Philly Mayor Wants Mag Punished over Race Relations Story

Todd Starnes, Fox News, March 18, 2013

The Philadelphia Human Relations Commission has launched an investigation at the request of the mayor after a well-known magazine published an essay that explored perspectives of white citizens on the issue of race relations.

Mayor Michael Nutter called on the commission to consider rebuking both Philadelphia Magazine and writer Bob Huber noting that “the First Amendment, like other constitutional rights, is not an unfettered right.”

Nutter’s fury was directed at a cover story titled, “Being White in Philly.” The story included conversations with mostly anonymous residents who detailed race relations in the City of Brotherly Love.


And the mayor also had some choice words for the anonymous individuals who were interviewed–some of whom claimed to have been victims of crimes perpetrated by blacks. He said they were “too cowardly” to provide their names.


Tom McGrath, the magazine’s editor, told Fox News he is very concerned that the government is investigating his publication.

“I find it chilling that he now wants to use the government to censor a news outlet,” he said. “As a journalist – as someone who thinks free speech is really important–I find that really, really troubling.”

McGrath said he stands by the story and the author–and acknowledged it set off a firestorm.


McGrath said the mayor “seriously overreacted to the story” and “mischaracterized the piece and what it’s trying to do.”

“White people do not always feel comfortable talking about race,” he said. “There are some white folks who don’t feel their views on certain issues are welcome in the conversation.”

And critics believe–ironically–that the mayor’s reaction to the story validates that point.


Nutter wants the commission to consider whether the magazine’s essay was the “reckless equivalent of shouting ‘fire!’ in a crowded theater.”

“Only by debunking myth with fact, and by holding accountable those who seek to confuse the two, can we insure that the prejudices reflected in the essay are accorded the weight they deserve: none at all,” the mayor wrote.


McGrath did say he welcomed the mayor’s call for a city-wide discussion about race – but noted the announcement was rich with irony.

“I find it pretty bizarre,” he said. “At the same time he wants us rebuked, he’s saying we need to have a conversation about race in Philadelphia – which was our point in the first place.”

“His point seems to be that he’s allowed to talk about some of this stuff but that other people aren’t,” McGrath added.

[Editor’s Note: Mayor Nutter’s full letter can be found here. Below is the most troubling portion.

While I fully recognize that constitutional protections afforded the press are intended to protect the media from censorship by the government, the First Amendment, like other constitutional rights, is not an unfettered right, and notwithstanding the First Amendment, a publisher has a duty to the public to exercise its role in a responsible way. I ask the Commission to evaluate whether the “speech” employed in this essay is not the reckless equivalent of “shouting ‘fire!’ in a crowded theater,” its prejudiced, fact-challenged generalizations an incitement to extreme reaction.

The original “Being White in Philly” article is available here.]

Topics: , , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • The__Bobster

    The sacred cows were “offended” by the truth, so free speech shall henceforth be shut down for YT.

  • Bill

    Guess it’s only okay to state the facts of black behavior IF you are black. Nutter proves himself just another Niger.

  • 48224

    Punished for telling the truth about blacks….sounds about right. I never fail to be amazed by the pseudo intellectuals and how they believe that denying facts somehow makes them smarter than someone that embraces those same facts.

    “The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it.”-George Bernard Shaw. (How a socialist ever came up with that quote is beyond me!)

    • pcmustgo

      Check out . It’s a white yuppie run site here that used to censor off crime complaints, complaints about black racism from young gentrifiers, etc. It seems the readership there has got more right wing over time and candid. It used to be any conversation on race or crime would be dominated by uber-left wing types who would dismiss any complaints as based on “anecdotal” (you know, real life), and therefore somehow invalid or just pure random experiences . OR even worse, the “statistics can be manipulated” so statistics are totally invalid or based police racist conspiracies, etc. You know, the impossible-to-rationalize with crowd.

  • HadEnough

    “Only by debunking myth with fact… — Mayor Nutter (talk about an appropriate name).


    Okay, then, we’re waiting, Mayor. Hit us with some debunking, please.


  • robin

    double down nutter, that should work good……..
    keep those people under you thumb.

  • generalquagmyer

    Well-me-now. I’m searching around for something intelligent to say in the face of this, but have watched too many videos of flash mobs and blacks-behaving-badly to be anything but perplexed to speechlessness. Luckily, McGrath himself comes to my rescue:

    “I find it pretty bizarre,” he said. “At the same time he wants us rebuked, he’s saying we need to have a conversation about race in Philadelphia – which was our point in the first place.”

    “His point seems to be that he’s allowed to talk about some of this stuff but that other people aren’t,” McGrath added.

    • 48224

      When blacks say they “want a conversation about race” they really just want to talk about slavery, reparations and more affirmative action. The crime and violence that blacks bring to any community is a reality they rather not face.

      • The ‘conversation’ is about how much more Whites can give or pay them for past injustices–even though NOBODY alive today experienced slavery in the USA.

        Time to ‘shut them down’….the conversation about victimization and demands for perks is OVER!

        • ken

          It is time to tell them to fcuk off.

      • TheAntidote

        Oh, yeaaaaaah. When they say they want to have a conversation about race, what they’re saying is they want to play poker but hold all the cards.

  • Salarino

    The mayor’s email address is: [email protected]
    It’s on the Philadelphia city website
    Maybe he needs some feedback that isn’t verbatim the gospel of our national politburo.

    • you would get more results if you debated a door

      • Salarino

        Honestly, I can’t argue with you because you are right. But it helps blow off some steam and maybe that email will be the one that pushes his royal blackness over the edge and causes him to lose his cool in front of some reporters (wishful thinking). After all they aren’t exactly known for their self-restraint.

    • pcmustgo


    • pcmustgo

      hey, guys, if you write Nutter, please include stories of times you were victimized by blacks and experienced unwarranted racial hostility from them. Don’t forget to add in the stats on crime and out of wedlock births.

      • ncpride

        There are hundreds of posts on that Philly article of Whites who have told their stories of black racism and unprovoked attacks. I think it’s wonderful, if for no other reason than other Whites can see just how far and wide it really does go.

  • What do the white people of Philadelphia itself think about their mayor’s position?
    I am really interested in hearing the opinions of the brain dead white liberal under 25.

    • 48224

      Then you will have to go to another website. I doubt any folks on this board meet that criteria thank goodness!

    • I am really interested in hearing the opinions of the brain dead white liberal under 25.
      (Incomprehensible gibberish) “tolerance” (more incomprehensible gibberish) “it’s like, you know, diversity” (even more incomprehensible gibberish) “OMG Kim Kardashian’s yoga teacher is naked LOL~!”

  • SargeInCharge

    “critics believe–ironically–that the mayor’s reaction to the story validates that point.”

    Most blacks don’t have enough intelligence, self-awareness, and honesty to get the obvious point those critics are making. Just like most blacks don’t have enough intelligence, self-awareness and honesty to understand that people aren’t “racist” against them just because the color of their skin.

    • JackKrak

      Urban Americans don’t do irony.

    • pcmustgo

      Most white liberals don’t either.

    • purestocles

      Nine years I spent in close proximity to Blacks in integrated grade and high schools. I can personally testify to the truth of your statement about black’s intelligence and self-awareness. They (with a few exceptions) simply had nothing to add to class discussions because they just flat out can’t reason well and in fact reason so poorly that they have no awareness of just how poorly they do reason. It’s a closed feedback loop that is given a boost by guilt-plagued, feather-brained white liberals. I don’t think that most of them mean to be dishonest. They’re just very limited and unfortunately, whites who provide excuses for their behavior are harming them in the long run.

      • sbuffalonative
      • tickyul

        I have had the horrific experience of living and working around Urban Americans for a large portion of my life. I try not to write-off a whole race of people as hopeless…..but it is really, really hard when it comes to Urban Americans. I do not hate them…..but I truly dislike and distrust just about all of them.
        The Urban American “problem” is one of the big reasons this country is on a horrible downward spiral.

        • Melanie

          I despise all of them. Even the “good” ones would never agree to allow whites freedom of association/disassociation, they are the very ones who when they get a little education/make a little money/get a government job, follow whites out to the “white flight” suburbs, thereby opening the door for their thug family and friends to follow. Not to mention the factor of “regression to the mean”, which means that black males from families of higher SES still have lower school scores, higher drop-out rates, and higher rates of crime than white males from families of poorer SES. As they say, you can’t base social policy on the exceptions to the rule.

          • BonusGift

            Bingo; and thank you, the truth is finally uttered with little or no hand wringing.
            Few want to face the physical reality of regression to the mean. It is a fact that even the children of the “talented tenth” (which is far less than 10% and declining) will regress toward the vicious nine tenth (which is really closer to the 95% + that voted for Barry Soetoro and increasing). White societies only spin off so many resources to be wasted chasing the mythological “magic black” (or, for that matter, “hispanic” or whatever “model minority” of the moment), especially when that is done at the expense of our sons’ and daughters’ and their future. It is not a sin to be ignorant, but to know the truth and yet do that which hurts your children anyway, is morally repugnant and sinful in the extreme.

          • westie

            Yep, even the black pet of the blogs, Zo @zonation turns out to be just a black racist!

          • Melanie

            Never heard of it. If whites weren’t mostly indoctrinated, they’d know that all blacks are racists, just as are all other races-except the most successful race in history, whites. We went past peak civilisation and have over-civilised ourselves into suicide.

      • Melanie

        I have to slightly disagree. I think that they are perfectly aware of their ethical shortcomings, but have never seen, speaking on the evolutionary scale, a reason to be otherwise. They operate by the “law of the jungle” as opposed to the white system which evolved as the “social contract” in various forms.

    • sbuffalonative

      They act like stereotypes and they wonder why people see them as stereotypes. Go figure.

  • I read the original article and the author could have easily found people with far more damaging anecdotes, it really looks like he showed restraint and even went out of the way to include a positive account from a white guilt liberal, “Jen”. Hopefully another journalist will follow up with an article that “keep sit real”, unowutimsayen?

    • Glickstein44

      That’s my observation also…just imagine how these trousered apes would have reacted if the Philly mag had served up moderate or regular truth rather than truth-lite.


    The Mayor is bordering on treason.


    Nutter is nuts!

  • guest

    “Only by debunking myth with fact, and by holding accountable those who seek to confuse the two, can we insure that the prejudices reflected in the essay are accorded the weight they deserve: none at all,” the mayor wrote.”

    That’s the problem with people like this mayor. They really don’t want to know the facts. People like him can’t handle the truth of racial reality and will demand punishment to those who have the courage to speak the truth of it.

  • pcmustgo

    Nutter exhibits Black Rage.

    What’s interesting is most blacks in online chat forums or just in general are pretty aware that large portions of blacks are ghetto, have more problems than whites, are more combatitive, even with each other than whites, etc.

    Nutter seems to be acting like this airing of black ghetto dirty laundry is some secret… it’s not.

    Seems middle class blacks are maybe the most in denial because they feel their middle class black identity is threatened by this or want to pretend most blacks are like them, etc.

  • Tom Iron

    Interesting how blacks can’t take anything. That’s the way they’ve always been. Just not up to anything. I can’t believe people can’t see this. Blacks aren’t even second rate human material. Maybe third rate at best.

    • robin

      blacks use their worse points to cry for sympathy from whoever will listen.
      white liberals listen.
      then blacks try to get a foothold in white society, then they use that foothold to pry further and further.

      As many of can now see, blacks strive to take it over and then they will oust us and pay us back for our weakness with a vengeance and ferocity most whites can’t imagine.
      think knoxville horror or wichita massacre………..

  • Tim

    “too cowardly to provide their names”… I used to post my legal name on here figuring it did two things. Left me immune to charges of being a “coward” and showed people I stood behind what I said. Then one night I got a call from what my Spidey -sense realized were some kind of College of Gen-X activists, trying in the words of the guy in the background on the phone, “to keep him on the line till we figure out who this is…” When I told my disinterested best friend about it he said, ” You don`t have an electronic trail, you have an oil slick!!”…

  • Michael_C_Scott

    Does Nutter understand that the US First Amendment applies even in Philadelphia?

    That’s a rhetorical question; of course he doesn’t.

  • Robert Binion

    There’s a mayor in Philly named Nutter

    Whose heart the truth makes flutter.

    Though he rants from above

    In the City of Love,

    His politics are straight from the gutter.

    • Anders

      I haven’t heard a limerick for ages, very good Mr Binton!

      • Robert Binion

        And they will march. And we shall . . . dance!

    • brengunn

      And this Mayor in Philly named Nutter

      Called out with nary a stutter,

      That racists be bad

      And he’d only be glad

      When the truth, white folks could not utter.

      • jane johnson

        In the interests of human relations,
        Mayor Nutjob wants investigations
        To find out if Whites
        Are within their rights
        Or are trying to start conflagrations

        • Andy

          Third-world thought and reaction
          Will generally be determined by faction:
          The system of “rights”
          Was invented for whites;
          Blacks do not not do well with abstraction.

          • jane johnson

            Sweet! I love limericks for getting points across in a creative way.

          • yawhdwwn

            Blacks say we are full of hate
            Many of them, so irate.
            They riot and pout,
            but can’t dish it out;
            Their impulsiveness is their fate.

    • CMLiu

      Article was polite, and 100% correct.

      It’s not just whites either. Any race that’s not black is censored from saying anything about black people. They are the ultimate untouchable victim.

      No matter how reasonable or how truthful you are, all they need to do is yell RACISM and flocks of liberal sympathizers come to defend anything they do.

      • SargeInCharge

        You are correct, Mr. Liu. As I’m guessing you have noticed, Asians appear to be blacks second favorite victim when it comes to mob attacks and The Knockout Game. And Marion Barry went on tirade last year about Asians opening businesses in DC’s black neighborhoods and stealing black jobs.

    • Unperson

      Philly Mayor wants mag punished for story

      ‘Cause it didn’t give blacks praise and glory

      “To spread urban blight

      Is our unfettered right!”

      One can see how this all might turn gory.

  • Unperson

    Nutter wants the commission to consider whether the magazine’s essay was the “reckless equivalent of shouting ‘fire!’ in a crowded theater.”

    Da Mayor seems to fear his fellow blacks are a bunch of pyromaniacs. He could be right.

    • zimriel

      And the whites, seeing that, rush for the exits . . .

  • Nutter and others of his ilk are the ‘Sons of Obamanation’

    These Liberal/Leftists have created a hypocritical racist society where blacks are allowed to be as openly hateful and racist against whites as they want to be. The Obama DOJ is committed to protecting that racist hypocrisy. Whites who don’t like it, and who refuse to pretend not to notice, are expected to sit down and shut up. Those who don’t, are called “racists” and will be “investigated”. ‘1984’ is now.

    This has happened because for the last 50 years the Liberal MSM and Politically Correct Politicians has given a certain demographic complete and unconditional immunity from responsibility for their actions, no matter how detrimental to themselves, to others, to us, our neighbourhoods, our cities, or the country as a whole. While in a fawning Liberal Hollywood they are intentionally sanitized and glorified beyond recognition; be it in movies, TV sitcoms, or commercials.

    The outrage over the article is a simple case of Victimists which include City Officials, and the left-wing MSM trying to make and keep discussions of black on white violent crime off limits. Because their agenda is based on an unspoken rule of the Left and their mass media, in which ‘Officially Certified Victims’ must not be shown to have victims of their own. To do so would erode their Victim status in the eyes of the general white population (where most of the money comes from to fund their many self-interest, race based entitlement programs). It would lesson the ‘white guilt’ they have used to get whites to accept being openly discriminated against, as in Affirmative Action. A Black Victim-hood and White Guilt-complex, black and white Liberal Democrats and their MSM, have worked hard to establish, control, exploit, and profit from for the last 50 years. They got us where they want us, and they don’t want to lose that grip.

    The reason is explained in this quote from Prof. William J. Bennetta of the Text Book League: “Sanitization is an indispensable part of this endeavour, because certified Victims must always be depicted as innocent, righteous paragons of humanity. The sanitization process consists largely of hiding or denying any facts which show that the Victims had victims of their own, whom they slaughtered, displaced, subjugated, enslaved or exploited.”

    They know that they have to do everything in their power to maintain the media induced shroud of silence that has kept the white masses ignorant of the ever increasing abuse at their hands. Because God help them when we wake up.

    • 1gravity

      Affirmative Action is a hate crime.

  • thurlow

    Like yelling KFC’s here in a crowded NAACP convention.


      Better, yell out WHITE WOMAN at a NAACP convention and watch what happens…..

      • Extropico

        I hear if you’re a white woman at CPAC, the same thing will happen.

        • OBSERVER

          Yell out “No more Food Stamps” in a Wal-Mart and watch what happens.

          Yell out “La Migra” in a Wal-mart and watch what happens.

          • Glickstein44

            hehehe….or yell out ,”Obama is giving out 3000 dollar checks” in a crowded Detroit and see what happens…oh,we already saw what happened!!

          • Luis

            Yell out, “He’s got a gun” at a Bantu expo.

    • Defoe

      Very humorous. I laughed out loud.

  • sbuffalonative

    They act like stereotypes and they wonder why people see them as stereotypes.

    • Melanie

      I don’t think they really wonder, they just know that they can call out the PC police if anyone dares to notice that the emperor has no clothes. They know what they are, that’s why they follow whites like a tick on a dog as soon as they get enough money or a section 8 voucher. What they don’t understand is that they can’t escape themselves. And chasing whites around the map just brings their dysfunction with them.

      • Defoe

        I think they “chase” Whites around as a form of harassment of Whites. They know the vast majority of Whites don’t like them; even the so-called liberal Whites in candid moments will tell the truth about blacks. And blacks know this.


    So, this African says: “…………. its prejudiced, fact-challenged generalizations an incitement to extreme reaction.”

    Well, notice, it is HIS comment above that is extreme. He is taking a pretty mild discourse about how blacks and Whites do NOT get along (duh, we all know that) and then he inflames the situation by calling it extreme. Sounds like he wants incitement and extreme reaction to a very luke warm article.

    I am so sick of Black people. Why, or why,do they demand to live with us. Why don’t they go away? They say we Whites are racists (we are) and are the cause of all their problems (lets’ say we are) but they demand to live with us? What a retarded race, and I mean no insult to retarded people.

    • zimriel

      Orwell, “Shooting an Elephant”. As long as we live among them, we are responsible for them.

      Shrug, Atlas!

      • QuinnTheEskimo9

        Try this: CTRL-GALT-DELETE

    • Conrad

      They’re not really all that retarded. They have white people on the run and they know it.

      • sbuffalonative

        Yes. Drive out the last white people and then bitch and moan about white flight.

        • bubo

          They really do think that way. They don’t do anything out of the ordinary to drive whites away. Whites just don’t put up with the sort of environment blacks create. Crime is just something that happens in black neighborhoods and in my experience blacks are completely ambivalent about it. They really don’t understand why whites leave, besides “raciss.”

          • sbuffalonative

            Very true. Blacks accept high crime rates because they see it as normal (and it is in their neighborhoods). Whites see low crime rates and personal responsibility as normal. The two cannot exist in the same space.
            The defensive argument I hear all the times from blacks where I live is that white crime rates are as high (or higher) than black crime rates but the white police officers in white communities work to keep things quiet. Instead of arresting white criminals (particularly white teens) white cops simply drop the kids off at their parents house and don’t report the crimes.
            I know in my community that kids get caught drinking in the park after dark and the police confiscate the beer and disperse the kids. Never happened to me (because I was a good kid) but many adults talk and laugh about it.
            But underage drinking is not openly dealing drugs on street corners. These white teens aren’t stabbing each other or shooting each other for revenge. There are no flash mobs and no drive-by shootings. There are no reports of rapes or murders. Any of these real crimes would be difficult for the police to cover-up even with political connections. Considering the number of blacks and Hispanics on the police force, it would seem highly unlikely that white police officers could get away with covering up violent crime.
            Blacks use this argument all the time to dismiss high rates of crime in their communities.

          • Melanie

            Just remember the Duke lacrosse “rape” case. Hush up white crime? Heck, whites get repeated frontpage coverage from the New York Slimes when they haven’t committed a crime? Tawana Brawley and the trumped-up “rape”? Sharpton instigated riots which led to murder over a rape which never happened? Yes, white crime gets “swept under the rug”, my azz.

            If they’re going to falsely accuse whites of crime, they could at least use some sense and choose a crime which whites commonly commit, and white-on-black rape is not one of them. The white-on-black rape rate is so low that it’s statistically non-existant.

          • robin

            in fact it is racist. that’s the problem.

            racism is realism. you have to deny realism to be a liberal.

      • QuinnTheEskimo9

        Yes, blacks really ARE all that retarded. They do not have white people on the run; those who control them do. Blacks are nothing more than useful idiots, kept complacent with EBT cards, booze, free housing and, best of all, their dream-come-true fantasy of assaulting, robbing and killing whitey with impunity.

        They have been unleashed on whites like a plague of locusts. WE are the target of a genocide, blacks are merely one of the tools being used to destroy us. There will be a day of reckoning at some point, when we whites are cornered with NO PLACE to go. We must keep our sights on WHO is doing this to us, and it is not blacks.

        • The Verdict of History

          We’ll just call them the Frankfurts… for now.

          • BonusGift

            The creators of Marxism and now cultural Marxism seem quite proud of their record of imprisoning and killing white Christians (e.g., their famine-genocide work during the 1930s in the Ukraine alone is horrific in the extreme), but I expect that the economic deterioration they have also enabled will ironically bring us closer to a day of reckoning.

          • MBlanc46

            Marx died in 1883. He clearly had no pride in anything that happened in the 1930s. If you have any reasonable definition of “cultural Marxism” it might be possible to determine whether its creator experienced any such pride.

          • Defoe

            How about weiners? Hot dignity dawg!

        • BonusGift

          You are right on target; they lack the capacity to be anything more than useful idiots.

      • Melanie

        No, they don’t have whites “on the run”. They know that for now, they have the protection of a jackbooted government holding law-abiding whites back. That’s why whites can create civilised areas in which to live-because we understand the concept of the “social contract”. We also understand that negroes aren’t living up to their part of the bargain, and so does our government. Some whites have come to understand that negros are not capable of living up to the social contract, they don’t even understand the concept. They only understand “the law of the jungle”. And those whites are fed up with it. But these whites, yet being responsible citizens, many with families, still have too much to lose to recognise that there no longer exists any “social contract” with negros. However, the government is working on that-on getting whites to the point where we have nothing to lose anymore. We already don’t have a fair and equal opportunity at jobs or school. We are losing our equal protection under the law, even for our lives, much less basic rights like that of freedom of association. This mayor has only spoken what many in government are thinking-to curtail our freedom of speech, what remnant of it we have left. Draconian gun laws are being passed in the very places where whites are most in danger from negro criminals. We are getting very close to the point of having nothing to lose by not holding up our end of this lop-sided social contract, when we’re doing all the carrying and still footing the bill.

        • BonusGift

          You are right, and very well put.

    • rightrightright

      Is this a threat? Experience shows that “extreme reaction” comes from blacks.

  • David Ashton

    Shouting Fire in a crowded theater is very bad. Setting fire to a crowded city is far worse.

    • rightrightright

      To spot a fire in a crowded theatre and refrain from shouting “fire” is very bad and potentially criminal.

  • Bobbala

    Can you shout fire when the building is on fire?

    • Dat’s racist!

      • Room101

        Beat me to it!

    • Glickstein44

      Quite frankly, if i was in a crowded theater full of blacks and there was a fire i would not shout fire but would quietly head for the exit.

      • JohnEngelman

        I literally laughed out loud at this.

    • Michael_C_Scott

      Fire is a social construct.

    • 1gravity

      It is not permitted to shout “Theater” at a crowded fire. Just ask Mayor Nutley.

  • Conrad

    I am sure that this chocolate mayor and his chocolate brethren in Philadelphia cheered while watching Django?! Maybe the Philadelphia Human Relations Commission could investigate that.

    • Glickstein44

      Bravo! Good point!!

  • Gerónimo Anónimo

    Michael, Michael , Michael!!! What’s wrong with you? I thought that you were going to be different from Willie B. Good, the Street brothers and let’s go back as far as Cecil B. Moore.

    Your invoking of the “Yelling “fire” in a crowded theatre” is in no way comparable to what the article stresses. A guy who yells fire in a crowded theatre when there IS a fire is a hero. One who does it when there is NO fire is a criminal; as would be the arsonist who set the fire in a real situation because the former could also cause a panic that could cause major death and injury.
    What are you doing with this response to the article? Truth is painful; especially when it points to YOUR people.How many Blacks have been killed by Whites in Philadelphia? How many White men have raped Black women? How many home invasions were done against Blacks by Whites. A nice family guy like you should have been a role model for the Black community so now it appears that you want to “kill the messenger” in order to ingratiate yourself with the “Black community”..

    Michael wake up! To them you’re just another Uncle Tom.
    Go and research Emile Zola’s quote about the consequences of hiding the truth.
    Someone has obviously “gotten to you”.

  • Room101

    Since ALL the problems affecting the government’s precious non-White and Diverse citizens are the fault of the “privileged” non-Diverse, i.e. White taxpayers, the Left is in an uproar that those footing the bill and taking all the blame should be allowed to express any opinion whatsoever.
    Once Government creates a society according to their cherished design where it’s impossible for any human life to survive at all without their permission and sufferance, they’ll stamp their boot on the face of YT forever, but allow us to dig our own graves on breaks.

    The only opinions about anything racial should come only from White people, since we’re allegedly the cause of and responsible for fixing all the problems of every Diverse non-White person the government owns.

  • Lygeia

    All this will do is cause the meme to go viral. Now, more white people will hear of this story.

    • Room101

      If White people, AKA (“privileged”-Racists) want to avoid attention, scrutiny, and inevitable unpleasantness, they won’t talk about it if they know what’s good for them.

      Almost every fellow White person I know, of all ages, realizes that they are suspected of “racism” and presumed to be “privileged” based on the color of their White skin by various accusers, juiced-into their Government taxpayer funded scams in some way shape or form.

      • Michael_C_Scott

        Perhaps, but I won’t work a steady job, and my house is paid for. My mother and most of my older friends are retired and also own their homes outright. There really isn’t anything the Politically Correct can do to punish us for speaking our minds, for the simple reason that our lifestyles provide them with no leverage against us.

        Freeing yourself from their psychological and political coercion is relatively easy; you just have to make up your mind to be satisfied with fewer unnecessary baubles and trinkets in life.

  • Luca

    The opinions of white people expressing their experiences and feelings clearly violates the 1st Amendment any Affirmative Action first year law student or Community Organizer knows that. Only black people have feelings which are constantly hurt by slavery, racism and discrimination and their feelings can only be soothed with money, lots and lots of money.

    • Melanie

      Any remaining whites in majority-black or black-run cities need to just move. Just bite the bullet and move. Take their assets with them, including their piece of the tax base. It should be clear by now that blacks would exterminate whites in a heartbeat if it weren’t for the money they extort from us. They don’t like whites, hate whites-well, whatever. We can leave and create thriving communities elsewhere, and let them run their fiefdoms on what they can manage to squeeze out of the very few producers who may be left amongst them. Whites need to stop playing host to the parasites, even if it means minimising our lifestyles. This is a principle of freedom worth sacrificing for.

      • No. I live in Philadelphia. As far as I’m concerned, the blacks can leave. I don’t care how many there are. A mass exodus can be engineered. Don’t be so willing to give up prime real estate. If you do, then after a while, there won’t be anywhere viable left to go.

        • Melanie

          The negros aren’t going to leave. They have to live in population centers-cities-where government services are located, because that’s how they survive. It’s bad enough that the government gives them vouchers to move into the white flight suburbs, where whites fled to create, again, safe and secure communities with viable schools. Why spread the cancer-negroes-by spreading them further into the heartland? They need to stay concentrated in pockets where someone-at least another negro-can somewhat control them. It only takes about 15% concentration of blacks to start the destruction of a given area. They’re app 13% of the population-there’s only so many of them to go around, but it doesn’t take many to begin the downward spiral. So let them remain concentrated near their necessary “gibme” centers, while whites take our assets, tax dollars, and intellectual capital elsewhere. Why stay and contribute to their well-being, such as it is, while at the same time being treated as a cash cow and a second-class citizen as a white in a majority-black city? It’s certainly plain that whites don’t receive equal protection under the law for their tax dollars. Let the negros live in the mess they made, and let them pay for it, if they can.

  • ViktorNN

    We’re now learning something else about “Being White in Philly” – keep your mouth shut, or else the blacks in power will make your life hell.

    I shudder to think what would have happened to the white people interviewed in the article if they did have their names published.

  • gemjunior

    The first amendment was supposed to be an unfettered right, as I understood it. But it’s been bastardized, like everything else that libs and blacks don’t like. It was fine for whites when they were their own masters but of course they can’t compete and have to have ALL standards lowered.

    • MBlanc46

      “Speech” consists of a variety of categories. The founders intended political speech to be inviolate. The courts have generally extended the notion to other forms of expression (e.g., pornography). But not all speech acts are expression. Threats, for example, or slander.

      • Michael_C_Scott

        Do you mean Mayor Nutter’s implicit threat that blacks will riot if they don’t get their way in this case?

  • Fair Dingum

    Bottom Line: If you’re white, just shut up and do as you’re told.

    • IstvanIN

      Too bad the author didn’t think to say that to His Honor! Bravo!

    • Melanie

      They can want in one hand and sh*t in the other, and see which one gets full. I answer to no negro.

  • Ralph

    I care what Blacks think just about as much as I care what a cow thinks.

    Blacks are not my kind. They have their own destiny. I believe in non-interference with non-Whites. Let them kill themselves, let them abort their babies, let them starve–it just doesn’t matter to me. I take the StarTrek approach of not butting into alien civilizations.

    • “I take the StarTrek approach of not butting into alien civilizations.”

      And yet they often violated the Prime Directive. The Wikipedia article on the Prime Directive includes a section citing various violations.

      • a multiracial individual

        Star Trek was perhaps the first multicultural show. In the Star Trek universe, race among humans does not exist. Consider the bridge of the Enterprise: A White guy from Iowa, a Black woman, a Russian (during the Cold War no less), an Asian, a Scottsman, etc.

        Star Trek is the ultimate, communist utopia. The best part is humans do not have any money. Everyone works to better themselves, and the rest f society. Isn’t that nice? Star Trek has an elite (and very liberal) following.

        • Michael_C_Scott

          In the Star Drek universe, emotionally unstable people are promoted to command officer ranks in heavily-armed starships.

          The Star Drek universe is chock-full of alien races that are so closely related as to be interfertile (Spock was half-human and half Vulcan, while Saavik was half Vulcan and half Romulan) but somehow have avoided accidentally annihilating each other with alien diseases to which they have no respective resistance (an examination of what imported diseases did to Polynesians, Amerinds, Inuits and Australian Aborigines would provide a more realistic likely outcome).

          On a related note, in the Star Drek universe, nobody ever runs into anything like the creatures from “Alien” or the Necromongers from “The Chronicles of Riddick”.

          In the Star Drek universe, it is possible to use an energy weapon to completely vaporize someone at short range without being blown to pieces one’s self by the blast effects of the expanding gases from the target. Likewise, it is possible to disassemble someone into energy and beam them down to land on a planet, reassembling them alive and well there, but it is impossible to disassemble an inanimate object into energy and then use that energy beam as a weapon by not bothering to reassemble the object. Since e=mc2, one gets about 991 million electron volts per atomic mass unit so converted: quite a lot of energy! Who needs photon torpedoes when you have a transporter?

          • Defoe

            It’s a tv show.

  • Barrack Osama

    How can we destroy their lives if we don’t know who they are? Anonymous cowards!

  • Unperson

    Mayor Michael Nutter [noted] that “the First Amendment, like other constitutional rights, is not an unfettered right.”

    I’m no constitutional expert, but I’m still pretty sure the whole point of the 1st Amendment is that Free Speech IS an unfettered right. Speech that is subject to being “fettered” by the authorities for political reasons wouldn’t be FREE, now would it? It would be, by definition, at least partly UN-free.

    But then Mayor Nutzoid, like most blacks, isn’t nearly as interested in FREE speech as he is in pro-black speech. For them, it’s all about what the speech in question has to say about black people. That is their sole (soul?) criterion for whether something is sayable or not.

    • First Amendment and free speech issues are one of the few issues where members of the Federal judiciary are almost always either unanimous or near-unanimous in their decisions.

      • MBlanc46

        And they’re the sort of issues that those who aren’t race realists can understand. This is a good issue around which to mobilize opinion.

  • PBL

    Why does Mayor Nutter (how apt) compare the piece to yelling “fire” in a theater. The article also yells “assault”, “robbery”, “theft’ and “burglary”.

    • BonusGift

      Any time a cultural Marxist useful idiot brings out the yelling fire canard he or she is telling you that they don’t respect the First Amendment and, in his case, he wants to muzzle your right to say anything other than what they want you to say, and especially they are not interested in the truth.

  • Lorin

    I have been in situations where people strongly disagreed with me about certain subjects and found the following statement rather effective: Make me a liar, prove me wrong or show me absolutely the error of my thinking and I will be grateful for the education”.
    I cannot think of a single time when someone actually took the challenge.

  • NYB

    Yelling ‘fire’ in a crowded theater is frowned upon because it could cause panic. The mayor knows what panic looks like, because he’s had black mobs rampaging down South Street every summer for the past few years.

    Mayor Nutter has been criticized of late for calling out blacks on their behavior, a move that made him somewhat more popular with whites.

    With this article, the mayor has found a convenient white whipping boy to prove he’s still a defender of blacks.

  • Shattered

    Bully mayor, bully government. Give up your 2nd amendment and the 1st and the 4th will quickly follow.

    • Alexandra

      The 4th is already gone, I’m afraid…we have the Pa–TREASON Act…and another example is DUI checkpoints, and of course everyone gets harassed when they want to get on a plane. When you suspect everyone, everyone is a suspect.

      • MBlanc46

        Indeed. And surveillance cameras everywhere. The police state is settling over the Western world like a soporific cloud. It extends its tentacles everywhere, but people are oblivious.

  • IstvanIN

    The article was far too mild and timid for my tastes and yet the mayor is offended. Had the article been brutally honest what would he have done?

    • Bad_Mr_Frosty

      Pulled a Dorner?

  • MBlanc46

    It does appear that Mr. McGrath is starting to stand up for himself. I hope that he continues to do so and draws large-scale attention to this controversy. This is really a chance to call the politically correct on their demands for an “honest conversation on race”. Forcing a climb down by Nutter would be a welcome victory. I trust that the ACLU will lend their assistance in the defense of free expression.

    • Melanie

      The next time one of the sh*t-stirring negros demands for there to be more “diversity” on the Philly Magazine, the editors etc should ask how many whites are employed at Ebony etc.

      • MBlanc46

        Good point.

  • Dave4088

    It looks like nut job Nutter just can’t move on. You would think someone ripped the bone right out of his nose with the way he’s been acting since that story broke. As with all leftists and blacks in general, anyone who expresses an opinion on race that offends them is somehow exceeding the limits of the first amendment.

    The real story of black-white race relations isn’t a pretty one contrary to what lamestream and hard left media outlets would have you believe.

    • Beetlejuice

      Well if the media — and this site — would stop giving him so much attention maybe he would stop acting “the fool” in front of the cameras. His act was tired yesterday and he’ll continue it as long as he has the national spotlight.

      • rebellisMMXII

        In a sane world you are correct but the Nutter coverage is helpful in a sick way.

      • BonusGift

        No, he does it only if he gets positive feedback, not negative; and he is not getting positive feedback here.

        • Beetlejuice

          Nutter is like a two year old having a tantrum. Any attention is better than none.

          Reality is, he IS getting positive feedback. See AR article “Philadelphia Magazine Story Discussed with Philadelphia Association of Black Journalists.”

          McGrath is already backing down. After screams from blacks about “diversity”: “McGrath said more diversity on the editorial staff, which is all-white, ‘would bring a richer experience to the magazine.'” Blacks called McGrath and Heber (surprise, surprise) “racists” and have threatened the magazine with a boycott. No matter how polite Huber and McGrath answered any questions, “the audience was not satisfied.” I expect there WILL be a boycott and the two will be looking for a job soon.

          And that is a win for Nutter.

          • BonusGift

            That is my point, He gets positive feedback so he does it. I very strongly doubt he reads AmRen. The day he doesn’t get rewarded for his behavior is the day it stops. We don’t improve things by ignoring them or not commenting on them.

          • Melanie

            If he really had any guts he would have asked to check the “diversity” stats of, say, Ebony magazine before making any commitments about “diversifying”.

    • Melanie

      “isn’t a pretty one”-boy is that the understatement of the year. The brutal murder of Bailey O’Neil is already swept under the rug. The killer’s father showed no shame or remorse for what his thug, waste of oxygen spawn did. No white equivalent of the NBP got in front of media cameras calling for the thug’s lynching, much less that of black babies, even though this was a clear-cut case of a racially-motivated brutality.

      No matter, the stories are still getting out-the thugs themselves upload videos of ther crimes on sites like WSHH pr whatever it’s called-and the very fact that the media is being so blatant in trying to suppress the truth is making people ask questions.

  • KittyAmerica

    Good to hear McGrath is standing behind the author; he’s more of a stand-up guy than little Rich Lowry .

    • Glickstein44

      Or William Buckley of National Review who fired Derbyshire comes to mind…

      • Beetlejuice

        William Buckley died in 2008. Derbyshire was fired by Rich Lowry in 2012.

        • Glickstein44

          Thanks for the correction…me bad;)

        • BonusGift

          Do you really think, if alive in 2012 he wouldn’t have drummed him out?

          • Beetlejuice

            Like he drummed out Peter Brimelow in 1998 and John O’Sullivan in 1997.

        • JohnEngelman

          In days of old, when conservatives were bold William Buckley had the courage to tell the truth about blacks, and to do so with his characteristic wit. When asked when he thought African blacks would be ready for self rule he said, “When they stop eating each other.”

          Now that they have self rule cannibalism among them has increased.

  • Sort of like shouting ‘Nutter’ in a crowded asylum.

  • Notice that the First Amendment is ONLY supported by anti-White racists like the Phila mayor and blacks?

    Time to tell them to ‘kiss off’ and for more journalists to start telling the truth—instead of the PC BS published in the mainstream media….

    The truth will set us ALL free…..

  • Exiled White

    Blacks can’t handle the truth, and there will be a lot more where that came from, whites are ready to start talking!!!

  • Rational Being

    Like many others of his race, this Mayor is apparently incapable of deference to rules that apply to others in society. The alternative is that he is unwilling to defer to such rules. The end result is chaos. The typical black prefers, instead, “situational ethics” that inevitably support his own position, or his own race, which seem to overrule any other interest. I have found that with blacks, the inability or unwillingness to recognize the importance of abstractions such as the need to follow laws or other societal rules is startlingly consistent. Their mindset is tied to the present, and to their own short-term interest. Nothing else is as important. This is not a cultural aspect as much as it is a genetic one, since it is consistently seen in all black-dominated societies across the globe. Thus, even while in a position of power, a black would be predisposed to disregard any rule that disfavors his interest or that of his tribe. While individual blacks may be smarter than others, there should be little doubt from the prevalence of violations of rules by many members of their race, leading to criminality or personal dysfunction or failure, that the main cause of this monumental defect is genetic.

    • Blacks have a very high time preference, as evidenced by their extremely high incarceration rate in white countries and their subsistent living conditions in their own countries. White America’s self-flagellating racial guilt and its generous welfare programs have combined to enable blacks to act out their worst behaviors without fear of much recrimination from Whites. It seems to me that blacks in America live like violent, promiscuous, irresponsible children who think that Whites will always clean up their messes and take care of them when they screw up, using the race card as a last (or first) resort to try and get the exculpatory response they have come to expect.

  • rebellisMMXII

    “He said they were “too cowardly” to provide their names.” The folks that were interviewed better standby…the ensuing punishments/lawsuits will expose them to more crime and violence. The names are going to be brought forward eventually.

  • George

    The ‘most troubling portion’ in Mayor Nutter’s letter is, if you readers will kindly allow me to mix metaphors, a double-edged Sword of Damocles. In other words, it cuts both ways.

    Is Nutter advocating that any writings or new article that incites racial disharmony and that might provoke violence should be banned? That the authors & publishers should be punished with the full force of the law? That the First Amendment is a mere inconvenience? It seems that this is clearly the case.

    Now, which racial grouping has entire ‘academic’ departments in colleges and universities across the nation, where people are publishing ‘research’ and polemics that incite racial hatred? These same departments have instructors who lecture their classes and further fan the flames of racial hatred.

    Will he be surprised that, when Thoughtcrime is a felony, blacks will have another crime category in which they are disproportionately over-represented?

    • BonusGift

      I believe Orwell’s point about things like thoughtcrime and newspeak was to show that our overlords were quite capable of being hypocrites and absurdly creating words and crimes that made little or no sense yet they could condition people to accept the contradictions as normal. I think it best not go there and just simply rely on logic and the rule of law in the first place.

  • tacheles

    […incitement to extreme reaction]
    So the nutball is worried that whitey will say enough is enough.

  • Luis

    Whenever anyone criticized Detroit’s high crime rate or poverty, Coleman Young would foam at the mouth and cry “racist”. Richard Hatcher did the same thing whenever anyone mentioned the high crime rate in Gary IN.

    Why should Nutter be any different?

  • humura

    Philadelphia, a city that has had Black racist flash mobs destroying property and attacking white people. This is also the city where during the 2008 election members of the New Black Panther Party were dressed in uniforms, carrying batons, and intimidating voters (and Obama’s Dept. of Justice dropped the suit against the NBPP). One of those involved was an elected Democrat, whose home had a sign that it whites were not welcome. The other NBPP character had been video taped calling for the killing of white men, white women, and white babies. Perhaps, that is the kind of racial discourse Mayor Nutter approves.
    Like Pres. Clinton and his Dialog on Race – that is the last thing liberals want. They want to insult whites, blame whites, promote white guilt (like the govt.’s VISTA volunteers who were supposed to wear “white privilege” bracelets!
    Philadelphia is moving closer to Detroit. The magazine presented reasons for the troubles – but liberals Democrats do not want to hear. They do not believe in dialog on race. They do not believe in free speech or the Constitution. They believe in taxing and graft, pro-crime policies, higher pay for teachers in schools where few learn, and what they learn may well be propaganda.
    One hopes more people will buy the magazine now.

  • “Only by debunking myth with fact”
    gee, I thought that was the intention of the original article

  • bubo

    I’ve got some myth that I’d like to debunk. The myth is that blacks “built America.” In reality they hauled bricks and picked cotton.

    • yeah, some people mistake the mule for the farmer

  • JohnEngelman

    And the mayor also had some choice words for the anonymous individuals who were interviewed–some of whom claimed to have been victims of crimes perpetrated by blacks. He said they were “too cowardly” to provide their names.

    – Todd Starnes, Fox News, March 18, 2013

    That’s probably because they were afraid telling the truth would cause them to get fired from their jobs.

    • this comment also implies that the stories had to be made up because blacks never commit crimes against whites

  • Brady

    You can shout “fire” in a crowded theater – if the theater really is on fire. In fact, you’d better.

  • rightrightright

    Blacks are allowed to say such things. Whites are not. Back in 2010, Rod Liddell, a respected journalist and frequent TV commentator/guest, got blasted out of the water for making similar remarks. He was told by our marxoid masters “the truth is no defence”. Absolutely! Let’s all carry on playing the jolly game of Let’s Pretend.

    I apologise for inflicting a further picture of the anti-White gargoyle, Diane Abbott upon your eyes.

  • JohnEngelman

    Tom McGrath, the magazine’s editor, told Fox News he is very concerned that the government is investigating his publication.

    “I find it chilling that he now wants to use the government to censor a news outlet,” he said. “As a journalist – as someone who thinks free speech is really important–I find that really, really troubling.”

    McGrath said he stands by the story and the author–and acknowledged it set off a firestorm.

    – Todd Starnes, Fox News, March 18, 2013

    Tom McGrath demonstrates more courage than National Review Editor Rich Lowry who fired John Derbyshire. It is outrageous that telling the truth can be dangerous.

  • LastBastionOfHope

    I actually had respect for Nutter because he was the only black person condemning race riots in Philly saying it was a black problem. Just lost all that respect after this article.

    • Melanie

      Whites really need to learn that when it comes to blacks, they will always side with race over principle, when it comes to the crunch. We’ve seen it again and again, but some never learn. I can’t fault them for it, I just wish that since that’s going to be the rules of the game, whites would play by the same rules and support their own.

      The best way to understand what will happen is to know that if it’s anti-white, the black person is for it. If it is beneficial to whites, blacks oppose it. Sometimes, even when it would also be beneficial to them. Most blacks have a very collectivist mentality-everything and everyone must be equal, by which they mean exactly the same. That always means lowering the standards, since that’s easier than making people who are incapable of it, rise to meet them.

  • Oneguywithafax

    Look what white kids did to poor innocent black friends in Chicago….

    truly shows how bestial white people can be… They had sex on top of the corpses… Kudos !! What a proud day to be white in America !!!

    • sbuffalonative

      Low-life degenerates who should and will be punished with the full force of law.
      The difference here is that you don’t see whites supporting these people or making excuses for them which is all too common with blacks and black criminals.

      • Melanie

        You hit the nail on the head. I’ve heard “Free Mumia!” but I’ve never seen marches and demonstrations for, say, “Free Ted Bundy!” With the average white person and white criminals, it’s more like “burn baby burn!” We ostracise and punish our criminals, rather than making them social causes (excusing, of course, leftist loonies who worship Che Guevara. Of course, that type is the same white wimp who is anti his own race).

    • Michael_C_Scott

      I’m betting they were methamphetamines users. Tweakers are just plain aweful people in other respects as well. The only good thing about them is that their teeth usually rot right out of their heads at express speed, which makes them easy to identify.

    • SheikYerbouti

      And yet, you will not find any white people to defend them. There will be no marches. No snappy slogans. Your comparison is moronic.

  • mike

    Once again black proves itself to be stupid beyond description.

  • Eurobeing

    Antonio Gramchi the Italian Socialist said, “When I protest to those in power they give me voice because it is their way. When I am in power I will give those who disagree with me NONE because it is my way.”

  • Fed Up

    Maybe Nutter is simply trying to live up to his name? Get real. Everyone in Philly, at least those Whites with a modicum of intelligence, are aware Blacks really are their enemy. Witness the amount of crimes, the constant Whte Flight, to get away from their Black neighbors. If you travel to Philly, every square foot in the Northeast has a house or apartment building over it. With the White Flight pushing the price of Bucks County (and other counties) real estate to near astronomic levels.

  • I was just thinking about something.

    This is a First Amendment issue. The First Amendment is, of course, the first ratified amendment in the Constitution.

    One would think that certain people who call themselves “Constitutionalists” would be all over this issue like ducks on a June bug, and raking Michael Nutbar over the coals. After all, they can spend 13 hours filibustering a Presidential cabinet nominee (who eventually got confirmed anyway) over a Constitutional concern that won’t be an actual problem for another 5-10 years down the road. But here’s a real live obvious threat to the Constitution RIGHT NOW, on March 21, 2013. A threat that is so much a threat that almost 100% of Federal judges would agree that it’s a threat.

    And Philadelphia was the city where the Constitution was written, to add another layer of irony to the issue!

    Yet, all I hear from the great “Constitutionalists” of our day is crickets on this.

    Moral of this story: Never send a “Constitutionalist” to do a racialist’s job.

  • nation of niger

    nigers (pronounced like the african nation) are so dumb.

  • sickandtired

    Boy, isn’t this a sick society…..
    The day has come when a man doesn’t have the right to speak his mind without being totally crucified. A crime done by a black is not a crime unless a white does the same thing.
    Speak out? Yeah, right, and lose your job, your reputation, and your basic freedom because they will swarm your place like flies on s h i t and if they don’t shoot it up, they will burn it down.
    I’ve witnessed this very thing. Where I live, a man was in his house and a black teenager started trying to break in the door. After sucessfully breaking in, the teenager was shot and killed by the home owner. The black community started harrassing the homeowner for defending himself and they eventually made it so he could not even step foot in his own yard without some kind of harrassment. They set fire to his place twice. They would randomly shoot through his house at all hours of the night. It finally got to the point that he gave up and moved.
    Guess how many white people came to his aid? If you guessed zero you would be correct!
    That’s why those people are anonymous.
    I have made it a point to NOt go where there’s a lot of blacks, to not buy from a black business owner, and to frequent places that don’t have black employees.
    I’m not a racist, but down here in the deep South… do what you have to do to survive.
    We HAVE to put a stop to this insanity!!

    • JohnEngelman

      A crime done by a black is not a crime unless a white does the same thing.

      – sickandtired

      Black on black crime is recognized as a problem, but it is blamed on white racism.

  • anarchyst

    “What goes around, comes around”. Most “journalists” in the USA give the Second Amendment to the Constitution “short shrift” but bellow loudly when the First Amendment is constrained. Journalists–how does it feel??
    Honest citizens who own guns are demonized and marginalized by leftist news media types for exercising a basic human right. Gun owners are expected to “give-up” some of their rights because of activity by criminals and madmen, both within and out of government while the root causes of maniacal activity are ignored (young people and psychotropic drug reactions).
    The Second Amendment to the Constitution is the “insurance policy” that guarantees the rest of the Amendments.

    • Here’s an argument for your toolbox.

      Left wing dingbat will say that the 2A was written for muskets and not “assault weapons.” Easy comeback is that 1A was written for handbills, broadsheets and town criers, and not 24/7 cable TV news, broadcast media and the internet.

  • rightrightright
  • ViktorNN

    What we need is a “Being White in America” website, where ordinary white people can tell their stories of anti-white racism and discrimination.

  • liberalsuck

    Blacks. Such big spoiled brat crybabies. “Ain’t no white folks beez’ wantin’ to talk bout’ race, yo” then when we do, this is how they react. They don’t care or they’re just too stupid to see their own hypocrisy. I think it’s the latter for many of them.

  • Frank

    This guy has a Hitler complex. What is going on here is nothing like hollering “fire” in a crowed theatre. He wants to limit speech he does not like.