • The Dude

        Jesus Christ. I hope it goes under and quick. They’re not getting a single click from me, let alone a physical purchase of any of their foul issues.

        • John Smith

          Their Aussie edition flopped in 2012.

          • The Dude

            Hopefully the first domino.

  • superlloyd

    ”But regardless of that important silver lining, it’s going to get scary for us to watch the world’s longest-running white societies get more prideful, assertive, and, from our standpoint, statist.”
    Don’t wet your pants you weenie, self hating, white libtard idiot. Europe doesn’t need your concern or opinion neither does the US for which, by the way, you do not speak.

  • listenupbub

    This article has made my week. I am excited for the opportunity of a true renaissance in European culture. I will definitely move to Europe if it happens in my lifetime.

    I had been considering Russia, but I do not exactly like the idea of spending 1200 hours learning the world’s hardest language and freezing my butt off.

    • belajadevotchka2

      Рrivyet! Definitely consider Russia. My husband is from Russia and we spend a good bit of time there. It isn’t as scary as you would think. Learn the Cyrillic alphabet. It is very simple as it is phonetic. The way you say a letter is the sound it makes. All it reading is really, is spelling very fast! Once you learn the alphabet and you see how easy that is, it gives you a lot of confidence and learning Russian becomes much easier.
      Also, Russians in the US speak broken English and do not mind if you go to Russia and speak broken Russian. They are very warm people and are very impressed that you speak a bit of conversational Russian. Even if you start out by learning only one case, they will understand you enough and they love it and the positively beam when Americans speak even terrible Russian! You will catch on and quickly learn the cases and grammer. You will get those A-HA moments when the rules start to make sense and things fall into place! As long as you are of White DNA and you know the rules and the norms you will be fine. And don’t let the weather scare you. A lot of areas aren’t any different in climate than Wisconsin! We’re from Tomsk, which is the bullseye center of Siberia. We are hoping more American Whites will make the move to the Near East with us. Also, there is a decent sized ex-pat community in Novosibirsk. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions! Anyone!

      • ShermanTMcCoy

        Seriously considering it, depending upon how things develop here in Germany. The Swabians are pretty conservative, like the Bavarians. Lot’s of white pride in the Eastern part of the country, too. Still, if we’re overrun, my kids speak Russian as well as they do German and English. . .

      • Diversity Heretic

        Do you have any thoughts about retirement in the Crimea or elsewhere in the Black Sea region of Russia? My wife and I will be moving in about three years (we presently live in Europe). We have been considering Portugal for the low cost of living, mild climate and limited taxation of retiree benefits. But Russia is attractive because the people retain some sense of racial and ethnic pride. But the climate is a drawback for an older couple; I grew up in Iowa and lived in Vermont before moving to Europe, and really want to avoid cold, snowy winters. I speak English, French and some German, so learning broken Russian isn’t impossible. My wife already speaks some Russian. Do you have any insight to share?

        • belajadevotchka2

          Actually, if you are looking to the Black Sea, I would avoid Crimea for the time being. There is much more upheaval than what we see on Western news. One place you may want to check out is Varna, Bulgaria. The winters are much milder, and, although a lot of the coast has been recently developed for tourists, the cost of living is still quite low. Mostly the tourists are Germans. I have friends there who rent out their sea front flats that I can perhaps put you in touch with. Bulgaria feels more Mediterranian than Eastern Europe, and Varna is touristy an relies on tourist dollars so they keep the gypsy contingency controlled. Bulgarian authorities don’t seem to have the term “racist” in their vocabs!

          • Diversity Heretic

            Thank you for your helpful information. We will keep Bulgaria in mind as we look for a retirement location.

          • belajadevotchka2

            Varna, specifically. It’s on the Black Sea and definitely fits with your mentioned lifestyle quite nicely. The rest of Bulgaria isn’t as nice or easy to live in. Also, if you are American or speak fluent English, it’s very easy to find easy, part time work for some supplemental income at the retail shops the tourists frequent.

          • Diversity Heretic

            Thank you again. Varna it shall be. Although I knew someone who visited Bulgaria regularly, evaluating surplus Bulgarian military firearms (for reconfiguration and sale in the U.S.). He was back in the mountains where the guns were stored and he rather liked Bulgaria. He preferred it to Romania and said that the topography reminded him of his native Vermont.

          • belajadevotchka2

            Bulgarian made Kalashnikovs are said to be the best. Yes, Bulgaria has it’s charm- Sophia is a wonderful city, the living in Bulgaria is dirt cheap and the country is covered in roses and sunflower fields but I think as far as retirement and a milder climate, Varna is a winner. Bulgaria is a fairly poor country with a sad economy but Varna has a big tourism trade so isn’t nearly as depressed and “2nd world”- more people will know English, a little more Western, culturally. Romania can be a wonderful place if you have good finances. Other than a poor ecomony, the only bad thing about those countries is the “cygani”- gypsies. Lots of horrid gypsies in Bulgaria and Romania, but as Varna relies heavily on keeping tourists safe and happy, they doo a pretty good job keepibg the gypsies in check there.

        • ML

          Advice from a total stranger: Black Sea coast is like Miami for Russians who don’t just move to Miami. A lot of sleazy types; not the warm, family-oriented Russians mentioned above. They go there to show off their wealth and bang tarts. In consequence, you won’t find much of this “racial and ethnic pride”.
          Bulgaria has those cheap properties, but those towns can range from (I guess) 10% to 60% gypsy.

          Put yourselves first. Portugal sounds like a great place to retire.

          • Diversity Heretic

            Thank you for your comment. My biggest concern about Portugal is its proximity to North Africa. Watching what’s going on in the Mediterranean and Italy is scary. I just don’t want to close on a house or an apartment in Portugal and fifteen minutes later find out that it’s the new destination of preference for the Arab and sub-Saharan African “migrants.”

          • silviosilver

            I’ve never heard of a Bulgarian town that’s 60% gypo, certainly not along the coast – and I’ve driven up and down it.

      • listenupbub

        That sounds great. I will keep this in mind.
        I am definitely visiting Russia in the next few years. If I can make money, I will try to get some kind of property in Russia. If I cannot find satisfaction in America in 10 years, I will move there for sure, and maybe teach English and some classes in my field at a university. (Russian universities are absolutely amazing!).

        I really do not fit in America. In my last year of college, my RA requested disciplinary measures for me because I suggested that guys should not marry/accept women as wives if they have been pornstars. I am not exaggerating one bit. The conversation was brought up because one of the girls at the school became a pornstar on RealityKings. This country is insane.

        • belajadevotchka2

          I know all about Russian universities- hubby has mechanical and electrical engineering degrees from Tomsk Polytechnic. This univ makes our MIT look like highschool. It’s one of the most respected tech univs in the world. And as you probably already know, they don’t preach social marxism in Russian schools. I suppose they are too busy learning math, physics, etc.
          as far as buying property over there, a lot of people are selling their dacha and more times than not, they have spent summers building little summer houses, running electricity and plumbing to them. My mother in law just sold their dacha to friends for a chunk of cash. It had a small (to us) 3 br house with all necessary amenities and a huge garden and potato patch. The areas where dachas are is usually a few miles outside of the cities. You can also find the traditional Soviet era Bauhaus style apts for sale but they are usually a lot more expensive. Finding a dacha for sale is definitely the way to go, IMO. If you need any advice or opinion, you can email me anytime. I am also on google+ under the same username!

      • golgisupreme

        The noun cases came easier once I started thinking of the nouns as how it’s used, instead of always in the nominative case. Basically, considering a noun being completely separate in meaning between it’s cases. The double negatives came much easier, since I do the same in English!

  • LHathaway

    “What could be more offensive and unnerving than seeing the Old World half of Western democracies slip back into the ancient pattern of demographic expansionism”?

    So, in an article about Muslims and non-whites settling into Europe, and doing so in increasing numbers, and having higher birthrates than whites there, what is offensive to author, no, the author is saying Nothing could be more offensive to her than the idea of Whites may start up demographic expansion?

    As is typical in our completely inverted society, she does unearths an important point. One that should rile up fear-mongers everywhere. What they should be riled up about is non-white demographic expansion. It’s not a myth or fairy tale.

    • connorhus

      Ya I thought that was funny too. It’s A-OK with these Self Hating Whites to celebrate Black and Brown expansionism while they condemn the so called bad old days of White expansion, most of which is only a figment of their own imaginations.

      Hypocritical much? Of course we already know they are.

    • The Dude

      That’s how afraid these far-leftist types are of whites having children at replacement level. If only.

  • Foolish Pride

    I love how his main concern is statism. For all his cries of “I’m antiracist” it all boils down to this silly “I hate the gubernmint” style libertarianism/conservatism as his primary motivation.

    • The Dude

      That seems to be his second main concern. His main concern seems to be by far white folks having kids.

      His vampire’s cross…

      • Rob

        Nice family.

        • The Dude

          It sure is. Got it from a Mormon website (surprise, surprise). I don’t care much about their religion, but they seem to be the only whites in America today that still commonly produce such fruitful families.

          Look at this! Six kids and probably counting. Such youthfulness, such vigor. That’s what an expansive population looks like. That’s what much of the Third World has and we don’t.

          • Rob

            Who cares what their religion si as long as they are white and not muslim.

          • ShermanTMcCoy

            Damned straight. I don’t care if they’re atheist or anything else, so long as they are not obnoxious about it.

      • Lion’s Mane

        A beautiful family. It’s heart-warming to see this photo — especially since Whites are an endangered species.

  • Deacon Blue

    Why is it OK if not acceptable for Blacks like Robert Mugabe in Zimbabwe to spout
    pure anti-White hate and preach “Black Pride” yet those in Europe why are White
    are never allowed the same, equal treatment without being excoriated at “racist”
    by the press?

    • Jason Lewis

      Rhetorical?

    • LIBERTYSINCURSION

      Because from here on out, the British, Scotts and Irish are forbidden to be the British, Scotts and Irish. The French are forbidden to be the French. The Germans will no longer be permitted to be the Germans. Italy will no longer be for the Italians who built it, and so on and so forth all through Europe. And America, well America is for everyone,,,, except the White population who built it of course. The question is, who is it that declared that our countries and especially Nations are no longer permitted to be our countries and our Nations? Who declared that from here on out, we will be diversified? < And don't say the jews. While they're certainly not gleaming symbols and advocates of Nationhood for all. It's much more complicated, treacherous and treasonous than that. )

      • Deacon Blue

        Agreed.

    • Usually Much Calmer

      Because everyone thinks Mugabe is a joke, though they probably won’t even articulate that in their heads. That is, everyone in America and Europe who has no experience with just how unfunny black violence is.

  • tetrapod

    “One path to Europe’s troubling welcome destination is already being carved out by Europe’s far-right parties, many of which are implicitly or explicitly ethnocentric.”

    “… Any European political organization that intentionally evokes fascism is certain to set off the racism alarm, among fellow Europeans the chosen ones most of all…”

    “…From an American anti-white, racist standpoint, it’s a spectacle of European governments and nongovernmental organizations working together to encourage white Europeans to be fruitful and multiply. After all, they’re the ones who need the motivation. In countries like Britain, immigrant birth rates have been the only a demographic bright spot disaster…”.

    “…Seeing politicians open the door to the return of history’s most frightening understandable prejudices makes white Americans not just queasy but angryoptimistic….

    “We have a hard enough time tolerating maintaining the persistence of Confederate memory here at home…”

    “…Europe will very probably finally rediscover Eurocentrism–not just as an abstract idea, but as an imperative for survival…”

    “…it’s going to get scary for inspire us to watch the world’s longest-running white societies get more prideful, assertive …”

    • LHathaway

      Wonderful re-write. It’s times like this I wonder whatever became of the amazing ‘John PM’ who used to post here.

      • I miss Spartacus.

        • LHathaway

          Oh, John PM became Spartacus?

        • Exuberant Auditor

          I don’t. But you can still come across his recent posts in other conservative sites and forums.

  • Irish

    I’m a Eurocentris…

    • LIBERTYSINCURSION

      Fancy that, I too am a Eurocentrist.

  • JohnEngelman

    It should come as a surprise to no one that as the cost of Islamic immigration rises, so does the backlash against that immigration.

  • Can you taste this pathetic loser’s panic and fear? It is delicious. I mean just look at this guy:

    • a1781054

      Where is the photo attachment?

    • Cindy

      Typical self-loathing beta male.
      Lives in Los Angeles, which serves as a nice echo chamber, I’m sure.

    • The Dude

      The sad thing is that there isn’t much to fear or panic about — the white fertility rates are still morbidly sagging, and the nationalist parties can’t seem to take the reins of power despite growing popularity. The white pride just isn’t there. He’s not fearing, he’s fear-mongering.

      • Diversity Heretic

        I am also sadly forced to agree with you. While the ethno-nationalist parties can become a political force, their chances of gaining control of even one European government are actually quite slim. Moreover, as Patrick Buchanan has pointed out on numerous occasions, it really doesn’t help much to gain political power if the dominant culture remains opposed to your views (e.g., Reagan’s attempts to change course in the 1980s). There may, however, be some hope in the east–the French National Front has been exploring cooperation with Russia. And there is the possibility of existing European nations breaking down into autonomous regions, some (but only some) of which may be more ethno-nationalist than existing states.

      • I disagree completely. In fact I would argue that the anti-white governments so oppressing us today simply won’t exist a decade from now. We are on the verge of a sea change.

    • antiquesunlight

      He should sue his barber.

    • Rob

      He looks gay.

      • anony

        He looks homosexual to me.

        • AFlaVet

          And very unhappy that way too.

  • The Dude

    Why does he keep saying “we Americans”? Speak for yourself, freak!

  • John Smith

    White people, a minority on the planet, can’t be allowed to develop their own pride and ensure their own survival against hostile, prolific non-white immigrants? SMH.

    • anony

      Pointing out just how small a minority in the world is a powerful fact for people to ponder. Most people don’t believe it when first told, but later when they have verified it, they are amazed.

      I’ve used that point to “awaken” a few.

  • antiquesunlight

    If white people like their cultures, people, and nations, they’re Nazis. The only way white people can’t be Nazis is if they agree to let as many incompatible weirdoes live with them as possible.

    Why don’t more people see through this garbage? It’s stupid.

  • Mentious

    Yea, it’s ok with this goomba for all other peoples to demographically expand, even into our own lands to our demographic demise. But Whites can’t even stand their ground and live.

    Why do I hear the sounds of lisping and hissing when I read his weird ga–age.

    • bv

      He’s not Sicilian he’s Greek so use Uni-Brow Yanni or Zorba.

      • LexiconD1

        He may be Lithuanian. Lots of them have Greek names.

        Being half Greek, I don’t want to claim him.

        • bv

          Greek sounding names.

  • Lion’s Mane

    Oh, how “shocking” the news! There exist some White people who actually want to survive and have a ethnic and national future! How dreadful! The world must be coming to an end! (LOL!)

    The anti-racists hate Whites so much. Anti-racists desire nothing less than the genocide of Whites and are very miserable when Whites object to this evil. The mystery — to me at least — is how anyone could ever think that the genocide of any people could ever be a good thing. THAT is the “unsettling” thing in all this.

    • LIBERTYSINCURSION

      “how anyone could ever think that the genocide of any people could ever be a good thing” – Especially of the group of people responsible for most of the worlds critically important innovations.

  • David Ashton

    European governments promoting European reproduction? Not yet.

    This article’s promotion of white deconstruction needs to be deconstructed in turn; it is almost a classic exhibit.

  • Weisheit77

    I’m commenting from Germany now. Europe is far from gone. I hate typing on a handy so imho the EU has to fail before they flood Europe. Europe can not absorb Africa’s problems. That would be killing the golden goose.

    • AFlaVet

      What you need is to recall some revisionist history .

  • Snazzy Snook

    Oh my God, can you imagine ?

  • Michael North

    This author perfectly demonstrates the liberal blend of folksy chat (to show he’s down with the thickies) with long words (to show he’s clever, really).
    The patronising managerial-progressive to a T.

  • MekongDelta69

    Muslim pride – GOOD.

    Black pride – GOOD.

    Brown pride – GOOD.

    White pride – BAD, EVIL, TERRIBLE, DESPICABLE, HORRIBLE.

    Oh brother…

  • puffdaddy

    What a joke – it is multiculturalism and “diversity” that results in the Iron Hand of the State!

  • hastings88

    What a ditsy leftist this Poulos is. His “logic” is all over the place, like a feminist. He is afraid of Europeans awakening? He finds immigrant fecundity to be a demographic “bright spot”? What a fool.

  • gooberboy9999

    Yes, I imagine it will be somewhat scary for the various race traitors and leftist who are currently attempting to ruin America.

    I also imagine their fear when it happens here as well will greatly eclipse that.

  • AFlaVet

    A tad Gay?

  • Paleoconn

    Black pride = to be celebrated.
    White pride = an evil to be snuffed out.

    Only it can’t be snuffed out. The harder they try, the uglier things will be when the Saxon learns to hate.