ACORN’s Former Chief Calls for More Immigration to Boost Black Power

Neil Munro, Daily Caller, September 20, 2013

ACORN’s former CEO Bertha Lewis urged Africans-Americans to support increased immigration as a strategy to gain political power.

“We got some Latino cousins, we got some Asian cousins, we got some Native-American cousins, we got all kind of cousins,” said Lewis, who spoke Thursday at the annual political conference of the Congressional Black Caucus.

“Cousins need to get together because if we’re going to be [part of the non-white] majority, it makes sense for black people in this country to get down with immigration reform,” said Lewis, whose ACORN group was formally disbanded in 2010 after a series of scandals.

Lewis did not mention solidarity with whites, or with people who define themselves as Americans, in her appeal for power.

“Everyone, even all white folks in this country, acknowledge that in a minute, [the] United States of America will be a new majority, will be majority minority, a brand-new thing,” she said.

In 2012, “for the first time ever in history, African-Americans outvoted white Americans. Oooh. That’s the fear of the white man. That could change everything. That’s why [immigration] should matter to us,” she declared.

Lewis got only modest applause from the room of 300 attendees, nearly all of whom were black.

But her appeal for non-white solidarity was backed up by New York Democratic Rep. Yvette Clarke.

“What will happen with comprehensive immigration reform will be a new landscape of humanity in the United States of America,” Clarke told the attendees.

“America is a shape-shifter, and based on who’s here, in what numbers and at what time, determines the political outcomes,” she said. Blacks should cooperate with Latinos, she said, adding “we all have skin in the game, literally.”

The racial appeal was echoed by William Spriggs, chief economist at the AFL-CIO. “If we are going to be the new majority, we’re going to have to start acting like the new majority and start setting the new rules,” he said.

Once Congress approves an immigration increase, minorities should demand more, said Chicago Democratic Rep. Luis Gutierrez, a leading advocate of the pending Senate bill,

“The next day after we pass it, you know we’re not going to be satisfied, we’re going to come back,” he said. “We’re going to have a civil rights act, we’re going to have a voting rights act. . . . Nobody is leaving this fight once we conclude this first chapter,” he said.

“Hopefully, in 30 years, [we] can bring immigrants… from all over the world,” Gutierrez said.

The call for solidarity among non-whites was commingled with some non-racial calls for solidarity of working-class Americans.

African-Americans should not object to gains by immigrants, said Spriggs, who became a union economist after leaving an assistant secretary job at the Obama Department of Labor.

“Somebody else winning doesn’t mean you’re losing,” the economist explained. “We can’t let one set of workers be pushed aside and think we’re going to make it.”

{snip}

Gutierrez urged African-American and Latino legislators to hide their disagreements from the public.

“We have tough conversations when we lock the room—but we are smart enough to lock the room,” he told the audience. “We keep our arguments to ourselves.”

Topics: , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Global Minority

    This just proves the point the races can not live in the same country with the same government it does NOT work and has never worked in all of human history. The Lord gave the different races their own nations for a reason. And that does not mean we have to hate each other. But we can not live under the same roof either. Well at least they make no bones about where they stand. Now what are we going to do about it?

    • Manaphy

      What we are going to do about it is:
      – Bring in more “immigrants”
      -Celebrate divers(h)it(t)y
      -Force miscegenation
      -Shove “Gay Pride” down the throats of white children (no pun inteanded)
      -Shove feminism down the throats of white men

      Why? Because that is what our Jewish friends say is necessary for any society to overcome all if its problems and xenophobia.

      • Global Minority

        Please don’t make me sick. I already no this.
        Russia is FREE FINALLY. I just read that Putin has implemented, Nationl Concetpion Day for married couples. They get the day off with pay to procreate! Wonderful. He has outlawed “gay propaganda” to children and a host of other Christian laws. Wonderful. And he called BHO for what he really is on Syria.

        • Manaphy

          Vladimir Putin is one of the most noble and honest leaders in the world stage. He stands for white values, and he isn’t intimidated by the usual suspects. If only we had someone like him here in America….

          • OlderWoman

            I never thought I’d see the day when Americans would admire Putin over our ‘president’.

          • Brian

            I know. I don’t like everything about Vlad, but he looks out for his nation’s interests, instead of trying to save the world at his country’s expense. I guess you take your allies where you find them.

          • Sick of it

            That’s been my point. Putin may not work in America, but at least he cares about his own nation and people.

          • Thor Bonham

            Yes, but do you notice all the talking heads on FOX i.e Shill O’reilly , Sean Hannity to name a couple, hate Putin and call him a mad man.. Putin is everything white and they hate him, so what gives ?
            They’re just like all the rest they’re actually liberal in conservatives clothing .. Actually, O’reilly calls himself an independent which I think are the WORST .. Independents actually vote either way, which I find sickening and cowardice, have some conviction and beliefs ..

          • Sick of it

            Sean is mistaken on some things, but he’s more conservative than a lot of their commentators, who appear to be flaming liberals. O’Reilly is a liberal…that’s obvious. I like Laura Ingraham as she’s probably the most conservative person on their network.

            Many independents could be considered moderate liberals, which is the same as the Neo-Cons unless one throws in their ridiculous push for war all over the world. There are very few conservatives in this country today, even fewer in the rest of the world generally.

          • ms_anthro

            You don’t really think the globalist traitors in our own government and most other Western governments are trying to “save the world,” do you? They’re prostitutes and profiteers, nothing more. “Save the world” is the window dressing they use to sell it to the proles.

          • Brian

            I was using ‘save the world’ sarcastically, as in your ‘window dressing’ usage. We agree.

          • ms_anthro

            Ah, got it. My apologies for not catching the joke. 🙂

          • Zaporizhian Sich

            Me neither, but we are living in ultra-Orwellian times where peace is war, love is hate, life is death.

          • MikeofAges

            Already happened. When he first came in, the upper middle class career gals thought he was cute and called him “Putey-poot”. Nothing compared to the greeting Gorbachev received in the West. Some of the Stanford types, not because they lacked patriotism but because they lacked lucidity, wore “Gorbachev for President” buttons. Deep down, I think they saw the Soviet Union as the “Big Brother Bear” and their protector against their domestic enemies, the people Barack Obama called “the bitter clingers”. That he is clinging to a 60-year-old ultraliberal agenda doesn’t count.

            Rush Limbaugh was just at the beginning of his career when Gorbachev was in power. He called those paroxysms of admiration for him, “Gorbasms”.

        • Mergatroyd

          BHOs Nobel Peace Prize should be handed over to Putin immediately.

      • David Ashton

        And give John Engelman his old job back as AmRen monitor as the icing on the cake?

        • Luca

          No wonder I am moderated to the hilt.

          • D.B. Cooper

            Oh pleeze! My Yahoo comments haven’t been working right in days, and I’m about one violation notice away from another account suspended.

          • ms_anthro

            At least you’re in good company.

        • What is wrong with a site when a troll who is opposed to the basic tennants of said web site is given a moderator job?
          I used to think that those who claimed that Engelman was a moderator were being paranoid. But every time i say anything negative about him, the post is removed. So I agree with them now.

          • Romulus

            You and I both. I’ve noticed whenever I post a comment, the little flag becomes an inverted triangle.

          • I argue with him, but I have my ducks in a line when I do.

          • QuinnTheEskimo9

            Why would you or anyone else here bother to “argue” with an anti-white sociopath? Sociopaths are by nature impervious to reason, logic and rational thought. Don’t waste your time, Mr. Scott. But remember to vote down and flag for removal.

          • I do not hope to convince him, but you.

          • Garrett Brown

            I believe he became a mod around the time they let him post his article about whites becoming too caring and nice. BIG mistake Amren.

        • OlderWoman

          Engleman is a moderator? I’m shocked.

          All I see from him is that he has a streak of anti-White in his posts.

          • JohnEngelman

            I am not “anti-White.”

            I do admire Jews and Orientals for reasons I can explain quoting articles I find here.

            The truth is what angers you.

      • kjh64

        “-Shove feminism down the throats of white men”

        Oh please, more nonsense. Women didn’t want 2nd class citizenship shoved down their throats anymore than men would.

    • John Ulfsson

      It’s amazing how these ‘progressives’ think that all will be fine and dandy if white men are just suppressed enough. White men haven’t been creating the growing racial strife of the past 40 years.

      Whites extending the olive branch in ’65, and non-whites have done nothing but demand more and more of whites to prove their willingness to submit.

      • Zaporizhian Sich

        That group who must not be named has been stoking racial hatred and violence for decades, and they are the ones leading these so-called civil rights movements and organizations. The ones who tiny nation is the tail that wags the dog rather than the other way around. I call the NAACP, MEChA, La Raza and any others like them domestic terrorist organizations who should have been crushed decades ago, the leadership eliminated and the members tossed into prison as subversives. I curse those who shall not be named in the lame stream media with death every day.

        • John Ulfsson

          Hint: look at who composes the leadership of organizations like the SPLC and ADL.

        • Sick of it

          Marx…well that’s obvious. They were involved in the Revolutions of 1848. They were heavily involved in the very first Communist International back in the 1860s. They have been pushing the ideas put forth by the Communist International wherever they can be found ALL OVER THE WORLD. Yet we are supposed to gloss over names which stand out ethnically. Occam’s Razor?

          • Zaporizhian Sich

            Exactly, but mention that certain J-word too many times and brain dead whites start calling you the other N-word. The point I am making is the Tribe has made it impossible for many whites to have an honest conversation about anything other than football, and other pointless pursuits. The Tribe certainly does not want it’s name linked with genocide against us, and in other circles I call them out.

          • Sick of it

            Find a copy of Germany Must Perish! from 1941. Let others read it and tell them who wrote it. Make sure they understand that it was printed before any talk of gas chambers.

          • David Ashton

            I found an incredible cheap copy of the original booklet in a s/h bookshop a few years ago, and it is quite an eye-opener, of which Goebbels made full use. However, it is only fair to note that the removal of Jews en masse from Germany and German-occupied territories was a previous long-term declared Nazi objective. The deportations during the war were mainly for forced labor to support the war effort, but this fitted Hitler’s idea of “racial” balance, to wit his speech on the destruction of Jewry before the war, and his remarks to Henrietta von Schirach and Admiral Horthy during the war. There is a passage in Goebbels’ diaries on the “liquidation” of a large percentage of Jews whose authenticity has been questioned by Faurrisson but convcinginly defended by Irving, especially as the propaganda minister made a similar public statement in a wartime journal. The Madagascar Project was serious but in effect a prison-colony programme rather than a new Zion, and it was dropped early in the war.

            The “gas chambers” are another issue. I have said that AmRen is not the best place to debate “Holocaust Denial”, except in so far as our modern case for white self-defense is poisoned by the Nazi issue. But my own tentative conclusions which may seem incompatible, after studying this question from all sides, are: (1) Hitler’s ideology was implicitly and potentially judeocidal, as is quite clear from MK alone if you combine all his reference therein, and look at the “biological pest-control” theme of Nazi film propaganda; (2) there is no direct evidence of a link between Hitler and mass-gassing (as distinct from mass-shooting); (3) there are serious problems with the credibility of “gas-chambers” on documentary, logistic and technological grounds, at any rate on the scale alleged; (4) Carlo Mattogno has made a case to answer over the gas-chambers at Auschwitz complex (apart from one curious reference to the concealment of “special buildings), but we are still awaiting his further analysis of the material on Treblinka, Belzec and Sobibor, and his prolonged delay on this raises the suspicion that he has changed his mind about these camps; (5) too many “eyewitness survivor” stories range from the grossly improbable to the quite ridiculous.

            The right response to opponents is: whatever the historical details, we condemn all mass-murders, including the communist democides, and oppose genocide, including the “bloodless” version now being applied to our own people through mass-immigration, miscegenation and multiculturalisation.

          • Sick of it

            As I’ve stated before, I am not a fan of genocide. The people who revel in it are broken (and usually socialists). I only mentioned gas chambers above to show that before the Germans even supposedly did or anyone heard of them doing anything along those lines, Jews were calling for the extermination of all Germans.

            That’s pretty darn extreme, especially considering how much Jews had been allowed to participate in German society historically and the wealth they had accumulated there. Talk about stabbing people in the back!

            Then there’s the presence of people of Jewish descent all over Germany at the time, many of whom wholly identified themselves as German, who participated in the German military/bureaucracy/industries both before and during the Nazi era in Germany. These people were massacred by the allied campaign of annihilation as well as the pure German, but were not targeted by Hitler (he would likely have to have included himself if he did). Basically, they have made this a black and white issue where it clearly was not.

          • Zaporizhian Sich

            Genocide against those trying to exterminate you is not genocide, it is self-defense and justice.

          • Sick of it

            Or one could smash them in a war and kick them out for keeps?

      • Sick of it

        We create virtually everything. Real progress is dangerous to worldwide control, as opposed to a more backward feudalistic or absolutist system.

      • Erasmus

        Progressives think that humans are fungible, and that if you replace white men with blacks or Latinos that you can still have a technologically sophisticated 1st world society. That they fall first for that fallacy every time, before all others, makes every other argument to prove they have severely attenuated intellects secondary.

        • Bon, From the Land of Babble

          Progressives want US to think that humans are fungible. They certainly do not believe this, as is evident by where they live and where they send their children to school.

          They reserve the right for themselves to live apart from the conditions they impose on the rest of us.

          Bon

    • Northerner

      You probably shouldn’t use that argument. The Lord gave the different races their own nations, but that didn’t stop one of them from trying to take over the rest. Europeans spent most of their modern history trying to get into non-white societies.

      • kjh64

        Yes, Europeans did try to take over non-white nations and that was wrong. However, all races have done this, not just Europeans.

  • Stentorian_Commentator

    In a way, this article is a good advertisement for race realism. As Munro points out, whites are to be treated as the enemy. As the blog Unamusement Park indicated, there is no double standard, just a single standard, to wit, screw whitey!

  • Truthseeker

    So these people get a sense of identity from being “minorities,” and think that simply being non-white is enough to unite people. In other words, their stated goal is to politically marginalize whites, and they think that once they do, there’ll be a non-white utopia (or should that be “utopia of color”?)

    How sad it’ll be (for them) when they drive all the whites out. The next ones to leave will probably be the Asians who don’t want to deal with their corruption and incompetence. Then the only thing they’ll have left is a third-world craphole full of warring dark-skinned races and no one left to cry “racism!” to. If I live to see that, I’ll be laughing.

    • David Ashton

      Racism – OK for some!

    • Garrett Brown

      Mexicans/mestizos don’t give a damn about jungle people. They only care about taking “their” land back and then kicking out whoever isn’t mestizo.

  • JohnEngelman

    Hispanics are more likely to hate blacks than are whites. Hispanics compete with blacks for unskilled jobs.

    • David Ashton

      As long as non-white immigration is “legal”, elections are “fair”, ethnicity is “diverse” and Jewry remains “supreme”, you don’t much mind what happens to white American culture, do you?

      • JohnEngelman

        Cultures benefit when they interact and learn from each other. That is why, when Columbus discovered America, the civilizations of the Old World were far more advanced than the civilizations of the Aztecs and the Incas.

        In general I see little use in a large black population. However, when individual blacks behave decently and perform well I am glad to see them succeed in white civilization.

        • David Ashton

          Nations can benefit from voluntary exchanges of goods or ideas with other nations, but that is not the crucial issue here, and my concise description of your position stands unanswered.

          • JohnEngelman

            On many occasions I have said that I enjoy cultural diversity, but I want it to be voluntary and based on merit. I am opposed to affirmative action. I am also aware that the diversity I enjoy has a price tag. Immigration deflates incomes and contributes to the growing income gap.

            There is nothing contradictory about my attitudes about diversity. They are nuanced.

          • MikeofAges

            How ’bout wanting it to be temporary? As in, come here to do what you are contracted to do, behave well, accept your compensation for the work you do and the privations you may have suffered, and go home? Even legitimate migratory farm workers accept those terms.

          • David Ashton

            As I understand your illustration of the Aztec empire and European colonisation, the former closed and to our eyes gruesome civilisation benefited from a foreign impact. But the multi-ethnic morass that subsequently arose is not that impressive. Europe itself was not multi-racial and had a Christian civilization, in the South American case of a Roman Catholic variety. Your vision of the world seems to exclude national group identities, except in so far as they have a monetary value.

          • JohnEngelman

            Beyond obeying the laws of the United States I am without national identity. I think the United States has much to learn from other countries.

          • David Ashton

            Please specify what the US needs to learn from which countries.

          • JohnEngelman

            To start with the United States should learn the single payer health plan from Canada.

          • Do you mean the plan that works only because Canadians can come to the USA for time-sensitive tests like CT scans, rather than wait on a list for these in Canada?

            Or do you mean the same Canadian health system that has made it ILLEGAL for people to have private health insurance coverage? They’re in good company here; North Korea and Cuba also do this.

          • David Ashton

            Anything from China, Israel or non-white countries?

          • JohnEngelman

            We could probably learn a few things about winning wars from Israel.

          • David Ashton

            What exactly?

          • JohnEngelman

            How to win against the odds. With a population of 7,707,042, Israel is often considered to have one of the strongest military forces in the world.

          • Would you really like me to write an article about how their officer training was copied from the old German “Werhmacht” model?

            Israel’s combat forces were not badly outnumbered even in 1973. Their problem is – and always will be – that calling up their reserves will shut down their own civilian economy, and that the Orthodox Jews won’t fight.

            I still wonder why you didn’t fight in 1973. If I’d been you, I’d have done my bit in the IDF and shown up for reservist training. If something is important, one does it. You’d have been old enough to fight in 1973, instead of bellyaching about a war in Vietnam in which you would never have to fight because you likely had a university deferment for conscription.

            I’m 47, my FBI file says “ex-mercenary” among other things, and I’d do it again. I may even have the opportunity, here in the states.

            There is a famous photo of me with a G-43 and two pouches (ex-sandbags) of Hungarian stick-grenades slung over my hips. My mother has a print. I was lucky.

            One has to be a fatalist in battle, or you have no place there.

            –MCS

          • Sick of it

            Ok…that’s a story that really needs to be told. Where were you a mercenary?

          • David Ashton

            The vigorous ethnic patriotism of a relatively cohesive society, a lesson to us all?

          • JohnEngelman

            Since its founding Israel has been one mistake away from annihilation. The United States has not been that way since perhaps the War of 1812, when Great Britain was also fighting Napoleon. Consequently, I tolerate actions by Israel I would not tolerate if taken by the United States.

          • David Ashton

            The Jewish state imposed on Arab territory was supposed to remove or reduce the perennial and almost universal problem of “anti-Semitism” but seems to have aggravated it.

          • Sick of it

            Their military is actually reminiscent of our militia system. All free men participated in said system until it was abolished by the Federal government.

          • Zaporizhian Sich

            Sure, you can also learn from how the Jews murdered 100 million Slavs too, starting with why they hate Jews with the venom they do. They do not win wars however, they start them and then drag other nations into them. Israel fighting its own wars? Gimme a break, were it not for the oppressed white Americans paying for their arms and their sons and daughters killing and being killed to benefit the Jews, Israel would have been wiped off the face of the Earth as it should have been decades ago.

          • JohnEngelman

            I would like to say that from China we could learn how to have a low crime rate, but the Chinese are innately more law abiding than whites everywhere in the world, so the Chinese government might be seen to have an unfair advantage.

          • David Ashton

            More individual conformity to authority than white Americans, or the French or Italians. Don’t miss Frank Dikotter’s new book on Mao’s massacres after the mainland takeover.

          • With this statement you have admitted – if accidentally – precisely the lack of national loyalty of which the more suspicious elements of the political right in many nations have suspected Jews for centuries – i.e. ever since the rise of the nation-state.

          • QuinnTheEskimo9

            David: Why are you trying to debate Engelman? You are wasting your time and effort, time you will never retrieve and your efforts are futile.
            Instead, Vote down and flag for removal.

          • David Ashton

            I think his latest “candid confession” was worth eliciting. He has finally locked himself in his own stocks for verbal “patriot missiles”.

          • JohnEngelman

            Verbal patriot missiles are what I have been getting ever since I began posting here from those who do not like the way I praise Jews and Orientals, documenting my assertions by quoting material I have found on this website.

          • Greg Thomas

            If I want to “enjoy diversity,” I will jump on an airplane. I certainly will not give them my home because I like their food.

      • OlderWoman

        Great question, David. He has a wide streak of anti-White racism in nearly every comment he makes.

    • They also compete for “gibs me dat” handouts extorted from the taxpayers.

      Perhaps strangely, when I tried “extortion” I was sent to prison for it.

  • “But but but…blacks are even more against amnesty and open borders than whites.”

    Sure, but their votes will always go to politicians that want amnesty and open borders.

    What explains the paradox?

    Blacks might not want open borders, but they want their welfare gibsmedat more than they don’t want open borders. So they vote Democrat almost monolithically, meaning YAY BLUE TEAM politicians that want to swing the borders wide open to haul in more Democrat votes.

  • anton drexler

    Blacks and browns won’t be able to keep their arguments to themselves for long, especially considering how the browns are cleansing ghettoes of blacks in an ongoing national urban race-war. Asians and browns, outside their “leaderships” of PC civil-rights professional whiners, loathe blacks even more than whites do. Ironically, “black power” will decline precipitously with the white population, since its liberal whites who are the apologists and enablers of black barbarism.

  • sbuffalonative

    They’re becoming increasing open and brazen. Can there be any doubt about the real goal of unrestricted immigration?

    I like to say the best way to destroy blacks is to give them what they want. This woman believes that non-whites are going to join forces to take down the white man. There’s no unity among non-whites. The only thing this will do is ensure that blacks will remain on the lowest rung of the social/economic/political ladder.

  • D.B. Cooper

    Yep, she looks like a Bertha alright.

    HELLO? Republican Party? HELLO??
    What are you going to do about this, spend millions trying to get their votes?
    Guess what? The GOP doesn’t even have MY vote anymore! I’m voting for the democrats in order to get all of you John McCain and Romney types out of office.

    • OlderWoman

      What…what is THAT?

      • D.B. Cooper

        It doesn’t look any better with hair either.

    • Mergatroyd

      OH yeccchhh! You owe me some eyewash, buddy. You need to start posting graphic warnings before putting up such an atrocity.

  • Son of Galton

    Here’s the one hitch in this otherwise brilliant plan: Whites are the only ones who end up paying for social justice schemes and shakedowns (as they are the only ones who can be relied upon to be net tax-producers instead of tax-eaters). The larger the ratio of non-Whites to Whites becomes, the more fiscally untenable the situation in America will become.

    Is it really reasonable to believe that a 10% White population can prop up a 90% non-White population? That, my friends, is the Zimbabwe Hypothesis of Wealth Generation; it was tried–it didn’t work too well, from what I can recall.

    • Mack0

      Zimbabwe is a great example.

  • bigone4u

    Blacks are at the bottom in IQ, while blacks are at the top in EVERY social pathology. Nobody like them and without white guilt as a motivator, other races aren’t going to put up with them. This woman did the cause of race realism a favor for showing that blacks have it in for whites. Liberals may be too blinded to see it, but every other white person can.

    • Rhialto

      America is now a divided country; the only thing binding non-Whites together is their common enemy, non-Liberal White men. Non-Whites consider Liberals as livestock, and Blacks as undesirable creatures .

      How long will it be until America disintegrates?

    • D.B. Cooper

      And what are white men now, the scared colonials of the Salem Witch Hunts of 1692? You, me, and other people on this site criticize minorities, yet we have problems within our own race.
      These nonwhites can be beaten rather easily in a war, but WHO is allowing them to come here? Who is carrying the torch of Ted Kennedy?

      • bigone4u

        So true, but the colonists were divided too, if I understand history correctly. We can never expect to have every white in solidarity the way just about every black and brown hang together. We are too individualistic. That’s usually a strength but in the coming time of troubles, it’s going to hurt us.
        As a start, I like the strategy of demonizing and targeting prominent traitors like McCain and Graham. Give both of them heck in comments, town meetings, and at the ballot box. Bombard their offices with stupid requests and smart criticisms.

  • Mack0

    All their words about diversity, equality and justice are a pack of lies. What they want is power and control. Unfortunately for them, Hispanics are smarter and unburdened by white guilt.

    • OlderWoman

      If they had power and control they’d do like all blacks do…they would abuse it.

      • Mack0

        And they would destroy what they control.

        • Greg Thomas

          Hispanics, especially mexicans, destroy everything when in large enough numbers.

          • Mack0

            The further away whites and their money are from ground zero the less likely we will be collateral in a confrontation between blacks and browns.

      • Zaporizhian Sich

        They will also learn the hard way why a small number of whites conquered THEM in the first place over 500 years ago.

  • Global Minority

    The Lations are not going to put up blacks and their whinning either. The darker one skin color is in Mexico and really all of Latin America the worse you are treated. The asians have even lower tolerance for blacks and latinos. So this black women does not know what she is saying either. She is that stupid to think they are going to join forces with them. They may temporarly. But once the Latinos gain ground and out number them and they will, they will toss the blacks to the back of the bus period. Serves them right too.

    • MikeofAges

      My favorite saying, trite but so true: “He who tries to ride the tiger will end up in the tiger’s belly.”

    • bilderbuster

      The back of the bus my foot
      The few buses still running when the White man’s long gone will be Mexicans only.
      The Blacks will miss the good old days but will still blame Whites & say Whites hated Blacks so much we bought the Mexicans here to abuse them.

  • WR_the_realist

    Bertha Lewis makes clear and explicit the anti-white agenda behind the leftists’ advocacy of ever more immigration. Of course its hard to see Asian Indian and Korean immigrants eager to ally with American blacks, so I suspect the whole project will backfire, but not before it wrecks the country.

  • joesolargenius

    While protesting in DC in September of 2010 I met some Blacks trying to get other Blacks to return to the Republican Party , the Tea Party also is getting more and more Black members.The Democrats won’t gain anything if they lose ten million Black American voters in the process of adding the same amount of legal and illegal alien voters, Bertha whom looks like she used to be a Bernie knows that she will be replaced by a Hispanic should this happen.These Black Democratic Party Politicians are trying to stay in the game which they can only do with the Black Vote,they know it is temporary as once the Hispanics are the majority all those elected will have an Hispanic name.

  • Ella

    I guess Blacks never heard of Caribbean since we currently get immigration from the islands.

  • Dave4088

    What these moronic blacks, who fantasize about a black-brown imperium over North America don’t realize is that, once whitey is out of the way (assuming whitey goes quietly as currently) the mestizos will turn on them with a vengeance and kill and/or enslave them. The white man’s spoils won’t be divvied up equally as they stupidly believe and blacks will be pining for the “bad” old days of white rule.

    • MikeofAges

      The white man’s problem in North America derives from his belief that his prosperity, culture and survival depends upon the success of the geopolitical scheme called variously “Manifest Destiny” or more poetically “sea to shining sea”. But is it so?

      Imagine dividing the present United States along, first, the southern boundary of Pennsylvania and then along a line drawn from the southwest corner of Pennsylvania to the Golden Gate or maybe a point somewhat south. North of that border, the North American homeland of those of white European descent. In the Southeast Quadrant, the North American homeland of the white Southerner and Black African in North America. The Southwest, the homeland of the Hispanic, the Southwest Indians and the white Southwesterner.

      The white Southwestern might slowly abandon the region and move north to the Rockies and western Great Plains. The white Southerner will never abandon the South.

      This plan would have one great salutary effect. It would drop on everyone that greatest of all equalizers, reality. I don’t think the politics of the North would be quite the same after this division was implemented. Those who did not belong in the North would start going home at an accelerated pace, or never come in the first place. And those who wanted to say that certain people did not belong there would be harder to marginalize and silence.

      Canada would have to move in the same direction under the weight of what was happening in the South. Quebec for Les Quebecers. The rest of Canada for the Anglo Canadian. In this new North, our only obligation to any outsider would be to the First Nations. And we can that willingly meets. It’s the only form of diversity that makes us better.

      Responses?

      • IstvanIN

        I pretty much agree except for a Hispanic homeland in the southwest. Whites and Indians, OK, but no Hispanics. They already have all of the new world south of the Rio Grande.

        • MikeofAges

          My argument, though, is that it would not be the responsibility of the Northern Tier to bring that about. I do think that it is the existence of the American colossus based on manifest destiny that makes every other claim and demand seem plausible. Get rid of Greater America and shrink it to what it would have been had secession been allowed, and there is chance, a decent chance, that a lot of the world’s problems would become more manageable.

          If at the time of secession the Confederacy had come forward with an announcement that it intended to end slavery over some period of time and along with that showed a plausible plan which they began to implement however slowly, the bloody conflict might have been averted for lack of support in the North for preventing it. The United States in turn would have demanded that the Confederacy agree not to expand beyond its existing boundaries. With the United States Navy to the south and the United States Army in the west to enforce the terms. Absent the Mexican War, the boundaries might look exactly as I have proposed.

          Another scenario is that absent the Mexican War, the rest of the Southwest quadrant might have declared and won its own independence just as Texas did. Mexico would have less to complain about.

          • Andy

            We had offered to buy the American southwest from Mexico at a reasonable price. Mexico attacked us. We won the war, and made selling the land (at the same pre-war price) part of the peace treaty. I don’t think Mexicans have too much to complain about.

          • MikeofAges

            The point of my geopolitical idea is that it confines the claims of those who have grievances against the North American white European and the United States to a more limited geographical extent.

            What I want to do is put into the play the idea that geopolitical concept the United States is based on. Manifest Destiny, might be an overreach which has made the United States and the world vulnerable to the extravagant and overreaching claims of disaffected people.

            As a practical matter, people value the idea of a common legal system, common financial system, and a nationwide business market. The idea of breaking up the United States into sections each of which is an independent country as of now has no plausibility. But if it ever became plausible, there would be ways to maintain a common market and make it possible for people from the Southern Tier to serve in the United States military. The legal successor to the United States would be the Northern Tiers. So it would accountable for the treaty obligations of the United States and would maintain possession of and control over the United States military forces.

          • IstvanIN

            It is all fantasy now.

          • Bossman

            If the USA were ever to fragment, it would be like handing over the leadership of the world to the Chinese or the Russians. That is not going to happen for a long time.

          • MikeofAges

            If repression and the maintenance of hegemony are the answers, then you have to practice it whole.

        • We already have a Hispanic homeland. It’s called “South America”.

      • Dave4088

        American will eventually break apart along racial lines. The status quo of mutual animosity and hatred between white, black and brown is not sustainable forever.

        • MikeofAges

          The trick is to make the racial lines the geographic lines. If the United States did not maintain hegemony over the Southern areas as well as the Northern areas which are its legitimate purview, then the people who possibly had a valid claim on the Southern areas as their North American homeland would no credible claim on the territory of the more limited United States.

          Do not forget Lincoln doctrine. The stake of maintaining the Union was whether government “of by and for the people” would survive anywhere.

    • Bon, From the Land of Babble

      Just like blacks in Zimbabwe now pine for the “bad” old days of White Rule:

      “Most black Zimbabweans would now prefer Ian Smith as leader to Robert Mugabe”

      “Life in Rhodesia was Better than Zimbabwe”

      amren dot com/news/2012/05/life-in-rhodesia-was-better-than-zimbabwe

      Bon

    • Bossman

      Hispanics are very good at assimilating Blacks out of existence. Blacks have disappeared in many Latin American countries.

  • newscomments70

    I don’t see how bringing in more Mexicans will increase “black power”. Blacks who support this should research how blacks are treated in Mexico. It’s like going back 200 years. They are treated like dirt. They have no special privileges, no hand-outs, no hero status. They are commonly mocked with racial slurs, sexually harrassed and forced to live on the margins of society. There articles written about this on the internet (often written by blacks). Try googling “Blacks in Mexico”, if you don’t believe me.

    • FransSusan

      Why do they stay?

      • Greg Thomas

        Because they have not made a run for the border yet.

  • Spartacus

    Secede. Either in the South, or in the north-west, or in any other place you think would work, but for God’s sake, just do it ! Every day you wait makes it just that bit harder …

    • Sick of it

      Our people have yet to rise up against blatant criminality. When that happens, expect secession.

      • Spartacus

        Just don’t wait too long to do it.

      • QuinnTheEskimo9

        Expect bloody violence and retribution involving military weaponry. The government will throw everything it’s got against us. Let it being, it’s far past time.

  • Zaporizhian Sich

    The depths of their hatred towards us is glaringly apparent here. They do not care what the consequences would be for them, as long as flooding more hostile racial and religious aliens dispossesses whites. This should convince whites that all other racial groups are implacable, mortal enemies who must be driven out of or otherwise eliminated from their rightful homelands as the fifth columnists, invaders, genocidists and usurpers they are.

    • Jesse James

      It is time for us to get back in touch with hatred, it can be a powerful force.

      • Zaporizhian Sich

        I’m already there, I harbor a lot of icy cold hatred towards certain groups of people, and have been for most of my life. I may appear to be just another Eloi white, but a few darkies found out how fast that mask can be ripped away to expose this beneath. That is what we will have to be towards our enemies, a destroyer without compunctions given they have no compunctions about murdering babies and the elderly among us.

  • “If we are going to be the new majority, we’re going to have to start acting like the new majority and start setting the new rules,” he said
    —now please tell me how its going to be good for Whites to be a minority according to the libs. sounds like its not going to be pleasant.

    • 1XXX

      Blacks are not going to be the majority….ever.

  • 1XXX

    Negro arrogance brings a smile to my face – It’s the gift that keeps on giving.

    They are incapable of comprehending that they are dispossessing themselves by supporting immigration. These are the people that are so completely dependent on handouts….and they think they’re going to run the country?!?!

    When the blood comes, it’s going to come in torrents.

    • Brian

      To the extent that Hispanics increase and need propping up, there will be less for the blacks. To the extent that Hispanics gain power, they will treat the blacks worse than we ever did. The Hispanics are merely in a marriage of convenience for the time being, using blacks as a wedge against us. When they no longer need that, the blacks will be crying for ol’ massa to return. They just never learn.

    • Rhialto

      Some Blacks are quick thinkers and are adept at taking advantage of situations that occur, but long range thinking is not a “Black Thing”. So Blacks aren’t concerned about the distant (to them) future, where the easily manipulated White man will be replaced by nasty Black hating non-Whites (and nastier Black hating White men).

  • Trevor Pilsbury

    Bertha may not want to “get down” with immigration reform once a Latino majority is realised. Latinos will not put up with African mischief the way whites have.

  • Spartacus

    Need I remind you what’s gonna happen if you keep on doing nothing ?

    http://ajkraad(DOT)wix(DOT)com/genocide-museum

  • Brian

    “This is a nation – not a polyglot boarding house.” Teddy Roosevelt

    • IstvanIN

      it is now, Teddy.

    • Sick of it

      He should have informed his cousin Franklin, who seemed confused on the matter.

  • White Mom in WDC

    Big Bertha needs to shut her Big Bertha pie hole. Sure Bertha, Asians and Latinos want to unify with you violent turdheads. Get real Bertha Baby!

  • MekongDelta69

    “The new [non-white] majority will start making new rules.”

    Not until you kill me, but you better be prepared to go with me.

    Bertha Butt:
    http://www[dot]discoverthenetworks[dot]org/individualProfile.asp?indid=2459

  • IstvanIN

    The point so many of us are missing is that first and foremost they will join together to take what is ours, to marginalize us, to make us a hunted third class minority in the land our forebears built, and ultimately exterminate us. Who cares what happens after we are gone, it is the initial coalition of blacks, Hispanics, Jews and Asians that should scare the beegeebies out of us.

    • MBlanc46

      Black resentment at Hispanics is already great. Hispanics have no love for blacks. This “rainbow coalition” stuff sounds wonderful to Dem politicians and academics, but it’s a pipedream.

    • Mergatroyd

      There will never be a coalition of blacks, Hispanics, Jews and Asians. Each of those groups is ethnocentric to the max and will not share resources with the others. Only whites are forced to do this. It is already a given that none will live with blacks.
      I think there will be eternal, violent warfare between the ethnic groups until one finally comes out on top. My money is on the Asians, Jews will depart for Israel and the other two will be wiped out, whites too.
      The main goal was to destroy the white race, nothing else really mattered.

      • Northerner

        Asians, especially the Chinese aren’t as ethnocentric as most people think. They will cooperate and ally with others (e.g., China in Africa) for mutually beneficial purposes.

  • Sick of it

    Funny, a lot of blacks are getting freaked out today by the massive influx of Hispanics…who utterly despise them.

  • Bo_Sears

    Everyone has an opinion on the future, so here is mine.

    1) If we have amnesty along with massive Mexican Flight from Mexico, they will overwhelmingly take up residence in the same areas already represented in Congress by African Americans. The effect will be that the Congressional Black Caucus will have half the number of members in 2920, as it has now, and Chicago Democratic Rep. Luis Gutierrez will be sitting in a corner laughing up his sleeve about how he pulled a fast one on African American legislators. Unless a youth in Chicago mistakes him for a white American, oops, I meant a polar bear.

    2) We are in for a dramatic contest between and among African Americans and Mexican Americans for the political prizes. New York Democratic Rep.Yvette Clarke will mourn the day she backed the Bertha Lewis plan.

    3) The political nature of the white Americans will change rapidly once they are a minority population in many cities and states, more and more. In some unconscious way, the president in the past has been a kind of father figure to us, leading us to do stupid things regarding taxes, spending, war, peace, and all the things that make this society a pleasant and a hurtful one to live in.

    We’ve already seen that President Obama has deliberately rendered himself no father to us by his remarks about “acting white” and “a typical white person” and “gripping guns & bibles,” and the whole enchilada of hateful references to the white Americans. And never clean them up.

    4) To hard left pundits, this feels like we are expressing a racial attitude toward Obama, but this isn’t true at all. He’s just not Dad and can never be Dad…it’s not a believable role for him to play as well as advertise his community organizing mentality. We just don’t want a Dad like that. Which means a growing discontinuity between white Americans and the federal government and the nation-state as a whole. But as we slowly disconnect from nation-state centrism, we move slowly to a tribal-state centrism. We’ve a long history of that from the Mayflower Compact in 1620 until we achieved independence from a one-man rule in 1776, or a total of 156 years. I don’t think it will take that long to rebel on a tribal basis this time, but it is definitely in our political genes.

    • Andy

      When did Obama make comments about “acting white” and “a typical white person”?

      • Bon, From the Land of Babble

        “The point I was making was not that my grandmother harbors any racial animosity, but that she is a typical white person. If she sees somebody on the street that she doesn’t know there’s a reaction in her that doesn’t go away and it comes out in the wrong way.”

        –Barak Obama to 610 WIP host Angelo Cataldi, 2008

        Obama strongly criticized the idea that achievement was limited to “acting white” in his keynote address at the 2004 Democratic National Convention. He said that “children can’t achieve unless we raise their expectations and turn off the television sets and eradicate the slander that says a black youth with a book is acting white.”

        Bon

        • Andy

          Thanks.

      • Bo_Sears

        “Acting white” in 2004, and “a typical white person” two days after his famous speech on race in 2008…it was during a radio interview. Whether one believes these are significant slips of the tongue, first, he has never cleaned them up, and second, others have lost jobs & elections for much, much less.

        We talk about this on our Facebook page. Third item from the top. Titled, “COMMENT TO JOAN WALSH RE SMALL, FLEETING COMMENTS”

        www [dot] facebook [dot] com [slash] resisting.defamation

  • mobilebay

    Can’t you just see this country run by a black? Oh,wait…

    • MikeofAges

      Not by a black, by an elitist left-liberal from the community of Hyde Park in Chicago. The Hyde Park scam is generations old by now. The political machine in the dirty working class wards of Chicago, be they white, black or brown, and the “independent” organizations in Hyde Park and a couple of other neighborhoods pretend like they are mortally at odds, but are in bed behind the scenes. All work, along with certain corporate interests, powerful unions, the academic cabal led by the University of Chicago and other powerful entities like the Catholic Church, to create a one-party state and a one-party government.

      The political machine has long looked to Hyde Park for upscale candidates and some intellectual cachet. Paul Douglas. Adali Stevenson, not a Hyde Parker but a Hyde Park darling. Abner Mikva. Barack Obama. Nothing new here but the paint job.

  • DLRisVH

    Oh………so after all this time and talk about equality, it’s actually about getting the upper hand and shoving it up YTEES @$$.

  • ViktorNN

    Okay, so in light of this rant which shows how non-whites view amnesty and the countdown to whites becoming a minority, please explain to me why any white person – including white liberals – would be in favor of “immigration reform” or any policy which hastens white demographic decline.

  • MBlanc46

    Apparently the Dems are trying hard to get blacks to support the Mexican invasion. While the loyal functionaries seem to be getting on board, there is a deafening lack of support among ordinary blacks. Perhaps too many of them are already in gang disputes with HIspanic gangs.

  • Bon, From the Land of Babble

    This racist idiot needs to look at what happens to blacks when Hispanics are a majority.

    They are ethnically cleansed by violence, as in Southern California.

    Bon

  • Evette Coutier

    When will we start sticking together like the blacks and other minorities do?

  • Rusty Shackelford

    They will get a rude awakening when they realize the squatties won’t be willing to give them nearly as large a slice of the pie as your average white.

    • Joe Biden said that Republicans want to put blacks back in chains. No, that would be the Mexicans, Arabs, Persians, Jews, Chinese, Indians (dot and feather), and other blacks.

      • QuinnTheEskimo9

        They’ll use them for slave labor or eliminate them. Chinese are also colonizing AFREEKA. Is there anything more racist toward blacks than Chinese? Well, at least they don’t have their own government telling them they have to hand over all their earnings to “more deserving” blacks who are owed ALL white wealth and property.

  • This silly argument ignores the fact that newly-arrived nonwhite immigrants detest US blacks (viz. Hispanic-black hatred and Asian-black antipathy). It also ignores the fact that as the percentage of the white taxpaying population decreases in relative terms, the piece of the tax-funded “gibs me dat” pie for each black will decrease, rather than increase.

    If you were a dog, would you prefer to live with a family who has you as their only dog and who can spoil you, or would you rather live in a kennel?

    • Nice blacks and dogs analogy. The Chinese will eat them both when they take over. And yes, in a world without Whites, they most definitely will take over.

      • HaroldWesterling

        What will be left to take over? …a bunch of rotten machinery, rusted hulls of what is left of our factories and no natural resources after the ‘new majority’ burns through them in 30 years time? I think the Chinese might stay where they are…

        • QuinnTheEskimo9

          The Chinese will make the former U.S. nice for themselves, i.e., black and Hispanic free. They have enough know how to keep the lights running but civilization will stagnate from then on.

        • Lebensraum.

  • IstvanIN

    Where ever you an African, you have Africa.

  • Aztlan will be monochrome indeed.

    But really, how do blacks “think of Asians as White”?

    • MikeofAges

      The know viscerally who is “vibrant” and who is not. Notice, don’t you, that urban blacks get along fine with white “players”. The white “players” are young adult men more noted for their social apperception and amoral approach to pursuing the female than they are for their intellectual acumen. Fit right in, I’d say.

  • Mergatroyd

    They listen to their black leaders who continue to tell them that whites are their worst enemy.

  • Mergatroyd

    You have a point. But subversive whites are useful idiots of their NWO masters who gave them the idea that the worst scourge of the earth is the white race. Their masters will throw them under the bus when the time comes, they will never be a part of the elite NWO because they are the wrong ethnicity.

    • OlderWoman

      DWL’s are the true enemy because they divide us. They have fallen for the lie that underneath our skin color we are all the same. There’s another lie that’s being argued and that lie is that ‘there’s no such thing as race’. Unfortunately, I have a neighbor from the Domenican Republic and I have already seen and reported his violent macho tendency to the police. But, I am repelled more by blacks than I am about latinos.

  • Mergatroyd

    Whites are already suffering.

  • Ella

    It is called “collective guilt.” Well, Canada was a British colony so that makes you guilty of slave trading in the Caribbean and USA.

  • Mergatroyd

    Obama is not that smart. He is a sock puppet for the NWO and will never be a part of the ethnic group that pulls his strings. He’ll be tossed aside when his usefulness is up. His purpose is to be a front guy for destruction of the white race. Whites will blame him instead of those who are engineering white genocide.

  • cecilhenry

    this is Genocide. Call it for what it is,

    This is also why democracy doesnt work. The mob can vote itself all the resources of those who produce.

    Parasitism is the result. Don;t be silent. They want to destroy you.

    Every country in the Western country is setting a date when the White race will become a minority.

    Non-whites call in to talk shows and rave about how great it is.

    But any White person who mentions it gets the word “racist!” shouted at him.

    There are calls for more ‘Diversity’, which means
    fewer Whites.

    There can be NO discussion.

    He is told:

    There is no such thing as the White race, and then he is told that the
    White race owes the rest of the world reparations.

  • Mergatroyd

    Whites have been forced to concede power and wealth to blacks. Blacks are only doing what they’re allowed to get away with — which at the moment is any and all rights and power over whites plus the “right” to assault, murder and rape whites while the media excuse and cover up their crimes. This was done TO us not BY us.
    In the old days, blacks “knew their place” so to speak and wouldn’t dare assault whites; now, to them, it is open season on whites.
    Just as planned by those who run the government, media and academia. Their goal is to destroy and eradicate the white race and eliminate all white homelands and they’re doing a good job of it. Blacks are merely useful idiots and a battering ram to be used against whites.

    • kjh64

      I don’t care about Blacks knowing their place. I just want separation. They should have their own society and country that they run as they see fit and so should se.

  • baldowl

    When your enemy announces himself, believe him and prepare for battle.

  • bubo

    We need Golden Dawn, or the Swedish Democrats, or General Pinochet. Instead we have John Boner and El Bush.

    I don’t want to live in a brown toilet.

  • HaroldWesterling

    That’s Phase II of ‘immigration reform’

  • JohnEngelman

    Who is “we?” Many, perhaps most, white American Gentiles join me in appreciating the presence and contributions of Jews and Orientals in the United States. Your kind of racial ethnocentrism is fading.

    • QuinnTheEskimo9

      You are profoundly wrong.

      • JohnEngelman

        How is it anti white to be pro Oriental and Jewish?

    • David Ashton

      You have claimed, rightly or wrongly, that Jews whether observant or non-religious have an exclusive right to a huge Jewish nation of their own in the Middle East. Is that “racial ethnocentrism”? Do not “perhaps most white American Gentiles” have the right to keep their own nation?

      The constitution of the nation in which you accidentally find yourself was created by people of a particular race and heritage, and bears its ethnic stamp. White ownership of the USA does not exclude the presence of some non-whites who make useful contributions, but there must be strict numerical limits as well as cultural selection regarding new settlers from outside the borders. Even you would be reluctant to admit huge populations from west Africa or the Muslim world. Others do not wish north America to become a Chinese colony.

      • JohnEngelman

        Israel and the occupied territories minus Gaza come to 27,376 square kilometers, or 10,570 square miles.

        The 22 countries of the Arab League come to approximately 14,000,000 square kilometers, or 5,400,000 square miles.

        Israel and the occupied territories are about 0.2 percent of the 22 countries of the Arab League. Israel and the occupied territories – which I would like to be formally annexed – are not a “huge Jewish nation.

        • We’re not talking about that, John. If Jews have the right to their own nation on its historical territory, do we white gentiles also possess such a right to our own nations?

          Answer the question, and no, hypocrisy is not “nuanced”.

          • JohnEngelman

            No.

            Not in the United States.

            This is what the Fifteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution has to say about the matter: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

          • Mike Conrad

            Amendments are additions to the Constitution. They have been rescinded before, and this is one which definitely needs revising at the very least. It’s being abused to the eternal detriment of the American commonweal.

            The USA has been invaded and is well on its way toward being ruined. Any other country would have put a stop to this long ago. Which is why I say that when the 15th is rescinded, the recission needs to be made retroactive.

          • Are you then suggesting that Jews are unique among the world’s people in deserving their own ethnostate?

            Hypocrite.

        • David Ashton

          The original Zionist demand was for a state that reached to the Euphrates. This biblical claim was proposed also by non-religious Jews whose ancestral links to the original Israelite population were by no means racially unmixed.

          Your land-area comparison resembles the 1938 German comparison with the British Empire and the USSR.

          From the Arab viewpoint, a thorn in the flesh can be very tiny but pretty painful.

      • JohnEngelman

        I am in favor of more restrictions on legal immigration to the United States. I am opposed to H1B Visas. I am in favor of locating and deporting illegal immigrants, and punishing their employers.

        • You are in favor of a slightly tarted-up version of the same system: the same hooker with a nicer dress and less light.

      • JohnEngelman

        To say that “Others do not wish north America to become a Chinese colony,” is moot, because that will not happen. However, Chinese immigrants and their descendants are likely to become more prominent in Canada and the United States because of their high average intelligence and work ethics.

  • This is an astonishing admission of intent. No doubt the White liberals are still snoozing and calling us “paranoid” though. I wonder how their children will like “the new rules”.

  • Bossman

    Mexicans are the descendants of the First Americans who were here before immigrants from Europe arrived in North America.

    • QuinnTheEskimo9

      Sorry genius. Every nation on earth was founded by conquest, genocide and dispossession of the aboriginal inhabitants.

      The first Americans were stone-age Europeans, according to recent archeological evidence. It’s been in all the papers. Didn’t you get the memo?

      These Europeans, who were the first people on the continent, ended up getting massacred by the Asians (“native” Americans to leftists) that crossed into America 10,000 years later.

      But even if the American Indians were the “first” people here it wouldn’t matter, because you completely missed the other guest’s point point, like a typical dumb liberal.

    • When did a Spanish-speaking Aztec acquire the right to live on land owned by other tribes. I’m 3/16 Cherokee and Tuscarora. *YOU* go back to Europe!

  • Zaporizhian Sich

    I always say various shades of waste matter never play well together. Many of them will if whites disappear regret that because whites have for the most part kept them from each other’s throats. When the famines and the shortages of drinkable water come to every corner of the Earth, their true nature will surface.

  • DelmarJackson

    I hope people are letting Neil Munro know how much they appreciate his reporting on immigration and other issues rarely covered by other so called journalists. I wonder how much longer he will be allowed to work.

  • QuinnTheEskimo9

    Big Bertha Lewis is blustering, blathering fool. She’s in the same category as other large, unintelligent black women with big mouths: Sheila Jackson Lee, Oprah Winfrey, etc.
    Only a fool like Obama would listen to the likes of any of them.

    • Jim Henry

      I totally agree with your comment. First of all, Big Bertha could care less about what happens 30 years from now. Her main priority is what fast food joint to pick for her next meal.

      This woman does not have the capability to plan ahead. If she did, ACORN would still be irritating us.

      These non-whites are so dependent upon YT that they could no longer function without our assistance at the end of the month. Do any of them have real jobs?

      The rhetoric her ilk is spewing doesn’t mean a hill of beans.

      Don’t worry…be happy.

  • Greg Thomas

    This proves beyond a reasonable doubt that those who support amnesty for some 25 million illegal invading mexicans and their kin is to displace White Americans. We are at war with diversity and nobody is coming to our rescue.

  • QuinnTheEskimo9

    Ted Kennedy was a useful idiot. Far too drunk and unintelligent to be taken seriously. He chased skirts while others carried the torch, let him be the front man and then hid behind him and blame him, as they do for the 1965 immigration flood bill. Kennedy was the front man only. He did not write it and Irish Catholics were not pushing it, only Jews.

    • OlderWoman

      Jesuits at Georgetown were the power behind Kennedy. Now they are controlling obama’s push for (Black) Liberation Theology and Redistribution of Wealth.

  • QuinnTheEskimo9

    Whites conquered and settled this land and we have every right to hang on to it. Washington D. C., the American msm and the academic system need to be fumigated of non-white, anti-whites.
    Only 1% of White Americans owned slaves. We owe them nothing except a ticket back to Africa. They should be thanking us for all the opportunities and money we’ve thrown at their feet while they act like insolent, spoiled children and assault us.

  • QuinnTheEskimo9

    The non-white American government has set it up that way, don’t blame Obama, he is merely the perfect front man and fall guy, any criticism of him is immediately met with screams of “racist.” Meanwhile, the government has imported hoards blacks and Hispanics and then pit us against them while they devalue and debase the American dollar, loot American’s wealth and sell off America’s hard assets to the Chinese.

  • ms_anthro

    The destruction of our White, Christian nations was foretold in the Scriptures. Google “the great falling away” and learn how Paul prophesied that people will abandon the churches as they begin to preach apostasy, and how we will be enslaved by our inferiors before Christ’s return.

    You don’t have to be a Christian or even a deist to find the parallels eery.

    • OlderWoman

      Apostasy exists in abundance in all members of the two Councils of Churches. They have returned to Romanism.

  • Epiminondas

    There will be a war of attrition, followed by a brief reign of terror in which the non-whites will attempt to exterminate the whites. It has happened before. They are telling us in no uncertain terms what they intend to do. If you are a young white person, be prepared to fight for your existence: economically at first, then literally by the last third of the 21st century. White babies being born now are to be pitied. The one thing that can save us is the prospect of eventual political disruption between whites, blacks and Hispanics. That would leave the door open for a break-up of the USA and a place in the sun for whites. I can’t see blacks, Asians and Hispanics living harmoniously among one another. It isn’t happening in LA.

  • Epiminondas

    Canadians deserve it. Most of them are a bunch of propagandized fools and anti-Southern bigots. They’ve been gullible on race because they didn’t know anything about blacks. By the time they figure it out, it will be too late.

  • SFLBIB

    I thought there was no love lost.

  • Sick of it

    The most solid nations in America today are liberal America and conservative America. It is basically broken down along ethnic lines, making your statement somewhat accurate, BUT includes tens of millions of white liberal cultists who will do everything they can to change this country for the worse.

  • No; we’d leave.

  • PouponMarks

    This saga needs to be made into a movie: Whites import Blacks and keep them restricted because they believe that giving them full rights will destroy the fabric of society, economically and socially. Blacks gain equal power, and then strive for unequal power over Whites, to subjugate them, pillory them, rob them, and blame them for everything, including clogged toilets.

    So, the supreme irony is that Blacks, the once “oppressed”, are now happy to be the oppressors. However, there is one difference. White achieved and maintained superiority over Blacks because they were superior; in intelligence, industry, socialization, cooperation, and rational thought. Blacks now strive for superiority in the only way they can: by superior numbers and perverting the democratic process.

  • OlderWoman

    I certainly wish that someone or something would push blacks out of the South. We have too many of them. I remember when the South was a pleasant place to live as we had our beautiful white communities and they had their community. It really throws me for a loop to go to our good neighborhoods and see them infest them like the parasites they are.

  • OlderWoman

    Southerners never abused their ‘slaves’. Our ancestors treated them like children because that’s the way they behaved. Intellectually, they are totally incapable of handling power and control properly. Everything to them is about skin color.

  • OlderWoman

    True. They are embarrassed by them. However, I also know that blacks in those countries are just as unintelligent, racist and violent as American blacks.

  • MBlanc46

    Can you imagine the outrage is some good folks set up The White Institute?

  • OlderWoman

    I have friends who have a Mexican family for neighbors. The Mexican had a family reunion and extended an invitation to my friends. My friends said they were treated like royalty and have had continuing good relations with them. They tell me they are unbelievably clean and their property well cared for.

    • We have some Tex-Mex neighbors who are like that, but they speak English at home and have good jobs. Even they don’t like wetbacks.

  • Another fine example of giving them what they wanted only to have them whine about it blowing up in their faces was home mortgages. “Redlining” (giving blacks mortgages for property they can actually afford)? Racist. “Reverse-redlining” (giving blacks mortgages for property they can not afford)? Also racist.

    Want another one? College admissions: admit blacks only to universities where they stand a chance of graduating? Bad. Admit blacks to very competitive, high-end universities where they are practically guaranteed to flunk out? Also bad.

    • Mike Conrad

      Impressive. I’m stealing this 😉

  • prunepit

    Are feminists and homosexuals, bisexuals, and the transgendered their “cousins” as well? Certainly the Democrats have allied them for political action.

  • prunepit

    Can’t they get all their “cousins” together to clean up Detroit?

  • Greg Thomas

    They do not even try to hide their hatred for Whites any longer. We need to return the sentiment.

  • libertarian1234

    She’s telling the other white haters that things will be different when they take over.
    Black ingratitude and abysmal hate runs wide and deep throughout the entire population.
    The only thing she doesn’t understand is that “people of color” dislike blacks more so than whites, and if she thinks they’re going to form a hate whitey alliance in perfect harmony she’s dumber than she looks.
    All anybody has to do is look at Africa, Haiti, and every black run city in the US to know black dreams of being overseers and managers are no more than delusions that come from the minds of these imbecilic-like children.
    But the BIG difference between blacks and children is that blacks are full of murderous hate and out-of-control violence that they inflict on everybody around them……which include “people of color.”
    She’d be better off preparing all her “people” for life in the slammer, because the “people of color” will be taking over their jobs, social freebies and AA will be non-existent, so nothing will be given to them anymore.
    God, she’s stupid.

  • JohnEngelman

    Orientals are not at war with white America. The worst thing an Oriental will do to you is get the job you applied for because he scored higher on the mental aptitude test.

    • Thor Bonham

      You’re an idiot ..

  • kjh64

    “Blacks should cooperate with Latinos, she said, adding “we all have skin in the game, literally.”

    Don’t make me laugh Bertha Lewis. There will be NO solidarity between Blacks and Latinos. Latinos do NOT like Blacks and neither do Asians. Blacks don’t like Latinos. All you Blacks will do by supporting “immigration reform” will be that you will make yourselves redundant because if America becomes a “majority minority” nation, the non-White Latino majority won’t give a damn about Blacks and will feel no “Latino guilt”.. America will be a 3rd world Latin America country and what little money that will be left in this dysfunctional mess will go to the Latinos. Blacks will find themselves about the “back of the bus” literally.

  • kjh64

    Now if we could get a strong woman to deal with “difficult men”. All these men who are allowing illegal immigration in order to have cheap labor and votes.

  • I was in county jails and federal prison in 2000-2003, and I saw it. In Denver County Jail, I got along well with almost everyone, but in federal prison, the Mexicans were heaps better than blacks. I just don’t want them here.

  • Thor Bonham

    WOW !! Does this make anyone one else reading this as pissed off as I am ?
    Can you imagine the outrage if everything they said, you put the words whites in it and had a room full of whites talking this way ? What are we to do when no one is will to stand up for us ? We really don’t have a “white” leader, do we ? Mr. Taylor can only do so much by himself ..

  • evilsandmich

    To be very mildly fair, non-white America (“America”) is doing a pretty good job of being at war with itself as well.

  • Zaporizhian Sich

    Yes, the frankness of these people should both frighten and enrage us. When Hitler came to power, he made no bones about what he was going to do, and neither did these genocidists. They mean what they say, they intend to kill us, all of us.

  • David Ashton

    International statesmanship has to “care about the Arab viewpoint”, if only because of the growing population of workless youth outside the oil-rich yet pro-fundamentalist areas.

    An Arab is no more comical than someone in a shtetl singing “If I were a rich man, dummy dummy dummy dum” or whatever.

    • JohnEngelman

      A Jew in a shtetl singing, “If I were a rich man,” is neither comical nor is he dangerous.

      • David Ashton

        Obviously the cinema audience got it wrong.

  • A Freespeechzone

    The hard reality is that Whites will ALWAYS have the monetary power and wealth–look at South Africa.

    Despite attempts to steal wealth from Whites—they still lose.

    No Apologies.