2013: The Year in Whiteness

Joan Walsh, Salon, December 30, 2013

Maybe it was the very fact of enjoying a wonderful Christmas with my family and friends, against the manufactured backlash to a nonexistent “War on Christmas,” that let me appreciate the perilous mental state of a small but noisy and paranoid swath of white America. Somehow over the holiday it became clear: 2013 was the year white grievance mongering became an uglier and even more lucrative racket.

Fox News has been peddling the phony “War on Christmas” for years, of course, but it took new Fox phenom Megyn Kelly to give it an explicitly racial cast. Not only did Kelly wage war against the menace of a black Santa–declaring nonsensically that the fictional character of Santa Claus “just is white”–but when she was called on it, she made herself out to be the victim of politically correct bullies, race-baiters and Fox haters. Suddenly it was clear: The imagined war on Christmas has become an equally farcical war on whiteness in the minds of those sad right-wing warriors.

The next week, “Duck Dynasty’s” Phil Robertson also became a martyr for the white right, after A&E briefly suspended him for holding forth on the nastiness of gay sex while insisting African Americans were happy in the Jim Crow South.

The new hysteria and hypocrisy was crystallized by one surreal fact: While paranoid white righties were fighting for their allegedly endangered right to celebrate Christmas (with their white Santa), they could watch a “Duck Dynasty” Christmas marathon on A&E, underscoring that there’s neither a war on Christmas nor on bigoted pseudo-Christians like Robertson. But there’s a lot of cash to be made, and fear to be stoked, by claiming both.

{snip}

2013 was also the year that George Zimmerman was acquitted of the murder of an unarmed black 17-year-old, Trayvon Martin, allegedly in self-defense, becoming a cultural hero to some of that same paranoid white right. {snip}

{snip}

Of course the stoking of white grievance is nothing new. It was at the heart of the GOP’s so-called Southern strategy, which always had a crucial Northern component: deliberately inflaming the anxieties of white working-class Southerners and Northern “ethnics” about racial and economic change. {snip}

{snip}

I’m optimistic nonetheless. A little under a year ago I wrote an obituary for former New York Mayor Ed Koch, outlining how the formerly liberal Democrat rode a wave of white fear and grievance into Gracie Mansion in 1977. I couldn’t know it at the time, none of us did, but New York was about to elect its first Democratic mayor in 24 years, a staunch progressive on racial issues with an African American wife and two biracial children. An ad that tried to depict Bill de Blasio as an anti-police lefty who’d lead New York back to the crime and chaos of the ’70s and ’80s backfired; so did the ravings of Rupert Murdoch’s New York Post, which did so much to help elect Koch.

De Blasio’s landslide win, among every racial and ethnic group, showed that white New Yorkers are ready to embrace the city’s multiracial future and tackle its lingering racial and class inequities. The mayor-elect’s influential “tale of two cities” is largely, though not exclusively, a tale of white and non-white New York. Red state demagogues can mock New York as a lonely blue island irrelevant to the rest of the country. But the city helped invent both liberalism and the backlash that tore it down. I’m going to bet that the de Blasio coalition has more influence, in the end, than Phil Robertson or George Zimmerman, Megyn Kelly or Sarah Palin. A noisy, paranoid white backlash against racial change may be inevitable, but it will also pass. That’s what scares them.

Topics: , , , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Hal K

    They are talking about implicit pro-whiteness, not explicit pro-whiteness. Time and again the mainstream media use the implicit pro-whiteness of mainstream conservatives against them, and the best mainstream conservatives can do is insist that they aren’t “racist,” i.e. they would never ever think of engaging in explicit racial identity politics the way nonwhites do. Let’s just hope that mainstream conservatives will think their way out of this paper bag soon.

    • Svigor

      Maybe it was the very fact of enjoying a wonderful Christmas with my family and friends, against the manufactured backlash to a nonexistent “War on Christmas,”

      On one of my now-rare, recent forays into leftist la-la land I discovered that lefties are verrrry touchy about the so-called “War on Christmas.” They really, really, really don’t like the fact that conservatives think they’re waging a War on Christmas. I was kinda surprised. I figured they’d all be foursquare behind “Happy Holidays/Kwanzaa/Chanukah/etc.” It was kinda cute. I didn’t even mention the WoC. I just did a quick joke in passing (“Merry Chri- er, Happy Hollidays”) and they were all over me. Made a huge stink about it, pretending like I made a big stink about it, etc.

      The next week, “Duck Dynasty’s” Phil Robertson also became a martyr for the white right, after A&E briefly suspended him for holding forth on the nastiness of gay sex while insisting African Americans were happy in the Jim Crow South.

      All Phil said was that he was there, and he never saw any abuse of blacks. But lefties hate Hate HATE it when whites have the temerity to announce what they saw with their lying eyes, if it fails to support their narrative. Not contradicts – just fails to support. Note how Walsh has to lie (what is it with lefties and lying? Do they even notice how routinely they do this?); Phil said he didn’t see it, Walsh rewrites that to “insisting blacks were happy.”

      So, let’s recap 2013, banner year for white supremacy:

      A white woman had the nerve to claim Santa is white.
      A white man had the nerve to say he didn’t see blacks abused back in the day in the south (to hell with whether it was true or not, he should know his place and not be uppity enough to say it).
      A mestizo guy shot a black guy (who stalked, ambushed, assaulted, and viciously beat him) in self-defense and beat the frivolous murder charges the leftist media and organized blackness trumped up, going broke and becoming one of the most hated and harrassed men in America in the process.

      Wow, yeah, I can definitely sympathize with Salon’s thesis that there we’re dangerously close to stormtroopers goose-stepping down every MLK boulevard in America.

      De Blasio’s landslide win, among every racial and ethnic group, showed that white New Yorkers are ready to embrace the city’s multiracial future and tackle its lingering racial and class inequities.

      Blacks are leaving NYC in droves, have been for years. I guess Walsh is ignoring the reality on the ground in NYC because she lives there, she’s white, and she’s on board with the white New Yorker push to de-blackify NYC?

      These people are insane.

      The left must be destroyed.

      • Hal K

        The left will always exist. What must be destroyed is the wall keeping explicit white identity politics out of the mainstream right.

        • Svigor

          True. We should move the wall so that the left are locked out, as we are now; destroyed as a viable entity.

          • Hal K

            We need to stop focusing on the left. The right is our most immediate concern.

          • Hal K

            If you want to move the wall, start where the wall is, not where it isn’t. The wall divides mainstream conservatism from pro-white identity politics. It is ineffective to spend ones time attacking the left if you are pro-white. First bring down the wall, then worry about putting up a new one.

        • M&S

          >>
          The left will always exist. What must be destroyed is the wall keeping explicit white identity politics out of the mainstream right.
          >>

          Nope.

          Got it backwards.

          The wall is to keep /us/ out and we need to build one of our own that forces the liberal left to realize their power comes from a group they no longer belong to. Can no longer access to gain power from. And should be very afraid that 2013 was indeed the year that ‘white grievance’ began to see them lose control over the message: Whites must disenfranchise themselves to uplift other races.

          Whites who endorse whiteness for it’s own sake and _refuse_ to be party to such a system which is not explicitly in their favor **as it is in every other ethnic homeland** are whites who leave the white liberals with No Power because the ethnics they endorse here are collecitively useless tagalongs who use white leftism as a vehicle for sapping the strength of the white right with racial guilt which they would never get away with on their own.
          Whites still have the sense to see that, when a black man insists whites are the maker of all ills, that he is doing so with white technology that exists only in a white society.
          It is when we are criticized by our own that we start to doubt our right to our own endeavors.
          Pull back from the racists who must remain ‘engaged’ with us to run their foul hucksterism (for liberal left is a profit making enterprise that uses blacks as a means to pry loose other white’s cash as much as vice versa) and you will see what happens when the cannibals have nothing but each other to look fondly upon.
          Leftists are not effectors. They are manipulators. And Black leftists ride white leftists to the finish line. Never realizing that if nobody deigns to run in the race, it doesn’t matter which idiot declares victory.
          The Right’s never ending desire to regain center-hood is our A#1 problem. We cannot bear to admit that we are not the moderates and the outliers in the Squeeze Chart of identity politics.
          We want the power and the respect and the wealth and they _proof of place_ that goes with saying ‘we were right and you were wrong’.
          But as the saying goes: “Be silent and exult!” For in that which is most trying you will find truth.
          We don’t need to be silent amongst each other. But we do need to organize a social network that deliberately excludes the race dating leftists so that they can find their own extinction without our help. And have only their own choices as to whom to call Kindred to blame.
          This is the truth of racism. You don’t have to hate anyone. You just have be really picky about whom you love. Time and tide will then take their tithing from those who make the wrong choice and leave those who want to live alone with their own to do so.

          • Hal K

            who use white leftism as a vehicle for sapping the strength of the white right with racial guilt

            What white right? The mainstream right is not explicitly pro-white. The most they ever do is talk about civic nationalism, and that is just more of the same. The radio talkshow host Mike Savage talked about bringing back “nationalism” with a “firewall” to keep out white “racists.” That is the problem in a nutshell. Don’t fall for this. People like Mike Savage are not on our side.

            Don’t fall into the trap that has been set for you by people like Mike Savage. They rail against the left and liberals, but at the end of the day they still want a “firewall” to keep out white advocacy. You are being taken advantage of.

            The way you use “racist” in a negative sense tells me that you still have the wool pulled over your eyes. As long as white conservatives keep saying it is wrong to be “racist” they are in effect saying that explicitly pro-white advocacy would be wrong. It is best to always put “racist” in quotes, since as commonly understood the term is logically meaningless.

            I think you have a ways to go before you understand the true nature of our problem. The fact that you are at AmRen tells me you are moving outside of the “wall” I am talking about, but your thought processes are still partially contaminated by mainstream thinking.

          • Michael Savage isn’t White so of course he’s not on our side. No presstitute in mainstream governmedia is. We have to create our own networks, our own voice.

          • M&S

            Hal K,

            >>
            What white right? The mainstream right is not explicitly pro-white. The most they ever do is talk about civic nationalism, and that is just more of the same.
            >>
            The right that votes with their tax code and real estate choices.
            The right that looks on wealth with a healthy ‘get there someday, except for all these social welfare taxes!’ envy.
            The right that still takes joy when a rocket goes up and wishes it had white astronauts on them because blacks and Hispanics don’t give a damn about space travel as the journey for it’s own sake.
            >>
            The radio talkshow host Mike Savage talked about bringing back “nationalism” with a “firewall” to keep out white “racists.” That is the problem in a nutshell. Don’t fall for this. People like Mike Savage are not on our side.
            >>
            You don’t get what I’m saying here. I’m glad to be a white racist. I think it’s natural to want the success of your own people within your own nation as homeland, over all others.
            >>
            Don’t fall into the trap that has been set for you by people like Mike Savage. They rail against the left and liberals, but at the end of the day they still want a “firewall” to keep out white advocacy. You are being taken advantage of.
            >>
            I am not a fan of Mr. Savage.

            >>
            The way you use “racist” in a negative sense tells me that you still have the wool pulled over your eyes. As long as white conservatives keep saying it is wrong to be “racist” they are in effect saying that explicitly pro-white advocacy would be wrong. It is best to always put “racist” in quotes, since as commonly understood the term is logically meaningless.
            >>
            Nope. A racist is an extant person. It is not something to be used in quotes to denote silliness or use outside the norm of it’s intended definition. The difference between me and the real racists is that liberals are pro-other (black, Hispanic, Asian, Jew etc.) race which means that they are anti-us.
            Until you make that cognitive leap, and can call an a liberal an anti-white racist you haven’t internalized the truth of life as evolution: we all function a little differently from each other, as we pass through stress tests, those whose reactions are positive survive a little better, those whose reactions are negative do not.
            This forms a _genetic algorithm_ of survival methods which in turn informs not just the individual but the society he lives in. Optimizing group behaviors as institutions towards the kinds of functional usefulness which make it /easier/ for those who pass Test 1 to move onto Test 2-3-4-1,000 without having to bang their heads on the wall of base survivalism.
            Acknowledging this ‘what you are informs what you do and what you do makes it easier to be what you are’ condition is part and parcel of acknowledging why whites have achieved great technical, philosophic, legal and artistic innovations in creating Western Society and other races essentially have not.
            If you allow others into your society whose Genetic Algorithm is not optimized to it, and then start optimizing your own world towards lower efficiency states which pander to their weaknesses rather than forcing them to become like you or fail into genetic dead ends, you weaken the Genetic Algorithm, making it pointless to be successful and cohesive with your culture norms.

            >>
            I think you have a ways to go before you understand the true nature of our problem. The fact that you are at AmRen tells me you are moving outside of the “wall” I am talking about, but your thought processes are still partially contaminated by mainstream.
            >>
            I think you should read Nietzsche and the Master:Slave relationship. Because it underlines, perfectly, why giving those who feel ‘unequal’ power can only destroy the function of our society which is to enable those who /achieve/ to find moral satisfaction and social leverage from doing so.
            There is no good but that which is useful, something which Masters (a more modern term for which would be alpha personalities) appreciate in direct reflection as the sentiment derived from owned achievement.
            There is no bad but that which is re-sentimented as envy or desire for benefit from the achievement of others that which Slaves (betas) cannot match on their own. Equality for them is not the chance to do well but the outcome that derives from the assumption of shared benefits.
            Something that is against the genetic selection algorithm of natural evolution. As why we do not and should not, endorse weakness.
            This is the dark heart of liberal worship of the weaker races. They identify with, in other peoples, that which they know is the not true in other whites: that to only way to gain power for a ‘social equalizer’ (community organizer, race studier) is to take if from those who achieve and give it to those whose ‘gratitude’ becomes a way of making a living, channeling successful people’s money towards weaker ones.
            This is why we must give up the struggle to own the Center of the political Squeeze Chart on racism by ‘convincing’ others that treating outside races like privileged elites is a very bad thing to do.
            Because they already know it.
            And the only way to attack such a pathological predatory illness is to deprive it of the _base_ means by which society struggles to flourish inspite of the unwanted load.
            And that means creating communities whose internal values are those of supporting only whites who give back to themselves.
            Racism must become real for us, even as we internalize it in our communities where we cannot be held accountable for whom we choose to exclusively give our moneys as our preferential treatment to.
            And through the achievement of better standards of group living than the individualist outsiders, we must create envy in other whites for what we have that they no longer can manage to achieve on their own as ‘mainstream’ society becomes ever more alien populated and hostile to them. When the river that is modern living begins to choke on the social detritus as the lack of white energy to keep the channel of progress and benefits flowing, the real nature and source of weakness will become clear as non-achievement, unable to fend for itself.
            At the point where whites are only buying from whites, only living in white communities, helping each other to stay debt clear and separate from a System which seeks to force participation through monetary leverage, we will engenders social failure by those who uplift non-white interests in the society which WE BUILT.
            And that will be the moment when we can take a stand and say: “We want out.” New currency. New Constitution. New Country.
            At that point, the Moderate (whichever way the wind blows) majority who are terrified of being called racist because that means stating loyalty for a group rather than their own selfish interests, will vote with their feet to move towards the White Right who have the most goodies.
            And we will own the Center by default.
            But it begins by saying “I know what racism is, and I choose be racist, not because I hate other races but because I love the Genetic Algorithm as the expressed achievements and social norms that whites have built, solely for themselves.”
            It may help to know that Liberals are racists too. They are simply twisted, inverted, ones who have chosen to give their loyalty to a Genetic Algorithm not their own. For the selfish principle of being a Slave Beta in controlling the flow of white money and power to a people other whites generally choose not to deal with.
            Like a franchise, where you have sole trading rights, you can shovel as much money and power into your pockets as you like for the right to ‘oversee’ the redistribution of wealth to non-whites which most white people would not betray their moral core by doing.
            You can’t cut off the choice these people have made. To love other races more than their own.
            But you can cut off the money that makes them socially powerful in doing so. And once useless, as paper tiger socialists, they will find that they have no more position with these fair weather allies than they do with us.
            And that will be the end of them.
            Racism is not hate. It is a preference of love as loyalty. But it is still preference. And if you don’t give loyalty to your own, you deserve to have no hope of succor from them.

          • Hal K

            Holy mackerel, that is a long comment.

            I like the term white right. If you can get more mainstream conservatives to think of themselves that way it will be a positive step.

            Likewise, if you can spread the message to white conservatives that “racism” is good if you are for your own race then it is also a positive step. I agree with the sentiment, but we disagree on tactics, since I think the term “racism” has too much anti-white baggage.

            My point is that it is the mainstream right that is defective. They are not able to adequately oppose the left because they exclude explicit white identity politics. Are you familiar with the blog “Alternative Right,” recently relabeled “Radix Journal?” The article they just posted, titled, “ON THE BRIDGE BETWEEN TWO INTERESTING YEARS” gets into this issue, and I recommend it.

            I have some familiarity with Nietzsche, although I can’t quote him chapter and verse. There will always be a right wing and a left wing in politics. See “The Righteous Mind” by Jonathan Haidt. He explains how conservatives tend to be loyal and liberals tend to be disloyal. It is true that they are loyal to people of different races, but we have to view this as a form of disloyalty. They enjoy betraying their own kin, for whatever reason. Nonwhite liberals are actually conservative, in the sense that they are loyal to their own people.

          • M&S

            HalK,

            Sorry about that, I can’t promise to this one will be much shorter.

            White females cannot achieve, with 50% of our upper body strength and 60% of our lower body strength, 75% of our cardio performance and a 3 point (one quarter MSD, the same spread as between Asians and Whites) IQ deficit what we do by hard work and a literally productive (manufacturing) industrial society.

            What’s more, women tend to have a much more even distribution of intelligence around that 96-97 norm than men do which means that they have fewer upper 130s who are capable of even beginning to do the high level executive synthesis of concepts which look towards longer term plus/minus consequences.

            Instead, they tend to engineer controlling circumstances by which what ‘feels good’ as safe and enabling to their own instinctive world view is dominant. An effeminized world based on care giving to all as the means to boost the value of the services they used to provide exclusively to their own and largely for free is part of that.

            Such a sly, instinctive, route to liberated empowerment is not their fault.

            It is, in fact, the result of an evolutionary pathway that had to prepare them, young, for breeding by building up empathic emotional maturity at the expense of rational, risk driven, intellect in much the same way as it did for blacks, because our female ancestors might well not live through a second child delivery and so the hunting band could neither pass them around once a man had given her his child nor pay for a lot of caloric debt on an asset that was going to not live as long or fully as he might.

            It is that bent of evolutionary logic and perhaps resentment which has prevented women from developing into the strategically calculating animals that men are at a larger, societal, level where giving up resources to gain love and support is not enough to keep the /collective/ group safe and prosperous. And you must be harshly exclusive towards other groups who would predatorily set themselves up to benefit from this largesse.

            I find this to be ironic since women are undoubtedly better evaluators of inter-personal motives as psychologies than men are, also as a function of being rearers of young minds with the required ability to see through the maze of childish sense-motive vs. real needs.

            With that attitude ingrained, we cannot ‘get away from’ the liberal mindset, but we can buy it off in those women who are starting to see how much of a load society burdens those ennobled with it’s care and maintenance and who want an easier certainty of life within some knowable rules rather than ‘more freedom’ which leads ultimately back to patriarchal chains, ‘under new management’, by Hispanics or Asians and blacks who are all dominant male cultures.

            Such a realization, as weariness, is building in women as the natural respect and gratitude for what they gave expecting only love in return is now summarizeable on a more dollars and cents level. And white males refuse to take the risk in paying it. Yet even this treachery ultimately remains the triumph of the pragmatic over the idealized because the need for love is terribly biochemically centered around a woman’s variable view of her own fulfillment and what that means. And so love is about the fulfillment of genetic mission statement, even if it is moderated by unhealthy thresholds of male performance expectation to go with their own ever elevated, ever more effeminized cultural effects.

            Getting that loyalty back from a wild and rebellious female population can only be done by containing the assets and resources which we refuse to share outside our endo-group.

            Not merely our sperm but also material things and services which women value like education, homes, debt relief, child care, health, and comfort of lifestyle which their own madness has currently made free with to all and sundry. But not without real co$t as loss of support for themselves.

            I choose white women here because they form the largest beta-slave group whom we -must- gain a significant percentage of shared goals from. Not because they are ‘pushovers’ or ‘easy to corrupt as convince’.

            But simply because their majority agreement guarantees the white majority opinion.

            Even as their wombs continue guarantee our future.

            For when those social resources grow thin from over-sharing, it will be too late to do anything.

            We will either have our intra-societal enclaves packed away and horded for our own benefit as Amish-Whites-Within. Or we will be in open warfare with the other racial groups that will form equal Hispanic/Black/Asian population percentages with us (and more of them young and combat-vital) in a 2035 environment. Peoples who will continue to expect us to ‘share everything white’, including our children.

            At that point, we will not be able to achieve the one thing that is most essential to military victory as the /taking back/ of what we will have largely lost: Massing of Numbers. Mobs think in moment. Militaries think in terms of the logistics necessary to achieve selective massing at a future point in space as time where dominant attrition gives easier victory.

            Defeat in Detail will still be possible. But retreat in majority will cost less. And that also will appeal to the sudden shamefaced racial awareness of women who see the reality of a brown society they have created and want no part of being subjugated by it. But also have less will power to withstand being called racist for associating with us.

            Thinking now of that future is where we must be, mentally, so that whether we secede and form our own new racial heartland or make war and fight for everything or nothing, it will be a planned action not subject to defeatism by the one psychological pressure point by which our manly egos presently cringe and deflate.

            The fear of racism. For men are providers and calling us racist is akin to calling us inept. And that is a very devaluing of our position as /deserving/ dominance over our own society.

            Take away that club by daring the liberal idiots to say what is bad about whites _being racist_, without apology or semantics, as shortages underline the necessity of love for one’s own greater family over non-family groups and they will have nothing but raw force with which to hold back our rage.

            We can defeat that force, simply by denying it’s own logistical connections as movements within an enemy territory.

            Or, if they yield, we can refuse to accept their pleas for continuance of membership in _our_ Family rather than be left behind amongst the blacks and the Hispanics and the Asians who will have no use for those who can only give away other’s money.

            “Oh, but we’re racists, you don’t want to be a part of /that/…”

            Is such an eloquent twist of irony’s dagger into the poisoned soul of the multicult.

            But if we give into the “Anything but racist, don’t call me _that_!” as a plea of our own for rules of engagement, we have shown them the very weakness which is the same as saying you don’t care enough about what you are fighting for to bear the cost of fighting it, all or nothing.

            _We need_ the will to say “Our genes as our race made all of this, and so we are more important as a bloodline, than you blacks, Hispanics or those (few) Asians who would merge with us. You do not deserve the benefits we have built up inside ourselves while your ancestors did nothing and so you will never have them by simple default of your presence among us. Try and stop our leaving and we will kill you all.”

            Make it clear that Racism is a benign form of evolutionary selection as _separation_ and you win the heart of the argument from which all else, economically, sociologically and otherwise, falls out.

            Freedom of choice in who we will serve. For ourselves, all. For them, nothing.

            Because if you will not breed with someone, then you cannot allow them to have any access to your societies goods or services which you cannot get back ‘The Old Fashioned Way’.

            If we cannot convince chary females (who are terrified of not fitting in, of having ‘dangerous’ opinions that could jeopardize their genetically ingrained pursuit of a safe environmental condition as right of access to societal benefits), that this is a necessity of exclusionary will, we will not win.

            Though we physically defeat our enemy in every engagement, battle and operation. We will die out.

            Facing down racism and daring to acknowledge the word without fear of being hated for it is thus a necessary precondition for our survival, because women, who form some 52% of our societal population base, will respond to men that are bold enough not to care about what others think and unified enough to be able to form a power base of their own in securing what resources are left.

            If we cannot bring women onboard with the reality of ‘Gurl Power!’ in a colored society, then we will still have a chance to do so, on sheer charisma of those white men who still believe in what and who they are, as a genetic destiny. Nietzsche would have called this The Will To Power and women swoon to it all the time.

            But we _must_ take away the IED effect of that one word above all others that could be used against us. Laughing off racism as a form of exclusive love is the key.

          • Hal K

            I think pro-whiteness is the key. Maybe that is another way of saying the same thing, but keep in mind that society already views “racism” as legitimate when it benefits nonwhites. Similarly, society approves of “sexism” when it benefits women. They don’t say as much, but that is the reality of the situation.

            What underlies white fear of the word “racism” is a societal death drive against whites and males. “Death drive” is a Freudian term. Regardless of what you think of Freud, the “death drive” is a useful concept. It can be turned inward or outward. I have not seen a discussion of the “death drive” as it applies to groups, but it must carry over. We have a society-wide death drive against whites and males. For nonwhites and females it is directed outward, and for white males it is directed inward. A related term is “scapegoating.” A healthy group will tend to want to scapegoat out-groups. The obvious implication is that whites are not healthy at the group level.

            This points to a strategy for turning things around, which is to get the anti-white, anti-male death drives reversed. That is why I keep talking about pro-whiteness. It is the most direct opposing force to anti-whiteness. The wall I have been talking about is the heart of the problem. By excluding white identity politics from the mainstream it undermines white loyalty throughout society. The wall weakens mainstream conservatives. If white identity politics could get into the mainstream then it would have a ripple effect that would change the psychology of all of society and neutralize the death drive. That is why I keep saying that we have to ignore liberals and focus on bringing down the wall in mainstream conservatism.

          • Talltrees

            _We need_ the will to say “Our genes as our race made all of this, and so we are more important as a bloodline, than you blacks, Hispanics or those (few) Asians who would merge with us. You do not deserve the benefits we have built up inside ourselves while your ancestors did nothing and so you will never have them by simple default of your presence among us. Try and stop our leaving and we will kill you all.”

            “Your ancestors did nothing”

            Immigrants are being told they deserve the same rights as Whites, the true Americans, whose ancestors created, built, died, and subject to lifelong injurious repercussions, lost arms, legs. Told, “We are a nation of immigrants, come on in, everyone is welcome.”

            Ironically, they wish to enter a country created by Whites because it is so great; however, opine for their native cultures, thereby intent on changing White culture to theirs so they feel more at home. Little do they realize, as they change the U.S. to theirs, it becomes more like their native country, the one they wanted to
            leave.

            They were permitted to enter, reap the benefits Whites created, but behave as hostile invaders winning a war…and given permission to take over, just as the allies gave permission to genocide the Germans after World War II as Germans were so evil ALL of them had to be annihilated.

            And…Whites are not permitted to fight back.

            I can’t express in words the anger this causes; the gall, the b—lls these immigrants possess, their self-righteous superiority, demanding rights and all the wonders of this country, unlike the appreciative European immigrants of the past. It is cause to take up arms and I hope we do.

            I’m not prepared to give up a country our ancestors created, land so resourceful and beautiful to a bunch of third-world non-Whites who could never produce much of anything, let alone such a great country as ours.

      • Max Krakah

        This is just a smoke screen because they know this can really be seen as the year of “The Knockout Game”

      • Dr. Möbias

        Then she deserves what DeBlasio will bring down on her rich white head, punitive taxes imposed on the rich and streets as unsafe as they were during General Dinkins day. Couldn’t happen to a better leftard.
        The left along with their Cultural Marxism must be destroyed.

    • Max Krakah

      they’re getting scared. This was an attempt to ridicule the movement.

      • Hal K

        What movement? The mainstream right is impotent because it refuses to engage in explicit white identity politics. All the left is doing is hitting the mainstream right where it hurts.

    • slash345

      I can’t support current conservatives. They keep sweeping their white nationalist principles under the rug while at the sametime pointing the finger at liberals at every chance they get and accusing them of being “the real racists.”

      I can’t vote for idiots like that.

  • Lagerstrom

    “White grievance mongering…a lucrative racket?” Is she on drugs?

    • Spartacus

      Of course she is…

      • Lagerstrom

        Stupid people take drugs.

        • Max Krakah

          well, is it cause or effect or both? Stupid people should be the last to do drugs.

    • sbuffalonative

      I know. When non-existent white farmers are awarded millions of dollars for never having farmed, then you can call ‘white grievance mongering’ a lucrative racket. These people live in a world all their own.

    • Alexandra1973

      Grievance mongering sure made Jesse Jackson rich.

      Oh, right–he’s black.

    • Keep Honkin, I’m Reloading

      the art of projection

      • 48224

        That’s exactly what I thought.

  • dd121

    I don’t think our grievances are “stoked”, they’re mostly suppressed by the left.

    • Svigor

      They turn our grievances into non-white grievances; see, whites with grievances are actually racist, and therefore a non-white grievance.

      It’s lamer than a dog with three legs and one eye that answers to “lucky,” but the lefty rank-and-file are cheap dates.

  • Pelagian

    “The Year in Whiteness”. Please! With the level of vitriol coming out of the Left these days, you’d almost think they were hankering for a race war.

    • Manaphy

      Not “the left”.

      • So CAL Snowman

        It’s so sad and pathetic that we have to cower in fear of the “j” word but hey we are free to rant and rave about blacks and browns so the hour of our victory must be fast at hand . .

        • Spartacus

          Don’t worry. The real holocaust is nearing, and they know it. That’s why they’re so hysterical in the first place.

        • Manaphy

          Ridiculous AmRen policies benefit no-one except for aforementioned Ethno-religious group and radical Anti-white John Engelman.

          • TheCogitator

            I don’t understand how you can say John Engelman is anti-white.

          • Ant-White is a stretch.
            An enabler of anti-Whiteness? Definitely.

            He’s a nutty lib to be sure.

          • Jotun Hunter

            he is anti white in a naive and childish roundabout way – he is a troll pretending to be a progressive who just recognozes IQ data – he is anti black and anti white

          • Mergatroyd

            — History is moving against you (Whites). America is becoming more multi racial, more multi ethnic, and more meritocratic. There is nothing white nationalists can do about. One gets places in politics by getting in front of popular issues. One does not get places by fighting for lost causes.

            –John Engelman

            How is that not anti-White? Supreme anti-White Tim Wise says the same thing.

          • I think Engelman is surrendering.
            Libs are short on guts.

            OTOH-
            Tim Wise is definitely anti-White.
            He is truly mentally ill.

          • Max Krakah

            engleman has run out of fortune cookies for the time being. He will get some more, don’t worry, from the same supplier, and they will have the same tired old bits that he will once again post. Like Chinese history, he is cyclical, repetitive, and goes nowhere.

          • Spartacus

            Just a thought – take screenshots of his posts with your snipping tool, it would have a bigger impact .

          • newscomments70

            I thought that was Tim Wise. You should check out Engleman’s comments on Alternative Right, they are even more radical. He actually tones it down on amren.

          • Manaphy

            I already commented this on another thread, but here it is again; John Engelman claims to not be Anti-white, yet he believes that:
            -Ashkenazi Jews are genetically superior to Whites.
            -Asians are genetically superior to Whites.
            -Asian women are more beautiful than White women.
            -Interracial marriage should be allowed.
            -Pointing out Jewish elements in the Anti-white movement is not okay.
            -It is okay to call White Nationalists on AmRen racist, bigoted, Nazis.
            -Immigration should NOT be restricted to non-whites.
            Much more if you would read what he actually comments.

          • Svigor

            Most importantly, he believes white “gentiles” should not be allowed to have for themselves what Jews have for themselves in Israel; that Jews should be allowed to exclude white “gentiles” from their living space, but white “gentiles” should not be allowed to exclude Jews from their living spaces.

            If that’s not Jewish Supremacist and anti-white, what is?

          • Mergatroyd

            I thought I liked you better on the other site, but you’re doing a fine job right here. The actual quotes from Engelman really help too for anyone who thinks he’s not an anti-White. My question is why is he allowed to write constant, demoralizing, anti-White commentary on a pro-White issues site? I reckon he’s driven away a number of good posters from here. At least Stormfront had the decency to ban him.

          • TheCogitator

            I guess I have not watched him as well as you have. Thanks.

          • Jotun Hunter

            he believes in diversity and immigration as well as the ‘superiority’ of asiatics due to their sat scores. he is either deeply irrational or he is lying with an aim to disrupt – both id say

          • Mergatroyd

            Or, he’s being paid. Someone on another site suggested he might be in an Israeli prison and forced to pay his keep by becoming an anti-White computer troll. Makes sense to me.

          • Svigor

            Like this: John Engelman is anti-white.

          • Mergatroyd

            Have you read his comments? Let me enlighten you with a few I copied from Celestial Times:

            — The thought of you losing your job to a more intelligent Jew or Oriental is pleasing to me. As time goes on there will be more of that.

            — I like ethnic diversity

            John Engelman

            How much more anti-White can you get? He thinks the world will be better off when Whites are race-replaced by Jews and Asians.
            It says something about his character, that he is no better than this Joan Walsh who’s made it her life’s work to destroy Whites.

          • Jews are not a race……………

          • Sick of it

            You’re right, they are triracial. Tribe is a better term. Although the oldest usage of the word ‘race’ was in reference to specific ethnic groups.

          • TheCogitator

            I hadn’t seen that. You make a good argument. Facts are facts.

          • Brian

            Try reading his posts.

        • Xerxes22

          They can always get some crazy White Goy like Joan Walsh to do their dirty work in attacking us. They think it gives them cover and anonymity. It doesn’t

        • Svigor

          Hey, gotta admit, “Walsh” ain’t exactly a Jewish surname. Sounds like this harridan’s at our doorstep. ‘Course, she didn’t give herself a job…

          • Xerxes22

            Walsh could be her married name. Joan is another one of those “journalists” who has had all her background info scrubbed from the internet. People who do that usually have something to hide.

        • ms_anthro

          We encourage open discussion without censorship at www[dot]presstitutes[dot]org. Check it out.

        • ixObserver

          Well, you shouldn’t. I don’t understand why people here on Amren use ‘non-eskimo’ for ‘jew’. Is it because Amren staff censors most discussion around Jews ? Amren (by its own definition) is an online pro-white forum not some anti-White enclave. If Amren is against honest debate about Jews in the context of White issues then that defeats its purpose. If it is not possible to have honest debate online, where the barriers are generally low, where is any hope in the real world ?

    • Raydonn

      I submit that we should oblige their repeated requests……………

  • Biff_Maliboo

    Please see SPBDL or Naggermania for the ‘Year In Blackness.’

    • Mergatroyd

      No offense but:
      What is SPBDL? Please don’t use acronyms whenever possible, mostly I skip over them quickly because they infuriate me. I have no idea what 99% of them mean.

  • Frank_DeScushin

    What Salon calls white grievance mongering I call white awakening.

    Whites should have been raising a far greater grievance to black-on-white crime and anti-white legislation a long time ago.

    • Max Krakah

      they are getting scared

  • bigone4u

    I read this before seeing that Joan Walsh is the writer. If I wanted easy upvotes I would post Joaney Phoney’s picture again and freak everyone out. My comment is that I’ve seen her on MSNBC and she’s a hate-monger of the worst kind. Plus, she’s insane, crazy, on drugs, nuts, playing with half a deck, and retarded. I would love to see Jared Taylor debating her bull you know what.

    • Svigor

      She’s a typical hysterical, paranoid lefty nutjob. That much was obvious from the piece. She’d be just as happy burning witches, if that were the thing to do.

      • Mergatroyd

        She’s a tool. I doubt she believes a word of what she’s saying and knows it. She’s being paid well to spew bile and venom against White America, which allows her to live in an all-White enclave, receive publicity, praise, honors and entre to elite cocktail parties.
        There are huge rewards for those Whites who turn on and attack other Whites.

        • Whitetrashgang

          Yeah I remember there was this so called conservative black talking head on CNN and it turns out he was getting paid 5 million a year to say stuff he didn’t believe.

          • ms_anthro

            It amazes me that the mainstream media presstitutes have any credibility with anyone. They’re bought and sold like common streetwalkers. When someone like Glenn Beck “finally” notices the Channon and Christopher murders, it’s not because he’s some great guy standing up against White genocide. It’s because he’s an opportunistic rat that can sense which way the wind is blowing.

            Anyone getting a paycheck from any of our enemies’ governmedia propaganda organs is not to be trusted whatsoever. If they had integrity and honor they wouldn’t be allowed to have a soapbox in the first place.

          • Sick of it

            Technically, Beck got sidelined precisely because he was bringing up inconvenient facts on a regular basis. Since then, he has not been nearly as useful to the truth movement. And yes he said silly things from time to time as well.

  • Rick Brooks

    Walsh is just another deranged zealot who fanatically adheres to the pseudo-religion of liberalism with its holy trinity of racism, sexism and homophobia. Even if she to ran into a group of yoots playing the “knockout game” I doubt that she’d change her beliefs.

  • Manaphy

    “A noisy, paranoid white backlash against racial change may be inevitable, but it will also pass. That’s what scares them.”

    First of all if anyone is “noisy and paranoid”, then it is Lesbian mudshark Joan Walsh, who sits there with her other Anti-white “writers” at Salon, writing obnoxious, genocidal articles like these. Secondly, protecting your race, heritage, and country isn’t “backlash”. It is patriotic defense. By the way, Joan you should look up the word “backlash” in the dictionary, if you are so intellectually challenged. While doing that, you should also scroll across the word “integrity”. Ignore that word, because even if you were to read the definition, you still wouldn’t be able to understand its meaning even if it punched you in the face, then violated your fat, lesbian, strap-on wearing, “wife”, beat your kids, and then took all your money. Also Joan, skip the word “altruism” for the same reason. Finally, seeing as to the amount of times you used the number “2013” in your rant which can loosely be called an opinion, here is one for you:1933.

  • So Joan of Crackpot thinks that her ship has come in because of the Oil Driller.

    But I know how that will end. Either one of two ways:

    1. He messes stuff up so bad that four years from now the voters in New York will come to their senses and put in another Giuliani type

    Or

    2. The demographics in New York are so far gone that electoral reversal like that will never be possible again, but no matter because New York will resume the course it was on as late as 1993, becoming a super giant Detroit.

    Either way, we win, and Joaney Phoney Baloney loses.

    • ViktorNN

      New York is becoming richer and whiter.

      The non-whites that will remain will be increasingly middle class. The NYC of the next ten years that will be the playground of the rich really bears no comparison to the NYC of Ed Koch. It was a mistake to try comparing de Blasio to Koch – the crime ridden NYC of the 70s and 80s is gone (for now).

      Poor blacks and hispanics are being ethnically cleansed by white liberal gentrification. They don’t call it that, of course.

      • Mergatroyd

        We’ll see. DeBlasio has targeted and openly declared war on the rich in NY for not paying their “fair share.” I read on another site that Connecticut is already seeing an influx of rich from NY City.

  • Extropico

    There is a war on Whiteness. Migration, with concomitant ethnic cleansing, is unilateral into White nations. And to Salon’s racist phonies: the grievance industry from explicit anti-White discrimination hasn’t even started yet. That’s what scares them.

  • 2014: Will the pro-White sphere put forth an actual effort to organize at a grassroots level and stop being neutered by cries of racism?

    Stay tuned!

    • Sick of it

      Will anyone ever actually try to arrest the criminals running this country for the actual crimes they have committed? That’s a very fair question to ask at this point.

  • Bon, From the Land of Babble

    I only read the first two paragraphs — all that I could take of this hysterical, racist screed.

    the year white grievance mongering became an uglier and even more lucrative racket.

    I am still looking for this racism and White privilege they keep talking about in the media. Just where it is exactly?

    What about 50 years of legally forced racism: affirmative action? How’s that for White privilege.

    But there’s a lot of cash to be made

    The only truthful thing you said, moron. There IS a lot of cash to be made from insulting, vilifying and criticizing Whites. There is nothing worse than an anti-White White who’s sold out the White race for a few shekels.

    • Funny thing is this: Phony Joaney Baloney lives and works in San Francisco, where most ghetto blacks were driven out long ago, and Hispanics are quickly being driven out. “Minority” in San Francisco parlance now means Asians, both east and south.

      The big driving forces in SF are two fold: One, that the city is now the American epicenter of the financial services arm of Asian-American pan-Pacific international trade, and more recently, that the Silicon Valley is now moving into SF, because the new younger hipster SV workers want to live in an actual city and not endless suburbs.

      • Max Krakah

        Is she a lesbian, if not and if she is married her husband is probably a member of NAMBLA

    • Rusty Shackelford

      Yep. It was very lucrative for GLAAD and Trayvon Martin’s parents.

      • Mergatroyd

        GLADD has its own powerful, well-funded grievance industry. Trayvon Martin’s parents aren’t White. Those who promote, fund, publicize on CNN and fight for the likes of Trayvon Martin and his parents and GLADD are anti-Whites whose goal it is to eradicate the White race by using clueless, stupid blacks and other “minorities” as front men. The shills and useful idiots are made stars and given hours of media time on TV and space on front pages of major newspapers to air their grievances against the “White Power Structure” that “keeps them down.” It’s all a farce.

  • Spartacus

    Another article from Salon… No more please. I s**t daily, so I already know everything they’re gonna write.

  • Frank_DeScushin

    If Joan Walsh mated with Tim Wise they would create the most anti-white white person ever. Or the kid would be so ashamed of his white-hating parents that he went the exact opposite direction.

    • Tom B.

      If I hated my whiteness as much as these fools I would go out in the woods and eat a bullet!! I guess the only reason they stay around is to make life miserable for the rest of us. I have tried so hard to understand the liberal mind but cannot grasp it—insanity is the only explanation!!

      • Svigor

        Because you’ve misapprehended their psychological makeup. When whites like Walsh throw their fellow whites (never themselves, their family, their friends) under the bus, they’re really saying, “look at me! Aren’t I precious! I’m soooo much better than these backward hicks! I’m special! I’m uniquely good! Promote me!”

        We’ve all seen the angling, cynical politician in movies and TV many times. The one who quickly gauges the crowd and makes a grandstanding ploy to win votes. It’s not a complicated profile: amoral and corrupt, papered over with a layer of leftism masquerading as morality.

        • ms_anthro

          What a succinct analysis. You’re a great writer, Svigor.

          • Svigor

            Well thank you for the kind word Ms Anthro. Happy New Year. 🙂

      • Mergatroyd

        There’s no insanity involved.
        Like Tim Wise (who isn’t White, BTW), fools like this Joan Walsh are paid and paid well to bash Whites. What they don’t understand is that they are useful idiots and will be the first ones destroyed when all of this blows up.

        I wouldn’t protect her life against those she champions when they inevitably turn on her, would you? She’s spent her professional life vilifying Whites.

        She’s proving what she is and it says something about her character which is evil.

        • ms_anthro

          Exactly right. And how long before her pets begin screeching about the unfairness that a White [sic] woman like Joan Wash gets paid so well to write for Salon? Shouldn’t a colored woman–I mean, woman of color–get that job? It’s just so unfair to underrepresent colored people in such important positions as online journalism [sic].

          There’s no cure for stupid.

        • Tom B.

          No I would not protect someone I see as the enemy of our country and all that is decent. I am an old school man from a farming life in the South. Back then when Jim Crow was in place we lived in peace with blacks pretty much. The crime rate in the town we lived close to was low and living conditions were similar to Mayberry R.F.D. or Happy Days and I would not trade my childhood for anyone’s—we were happy. Fifty + years later, after being inundated with liberal socialist ideology that same town is now one of the top 5 in violent crime–the schools are ruined and there is nothing but misery for everyone. I have seen what idiots like Walsh and her brain-dead kind have done to our country. For the life of me I will never understand how people can be that stupid! I hope you are right about them being destroyed when this thing blows up—we will never see peace again until they are gone.

        • Tim Wise is white, but he uses his religion as an excuse to be a renegade. I’m 3/16 injun and passing, but I don’t hate whites the way he does. I’m 13/16 white, mostly Celtic: Scots, Irish and Welsh. The civilization Wise pretends to ignore around him was created by whites.

          You didn’t build that, Mr. Wise.

  • ftex

    How quickly these clowns forget the consequences of their liberal policies. Growing up I never set foot in NYC, except for class trips to the Museum of Natural History or the Statue of Liberty. My family and I didn’t begin taking day trips there until the mid 90’s, when Giuliani starting cleaning up the joint. Did the improving economy help with lowering crime? Of course. The end of the crack epidemic? Sure. But make no mistake about it, Giuliani’s policies of stop-and-frisk and relentless cleaning up of crime ridden neighborhoods turned the tables. Policies that Bloomberg, a liberal no less, realized were necessary. This idiot De Blasio is set to turn the tables again, unfortunately upside-down. New Yorkers better brace themselves.

  • libertarian1234

    I wonder if this character, and others who are working to marginalize and demonize white people, know that they’re making themselves a BIG target as this country continues to split along racial lines. I imagine they do, but are protected from worrying about it by their arrogance and huge egos.

    I also believe that part of the process of devolving into civil war will include many pre-skirmishes and assassinations.

    Looking at the history of pre-civil war activity throughout the world in the last one hundred years, these loudmouth purveyors of denigration and hate have been made to wish they had kept their evil mouths shut……with very many of them ruing the day they were ever born.

    That will be the case in this instance also.

    • Mergatroyd

      They think they are being protected and that’s where they make their fatal mistake. This is where the term “useful idiot” evolved. They do the dirty work for their bosses but are the first to go when the SHTF.
      They’ll be hunted down by those whom they demonized and marginalized while their benefactors decamp for Israel, without them because they are not of the same race. So easy to predict.

  • Truthseeker

    I’m sorry, but this article is laughable in its ignorance. This woman clearly lives in a liberal bubble where everyone believes this stuff despite the obvious stupidity of it. These people just repeat their truisms and get validation from their circle, all the while unaware that they’re useful idiots.

    I guess those of us who’ve stepped outside the mainstream can see the truth more clearly than the average person. It just seems so obvious now that it’s hard to believe anyone honestly believes the type of crap that Joan Walsh propagates.

    • Reverend Bacon

      In graduate school, a very smart professor I knew said something about students “trying to use their excellent writing abilities to hide a complete lack of knowledge of the subject matter.”

      Unlike most liberal drivel, this is fairly well written. But it’s doing exactly what my professor warned about. Yet, don’t fool yourself, truthseeker: there are loads of people out there who honestly believe this type of crap.

      • Truthseeker

        You nailed it: It’s dolled-up garbage. I was trying to get at that in my previous comment, but I couldn’t find the right words.

        And yes, believe me, I’m aware that many people honestly believe this crap. I know the frustration of trying to talk to people about the truth only to find that it’s either beyond their comprehension level or too far outside the realm of what they allow themselves to consider. Ever since the blinders have come off for me about race, it’s been a struggle to stay sane when I’m surrounded mostly by people who have been brainwashed. I’d imagine most of us here know that frustration. Not a day goes by that I don’t curse the Cultural Marxists for the seeds of destruction they’ve planted in just about everyone I love.

        • ms_anthro

          The key is to be absolutely unapologetic for your views when faced with multicult insanity. Never apologize, never back down, never let yourself get too emotionally involved. Just counter with basic, obvious statements that are clear to anyone with even the crudest observational skills. Calmly point out that the emperor is nude, and do it gently, cheerfully, and with humor when possible. The good people will eventually realize it’s okay to ditch their Leftist programming and will gradually come onboard. The others are lost, and maybe not such good people after all. Either they’re too dumb to see reality, or (more likely) they’re dishonest to the core.

          Hang in there. The mass awakening continues and will only snowball from here.

          • Mergatroyd

            Be careful, friend. The truly entrenched lefties will resort to violence if their views are challenged, others will try to smear you and get you fired from your job.
            This happened to a Canadian I know who found the police at his doorstep after a friendly conversation with another White about pro-White issues.

          • ms_anthro

            Oh, I’m well aware of the dangers. But I made a promise to myself that I’d always speak the truth no matter the consequences, because that’s what my God commands of me. As a Christian, I have nothing to fear from this world anyway. As a person who values personal integrity and courage, I try to live up to my own standards.

            We all have to do what we’re comfortable doing, but it starts with each one of us. They can’t get us all and we outnumber them greatly.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Help me with the “anthro” portion of your moniker. Do you have any Anthropology background?

            I believe white people are only 7% of the world population?

          • Anthro means “man” (as in mankind). I chose it because the issues we Whites face actually affect all of us, regardless of our racial subspecies. If Whites allow themselves to perish, the world will descend into savagery everywhere.

            No anthropology background aside from a few laughable courses I took in college. I believe our world percentage is around 8% and falling.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            There is a fair amount of statistical subterfuge in that data. The EEOC and the Census Bureau call Armenians and Jews ‘white’, but they don’t consider themselves white.

    • Svigor

      I think you might have the arrow of causation reversed, there: those who see the truth more clearly than the average person tend to step outside the mainstream, rather than the other way around.

  • sbuffalonative

    If the traditional Santa Claus story was created by whites then he is white. Had the tradition begun in Africa with a black Santa Claus then he would be black. But his story didn’t originate with Africans in Africa. The tradition came out of Europe. Therefore, Santa Claus is white.
    It’s like I say, blacks don’t have any historic myths and sagas. All they can do is co-opt what white people have done and created.

    • IstvanIN

      Because they have nothing of their own.

      • Keep Honkin, I’m Reloading

        well, there’s the Great Pyramids and Astrology… : /

        • IstvanIN

          Yup.

      • Mergatroyd

        They have the FBI and DOJ crime stats on rape, assault and murder.

      • ms_anthro

    • Pro_Whitey

      You can’t win with these scum. The Dutch are inclusive, they have Zwarte Piet – Black Pete – as a black assistant to Sinterklaas, and the leftists hate that to no end.

      • Svigor

        Oh, I dunno. If Zwarte Piet were to be put in charge, get to sleep in Sinterklass’ bed with Mrs. Klass, and Sinterklass were to be relegated to the couch or better yet, the dog house, I bet the lefties would be happy with that.

        • celtic.cleric

          He is black due to him being a chimney sweep. Under all the soot is a white chap I’m afraid.

          • Svigor

            Ah, why let the truth get in the way of a good lie?

    • Tom B.

      Oh yeah!!? Let’s see–they got Uncle Remus,Stepnfetchit, Amos &Andy,Little Sambo–I might think of a few more!! Oh yeah! Opal Wimfrey! almost forgot her.

      • jane johnson

        They were all created by Whites, as well.

    • Non Humans

      Stealing.. One of the very few things that nonhumans do well.

  • Greg Thomas

    They are terrified we will begin to speak out, because they know how detrimental it will
    be to their diversity racket if Whites wake up. They ill take every opportunity
    to demonize us as “racists and hate mongers.”

    • I agree, they say we’re “cowards” for not wanting to get into ‘the racial conversation’, but in reality the last they want is for us non apologetic, pro Whites to have, is “a voice”, at least a credible one.
      Before I bumped into the honorable Mr Jared Taylor, the last ‘pro Whites’ I witnessed given a platform in the media were on Jerry Springer.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      Diversity & Inclusion is indeed a racket. It’s a reverse discrimination machine.

  • MBlanc46

    I hope that they ain’t seen nothin’ yet.

  • Alexandra1973

    The ignorance in that article is overwhelming.

    • Laika

      What part of Cultural Marxism isn’t ignorant?

  • Conrad

    Joan Walsh should pay more attention to her own words. She lists
    a number of complaints that whites are making, part of the backlash,
    as she puts it.

    The attack on Christmas.

    The attack on white Santa.

    The attack on Mr. Robertson.

    But she fails to mention other complaints being made by white
    Americans. Like the Affordable Health Care Act, the immigration
    problems, the entitlement system, affirmative action, reverse
    discrimination and the Knock Out Game just to mention a few.

    She also failed to mention the Golden Dawn Party
    in Greece, the BNP in England, Jobbik in Hungary, I could go on here
    but you get the point. She did not seem to want to mention that the
    vast majority of white American sided with the mixed breed, Zimmerman
    in the shooting of Trayvon Martin because they knew that it was not
    an alleged act of self-defense.

    She is right about one thing, the noisy, paranoid white backlash
    against racial change will pass. After all, it’s only a bit of
    whining. But it will come back, again & again, louder each time.
    That is how revolutions work.

    • Svigor

      Well said, very incisive; each of the supposed white “assaults” listed by the author highlights a very real assault being sustained by the left against whites. As usual, the lefties invert reality.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      ‘Revolution is a process, not an event’.

      —Anonymous

      • Conrad

        So true, so true. But I think that the process is further along than the Commies would like to admit.

        • AndrewInterrupted

          I hope so. I haven’t heard any chatter recently from North Colorado’s state from state secession attempts. Just headlines about pot sales. Maybe that will reinvigorate them to split.

          • I voted for legalized marijuana, just so the criminal gangs would be denied a source of revenue.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            That’s my instinct, too.

            Plus knowing the origin of the stuff is a plus. Who knows what type of toxins are in the illegal stuff, like the Paraquat days.

            That might also be the answer to the methamphetamine scourge as well. Why let the Mexicans and Columbians invade our cities and peddle the stuff.

            Meth is not taken by stereotypical drug addicts as most would think. Most are everyday people using it to compete against their coworkers. It is a big problem in the slave labor countries. That’s how they bang out so many widgets.

            Legal stimulants like Adderall area also being abused for the same reason. American workers are getting sucked into that same race-to-the-bottom mentality.

  • Tim_in_Indiana

    Maybe it was the very fact of enjoying a wonderful Christmas with my family and friends

    Hmmm… enjoying Christmas with her family–her racial kith and kin–and with friends (of her own choosing)? Why wasn’t she celebrating Kwanzaa, or spending a month in Detroit, helping to fix up gutted houses, or a year or two in Haiti helping black children to learn how to read? Methinks I smell a closet racist basking in white privilege here…

  • Rusty Shackelford

    More like “The Year in White Liberal Status Whoring”.

    • Svigor

      Bingo. “White guilt” is a euphemism for “White Lefty Status Whoring.”

  • batlcrewzer

    The modern Republican party successfully combined the aristocratic tendencies and seething bigotry of the South with the soulless and destructive capitalism of the north.(until 11/06/08 that is, and again 11/06/12) They are literally a synthesis of everything that was ever wrong with America.The Tea Party the shining beacon of ignorance, greed, and the serfs of One Percentile who by themselves, want to keep the commons as serfs, use and discard as they see fit. They are poor trash after all.

    • PvtCharlieSlate

      Relax, Pal. Don’t get so worked up. It’s all OK. Really it is. Save your energy. If anyone ever wants to hear for something like you all they have to do is fart.

    • Svigor

      Lefties and their 1% stupidity again. Don’t they know enough math to know that 1% means 1 in 100?

      Like 1 in 100 Americans are really fat cat oligarchs rubbing their hands and laughing maniacally, lol.

      Stupid leftists. It’s the .01%, the .001%. And they’re happily hiding inside your 1%, using them as camouflage.

      Idiots. Useful to some, I suppose.

      But the real oligarch class is highly leftist and about 40% Jewish, and lefties can’t very well go opposing them, now can they.

      • Mergatroyd

        The oligarch class is highly leftist when it comes to YOU but not them. They separate themselves completely from the diversity they demand for us and use ethnic networking as a lucrative career path, then whine they’re a poor, persecuted minority to get whatever they want. Never mind they control the media top to bottom, academia, top to bottom, and the entire U.S. government, top to bottom, and why I question your 40% figure.
        I can’t think of a major U.S. institution that has been in White control for at least three decades, and if it is, it is beholden to sue-happy courts, justice dept. and government that are not in White hands and that would be happy to sue it out of business. Ditto for the majority of U.S. politicians who are beholden to blackmail, threats of destruction and cash flow from that same “40%.”

    • libertarian1234

      “The Tea Party the shining beacon of ignorance, greed, and the serfs of One Percentile who by themselves, want to keep the commons as serfs, use and discard as they see fit. They are poor trash after all.”

      Tea party? No. Their main concerns are traditional American values and a sane fiscal policy and an insistence on going through legal channels on immigration.

      GOP? Yes. There’s a lot of truth to that, since the Chamber of Commerce has constantly pushed for more peon labor from south of the border, and the GOP management’s chief concern is obtaining and holding on to power even if they have to forsake their most conservative base.

      They’re concerned with power not principle, and the Karl Rove types are fighting tooth and nail to prevent principled people from taking over their party. The candidates they’ve selected to run for president are the same stodgy, incapable ones who embrace party management, but are practically inarticulate on just about everything. But they’re favored, because they echo management’s ideology.

      They’re just about going ballistic with the Ted Cruz, Lee, and Rand types. They see them as obstacles to their vision of power at all costs.

      But the totalitarians on the left are far worse. They never had a clear, cogent thought in their lives. They want to totally control the citizenry, and their entire base of supporters can be exemplified by the camera shot of Nancy Pelosi glaring wild-eyed and announcing that, “We have to pass the health care bill so we can see what is in it.”

      And their suggestion to pass a bill funding midnight basketball to keep blacks from killing, raping and robbing is a real classic.

    • Andy

      1) What is wrong with aristocratic tendencies?
      2) Can you give examples of the South’s “bigotry” (intolerance of other people’s opinions) and show how it was worse than the North’s?
      3) The North’s “soulless and destructive” capitalists were the founders of modern philanthropy. What have socialism and communism done to compare?

    • Mergatroyd

      Looks like yet another poster who automatically assumes that any White who isn’t a hard-core member of the Democratic party is automatically a “soulless,” evvvilllll Republican. Oh the horror!

      So better we throw out lot with the White-hating DEMONrats who believe government has all the answers as to how to run our lives better than you do?

      Come to think of it…there IS no difference between the two parties. Happy now?

  • odious liberal

    Some of her best friends are negroes. Sometimes she even is seen in public with them.

  • bilderbuster

    As far as I know, no Kennedy’s except Carolyn ever married a non-White.

    • Charlotte

      I assume you are referring to her Jewish husband. I am still not sure why Jews are non-white, regardless of how they “identify.” Their genes are European and Middle Eastern, mostly mediterranean. I just can’t be that fussy about who’s white. I know them when I see them.
      And as a matter of fact, one of RFK’s sons married a Jewish girl, and has 3 kids. They look very Kennedy.

      • Sick of it

        Read about the Khazars of Khazaria. White people did not form Khaganates. Modern “Jews” and ancient Israelites share some DNA, but are not the same from either a biological or a cultural point of view.

      • Beetlejuice

        They hold themselves apart from whites, that’s why. They have political organizations, schools and special minority status exclusive to them and ONLY them. Don’t tell me they were excluded from white country clubs, they had their own in the United States and still do. That is thrown in the face of white Americans to show us how “anti-semitic” we were. We let them into the country that WE whites created and they agitate to throw open our borders?
        They also have an entire country, Israel, that allows in Jews and ONLY Jews, a homeland that is exclusive to them that they would deny to us whites (see hypocrite Barbara Spectre).
        They are not us and desire to be no part of us.

  • Lagerstrom

    Who/what exactly is this non-person?

  • Svigor

    White lefties are not “self-haters.” They do not feel “guilty.” They feel other whites are guilty. They throw other whites under the bus for their own gain. That is not guilt, it’s narcissism.

    • Max Krakah

      white lefties are SCARED people. People who live by fear become EVIL. They are SCARED of the REALITY of what the black race is and the reality of what moslems are like. They live by the LIE that we are all the same. THEY CAN ONLY function under the COMFORT that that lie gives them. When you threaten that lie with REALITY, then YOU are their enemy because YOU are the one who is threatening their survival mechanism, even if it is a mechanism which will lead to there eventual demise. Like a drug user, they don’t care, they are weak. They are too weak to face what frightens them, that is not only the reality of blacks and moslems, it is also the reality of their true feelings for such threats to their own existence. They have to believe that there are no threats other than “mean” whites. They know deep down inside that whites are not a threat to them, so this they can live with. IT is a true sickness, a true evil. They will do and allow untold injustice and horrors to befall other whites, all because they themselves, libs that is, are weak cowards.

      • Svigor

        If memory serves, at least one study has shown that leftists are less able and likely to perceive threats than rightists. Something about their brain function, amygdala, something like that, where they are less able to perceive threats. The upshot being that they’re basically clueless boobs.

        • Max Krakah

          IT is an emotional block, this is how they operate and is a sign of their sickness. It is more that they REFUSE to perceive, they have a lower tolerance for the discomfort that such perception brings, they subconsciously avoid this discomfort. Such studies are done on adults, by that time their personalities and coping mechanisms are formed. One will never turn a lefty with reason, only when the danger they are avoiding becomes a reality that they can not ignore do they change their mindset on an issue. IF a white nationalist movement took over and meted out REAL, and harsh treatment for liberal statements and views, only when they could not cope with the fear of the white nationalist would they then JOIN the white nationalists. They would then tell themselves what they need to to feel comfortable about the white nationalists. Presently, any threats by white nationalists carry no weight at all, it is like the parent that continually threatens the misbehaving child- “if you don’t stop we are going home”. WE all hear the parent say this repeatedly, and never carry through with the threat, so the child does not fear this threat. Same here, if they feared us, the libs would all of a sudden love us, that is their sickness. We can’t cure them of it, we can only use it to our advantage.

      • Jotun Hunter

        very astute – sums up the problem nicely. it accounts for the rampant liberalism of young girls and the effeminate beta males who try to impress them by exhibiting socialist values that retain the illusion. it is likely only a greater fear will motivate them onto a saner course

        • Beetlejuice

          The greater fear is being locked out of jobs and careers with a $100,000 school debt to pay off. Try to impress a girl with that.

  • Svigor

    “Reasonable doubt” is the part I think lefties object to. Lefties really have a problem with principles. They hate them, basically. Principles just get in the way of their power, of their achievement of their objectives.

    Free speech, due process, (fill in principle here), they’re just pesky obstacles. Unless they happen to be useful to them at a given moment, then they’re sacred icons.

    ETA: actually, I failed to heed my own profile. Lefties don’t hate principles. They have none, but they don’t hate them. That would attribute far too much intellectual rigor to them. Theirs is the sociopathy of children. Amorality, essentially; they want what they want, and they want it now. If principles get in their way, they hate and rage against those principles until they get what they want. Once they do, their hate subsides. So their hatred of principles, or anything else that gets in their way, is not abiding. That would be giving them credit for too much character.

    • Glen

      You’re doing a good job here, Svigor.

  • Svigor

    Lefties get everything wrong. Walsh thinks “we” consider Zim a hero. Nope. We were just hoping the left couldn’t destroy and imprison him, because we thought, “but for the Grace of God, there go I.” Now she probably thinks we’re cheering the fact that he sold a painting for 100k, because “he’s our hero.” Nope. We’re just hoping the left doesn’t get to destroy his life, because we’re thinking, “but for the Grace of God, there go I.”

    • Laika

      Great line, “But for the Grace of God…” that is exactly how the majority of Whites felt, IMO. If Zim had been convicted, it would have meant there is no self-defense plea against blacks, even those who are clearly trying to murder us.

      • Svigor

        The sad part is, I doubt very much that Zim would have been acquitted if he’d had, say, my online history. The upshot being, white “racists” have diminished right to self-defense, at best.

        • ms_anthro

          Eric “My People” Holder enlisted the FBI to try and find any evidence that mestizo George Zimmerman, who took a black date to his senior prom and singlehandedly helped a black homeless man who was beaten by the police chief’s son get justice, was “racist.”

          This should horrify any thinking person. Wrongthinkers and hatefacters will receive special ministrations from the Tolerance Police even if they are completely within their legal rights.

        • Stan D Mute

          Even without your online history, if Zimmerman was a white guy with blond hair and blue eyes and a job as an engineer, he would have been toast. That he was a mestizo and do-gooder who tried to help Afros be civilized is what saved him.

    • Max Krakah

      Hell, the man’s career as an artist started out as a community watchman, now he is selling paintings for six figures. He is some kind of hero! I’m waiting for the painting of TM lying on the ground, dead, mouth open, tongue hanging out! THAT one , by GZ, will sell for SEVEN figures!

  • Thor Bonham

    Joan Walsh, A libtard that hates the color of her own skin .. What a shame, must suck for her not to be able to wipe it off ..

  • ms_anthro

    It terrifies them. They know that the when Whites finally decide to fight back, they and their kind are in serious, serious trouble. The same high-minded principles that enable us to tolerate their anti-White rantings also instill in us one extremely important value: justice.

    We won’t forget.

  • Hopefully in the new year our cold civil war against the star bellied sneetches will continue to move in a positive direction. When white male presidential candidates stop pretending MLK and Nelson Mandela were laudable, and start calling out TNB bullshit, the war will be closer to won. Of course that might be the most unlikely dream of all.

  • ssviking

    We should take this as a complament i think were really starting to get them… they haven’t seen anything yet

  • Mergatroyd

    But these anti-White hate mongers that are waging this war against the White race really believe that you get up every morning and plot their demise.
    They absolutely believe that if it wasn’t for them, we’d be goose-stepping in the streets, wearing robes, firing up the ovens, sharpening our knives and knotting up ropes into the shape of nooses. They’re obsessed with killing us off and work tirelessly and endlessly to keep the anti-White narrative going every minute of every day on every TV station, in every movie, in every msm newspaper, book, magazine, everywhere. It’s relentless and ongoing and the never, ever let up.
    And they won’t until their goal is met, the ending of White homelands and the genocide of the White race.
    They are ruthless and cold-blooded, use others to do their dirty work against. This is the worst enemy we’ve ever faced, and they’re winning. By 2032, it’s predicted there will be no more majority White homelands leaving us to be ruled over by non-Whites with hyped up grievances against the White race. What then?

    • ms_anthro

      I don’t agree that they’re winning. I think they’re about to find out the hard way why White Americans have been buying all those guns and all that ammo in record numbers, and why nationalist parties have been springing up all over Europe and the Anglosphere. If they’re stupid enough to keep backing us into a corner, they’ll learn what the word “backlash” really means.

      Don’t let them make you think they have the upper hand. Realistically, far left true believers are a tiny minority of every White country. They seem so powerful because they currently control the bullhorns of our culture and because they have hijacked our governments. But the people who run this country, the average citizens who maintain all that infrastructure they depend on to keep the machine running, are not onboard, not by a long shot. And we’re getting restless.

      • Dr. Möbias

        Then you’d better hope and pray that Obama and the lackeys in the Republican party don’t push that amnesty through that they’re hell-bent on passing before the 2014 election season.

        It WILL be game over for us.

  • Mergatroyd

    She sees is. But she’s being paid well not to see it.

  • Max Krakah

    Liberals are people who live by lies. There is indeed a war on christmas, that is this man’s first lie. The war has taken the form of lawsuits against putting up christmas trees and creches, and it has taken the form of banning all songs that have any religious meaning at all. The war has been one to both ban it and to secularize it.

    There is a very good book that describes people like Walsh, it is called “People of the Lie” and it describes the form that evil takes in people, living by lies is fundamental to it.

    • Laika

      There indeed has been litigation against any sign of Christmas. Christmas trees, nativity scenes, caroles have all been labeled as religious by the courts. Yet those same courts have ruled that Menorahs are cultural and not religious and therefore OK to display, including a huge Menorah right outside the White House.

      • Max Krakah

        There are schools where any mention of christianity is forbidden, no one can wear crosses and yet the children are REQUIRED….. REQUIRED… to spend a month learning about ISLAM!!!!!!!!

        • WR_the_realist

          A month of learning about Islam wouldn’t be bad if children were taught the truth — that Islam spread through conquest and forced conversions.

  • ssviking

    This is the net result of 1945, I’m of the opinion that not a single white life lost in ww2 was worth giving so the tribe could have a state and rule the west as they do now. Some things once seen can never be unseen

  • Mergatroyd

    Why don’t you and Engelman depart for the SPLC site where you can fantasize to your heart’s content about offing Whites.

  • Mergatroyd

    Then go over to Salon where you can fantasize with Tim Wise, Joan Walsh and John Engelman about offing Whites.

  • Max Krakah

    in a saphic way?

  • Doesn’t matter. Any book that spreads the KKKrazy Glue paranoia is sure to sell like hotcakes among the Pajama Boys, Julias and the underroo-clad iPad activists in their parents’ basements that serve at the portion of the Democrat-left base that knows how to read.

    People like Phony Joaney Baloney are perpetually mad that the Democrat Party lost the white South, because they figure if they still had them, the Democrats would have near total electoral hegemony, and therefore their promised leftist utopia would be upon us. What they don’t realize is that the white Southerner will simply not be part of a long term political coalition that includes both blacks and egalitarian-minded whites outside the South.

    • KhanBoi77

      They should be mad at Lyndon Baines Johnson, not White Southerners who did the sensible thing and escaped the party of the Loony Left.

  • John R

    Yeah, I can sympathize with this article: It must be so annoying for those people of color to hear White people complain about race; make everything a racial issue; get so hypersensitive that every policy or statement is aimed at them. Gosh, it would be even worse if those darn White people started actually making a game about knocking out people of color, and the damned pro-White media just wanted to play it down! Yeah, now that would REALLY get me mad if I was a person of color. See, I can be sympathetic! LOL.

  • newscomments70

    Liberals are full of hate and ignorance. They arrogantly believe that articles like this will educate us and promote their agenda. They are only promoting more hatred.

    • yes, liberals are indeed full of hate and they are ignorant.

      Liberals are programmed to hate working class whites. And they are indeed ignorant. Liberals are programmed to idolize nonwhite and immigrants.

      But what about conservatives? They are perfect. So knowledgeable! So angelic!

      No, conservatives are also programmed, just in different ways. Conservatives are programmed to love the rich.

      Conservatives are also ignorant, just in different ways.

      When are americans going to wake up and see that both dominant politcal ideologies are molded for and by the corporations?

      • newscomments70

        “Conservatives are also ignorant, just in different ways.” I have no argument with that. Prominent conservatives have always supported third world immigration, forced integration, and Section 8 housing. These destructive programs only mean short term profits for them. It doesn’t matter how many of our children are raped. Profits come first. They throw us a few crumbs and expect us to keep voting for them, while our standard of living continues to decline. The working class/middle class (now poor) is simply cannon fodder for both parties.

        • Stan D Mute

          You concede “they’re ignorant in different ways” then go on to cite how they’re exactly the same in the same ways.

          A real challenge would be trying to find a difference between them!

          • newscomments70

            That would be an interesting and lengthy discussion. Our energy would be better spent replacing the incompetent, genocidal regimes.

      • Stan D Mute

        Surely you’re not serious.

        “Conservatives are programmed to love the rich.” – Huh? Wall Street is hardcore leftist. Hollywood is hardcore leftist. Both are immensely rich. The CEO’s of the Fortune 100 are hard left. Most of the Fortune 500 are hard left. Conservatives (repugnantcons) are inclined perhaps to admire the rich, inclined to let them keep their wealth maybe. Paleos, like most race realists, admire *earned* wealth as opposed to crony capitalist and idolatry (think NBA/nfl and entertainers) wealth. But there’s no real difference between RepugnantCons and Demonrats.

        “Conservatives are also ignorant, just in different ways.” – Again, Huh? Repugnantcons and demonrats are two sides of the same coin. Both are anti-white, both are pro-Afro, both are rushing headlong to destroy every white enclave in the world.

  • robinbishop34

    Don’t you think that the occasional, obligatory anti-white article like this is simply a necessity in her world? Part of her job is to regularly throw crumbs to the leftist hegemony by embracing her children’s own dispossession and re-affirming her subordinate status.

  • salon is now trying to get readers by race baiting and denigrating whites

    • AndrewInterrupted

      Joan Walsh came off as the flaming a-hole she’s always been. Barely a tempest in a teapot.

      She and Maureen Dowd are good arguments for hormone replacement therapy. Doctors should reference those two woman when pitching that post menopausal decision. I could just see the brochure: “Do you want to end up miserable like this?”

      Maybe Salon should go 180 degrees and try objectivity? They would be alone in the space. Of course, the would have to fire the entire staff. It would be a good will gesture on their part that they want to join America.

      • Beetlejuice

        Salon is a fringe political newspaper that promotes the likes of Joan Walsh, a bitter old feminist who purports to speak for all whites and all women.
        Maureen Dowd is a dried-up, childless old hag whose time has long since passed. She and other ugly feminists writers think they’re authorities on women’s issues but what do they know? Life has passed Dowd by so she takes out her anger on everyone else, especially women.

  • ssviking

    Because they were the only ones to benefit don’t belittle me with your allied propaganda as history bullshite considering that my mostly benign commet was deleted most mean i hit a nerve what wrong amren mod little to close to the truth

  • ssviking

    Actually allied air bombing was the reason the camps looked the way they did at the end of the war. with food and medicines in short supply for everyone the camps were last on the list and yes they were the only ones to come out on top in that war the US today is a result of backing the wrong side back then.

    • IstvanIN

      Most of the “victims” died as a result of allied bombing, not because of something the Nazi’s did.

  • ssviking

    Actually it was allied air bombing that left the camps in such bad shape, food and medicines were in short supply so they did hit the “raillines” and yes they were the only ones to come out on top in WWII. saying any alternative views about WWII are conspiracy theories is just as lame as liberals saying the same about white nationalists who fight white genocide.

  • Jotun Hunter

    I think those white liberals with the most apparent hate are mostly fueled by fear – and when the chips fall will be easy enough to put in line. They merely can’t cope with the change in wind – all change they run from

    • Sick of it

      They should be treated the same as the Tories after the American Revolution.

      • I don’t hate Canada enough to want to send them there.

        • Sick of it

          I was referring to hanging people and burning them out of their homes, but hey, let’s go with Canada.

  • Druid

    African Americans were happy in the Jim Crow South.
    ________________________________________
    African American’s are never actually what could be considered “happy,” But I’m sure they were what could be considered “happier” during the Jim Crow era in the south than they are now.

    • IstvanIN

      What exactly is happiness? I think the definition would determine the answer. They seem happiest without much in the way of discipline or responsibility.

      • LACounty

        Losers always blame others for their misery and failures. Those more intelligent and self sufficient are usually content with their lives. Amazing the thought process of those that despise Whites in the U.S. when they have every opportunity to leave, while living off the backs of Whites. They bite the hand that feeds them. Continuously. With all the Bantu complaining that goes on it’s a wonder that most haven’t left for SA.

    • Beetlejuice

      The race hustlers were the ones who told them they were unhappy. That they needed to live around Whitey and shop in his stores to feel happy and fulfilled.

  • AndrewInterrupted

    Yeah, it is a little circus freak-ish. Like reading M.A.D. magazine.

  • newscomments70

    “A noisy, paranoid white backlash against racial change may be inevitable, but it will also pass. That’s what scares them.” Yeah, Zimbabwe, South Africa, Detroit, Camden, NJ, Flint, MI, Los Angeles, (and many more) are doing so well now after demographic change. People were paranoid at first, but now these places have become heaven on earth.

  • newscomments70

    As hateful as this article was, I suggest having a look at the comments on the original article. About 90% are pro-white. I imagine salon will reign in on “racist comments” like the others. EVERYONE is racist! How can this be?

    • Beetlejuice

      At least Salon is still allowing the comments. Most lefty sites would have cut them off by now, erased the lot of them or not allowed commentary on such stories. They’re well aware of the White backlash.

      • newscomments70

        I believe that will end soon. Where there are no comments allowed, I am now emailing the editor.

  • What makes this African think it will pass? The loony left has taken this crap to where one will be labeled as a coward if they do not fight! I prefer to go to the grave being called a “RACIST” than a coward………..

    • WR_the_realist

      Joan Walsh is white. But she’s one of those lefty whites who makes her living by bashing white people. It’s a lucrative profession. She not only writes for Salon but is also a political analyst for MSNBC, which tells you all you need to know. She wrote a book titled, “What’s the Matter With White People: Finding Our Way in the Next America”. Joan Walsh is herself exhibit A in showing what’s the matter with white people.

      • Sir, I was poking fun at her! I have only met two real American Africans that were black! The others that I’ve met were all white real African-Americans! Also if Whites voted like Africans,I think that is 96% one way. Then there is NO way for them to win an election?

  • cecilhenry

    What a self-satisfied fool.

    Just one example of the war on Christmas.

    It is so hard to find REAL Christmas carols song on the radio or elsewhere outside of me playing them at home. These carols have effectively though tacitly been banished publicly. (Hark the Herald, O Come all YE Faithful, Joy to the World, Silent Night, WE Three Kings…. the list goes on) AND not a one is played.

    Bruce Springstein’s ‘Santa Claus is coming to Town’ is NOT Christmas music.

    ITs cultural flotsam on the body of Christmas and the culture. Nothing wrong with a few ‘pop star’ Christmas songs.

    But what we have now is a farcical month of ‘Christmas’ garbage without a single beautiful song.

    Sad, and so UGLY.

  • pcmustgo

    i’m half jewish ang serious about anti-white racism being a problem.

  • Seek

    2013: The year of white grievances? If only!

  • When I took people out of their comfort zones it was a federal felony that got me locked up for three years.

  • MBlanc46

    I’m glad that she’s basing her argument on the rosy future that she predicts for NY under the actually existing Left. She’ll have some ‘splainin’ to do when and if that doesn’t happen.

    • Beetlejuice

      She’ll be the first one to call a moving service and leave the city. Liberals like Walsh are hypocrites and don’t want their money targeted by DeBlasio any more than a tea partier does. She’ll blame the White Right all the way as she settles into another state.

  • Brian

    What else should we expect from a coalburner like Walsh?

  • Brian

    If he ‘rocks’ so much, you could spell his name correctly. Just think of the Communist Engels.

  • Magician

    …..

  • Bon, From the Land of Babble

    It won’t be long until New Yorkers are begging for the return of Mayor Dinkins.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      And what was the opinion on the street with respect to Ed Koch?

  • bubo

    If whites are going to survive the next 50 years the media in it’s current form must be completely destroyed. It’s step one but the most important.

  • AndrewInterrupted

    I agree. It all will hinge on which way the ‘Stop&Frisk’ battle goes.

    If they phase it out, it will be ‘….deja vu all over again’.

  • Mergatroyd

    Perfect opportunity by old Rev. Al to burn a few “White” businesses to the ground that “rip off blacks,” a la Freddy’s Fashion Mart.
    Just hope all Whites have left the city before it happens, even though DeBlasio will still blame Whites when the city burns.

  • Beetlejuice

    Won’t be long until New Yorkers beg for the return of Mayor Dinkins.

    • Who Me?

      Di Blasio has already started with the statement that he plans to ban the horse-drawn carriage rides in NYC–on the grounds of stopping animal cruelty. Now this is just small potatoes, but it IS his very first official move. Gives you a slight glimpse into what the rest of his regime will bring.
      As for this Salon writer…I just do not know where to begin to reply to her screed against White people. I don’t think I’ll even try. I’ve seldom seen so much hatred and disinformation in one piece before, outside of maybe Tim the un-Wise’s rantings. I COULD spend hours unraveling it, but we all know the truth, and it wouldn’t convince a liberal anyway. They can’t see the truth even when it’s staring them in the face. If they could, they wouldn’t be lefties.

      • Who Me?

        I will add this. She says: “A noisy, paranoid white backlash against racial change may be inevitable, but it will also pass. That’s what scares them.”

        No. A backlash IS building, true. But it will NOT pass, and it is not us that are scared, but this so-called writer and her ilk. THEY are scared to death that it will NOT pass untill many things are put back to rights.

  • Beetlejuice

    So does the New York Times, Washington Post and every other mainstream newspaper, all the alphabet channels including Fox News and cable channels too. No escaping it except on the Internet.

  • Beetlejuice

    Did you add that to the comments at Amazon about this book? I’ve always felt the comments are mostly staged by the author and author’s supporters. You can at least vote “one star” which is pretty close to zero stars.

  • emiledurk16

    Ms. Walsh forgot the heading “Knockout Attacks Pervasive, The Year In Blackness

  • TXCriollo

    This year has been a scary year for the left, the Zimmerman trial did not go there way, people said a black santa is dumb, and many more things. There leader Obama is seen as a fraud, the minority birthrate has dropped there plans are falling apart. As bad as the recession has been it started to wake people up. the left will go all out to keep people thinking there racist for being conservative I hope in 2014 more people figure out the left is full of it

  • judenjager

    Read the comments on the news today ( when they allow them). People are waking up. They are slowly coming to grips with what is being done to them. The future won’t be pretty.

  • Massif1

    America is a white country. The rules of the land are created for and by white people. The white crime (non-white collar) is practically non-existent in most parts of the country. Our jails are filled with blacks and latinos and whites still have to pay for diversity. Blacks can send their children to schools and white property owners will end up with the bill. Liberals and feminists have been cheering for more diversity in schools, businesses, and government and look at where we are. The government still gives money to those who choose not to work and takes away money from veterans. I have seen more and more unqualified blacks working in positions that have been given for them in the name of diversity.

    I would like to see more liberals, feminists, gays, and pro-gays living next to blacks and latinos. Majority of these white hating rejects live in expensive communities with security guards and gates. Even their gardeners are white. These “diversity advocates” don’t have any run-ins with diversity so they don’t have a care in the world.

    I would also encourage everyone to boycott companies that promote diversity agenda and have special programs created just for certain groups.

  • PROUD TO BE WHITE

    For those of you who might remember the message given by Dr. William Luther Pierce in his seminal novel – “The Turner Diaries” all it will take is a catastrophic collapse of the US economy to wake up the lemmings and the couch potatoes, the Sally Soccermoms and the Joe and Jill six-packs. Many people of white European descent know things are crazy, but many feel, “hey what can I do, I am only one guy and I have a job, kids in school and a mortgage.” Well when the collapse comes – and I think it will be this year – there will be no job, no schools and no mortgage to worry about. The only thing on your mind will and should be survival. I am afraid this must happen to save America and other countries. Democracy has failed us all. Our elected politicians do not listen to us and it
    matters not who is in government – democrats or republicans. They are corrupt to the core and they take orders from a foreign master who has engineered the collapse of western society, or at least think they have.

    For those who are interested I am thinking about creating (free to download) a William Luther Pierce Definitive collection putting his broadcasts under specific heads such
    as, race, race-diversity, race-riots, race-crimes, South Africa, white guilt, Jews and a few other categories so you have a quick and handy reference should you need debating material. I am thinking about having my copies professional bound. I will be doing the same with the work of Dr. Revilo Oliver. As for the Turner Diaries I am thinking about including sketches and a few pop-ups so the children will find it interesting to read. Perhaps before their evening prayers and before retiring to bed! Sketches like you see in the old literature like Aesop’s Fables! Free to download too.

  • I do not agree with Africans in any way! I see no problem with them being removed..