Business Beats Bigotry

Gregory Rodriguez, Los Angeles Times, March 28, 2011

Conservative Utah has bucked the national GOP trend of embracing hard-line–and arguably inhumane–laws meant to make states inhospitable to illegal immigrants. Two weeks ago, Utah Gov. Gary R. Herbert signed into law a bill that will grant work permits, and a path to legal residence, to undocumented immigrants and their immediate families.

And conservative Arizona, which last year passed the anti-immigrant law known as SB 1070, defeated a second slate of such measures, including one that sought to deny birthright citizenship to the U.S.-born children of illegal immigrants.

Surprised? You shouldn’t be. There’s nothing inherently conservative about taking a punitive line against illegal immigrants. Instead, as these votes in Utah and Arizona show, old-school conservatism–that of employers and business interests–just might be the key to finally dealing justly with the 11 million people living within our borders without papers.

Business’ first loyalty is to the bottom line. That tends to make businesspeople seem indifferent to social issues; they concentrate on balancing their books and staying afloat, not on saving the world. For the politically liberal, that smacks of meanness and greed. But cool pragmatism is the right antidote for passionate bigotry. In fact, despite all the time and energy Americans spend praising the wonders of tolerance and the virtues of inclusion, bottom-line values have throughout our history done about as much to fight bigotry as has any particular brand of high-minded moralism.


As Jonathan Koppell, dean of the public policy school at Arizona State University, says, “Most businesses are hard-pressed to let visceral emotions drive decisions to the point where the balance sheet suffers. In the marketplace, alienating a significant segment of the population is never a good strategy. Sadly, the same cannot be said of the political arena.”

So how did business meet politics in Utah and Arizona?

Utah saw the economic damage Arizona did to itself with SB 1070. The law, which prods police to question those they stop about their immigration status, drew boycotts and cost the state millions of dollars in tourism and convention business. Pushed by business leaders and the Mormon Church, politicians didn’t repeat the mistake.

As for Arizona, with five more virulently anti-immigrant measures up for consideration, 60 state business leaders sent a letter to the Legislature asking them to not make matters worse.

None of this suggests that Republicans or most voters in these states are suddenly pro-illegal immigration. What it may mean, however, is that the pragmatism of pro-business conservatism is finally standing its ground against the emotionalism of social conservatism.



Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.

2 Responses to “Business Beats Bigotry” Subscribe

  1. Anonymous April 1, 2011 at 10:06 am #

    From Australia: What has happened for the USA to sink so unbelievably low? I think our illegal refugees program is bad.. one look at a story like this and I truly think it is impossible. Who let this go on?? Why didn’t anyone protest?? Here the PCness is mad too, but something that extreme would never happen hear.

    My condolences, truly.

  2. Nathaniel Branden, Jr. April 1, 2011 at 1:20 pm #

    The US was nowhere near a laissez-faire economy in the 19th century, Lincoln instituted a dictatorship, went off the gold standard, abolished habeas corpus, the Feds subsidized internal improvements, gave subsidies for huge land grabs by the railroads, there were all sorts of laws inhibiting local businesses, anti-abortion laws were enacted, the venomous antitrust laws were enacted, the south was under military occupation. Read Louis Hacker, Clarence B. Carson and other real historians, and yes, IF all government education, welfare, medical care, social security, disability aid and civil rights laws in the private sector were abolished that would drastically illegal immigration. Illegal welfare immigration has been government sponsored a la LBJ’s Great Society from the beginning. The railroads who brought in the coolies were exactly the ones given the federal grants. I have worked for employers who have specialized in hiring foreign cheap labor and they were paid by the Feds to do so.