Takeaway Brothel Boss Hounded Girls for Sex

BBC News, May 14, 2012

A Carlisle takeaway boss has been convicted of attempting to recruit four girls aged between 12 and 16 into prostitution.                            

Azad Miah, 44, was also found guilty at Carlisle Crown Court of running a brothel from his business and paying for the sexual services of teenagers.

The owner of the former Spice of India restaurant had denied all charges.

He was found guilty of inciting four girls into prostitution, and cleared of the same allegation against two others.

He was also convicted of paying for the sexual services of two girls.

Miah, who was warned that he faced a “substantial” prison term, will be sentenced on Tuesday.

‘Persistent offers’

The court was told that the married father-of-four hounded and stalked the girls to try to persuade them to have sex for money.

He was described as carrying out a “cold, clinical exploitation of the desperate and vulnerable”, targeting girls with drug or alcohol addictions, or with troubled backgrounds.

In his opening address, prosecutor Tim Evans said: “It is the Crown’s case that the defendant deliberately targeted girls who fell into that category or who had other problems with the law.

“The defendant believed that such girls would be more likely to give in to his persistent offers . . .  and they may find themselves less likely to be believed if they complained to the police against a responsible, respected restaurateur of the city.”

The jury heard that one girl complained to police about Miah persistently harassing her in 2008, three years before he was arrested, but gave up when no action was taken.

Miah came from Bangladesh to England with his family in 1982, married his Bangladeshi wife seven years later, and opened the Spice of India in 2000.

The restaurant and takeaway in Botchergate is now operating with new owners and a new name.

Miah was convicted of paying one girl for sex a number of times when she was aged between 15 and 17. She used the money to fund her heroin addiction.

Following his arrest he claimed that the relationship did not begin until she was 18.

‘Big money’

Another 15-year-old—whom he incited into prostitution—was paid £80 for sex after being told on her first day of work at the takeaway that she could make “big money”.

He later claimed he had given the girls money out of generosity, and they had got together and concocted stories in revenge when the money stopped.

Det Con Christy Robertson, who interviewed Miah after his arrest, described him as “arrogant”.

She said: “I would say that he showed contempt for the girls, he was dismissive of them.

“He was disrespectful to me. If I challenged him in any way then he was across the table with fingers [pointing] in my face.

“I think that he thought it was a joke to him.”

Following his conviction, Linda Vance, from the Crown Prosecution Service, said: “He preyed on these particular girls because he thought they were easier to exploit because of their vulnerability.

“Even though he knew that they were under 16 he repeatedly approached them, followed them and bombarded them with text messages, sometimes for weeks at a time, pestering them for sex in exchange for money, drugs or alcohol.”

She added: “Azad Miah is a sexual predator.

“Through the detailed investigations by the police, the thorough preparation of the case by the prosecutors, and most importantly the courage of his victims in coming forward, he is now facing justice.”

Azad Miah

Topics: ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

    …. And they let rats like him infest England.

  • Church_of_Jed

    We don’t believe that the surrender monkey Brits will really keep these Diversity pervs in jail full sentence. Some UN Human Rights and Inclusive Diversity Commission will put the word out that the perv has served “too much time already for a negligible crime and suffers from unjust laws,” and the Brits will know they have cover to spring him early, just as their mentality favors.

    • loyalwhitebriton

      “surrender monkey Brits..”

      I will not write what I really think about that sentence because it will simply removed by the moderator.

      Cognicise the following:

      Most “Brits” hate the very presence of these diversities in our formerly great nation.
      Most “Brits” would like to see the likes of azad miah swinging at the end of several yards of hemp.
      Most “Brits” don’t have have a mentality which favours releasing such offenders early (see above).
      Most “Brits” would like to see the politicians who engulfed this country in multiculturalism facing the most appropriate and codign punishment (see above). 

      Don’t confuse most “Brits” with the nation hating, “Brit” hating, race hating, everything hating, political elites which run this country.

      I hope that clears things up.

      • Church_of_Jed

        We watch your parliment and royal weddings, and we see White privilege in its supreme physical manifestation. All those bright Whiteys  that we see surely are the main part of the elites who gave Churchill’s Britian away to the Muslim invaders and Jamacian gangs. 

        How do they protect themselves from the Diversity Curse, and how do they think they will in the future? Don’t the fear the common Brits as Louis should have feared his French subjects?

        Do you think your next Archbishop of Canterbury will be a dangerously useless as the current one?

        • loyalwhitebriton

          I’ve edited my last comment so that it does not seem in your face. After I read the Amren article (and with a bottle of wine down me) I entered into my usual angry white male state, and took it out on you. Sorry.

          Anyway, you make a perfectly valid point. Many of the white elites that you see at our various Royal shindigs, and State opening of Parliament, etc, are the very same elites who have sold our country down the river and into the abyss.
          The reasons are manifold, but include the usual self-loathing from the Left and cowardice from the right.

          Indeed, there is a very arguable case for charging many of our elites with actual High Treason:

          Finally, as far as the next Archbishop is concerned, if it’s “Dr” Sentamu, I’ll stop attending my local Anglican communion, and become a Methodist or something (it’s bad enough having a bearded lefty at the helm).

          • Church_of_Jed

            The Big Voodoo from York is a logical succession and a proper punishment for Christianizing the savages. White Christians should have left the afrovoodoos alone to worship snakes and dust clouds however they saw fit as best satisfied their imaginations. We cursed ourselves by bringing them in our midsts.

      • The__Bobster

        Well, who the hell is voting these political elites into office?

        • Sherman_McCoy

          Yes, why don’t we see a UKIP/BNP coalition government?

          • KenelmDigby

            The short answer is that the Conservative Party -supposedly the party of British nationalism – should have done something to stop the invasion.
            Quite simply, they didn’t. They are just the same as your Republicans.

          • loyalwhitebriton

            Generally speaking, UKIP tend to appeal to disaffected Tory voters, and BNP to equally disaffected Labour voters.
            Also, UKIP and BNP can’t stand each other.
            Personally, I would be very happy indeed to have either a UKIP or BNP majority government.

        • loyalwhitebriton

          In 1997 Tony Bliar talked sensisble talk about immigration, then opened the floodgates when elected. In 2010 ‘Call me Dave’ Cameron made some encouraging noises about significantly reducing immigration, and what’s happened? Nothing!
          Pathetic really. But we were lied to, by the Left and Right.
          Revolution is the only thing which will sort this nation out (and yours).
          We certainly can’t rely on our Pathetic & Lying politicians.

      • JackKrak

        Don’t worry, LWB, most us know who the real Brits are. I’m sure you know that we Americans have our own traitor class as well working overtime from within to enforce their views on us, just as yours works to give you more Mr. Miahs.

  • Johnny Reb

    I’m losing all faith in the Brits.  If I had a white neighbor who let his daughters be raped and never took  out the trash, I’d have to conclude that there was something wrong with the old boy’s head.  Looks to me like the Brits have caught the same disease.

    Are you seriously telling me that the young lads who walked upright, in straight lines, towards machine gun fire on the the Albert-Bapaume road on July 1st, 1916, wouldn’t spit on their descendants today and call them cowards?

    • Kurt Plummer


      Are you seriously telling me that the young lads who walked upright, in straight lines, towards machine gun fire on the the Albert-Bapaume road on July 1st, 1916, wouldn’t spit on their descendants today and call them cowards?

      If they did, I would let them know that I considered them equally dysgenic fools.

      _Had they lived_ the makeup of Britain would be entirely different.  Because, had the UK not have away lives, ‘over the top’ in Paul Bunyon style competition between ‘bravery’ and auto repeating firearm technology, of the likes of Hiram Maxim and Company, they would have been populated by a people vastly smarter than they are today.

      ‘…invent something that will enable these Europeans to cut each other’s throats with greater facility.’  (and you will make millions) I believe was the pragmatic reply to the American’s attempts to introduce something, gasp, useful to his homelands.

      In a eugenics forum I ghost, there was posted a study of WWI casualty figures which correlated rank with IQ variables and found that something like 20-30% higher losses were recorded among those junior officers with the HIGHEST intelligence.  While the ‘upper ranks’ were surprisingly, not only devoid of attrition but also of truly high operating IQs as strategic genius.

      Indicating where the class system as inherited wealth had replaced insight with lockstep social stultification.

      We didn’t suffer from this at the time.  And so it becomes ever clearer that Washington was right: We should have never become infected as involved with whatever mental disease convinced the European Whites that they had to slaughter each other ‘for just cause’.

      Because that is the point where the Victorian era became the Edwardian one and the empowerment of previously politically mute (women and common laborers) elements of society saw the beginnings of the loss of understanding that a world made for whites was one based on internal, prejudicial, cultural focus and cohesion.

      For exclusive access to privilege yes.  But also for genetic population advancement.  As the endgame of evolutionary dominance.

      Of course we know whereof this ‘school’ of thought originates but what most don’t understand is the vectors of exploitation by which native white homogeny and non-destructive desire for competition as personal fulfillment in _pursuit of excellence_ were forcibly turned back upon itself.

      Through organized interventionist warfare.

      The solely evil ends of which we see as the monstrous outcome now eventuated upon us, today.

      Multicult, egalitarian, universalist, race-neutral and white neutered.  Which would be bad enough on it’s own but that it equally FAILS to recognize the species as much as race suicidal outcomes of Malthusian deficit in resource and genetics driven isolation of survivable (beneficial) characteristics, within and for, one group.

      That this occurs solely because we’re too good when we’re allowed to compete as equals is a given.  That nobody else stops being tribally corrupt to adopt our socially altruistic (conservative) methods is the unseen and critical, other-racial flaw.

  • bubo

    The Brits have the same problem as we do.  Life is still too comfortable for most of them/us.   

    That might not be a problem for much longer.   Once we lose are fear of being blacklisted/fired or shamed for doing what is necessary for our culture to survive there will be no stopping us.  

  • KenelmDigby

    Miah is a Bangladeshi.
    Bangladesh  the most wretched,horrific, degraded, beggarly, starving nation on Earth. As a child I watched TV footage of everyday life in Bangladesh, the horror of watching the human degradation – skinny, nudey, beggarly bodies in a Dantean Hell – has stayed with me for the rest of my life. It has left me with a life long deep fear of poverty, a confirmed malthusian pessimism, and a deep seat horror and loathing of the entire Indian sub-continent.
     And now we have a maggot from that land of filth, cholera and starvation terrorizing girls of a better and more honorable stock.
     The saddest thing is that the British political class would do anything, up to and including shedding White blood, to defend filth like Miah.

  • KenelmDigby

    I remember a few years back a boat-load of Bangladeshis tried to impose themselves on Thailand, by using that familar trick that works so well with dumb, weak Europeans (ie washing up unwelcome and unwanted on a beach).
     Well, the hard-headed and canny Thais simply attached a tow rope to the boat, used a tug to pull it far out to sea, cut the rope and left it there. No further sea-borne invasion was attempted.
      The stupid jerks at the ‘The Economist’ fulminated, but no diplomatic incident ensued. Quite rightly, the lives of Bangladeshis had very little import in diplomatic circles.

  • KenelmDigby

    Fabius, believe you me, the British government would glory in seeing indigenous, native White starving in the streets like dogs, but would love to mollycoddle, privelege and protect ugly-faced black scum like Miah.

  • Ltuyyz

    Third world immigration brings third world problems. The UK does not need any more of that sort.

  • Kurt Plummer


    I wonder how Britain became a world power?

    Great Britain became a world power upon whose Empire ‘the sun never set’ by virtue of being racist.  The British (rightly, at the time) thought of themselves as superior to the other races and cultures of the world and so spread their genes while enriching their coffers to grow the population accordingly.
    People thought, wrongly, that the wealth meant they could stop being bully-for-us, racists as the money would:

    1.  Last Forever.
    2.  Buy Them Friends.

    It only brought them envy.  Which was turned against them through the FALSE morality of ‘racism’ as a bad thing.  Racism which was no worse than that of those who envied (and wanted for themselves) the same position.

    And the reason for this is simple:  Humanity will not deliver the death blow to those also-rans (an Anthropologist would call them Missing Links in the mistaken belief that they were predecessors lost from the fossil record rather than competing variants of the same species, from the same time period, which were simply edged out) who have missed the evolutionary boat.

    Yes, ‘all races bring something to the table’.  Be it empathy or athleticism or lower instances of psychotic behavior modes deriving from high creativity.

    But what is equally not well understood is that:

    A.  Occurences of the worst behavior are self cancelling in a society which treats it’s own to the same level of high expectation pursuit of excellence as it does other races.  i.e.  It is the rule which defines the exception.

    B.  Breeding X to Y is not going to result in a hybrid with the best of both ‘predecessor’ sub-species characteristics.  It’s going to result in an admixture with a near random assortation of genes from each parent, the best of which will, inevitably, be lost to compareable dominant/recessive match out as well as meiotic transposition within the gametes themselves. 

    Nature _does not_ breed better beings.  Because nature doesn’t cull non active genes.  It only isolates them as best it can from outside interference.  Through the protective behaviors of racism.

    Now.  Does this mean that whites would have been better off exterminating fully the various indigene groups of those areas we colonized?  Yes.  But it’s too late now to do so and would be unnecessarily cruel to groups like the Native Americans who are already locked in an eternal gulag of federally mandated corruption.

    Does it mean that, now that we have dominance of those regions as -our- homelands, solely by virtue of numeric advantage, that we should give them up to another group whose expansionist, racist, sense of self worth is greater than ours?  No.

    Does it mean that the future must reflect the past as a lesson in what humility costs us as ‘sharing’ of our genius as the physical benefits which derive from it?  Maybe.

    We cannot fix the world.  But nor can we let the 90% of the planet whose people have sub 90 IQs and are incapable of sustaining a first world social status (or they would not come here to have it) run us all off the cliff like the veritable Lemmings of Norse myth.

    If genocide is not morally permissible then protective isolation must be.  And that _specifically_ means that, because we don’t overbreed as every other race and nation does, we should be given a larger share of the global resource pool than they have.

    A **much** larger share.  So that we may be happy.  And in that happiness cause the envy which drives others to match us.

    For in this alone will we have proven, regardless of skin color or locale, which group of homo sapiens won the evolutionary race.  As all those who want what we have must learn to live as we do.

    And we must learn to readopt the evolutionarily essential behavior of protective racial prejudice.  For such is what has protected our genetic pathways in becoming who we now are.  And what we should continue to develop onwards from.  As opposed to taking a long step backwards to rejoin the also rans.

  • SLCain

    What is wrong with Britain?  Have they no street lamps?  Have they no rope?