British police have foiled an alleged plot to assassinate the Queen in a knife attack this weekend at a Remembrance Day event in London, it has been claimed.

Counter terrorist police swooped on addresses in the west of the British capital and in the Thames Valley and arrested four men aged 19 to 27.

Scotland Yard were remaining tight lipped yesterday but confirmed it was an alleged Islamist plot to be carried out on British soil and was part of “an ongoing investigation into Islamist-related terrorism”.

But they declined to name the target.

British tabloid The Sun yesterday reported the plan was to kill the 88-year-old Queen at an event at the Cenotaph in the capital where she was to lay a wreath. The newspaper said both the Queen and Prime Minister David Cameron had been made aware of the alleged plot.

Other British media were yesterday reporting police suspected it was more likely to be a gun attack plot on an unnamed target but potentially just random members of the public but armed police were already planning a tight cordon around the Royal family and Mr Cameron at war memorial events.

The palace declined to comment last night as is standard policy on security matters.

Armed guards had in the past two weeks been deployed to watch over ceremonial sentries including at the palace and Whitehall since the murder of Canadian reservist Nathan Crillo who had been on ceremonial duty at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier in Ottawa.

But there were particular fears there could be a random attack carried out on any of the hundreds of events leading up to and on the nationally marked Remembrance Day on Sunday and next Tuesday.

Heavily armed counter terrorist police swooped on four addresses across west London and High Wycombe in the Thames Valley and arrested the four men and raided another four addresses linked to the men.

The suspects were all arrested and are being held in custody on suspicion of being concerned in “the commission, preparation or instigation of acts of terrorism”.

Police yesterday remained guarding their homes as detectives inside could be seen removing items of potential evidence.

The 19-year-old, understood to be called Yusuf Syed, was arrested at his mother’s house in High Wycombe at the same time as a 22-year-old was arrested in Hounslow in London’s west at 8.45pm. The younger man was said to have just returned from a trip to Pakistan.

A 25-year-old was arrested in Uxbridge at 2.55am yesterday morning while a 27-year-old was arrested in a car in the street in Southall at 8.30pm yesterday.

The arrests came from intelligence gathered by spy agency M15.

It is understood at least one of the men had been spoken to police in the past for jihadism. A second of the four man had had his passport seized by authorities recently after he planned to travel to the Middle East to take part in jihad.

Earlier this month, senior police officers and MPs said there was likely to be a significant rise in the number of armed police at the Remembrance Sunday and Armistice Day commemorations in London due to increased fears of a terror attack either on military personnel taking part or a dignitary. It is understood police were mostly fearing a lone attacker with a hand weapon as opposed to an orchestrated bomb plot.

The latest arrests come a few months after the national terror threat level in the UK was raised from substantial to severe, meaning a terrorist attack is “highly likely”.

It also followed social media calls by Islamic State (ISIS) extremists for followers to carry out unsophisticated lone wolf attacks in home states whether in Britain, Australia or the United States.

The Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre (JTAC) raised the national level against a backdrop of increasing concerns over hundreds of aspiring British jihadis travelling to Iraq and Syria to learn terrorist “tradecraft” and fight alongside terror groups like ISIS.

{snip}

Topics: , , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Rick O’Shea

    I realize it’s an awful thing to say and I’m not saying I *wish* they’d been successful but I cannot help but think just how powerful something like this happening would have been toward waking Britain up to the threat posed to their entire culture, history, identity, and way of life by letting Muslims into their society.

    Or perhaps I’m underestimating just how asleep and suicidal they are.

    • TruthBeTold

      A credible attack might wake up a few people.

      • I don’t know that Britain has ever had a regicide committed by common assassins. The official executions of Mary Queen of Scots and King Charles I don’t really count. I imagine the British royal family has top-notch security.

        • D.B. Cooper

          Their security isn’t what it used to be. The have Affirmative Action African and other assorted diversities now standing guard, plus a few women barely 5 feet tall.

          • Most government agencies in the developed West have token diversity hires. They get to play “dress up” while someone else does their jobs for them.

          • Whitesneedtobebrave

            You are right DB. Even the person who put the announcement of Prince George’s birth on the easel in front of the palace gates, was a DIE-versity hire from India who was working on a UK work visa. That really shook me up to think that they would have a non white and a non Brit working for the queen. Later I read he was back in India after his visa expired.

          • David Ashton

            The entire Anglosphere is suffering from the “race, gender & disability” ideology, even your country.

        • Rhialto

          There were also hideous punishments for those who attempted regicide which were an effective deterrent. Google “drawn and quartered”. This is a penalty that would deter all but the most devout.

      • Ike Eichenberg

        You’d think the beheaded soldier Lee Rigby would have been enough for some Anglo on scum cleansing.

        • meanqueen

          Yeah, I know, but it didn’t seem to accomplish a damn thing. The Brits are still lying down for the Muslims.

    • If that kind of thing would have worked, it would have worked after 7/7.

      If this would have been successful, everyone would cry, then redouble their efforts to support diversity, equality and democracy.

    • Ike Eichenberg

      Not asleep or suicidal.
      Brainwashed with the “diversity is strength” nonsense and ignorant of genetic race reality, both thanks to the left.

    • NoMosqueHere

      The only proper British response to such a terrorist attack would be the mass expulsion of muslims and a total bar to any further muslim immigration. Any response short of that would be insufficient.

      • DonReynolds

        Nuclear weapons are not like gunpowder. They are actually difficult to make and detonate, with an incredible amount of infrasturcture…..any part of which can be disturbed or destroyed in a flash. If the Muzzies get nukes it will ONLY be because they have been allowed to …..or because some nuke nation has provided them.

      • Oil Can Harry

        If you ban immigration by Muslims the Muzzies arriving from Africa and the Middle East will just lie and claim to be Christians.

        The ideal would be to ban all Third World immigration to the West.

    • IstvanIN

      I would never want to see HM The Queen assassinated but would even that arouse the British public? Would the military back the public or the politicians, who would in lock step make excuses for her murder? Or would the PM call out the troops to put down any riots in protest of the Queens murder and the troops would shoot the public?

      • KenelmDigby

        It probably wouldn’t.
        The very, very first thing that the politicians would say is that ‘you can’t blame all Muslims’ or ‘this is a time to unite rather than divide’.

    • David Ashton

      Muslim entry into Britain was a case of creep at first, and then acceleration. It was not generally welcomed by the population, and is not now, especially near their no-go areas. The population was deceived by a political conspiracy. It is a long and very complex story.

  • I am completely stunned. Did these Islamitards really want that idiot Prince Charles to be king?

    • KevinPhillipsBong

      Maybe, as he vowed to be the ‘Defender of All Faiths’.

      • David Ashton

        A good example of misrepresentation of the Heir to the Throne. He never said he wanted to defend each and every “faith”. He knows perfectly well the difference between Jews and Hindus, Salafism and Sufism, the Latter Day Saints and the Watchtower Bible & Tract Society, Satanists and Scientologists. He is a member of the Anglican communion, but did not want to take an aggressive position towards other denominations. What he actually said was that he wanted to be the Defender of Faith (itself), in other words of the spiritual dimension to human life. He recently condemned the Muslim persecution of Christians, and is well acquainted with the apostasy penalty in Islam. As a discreet patron of the Church of England Prayer Book, President of the Royal Shakespeare Company, an explicit defender of English village life and other traditions, critic of “short-term” politicians and of political correctness, I do not think he would sell out the core nation of our hitherto United Kingdom, notwithstanding the courtesy he shows to people of different races that has never been too evident in his Grandmother, Father or second Wife,

        • IstvanIN

          He has to be very circumspect in what he says since he is not allowed to be “political”, which I think is insane. Everyone should be entitled to publicly state their views, especially a man who has to take the long view, as opposed to the only worried about the next election politicians.

    • Anglokraut

      The Prince of Wales is old and weak–absolutely the Muzzies would want a weak monarch in place. There’s no Henry V, or Black Prince to inherit the throne in England.

      • none of your business

        The British sovereign is an actor. If a powerful sovereign came along who didn’t speak the lines written and had some independent thought, he or she would soon retire or die of some obscure disease. They know they are actors.

        • David Ashton

          “I don’t always do what I am told.” “Short-termism will be the ruin of this country.” “Political correctness is the problem.”

          Prince Charles in unscripted moments.

      • David Ashton

        He looks pretty vigorous to me, although he has only recently given up the exceptionally strenuous sport of polo because of a back injury. He has spoken up for wounded ex-servicemen with an implicit reproach for their political masters. Google his Military Career and Interests on the Royal Family Website.

        Traditionally Muslims are against monarchies of all kinds, despite Saudi financing of terrorists and extremist preachers.

        • Anglokraut

          “Traditionally Muslims are against monarchies of all kinds, despite Saudi financing of terrorists and extremist preachers.”

          Yes, Saudis–the people ruled by Sheiks and Princes a.k.a.: monarchs. And don’t forget the long-standing tradition of having Sultans; Brunei is having a bit of trouble with that right now. I believe a sultan is also a monarch.

          Snark aside, I know from your past posts that you are a die-hard Englishman, bordering on British chauvinist, but you still have to have your information straight on Islam, or your own brainwashed countrymen will devour you.

          • David Ashton

            I would not describe myself as a “chauvinist”. I see myself as an English, British and European. I am still not sure what your apparent correction of my information about Islam entails. Most of my fellow-countrymen, rightly or wrongly, have no particular sympathy for Islam..

          • Anglokraut

            You said that Muslims are against monarchies; I was able to refute that by pointing out Muslim countries that have monarchies.

          • David Ashton

            Traditional mainstream.
            Strictly speaking Muslim societies should be theocracies governed by clerics who interpret the Koran and Hadith. Of course, Sunni and Shia adherents differ over the rulership from the days of the Prophet.

    • David Ashton

      Charles is not an idiot, despite endless denigration from supposedly right-wing papers like the “Daily Mail”.

      • His pronouncements on the subject of global warming do not exactly make him out to be a rocket scientist.

        • David Ashton

          Of course, there are differences of opinion even among qualified scientists on the cause(s) and trends in global warming, and his pronouncements err on the side of caution because of an instinctive love of countryside and agriculture.

          • DonReynolds

            I agree. What the British Royal Family says in public and what they personally believe or think is by no means the same thing.

          • none of your business

            He even earns his own living with his Duchy of Cornwall cookies and stuff.

        • none of your business

          He got through algebra and geometry while his Mother barely made it through multiplication and never did get fractions. There is nothing wrong with him. He hates modern architecture so that makes him great in my eyes.

          • David Ashton

            He studied anthropology at university, and has always struck me as very intelligent, thoughtful and well-read, with an agreeable sense of humor. It is not a weakness to be able to mimic everyone in the famous radio Goon Show. Some of us know his minor weaknesses, but get tired of silly stories such as that he relies on a valet to put toothpaste on his brush, if not too clean his teeth for him. He is about the same age as William IV when he became King and seems pretty fit.

        • Anglokraut

          I think people with no scientific background spouting off on something of which they have no in-depth knowledge is a big problem. Worse still when such people are in charge of public policy.

          • David Ashton

            Cuts both ways.

    • none of your business

      ER2 should have done the right thing and retired at 65 like everybody else.

      • David Ashton

        Abdication is not possible after Coronation and Anointing. Some of her duties are gradually being passed to Charles as a potential Crown Regent if she becomes incapacitated. Longevity may be in both their genes.

  • TruthBeTold

    And when Cameron gets his ‘Asian’ PM, they will have easy access.

  • Cheri Rodriguez

    Curious what The Queen’s reaction was to Enoch Powell’s 1968 “Rivers of Blood” speech.

    • none of your business

      She probably never heard of it. Here only real position is the one she loves best, head of the Commonwealth, commonly known and the cannibals and kleptomaniacs convention. Look at those pictures, there she is the only white person surrounded by bloodthirsty dictators, mass murders, cannibals and thieves who tuck away billions of foreign aid in off shore bank accounts. She is very , very proud of “her” commonwealth.

  • WR_the_realist

    Good grief. The British monarch wields no power worth having. What would even be the point of assassinating her?

    • MekongDelta69

      Symbolic

    • meanqueen

      Just for kicks. She’s a symbol, and to a moronic subhuman, attacking a symbol is satisfying.

  • Ambrose

    Glad they were stopped, but I don’t see how this has anything to do with a clash of cultures, so to speak. There are lunatics of all backgrounds, beliefs, and creeds. After all, subversive plots are not unheard of even in the United States by individuals of non-Muslim background.

    • David Ashton

      In this case it was a cultural clash. Not all Muslims are terrorists, but many terrorists are Muslims. This is the religion without the Golden Rule, one that promises heaven to those who fight and die in the “way of Allah”.

    • Bryan Dennis

      Troll alert^

      • none of your business

        He even defended a group who planned to kill the Queen or anyone else they could reach. Even the IRA never planned to kill a member of the royal family. They got Mountbatten but he was a distant relative and a hanger on.

        • David Ashton

          I am not sure sure. The IRA missiles at Heathrow which diverted the Queen’s Flight have been hushed up and its political wing leaders are now in the NI government, Mountbatten was a close relative and a good friend to Charles; the victims were not only royals. The IRA Brighton bomb was an attempt to kill off HM Government, but managed only to kill and injure a few, including Norman Tebbit’s nice wife still paralyzed below the neck.

  • Steve_in_Vermont

    I hope they have improved security around the royal family. In the past that wasn’t the case. And, thankfully, all British police officers are well armed and capable of protecting….what?….sorry, strike that last comment.

    • IstvanIN

      As Britain becomes less and less British the Windsors will become birds in the gilded cage.

      • Steve_in_Vermont

        It’s hard to believe this is the same country that just a few generations ago fought and won the Battle of Britain. There will never be another Winston Churchill.

        • Cheri Rodriguez

          When I was in Las Vegas this past March, I met a 20-ish couple from England outside The Stratosphere and we were talking about England’s decline. The male said–“We’re a country without a backbone anymore.” They seem to know what’s up. They just have no clue how to fix it.

          • David Ashton

            Some of us do have more than a clue, but too little influence. Now we hear that Farage is to appear on a disgusting TV program along with two other “posh drunks”. History begins with tragedy and ends with farce.

        • David Ashton

          Exhaustion. Also, the defense of our nation has been gradually rewritten as a defense against “racism”.

      • David Ashton

        They probably realize this prospect, and paradoxically that provides a slender sliver of hope.

  • D.B. Cooper

    The Queen is so freaking senile now, she’s probably dribbling her drool while complimenting how nice those dear boys from Pakistan are.
    Imagine what would’ve happened if those punks tried to assassinate this Queen Elizabeth.

    • David Ashton

      You must be the most charmless troll ever to squeak his Anglophobia on this site.

      • D.B. Cooper

        Why thank you, David! This is how I picture the average British “man” these days: a pink wearing Eloi who cowers in fear why some sub human carries off one of his women.

        • David Ashton

          Yes we know. You have out this pretty picture on several times already. You still haven’t told us what you have done for the US that we should emulate in the UK.

          • D.B. Cooper

            I have been known to appear on many other sites, and have been banned from quite a few. If I can just get a few brain fogged white liberals each day to question diversity for the first time in their lives, then I did my job.

          • David Ashton

            So no more than what I and English friends have been doing.

    • Anglokraut

      Didn’t Elizabeth I expel the Negro from England with a series of laws known as “Blackamoor”? Her assassins came from the embracing, loving religion of Christianity.

      • DonReynolds

        Roman Catholic, to be specific.

        • Anglokraut

          Yes, I know. But since Catholics are Christians, I chose to cut to the chase.
          Different denominations of a religion, to me, is like having different flavors of excrement–there is no way I would eat it, no matter the taste.

      • none of your business

        Yes she did expel the blacks. She was a lot better than her Father who personally signed 72,000 death warrants for political, religious and dynastic crimes such as being a relative of his Plantagenet Mother.

    • none of your business

      She’s not senile. ER1 killed many on rather bogus charges but those were the times.

    • Ohmy!

      I like the current queen, doubting that she’s senile.

  • JohnEngelman

    The way to stop Islamic terrorism is to keep Muslims out of our countries, not to invade their countries.

    • David Ashton

      Amen to that.

    • none of your business

      Exactly right

  • The monarchy will be gone soon anyway. Nonwhites have no interest in a white king or queen or the attendant traditions. They covet the palaces, jewels, and other treasures, preferring that the wealth be redistributed to them.

    Of course, if one of heirs to the throne marries an African woman, who pumps out mulatto sprogs, maybe the nonwhites could be won over to supporting the royals.

  • dd121

    This story stirs conflicting emotions.

    • meanqueen

      In me, too.

  • SolStans

    Am I the only one holding out hope that William mans up, takes his middle name (Arthur) at his coronation, and repels the invading hordes? C’mon. The guy was born on the summer solstice on the day of a solar eclipse. Maybe Britain still has some mojo left in its soul.

    • IstvanIN

      He would have to have the British public and military on his side.

      • SolStans

        And maybe some descendants of former colonists who were loyal to the king. I’m game.

      • SolStans

        As for gaining their support: all he has to do is have some Excalibur rigged into one of the megaliths at Stonehenge, and pluck it out as the summer solstice dawn shines through the aligned stones. He might even wow some moors with that maneuver.

      • David Ashton

        Not out of the question altogether.

    • DonReynolds

      Prince William would be the one who could, but Prince Harry is the one with two tours of duty in combat against the Taliban in Afghanistan. Prince William wanted a military career but being the next king does seem more important to the nation.

      • SolStans

        This is why royals should have multiple kids. One for the throne, another for the army, and the last for the collar.

    • David Ashton

      Interesting thought. “An Arthur shall come to save England” in its final peril (Layamon). His father Charles is also named after that semi-legendary hero and St George and the Knight on Horseback. 2050 is the demographic turning point. Read Clemence Dane’s “The Saviours” and Page Bryant;’s “Awakening Arthur! His Return in Our Time”. The original “King” committed adultery with a Saxon maiden called – Camilla. We are now treading into the deep waters of astrology, myth and archaeo-futurism.

    • This is the same William who proclaimed that “my heart is in Africa”? I guess he’s had a whole life being indoctrinated by the PC establishment and has never had any contraveining experiences or instruction.

      I for one don’t have much hope in him.

  • DonReynolds

    This is unspeakable and I hope the parties involved manage to make it to prison, while still alive. I cannot say why they even bothered to arrest them. Assassins do not deserve to live so long.

  • ncpride

    Not feeling any sympathy here. Only when ‘elites’ are affected the way your average White person is will there be change, if even then. The British government has turned a blind eye while the daughters of GB have been used and abused by Muslims, and that’s just a small sampling of the nonsense the average Brit is forced to deal with while their country is handed over to everyone and anyone. Let ‘them’ see and experience what they claim is so damn wonderful for YOU, Brits.

  • Whitesneedtobebrave

    The royal family is a joke. If they had some guts they would have expelled all the non whites and half breeds from the UK. I am sure that Elizabeth -1 would have done that.

    • David Ashton

      The process was too slow, the transformation from Empire to British Commonwealth to The Commonwealth… The monarchy is constitutional, and can act only on the advice of ministers.

      Let me rewrite this: “The US government is a joke. If it had some guts it would have expelled all the non-whites and half-breeds from the US. I am sure that Abraham Lincoln would have done that.”

      • Whitesneedtobebrave

        yes, David he should have done that, but he was assassinated before he could do that. BTW, I asked you before, if you are a white nationalist or a liberal and you have not answered. So please answer that. Also are you from the US or UK???

  • KenelmDigby

    The United Kingdom has never had a written constitution.
    The basic set up in the UK, since at least the Norman Conquest of 1066, has been the entire British state is symbolized the personage of the Monarch, who in this case is Queen Elizabeth II. This concept is far, far different to the concept of a President. In former times, before parliamentary reforms, it meant that the Monarch was more or less identical with the entire British state. Vestiges of this still exist, we speak of the ‘Royal Navy’ and ‘Royal Air Force’ amongst just two examples.
    Therefore, an attempt on the life of the Monarch is about as serious an insult against Britain and British people as it is possible to get. It cannot possibly get any worse than this.
    Despite all this, I am certain the British political class, who are supposed to be the Queen’s ministers, will still back up the Muslims right up to the hilt, and somehow try to blame the Queen for antagonising them.

  • Snardley Butler

    Probably the same reason whites aren’t out fighting the cultural marxists, most people are pussies.

  • David Ashton

    The Prince of Wales recently condemned the persecution of Christians by Muslims. The “religion of peace” scam reflects the belated bewilderment of the political class. The problem, like the solution, is complicated, and not helped by transatlantic abuse,

  • David Ashton

    This is a very fair analysis. The trouble with his personal views is that they aggregate opposition rather than support. He is a true European, but has discreetly criticized the EU bureaucracy. Thank you, Margaret Falkenberg, for injecting good information, common sense and generosity into this thread.

  • Pontifex Maximus

    The queen and her kin are extreme Mohammedanophiles; they constantly bleat about “diversity” like a bunch of mad sheep! The entire British polity is so pickled in the multicult that they thus richly deserve to be targeted by jihadists!

  • M&S

    Ike was not in charge of strategic planning when we went to North Africa (Marshall was) and once there, he very nearly got his walking papers signed for want of a couple real boneheaded moves that made our soldier’s lives a lot harder at Kasserine.

    By the time he could do anything, the summer of 1943 was done and with it, the chance for a simultaneous win-hold-win strategy with the Russians, during Zitadelle.

    In this, you have to recall that, while the Atlantik Wall did not exist in any real sense and the Germans had sucked their Western forces dry to support the attacks at the Kursk Salient; they still had gas and a sizeably efficient Luftwaffe with which to deliver it.

    The U.S. had virtually nothing in the way of amphibious forces in Europe and would have had to have transferred Marines and Carriers from the PTO to stage an amphibious SPOD seizure operation, going in straight to Cherbourg to provide a RORO capacity to unload troops, because we had no Mulberries or mobile jetties to offload a serious beachhead force.

    Would it have been a superior investment over Africa and saving the sand from fascist scorpions? I’m sure. The DAK was sitting at El Alamein with epidemic levels of dysentery and Rommel was in Germany, getting his guts cleaned out from the same after suffering a minor heart attack when his blood chemistry got seriously out of whack from dehydration and diarrhea.

    In any case, the Mediterranean campaign was an exercise in ‘I smell a Winston’ stupidity as dated colonial interests, fighting up the Italian Boot of a mountain range only to end at an even bigger one in the Alps with only logical route up the narrow corridor East (past Venice) into Austria and Hungary as a means of making Russia’s war easier, not ours.

    But the reality remains that the moment to make serious changes to history was late fall (September/October) 1942 and with Stalingrad still hot and heavy, we didn’t have any notion at that point what would happen at Kharkov to set up the bulge. While Eisenhower didn’t get his fourth star and the dual hats of ETOUSA and SHAFE until about December 1943 by which time, the chance to thieve into Europe while the Germans were whacking away at Russian Wheat in the summer was long past.

    Put another way, if we get to invade Europe, then Guderian gets to send panzers IMMEDIATELY after 3rd Kharkov, in a push straight for Moscow. That would have likely taken the Soviets by such surprise (with all their forces still in the South cleaning out the Don Bend), that they might well have been kicked out of the war.

    At which point, Hitler can bring his entire army around to face whatever we put ashore in France. And we’re screwed because our troops aren’t seasoned (and he can move south, through the Crimea, to threaten the Middle East and Palestine, if he chooses to).
    The sadness is that the British could have lined up the Royal Navy, bow to stern in the Suez and ‘nary a worry’ that Alex or Cairo would fall as threats to the Canal. Fighting in North Africa was fighting for pride of place, not for any real gain.

  • Transpower

    Islam is a bizarre death cult. The founder, Mohammed, was a mass murderer, a mass thief, a mass rapist, and a pedophile. Anyone who follows him is, in effect, also a criminal.