David Duke Again Takes Advantage of Media Airtime to Lie and Mislead

David Neiwert, SPLC, January 13, 2015

The recent scandal that erupted over Rep. Steve Scalise’s speaking appearance before David Duke’s white-supremacist organization, the European-American Union and Rights Organization (EURO), inevitably meant that mainstream media would be turning to Duke himself for answers to their questions. And indeed, Duke was interviewed on several media outlets early this month, on CNN and on Fox News.

And as usually occurs when Duke gets airtime, he parlayed the interview into an opportunity to propagandize and sell both his twisted worldview and his books. Most of all, Duke performed his specialty, which is to sell outright falsehoods and self-serving distortions.

Duke appeared first on CNN with Michael Smerconish for his weekly news-interview program on Jan. 3, then on Jan. 5 for an appearance on Fox News’ “The O’Reilly Factor” with Bill O’Reilly. On both programs, Duke attempted to make the familiar claim that he isn’t a white supremacist or a racist.

{snip}

In reality, ethnic advocacy groups such as the NAACP and the National Council of La Raza (which Duke also mentioned in attempting a similar line of argument with O’Reilly) are genuinely about advancing the interests of the ethnic groups they represent, and are not even remotely hate groups because they do not engage in demonizing and promoting false smears about people of other ethnicities. Nor do they engage in political agendas aimed at attacking the interests of other racial groups.

All of these groups are thus understood to be working well within the mainstream of American politics. So a politician who engages with such groups is indeed listening to a range of his or her constituents and is acting well within the mainstream.

However, that is not the case with any kind of hate group, who typically represent only a tiny bandwidth of any constituency and whose beliefs represent a vicious kind of extremism that the vast majority of Americans repudiate. Any politician who engages with them is not only displaying questionable judgment by coddling frequently violent extremists, but is in the process helping to legitimize them by lending them the credibility of their public office.

{snip}

Topics: , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • anony

    So, the $PLC gets to define a “hate” group. Yeah, that’s making sense. Next.

    • WR_the_realist

      The $PLC is a hate group.

      • RonanTheLibtardian

        I may have to start a site called: “HustleWatch” to monitor the subversives over at the SPLC. They hate America something awful.

        • LHathaway

          Not as much as I do.

    • Juggernaut3000

      Unfortunately, the $PLC does get to define “White” as a hate group, all of that is. In their eyes we are all potential Nazis with our “shaky trigger fingers” ready to fire up the ovens.

      The media feature anti-White Mark Potok front and center as if he is some sort of God and his words come from on high. This is because he and his ilk control the media.

      • anony

        I did some research on the $PLC years ago, and found some pretty unsavory things about Morris Dees. He surely is a sleaze ball.

      • Realist

        White people need to stop whining and do something about it.

        • HJ11

          It all starts with one. You are one.

          • anony

            “I am only one, but still I am one.
            I cannot do everything, but still I can do something.
            And because I cannot do everything,
            I will not refuse to do the something I can do.”

            Edward Everett Hale

    • Fr. John+

      You took the latkes right out of my mouth, Anony.

      • anony

        Glad to be of help. 🙂

  • Easyrhino

    “Duke performed his specialty, which is to sell outright falsehoods and self-serving distortions.”
    Isn’t this the sole goal of the $PLC?

    • TheMaskedUnit

      I wish somebody would point out the errors and skip the libelous assertions.

    • “Duke performed his specialty, which is to sell outright falsehoods and self-serving distortions.” – David Neiwert

      That sentence says more about the accuser than the accused. It’s projection.

      • Juggernaut3000

        We know this and repeating that here is like preaching to the proverbial choir. The problem is David Neiwert and his ilk have utter control of the media, therefore THEY get to dictate what the masses do and do no hear and suppress those they do not like, like Daivid Duke for instance.

        This is why it is critical to go out there and spread the word. The Chinese are being targeted by the Culture of Critique, by the way, although I understand they are very well aware of the implications of what that means. Read this and pass it along.

        http //tinyurl com/p2h5p3p

        “Projection” is freudian gobble-de-good, BTW, concocted to push psychopathology on the White race.

        • anony

          Psychology and Psychiatry both are designed to critique Whites.

          • RonanTheLibtardian

            Given their brains are the highest evolved.

            It’s not hard determining what’s going through a ‘gibsmedats’ mind.

          • Jacobite2

            “The Culture of Critique” by Kevin Macdonald. Best discussion of psychoanalysis and the other social studies I’ve seen, and I’ve seen some.

      • propagandaoftruth

        I could go through this hack piece and repudiate 100% of it’s slanted, racist canards.

        When all morality and sanity have been inverted I will fiercely serve the “dark side” and howl at the moon.

        • Juggernaut3000

          Does that mean you agree with David Duke?

          • propagandaoftruth

            I respect the man. I may not agree with what I think you are leading to, though there is truth in it.

          • Jacobite2

            Duke believes the same things 95% of American whites did 70 years ago. The problem is that he’s uneducated and so has no access to more culture-based arguments. The bigger problem is that, unlike 70 years ago, there are no educated white people to throw him a line. Those whose minds are right don’t agree, and those who agree won’t risk their careers, if not safety, to speak up. If you disagree, read up on what 2% of the US population were able to do to the most admired man in America after he gave a perfectly truthful speech about US involvement in WW II. This was 1941.

          • Guest

            Do you have a problem with Duke?

      • RonanTheLibtardian

        “Projection” is a cultural Marxist staple.
        It’s the Stalin and Mao equivalent to “the Party line”.

  • connorhus

    LA Raza and the NAACP don’t engage in smears against Whites?

    They make up their own reality as well as their own history as they go.

    • Juggernaut3000

      Their own history is made up for them. They are told what their great historical accomplishments are, and that Whites stole from them what they created.

      Black average IQ is 70-80, Hispanic around 90, both sub-100. They have no history to speak of, no accomplishments except canabalism and human sacrifice.

      They do not write textbooks or create shows for the history channel.

    • RonanTheLibtardian

      I call it “the parallel narrative”. The crux of cultural Marxism is “the parallel narrative”.

      A narrative that can not survive truth and facts can only survive as a parallel one.

  • See The Future

    It is an act of treason for any political representative to cater to any identifiable religious or racial group. How can any politician stand for his constituents when he is actively lobbied by foreigners and cults.

    • Juggernaut3000

      How can any high-level cabinet members have dual citizenship? Isn’t that divided loyalty?

      • anony

        It depends on what the meaning of “divided” is.

        Or what the meaning of “loyalty” is.

        Or “what the meaning of “is” is.”

  • MekongDelta69

    Ahh – Morris Sleaze’s $PLC is ranting again.

    This is what I hear whenever they babble about anything:
    “Blah, blah, blah, yadda, yadda, yadda, racist, racist, racist.”

    • Zimriel

      Hah. I got “moderated” (to dev/null) when I posted a pro-Zimmerman comment over there, back when that was A Thing. Nowadays we know Zimmerman was right to defend himself.

      Again: SPLC has only one principle, and that is the subjugation of whites. They’ll even ruin the character of a Peruvian mestizo if that will serve the cause of subjugation of whites.

    • Juggernaut3000

      My comments about Morris Dees were up for about an hour on this very site before they were deleted.

      No obscenities, only truth about him and his divorce settlement.

      • MekongDelta69

        I left about 4 comments with some back and forth from the usual brain-dead idiots. I told them everything they were going to say in advance, and as usual, they didn’t let me down. All of them are mind-numbed zombies, who parrot the same things ad nauseum. Nothing‘s changed with any of these people in 50 years.

        Somehow, my comments were left up overnight, but true to form, they were deleted this morning. No leftist can stand up to FACTS which blow apart his fragile and distorted world-view.

        • Itooktheredpill

          My leftist, short green hair, vegan, yoga instructor, kumbaya aunt essentially banned all talk about “politics” ( race) during christmas dinner this year after I almost made her cry over the summer.

          However it seems her brother who is the complete opposite of her missed the memo and made a comment about the stupidity of blacks that totally flustered her. Had me grinning rest of dinner.

  • OS-Q

    “…Nor do they engage in political agendas aimed at attacking the interests of other racial groups.”

    Because if you ask the SPLC, white people:

    1. Don’t exist
    2. Don’t have anything to worry about AND
    3. Deserve to be punished.

  • HJ11

    Duke got under their skin. Good.

    Check out his Website. There’s no hate there, only a lot of facts about the real haters.

    • Diversity Fatigue

      Whats up with Duke going to Iran and having a meeting with Ahmadinejad? Duke is a nutjob.

      • curri

        It should be obvious that the main enemy of whites worldwide is the neo-Bolshevist regime in Washington. Iran is hardly pro-white, but it’s clearly an enemy of the American Empire and its homogenizing, “Last Man,” secular hedonist and Cultural Marxist ideology.

      • HJ11

        No, you are the nutjob and a troll. Toddle off to shul.

      • Juggernaut3000

        Why don’t you find out WHY he went to Iran instead of running your keyboard.
        Why was he in Iran? What possible reason did Dr. Duke have for going there?

        Read up on Duke, what he stands for and what his message is (pro-White, BTW), otherwise you are a tool of White enemies and support their agenda of White genocide, no small thing that Dr. Duke speaks out against publicly and daily.

      • HJ11

        Troll talk. Iran is not our enemy. In fact, the Iranians are the cousins of most Whites. Iran means the land of the Aryans.

        • David Ashton

          The problem is the Zoroastrians were killed or driven out by the Muslims.

  • Mack0

    David Duke in a nutshell; jews, jews and more jews. I’m sure he’s sincere but he has a one track mind.

    • Chip Carver

      At least he’s not disingenuous like those who deny the root of the problem.

      • Mack0

        Very true. He makes valid points.

        • Sparky

          And the root of the problem is?

          • anony

            Do your own homework. If you really want the answer to your questions, there is plenty of information available. Read, study, think.

          • LACountyRedneck

            Clueless folks.

        • Fair Dinkum

          Even a blind hog will find an acorn now and then.

      • Sparky

        And what is the root of the problem?

        • Sid Ishus

          Pesky Eskimos.

      • Diversity Fatigue

        I dont like neo nazis, Chip.

        • HJ11

          That’s because you’re Jewish.

        • Juggernaut3000

          What is it, exactly, that makes David Duke a Neo-Nazi?

          That term is used to shut down any and all opposition or criticism of those who push for the genocide of the White race.

          It appears you side with the genoicidists of the White race. Why is that?

          • Chip Carver

            Duke isn’t a neo Nazi. That’s one of the usual smear tactics employed by The Usual Suspects. They try to brush anyone and everyone who knows what’s going on with that old moniker. The second you see someone use that term, you can bet it’s one of our enemies pretending to be on our side … but for this “one thing”. The people that use this term are neo-bolsheviks and neo-mensheviks, some of whom even hide behind the term neoconservative.

          • anony

            Neo-Nazi, just like “racist”, has lost all meaning. Use of the term, in addition to your points, immediately classifies the user as ignorant, and not worth conversing with.

        • HJ11

          How do you feel about Zionists? Er, how about Neo-Zionists?

        • LACountyRedneck

          Zionists are a much bigger problem for Gentiles. I don’t believe there are any Nazis alive today.

        • ThomasER916

          You’re the problem.

    • HJ11

      It’s the right track, though.

      • Diversity Fatigue

        No it isnt.

        • ThomasER916

          Yes it is. You’re the problem.

    • Henry Higgins

      But people who endlessly obsess over ‘negro DNA’ don’t.
      Whatever.

      • Mack0

        What’s your point?

    • Diversity Fatigue

      Duke lost it about ten years ago. He became obsessed with Jews. I think he is a paranoid schizophrenic.

      • Mack0

        And that’s my point. He focuses exclusively on the Jews and has demonstrated sympathy for Islam in the vain of ” the enemy of my enemy is my friend”

      • LACountyRedneck

        Some people believe the negro is our biggest problem. They are relatively easy to handle.

      • ThomasER916

        You’re the problem. You’re the delusional one.

        Any White who screams “Neo-Nazi” at this stage is still so indoctrinated they’re beyond stupid.

        • SoulInvictus

          Yup.
          Whenever I see stuff like that still on here, my first thought is that…does this person not realize that “neo-nazi” has been watered down (or concentrated?) to mean virtually anyone of European descent that believes their culture, genetics, and national boundaries are worthy of preservation. Usually accomplished merely by a moderate and sane exclusion or deportation of foreigners, not a genocidal rampage.

          That would accurately describe the views of the vast majority of readers here. Which is why I never jump on the bash the neo-nazi bandwagon no matter how stupid I may find the actual neo-nazi movement, who are most likely manipulated by Feds just as the Klan was anyway.

          Though antagonistic, unlikely to win hearts and minds, etc… they’re white and unashamed, and so still preferably to those that freely wield the neo-nazi cudgel to silence any sort of European unity.

          Of course, to go actual “neo-nazi”, one would merely need to advocate an Israeli style immigration policy.

          Side-note: Neon-Nazi would be kind of a cool band name.

    • mael

      He’s right more than he’s wrong. Those of us that learned history before it was re-written by the victor know this. Look what happened to David Irving when he dug a little too deep…………..

    • Raydonn

      And he is 100% correct…………..

    • Juggernaut3000

      He openly and publicly stands up for Whites in the face of incredible opposition from powerful forces that smear him and what he does daily.

      If you’d like to point out where Mr. Duke is wrong, I’d be happy to look it over.

      • Mack0

        Does he believe the Protocols of the Elders of Zion is legit?

        • HJ11

          Legit or not, it does seem to tell the tale correctly.

        • David Ashton

          Find out and tell us. The “reason” people (especially Arabs) believe this demonstrably concocted document is because it seems “to fit the facts”. It is these “facts” that need to be discussed, with accuracy and discernment.

          For reasons to question the “authenticity” of the Protocols, you need to study the new relevant textual analyses by De Michelis and Hagemeister. My opinion, after long study of all aspects, is that it combined some Jewish notions in a “parodic” form, and was a response primarily to the Jewish-Masonic political influence in late 19th century France and its linkage to Russia at a time of economic crisis.

        • Juggernaut3000

          I asked you to point out where he is wrong.

          • Mack0

            His support for Islam. He’s a fool supporting Islam in any capacity.

          • ThomasER916

            We’re still waiting.

          • Mack0

            Waiting for what? He believes in Jewish conspiracies. It’s on him to prove it. Even if some of what he says about jews are true they are only doing what ever white nationalist wants to do but does poorly-stick together and pursue their groups interests. Instead of blaming Jews for everything try to understand what they do right.

        • ThomasER916

          I don’t care if George Orwell’s “1984” is “legit.”

          I don’t care if Aldous Huxley’s “Brave New World” is “legit.”

          I read them because that’s as close to the truth of this Empire of Lies as we’ll ever get.

          • SoulInvictus

            Well said.

    • David Ashton

      There is something in this, as there always has been. But why not refute him on specifics rather than just use abuse – it won’t work in the end.

    • Laura Dilworth

      Not true

  • Tim_in_Indiana

    In reality, ethnic advocacy groups such as the NAACP and the National Council of La Raza … are genuinely about advancing the interests of the ethnic groups they represent, and are not even remotely hate groups because they do not engage in demonizing and promoting false smears about people of other ethnicities.

    So they instead promote true smears? Biggest laugh of the article! I suppose saying or implying that whitey is responsible for all black troubles is not a “smear” at all!

    Any politician who engages with them is not only displaying questionable judgment by coddling frequently violent extremists

    Has the SPLC ever bothered to check the black-on-white violence rate? It’s far, far higher than the reverse. Who are the real “violent extremists” here?

    • Chip Carver

      Professor Angel Gutierrez: “We have got to eliminate the gringo, and what I mean by that is if the worst comes to the worst, we have got to kill him.”
      http://www-dot-brokencountry-dot-com/index.php/2014/08/05/arlington-texas-professor-jose-angel-gutierrez-rants-about-killing-the-american-gringo/

      • Sparky

        But they aren’t the “root” of the problem, right?

        • Diversity Fatigue

          Chip is a neo who cant back up anything he says.

          • Julius Caesar

            I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. I don’t like (any) Muslims, and the good majority of Jews, blacks, Mexicans, Asians etc. What does that make me? I believe they are ALL the problem of the White race, not to single out one group. I’m an equal opportunity hater.

        • LACountyRedneck

          Correct.

      • David Ashton

        “Oh yes please, that’s just what we white-skinned Anglos deserve – I learned all about how evil we are at school and university.” – Joe Dopey BA (Sociology).

        • LexiconD1

          Now you know why he’s got time to participate in those ‘protests’.

          He’s not getting a JOB with that worthless degree.

          • ThomasER916

            The Culture of Critique isn’t hiring Whites.

          • LexiconD1

            Especially one that has a worthless degree that leads to no jobs other than ‘teaching.’

  • Truthseeker

    In reality, ethnic advocacy groups such as the NAACP and the National Council of La Raza (which Duke also mentioned in attempting a similar line of argument with O’Reilly) are genuinely about advancing the interests of the ethnic groups they represent, and are not even remotely hate groups because they do not engage in demonizing and promoting false smears about people of other ethnicities. Nor do they engage in political agendas aimed at attacking the interests of other racial groups.

    If you acknowledge that different racial groups have different interests, you’re in effect acknowledging that they shouldn’t be living in the same country. We don’t live in a world where demographics are a mere triviality, and nothing anyone does affects anyone else. It all ties together, and the shape society takes will not affect every group the same way.

    Turning the country our ancestors founded into a Third World mess where degenerate Third World culture is the mainstream is most definitely attacking the interests of Whites. Fighting for more affirmative action policies is most definitely attacking the interests of Whites. Lobbying to let illiterate, violent, disease-ridden peasants stay in our country after entering illegally is most definitely attacking the interests of Whites. We gain nothing from any of this, and in each case, we lose something valuable. Drop the line about how no one’s attacking our interests, because we’re not idiots.

  • Christorchaos

    You can tell when they use this formulation that there are no falsehoods and are at best only distortions which of course can be gainsaid :

    to sell outright falsehoods and self-serving distortions

    Even race baiters like SPLC have a little bit of an academic conscience. Their slip is showing.

  • WR_the_realist

    Any pro-white group is called white supremacist. Any pro-black or pro-Hispanic, pro-illegal immigrant group is called a civil rights group.

  • Mary

    Well, also remember: Whites are not actually an ethnic group, anyway. We are merely an evil social construct, and we really enjoy bullying and exploiting all the poor, innocent blacks and browns of the world. Our evil presence needs to be eradicated…as long as we leave our wealth.

    • Julius Caesar

      I always ask the leftists…if the White race does not exist, how can you get rid of it? Are you telling me you’re actively fighting a mere illusion? From there I point out that they may need to seek professional help for that problem.

      • ThomasER916

        I usually brow beat them until they’re an emotional wreck. I’m not going to be cordial with anti-Whites.

  • JohnEngelman

    I have no use for David Duke, and his message of anti Semitism.

    Nevertheless, I would want a politician to be able to speak at an American Renaissance Conference without damaging his career.

    Race realism is not the same as anti Semitism.

    • Reynardine

      The ones who got us into this race-y mess, are, unfortunately of the semitic disposition.

      Certainly, if you accept evolution, does not your philosophy have room for human parasitism as an evolutionary strategy as well?

      • JohnEngelman

        What matters for human evolution are genes that enable higher intelligence.

        • Nature doesn’t necessarily favour higher intelligence. It favours groups that manage to survive. Nothing more to it.

          • Reynardine

            Yes, though might I add that it’s not only who manages to survive, but also who has their offspring survive as well. If intelligence interferes with this, then it’s evolutionarily detrimental and will be selected against.

          • The modern welfare state as we know it is about a half-century old. That’s an eyeblink in terms of evolution, unless one is talking about bacteria or fruit flies. Welfare is thus far dysgenic only in terms of breeding idiots who can not take care of themselves. But the Gibsmedatistanis aren’t biologically set up to survive a major natural disaster.

            Let’s use Hurricane Katrina as an example. The National Weather Service had been tracking the path of the storm. Much of New Orleans is below sea level. Everyone knew approximately where and when it would reach shore. How many of the Gibsmedatistanis bothered filling up empty jugs with potable tapwater, just so they’d have something clean to drink after salt water and backed-up sewage got into the drinking water after the storm? We don’t have hurricanes in Colorado, but we have a month’s worth of tapwater for three people in 1.75L plastic liquor bottles in the basement. We rotate the water once a year, using the old stuff on the garden plants. If a bottle cracks or is otherwise damaged, it goes in the recycle bin. This therefore costs absolutely nothing. Widemouth 1.75L plastic juice bottles can also be used for storing dry, non-perishable foods, such as rice, split peas, lentils, dried beans, flour, and the like. Plastic screwtop bottles are weatherproof, insects can’t get in them, and while mice could chew through them, they can’t smell the food inside, so they won’t bother (especially when the bottles of food are stored in the attic, some 20 feet above ground).

            There is an overpopulation of people who are congenitally unable to take care of themselves. They are thus exquisitely vulnerable to any failure at all in the tax-funded support chain that keeps them alive. That’s not a recipe for biological success. That’s catastrophic disaster just waiting to happen.

          • Tarczan

            I have a bunch of water purification systems. I also have a couple of lifestraws, I’ve used them in some of the streams around here and had no problems. Plenty of streams and rivers in Ohio.

            I’m also working on edible plants, I have a few identified, and I am planning on shooting my gun and becoming proficient with it. I also have a lot of food stored, along with a wood stove and wood.

            My arguement is that people spends thousands every year on various forms of insurance they never use, why not spend a little on another form of insurance, one that will not go to waste, either way?

          • JohnEngelman

            Evolution happens at the individual level. Throughout human evolution the trend has been toward higher intelligence.

          • Individuals can be lumped into groups on the basis of similarity. Evolutionary trends are just trends. They can change over time.

          • WR_the_realist

            Until now. But now stupid people get welfare if they breed and more welfare if they breed more. Smart people in every western nation + Japan have below replacement birth rates. Currently stupidity is selected for by evolution.

          • JohnEngelman

            Dysgenics is a passing phase.

          • WR_the_realist

            It only has to last for a few generations to wipe out civilization. And do keep in mind that the biggest advocates of dysgenics are Democrats. The alternative, eugenics, is a horror to them.

          • JohnEngelman

            Aid to Families with Dependent Children was replaced with Temporary Assistance for Needy Families. Eventually TANF will be eliminated.

          • David Ashton

            Prove it.
            In the long run, we are all dead.
            You have read Lynn on the Jews (in demographic decline) – now read him on Dysgenics.
            When the sows’ ears outnumber the silk purses there is not much hope left.

          • JohnEngelman

            Neither of us will be alive ten thousand years from now. I predict that the average intelligence will be higher than it is now, probably much higher, just as the average intelligence now is higher than it was ten thousand years ago.

            In “RACE, EVOLUTION AND BEHAVIOR, Professor J. Philippe Rushton, who spoke at six American Renaissance Conferences, drew a distinction between the K-strategy and the r-strategy for reproduction.

            Humans that practice K-strategy have few children, and provide well for them. Humans that practice r-strategy have many children, and provide poorly or not at all all for them.

            K-strategy is usually followed by individuals and races with higher average IQ’s. In the long run those who follow K-strategy have more descendents.

          • David Ashton

            I think it may have been Nietzsche who said that the socialism of time, which respected past achievement and sought to create an improved future human being, was preferable to a socialism of space, which was concerned only to maintain the present comfort of everyone currently alive.

          • LHathaway

            Just where did he come up with the label ‘K’ strategy?

          • JohnEngelman

            Harvard University biologist E.O. Wilson was the first to use the term r-K Life-History Theory. He used it to explain population change in plants and animals. I have applied it to the human races.

            – J. Philippe Rushton

            I do not know where E.O. Wilson came up with those terms.

            K-strategy is favored by the more advanced animal species, and with humans, the more advanced races.

            When I tried to explain that to Tim Wise he became abusive.

            Anti racists cannot present their arguments with facts and logic. So they present them with invective, obscene words, and the ability to destroy the careers of those they disagree with.

          • LHathaway

            You’re provide us with a wealth of knowledge, as always.

          • JohnEngelman

            Thank you.

          • BlueSonicStreak

            John, I’m very curious to know when and where you had this conversation with Wise. Did you really speak with him directly? Is there any record of this conversation online?

          • JohnEngelman

            We had an e-mail conversation in September 2013. If you would like a copy of it, please click on my avatar, and send me an e-mail letter. Because I did not get Tim Wise’s permission to post it publicly, I ask you not to post it publicly.

          • BlueSonicStreak

            I will do so in a minute or so, and I understand. You can trust me not to burn my sources.

            I used to read/believe in virtually everything Wise said as a liberal twenty-something, so I have a weird flinch every time I see his name. I first started seeing real problems with him when I noticed on his Facebook page that people were calling him out as living in a gated community, although I’m not sure how to confirm if that’s true. He also arrogantly flipped out at an Asian guy criticizing him.

            He’s got a very strange personality from where I’m sitting; very driven to power while adopting a posture of supplication to non-whites for forgiveness.

          • JohnEngelman

            I wonder who the people are who pay for Tim Wise’s books and appearances. I suspect that the great majority are middle class blacks, who achieved their middle class status with the assistance of affirmative action policies, and who want to believe that they deserve their jobs, rather than the whites and Asians who performed better, and did not get those jobs.

            I am liberal on most issues. I believe the liberal tendency to make excuses for blacks has run liberalism off the rail, and led to the Republican domination of the United States that I regret.

          • BlueSonicStreak

            Well, I admit to having bought his books. So yeah. He’s also very popular with young white liberals – or was, until recently. Some of his apparent mask has slipped; and the young liberal blogosphere has been crucifying him lately for not properly checking his white privilege.

            You have to understand that people like Wise and Macklemore don’t stay on top for very long in those circles because they WANT white guys to fail. If Wise continually succeeded in saying all the right things, it would challenge the idea that white men are doomed to behave in racist ways and cannot be trusted. (In the case of Wise, he really does seem to be “off.” In the case of Macklemore I think people have pretty much invented reasons to hate him.)

            I’m liberal on several issues as well. I just can no longer stand to identify myself as “a liberal,” as I feel the overall ideology connected with that identity is being invaded by a creeping toxicity.

          • JohnEngelman

            I sent you the file. If you do not get it, send me another e-mail letter.

            When I was in college the white liberal guilt complex was understandable. For white liberals the most important issue was the War in Vietnam. We wanted black allies. In addition, legally sanctioned segregation was a recent memory. It was easy to believe that black deficiencies were the result of racial discrimination.

            Currently white college students have been discriminated against by affirmative action policies. Every day in the colleges they did get into they see blacks who are less intelligent than white friends who applied to the colleges and did not get in.

            In the two generations since the civil rights legislation has been signed black crime and illegitimacy have gotten worse. Their academic performance has hardly improved at all, despite expensive efforts to help them. It should be obvious that black deficiencies are the result of black genes, rather than white racism.

          • anony

            “… just as the average intelligence now is higher than it was ten thousand years ago.”

            That is probably a true statement simply because there are more intelligent people alive today than were alive 10K years ago. But that does not mean that human intelligence is greater now than then.

          • anony

            ” Currently stupidity is selected for by evolution.”

            It is certainly selected for by the welfare state.

          • Reynardine

            You presume a selective evolutionary pressure that increases intelligence.

            Those days are over for the foreseeable future.

          • JohnEngelman

            Computer technology increases the relationship between intelligence and income.

            I am looking at the big picture for the long term.

          • David Ashton

            But income does not necessarily produce kids.

          • Reynardine

            But does computer technology increase the relationship between intelligence and bearing offspring?

          • JohnEngelman

            Mastery of computer technology makes it possible for a man to support a family well.

            What matters is not having a lot of children. What matters is having a lot of descendents.

          • Reynardine

            Mastery of computer technology makes it possible for a man to support a family well.

            There is no guarantee that he will, and indeed, evidence to the contrary.

          • anony

            I think that genetic engineering will be the critical factor in increasing human intelligence. This may happen in the foreseeable future, perhaps much sooner than we think.

          • JohnEngelman

            Throughout human evolution intelligent people usually have had more descendants than stupid people. That is why modern humans are more intelligent than humans were 100,000 years ago, a million years ago, and so on.

            It is reasonable to assume that this tendency will continue.

          • Reynardine

            Don’t confuse nutrition with evolution.

            When we learned to cook our food, there was another IQ jump. Back then, however, evolutionary pressures towards intellectual selection were still commonplace (wolves, starvation, rivals), so the cooking allowed us to engage in an evolutionary feedback loop to improve ourselves.

            The huge boost in IQ over the last several years can be attributed to the massive availability of meat at your local grocery store.

            To be able to have active genetic trend towards intelligence, you must first show me a modern evolutionary pressure that selects for that.

          • JohnEngelman

            Civilization exerts greater evolutionary pressure for intelligence than hunting, because intelligent men are usually more prosperous in a civilized country than unintelligent men. Thus they have been able to have more children who survived and reproduced.

          • Reynardine

            I trust you’ve never been hunting if you really think that. Hunting is actually rather a strenuous and difficult activity, even in its modern incarnation. I’m not talking about game farms where the animal is docile and is set in a field somewhere, either. Take away all the modern conveniences (engineered calls, decoys, camo, scent blockers, modern hunting rifles, optics, modern traps, thermal insulation, vehicles) and hunting just becomes more and more difficult.

            Rural life is far more difficult than city life and consequently requires much more planning. I can drive a few miles to a store now at any time, but when I lived in a rural setting, it was a monthly or bi-monthly trip where I had to estimate what I’d need. This behaviour still informs my own shopping habits, and even though I’m in a city, I’m stocked up on lots of food and supplies.

            Coming from a rural background, city life is ridiculously and hilariously easy and I can understand why people pick it. Prices are much cheaper too because of economies of scale and sizeable second-hand markets.

            In a civilization, there is significant division of labour, and you can be a complete doofus, but as long as you provide some sort of marketable skill you can receive money. A lot of my city friends are complete idiots who keep less than a day’s worth of food in their houses and cannot cook, but they manage to feed themselves through one or two skills they’ve developed and the infrastructure of food that cities provide. My city friends aren’t having children, either, but my rural friends are because they need them on the farm.

          • JohnEngelman

            It has always taken a great deal of intelligence to be sucessful as a merchant, a money lender, a scribe, or a government official. It has taken more intelligence than to be a sucessful paleolithic hunter or a farmer. We should remember that during most of history most farmers were landless farm laborers, or peasants who owned small plots.

            Those who became sucessful as merchants, money lenders, scribes, or government officials usually become more affluent than hunters and farmers. Consequently they have had more descendents.

          • Reynardine

            The occupations you describe – merchants, money-lenders, scribes, government officials – are outcomes of large, successful landholding farming and warrior-hunter societies. Scribes developed at least in Sumeria in order to track farming resources more efficiently with cunieform tablets. Geometry in ancient Egypt developed out of a need to divide arable land into efficient sectors. Astrology and astronomy developed out of a need to track time calendrically for the knowledge of when best to farm or hunt.

            The most efficient farmers and hunters became other things, and improved their original line through nutrition and inter-breeding with other intelligent farmers and hunters. The evolutionary pressure was subsequently removed with their offspring otherwise. This is why nobility developed in the first place, to ensure that the work of those evolutionary pressures were not bred-out.

            If we’re all descended from merchants, money-lenders, and scribes (VERY recent occupations that would have had little evolutionary influence), why do so many of us have genes that are specifically for farming and herding (starch-processing amylase and milk-digesting lactase)?

            There is definitely a reason why many aristocrats treasure and still treasure hunting:
            it’s a primordial expression of their ancestoral activity.

            Stupid hunters die. Stupid scribes just don’t get a bonus at the end of the year.

          • Weisheit77

            The IQ fetishism that has no regard for historic cultures, nor beauty or athleticism. John the mad scientist is going to whip up some super humans by selectively breeding Japanese and Jews. I just hope these new super humans aren’t as predictable and as dry as his posts are.

          • David Ashton

            We could just rely on robotic androids.
            But I love the culture of Aristotle, Chaucer, Shakespeare, Bach, Verdi, Da Vinci, Eliot, Pound, Galton………&c &c &c.

          • David Ashton

            Overall, but there is evidence to suggest that civilizations begin to degenerate when their productive elites get luxurious and lazy, and fail to reproduce like kind, while the welfare system they have created allows the multiplication of people who can only produce babies, i.e. the “proles”.

          • JohnEngelman

            Alternately, one can argue that the Western Roman Empire fell because peasant owned family farms were consolidated into large estates worked by slaves. When the peasants lost their land they had little incentive to support the Western Roman Empire.

            In the Eastern Roman Empire, which came to be called the Byzantine Empire, the government preserved family farms in return for military service by the sons of the peasants.

            The Western Roman Empire fell in 476. The Byzantine Empire lasted until 1453.

          • dean53

            Exactly. Atomistic, individualistic, high IQ whites don’t stand a chance against group-think, collectivist low-IQ blacks.

          • Henry Higgins

            We don’t stand a chance against collectivist anybody. But the real power behind anti-white are the ultimate collectivists.

          • Reynardine

            Scientific simulations have shown that ethnocentrism and numbers carry the day.

          • Sparky

            Source?

          • See The Future

            In the end, we will all go the way of the dinosaur.

          • David Ashton

            Speak for yourself.

          • See The Future

            My reference was to society in general. We have had the ability to live in a civilized society with all its pleasures. But we have too many traitors and do-gooders flooding us with those that wish to replace us.

            As events unfold daily it does not take a rocket scientist to extrapolate where this is going. We will either succumb to the flood and be bred out of existence or we will retaliate against the enemy and remove their ability to harm. So we have the choice of pay me now or pay me later.

            Notwithstanding the above there is always the possibility of meteorite strike, the sun exploding or flaming out, pandemic, volcanic eruption, shifting of the poles, earthquake of ability to move land masses.

            Our time is finite……………we will be extinct one day one way or the other………I would rather die free and fighting than be useful idiot and future slave.

          • David Ashton

            I agree with your conclusion. I also have grandchildren, as do my favorite friends and relatives, not to mention the bright and beautiful white children who – presently – still outnumber the imported replacements. I have taught, and do not hate, the latter, but my own people and their culture come first, especially in the ancestral homeland I love.

            If I hate anyone, apart from the imported foreign criminals and terrorists, it is the gang of “white” traitors.

          • See The Future

            I will one day be going where everyone else is going, and that is either cremation or six feet under in a box. So will you.

            My reference was to society in general. We have had the ability to live in a civilized society with all its pleasures. But we have too many traitors and do-gooders flooding us with those that wish to replace us.

            As events unfold daily it does not take a rocket scientist to extrapolate where this is going. We will either succumb to the flood and be bred out of existence or we will retaliate against the enemy and remove their ability to harm. So we have the choice of pay me now or pay me later.

            Notwithstanding the above there is always the possibility of meteorite strike, the sun exploding or flaming out, pandemic, volcanic eruption, shifting of the poles, earthquake of ability to move land masses.

            Our time is finite……………we will be extinct one day one way or the other………I would rather die free and fighting than be useful idiot and future slave.

        • Reynardine

          Darwinism says nothing of the sort.

          The drivers behind evolution are success in bearing new progeny – i.e. reproductive fitness.

        • David Ashton

          Moral character and cultural quality are important.

          • Reynardine

            Absolutely. You can have a dumb person, but as long as he’s docile and follows the rules, he’s a boon to society. An intelligent person who doesn’t follow the rules is a bane to society.

          • David Ashton

            He can be a “John Galt” or a “Meyer Lansky”.

        • Reynardine

          Raw intelligence is not the be-all, end-all of human evolution, though it definitely has helped us.

          Brain size is strongly connected to intelligence, and many of our ancestors (Neanderthals included) had larger brains than did H. Sapiens. We merely had the right arrangement of “things” going for us: we reached the “good enough” point.

          Until h. sapiens mixed with neanderthals, there was little to no civilization. We interbred with them, then bred them out, gaining intelligence, but maintaining our stability.

          Larger brain cases are also problematic for women insofar as birth: a larger brain requires more nutrition and wider hips. Thus, birth of larger and larger brains is more and more dangerous.

      • Sparky

        Referring to a 25 year-old book?

        • Reynardine

          The trilogy, really.

      • Teddy Kennedy of Immigration Reform Act infamy was a Catholic of Irish extraction. He and I were doubtless more closely related to each other than either were/are to Jews.

        • David Ashton

          Look into Manny Celler, and his lifelong record.

        • Reynardine

          Just like evaluating blacks, you have to evaluate the whole of the ethnogroup.

          What is the Irish-Catholic stance on blacks, jews, morality, etc? I would venture that Irish ethnocentrism still reigns supreme and the Irish look out for the Irish in general. The Irish Catholics were among the only ones to fight the depravity of Jewish Hollywood and Jewish Pornography with measures like the Hays code among others.

    • Henry Higgins

      Blaming a group of people for their immoral choices is not anti anything. Rather, it’s pro-accountability. Semitic supremacy is a choice. Holding it’s adherents responsible for the exploitations and downright violence they inflict on others is far more ‘moral,’ just and upstanding than using racial differences to justify whoever’s exploitations. Duke holds the moral high ground, which is why he’s being pilloried by the alphabet agencies.

    • Raydonn

      Denial isn’t just a river in Egypt…………..

  • Bon, From the Land of Babble

    As usual, the truth is the exact opposite of what the SPLC says. They are not a legitimate source of information. The SPLC tells outright lies and the mainstream media publish it without any rebuttal, criticism or opposition allowed.

    The SPLC exists to counter any opposition we Whites have to our own genocide via forced integration and race-replacement and to prevent us from organizing in our own interests.

    The SPLC is a hate organization that labels anyone to the right of Obama as a hater, Nazi and bigot and will work to destroy that person both personally and professionally. Ask Kevin Lamb or Kevin MacDonald.

    I often get letters from people who write and say what the Feds are doing is unconstitutional, and all we have to do is file a lawsuit. No. it would be a miracle if you won in the courts and 99 to 1 that you would lose and they would take whatever resources you might have in their legal fees that they would make you pay.

    —David Duke

    Here is the legacy of the SPLC:

    White grandmother murdered by two blacks during purse snatching

    http //www msnewsnow com/story/27842736/two-suspects-charged-for-murder-of-carolyn-temple-one-still-at-large

    White boy, 16, beaten by two blacks at Carrick group home dies; Homicide charges expected

    http //www wpxi com/news/news/local/best-friend-boy-severely-beaten-carrick-group-home/njnSM/

    Tuscaloosa Police charge black man with November rape of 14-year-old girl

    http //www al com/news/tuscaloosa/index ssf/2015/01/tuscaloosa_police_charge_hueyt html#incart_river

    And these are just from today.

    The SPLC couldn’t give a damn.

    • RonanTheLibtardian

      The numbers are even more disparate than that. Eric Holder’s DOJ counts Mestizo gangsters as white, to name just one act of statistical subterfuge.
      .

      • RonanTheLibtardian

  • dd121

    SPLC. I stopped reading.

  • B.A_2014

    It’s nice of the SPLC to point this out to the American people. It’s a scientific fact, as we all know, that only white people are racist.

  • Flanders21

    N.O.I., headed by Louis Farrakhan has received Federal contracts to provide security in several states in areas with high crime,starting in 1991. Just 20 years earlier members from this Hate group murdered over 70 White men, women, and children in the state of California.Even the mayor of San Fran had been a victim of this group but survived.These murders came to be known as the Zebra Killings, in a book written by Clark Howard.

    In your search browser type in– As Farrakhan Groups Land Jobs from GOVERNMENT, Debate Grows…Its an article publish in The New York Times dated March 4, 1994 and written by a Steven A. Holmes…3 pages long.

    The media as well as our federal government and the politicians,left and right working for the federal government at that time and to this day support a vicious kind of extremism that the MSM,national politicians, and the Splc and its vast supporters give legitimacy to.

    Read the article…

    • Sick of it

      Most of the politicians on the so-called “right” sound like Karl Marx. They wouldn’t know conservatism if it deported their pot smoking Jamaican sons in law.

    • Wilmoto

      As Farrakhan Groups Land Jobs From Government…NOI is not simply a racist or anti-semitic organization but appears to be an organized crime syndicate as well.I highly recommend readers take the time to read the NYT article and then read SPLC long profile of Farrakhan at their site. Not one word about Farrakhan’s Security agency receiving Federal contracting!

      From the NYT article:

      A chain of health clinics run by a top Nation of Islam official received $213,000 last April in Federal money for a one-year contract to treat AIDS patients in Washington; the chain, Abundant Life Foundation, is also seeking a share of $2 million in AIDS treatment contracts that the District of Columbia government will soon hand out.

      N.O.I. Security has also provided security for private companies in Washington, including Federal Express, which employs it to guard its sorting center, and for the Ramada Renaissance Hotel.

      These contracts have caught the attention of critics of the Nation of Islam, especially Jewish groups, who say that public money should not go to individuals or companies affiliated with such groups.

      And yet “strangely” enough public money has gone to individuals and companies affiliated with such groups…

  • Sick of it

    “In reality, ethnic advocacy groups such as the NAACP and the National
    Council of La Raza (which Duke also mentioned in attempting a similar
    line of argument with O’Reilly) are genuinely about advancing the
    interests of the ethnic groups they represent, and are not even remotely
    hate groups because they do not engage in demonizing and promoting
    false smears about people of other ethnicities. Nor do they engage in
    political agendas aimed at attacking the interests of other racial
    groups.”

    Biggest lie in history? Seriously, La Raza refers to the “Bronze Race” and their desire to “retake” “Aztlan” from the gringo. The NAACP is about getting blacks into every position everywhere (public or private) and filling the pockets of blacks in the NAACP hierarchy. NAACP “preachers” simply scream hatred of whites from their pulpits.

  • dean53

    Come on. Its disingenuous for Duke to claim he isn’t a white supremscist or a racist. Better he should have argued that all ethnic advocacy groups are equally supremacist and racist. And that the racial advocacy that non-whites engage in, with IRS tax-exempt sanction, is acceptable for whites to practice as well.

    • That’s a good point. He should have said something to the effect of ‘Yes, I would be considered a racist for doing something that people of all racial groups do – namely, promote the interests and welfare of their own group. In that sense, yes, I’m a racist.”

      Whether one agrees with that approach or not, we’ve got to stop all this trepidation and fear over being labeled the “R” word. Once they discover that we don’t think all racial groups and cultures are equal, we are automatically racist in their eyes.

      • ThomasER916

        Jared Taylor has been on TV less than Duke. Why? Because Useful Idiots like you need to hate White people.

  • nasedo

    Duke lost me forever when he declared “Islam is not a problem”

    • I agree, that was a lame comment.

      • Weisheit77

        Wasn’t it more of an admission that Islam isn’t the reason that Britain’s and France’s cities (and now America’s) are becoming full of poor Muslims? Wasn’t he trying to point that the poor from other nations don’t cross oceans and national borders to occupy more powerful nations unless the more powerful nations want to be occupied? These aren’t like the goths in Roman times. No one has sacked a capital and are highly unlikely too. No one has beaten a western army on a field of battle.

        I totally support the idea that I think was popularized by Ron Paul, “there over here because we’re over there.” In fact, that’s exactly what OBL said. It seems like if we bomb 100 over there 1,500 move to Europe and 500 move to US and the Islamic world has the numbers to win that game.

        I would say Islam is not a problem in Islamic countries or when fighting Israel. Islam becomes a problem when it moves next door because my tax money helped fund a war that blew up their neighborhood.

        • Zimriel

          Islam is a problem because Islam is a problem.

          Even if there was not a single Jew or Northeastern Protestant in this nation (depending on if you read CounterCurrents or UnqualifiedReservations) – the ideas of Islam would still be floating out there in the Internet. Those ideas would be available to ghetto thugs and dudes in prison, or just people who were bored. Or to legal immigrants let in from anywhere. Or to people who snuck in. Or to someone from another country who hijacked a plane.

          Maybe not as many, but there would be infiltrators, and they’d infiltrate.

        • nasedo

          “The enormity of the slaughters of the “religion of peace” are so far beyond comprehension that even honest historians overlook the scale. When one looks beyond our myopic focus, Islam is the greatest killing machine in the history of mankind, bar none.”

          For those who think Islam is not a problem please read this column:

          http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/05/the_greatest_murder_machine_in_history.html

      • Christorchaos

        It’s a defensible position from Duke. It shouldn’t lose you. Because, if you think about it, you can really only have one “problem” .. everything else is a symptom.

    • Americaandthewestshouldbewhite

      He is right because the Jew(ss))) are an even bigger problem

    • See The Future

      It is true that islam is not a problem if it is practised in middle eastern countries, Africa, etc.

      But in the USA islam is a problem that will get worse and worse with time.

      But the real problem is with the leadership in the USA. By legal means the lawmakers could ban the practise of islam and sharia.

    • ThomasER916

      Duke is 100% correct. The problem is not Islam. That is a symptom. The problem is anti-Whites. If America was 100% White and 100% pro-White then we wouldn’t have a single Muslim in our country. Not one.

      We wouldn’t have Affirmative Action, “refugees”, non-White adoption, miscegenation, Hate Speech, Hate Crimes, or Obama. There’d be no Culture of Critique either. If America was a country for Whites then it wouldn’t be a country for Muslims. If you “married” a non-White you’d be deported to live in a non-White country. Why? Because miscegenation is not good for Whites.

  • LHathaway

    Hating whites is considered enlightenment, education, fighting stereotypes and raising awareness. There was no need for this article. Everyone knows that already and has redoubled their commitment to do more. .

  • Jeff Traube

    Duke is no more wrong in advancing the interests of European-Americans than La Raza, the NAACP and ADL are for advancing the interests of their respective groups. In fact, Duke has something in common with the Founding Fathers. Has AR gone PC ?

    • Americaandthewestshouldbewhite

      sometimes AR does go PC. You write some comment about the Jew(s)), they will delete it.

      • mael

        Have their funds dry up, they will.

  • IstvanIN

    Regardless of his views and whether or not I agree with them I find Mr. Duke far more civilized than his left-wing opponents.

    • Robert Smith

      And makes more sense than any mainstream Republican.

  • superlloyd

    ‘In reality, ethnic advocacy groups such as the NAACP and the National Council of La Raza (which Duke also mentioned in attempting a similar line of argument with O’Reilly) are genuinely about advancing the interests of the ethnic groups they represent, and are not even remotely hate groups because they do not engage in demonizing and promoting false smears about people of other ethnicities. Nor do they engage in political agendas aimed at attacking the interests of other racial groups.’
    How can these hysterical, leftist shills be so brazen with their lies?

  • Zimriel

    Note here that AmRen is not a supporter of Duke and/or of all Duke’s been saying over the years. (I’m basing this from what I’ve been following of these circles.)

    The SPLC doesn’t care about shutting down Duke. It cares about shutting down whites. It loves that Duke is around – so it can use Duke and his associations, however many degrees-of-Kevin-Bacon between him and those associations, as a cudgel against whites.

    • mael

      I support Duke. He’s for White people. Amren supports jews and their helpers, which is anti-White.

    • BlueSonicStreak

      Exactly. The SPLC and similar WANT Duke in the limelight so that they can point to him and say, “That’s what THEY look like.”

  • ViktorNN

    And just as Duke parlayed his television airtime for self-promotion, the $PLC is sure to use Duke’s airtime to promote the $PLC.

    Who will raise more money from Duke’s appearance on O’Reilly’s show, the $PLC or Duke?

    Do we need to ask?

    • Zimriel

      Do we even care to ask?

    • Americaandthewestshouldbewhite

      I would rather raise money for Duke because he is for white people and not for the splc.

  • Evette Coutier

    Labeling all pro-white groups as hate groups was a stroke of genius on the part of liberals. And notice he they use every dirty trick in the book to keep us from labeling Islam as a hate group. They are well aware of the consequences, and that’s why they did it to whites. It’s high time we learn our lesson and turn it back on them.

  • A Freespeechzone

    “However, that is not the case with any kind of hate group, who typically represent only a tiny bandwidth of any constituency and whose beliefs represent a vicious kind of extremism that the vast majority of Americans repudiate. Any politician who engages with them is not only displaying questionable judgment by coddling frequently violent extremists, but is in the process helping to legitimize them by lending them the credibility of their public office.”

    So NOW Whites are a ‘tiny bandwidth’??

  • See The Future

    Fear of reprisal needs to be put back.

    • ThomasER916

      Wrong. The Culture of Critique needs to be wiped out. Completely.

  • curri

    SPLC has been exposed as a racket numerous times by liberals, libertarians, MSM organs and a Marxist (Cockburn)-plus of course a wide variety of right-of-center outlets. Yet it never seems to suffer any lasting damage to its reputation. It’s almost like it’s receiving some kind of special protection.

    • ThomasER916

      Once they get their hooked proboscis dug in, there’s only one solution to remove them.

  • David Ashton

    Jewish lecturer: “Anti-Semites say we all stick together and think alike. In fact, we notoriously all disagree with one another.”
    Jewish heckler: “I disagree.”

  • David Ashton

    Maybe, but those graphs are worrying.

  • David Ashton

    They could be OUR or YOUR children and grand-children. Let’s give THEM a thought, you do-“gooders”.

  • David Ashton

    They all are – from Plato to Ricardo Duchesne, from the ancient Gauls to AmRen readers.
    WES who should be D if not already.

  • David Ashton

    And the wrong color, hair-form, skull shape, language, history and cultural capability.

  • White man takes to media in order to defend his own position shocker.

    How very racist of him!

    What’s more, he had the temerity to do it very well, push his books for free and inform the public about the real issues he is talking about – and not the ones which the controlled media place in his mouth for him!

    Obviously these “SPLC” people don’t want David Duke to have any air time at all – and when they do, they want it to only be on their terms and with their messages left ringing in the ears of the viewer.

    We all know who David Duke is the most critical of. Being critical is not ‘hate’. Exposing the antics of real ‘hateful’ and harmful acts is not ‘hate’. Securing a future for white interests is not ‘hate’. But of course, we all know the score by now.

  • Fair Dinkum

    Well, I’ve been banned at “Hatewatch.” I can die a happy man, now.

  • authorizedversion .

    So Duke hates Jews. So what? I hate a lot of people. I don’t care who hates who, I care about how people behave.

  • anony

    Wikipedia is not my idea of a reliable source.

  • anony

    Only a very few are shown. There are many, many more. But thanks for making the point.

  • ThomasER916

    To understand the $PLC, read Kevin B. MacDonald’s “The Culture of Critique” series. Pay close attention to “Cultural Insurrections.”

    Of course, Kevin was banned from Amren.

  • ThomasER916

    I’ve seen the way your fellow Cultists fly off the handle like at an Amren meeting a while back. There’s nothing to “sustain” a discussion with a Jew shouting in your face. That’s the point of their tantrum politics. Shut down the debate by shouting in until no one is speaking or working. Shut down everything until they’re in control.

    Since Jared is about as dim as you are the most ardent defends of Whites are not allowed at Amren, but our enemies for the past 3,000 years are inside the Gates of Troy.

    I’m sure this comment will be deleted. That’s how you “sustain” your discussions.

  • David Ashton

    “Jews dominate because they are clever” (Nathaniel Weyl). “Jews dominate because they are clannish” (Julius Streicher). “We only feel secure if we are supreme” (Rabbi Hugo Gryn). Maybe there is something in all three. But WASPs and WASRCs should act in their own interests too.

  • Augustus3709

    Looking up SPLC on Wikipedia…it literally looks like a Jewish organization that legally attacks White and Christian organizations. That is their purpose. Wow.

    A “non-profit” organization which pocketed over 40 million dollars in 2012.

    How do you like that.

    • Augustus3709

      I don’t appreciate my comment being edited.

      Their president’s name is Cohen, hence, a “Jewish Organization.”

    • BlueSonicStreak

      I agree (with what now appears to be your deleted comment, as it won’t load for me), I hate having my comments edited.

      I would rather they are just removed versus edited. If something I say is not acceptable to the mods, I can simply try rewording.

      If my comment is edited, then something I DID NOT SAY is up under my name, and I cannot change it. Pointing out that my comment was edited, however, gets removed. Intellectually dishonest modding.

      Just delete the comments you don’t like, mods.

  • David Ashton

    1. “Character” is related to crime rates, but is also socially observable in family and neighborhood comparisons. My point was that clever criminals can do more damage than stupid ones, and escape detection and conviction more successfully.
    2. Aesthetic preferences may or not be entirely private-subjective, and some like myself can admire the beauty of much East Asian architecture, &c. On the other hand, although the beauty for example of mud-hut villages in Africa can be appreciated, it would be reasonable to argue that the architecture of European cities and villages was “superior”. There may be some genetic and cultural basis to artistic creativity and formation; cf. Talbot Rice on this, including comments on the ancient Jewish and Muslim pictorial (but not poetic) tradition.
    3. Literature: unlike Ayn Rand, I think Shakespeare preferable to Mickey Spillane. But then that’s me. If the literature, philosophy, art, mathematics, science and technology of Europe alone survived a global catastrophe, I think that would be disappointing but enough for all human survivors – maybe not the case with just the Japanese heritage.

  • David Ashton

    Mr Anonymous, I do not believe in “singling out the Jews” and have so expressed myself on that here several times, and certainly not persecuting them as a people. Like anyone else with half a brain and half a heart, I can tell the difference between an astrophysicist and a swindler.

    There is a “racial” similarity between many Armenians and many Jews, and a very loose migratory similarity between Gypsies and Jews, but Armenians do not “run” Hollywood and Gypsies do not “win” Nobel Prizes, That will give you some clue as to the disparity in comment, favorable or unfavorable.

    I do not wish to be drawn yet again into discussing “anti-Semitism”, but will provide a short, select, scholarly bibliography, if you wish, and the Moderator can bear it.

  • El tango

    “To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize”