USDA Requires Little Documentation for $50,000 Discrimination Payouts

Lachlan Markay, The Foundry, October 11, 2012

The U.S. Department of Agriculture will pay up to $50,000 each to female and Hispanic farmers and ranchers who claimed they were discouraged from applying for USDA loans due to perceived discrimination. But those farmers won’t be required to prove that they ever actually farmed.

The payments are part of a settlement agreement reached between the USDA and North Carolina farmer Timothy Pigford that created a $1.33 billion fund to compensate farmers who say they were discriminated against by USDA officials between 1981 and 2000. Previous payments have gone to black and Native American farmers.

The women and Hispanic farmers fund provides different levels of compensation based on the nature of the alleged discrimination. Tier 1(a), as it’s known, is comprised of farmers and ranchers “who sought to apply for a USDA loan but were actively discouraged from submitting an application” due to perceived discrimination.

In other words, by definition, USDA has no record of 1(a) claimants actually applying for a federal loan. {snip}

According to a checklist of required claimant submission materials, USDA requires that all tiers submit “documentation of farm land ownership interest, if available” [emphasis added]. In other words, documents showing that one actually farmed are optional.

“A document from a non-family member to you, or from you to a non-family member that supports your contentions” is the extent of the documentation required for 1(a) claimants to demonstrate that they owned or had a stake in a farm from 1981 to 2000, according to the USDA checklist.


The thorny “attempted to farm” issue arose in previous USDA settlement payments, which, Breitbart News’s Lee Stranahan noted last month, provided a tautological basis for discrimination compensation:

The low bar was a trick that the lawyers and politicians put into Pigford years ago; the “attempted to farm” standard. All you had to do was to say that you attempted to farm. In other words, you made the unprovable claim that you went to a USDA office and they did not even give you an application. Your lack of an application or any other documentary evidence became the proof that you had suffered discrimination.

Rep. Steve King (R-IA), who scrutinized previous USDA discrimination payouts, told Scribe that the department “has not put in place adequate safeguards to prevent exploitation” of the female and Hispanic farmers settlement. “The Pigford settlement created fraud of historic proportions and now the Obama administration is heading down the same path by creating a payout system for women and Hispanic farmers,” King added.


According to some reports, Pigford paid out settlement money to about 80,000 black farmers, even though there were only about 33,000 such farmers in operation during the period in question.


Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Jed Sant Devi

    What does it tell you that no White governors are on TV talking about this, or anyone at Fox or Beck?

    Some corruption is excusable when BRA Diversity yells racism when you ask questions.

  •  So owning a “farm” is not necessary to prove you were a
    female hispanic “farmer” that perceived discrimination How much longer is this
    **** going to be tolerated before it’s stopped? This is where my federal tax
    dollars go? To support this THEFT in the name of race!

  • IKantunderstand

    Ummm, do I have to prove I’m Hispanic? Female? I mean, if I really don’t have to prove I meant to apply for a farm loan, or in fact prove that I actually owned a farm, than what the hay! (Farm talk) let’s all of us here at Amren swamp the gov. with discrimination claims! We are all Hispanic lady farmers denied loans! We can each get $50,000 dollars!!! We can rejoice in the fact we made other White taxpayers pay for it ! Oh, wait, that would mean our friends, and family. We would probably feel guilty. (As well we should!). And, there you have it, another way WHITE PEOPLE are different from everybody else!!!!!!!!!!!!!