The Birth of Three Nations

Fred Reed, Fred on Everything, January 13, 2015

Regarding the unsurprising slaughter in Paris:

Diversity is a disaster. Why people cannot see this is a mystery. A country can ignore an unfortunate reality, but it cannot ignore the consequences of ignoring it. Why governments allow and even encourage immigration of incompatible populations is a greater mystery. Few things cause more misery, hatred, death, and destruction than does diversity. One may wish it were not so, but it is so.

Some examples of diversity: Chechens and Russians. Irish Catholics and Irish Protestants. Tamils and Sinhalese. French and Moslems. Dutch and Moslems. Swedes and Moslems. Germans and Moslems. Turks and Armenians. Whites and blacks in South African. Ugandans and Indians. Cambodians and Vietnamese. Blacks, whites, and browns in the United States. Jews and Germans. Jews and the rest almost everywhere. Hindus and Moslems. Sunnis and Shias. Turks and Kurds. Tutsis and Hutus. Moslems and Israelis in Palestine.

Note that most of these have caused horrendous bloodshed. Diversity doesn’t work, as a rule catastrophically. Why would any country deliberately seek more of it?

If you point this out, the responses are automatic. “I know some really nice Mexicans/blacks/Moslems etc.” Or “Most Catholics/Protestants/Hindus aren’t terrorists.” True, well, and good. And irrelevant. There were really nice Germans and Jews in the Third Reich. How much did that help?

As a species we do not like diversity, though we may think that we should. People want to be with others like themselves. Difference breeds suspicion, friction arises,and the depraved or disagreeable nature of the other group is blamed.

Distaste for diversity of almost any kind runs through societies. Liberals associate chiefly with liberals, conservatives with conservatives, military people with military people, the rich with the rich, the highly intelligent with the highly intelligent, the young with the young. We may tolerate others if the distinctions are not too great, or if we are not forced into excessive contact. For example, while the Chinese in America are superficially very different from Euro-Americans, they are quiet, courteous, law-abiding, and studious, so little antagonism occurs. But the potential is there, as when they greatly outperform whites academically.

Men of all groups object to marriage of their women to other groups. The women are somewhat less clannish, more willing to marry out-of-group. This can cause bloodshed.

The tendency to drift into antagonism goes far beyond the rational–which just makes it intractable. For example, tens of millions of Hispanics live in the US and clearly are going to stay. Would not American patriots (patriotism being another form of the pack instinct) want them to prove smart, industrious, and eventually good and prosperous citizens?  No. If I suggest that Hispanics may not be as awful as hoped, I get furious email (all from men: this too is built-in) insisting that Latinos are, are, are irremediably stupid, criminal, shiftless, hopeless, shriek. That is, distaste for diversity outweighs self-interest.

Examples of such tribalism as an inbred trait abound. Countless Americans loathe the French, without having been to France, speaking a word of French, or having met a Frenchman. The sophisticated detest “rednecks,” largely with no reason that makes sense. Hatred of Jews exceeds by far any harm thought to be caused by Jews. Northerners dislike Southerners. Lesbians detest men. Heterosexual men dislike the company of homosexuals.

Proponents of genetic determinism sometimes try to make these automatic hostilities the result of some evolutionary strategy to maintain the purity of one’s gene pool, but of course it is not. Many groups that dislike each other are genetically indistinguishable.

Those among us who prefer hope to observation invariably insist that dislike springs from some defect in the character of those doing the disliking. If only those awful bigots would learn tolerance. If only we indoctrinated children enough in the schools, surely . . . . If only we made enough laws, or prosecuted hate crimes, or showed enough harmonious togetherness in movies, surely . . . .

In support of this delusion, they often point out that the Irish and Italians no longer suffer discrimination in America. See? Diversity is no problem. Yet this was not a triumph of toleration, but of assimilation: they stopped being  Irish and Italian, and assimilated to the dominant culture.

But assimilation becomes less likely and more difficult as the numbers and concentration of a group increase. Immigrants in small numbers, especially if dispersed, have to live in accord with the dominant culture. They will be seen as interesting rather than as invaders. Nobody hated Mexicans when they were few.

Diversity runs contrary to our instincts, but is usually described as a conflict between niceness and not-niceness. One hears, “But there are no evil cultures. They are just different.” If a culture that practices forcible genital mutilation of girls is not evil, sez me, it will do until evil comes along. But, my prejudices aside, it is true that most cultures are in themselves friendly and pleasant. It just doesn’t make any difference. Usually it is not the nature of the cultures that causes trouble, but the attempt to mix them. This happens even when differences are small. During World War Two, for example, the British became thoroughly sick of American GIs. (“They are overpaid, oversexed, and over here.”)

In America today we see huge homogeneous pools of Negro and Hispanic population and culture. Tthe inhabitants of the massive black ghettoes have virtually no exposure to white America except via television, which means that assimilation is not going to happen. Further, as usually occurs with dense concentrations of a culture, they do not want to assimilate. They have their own music, modes of dress, variant of English, and non-standard names intended to emphasize their distance from whites.

The same to a lesser degree is true of Hispanics. It is also true of American expats, who tend to clump together and have no desire for assimilation. Human nature is human nature.

Aggravating the problem is that the United States no longer has a dominant culture, or at any rate no culture willing to be dominant. This has proved to be a recipe for unending and apparently unendable confrontation with blacks.

Will Hispanics follow the same pattern? They may well. Their numbers and concentration are great enough, they begin to have real political power, and will eventually have a voting majority in the Southwest. They know they are disliked by much of America. Hispanics are more assimilable than blacks; the question is whether they are assimilable enough. If the almost invisible differences between two flavors or Christianity or of Islam can lead to warfare, so may those between Latino and white. And trouble already brews between black and brown.

Diversity. It offers to divide America into three countries, self-aware and, may God preserve us, mutually hostile. We can talk forever about what ought to be. We can leap from a tall building, insisting that we are birds. Yet we live in what is. We are not birds. Reality eventually takes hold. Aye, there’s the rub.

Topics: ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • MekongDelta69

    I’m glad he wrote the article (as I am most – but not all of his articles), but what a pathetic world we live in, where the inanely obvious has to be stated, to anyone who has an IQ of a frozen meat locker.

    • David Ashton

      Trouble is, our WORST enemies are not stupid.

      • Sue

        And they’re ancient old twists too!

        • David Ashton

          Is this an allusion to that well-known Koranic sura – Isaiah 60.12? If so, your comment will be “blotted out” by the Moderator.

    • Mack0

      Multiculturalism and diversity advocates are poor Tantalus.

      • Rhialto

        Before I put my computer glasses on, I thought you wrote “Tarantulas”. That would have been appropriate; the Liberals who who promote “multiculturalism and diversity” are like spiders* in their attitude toward the normal White population.

        *Apologies to arachnophiles.

        • Yancy Derringer

          No prob.

    • pcmustgo

      Most DUMB whites, white liberals, think Diversity is working because they have that one Black and Asian friend… out of like 200 of their facebook friends. This is diversity for most whites.

      • Charles Martel

        And that one black friend is thoroughly despised by other blacks for it!

        • ElComadreja

          I’ve seen that situation a few times. The black invariably succumbs to peer pressure and starts acting like a “negro”.

      • WR_the_realist

        I know some decent black people and some decent Mestizos. But I also know what my country will be like when it is one third black and one third Mestizo. It won’t be pretty.

        • RonanTheLibtardian

          50 Balkan states would be preferred.

    • Chris

      Sometimes the first duty of intelligent men is the restatement of the obvious.

      George Orwell

  • Dave4088

    Birds of a feather flock together and every man loves a man like himself. Fred forgets to mention that racial diversity is only being forced on the white West and nobody else and certainly not Israel who is busy expelling their Africans as of this writing.

    The promotion of racial diversity and multiculturalism is just a form of unconventional warfare being waged against whites by “their” own governments who mostly cater to alien racial interests at the expense of their historic and traditional majorities.

    • David Ashton

      Two useful books on how it happened in “education” & “immigration” – John Ellis, “Literature Lost” (1999) & Byron Roth “Perils of Diversity” (2010).

      • silviosilver

        Literature Lost is excellent: a brief but cogent and wide-ranging demolition of cultural lunatic leftism.

        • David Ashton

          John Engelman should read it, rather than ask anyone to summarize the contents.

          • silviosilver

            I think Engelman would struggle with Literature Lost. Even though Ellis claims to be an anti-racist (in the naive sense, I’m sure he is), his work can very straightforwardly be put to use to attack the anti-white status quo. And since he writes with such clarity Engelman’s obfuscations would have a very hard time of it.

            That said, Engelman isn’t being unreasonable (for once!) in asking people to summarize books since “you need to read Author X” is too often used to wriggle out of the requirement to defend one’s position.

          • David Ashton

            I do not wish to “pick on” Dear John particularly, but he has been unduly skeptical of the evidence of international “race-gender-class” subversion of academia, its organization, influence and damage. His importance here is shown by his AmRen articles as well as repetitive and subjective posts.

          • stewball

            Poor John.

    • pcmustgo

      Yeah, too bad it’s super hard for me to find race realist friends in NYC.

      • ElComadreja

        They’re out there but afraid to open their mouths. Boston is no different.

        • pcmustgo

          really, I heard Boston is “really racist” and segregated in an open way. Yes, I have some apolitical, neutral friends who aren’t into PC and are politically incorrect somewhat. But it’s hard…

          • ElComadreja

            Whites, blacks and mestizos really have no use for each other here but most will play the game in work or other public situations. The whites that socialize with either group are considered white trash by most.

    • RonanTheLibtardian

      Peter Brimelow’s ‘minority occupation government’.

    • pcmustgo

      LIBERALS AND CONSERVATVES *HATE EACH OTHER IN AMERICA…. with most of the hate and intolerance coming from Liberals.

    • stewball

      They’re not our Africans. They’re illegals. Don’t you wish i could get rid of your illegals?

  • TruthBeTold

    Diversity is the source of conflict, resentment, animosity, and ultimately outright violence.

    • David Ashton

      Suits the revolutionary left, ever present and ever coddled by the “liberal” media.

    • Wherever diversity reigns, ethnic conflict occurs.

      Thus the liberal narrative comes crashing down.

      • Jim Kental

        I partly agree. I grew up in New York City and have observed one salient truth: In my time as a student and teacher I’ve noticed that whites and Asians usually perform well (or at least cooperate and pass). Blacks and Hispanics usually gel together and form their own underperforming sub-culture. Sad but true…… this is nature, not conditioning.

      • RonanTheLibtardian

        A parallel narrative never crashes. It continues to feed the anti-white flock.

    • anony

      One must conclude that this low level conflict is what the powers that be want.

      It’s a variation of Divide and Conquer.

    • Chasmania

      And yet progressives and unwitting stooges will with metronome like regularity spew out the phrase ” Diversity is our strength “.

      • daddio

        Like parrots

    • Ellis Kurtz

      Diversity is the source of conflict, resentment, animosity, and ultimately outright violence.

      Not invariably.
      1.Israel is a diverse society – around 21% of the population is Arab, mostly Muslim. But there are no attacks from this population on the Jews. There is friction from time-to-time, but it never gets out of hand.

      2. In the aftermath of the Paris killings, Benjamin Netanyahu told French Jews “The state of Israel is your home” etc, the implication being that they would be safer in Israel than in Europe. Think about this: Jews will be safer in a tiny middle eastern country surrounded by 100 million hostile Arabs than in an advanced European country with an anti-Semitic population of at most a few million, and probably much smaller.

      It is clear that the Jews in Israel are doing something that Europeans are not.

      • UncleSham

        Perhaps all those automatic weapons that the Israelis carry are a greater deterrent than peace marches and holding hands? I can’t say I expect Europeans to come to that conclusion anytime soon.

        • Ellis Kurtz

          I would say that it arises from the Jewish Israelis belief in themselves as a people. As a result, they desire their survival. As a result of this, they will take no stuff from minority populations. They don’t have to say this, it is understood. As a result, they get no stuff. If only we were the same.

          • Ellis Kurtz

            What i meant was

          • Ellis Kurtz

            I didn’t actually write “stuff”. What I wrote was changed by you know who (or what).

        • stewball

          Perhaps all those automatic weapons that the Israeli SOLDIERS carry!

      • stewball

        Looking after each other?

  • Capn Dad

    Hey birds of a feather right? I have always said that the best way to settle the race problems we have is to first admit that integration doesn’t work. Can’t be legislated, prayed for, adjudicated or bought. Can’t be forced and can’t be coerced. Diversity…….argument for a politician who doesn’t have anything else to offer.

  • ValKilmerBeforeHeGotFat

    The essay is fundamentally flawed in that is supposes a belief that diversity proponents are sincere about people getting along. They are not. Diversity advocatism is all about mischief, its about vote dilution, its about wealth distribution, its about harassment and accusation.

    • anony

      I think it’s about divide and conquer.

    • ejXinMI

      Did you mean “wealth confiscation”?

    • Valmont

      It’s also about the destruction of Western society’s traditions and institutions.

      • daddio

        Mostly this. The rest is gravy.

    • dean53

      It’s about genocide.

    • LHathaway

      Someone suggested it is about humiliation.

    • RonanTheLibtardian

      That’s why Obama likes the Latins so much. He’s not pro-Latin, he’s anti-White. Shakespeare’s ‘…strange bedfellows’. It’s the most epic gerrymandering campaign in human history.

  • Bryce Armstrong

    “Most cultures are in themselves friendly and pleasant”

    I defy anyone to site a single example where decency is allowed to exist other than Western Civilization.

    • a multiracial individual

      Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Barbados, Israel, etc.

      • Bryce Armstrong

        That whole WWII thing was pleasent and friendly wasn’t it?

        • Chasmania

          I can only assume you are talking of Japan, but you have to remember that prior to and AFTER the war, America and Japan have enjoyed rather close and good working relationships, nationally speaking.

          • DAWNOFNEWDAY

            FDR had pushed the Japanese into a war with us. He placed harsh sanctions on the Japanese people in the summer of 1941 which cut off about 80% of their income stream, and many of these private communications today between the US government and the Japanese government are hidden. There were warnings weeks in advance in many Hawaiin newspapers before the attack. FDR had to have known, just as he knew Stalin (who he supported and united with the fight the Germans) was a mass murderer who killed 15 million Ukrainaians by that time.

          • Chasmania

            Exactly. Painting Japan into a corner when they are already at war was either extremely naïve, or showed that FDR was itching for a war. You can always get things done during a war that you would never get by a peace time nation.

          • DAWNOFNEWDAY

            Neither Japan or Germany had EVER been aggressive towards the USA before WWII.

          • Charles Martel

            Maybe but that all changed on Dec 7, 1941 when the Japanese launched a sneak attack on Pearl Harbor and Germany declared war on the U.S.

          • LHathaway

            Muslim terrorist had NEVER struck the USA before 9/11.

          • Bryce Armstrong

            Yeah, out of the list they were the ones we were fighting wasn’t it? Why don’t you bring up that before the war they were always a warrior society with century’s of constant feudalism? Or after the war their society morphed into a pastiche of the United States?

          • Chasmania

            I’m not exactly sure what point you are trying to make, perhaps you just spell it out instead of asking questions that aren’t really MAKING the point clearly.

          • Bryce Armstrong

            Well, I’ll talk really slow the next time to make sure you can understand it.

          • Chasmania

            Okay, lets see if we can sort this out.

            1 You ask for examples of “decency” outside of western civilization

            2 Someone provides you with their opinion of at least 5.

            3 “That whole WWII thing was pleasent and friendly wasn’t it?

            ” – as if that refutes all the examples, let alone Japan.

            4 I make the ‘mistake’ of pointing out to you that Japan enjoyed a cordial relationship with the US before and after the war…

            5 You then ask me why I didn’t point out that Japan was a “warrior” society for many centuries, and that they emulated many aspects of American society, post WW2. ( Care to explain how that was MY job ? )

            6 I ask for clarification and you proceed with not providing any. ( Leaving me to wonder if you are sleep deprived or somehow impaired )

            …Now, how about you go ahead and type real slow and make a frigging point ?

          • Bryce Armstrong

            You make more mistakes then that, don’t sell yourself short.

          • Chasmania

            Multiple chances to make yourself understood and you don’t. It’s official. You’re an idiot.

            Since you can’t or won’t make a point, I am done with you like the TP I use to wipe my ass. Revel in all your glory.

      • Sick of it

        The center of the international sex slave trade happens to be one of those countries.

      • newscomments70

        I know several whites who were mugged or physically attacked in Barbados. Barbados has a very high crime rate and is dangerous for whites.

        • ElComadreja

          Any Caribbean island is very dangerous for whites. Stray from the tourist areas at your own risk.

          • newscomments70

            I had good luck in Bermuda and Turcs and Caicos. I don’t go back though, why push my luck?

      • stewball

        Singapore

    • LHathaway

      You have this one backwards, brother. If you’re looking for true decency the last place you would look today would be Western civilization.

      • Bryce Armstrong

        I’m not you’re brother queer.

        • LHathaway

          I’m not sure whether to say, ‘you prove my point’ or ask if this can all be found in your new book ‘how to win friends and influence people’?

  • IstvanIN

    it is true that most cultures are in themselves friendly and pleasant. May be generally true of Christians, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists and even primitive tribesman but not muslims.

    • David Ashton

      Bedouin hospitality, but they don’t expect guests to insult hosts.

      I always think of the poor old missionary who was offered the wife of an Eskimo as a kind gesture. (I don’t suppose she looked like Megan Fox or Gemma Ward or Lily Travers or….)

    • ZB01

      With Islam, you hope for adherents who are actually less religious than other so-called “religious” people. The less religiously observant an Islamic person is, the more likely they are to be less unpleasant than they might be otherwise; even then, you still never really can know….they are still Islamic, after all.

      • pcmustgo

        I did once over-hear a Brazilian talking about how different India was from Egypt. In India everyone was poor but happy. In Egypt, everyone seemed angry and had a gun.

  • JohnEngelman

    If an aversion to people of other races and ethnicities is natural, I guess I was not born with the gene for ethnocentrism.

    • David Ashton

      Poor old John. Its me – me – me, as usual.

      • JohnEngelman

        Just because something is natural does not mean it is good. Criminal justice systems exist because many people have natural inclinations toward what is not good.

        • The Dude

          Except that, in this case, it’s both unnatural and pernicious. There is such a thing as too much diversity.

          • JohnEngelman

            Diversity should never be forced by affirmative action policies.

          • David Ashton

            The ruling powers would think you answered this point yourself just above.

        • Dan O’Connor

          Just because something that has been considered until recently in the West ( and all non Western countries ) as dangerous and fraught with obivous perils ( i.e. conceeding one’s lands and heritage to alien cultures and peoples ) has now been guilt indoctrinated into Whites
          ( and only Whites ) as ” good ” does not mean it is good.

          If the criminal justice system was meant to prevent natural inclinations and enforce good then it would outlaw third world race relacement of White people as ” not good ” , because it invites confict and suffering , and so is evil and genocide and a crime against humanity

          You see ? While your sociological lie can travel all the way around the world and back again , the truth has to expend far more effort unpacking and debunking your neuro-linguistic sentimentalised feel good clap trap

          • JohnEngelman

            I see no benefit in opening our doors to third world peoples, although there are some that I like.

            When I moved to the San Francisco Bay area I was fascinated by the racial and ethnic smorgasbord, even though I think some races are superior to others.

        • Hy Alldredge

          That’s funny, I always mention that when people say that homosexuality is natural. Anyway, if you bothered to actually read the article, you would realize that a) Fred wasn’t talking about a personal aversion and b) he isn’t assigning moral value to ethnocentrism, but pointing out that it’s inherent, universal, and in populations as a whole does not respond to retraining and social engineering. Therefore, forcing diversity on entire countries produces disasterous results.

          Perhaps you’d be in favor of a eugenics program where genetically gifted individuals such as yourself are allowed to breed while the racists are sterilized or eradicated. They managed to breed a domesticated fox in Russia – it might work in a few dozen generations. Might take a while to repopulate the world, though.

          • JohnEngelman

            If I was genetically gifted I would have achieved my goals in life. At the same time, I do not blame others for my failures.

        • David Ashton

          Missed my point.

          • JohnEngelman

            I made my point.

    • pcmustgo

      I wasn’t either. Until I had horrible experience after horrible experience after dissapointing experience in my overly diverse life in NYC. That’s the whole point. Lily white kids in the suburbs love Blacks and literally view Blacks as “poor Black people”. Poor, righteous, oppressed Black people. That’s how I viewed them and many I meet still do.

      • JohnEngelman

        Blacks are different. I have become disenchanted with them too.

        • MrGJG

          Yea…disenchanted.

          • JohnEngelman

            Even though I like some of them. Racial differences are significant, but they overlap.

      • Hy Alldredge

        I feel your pain. I’ve lived here 14 years. Somehow I manage to avoid lots of close encounters with black people aside from the feral hordes that pour out of a nearby high school every day at about 4:00. I’ve mostly lived in Dominican neighborhoods, though, and they are overtly racist and apparently don’t tolerate blacks hanging around. Still, I have always felt a sense of relief when I left town and traveled to lily white towns, like a sense that civilization has returned, even before I was racially aware.

        On another note, I grew up in Rochester NY and the blacks there seem MUCH worse. I’ve been forced to go to Harlem before and while unpleasant it’s not even close to black neighborhoods there. I was terrified of them growing up. Maybe it’s just as bad in the South Bronx and Brooklyn though I wouldn’t know.

        • pcmustgo

          Yes, I have heard Dominicans hate Blacks… were the Dominicans racist against whites too? I like leaving NYC to take in nature. It’s a relief in that sense. I live in a mostly white ethnic hood….

          • Hy Alldredge

            I’ve never had any issues with Dominicans. They’re don’t hate white people, but they are very insular. They think of Washington Heights/Inwood as belonging to them and often aren’t overly friendly to outsiders. Then again sometimes they are. It’s a mixed bag.

            Criminality is much less than blacks and mostly drug dealing. Washington heights is the cocaine distribution center for the Northeast which, I’ve read, is why the big time dealers don’t tolerate muggings and such because that would attract a police presence. My neighborhood had more street level dealers but I never had any problems besides funny looks. Then again, at the time my not-yet wife was friends with a local drug dealer, and apparently he spread the word to not f*ck with me at her request.

          • pcmustgo

            DOMINICANS ***************HATE BLACKS AND ARE NOTORIOUS FOR THIS… Most of this stems from them hating Haitians. That being said, Dominicans are part Black… they are usually even Blacker/darker than Puerto Ricans… tri-racials like Puerto Ricans, but just a bit darker on average. Most Dominicans are in denial that they are part Black, even with obvious Negroid features- they just hate Blacks that much. Dominicans and Puerto Ricans also have a feud going, mostly because Dominicans are more successful and open businesses and Puerto Ricans maybe emulated Blacks too much. I’ve known many Ricans that were friendly to whites and my best friend’s brother rented a room off a Dominican woman in Washington Heights for many years and she was nice to him, would cook for him. He, of course, preferred Washington Heights to East New York. It is quite obvious to me Hispanic/Puerto Rican/Dominican neighborhoods are “superior” to Black neighborhoods in terms of crime and having more businesses- of course more slummy than white hoods though. Blacks are incredibly jealous in NYC of other group’s neighborhoods… always whining, why do they have the nicer neighborhoods? There’s not enough Black people here! I was also surprised to learn more Latinos live in separate hoods than Blacks. Their alliance is much over-stated.

          • pcmustgo

            Oh, Dominican Hair Salons are considered the best for doing Black women’s hair, they are everywhere in NYC, in black hoods, and Black women are a bit jealous of these Dominican women taking over their hair care industry in that way.

          • pcmustgo

            Bushwick, Brooklyn is much nicer than Bed Stuy, and tons of whites have moved in. I eat at Dominican restaurants all the time and get no attitude.

          • pcmustgo

            Your wife is Latina or White or Asian? See, even “funny looks” are unacceptable to me. Do you mean hostile looks or looks of confusion?

          • Hy Alldredge

            My wife is white. I meant looks of confusion, or even amusement. Like “what’s he doing here?” No hostility though. That and the constant noise made it suck so I moved as soon as I could afford it.

        • pcmustgo

          Yes, Albany, NY is a serious hardcore ghetto compared to NYC ghettos…. money (perhaps drug money) seems to keep even ghetto people here new clothing. Real poverty seems to be outside NYC.

        • Nancy

          Man, the Dominicans should know better than anyone how miserable it is living near blacks. I often look at the map of the Western Hemisphere and marvel at how white liberals can make excuses for the reason why two distinct races on one tiny island can have two completely different socioeconomic conditions: the DR being a popular stop along Caribbean cruises, while Haiti is the poorest, crappiest nation on this half of the globe.

          • Hy Alldredge

            Ever see a satellite image of the Haiti/DR border? It’s a stunning visual example of how blacks plunder and destroy any environment they live in with no thought for the future. It worked in pre-colonial Africa because they could just pack up and move on to plunder another area while the one they left recovered. They are totally incompatible with modern civilization.

          • Nancy

            No, but the moment I read your post, I went straight to Google Earth to take a look.

            Scary, indeed.

    • anony

      Look around; clearly integration doesn’t work. We can all get along with those of other races when it is confined to one-on-one relationships or small like-minded groups.

      The article is speaking about societies of people being forced to live together. That’s what does not work and what is un-natural.

      • a multiracial individual

        Low IQ is the issue. Diverse environments populated by high IQ individuals are tranquil. Homogeneous environments populated by low IQ people are still troubled.

        • TL2014

          It’s not just low IQ. Temperament plays a role, too.

      • pcmustgo

        We can all get along if the relationship remains superficial, like at work, and we lie and don’t say what we REALLY think of each other, of them.

    • ZB01

      On the whole, I find your commentaries among the most interesting. On the one hand, you are a “race realist”; on the other hand, your views don’t devolve into “hatred” of other people merely on account of their race. You seem to be able to get along with any decent person regardless of race. Also, I admire the fact that you take a lot of flak from others’ comments but you let it roll of you like water on a duck’s back. Though I have to admit that sometimes you pretty well set yourself up for an epistolary shellacking by the things you do say.

      • JohnEngelman

        Thank you.

        My opinions are probably more mainstream than the opinions of those who flame me. In addition, I am able to document my factual assertions.

        • JohnEngeIman

          Except when people ask me to back up my claims to Jewish supremacy. I usually fail there.

      • pcmustgo

        I’m nice to everyone of every race. I just don’t f-ing like about how they often treat me in return. And I now socially self-segregate.

      • pcmustgo

        Most whites DON’T hate blacks…. or latinos or asians…. they hate us. We respond by becoming “racist” in our thinking of them. But from what I see in liberal cities, the aggression and antagonism is coming from them.

        • Augustus3709

          Whites are taught from birth to be nice to everybody, and most honestly try.

          But then over time bad experiences and observations chip away at that friendliness, and after feeling confused and defeated, (even betrayed), you realign yourself to your own group.

          • pcmustgo

            totally, then we break down and say f- it, I don’t care anymore!!!

    • silviosilver

      I guess I was not born with the gene for ethnocentrism.

      Sure you were, Engelman. That’s why you’re so relentlessly anti-white.

      • JohnEngelman

        I am not anti white any more than I am anti the other races. I evaluate people as individuals. I like people who are decent. I prefer the company of those who are decent, intelligent, and well informed.

      • JohnEngelman

        How am I anti white?

        • silviosilver

          You support immigration and mass-multiracialism, pretend that whites aren’t being race-replaced and describe whites who’d prefer to racially live on rather than die off evil.

          • JohnEngelman

            I am in favor of more restrictions on immigration. I believe diversity should be based in merit and personal choice. I am opposed to affirmative action.

          • silviosilver

            Yes, as I said, you favor ongoing, endless immigration and mass-multiracialism.

  • Luca

    We are biologically wired, for the sake of survival, to be wary and cautious of things strange and new to us. On the other hand, we are comfortable and feel safe around people and surroundings that are familiar and similar to what we are accustomed to.

    The ‘diversity’ we see today is being forced upon us by Government and there is no logical or beneficial reason for it.

    Fred is correct in his summation that diversity is a disaster. If people want to emigrate to another country they must assimilate. Even in Canada where the French and English have developed separate societies, there is much friction and resentment. Here in the US, where we use to promote assimilation we see no such resentment between people of French and British descent.

    • The Dude

      “Here in the US, where we use to promote assimilation we see no such resentment between people of French and British descent.”

      That’s because there’s no French and English descents anymore. But that I mean you couldn’t tell a French-American from an English-American by the way they speak, behave, etc. Assimilation means they have forgone their past ancestries and consider themselves American, or white American above all.

      Also, interethnic marriages have helped a lot in easing and dissipating the early tensions between European-American ethnicities.

  • Caucasoid88

    I thought Fred said for AmRen that large swaths of Mexicans in the US would be no problem because they are capable of maintaining civilization?

    • KevinPhillipsBong

      Then there are parts of Mexico Fred must not visit.

    • Nancy

      Fred has a Mexican wife, I think, and he also has a residence in Mexico (or somewhere south of the border). His position (if you read back through his articles on his website…the ones on law enforcement are particularly good) is that Mexico, unlike Africa or Haiti, for example, is able to maintain a measure of civilization that is comparable to, if not as advanced as, other First-World nations. They have hotels, airports, restaurants, infrastructure, etc., so in effect they are much closer to our society than those of tribal Africa. He doesn’t think it’s right for us to “lump them in” with the Bantus, so to speak.

      He admits that things like corruption are a bigger issue in Mexico than here, obviously, and technology is slow to catch up. My feeling is they’re better behaved down there because their tourism industry depends on them not scaring away white dollars, while they have no such incentive to do so on this side of the border. (Part of the reason why places like Costa Rica are more advanced than Guatamala or El Salvador.) But his main deal seems to be to promote the idea that Mestizos aren’t “as bad as” whites seem to think.

      Since I’ve never been to Mexico and my only experience is with Mestizos in the Atlanta area, I’ll withhold judgment. Are they as bad as Negroes here? Not by a wide margin…but my experience teaching school for the past 20 years tells me that, while Mestizos as a group are better students than Bantus, they’ve still got a ways to go before they can compete with whites. I don’t see it happening.

      • pcmustgo

        Mexicans in the USA can at least run restaurants…. I have been in all kinds of Mexican restaurants, and other Latino restaurants (Cuban, PR, Dominican) and never been treated with rudeness. Even in ones that are “hole in the wall” and don’t have many or any white customers. Yes, better behaved than Blacks….probably not going to academically equal whites.

      • GeneticsareDestiny

        I feel the same way about Mestizos. They’re definitely better behaved and more successful than blacks, but I don’t think they’ll ever be on par with whites in most measures of lifetime success (high school graduation rates, teen pregnancy rates, crime rates, etc).

        It also doesn’t help that the Hispanics we’re getting in America aren’t representative of Mexico and the other Latin America nations they’re coming from. They are not drawn evenly from all social classes; we’re getting the bottom-of-the-barrel Hispanics (many of them are not even Mestizo, but are rather Indio). Middle and upper class Hispanics would probably have a better chance of fitting in with mainstream white American society, but the lower class Hispanics we’re getting just don’t have what it takes, on average.

        I went to school with some Hispanics, most of them Mexican. They seemed to be in-between whites and blacks in pretty much every measurement; they did homework more often than blacks but less often than whites, acted up in school less often than blacks but more often than whites, etc. This is the pattern we also see among the adults and I don’t see it changing any time soon.

      • Douglas Quaid

        I agree, I don’t think we need a bunch of Mexicans here, yet at the same time I don’t have nearly the visceral reaction to Mexicans that I do to blacks. The Mexicans I’ve known all worked hard, and wanted to be here, they didn’t have this victim chip on their shoulder like blacks do.

        Shoot, the majority of the time when I see blacks in public they are loafing around or doing that super slow shuffle of theirs down the side walk apparently with nothing important to do. Most of the time when I see Mexicans they are working their butts off at the hand car washes we have here. If we are going to deport anyone let’s deport the welfare suckling blacks first.

        • Charles Martel

          So true. When was the last time you saw a black kid hustling for work outside a Home Depot??

        • pcmustgo

          Maybe because Blacks, especially Black males, ARE HUGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! They’re big and tall and intimidating, right? I’m tall too, but it’s quite obvious Blacks are bigger and stronger than everyone else on average. Fatter too. Whereas Mexicans are pretty strong but short… Is this why?

    • connorhus

      I see a lot of Whites say almost the same thing about Hispanics. In truth I have worked with some that were hard workers, amiable and generally a pleasure to be around. The problem is if you really get to know them and their situation there is always at least half a dozen other Hispanics attached to them (Parents, grandparents, cousins, cousin’s kids etc.) that are no better than Ghetto Blacks and complete welfare “queens” sucking up every gimmee program they can find.

  • Luca

    I was responding to pcmustgo when he got moderated for using the j-word. Here is my response to him if it doesn’t get zapped. BTW.. who’s on moderator watch today? Engelman?

    Nope, the real enemy are the leftist or Neo-Marxist elites. And there is
    no denying that among their ranks are an extraordinary,
    disproportionate percentage of Ashkenazi. Always has been, even within the
    communist movement. Here we find them in positions of power in the
    uber-liberal world of Hollywood, the media, the judiciary, academia and
    politics, again in disproportionately high numbers.

    Most everyday
    Jews are wonderfully normal people with a good percentage of European
    DNA, which makes it easier to get along with them.

  • notyranny

    Masterfully put, I have had all these thoughts at one time or another but have never observed them in an orderly fashion. I will certainly link this article and send it at every opportunity.

  • anony

    I can sum the article up in five words: Separation is the only answer.

    I have stated this a gazillion times. For a harmonious society, it is the only answer.

    • connorhus

      What we need is an end to government sponsored social “uplifting” and this problem would fix itself pretty quick. Blacks would eventually migrate to a few areas all their own, same with Asians, and Hispanics would return South.

      • Hy Alldredge

        Some Mexicans might go back but blacks can’t even stand each other. And cutting of government benefits would just make them violent. I would never suggest simply ending welfare/EBT unless segregation were back in force AND white people were allowed to defend themselves without Eric Holder stepping in. In other words, a return to pre-civil rights America, which will never happen. And any area black people had to themselves would immediately degnerate into hellish conditions (think Haiti) and they would flee for white areas in droves. Short of just kicking them out, segregation is really the only way to deal with them.

        Asians seem to self-segregate and don’t really care if white people want to be around them or not.

        • connorhus

          So you’re gonna say going back to pre-civil rights era conditions is impossible but then claim a separate White Ethnic state is?

          Sorry but that’s just delusional.

          Fact is if you cut the government welfare monstrosity, let em riot and there will be no money to prosecute Whites who defend themselves anyway. The problem will work itself out mostly in a few short, and yes violent, months. No need to tell property owning Whites in whatever part of the country you want to abandon that they are own their own. I am sure the part you want to abandon is not the part you are living in currently either is it?

          • Hy Alldredge

            When did I ever claim a white ethnic state was possible? I know I’m working on short sleep here but I just reread my comment and I’m not tired enough to be hallucinating.

            I was arguing against the idea that blacks would “migrate” into areas all their own. It wouldn’t be migrating, it would involve violence, like you said, and continued violence to enforce the separation.

          • connorhus

            My apologies then. I took it, especially when you mentioned segregation, that you were taking a stance for a separate White state. Not that I am against the concept in itself to be sure but I am not willing to give up any of White rural USA to form it just because they are not already living in a dry, barren part of the country.

            Violence doesn’t scare me. It’s inevitable at this point regardless and would be better to get it over with now rather than later. The longer we wait the weaker we get. Without government financing the Blacks and others will have no choice but to self migrate. They cannot compete on a level playing field and without our resources being stolen from us to help them they will eventually have no choice.

            Will it take generations? Certainly it will, but it is going to happen one way or another so let’s get the ball rolling.

    • TheMaskedUnit

      The parasite doesn’t see the same benefits as the host.

  • superlloyd

    Diversity is disunity. Diversity is no disparate impact for the unmerited, inadequate and criminal. Diversity mixes mediocrity with excellence. Diversity has no value as all competing vaues are equal and thus meaningless. Diversity is destruction.

    • WilmotRobertson

      The smartest way I have heard this put is: You can have racial and cultural diversity OR social cohesion, but you cannot have both.

  • ejXinMI

    Check out “Moral Tribes” by Joshua Greene. Or just listen to an econtalk org podcast in which he was interviewed. Other folks are starting to tune in. Don’t know if it is in time though…

  • Bill Moore

    Hello,

    I thank AmRen for posting this article by “Fred on Everything”, Fred Reed.

    I’m a subscriber to Fred Reed’s posts, and have been so for several years. He sends out an article about once a month or so. Always a good read.

    Everyone on here should subscribe.

    Here is the link: fredoneverything(dot)net

    Thank you,
    Bill Moore

  • MartelsGhost

    The DIEversity chain is only ever going to be as strong as it’s weakest link. Those with the lowest IQ’s and the highest propensity towards violence are always going to be the breaking point.

  • Bossman

    The USA has managed diversity better than most nations.

    • connorhus

      Only through massive debt and continual wealth redistribution taking from Whites. No other country would ever dare destroy their best producers like the good ol USofA has.

  • TheMaskedUnit

    I am not buying it …

    There are way too many muslims bypassing the benevolence of dar al islam to experience the cruel, bloodthirsty Christian crusaders of Australia.

    I don’t see any negros breaking in to Africa to escape the European branch klan persecution.

    The worst human rights abuse any white man can commit is to move away from a black family. Sure. It is followed closely by large groups of white people moving IN to a black neighborhood. That’s just because of the danger of them being priced out of the abuse.

  • dd121

    Fred’s question is “Why do we bring this diversity down on our heads when it causes so much destruction”. The answer is, the end game of all of this is our slow but ultimate destruction of our civilization by leftists. Why they want to do it, is because they think whites should be punished (destroyed) because of their jealousy for what we have and have created.

    • connorhus

      Also fueled by a generous helping of reproductive organ envy. Shut down Feminism and not one shred of this Die-versity weapon the left uses would stick.

  • LeonNJ

    Not all Pakistanis are angry Muslims who want to wage jihad on the infidel. My waiter today had a smile on his face.

    • IstvanIN

      …after he spit in your food.

  • Rurik

    He might also have included “…Muslims and Muslims”.

    • Veritas

      Oops. We also forgot Sikhs and Muslims and Atheists and Muslims.

      • daddio

        And Martians and Muslims…

    • WR_the_realist

      Well, at least Sunni Muslims and Shiite Muslims. And both hate the more mystical and less aggressive Sufi Muslims.

      • Rurik

        And do not forget the Kharijites, who preceded the sunnah-Shiah break. And the Salafists, who apparently are a sort of neo-Kharijite.
        And I retain my doubts about the Sufi. The Naqshbandi sect of Sufis is reportedly very strong among the Chechens.

  • Evette Coutier

    Liberals say America is a racist, sexist, homophobic nation with institutional bias and discrimination against non-Whites, then they tell Hispanic illegals to come here for a better life. Twits.

  • Sick of it

    “That is, distaste for diversity outweighs self-interest.”

    Crime statistics prove otherwise.

  • LHathaway

    “If a culture that practices forcible genital mutilation of girls is not evil, sez me, it will do until evil comes along”.
    I thought we live in a society where talking about sex wasn’t allowed? If so, how would Fred know anything about female genital mutilation? This sounds like a case of SWJ. . .? I’m guilty of it myself, very much so.

    • Spikeygrrl

      What is SWJ?

      • LHathaway

        I think I meant SJW, social justice warrior. Sorry about that. Had to look it up again, myself. When I looked that phrase up I realized it was describing me – a social justice warrior for white men, lol. This is the birth of 4 nations . . . Asians don’t want to be left out.

  • sam

    If Fred Reed is going to get re-posted all over over the place I sure wish he’d learn how to write. His prose is insufferable.

  • Ed

    Men of all groups object to marriage of their women to other groups. The women are somewhat less clannish, more willing to marry out-of-group. This can cause bloodshed.

    I’m not sure this is accurate. In my experience women tend to prefer their own group than men. Take Black women for example, they prefer Black men to the tune of 90%+ whereas Black men exhibit no racial preference in a partner, at least on line.

    • Spikeygrrl

      Black men — and all too many White men — will bang anything with a pulse and a p[another word for “cat”].

  • Sha of Communism

    “Distaste for diversity of almost any kind runs through societies. Liberals associate chiefly with liberals, conservatives with conservatives, military people with military people, the rich with the rich…”

    So much truth compressed in this one article. I only hope common sense as such can be common.

  • ImTellinYa

    Hispanics are incompatible with Whites. They are in fact stupid and commit crimes at a vastly greater rate than Whites. Wherever they settle and become the majority, or even a significant minority, the area turns into a dirty, crime-ridden, drug-ridden, corrupt third-world mess. Here in California the police refer to domestic violence as “Mexican foreplay.” Drunk driving is apparently a God-given right among Hispanics. And apart from the crime, the level of everyday behavior is fairly horrendous. Hispanics are very, very bad neighbors. Our self interest would require that we forcibly deport almost every single Hispanic. They are not going to “stay” in the United States.

    • John

      Go visit “Fred on Everything’s” website and read column #633. And I quote “DV is so common amongst Mexican-Americans and the illegals that we call it “Mexican foreplay”. Probably 60 to 70 percent of my DV cases involve Mexicans/Hispanics.” [DV= domestic violence.] “…50% of the DUIs are hispanic, and of those, the majority are here illegally….. DUI seems to be a Mexican national hobby. I get far more hispanic defendants in that category than any other. And they seem to be most likely to repeat.”

    • LHathaway

      Many towns in California, filled with Mexicans are quite nice. Perhaps even nicer than equivalent towns of Whites. I kind of doubt most of the Mexican’s are over fond of, and fawn over, Whites there. It probably is in our self interest to stay away from them.

      • newscomments70

        Which one may that be? I live in California. The white towns, what’s left of them, are the nicest and most peaceful. Pasadena has some nice neighborhoods (white ones), but it was much nicer when it was mostly white.

        • LHathaway

          Santa Rosa, California. Wonderful town. Census bureau lists the town as 60% white. I would guess the town in actuality is above 60% Hispanic (with of course major areas of the town entirely Hispanic).

          • newscomments70

            I live in a wealthy California small city. It is almost all white. Obviously there are Mexicans who work here. Some commute and some cram into the limited rentals. We also have a day worker pick up. Illegals congregate for sleazy contractors to hire them. The local government supports this; they even give them portopoties. With all of this wealth, we have Obama stickers EVERYWHERE. There are problems here, but it is not nearly as bad as the poor and working class cities.

    • pcmustgo

      Lots of petty theft. When I went to Costa Rica, stuff got stolen off of my rental car… something metal, a part…

  • ALNLA

    “Why governments allow and even encourage immigration of incompatible populations is a greater mystery. ”

    No, actually, it is not a mystery. The political class in the West insulates itself from the consequences of diversity (the Clintons in Chappaqua, etc. etc.) and, moreover, it is easier to rule over a disunited, multilingual population. As a bonus, the same politicians can then congratulate themselves on their openness to those who are different.

  • ZB01

    This article is generally true. Sometimes, however, you have strange anomalies. Case in point: The San Patricios wherein White Americans of Irish descent deserted their White, Protestant, American, military superiors, to fight alongside Mexican Catholics. To this day, that is sometimes why you will see someone who is clearly Hispanic with a last name like McGuire or O’Malley.

    But even then, there is still conflict: this time Catholics siding with other Catholics, apart from race.

    • RationaliseThis

      I also disagree in regards to Irish Catholics and Irish Protestants not getting on. They do get on in the Republic which has a fair number of Protestants. It’s a problem in Northern Ireland only and then really only due to a bizzare political and historical issues. These problems are now dying out because they weren’t really racial and so can be solved by political and moral methods. I don’t think we will see the problems caused by Blacks, Muslims go. The Muslims are mostly not a White while their creed is uncompromising and mindlessly relentless.

      Whatever bad things you do say about the IRA they did at times give warnings of bombs a humanity which can’t be said of jihadists.

      • curri

        And the IRA has been Marxist since at least 1970. Today Sinn Fein/IRA is enthusiastically pro-immigration. They were also well-known for their ordinarily criminal Mafia-like activities. These characters would make for an interesting psychological study if you could ever rely on them to tell the truth.

        • Xerxes22

          Not true. In, 1970 there was a split in the IRA. The Official (Marxist) wing later became extinct. The Provisional (nationalist) wing waged a successful campaign against the British occupation forces and forced the British government to sign a peace treaty. Sinn Fein is the largest Nationalist party in N. Ireland and the third most popular party in the Irish Republic. All parties in the Irish Republic are pro-immigration, not just Sinn Fein.

      • saxonsun

        How very decent of them.

    • pcmustgo

      What do you think of the “Black Irish”? Descended from Spaniards or no? I met a girl the other day who was Black Irish I could have sworn was some kind of Latina or mulatto… dark, dark brown eyes and kinky hair, fuller lips, porcelain perfect white skin… I had no idea she’d be Irish.

      • ZB01

        I think they are frequently very attractive!

  • IKUredux

    This is so simple, so fundamental. All of us, whoever we are, cling to our people. We are all tribal. Even, if we fail to understand it on an intellectual level. It does boil down to tribalism. Blood and soil. It pains me to use that term, but, I like it.

    Tribe. What a wonderfully primitive word. Please, you Whites know what you envision when you hear the word “tribe”.Well, I know what I envision, and, since I’m White, I will proceed. As it turns out, being a member of a “tribe” is the greatest thing you could ever be. That is correct. In a perfect “White world”, being an individual is your greatest goal. Since this is not a perfect “White world”, focusing on being an individual is death. Because the rest of the world is clannish, they are ethnocentric, they are simply for themselves.As a member of the White tribe (if you are White, you belong, the rest of the world says so). Despite the efforts of the leftists, despite the fact that they have introduced millions of non White foreigners into our ancestral homelands. We Whites need to revert to the PRIMITIVE! that’s right.

    WE Whites need to go TRIBAL. YUP. That’s right. We Whites can only win this fight by being even MORE tribal then the rest of them. Let’s face it. The governments of the world, (the White world) want to KILL us. They want us REMOVED. By hook, by crook, or, miscegenation.

    BLOOD AND SOIL. White countries belong to WHITE PEOPLE. We shed our blood to own the soil. OUR BLOOD IS IN THE SOIL. THEY ARE ONE IN THE SAME.

    • Spikeygrrl

      AND.
      “They are one AND the same.”

      • LHathaway

        I do not think you’ve discovered a typo, only an interesting turn of phrase.

        • Spikeygrrl

          An INCORRECT turn of phrase.

  • Uncle Wardle

    Muttonheads that like diversity should be able to go somewhere to get it if they wish. Likewise, those of us who have no use for it should have places we can live and go that we know are completely free of it. Fair is fair.

    • Nancy

      This is why the three-state solution is the best answer: A blacks-only state (voluntary…they don’t have to go, but whites “can’t” live there); a diversity state (what we essentially have now); and a whites-only state (again, voluntary…but blacks can’t live there).

      Take a poll or census to see how many people would choose which state, divide up the country accordingly, and we’re done. Make sure the blacks have at least one coastal port so they can’t complain about unequal resources or restricted trade access.

      It would be a ***** to police the borders between the diversity state and white state, as blacks would immediately target our side for criminal activity, since we have the most goodies, nicest living conditions, etc. Then let’s count how many so-called “diversity-loving libs” immediately petition to move to the WS.

      • Snazzy Snook

        Blacks trade ? LMAO, without whites blacks would die off in a decade or less..Then we could split the country in two ..

      • brior

        Why should America give up ANY real estate to these invading hoards of brown and black poverty, they already have south America, central America, Puerto Rico, the Caribbean, Africa Haiti, Jamaica, Etc…. These people creat nothing but more poverty and hatred, …. And manned space travel over at NASA…..

      • pcmustgo

        too funny

  • C. Magnus

    A good point resulting from this article is that diversity is bad in and of itself, we don’t need to even get into the problems with other races to oppose multiculturalism. An actual study to quote would be the one by Robert Putnam on this, so there’s not just opinion but scholarship behind this.

    Diversity is not only promoted for civil society but also by private companies. I did an online application last year and I recall a question and answer form where one of the questions went something along the lines of how would you support or contribute to diversity as an employee of this company.

    I simply wrote that I would value diversity of skillsets and opinions. Interesting how they only frame diversity in terms of race, gender, religion and sexual orientation and expect us all to go along with it like ‘of course it’s good, duh, this is the 21st century’. I’m not sure how I’d react if asked this face to face in an interview. Maybe ask them to clarify ‘diversity of what?’. What I really want to say is ‘I value performance, not diversity. Next question.’

    I have heard said that diversity is actually good in a limited sense, such as in a technical profession (IT or engineering). Is there any solid evidence for this? Even if it is I’m sure they mean it in the whites working with smart Indians and Asians way, not in a blacks and Hispanics way.

  • SolStans

    “Hatred of Jews exceeds by far any harm thought to be caused by Jews.”

    Please cite your source on this. Otherwise, you wrote an excellent essay.

    • Augustus3709

      It’s a touchy subject but there’s so much evidence for it it’s hard to ignore or explain away.

      Seeing that Communist Jew standing next to Mandela is just ridiculous.

      Africa should have been USA 2.0 with nations like Rhodesia, South Africa, Cameroon etc linking up to form a glorious civilization like we did with North America.

      That last 5 generations or so have been a nightmare.

  • Beautiful Asian Woman

    Any cute and handsome white boy out there ready to sweep me off my feet?

    • Ultimate187

      I can’t believe you made a new account to post this garbage.

  • Fee-fi-fo-fum

    You do know, Fred. You are just to much of a p#ssy to say it.

  • curri

    “Hatred of Jews exceeds by far any harm thought to be caused by Jews.”

    I don’t know. Google “NKVD: Excerpt from Sergei Semanov, The Russian Club,” “The German-Jewish Kulturkampf in the Weimar Republic” and “The Sexual Decadence of Weimar Germany.”

  • SupremeGalooty

    You got your history WRONG here, Mr. Fred. The Irish Catholic vs the Irish Protestant had absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with religion – or diversity. It was merely a case of the filthy Brits ridding themselves of a bunch of pesky Presbyterians at the expense of the Irish.

    • curri

      It obviously has something to do with diversity. You can locate the source of this: “The Ulster protestants were deliberately brought in over three centuries ago from English speaking areas of Anglo-Saxon ethnicity, often from either side of the Scottish borders, in order to crowd out the (then) Gaelic speaking Celts, and there has only been a little inter-marriage and/or cross over between the communities since then. There was a little overlap in their ancestry, but only a little and you have to go back several more centuries to find it…So, no, Ulster isn’t a case of one people splitting along religious lines, but of religious differences further hindering the mutual assimilation of two quite distinct peoples.”

      • SupremeGalooty

        Your use of the word “obviously” is in error. Additionally, I reject completely the last sentence. I reiterate: It had nothing whatsoever to do with diversity or religion. It had to do with British hegemony.

      • John Smith

        Both have very similar Germanic and Celtic antecedents, though the ratio differs in each population.

  • Mohamad

    I pretty much agree. The concept of diversity is moronic. You cant expect several cultures to live happily by each other. I lived in Reading, Pennsylvania where it is majority Latino.Puerto ricans, Dominicans and Mexicans, were the majority, and they all loathed each other. if Latino’s of different countries cant get along, then how do they expect diversity to work in the larger picture? I currently live in Detroit, near Dearborn. I see first hand the wonders of diversity. Dearborn is majority Arab, and i could write a book about what goes on here. People like me, who are outspoken about many things I see wrong with middle eastern culture, are called traitor’s, are called “white boy wannabe’s”
    I think if any one comes to this country they should assimilate asap.
    the truth is western European culture is superior. Or else there why would so many Arabs want to live here
    I guess I accepted the fact that I’ll never fit in anywhere

    • jayvbellis

      Thanks for your honest response.

      May I suggest you explore the political/cultural system of Kemelism?

      It was established after World War I by the Turkish Nationalist hero Kemel Ataturk:

      A secular republic – that looked to Europe in areas of science, education and economics. Religion is tolerated and respected, including the rights of religious (non Muslim, Christian) minorities. It was recognIzed that Turkey was overwhelmingly Islamic, but the Islamic religion was not allowed to threaten the secular Turkish Republic, when it did/does the Turkish Military steps in.

      So there are no horrors like Islamic extremists cutting off people’s heads, enslaving people, brutally persecuting Christians etc, nor is there the other extreme of cultural Marxists publish porn attacks on religion etc.

      Mandatory atheism , Communism isn’t the answer, lots of people are going to be religious in some way. We aren’t going to erase the Islamic religion in some global crusade.

      But, yes Kemelism – a secular republic, it can and does work.

      • Mohamad

        Yes! I have studied that. Mustafa Kemal died young, before he could achieve his goal. however I am amazed at how he transformed Turkey from a ancient caliphate to a secular country. had he ruled for another 30 years Turkey would have been paradise.Turkey is 99% Muslim, but the secular laws (up until recently) did not even permit a women with a head scarf to enter a government owned building!
        There are quite a few secular critics of Islam in the Middle east, but they are in extreme danger. Some were killed( Farag Foda, Egypt)
        I’d frankly prefer a secular dictator( Assad) than a Islamic zealot ruling

        • jayvbellis

          Agreed.

          Except you are showing a bit of the extreme religious mindset when you state Secular Turkey could have been a …

          Paradise.

          This longing for paradise always caused terrible problems as frustrated (young) men see the world around them as very flawed, deeply disappointing and then religious extremists try to get them to fight, destroy and achieve paradise in this world or the next, complete with 30 beautiful, White blonde virgins who will become sex goddesses for those who fought, killed for…

          Paradise.

          Paradise simply is impossible.

          Instead we should strive for realistic societies that work, Ok, not bad, given local conditions, local culture.

          We ain’t getting Saudi Arabian Muslims to embrace gay and lesbian rights or feminism.

          Not sure any honest man alive on planet earth really embraces…

          Feminism..

          Ha ha.

    • Weisheit77

      God, Reading, PA. I didn’t know a town could have so many Latinos until I went to that place. It’s sad too as all the old time architecture is there from when it was a booming train hub. It’s quite a comparison between the majestic buildings and the squalor shuffling about on the sidewalks beside them.

      • Mary

        It’s always tragic when diverse newcomers inhabit (and often destroy) our beautiful historic buildings. Too many historical areas have been ceded to those who have no appreciation for them.

      • pcmustgo

        Puerto Ricans or Mexicans? I suppose it’s better than Blacks taking over. I knew a girl from Reading.

    • pcmustgo

      Reading, PA is one of the poorest cities in America.

  • ElComadreja

    You forgot Greeks and Turks. While people are somewhat aware of the Armenian genocide they remain ignorant of what the Turks did to the Greeks.

    • Mohamad

      There were atrocities on both sides in that conflict( 1919-1921)
      It is messed up that in Turkey, mentioning the Armenian Genocide result’s in a jail sentence

      • ElComadreja

        There were plenty of abuses by the Turks before and after that period. The atrocities were primarily Turk on Greek. In the Ottoman Empire Greeks were routinely treated as inferior second class citizens. First born males were forcibly taken from their families and raised as Turks which accounts for the present day genetic similarities.

  • SFLBIB

    White liberal elites came up with the idea that “diversity is our stregnth.” Only a few days ago, Hillary repeated the old “celebraite diversity” mantra. The problem with these elites is they come up with an idea, that is never to be questioned, and push it off to the hoi polloi to implement. Then when it doesn’t work, wring their hands and wonder what the problems are [it’s never the idea]. They never live it themselves [how many blacks live in Clinton’s tony Chappaqua, NY? Here are the demographics [wiki]: “The racial makeup of the census designated place [CDP] was 91.80% White, 0.94% African American, 0.03% Native American, 5.62% Asian, 0.02% Pacific Islander, 0.52% from other races, and 1.07% from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino of any race were 2.55% of the population. 14.3% were of Italian, 11.4% Russian, 10.6% Irish, 7.1% United States or American, 6.0% English and 5.7% German ancestry according to Census 2000. 92.4% spoke English, 3.6% Spanish and 1.0% Italian as their first language.”

    So she doesn’t have to live according to her stated beliefs.

    • Cindy

      Same with Maureen Dowd. Works for lily white newspaper. Lives in lily white neighborhood. First to point finger and cry “you need more diversity!”

      • John Smith

        Other, less “enlightened,” less wealthy whites are the ones who always need it.

  • ForReelzYo

    Let’s not forget upon the arrival of the Spanish that these people were sacrificing women/children in the most brutal way and they hadn’t even yet conceived the concept of, “the wheel”. I find their illegal method of migrating into our country cowardly and distasteful.

    • Spaniard in LA

      The Mayans and other tribes in MesoAmerica had discovered the wheel long before my ancestors arrived. The Mayans would actually make toys with wheels for their children. The Mayans were also great astronomers. Mexico City was built on an island by the Aztecs. One cannot compare the MesoAmerican tribes to the tribes in Africa. Other than that, I totally agree with you.

    • pcmustgo

      Let’s not forget ancient Romans apparently sacrificed humans too and had Bacchanalia… that involved blood.

      • Keyword: Ancient. The indios were still committing their cultural atrocities eons after the Romans had evolved away from such practices.

  • RonanTheLibtardian

    Diversity was never agreed upon by western citizens. It was foisted upon them.

    During the preambles and dissent leading up to the signing of The Immigration Act of 1965 (aka Hart-Celler), skeptical and wary Americans were assured that the near 90% European-American demographic wouldn’t change as a result. That was a big, fat sin that was never atoned for.

    Diversity was never inevitable, nor wanted, nor voted for.

  • brior

    “Hatred of Jews exceeds by far any harm thought to be caused by Jews.” Ah yes the non stop multicult mantra of the jews and their open borders screaming and money to buy political favors by the boatload causes no harm at all. This is where the problem begins,with those who control the media and political narrative. Prove me wrong!

  • Americaandthewestshouldbewhite

    Do we see a snake mating with a lion? nope, in that way whites should stay away from non whites and have pure white babies. Also, the libs in the media should not force DIE-versity and miscegenation on whites by putting a white anchor woman with a negro or vice versa on the news or in the sports.

    • RonanTheLibtardian

      “Don’t feed the bears”.
      .

      • Americaandthewestshouldbewhite

        SO true, in some areas of my city it looks like this pic.

        • John Smith

          And many look even worse.

  • Augustus3709

    There is a “minority threshold” which shouldn’t be passed.

    I don’t know what it is, maybe 5-8% of the population.

    When the minority gets too big, they forget they’re the minority and start getting “uppity”.

    • John Smith

      Trees and ropes help remind them otherwise.

  • UncleSham

    Sacrificing your own for the sake of another race is never met with gratitude. Just ask any African-American how thankful they are about the Civil War.

    YT has forgotten that he must compete to survive, and all the other races are rationally exploiting this weakness. Jews are not exceptionally evil, just exceptionally intelligent.

    • Mike

      Christianity certainly doesn’t help

      • UncleSham

        Our Secularists are just as bad as our Christians. Both groups consider sacrificing our own for the sake of others to be a virtue. This idea may have become popular through Christianity, but it has long since become independent of it.

  • Guest

    ‘Countless Americans loathe the French, without having been to France, speaking a word of French, or having met a Frenchman.’

    Interesting quote — but I cannot quite see why this should be so. (I am not saying that this is false.) Are we talking about a particular portion of Americans, or of the population at large? Is it because of religion? Of course, I grew up in a part of the U.S. that had been settled by the French. It is, however, no longer a “French” settlement by any means.

    “Loathe” seems a very strong word in this context. If the sentence had read, ‘Countless Americans are suspicious of the French . . . ‘ I could possibly understand that somewhat.

    France actually is made up of several ethnic groups. There is more than one ‘stock’ of people in France. I find it difficult to imagine many Americans feeling such a strong dislike for, say, Brigitte Bardot.

  • pcmustgo

    I read a story about a white male who moved to Costa Rica… a lot of white americans fantasize about this and there’s websites that teach you how to do it, what the culture is like , etc. Anyways, he fell in love with a Costa Rican woman (their women are all slim and beautiful, I can attest too, tons of model-like prostitutes down there too who come from all over central america)… she pretended to love him for 6 months, then cleaned out is bank account. He tried to start some construction business down there but said Costa Ricans are so Low IQ and dense, it just didn’t work.

    • pcmustgo

      Then he moved back to the USA and warned other gringoes not to try this.. “pura vida” ain’t all it’s cracked up to be. These are people who literally don’t bother to make ANY street signs… even though there’s tourists driving around down there. No street signs. You need a gps and even with that it’s hard and hit or miss. I drove the whole country, I would know. Dangerous to drive after dark.

    • Chasmania

      As I pointed out, the jobs weren’t BUSINESS opportunities, but managerial or oversight jobs that made sure the low skill workers didn’t screw things up too badly. In particular, the field we were considering was aircraft maintenance – i.e. standing over their mechanics and/or checking out their completed work.

      As far as letting a woman – Costa Rican or ANY race – have access to your finances a mere 6 months into a relationship shows poor thinking and would explain a business failure. Blaming the local workforce sounds more of an excuse than a cause, IMO.

  • Viking.

    He is 99% right. The only thing that can save America is that immigration is stopped and that White-America reasserts itself. Racist you shout, but it is not, it is logical sense. Mass- immigration makes integration an impossibility. Only limited immigration and small minorities with a dominant majority culture is practicable. If this planet’s population is ever to be unified, it has to happen slowly. Right now migration is causing ethnic conflict. The latino immigration will further divide America, but by far the greatest cause of civil conflict is Muslim immigration. Islam is incompatible with all other cultures.

  • Speedy Steve

    Fred makes it seem that tolerant women disproportionately cause the friction. Get them out of the workforce and into the kitchen. Where’s my food, woman?

  • John Smith

    We need a three state solution to the US diversity problem, with whites getting the Midwest, Upper South and PNW.