Ignorant Viewpoints Shouldn’t Be Ignored

Editorial Board, Highland Cavalier, October 28, 2011

Today we published a potentially controversial advertisement. The ad, on page 5, says simply, “Is diversity a strength? We think not. For an alternative view: www.AmRen.com.”

The ad was paid for by the New Century Foundation, a nonprofit organization that publishes the monthly magazine American Renaissance. The website mentioned in the ad is for the magazine.

Both the organization and publication are, by any objective standard, representative of a white supremacist viewpoint.

As an editorial board, we debated whether or not to accept and publish New Century’s ad. The content of the ad is not inappropriate itself, we thought. {snip}

{snip}

We vehemently disagree with New Century’s cause. Diversity is a strength. Our nation, our community and our college are all built on it. We believe the organization’s beliefs are incorrect and even crude. They are, and certainly should be, unpopular.

The question we asked ourselves, then, was: Should opinions be rejected merely because they’re unpopular? If we brush ugly views to the side and don’t discuss what makes them wrong, how do we learn from them?

In the end, most of us felt that hiding New Century’s ad because it espouses white supremacist views doesn’t serve our purpose, which is in part to serve as a conduit for discussion of issues that affect us as a college community.

{snip}

We encourage you to visit amren.com and read what the group has to say. Discuss it with your peers, professors and others in the community. Talk about how it makes you feel and think about why diversity is a strength.

As always, feel free to contact us or write a letter to the editor with your comments and critiques of our decision. {snip}

[Editor’s Note: We have created a page with a video and other information about diversity.]

Topics:

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • young Jim

    Most of the college students won’t understand affirmative action until they work for a minority, after they notice the other minorities receiving promotions or good evaluations it’ll sink in. As far as the “diversity is strength” ploy, research why and how past great civilizations fell, Rome, Macedon, currently Britain. Look at crime statistics for our most diverse cities, then you’ll see the facts; where there is blacks and latinos, crime is much higher, and people expect not to work while still receiving welfare. Inner city schools get more money and have less graduation, but no one can figure out why; cause blacks and latinos don’t want to learn. I’ll stop now or I’ll spend all on this one subject.

  • Question Diversity

    There’s an old intemperate phrase that goes, “Don’t defecate where you eat.” Actually, it doesn’t say quite that, but you get the point.

    The NCF was nice enough to take a printed ad out in your printed paper, I’m sure you could desperately use the money, and all you can do is bash the advertiser?

    Diversity is a strength.

    Again, explain to me why or how, and do so without merely defining diversity.

    Also, I couldn’t help but notice the title of JT’s new video. Yes, it is a takeoff on the old “Question Authority” bumper stickers. I got the idea to start using “Question Diversity” as a screen name because I saw a hippiemobile with the bumper stickers “Question Authority” and “Honor Diversity” next to each other. I did the simple transposition of words, because questioning diversity IS questioning authority.

  • Memphomaniac

    The US Supreme Court has ruled that protected (free) speech is necessarily unpopular speech. Popular speech needs no protection. Unpopular viewpoints may later become popular, but not if they are blocked or censored or disallowed. If an unpopular viewpoint is so potent and threatening that others must seek to stop it before others can hear it, I say we NEED very much to hear this unpopular speech….and maybe make it popular indeed. The truth is unafraid of all viewpoints but the deception and the lie is fragile and fearful of being upset or exposed.

  • Sincerely Concerned

    “If we brush ugly views to the side and don’t discuss what makes them wrong, how do we learn from them?”

    This is perhaps the scariest statement. It has Orwellian overtones. “Ugly”, “wrong”. Thanks for making up the minds of your own before they have a chance to go to the site(s) and determine for themselves what they may think.

  • Anonymous

    European diversity worked. Asian diversity in the West worked out too fairly well I believe. Both groups seem quite capable of integrating into Western society. As for Black and Hispanic diversity being a “strength”, why don’t the people who constantly repeat this mantra move to Detroit and prove that?

  • Anonymous

    Highland Cavalier

    Is that some school in the old confederacy? Sounds like it. How the south has fallen. Such pompous nonsense. No different from 20 years ago when I was in college. Same old same old.

    Wait till they try to get a job. Or live with a diverse roommate who brings a lot of diverse roommates over including a rapist murderer.

  • Miss Whitey

    I don’t understand how this article can claim that diversity is a strength. They obviously don’t understand history.

    Whenever you put people of different cultures, races, ethnicities, religions, etc. together there is ALWAYS conflict and, unfortunately, many times bloodshed. Differences tend to do this even within the same races and ethnicities, but it is worse when there are differing races and ethnicities because many of them have historical racial grievances that are nursed and that they will never go beyond.

    I have noticed since America has increased its diversity from Third World countries, our country is broken, in conflict, and divisive. There are unending accusations of racism and discrimination.

    I would rather live in peace.

  • J.P.

    My answer on the diversity question is normally the question, If diversity is so good why is lowering standards the typical method used to implement diversity ?

  • Anonymous

    If this awakens even one person it’ll have been worth it. Someone reading this must have a lingering doubt as to why certain minorities fail as a group. All I can say is read up. I certainly didn’t stumble onto AmRen with the opinions I currently hold. This website helped, but more important was my own research. Read up on the facts yourself, blank slate, do not think about how you would like things, only how they are. Utilizing logic, you’ll realize why we here at AmRen think the way we do.

    Remember that while we can tell you how blacks have an average IQ of 85, we cannot tell you all blacks have an IQ of 85. Same goes for whites at 100 or asians at 106. We only talk about such numbers not because we swell up with pride for our race, but because they explain the social and economic inequities between the races. Ockham’s razor seems to be applied everywhere but race.

  • BO_Bill

    “Ignorant” is a dated word used against those people who recognize biological differences between groups by observing human interactions and exercising the former sciences of “sociology” or “anthropology”. This editorial board is behind the times. The casual observer knows that the identifier “Ignorant” was replaced by “Hateful” in the 1990s, only to be recently replaced again by “Scared”.

    But the person who is concerned about the consequences of the demographic future of his country is usually not “Ignorant” or “Hateful” or “Scared”. I think a more accurate identifier would be “Objective”. Those other words often seem to be Freudian projection on the part of the people who seem to gain so much self-affirmation by using them.

  • John Engelman

    Those who maintain that diversity is valuable need to go beyond feel good rhetoric and examine the results.

    When white Europeans, whites of European descent, the upper stratum of India, and Orientals interact the results can be positive. These are racial groups who have practiced urban civilization for several thousand years, and agriculture for thousands of years more.

    When whites interact with racial groups closer in number of generations to a paleolithic existence, and when these less evolved racial groups interact with each other, the results are frequently negative.

    The Arabs were once creators of a great civilization. Unfortunately, they never really recovered from the Mongolian conquests of the thirteenth century. The religion that unites them has become a force for intolerance and obscurantism.

  • Stevn

    The continued false statement that This Nation was founded on diversity must be met with truth at every opportunity. The preamble to the constitution, every immigration law up until 1965, and just about every politician up until the modern era have been implicitly or explicitly pro European majority.

  • McGillicuddy

    Stuff like this is better than nothing, and is even necessary, but we must not fool ourselves; it’s very easy for people to ignore bumper-sticker type arguments, especially from extremists like us. The average UVA student who watched that video rolled his eyes, and thought one of two things: ‘Just another reactionary who doesn’t understand that progress takes time.’ or ‘Yeah maybe, I guess, nothing to get to worked up about, I’m not really planning on living in the ghetto anyways.’ I think the argument that diversity is code for anti-white, that it’s only white countries that are being forced to embrace potential minority status in their own homelands, etc. would get people thinking a little more, but even still many would say, ‘So what, that’s actually what makes us better.’

    Ultimately, we have to convince people of the moral superiority of ethnic nationalism vis-a-vis egalitarian universalism. There is such an argument, on realist and idealist grounds, but the curious first-time visiter does not have time for it, and mainstream newspapers don’t have the space for it. So AmRen must make do with videos like this, a few viewers will read more, and some will even be converted, but most of the onus is on us readers to make our case to friends and family.

  • ice

    “We vehemently disagree with New Century’s cause. Diversity is a strength. Our nation, our community and our college are all built on it. We believe the organization’s beliefs are incorrect and even crude. They are, and certainly should be, unpopular.”

    The article refers to “we” editorially but obviously it’s one person, probably a male. Such ignorance is absolutely amazing, but even more amazing is the fact that this dork isn’t even aware that inundating the country with divisive elements was a plan to fractionalize the country so no single group was dominant, and the method used to repel rightful, natural opposition to it was a process of brainwashing, declaring it was good (diversity is our strength) and shouting anyone down who doesn’t like it as haters.

    Also, as is quite evident in the writing of this pitiful, brainwashed fool, such brainwashing includes demonizing anyone who wants to be a separatist…..and no straddling of the fence either. He and his zombie co-horts MUST have a full 100% acceptance completely of this skewed, radical leftist hogwash. They’ll tolerate nothing less.

    Note the close-minded comments advising the lemmings to think about how diversity is a strength. This pitiful moron is completely unaware he’s being a close-minded bigot far greater than anyone he’s criticizing.

    His parents, if they have an ounce of sense, should demand his tuition back, because the school’s obvious purpose is social engineering in place of education, and they’ve caught this fool, hook, line and sinker. It’s truly disgusting.

    I have very little respect…if any at all…for mind-numbed university fools who are too weak-minded to resist mind-control.

  • Brett

    The fact that they wrung their hands over whether to run this benign ad says a lot. First, they must ask themselves why Amren

    not only exists, but is supported. That initial gut reaction they had to not run the ad is typical (in certain circles of effectively conditioned individuals). Most people from spheres like theirs wouldn’t. They’d object to it and not run the ad which effectively stifles any discussion or debate. This is a common response (again, in certain circles, particularly that of academia) and is precisely one of the reasons why Amren exists. Our viewpoints are not included in what people like to call “diversity”, which is a context dependent term.

    What kind of diversity are we talking about? It probably refers to racial diversity, and I’ll get to that, but it also refers to diversity of thought, which is by and large not what people mean when they speak of “diversity”, they simply mean racial diversity. Yet, why I’m here and support Amren is that I value diversity of thought. I personally object to censorship and the stifling of opposing viewpoints which is how I first came to look into Amren to see what they were about. I didn’t let media outlets which appeared to be merely recycling SPLC propaganda scare me off, scare me into not investigating alternative viewpoints. If it isn’t fear then what is it in their case? What explains their ignorance of Amren? Is it that the media have given them an excuse to be intellectually lazy, an excuse to bask in their own unchallenged intellectual supremacy? Who are the supremacists in this scenario?

    If Amren is supremacist, then every ethnocentric minority group, special interest or advocacy group in this entire country is racist and or supremacist as well. Is the NAACP supremacist? Is NCLR supremacist? Is the Asian Pacific Congressional Caucus

    supremacist? Is the Arab American Institute supremacist? Is the Black Congressional Caucas supremacist? The list goes on and

    on…there are hundreds, possibly thousands of these types of organizations and not a single, officially recognized and accepted interest/advocacy group for whites. ZERO. Let me say that again…ZERO.

    Would they please explain to us why they think that is and if they don’t think pervasive anti-white racism is the cause please indicate why they don’t believe this is the case.

    The only difference between Amren and these other ‘acceptable’ ethnocentric interest/advocacy groups is that most of us are white and Amren publishes stories and opinions from a white perspective and that are of interest to whites. That is

    the ONLY difference – that we are by and large white. These others groups are pursuing their enthnocentric interests (free from accusations of racism and supremacist, a lot of them get funding and recognition from the government!) and so are we (without taxpayer funding mind you!). Please explain to me how this amounts to racism on our part or again could even remotely qualify as supramecy.

    In the context of myself, as a white person, how do I personally benefit from diversity? It seems to me the “benefit” of American-style diversity is that I don’t get a say. I get to be discriminated against by Affirmative Action policies and yet, although the government classifies me as a “Caucasian” for purposes of discriminating against me, I’m not allowed to have a Caucasian interest/advocacy group of my own that advocates for me!? That says “Hey, U.S. government, why are we still pretending that Affirmative Action isn’t institutionalized racism? Why is racial discrimination still acceptable in this country as long as it’s only directed at whites?” I have no one in government that will represent me in this concern. Is diversity a strength…for me? I’d ask the paper to come up with one single example of how diversity directly, personally benefits me as a white individual.

    Interestingly, as the paper has also demonstrated, our critics do not actually know what we talk about here, refuse to allow us to debate them openly (typically), and smear us as supremacists because they googled “Amren” and noticed the SPLC says it is white supremacist so they mindlessly, uncritically accept this smear as god’s truth, and cannot provide actual demonstrative evidence of supramecism (because you’d have to actually read Amren to do that) to back up their smears.

    Please, by all means they should scour this site for the “supremacy” they think exists here. Show me where I’m wrong! I can tell them that only people I personally dislike are journalists that keep repeating the same ignorant lies about us over and over! Whatever happened to fact checking in

    journalism? Who knows. Apparently for them, that process stops at the SPLC’s website which is curious because when you’re reporting on something, shouldn’t you have direct knowledge of it? Here’s a tip: The SPLC was never appointed the official moral compass of America. They may think it has the last and final say, but that doesn’t make it true.

    Also when they refer to “ignorant viewpoints”, as they did in the title of their article, are they referring to us? Because ignorance is defined as a state of being uninformed. I have to wonder if I seem uninformed to them? We’re well aware over here, it’s their paper that has demonstrated ignorance of us and what Amren is really about. That’s the only ignorance that exists here.

    It’s so incredibly arrogant, considering their complete ignorance, that they would call Amren “supremacist” before bothering to ask “Hey, what are you guys actually about?” Give Jared an interview! Are you journalists or a paper posing as a smear campaign? Prove you’re not just the latter. I invite them to ask us to share our views and debate them as often as they’d like. I’d like nothing more than that.

  • bob

    Both the organization and publication are, by any objective standard, representative of a white supremacist viewpoint.

    Well, “by any objective standard”, those holding a “white supremacist viewpoint” would somehow advocate that whites are, um, well, uhhh …. supreme.

    But there is an awful lot of racial realist and HBD literature – quoted here – that point-blank says that (as compared to whites) Asians have higher IQs, and at least the Ashkenazi Jews, if not other type of Jews as well.

    Come on Amren, you’re blowing it!

    Yep, “Liberalism Is a Mental Disorder”.

  • Anonymous

    “We encourage you to visit amren.com and read what the group has to say. Discuss it with your peers, professors and others in the community. Talk about how it makes you FEEL and think about why diversity is a strength.”

    The condescending attitude and voluntary irrationality of these lefties is infuriating.

  • Jupiter7

    Anon 6:19

    Asian diversity in the West worked out? For who? The White Greedy Liberal Cheating Class obviously. Asians in our America are actively participating in the destruction of who knows how many centuries of Native Born White American engineering, medical, scientific and technological experience-future generations included-Native Born White American variety. This, is most definitely is in the realm of genocide. If you want to be among Asians..pack your bags and go live in China, India, Pakistan or Korea..don’t impose Asia on the rest of us.

    To the college kids: ask your cool and hip college professors why they don’t live in Newark NJ or Hempstead Long Island which have been massively blessed by nonwhite diversity? Another thing to think about: why would you want to deprive millions of Native Born White Americans the enormous benefit of a severe labor scarcity that would be a direct consequence of shutting off all non white legal immigration-down to 0? Why are you in favor of the Liberal White Greedy Cheating Class stealing the trillions in wages from millions of ordinary Native Born White Americans..which they are able to do through the importation of Asian, Muslim and Hispanic scab labor? Ask your really cool and hip professors this question.

  • Anonymous

    “our purpose, which is in part to serve as a conduit for discussion of issues that affect us”

    An admirable position.

    I have no doubt about the integrity of the well-discussed and well-argued viewpoints of Amren.

    My only question is: should the student body, after discussing Amren, make up their minds that Amren is correct, will the student newspaper be civilized and agree to disagree, or will it go on the attack and try to rid the campus of controversial thoughts?

  • Anonymous

    Ignorant viewpoints, White supremacist, vehemently disagree, incorrect or even crude, unpopular, ugly views. Wrong. Such a long list of negativity in such a short promo is generally quite indicative of a mind ruled by emotion rather than reason. It was minds ruled by emotion rather than reason that countenanced people being burned at the stake for their beliefs. On a superficially emotional level, the writer truly believes this is the way it should and must be, but at a deeper level doubts and contradictions lurk, hence a defensive and obstinate front. Such processes are usually found in the most fundamentalist of diverse religions and I have always maintained multiculturalism and diversity proponents are of the same cut with their own high priest, chants and sacraments.

  • underdog

    So when are we going to go big time. UVA Charlottesville, Univ. of MD College Park, UNC Chapel Hill??

  • Flaxen-headed Strumpet

    I went to the original article and found that the comments section is non-existent. But another link caught my eye at this student paper.

    It seems that the editorial staff is incapable of following the philosophy of an Argentine Jewish journalist that they showcased in this article:

    http://home.uvawise.edu/highlandcavalier/?p=4703

  • Anonymous

    If diversity is a strength, why does the government force it upon us literally at gunpoint?

  • Anonymous

    How is diversity a strength. Or put another way, what specific behaviors do non-whites engage in that are an advantage to whites? What problematic behaviors do they engage in?

    I’ll answer that. Non-whites hate whites and there is no rational observation of benefit to their existence in our lands whatsoever. You can readily observe the hatred. And it is only with great difficulty and leaps of drivel and fast talking that one pretend there are any advantages.

    What does the term, ignorance mean? It means, as opposed to being stupid, or uneducated, the person is stubbornly ignoring what can readily be observed. So what behaviors are “rednecks” stubbornly ignoring, even lying about? None. But what about the liberals? Are those who espouse the “joys of diversity” willfully ignoring certain behaviors? Yes…the fact that non-whites, rape, rob, murder, assault, steal from, and parasitize our societies via abuse of welfare. Also, the tremendous degenerate behavior they engage in….prostitution, slavery (especially slavery of children), drugs, gangs, out of wedlock births. All manner of mayhem, mischief and let’s be direct and to the point about it….evil.

    It’s liberals that are ignorant. And we need to be more direct with them about what the term, ignorance, means, define it. More to the point, not to tolerate it. Liberals are not engaging in argument here…but in bad behavior. That should consequences….fear. Stigmatization, assault, loss of job, loss of place in community. In other words, you think my “white supremacy” is ignorant? Then you are not allowed to live in my white neighborhood and should be forced to live in Detroit….shot if you attempt to leave.

    Try ignoring that.

  • Tom S.

    *Ultimately we published the advertisement, but decided to donate the money New Century will pay us to the Virginia chapter of the NAACP.

    So they decided to donate the money to a “black supremacist” group – the NAACP! To them, Amren is a “White supremacist” group while the NAACP is considered a “civil rights” organization even though both are just looking out for the rights of “their” people. So I guess it would only be fair if the NAACP ran an ad that they should donate that money to Amren – right?

    *Diversity is a strength. Our nation, our community and our college are all built on it.

    I personally think that “diversity” creates adversity. Our nation, our communities and our colleges were built and were considered first rate the world over long before we had the “strength” of diversity. Statistics prove that any nation, community or college that has a lot of diversity also have more crime, are not as well maintained and have a lot of infighting amongst the various groups. Can any of these diversity lovers name any place on earth that IMPROVED after Whites moved out and blacks/non-Whites moved in? Do they really think that Detroit, E. St Louis, Zimbabwe or South Africa got better after Whites left? Diversity also means that White European culture and White peoples rights are ALWAYS compromised in favor of non Whites. How many colleges\corporations permit – and even encourage – non-Whites to form organizations to look out for their interests, but yet refuse Whites that same right.

    I will give the Highland Cavalier credit for at least having an open mind instead of just shutting\shouting down any opinions that they don’t agree with.

  • global minority loses another

    Another ignorant news story that college students will be forbidden to discuss for fears of “stigmatizing blacks with divisive and hurtful lies that stoke fear, hate, and violence”:

    http://goo.gl/kqJHO

    Stabbed to death as she came home from school: Girl, 14, murdered after confronting burglar

    Kelli O’Laughlin found dead by her mother in $500,000 Chicago house

    Police release sketch of suspect showing a black man in his late 20s

    Reports that investigators already have a suspect in custody

    There had been a spate of burglaries on expensive houses in the area

    Friends flock to Facebook to express grief for ‘angelic’ girl with ‘big smile’

    She had talked about ‘growing up’ in that day’s Spanish class

  • WR the elder

    I invite any of the brainwashed readers of the Highland Cavalier to come right here and explain to us how diversity is a strength. At best, diversity is neutral. At its worse, it leads to civil war and genocide. When Jared Taylor debated Peter March on this very issue, Peter March didn’t even try to show that diversity is a strength. All he did was sound morally outraged and insist that diversity is a cross that we wicked, wicked white folk must bear.

  • E Pluribus Pluribus

    Assuming genuine intellectual curiosity on the part of young visitors to this site as to what science has to say about race in light of contemporary challenges such as education, they cannot do better than this superb review essay by Raymond Wolters, Thomas Muncy Keith Professor of History at the University of Delaware:

    Race And Science: A Review Essay Assessing the Debates of the 1950s and 1960s in the Light of Subsequent Research

    Social Scientists for Social Justice: Making the Case against Segregation by John P. Jackson, Jr.

    New York: New York University Press, 2001

    Science for Segregation: Race, Law, and the Case against Brown v. Board of Education by John P. Jackson, Jr.

    New York: New York University Press, 2005

    Reviewed by Raymond Wolters

    Occidental Quarterly

    Summer, 2007

    http://tinyurl.com/6as9k3b

  • Ron

    I have yet to find an advocate for diversity that can explain how diversity is a strength. Some use the lame “ethnic food” or “music” as examples. Most others ignore the question outright and predictably resort to name-calling. The fact that they can’t explain diversity’s strengths leads one to believe that deep down inside, even THEY don’t believe it. They simply parrot what they think their peers believe because they don’t want to be shunned by the group, never realizing that many of their peers also question the the validity of diversity being a strength but are likewise too afraid to speak out. In other words, they go along to get along.

  • white advocate – Canada

    Here are my two big reasons for dissenting from the diversity program.

    The science supporting it has been found bogus. There are many instances of premeditated fraud. Some really big names in sociology and anthropology have been found guilty. Yet the diversity program goes on. The political force driving the program calls itself liberal. What kind of liberal is it that loses respect for science? So something else beside liberalism has to explain the success of the diversity program. What would that be? There is the possibility that diversity defenders have been trapped by some weird of decadent trend; or perhaps they have been recruited onto one side of a social battle.

    I came into the white movement out of the environmental movement. Even if you disagree that there is a crisis, you must concede that an environmental movement could succeed even if there were no crisis. What would be the successful elements of the movement? Critical mass, leaders, money, access to media, and maybe most importantly, group interaction leading to solidarity, reciprocity, and trust. The last point is proving to be difficult in the modern world. The very last thing I would allow is a tangled mess of tribal fighting. This is not how you get everyone together to achieve environmental goals.

  • Henry Clay

    From mission statement of the University of Virginia at Wise:

    “The University of Virginia’s College at Wise is a diverse community of people who believe that information can be transformed into knowledge and that teaching and learning create a foundation for wisdom.”

    Note that there is no mention of “truth.”

  • Henry

    If diversity is so good and natural, then why does it have to constantly be defended and shoved down the throats of Whites? Why does Affirmative Action exist? Why do we need Diversity Training Programs at work? Diversity is not natural and is dangerous for Whites. Even if it did work, then it would be dangerous for Whites. Extinction or genocide through mongrelization.

  • Anonymous

    The word “ignorant” is rooted in the Greek phrase that translates as “not knowing.” All these people who tout “diversity” do so without knowing, and being utterly incapable of articulating, why it’s a good thing.

  • HH

    Notice the standard default position of praising “diversity,” loudly declaring it a strength (as if this is somehow self-evident) and then swiftly moving on without even the most superficial attempt to quantify their claims. In fact, in all my racially-awakened years I have never yet heard anyone explain how “diversity” is a strength or why! Of course I haven’t, because they cannot – as it is NOT! Simply repeating their favorite mantra doesn’t make it so.

    If you happen to enjoy co-habitating with non-Whites for whatever reason, I suppose that is your business. But stop pretending it is some glorious benefit to the rest of us – it isn’t! It never was, nor will it ever be.

  • UnclePen

    Wise, Va., just a few miles from where the incomparable Stanley Brothers were born and raised.

    And U.Va., my own alma mater! You kiddies in Wise are breaking your old Uncle Pen’s heart!

    Do you kiddies like diversity? Well your old Uncle Pen likes diversity too! He especially likes Mexico, where he hangs out in villages and small towns when he has the chance.

    And since he likes diversity, your Uncle Pen is pro-White, and not anti-White like those who guide you at UVa in Wise and who want to destroy diversity!

    That’s right.

    The anti-Whites who guide you don’t believe in the Theory of Evolution. That’s right too! They don’t accept that theory’s fundamental tenet that separation is what creates diversity, separation is what maintains diversity, and ending separation is what destroys diversity.

    That’s all the explanation I should need to give you kiddies, but since college ain’t what it used to be back when I graduated from U.Va. in the mid 1960s, your old Uncle Pen will explain it to you.

    Consider a group of animals selected randomly from the same species, and let half of them wander into a very different environment from the other half and let both groups stay in their respective environments for many thousands of years. The differing pressures from their two distinct environments will select different traits that will come to distinguish one group from the other. The two groups will have genetically diverged from each other, just as Whites diverged in northern climes from Blacks left behind in tropical Africa, and just as different varieties of white-tailed deer have evolved in response to differing environments in the valleys of the Smoky Mountains.

    Bring all those varieties of white tailed deer together in one valley, and they will interbreed and soon there will be only one variety of white-tailed deer. No more diversity.

    Similarly with non-Whites and Whites. Put them in the same country and remove the barriers between them, and they will interbreed until eventually there is just one race. No more diversity.

    We see this in progress today…how many of you, even in the areas you live in, know a family that has mixed children somewhere in it today?

    That same process that is underway here was long ago completed in Mexico between the Spanish conquistadores and the Indian peoples they found there, producing the mestizo race that inhabits Mexico today. No more diversity in Mexico.

    This is for real, kiddies. This is really happening. The U.S. and all the other formerly white countries of the world are being purposefully flooded by non-Whites, and the result will be the elimination of the White race. The purposeful elimination of a race by any means is designated by the U. N. as genocide.

    The anti-Whites who guide you call themselves anti-racist, but what they are is anti-White, and the program they support is White Genocide.

    Anti-racist is just a code word for anti-White.

    http://goo.gl/J1DCA

  • UnclePen

    22 — Flaxen-headed Strumpet wrote at 9:56 PM on October 28:

    “I went to the original article and found that the comments section is non-existent.”

    I think it’s just that there haven’t been any comments yet (the articles in the paper seem very uncommented upon!), and I urge Amren folk to go there and comment.

    I show a box to comment in on my browser (Safari), and I just left the same comment I just submitted here. If they post it, they’re a better paper than the anti-White rag here at UC Berkeley, where everyone reveres in every way except practice the Free Speech Movement that originated here.

    Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White

  • Anonymous

    #2 Question Diversity:

    Thanks for sharing how you hit upon your moniker. I have always considered it perfect.

    You wrote:

    Diversity is a strength.

    Again, explain to me why or how, and do so without merely defining diversity.

    My comment:

    Even better, explain WHERE it is a strength!

  • Anonymous

    “We encourage you to visit amren.com and read what the group has to say. Discuss it with your peers, professors and others in the community. Talk about how it makes you FEEL and think about why diversity is a strength.”

    Hopefully, as they pore through the daily litany of horrific black behavior, as reported in media stories from which they have probably been shielded, but which AR lists each day, they will have a startling awakening. At least the ones who aren’t hopeless indoctrinated by the Left.

  • Anonymous

    #31 –

    The “University of Virginia’s College at Wise” should perhaps be rechristened “Diversity of Virginia’s College at Wise”.

    In general, the word “university” can be replaced with “diversity”, to better reflect its modern purpose.

  • hire_a_Somali_warrior_to_protect_your_property

    It finally came to me what this article reminds me of. It reminds me of when I was editor of my elementary school newspaper in the 6th grade, and my teacher had me write an article, “Good Citizenship in the Cafeteria.”

    This article from U.Va. Wise should be entitled, “Good Citizenship in the Age of White Genocide.”

  • Cousin Charlie from TN

    I’ll say that maybe Amren is “far right”. Just for discussion purposes. Well, so what? The MSM is all far left, and what’s popularly taught on campuses even passes over into the worship of Marx. The left of left. Well known by all.

    So–why do these “enlightened” “students” and “teachers” feel so threatened by those who believe that they are idiots? Seems very psychological.

    I will admit that I do believe that they ARE idiots. Thank God I went to a music college that had zero politics, at least overtly.

  • Southern Hoosier

    Sweet! Amren got their message out twice. Once in an ad and once in a editorial. I am sure that a lot of people that don’t bother to read ads do read the editorials.

  • sandy

    to Commenter #5 I don’t want Asians integrating into Western Society. With integration comes miscegenation. You will lose the beautiful White skin and blonde hair and blue or green eyes of European Americans. Let the Asians stay in Asia.

  • underdog

    Wise, VA is known as “The Safest Place To Live On Earth”. And I believe it judging by the data presented here:

    http://www.city-data.com/city/Wise-Virginia.html

    So safe, one can toss self-loathing cultural Molotov cocktails with impunity. It would be interesting to trace the political and social evolution of these kids down the road when they have to leave Wise and go out into the real world. (which isn’t going to be pretty)

  • noneknown

    I would love to ask the editorial board of the Highland Cavalier if there is a chapter of La Raza on their campus. Even if there is not a chapter, the editorial board members have probably heard of La Raza and support it and would love to have a chapter on their campus.

    Then I would tell the editoral board, the ones who don’t speak Spanish, that La Raza means The Race.

    Then I would inform the editorial board that the motto of La Raza is: “For the Race, everything, for those outside the Race, nothing”

    Next, I would inform the editorial board that La Raza receives, annully, millions of taxpayer dollars from the federal government.

    Next, I would explain to these people that Whites are only about 7% of the population of the world, a very small minority and that they should do what the environmental activist bumper sticker admonishes them to do, namely: THINK GLOBALLY, ACT LOCALLY.

    I have been visiting Amren for many years, and have rarely, if ever, read hateful things on this site. Nor have I heard hateful things on the tapes of the speakers at the conferences Amren produces.

    The college students should realize that the prohibition of study and discussion about certain subjects by intimidation is a campaign to hide valuable information from them. And a very successful campaign it is!!

  • Anonymous

    Talk about how it makes you feel and think about why diversity is a strength

    I would pay money to hear what the students thought about diversity being a strength. Sounds great until you try to come up with the facts.

  • Lindsey Weiss

    Tom S. on October 28th wrote:

    “I personally think that “diversity” creates adversity. Our nation, our communities and our colleges were built and were considered first rate the world over long before we had the “strength” of diversity. Statistics prove that any nation, community or college that has a lot of diversity also have more crime, are not as well maintained and have a lot of infighting amongst the various groups. Can any of these diversity lovers name any place on earth that IMPROVED after Whites moved out and blacks/non-Whites moved in?”

    YES! I can think of 3 right now: China, India & Singapore. During the imperialist reign by various European powers and the cultural genocide, oppression, abuse and exploitation of the Chinese people – “Chinese Melon”….one of the greatest civilizations on Earth – China was completely devastated. It was only after they managed to kick the undesirable whites out & under stringent Chinese policies that they are today on the verge of being the next greatest superpower of all time beating the United States. Whites were a bane. Ditto for another very great ancient civilization – India. After the Brits were kicked out, despite it’s problems India has done much better comparatively. As for Singapore – its the world’s cleanest, technologically proficient & a nation which is near perfect especially after the high IQ Han Chinese & Southern Indians (Tamils) took over and created the most perfect nation on Earth – zero poverty, near zero crime rate and 100% literacy rate. Singapore is a 1st world hi tech nation which exhibits prosperity, high quality lifestyles and efficiency to it’s best!

    http://goo.gl/sE9Fm

  • Question Diversity

    37:

    Jew Among You recently had a conversation about this at his blog. One of his regulars, who might be a regular here, said that he has heard the diversitarians trot out these two canards when asked why/how/where is ODIOUS (Our DIversity Is Our Strength):

    1. Because the world is diverse, the country and corporate America needs to be diverse in order to market to the world.

    My answer: That’s circular logic. And it really doesn’t do anything more than define diversity.

    2. Racial diversity brings new perspectives.

    My answer: Again, that just defines diversity. We know what it is, we’re all grownups with three digit IQs.

    Someone else at J.A.Y. brought up a great point – The left keeps saying ODIOUS, but then (properly, IMHO) blame the European colonial artificial borders left in place for Africa’s civil wars. Spot the contradiction – Diversity is supposed to be “our” strength when the diversity is racial, but it can’t be Rwanda’s or Nigeria’s strength when the “country” has various kinds of black people.

  • Sonya

    Lindsey Weiss Amren is NOT about White supremecy. Most every poster here will agree Asian’s rate higher when it comes to spacial IQ and no doubt they have built some amazing civilizations.

    Every White country in the WORLD is expected to integrate and accept third world inhabitants as the crime rates skyrocket. Why is it only White countries? Go tell China they need to integrate with other races, or Japan, or Mexico, or any non-White country you can think of. They will laugh in your face.

    Why is their a double standard regarding diversity Lindsey? Can you explain that? Why won’t countries like Japan and China and Singapore accept people from Africa with open arms? Is it because only Whites understand the benefits of diversity and therefore those OTHER countries are somehow lacking or less intelligent?

    Please explain that Lindsey.

  • Anonymous

    47 — Lindsey Weiss wrote at 10:17 AM on October 29:

    Tom S. on October 28th wrote:

    “I personally think that “diversity” creates adversity. Our nation, our communities and our colleges were built and were considered first rate the world over long before we had the “strength” of diversity. Statistics prove that any nation, community or college that has a lot of diversity also have more crime, are not as well maintained and have a lot of infighting amongst the various groups. Can any of these diversity lovers name any place on earth that IMPROVED after Whites moved out and blacks/non-Whites moved in?”

    YES! I can think of 3 right now: China, India & Singapore. During the imperialist reign by various European powers and the cultural genocide, oppression, abuse and exploitation of the Chinese people – “Chinese Melon”….one of the greatest civilizations on Earth – China was completely devastated. It was only after they managed to kick the undesirable whites out & under stringent Chinese policies that they are today on the verge of being the next greatest superpower of all time beating the United States. Whites were a bane. Ditto for another very great ancient civilization – India. After the Brits were kicked out, despite it’s problems India has done much better comparatively. As for Singapore – its the world’s cleanest, technologically proficient & a nation which is near perfect especially after the high IQ Han Chinese & Southern Indians (Tamils) took over and created the most perfect nation on Earth – zero poverty, near zero crime rate and 100% literacy rate. Singapore is a 1st world hi tech nation which exhibits prosperity, high quality lifestyles and efficiency to it’s best!

    http://goo.gl/sE9Fm

    ————————————

    What are you talking about? Well, Ms. Weiss, (doesn’t sound like an asian name to me) are you another pro-asian advocate coming on AR to spout nonsense?

    The question was asked, ” Can any of these diversity lovers name any place on earth that IMPROVED after Whites moved out and blacks/non-Whites moved in?”

    PLEASE tell me where China, India and Singapore have millions of blacks and non-whites living in their countries? Don’t you know the difference between a homogenous nation and one such as the “new” America? America was the best and greatest country on earth when it was WHITE, bar none.

    As for your insistence on those 3 being “great” countries to live, I beg to differ.

  • neanderthalDNA

    “We vehemently disagree with New Century’s cause. Diversity is a strength. Our nation, our community and our college are all built on it. We believe the organization’s beliefs are incorrect and even crude. They are, and certainly should be, unpopular.”

    Quack quack goes the duckpeaker. Certainly…

    “We encourage you to visit amren.com and read what the group has to say. Discuss it with your peers, professors and others in the community. Talk about how it makes you feel and think about why diversity is a strength.”

    Interesting. At least someone encouraged the reader to actually investigate for themselves. Makes one wonder if perhaps a heretic or two may be lurking amongst the editors, quacking the duckspeak in a form of racial kitman but in fact pointing the way. I love the commissar-like exhortation and directive at the end to how one should properly react…

    Any publicity is good publicity – the Earth is not the center of the universe and no amount of dogma can hide that forever…

    So sure kids – go visit that awful, horrible “racist” old Amren and read what they say…

    So you will know the truth.

  • john

    While clearly some AmRen readers and posters are white supremacists, I don’t think the majority of us are. We’re simply race realists who believe everybody should have equal opportunity and let the chips fall where they may. And if whites and Asians seem to come out ahead in this game and blacks seem to do less well, that’s just way it is. It brings us neither joy nor feelings of guilt. I think most of us wish it weren’t that way, but we didn’t design the human gene pool.

  • Anonymous

    47 — Lindsey Weiss wrote at 10:17AM on October 29:

    Can any of these diversity lovers name any place on earth that IMPROVED after Whites moved out and blacks/non-Whites moved in?”

    YES! I can think of 3 right now: China, India & Singapore.

    Lindsey, yes, you are indeed correct that China, India and Singapore are better off without white exploitation. And yes, that is what the question asked. But read the context of the question, which is DIVERSITY. Whites were providing DIVERSITY which was undermining and weakening those places. Once the DIVERSITY, in this case, whites, were removed, the places again began to prosper, strengthened by their very LACK OF DIVERSITY. Remember the original article also stated, “Statistics prove that any nation, community or college that has a lot of diversity also have more crime, are not as well maintained and have a lot of infighting amongst the various groups.”

  • Anonymous

    I get really tired of hearing oxymorons like “Asian diversity”

    Asians are the most racist and exclusionary of people but always willing to prostitute their women to white men when times are hard.

    And guess what – there are a million illegal aliens who are Asian in the US and they are pouring in, there will be a backlash when they take over as the Mexicans did.

  • This Way Folks

    “We encourage you to visit amren.com and read what the group has to say. Discuss it with your peers, professors and others in the community.”

    This is excellent. Remember there’s no such thing as bad publicity; many people have doubts about diversity, & having them pointed in this direction is the best thing for them (even if the advertising fee does ultimately end up with the NAACP).

  • Mike

    “Diversity is a strength. Our nation, our community and our college are all built on it.”

    Los Angeles was built on a fault zone – it doesn’t mean that earthquakes are a ‘strength’. If a heavy smoker completes a marathon he does it despite being a heavy smoker – not because of it.

    Diversity of skills = good. Diversity of race/religion = malignant clutter. There are no examples of countries being successful because of diversity – only countries being successful in spite of diversity.

    Personally I’m curious to read some academic research studies ‘proving’ that diversity is a strength. Oh wait – there aren’t any.

    Try suggesting to a liberal that it’s selfish for White countries to be getting all the ‘diversity’, and so it should be sent to troubled, third-world countries instead. Perhaps a couple of million Sudanese transported to Haiti would make it happier, more prosperous place.

    When they moan that Haiti lacks the infrastructure to cope with mass immigration just smile condescendingly and remind them that America itself was built from nothing using ‘diversity’. If they still disagree act all offended and ask them why they think that Sudanese immigrants are a burden?

  • E Pluribus Pluribus

    @47 Lindsey Weiss: “Whites were a bane [in China]. Ditto for another very great ancient civilization – India.”

    Nonsense, of course. For a far better-informed opinion see:

    The Imperialists and Their Attributes

    By TUNKU VARADARAJAN

    WALL STREET JOURNAL

    February 23, 2006

    http://tinyurl.com/5typbcc

    OPENING PARAGRAPH:

    “Wonders of the world have always been reckoned in architectural or natural terms — the Taj Mahal, the pyramids, the Grand Canyon. No one, it seems, has thought to compile a list of administrative wonders. Till such time as someone does, may I nominate the British administration in (and of) colonial India as being at the apex of such a list…”

    ===

    Perhaps someone would be good enough to provide a corrective to Ms. Weiss’ other two examples of White’s perfidious influence on the world — in China and Singapore.

  • Mike
  • Robert Binion

    Such are the rhetorical dynamics of “tolerance.” You may call me racist and I am not allowed even to agree with you. This is the ethos taught the very young by media priests in a never slackening stream of junk drama and junk news.

    (Uncle Pen, the early Rich-R-Tone 78s cut by the Stanley brothers were once released on vinyl in the seventies by Melodeon. It is one of my “desert island discs.” It sure was hard to swallow Ralph’s endorsement of Obama in ’08.)

  • Courtney from Alabama

    “The Arabs were once creators of a great civilization. Unfortunately, they never really recovered from the Mongolian conquests of the thirteenth century. The religion that unites them has become a force for intolerance and obscurantism. ”

    Enough of this nonsense. Where are you getting this? Other than the upper Middle East (Turkey), where else have Mongolians changed the demographics of the Middle East? “Arabs” (not all people in the Middle East are arab) intermixed heavily with blacks in the southern parts of the Middle East at one time. I thought Mongolians were part of the high IQed ethnic group that some people on here enjoy complimenting on here all the time anyways. The fact of the matter is that arabs have never been creators of “advanced civilization” at least not to the same level as Europeans. Much of this advanced math that arabs are given credit for was created by Greeks, Persians and Hindus (all Indo-European). I don’t understand why so many whites are so fascinated with a desert dwelling group that came storming out of the Arabian Peninsula, and that only became “great” when coming into contact with other civilizations that already existed in the Mediterranean region.

  • Anonymous

    By MATT BUEDEL ([email protected])

    OF THE JOURNAL STAR

    Posted Oct 24, 2011 @ 07:24 PM

    PEORIA —

    Two motorists were accosted by groups of teenagers within a few days of each other in an area near the site of a similar incident over the summer that drew national attention.

    A group of about 50 young people on West Thrush Avenue near North Sheridan Road in June caused a disturbance by blocking the roadway and, according to one resident but not others, shouting race-related remarks.

    Comments related to race also were part of one of the incidents last week.

    A Meals on Wheels delivery driver was making his way to a home in the 800 block of West Nowland Avenue about 12:45 p.m. Wednesday when he encountered a group of 15 teens – 13 males and two females – walking down the middle of the road.

    The group would not yield to the motorist, who followed him until reaching the house where he had to make the meal delivery. As he exited to take the food to the door, he was verbally attacked, according to a report on the incident.

    One teen called him “honky,” while another threatened to “kick his white (expletive).”

    As the volunteer driver returned to his car to leave, the teens surrounded his car and pounded on it. The vehicle was not damaged, but police noted disturbances to dust on the vehicle, backing up the driver’s story.

    A woman driving in the 800 block of West Brons Avenue on Saturday night was the subject of a similar, but much more aggressive confrontation. She encountered a group of more than 40 teens about 10:25 p.m.

    The group surrounded the 21-year-old woman’s car and began beating on it with an object that shattered her driver’s side window. One of the boys involved in the attack also pointed a handgun in the direction of a passenger in the car, but didn’t make any threats or attempt to open the door.

    When police responded, the group scattered in different directions. No arrests were made.

    Both incidents remain under investigation by police. Public information officer Doug Burgess said Monday the incidents do not appear to be organized efforts, but rather the byproduct of unruly circumstances.

    “It’s not groups that are getting together to wreak havoc on the community,” Burgess said.

    The group Wednesday likely had just left school after District 150 released students early for the day. Police also have fielded reports that the group Saturday night had just left a nearby house party. The large group in June, too, had been at a house party just before that incident.

  • Justus

    America’s new racists

    The late South African economist William Hutt, in his 1964 book, “The Economics of the Colour Bar,” said that one of the supreme tragedies of the human condition is that those who have been the victims of injustices and oppression “can often be observed to be inflicting not dissimilar injustices upon other races.”

    Born in 1936, I’ve lived through some of our openly racist history, which has included racist insults, beatings and lynchings. Tuskegee Institute records show that between the years 1880 and 1951, 3,437 blacks and 1,293 whites were lynched. I recall my cousin’s and my being chased out of Fishtown and Grays Ferry, two predominantly Irish Philadelphia neighborhoods, in the 1940s, not stopping until we reached a predominantly black North or South Philly neighborhood.

    Today all that has changed. Most racist assaults are committed by blacks. What’s worse is there’re blacks, still alive, who lived through the times of lynching, Jim Crow laws and open racism who remain silent in the face of it.

    Last year, four black Skidmore College students yelled racial slurs while they beat up a white man because he was dining with a black man. Skidmore College’s first response was to offer counseling to one of the black students charged with the crime. In 2009, a black Columbia University professor assaulted a white woman during a heated argument about race relations. According to interviews and court records obtained and reported by Denver’s ABC affiliate (12/4/2009), black gangs roamed downtown Denver verbally venting their hatred for white victims before assaulting and robbing them during a four-month crime wave. Earlier this year, four black girls beat a white girl at a McDonald’s, and the victim suffered a seizure. Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel ordered an emergency shutdown of the beaches in Chicago because mobs of blacks were terrorizing families. According to the NBC affiliate there (6/8/2011), a gang of black teens stormed a city bus, attacked white victims and ran off with their belongings.

    At Philly’s South Philadelphia High School, Asian students report that black students routinely pelt them with food and beat, punch and kick them in school hallways and bathrooms as they hurl racial epithets such as “Hey, Chinese!” and “Yo, Dragon Ball!” The Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund charged the School District of Philadelphia with “deliberate indifference” toward black victimization of Asian students.

    In many of these brutal attacks, the news media make no mention of the race of the perpetrators. If it were white racist gangs randomly attacking blacks, the mainstream media would have no hesitation reporting the race of the perps. Editors for the Los Angeles Times, The New York Times and the Chicago Tribune admitted to deliberately censoring information about black crime for political reasons. Chicago Tribune Editor Gerould Kern recently said that the paper’s reason for censorship was to “guard against subjecting an entire group of people to suspicion.”

    These racist attacks can, at least in part, be attributed to the black elite, who have a vested interest in racial paranoia. And that includes a president who has spent years aligned with people who have promoted racial grievance and polarization and appointed an attorney general who’s accused us of being “a nation of cowards” on matters of race and has refused to prosecute black thugs who gathered at a Philadelphia voting site in blatant violation of federal voter intimidation laws. Tragically, black youngsters – who are seething with resentments, refusing to accept educational and other opportunities unknown to blacks yesteryear – will turn out to be the larger victims in the long run.

    Black silence in the face of black racism has to be one of the biggest betrayals of the civil rights struggle that included black and white Americans

  • sensitivity_trainer_and_nose_wiper

    35 — UnclePen wrote at 1:14 AM on October 29:

    “…anti-Whites…don’t accept the [Theory of Evolution’s] fundamental tenet that separation is what creates diversity, separation is what maintains diversity, and ending separation is what destroys diversity.”

    Indeed! And I was floored to see students in Wise, Va., in the heart of white Appalachia, repeating with zombie-like fervor the false homilies of anti-Whites who have hypnotized them and enlisted them in the anti-Whites’ program of White Genocide.

    Young students at Wise! Do you doubt that your brains have been taken over by anti-Whites when you were too young and naive to see what was being done to you?

    Do you think that if it were true, you would have learned of it from the same institutions, your schools and your media, whose function is to hypnotize you and ease the way for your genocide?

    Don’t serve in the army of the anti-Whites who have enlisted you to fight for White Genocide against yourself, your family, your friends, and your people.

    Educate yourself truly and understand what has been done to you!

    Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White

    http://goo.gl/J1DCA

  • ThoughtCrime

    I’ve learned while posting in Knoxville that in all that beautiful and heavily White region, the principle nodes from which anti-Whites spread their genocidal poison are colleges, universities, and news media.

    But those nodes do not yet reflect the overall feeling of the people who live there, as the following email I sent to a friend last night will show:

    “I’m amazed that anyone is still saying ‘diversity is strength.’ But Wise is way up in the back of some dark holler, as the song says….I had a fantasy of moving there for a long time and subscribed to their newspaper until a few years ago. It was fun to read…my favorite article was when an old guy on their school board said cheerily at a public meeting, “There’s a [N-word] in the woodpile,” and didn’t seem to realize even afterward that that was no longer a cool thing to say! Ha ha! Hard to believe, but it sure was refreshing. He had been a high school teacher of something like typing, and a young black woman who had been a student of his and had liked him felt very hurt and betrayed.”

    Of course I make a mistake to repeat that story here, since any young students from Wise who read it will fail to grasp its several points and instead will only be reinforced in their foolish anti-White beliefs.

    There is so much to explain, and so little brainpower left in our hypnotized youngsters to understand it with.

  • Courtney from Alabama

    “YES! I can think of 3 right now: China, India & Singapore. During the imperialist reign by various European powers and the cultural genocide, oppression, abuse and exploitation of the Chinese people – “Chinese Melon”….one of the greatest civilizations on Earth – China was completely devastated. It was only after they managed to kick the undesirable whites out & under stringent Chinese policies that they are today on the verge of being the next greatest superpower of all time beating the United States. Whites were a bane. Ditto for another very great ancient civilization – India. After the Brits were kicked out, despite it’s problems India has done much better comparatively. As for Singapore – its the world’s cleanest, technologically proficient & a nation which is near perfect especially after the high IQ Han Chinese & Southern Indians (Tamils) took over and created the most perfect nation on Earth – zero poverty, near zero crime rate and 100% literacy rate. Singapore is a 1st world hi tech nation which exhibits prosperity, high quality lifestyles and efficiency to it’s best!”

    You must be joking. And you are wrong for a number of reasons.

    I am not going to join the Amren crowd that chants the same rebuttals to posts like this such as : ” yes Asians have created great civilizations BUT……….”.

    It is time for the American Renaissance faithful to stop with this nonsense about how great Asians are. Yes, their civilizations were great compared to other nonwhite civilizations (and in the case of Southern Asia and the Middle East a lot of this had to do with interactions with Indo-Europeans) , but nobody can convince me that any of these civilizations have been as great as what whites have produced. What was so great about them that we have to constantly cheerlead them as better than white civilizations on here?

    Give me a list of Chinese “inventions” and I can give you a longer list of Greek ideas and inventions that actually led to something useful (the modern world). And of course that is only focusing on Greece alone and excluding many other white nations.

    And in response to this poster inparticular, he seems to miss the cause and effect pattern involved that actually made places like China “great” in modern times to begin with. Liberals love talking about how “after the Europeans left, things got better”. Well, shouldn’t we come to the conclusion that perhaps these areas became great because of European influence?

    People like this poster here act as if India and China returned to their old ways after Europeans left and then became great because of it. Are you joking? Everybody cheerleads the developments India and China have made in Space Exploration recently as if these two nations are uniquely better than the West, but if that is the case then why Space Exploration ( a white creation) instead of something that is indigenous to those two civilizations? The fact that India and China STILL get most of their current technology from the West is beside the point here.

    And as an aside, I agree that Asians should be able to build up their societies as they see fit. And I also agree that white colonialism wasn’t necessarily moral for those countries. However, that doesn’t mean that I am going to ignore facts, and it is simply untrue to say that Asians had nothing of value to learn from Europeans, or to imply that these civilizations are somehow better than anything Europeans have to offer.

    I think posters on Amren need to learn how to think outside the box on this issue instead of automatically calling posters such as myself “white supremacists” for stating facts on how whites are better at many things compared to other races, including Asians. It is simply the truth, just as there are other things that other races do better than we do. But if we wish to discuss the modern world, the fact is that it was created by white people and only white people. If Asians are going to become the next superpowers based on their own intellects then why don’t they start from scratch from where their own civilizations left off before they were influenced by white people?

  • Anonymous

    47 — Lindsey Weiss wrote at 10:17 AM on October 29:

    Yes Lindsey you thought of three(3) all of which were Asian. You forgot one of Tom S’s premises about Blacks moving in. You can’t name one country, city or town that has improved with the advent of Blacks.

    In all fairness the British as insufferable as they may have been in India left infrastructure, and governmental models to be followed which helped India to advance albeit the many problems that they endure not all of which can be laid at the feet of England.

    You forgot to mention Africa which prospered under the British rule and when they left the Africans were totally incapable of creating a civilized society. The savagery and butchery continues unabated. Many South Africans stated in interviews that they were better off under Apartheid in the sense that they at least had jobs.

    China, Japan, South Korea, Singapore all successful, all Asian and all non-diverse.

    As for “cultural genocide” and abuse of the Chinese people, I would say that the Emperors and Mao Tse Tung did a yeoman’s job of abusing the people. The Communist cultural revolution sought to obliterate the previous culture and resulted in the extermination of 25 million people by most accounts. No evil White people to blame for that. You also forgot the “Cultural Genocide” of the Tibetan people by the Chinese.

    Pol Pot in Kampuchea AKA Cambodia, managed to exterminate a quarter of his population; again without any help from the evil White people.

    From your name and from what you wrote I would guess that you are White and self loathing and have no White children to leave behind to be slaughtered. If I’m wrong about that, shame on you!

  • Anonymous

    As aggravating as it may be to give a newspaper money for an ad and then get insulted and berated by that paper, we should probably be glad that — in this age of conference cancellations and other banishments and persecutions — AR was able to find a couple of publications that would run their ad at all. At least these two college papers didn’t just turn the ad down flat, while mumbling something about “unacceptable content”. So my reaction is to be pleasantly surprised that this (harmless, tasteful) notice for (legal, nonviolent) American Renaissance even managed to make it into print in this, the Year of Our Soros, 2011 CE.

  • Harumphty Dumpty

    Go to the link at the end of Amren’s copy of the article to post on the original article.

    I think the page linked below is where you can see if your article has been printed after being moderated. I’m very curious to see what the boundaries will be of the editors’ admirable respect for open expression which they’ve exhibited so far (a light that shines brightly in contrast to everything else about them).

    http://home.uvawise.edu/highlandcavalier/?cat=55

    Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White

  • Anonymous

    Reading the article about diversity is strength and other absurd claims. We WN have to admit, creativity and IQ of Whites aside, apparently our people have a propensity to believe anything! There is no other explanation. Anyone with even an average IQ can see that America is coming apart at the seams. This for a country that 50 years ago was the most advanced and creative society in the history of the world. At least for most of my life I lived in THAT country rather than the heap called modern multicultural America.

    The idea of importing of people from countries that are basically basket cases corrupt and non creative and expecting the civilization of our youth to remain unchanged is beyond naiveté it s insanity. I need a drink!

  • Jagdflieger

    Several points regarding the diversity lover’s points about China, India and Singapore. First, Whites never migrated in mass to any of those three countries nor did they become a sizable percentage of the population so therefore the central thesis of her argument is immediately in error. Second, as to her charge that “During the imperialist reign by various European powers and the cultural genocide, oppression, abuse and exploitation of the Chinese people – “Chinese Melon”….one of the greatest civilizations on Earth – China was completely devastated.” it should be pointed out that at no time did Europeans negatively affect Chinese civilization nor traditions in a manner that can be compared to the damage inflicted by the Asians and Chinese themselves during the Mongol invasions, Taiping Rebellion and of course the Great Leap Forward and Cultural Revolution of Mao. Third, I suggest that she take a look at the HDI and see if it supports her claim that these three countries are generally better off than majority White countries. In 2010, the highest ranking of the three was Singapore at 27, followed by China at 91 and India at 122. For comparison, she might care to note the fact that the top 10 countries in the ranking all are majority White countries of Europe or North America and that the majority of those listed under Very High Human Development are as well. Fourth, if she does believe that the limited arrival of Whites into those three countries negatively impacted the native population, is she open to the idea that the arrival in mass of Asians, blacks, Hispanics and Muslims into Australia, Europe and North America may very well negatively affect their resident populations?

  • Anonymous

    2 — Question Diversity wrote at 5:26 PM on October 28:

    “Also, I couldn’t help but notice the title of JT’s new video. Yes, it is a takeoff on the old “Question Authority” bumper stickers. I got the idea to start using “Question Diversity” as a screen name because I saw a hippiemobile with the bumper stickers “Question Authority” and “Honor Diversity” next to each other. I did the simple transposition of words, because questioning diversity IS questioning authority.”

    I always look forward to reading your posts. They are usually filled with good information and insightful opinions. Just want to add that I too, have been annoyed in the past at those “Question Authority” stickers. I always wanted to make one that said, “Question Yourself.” All of us can always use some self-examination, lest we reveal ourselves easily assailed hypocrites.

  • Njuton

    Lindsey wrote:

    “YES! I can think of 3 right now: China, India & Singapore. During the imperialist reign by various European powers and the cultural genocide, oppression, abuse and exploitation of the Chinese people – “Chinese Melon”….one of the greatest civilizations on Earth – China was completely devastated. It was only after they managed to kick the undesirable whites out & under stringent Chinese policies that they are today on the verge of being the next greatest superpower of all time beating the United States. Whites were a bane. Ditto for another very great ancient civilization – India. After the Brits were kicked out, despite it’s problems India has done much better comparatively. As for Singapore – its the world’s cleanest, technologically proficient & a nation which is near perfect especially after the high IQ Han Chinese & Southern Indians (Tamils) took over and created the most perfect nation on Earth – zero poverty, near zero crime rate and 100% literacy rate. Singapore is a 1st world hi tech nation which exhibits prosperity, high quality lifestyles and efficiency to it’s best!”

    Are you serious about India? It still has a primitive caste system with the whitest people rising to the top. They still worship rats, cows and live in their own mess, with low IQs. Not to mention that the roma gypsies (70 IQ and a crime rate that beats blacks) originated from India.

    India had moments of greatness hundreds of years ago when led by Caucasians.

    And you think Singapore is the perfect nation? Why is it that so many Singaporeans love to get out of there but never the other way around? Same with China. The societies may be orderly but they are also soulless and oppressive. People there are worked like animals and that’s how they can come close to whites in achievement, but still cannot create original science and civilization like whites. Or were Korea and Japan oppressed by whites too?

    Deep down a lot of Asians envy whites for their combination of beauty, physical prowess and ingenuity.

  • Anonymous

    3 — Memphomaniac wrote at 6:10 PM on October 28:

    “The US Supreme Court has ruled that protected (free) speech is necessarily unpopular speech. Popular speech needs no protection. Unpopular viewpoints may later become popular, but not if they are blocked or censored or disallowed. If an unpopular viewpoint is so potent and threatening that others must seek to stop it before others can hear it, I say we NEED very much to hear this unpopular speech….and maybe make it popular indeed. The truth is unafraid of all viewpoints but the deception and the lie is fragile and fearful of being upset or exposed.”

    What AMAZES me is that the Berkeley based “Free Speech Movement” in the 60s evolved into a political movement that not only advocates laws against it, but also laws against free thought.

    But I am against ANY organization, including religion, that would seek to limit my right to freedom of conscious.

  • Anonymous

    21 — underdog wrote at 9:51 PM on October 28:

    “So when are we going to go big time. UVA Charlottesville, Univ. of MD College Park, UNC Chapel Hill??”

    You know, going big time may mean going small time. I mean that going after the issue at the community college level might be best. These community colleges have taken on the worst aspects of the Ivy League leftists and can change the quickest. These schools exist throughout the local white communities and are the real beach head for immigration and even miscegenation. The center of immigrant matriculation and accommodation is certainly responsible for the higher influx of non-whites in Washington State where I live. I saw it at work in California in the ’70s as well. Great community colleges became pools of immigrants and state bureaucratic handouts until whites avoided some campuses altogether because the neighborhoods changed due to the matriculation at community and state college admissions ans support tactics.

  • Puggg

    “University of Virginia at Wise.”

    As in Tim Wise?

  • Question Diversity

    71 Anonymous:

    How about a little bit of amateur philosophy conversation?

    Those “Question Authority” bumper stickers have always bothered me, too, but for a different reason: The phrase is subject to a lot of misinterpretation.

    I’ll cut to the chase. A proper “conservative” would have a bumper sticker that reads Question Authorities, while the left likes Question Authority. The slightly different spelling makes a world of difference. The left wingers just don’t seem to like the concept of authority, while we know that authority has to exist, we want to be picky about who gets to do it, what their latitude is, and their reasons for doing what they do. Except the hypocritical left shows its totalitarian stripe when it gets any appreciable power.

  • sensitivity_trainer_and_nose_wiper

    Talk about how it makes you feel and think about why diversity is a strength.”

    Is this school part of a formerly fine university, or is it just a touchie-feely “sensitivity” workshop?

    Nauseating!

    And if only the students could read what the sentence really says:

    “Talk about how it makes you feel and think about why White Genocide is a strength.”

    Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White!

  • Jason Robertson

    Whites presently in the majority within established white nations have every right to retain “supremacy”.

    As for the whole world, do we want instead Chinese, Arab or African “supremacy”, let alone a combined non-white “supremacy”?The prospect of an anti-white global race conflict remains on the cards so long as an “unsustainable” population explosion in non-white countries continues, and we should prepare to defend white nations against this possibility, particularly with respect to cyber-warfare and space-weaponry being developed by Chinese technicians.

    Inside “white” nations, law-abiding non-whites will feel less uncomfortable and less threatened, after an impartial ban on multi-ethnic immigration, because this will reduce inter-ethnic conflict and resource rivalry.

    It is easier to treat a small number of decent people of different pigment or culture kindly, so long as they do not multiply to threatening proportions or give prior loyalty to alien governments. One Chinese takeaway does not make a Mongol Horde or a Cultural Revolution.

    Law-breakers, whatever their race, can be dealt with by prison without “marital rights”, voluntary sterilisation, and the death-penalty for deliberate murder, terrorism or child torture.

    The acculturation of law-abiding ethnic minority folk to white-western norms is possible and tolerable, so long as any biological disadvantages, from racial assimilation or moron multiplication, are prevented by an impartial humanitarian eugenics policy.

    Those who cannot fit in psychologically with such a policy should be assisted to migrate to preferred culture zones overseas. This would make little difference to the population problem in countries which must sooner or later develop contraception, whatever happens here.

    AmRen’s position is not “unpopular” with ordinary white folks outside ideologically controlled acade/media; and some thoughtful non-whites long settled in white lands may well be privately relieved by the programme developed above.

  • Anonymous

    Absolutely loved your post John.

    Your are right about the Mongolian invasion. But they have had 700 years to recover. One would think that they could have got the Iraq irrigation system Genghis destroyed up and running by now. I know he either killed or brought back to central Asia everyone who worked on it. I know he took back all the manuals and tech information.

    But still, they have had 700 years to recover. I mean if non Arab non Muslim stone age people 6,000 years ago could start that irrigation system, surely the Iraqis from 1400 on could have done the same thing.

    Most of the so called great achievement 700 to 1200 under Arab Muslim control was done by Christians and Jews. Christians were 40 percent of most of those countries.

    The Alhambra and other splendid buildings in Spain are supposed to be one of the glories of Muslim Arab civilization. Truth is, it was all built by Christian slaves, from engineers and designers to laborers. The scholars that Haroun al Rashid funded to copy the great works of antiquity were Christian Syrian monks who had been doing it for centuries in their monastery.

  • Cassiodorus

    China, India and other Asian nations have become prosperous in recent decades exactly to the extent that they’ve stuck their beaks into the West; this is the parasitic relationship our betters demand that we celebrate as “diversity.”

    L. Weiss is naive, at least, to think that Chinese or Indian prosperity does not depend upon whites and their nations. A googled search for “China and industrial espionage or intellectual theft” will provide the rudiments of an education in this matter.

  • Rick

    These elitists sit there in their smugness and defame opposing points of view, as if theirs is the only correct world view. As a matter of fact, they should be like the press ought to be–they should present all viewpoints and let the hearer decide for themselves. Of course, they cannot create their Marxist utopia with an “un-brainwashed” mind that is allowed to think for itself, so they most impose their view as the ONLY view to accept and every other view as “ignorant” or “deivant” in some way. Man I would be a terrible college student at my current age of 44. I would call them out at every opportunity. It would be spirited to say the least.

  • Anonymous

    47 — Lindsey Weiss wrote at 10:17 AM on October 29:

    Tom S. on October 28th wrote:

    “I personally think that “diversity” creates adversity. Our nation, our communities and our colleges were built and were considered first rate the world over long before we had the “strength” of diversity. Statistics prove that any nation, community or college that has a lot of diversity also have more crime, are not as well maintained and have a lot of infighting amongst the various groups. Can any of these diversity lovers name any place on earth that IMPROVED after Whites moved out and blacks/non-Whites moved in?”

    YES! I can think of 3 right now: China, India & Singapore. During the imperialist reign by various European powers and the cultural genocide, oppression, abuse and exploitation of the Chinese people – “Chinese Melon”….one of the greatest civilizations on Earth – China was completely devastated. It was only after they managed to kick the undesirable whites out & under stringent Chinese policies that they are today on the verge of being the next greatest superpower of all time beating the United States. Whites were a bane. Ditto for another very great ancient civilization – India. After the Brits were kicked out, despite it’s problems India has done much better comparatively. As for Singapore – its the world’s cleanest, technologically proficient & a nation which is near perfect especially after the high IQ Han Chinese & Southern Indians (Tamils) took over and created the most perfect nation on Earth – zero poverty, near zero crime rate and 100% literacy rate. Singapore is a 1st world hi tech nation which exhibits prosperity, high quality lifestyles and efficiency to it’s best!”

    The British DID do some bad things in China, but it also opened it up to the world. It was already an inward gazing, shell of a once great dynastic ruling class, which I how Britain got in to begin with. Even more so for India. Singapore seems to be prospering due to the West as do the former two. India was a post empire region of warring tribes when Britain arrived. India today is successful chiefly because of the discipline and industrial management styles AND English (including English culture) that India learned. Ghandi greatly admired the British. He just felt it was time for India to learn to rule itself.

    Today although it looks fairly stable India’s post-British civil war between Muslims and Hindus is simmering just under the surface (and sometimes boiling in Kashmir). Both Pakistan and India acquired nuclear weapons and both have recent history and character that underscores the real risk that implies.

    India and China have both passed the US and nearly everywhere else as the most polluted nations in the world. The public health hazards in India are astounding. Wonderful places to live?

  • Anonymous

    I just read Crowdie and cream- about Scottish people living in the Hebrides in the 1930’s , Gaelic-only speakers for the most part , and council housing was for white natives of the island , not black foriegn people. There was NO Diversity! NO Cute Asian Students! NO blacks! No apologies. yes , they had the poverty from living on a beautiful but harsh land and class warfare of an extreme degree. But no Jamaicans or Hindus. It must have been wonderful.

  • John Engelman

    Ignorant viewpoints shouldn’t be ignored

    By the Highland Cavalier

    Editorial Board

    ——-

    Many liberals dismiss those who disagree with them as being ignorant. One reason for that ignorance may be the fact that many liberals suppress scientific facts about the reasons for racial differences.

    I admit that I am ignorant of scientific evidence that the average Australian Aborigine has the same intellectual potential as the average Ashkenazic Jew. When I ask for evidence, however, I do not receive education; I receive insults.

    I do not feel any hostility or contempt for Aborigines at all. They fascinate me. By studying them we can learn about what our ancestors were like over fifteen thousand years ago. I also think they have been mistreated.

    Nevertheless, I will not believe something unless there is evidence for it. I am ignorant of evidence for innate racial equality.

  • Anonymous

    I work with UCI students on occasion. They come from all races and backgrounds. I have to say that they are mostly great kids and I enjoy working with them. What disturbs me is what they are learning. They often parrot what their professors tell them. The professors are basically grooming them to be marxists. Not only does it disgust me, but we are paying for this with our tax dollars. These smug, racist, marxist professors are paid six figure salaries and live in luxury university-owned houses. The houses they live in would cost $2 million+ in the current market. They are teaching young people how to hate America, hate religion, hate the free market system, and sometimes hate white people. WE ARE PAYING FOR THIS. It fills me with rage to know this is happening.

    I try to calmly tell the students that these liberal classes are a waste of time. Marxism does not work…study engineering, medicine, business…something useful. They often listen to me, but they always go back to their Soviet classes and continue with their indoctrination. These college students commonly remain left wing until they are older or forever. I’ve heard many parents complain that these liberal universities turn their children against them.

    We all want our children to attend college, but their must be away to do away with left-wing, radical professors. We need to start harrassing them like they harrass us. It is easy to acquire email addresses and phone numbers of college professors. If there is one who is teaching your child something awful, it’s time to start calling them and sending them emails. Contact them every day until they are yelling at you and their hands are shaking. Also, complain to the administration and to your local state representative. We need to stop supporting a system that is trying to destroy us.

    These are my ideas and suggestions, I would be pleased to hear what others think as well.

  • Anonymous

    Don’t forget “white privilege”, students! That’s what your professors will fall back on when you prove them wrong with facts. Ask them why we still need affirmative action and see if it takes them longer than sixty seconds to mention the term “white privilege”.

    This is what all your anti-racist instruction will boil down to: The concept of “white privilege”. Take note of how utterly

    unquantifiable “white privilege” is. It exists, they assert, because they say it exists, but can they prove it? How do they prove it? With what evidence?

    Do you not feel pressured to infer its existence and prove you confirm it by agreeing with them? Do you not feel the pressure they apply to you in this regard to agree with the conclusion that “white privilege” still exists and is a problem? Do they not cite examples of outcome inequalities among racial groups and assert that these differences exist because of “white privilege”, in effect bullying you into this conclusion because to disagree with them is to openly admit you believe, for example, that blacks, for whatever reason, tend to not score as

    high on tests (whether you believe that’s genetic or cultural it will make no difference to them)?

    Try it. Try challenging your teachers to at least consider that what they call “white privilege” may not be the cause of these outcome inequalities and that certain groups, for

    whatever reasons, perform at different levels. Try it and see how “tolerant” your teachers are of this suggestion, at even

    considering that there could be another reason beyond the concept of “white privilege” they are espousing. See how long it

    takes them to at the very least imply that you are a bigot or racist and and alienate you from your peers.

    The thing is…on some level you already know this is how it works. Ever wonder why in these types of “instruction” everyone magically arrives at the same conclusion? Because to not do so is to be cast out and vilified. It’s called peer pressure. Not very scientific is it? Would you say that in relating to their students in this manner your teachers are “tolerating diversity”?

  • Pat

    No. 66 – ‘from what you wrote (Lindsey Weiss) I would guess that you are white’ – Weiss is German for white, so you have probably guessed right.

  • John Engelman

    60 — Courtney from Alabama wrote at 1:17 PM on October 29:

    “The Arabs were once creators of a great civilization. Unfortunately, they never really recovered from the Mongolian conquests of the thirteenth century. The religion that unites them has become a force for intolerance and obscurantism. “

    Enough of this nonsense.

    ——

    Modern Arabs are at least in part descended from those who originated civilization in Egypt and what is now Iraq five thousand years ago. Back then Courtney, your European ancestors and mine were still living in the stone age.

    Chinese civilization begins with the Xia Dynasty in 2100 BC. At about this time the Mycenaean civilization began on Greece, but most of Europe was still neolithic. Some Europeans remained paleolithic until five thousand years ago.

    The height of Arab civilization can be dated from the life of Mohammed in the seventh century, to the Mongolian conquests in the thirteenth century. During that time Western Europe experienced the Dark Ages. Literacy almost ceased to exist.

    While this was going on the Chinese experienced the Tang, the Liao, and the Song dynasties. From 907 to 960 there was a war lord period, but nothing equivalent to the European dark age.

    It cannot be said that all racial and ethnic groups are equally accomplished. It also cannot be said that Nordic Europeans have always been in the vanguard.

  • Anonymous

    68 — Harumphty Dumpty wrote at 2:10 PM on October 29:

    Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White

    I just wanted to tell you that I really like this phrase that you and a couple of other posters are using. It sums up a lot!

    I wonder what the students at Wise would think of the phrase, or of anything else we’ve written here. I hope they will post and tell us. But I see they hardly post at their own site!

    I can remember when parents paid to have their children deprogrammed from cults.

    Now parents pay to send their children to four-year cult training centers called colleges and universities.

  • Lindsey Weiss

    To #27 Nutjon at 2:57 who wrote:

    “Are you serious about India? It still has a primitive caste system with the whitest people rising to the top. They still worship rats, cows and live in their own mess, with low IQs. Not to mention that the roma gypsies (70 IQ and a crime rate that beats blacks) originated from India.”

    I did state that India has it’s own fair share of problems BUT it is MUCH better off without the British. Infact despite it’s problems, India is one of the world’s fastest growing economies with the fastest growing middle class almost the population of the entire United States. It is one of those few nations in this economic recession to have successfully eliminated it’s percetile of poverty.

    http://www.aircargoinsights.com/market/indias-emerging-middle-class-looking-for-luxury/

    Now talking about IQ’s – India DOES have the highest IQ people & the lowest too. For eg. South Indian Upper castes have the highest IQ of any human community at 120-125 outscoring Ashkhenaz Jews, East Asians & Nordic whites.

    http://isteve.blogspot.com/2008/06/indias-average-iq-in-2100.html

    However the make only a small %’age of the population, wheras lowercastes make the majority bringing the overall average national IQ down.

    “India had moments of greatness hundreds of years ago when led by Caucasians.”

    Caucasian is a very misleading term in anthropology. Almost all Indians are Caucasians. Theres a big difference between Indian caucasian and European white. India’s success was always due to Indian caucasians themselves….from Sashurtha – the Father of surgery to Gautam Buddha – one of the greatest religious philosophers & Aryanbhatta – a legendary mathematician.

    Also, after achieving independence from the lousy British, Indians have become more successful as individuals too. Take for instance the fact that Indians are now the wealthiest community in Great Britain or that the wealthiest man in UK is an Indian – Laskhmi Mittal or the fact that an Indian owns the world’s most expensive home in downtown Mumbai. Funny that Indian students also outperform white Britons to earn the highest academic scores at high school at Cambridge level. And ironically, the very East India company which was the star of the British crown ( which financed & carried out colonial operations from the Americas & Africas to Asia & Australia (for the once Mighty Brits) is now OWNED by an Indian.

    http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/east-india-company-now-in-indian-hands/97673/on

    Deep down a lot of whites envy & resent Asians for their combination of beauty, physical prowess and ingenuity. No white nation compares to the success of Singapore ( a successful nation built by high IQ Chinese & Indians).

    http://www.cnngo.com/singapore/life/alexis-ong-singapore-perfect-world-capital-586190

  • Courtney from Alabama

    “Modern Arabs are at least in part descended from those who originated civilization in Egypt and what is now Iraq five thousand years ago. Back then Courtney, your European ancestors and mine were still living in the stone age. Chinese civilization begins with the Xia Dynasty in 2100 BC. At about this time the Mycenaean civilization began on Greece, but most of Europe was still neolithic. Some Europeans remained paleolithic until five thousand years ago. The height of Arab civilization can be dated from the life of Mohammed in the seventh century, to the Mongolian conquests in the thirteenth century. During that time Western Europe experienced the Dark Ages. Literacy almost ceased to exist.

    While this was going on the Chinese experienced the Tang, the Liao, and the Song dynasties. From 907 to 960 there was a war lord period, but nothing equivalent to the European dark age.

    It cannot be said that all racial and ethnic groups are equally accomplished. It also cannot be said that Nordic Europeans have always been in the vanguard. ”

    This is way too easy for me to offer a rebuttal to. I have argued with you and others like you on here over and over again, and each time I tell you the same thing. You always list such and such period that other people were more advanced than Europeans. How does this disprove my main point….that European civilization has produced more than anybody else has?

    And I never said Europeans were the only ones to produce civilization. Nope, I said that Europeans have produced more than anyone else and that Europeans were the only ones to create the modern world. So in that case, I don’t understand your point about the modern arabs being partly related to the Ancient Egyptians.

    As to your comments about Northern Europeans coming on the civilization scene kind of late, how typical of what is taught in the modern liberal university? Do whites think for themselves anymore? Of course Northern Europeans came onto the scene later. Most of Europe had a rigid climate while Middle Easterners, Indians, and Chinese people were enjoying their lush river valleys. But AGAIN, how does any of this mean that whites have failed to create more than everyone else in history OVERALL?

  • Anonymous

    Lindsey wrote:

    “YES! I can think of 3 right now: China, India & Singapore. During the imperialist reign by various European powers and the cultural genocide, oppression, abuse and exploitation of the Chinese people –

    Lindsey please read some Chinese history. I think you got the info about China from some false university anti White racists course.

    China was never a colony of any Europeans. Europeans did have Macao and later Hong Kong as colonies leased by the Chinese goverment. Macao was an empty tiny Penninsula when the Portaguese arrived. The Portaguese leased it from the Chinese govermnet. The Chinese leased it because the area was unpopulated. The Portaguese built a thriving city and harbor.

    The Chinese loved Macao because China benefited greatly from Macao exports of Chinese goods, especially tea all over the world.

    There was a wall enclosing the end of the Penninsula where it joined the mainland. There was a large open gate. No European was allowed on the Chinese side. Chinese were allowed on the Macao side. Macao benefitted China a lot more than it benefitted the Portaguese. For centuries it was the only harbor in China that exported Chinese goods.

    Hong Kong had less than a thousand people when the English leased it in I think 1849. The reason Hong Kong was so underpopulated is that it has very little water. Hong Kong could not support a population more than a thousand until the British dug deep wells with their British machinery and skills.

    Shangahi was a tiny settlement when the English and French built the harbor and industries.

    China was never a colony of any European nation whatever nonsense you learned in college. It was always ruled by the Emperor and Chinese goverment officials. Macao and Hong Kong were ruled jointly, with the Chinese goverment ultimately in charge.

    There were areas highly impacted by European settlers. There were thousands of Christian missionaries all over China. This was nothing new. Syrian monks reached China cerca 250. There were Catholic bishops in Bejing in the 1200’s.

    I suppose they taught you the horrors of the seperate business courts? It is true. Because of the racism of the Han Chinese, the European businesses were sequestered in ghettoes they were not allowed to leave. The Chinese goverment ordered them to set up their own courts for their business and other civil disputes. The Chinese govermnets ordered them to police themselves. Since they were not allowed to leave those ghettoes they did police themselves.

    Later in Shanghia and some but not all other places the westerners were allowed to live among the Chinese.

    China is a very large and very old country. It has had good and bad times. It has been highly centralized and then fallen into feudalism and then centralized again.

    The 19th century was one of the bad times for China. In 1830 a civil war began. It lasted off and on for 30 years although the main rebellion was broken by imperial troops about 1840. The rebellion was led by Guandong province. The repression by the imperial troops led to the Cantonese diaspora.

    That’s why the people and language of the overseas Chinese was always Cantonese until the 1980’s when other Chinese fled their communist starvation and slaughter.

    When the civil war started the Emperor was severely retarded and everyone knew it. His 2 wives did the best they could but the situation was bad. The main result of the civil war was that the country split into sectionalism and feudalism. With invaders all over the country, warlords rose to protect their own people and territory. It was nothing new. It was the cycle of centralism to feudalism back to centralism that had been going on for thousands of years.

    The retarded Emperor had a retarded son. He became Emperor and his Mother ruled for him. The imperial family had thousands of members. Hundreds were adult men who could have been very effective Emperors. The worst would have been more effective than 2 retarded emperors for most of the 19th century.

    But the imperial family did not do the obvious thing; retire the retarded emperor and select a capable one.

    Remember, Lindsey that China was not ruled by Han Chinese from about 1600 to 1910. Did they teach that in your hate Whitey anti colonialism class? During the latter part of the 19th century the Han got a successful revolutionary movement together.

    The retarded Emperor’s Mother became Empress when he died. She did the best she could with what she had. The Han revolutionaries were determined to overthrow her, the Manchu Empress. The civil war had left the country feudal and regional instead of centralized. Warlords ruled out side Bejing.

    The Empress then did the stupidest thing any ruler has ever done.

    She was dying. She designated a 2 year old great great grandson as her heir. Again the imperial family allowed this. There were several grandsons and great grandsons who would have been competent Emperors.

    Instead China was ruled by corrupt officials and servants in the name of a 2 year old. The last Emperor was not allowed to see his parents.

    Finally in 1910 the Han revolution succeeded. The Manchu Emperor was overthown and China became a Han republic.

    Things got worse. the bandit warlord goverment got worse. The central goverment got weaker. In the 1920’s the Russians sent communists into China. Small scale revolutions and civil wars broke out all over.

    In the 1930’s the Japanese invaded and took over large sections of the country. In 15 years of occupation the Japanese did more damage to the Chinese people, their culture, their economy and country than the Europeans did in 400 years.

    From 1930 to 1945 the Chinese fought each other instead of uniting against the Japanese. 1948 the Han communists took over. They have murdered about 200 million of their own people since. They have caused untold damage to the environment.

    Mao’s backyard steel production experiment did not produce 1 ounce of steel. To find the fuel for the back yard steel set ups, China was deforested. Millions of acres of trees were cut down for the back yard steel experiment. Billions of tons of metal including from kitchen equipment to trucks to steel girders in buildings to bridges to railroad tracks and the trains were melted down in the great backyard steel experiment.

    The ony good thing about the communist horror is that it unified

    China once again with mass murder. China is now centralized and seems to have a competent and reasonable goverment something it has not had since the early 1800’s when the imperial family allowed a retarded man to be crowned.

    China’s problems since 1800 are problems China and its people created. The European business colonies did nothing but help by exporting its goods to the world, something the native Chinese did not attempt to do because it was forbidden for the Chinese to export its goods to the outside world until the han revolution.

    Had the Europeans not established their colonies in Macao and HongKong China would have been a lot worse off than it was.

    Hope you didnt’ pay $50,00 per year in tuition to learn a totally false version of Chinese history from 1600 to 1945.

    Did your marxist professor teach you that the communists never massacred anyone? Did they tell you there were no famines 1945 to 1990? Did they tell you the communists only executed spies, dissidents and sabatuers?

  • GWS

    Lindsey Weiss

    “Deep down a lot of whites envy & resent Asians for their combination of beauty, physical prowess and ingenuity. No white nation compares to the success of Singapore ( a successful nation built by high IQ Chinese & Indians).”

    Your diatribe on India ended with the statement above.

    Great sense of humor you have there.

    How about some facts on “physical prowess”? How many gold medals has India achieved in the Olympics in their entire history? Just a couple. They are just not athletic.

    Beauty speaks for itself. Western women have that locked up. Blame God if you don’t like that one.

    No doubt there are a lot of good things coming out of India and China these days, but comparing them to the white kids of today that have had educations emphasizing “social justice,” “women’s studies,” even “sports medicine” doesn’t cover the story. People posting at AMREN will make that exact same point.

    Discard diversity, affirmative action, the EEOC, the NEA and a host of other government meddling, allow our countries to embrace the pursuit of excellence like we used to and see what happens. History has already show what happens. We create the most liveable societies in the world.

  • Anonymous

    “No white nation compares to the success of Singapore ( a successful nation built by high IQ Chinese & Indians).”

    Then please explain why Singapore ranks 27th in the Human Development Index and the top ten countries in the world according to that important statistic that measures well-being are all majority white such as Norway (1), Australia (2) and New Zealand (3). As regards the “lousy British,” are you willing to state that the influx of lousy Africans, Asians and Muslims have had generally negative consequences for the native population of Britain, an example being the recent riots and destruction caused by mainly non-white hooligans? If it is true that India is better off without Whites might it be true as well that Britain and other White nations could very well be better off without non-whites? I generally admire and respect Asians, unlike blacks for example, but I strongly feel that we do not need them in our countries any more than they need us in theirs.

  • Bon, From the Land of Babble

    Diversity is neither desirable nor practicable; it can only be achieved when an authoritarian, strong-arm, totalitarian government sits on the “diverse” population like a lid on a pressure cooker. Opposition to the regime means death. Any dissent is met with a 10 cent bullet in the back of the head.

    The United States is fast moving in this direction as the USG enforces a repressive PC Reign of Terror against Native Born White Americans who resist losing their country and culture to a flood of illiterate non-Whites in the name of “diversity.” Britain is already there.

    As the USG continues to mandate LIES such as: “all cultures are superior to White culture” and “race is a social construct”, and more Whites wake up and resist, the USG will fight back with more oppression, more tyranny, more laws passed stripping Whites of any remaining rights. When Whites become a minority in the US, lorded over by non-Whites, they will be in physical danger.

    The more totalitarian or authoritarian a state, the more government killing. The most rigorously totalitarian countries in the world, including Stalin’s Soviet Union, have also been this century’s greatest killers

    After the fall of the Soviet Empire in the early 1990s, the lid blew off; since then more than 100 ethnic-based conflicts have arisen in old Soviet-controlled lands, killing more than five million. The UN estimates two million of those were children.

    I’ll end with these quotes about diversity from Jared Taylor:

    What are the advantages the United States gets from a racially mixed population? None.

    If diversity were a strength people would practice it spontaneously; if diversity were enriching, people would seek it out. It is in private gatherings not governed by some kind of civil-rights law that Americans show just how much strength and enrichment they find in diversity. Such gatherings are usually the very opposite of diverse.

    Bon

  • sbuffalonative

    A diverse area doesn’t mean people interact or get along just because they’re in the same geographic location.

    Wherever I see diversity, I see self-segregation, resentment, or open hostility.

    Diversity is not a strength. It’s an endless source of tension and conflict. It’s only a matter of time before resentments build and conflicts arise and people self-segregate or move away to be with people like themselves.

  • Bon, From the Land of Babble

    After the Brits were kicked out, despite it’s (SIC) problems India has done much better comparatively.

    I did state that India has it’s (SIC) own fair share of problems BUT it is MUCH better off without the British.

    It certainly is! India has flourished without the British — now, if Indians could only conquer their SEWAGE problem:

    Mr Singh told the BBC that more than 65% of India’s rural population defecate in the open, along roadsides, railway tracks and fields, generating huge amounts of excrement every day. ‘This finds its way into the water sources,’ Mr Singh said.

    At New Delhi’s Yamuna River, garbage cascades down the banks, giving off a fetid stench as half of the city’s raw sewage flows into its waters. Samples taken recently from the Ganges River show levels of fecal coliform, a dangerous bacterium that comes from untreated sewage, were some 3,000 percent higher than what is considered safe for bathing.

    Waterborne diseases are India’s leading cause of childhood mortality.

    Here are some lovely photos of India’s pristine rivers and clean countryside posted by MarcB– from a Chinese website (guess the Chinese are jealous of India’s cleanliness since China has a very slight pollution problem, nowhere near the pollution in the US, of course.):

    India: http://goo.gl/n7BV4

    China: http://goo.gl/BAti

    Take a GOOD LOOK!!

    Infact despite it’s (SIC) problems, India is one of the world’s fastest growing economies with the fastest growing middle class almost the population of the entire United States.

    Oh, yes, India “Infact” is certainly growing:

    India’s population has grown by 181 million people over the past decade to 1.21bn, according to the 2011 census. That’s 18 million more people annually who need food, clothing, housing and eventual employment. India has had difficulties in providing the basics like food to its skyrocketing population.

    But in only one direction:

    Female foeticide remains common in India, although sex-selective abortion based on ultrasound scans is illegal.

    http://goo.gl/qyVqy

    Deep down a lot of whites envy & resent Asians for their combination of beauty, physical prowess and ingenuity.

    Yes, you are certainly correct here too. A people who have nothing but poker-straight black hair and dark brown eyes are certainly envied for their beauty –unlike us ugly Whites with our blue, green, hazel, and light brown eyes and our blonde, red, light brown, dark brown, auburn and black hair.

    Maybe you can explain why so many Asian are obsessed with changing themselves to look more Caucasian through plastic surgery?

    From the article: An Influx of Asians are Having Plastic Surgery to Look More Western

    Dr Kim says his clinic, one of the most successful in a city dubbed the ‘plastic surgery capital of Asia,’ performs 100 surgeries a day.

    ‘They always tell me they don’t like their faces,’ says Dr Kim ‘They want to have some westernized, nice faces. They want to have big eyes like westernized people, high profile, nicer noses.’

    The Chinese and Korean patients tell me that they want to have faces like Americans. The idea of beauty is more westernized recently. That means the Asian people want to have a little less Asian, more westernized appearance. They don’t like big cheekbones or small eyes. They want to have big, bright eyes with slender, nice facial bones.

    http://goo.gl/irynP

    As for envying Asian “innovation” piggy-backed or stolen from Whites (posted by Fer de Lance):

    In 1996, Congress passed a new law making theft of industrial secrets a federal crime. The offense rises to espionage if the secrets are handed over to foreign governments.

    Every single person arrested or convicted under this law has been Asian, and the vast majority have been Chinese.

    How about YOU giving up all White inventions? If not for White-created technology, you’d be without a computer to spew your White-hating, racist, bigoted screeds.

    You can thank Whites for the following (although I doubt a White-hating racist such as yourself ever would):

    Computers and the software that drives them, the Internet, the bulk of mathematics, physics and chemistry, 95% of all medical advances and life-saving pharmaceuticals including antibiotics; the internal combustion and jet engines, satellites, rocketry and spacecraft, microscopes, recorded music, television, radios and cameras.

    You are a typical White-hating hypocrite and bigot! You take pleasure in demeaning and disparaging Whites while using making use of the things WE Whites created.

    Bon

  • Bon, From the Land of Babble

    Modern Arabs are at least in part descended from those who originated civilization in Egypt and what is now Iraq five thousand years ago. Back then Courtney, your European ancestors and mine were still living in the stone age.

    John: What does it matter now? Who cares? Really. We’ve passed every single one of those civilizations by a huge margin, let them far behind. We could quibble for eons as to which civilization had what when.

    What I tell my students is this: What matters is how you finish.

    And, I’d say we’ve done a pretty good job, considering we White Europeans put a man on the moon; something non-Whites have not done to this day.

    Yes, we Nordic Whites once lived in caves and painted ourselves blue while striving to survive the harsh environmental conditions and long dark winters in N. Europe while other civilizations flourished.

    We Nordic Whites had to figure out how to stay alive in an area of scant plant foods, where sustaining ourselves meant hunting big game. We also had to figure out how to keep warm and protect our food, ourselves,and loved ones from marauders and predators. All of these things require high cognitive ability. Those who did not or were not able to plan ahead for the long, cold, dark Nordic winter did not survive, their genes taken out of the gene pool.

    As M. Rushton writes: Winters are good for your genes!

    Mother Nature has neither pity nor sympathy; she is remorseless and ruthless.

    It also cannot be said that Nordic Europeans have always been in the vanguard.

    John:

    I have never heard one single person say this, ever; nor have I read any post stating this on an AmRen thread.

    Bon

  • Anonymous

    Not all college newspapers are anti-white.

    http://goo.gl/T6Hi2

  • ghw

    What AMAZES me is that the Berkeley based “Free Speech Movement” in the 60s evolved into a political movement that not only advocates laws against it, but also laws against free thought.

    But I am against ANY organization, including religion, that would seek to limit my right to freedom of conscience.

    ………………………

    I remember the “Free Speech Movement” well. Actually, it should have been dubbed “The Dirty Speech Movement”, because that was really what it was all about. There was much less concern given to political or philosophical thought, or about matters of conscience. It was, in fact, founded by Mario Savio, a New Yorker (from Brooklyn). His concept of free speech was filty speech. Before that, American college students were expected to behave, dress, and speak like young ladies and gentlemen. After that, they degenerated into a pack of slovenly, filty-mouthed bums spouting obsceneties. It was the newest fad. We have never recovered from it.

    The Free [Filthy] Speech Movement did enormous harm to America.

    It was not about “freedom” at all. It was part of the overall Marxist deconstruction of all civilized standards, western standards, and the elevation of the course and the primitive above the civilized and the refined.

    It was part of the Frankfurt School’s “March Through the Institutions”. And very effective it was on those gullible college kids who were in revolt against their parents’ bourgeois mentality! They were going to make a new world — they thought! Look at the wreckage they’ve left us. Don’t make the mistake of supposing that it had anything to do with freedom of thought and conscience. Those totalitarians would never have stood for such a thing– certainly not as applies to you.

  • Anonymous

    Singapore uses caning as an instrument of corporal punishment–they force the people to be orderly.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caning_in_Singapore

  • Lindsey Weiss

    To GWS wrote at 8:22 PM on October 29 who wrote:

    “Beauty speaks for itself. Western women have that locked up. Blame God if you don’t like that one.”

    I think you need a reality check from your delusion of grandiosity! As a white girl myself (I’m Ashkhenaz Jewish from Connecticut with dirty blonde hair & green eyes) – I’ve actually travelled & lived all over Asia – India, Singapore, Japan, Hong Kong, Mainland China & the middle east. In India, a white woman maybe the object of unwanted attention with stares but fact is by no means is she considered the epitome of beauty…infact Indians prefer the ideal woman to be someone with fair olive/ light brown skin, brown eyes & a delicate frame with a very high IQ – (definately NOT your tpical pale Nordic white blonde blue eyed masculine looking European girl. The fact is there have been more Indian woman who have won International beauty contestants ( Miss Universe/ Miss World titles) than any white woman from a western nation save the latin American nations. The funny thing is when I lived in Mumbai, India – home to the world’s largest movie industry (Bollywood) as an international there, I personally knew & even heard of many attractive white girls from Eastern Europe, western Europe & even some from America who were trying their luck in the movie industry but were rejected because they were too blonde-blue eyed and colorless! A cursory look at Bollywood will reveal that ALL their actresses & models are wholly Indian with not a single white (despite heaps of aspiring white starlets & even stars from countries like the UK & western Europe). Meanwhile here in the west some beautiful & talented Indian girls are making it big in Hollywood mega blockbuster films:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLH7R-E3MJw

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RY0zW5DJ1z0

    Ditto with the Chinese who prefer their own racial kind. Just look at their movie or music industry. Most Asians consider white women to be she-males – too tall, broad shouldered, big boned and obese with an offending masculine attitude & voice. So, NO white women DON’T have that locked up! In the end beauty is a relative concept & simply lies in the eyes of the beholder!

    Indian & Chinese students excel and even outscore white students not just in their countries but even more so even in western nations like the UK, Australia & USA. Academic scores speak volumes unless ofcourse like those underachieving blacks & hispanics you are simply trying to deflect from this core issue with more excuses.

    http://goo.gl/RjcSE

    http://goo.gl/DQym3

  • highduke

    White Liberals just don’t want the responsibility that comes with ethnic & racial solidarity and they avoid talking about that openly with well-rehearsed diversionary liberal rhetoric without a second thought.

  • Rick

    I posted a comment on the UVA-Wise newspaper section of this article. I ripped them for their intolerance to differing world views and told them to stick with teaching science and math and that college is not a place of indoctrination to a particular set of ideologies but should be a place where people can investigate truth for themselves and form their own thoughts.

    My comment is now gone. It didn’t even last a day.

  • Dick Whitman

    If diversity is strength why do they have to force it on people?

  • David Ashton

    A balanced, well-informed, comprehensive and accurate appraisal of the relative global contributions and inter-actions of different racial groups, and especially their own elites, a major enterprise for objective historians, makes no difference one way or another to the right of “white” nations to retain ethnic hegemony within their own territories.

    A good start, perhaps, is Charles Murray’s “Human Accomplishment: The Pursuit of Excellence in the Arts and Sciences, 800 BC to 1950” (Harper/Collins, NY 2003).

    As a famous Russian remarked, virtually the only “genuine communists” left in the world are those dominating western

    universities and their publishing houses.

    Back in 1951 as a boy I went with my parents to Singapore and, although Britain was fighting Chinese Communists in Malaya, we travelled there with a communist university teacher of Polish extraction destined for a lucrative apppointment, and were entertained in his expensive home; several of my tutors at Oxford and London in the 1960s were marxists, one of them notoriously outspoken; the university situation became gradually worse by promotion rachets. I remember that Singapore was divided into ethnic areas, was conspicuously clean compared to Indian and Egyptian towns, and in later years adopted a postive eugenics policy to promote a high birth-rate among its best students. I have doubts about the high IQ levels for East Asians proposed by Lynn and Rushton, because these do not reflect the peasant interiors so much as the enterprising littoral migrants on both sides of the Pacific.

  • Miss Whitey

    #90 Lindsey Weiss said:

    “Deep down a lot of whites envy & resent Asians for their combination of beauty, physical prowess and ingenuity. No white nation compares to the success of Singapore ( a successful nation built by high IQ Chinese & Indians).”

    As a White woman, I can tell you I’ve never envied Asians for any of their attributes. And if Singapore is so successful, how come Chinese and Indians are constantly coming to America for a first world education and jobs? People such as you are always pointing out how great other countries are. Yet, the natives of those countries are constantly emigrating to the United States, where supposedly Whites are inferior compared to certain immigrants.

    I assure you if Whites were so inferior we could never have established the most free and prosperous nation on earth(which we are rapidly losing).

    Oh, by the way. Are you an Indian or are you Chinese?

  • Sonya

    Lindsey is bright enough to avoid direct questions and only address the points she can argue safely. Kudos to her.

    But Lindsey, you fail to answer or even address the original query. Why is DIVERSITY a strength?

    Answer the question Lindsey, and provide legit sites/statistics to back up your answer.

  • Anonymous

    Without the White race all Asians would be living in the 10th century.Period.

    Fellow Whites do not fall into the trap of arguing specifics of IQ with these Asian obsessed people. The bottom line is almost all inventions in science, mechanics, medicine, art, etc are White.

    As far as this person claiming she has traveled blah blah blah. Well I am 53 and have been traveling the world since 1975. I have traveled extensively in China. There villages are just ugly cement made monstrosities. While in Europe the whole area is filled with beautiful architecture and beautiful cities. Asia shows none of this. And imagine European cities without World War 2 the Munichs, Dresden and Nurembergs.were said to be totally beautiful.

    Whites are the standard the rest of the of the world aspires to. They are natures gift to humanity.

  • BEBE

    102 — Lindsey Weiss wrote at 9:18 AM on October 30:

    To GWS wrote at 8:22 PM on October 29 who wrote:

    “Beauty speaks for itself. Western women have that locked up. Blame God if you don’t like that one.”

    I think you need a reality check from your delusion of grandiosity! As a white girl myself (I’m Ashkhenaz Jewish from Connecticut with dirty blonde hair & green eyes) – I’ve actually travelled & lived all over Asia – India, Singapore, Japan, Hong Kong, Mainland China & the middle east. In India, a white woman maybe the object of unwanted attention with stares but fact is by no means is she considered the epitome of beauty…infact Indians prefer the ideal woman to be someone with fair olive/ light brown skin, brown eyes & a delicate frame with a very high IQ – (definately NOT your tpical pale Nordic white blonde blue eyed masculine looking European girl.

    ————————————————–

    Thank you.

    You confirmed my suspicions about who/what you are. Typical nonsense and anti-WHITE garbage people like you love to espouse. Could care less what “Indians” prefer or what vitriol/lies you love to throw around on forums such as this one. You are an obvious troll and anti_white to the core, just like John Engleman, and most of us old timers here can spot you a mile away.

  • save_Ingrid_Bergmans_genes

    Indians don’t consider us beautiful? I am CRUSHED!

    Lindsey, if Freida Pinto is the Indians’ idea of beauty, they are welcome to it. Your first link was my first acquaintance with her, but talk about masculine features!

    Bon, wonderful posts. I especially enjoyed plastic surgeon Dr. Kim’s description of how his Asian patients want more Western features.

    And I note that the attraction of Ghetto black culture has stopped short of causing anyone anywhere to want plastic surgery to look more African.

    Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White

  • E Pluribus Pluribus

    @Lindsey 102

    Some of the success of Asians in the West in recent decades is due the parallel success of cultural marxists in taking over Western institutions, in particular, schools and universities. In fact, there has been a dramatic decline in white students scoring over 600 and 650 on the Verbal SAT. On BookTV.org, in 2010 E. D. Hirsch Jr., [referring to a chart showing the average Verbal SAT score falling about 40 points from 1967 – 2002], pointed out:

    “The absolute number of students who scored above 600 declined by 56 percent and the absolute number of students who scored above 650 declined by 73 percent. A sudden influx of black and Hispanic test-takers cannot explain why large numbers of college-bound middle-class white students suddenly became less proficient. That is what happened.”

    Hirsch did not say this but it is obvious: As America has become more diverse, far fewer whites are scoring above 600 on the Verbal SATs. Diversity, it seems, fuels non-achievement, at least for whites.

    It is plausible that much of the decline in white verbal proficiency in recent decades is accounted for by the effect of the ideology of multi-culturalism on curricula, in particular, on history and literature instruction. Textbooks are especially revealing:

    “Beginning in the early 1980s, as immigrant children again increased in numbers in the public schools, social reformers began to shed most of their remaining academic constraints . . . the most effective way to upgrade the status of students whose academic performance in school had barely changed . . . was not so much to enhance it positively through celebratory readings but to reduce the moral and cultural status of the mainstream. To do so, they began to load the history and literature curriculum with literary works or other kinds of reading that stressed the flaws and failings of the United States . . . Although this literature became known facetiously as ‘victim lit’ or ‘white-guilt lit’ for its highlighting of a group’s victimization by white Americans, many teachers believed it was useful precisely because it served to elevate a minority group’s moral status, build group solidarity . . . and create guilt in white students . . .” (Losing Our Language: How Multicultural Classroom Instruction is Undermining Our Children’s Ability to Read, Write, and Reason , by Sandra Stotsky, 1999, p49)

    In Losing our Language , Professor Stotsky, then a Research Associate at the Harvard Graduate School of Education, examined “the contents of the leading readers for grades 4 and 6 published in 1993 and 1995.” Five years later, in The Language Police: How Pressure Groups Restrict What Students Learn (2003), research professor Diane Ravitch would reveal how textbook publishers efficiently generate such content. Their key instrument: comically elaborate “bias and sensitivity guidelines” — some of which, with great difficulty, Ravitch was able to obtain. Below is her description of the guidelines of publishing giant McGraw-Hill:

    “The MH guidelines express barely concealed rage against people of European ancestry. They deride European Americans for exploiting slaves, migrant workers, and factory labor; they excoriate the land rapacity of the pioneers and mock their so-called courage in fighting Native Americans: “Bigots and Bigotry,” say the guidelines, referring to European Americans, “must be identified and discussed.” European Americans, the guidelines suggest, were uniquely responsible for bigotry and exploitation in all human history . . .” (p44)

    My favorite example, however, of the exquisite sensitivity of the textbook and testing industry to the ideological demands of selling to state education systems is an incident Ravitch shared about her 1998 service on the National Assessment Governing Board, the supervisory body for the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). Ravitch, a Clinton appointee, worked on a subcommittee tasked to review fourth grade reading passages intended for what would have become a voluntary national test:

    “After I had read about a dozen such passages, a combination of fiction and nonfiction, I realized that the readings themselves had a cumulative subtext: the hero was never a white boy. Instead, the leading character – the one who was most competent, successful, and sympathetic – was invariably either a girl (of any race) or a nonwhite boy. Almost without exception, white boys were portrayed as weak and dependent. In one story, a white boy in a difficult situation weeps and says plaintively, ‘ If only my big sister were here, I would know what to do.’” ( ” Education After the Culture Wars, ” Daedalus , Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, Summer, 2002)

    * * *

    So, a bit of gloating on your part is in order. Whites have been and are being badly damaged by public schools and by their universities. Whether cultural Marxists will be as successful going forward remains to be seen.

  • Bon, From the Land of Babble

    Indian & Chinese students excel and even outscore white students not just in their countries but even more so even in western nations like the UK, Australia & USA. Academic scores speak volumes unless ofcourse like those underachieving blacks & hispanics

    And, good for them. Then explain to us stupid Whites why they need to keep coming over here to steal White technology?

    Why can’ they create their own technology or pharmaceuticals if they’re so much smarter that Whites?

    If they find us so ‘offensive’ why are they doing everything possible to join White- run, White-created societies?

    The Washington Post reports:

    Since the communist revolution in 1949, China has developed only one internationally recognized drug — Artemisinin — to fight malaria.

    Chinese science and technology is also awash in scams and sometimes-troubling practices…China is also the leading source of what are known as “junk” patents — ridiculous claims of “inventions” that are little more than snake-oil scams.

    Finally, plagiarism and doctored results seem to be as common as chopsticks. A study by Wuhan University uncovered an entire industry of bogus report and thesis writers who raked in $145 million last year, a fivefold increase since 2007.

    FBI officials allege that there is a large-scale operation in the United States to pilfer American industrial, scientific, technological and military secrets. In the past few years, dozens of Chinese have been convicted of stealing American technology and shipping it to China.

    you are simply trying to deflect from this core issue with more excuses.

    The core issue, of course, being Freedom of Speech, which YOU reserve for yourself but not for Whites, right Lindsey?

    You are a White-hating, pro-White genocidist.

    Bon

  • MuayTyson

    Lindsey Weiss,

    You are obviously intelligent but so very much uninformed.

    You see if you truely lived in Asia as I have you should have more of a clue about the actual going ons. I have friends in India, Singapore, and China and the reality you portray is far, far different than what is actually discussed between friends.

    Each of these countries are very much racist by Western standards and only the fair skinned, intelligent people rule and place each of the swarthy, low IQ people in a catagory below themselves.

    Sure the official line is what the West wants to hear,”We are strong multicultural nationas!” The truth is Han Chinese rule China with absolute power, Singaporean Chinese rule Singapore with absolute power, and the light skinned desendants of the Mogals rule India with absolute power.

    Please ask a very drak South Indian what he/she thinks of the Indian power structure. Ask a Malay how they feel about the iron rule of the Chinese in Singapore. Maybe you could ask a Muslim Uygar how they view the central Chinese government.

    Please excuse me for my poor grammar and spelling but I wanted you to get a REAL education born of experience not from a book or college professor with an agenda.

    Cheers

  • Anonymous

    “In the end beauty is a relative concept & simply lies in the eyes of the beholder!”

    This is true. Asians of course would consider their own features to be the most attractive as would every other race.

  • Dan

    “I think you need a reality check from your delusion of grandiosity! As a white girl myself (I’m Ashkhenaz Jewish from Connecticut with dirty blonde hair & green eyes) – I’ve actually travelled & lived all over Asia – India, Singapore, Japan, Hong Kong, Mainland China & the middle east. In India, a white woman maybe the object of unwanted attention with stares but fact is by no means is she considered the epitome of beauty…infact Indians prefer the ideal woman to be someone with fair olive/ light brown skin, brown eyes & a delicate frame with a very high IQ – (definately NOT your tpical pale Nordic white blonde blue eyed masculine looking European girl. The fact is there have been more Indian woman who have won International beauty contestants ( Miss Universe/ Miss World titles) than any white woman from a western nation save the latin American nations. The funny thing is when I lived in Mumbai, India – home to the world’s largest movie industry (Bollywood) as an international there, I personally knew & even heard of many attractive white girls from Eastern Europe, western Europe & even some from America who were trying their luck in the movie industry but were rejected because they were too blonde-blue eyed and colorless! A cursory look at Bollywood will reveal that ALL their actresses & models are wholly Indian with not a single white (despite heaps of aspiring white starlets & even stars from countries like the UK & western Europe). Meanwhile here in the west some beautiful & talented Indian girls are making it big in Hollywood mega blockbuster films:”

    Your description of white females as “masucline” in comparison with Asian females is laughable. Indian women have ugly, masculine faces. Compare Indian beauty queens with typical white women. http://goo.gl/L8WX8 Asian women are also have far less feminine physiques than European women. Mongoloid women especially, tend to have small breasts, and flat buttocks compared with European women, in addition to unappealing baby faces.

    “Indian & Chinese students excel and even outscore white students not just in their countries but even more so even in western nations like the UK, Australia & USA. Academic scores speak volumes unless ofcourse like those underachieving blacks & hispanics you are simply trying to deflect from this core issue with more excuses.”

    Yes, Asian parents tend to push their kids academically more than White parents (at least nowadays), and East Asians have slightly higher average IQ scores, however Whites have higher standard deviation (variability) in IQ scores (18 SD versus 12 SD: Jensen, A.R. 1998. The g Factor. Praeger: Connecticut, USA.) meaning that there are far more White geniuses than Asian geniuses.

  • Harumphty Dumpty

    Hey, you kiddies at Wise! Did you see what a REAL college newspaper can do, at the link 99 – Anonymous gave?

    “Americans should recognize South African genocide”

    “Since the takeover of the ANC government in 1994, racist black gunmen have grotesquely murdered more than 3,000 Afrikaners, [Wise kiddies, Afrikaners are Whites descended from the original European settlers there] according to a March 28, 2010, Times UK article. Often, Afrikaners are forced to watch as their family members are brutalized and tortured before being killed.

    Gregory Stanton, head of Genocide Watch and a former law professor, said ‘There is a motive of hatred, that these are hate crimes. People are tortured and murdered in ways that are dehumanizing.’

    In a 2003 report on the attacks, Genocide Watch found that convicted gunmen ‘hated their Afrikaner victims and saw them as ‘dogs’ rather than people; and that they killed and tortured and raped for this reason.’

    Louis Swanepoel, senior in mechanical engineering, is a K-State student from South Africa. He came here in June 2005 with his parents, who left South Africa to find work and avoid the rising tide of violence. He agrees that Afrikaners are the victims of an ongoing genocide.

    ‘My friend and his mother were assaulted with golf clubs and his father was killed with a shotgun,’ Swanepoel said. ‘After we moved, the people who bought our house were murdered.’

    Swanepoel said the violence cannot be explained as a backlash against apartheid.

    ‘Afrikaners always get along with older Africans. The people conducting the attacks have grown up after apartheid. A lot of them aren’t even from South Africa — they’re from Zimbabwe and Mozambique.’ Swanepoel said of the genocide, ‘The ANC might see it but doesn’t care about it,’ explaining that government policies systematically deny jobs to Afrikaners on the basis of their ethnicity.

    According to an April 9, 2002, BBC article, a woman born in South Africa has a greater chance of being raped than learning how to read. In a June 20, 2009, Time survey of South African men, one in four admitted to being a rapist, making the country the rape capital of the world. In a survey of schoolchildren in the Soweto township, one in four boys said that ‘jackrolling,’ a South African term for recreational gang rape, was ‘fun,’ according to a June 19, 1999, BBC article.

    ‘The criminals in our country have more rights than the victims,’ Rensburg said. ‘If someone is breaking into my home, I have to wait until he’s three meters from me before he’s threatening my life. Then I have to fire a warning shot before I am allowed to shoot him. I am not allowed to shoot him in the back, so if my husband walked in on a guy raping me, my husband could not shoot him.’

    Walk onto any college campus in America and you can find students who admirably work against genocide in the Congo, Uganda or Rwanda. As citizens of one of the most generous nations on earth, we’ll stand up for people halfway around the world we’ve never met. So why is no one standing up for the Afrikaners?”

    http://goo.gl/T6Hi2

    Kiddies from Wise, can you answer the writer’s last question?

    I’ll give you a moment…..

    I knew you’d need help: NO ONE IS STANDING UP FOR THE AFRIKANERS BECAUSE THE AFRIKANERS ARE WHITE!

    White Genocide is being accomplished not only by flooding all white countries with non-whites, which will interbreed us out of existence (see UnclePen #35 above for the Darwinian details), but is also being accomplished by outright slaughter!

    Get a clue, kiddies from Wise!

    Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White

    (To 99 – Anonymous: You rock!)

  • Anonymous

    I wish looks would be left out of the discussion.

    There may be something to Asians doing better in school compared to Whites.

    I sure can tell a difference from how it used to be.

    It used to be, that white children had a father who supported the family and a mother, who made a home for them. Children used to be well raised, polite, doing good in school. Schools were not madhouses and dumbed down to the lowest.

    White children now increasingly have one parent, instead of studying, doing chores, riding their bikes in the neighbourhood, etc. they watch stupid TV shows, play stupid computer games, listen to stupid rap music and other noise and have lost our good standards in the course of time. Nothing comes from nothing, white children do not work half as hard for what they accomplish. If they studied as hard as Asiens you would not see them for dust.

  • Jennifer

    I am a middle school teacher at a school that’s 80 percent Asian (about three-quarters of those Asians are Chinese; the rest are Indian, Korean, Vietnamese, and Japanese).

    My Asian students are not only high achieving, but EXTREMELY polite and respectful. Teenage rebellion is UNHEARD of in their culture. My white students can get chatty and slightly rebellious but nothing compared to the stuff you see that goes on in inner-city Black schools.

    I would say that if the Asian percentage of the population were to increase to 20 percent of the U.S., the American tax base would go up, the crime rate would go down, and our shortage of scientists and engineers would disappear overnight.

    The solution to China’s overpopulation problem and low white birthrates would be to bring the Chinese to Western countries were they can become productive, hard working citizens. Another benefit is that Chinese don’t coddle Blacks like liberal whites do. When, not if, the Chinese take over California, all the welfare and section 8 programs will be demolished, forcing the Black population to leave California for the liberal white northeastern states and midwest. California will once again, become a prosperous nation.

  • Dan

    I love how they call our viewpoints “ignorant”, but they never explicate what it is about them that are “ignorant” (lacking in knowledge). What exactly is it that they know that we don’t know? Methinks they are the ones whom are ignorant about anthropology and evolutionary psychology.

  • Anonymous

    “As a white girl myself (I’m Ashkhenaz Jewish from Connecticut with dirty blonde hair & green eyes)”

    Well Lindsay I would like to ask you honest question. Your relatives, if they are typical, probably came to the USA around 1900. Your ancestors did not want to immigrate to India, China, or Brazil. They overwhelmingly chose to come to a White created and dominated society. Now there was a great many Anglos who were against allowing anymore Jews into the country. Primarily because they said your group would disrupt the social order. Now 110 years later your group has been over represented in all things that promoted radical change to the USA. Especially things having to do with the promotion of non-Whites.

    Now my questions? Why did your group want to come to a White dominated country, if all groups are equal as you claim? Second question do you blame, some of us Whites for feeling our ancestors were correct in warning us about letting to much of your group in?

    I ask these question in all sincerity.

  • Jason Robertson

    There are some light-brown/olive-skinned Indian and Jewish women, and some pretty white-skinned Chinese girls, that white men will find attractive, without wishing to have their babies.

    Though they are all dark-haired and dark-eyed, they can have gracile physiques and a feminine (not feminist) charm that European women often lack. Of course, this is to compare the best with the best; the most attractive of Chinese and Japanese girls have longer than average legs and more European noses.

    White men will also find some mulatto women attractive, because their lips and nostrils are more prominently sensual, their eyes wider and their buttocks more protruberant; all mating signals,

    with a light “tan” colouring to spice the exotic appeal. Their heels are not so attractive. The “British” pop-star Alesha Dixon is a good example.

    I am not in favour of cross-breeding, but do not dismiss these factors.

    There is no doubt that black men seek white women, and the entertainment media and commercial advertising (e.g. bedroom furniture, wedding outfits) promote this pairing. It is a fatal conjunction between evolved female nordic beauty and perceived ultra-masculinity in muscle-power and genitalia, culturally reinforced by black experience in sweet-talk and dancing.

    Young white males should reclaim our young white girls, and our older men should stop importing south-east Asian women as wives aka domestic servants.

  • Flaxen-headed Strumpet

    Well folks, I can’t believe it! After an eternity of pending comment moderation, they’re actually letting our voices be heard on two opinion pieces in the comments section of this student paper.

    http://home.uvawise.edu/highlandcavalier/?p=4700

    http://home.uvawise.edu/highlandcavalier/?p=4703

  • Harumphty Dumpty

    Will you all quit talking about women, please! ALL women are attractive, bless their souls!

    And that’s the problem! All races will be interbred out of existence if they’re mixed together all around the world!

    But we don’t have to worry about that, because races are not being mixed together all around the world.

    They’re only being mixed together in every White country!

    No one is demanding that Japan be flooded by non-Japanese.

    No one is demanding that China be flooded by non-Chinese.

    But if you object to the flooding of White countries by non-Whites, you’re a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews!

    This genocidal program against our race is being carried out by anti-Whites who call themselves anti-racists.

    What they are is anti-White, and their program is White Genocide.

    Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White

  • SS

    “Ignorant comments must not be ignored”.

    That’s right so every time someone suggests “white racism”, be sure to remind them about the real racism (physical assaults) committed against Whites by non-whites and follow that up with all the privileges (Affirmative Action, Government and Business set-asides, SBA set-asides, etc.) every single non-white race gets while the White Man gets nothing.

    Don’t forget to remind them about all the fake hate crimes non-whites commit either. You might want to thrown in all the Federal Funding all the non-white race groups get too.

    If they dare mention Slavery, invoke Anthony Johnson.

    There are TONS of examples to throw in their face.

    They have non-white History Months but White People have none.

    They have their own News Channels but not White People.

    They have Chambers of Commerce and Caucuses and we have none.

    Non-whites get to claim race thereby giving themselves “minority” status but White People are lumped together and counted as one.

    Whites are officially the Minority now yet non-whites are still the “minority”.

    Non-whites get to have their “culture” taught in Publicly Funded American Schools but no classes about White Culture.

    Y’all get my point…

  • Mack the Knife

    As a white girl myself (I’m Ashkhenaz Jewish from Connecticut with dirty blonde hair & green eyes).

    It is as I suspected and now you’ve confirmed it. You are a supremacist and white-hating racist.

    Advocacy is for yourself and every ethnic/racial group except whites.

    No problem if Hispanics want to organize and proclaim: “For our race everything; for everyone else, nothing.”

    Or blacks wish to spew anti-white venom or freely assault and kill us — hey, no problem! You’ll make sure black-on-white crimes are covered up, won’t you? You’ll make sure blacks are NEVER accused of hate crimes because that’s not possible, is it? Only whites are capable of hate crimes and hate speech according to the DOJ.

    But if WHITES want to advance our interests to stop white genocide?

    Well…that’s different, right Mz. weiss? Any time whites organize it must be stopped lest the ovens be fired up, right? Whites ONLY organize for supremacist reasons, to goose step in the streets for round- ups, right? Every white secretly longs for a Fourth Reich, for Hitler to return, am I not correct, Mz. weiss?

    Therefore, it is up to you and others of your ilk to rally Blacks, Browns and Asians against “white supremacists” to make sure we don’t have the same First Amendment or Freedom of Assembly rights you and every other ethnic or racial group enjoys in the US. You’ll make sure the big guns are notified in the SPLC and ADL to shut down white meetings such as the American Renaissance conference, make sure hotels and their employees threatened so they won’t host our conference.

    You will also make sure that the US is flooded with third world destitute so whites will not longer be a majority, right? THAT is your main goal. AND, you’ll make sure that when the United States becomes one more third world country, that whites are blamed for the misery. What do you care? You’ll have long left.

    Let me ask you this: Do you feel safe now?