Can Obama Legalize 11 Million Immigrants on His Own?

Brad Plumer, Washington Post, November 14, 2013

It’s now looking extremely unlikely that Congress will enact immigration reform this year. And that raises a question: Could President Obama use his executive powers to effectively legalize some of the 11 million undocumented immigrants already in the United States?

This possibility has actually been raised several times before. Back in August, Sen. Marco Rubio warned House Republicans that if they don’t pass a bill, Obama will act on his own: “I believe that this president will be tempted, if nothing happens in Congress,” Rubio said, “to issue an executive order as he did for the Dream Act kids a year ago, where he basically legalizes 11 million people by the sign of a pen.”

It’s not just Rubio. Immigration reform advocates have been quietly discussing the possibility of executive action on legalization as a “Plan B” if the bill dies. (The White House, for its part, has shown no signs of contemplating any such move.)

So what could Obama actually do for illegal immigrants on his own? A bit, though probably not as much as Rubio suggested. In 2012, the administration was able to stop the deportation of hundreds of thousands of undocumented youths under a deferred-action program. Obama could, in theory, expand that program somewhat, allowing even more current immigrants to work legally in the United States without fear of getting deported.

But, legal experts say, it would be extremely difficult to expand this program to cover all (or even most) of the country’s 11 million undocumented immigrants. And Obama only has the power to defer deportation—he can’t “legalize” immigrants on his own. That’s a key distinction here. True immigration reform ultimately depends on Congress.

{snip}

In June, 2012, then-Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano signed a memo creating the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. This is the program Rubio was referring to.

The DACA program applies to any undocumented immigrant aged 16 to 31 who was brought to the United States as a child, has either graduated from high school or is currently enrolled in school, and doesn’t have a criminal record. The government basically promises not to deport these youths for two years and allows them to work legally in the United States. They don’t get permanent residency or a path to U.S. citizenship, however—as they would have if Congress had passed the Dream Act.

As of June, the administration had received more than 550,000 applications for DACA and approved about 72 percent of them. There are another 350,000 or so youths in the country who likely qualify but either don’t know about the program or can’t pay the $465 application fee.

{snip}

The legal rationale for the DACA program was outlined in a letter (pdf) drafted last year by UCLA law professor Hiroshi Motomura and co-signed by nearly 100 top legal scholars around the country. In an interview, Motomura told me that Obama could conceivably expand that program, but there are limits to how far he can go.

“Here’s how I think about it. If the president can make a list to prioritize who should be deported first, then I think it’s clear that he can give people at the bottom of that list a piece of paper saying you’re at the bottom,” Motomura says. “That’s how I think about DACA. It’s clearly within his discretionary power. But if he did this for every single immigrant, he would no longer be exercising his discretion. That would be problematic.”

That means—and again, this is all just in theory—Obama could extend promises of deferred deportation to some additional groups of illegal immigrants. He could try to extend it to domestic-violence victims, say. Or to workers who are bringing civil rights or labor-violation claims. Or to those with disabled children. It’s possible that these moves could cover another couple million undocumented immigrants. But he can’t extend deferral to everyone.

{snip}

So far, we’ve just been talking about the legality of an expanded deferred-action program. Whether Obama would actually do this in practice is another question. There are good reasons to think he wouldn’t.

In a leaked 2010 memo (pdf) from the Department of Homeland Security, officials actually considered and rejected the idea. The memo noted that a massive deferred-action program would have an enormous number of downsides. For instance: “The Secretary would face criticism that she is abdicating her charge to enforce the immigration laws.”

The memo also noted that Congress could just block the administration’s actions: “Congress could also simply negate the grant of deferred action (which by its nature is temporary and revocable) to this population. If criticism of the legitimacy of the program gains traction, many supporters of legalization may find it hard to vote against this bill.”

{snip}

Topics: , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • [Guest]

    It’s going to happen, folks. It’s merely a question of when and by what mechanism.

    • DonReynolds

      We are all going to die anyway.
      Just a question of when and by what mechanism.
      Let Obamba start a civil war.
      Yes, it could come to that.

    • Mergatroyd

      Best post on the entire thread, Guest. You, of course, are correct. Once the demographics of this nation are changed enough to give the lefty Democrats a permanent, growing voting bloc, it will be all over for us except for the shooting.

      Don’t anyone call me hopeless here unless you prevent solid evidence that we whites are winning this battle in the long run (Guest’s point). All indications are that we are not. We are in the final days of South Africa before the violent black, anti-white regime took control and the final days before the anti-white commies took the reigns in Russia.
      This is the fate of whites in the U.S. and England because the exact same thing is happening. History repeats.

      • Sick of it

        We have our own Mugabe who is preparing for war against us as we speak. Has any other President in American history replaced so many military officers in such a short span of time?

      • [Guest]

        Thank you.

        I hope that we’re both badly mistaken, although the evidence declares otherwise.

  • That’s the wrong question to ask.

    Even if he does do some sort of blanket executive order quasi-amnesty, what will really be the difference between that and what we have today?

    What I mean by that is hardly anyone is actually deported anyway, there are so many legal hurdles between the Feds starting the paperwork process (civil litigation) for deportation and actually sending them home that “deportation” is largely a chimera and a joke.

    So the right question is this:

    What will the political ramifications be if Obama does this?

    If he does it, then he’s really stupid or desperate, because it actually changes virtually nothing, like I said above, but he’s on public record granting a form of amnesty, which we just screamed at the top of our lungs to stop.

    Lead anchor around his political party.

    • Anon

      I am actually hoping for the complete and total collapse of socialism. Currently, the US has pretty much maxed out what it can support….edging right up against a second Great Depression.

      The vast majority of Americans are useful, hard working, educated people of a mind to work together….exchange goods, and behaviors in a trustworthy manner. In other words…they are white.

      The only real power our government has is by enabling those tendencies and taking an amount for its own use. Too much and they cease being able to enable such behavior….or, more to the point, easily enable those behaviors.

      White people are going to do those things, no matter what. But, if it is too much of a hassle to do it the “normal” way, we will do it through various alternative ways.

      The more that happens, the more the real power of our government shrinks. Realistically, it just has to shrink a minor amount before it collapses under its own weight.

      When the EBT cards flash 00, our government will have its hands full dealing with negroes burning down cities. Then, it won’t be able to do much of anything anymore.

      In every majority white area, life will go on just as it always had. However, outside these areas, immigrants will be pouring out of the US. There is nothing for them here without socialism.

      • DonReynolds

        We need to have a bag limit when the EBT rebellion starts. There will not be enough to go around. YES, WE CAN.

        • ThomasER916

          We need to collapse the system so the parasites will starve and the anti-white whites will learn their race exists.

          • Mergatroyd

            You’d better be heavily armed, friend, and surrounded by like-minded family members or other whites. Those starving parasites will come after YOU with a vengeance because they’ve been convinced by the govermedia that YOU as a white are the cause of all their poverty, misery and failure.

    • Mergatroyd

      Obama and his regime are not stupid or desperate. The only thing they’re desperate for is for an amnesty to pass. Not only for the tens of millions of new votes but to increase their power and a huge jump in the number of “citizens” entirely dependent on the government for food, housing, etc. Who’s going to stop them? Roy Beck? Hate to say it but he’s fighting a losing battle.
      What will be the change? New American citizens will find it very easy to access welfare programs and “affordable housing” and there won’t be a need for voter ID laws because tens of millions of illegals will all be legal citizens. They’ll be able to get driver’s licenses easily to drive drunk on our roads.
      Once the demographics are safely on the democrats’ side, which is happening rapidly, our screaming won’t mean a thing, and we’ll still be called haters, bigots, etc.
      Amnesty is not about cheap labor, that is a side issue, it is about white race displacement and a permanent lefty voting bloc that whites will be unable to overcome.

  • Herman

    11 million illegal immigrants?
    My guess is 35 million.

    • borogirl54

      We will finally find out how many illegal immigrants that are actually here in the US once all of them apply for legalization if a law is passed or Obama issues another executive order.

      • DonReynolds

        Based on the amnesty of 1987, multiply the lie by 4. There will be four times what they admit to, due to chain immigration. We were told it would only be one million and when they got done counting noses it was four million.

    • You beat me to it:
      Can Obama Legalize 35 Million Immigrants on His Own?

    • Mergatroyd

      There are 11 million in California alone. Some cite 50 million and I wouldn’t doubt it. If that is a low ball figure, it won’t be for long once family reunification starts up and entire villages are imported as newly-minted American citizens instantly eligible for every welfare program imaginable.

  • Jesse James

    Non-enforcement of existing immigration law is de facto legalization.

    • DonReynolds

      Non-enforcement is an impeachable offense and a violation of his oath of office.

      • Mergatroyd

        So who’s going to call him on it? Emasculated, ineffective Republicans? They haven’t so far.

        • Sick of it

          My congressman said he would not initiate impeachment proceedings because he doesn’t have enough support for it. I bet most Republicans in the House would vote against impeaching the liar in chief.

  • dd121

    Why not? He does everything else by fiat.

  • borogirl54

    Obama has denied that he will do this even when pressed by immigration activists. He said that he wants any immigration reform to come from Congress. Who knows what he will do since he is a lame duck president anyway?

    • Mergatroyd

      Obama is a liar. Anyone who believes a single word he says is a fool.
      He can deny all he wants, remember “you can keep your doctor…” which he recently DENIED saying even though there was video proof? He knows the media is complicit so he can say whatever he wants.
      If the Obama regime has its way and amnesty is granted, elections won’t matter, lame ducks won’t matter. When blacks were granted the vote in SA, it was over for whites. Permanently.

  • bigone4u

    Obongo’s fat cat buddies just can’t live without their illegal maids, cleaning ladies, and gardeners and yard men. They can’t live without their cheap labor in the factories, slaugherhouses, and construction sites, replacing Americans and even slowing down the robotization of certain jobs due to illegals working on the cheap. My fondest hope is that the fat cats wake up to find their jewelry missing, their bank accounts emptied out by identity theft, and their wives run off to Mexico to party with Jose using his stolen credit cards.

    • borogirl54

      America has always had an addiction to cheap labor since slavery. Illegal aliens provide a cheap and docile labor force that Americans would not.

      • bigone4u

        The old saying is “We should have picked our own cotton.” The new saying is “We should have mowed our own yards.”

        • MBlanc46

          And I do.

        • borogirl54

          When I was young, we used to hire people to clean our yard that were US citizens that basically ran their own landscaping business.

      • Jesse James

        Since before chattel slavery, indentured white servants were the first cheap labor force brought to America. Whites were not docile and made poor slaves which is why they were replaced with Africans and chattel slavery.

        • Brian

          How I wish China was to our east and Africa to our west.

        • borogirl54

          White indentured servants would run away and would blend in with the community so they were harder to find than Africans who would stand out.

          • Mergatroyd

            White indentured servants were small number in number. They did not build the infrastructure of this country and neither did slaves imported from Africa or cheap laborers from Mexico.

            Whites built this country from the ground up. Period. Anyone who says otherwise is a liar and miseducated.

          • kenfrombayside

            This may be a vicious, but true statement: Africans were imported to be farm animals. They were not brought here to solve unique engineering problems. Yes, the United States became what it is because of European migration; these so-called African-Americans and mestizos are useless parasites who plunder and destroy.

      • Mergatroyd

        You are wrong.
        How do you think this country’s infrastructure was built? Its roads, buildings, bridges, homes, etc.? America was 90% white up until the 1965 immigration flood act so WHO built all that? Cheap non-white labor? Who constructed and provided the labor for all the buildings in New York? Detroit? San Francisco? The interstate highway system?

        Hint: It wasn’t non-white labor that built those structures.

        • Blue-eyed Devil

          My Irish and Italian ancestors helped build it from 1850 on.

          • Alexandra1973

            I’ll see your ancestors and raise you my ancestor who helped found Hartford, Connecticut. 🙂

            One of my son’s Irish ancestors swiped horses for General Washington.

          • Sick of it

            I come from one of the founding families of New Amsterdam/New York 🙂

          • Blue-eyed Devil

            Cool.

          • Blue-eyed Devil

            You got me beat there. My Irish ancestors arrived in 1850 and my Swedish and Italian ancestors in the early 20th century. Nobody was on the Mayflower in my family.

        • MBlanc46

          A lot of those white immigrants–think Irish–were cheap labor.

          • QuinnTheEskimo9

            “White immigrants,” not brown or black says it all. What’s the difference now? The immigrants being massively imported are not White as they were in the past and are and will ruin this country. People are not a commodity. How many of those Irish were “cheap labor” into the second and third generations?

            The Irish didn’t later become a massive drag on the economy of the U.S. and assimilated just fine, that’s because they were White, unlike the “cheap labor” being imported today to do the jobs (White) Americans won’t do. Jobs Americans once proudly did to build this country from the ground up. Neither blacks, nor Chinese nor Mexicans built this country, it was built by White labor, including Irish and many of my poor German relations.
            Japan’s native born population is crashing yet no one is demanding that the Japanese open up their borders to cheap non-Japanese labor, this is being done in White and ONLY White countries. The Japanese wish to preserve their unique heritage, language and culture and good for them.
            I wish the same for Whites and am labeled a hater and xenophobe. Seems the purpose for for importing this new, brown “cheap labor” is to destroy White nations –“cheap” labor which costs us billions upon billions in endless, perpetual and growing, generational welfare, housing and education costs, not to mention the crime and violence this “cheap labor” brings with it. Unlike the Irish, second and third generations of the new “cheap labor,” are mired in gangs, shootings, illiteracy and illegitimacy, school failure and massive welfare use.
            Looks like “cheap labor” isn’t so cheap after all.

    • MBlanc46

      I think that we have to keep hammering away at the root cause of the amnesty drive. There’s at least some anti-fatcat sentiment in the nation, and we need to forcefully make the association of immigration and the elites. When you frame it in terms of the immigrants, as the amnesty supporters do, there’s a tendency for people to go all Emma Lazarus with “huddled masses yearning to breathe free”, when the reality is the huddled masses being super-exploited by the fatcats.

      • Mergatroyd

        The root cause of the amnesty drive is to displace the white race. Period. We are the ones standing in the way and the only race with the intelligence to see what the NWO in the UN wants to do to and put a stop to it.
        The facts are on our side, MBlanc46, about race displacement, so our job is to tell everybody we know about it and don’t mince words, but as always be careful. I have done this with trusted family members already who were resistant at first but when the facts and agenda are laid out before them, they are shocked and outraged. Look around you, I don’t know where you live but I suspect you’re starting to see more brown and black faces, especially recently. I live in a very wealthy white/Jewish area and I am seeing this for the first time in 30 years, especially in the supermarkets. There is no way these poor blacks and browns could afford to live anywhere near the area so it has to be the government moving them in through “affordable housing.” I am also starting to see “for sale” signs going up around me so I’m not the only one who notices these changes. I noticed one beautiful home had bars put over its expensive, cut-glass windows this past week. Houses here start in the $750,000 range for a fixer-upper and there are no apartment complexes nearby.

        Once the demographics and voting bloc in this country have shifted to third world democrats, there will be no stopping this juggernaut. It is leading to competition over resources like water, which is becoming scarce. Our land will be confiscated as well as the government rules that private property is illegal. Who do you think this regime will favor, us or the new voting demographic they’re busy flooding into this country?
        Look to South Africa for the future of the white race, but you’ll have to look on line because the media censors news of white rapes, tortures, murder and outright displacement from SA.

        • kenfrombayside

          Short of an AK47, I’ve been fighting back on a daily basis thru phone calls, emails and letters.

  • Greg Thomas

    First off, it’s more like 30 million illegal invaders squatting on US soil. That does not take into account the millions more which will flood our country via chain migration should amnesty ever pass. Moreover, we already had a “deferred-action program” in place when Obama appointed the open borders hack, Janet Napolitano, as Secretary of Homeland Security.

    What’s changed?

    • Dave4088

      Don’t forget the hundreds of thousands (if not more) with expired visas who simply get lost in the American landscape. And conservatives blather about how legal immigrants and immigration are “good” and carbon copies of the Beaver Cleaver family.

      • Greg Thomas

        That’s right Dave. It truly is a nightmare. Any politician who supports massive legal and illegal third world immigration is not a “conservative.”

        • M.

          You guys need a major nationalist party.

          • Mergatroyd

            No kidding. But every time we try to organize along our own interests as pro-whites, the media, SPLC and all other anti-white organizations, and there are many of them, will do everything they can to prevent us, including physical force, because they know the authorities will look the other way. Anyone caught with pro-white sympathies risks his job and being labeled as a Nazi for life.

          • M.

            Well, European nationalists are called that too, but they still exist, and people can vote for them.

            It doesn’t have to be explicitly pro-White either. France’s National Front for example doesn’t openly state “France for White poeple”, but it’s implicit in its policies. They are for zero legal immigration, strict enforcement of illegal immigration laws, encouraging emigration of the non-natives, and tougher sentences for fellons and criminals (mostly non-White).
            While none of these points give any mention to race or ethnicity, their enforcement will definitely lead to a whiter France.

            I’m sure many people in the US want these exact laws to be enforced, and they should be represented.

          • Sick of it

            If we had all of the above and scrapped welfare, we’d have a whiter America. Canada would get flooded by folks they don’t want, but would ultimately accept because it’s the liberal thing to do.

          • Greg Thomas

            Don’t I know it!

          • M.

            I think you do have one, the American Independent Party.

        • Mergatroyd

          Any politician who supports massive legal and illegal third world immigration is an anti-white who supports policies that genocide the white race.

          These policies are being carried out to destroy the white race, that is the primary goal. Only white countries are being forced to accept tens of millions of high-fertility third world welfare-for-life users. That is because the government of the U.S. is anti-white.

        • Blue-eyed Devil

          Juan McCain and Jorge Bush support it.

          • Greg Thomas

            And both are evil, Anti-White traitors!

  • MekongDelta69

    NoBama will try to do anything on his own.

    After all – he thinks he’s Dictator-In-Chief…

    • Blue-eyed Devil

      Barack is worse than Mugabe and Zuma combined.

  • Sensitivity Training

    Not protecting America from invasion is an impeachable offense, but I’m the White privilege hate criminal for saying so.

  • Dave4088

    11 million? Try 30 million. And yes, in true African potentate style, Obozo will circumvent Congress and legalize the brown and other squatters that some call undocumented tax consumers if he deems it necessary to his anti-white agenda.

  • Spartacus

    Obongo likes tacos !

  • tickyul

    Let’s see, there are 20-30 Million illegals……so legalizing about half should be NO problem for Mr. Hussein.

  • Anon

    What difference would it make if he did vs if he didn’t?

    The only way we could possibly increase immigration beyond our complete and utter lack of anything remotely like any restriction at all would be if we literally sent troops into other countries to kidnap and forcibly relocate those people here.

    There is no such thing as an illegal alien. A term like that implies there are legitimate laws restricting people from coming here that are being ignored. That a person doing that risks arrest and deportation. Nothing even remotely like that situation exists. Instead, so called “illegals” gather openly and in large numbers and proudly declare themselves and have no risk whatsoever of any consequences. Is it still illegal if the law you are breaking is treated as a joke?

    These people do as they please and no one stops them. Why exactly would they want “amnesty”. I’d say the dominant attitude among these people is to laugh at the “monkey” in office (unlike Americans, people south of the border hold blacks in open, racist contempt without even an ounce of shame) and tell him where he can shove his amnesty.

    • Every Monday in Chicago there is an immigration rally / protest in front of the Department of Homeland Security building on Congress.

    • Blue-eyed Devil

      No such thing as an illegal alien? You’re nuts.

  • Marc Zuckurburg

    We need comprehensive immigration reform.

    Comprehensive immigration reform will raise wages and salaries, strengthen national security, prevent terrorism, enhance our domestic crime-fighting ability, ensure that we continue to encourage the best and brightest to partake of the American dream, enhance our competitiveness and our ability to innovate, and make America more prosperous.

    Make my immigration reform comprehensive, please!

  • Ella

    It’s like misery loves company. There is so much violence and crime in Black neighbourhoods so spreading the Hispanic violence to Whites would be an equal offering. Illegal Hispanics alone kill 6,000 Americans just by drinking and driving to start.

    • DonReynolds

      TWENTY-FIVE Americans are killed every day by illegal aliens. Half due to drunk driving, the rest the old fashioned way.

      • Mergatroyd

        If you got that from the media, multiply the number by at least 4.

    • Mergatroyd

      Not only in black neighborhoods, they are using city transport systems to take their violence into white areas. It appears these transport systems (buses, light rail) were built specifically to funnel urban blacks and browns into safe white areas. Some of these violent mobs have used bus systems to go into white areas to rob, assault whites and riot and then gotten back on the bus to leave the area.

  • DonReynolds

    Somebody should read the Constitution to Obama…..it clearly states that the Congress shall make UNIFORM rules for immigration and naturalization. Does not say anything about banana breath being able to change it at will. He sees himself as a bloody dictator and should be dragged from the White House, kicking and screaming.

    • Bossman

      Wrong! It does not say anything about immigration; only about uniform rules for the naturalization of the immigrants.

      • DonReynolds

        The US Supreme Court disagrees with you. See Arizona v United States (2012). (Not what I wanted to hear either, but that was their decision.)

  • “For instance: ‘The Secretary would face criticism that she is abdicating her charge to enforce the immigration laws.'”

    ———————————————–

    That’s almost as fearsome a prospect as a cabinet secretary being told in a congressional hearing that he/she is deliberately withholding information that could hurt the administration.

  • Mergatroyd

    How many executive orders (EOs) have the Republicans tried to repeal or even to stop? Obama has signed 163 legally binding EOs, including one that gives him and the federal government unlimited power over all fossil fuels, land, water, air space, with apparently no resistance. So what’s to stop him from signing an EO granting amnesty in the name of national interest, security, Agenda 21 or any other reason?

  • Blue-eyed Devil

    I live in Southern California and can assure you that many illegal aliens work for rich white people. Even white republican politicians have been exposed in their political campaigns having illegal maids and nannies (i.e. Meg Whitman). Hell, even Arnold knocked up his illegal maid and had a mixed-race bastard with her. Rich whites are hypocrites.

  • gregCall

    Amen brother, you said a mouthful.

  • Talltrees

    I like your adjectives.

  • Blue-eyed Devil

    So did the Irish.

  • Blue-eyed Devil

    The richest man in the world is Mexican (Carlos Slim).

  • Blue-eyed Devil

    Low IQs in their Indian skulls.

  • QuinnTheEskimo9

    Disingenuous anti-whites always throw this silly scrap in our faces, as if the Chinese built most of this country.

    Chinese laborers built SOME of the transcontinental railroad, mostly through the Sierra Nevada Mountains because there was a labor shortage in west. In the east, The Union Pacific recruited laborers from army veterans and Irish immigrants.

    Chinese labor used during the transcontinental railroad was a VERY minute part of the massive labor force it took to build the infrastructure of this country. The VAST majority of the laborers who built the airports, bridges, canals, dams, electrical system, hospitals, lighthouses, schools, highway system, sewage systems and dredged the ports were WHITE laborers, NOT Chinese.

  • QuinnTheEskimo9

    Paper routes too. When I was a young kid, these routes were highly prized b/c it was a way to earn money before 16. I remember my brother delivering the evening newspaper on his bicycle when it was pitch dark. He was trying to save enough money to buy a particular water ski that he was coveting, which he eventually did.
    Newspapers are delivered in my area by middle-aged Mexicans. Haven’t seen a kid delivering papers in decades.

  • Bossman

    Yes, that should be happening. Some white Americans go to Mexico to retire but it seems that very few would go there to settle and raise families. But at some distant date, North America will be integrated.

  • IstvanIN

    It is very difficult for an American to own property and businesses in Mexico. They don’t give their country away as easily as we do.

  • kenfrombayside

    Keep the pressure on your reps in congress. Giving 11 – 30 million (nobody knows for sure) criminal lawbreakers legalization pure insanity. Plus, they could sponsor their relatives; that would bring the total up to about 50 million aliens in our midst. Of course, these new citizens will vote for the vile democrats and their socialist giveaways. Most of them will be unskilled, uneducated, low IQ etc. Stop this outrageous bill now. Don’t sit on the sidelines.You are not wasting your time. The American people don’t want this bill. You have to do all you can do to stem the third world assault:
    – Contact your 2 US Senators and rep in congress.
    – after biz hours, leave a message on your DC rep’s voicemail. All US Senators have multiple offices so it would be a good idea to hit all of the. Remember, be civil and don’t threaten
    – go to NUMBERSUSA then go to the take action button. You will be able to send faxes to your 2 US Senators and congressional for free. (I also gave a $50 donation).
    – use Business Reply envelopes to state your opposition to America’s insane immigration policies and the proposed amnesty. Don’t give the parties any money.
    – join an immigration group like FAIR. Strength thru numbers!
    – go to the RNC & DNC sites to email them.
    – Use the media: call a talk radio program; write a letter to your local paper. If the media outlet is liberal, then talk about economic impact of massive third world immigration.
    – text everybody in your cell phone queue now.
    IF YOU DO OR SAY NOTHING, YOU ARE PART OF THE PROBLEM….

  • Puggg

    Hallelujah.

    An immigration story on AmRen, and I’m surprised and pleased that we haven’t heard from our resident troll, the one that says “please please please give me my comprehensive immigration reform.” The troll that has a name almost like someone who helped start that massive waste of time social network that will be a thing of the past in five years.