Rubio-Obama Immigration Plan? Senator’s Proposal Looks Like White House Policy

Marc Caputo, Miami Herald, January 16, 2013

The White House has said Florida Sen. Marco Rubio’s immigration plans, which could legalize the status of some of those unlawfully in the country, “bode well for a productive, bipartisan debate.”

A reason for that optimism: Rubio’s ideas and comments closely mirror those of President Obama in a 2011 policy speech in El Paso Texas.

“This is the Rubio-Obama immigration plan,” Mark Krikorian, head of the conservative Center for Immigration Studies, told Mother Jones.

“There’s nothing substantive in Rubio’s proposal that wouldn’t immediately be agreed to by President Obama,” he said, noting that President George W. Bush proposed a similar plan in 2006 that many Congressional Republicans helped kill.


Not only do Rubio and Obama’s plans create a similar type of amnesty for the estimated 12 million illegal immigrants, the two politicians have used similar language.

Here’s Obama unveiling his plan in May 2011, relatively little-reported at the time:

“Those who are here illegally, they have a responsibility as well. So they broke the law, and that means they’ve got to pay their taxes, they’ve got to pay a fine, they’ve got to learn English. And they’ve got to undergo background checks and a lengthy process before they get in line for legalization. That’s not too much to ask.”

Here’s Rubio in the Wall Street Journal on the undocumented:

“They would have to come forward. They would have to undergo a background check . . . They would have to pay a fine, pay back taxes, maybe even do community service. They would have to prove they’ve been here for an extended period of time. They understand some English and are assimilated. Then most of them would get legal status and be allowed to stay in this country.”

Neither Obama nor Rubio have issued bills. So it’s unclear what the real specific policy differences would be on many of the finer details, although the two appear to disagree on the effectiveness and need for more border security.


Also, national reporters described Obama as seeking a “pathway to citizenship” in May 2011. But he never said that phrase in his speech or his written plan. Obama never specified what “legalization” is. Even if Obama has changed his mind, it’s a good indication the president and Rubio agree far more than they disagree about “legalization.”

The two did have a disagreement regarding a pathway to citizenship vs. a pathway to legal residency regarding the proposed DREAM Act, which would allow those brought to this country as children to legally remain if they go to college or the military.

Obama wanted a pathway to citizenship. Rubio called for a residency pathway. Rubio shelved his plan, he says temporarily, after Obama used the framework of the Republican’s plan in an executive action that stopped deporting these young people.

More broadly, the president and Rubio share similar policies and rhetoric regarding the need for more farm workers.

Rubio in the Journal: ““The goal is to give American agriculture a reliable work force and to give protection to these workers as well.”

Obama in May: “We need to provide our farms a legal way to hire workers that they rely on, and a path for those workers to earn legal status.”

Both Rubio and Obama have said that businesses should be punished for knowingly hiring illegal immigrants. And they believe this protects lawful workers as well as the immigrants.

Rubio in the Journal: “When someone is [undocumented] they’re vulnerable to being exploited.”

Obama in May: “Also, because undocumented immigrants live in the shadows . . .  they’re vulnerable to unscrupulous businesses that skirt taxes, and pay workers less than the minimum wage, or cut corners with health and safety laws.”

Both Rubio and Obama want more highly skilled immigration.

Rubio: “I don’t think that in the 21st century we can continue to have an immigration system where only 6.5% of people who come here, come here based on labor and skill. We have to move toward merit and skill-based immigration . . . I don’t think there’s a lot of concern in this country that we’ll somehow get overrun by Ph.D.s and entrepreneurs.”

Obama: “Our existing policies provide limited avenues for talented and industrious individuals to work and reside in the U.S. For example, each year, we provide approximately 400,000 visas to foreign-born students seeking to enroll in U.S. colleges and universities, but then force them to leave the country to compete against us when they graduate. In addition, it is difficult for talented entrepreneurs who wish to start companies and create jobs in the U.S. to enter and remain in the country.”

One obvious difference, at least regarding their rhetoric, appears to be the issue of border security. Rubio says more needs to be done.

Obama says his administration has and is doing enough. {snip}


Topics: , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.