Michael Savage: Time for a ‘Nationalist’ Party

Drew Zahn, WND, January 8, 2013

Michael Savage, one of the nation’s most prominent voices in talk radio, said today America is “absolutely” ripe for a third party, in part, because the two largest parties in the U.S. have pulled a “charade” on the American people.

“There is no Republican Party,” Savage told fellow talk show host Aaron Klein. “It’s an appendage of the Democrat machine, as we’ve all just seen. It’s two-card Monte, as we well know. It’s a game being played against the American people. You’ve got the drunk Boehner on the one side, and the quasi-pseudo-crypto Marxist on the other, who is really just enjoying the ride in Hawaii right now, representing his factions.”

Instead, “We need a nationalist party in the United States of America,” said Savage on WABC’s “Aaron Klein Investigative Radio,” suggesting a party focused on “borders, language and culture.”

He continued: “You have the rudiments of a new party in this country called a tea party. They need to restructure their party. They need a charismatic leader, which they don’t have. When you say, ‘Tea party,’ no one knows who the leader is, because there is no leader. No man has stepped forward who can lead that party—no one who is an articulate speaker, a charismatic mover of people.

“The tea party is the rudiment of the new nationalist party,” Savage explained. “Somebody has to bring them all together, unite them like King David did the ancient tribes of Israel. And there is no King David out there. Who’s the King David? Tell me who is going to do it?”


“There are people so frustrated by the democracy that is gone in this country, the structure that has replaced our democracy is what I meant to say, that they would clamor for the new nationalist party,” Savage said.

Savage also pointed out the term “nationalism” needs to be redefined, as it’s too often associated with Hitler and the National Socialist Party, the Nazis, of 1930s Germany.

This association, however, Savage claims is simply the design of the “internationalists” in the ranks of the left and leftist media who desire to “dissolve the sovereignty of nations.”

“Borders, language, culture has been my motto in radio from the beginning,” Savage explained. “Nationalism is the only thing that can save America, and a new nationalist party that has a very strict firewall that does not permit the radical fringe of racism.”

He continued, “Going forward we have to, I think on radio, continue to educate the audiences about nationalism and the importance of our nation and our nation’s sovereignty—borders, language, culture. Borders, language, culture—it defines every nation on the planet, the flag, the language, the borders. And what is it the internationalists do? They want to dissolve the borders, they want to introduce multiculturalism, they want to introduce a Tower of Babel of languages.”


Topics: , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Michael Weiner is always popping off about how we need “non-racial nationalism.” Since “nationalism” comes from “nation,” which in turn comes from the Latin “nascere,” to be born, “non-racial nationalism” makes as much sense as non-wet liquid water.

    Want “non-racial nationalism?” You’ve got it in UKIP. Which is STILL vilified as “racist.”

    • Triarius

      Exactly. I’m fine with a nationalist party in the US. It will be de facto white and vilified as so regardless. In my few years of voting I have never voted Dem or Repub anyways.

      • Morris Thecat

        yes, Weiner can drop dead, he will not be part of the solution because he is a jew and as such he will never back a real nationalist, white ethnic party.

        • He can’t. It will go against his Holocaust sensibilities.

          • josh

            Yes the Holoco$t! So many put to death…thank God there were a few survivors,each one with a book contract!

        • blight14

          Well stated Morris…..note you got two ‘down’ reps for your honesty….sad!

          • Morris Thecat

            gee, guess who gave me those?

          • blight14

            Let me guess…………………..got it!

    • Morris Thecat

      I sometimes think he is part of the left, that his purpose is to voice people’s discontent for the purpose of sedating them. He gets people very upset, but then their anger is spent and they settle down and let the left take another step. I have come to the conclusion that all the “talk show” people are worthless for the same reason. They complain but never do anything, never lead anything, and they NEVER voice the REAL problem which is race. They are a marxist tool of sedation. Americans are foolish to follow anyone who will not lead them anywhere.

      • Daisy

        It’s also called ‘disinformation’ tactics, and TCP have used them throughout their exploitation of white people to do exactly as you say. BTW, I love your moniker.

        • Morris Thecat

          thanks, that advertising icon left an impression on me

      • josh

        He is one of many Jews trying to steer white people. But–why bother?We have accepted genocide with the same smiling cheerfulness as the YKW are doling it out!

        • HamletsGhost

          We didn’t accept genocide any more than a rape victim accepts rape.

    • jeffaral

      We should send him a message: Please Mr Weiner go home,

  • Eurobeing

    Question Diversity:
    I agree that he is not as solid on racial issues as I would like but he is exactly right about a Nationalist Party. You don’t hear Ma Haa Rushy talking about this.
    Rush doesn’t know wheather to S__t or go blind at this point.

    • Morris Thecat

      He is a tool of the left, his purpose is disarm a nationalist party before it is even created. He is applying marxist techniques of making something “unacceptable” or “inappropriate”. His audience should abandon him for this.

      • blight14

        Correct again Morris……Granted, both of us will likely get banned for uttering such commentary.

  • white dude

    thank goodness I stopped listening to him, with the rest of the ‘conseratives’ nowadays.

    • Morris Thecat

      I had enough of him 4 years ago. His website now has crackpot ads for paranoid stories such as the one about the government stockpiling caskets. Really? Does it make sense that a government that is going to mass murder people( if one believes the story) plans on burying each victim in a nice plastic coffin?????? I split my sides laughing the first time I heard that. Do people really think political mass murders happen that way and that the perpetrators are so anal retentive as to put people one or two to a coffin? It is ridiculous yet that is up on his website. There is also an ad up about some show Jesse Ventura mad and has been supposedly “banned”. I watched the youtube videos of that show and did not think they were anything.

  • Dunnyveg

    Is this the same Savage who donated money to Gavin Newsome during his campaign, who is about as far left as one can get, only to have his donation returned? Savage isn’t to be taken seriously; he’s only in this for the fame and fortune.

    • Follow the gefilte fish.

      • The__Bobster

        With eyes!

    • Morris Thecat

      he’s a typical big mouthed jew

      • blight14

        Indeed……….if you want to see/hear a massive stroke, ask him about the name change…..or make any reference to the subject-which-cannot-be-uttered……he goes absolutely ballistic….

        • Morris Thecat

          I called his show a few years back and got on the air. He was talking about liberal NYC jews and I related a story about some communist jews posting leaflets at Columbia University in NYC that called for outright murder of rich people. There was no soft peddling or euphemisms in these leaflets. They called for the outright seizure of all of the moneys and properties of the rich and then their murder. The three individuals posting these leaflets all were wearing yarmulkes. There was one male and two females, each in a granny dress. The male did not have a beard as far as I can remember but the yarmulkes gave me the impression that they were conservative jews. So I called Michael Savage and asked tried to ask them about how jews reconcile the clash between the ten commandments and communist ideals, coveting, murder etc. I made it through the part about the leaflets and what they said, but when I mentioned they were jews and all wearing yarmulkes he instantly changed his demeanor, became nasty saying something like “so what? so you met some NY socialist jews, big deal, have a nice day”. In other words, he really didn’t like the fact that something that he is well aware of regarding jews was just broadcast, nationwide one his show, and he tried to sweep it under the rug as soon as possible and move on.

          • blight14

            Morris, it isn’t surprising at all…..I’ve heard him go literally bat ___ crazy when the subject arises…..He’s generally sickening for the most part, his ‘take’ on himself is about like Obongos-when he looks in the mirror he sees something magnificent…..He’s basically a clone of David Horowitz, a ‘reformed’ red diaper baby……granted, once a red diaper baby, always a red diaper baby…..

          • PesachPatriot

            I’m sure rich people with private security are terrified of 3 scrawny jews from NY…those jewish street gangs are so scary and violent….I can’t believe the garbage they were posting….it wasn’t too long ago that they tried that idea in Russia, China, North Korea, Cuba, Cambodia and a few other places and it did not work out very well…good point about the ten commandments….i’m not especially religious but I always thought the ten commandments were a great idea and a pretty good set of basic rules for a civilization…but why did it have to come from a deity for humans to take it seriously? Most of the non-god related ones just seem like common sense.

            I understand how some of us in the early 20th century fell for this ridiculous nonsense but after the last 90 years or so and all the mess communism has caused around the world those 3 you encountered are ridiculous. This makes me ashamed that I probably share DNA with those three…I am not a big fan of the plutocratic classes and their narcisstic sociopathy in america, but those troublemakers are the textbook definition of chutzpah….a hundred years ago in russia a czarist policeman would have ended their afternoon in a very unpleasant manner…I had no idea columbia university was as bad as berkeley these ays.

          • Morris Thecat

            Have you heard of the “Holodomor”, the bolshevik jews murdered tens of millions of Christian Ukrainians through famine. That was after they confiscated everyone’s guns, then gave guns to the operatives who went to the Ukraine, confiscated every last bit of grain, every last chicken, cow, pig, made the skeletal people work in the fields till they died and even had their victims box for the guards amusement at times. They are trying to do the exact same thing here.

          • PesachPatriot

            My grandmother was actually born in the Ukraine in 1930, I think it went on until germany invaded almost, so she remembers that whole thing pretty well…the first people the bolshevik jews started trouble with were the more, traditional, religious, conservative ones who knew and told them in no uncertain terms that communism was a bad idea….I have often wondered why it is socially acceptable to wear hammer and sickle or che guevara shirts when the death toll from communism(which lasted a lot longer in more places) is probably higher than that of nazism which only lasted twelve years.

            I don’t think its quite the same here…the politicians are crapping their pants because the economy is about to deflate like a cheap beach toy and they don’t want to meet street justice at the hands of angry citizens. The gabby giffords thing shook them up pretty good…they know that they are not untouchable.

          • jeffaral

            Thanks to Adolf Hitler the Communists didn’t conquer western Europe. He saved Europe while the Allies handed over eastern Europe on a plate to the Reds!

          • The case could be made that Hitler did exactly that, handed over EE to the Reds. Remember, for a few years, he and Stalin were allies.

    • weinerschnitzel

      Throw the Weiner in the well so my people can be free!

  • Michael Savage (aka Weiner) is a zionist jew neocon, whose allegiance is to Israel, not the US, let alone the white race.

    • Alexandra

      What kind of Zionist are you referring to? There are several kinds.

      For the record, there’s the *nation* of Israel (descendants of the twelve tribes), then there’s the *state* of Israel. You can support one without supporting the other.

      • Daisy

        It’s a distinction without a difference.

        • Gracchus123

          Actually, there is a difference. Zionism is a political movement which started with a goal to find a “homeland” for the diaspora Jews.

          The “nation” includes all Jews worldwide.

          The “State” of Israel is the geo/politcal entity on the eastern mediterranean shore.

          Many Jews oppose the existence of the State of Israel claiming that the formation of that State mentioned in their writings is, in fact, a spiritual existence. That sect is called the Neturi Karta (not sure of spelling).

          We in America never hear much about those Jews who oppose the “State” of Israel because our “free” media think that news is NOT fit to print (or broadcast). Contrary to what many Americans believe, we labor under a highly controlled media, first amendment or no.

          • Daisy

            And what percentage of Jews do you allege oppose the existence of the state of Israel? Do you not get that nation and state are synonymous? Again, just more semantic games TCP think they can play on us ‘dumb, lower-IQ goyim.’ And next you’re going to claim a european power diaspora’d the Jews…when they left of their own volition to make money off of the european people. Last, judaism calls for every jew to unite with jews in their ‘nation,’ so the existence of some supposedly differentiated ‘state’ in and of itself requires all jews to defend it. That, in judaism, defines ‘god.’

          • PesachPatriot

            The neturei karta sect, (pretty close on the spelling) is a very small group of bronze age throwbacks, they probably have less than 1000 members worldwide…prior to the creation of Israel, many rabbis in europe and the arab countries opposed the creation of a state as going against the will of god…they were angry with the political zionists for disobeying them(and early 20th century zionism was to an extent anti-clerical, rationalist and anti-religion). After the unpleasantness of 1939-1945 many previously anti-zionist rabbis changed their positions and even settled in Israel. You are right about the heavily controlled media…there is more criticism of israeli policies and politicians in the hebrew language press than in most mainstream american media.

            The biggest irony is that there a few pockets of medieval fanatics in Israel who oppose the existence of the state, even though they enjoy subsidies for their schools and army draft exemption. There was a shirt in the jerusalem market which showed an F-16 flying over the old city and two men in traditional religious clothes shaking their fists at it and yelling not on shabbos…

          • Gracchus123

            When I worked in that area of the world, I saw a tee-shirt that said “Visit Israel before Israel visits you”.

            I’m not sure about your numbers for the sect, though. It seems to me that Neturei Karta has many more than 1000 members based on the writings on their web sites. Where do you get your numbers?

          • PesachPatriot

            Thats another old shirt too…I am also fond of the Uzi does it and don’t worry America, Israel is behind you shirts…I may be wrong on the number, but they are as representative of the jewish faith as appalachian snake handlers are of the christian faith…Even other hasidim consider them kooks for wanting to dissolve the state of Israel and give the entire country to the palestinians…how many members does their website claim?

    • Sounds like you live in San Fran. They say the exact same thing.

    • Marc B.

      He’s a definitely Zionist of the Israel Second variety, but he broke with the NeoCons many years ago and has vocally been in agreement with Paleo Conservatives on issues like free trade, immigration, and avoiding foreign entanglements. He’s also mentioned on several occasions acknowledged that the Third Worlders haven’t contributed much to the world in terms of science and technology and has alluded to savagery being an inherent trait of blacks, Hispanics, and Arabs.

      I don’t listen to him much at all, but he has been the closest thing to a Paleo on the national talk radio airwaves. He’s correct that the Republican party needs to be replaced, but wrong about the racial aspect: it must be an intrinsically pro-White conservative political party, because the Tea Party has proven to be to wimpy to admit it’s a party of White self-interest. Any new party will have to overtly advocate on behalf of Whites and in defense of Western Culture.

      • Svigor

        Let’s put it this way: I’d love to replace all the Jews with types like “Savage,” but there’d still be a wide, insuperable gap between them and what I consider politically acceptable.

      • Give Weiner credit for this much: Advocating that Israel receives no American foreign aid. Now, his motivation might not be 100% pure — The reason he advocates this is because Israel today won’t suddenly turn back into the take-no-prisoners Israel of Golda Meir, and he thinks (and it might be true) that our foreign aid is preventing that, so he’s basically calling for American foreign aid to bribe a foreign government into a point onto its own body politic of his own liking, if that’s his position, then it’s dumb. (Private American citizens can be thrown into Federal prison for that sort of thing — the Neutrality Act.) My position is no foreign aid to Israel, Israel makes its own policy and puts itself wherever it pleases on its own body politic. But, the Weiner position is a good start.

        Also, the ADL has mildly criticized Weiner.

        My beef with him is that when you scratch the surface and get down to the brass tacks of his soul, he is still a multiracialist at heart. His “nationalism” is only structural and credal, and of course, structural and credal nationalism only exists as an outgrowth of real blood and soil based nationalism, so it’s foolish to think that the credal and structural nationalism of Weiner’s ideal of a “non-racial nationalism” can ever exist beyond the passions of one or two election cycles if not anchored to blood and soil, which of course he opposes.

    • Matt West

      He has been pretty outspoken about supporting the historical American nation, with his “borders, language, and culture” philospophy. He has not been prefect in terms of foriegn wars but has been better than most other “conservatives.” He doesn’t believe that he needs to be talking about the “white race” right now, ideologically illogical, but, it could be argued, pratical as in our society, being seen as “pro-white” is the most horrible thing anyone could ever imagine.

      • Sherman_McCoy

        A conservative nationalist movement would be inherently pro-white because its tenets would be against all the things the non-whites want: amnesty, welfare, etc.

    • Matt West

      I have to admit that I am a certain “zionist” of sorts, as I support the right of Israel to be free of Arab invasion and terrorism just as I support the American people’s same right. Was Israel founded based on imperialism? Yes. As was our nation and other white nations. I support a two-state solution in principle, however, I believe that a state has a right to defend itself if attacked. If Mexicans were firing rockets over into our citiies, I would support the invasion and occupation of Mexico, even if it kills a few civilians. There are a few pacisfists on here who think that “war is never the answer.” But no one can believe in “nations” without a mechanism to defend the nation.

      • bluffcreek1967

        I agree with a lot of what you’ve said. I too support the right of Israel to exist, and to defend itself from the evil Muslim that surround them. And yes, I too believe that sometimes ‘war IS the answer.’

        • Triarius

          But I do not believe in the US being Israel’s attack dog or “dual citizens” drumming up affirmative action, multiculturalism, and dividing a nation. Those that are openly for a foreign country over the one they reside in should not be alowed in politics. They usually don’t hide the last fact.

          • bluffcreek1967

            I agree with you that the US should not be involved as Israel’s ‘attack dog’ (as you put it). We simply don’t have the money to be the world’s policeman nor to be, in effect, the national defense of other nations – including Israel. Israel has enough funds and military might to defend itself. It’s their responsibility to arm and defend themselves.

          • Guest

            What is the source of those funds/arms/etc?

          • blight14

            Good point, America for the most part but they’ve extorted Germany for billions too…..we are far and away the biggest source of their funds, weapons, technology, etc…..Look at this lunacy surrounding the nomination of Chuck Hagel……its utterly sickening to witness….

          • Matt West

            That is simply not true as Israel has a large functioning economy, based on much more than the few billion squandered on military equipment they don’t need.

          • The world created Israel as a Jewish homeland. They need to go and stay there. They can all play at being Jews together and leave the rest of humanity in peace.

          • Repatriate all jews to israel and see how they like it. Let all the comedians on Comedy Central suite up and strap up in israel’s defense.

          • gemjunior

            Over 200 years ago Ben Franklin said that even “if you gave Israel back ito them in fee simple, they would not move there. Why? Because, Gentlemen, they are vampires, and vampires can’t live off of other vampires”.

          • Spot on. Israel is allowed to kick blacks out, but the jews here in our country (and Europe for this matter) will criminalize us for such desires. Jews can be a screwy lot to deal with.

      • Tucker

        I am also a strong supporter of the right of Israel to exist, at least for as long as it is necessary to make certain that their population doesn’t wind up flooding into the USA. With the incredible and undeniably destructive and subversive damage that the supposed 3% of our population have already done to undermine and destroy our Republic – we most certainly would lose any hope of surviving, or of repairing the damage, should these toxic, anti-white, West-hating people double their percentage of our population

        • nobody

          They are not our friends. People play the “God’s Chosen People” card and that is ridiculous. God’s chosen people wouldn’t cause so many problems all across the world. The bible also says that there will be those who claim to be Jews but are really of the synagogue of satan. There have been 1,447 innocent Palestinian children killed by the Israelis, does that sound like something “God’s Chosen People” would do? I have nothing for these scum, and they can stay out of my country and stick to their own stolen blood stained lands.

          • josh

            Lets arm the Palestinians! I say lets ahve a One State Solution: Let the jews and the Pallies learn to live together!

          • PesachPatriot

            The palis have plenty of weapons. Every child in gaza knows how to break down and re-assemble and AK-47 blindfolded by the age of 8. There’s also plenty of stinger missiles and other shoulder mounted anti-aircraft devices, not to mention the numerous explosives factories they have…what they lack is Israel’s industrial capacity to manufacture things like the merkava tank and uzi’s.

            The left likes to paint the pals as sweet gentle muslim hippies who just want to bake baklawa and sell religious knick knacks to american and canadian tourists being oppressed by big mean jackbooted thugs with yarmulkes…we do not go looking for trouble with them but we do not roll over and play dead either….the day they call off the jihad is the day the conflict ends. We had lived peacefully in the arab countries for millenia, before Islam even existed in the region, but we won’t be going back to dhimmi status any time soon. Our one country with no oil is a lot nicer than all 22 of their hell holes put together.

          • Daisy

            This is what I don’t get: ‘we do not go looking.’ ‘we had lived peacefully.’ ‘we’ blah blah blah. If your country or ‘state’ or ‘nation’ is Israel then why are you living in the US? This is not to imply that I agree with your assertions regarding Arab-Israeli relations, but I am more concerned with what’s best for the US than mediating a fight between middle-easterners.

          • PesachPatriot

            Sorry I used the we phrase…I am a non-dual american citizen. I have relatives who live there, but I care a lot more about what goes on here. I believe a lot more in the Constitution than a bronze age book of rules and regulations. I wish Israel well in general, but I pretty much agree with ron paul’s position that the US is broke and can no longer afford to dump tons of foreign aid all over the MENA region. I live here because I was born here, my english is a lot better than my hebrew and I would miss halloween and july fourth if I moved there.

      • josh

        if the mexican army murdered your family and drove you off your land and kept you living at a standard lower than sub-Sharan Africa,would you “support” the firing of rockets into their swimming pools? So Mr. Big Shot you are willing to wage war when necessary,you aint no sissy pacifist;why wouldnt the Pallies fel the same? THET rae the ones who got pushed off their lands?Are you a Linda Lovelace for the YKW?

      • Svigor

        I peg my support for Zionism and Jewish ethnocentrism to American Jewry’s support for European ethnocentrism, the way some countries peg their currencies to the US dollar. So at the moment, the support they’re going to get from me is essentially nil. In fact, it’s more accurate to call it opposition.

        • Sounds exactly like my views on the Zionist [State] of Israel. You won’t get an accurate picture of my feelings on their hypocrisy and manipulations by labeling my support of their plight as just frosty, frigid, cold, or even really freaking cold, man. For someone to truly comprehend an accurate level of my contempt and indifference, we’re gonna have to start talking about the cryogenic range.

          They’ll get my support the day they embrace their racialist tendencies and start vocally supporting other racialists with the same vigor they use to manipulate the policies of foreign governments. Support will begin that day, and not a day sooner. You are what you are, so stop lying and embrace it. Mark 3 22

    • Steven Bannister

      Jewish or not, Michael Savage is one of the ONLY major talk show hosts who has actually made statements IN DEFENSE of “the white man” and he routinely skewers his fellow Jews for being leftists.

      • Hal K

        You are right. He wrote “The Death of the White Male,” and you can hear him say some explicitly pro-white things in the YouTube video “MICHAEL SAVAGE – THE DEATH OF THE WHITE MALE AND THE SOCIALIST SOCIETY”.

        It would be worthwhile to delve a little more into what he meant when he said that the fringe “racists” would be excluded from his nationalist party. What are the extreme “racist” views that he would ban? The sort of barrier he is suggesting would be harmful. If you put up a barrier against all views to the right of your own, then you only weaken your own position.

      • Tucker

        Savage must be a guy who has to consume huge quantities of acid reducing medications every day, just to get through the mine field of contradictions that must bounce around inside his head.

        On one hand, he seems to grasp that White men are the backbone of this nation and without our ambition, talents, hard work, and superior work ethic – this nation would be nothing more than a bigger version of Haiti or Mexico. And, he appears to be a little worried over the effort of his ethnic kin to flood the USA with millions of incompetent, unskilled, low achieving, unambitious, parasitic leeches from the Third World.

        But, on the other hand, he just cannot bring himself to dig into the subject of WW2 and shove aside all the Hollywood, Steven Spielberg concocted exaggerations and misinformation that he’s been programmed to believe about what did or didn’t happen during that period of history – and to examine, with an objective eye, what his tribe were doing and trying to do (agitating for Communism to take over Germany) and endlessly attacking and subverting the German culture, just as we have seen the Hollywood crowd do here in America.

        Were he to do an honest and objective examination of the events which lead up to WW2 – he would clearly see that what is happening to America today is exactly what was happening to Germany during the Weimar Republic era. Or, is Savage even serious when he harps on the importance of language, culture, history and sovereignty? If he were, he would be forced to pin the tail on the donkey who was behind the creation of both Weimar Republic Germany and now Weirmar Republic Amerikwa.

        So, clearly, Savage suffers from deep rooted inner conflicts. He has been taught to harbor hate and fear of racially healthy, racially strong White men – because such White men put their foot down and do not tolerate aliens who seek to subvert and undermine the foundations of their nation and their culture.

        Such White men do not grovel at the feet of their racial competitors and soil their pants if a minority calls them a ‘racist’. Such White men are at the same time both exactly what America needs and also exactly the kind of White men that Savage fears and wishes to keep subdued and out of power.

        Which is why any nationalist party has to be a White Nationalist party. To fix every one of the problems that Savage complains about incessantly on his radio show – it will require a racially healthy, racially strong, no-nonsense White male army of political leaders.

        • blight14

          Tucker, that was a pleasure to read and I thank you….spot on! The bs of the ‘why’ surrounding WWll has been so HollyVitzed its sickening….to believe that you can actually get put in prison for questioning certain ‘aspects’ of the war is beyond belief….and yes, the events that led up to WWll in Germany are mirrored in America today….will the outcome be the same?

      • HamletsGhost

        In other words, he plays the good cop to the leftist Jews’ bad cop.

      • Morris Thecat

        True, my opinion of him wavers back and forth. Still, I think his liberal past has too much of a hold on him. He is too compromised to lead such a party.

  • Fr. John+

    Is this the same Michael WEINER, who is a member of one of the most Racist, xenophobic, ‘tribal cultures’ (judaism) the world has ever known, who says, ‘Of course, a ‘new America’ shouldn’t be ‘racist’????

    What’s good for the goose is good for the gander, Michael. Also, as the Church is the supercession of apostate O.T. Israel; as there are groups of his own “people” who have members which deny Israel’s ‘right to exist,’ I see nothing wrong with a nationalist, racially aware America, based on biblical principles of “kith, kin, kirk, and kitchen.” In fact, it sounds like exactly what the Founding Fathers envisioned, way back in the 1770’s…… imagine that. An idea whose time has come…. again! Deo Volente!

    • The__Bobster

      He will attack the group that shall not be named while vilifying people like Chuck Hagel for naming them.

    • Son of Abraham

      “Is this the same Michael WEINER who is a member of one of the most Racist, xenophobic, ‘tribal cultures’ (judaism) the world has ever known…?”

      “Michael Savage (aka Weiner) is a zionist jew neocon…
      Ugly. Ugly comments.
      I didn’t know Der Sturmer had a website.

      • Morris Thecat

        the fact is that Israel is a country that defines itself by ethnicity, and mr weiner is a member of that ethnicity and he supports israel. He supports its definition. That is not ugly, that is just a fact. He is applying a double standard. Jews get an ethnic homeland, whites Europeans don’t. It is amazing that on the web jews decry every other country for defining itself in ethnic terms, yet that is exactly what they do, and always have done.

        • Daisy

          Don’t worry, TCP always resort to invective when they can’t argue based on facts, which is most of the time.

          • Mick

            What is TCP ?

        • Extropico

          Stopping the pernicious erosion of remaining American sovereignty will not be accomplished without directly addressing the double standard of most Jews on the propriety of ethnic nationalism. If they support it for Israel, they shouldn’t be attempting to deny it to the descendants of the founders of America. Once that issue is fairly addressed, there are possibilities of improvements in our prospects.

          • Steven Bannister

            I agree completely. In my mind, it’s 100% okay for Jews to support Israeli sovereignty PROVIDED they support American sovereignty as well. Michael Savage meets this criteria.

          • Morris Thecat

            he doesn’t support “American” sovereignty because he decided that he has a right to define that American must be all inclusive, which means it means NOTHING.

          • Morris Thecat

            I support Israeli sovereignty. I see no reason why one can not perceive their role as the people who have tried to destroy the ethnic identity of America and still not support Israel. I believe I am consistent, they are not.

          • blight14

            Morris, have you looked up the list of ‘dual citizens’ in our government?

          • PesachPatriot

            Just curious as to how you define american sovereignty? Withdrawing from the UN? Creating a separate ethno state in the lower 48? I’m a big supporter of the Constitution, probably what you define as american sovereignty as well….

          • Svigor

            Yep. The important thing is not so much to change the behavior you describe, but to trumpet it to the world and force the issue to the forefront for as long as it takes to change the public consciousness.

        • Son of Abraham

          It is the Jew-hating and Jew-baiting comments that litter this site that are ugly.
          To wit:
          “…one of the most Racist [sic], xenophobic, tribal cultures the world has ever know.” — Fr. John
          ” he [sic]is a typical loud-mouthed Jew” . Morris thecat
          “Michael Savage (Weiner) is a zionist jew neocon. John Smith
          “follow the gefilte fish’ Felix
          Truly, a low brow crowd has infected this website.

          • bluffcreek1967

            I agree with you! But please know that not every white, race-realist despises the Jewish people and seeks to blame them for every woe in the world. There are, in fact, many whites who are race-conscious and who also support the right of the State of Israel to exist and to defend itself from the wicked Muslims who surround them.

            There are other white Amren readers who take a very low view of Jews and Israel. They have their reasons even though I don’t agree with them. We have debated these very points at times on Amren. We agree to disagree and leave it at that. On any site such as this, there’s going to be a ‘diversity’ (in the truest sense) of opinions and I’m okay with that.

          • Morris Thecat

            I don’t despise all jewish people, but it get’s my back up when jews start telling us we have to go on with business as usual,- which is a game that they created back in the fifties, as soon as they started dominating the courts and the media, and any idea that we can’t have a racially based party is business as usual and will lead us to further marginalization. We are where we are because of this refusal to acknowledge reality and mr weiner wants to lead us down another dead end road.

          • Svigor

            That’s all I demand from anyone.

          • HamletsGhost

            No, we can’t just leave it at that and move on. This is an issue of absolute importance.

            Would you send an army into battle without resolving the question of whether there are spies in your ranks? What chance would you have for victory if someone was sending your secrets to the other side?

          • Steven Bannister

            Hey, people are angry. Keep in mind some of the people on this website are victims of violent crime by blacks and Hispanics and are highly resentful of the largely Jewish led efforts to create a Third World America.

            Not all of us hate Jews, I welcome any Jew that supports our cause.

          • Morris Thecat

            I can call someone a “loud mouthed jew” and that doesn’t mean I hate jews. I’ve heard other jews say the same thing about jews, and they are correct, there is a certain brazenness and pushiness that is unique to jews, not all jews, just the loud mouthed ones. A loud mouthed Italian is not the same as a loud mouthed jew.

          • Daisy

            It’s always interesting to me that when the jews seek to enumerate the alleged hostility or hatred of them in whites, they are deemed righteous or holy, yet when whites are merely defending themselves by naming jewish hatred of them, we are depicted as haters. The truth is in the actual facts.

          • Svigor

            Well said. 🙂

          • blight14

            WELL stated Daisy!

          • HamletsGhost

            No true Jew can support our cause. It’s in the nature of that beast that they must always oppose and undermine any nation but their own.

          • Morris Thecat

            you are a jew, so of course that is what you would say, you think you can sell the idea that you are not biased? You have an agenda and it is the same as other who hail from the “Culture of Critique” , an agenda whose aim has been to destroy this country. It has been quite clearly and unequivocally so.I don’t care if you are offended because people are recognizing what jews have done and want to do. go ahead, be offended, and he is a loud mouthed jew, are you going to deny that? One just can not deny that his demeanor and verbal strategies are characteristically jewish. Believe me mr “son of abraham” I listened to him for several years and I’ve heard him slam anglo saxon, waspish people, and I’ve heard many jews do the same when they thought, wrongly, that they were in all jewish company. Don’t get so self righteously indignant with me, I have quite a good idea what you say when you think YOU are in all jewish company.

          • Daisy

            As someone who picked up some hebrew and yiddish from a very bizarre upbringing by a self-loathing irish catholic mother who somehow thought raising me amongst jews was some revolt against the WASPS, I can tell you that the comments jews make about white people when they think they’re alone or that you somehow are ‘one of them’ are pretty unbelievable, not to mention constant. Jews who claim otherwise are simply lying or deluding themselves.

          • Morris Thecat

            Yes, I once heard a jewish man at a function say that wasps were like the white meat of the chicken breast, dry flavorless and boring unless some kind of sauce was added. he said this while he was eating his meal. It was out of the blue, he wasn’t enjoying the usual wooden chicken that gets served at alot of functions and that triggered his soliloquy about WASPS.

          • Svigor

            I tend not to take these kinds of things seriously. I mean, we’re clearly tasty enough that Jews the world over prefer living among NW Europeans to living amongst their own kind.

            Jews have a pretty profound inferiority complex going with regard to NW Euros in general and Anglo-Saxons in particular.

          • blight14

            Utterly typical…..and disgusting………..were there any repercussions after his comment?

          • Morris Thecat

            of course not, it was a function, people just nodded but then changed the subject, as if they weren’t really listening to him. I got the impression that those who knew him weren’t listening to him.. No one wants unpleasantness at such times. It was obvious that this individual thought he had a great clever wit, and that the reality is that when he started going off on tangents like this, people stopped listening to him.

          • Extropico

            I notice you don’t address the double standard issue. If I moved to Israel and started talking about the need for more “diversity”, do you think I might face some anger from Israelis? Would I make it out alive?

            I am also very uncomfortable with some of the wording. There are legitimate issues to be discussed; and they shouldn’t be suppressed by fear of the issues themselves being termed “low brow.”

          • “Truly, a low brow crowd has infected this website.”

            No, just a crowd of White people who are tired of pretending that an ethnic fifth column living as guests in *White* countries are their friends.

          • Svigor

            One would have thought that far more “ugly” and frequent comments directed against blacks here would have long since run you off of this site, thus sparing you the pain of experiencing the far less “ugly” and frequent “Jew-baiting.”

          • HamletsGhost

            The truth is very often ugly. Can you refute any of the above statements with facts of your own.

            The ugly truth is that America was hijacked by Weiner’s tribe. If he refuses to acknowledge that fact then he is with them, not with us.

      • Yes, we well know. Pointing out that Jews have interests and work for interests that conflict with the interests of Whites is “ugly.” Pointing out that a Jew working for the interests of Jews is a Jew is “ugly.” It’s imperative that Whites must pretend otherwise to avoid offending Jews.

      • Svigor

        Ignorant comment. Judaism is indeed the tribal religion of one of the most xenophobic, tribalistic, racist groups the world has ever seen. That wouldn’t be a bad thing, if they weren’t also the vanguard of the movement to eradicate all of those values from European populations.

    • Bill

      His people in their tribal land built a wall to keep blacks out, and have been deporting blacks with vigor. What’s good for the gefilte fish apparently isn’t allowed for the white man.

    • Matt West

      I think many are hypocrits who support Israel’s right to be a “Jewish state” while denying America’s right to be America. However the right-wing government in Israel and the left-wing Jewish establishmeant here are not the same. If you read leftist publications, as I sometimes do, you will see that criticism of Israel is constant. Some say it’s “anti-semitism” but I think it is the logical outcome of a belief system where white people are evil and white countries are evil, and should be given to non-white people. However the infuence of hypocritical wealthy Jews keeps the Democratic party from being the official anti-Israel party. Despite the views of Jews in America, I think that Jews in Israel would be very sympathetic to the views of those who argue for the historic American nation.

      • “I think that Jews in Israel would be very sympathetic to the views of those who argue for the historic American nation.”

        Then you think wrong. If Israel isn’t hostile to the existence of White countries as White countries then Israel is definitely indifferent to it. A member of Israel’s ruling right-wing political party even considered the possibility of exporting Israel’s African immigrants to Australia, asking a left-wing Jewish politician in Australia to push for such a scheme.

        Israeli Likud politician: Send African migrants to Australia!

        MK Danny Danon (Likud) asked Australian MP Michael Danby on Wednesday to
        propose, in parliament in Canberra, sending African migrants from Israel to Australia.

        Danon and Danby discussed the issue during the Australian politician’s visit to Israel for the World Jewish Congress’s International Conference of Jewish Parliamentarians.

        “The arrival of thousands of Muslim infiltrators to Israeli territory is a clear threat to the state’s Jewish identity,” Danon told The Jerusalem Post.

        “The refugees’ place is not among us, and the initiative to transfer them to Australia is the right and just solution.

        “On the one hand, it treats the refugees and migrants in a humane way. On the other hand, it does not threaten Israel’s future and our goal to maintain a clear and solid Jewish majority,” he explained.


        It is “right” and “just” to protect Israel’s existence as a Jewish country by destroying Australia’s existence as a White country. Israel clearly is NOT a friend of White people or White countries.

      • HamletsGhost

        That’s how Jews broke from the left starting in the 1970s and became “neoconservatives”. The standard Leftist argument against colonialism in Algeria, Vietnam and Latin America was being applied against Israel’s treatment of the indigenous people of Palestine.

        That’s when the Jews who led the movement decided it was time to get off the bus and hijack the conservative bus. They went from flag-burners to flag-wavers in a split-second, and there are still fools who think they are on our side.

        Now they are working on hijacking the racialist bus, and if we let them, failure is GUARANTEED.

        • Gracchus123

          The best way to “control” a movement is to lead it.

  • falsedawn

    The concept of “politics” is old hat at this point. Just become the best marksmen/women you can be. The die is cast.

    • Morris Thecat

      Exactly, and mr weiner, being the most vocally conservative jew in the public consciousness shows us that they are not on our side.

    • David Sachs

      The millions of hard core guns accumulated by that section of insulated, paranoid, politically and socially insignificant whites in America will be useless against a better armed powerful & determined technology friendly foreign nation (Eg: China) or even the federal government which runs the powerful US military (army, navy, airforce, marines & owns all the nukes, B52 bunker buster bombers, Satellite guided missiles (Starwars programs), drones, chemical & bio-warfare, etc), CIA, NCIS, NSA, ATF, FBI, FDA etc.
      The fact is even if tomorrow, there happens to be a “white racialist renaissance”, the federal govt. or a technologically sophisticated well armed foreign power with the world’s largest well trained standing army (China) can always successfully invade the United States.
      Honestly, what good are guns ( even if they are the best semi-automatic/ automatics) against drone attacks, missiles (nuke and non nukes), B 52 bombers, air force guided aerial bombings, bio warfare etc, where by the push of a mere button millions can instantly be vanquished? I am against any sort of stupidity where citizens need to go against the will of the federal government. It is futile and will always lead to failure. The broken and FAILED Tea Party movement is a good example of classic conservative epic failures in recent times.

      • falsedawn

        Sir, there a million reasons not to try. I’m not interested in any of them . I live by the concept of CAN DO – WILL DO…

      • Michael Valentine

        Three words. Egypt. Libya. Syria. I have to believe that OUR military will be less inclined to fire on American citizens.

      • Daisy

        No one seems to be reading this thread anymore, but I’ll still correct your ignorance: tyrannical leaders rarely turn conventional weapons against their people, as if they did, their people would soon cease to be their people. Tyranny takes over from within. Did Sadaam Hussein gas his own people? No. Did Hitler or Stalin use conventional weapons against their people? No. Even in Hitler’s attacks against the jews, a people he deemed (as did they themselves) other than native Germans, he didn’t turn conventional weapons against them, but he and the Nazi party did take away the populace’s guns early in their reign through the anti-gun laws passed by the Weimar Republic. Same for Pinochet’s Chile. One of the mid-20th century Brazilian dictators only held onto power in a rifle-bearing standoff between various factions vying for control, most of which took place outside of public scrutiny.

        When the new gestapo comes have your guns ready, and take a few lessons from history. And if you want to meet them empty-handed, then fine, but don’t impose your weakness on the rest of us, and try to face the fact that there is a 2nd Amendment. “I am against any sort of stupidity where citizens need to go against the will of the federal government.’

        • PesachPatriot

          Daisy, there were plenty of jews killed with conventional weapons in WWII germany…most of the million killed in the soviet union were dispatched with bullets not gas. The nazis moved to gas because shooting was too close and personal and mentally traumatized even the most hardened men eventually…saddam hussein also technically used gas on his own people when he gassed the kurds at halabja in 1988…they were iraqi citizens technically, but since saddam was a sunni arab and they were kurds they were not technically “his people”…Stalin’s security forces also killed plenty of people with regular conventional firearms…i think the katyn officers massacre was a pretty good example….your last paragraph is right on though…door knocks at 2am are only good if you called in a very late pizza

          • Daisy

            By conventional weapons I actually meant the conventional weapons of the army. None of the situations you or I describe involved leaders turning, say, missiles, or drones, or these larger-scale bombing types. Even in Katyn the Soviets just used regular guns and tried to keep it quiet and the Poles weren’t technically their people. I’m refuting the notion that because no militia or even just individuals could keep up with our army’s weaponry that that means we couldn’t fight takeovers by tyrannical factions with our guns.

          • PesachPatriot

            I see what you’re getting at here…even though the viet cong were outmatched technologically by the US army they were still able to resist…same situation with the afghans against the russians too…

          • Morris Thecat

            If the jews had fought back, and killed people who knocked on their door at 2 am to drag them off, the NAZIs may have abandoned their final solution. The jews were too docile for their own good. One man with a machine gun could control a thousand people and force them into the gas chambers.

          • PesachPatriot

            If I had a nickel I could go for a ride on the subway…I think the reason so many walked so easily to gas or mass graves was because they were already psychologically defeated…this was not the modern IDF…this was a people of high ideals, pacifism and not used to military matters after millenia of exile and being more concerned with holy books and learning than taking and holding territory. All of that said, there is not a single word wrong with your post…there were small uprisings at treblinka, sobibor and the warsaw ghetto but it was pretty much too little too late to be really effective.

          • Daisy

            Don’t agree with the high ideals, pacifism, that they were in exile or more concerned with holy books than worldly things, sorry. In all likelihood there was no one single reason why the jews chose to respond the way they did. But I do think that being given things, never having to fight, or not as commonly, as the european masses was one essential part of it all. The Bielski brothers are an interesting exception (which is not to say I hold them in the same esteem many do); they came from a lower class although not poor, and they fought.

          • Morris Thecat

            The Jews responded the way they did for a couple, widely acknowledged reasons. One, it had been a successful strategy for most of their history to not fight back against greater numbers but to instead try to ride things out, take the losses and hope for a day when things calmed down. The second reason was that, like modern white Americans, they were too comfortable and too soft. The thought of direct confrontation and resistance required them to think in a way that they had never thought before. Most people could not make that leap until the doors to the camp closed behind them, and then it was too late. I have mentioned the bolsheviks and the Holodomor in previous posts. The way I see history is that more often than not, innocent people pay for the crimes of others. The Jews of Western Europe, and the religious Jews in the East were not the people guilty of the Bolsheviks crimes, yet they paid the price for those crimes. The injustice of this view of history may bother many people, but when you look at world history it seems that the majority of victims are innocent and the majority of the guilty never get punished.

        • Morris Thecat

          If a ragtag bunch of Afghanis can cause great difficulty for the American military, then a well armed American civilian population will be unconquerable. You are assuming that roads will be open and the military will have free movement, and that it will be composed of people who all back the government. No sir, once it starts firing on American civilians the days of this government will be numbered, and that number will be small. Wholesale defections from the military will happen almost immediately. Much of the weaponry of the military will disappear with those defectors. Roads will be booby trapped with IED’s or blocked with roadblocks, supply lines will be cut, there will be mass confusion and mass fraggings amongst the military.

          • Daisy

            You’re basically elucidating one variable of my overall point so maybe you misunderstood my nomenclature.

      • PesachPatriot

        Mr. sachs…do you happen to work at a certain infamous financial institution with the same name? Yes, the firearms across the north american continent are not the equivalent of F-16’s, tanks, nukes, drones etc…but the politicians must be somewhat antsy if they are trying so hard to confiscate them. The things you mention will only work if the soldiers who swore an oath to a certain document actually are willing to use them on US citizens.

        • Morris Thecat

          In the last days of the soviet union guns had become ubiquitous amongst the population. The Soviets had a huge army but even they knew that they could not resist a well armed population. WEll armed populations don’t directly engage the government military. They resist government decrees , they loot government supplies,they launch surprise attacks against individual targets, they attack and then melt back into the general population. The government military never has a real target to shoot at, just civilians who may or may not be involved in resistance. It becomes a war of attrition where the government forces die of a thousand cuts while they are forced to retaliate in ways that further alienate the population while never weakening the resistance. Every strike the government makes only strengthens the resolve of the population to resist. A government can not go against the will of the population for long unless it is prepared to commit enormous atrocities such as the early bolsheviks did. To do that the government needs a large number of men who will commit those atrocities, the America soldier is very unlikely to do any such thing for this government. This government has disenfranchised them, disrespected them, and is defunding them-probably the stupidest thing that the liberals have ever done.

          • PesachPatriot

            This is a very good point morris…this is not the days of the unpleasantness between the states or WWI with black and white photography and slowly printed and censored newspaper reports…images and information go around the world in seconds now…no US government can really expect to be able to use air strikes, drones, chemical, nuclear or biological weapons on its own territory….The cities can be isolated and secured but the rugged hinterlands and rural areas are quite another matter.

      • jeffaral

        Ask the Taliban why guns are good for!

      • So your case is this: There’s nothing we can do, they’ll squish us like bugs anyway. So let’s all go bowling.

        Just in case you haven’t figured out, or maybe you haven’t because you think the whole world is dumber than you: I know my one and only 9mm pistol won’t beat the entire force of the world’s militaries put together. I’m more interested in deterring the “diverse” trouble I try to avoid in case it finds me anyway.

  • Nationalism without the racial element[Racism] as the impetus is nothing more than a few policy and media manipulations away from what we have today. What on earth goes through the mind of people like Savage when they proselytize for some grand utopia that has absolutely no proof of ever working? Black and brown people, as a whole, have shown no propensity or desire to push a country in the same direction as White people.

    Nationalism without Racialism? No thank you.

    • Svigor

      Nationalism without racialism is an oxymoron. It’s absurd that a white man has to precede “Nationalist” with “white” these days.

  • Bobbala

    /ˈfæʃ ɪz əm/ Show Spelled [fash-iz-uh m] Show IPA
    1. ( sometimes initial capital letter ) a governmental system led by a dictator(check) having complete power(check), forcibly suppressing opposition(check) and criticism(check), regimenting all industry, commerce, etc.(check, check, check), and emphasizing an aggressive NATIONALISM(check) and often racism(ROFLOL).

  • PesachPatriot

    I used to listen to savage a little bit but tuned out because he was always ranting about gays and liberals…I don’t care what two consenting adults do in the privacy of their bedroom and nobody from peta ever flash mobbed a wal-mart. Borders Language and Culture are important…but its a little late now i think…our borders are a joke, we press spanish for one and our culture is honey boo boo, jersey shore and all my babies mamas…Just because he is one of my kind doesn’t make him such a bad guy….If the nationalist party was headed by someone with big name recognition like Ron Paul it might gain some mainstream traction. If it had a platform of returning to the constitution, foreign policy isolation and harsh punishments for financial crime as well as shutting down the FRB and returning to a gold/silver standard, ending the war on dangerously fun scary plants and cleaning up our cities it could seriously go somewhere.

    • Not Politically Correct

      Interesting considering what is known about him

      • runner

        One never knows.

  • Hal K

    This is an example of how pernicious the term “racism” is. When conservatives say they are against “racism,” they are also saying that it would be wrong for whites to look out for their group interests. People like Savage rail against liberals while at the same time keeping white conservatives hamstrung by suppressing pro-white advocacy.

    It would be beneficial if pro-white advocates would minimize the energy they spend criticizing liberals and instead focus on the harm done by mainstream conservative commentators to white interests.

    • Morris Thecat

      No, what this is an example of is how you have been duped. The forces that want to destroy this country put people like savage and limbaugh out their to neutralize you. You listen to them, you get upset, you spend your emotions, then you are exhausted and these two will never ever do anything to truly oppose the forces of evil. They are a trick, to get you focused and still, and they also will tell you not to act. Action is what is needed not words.

      • Hal K

        I don’t think you understood my comment. Reread the whole comment. If you still think I am duped, then please explain how.

        • Morris Thecat

          you’re right, I only read the first sentence when I read that, we are saying pretty much the same thing.

    • HamletsGhost

      Why does the bull lose the bullfight? Because he aims at the red cape, not the little man who is holding the cape.

  • kjh64

    A nationlist party isn’t going to please everyone but this would be a start.

    • WHITE ex-liberal

      It would please the only ones who matter to me at this point. The “racism” label has lost its power over me. It is obvious who is doing this to us.

  • bigone4u

    The criticism of jews here ignores whether the idea is a good one or not. A nationalist white party–I don’t know, is that the TeaParty? Hasn’t Pat Buchanan been wanting to turn the Repubs in this direction for years? Would such a party just consolidate the Dem stranglehold on us?
    The idea merits serious proposal and discussion. I just don’t know who has the status to really get the ball rolling on this.

    • Daisy

      Without the jews there likely would never have been a need. The Dems already have a stranglehold on us so how much worse can it get? I think we as whites need to get the ball rolling…

    • Sir Geoffrey

      Yeah, Pat tried that when he named Ezola Foster as his running mate. Foolish mistake? Pat is way, way too smart to make a mistake like that. He effectively sabotaged his nationalist movement, which led to the W disaster, which led to the O catastrophe. Nationalist movements will be demonized as racist whether they are or not. Time to take the “racist” slur and wear it as a badge of honor.

    • Svigor

      True, the idea on its face has merit. I’d love to see a Nationalist party dog-whistle its way to “un-racist” power in this country. It would definitely be an improvement.

  • Ox Tall

    Trust nothing Savage says or does, deep down he is a committed leftist. An admitted red diaper baby who worked with some destructive leftists in the 60’s. Immediately after Sandy Hook Savage backed gun control, he backed it before any facts were in. They still aren’t. When push comes to shove Savage/Wiener will march with his tribe against us. Don’t wait to see his true colors after it’s too late, see him for what he is now.


    • blight14

      Once a red diaper baby (David Horowitz), always a red diaper baby….What would J.Edgar Hoover have to say about ‘Mr Savage’? I’d trust Hoovers advice were he here to offer it…..

  • Amren reader

    If he is the one who has the only “acceptable” way, then maybe we would be better off under a Marxist way of life then Savage’s!! I mean, is there really a difference, anyway? When he wails against “racism” and “hatred”, you know he means the white variety, and dodges the Mexican, black, and Asian varieties just like the Lefties. I’m surprised he does not also include a firewall against “sexism” and “homophobia” for any future nationalist party. I know the former Soviet Union was brutal and there was no freedom, but at least there was also virtually no crime or violence, either. Savage’s version of America would be a total joke.

    • blight14

      I submit that NEITHER Weiners plan NOR the Marxist ‘utopia’ are acceptable, period. He is what he is and his plans for OUR nation are null and void.

      • HamletsGhost

        Bingo! The reason we are in this current mess is because we foolishly accepted one or another of the choices offered by Weiner’s tribe.

        If there is to be any hope for us and our children’s children, we must throw all of the would-be Weiners over the side.

        • blight14

          Well stated……….

  • tickyul

    No political solution for what ails this country…..NOPE! I think everybody knows what that means……it ain’t going to be pretty.

  • Matt West

    Michael Savage has some good points and is about the only major media figure with a mass adiance who ever dares to discuss things such as “borders, language, and culture.” However he is on another level an embaressment. He says things such as this little rant to a caller “Oh, so you’re one of those sodomites. You should only get AIDS and die, you pig; how’s that? Why don’t you see if you can sue me, you pig? You got nothing better to do than to put me down, you piece of garbage?” His paranoid rhetoric, and his regarding of Obama as a “communist,” while Romney was a “savior” lead one to think he is just another mainstream-media “conservative.” I don’t know what he meant by “King David” but if he was talking about himself, he’s dead wrong.

    • Morris Thecat

      like I said before, he’s a big mouthed jew.

  • ye ol’ swampyankee

    How can a country have a sense of nationalism when current conditions define it as a racial and ethnic hodgepodge.? Multiculturalism flies in the face of Nationalism.

    In my book that’s like saying I want more muscle mass, but I refuse to train with weights. . .

  • Steven Bannister

    I like Michael Savage and I believe his intentions are good. But- the problem with a “non-racial nationalist party” is that blacks, Hispanics and Asians would never join it. They already HAVE a party which represents them, the Democratic Party. Why do they need anything else?

    The Tea Party TRIED to be colorblind and they had numerous black speakers and candidates and STILL the MSM labeled them as “racist.” In my opinion, there’s just no way to create a Nationalist party without it being perceived as majority white.

    • Sherman_McCoy

      “But- the problem with a “non-racial nationalist party” is that blacks, Hispanics and Asians would never join it.”

      And- the BEAUTY of a “non-racial nationalist party” is that blacks, Hispanics and Asians would never join it.

      There, fixed it!


    Another false prophet.

    It is true that racially aware whites should be building a real pro-white nationalist party and stop wasting more energy on the failed effort to use the GOP as a vehicle to advance white interests.

    The only thing that will make the GOP leaders consider changing course is if they start losing large numbers of votes to a third party. The response from the GOP and conservative establishment leadership to the last election makes clear that they are not even considering moving in white-friendly direction and instead intend to amnesty illegals, increase legal immigration and pander to minority groups.

  • bluffcreek1967

    I like some of things that Michael Savage has said. He’s actually very insightful at times, and you’ll hear things from him that you won’t hear from the ‘safe’ and ‘proper’ radio conservatives – although I certainly wouldn’t agree with everything he’s publicly said by any means. He’s often so blatantly self-serving, narcissistic, overtly jealous of the success of other radio personalities, exudes a ‘woe is me’ and ‘no one understands me’ kind of attitude that doesn’t sit well with me. Sometimes it’s all too much. I turned him off a few years ago and I rarely listen anymore.

    But I think we need to have a reasoned and balanced perspective about Savage. Rather than thinking that Savage is some sort of ‘tool of the Left’ or an agent of the Jews who really despises America and is trying to undermine it, I think he’s just philosophically inconsistent at times. Savage is temperamental, sometimes overly emotional, verbally impulsive and I tend to think he hasn’t thought through the implications of his own words. All of us (myself included) have failed now and then to discern our logical pitfalls because we haven’t considered everything or carried out the full conclusions of our views – and I think Savage has done the same in this case. I know Amren probably won’t agree with me, but I think we need to be a little more restrained and not be so quick to jump on the conspiratorial bandwagon when it comes to Michael Savage.

    So, yes, I think Savage needs to see the importance of race in the equation of nationalism. But he’s been right about the need for more Americans to appreciate such concepts as ‘borders, language and culture’ – and for that I’m thankful.

    • Svigor

      Yeah, I tend to be more forgiving of Savage than most, and your comment resonates with my (limited) experience with him as well. I wouldn’t mind a hundred more in the media like him. They’d be a big improvement over what we have now.

      That said, I always find it amusing when people are surprised by the fact that he’s a Jew; he practically screams “neurotic Brooklyn Jew.”

      • PesachPatriot

        I don’t think there is any other kind in brooklyn…you should see them in florida when they are 90…I always attribute my relative sanity to growing up in a rural area instead of the rotten apple

    • HamletsGhost

      If a career criminal, finally caught for a lifetime of crimes, suddenly announces he’s seen the light and got religion, wouldn’t you be at least a little suspicious of his motives? Especially as his newly found beliefs come to him just before he is to meet with the parole board?

      Communist Jews, who spent their whole lives destroying the pillars of our society at all levels, suddenly claim to see the light, and you want to embrace them?

      Jews are guilty until proven innocent. So far, no proof of their bona fides is apparent.

  • name

    Michael Savage: Certain races more intelligent than others


    • HamletsGhost

      So he states the obvious. Do you want to knight him?

      • Morris Thecat

        to state the obvious requires courage these days

  • NYB

    By his flawed definition of “nationalism”, I could create a new country out of Haitians, Swedes and Japanese, as long as they share “borders, language and culture”.

    He needs to look up the Latin root of the word ‘nation’. It means to have been born of common origin.

    He needs schooling in nationalism before he speaks again.

    • PesachPatriot

      The japanese and the swedes might make a pretty decent country…nintendo and nokia phones, ikea furniture, sushi, swedish meatballs….the haitians would wreck it pretty quickly though….

  • IstvanIN

    Nationalism has to be either racial for a country like the US (European-American) or ethnic as in the case of most European countries. Otherwise you have an empire (British) with a particular ethnic group (English) keeping everybody else under the their rule.

    The only really “voluntary” empire the world has known, and it could have rivaled the US and USSR, was the UK and the Commonwealth Realms. Great Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, with a common people, language, history, and monarch, could have tossed out the rest of the old empire/commonwealth, worked together and been a major presence from Europe, North America and the Pacific, not to mention the Falklands in the south Atlantic and Gibraltar on the Mediterranean.

  • StillModerated

    Who needs racism? Jesse Helms proved you can win a senate seat by “pandering” to the White vote.

  • Luca

    Regardless of Michael Savage’s affiliations and regardless if he is even sincere, he is absolutely right. The sticky point here is “culture”. If we use history as an example I would say we hit the high-water mark of American culture around 1964.

    If we could control and completely harness the liberal, leftist, Marxist, socialist, communist anarchist element in our society, I believe other problems (like race, immigrants, crime, industry etc) would fall into a more natural order and progressively improve.

    We need a national party of common sense, taking pointers from Libertarian, Republican and Constitutional principles.

    There is not now nor ever was racial unity among Whites. That is why any idea based on the notion that such a unity exists is a waste of time. You can however build an agreement among Whites on culture. A culture based on fairness, morality, ethics, and the Rights of Man stands a much better chance than anything built upon race. Racial issues will always divide this country until the race issue are completely ignored. As long as you fan the flames of race the issue will never go away. It’s like scratching a scab that will never heal.

    You can get to where you want to go without waving a racial banner. There is more than one way to skin a cat.

    • HamletsGhost

      Actually, whites were united on the subject of race till recent decades.
      It was agreed by both Republicans and Democrats that America was founded by white men and that it should stay that way.

      Things changed in the 60s. Guess who led the change?

      • Luca

        The subject of race has divided Whites in this country in one way or another since 1776 when the Southern delegates would have refused any inclusion of emancipation in either the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution.

        We fought a bloody Civil War over the question of slavery and there were people on both sides of the aisle pushing for or against Civil Rights, Segregation, AA, EEO etc.

        They will never solve the problems of race if they refuse to identify the cause of the problem.

  • A nationalist movement that refuses to EXPLICITLY fight for the interests of White people is worthless. The GOP will crumble because it ignores its White constituents. Weiner’s proposed “nationalist” party is just another ploy to misdirect the anger and energy of Whites, as are the GOP and tea party.

    • Yeah, I’m really sick of all this implicit cowardice masquerading as strategy. People will spend years and years of their lives trying to dance around the obvious and couch their words so as to not offend people that either don’t care about facts or will be offended no matter what you say.

      If it’s not specifically about White interests and addressing the negative effects of multiracial societies, then I’m just not interested. Long walk, short pier…..

  • IKantunderstand

    Dumb Ass. A nationalist party based on borders,culture, and language is a wimpy way to talk about race. THEY ARE ONE AND THE SAME!!! WE do need a new party. But let us not pussyfoot around what this party is about. It is about keeping this nation majority White.

  • Michael_C_Scott

    This is Michael Weiner,and all of this will be a trap which will make Mr. Weiner more money.

  • White and Proud

    Wasn’t this the same guy who threatened to sue AMREN for posting an article of his a few years ago? He is a fraud.

  • Western Front

    Big deal. Create a White Nationalist or Third Party. Call it what you want. Give it a name. You have to start somewhere. And just advocate for White interests. It is those who take the first steps who will be the most violently attacked. They will have to handle the onslaught. It will be ugly. Ultimately, by having three parties – perhaps not possible – but still – it will split the black and latino voters and liberal Whites and allow the 200 million Whites in America to not be forced into winning a majority or nothing at all.

    As for leftist Jewish influence – I don’t know how to answer that. Not every Jew is a Hollywood $PLC fifth column conspiracy member. I think that Jews are finished in America because of intermarriage anyway. While this sub-group of enablers has to be confronted so do liberal churches and charities, etc…tunnel vision can result and take attention away from the real issue of 40 million pathologic blacks destroying the country while latino hordes invade from the south.

    • HamletsGhost

      Who unleashed those 40 million blacks on us?

      • George


        Well, John W. Booth, really. Lincoln likely would have offered another set of free cruises to Liberia. Thanks to Ford’s Theatre, we instead got the revised 13th Amendment 13. Then the 14th & 15th.

  • Demopublicans. In England they have Labour and the Torys, a two headed beast.

  • Tucker

    The Savage Weiner , true to his ethnic roots, is controlled opposition and has been from the very beginning. Anyone with a brain bigger than a marble and IQ over single digits should have been able to see through this guy’s scam years ago.

    Time for a refresher: It is a well known trademark of the gang Weiner belongs to, to constantly survey the horizon and keep a sharp eye out and an equally sharp nose-in-the-air for any sign or aroma of growing opposition or resistance to the White European Genocide Agenda that is the primary foundation of the Frankfurt School of Cultural Marxism’s fundamental ideology. The Savage Weiner and his co-white-genocide promoting conspirators, post November 6th and even years before that magical date – have been monitoring sites like AmRen, The Occidental Observer, etc., and have seen the significant and (to them) worrisome increase in White Nationalist, White racialist, and White European preservationist thinking and activism – and this makes the genocidists very nervous. And, the kind of commentary that we are used to seeing on sites like AmRen is now becoming very common on mainstream websites that are clearly not-White Nationalist in their general approach to news coverage. The Bob Whitaker Mantra has exploded and is all over the entire Web now, and it seems to be spreading like a prairie fire.

    At the same time, these genocidists peer across the Atlantic Ocean and survey the long overdue rise of European Nationalist parties throughout all the major historic White nations of Europe – and then they take nervous note of the efforts by American based pro-White activists like Jared Taylor, Kevin MacDonald, and others, to form connections and alliances with, and to collaborate with, their European Nationalist leaders and counterparts in Europe. This indicates to the Savage Weiner crowd that the handwriting is on the wall and that there is no longer any effective way to stop the rise of White European Nationalism – the enemy senses that the movement has reached a tipping point and that this is turning into a juggernaut.

    Thus, I would guess that the genocidists have held a few panicky strategy sessions in secret, and are attempting to repeat another well known tactic that they’ve used with amazing success in the past – namely, trying to get their people out in front of the perceived opposition to their agenda, elbow aside the legitimate leadership, take over leadership positions and then once they control the movement- steer it into directions which continues to advance their agenda. In this case, that agenda is White European reduction to minority status inside every historic White European nation, followed by the subjugation of White European people to hostile minority rule, followed by a swift deprivation of sacred and precious Constitutional rights (The Second Amendment, the First Amendment are two that are on the chopping block), followed by non-white, twisted and diabolically evil reinterpretations of our Constitution which will usher in new laws which will come as close as possible to making it illegal to even be White, and which will have a very high likelihood of prohibiting Whites from marrying one another and having White children, since as Susan Sontag and Noel Ignatiev have said: extermination of the White race is such a noble objective that anyone who opposes it has to be mentally insane – or, something very close to that.

    Conclusion: Tell Mike The Savage Weiner to put his idea of a ‘non-racial’ Nationalist Party in a place where the Sun never shines.

    Now is the time for Whites in America and also all around the White European world to join hands with their racial kinsmen and women, and to adopt a no-tolerance policy towards white racial treason within our people and to understand that our very survival is at stake and this battle will only be won by Whites who come together as a race and who fight as a united race of people.

    • Morris Thecat

      wow, you put that very well. That is exactly what I think but was not able to put is as succinctly as you did. I think Rush Limbaugh has been used from the start in just such a manner but he does not realize it. It appears that the jews have run out of tricks in their marxist media carpet bags. No one is falling for these some old same olds anymore.

  • savagery

    Who is Savage kidding since it is his puppeteer khazars who own and control all the media and brainwash the masses and he knows it. Savage and his khazars may be worried their little mind game is out of hand and over the top so he wants some protection?

  • We need a party that excludes liberals and jews. Only then can we move forward.

  • Sir Geoffrey

    “Nationalism is the only thing that can save America, and a new
    nationalist party that has a very strict firewall that does not permit
    the radical fringe of racism.” Replace racism with Euro-centrism, which is what they mean.

    And what is it the internationalists do? They want to dissolve the
    borders, they want to introduce multiculturalism, they want to introduce
    a Tower of Babel of languages.” How do you combat this without Euro-centrism?

    This is the magical power of two party politics. Destroy with one party, logically handcuff the opposition with the other party so they cannot take effective corrective action.

  • nobody

    I used to listen to Savage’s radio show every now and then, 100% garbage. He is anti-freedom and pro big government and he thinks that he is much more clever than he really is.

  • “And there is no King David out there. Who’s the King David? Tell me who is going to do it?”

    Well, we don’t have a “King” David, but we do have a Duke…

    • I see what you did there. 😉

  • gemjunior

    I actually like listening to him because he abuses black and mexican”racists” constantly. I think he is really clear about how useless he finds them, and how destructive. He also hates Hollywood “vermin in the media” – “Katzenberg, Ratzenburg, Flatzenburg & Spielberg” as he calls them. So he knows what’s going on and just won’t say he can’t stand Jews because he IS one and doesn’t feel comfortable saying it loudly because he feels disloyal and traitorous to his religion. He doesn’t want to be labeled a “self-hating Jew”. I don’t think he is anti-white at all. I think he wants this country turned around to BEFORE his co-religionists took the helm and drove it into the toilet bowl, and I’m with him on that. I believe he wants whites to have the control of this country. He even supports Christianity and is always saying this was meant to be a Christian country.

    • HamletsGhost

      If he supports Christianity, let him become one.

      • IstvanIN

        You can support a religion’s right to exist, and even it’s right to be the majority religion of a nation, without being a member of that faith. Protestant America was the best place in the world for Jews, anyone with half a brain should realize that.

        • HamletsGhost

          I guess that would exclude most Jews from the demi-brain category. They had everything opened to them in this country, and they could think to do nothing but to destroy it. And everyone thinks Jews are so smart.

          • JohnEngelman

            Ashkenazi Jews have the highest IQ of any ethnic group known.
            They average around 112-115, well above the European norm of 100…

            Their numbers among prominent scientists are roughly ten times
            greater than you’d expect from their share of the population in the United
            States and Europe. Over the past two generations they have won more than a
            quarter of all Nobel science prizes, although they make up less than
            one-six-hundredth of the world’s population. Although they represent less than
            3 percent of the U.S. population they son 27 percent of the U.S. Nobel prizes
            in science…

            American Jews are also over represented in other areas, such as
            business (where they account for about a fifth of CEOs) and academia (where
            they make up about 22 percent of Ivy league students).

            – Gregory Cochran and Henry Harpending, from “The 10,000
            Year Explosion: How Civilization Accelerated Human Evolution,” Chapter 7:
            “Medieval Evolution: How the Ashkenazi Jews Got Their Smarts,” pages
            188, 189, 190.

          • JohnEngelman

            The Chosen People: A study of Jewish Intelligence and Achievement is the most recent work of Richard Lynn dealing with group differences in IQ and their ramifications. As in all of his previous work over the past decade, he substantiates his arguments with huge quantities of empirical data. He advances his positions dispassionately and lets the facts speak for themselves, which they do in impressive, nearly irrefutable fashion. In his previous books he examined racial and ethnic differences in IQ for many groups.The Chosen People is a case study of one distinct group that has shown remarkably similar patterns of achievement in a wide variety of settings.

            Professor Lynn begins by pointing out the extraordinary success of Jews in almost every field. In the 19th century the restrictions that had prevented most Jews from advanced nonreligious study began to be lifted in most of Western Europe, and by mid-century, “people began to observe that Jews were outstandingly successful, and began to speculate that this was attributable to their intellect.”…

            Having established with extraordinary diligence the success of Ashkenazi Jews, Professor Lynn addresses the question of the origins of these Jews’ high intelligence. He dismisses environmental explanations on a number of grounds….One is left with genetic explanations.

        • Daisy

          I’ll never understand how nationalism is spun as a religion. Judaism posits that god is on their side in fighting others over land and material resources, and to establish a nation. It has nothing to do with an afterlife or with things that the word ‘religion’ usually applies to. It’s an ethincity, a race perhaps, a nationalist movement, but definitely not a religion.

          • PesachPatriot

            The religion is more than nationalism, but it is intimately connected to it because the people who wrote the bible were a bronze age agricultural society. All the jewish holidays are tied to the agricultural calendar. The land of Israel was the basis of their livelihood…there wasn’t much need for hedge fund managers, real estate lawyers, computer technicians or laboratory scientists in judea and samaria around 1500 BC…the more aggressive boys became warriors, the more intelligent ones became priests and studied religious law. The afterlife is mentioned in a few texts, as well as apocalyptic ideas and final judgements of humanity.

            The afterlife isn’t a big topic in the Bible because the majority of the text is mostly commandments and prohibitions. Your average non-religious american jew barely knows half of them. We fight with palestinians over land and material resources because we know the tender mercies and high ideals of the rest of humanity all too well.

    • IstvanIN

      I always got the impression he was disgusted by his fellow Jews and what they (the 75% who vote Demoncrat) have done this country. His put-on “New York” accent that is obviously a “Jewish NY” accent. Being Jewish it has to be difficult having to disagree with your own people, and lets face it, get too “anti-Semitic” and even a Jew will be disappeared from the airwaves.

      • HamletsGhost

        He only disagrees with his fellow Jews on means, not ends.

        Wiener plays the conservative good cop to the liberals’ bad cop. Anyone who falls for that old trick just plays into his hands.

        • gemjunior

          I’m going to listen to him with this in mind and see if he’s doing this. It’s always annoyed me that he won’t say it – how all the people he screams about (Feinstein etc.) are Jews and everyone knows it including him but it remains something that nobody is allowed to say – you get the feeling that if you say the word Jew, he’ll start screaming “antisemite”!!. But he’s the only person on any sort of, kind of, supposed, somewhat MSM person who is absolutely saying out loud what’s happening with criminals in congress etc. For example, all the dirtbags profiting of the war in the billions – off companies in the middle east but would NEVER send their own sons to die. We all know what these people diserve charges of high treason and the gibbet – but nobody will say it. Except this guy.

  • Garrett Brown

    If Great Britain can have one, and that party even took three seats of parliament, why can’t we?

  • JustWakingUp

    I came across a YouTube video a few years back entitled, “Why Germany Hated the Jews.” It had pictures of the cultural filth in 1930’s Germany and who pushed it. The attempts and communist takeover and who pushed it. I was in shock. Everything I’d been taught my whole life was in question. My first thought was that this is America now. It was very unsettling and when I went to show it to someone else a few days later it was pulled. One thing I realized is that I’ve only heard one side of the story my whole life. I find it strange we were allied with the communists in ww2.

    • PesachPatriot

      It had a lot more to do with some jews in germany profiting off the hyperinflating deutschmark…as most here know the german people have a deep respect for authority and the state…They refused to accept that their currency was being printed away to nothing by a foolish government. They held on to paper currency, stocks and bonds, until they had to start burning them to stay warm.

      The jews of germany had seen many paper currencies fail over the centuries, so they were the first to lose faith during weimar…they dumped their paper currency for gold, silver, diamonds, fur, artwork, real estate…basically anything of real value that could not be printed….The older people told them not flaunt their wealth, but the younger ones were foolish and did not listen and we all know how things ended up….

      • Gracchus123

        Is all of that why the International Jewish Congress declared war on Germany in 1933?

        • PesachPatriot

          I don’t know for sure since I wasn’t around…Hitler had made his intentions pretty clear in mein kampf(which I actually read a long time ago), but believe it or not I think there were actually some jews in germany who actually voted for him, thinking his anti-jewish rhetoric was simply political grandstanding, they thought he would fix the german economy and tone things down once he became a legitimate political leader and not the leader of an opposition party…anyway the IJC back then was hardly the equivalent of the modern state of Israel in its ability to wage armed conflict…Someone else posted something here that said david irving is now shilling for gun control after sandy hook…

    • Gracchus123

      Those facts about WWII that “shocked” you are written about in P.J. Buchanan’s book, CHURCHILL, HITLER AND THE UNNECESSARY WAR.

      You can also find those facts in Hitler’s MEIN KAMPF.

      I too was shocked after reading MEIN KAMPH; the descriptions were as fitting to contemporary America as anything could be. It made me question everything I thought I knew about WWl and WWll.

      Then I found the writings of David Irving. I’ve never been the same.

  • Mark

    Michael Weiner’s greatest loyalty is to Israel. This guy’s a Trojan Horse.

  • saris1

    “Savage also pointed out the term “nationalism” needs to be redefined, as it’s too often associated with Hitler and the National Socialist Party, the Nazis, of 1930s Germany.”

    What Savage fails to mention is that the term “Nationalism” in the 20-30’s meant something entirely different than what it means today. Nationalism meant “Autarky” that’s what it meant, complete self sufficiency.

    Savage is another deceitful Jew leading everyone the wrong way. He says “don’t do this” with his childish reverse psychology and then everyone does it, so they can go against the “mainstream.”

    No, what America needs is real Nationalism — AUTARKY just that would solve a LOT of America’s problems.

  • Dave4088

    Oh, the new nationalist party cannot permit the “radical fringe of racism” according to Michael Savage (Weiner). I guess that’s only allowed for the Likud party of Israel, but not for the white hoi polloi of American. That’s the worst advise anyone could give and most of us know why.

    Any new party must be race based and pro-white for American whites to have any fighting chance at survival. A new party with a bunch of of fearful whites with narrow concerns and a black figurehead won’t excite anyone and will be recognized for the fraud that it would be.

  • pro-American

    Michael “Savage” Weiner starting up an “American” Nationalist party has got to be a joke right?!

    Weiner is nothing but a fanatical, extremist zionist, neocon/ziocon Jew, who NEVER puts the USA first, but always puts the zionist, Jewish supremacist, terrorist state of Israel first, who happens to believe (like all traitorous to the USA, Israel first, neocon, zionist trash) that Obama is NOT sufficiently kissing Israel’s a**, sucking up to Israel, being militaristic enough against Israel’s alleged “enemies,” etc., even though Obama is nothing but a zionist puppet and slave par excellence, and certified war criminal responsible for the killing and maiming of thousands of innocent civilians — but to these neocon, zionist supremacists, in their eyes, he’s actually a freaking “pacifist” and not pro-Israel (a FOREIGN COUNTRY) enough!

    Same with the teocon/neocon so-called “Tea party.” They were several years ago infiltrated by Ziocon (neocon) Israel firsters, as 99% of them are also not really pro-American in the slightest, but pro-Israel, zionist supremacist to the core, who want America to continue to become bankrupt, to continue losing countless AMERICAN soldiers all for the sake of Zion, attacking and killing and continuing to go to war against all of Israel’s alleged enemies, of course Iran being their next target, and for the (zionist controlled) “US” govt to continue to DESTROY the US Constitution — signing off on the more NDAAs, more illegal spying initiatives, more extensions of the Patriot act, and every other, very anti-constitutional provision that completely trash the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, continuing to turn America into a Police State …. But these treasonous zionist, Teocon “Tea Party” Israel firsters NEVER complain about any of this (nor do the millions of fanatical Oboma apologists and kool aid drinkers either, but that’s another story…)

    Watch how these zionist/Israel first (NOT America first!) Teocon “Tea Party” activist types including Michael “Savage” Weiner, are all getting their panties in a twist because Obama has nominated a man (Chuck Hagel) who actually said something slightly negative about a FOREIGN COUNTRY! A FOREIGN COUNTRY! (Even though Hagel has many times pledged loyalty to Zion and has waxed poetic about how he truly LOVES Israel notwithstanding) And in his comment he basically said that he would PUT AMERICA FIRST!!! Oh the freaking irony!!! And you have these same zionist/Israel first, zionist supremacists including Mr. Weiner and the Teocon party activists critiquing Chuck Hagel saying this, and then having the freaking gull and temerity to then turn around saying they are the REAL “American” Nationalists, or that they are going to start a new “American” nationalist party?!?! It would be funny if it wasn’t so damn sad!

  • Euro-American Patriot

    Michael “Savage” Weiner starting an American Nationalist
    party has got to be a joke, right?

    IMO, Mr. Weiner is nothing but an extremist neocon, zionist who NEVER puts
    the USA first, but always puts Israel first, who happens to believe (like all Israel
    first, neocons) that Obama is NOT sufficiently kissing Israel’s back side,
    sucking up to Israel, being militaristic enough against Israel’s alleged
    “enemies,” not starting enough wars, etc., even though Obama seems to constantly
    be doing Israel’s bidding, and is responsible for the killing and maiming of hundreds
    of innocent civilians, and getting the USA involved in even more wars and
    foreign entanglements then even Bush did. However, to these neocon, Israel
    first extremists, and I’ve heard this over and over and over from Mr. Weiner
    and his ilk, Obama is in their eyes, actually a freaking “pacifist,” not
    killing enough Muslims, is too scared to go to war against Iran (another
    country’s alleged enemy, NOT the USA’s) and of course one hears this last one
    over and over and over and over, that he is NOT pro-Israel (a FOREIGN COUNTRY
    the last time I checked) enough, that he is throwing Israel under the bus, etc.
    Now, I know that no one here with half a brain likes or approves of Obama or
    what he and the Marxist Democraps stand for, and I certainly DO NOT, but just
    because they seem to “hate” Obama does not mean they are “right” in any way.
    The enemy of my enemy is not necessarily my friend…

    Same with the teocon/neocon so-called “Tea party.” Several years ago,
    IMO, they were basically taken over by the neocons (what’s the difference
    between the typical Tea Party person, and the typical so-called “conservative”
    Republican, at least in 2013?), as 99% of them are also not really pro-American
    in the truest sense, but seem to want America to continue to become even more bankrupt
    morally and literally, fighting more wars for a certain foreign country, to continue
    losing countless more poor, working class, WHITE AMERICAN soldiers for this
    special foreign country, of course Iran being their next target, and for the US
    govt. to continue to DESTROY the US Constitution — signing off on more NDAAs,
    more illegal spying initiatives, more extensions of the misnamed “Patriot” act,
    and every other, anti-constitutional provision that completely trashes the
    Constitution and the Bill of Rights, continuing to turn America into a Police
    State. Yes, they seem to be very good at defending the Second Amendment (or at
    least paying lip service to it), I’ll give them that, but that’s about it…

    Case in point, just watch how these Israel first (NOT America first)
    Teocon “Tea Party” activists are all getting their panties in a twist because
    Obama has nominated a man (Chuck Hagel) who actually said something slightly
    negative about a FOREIGN COUNTRY. A FOREIGN COUNTRY! (Even though Hagel has
    many times waxed poetic about how he truly loves Israel notwithstanding) And in
    his various “controversial” comments he was basically saying that he would PUT
    AMERICA FIRST. Oh the freaking irony. And you have these same Israel first, neocons
    including Mr. Weiner and the “Teocon” party activist types critiquing Chuck
    Hagel saying this, and then having the freaking gull and temerity to then turn
    around saying they are the REAL “American” Nationalists, or that they are going
    to start a new “American” nationalist party. It would be funny if it wasn’t so
    damn sad.