Loretta Lynch’s Similarities to Eric Holder a Red Flag for Republicans

Phillip Swarts, Washington Times, January 27, 2015

Republican lawmakers plan to grill U.S. attorney general nominee Loretta Lynch on Wednesday on everything from her position on President Obama’s immigration amnesty to how she would pursue the Justice Department’s investigation into the IRS targeting of tea party groups.

Mostly Republican senators want to ask whether she would follow in the footsteps of Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr., who has used his perch to push an activist agenda on gun control and voting rights, while defending Mr. Obama’s expansive claims of executive powers to alter Obamacare, launch a war in Libya and grant tentative legal status to illegal immigrants.

{snip}

Senators are worried that Ms. Lynch, who would become the nation’s first black female attorney general, has too many similarities to Mr. Holder, who has had an adversarial relationship with the legislative branch.

In 2012, Mr. Holder became the first sitting Cabinet member to be held in contempt of Congress for not providing key information to the House of Representatives during their investigation into the Fast and Furious gunrunning scandal.

{snip}

Republican senators are eager to find out whether Ms. Lynch considers Mr. Obama’s executive amnesty, which aims to shield as many as 5 million illegal immigrants from deportation, within the confines of the Constitution.

{snip}

Sen. Jeff Flake, Arizona Republican, will question Ms. Lynch about Operation Streamline, a Justice Department program used to fast-track prosecutions of illegal immigrants that advocates say the federal government has largely let fall by the wayside.

Ms. Lynch, who has no ties to Mr. Obama’s policies, is stepping into the congressional limelight at a time when the Justice Department is beset by criticism from conservatives and liberals alike. Civil rights advocates railed against the Justice Department’s handling of the Michael Brown and Eric Garner cases, while Republicans are annoyed that the department hasn’t initiated an investigation into the IRS targeting of tea party groups.

Ms. Lynch, 55, U.S. attorney general for the Eastern District of New York, was unanimously approved by a Senate voice vote to her current position. She was appointed to that post by President Clinton in 1999. She left it and returned to private practice before again taking the position when nominated by Mr. Obama.

{snip}

As the top prosecutor for a district that includes Brooklyn, Queens, Staten Island and Long Island, Ms. Lynch was best known for her prosecution of the four New York police officers charged with violating the civil rights of Abner Louima, a Haitian immigrant who was beaten and sodomized while in custody.

{snip}

Topics: , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • MekongDelta69
    • Bon, From the Land of Babble

      She has sadistic plans for Whites…

  • propagandaoftruth

    Oh why would Obama choose Erica Holder to replace Eric Holder?

    Same anti-White crypto-Marxist, different plumbing.

    • “Different plumbing” … you can never be sure these days. Theres a good chance its holders long lost brother, not sister.

  • D.B. Cooper

    Oh, the democrats do not have to worry about a thing. If the Republican Party weren’t such wimps, Holder, Kagan. and Sotomayor would not have been appointed. Lynch is merely yet another unchecked quota receiving the GOP’s nod of approval.
    Remember our first four star black and female admiral?

    • Oh she’s a beauty! I’m sure those muslims are quaking in their boots at the sight of this tough and brave admiral! Truth is, they’re laughing their asses off at how stupid we Americans are. Appointing this woman to such a strategic and important rank as admiral tells our enemies that we’ve already been internally defeated.

      • propagandaoftruth

        Interesting the number of (mostly White male) field grade officers Obama has purged over questionable stuff the last few years. Gotta make way for this, I suppose…

        And eliminate possible coup leaders.

        Well, Obama is a crypto-Marxist, so why not take a cue from Uncle Joe Stalin?

        • It can only help us, since the military will eventually be turned against white Americans. The more feminized and Third World it is, the better for its enemies.

        • M&S

          Uncle Joe purged his officer corps of it’s best thinkers less than two years before putting all the men and equipment in the Western Theater (2.9 million) within an easy days march of the leapoff points of more than 3.8 million Germans who wanted to overthrow his regime.
          You can’t hide 3.8 million people getting ready to stage an assault on your country. You just can’t.

          • Black Swan

            The Germans would have eliminated the menace in the East if we hadn’t supplied the bloodthirsty Soviets with food and armed them to the teeth with the latest military weaponry. The Soviets were bumbling fools compared to the German military.

            “We” fought so Communism could win and continue its march through the West and its institutions.

            Uncle Joe Indeed.

            FDR, Stalin and Churchill should have been tried as war criminals.

          • M&S

            Black Swan,
            Given the evidence of History and the coming death of whites, I can say with a certainty that six million Jews who didn’t die in Auschwitz and who were sacrificed by WJC leaders who came to FDR and said “We cannot find evidence supporting a need to bomb the camps…” for the sake of a political benchmark for Zionism would have been a small price to pay for White solidarity in a European nation state as we now face the World’s Horde Populations in a very fragmented, infiltrated, condition.
            Certainly a much more valid economic and scientific competitor to drive our own advancement that attempting to appease the world as a superior socialist alternative to the Soviets by invasion-to-invitation level demographics change.
            However; Germany itself was highly socialist and the PC policies of today’s EU have their roots in the same Frankfurt School belief system as came to drive their book burnings and ‘directed thought’ policies.
            Relative to the period state of the art military… Ainh.
            The Soviets benefited more from our trucks, food and radios than they did our tanks or aircraft. Their own designs for which were competent enough or in fact exceeded our own, especially in dealing with heavy German armor on the open Eurasian steppes. What troubles me more is that the precursor events to WWII stretch as far back as the 1920s when an otherwise inexplicable induced starvation plan as perceived suppression of a non-existent rebellion in the Ukraine resulting in -exactly- the kinds of forced relocation efforts needed to ‘preposition’ large, ethnic Rus, populations beyond the Urals where they would be ideally suited to manning a large scale industrial effort with the kinds of mental capacity that the resident Asian population could not (then) supply. Allowing the highly fecund, savagely capable, Asian populations to do the fighting and dying out West.
            That was clever.
            That the Holodomor also emptied the Ukraine of potential recruits for the Nazis is nothing less than astonishing in it’s multi-decade vision. And I do believe it was intentional, not random. Because the nature of it hurt the Soviet State, badly, in the short term when it was most vulnerable to intervention or collapse.
            Trying people for crimes which were not in fact criminal (the Laws Of Land Warfare make it clear that resolution by Coup De Main is still a reasonable option in diplomacy by other means but only stipulate the preconditions by which ‘any’ means are forbidden) before the event is immoral and illegal as well as hypocritous, given what we did to the Native Americans by similar means and with vastly great casualties as disenfranchisement consequences.
            What Nuremburg signaled was a stultification and stagnation of growth through dynamic, combative, competition between nation states that believed that they had ‘won it all’ and that unipolar nukes would keep it that way. Nuclear technology proliferated and then became irrelevant as people who would not risk nuclear war for things they cared about (European interests, see Berlin) also would not inflict it upon peripheral states (see: Eisenhower’s published: “Atomic Strikes are permissible in Korea!” water-test and Nixon’s inability to generate sympathy for the Vietnam war by detonating nukes in China.).
            Peripheralism thus became possible as a conventional warfighting method of resource entanglement and denial and so we are right back to warfare as a means of furthering state interests at HUGE cost because we are afraid/embarrassed by the possibility of prolonged conflict escalation to nuclear levels, especially in a terrorist age.
            If there was a crime in the 1940s, it may well be that of stiflement. The WWI Great Powers were content to parasite their colonies for economic stability as City-not-Nation States and they deathly feared Hitler’s ‘admiration’ for the combined demographic, industrial, logistic and resource control represented by the continental U.S. powerbase. Thus they ‘went along’ with the American idea of saving the village by burning it down because they were too stupid to realize what it meant as the death of Old World powers and the rise of America.
            Such was the true Holocaust of WWII as European Americans destroyed the hopes and futures of their ancestral peoples for the short term gains of half a century of global rule with which we have done NOTHING useful for ourselves as opposed to our toys or our weapons or our wealth class.
            Hitler’s Germany would not have destroyed the underlying societal support structure as culture base of the European peoples as we did. Because Hitler’s Germany was looking for the Coup De Main which we denied them.
            But.
            As WWII was ultimately a planned event. With likely decades of thought behind it. So too do I have to believe that what came during it’s campaigns and after was as well. Since the Jews were indeed victims of that condition, if nothing like the levels they now claim entitlement from, that leaves another agency as pushing this agenda. And whatever or whoever it ‘Really Is’ that is forcing things down this present path is the party I want to start answering for their actions.
            The first step to trust is truth.

          • Black Swan

            The truth is outlawed in many nations now.

            Merely questioning the false narrative of WW II puts one in prison for long periods of time in 109 nations. This shuts down all scholarship and research, and here the leaders of various European nations were just rattling on about free speech.

            Ask Ernst Zundel: http //www zundelsite org/

            I believe one of the main goals of WW I, II, etc. was to thin the ranks of Whites in Europe and the U.S. We Whites must not fight in any more wars agitated by outside sources, by those who are not us, for their benefit not our. The only “benefit” for the White race is millions of ur young White males cut down in the prime of life.

          • M&S

            Agreed.
            That said, wars which win land and gain resources are useful, if the tributary effect is adequately cascaded down through the class system to benefit all of society. This is not a happy truth because it is not a noble one. But it -is- something which gives society strength by feeding on the corpse of other culture groups.
            It is effectively what is happening here and now with ethnic populations eating white social position in our own failing state.
            There is in man a semi-suicidal ‘go big or go bust’ urge which takes monumental risks to gain prestige as social position. After WWII the rest of the 20th century represents a Keynesian continuancy of constant warstate economics which never properly fed into a cooldown and unwind condition white expansionism, due to rich social resources.
            And indeed -could not- do so because the wealth of Europe was in it’s soft capital and those patents and processes and brains were all controlled as proprietary by Corporate Interests.
            Then the Russians got The Bomb and the resultant period of the 50s and 60s especially, while certainly better off than the 30s had been and the 40s /would have been/, had we not gone into production overdrive, was still more paranoid that productive.
            The 70s saw a collapse of this national psychosis and the 80s was the nihilist credit-living fallout from that.
            Point Being: Nothing is without purpose or useful need but the conditions by which we undertake a given fight must never again be those of moral redemption for anyone else’ problems or perceptions of ‘Our Duty’ as a Nation State.
            What the far left seeks to do is capitalize on this realization through fear baiting and dominance of the counter-moralist stance and that is just as destructive because it operates against the societal immune system in undertaking such enormous STUPID actions as mass immigration by hostile, worthless (to a high tech state) and dependent ethnies which have anything up to a 3:1 differential advantage in TFRs.

          • Black Swan

            These conditions you write of were forced on us from without, not from within.

            The communists vowed they would “march through the institutions” and they have. They have won. A PC iron-curtain has descended upon us. But, all is not lost, there is always hope. There will come a point where we Whites will either fight for our very lives or end up as ashes. My money is on the White race winning this. But more Whites must be made aware of who it is we’re fighting and what’s at stake, i.e., complete loss of homelands and attendant resources.

          • 1G25

            Not Churchill, I think. The UK had been getting the crap beaten out of it since 1940, and said he’s join in league with the Devil to beat Germany.

            The other two, absolutely.

          • Black Swan

            Yes, Churchill especially.

            The British lost 900,000 in WW I and the last thing they needed was another major war.

            Hitler wanted peace while Churchill bombed German civilians. Hitler could have destroyed the British at Dunkirk and didn’t. He was hoping the British would stop warmongering once they saw the German strength:

            “When I look around to see how we can win the war I see that there is only one sure path. We have no Continental army which can defeat the German military power.. there is one thing that will bring him down, and that is an absolutely devastating, exterminating attack by very heavy bombers from this country upon the Nazi homeland. We must be able to overwhelm them by this means, without which I do not see a way through.”

            This is also why Churchill was so desperate to get the Americans involved in the war. Some posit he bombed German civilians hoping the Germans would retaliate the same way, which they eventually did, so Churchill could “prove” to the Americans how evil Hitler really was.

            Leaflets were dropped on the British population begging for peace. Churchill refused to answer phone calls from Hitler begging for peace instead responding with bombs on German civilians.

            Here’s what the leaflet said:

            “In this hour I feel it to be my duty before my own conscience to appeal once more to reason and common sense in Great Britain as much as elsewhere. I consider myself in a position to make this appeal, since I am not the vanquished, begging favors, but the victor speaking in the name of reason. I can see no reason why this war must go on. I am grieved to think of the sacrifices it will claim.

            I should like to avert them. As for my own people, I know that millions of German men, young and old alike, are burning with the desire to settle accounts with the enemy who for the second time has declared war upon us for no reason whatever. But I also know that at home there are many women and mothers who, ready as they are to sacrifice all they have in life, yet are bound to it by their heartstrings.

            Possibly Mr. Churchill again will brush aside this statement of mine by saying that it is merely born of fear and of doubt in our final victory. In that case I shall have relieved my conscience in regard to the things to come.”

            –Appeal to Reason.

            Churchill was a war criminal.

          • 1G25

            “Hitler wanted peace while Churchill bombed German civilians.”

            On its face that statement rates no response. Hitler wanted peace. Jesus Christ.

            A German bomber formation got lost one night in 1941 and bombed Coventry, instead of the airfield that was its target . Theretofore, both sides kept civilian centers off limits. After the Coventry bombing, not known to the Brits as an accident, Lancasters began the urban campaign.

      • Black Swan

        We’ve been internally defeated for along time. I hope you don’t think the new multi-cultural military, where gender rights, gays in the military and upholding PC dogma is far more important than “defending America.”

        Today’s army is used for offensive purposes in the Middle East, not defensive purposes such as defending America’s borders; they are being used to aid and abet illegals while American military vets die waiting for medical treatment.

        What this means is that when you or your family face danger or peril, the US Calvary is NOT coming to your defense. You must defend yourself and teach everyone you love and care about to do the same.

        If anything, the US military and law enforcement being primed to eliminate Whites.

      • dmxinc

        Image the what the Japanese in 1940 would have thought facing this threat.

    • dd121

      How many whites were nominated for this? I suspect as many nominations as Selma got. haha

      • Black Swan

        Woe be to any White pol that votes against this abomination.

    • Greg Thomas

      Right again DB…Don’t worry…the GOP will “grill” her and then rubber stamp her nomination. Happens everytime.

  • Most Americans should be completely floored and outraged that this woman publicly stated that illegal aliens have a “right” to work in the U.S. “regardless of status.” But very few are, and especially among our elected officials from both parties.

    This is one of many proofs that our nation cannot be reformed. We have went beyond the point of ‘no return.’ The only viable options, I think, is an amicable divorce from the Union by states that are fed up with tyranny (my hope!) or a very bloody civil war in which whites will have to take time away from TV and sports and fight for their very survival.

    Loretta Lynch is an ‘enemy within’ who is guaranteed to continue Obama’s destructive policies of racially and culturally displacing whites.

    There is no neutrality.

    • dd121

      Do you think the Republicans will put up serious opposition to her nomination? Me either.

      • Holden

        She knows it’s all theater to placate the masses. Afterwards, they all go to the same bar for drinks and a good laugh at how easy it is to fool the American people.

        • They have the same corporate donors and rub elbows at the same galas and charity events and conferences and retreats and meetings. It’s simply amazing that otherwise intelligent people think the two parties are not on the same team.

      • Black Swan

        One thing that is important to remember. With very few exceptions, Jeff Sessions come to mind, there are no differences between the Democrats and Republicans. Both have the same goals, both work for the same paymasters.

        Importantly, both parties are anti-White.

    • libertarian1234

      “Most Americans should be completely floored and outraged that this woman publicly stated that illegal aliens have a “right” to work in the U.S. “regardless of status.”

      That she doesn’t understand what a “right” truly is reveals quite clearly her lack of intelligence, and because of it, her incompetence for the job.

      • WoodyBBad

        I am outraged. How can a person this high up the ladder think this, much less have plenty of people on board with this idea?

        • You got it backwards; ONLY people who think like this are ALLOWED to climb the ladder any more.

        • Black Swan

          Which one “high up the ladder” doesn’t think this?

          In 2008, millions of young people, new voters, were brainwashed and duped into voting for Obama’s new Rainbow Nation. They are the very ones who are hurt the most by the Obama regime’s policies. Can’t find a decent job. Saddled with worthless degrees and massive debt in their 20s. Slated to take the brunt of supporting Obamacare and massive non-Whites who are entitled for life.

          This group is the most disaffected, IMO, and, if can be reached, will affect the outcome of the next election, at least one can hope. There is so much voter fraud out there that honest elections are a thing from the distant past.

        • dmxinc

          Affirmative action.

    • notyranny

      Agreed!

    • Black Swan

      True, we have “went” beyond the point of no return.

      But it is not states that need to separate, it the entire White tribe that needs to separate from non-Whites. We need to get non-Whites, most of whom would like to see us dead, off our territory and out of our lives otherwise they will be a millstone around our necks.

      We need a homeland for Whites and ONLY Whites, just as Asians and Africans have homelands for their people and ONLY their people.

      Nothing else will work, there is no other alternative. We either separate ourselves and built an exclusive White homeland for future generations of Whites or we will go the way of the dodo bird.

      • Good point, but I’m thinking more along the lines of a collection of states fed up with tyranny that might secede from the Union and implement a confederacy (or whatever one chooses to call it) that would be more in line with white nationalism.

        This is a more likely scenario than one in which a white homeland automatically arises with little or no connection to the existing states. Such a secession may even eventually turn into a white homeland, but I tend to think that this would take time to develop.

    • Greg Thomas

      Her latest statement today is the “law gets in the way” of illegal invaders and their “right to work.” There is no way this country can survive these traitors

    • ricpic

      Ah, but will they take time away from TV and sports? The mere fact that the question has to be asked indicates two things: lack of the fiber necessary to give up comfort even when under extreme threat; the lack of a firm identity, for a firm identity would already be up-in-arms at the anti-white, anti-traditional attack.

  • Easyrhino

    Someone needs to inform these arrogant clowns that the role of the DOJ is to enforce existing laws. The DOJ and or atty-gen doesn’t have the leeway to pick and choose which laws to enforce nor do they have the authority to push an agenda. Perhaps a civics exam on the Constitution should be a prerequisite as part of the vetting process for the job.

  • Luca

    I can’t think of one appointment or decision Obama has made that has done anything other than hurt this country. Why should this one be any different. He’s a malicious Neo-Marxist.

    • EXACTLY!

    • Black Swan

      He does what he’s told by his malicious, Neo-Marxist handlers.

      Don’t give Obama the credit, he’s the front man and fall guy, nothing more. A perfect, teflon dupe. Any criticism is automatically racist.

  • Biff_Maliboo

    Well, you didn’t like an Angry Black Man, so here’s an Angry Black Woman.

    • Right on. A black woman doesn’t have to be screaming and carrying on in order to discern the seething rage deep insider of her. How do I know this? Because no black person reaches similar or exact views of Obama without a deep and abiding resentment of whites. She’s just good at concealing her anger.

  • phillyguy

    I am sick and tired of these so called angry Negroes.

    • libertarian1234

      Amen.

      Of all the people of the earth they have contributed ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to mankind, except trouble, turmoil, crime and violence, and they dumb down every society they emigrate to.

      And, if that isn’t enough, the vast majority of them have mental disorders, which makes them think there are forces against them hiding behind every rock and tree just waiting to try to kill them off.

      • notyranny

        I think they’re right about the last part 🙂

        • No. Not now. But when the mestizos take over this country and the Arabs take over Europe, they will be.

          • notyranny

            The only Race to fear is the Asian Race, smart and ruthless…..however, fear not because a small group of smart motivated Whites can FUp pretty much anybody.

      • Rhialto

        There is no doubt in my mind that Blacks have much anger inside them.

      • badbox27

        Blacks/Africans are scourge on the White race. They are parasites in every sense of the word.

        • They are the one race of homo sapiens that just was never suited to any kind of advanced society, period. This is just made more obvious as time passes. How much more proof do we need?

        • 1G25

          “The white man’s burden… .”

          – Rudyard Kipling , long ago
          .

          • Carney3

            The burden was actually a reference to a duty to uplift. It was not a disparaging reference to non-whites.

          • 1G25

            Sure. Like it’s our duty to uplift, via taxation, affirmative action and tolerance for the destruction of our culture and our country, the anthropoids among us who are born and bred to hate us.

            Kipling wasn’t a bleeding heart liberal. He’d seen he elephant, and knew the crap life has to offer.
            .
            .

          • Carney3

            Re read the poem. He wasn’t PC, but that phrase means what I said it means.

    • notyranny

      Just type in Johnny Rebel on YouTube and listen to some unbelievably anti PC music….Hilarious ! Especially the one called” quit your bitchin N••••R “

  • Mary

    For all practical purposes, Loretta Lynch IS Eric Holder minus the creepy little mustache. It will be a seamless transition.

    • DiversityIsDeath

      Loretta Lynch has her own creepy little mustache too. (And so does the affirmative action afro-admiral.)

  • RacialRay

    A black, female Clinton appointee named Lynch who is best known for pursuing the cops in the sordid Louima affair.

    Sounds like someone I’d like to have looking after my white interests…NOT.

  • my bet she will be if not worse than Hold em up Holder.

    • libertarian1234

      That’s what I was thinking.

      Black males are preposterous, but black females are ludicrous to the extreme.

  • Garrett Brown

    Why was Holder trying to start a war in Libya?

    • Unperson

      The short answer is: Because it would be to the detriment of American whites; and to the benefit of non-American non-whites .

      • Garrett Brown

        I can always come to that conclusion when fighting Jewish wars but what was the Obama administration’s reasoning? Was there another African war we had to stop?

  • Capn Dad

    Duh???….Really ya think?

  • libertarian1234

    She’s a white-hating militant black who intends to use her position to advance blacks and black causes any way she can, just as Holder is doing right now.

    Whether she agrees with Obama on amnesty is a moot point, because it is a treasonous act intended to ethnically cleanse the white population in their own land and it violates the separation of powers laid out in the constitution. Because the action undermines the security of this country, arresting the community organizer should be mandatory for the justice department. Case closed.

    He has actively encouraged the inundation of people into this country who have been taught in their schools that this land is really theirs so they’re just occupying what they have rightfully owned for centuries. Such an attitude constitutes a declaration of war against this country and promoting, facilitating, and encouraging their entry is tantamount to aiding and abetting a hostile foreign force whose intent is to conquer the country and make it an extension of Latin America, especially Mexico.

    The GOP needs to demand that the FBI arrest the community organizer for treason and his executive orders rendered null and void.

    • Bill Moore

      Hello,

      When the Caucasians are gone, civilization will be gone.

      Bill Moore

      • “It’s a mad house!”

        • I’ve often wondered if that was the true inspiration behind planet of the apes. If you really think about the first film, thats EXACTLY what the earth would be like, generations after the whites were gone (assuming blacks somehow became the dominant species) they would be unable to maintain any of our technological advancements beyond the most basic, fire, some simple concepts like a water mill. They would quickly slide back into their tribal groups, and be right back in the same stagnant stage of non-evolution they were in before we found them. A simple, violent people in a simple, intellectually bankrupt society.

          Its hard to buy the thought that the apes arent an obvious stand in for negroes.

  • dd121

    She appears to be just another anti-white race baiter similar to Obama’s other appointments.

    • 1G25

      And incredibly blatant about it.

      • dd121

        That’s why I think the Republicans should oppose her confirmation. If nothing else it tests the waters to see if whites have started to rebel against unequal treatment.

  • “Loretta Lynch’s similarities to Eric Holder”

    Gee, I wonder if that has something to do with the fact that the same person appointed them both to the same job.

  • Bon, From the Land of Babble

    “Republican lawmakers plan to grill U.S. attorney general nominee Loretta Lynch.”

    McCain and Sens. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) and Deb Fischer (R-Neb.) all said in interviews they have met with Lynch privately and are inclined to vote in favor of her nomination.

    Following the July 2014 death of Eric Garner, an unarmed man who died from a possibly, department-prohibited, chokehold by New York City police; Lynch agreed to meet with Garner’s family to discuss possible federal prosecution of the officer believed to be responsible in his death

    Is this Sharpton in drag??

    Have they been seen together?

    She’s got the same nasty, arrogant, mad-at-the world look on her face and the same toilet-brush hair. Here I thought janet reno took the prize for ugly.

    Another racist, affirmative action stooge from harvard for the upper echelons of government.

    She needs to be Borked.

    • Bossman

      Don’t you have better things to do with your time than doing this? Is gender confusion something you relish?

      • Bon, From the Land of Babble

        An ad hominem attack from a virulent, militant anti-White idiot.

        How original.

        In your childish anti-White OPINION I ‘relish gender confusion.’

        I look forward to the day when brainwashed Anti-Whites like you are exposed as the sick idiots you truly are.

        How and when did you first start hating White people?

    • Who Me?

      Yikes! Going purely on looks alone, the old one has the new one beat by a mile. As to any other differences, I couldn’t find any. At least she’s only good till 2016, maybe she won’t do too much damage, faint hope.

  • dave

    When the dog and pony show is over, the Republicrats will give her a pass, and she will be the next Erika Holder.

  • notyranny

    Obama’s interview… So do you hate White People? A. YES! Are you a Communist? A. YES! …..you’re Hired !

  • WR_the_realist

    You generalize overmuch. But I certainly don’t trust anyone selected by Obama — white or nonwhite.

  • IstvanIN

    South African justice system coming to an American state near you.

    • 1G25

      The resurgence of the KKK soon coming to a town near you.

  • IKUredux

    Ms. Lynch wants to lynch Whites. Obviously, she will get appointed.

  • Bill Moore

    Hello jux,

    Well said.

    When the Caucasians are gone, civilization will be gone.

    Africans to Africa, Mexicans to Mexico.

    Bill Moore

    • We will descend into another Dark Ages. It will be the end of democracy, liberalism, and basic concepts such as individual rights. These are all White, European ideas. No other race shares them. By the way, you don’t need to sign your name to your posts, just saying.

      • 1G25

        The NSA has us on file, no matter the handle.

  • Bill Moore

    Hello asdf,

    Well said.

    Unfortunately, a Caucasian Progressive woman that I know has already announced to me that she will be voting for Ben Carson.

    I said, “Please, not another African”. She got pissed off.

    Bill Moore

    • To be fair, I would vote for a Boer any day of the week.

    • If the person to whom I was speaking was an acquaintance of mine, and the conversation was private, I wouldn’t have used the word “African” if you get my drift.

  • LHathaway

    our ancestors put in this thing called voting. i think it’s time we started using it.

  • Mmmmhmmm! *snaps fingers in a descending Z formation*

  • superlloyd

    Below is fundamentally what Glayde Whitney wrote at the turn of the 21st century.

    American founders core political beliefs: 1.Rule of law 2.Individual rights. 3.Personal property guarantee. 4.Shared cultural identity.

    Government core political beliefs now: 1.Government mandated group rights 2.Government controlled redistribution of property. 3.Divisive multi culturalism. 4. Overriding of the law and selective application of existing law to facilitate the first three axioms and decrease freedom of speech and association.

    She is the perfect nominee to facilitate government aims and beliefs as was [email protected]£ Holder.

  • Black Swan

    I’m sure once confirmed with full GOP support, and that is a given, she’ll take up Benghazi and Fast & Furious, right?

    • Carney3

      Don’t try to be cooler than thou by being more despairing than thou. A significant number of Republicans will oppose her. That’s not full support.

      • Black Swan

        We’ll see.

        You are obviously more optimistic about the GOP than I will ever be.

  • Black Swan

    We never learn because we are kept from the truth.

    Hint: Blacks are not the problem.

    • benvad

      Is. It those damn Amish again like G.Soros?

      • Black Swan

        Yes, him and Sheldon Adelson.

  • Will she follow in the footsteps of Eric Holder? She is black. She was selected by Obama. HELLO! What do you THINK?

  • Yes, and NEVER AGAIN fall for the “good black.” Remember Colin Powell? Yep, in the end he showed his true color, (cough) I mean colors.

    • Black Swan

      All of those blacks that pretend to be conservatives, Ben Carson, Colin Powell, Thomas Sowell, Walter Williams, voted for Obama once the curtain in the voting booth was drawn.

      You know it and I know it.

  • Remember the “good cop, bad cop” technique? Well, the Left is using “good black, bad black” in much the same way. Don’t trust ANY blacks; they all hate us and are our enemies. Even those who seem respectable.

  • Black Swan

    Tell the government to take its boot off our necks.

    We know that speaking out could land us in a lot of hot water, job loss, career destruction, branded as a “racist” for life.

    There’s a good reason people keep their mouths shut. Tight.

  • 1G25

    The Great American Negrocracy marches on.

    One day, soon I hope, there’s going to come a reckoning.
    .

  • libertarian1234

    It will be a grave mistake for the GOP to confirm this thing.

    She’s not only unqualified for the job she’s more of a rabid, leftist hater of this country and the white people who founded and built it than the rat look-a-like, Holder.

    There is no evil like the evil of a black female who has a ton of mouth and an ounce of brains.

  • 1G25

    Abner Louima, a recent Haitian immigrant, walked over to the lawful and peaceful arrest of a negro across the street, and interfered with the police officers, eventually getting physical with them, and when he was placed under arrest, resisted physically.

    Maybe next time he’ll either behave, or carry his own KY Jelly.
    .

    • John Jackson

      You’re the worst kind of moron. You obviously didn’t read a word of what he said. I don’t care if he did interfere or resist arrest, is that a crime? Sure? Should he have been punished for it? Yes, but not like that.

      Also, I find it a bit strange that you are trying to defend people who would stick a nightstick up some guys rectum, is that the kind of crowd you run with? Any white person who gets their jollies sodomizing a Haitian is no friend of mine.

      • 1G25

        A) I intimated that when a lowlife POS f***s with a bull, he often gets the horn. That’s all.

        B) Who does one have to sodomize to qualify as a friend of yours?

        • John Jackson

          Really? That’s the best you can do?

    • Rustler

      Trolls like this have no place in the nationalist movement.

  • 1G25

    ” You know, I thought there would be this mass uprising by whites to at least break off parts of ‘fly over America’ but that’s not happening.”

    Maybe not… seacoast colonists attacked British merchant ships in 1771 over oppressive measures by the Crown, and the Boston Tea Party was in 1773, three years before the Declaration, and some inland colonists were into guerrilla warfare against the Redcoats years before that… I think conservative aggravation is evolving, headed for the boiling point, eventually.

    The Texas Nationalist Movement gains strength and numbers daily, and some local periodicals in small towns aren’t loathe to mention it occasionally.
    .

  • Epiminondas

    Let’s just do without an AD for a couple of years. It couldn’t be any worse than having another Holder.

  • 1G25

    “Even most of the ‘patriots’ are cowards.”

    Do you include eight million veterans in that tally ?

  • Vito Powers

    Here’s an excerpt of an exchange between Senator Jeff Sessions and Lynch

    SEN. JEFF SESSIONS (R-AL): The president’s action would give people who came here unlawfully the right to work, participate in social security and medicare, when Congress has not done that, allows them to stay for at least a period lawfully. Let me ask you, in the workplace of America today when we have a high number of unemployed, we have had declining wages for many years, the lowest percentage of Americans working, who has more right to a job in this country? A lawful immigrant who is here — a green card holder — or a citizen, or someone who came here illegally.

    LORETTA LYNCH: Senator, I believe that the right and obligation to work is shared by everyone in this country, regardless of how they came here. When one is here, regardless of status, I would prefer they be participating in the workplace than not be.

    Go to realclearpolitics if you want to see a video of it.

  • She is the one to put the nail in the coffin of white privilege. But her style will be discreet. A fancy lady.

    • newscomments70

      What the hell is white privilege? is that a joke? 30,000 white women are raped every year by black men while the reverse almost never happens. A black male is 39x more likely to attack a white male than the reverse. Millions of whites have been shut of work, promotion, and universities because of affirmative action, which is institutionalized racism. How is is this a privilege? Is being raped a privilege?

  • John Jackson

    I agree 100%, I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: White people’s problem is not the Jews, the Blacks, the Hispanics, or the Arab Muslims – it’s other whites.

  • Rustler

    This is political theatre. Most Republicans support amnesty and open borders too.

    We need a nationalist political party in the USA now. The GOP will never become a pro-white party. Not ever. Let’s put that delusion to rest once and for all, we have wasted enough time already.

  • You make a valid point, and NO I don’t believe any secession will be peaceful, although as I noted in my comments that this was “my hope.”

  • Is anyone else having this problem?

  • Ohmy!

    Even though Loretta Lynch has my maiden name, I hope to God that she doesn’t become the next Attorney General of the U.S.A. I am sick to death of liberals and their destructive policies. My children know that in the future, I will not elect a black person to office, no matter how wonderful that individual may seem.

  • ricpic

    She is blatantly lawless. Okay, no surprise there. And I suppose it will be no surprise when she gets enough Republican votes to be confirmed. Which means that both parties are in agreement that the constitution is to be trampled to death. Which leaves us with the rule of men, not the rule of law. Since I don’t think enough are willing to risk very much let alone everything for liberty…..expect slavery.