Immigration Reform Can’t Wait

Rupert Murdoch, Wall Street Journal, June 18, 2014

When I learned that House Majority Leader Eric Cantor had lost his Republican primary, my heart sank. Not simply because I think he is an intelligent and talented member of Congress, or because I worry about the future of the Republican Party.

Like others who want comprehensive immigration reform, I worried that Mr. Cantor’s loss would be misconstrued and make Congress reluctant to tackle this urgent need. That would be the wrong lesson and an undesirable national consequence of this single, local election result.

People are looking for leadership–those who stand for something and offer a vision for how to take America forward and keep our nation economically competitive. One of the most immediate ways to revitalize our economy is by passing immigration reform.


Is the idea of immigration reform complicated by the fact that some immigrants went outside the legal system to be here? Yes. It is complicated even more by the fear some Americans have, quite naturally, of how changing populations might also change our culture, communities and economic circumstances.

Well, of course immigration means change. Immigrants enrich our culture and add to our economic prosperity.


Do Americans really wish Google, eBay, Pfizer, or Home Depot were headquartered in Eastern Europe or China instead of America? Whether it’s a high-profile tech company or a small business employing just 10 people, 28% of all new American businesses started in 2011 were founded by immigrants. Those are entrepreneurial people we want to continue to attract to our economy.

I don’t believe that people come to America to sit on their hands. The vast majority of America’s immigrants are hardworking, family-minded individuals with strong values. They are drawn here from many different places by a common belief that this is still the land of opportunity for those willing to work hard.

We need to give those individuals who are already here–after they have passed checks to ensure they are not dangerous criminals–a path to citizenship so they can pay their full taxes, be counted, and become more productive members of our community.

Next, we need to do away with the cap on H-1B visas, which is arbitrary and results in U.S. companies struggling to find the high-skill workers they need to continue growing. We already know that most of the applications for these visas are for computer programmers and engineers, where there is a shortage of qualified American candidates. But we are held back by the objections of the richly funded labor unions that mistakenly believe that if we keep innovation out of America, somehow nothing will change. They are wrong, and frankly as much to blame for our stalemate on this issue as nativists who scream about amnesty.

If we are serious about advancing our economic future and about creating job growth here in America, then we must realize that it is suicidal to suggest closing our doors to the world’s entrepreneurs, or worse, to continue with large-scale deportations.

That is not to suggest we don’t need to do a far better job securing our border. Border security should be an integral part of a comprehensive solution, and we should not dismiss the concerns of states that are struggling to deal with the consequences of ongoing illegal immigration.

Some politicians and pundits will argue that this is not the time to bring immigration reform to the congressional floor–that it will frighten an already anxious workforce and encourage more extreme candidates, especially on the right. They may be right about the short-term politics, but they are dead wrong about the long-term interests of our country.


That is why I was pleased to see Sen. Rand Paul and Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform, step up their efforts to lobby for immigration reform.

President Obama has shown wise restraint despite pressure from the left to act, recognizing that a bipartisan approach on such an immense issue would be best. Remember ObamaCare?

However, if Congress fails to even try to have this important debate, the president might feel tempted to act via executive order. I hope it doesn’t get to that point, given the furious political firestorm that would result.

All the more reason, then, to recognize that the facts are on the side of reform, and democratic societies don’t advance when our elected officials act like seat-warmers.

Topics: , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Oil Can Harry

    Hey Rupert. think of how much money you’d have saved if your gold-digging, home-wrecking wife hadn’t been allowed to emigrate from China to the West.

    • Ancient, creaking Rupert practiced the diversity he preaches and it bit him in the butt. I’ll bet his young slant eyed wife enriched the old geezer, alright.

  • Publius Pompilius Quitus

    No patriotic or national movement in the USA will gain steam until the GOP is destroyed.
    The GOP has been the left’s best friend because it distracts from true opposition to the establishment. As one sees with Mr. Murdock’s article, Republican elites are just as plutocrats as the Democrats’, and they may be even less concerned with the American nation; for they don’t even fain concern about workers. Worse, they give people a false sense of moral superiority by replacing nationhood with vain values.

    • JohnEngelman

      Ever since the Republican Party was founded in 1854 it has been dominated by the business community. Do not be surprised by Rupert Murdoch’s essay. Immigration helps the business community by lowering wages.

      • Sick of it

        To be more precise, said party has been dominated by robber barons, not hardworking middle class businessmen.

        • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

          Yes, and they gained them (the middle class) by pandering to their patriotism and Christian simplicity. Still works.

      • Manaphy

        Not the “business community”.

      • Nancy Thomas

        Ahhh…more deep insights….yes, it’s the fault of “Republicans!”

        My God, what would we do without your razor sharp analysis?

        Knowing what the real problem is, now I’ll be able to sleep at night.

        • Mergatroyd

          Let’s keep believing that, shall we? Or maybe that blacks are our greatest threat?

          Our real enemy would certainly like that…

          • JohnEngelman

            Your real enemy are more intelligent Jews. They out compete you.

          • Nancy Thomas

            My IQ is surely 20 points or more higher than yours. I could outcompete you in every endeavor known to man. Your ego inflation is DISGUSTING and totally unwarranted because you are NOT all that bright!

          • JohnEngelman

            You claim that. You do not demonstrate it. Your comments express anger. They do not reveal knowledge and insight.

          • Nancy Thomas

            You’ll be happy to note that I am now on the net looking to make a sizable donation to the most radical anti-Israel Muslim group I can find. You’ve inspired me to do this. Have a nice day John, and don’t trip on that massively inflated ego.

          • JohnEngelman

            A “massively inflated ego,” while not an asset, is preferable to a vast reservoir of hatred. I have been following you around on the internet. Your comments are characterized by hatred and anger.

          • rowingfool

            John, you need tutoring in math. I know math is hard, but you’ve got to try a get a basic understanding of numbers. Visit La Griffe du Lion’s site to get a handle on what two juxtaposed bell curves look like.

            Although the IQ of Ashkenazi Jews is approx. 12 points higher than that of whites, they make up only 2-3% of the population while white are 62%. Therefore, there are many more whites on the tail of the right end of the juxtaposed curves than there are Jews in spite of white’s lower collective IQ. This is just a fact you’re going to have to accept if you wish to move ahead in your understanding.

            There are many of us, whites, who are or whose parents were research scientists, professors, doctors, lawyers etc. We have no delusions about Jewish capabilities. We neither over nor under rate them. They are our peers. Accept that.

          • JohnEngelman

            An average IQ of 112 pushes the Ashkenazi bell curve to the right, and means that a higher percentage of Ashkenazim are in the genius range. This helps to explain why Jews have won one out of five Nobel Prizes.

          • rowingfool

            You are a simple-minded fool. Apparently you can’t hold two notions simultaneously in your noggin. In comparing gentile to jew IQ, we are comparing percentages of percentages of non linear functions which have graphical and analytic solutions that exist, though they are not apparent to the simple minded.

            Above the gate to Plato’s Academy was posted the following, “Let none but Geometers enter here.”

            The ability to reason intelligently using statistics is the very basis of this site’s stand vis-a-vis the fuzzy-headed liberal equalitarian.

          • JohnEngelman

            Ashkenazi Jews have the highest IQ of any ethnic group known.
            They average around 112-115, well above the European norm of 100…

            Their numbers among prominent scientists are roughly ten times
            greater than you’d expect from their share of the population in the United States and Europe. Over the past two generations they have won more than a quarter of all Nobel science prizes, although they make up less than one-six-hundredth of the world’s population. Although they represent less than 3 percent of the U.S. population they son 27 percent of the U.S. Nobel prizes in science…

            American Jews are also over represented in other areas, such as business (where they account for about a fifth of CEOs) and academia (where they make up about 22 percent of Ivy league students).

            – Gregory Cochran and Henry Harpending, from “The 10,000

            Year Explosion: How Civilization Accelerated Human
            Evolution,” Chapter 7: “Medieval Evolution: How the Ashkenazi Jews Got Their Smarts,” pages 188, 189, 190.


            Richard Lynn, The Chosen People: A Study of Jewish Intelligence and Achievement, Washington Summit Publishers, 2011, 408 pp. soft cover $39.00, hard cover $60.00.

            Prof. Lynn writes:

            [Jews] arrived as penniless refugees unable to speak the languages of their new countries; they were the “huddled masses” from the most backward region of Europe. Yet by the middle decades of the 20th century, the children and grandchildren of these immigrants were doing far better than their Gentile hosts on all indices of socioeconomic status and earnings and outperforming them by several orders of magnitude in obtaining elite academic distinction…

            The development of IQ tests confirmed the impression that Jews were unusually intelligent, and Professor Lynn’s extensive review of the literature indicates that Jews in the US have an average IQ of 110 compared to 100 for other Europeans. This would help account for their outstanding
            performance in a variety of fields. Though Jews are only about 0.2 percent of the world population, half the world’s chess grandmasters, for example, and 16 percent of Nobel Prize winners for science have been Jews. For Professor Lynn,
            the purpose of his book “is to document and explain such achievements.”

            – Byron M. Roth, American Renaissance, November 2011

          • rowingfool

            Ah, changing the subject–a sure way to win when you have been bested in a debate.

            Your original post challenged a commenter with the following quote; “Your real enemy are more intelligent Jews. You can’t compete with them”.

            And now, moving the goalposts, you cite evidence pertaining to performance at the very highest, most-rarefied level.

            These are two different things entirely. Although in absolute numbers white European gentiles earn more of even the highest honors than do Jews.

            But setting that aside for the moment, we note that as we move from the extreme right end towards the left of our two overlapping bell curves, the greater the gentile/jew ratio becomes (these are nonlinear, remember). Your discussion began with your response to someone who said the following; “hardworking middle class businessmen”, meaning the so called “smart fraction” that organizes a modern technological society. And of the smart fraction, gentiles outnumber jews by an even wider margin than they do at the very highest reaches of attainment. What is it about this that you don’t understand?

            Jews are fine. No one denies that they can be brilliant. Just don’t trip over the truth in your rush to worship them.

          • JohnEngelman

            When was I defeated in a debate? You suggested that Jews do not deserve their achievements and their prosperity. They have earned both in the face of discrimination and bigotry because of their superior talent.

          • rowingfool

            “You suggested that Jews do not deserve their achievements and their prosperity.”

            You are a liar. You would never say that to my face. And if you did, I would give you a swift and unforgettable lesson in manners.

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            In the sense of percentile not absolute numbers. But what the Jew haters don’t want to admit is that it is they who made the Jews their enemies. Jews had no reason to hate anyone else (except Rome of course, but that was a separate issue about revolting against humiliating, authoritarian rule) until the advent of Christian led religious persecution that became a cultural habit/reflex for European whites. It is one of our biggest errors in our history and also the biggest lie historically. But I can’t see how this can be corrected in any workable way. However, I do think that whites are squandering their miniscule political capital by harping on the subject of the Jew as the social/political pariah.

          • Sick of it

            The so-called Jews currently plotting against us showed up in Poland during the Middle Ages (via Central Asia). There was no historic friction except that which was caused by their own actions.

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            You simply do not know history. What are you reading, Stormfront junk? The Polish rulers brought in German Jews to help them establish municipalities. Those Jews had settled in the Rhinelands in the 6th and 7th century. They were all males that took German wives. (Proven lately by dna). They knew the region because they had come earlier with the Romans as suppliers. The Polish rulers used them as civil managers, organizers and bankers. They had already been successful at doing this for Western European kings (Especially French) bankrolling kings and nobles, and bringing in trade. Jews bankrolled William the Conqueror. They later bankrolled Richard the Lion Hearted. They bankrolled Phillipe the Fair who then turned on them, driving them out of France to cancel his debt (Templars the next year). Jews brought in precious stones and things like silk and perfume. The Jews stimulated medieval Europe enough to have a large claim on a prime cause of the Renaissance. Also, in the middle ages the only medical school in Europe was located in Montpelier and was staffed mostly by Jews.

            So the Polish kings contracted with them. But they also used them as tax collectors. So the common people resented the Jews on several levels. First, they were not Christians and were the “Christ Killers.” Next, they were favored by the monarch above them, lived higher and stood apart. Finally, they were the bad guys the collected taxes or goods as factors. So when the time came, Jews were blamed for everything that went wrong.

            You are trying to justify yourself with flat out lies. People who create false history on either side, are doing the white race no good service.

          • Sick of it

            So you’ve never heard of the Khazars of Khazaria? A real, very numerous tribe which “converted” to Talmudic Judaism in the 8th century A.D. A tribe which stuck together for centuries while living amongst other peoples. We should ignore them because it bothers your sensibilities? I was reading about the Khazars while still a liberal and had never heard of Stormfront.

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            I know all about the Kingdom of Khazaria, the real history, not the Stormfront version. If you were reading about Khazaria while still a liberal, you were not reading source documents and likely doing it online. But I doubt that you were ever a liberal by definition.

            The King was pragmatic and open minded. When the Jews were driven out of the Middle East, they made their way into non-Christian, non-Muslim regions. The King allowed them to settle in peacefully. He eventually converted to Judaism himself but did not force his subjects, most of whom remained pagans or nominal Christians. The Khazars have been genetically linked to the original settlers of that area (modern day Ukraine) the Scythians, who were first reported on by Herodotus. The Khazars eventually became Eastern Orthodox Christians after the Khazaria was conquered by the Russians. The ultra Christian conservative Cossacks that served the Tzars so faithfully to the last sprang from the original Scythian tribes and not withstanding some Central Asian genetic drift, are considered Caucasians.

            Crack a reputable, actual history book to balance your appetite for propaganda.

          • Sick of it

            Our real enemy bankrolls the Republican and Democratic parties. And probably most of the political parties on the planet.

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            You provide me with this proof of your astute, well documented and unbaised, objective perceptions.

            You and people like you are not doing white race realism any good, because it is childsplay for liberals to knock down silly comments like this that link directly to long debunked theories of Jewish world domination conspiracy (The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion).

          • Sick of it

            You want an astute argument? Liberals such as yourself are insane and many of us have gotten beyond tired of dealing with you. Be glad you live with fellow travelers in California.

        • JohnEngelman

          if you have nothing to say, do not say it here.

          • Nancy Thomas

            I have plenty to say, but filthy scum that you are, you don’t want to hear it. You are beneath contempt. You lie and lie and lie, and then you lie some more for good measure, and then you prevaricate and dissemble and try to throw people off. You are totally lacking in intellectual integrity. You have no honor, no decency, no goodness in you. You are EVIL. You should not be allowed to post here. You are a hate filled anti-white bigot and you are FOS.

          • JohnEngelman

            You are angry. People become angry when opinions they want to believe are true, but fear are not true, are questioned.

            If you were confident in the validity of your opinions you would be calm and reasonable.

          • Mergatroyd

            That is exactly why you were kicked off of Daily Stormer and Stormfront.

            Hey John, I just got another fund raising letter from Jared Taylor asking for a donation.

            I told him to forward it on to you, LOL.

          • JohnEngelman

            I am always willing to listen to a good argument, and usually to a bad argument.

            I was banned from Daily Stormer and Stormfront because of the intolerance and poor debating skills of posters like you. Being banned from those websites is for me a source of pride and amusement.

          • Mergatroyd

            John, you need to take a break and stop sitting on these threads 24/7. You must also understand that many here do not agree with you, especially the type of arguments you use, as I explained clearly on Daily Stormer a few weeks ago:

            Also, stop threatening people. Don’t say you don’t because you do. This is from your own posting:

            “If I am a moderator those who flame me for expressing my admiration for Jews and Orientals have reason for concern.

            Wouldn’t it be funny if I would out all the anti Semites to their supervisors, employers, and landlords. I imagine many of them are Jews.”

            I take that as a direct threat. I believe you should be banned for threatening posters here and on Alternative Right. Stormfront and Daily Stormer justifiably banned you for threatening people.

            We’re trying to help save the white race which is under threat of genocide and you undermine everything we do and now you’re threatening people.

            Why should I donate to a site where someone like you is allowed to threaten other posters by exposing them to their employers?

          • JohnEngelman

            I am well aware that others disagree with me. I only ask for them to demonstrate how I am mistaken.

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            I think you are wrong here concerning posting real names. As one who often argues a leftist dialogue, you are in safe political territory; no one will be coming after you. People like me with something to protect have to have a veil.

            The old saying may apply; “When you’ve got nothing, you’ve got nothing to loose.”

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            I often don’t agree with John Engelman, but the idea that people ought to be banned because of what they post, especially since he often provides sources while most others don’t is a betrayal of any notion of intellectual qualification or some sort of dedication to Jeffersonian “truth.”

            If more posters here would actually learn real history rather than political myth, and be able to admit when someone they don’t really agree with overall makes a point, they’d end up with better and stronger arguments for the promotion of white rights to unsympathetic parties.

          • JohnEngelman

            I have never advocated the banning of others. Others have advocated that I be banned.

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            I meant this to be a supportive statement, not one accusing you of advocating the banning of others. Read my comment to Megatroyd below…

          • JohnEngelman

            Thank you.

          • JohnEngelman

            Stormfront and Daily Stormer justifiably banned you for threatening people.

            – Mergatroyd

            Stormfront banned me for pointing out that one of Adolf Hitler’s charges against German Jews was factually incorrect.

            Daily Stormer banned me because of your complaints. You cannot justify your opinions in a civil debate. You only feel comfortable in an echo chamber where everyone agrees with you.

            In addition, I defended Jared Taylor against an attack by Andrew Anglin.

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            Someone messed with my Disqus account and prevented me from posting here for a couple months. (I still can’t post on CNN). I didn’t really care, but posted as a Guest, but the narrator seems to have deleted every post I made during that time. This Jeffersonian brag of Amren is a farce.

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            Being kicked off sites like Stormfront is going to happen to anyone on the reasonable side of neo-nazism. They are afraid of historical truth. Whites do fine in the actual historical examination, even though they made some big mistakes. The reason Jews became so intelligent was largely due to the isolation that Christians forced upon them (combined with their own long cultural tendency toward literacy, math, accounting and trade). Remember, Jews gave precious stones their colloquial name by Christians – “Jewels.” The problem is that so few whites know their own history, but make it up for self-aggrandizement and/or radical right political myths. This provides our enemies with easy tools for dismantling any notion of white rights.

      • WR_the_realist

        Right now the Democrats are even more eager than the Republicans to help their corporate masters get more cheap labor. You seem to keep thinking that the Democratic Party is what is was in 1960. Your average union Democrat in 1960 wouldn’t even recognize the crawling horror that the Democratic Party has become.

        • JohnEngelman

          Democrats who favor open borders have different motives than Republicans who favor open borders. Democrats care about poor immigrants. Republicans want their future employers in the business community to become richer by paying lower wages.

          • WR_the_realist

            Yes, Democrats are foolish enough to think we can help the 4 billion humans who are worse off than the average Mexican by bringing them all here. But the actual result is lots of cheap labor for the rich. Consequences matter, motivations don’t.

          • JohnEngelman

            Most liberals do not understand that high rate of immigration interferes with nearly every thing else liberals want to achieve.

            I am a liberal on many issues. I understand.

        • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

          I don’t think so. I think the left sees voters and can live with the cheap labor desires of the right because it sees that ultimately, they will win and then walk their former political enemies to the guillotine.

          • JohnEngelman

            Conservatives cannot make connections between their desire for low taxes and an expensive military.

            Liberals cannot make connections between their desire to be compassionate to impoverished immigrants, and the brutal fact that a high rate of immigration contributes to lower wages for American citizens.

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            I don’t think either are that dumb. I think one imagines that it will outfox or “out will” the other in the end. What it is for sure is a race for votes. The problem of conservatives is that they rely too much on “faith in God” to see them through.

          • JohnEngelman

            The problem with conservatives is that they believe, despite 33 years of contrary evidence, that cutting taxes generates so much economic growth that it balances the budget. During the twentieth century there was nearly always more economic growth under Democratic presidents, when tax rates were usually higher.

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            Not only that, but the government actually grew more during the tenures of Republican presidents, Nixon, Reagan, Bush 1 & 2.

            I think that it is ironic that the economy grew the most and cut that huge and heavily debated deficit that Reagan and Bush 1 left when “hippies” who were all those years, developing computers in their garages provided the tech boom that corrected that deficit during Clinton’s years and then returned in a few short years under Bush 2.

            My friend in Slovenia commented on their high taxes thus: “We’re one big family here, so we don’t mind.” He survived three surgeries for cancer and while going through that, married his second wife and fathered two beautiful white children and built a three story house, which he owns outright.

            The important thing for us to do is recognize that useful ideas exist everywhere and the one who is polarized politically probably isn’t capable of the sort of pragmatic creativity that is needed for the white race to survive. My Slovenian friend lives in a country that has been primarily Slovene since the 6th century and at least at the last report, still was. So ethnic and cultural homogeneity is important. That’s a big (and useful) argument for the notion of separatism and racial, cultural, and ethnic distinctions. In the end this chronic tax argument is a waste of time.

  • Rupert would look good doing “The Mussolini “.

  • Do Americans really wish Google, eBay, Pfizer, or Home Depot were headquartered in Eastern Europe or China instead of America?

    If it means having to displace the historic American nation, then I don’t care. What would you rather have, a search engine/internet auction house/a pharmaceutical/a big box hardware store (and I avoid the big box hardware joints like the plague), or an ethnostate? Let me think that over for 0.001 second and get back to you.

    Whether it’s a high-profile tech company or a small business employing
    just 10 people, 28% of all new American businesses started in 2011 were
    founded by immigrants.

    These businesses are usually things like Chinese and Indians (dot, not feather) and the like scamming the SBA to buy nail salons, motels and quickie marts from each other.

    The vast majority of America’s immigrants are hardworking, family-minded individuals with strong values.

    How would you know, chief?

    Next, we need to do away with the cap on H-1B visas

    What, you want the native born white American not to be able to do any job?

    But we are held back by the objections of the richly funded labor unions

    That mentality is decades out of date. Unions are almost fully on board with the whole amnesty and open borders project, including lifting the H-xB/J-x visa cap totally or at least creating many more annual allotments. And other than their being part of the Democrat-left vote-seeking coalition, I’m SMH trying to figure out why.

    If we are serious about advancing our economic future and about creating
    job growth here in America, then we must realize that it is suicidal to
    suggest closing our doors to the world’s entrepreneurs, or worse, to
    continue with large-scale deportations.

    Because native born white Americans never accomplished anything on their own, such retrograde dumb clucks who couldn’t find their cheeks with both hands on their faces.

    That is not to suggest we don’t need to do a far better job securing our
    border. Border security should be an integral part of a comprehensive

    If you’re going to let everyone in, why have border security at all when you’ve just erased the border? Oh I know, to give all the white men you just threw out of the real job market some semblance of employment. Except the USBP hardly has any real white people anymore, so I’m fooling myself there.

    That is why I was pleased to see Sen. Rand Paul and Grover Norquist,
    president of Americans for Tax Reform, step up their efforts to lobby
    for immigration reform.

    I can only hope that you do PSAs on your own cable news channel praising Rand Paul and all the rest of the Republican open borders traitors, and I hope (wink wink) that you spend the next few years just ripping into Jeff Sessions and Kris Kobach, and beg them not to run for President.

    President Obama has shown wise restraint despite pressure from the left to act

    Do you ever watch your own cable news network, Rupert? If you did, you’d know how wrong you are about Obama’s “restraint.”

    However, if Congress fails to even try to have this important debate,
    the president might feel tempted to act via executive order.

    Let him. This might be, as Richard Spencer put it today in his 2034 prediction, the Bealean moment we really need.

    Related: Sheldon Adelson is also singing this same kind of tune, see Drudge for the link. I think this is a coordinated effort on the part of the zillionaires to make us think that what happened nine days ago had nothing to do with immigration.

    • Oil Can Harry

      Excellent dissection.

      I chuckled at Rupert’s empty threat that Home Depot will leave the country.

      Hey, will HD take all the illegal aliens clogging up their parking lots with them?

      • Arthur Blank, Homespanic Depot’s CEO, is one of the biggest negro-lovers around, just to throw icing on the cake.

        Luckily, being from a city and a metro area with very few Hispanics/illegals, even though I don’t use the big box hardware joints, there are so many of them that I often pass by their parking lots, and I’ve never seen day laborers gathered in any one. I have seen it plenty of times when I visited my great uncle (RIP) in Arizona.

        If you’re into mindweapons and finding little subtle ways to beat the system, there’s probably an Ace, or a True Value or a Do-It-Best close to all of us that would appreciate our business.

    • Pro_Whitey

      Re unions, the majority of union members are now in the public employee unions (there should not be any). It’s quite in their interests to maximize government users to be herded and fed.

      • That’s true by itself. But even the few parts of the organized labor movement remaining that are bastions of working-middle class white people in the private sector are on the wrong side of this issue.

    • Sick of it

      Corporations destroy creativity most of the time. They reduce available jobs. They ruin their host nations in every conceivable way that would benefit them. Kick out the leadership of Google and we will still control the backbone of the internet. They lose. What benefits do we receive from the corporate structure?

      • Having to lose jobs and production facilities to foreigners hungry to work 16 hours a day for ten dollars a day?

  • Bossman

    I’m confused. Fox News which is owned by Rupert Murdock appears to be very anti-immigrant and anti-Hispanic so what is really going on?

    • 1. FNC’s immigration coverage, while better than CNN or MSNBC, is nowhere near as patriotic as, say, AR or V-Dare.

      2. Even at that, FNC is a one-off in the Murdoch global media empire.

    • Ike Eichenberg

      Give the viewer what they want.

    • Alexandra1973

      Having a “conservative” network and a “liberal” network helps keep the left vs. right paradigm going.

      • Mergatroyd

        Fox is anything but conservative.

        • Alexandra1973

          Yep, but for whatever reason it’s perceived as such. I guess it’s relative.

          • Mergatroyd

            They employ the likes of Shill O’Reilly and pass him off as a “conservative voice”. Enough said

        • WR_the_realist

          Fox is neocon. A neocon is a Democrat who likes war.

    • Nancy Thomas

      Not remotely true. Just the opposite. ALL of the hosts have been forced to adopt Murdoch’s pro-amnesty line. That’s why I no longer watch Fox. They are controlled opposition.

  • Jesse James

    Last time I checked Murdock was an Australian, screw what he thinks about America.

    • 1stworlder

      Are you sure he isn’t another background that incudes the first 2 letters of your name?

      • Sick of it

        We’re not supposed to talk about that, for fear of being called Nazis.

  • Rhialto

    During the 19th century, the ultra wealthy like Vanderbilt, Rockefeller, J.P. Morgan, were referred to as “Malfactors of Great Wealth”. Basically they only cared about themselves, and except for some PR, were indifferent to the rest of the country. Murddock continues this great tradition into the 21st century, augmenting it with neocon/Liberal malevolence toward normal White men.

    • 1stworlder

      Actually Rockefeller & Carnegie benefited society by actually making things and making them cheaply dropping prices on steel and oil significantly Its those that produce nothing use govt to socialize their failures that hurt us. The book “Myth of the Robber Barons” compares them to those failures supported by government.

      • Löwenmensch ᛟ

        Carnegie was a POS

      • Sick of it

        Said people created our current society. Their money, their descendants, their causes. Same with the Rothschild family.

        • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

          And all the evil that came with it.

      • Rhialto

        You make a point that I pretty much agree with, Capitalism is an effective economic system, especially in times of rapidly changing technology, and Capitalism requires Capitalists. Capitalists care about profit, and little else; their political views are those that maximize profits: They have always promoted high levels of immigration.

        • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

          This is too simply put. Trade is what makes the world go around and it takes capital to engage in trade. It’s when individuals abused the system to become false nobles (robber barons) through Laissez Faire Capitalism the evils increased. The trend of such a system is towards a situation where a few own everything and next comes revolution. Similarly, the supposed remedy of no trade, and a closed economic system where incentive is killed has been shown to have inherent failings that cause stagnation and eventual collapse.
          So it could be as well said that communism is the best system for organizing and propelling a disparate, third world, impoverished group to a survival level and beyond.

          Without the stimulation of the promise of reward for initiative, both systems fail. When a society no longer has room for advancement because all the wealth is concentrated in a few hands, bad things will happen. When people stagnate due to collectivism, bad things happen.

      • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

        Rockefeller was Standard Oil and Carnegie was steel, they didn’t made ANYTHNG, but provided raw materials and pushed legislation away from steam and electricity toward oil and steel. But that sort of irrelevant since it took politicians (Roosevelt) to make them see the benefit of becoming less selfish. At the same time, there was the rise of the “Round Table” talks in the UK where the nobles and business lords (often the same) came together after being universally affected by writers such as Chlarles Dickens and WT Stead toward the realization that their worlds won’t last long if the majority of people live in squalor and hopelessness. Revolutions had been erupting in Europe throughout the 19th century and these people were wisely attempting to correct some terrible social imbalances. But that they had to be dragged to it in the U.S. is putting it mildly. Just the example of the coal mining wars ought to be enough to substantiate that argument. Labor rights such as the 40 hour week, child labor laws, safety rules, etc., had to be fought for, literally. No, left on their own, the Robber Barons would likely have never changed. It’s not such a sacrifice after all, to donate a single digit percentage of your wealth to a library system or endowment. By then, Carnegie was an old man, who was still acting mostly in his own interest, trying to buy his way into heaven at the last moment.

    • saxonsun

      And where would we be without these “robber barons?”

      • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

        Oil and steel were already known and others would have found ways to market it and “make things.” Remember, these guys didn’t make things, people like Bell, Edison, and Ford “made things.”

  • Murdoch is a member of the tribe, and like most of them is a New World Order globalist. Globalists are not the friends of my race, no matter their race or ethnicity. With globalists, it’s me, me, me and money, money, money. Murdoch’s opinions are unimportant. His money is.


    “Well, of course immigration means change. Immigrants enrich our culture and add to our economic prosperity” – NO! You need to get it right Mr. Murdock. Immigrants, especially the kinds of immigrants that you desire, enrich YOUR culture while destroying OURS! They add to YOUR prosperity, while sapping OUR, ever more elusive prosperity!

    Here’s a thought! Get yourself, and don’t forget your sons too, on that private plane of yours and head back to Australia. Where you can exploit THOSE illegal aliens at the expense of of the average Australian citizens while attempting to manipulate THEM into a Kum-Ba-Yah drum circle of BS brotherhood! STOP TRYING TO MURDER MY AMERICA!

  • dd121

    We don’t need any immigration “reform”. We need our leftist politicians to enforce existing federal law or face impeachment.

    • mikebowen55

      We’ve seen how that has worked out. It’s time for a new plan whatever that may be.

  • DaveMed

    “Immigrants enrich our culture and add to our economic prosperity.”

    Really, Mr. Murdoch? Those who come to America just happen to all be terrific people? Not people who see a society that offers a better quality of life than the squalid slums created by their own?

    • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

      What always amazes me is why people like Murdock and Trump seem to never have enough wealth. Because if they weren’t just thinking of their next billion, they’d be thinking about the long term, and what will happen when the planet is run by the people he today hopes will increase his wealth through labor exploitation.

  • kjh64

    This is just a scam to drive down wages. We don’t need mass immigration. Most immigration should be done away with and small amounts allowed IF and only IF a person is actually going to open up a business or be an entrepreneur that will hire Americans or a person that has some genius or special skill that is difficult to find here and is needed. We do not need large scale immigration, it should be very small only allowing the best and brightest

    • Einsatzgrenadier

      At this point, we don’t need ANY immigration. What America does need is to reduce its population by about 100,000,000 (all nonwhites) and a permanent moratorium on all immigration.

  • Alexandra1973

    Hm. I believe he’s the owner of Fox News.

    He was made a Knight Commander of St. Gregory by JP II.

    Sure you Aussies don’t want him back?

  • Löwenmensch ᛟ

    ‘Whether it’s a high-profile tech company or a small business employing just 10 people, 28% of all new American businesses started in 2011 were founded by immigrants.’

    Ah yes Murdich, you see the game is fixed for the immigrants to get special treatment for businesses by the anti-white feds. Such as preference at the Small Business Administration, Minority and Women Prequalification Program,Supplier Diversity Program,The National Minority Supplier Development Council,The Minority Business Development Agency,Office of Refugee Resettlement and a multitude of other programs/organizations designed for the empowerment of non-whites and destruction of Whites. Who does Murdich think he’s fooling?

  • Puggg

    “Wall Street Journal”

    We’re coming up on July 4, and 30 years ago this July 4, this very newspaper came out with an editorial calling for a constitutional amendment to require open borders and no immigration restrictions. And Rupert Murdoch didn’t own the Wall Street Journal until 2007. So this can’t be a matter of Rupert Murdoch’s ego or interests at work purely, this has been the editorial bent of this paper for at least 30 years.

  • Sick of it

    Perhaps Mr. Murdoch should shut his face and return to his own country.

  • Caucasoid88

    How can someone be so evil? He’s obviously intelligent enough to see Mexican illegals will not benefit the economy in any meaningful or unique way. He knows the opposite will happen. He has either gone senile, or simply wants to turn his 13 billion into 14 billion. The former is understandable considering this essay and the latter is flat-out evil. His death can’t wait.

    • Nancy Thomas

      Clearly he is anti-white. I wonder why?

      • seala

        Look at the type of white people he has mixed with over the past few years

        • Mergatroyd

          Look at his family tree on his mother’s side. It is there where the answer lies.

          • seala

            His mothers family tree is white European. So what is your point

          • Mergatroyd

            You are wrong. That’s my point.

          • seala

            I am not wrong. Where do you say his non white ancestry exists -and I do have a copy of his ancestry on both sides of his family

          • Mergatroyd

            “Rupert’s father, Sir Keith Murdoch, was a newspaper publisher, and his mother an Orthodox Jew,” Curtiss wrote, “although Murdoch never offers that information in his biographies.”

            From “Murdoch’s Deeply Hidden Jewish Roots”

            http //www veteranstoday com/2011/07/16/murdochs-deeply-hidden-jewish-roots-a-biography/

          • seala

            You quote someone else as PROOF ? Curtiss was either wrong or deliberately lying. Now I loathe RMs politics however lying about his origins discredits any opposition to his policies. Dame Elizabeth was Catholic and brought up as such.

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            Going off on an unproductive tear. Was Andrew Carnegie Jewish, JP Morgan? Etc., etc….?


            The whole question of whether she is or is not a European, is an entirely moot point. Cause whatever the h_ll is in that photo is clearly not even human, let alone European.

          • Mergatroyd

            You are 100% wrong and here’s the proof:

            Rupert’s father, Sir Keith Murdoch, was a newspaper publisher, and his mother an Orthodox Jew,” Curtiss wrote, “although Murdoch never offers that information in his biographies.”

          • Caucasoid88

            I’m interested to hear your thoughts as to whether Jewish anti-white animus is within the genes or learned.

          • Mergatroyd

            I’m convinced it is within the genes. They’ve repeated the same pattern over and over: Destroy from within every society that they’ve been admitted to. That’s why they’ve been kicked out of 109 countries.

            Reading the Culture of Critique will clear up any misunderstandings, also A People That Shall Dwell Alone.

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            Maybe you’d better read up on actual Christian and European history to see how the Jews were made into our “enemies.” We are long past the point where we could complain justly that the Jews have no reason to exploit whatever they can to protect themselves.

          • Sick of it

            It’s learned behavior. They’ve been absorbed into white populations all over the planet. Many people do not even realize they have Jewish ancestry…and they couldn’t care less.

        • Mergatroyd

          Sure, let’s look at them:

          “Murdoch’s support for Zionism extremists is well known and a matter of record. As New York Governor George Pataki said, “There is no newspaper in the U.S. more supportive of Israel than the [Murdoch’s] New York Post.”

          It is through a network of Zionist organizations, in which Murdoch plays a central role, that Murdoch is connected to the individuals who arranged the privatization – and obtained control of the World Trade Center – shortly before its destruction.

          These key individuals are: Larry Silverstein and the former Israeli commando Frank Lowy, the lease holders of dubious repute who gained control of the WTC property six weeks before 9/11, and Port Authority Chairman Lewis M. Eisenberg, who authorized the transfer of the leases.

          Murdoch belongs to, and has been honored by, a number of leading Zionist organizations in which Silverstein, Lowy, and Eisenberg all hold senior positions. These organizations include the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), the United Jewish Appeal (UJA), and the New York-based Museum of Jewish Heritage – A Living Memorial to the Holocaust.”

          http //www veteranstoday com/2011/07/16/murdochs-deeply-hidden-jewish-roots-a-biography/

          Hope you don’t think he’s a “white guy who supports white causes,” he’s anything but.

    • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

      Just to be clear, these current emigrants are so much Mexicans as Central Americans reportedly fleeing the gangs wars in their countries.

  • Marc Zuckurburg

    Tell it like it is, Rupert. We’re going to make it to the top of the mountain. We shall overcome, someday.

    Rupert and Marc, in unison, combined $50 billion of loot between us: Make our immigration reform comprehensive, please!

    This has to be the most intelligent and insightful thing that I’ve ever read that someone didn’t already ghost write in my name.

  • Nancy Thomas

    How strange….Murdoch certainly LOOKS white? Hmmm….Ben Wattenberg said that whites becoming a minority would be a “transcendent moment.”
    Susan Sontag said that “whites are a cancer on the earth.”
    Noel Ignatiev says that “whites should be exterminated.”

    Is it possible that Murdoch is just another one of those crazy white people?
    So hard to make sense of it!

    • Mergatroyd

      Look closely: Murdoch is not white on his mother’s side. That is the side he identifies with.

      • seala

        Rubbish ! Dame Elizabeth Murdoch was the daughter of Marie Grace de Lancey and Rupert Green Neither were non-white

        • Mergatroyd

          Do your research before posting. You are wrong.

          • seala

            No I am not. Back up your claim with your “evidence” I have his family tree -and I have met Dame Elizabeth on several occasions

          • Ace

            Instead of saying he’s wrong, why not provide the evidence as he demands? Do you have evidence for your assertion, or not? If so, what is it?

          • Mergatroyd

            Yes. I apologize for the late reply. I tied up with my business and indisposed.

            Here it is. Please pass it on.

            “Murdoch ‘became an American citizen for business reasons,’ according to Richard H. Curtiss, editor of the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs. Keith Rupert was born in Melbourne, Australia, on March 11, 1931. “Rupert’s father, Sir Keith Murdoch, was a newspaper publisher, and his mother an Orthodox Jew,” Curtiss wrote, “although Murdoch never offers that information in his biographies.”

            Rupert’s father Sir Keith Murdoch attained his prominent position in Australian society through a fortuitous marriage to the daughter of a wealthy Jewish family, née Elisabeth Joy Greene. Through his wife’s connections, Keith Murdoch was subsequently promoted from reporter to chairman of the British-owned newspaper where he worked. There was enough money to buy himself a knighthood of the British realm, two newspapers in Adelaide, South Australia, and a radio station in a faraway mining town,” Candour wrote in 1984. “For some reason, Murdoch has always tried to hide the fact that his pious mother brought him up as a Jew.”

            While Murdoch may have “tried to hide” his Jewish roots, he has been quite forthright about his support for extreme right-wing Zionists, such as Benjamin Netanyahu and Ariel Sharon.

            http //www veteranstoday com/2011/07/16/murdochs-deeply-hidden-jewish-roots-a-biography/

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            This is not proof, but a politically biased piece of propaganda pretending to be valid because it got published. Publishing doesn’t equate validity. You need deeper sources. But your idea that anti-white Jewish trait is genetic is proof enough of your lack of understanding of both dna and genetics and how to think critically.

            The entire claim that Murdock has Jewish genetics is so inconsequential that your insistence only portrays your own neurotic psychosis.

          • Ace

            Thank you for your detailed reply. And, you delivered on the proof.

            Amazing that one can just go out and buy a couple of newspapers, a radio station, and a knighthood. Must be nice.

            Odd that Murdoch would try to hide his Jewish roots. With such a large fortune behind him I don’t see how it would affect him adversely.

            “Extreme right-wing” is a phrase I find meaningless. Right-wingers are at the opposite pole from left-wingers who love the state. What’s extreme about this I have no idea. Zionist seems to me to be neutral, just signifying a belief that Jews aren’t going to be welcome anywhere and so should have a homeland in Israel.

        • Mergatroyd

          Here is the proof. I’ve been tied up with my business and indisposed for the past few days.

          Murdoch “became an American citizen for business reasons,” according to Richard H. Curtiss, editor of the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs. Keith Rupert was born in Melbourne, Australia, on March 11, 1931. “Rupert’s father, Sir Keith Murdoch, was a newspaper publisher, and his mother an Orthodox Jew,” Curtiss wrote, “although Murdoch never offers that information in his biographies.”

          Rupert’s father Sir Keith Murdoch attained his prominent position in Australian society through a fortuitous marriage to the daughter of a wealthy Jewish family, née Elisabeth Joy Greene. Through his wife’s connections, Keith Murdoch was subsequently promoted from reporter to chairman of the British-owned newspaper where he worked. There was enough money to buy himself a knighthood of the British realm, two newspapers in Adelaide, South Australia, and a radio station in a faraway mining town,” Candour wrote in 1984. “For some reason, Murdoch has always tried to hide the fact that his pious mother brought him up as a Jew.”

          While Murdoch may have “tried to hide” his Jewish roots, he has been quite forthright about his support for extreme right-wing Zionists, such as Benjamin Netanyahu and Ariel Sharon.

          Read the rest here: http //www veteranstoday com/2011/07/16/murdochs-deeply-hidden-jewish-roots-a-biography/

          • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

            You cannot buy a knighthood, I know that as a fact, but go ahead and look it up. It is possible to buy a lordship or noble title, but not a knighthood. This renders your entire “proof” useless as it is unreliable because the writers don’t understand this simple fact of peerage.

            It requires more than a narrative to provide proof and from an accepted source, not a political website.


    Remember that Murdoch is a fanatical supporter of the ultra-right wing government in Israel that sentences “illegal infiltrators” to prison and then deports them.

    • Pro_Whitey

      And I believe he shares some ancestry with Israel’s rulers.

    • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

      The ISIS is now in control of the Jordanian border with Iraq. Maybe you can celebrate when they attack Israel tomorrow. Well done.

      • ATBOTL

        Maybe you can move to Israel since that’s where your loyalty is.

  • IKUredux

    Hey Murdoch! Why did you leave Australia? If you have become an American citizen, than our rules are too lax. Oh. Wait. Apparently we don’t have any rules anymore, at least, no rules or laws that are enforced. But, anyway, what the hell are you talking about? What non-White immigrants to this country have created a multi -million dollar enterprise that employs thousands? Just because some immigrant gets promoted to the CEO position, doesn’t mean that they conceptualized, and formed said company. And, you know what? i am so sick of hearing about how this a nation of immigrants. Gee, you go back far enough in history, and EVERY country in this world is a “nation of immigrants”. So the hell what? Come on, d*ckwad, you actually have the testicular fortitude to say that the recent immigrants to this country are creating companies and the concommitant new jobs? Really? Like all the Dunkin Donuts couldn’t have had non-Indian owners(oh yeah, for once Biden was correct). And, they pretty much hire only other Indians, that for some reason were allowed into this country. Gee, I guess it is really hard to make donuts. And, what about all the Arabs who own all the freakin gas stations? White people used to own them. And, once again, their only employees are other Arabs. What about the Koreans and the convenience stores? Really, all the convenience stores in N.Y. and elsewhere just happened to be owned by Koreans. Whoa! Guess who they mostly hire? Why has our government provided low cost loans to these invaders to open businesses, while, ignoring their own home grown, citizens? And, frankly, this includes American Blacks. W-T-F?

    • saxonsun

      And what about all those construction jobs that we used to have? Now I see only illegal Mexicans.

      • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

        Where you are, I guess. In Washington State, many are still white. But in California, I can tell you what happened; white workers used to use meth to get them through the day and then partied and drank at night (along with other drug used). By the late 1980s, contractors in the field couldn’t count on white workers to show up at a work site. So they began to hire Mexicans, who were willing to show up and work hard. Later, the meth wave went into rural communities and now we see single mothers losing custody of their children because they use meth (often to loose weight. I know this from my training as a Guardian ad Litem).

        I am against the cheap labor immigration Reconquesta. I saw the Reconquesta in progress in California and saw many a white victim. I myself was one of them (although I was not beaten, raped or murdered). But whites who did these drugs and their bosses who thought it was fine because they worked harder are to blame, ultimately.

  • jayvbellis

    The last “American” media owner of any importance was Ted Turner.

    When Ted married Hanoi Jane Fonda and merged Turner Broadcasting CNN with Gerald Levin’s Time Warner Inc – that was all she wrote.

    Fox News is supposedly “conservative” – yeah right.

    Fortunately Fox commentators are blasting immigration anarchy and giving the middle finger to Rupert Murdoch.

  • ShermanTMcCoy

    Rupert has long ago reached his expiration date. McCain, too, for that matter. I can tell by the stench of the grave about them both.

  • Rachel May

    Rupert Murdoch’s Jewish origins: a matter of controversy

    A well placed correspondent with connections to the newspaper world (who has asked to remain anonymous) reports to us:

    “I shall quote exactly what Candour [a rightwing British journal edited by A K Chesterton] said in its June 1984 issue (vol. XXXV, no. 6):

    BIOGRAPHICAL details of [Rupert] Murdoch’s past are sketchy and often contradictory. One reads that his grandfather was an impoverished Presbyterian minister who migrated to Australia from England, that his father was a low-paid reporter for a British newspaper in Australia, and yet, young Rupert divided his time between his family’s suburban home near Melbourne and the family’s sheep ranch in the country. He was educated first at the fashionable Geelong private school, and went on to the elitist and aristocratic Oxford University in England.

    “Rupert’s father Sir Keith Murdoch [see below] attained his prominent position in Australian society through a fortuitous marriage to the daughter of a wealthy Jewish family, née Elisabeth Joy Greene. Through his wife’s connections, Keith Murdoch was subsequently promoted from reporter to chairman of the British-owned newspaper where he worked. There was enough money to buy himself a knighthood of the British realm, two newspapers in Adelaide, South Australia, and a radio station in a faraway mining town. For some reason, Murdoch has always tried to hide the fact that his pious mother brought him up as a Jew…

    And that, as I am sure you know, makes him a Jew according to the law of the Talmud, and indeed according to the present laws of Israel.

    Spotlight [a rightwing Washington weekly published by Willis Carto] in fact examined Murdoch in considerable depth in no fewer than three issues, 30th January and 6th and 13th February [1984]. My friend Ivor Benson whom I regarded as a very judicious observer and commentator, reckoned, along with Spotlight, that his meteoric ascent was completely artificial, and that he was a front for far more powerful super-rich subversives, Michel Fribourg, Armand Hammer and Edgar Bronfman, “all of them part of a super-rich ‘Zionist Mafia'”, to quote Benson, who added: “By comparison with these three, Murdoch is just an ambitious midget who has been given the job of drawing all the public attention away from those who make the real decisions.” (Benson’s Behind the News, March 1984)

    Could well be. Certainly I can confirm that at least part of his meteoric ascent was artificial. I remember my brother-in-law [a former editor of The Times] telling me, at the time of Murdoch’s acquisition of The Times, that it was a strange business. Murdoch was by no means the highest bidder.

    For my part, I myself have always had good personal motives to take a favourable view of Murdoch, because my brother-in-law was easily his favourite editor of The Times, and, when my brother-in-law died (in office), Murdoch treated my sister completely fairly, from a financial point of view, without making the slightest difficulty. But, despite that reason for some prejudice in his favour, I have always been forced to the judgement that he has been a force for unspeakable evil.

    His was the “breakthrough” which made the tabloids genuinely pornographic.

    In my opinion at least, his policy with The Times completed its collapse from its position as the most respected newspaper in the world.

    And his republicanism makes me sick — it is not for the purpose of creating a better world, but quite obviously purely destructive. And I could go on.

    PS: QUITE recently, a Times correspondent actually resigned because he was not allowed to report properly what was going on in Israel, or even to use accurate words to describe facts which were undisputed. He stated: “Murdoch’s executives were so scared of irritating him that, when I pulled off a little scoop by tracking, interviewing and photographing the unit in the Israeli army which killed Mohammed al-Durrah, the 12-year-old boy whose death was captured on film and became the iconic image of the conflict, I was asked to file the piece ‘without mentioning the dead kid’. After that conversation, I was left wordless, so I quit.” Unusually courageous for a modern journalist.

    • jayvbellis

      We can not blame all our immigration problems on the Jews. There are plenty of White Gentile traitors, enemies – look at Rand Paul, Lindsey Graham, john McCain, the Bush family, Tyson foods CEO Donnie Smith.

      So Murdoch is out of the closet as an amnesty, immigration traitor. He’s in the enemy camp. Punish this enemy, who cares if he has so obscure Jewish heritage.

      Hell, the top of the Catholic Church, Southern Baptists are all against us!

      • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

        Ted Kennedy sponsored the bill written by Frankfurt School member Emanuel Cellar (a Jew); The 1964 Immigration and Naturalization Act, which was aimed at increasing non-European immigration into the U.S.

  • jayvbellis

    Too many Americans fell for the lie that all our adversaries, enemies were Liberals, Leftists.

    We’ve had lots and lots of adversaries on the supposed a Conservative, Right side.

    First, Jewish Neo Conservatives who claimed to be joining us, in reality they took over National Review and most everything in Conservative Inc. They purged Pat Buchanan, Peter Brimelow, John Derbyshire, Joe Sobran and pretty much anyone who spoke out against mass Third world immigration to the West, or endless US wars for Israel.

    But, they aren’t the only enemies on the “conservative” Right. There are the big Agribusiess owners who demand endless supplies of cheap, Neo slave non a white labor. The. Onion King in Georgia, Tyson Foods CEO Donnie Smith, even militia folk hero Cliven Burdy insist that they need endless supplies of Mexicans, Central Americans, even Somalian Bantu Muslims!

    Then, of course there is Amren’s traitor of the year Rand Paul.

    Now Fox News owner Australian Rupert Murdoch comes out of the closet as an open borders, mass immigration, amnesty loon.

    john McCain, Lindsey Graham, The Bush family… Lots and lots of enemies, traitors on the Conservative Right.

    • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

      But just think of how good things will be when the ISIS conquers Israel and puts all the Jews and Christians there to death.

    • Sick of it

      A conservative, by his very nature, would oppose immigration from the third world (how does one conserve his nation of origin by replacing the basic genetic stock of his nation?). Just because a man lies about his beliefs, doesn’t mean we should believe him. And politicians lie all of the time. John Boehner is a wonderful example all by himself. Look at his family’s personal life. Let’s dig into his background. I doubt we will find very much that could be considered conservative.

  • jayvbellis

    M’thinks Murdoch is doing a Ted Turner and wants social acceptance with the rest of the media elite, academic elite – the chattering class.

    He wants his children to be accepted at Harvard, go on networking retreats to Martha’s Vineyard.

    • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

      Because it’s tough to be a social outcast.

  • jayvbellis

    Great work on the flyer distribution in Colorado.

    This is positive, effective activism, not butt showing, evolutionary fantasy, not counter productive “going postal” .

    I think this is the way to go – National Alliance style activism with special emphasis is on the Northwest Imperative.

    The NorthWest Front should concentrate on producing good propaganda, good educational material (a virtual bookstore, the National Alliance had a great bookstore)

    Mr. Covington is a better writer than Dr. Pierce and also a better radio commentator, he has a folksy voice.

  • Obama’s approval rating on his handling on the immigration issue is 31%, compared to 65% disapprove. If you read a little further, you’ll find out that his approval rating among Democrats on the immigration matter is only 60%, which is pretty lethargic for Democrats when it comes to a Democrat President pushing a Democrat friendly issue that Democrats are singularly obsessed with right now.

    politico (dot) com/story/2014/06/poll-obama-immigration-approval-low-108106.html

    Dave Brat probably understood this all along.

    And so far, what is the RINO establishment response?

    A whole lot of Rupert Murdoch and Sheldon Adelson mendacious denial and treachery.

    The RINOs were complaining that Dave Brat got Democrat votes. Well duh, isn’t that what you want to do? Mitt Romney wishes he could have gotten more Democrat votes than he did, except he tried to do so by trying to be Democrat lite, when Democrat regular beats Democrat lite among Democrat voters all the time.

  • Ace

    Mr. Murdoch appears to equate “enrich” with “come to.” Would that he would refine his notions of “enrich” and in the process develop an understanding of the concepts of “historical nation,” “foundational culture,” “ethnic strife,” “saturation,” “incompatibility,” “displacement,” “rejectionism,” and “illegal.” Whites are slated to be a minority in our own culture and in exchange we’re supposed to be grateful for new restaurants or computer repair businesses? And read this nonsense while the gates are welded open?

    How many of those foreigners starting new businesses here are doing so while collecting public benefits and getting preferential legal and educational treatment? Maybe Americans would find it easier to start businesses if they could do the same.

    I swear, why are otherwise intelligent people such complete saps on the issue of foreigners? 300M+ Americans and we somehow need foreigners to prosper?

  • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

    What I’ve seen in California, Oregon and Washington is that these so called, highly skilled workers from Indian and Asia are not that skilled. What I mean is that they are not usually programmers or inventors, but on the IT level. It is merely a way to get cheap labor. Everyone most also be noticing that when they call the tech departments at their internet/phone providers that the one on the other side is rarely a native English speaker. The main skill they seem to be working on is better English pronunciation.

  • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

    Yep, they built the Railroad in California to Utah because no one else would (or could) dangle from ropes with dynamite on their backs. but it is important to realize that most of those Chinese were men who planned on returning to China with their “fortunes.” The ones that didn’t return were mostly forced out anyway. On the other end, it was mostly Irish immigrants building the railroad. So what are you trying to say?

  • Whiteplight sees the Emperor N

    The Mexicans I knew in the 50s and 60s (in school) weren’t any more intelligent than they are today. Just less dangerous due to smaller numbers. But even as a child of four, my first experience with a Mexican kid was when one stole a toy cap gun from me. When I ran after him to get it back, he turned it around and chased me with the intent of hammering me on the head with the butt. (My dad got it back for me).