Experts Concerned Scientific Advances Are Giving Rise to ‘Neoracism’

News, February 15, 2014

Advances in genetic sequencing are giving rise to a new era of scientific racism, experts have said.

New forms of discrimination, known as “neoracism”, are taking hold in scientific research, spreading the belief that races exist and are different in terms of biology, behaviour and culture, according to anthropologists who spoke at the annual American Association for the Advancement of Science conference in Chicago.

This comes despite decades-long efforts to reverse attitudes that were used to justify the slave trade and the Nazi ideology.

“Genome science can help us a lot in the individualisation of medical practice,” said Nina Jablonski, an anthropology professor at The Pennsylvania State University.

But she warned that science could be “misused” to propagate the belief that people inherently have different abilities based on skin colour or ethnic background.

She cited new research urging that children be identified based on their genetically predetermined educational abilities and then put in separate schools that could be used to foster different kinds of learning.

“We have heard this before and it is incredibly worrying,” she said, recalling the segregation era when blacks and whites were schooled separately and African Americans were considered inferior.

“The educationalists who are proposing this meant this in a positive way but it is something that could be easily distorted if it were implemented.”

Many distinguished scientists in the United States recognise that race itself is not a biological variable, but they still buy into the notion that shared ancestry can impart certain biological characteristics, said Joseph Graves, an associate dean for research at the University of North Carolina.

Published research has shown that blacks are more likely than whites to have a blood type that causes sickle cell disease and can protect against malaria, and are more likely to have a certain gene called APOL1, which protects against a parasite that causes sleeping sickness.

While Prof Graves did not dispute these findings, he said it is wrong to imply that genetic differences account for the vast health disparities between whites and blacks.

“The assumption is that African ancestry predisposes one to greater disease and mortality profiles in the United States,” Prof Graves said at the conference.

“This is what I call the myth of the genetically sick African.” Instead, social factors are more likely to blame for poorer health among blacks in the United States, he said.

“Americans continually conflate socially defined and biological conceptions of race,” Prof Graves added. “Neoracism results in part from this confusion.”

Another concern is the ancestry tests that are now commonly sold online, a trend which feeds the notion that one’s ethnic heritage may indicate the state of one’s health, said Yolanda Moses, a cultural anthropologist at the University of California, describing these tests as “misleading.”

Over the past decade, the expansion of DNA databases which include genetic profiles from people arrested—but not convicted of crimes—is also a concern, she said.

“Genetics have a profound impact on race and the criminal justice system,” she said.

Topics: , , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • sbuffalonative

    Scientific Racism: Telling the truth.

    • RebelliousTreecko

      Scientific homophobia: Pointing out that two humans of the same sex can’t conceive a child.

      • Manfred Delport

        Scientific homophobia: Wondering out loud why a gay gene would not, by definition, die out.

    • Michiganman6

      I am no fan of the Nazis but not everything they preached was wrong. For instance, they believed in eating right and exercise. They also believed you could breed better people. I also believe that is possible. I say offer low IQ unproductive people money to be sterlized and make the world a better place. What society does now is the opposite. Society encourages lazy, low IQ people to lay around and breed while hard working smart people are taxed to death to pay for the breeding farms, called public housing, of the lazy, dumb people.

      One day, steps like this will have to be taken or it will mean the end of civilized society.

      • sbuffalonative

        The excuse to hide the truth because it will lead to the rise of Nazis is fear-mongering.

        Lying to people that they can do or be anything they want is not helping anyone. It leads to resentment, jealousy, and outright aggression.

        • Erasmus

          They work to hide the truth because they believe it will lead to the rise of Nazis eugenics. This is fear-mongering.

          Oh, hell, that bull-dyke professor should just cut to the chase and run around shrieking, “The sky is falling! The sky is falling!”

          • LHathaway

            It’s not the traditional fear mongering? They’re trying to make us afraid. And they do. Most people want to be on the stronger side.

      • DNA Explains It All

        Perfectly detailed in the movie “Idiocracy” from 2005 I think. Just they showed it being poor hicks that drug us down.

        • https://politicallogical.wordpress.com/ WideBridge

          “idiocracy” – great movie – I think destined to be a classic. But if I recall correctly, the end shows his family with one of the three children being non-white, and shows it in a positive way. Given the challenges to not having our people replaced, this is not the best ending for a movie.

          • Epiminondas

            The movie casts a veil over the truth: the lower IQ individuals in such a future society will be overwhelmingly black.

          • Brian

            He had enough trouble getting the film released and promoted as it was, and there may not have been enough black actors in Hollywood to portray the future legions of dusky mouth-breathers required for accuracy.

          • 1stworlder

            More like Elysium.

          • Edruezzi

            I thought they already were black.

      • Oldcorporal

        That’s right. I used to be a little hesitant to point out that Hitler did some GOOD things, as well as the well-known bad ones. It doesn’t any more. Getting older cures a lot of things.

        • Epiminondas

          He was not as bad as Stalin…our ally.

        • jeffaral

          Hollywood tells us Hitler was bad. In fact Hitler was a nice guy.

        • Anglo

          I sure liked his Volkswagon!

        • Edruezzi

          The fact remains that Hitler based an entire foreign policy on a concept of race based on folk knowledge. In a related story, a recent poll showed that 450 years after the birth of Galileo 25% of Americans don’t know that the Earth orbits the sun. Fewer Europeans know that.
          Now imagine those people declaring that Galileo’s orbits are a load of liberal propaganda.
          You get the picture, right?

        • Edruezzi

          If you’re a Marxist, one of the good things Hitler did was giving Marxism a few more decades of life. His attack on the Soviet Union was the single greatest shot in the arm the Commies ever got. Russia would have been a third-world country if he hadn’t invaded it.

      • David Ashton

        “Society…will scientifically regulate the growth of population. It will especially speed up the very evolution of man himself, his brain and body. Capitalism has checked the evolution of the human species, if it has not actually brought about a process of race degeneration. But Communism will systematically breed up mankind. Already the scientific knowledge is at hand to do this, but it is at present inapplicable because of the idiocy of the capitalist system, its planlessness, its antiquated moral codes….” – William Z. Foster, “Toward Soviet America” (1932) p.341.

        Surprised, folks?

        • Sick of it

          Considering that the Soviets were breeding inferior people with superior people, I find the quote fairly amusing. And then there were the times they murdered highly intelligent people because those in power had a temper tantrum. Heck, that does sound familiar…

      • silviosilver

        Eugenic improvement doesn’t require low IQ people to be sterilized. The same ends can be achieved by creating incentives for low IQ people to breed at a lower rate than high IQ people. Sterilization gets the job done in a quick and dirty fashion, sure, but it raises so many moral qualms that’s just not worth the trouble to broach it – save perhaps in the case of violent criminals.

        • Michiganman6

          I said offer them money to be sterlized. The word “required” was never used. If Uncle Sam offered welfare mothers $5,000 cash to be fixed, they’d be lined up around the block. AND the $5,000 is well spent and will save society that amount 100 times over ($500,000) …..easily. A low IQ, cigarette smoking, robbing, drug addict, rehab patient, prison inmate, emergency room regular … that was never born will save us at least $500k per person. Slowly but surely the under-class will shrink but will never completely go away so we will always have plenty of garbage men.

          • silviosilver

            At issue is less than content of your proposal and more the way it is framed. “Sterilization” sets off alarm bells that prevent any serious consideration and stifle understanding. It creates the impression that eugencists are impatient to achieve human perfection and that people deemed fit for sterilization are considered by eugenicists as unwanted in society in any way, shape or form, but this is not the central claim of eugenics. Eugenics contends that societal improvement occurs over the long run when people who possess certain valuable traits (intelligence, industriousness, etc) to a high degree outbreed those who possess such traits to a lesser degree, and vice versa.

          • Michiganman6

            One of these days “something will happen”… resources will become scarce and my views will be tame by what will actually happen.

          • silviosilver

            I cannot rule that out, but you should remember that such predictions have been made for over fifty years now without the remotest sign of catastrophic collapse or spontaneous uprising, so to bet everything on that eventuality is imprudent. In any case, such a time is not today, so your message, while inherently valuable, is rendered less effective than it could otherwise be.

          • toldev

            I think he was talking about a natural event or perhaps a made made event like the bubonic plague, an asteroid strike, or a global nuclear war. Any one of those events would remove much dreck from the human gene pool.

          • silviosilver

            I don’t think such disasters would alter the distribution to any meaningful degree. As for his statement “tame by what will actually happen,” that’s classic WN prophet of doom speak that doesn’t move anything forward and creates disillusionment when the predicted events fail to materialize.

          • Brian

            The most valuable resource that is in danger of becoming scarce is not oil, copper, fish or timber, but the fraction of the human race with >IQ 110– the ones who know how to keep the societal machinery running.

          • Natassia

            Offering people money to be sterilized is also immoral.

          • Luca

            It is far more “moral” than taxpayer funded abortions.

          • sbuffalonative

            There are non-permanent forms of sterilization which can be reversed. Offering people a chance to better themselves until they are ready to have children isn’t immoral to me. As long as it’s voluntary and reversible on request, I don’t see a problem.

          • Spartacus

            Darkies aren’t people…

          • bilderbuster

            Giving non Whites every possible incentive for endless breeding is immoral & insane.

          • Garrett Brown

            Did Jesus tell you that during your sleep?

          • http://www.amren.com/ Michael Christopher Scott

            I’d prefer we just execute “undesireables”, but I would never trust any government with that sort of power.

          • BillMillerTime

            Why?

          • Natassia

            That’s easy–because it condemns a person as impossible to reform. It says, “We don’t believe you will ever be a moral person, and therefore we want to pay you to unnecessarily mutilate your body so we don’t have to deal with the possibility that you will produce offspring just like you.

          • BillMillerTime

            So how many little future welfare parasites should the mama parasite/Obama supporter be allowed to pop out before you realize that she is in fact impossible to reform?

          • http://www.youtube.com/user/GenXinOz GenX ANZAC

            Bringing babies into this world, who’re going to be neglected is immoral. Let these hypothetical “paid to be spayed” people use the money for some night school classes, then get their lives together, then reverse the procedure to start a family properly, instead of being hobbled too young and ill prepared with the responsibility of raising a human being to hopefully become a functional adult in this ever increasingly complicated modern world.
            If they’re not up to that, then why is passively enabling them to breed with the tax payer and eventually the criminal justice system taking over morally superior? Every action has a reaction and sometimes trying to be “good” in the short term, has further longer term consequences. For instances look at the 1980′s food aid push for Ethiopia, which has lead to the population there doubling in 20 years, those original good intentions have now doubled the size of the problem.
            After doing a good deed do we magnanimously pat ourselves on the back then just look away after our moral ego has been satisfied, or do we continue to lord over the downtrodden as we micromanage every aspect of their lives under the guise of looking after disadvantaged?
            Who are we to decide what options and choices to offer the needy? You insult those you’d help by assuming that they’re not up to the task of making an informed decision, so who’s the supremacist now hey?

          • bilderbuster

            Whites don’t need Black garbage men.
            Smart Whites can make robonegros for that.

          • sbuffalonative

            Cars will be driving themselves soon. There’s no reason not to believe that garbage pick up couldn’t be complete automated with ‘smart’ trash cans and ‘smart’ garbage trucks; among many other things.

          • Patrick Rowe

            Garbage men will be taken over by robotics.

        • LHathaway

          we live in a democracy. I could see some folks being encouraged to only having 1 child while others being encouraged to have many. It is a democracy, even ‘stupid’ people might vote for that.

      • IstvanIN

        Marge Schott lives!

      • Sloppo

        Hitler was bad because he was promoted eugenics. We’ve proven our goodness by spending trillions of dollars on a dysgenics program to increase our supply of lazy, stupid, and criminally violent people.

        • silviosilver

          That’s right. We are practicing de facto dysgenics. The interesting thing about de facto dysgenics is that there is no difference between de facto dysgenics and intentional dysgenics except that the latter would be accompanied by an announcement of intention; the actual practice of providing the shiftless, stupid and violent with financial incentives to breed more than they otherwise would (or could) is for all intents and purposes identical.

          • http://batman-news.com Low Burning Flame

            You’ve got that wrong. Money is given to poor people to prevent poverty and to keep first-world status. Of course, its been abused by liberals to rob their own nations and make super poor non-white people richer. Liberal elites are sociopaths who get some sort of sexual pleasure from destroying their own nations. There is a very serious mental illness in a race, and its killing us.

          • Michiganman6

            Of course most people against a better society through breeding will be Democrats. It will cut into their base drastically. Right now, Republicans are having their base eroded through immigration from the third world.

        • Erasmus

          Yup. We tax the productive. high-IQ members of our society, who should be having more children to pay baby mommies and baby daddies to spawn millions of Rachel Jeantels and Trayvon Martins.

          Put aside the straw man argument the left always puts forth that we want the social misfits sterilized, no one is calling for that. But can we please stop making it profitable for them to breed?

      • Funruffian

        Dr. William Shockley was a proponent of Eugenics and made proposals to curb Dysgenics.

        • JohnEngelman

          And he was shouted down.

          • Erasmus

            And he was right.

      • Natassia

        “I say offer low IQ unproductive people money to be sterlized and make the world a better place.”

        Believe it or not, it isn’t the low IQ unproductive people who are screwing the world up. It’s the “geniuses” like the sodomite economist John Maynard Keynes who are the most destructive.

        Low IQ unproductive people fail to reproduce in a sane world because they fail to find mates, or they starve. But we no longer live in a sane world.

        • Brian

          I’d rather live next door to J.M. Keynes than anyone at all from the ‘Democratic Republic’ of the Congo. 9 times out of 10, the genius will be useful or a harmless eccentric, and he will rarely gangrape anyone or hack neighbors with a machete before cannibalizing them.

          • silviosilver

            So would she, no matter what she says here.

      • wildfirexx

        I agree, …in the animal kingdom nature selects the genetically fittest to survive and reproduce, while humans are going in the opposite direction, where the mothers that have the most kids seem to come from the poorer uneducated families, in which they rather collect welfare than work.
        That’s why sperm banks with artificial insemination could play an important role in the future in determining the offspring. Already today many single women can choose their donor, not just on physical characteristics, but intellect as well.

      • http://batman-news.com Low Burning Flame

        Very few ‘low IQ’ women would take an offer to prevent them from having children. Wanting to be a mother is innate for adult females, with few exceptions, the offer would insult the very essence of womanhood in the eyes of most women. When women find out they can’t have children because off womb problems, they can often slip into a major depression over it. The enforcement of sterilization to low IQ women, would result in an increasingly mentally-ill nation.

        • silviosilver

          Women are obviously capable of overcoming or quelling their innate desire to mother offspring, which is why so many women (over 15%) are voluntarily childless.

          “Offers” to low IQ women would not be marketed as such, obviously. Good grief.

          Your last sentence is complete nonsense.

    • Sick of it

      What’s worse is that these people show continual bias against the truly capable. Highly intelligent people are thrown into ghetto schools with everyone else, their fantastic minds left to rot in a useless system run by idiots.

    • Erasmus

      That they can’t handle the truth and must forever be on their guard to suppress it demonstrates that the left will always fail. (You just can’t keep swimming against reality forever.)

      The sad part is that so many innocent people, because of them, suffer; that so many good plans, because of them, never see the light of day.

  • Peter Connor

    It will be sweet to watch the cultural marxist know-nothings go down in a hail of genes.

    • sbuffalonative

      The fall, if it happens, will be long and slow. The ‘progressive’ left are masters of making excuses and finding alternate (absurd) theories.

      You could point to a cloudless summer sky at noon and say, ‘the sky is blue’ and they would say, ‘not necessarily. Just because we see it as blue doesn’t mean it is blue’.

      The same with genes. No matter how clear cut the evidence is, they will still likely insist that environment can trump genes if we spend enough money on the problem.

      It’s going to be a long, protracted fight.

      • Peter Connor

        Their problem is that the Chinese and other Asians aren’t playing this game–they see that there is a lot of money to be made, and the wealthy will flock to them to get new and improved babies, cancer treatment, etc. Money talks much louder than academia, which the wealthy know is a pack of fools.

  • Romulus

    Anthropology as of late is the one discipline that has been severely compromised by political correctness, as most of us commentators are aware. Genetics trumps their discipline and they knower. We have read several articles on amren, wherein the ” jablonski’s” of the world try to deny empirical evidence of racial differences.
    True to form,the “jablonski’s” are the multi/PC worlds best friend, in part for their famous victimhood.
    This article demonstrates how the “jablonski’s ” will approach all the neoracism in the sciences.

  • dd121

    You mean there’s something to this genetics thing? I’m shocked!

  • D.B. Cooper

    First of all, boyz and gurlz, don’t put any faith in any statements from an activist, feminist Affirmative Action professor.

    • MekongDelta69

      Me – “I would like to expunge all guilt-ridden, self-loathing, spineless leftists from our society.”

      • Peter Connor

        And deport them.

        • DNA Explains It All

          To “expunge” would cover that.

      • Alexandra1973

        Send them to Darfur or wherever else the genocide’s going on. Maybe they can hold candlelight vigils and feel better.

      • Brian

        If we get some ability on the genetic engineering front, the first order of business should be to target the ‘pathological altruism’ genetic mechanism and whites and surgically strike that out– many of our other issues would magically sort themselves out.

    • http://www.amren.com/ Michael Christopher Scott

      The libtards like “race” just fine when they want to waste money we have to work to earn.

      • dd121

        The left are the ones who make “race” a permanent part of the discussion. It’s how they cultivate one of their many “victim” groups.

        • LovelyNordicHeidi

          “The left are the ones who make “race” a permanent part of the discussion.”

          Thank them for doing that. It will be their own destruction. The self-destruction of cultural marxism is inevitable because of the fact that they are obliged to talk about race forever while they preach that race does not exist. At some point they will lose their power, and a sudden revolution will occur that none of them expected.

          • dd121

            Hope you’re right but they don’t seem to see any contradiction in those conflicting positions. The Republicans are too timid to point it out.

      • connorhus

        The libtards like “race” just fine when they want to waste money we have to work to earn.

        That statement kinda sums the whole thing up in a nutshell. MS

    • Extropico

      That’s no scientist; that’s an antiWhite social engineer.

    • dukem1

      I’d like to expunge the word as well…Why can’t we all agree that some folk just can’t cut it in a modern, advanced, civil society?

    • Oldcorporal

      Real knockout, isn’t she? Be still my heart!

      • http://www.timwise.org/ Skip Wellington

        If I wasn’t as gay as Old Dad’s hat-band, she would be the girl of my dreams!

        • http://www.amren.com/ Michael Christopher Scott

          I’m not gay, but I wouldn’t hit that with anything other than a shovel.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      All you have to do is see those three letters in the upper
      right-hand corner of the picture to know that it’s pure propaganda.

    • Spartacus

      Race is not a social construct . Society is a racial construct .

      • LACountyRedneck

        What planet is that?

        • Spartacus

          Planet of the misshapen boobies .

        • bilderbuster

          Planet Pygmy?

      • sbuffalonative

        ‘One of these things is not like the other. One of these things just doesn’t belong’.

        Since race is a social construct developed by the white man to promote white supremacy, none of these females saw any difference between this man and themselves.

    • BonV.Vant

      In the future videos of such liberals will be shown to the public to show just how stupid and crazy they were, how they felt so self important, self righteous and how they were so wrong and did so much damage.

    • sbuffalonative

      One can deny reality but reality still exits.

      ‘There are no lions and tigers. There are only cats.’

    • JohnEngelman

      I would like to be able to expunge the word “racism” from our vocabulary. It is being used to suppress the truths that are being revealed by genetics research.

  • Michiganman6

    “the belief that races exist and are different in terms of biology, behaviour and culture,”
    It took a scientist to figure that out??? We used to call that common sense.

  • Lt_Greyman_NVA

    But blacks themselves say that black children can only be taught properly by a black teacher in a black school. It would then follow that a White child can only be taught properly by a White Teacher in a White school.

    • dukem1

      Blacks say whites don’t like them because the whites are concerned the black will “rub off.”..
      But they seem quite convinced that “White” will somehow rub off and improve their lot in life.
      It’s gotta suck to be one of them.

    • Erasmus

      Separate but equal was best.

      You can either have a 1st-world, modern country, or you can have diversity. You can’t have both.

      • JohnEngelman

        The statement “Diversity is a strength” is not presented as a topic for debate. Like the statements “Race is only a social construct,” and “Rape is about power, not sex,” it is presented as a tenet of a creed that is defended with anger rather than reason.

        People do not become angry when beliefs they are confident in are questioned. They become angry when beliefs they want to be true but fear are not are questioned.

  • Frank_DeScushin

    “This comes despite decades-long efforts to reverse attitudes that were used to justify the slave trade and the Nazi ideology.”

    That’s Liberal egitarianism in a nutshell. They know they’re lying, but they believe they’re virtuously noble lying because they’re convinced that the truth tellers secretly harbor intentions of genocide or reinstituting slavery. In reality, people want the truth because they’re sick of getting scapegoated for minority failure and they just want to be left alone from minorities.

    • So CAL Snowman

      As the old saying goes, “the truth shall set you free”

      • DNA Explains It All

        Uhm, that’s maybe true, so whites must NEVER be allowed anything resembling it.

  • MekongDelta69

    Normal person – “Here is the truth.”

    Deranged leftist – “La, la, la, la, la – I can’t hear you.”

    • AndrewInterrupted

      Welcome to ‘Social Engineering’.

  • DavidSNESGAMER

    lol. If “skin color” were the determining factor, albino blacks (or dark/tanned caucasians) would look the same. They don’t.

    (The golfer Vijay Singh is darker-skinned than 99% of blacks. So he should be categorized as an “African-American”.)

    • sbuffalonative

      If the theory of white privilege is correct, African albinos should be lording over Africans.

      • IstvanIN

        Actually the poor things get slaughtered and used for magic potions.

        • Erasmus

          Yet, the left still insists we’re the evil judgmental ones for criticizing the homicidal tendencies of Africans.

          Help me out. I can remember “Thou shalt not kill,” but I can’t remember which commandment declared “Thou shalt not be culturally intolerant” ?

      • Bantu_Education

        Instead they are (or were) killed.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      “….Please!…Did I get a white brain, too?…”

    • Brian

      I can sympathize with the albinos a bit, as they know that feeling of being surrounded by darkies and having their ‘white privilege’ lead to being killed and eaten by their fellows.

      • Katherine McChesney

        This morning I saw an article on HuffPo about the many ‘shades’ of black people. Some had vitiligo, some appeared to be white. There were albinos who were ‘proud’ to claim their black heritage. The comments were downright pornographic….whites who praised blacks and one in particular was a White man with two black children. Of course, they condemned the White race for it’s part in ‘slavery’ and ‘racism’ against blacks today.

  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0wdIiT16LV4 Afrikanerhart

    Got to love the “scare photos” in the linked article with images of Hitler, “civil rights” marchers being fire hosed, etc. They have nothing to do with the article’s actual subject and are a prime example of dishonest reporting.

  • Kathy M

    Right. Racial differences do not exist. Got it.

    • DavidSNESGAMER

      Hm. Wolves and Chihuahuas are the same species, but obviously hugely different. So on a technical level, I don’t think the distinction is a matter of “species”. I don’t know much about biological taxonomy, though.

      • Kathy M

        Correct. Whoever made that photo was indeed wrong. I think it should have read “sub-species.” However, it does make visually clear that there are racial differences.

        • Tarczan

          Yup. Whenever somebody tells me race doesn’t exist I always tell them I can pick the one Swede out of a roomful of Bantus every time.

          • Martel

            The politically correct must think its a magic trick when you do that

          • Alexandra1973

            I like to point out that on those forensic shows, they even point out that you can tell race by someone’s skull.

          • Luca

            And thicker skull with the smaller brain cavity, heavy brow ridge and forward thrusting mandible belongs to “guess who”.

          • Alexandra1973

            Yep. Kinda dispels the “race is just skin color” myth.

          • bilderbuster

            I do the same & it ends the debate then & there.

          • Brian

            I’m not a forensic anthropologist by any stretch, but even I know to look out for the gonion angle/position, dolicho/brachycephaly, orbital width, and degree of mandibular prognathism. When you know just those few things, it becomes pretty obvious, at least for north euro vs. west african.

          • http://www.amren.com/ Michael Christopher Scott

            Even our teeth give away our race.

          • Katherine McChesney

            A black skull has a protruding ‘mouth barrel’.

      • David Ashton

        Perhaps the word “breed” should be abolished from zoology, animal husbandry, farming, etc.

        • Alexandra1973

          Careful, you might give PETA ideas….

      • Sick of it

        Just ignore the “archaic DNA” as it obviously has no meaning with regards to one’s origin… /sarcasm

    • DNA Explains It All

      Sub-Species and I agree.

    • Bossman

      These two people are of the same species. The early British convicts who were sent to Australia must have humped a lot of the kind women as the one from the left.

    • Oldcorporal

      Great photo! Where’s the baboon from?

      • LovelyNordicHeidi

        It’s an Australian Aboriginal. Officially it belongs to Homo sapiens, but I’d call it Homo australiensis.

        • bilderbuster

          Homo hideous.

      • Bossman

        Most likely from Australia. She looks like an aborigine from Australia.

    • Tarczan

      Maybe the chick on the left is beautiful to Abos.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      Is that Katie Pavlich on the right?

      • bilderbuster

        That’s Zira from The Planet of the Apes on the left.

        • http://www.amren.com/ Michael Christopher Scott

          Zira was better-looking.

          • bilderbuster

            Not to mention more evolved.

    • Brian

      Who stole that wax figure from the natural history museum?

    • Erasmus

      That’s Miss Kakadu National Park, 1969, on the left.

  • DavidSNESGAMER

    American, uh, “science” is in the gutter largely because the, uh, “scientists” have gone from being curious to banning curiosity.

    While these (non-gentile) Whites are suppressing knowledge, China’s and Israel’s serious scientists are laughing at them and racing ahead with their fascinating eugenic studies.

  • JohnEngelman

    Since the publication of Richard Herrnstein’s 1971 article in The Atlantic that was entitled “IQ” I have watched the the persecution of those who told the truth about innate individual and racial differences. I will enjoy watching the persecutors have sharp painful facts pushed into their faces.

    • http://www.amren.com/ Michael Christopher Scott

      I would rather watch them all hung from lamp posts, but that can always come later.

  • Dave4088

    This information isn’t new or revelatory to anyone that has done basic research in genetics and biology. And don’t expect the anti-whites and cultural Marxists to have a collective epiphany over these facts. If anything I would expect them to downplay these findings or dismiss them outright via ad hominem style attacks and emphasize how important it is for biologically dissimilar and mutually hostile racial groups to forcibly coexist.

    • sbuffalonative

      It isn’t new. What’s new is that it’s becoming increasingly impossible and increasing obvious that people are deliberately hiding the truth.

    • Reverend Bacon

      What’s funny about that (well, not funny ha-ha) is that in nature, the liberals tend to be quick to argue for separating all Invasive Alien Species, and promote biodiversity. I agree with them, but I’m consistent: it should be true in human biodiversity as well.

  • Jenny Star

    “according to anthropologists” – stop. lol
    Anthropologists telling scientists to stop with the science that doesn’t fit their ideology. Do we need further proof that liberalism is a religion?

    • E_Pluribus_Pluribus

      Psychologist Jonathan Haidt put it succinctly:
      “Liberal politics demands that there be no innate differences between groups.”

      • Reverend Bacon

        Yeah, uh, except for basketball and track. Because that’s, like, a positive thing.

    • Bantu_Education

      This religion should be called what it is, DIRE – Dogma of Innate Racial Equality.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      The Liberal ‘social engineering’ types are trying to discredit Anthropology and Archeology by falsely quoting them. Suddenly it’s bad science. They’re doing the same thing with Denis Stanford and his inconvenient discoveries. Suddenly Archeology is junk science.

  • thomas edward

    Experts Concerned Scientific Advances Are Giving Rise to ‘Neoracism’
    _____________________________________________________
    The “experts” don’t have to be concerned. All people know how the blacks are and it doesn’t have anything to do with scientific advances. Even a guy like Gandhi knew the scoop on blacks.

    • bilderbuster

      Three year old children can tell the difference is more than skin color.

  • Diversity Fatigue

    They certainly don’t mind admitting race exists when it comes to Affirmative Action now do they. uh, like, what gives?

    • Dave4088

      Only racists ask obvious and unpleasant questions.

      • AndrewInterrupted

        Race differences exist where convenient.

      • JohnEngelman

        That is why liberals suppress the “dialogue on race” they pretend to desire.

  • Tim_in_Indiana

    Boy, did this piece of trash journalism lay it on thick.

    This comes despite decades-long efforts to reverse attitudes that were used to justify the slave trade and the Nazi ideology.

    Right, instead of the current policies that were used to justify Stalin’s purges and the Communist murder of millions.

    • Brian

      Yeah, because the slavers and Nazis loved talking about DNA, the dual helix nature of which was not even known til Watson and Crick in 1953. This ‘journalist’ must not be good with calendars.

    • JohnEngelman

      An underlying fear by the author, and by those who suppress a candid discussion of racial differences is that the truth leads to death camps. Charles Murray provided the best response to that when he wrote in his essay “The Inequality Taboo,” “specific policies based on premises that conflict with scientific truths about human beings tend not to work. Often they do harm.”

  • Truthseeker

    This comes despite decades-long efforts to reverse attitudes that were used to justify the slave trade and the Nazi ideology.

    I’m sick and tired of this false dichotomy, and even more frustrated by the fact that so many people are dumb enough to buy into it. It’s incredibly absurd to think that the only options are either believing in zero racial differences or supporting Naziism and slavery.

    There’s a common-sense answer that’s right under everyone’s noses, but they’re too brainwashed to see it: separate nations. It’s simple, and it serves everyone’s best interests. But it violates the religion of multiculturalism and diversity, so that’s not even a thought in their mind. It’s a scary heretical idea that must never be allowed.

    Oh, these useful idiots. I can only shake my head at them.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      “…decades-long efforts at trying to make square pegs fit into round holes…”

  • LovelyNordicHeidi

    ………….

    • JohnEngelman

      And if the race denialist gets angry he starts shouting “Racist!” as though that somehow wins the argument.

      • Jotun Hunter

        engelman you are exactly like that pidgeon

        • JohnEngelman

          Once again, a gratuitous insult. When I click on your avatar I can tell that at least half of your comments are expressions of hostility for me. I have become an unhealthy obsession for you.

          • Jotun Hunter

            no, I just have the time right now and you are such a cancerous annoyance. I’ll lose interest in you again soon enough – just here to remind you how far from a genius you really are, despite your bizarre ego.

  • LovelyNordicHeidi

    “This comes despite decades-long efforts to reverse attitudes that were used to justify the slave trade and the Nazi ideology.”

    I’m growing tired of the argument from slavery and reductio ad Hitlerum.

    • Alexandra1973

      Why are they worried about slave trade? Nowadays people don’t have need for antiquated farm equipment.

      Besides, slavery is currently going on in–guess where?–Africa!

    • Reverend Bacon

      It’s a classic ad hominem argument. It’s much easier to say, “this looks like Hitler, and we can prove he was bad,” than it is to actually address the idea on its own merits.

      It’s like boycotting the America’s Cup and Carnival Cruises because “boats and ships were used to support the slave trade.”

    • Brian

      Especially since whites didn’t start slavery by a long shot, but did end it in our lands, by way of the industrial revolution. When was the last time we got credit for that?

      • Bossman

        What really ended African slavery in the Americas was the Civil War in the USA, the revolution in Haiti and the movement for independence in Latin America.

        • Brian

          Those are proximate causes. The ultimate cause was the Industrial Revolution. You don’t need galley slaves pulling the oars on a warship when you have coal-fired steam engines. You don’t need a slave fanning you with a palm frond when you have air conditioning. Machines are our slaves now.

          • Bossman

            The Industrial Revolution started with the cotton mills in the UK which created a very strong demand for cotton which were picked by the slaves of the American South. Just before the Civil War, slavery was growing by leaps and bounds.

          • Brian

            I’m aware of that, but we don’t have slaves picking cotton today do we, and we produce it just fine…with mechanization. I’m not saying the IR immediately caused the eradication of slavery all by its lonesome– I’m saying it created the necessary conditions for human slave labor to be replaced by machinery.

    • JohnEngelman

      The Nazi movement discredited the belief that racial differences are important. After World War II, and especially the revelation of the Holocaust most people did not want to think that way.

      As the Nazi movement fades from living memory, as more is learned about the human genome, and as racial differences in crime and average intelligence persist, the constraints of political correctness are weakening.

  • Daniel Schmuhl

    Jablonski is likely a “merchant”, and is trying to obscure the truth like thousands of other “merchants”.

  • striket3

    My computer is racist!

    • bilderbuster

      My ammunition is too.

  • Oldcorporal

    The truth has the liberal White self-haters scared to death. Here they’ve spent all this time trying to ram the “There’s no such thing as race/we’re all the same under the skin” fairy tale down our throats, and now their much-revered “science” is proving them wrong. By the way, what an original idea for the publication to use a photo of Adolf Hitler to lead off the article. Bet they had to sit up nights for weeks to come up with that one.

    • John Ambrose

      The liberal white self-haters are like the Medieval Church with their manic obsession to suppress uncomfortable truths and hounding down the heretics, err, I mean “racists.”

      • Sick of it

        If certain heretics had been expelled by the Medieval Church, we wouldn’t be having these problems.

    • Reverend Bacon

      Yeah, but they aren’t giving up. Did you notice this one: “Many distinguished scientists in the United States recognise that race itself is not a biological variable, but they still buy into the notion that shared ancestry can impart certain biological characteristics, said Joseph Graves, an associate dean for research at the University of North Carolina.”

      “Race itself is not a biological variable.” That’s rich. You can take BS, couch it in scientific terms, and if it’s pro-liberal, you get away with it. “the mere presence of di-hydrogen oxide on a planet with an average temperature of 60 degrees Fahrenheit doesn’t mean that the planet has water.”

      See? Of course it means that, but they just think we’re too dumb to notice. If race isn’t a biological variable, why is it that one can determine race from DNA? In fact, one can even determine race from the bacteria in the mouth (yeah, I know, that’s so blind people know when to hide their stuff).

      • Brian

        Yeah, he’s playing games, but not very well. Technically, in a narrow sense, it’s true that ‘race itself is not a biological variable’, in the sense that there is no ‘race gene’ with 5 different alleles, corresponding to Cauc, Mong, NatAm, AustroN, or Neg. But we can easily grab a collection of (326?) gene clusters and correlate to specify race just as definitively. The ‘race info’ is just spread out in several clusters is all. And this Graves turd must know this and is being disingenuous, or is dangerously incompetent.

        • silviosilver

          If race wasn’t genetic you’d expect that a white man breeding with a black woman could produce a Chinese-looking kid, or a Nigerian breeding with a Sri Lankan could produce a Danish-looking kid, and that such events would occur routinely. But astonishingly, whites breeding with whites produce white kids, black breeding with blacks produce black kids, Asians breeding wit Asians produce Asian kids, and this happens almost without fail (ie except in cases of existing admixture). How can that be if racial information isn’t genetically transmitted?

          • Brian

            Perhaps Graves should watch the DNA/ancestry show produced by his fellow smart black guy Henry Gates (Obama beer summit guy, actually 1/3 black) where he tells black celebs _exactly what percentage of black, white, asian, amerind they are_.

            The way I look at it is like with Sherlock Holmes: is the ‘crime information’ transmitted to him when he visits the scene? That depends. Does the perp leave a note behind saying who did it, and how? No, but there is plenty of information pertaining to the crime inadvertently left behind for Sherlock to piece together and deduce who did it and how.

            So, while there isn’t a single, unambiguous ‘race gene’, there are plenty of genes scattered about the genome that statistically correlate to the ‘social categories’ of race, and more importantly, the physical location of ancestry, which the computerized DNA scanning equipment can easily ascertain from a sample.

            Graves is just being a squirrel, that’s all.

          • silviosilver

            If we share 98% or 99% or whatever it is of our genes with chimpanzees, it’s obvious there is no one “homo sapiens gene.” Races differ genetically and are thus not 100% identical, so one wouldn’t expect there to be one sole “race gene.” Genetic race-denial is the dumbest thing going. Nothing could be more clear than that these people are lying through their teeth. Sadly, their propaganda has been very effective – not surprising when you’ve spent decades planning and cooperating.

      • http://www.amren.com/ Michael Christopher Scott

        I was one of the original writers about dihyrdrogen monoxide on Santa Cruz forum about 20 years ago.

        Commonly used as an industrial solvent, and fatal if inhaled!

        • Brian

          Useful for detecting witches though.

  • Dave4088

    Anthropology professor Nina Jablonski is frantically worried that the scientific findings buttressing the fact that race is more than a social construct could be “misused” to propagate the belief that people inherently have different abilities based on skin colour or ethnic background.” I wonder if Ms. Jablonski belongs to the same ethnic group as Franz Boas?

    And Ms. Jablonski needn’t fret as most whites are too glued to ESPN, reality television and video games to take note of these recent findings.

  • Tarczan

    “The assumption is that African ancestry predisposes one to greater disease and mortality profiles in the United States,” Prof Graves said at the conference.

    “This is what I call the myth of the genetically sick African.” Instead, social factors are more likely to blame for poorer health among blacks in the United States, he said.

    That’s true, in addition to Kools, huge amounts of fried food, 40 ouncers, and illegal drugs.

    • http://www.amren.com/ Michael Christopher Scott

      Whatever happened to good old-fashioned stupidity?

      • Tarczan

        That too, obviously.

    • Alexandra1973

      And killing each other over said food items!

      • Ron Cheaters

        Don’t forget the imulse to buy the latest pair of air jordans at the expense of nutritious food.

  • Spartacus

    “Another concern is the ancestry tests that are now commonly sold online,
    a trend which feeds the notion that one’s ethnic heritage may indicate
    the state of one’s health, said Yolanda Moses, a cultural anthropologist
    at the University of California, describing these tests as
    “misleading.”

    ———————————————————————————————————————

    Yolanda Moses ? I wonder which tribe she’s from…

    • silviosilver

      She’s black. I always think of blacks when I hear Moses in a modern context. (Eg Edwin Moses, Moses Malone)

    • Extropico

      This racial enthusiast is on the faculty of the University of Salzburg, in Austria, to help eradicate the race there that doesn’t really exist.

  • silviosilver

    a cultural anthropologist at the University of California, describing these tests as “misleading.”

    Maybe they are “misleading.” Even so, it surely pales in significance compared to the monumental deception carried out by the diversity industrial complex.

  • Spartacus

    Race is not a social construct, society is a racial construct .

    • slash345

      HAHAHAHAHA

  • antiquesunlight

    “New forms of discrimination, known as ‘neoracism’, are taking hold in scientific research, spreading the belief that races exist and are different in terms of biology, behaviour and culture… This comes despite decades-long efforts to reverse attitudes that were used to justify the slave trade and the Nazi ideology.”

    That darn science just won’t conform to our preconceived PC ideologies!!!

    “Many distinguished scientists in the United States recognise that race itself is not a biological variable, but they still buy into the notion that shared ancestry can impart certain biological characteristics…”

    Isn’t race the result of shared ancestry? Seems like it would be hard to believe in one but not the other. I guess if you’re a liberal, you can believe whatever you want, huh? Seriously, is there any meaningful difference between saying “races have certain characteristics” and saying “large groups of people with shared ancestry have certain characteristics”?

  • BonV.Vant

    “This comes despite decades-long efforts to reverse attitudes that were used to justify the slave trade and the Nazi ideology.”

    WEll, not just “this” but also the actions of blacks now that they feel they are unconstrained by white social norms. Add episodes of “the knock out game”, countless episodes of blacks invading the homes of whites and beating raping and killing them, countless episodes of blacks brazenly stealing. I feel like I am in the movie “Jumanji” and all of a sudden the animals are running lose. The affects of race on ideas of social order just can no longer be denied. WE are living in a remake of “A birth of a Nation”

  • DailyKenn

    *
    Somewhere Galileo is nodding with consent.

  • dd121

    “Neoracism”? There’s nothing new about it. It’s been quite obvious for centuries that blacks are a lesser sub-species. Doesn’t mean we should hate them, just that they shouldn’t become programmers in silicone valley.

    • Sloppo

      They have their talents. They’re the best sprinters. I just watched a Youtube video and I could see that they’re pretty good at funeral twerking also.

      • dd121

        Funeral twerking? Maybe that should be an event in the summer olympics.

        • IstvanIN

          Usually they have shoot-outs at funerals. Or am I thinking of baby showers? Black culture is so complex.

          • http://www.amren.com/ Michael Christopher Scott

            You forgot birthday parties, barbecues and ball games.

    • dmxinc

      “Silicone Valley”

      Is that where boob jobs are done?

  • BobWhitakerisokay

    The Blank Slate Theory is an article of faith in the PC religion that underlies so much anti-Whites insist upon, from forced integration to 3rd world immigration to White /non White race mixing. Do not expect BST to go quietly, scientific evidence to the contrary notwithstanding.

    • IstvanIN

      The Blank Slate Theory is such hogwash. Have any of these nitwits ever been around a baby for more than two-seconds? Do they have children? Anyone who has had kids can tell you that a child’s personality begins to express itself very early. There are certain inborn traits: some kids are outgoing, some shy, some bold and fearless, some happy no matter what, some cranky and on and on. You have to be a told boob to believe the BST.

  • Alexandra1973

    I’m a realist but I do not desire to wipe out any one race. I simply want to be white and left alone.

  • DailyKenn

    Neoracism? Does that not imply there must have been paleoracism? What about protoracism? Maybe someone will concoct the neologism ‘quantum racism’ and add them all in a lexicon along with ‘critical race theory’ and ‘disparate impact’.

    • Alexandra1973

      Maybe it’s so people will think neonazism.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      They use words like neoracism because they are Europhobic.
      Just ignore the Europhobes. They hate.
      They hate us because we’re beautiful.
      And Uncle Barack will cut off funding if any other ‘conclusions’ are reached.

    • Brian

      Or it could be unified with Afrikan Fizzix to form the Big Ubangi Theory.

    • Brian

      Neoracism has 20% more creamy nougat filling.

  • Shooga J

    I realize I am genetically different. And I do not mind if I am told I am different. There are facts. I am not as smart as most. I tend to get violent at times. I did not do well in school (Which is why I became a reporter). So to call someone a racist because they are showing the facts is kind of silly. I mean, what kind of person hates facts?

    • Alexandra1973

      The kind that would prefer to stay in La La Land.

      • Einsatzgrenadier

        Also known as liberals.

        • http://www.amren.com/ Michael Christopher Scott

          I would rather liberals recover from their stupidity. My high school girlfriend was a liberal, and the worst I can say about her politics is that she was tragically mistaken, though otherwise brilliant, especially with languages.

  • Brian

    “Many distinguished scientists in the United States recognise that race
    itself is not a biological variable, but they still buy into the notion
    that shared ancestry can impart certain biological characteristics, said
    Joseph Graves, an associate dean for research at the University of
    North Carolina.”

    Is the author really suggesting that shared ancestry does not impart certain shared biological characteristics?

    • Brian

      I believe he is, Brian #2 (or am I Brian #2?). Dude might be an affirmative action hire.

      If Graves follows his own (il)logic to its conclusion, he would have to deny that continental ancestry has nothing to do with skin color, even.

  • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

    The left’s respect for science which they whine about everyone else not having?

    Crickets.

    “Racial profiling” = Cops noticing things.

    “Neoracism” = Scientists noticing things.

  • Jon Doe

    The agenda is hidden under the guise of “equality” but in truth isnt the meaning of equality treating everyone exactly the same? Meaning no special month, no special treatment, no affirmative action, no disadvantages and no free anything. Is that not the meaning of equal? There is a reason why certain regions of the world for thousands of years is, have and will always be on top. If they really are “just like us” then why do they need special non equal treatment? If you are my equal than prove it.. build your empire lead your people… but it never happened and it never will. All they do is piggy back off of other people like parasite. Science and Nature will always win, survival of the fittest is inevitable, no matter how hard they try to fight it.

  • IstvanIN

    Many years ago I read an opinion column in the Newark Star Ledger by a black, sorry, I don’t recall the name, who said he wasn’t afraid of science proving there were racial differences in intelligence. He said if that were the case then science would just have to come up with different strategies for teaching black children. Rather a practical attitude.

    • WR_the_realist

      Liberal whites are more afraid of race realism than blacks are. Yes, I know that many blacks shout “Racism!” at any claim of racial differences in IQ or behavior, but that is not because they don’t believe in such differences, it’s because they know how easily they can manipulate white liberals by playing the role of the offended victim.

  • Garrett Brown

    SCIENCE BE RACIS!

    • AndrewInterrupted

      I teach dat tuh mah chirrens.

      • Garrett Brown

        So wen dey go to da schoo dey knows wus hapnenen!!!!

        • AndrewInterrupted

          Let’s face it, if they keep sending the good jobs to China, we will have to learn Chinese. We may as well learn Ebonics, too.

          • Garrett Brown

            Nei hou!

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Dau hoi ahhhhhh!!!!

          • Garrett Brown

            Wut lol

  • Groovy

    Does anyone wonder why the Government went after 23andme? Hope Sergi Brin’s (ex) wife still has some clout to fight them

  • negrolocaust

    MICHAEL SAVAGE the ONLY and the LOUDEST voice. started his show tonight on the reperations scam. youtube user ONLYTHEBEST posts his videos. anybody against michael is anti-white.

  • Einsatzgrenadier

    The fact that blacks have contributed virtually nothing to human civilization is all one needs to establish the existence of racial differences in intelligence and behavior. Where is the black equivalent of Bach, Shakespeare, Newton, Marco Polo, Beethoven, James Watt, Tesla and many others? Where are the great black civilizations and cultures? Claims of black intellectual parity with whites are laughable. Blacks are obviously genetically inferior to whites in terms of intelligence and moral character. All of the empirical evidence points in that direction. Only a Frankfurt School apparatchik would seek to deny the obvious in the name of some ridiculous egalitarian superstition.

    • antiquesunlight

      You so ignorant you don’t know the Egyptians were black and taught white people how to do everything.
      But seriously, not only are you right about the lack of significant black cultures, but virtually any evidence someone might point to of black achievement has come from within white societies. Jazz, for example. I’m no expert on black history, but it seems to me like blacks reached their cultural peak in early 20th century America.

      • Mergatroyd

        What’s come out too is that those Egyptian rulers had Western European, not black, DNA.
        “We’ve got the same mummy! Up to 70% of British men are ‘related’ to the Egyptian Pharaoh Tutankhamun”

        httpCOLON//wwwDOTdailymailDOTcoDOTuk/sciencetech/article-2022313/Up-70-British-men-related-Egyptian-Pharaoh-TutankhamunDOThtml#ixzz2tgVUFogd

        • AndrewInterrupted

          Whooopsie….!!! We’ve got another inconvenient truth.
          Neoracism..!!!

        • antiquesunlight

          Interesting, but the science there seems a little shaky. They based it on a picture?

    • Mergatroyd

      The current cultural narrative would say there are no black geniuses because of colonialism, slavery, racism and White oppression. Otherwise there’d be a black Beethoven, Watt, Tesla…

      • Brian

        They didn’t produce squat-a-roni before 1500AD either. Or before the Greeks who done stoled errrrythang.

        Typical pattern of argument for black apologists:
        1. Claim their backwardness is because of colonialism/slavery/apartheid.
        2. Afrocentrist myth: black Gypshun spacecraft were destroyed by Greeks and Romans, leaving no trace.
        3. Change the subject, parting cry of ‘rayciss’.

    • Brian

      There are black inventors:

  • Ella

    Professors confessed at times that they could not teach the results of intelligence studies since some students would misconstrue the information into racist ideologies. So, they would avoid teaching results to be safe than sorry. As genetic research continues, information has become widely published via Internet and censorship just cannot be attained. Libs are losing against medical technologies.

    • Mergatroyd

      That’s why they’re pushing so hard to gain control over the Internet and enact hate speech laws to prevent any challenges to their lies.

      • AndrewInterrupted

        That does appear to be the plan.
        The Repugs will have to win big in 2014/2016 to reverse some of that.

  • Sangraal

    Nina Jablonski writes on twitter,

    ‘Support teaching evolution, climate change, and other facts of nature: Speak up for strong science education standards’.
    Oh the irony!

    • AndrewInterrupted

      That is pure Hillary Alinsky.

      • Mergatroyd

        You know she wrote her dissertation on Saul Alinsky, something she tries to hide in every manner possible. She doesn’t have to worry, the media will never call her out on it, just as they never call out Obama on HIS hiding of his grades, transcripts and test scores.

        Ask Wayne Allen Root what happens when you call on Obama to reveal his school records (the IRS was sicced against W.A.R. which he says cost him a lot of time in court and money on lawyers only to have ALL charges dismissed almost instantly).

        • AndrewInterrupted

          Obama also embraced the Lucifer worshipper, Saul Alinsky. Andrew Breitbart covered that heavily in his book: Righteous Indignation.

          He called Obama “the first Alinsky president”.

        • Brian

        • AndrewInterrupted

          “…Ask Wayne Allen Root what happens when you call on Obama to reveal his school records (the IRS was sicced against W.A.R. which he says cost him a lot of time in court and money on lawyers only to have ALL charges dismissed almost instantly)…”

          That’s known as ‘…the Chicago Way…’

          O’Bummer’s gangsters did the same thing to Ben Carson, right after he had made critical comments. Up to that point he had never been audited in his life.

  • itdoesnotmatter

    If DNA analysis had been available at the turn of the twentieth century, Ellis Island would have used it for screening the huddled masses pouring in.
    They were thorough in those days, repatriating anyone who presented problems or abnormality, including low IQ, even obnoxious, uncooperative behavior.
    I actually envy Israel for having the courage to take this action, but wish they would practice globally what they practice locally. Please, Israel, lean on the various Hebrew organizations, insist they stop pushing Third World
    immigration onto developed cultures.

    • Diana Moon Glampers

      Third world immigration into all first world countries other than Israel is part of Israel’s power plan.

      • itdoesnotmatter

        Diane, Israel is a small country, Jews may be power players, but they are small in number globally.
        It what you say is true, this an enormous risk, that of alienating Western cultures.
        The backlash could destroy them.

        • Diana Moon Glampers

          True, but I think it is a calculated risk that has been carefully orchestrated. Barbara Spectre is no outlier (except that she mentioned something verboten on camera).
          I am not big into conspiracies but I have my theories on the motivation. I think it’s foolish and underestimates the ingenuity of the displaced.

          • itdoesnotmatter

            I would love to hear your theories. For the record, I am not naive about the hopes and dreams of the nefarious U.N. for a NWO.
            Racial invasion via the construction of “sustainable, mixed use, affordable housing” by an organization called “One Bay Area” is taking place in my lily white suburb.
            Their smooth talking shills are sent to communities, and unelected, yet acting in an official capacity, impose on us without taking a vote or soliciting meaningful input from locals who may be wise to them.
            After the greenbelt is leveled, high rise construction begun, libtards living in 6 million dollar homes notice their views will be obstructed, country roads will be impacted with traffic.
            It is only then, when it is too late, the Barry voting libtards awaken to how soulless these people are.

  • http://ostrovletania.blogspot.com/ Andrea Ostrov Letania

    Funny but speaking of slavery and mass murder, the equality-obsessed communism created the biggest slave states(national prisons really) and killed the greatest numbers of people. Look at Stalin’s USSR, Mao’s China, North Korea, Khmer RougeCambodia, Mengistu’s Ethiopia, etc.

    So, maybe we should be wary of the notions of racial equality since so much mass killing and slavery accompanied such ideas.

    Also, among all the great European imperialists, the British were the most racially discriminatory and race-conscious. And yet they were the most progressive and did the most to end slavery all over the world, whereas the racially tolerant-and-mixed Ottomans, Spanish, and Portuguese were most reactionary and most resistant to abolition of slavery and the slave trade.

    Maybe progress has something to do with order, cohesion, and stability, and the homogeneous-oriented societies are the most orderly, cohesive, and stable.

    In contrast, diversity and mixing bring out the tribalism among various groups–the bowling alone syndrome–, and that retards progress. After all, the racially homogeneous American North and Canada were more progressive than the racially mixed American South and Latin America.
    Hence the paradox. Homogeneously ‘racist’ settings produce more progress, whereas diversely multi-racial settings produce more resistance to change due to tribal lack of trust among the various groups.

    • Bossman

      It is not as simple as that. The British were shamed by the American revolution and were shocked by what happened in Haiti. So they quickly began to change their ways and thinking about the subject of slavery.

      • Mergatroyd

        The British put an END to slavery. Americans lost 500,000 young men in the Civil War putting an end to slavery in North America.

        But are we Whites ever given credit for that? Nope, WE are considered the primary instigators of slavery while Arabs, Asians, Native Americans and every other people group that practiced slavery down through the ages (which was MOST OF THEM) — and STILL practice slavery to this day are given a PASS.

        • Bossman

          There have always been two kinds of whites: Those with a sense of social Justice and moral conscience and those without any such sense.

          • WR_the_realist

            Communists have a finely tuned sense of social justice. That’s why when they weren’t starving their opponents to death or simply shooting them they worked them to death as slave labor. I am well aware of the brutal totalitarian impulse that lurks behind all those liberal calls for “social justice”.

  • Oil Can Harry

    That buffoon’s only background in science was the time he rented the movie Weird Science with Kelly LeBrock.

  • antiquesunlight

    Maybe, maybe not. Articles like these give me a little hope that the PC facade is beginning to crack. There’s got to be a fair number of people who read crap like this and think, “These people are out of their minds.” At least, that’s what I like to think…

  • Brian

    spreading the belief that races exist and are different in terms of biology, behaviour and culture
    ===
    Good grief, we’re not even supposed to believe in CULTURAL differences now? Go to a black Baptist church on Sunday morning, next week to a white Baptist church, and the following week to a Korean-American Baptist church. Are we supposed not to notice that the black church is the least inhibited, most voluble and demonstrative, the Asian the least, and the white 2/3 toward the Asian?

    (Not to mention that these same ‘cultural’ traits (culture = biology + environment) show up the same way in every other facet of life in exactly the way anyone would expect)

    Either these particular scientists are not as bright as they should be (perhaps suffering from ‘thintelligence’), or they think we are spectacularly stupid and/or naive and can be bowled over by authority. They grudgingly, barely admit to some tiny things around sickle cell and lactose tolerance? We are MILES BEYOND that with the published papers already…scores and scores of differences, not just 3-4. Either way, China is going to burst this dam wide open even if we don’t.

  • Brian

    Who came up with this idiotic term ‘homoPHOBIA’? Like anyone’s scared of Liberace. What exactly do you think marriage is for? Does the state need to acknowledge that two people are goo-goo for each other? Marriage exists primarily to create an environment for children to be raised in, and secondarily to encourage a shared household/labor arrangement to combine the strengths of women and men for economic (woman to cook, man to plow) and legal reasons (making medical/death/property decisions). The infertile (whose status was often unknown before marriage) and the few older folks getting (re)married were just allowed to go along for the ride, so to speak.

    I don’t really have much problem with gay marriage, under the live-and-let-live principle. But I do object to this notion that anyone who doesn’t enthusiastically wave that rainbow flag is some kind of reasonless, reprobate killjoy beyond the pale of civilized human company.

    • KunTewk

      I prefer homo-repulsive.

  • Brian

    I’ve read some other similar statements from this guy– he’s trying to hold back the flood because he has an inkling of what’s coming down the pike.

  • Brian

    They’re trying to miscegenate us all into beige 90 IQ mutts before the facts can be uncovered…a race to bury the evidence.

  • arqoi

    That big giant pic of Hitler smack dab on the front, well that’s not biased at all!

    Clearly any science that doesn’t agree with them, they label as “not real” or racist. And then they have the guts to laugh at creationists, not realizing that they’re pretty much the same, operating on faith and belief instead of the facts.

    • Mergatroyd

      They also outright reject any scientific methodology that proves their theories that “race is a social construct” or “all people have equal IQs” are fabrications.

      The entire current cultural narrative is built on a pack of lies, but challenging those lies could well land one jobless and ruined, but the lies are becoming harder to maintain and hence the push for any challenges to be considered as “hate speech” subject to arrest, heavy fines and jail time.

  • Truth Teller

    Given my pro White male post judice, I hate to say this, but seeing the pictures of the dark women proves that men will **** anything. How could the first Spanish explorers do those Mayan and Central American bowling balls? What are the mechanics of dealing with a 70 inch waist on a 4ft 8 woman?

  • Truth Teller

    Anthropology has been always been a mass of lies. Ever read Margaret Mead Boas’ most popular propagandist? Virtually every word has been proved false.

    • Einsatzgrenadier

      Not true. Mead was a social constructionist; Boas was a liberal environmentalist and cultural relativist. Try reading classical physical anthropology, which has not been tainted by any of these assumptions. I highly recommend the “Origin of Races” (1962) by Carleton S. Coon.

      • http://www.amren.com/ Michael Christopher Scott

        I sincerely hate the conservative right’s abandonment of environmental conservation to the communists. We recycle all the steel, glass, paper and plastic, unless we can reuse it. All of the kitchen scraps go in the compost bucket for the vegetable garden. We grow amazingly good tomatoes this way. Thus there is almost no genuine trash from three people.

        • Peter Connor

          Unfortunately, tokenism that probably uses more energy than it is worth. We put all that stuff out by the road and the Mexicans take it away for their own use, not recycling.

          • http://www.amren.com/ Michael Christopher Scott

            Re-using by the Mexicans is just as good. We wash out plastic containers and soak the labels off to store small parts in the basement. Even re-use by the Mexicans is better than that stuff going straight into a landfill.

      • Mergatroyd

        One of THE most unfortunate events in American intellectual history was the replacement of Darwin with Marx, Weber, and Durkheim, which was carried out by Boas and his minions, the effects of which we’re forced to live with to this day (race as a social construct, except for HIS, of course).

        Boas believe that skull and brain size differences between races were due to current environmental conditions rather than inherited over long time spans. Boas rejected biological and evolutionary theories and believed that cultures, like languages, were arbitrary collections of symbols with no natural relationships to their referents.

        httpCOLON//wwwDOTkevinmacdonaldDOTnet/chap2DOTpdf

    • AndrewInterrupted

      I think this so-called article was for the purpose of delegitimizing Anthropology.

      • JohnEngelman

        The article is an attempt to legitimize scientific facts that discredit the liberal dogma that “Race is only a social construct.”

        This nonsense is dangerous because it can inhibit a scientific inquiry into the relationship between genes, IQ, crime, and race.

  • Truth Teller

    Einsatzgrenadier
    Forget about Newton and Tesla. What black culture ever figured out how to build a 2 story building,make string and yarn, weave cloth, figure out straight pins let alone safety pins and brooches build primitive ovens, make unbaked adobe bricks or anything? When the Portuguese landed in S. Africa they found that although the locals used fire to keep animals at bay during the night, they had not yet figured out how to use fire to cook.

  • Truth Teller

    I always tell liberals that Hitler was a liberal.
    Consider: he was a vegetarian, and a homosexual. He believed in holistic and alternative medicine. He was a picky eater. He was a radical environmentalist and forest worshipper although that is kind of an ancient and modern German thing. He created a socialist economy. He built low income housing projects. He created all sorts of children and teen organizations which were compulsory. He created compulsory Job corps type programs. He was against home schooling. He hated Christianity. He favored neo pagan mysticism. He decreed affirmative action for a favored ethnic group, He banned a non favored ethnic group from first government and then private sector jobs. He banned a non favored ethnic group from higher education. He felt that once conquered the Slavs should all the work while Germans sat back and enjoyed the fruits of their labor. Just as liberals have ethnically cleansed Whites from vast sections of our largest cities, he planned to exterminate Slavs so Germans could settle their lands.
    He blamed all the problems of Germany and Europe on one ethnic group Jews and like SPLC, AJC, ADL, Tim Wise, Noel Ignatiev, Reuben Navarro vowed to exterminate the ethnic group blamed for all the problems of the world.
    What is the difference between Hitler and Foxman, Dees, Wise, Ignatiev andNavarro?
    Hitler advocated the extermination of Jews, Dees et al advocate the extermination of Whites.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      I think we can guess where the down-thumb came from….<;-D……

      But, well done just the same. Unfortunately now, AA is designed to persecute 1/3 of the American population. It originally only gave preferential treatment to Blacks, which was only roughly 10% of the population. Now AA is 66%, ganging up on the other 33% of the population.

    • Mergatroyd

      “he planned to exterminate Slavs so Germans could settle their lands..vowed to exterminate the ethnic group blamed for all the problems of the world.”

      I defy you to prove this.

      • http://www.amren.com/ Michael Christopher Scott

        He wrote it in his own book. Hitler said what he wanted to do, and then tried to do it.

        • Mergatroyd

          Let’s see the exact quotes about exterminating the Slavs and Jews.

          • http://www.amren.com/ Michael Christopher Scott

            You read “Mein Kampf” if you have the stomach.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Which has been the most heavily read book recently, worldwide.
            Hmmmmmmmmm??

    • jeffaral

      You talk like a communist jew.

  • Lagerstrom

    Booo-rrr-iii-nnn-ggg! (sic).

  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0wdIiT16LV4 Afrikanerhart

    Hush, troll.
    You’re not wanted here.

  • JohnEngelman

    The photographs connected with with this article are obvious appeals to emotion. That goes to show how hysterical the anti geneticists are becoming. They are terrified because what they have tried to believe all of their lives is being proven to be false. They are horrified at the legitimate political implications of the truth.

    • WR_the_realist

      Yup, in the caption to the very first picture that inform us that Hitler
      believed that some races are superior to others. Well, Hitler was a
      vegetarian too. So you better eat dead cows or you might find yourself
      gassing Jews.

  • JohnEngelman

    Over the past decade, the expansion of DNA databases which include genetic profiles from people arrested—but not convicted of crimes—is also a concern, she said.

    “Genetics have a profound impact on race and the criminal justice system,” she said.

    - News, February 15, 2014

    This is only a concern for those who are sympathetic for criminals, especially when they are black and poor.

    For decent people this means a safer United States.

  • BonV.Vant

    youtube and “starship hip hop” where blacks are proudly posting all of their violence and criminality is doing a lot more for racial realism than science. When people can clearly see the difference, the appalling savagery of blacks, then a scientific explanation for that difference is not nearly needed.

  • Truth Teller

    Einsatzgrenadier
    I have read Carletoon Coon’s book origin of races. I don’t remember much. Even biology is racist now. When my son was in college he took biology. The teacher stated “blond hair and blue eyes are mutations and the sooner they disappear the better. She was a natural redhead with paper White skin from Minnesota named Andersen.
    What does your name mean? A crew of riflemen?

  • BonV.Vant

    let’s listen to the thieves tell us why theft is not bad. Let’s listen to murderers tell us why moral condemnation of murder is not bad, lets listen to homosexuals tell us how homosexuality is not bad.

  • sbuffalonative

    This isn’t about marriage at all. It’s about access to your spouses healthcare and rights to money and property. ‘Love’ is just the meme to pull at people’s heart strings.

    But it’s even bigger than that. It’s about power. Once homosexuals have the federal protection of marriage, watch for socially destructive lawsuits. Businesses and churches are already being targeted for discrimination.

    Homosexuals will use this new right to gain access to children and I don’t mean necessarily for sex. They will increasingly say that ‘discrimination against gays is rampant and growing’ and that they have to teach young children at an early age about homosexuals.

    Kindergarten classes will be required to have pro-homosexual lessons to teach tolerance.

    Marriage is just a front. ‘Love’ is just a public relations ploy. Power and control are the goals.

    • BillMillerTime

      Certain neighborhoods have deed covenants which restrict the sale of property only to single families. In Houston, for example, there is a rich neighborhood known as River Oaks which does not allow multi-family dwellings. It’s single-families only where “family” is understood in ts traditional sense. Believe it or not, some people do not want to live around Adam and Steve who pretend to be “married.” Once marriage licenses are issued to homosexuals, it will generate a flood of litigation. That marriage license will become in essence a license to sue to force others to accept their lifestyle.

      Here is my response to all the people demanding “marriage equality.” You want freedom of association? Fine, so do I. Join with me in proposing a 28th Amendment to the US Constitution: “Freedom of association among private parties shall under no circumstances be infringed.”

      I’ve run that by many advocates of “marriage equality.” Not one of them has embraced it.

      • http://www.amren.com/ Michael Christopher Scott

        Many municipalities limit the number of non-related persons who can share a single home to three. This prevents five college students from renting a place and the parking their cars all over the neighborhood.

        • BillMillerTime

          Many municipalities violate property rights in any number of ways. I simply pointed out that in this case, as with many cases, there’s a property rights solution: deed covenants.

    • http://www.amren.com/ Michael Christopher Scott

      Love is not a PR ploy. I love my wife. I have only a few male friends, and would thus never abandon them under fire or any other circumstances. Love is one of the only things in which I really believe, and I would have nothing left of myself if I betrayed that.

      • sbuffalonative

        I’m not discounting or deny people fall in love.

        But those being trotted in public are being done so to push their cause, a cause that is deeper than two people falling in love.

        They are their to tug at the heartstrings of Americans to make them think, ‘they’re just like use. They should have equal rights’.

        But as I said, it’s not about equal rights. That’s just the facade. This is going to have far reaching implications.

        If you told me two guys wanted to get married I wouldn’t care. But why get married if you don’t have to? Men have been living in relationships for a long time.

        The agenda is bigger than marriage. It’s political. Equal rights means special rights.

        We’ve already seen it. Churches being targeted for refusing to perform marriages. Flower shops and bakeries too.

        It’s going to get bigger. Just like ‘civil rights’ for blacks, the demands didn’t stop with the end of Jim Crow. That was only the first step.

        Their war hasn’t been won. It’s only beginning.

    • LHathaway

      “Kindergarten classes will be required to have pro-homosexual lessons to teach tolerance”.

      Meanwhile in the workplace it wont be about ‘tolerance’ at all but intolerance of heterosexual expression. Exchanging private phone numbers between two employees of a different sex, or between an employee and a client and you’re fired. Come to think of it, schools teach ‘intolerance’ of heterosexual relations.

  • Peter Connor

    “Experts”? Experts at marxist academic politics, no doubt, or they would be pushing a broom. I didn’t notice any quotes from Greg Cochran or Stephen Hsu.

    • Mergatroyd

      Or Rushton, or Murray, or Lynn, or Jensen.

      • Peter Connor

        Quite so.

  • AndrewInterrupted

    “Genetics have a profound impact on race and the criminal justice system,” she said.

    Especially when you install Diversity Darling crooks in your crime labs. Just ask Deval Patrick.

  • AndrewInterrupted

    I warned you…! Get out…!

    Corey, the Queen Sheba, and her thugs will hunt you down…

    “…Where dat whot boy? Where dat whot boy?….We gohn keeeeel hiz chirrens….”

    Retreat to an Ocala enclave, then bug-out to cold country.

  • Mergatroyd

    “Many distinguished scientists in the United States recognise that race itself is not a biological variable”

    You’ve got to be kidding me? Which “distinguished scientist” believe there are NO biological differences between the races?

    Name names and out ‘em so we can mock, ridicule and laugh at them, ALL scientific and empirical evidence are NOT on their side starting with brain size.

    OTOH, “scientists” may have to go along with the current marxist doctrine of “race as a social construct” to keep their jobs.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      That certainly isn’t Doctor James Watson’s theory.

      This so-called article was all an attempt at ‘projection’.

      Right wingers don’t have good radar when it comes to the staple Leftist tactic of projection. It’s one of the Left’s propaganda WMDs.

  • Epiminondas

    Radical egalitarianism is a religion. They can’t handle the truth.

  • silviosilver

    I’m not “phobic,” I just find the idea of homosexual sex disgusting, as 99.9% of heterosexuals do. I mean, since you’re so non-homophobic, would you prove it by allowing a gay man to fondle you or bend or take one up the rear in the name of tolerance? Most heterosexuals would be thoroughly repulsed by the thought, no matter how tolerant they considered themselves.

    On the other hand, I would allow a female I am not attracted to kiss me on the lips or fondle me in order to prove I’m heterosexual without a second’s thought. I wouldn’t enjoy it, but I would not be at all repulsed by it.

    See? Big difference in innate reactions isn’t there.

  • bear grylls

    Actually thanks to genetic research new species of animals have been discovered.Turns out two populations of the clouded leopard which look almost identical are in fact two different species.Believe it or not there more of an imperative to preserve both species.Zoos discourage creating Hybrids so as to preserve the purity of subspecies (races) of animals like tigers. But I guess to do the same thing for humans would be evil racism.

  • Erasmus

    I’m fairly certain it was taken in eastern Belgian Congo.

    Notice how the people are unafraid of the white guy, where as they’d be running in terror from the local diversity, who still eat pygmies.

  • John R

    Well, funny how history does not change: We have our modern day flat earth people arguing that the Sun revolves around the Earth, and threatening to burn the heretics who show evidence otherwise. Every age it seems has it’s orthodoxy. Ours is of course, that “race doesn’t exist” and that all the problems of the black (race?) are caused by “white” people (who are not a race, yeah.).

  • HJ11

    Hitler was trying to save the White race. Had the Germans won, we would not now be facing our genocide.

    • WR_the_realist

      Hitler was a German nationalist. I would have surprised the Poles and the French to hear that Hitler was saving their race.

      • HJ11

        Scratch the surface. We have many weak seeds among us. Call them members of the herd. Hitler was trying to save the White race by improving the White race. He was not trying to destroy all Poles or all French. Even back then, he understood more about genetics than do many weak seed Whites today. He was attempting willed evolution based on the knowledge then available.

      • Chris Granzow XI

        If that’s the case, then how come he wasn’t executing everyone in Vichy France. When you look back on history, it’s important to distinguish between the victors’ propaganda, fact, fiction and reality. I’m sure there were Frenchmen and Poles who were killed for ideological & political reasons, and I’m sure there were Polish soldiers and French soldiers who were killed during battle and bombardment…..but that certainly doesn’t mean that he intended to genocide their entire populations.

  • newscomments70

    I noticed that no comments are allowed on the original article. I wonder why. Liberals do not want to hear the truth and they need to have the last word. They also want to maintain the illusion that their opinions are still mainstream. Any race-related article will be filled with comments almost identical to AMREN. There will always be a handful of white liberals and angry blacks, but they will be shouted down by the majority. The media is trying desperately to shut us out. They are shocked by the deluge of “racist” comments. Instead of facing the truth, they scream “racism” and try to silence us. The pandora’s box is open and the dam has broken. Liberal media and education is on a fast track to irrelevance.

  • http://saberpoint.blogspot.com Stogie Chomper

    Sounds like scientific research into different schooling for differently abled people is a great idea — it might teach the social and thinking skills that people of lower IQs need to lead more successful lives. Of course, this would seriously disrupt the racial grievance industry and the leftists who depend on their votes, and we are already seeing pushback from these neo-Marxists.

  • scutum

    I recently had a rotator cuff repair done on my right shoulder. The physical therapist who worked with me in post-op rehabilitationhad two children who had recently started school. As we talked about his children and how he wanted to see that they had a good education he lamented the fact that he was not able to afford any additional children. He said he wanted to
    have more but just couldn’t afford it if he was going to be able to provide his present children with the intellectual and physical education he wanted for them. In the meantime out Government is spending billions on the care and up keep of millions of human weeds. I believe there is an agenda to eliminate Europeans from this country. The Negores are much easier to control, all you have to do is throw some money and or drugs at them.

    • sbuffalonative

      Yes, whites are expected to pay for their own children while non-whites are not. We’re funding dysgenics.

      • AndrewInterrupted

        That is definitely the plan. That’s why a Cambodian woman who doesn’t even remember Cambodia can have three children on our dime, but a European American man will go to jail if he falls behind on payments for one child. The Left has been engaged in population warfare like that for decades now.

  • Multicultural fascist

    Race is a social construct! Ha ha ha the biggest lie self hating whites and Eskimos have been shoving down our throats for days. Are dog breeds also a social construct?

  • Brian

    You make a good point about the difference between ‘equality under the law’ vs. ‘wanting the same thing that everyone else has’, with the blind man/driver’s license example. To the extent that marriage is about raising children, and M-M or F-F can’t produce them, that seems valid. But there is adoption, and while it isn’t ideal, there are gay couples who could raise children at least as well as some bad heteros do, or better than foster care/orphanages. What if they gay couple says they want marriage because they’d like to adopt ‘difficult’ children no one else wants? This complicates the issue doesn’t it?

  • Brian

    Not being in 100% agreement with you does not mean my eye is ill-informed or untrained (not sure how that would work). You are assuming the conclusion. How about keeping your insults to yourself?

  • Brian

    Good point. I can see a distinction between the direct, specific arguments in favor of gay marriage, which I would reluctantly go along with if this issue were in a political vacuum, but as you say, what are the larger effects of this and the context? It does seem to be used, whether by the gays themselves or not, as a battering ram (among many others) to break down ‘the eternal verities’ and grease the skids for whatever other hare-brained utopian notions come down the road.

    • silviosilver

      but I can see what the libs have planned next and how this ‘camel’s nose in the tent’ fits into that scheme, and so I have to oppose it.

      That’s political reality, yes. One is either advancing or retreating, accreting or diminishing, however minimally. Consensus is an illusion created by political equipoise. I find it dispiriting to think this way, but it is the only conclusion I can draw.

  • AndrewInterrupted

    TED-talks are all Cultural Marxist all the time. Card carrying.

    • WR_the_realist

      Nah, just 80% of the time.

      • AndrewInterrupted

        Scamberg even bought off Mike Lowe for the purposes of dissuading young men from attending college.

        That wallpaper is for her girls.

  • Brian

    I’ve often wondered at what point we would be justified in taking up arms– putting it all on the table and going for broke. Making it illegal for whites to marry each other would certainly qualify as a casus belli, but at the point it might be too late already. What is the breaking point here?

    • Edruezzi

      There was a guy who went for broke in 1939. You know who I mean.

  • Brian

    Natural selection is to some extent based on ‘opinion’, in the form of sexual selection…E.g. peacock feathers, which are detrimental to moving around and getting food, but the ladies like that biological bling, so it gets promoted. The propagation of blue eyes in humans may be a similar trait.

  • Brian

    Many intelligent children, esp. those born to less-intelligent parents, are in public schools.

  • silviosilver

    The Israel Cohen quotation was overwhelmingly likely to have been a fabrication by Eustace Mullins. It doesn’t particularly matter (besides deceit being counterproductive) as events since the late 50s have played out pretty much exactly that way.

    Your purpose, of course, is to inflame passions to even greater degree than they are already inflamed among the average poster to these threads, because there has only ever been one right way to live and that way is white nationalism and “science proves it” but these facts have been suppressed, and fingering the culprit and exposing his designs is the capstone move that will bring everything together and propel the movement to final victory.

    I really don’t think it works like that. Race is real and it matters but the political maneuvering required to bring about the kinds of changes necessary takes a hell of a lot more than shaking your first at ykws. But don’t mind me. If you disagree, carry on.

  • silviosilver

    It’s insulting, for one thing. That’s not a deal-breaking degree of “immorality,” of course, but I think it would sting. What if someone offered you money to sterilize yourself because you’re multiracial? Wouldn’t you be at least taken aback? It’s the same thing with explicitly targeting low IQ people in such a direct manner, “Listen, here’s $500 bucks, go sterilize yourself. We don’t want any more of your kind propagating your worthless genetic material.” You’d need a heart of stone not to feel for a person in such a position.

    And yet, society does have a tremendous interest in the various rates at which various segments breed, because the long term effects exert such a powerful influence on the shape that society eventually takes. Influencing various segments to breed at long term eugenic rates will require much more than simply grumbling about low IQ people and offering them a few bucks to get lost. Techniques of “demographic management” will have to form a fundamental aspect of what is meant by “good governance,” much the way that government came to be judged by its performance in managing the economy. Even though the ultimate aim is to encourage low IQ people to breed at lower rates (including some of them forgoing childbirth altogether), the manner in which that objective is pursued can make all the difference in the way the specific policies are received.

  • Edruezzi

    I’m sure a lot of guys felt the thrill of being right, that tingle, that rush of joy.

  • Truth Teller

    Low IQ doesn’t necessarily lead to violence. If this were the case, why are a lot of people who are mentally retarded very docile?

    • Chris Granzow XI

      It’s a combination of low-IQ and aggressive-violent genes. They have a higher frequency of MAOA-2R, which accounts for extreme violence and aggression. It’s most prevalent in blacks and pacific islanders. There are probably a million more other genes that we will discover unique to blacks in the next hundred years….and still we’ll only be scratching the surface.

  • Anglo

    Right. I notice, for example, people rarely mention Stalin, Pol Pot’s Khmer Rouge, or any of the other wholesale massacres committed throughout history. It’s always Hitler! Hitler! Hitler!

  • The Verdict of History
  • LHathaway

    “social factors are more likely to blame for poorer health among blacks in the United States, he said”.

    The guy’s got a point but the greater reality in america today is that made by the article: Whites even Potentially being ‘neo-racists’ in thought, that’s just horrible. People of color being out and out racists, ‘giving back’ or complaining about white evils or deficiencies, that’s paid for and promoted.

    • Chris Granzow XI

      Even if it’s social factors and not genetics, it’s still their genetics that led them to those social behaviors. For example, it’s like saying blacks are more violent because they choose to attack people (not their genetics)……but which then begs the question about what is so inherent in their dna and genetics that makes them choose be violent so frequently. It always leads back to genetics.

  • silviosilver

    The point is that it’s natural to be disgusted by homosexuality, meaning that it is not equal to heterosexuality and shouldn’t be treated as though it were equal to heterosexuality. That doesn’t mean gays should be mistreated. It doesn’t meaning “banning” gay sex. It does mean that we have a right to guard ourselves against gays’ encroachments. In practical terms what this means for me is a gay who is not “in my face” with his gayness is a gay whose gayness is not an issue for me. The more flamboyant a gay, the less likely I am to want to have anything to do with him, and no amount of whining about the “unfairness” of this will sway me an inch. It’s my life, my well-being, my happiness at stake. If he can’t handle this, it’s not my problem.

  • silviosilver

    The goal in both case is to have low IQ people breeding at lower rates, yes. But one approach places low IQ people’s deficiencies in the spotlight and can easily create a persecution complex, quite likely with the result of interminable and depressing “social jostling” as people attempt to escape the stigma of official deficiency. The demographic management approach frames the issue as “we’re all in this together,” and argues that the sooner demographic management principles can be applied, the sooner society as a whole stands to benefit.
    This isn’t deceitful or deceptive, it’s what I actually believe. Low IQ people do not only suffer personal hardship related to difficulties they experience in attaining academic or job-skill competence, their lives are also made more difficult by being surrounded by large numbers of other low IQ people, who influence their thought patterns and behaviors. Low IQ people would unquestionably benefit from a reduction in the number of other low IQ people in their lives. Naturally, the rest of society benefits from such a reduction as well, since social problems like delinquency and violence are strongly influenced by low IQ and low IQ environments. On the other hand, all stand to benefit from a growing proportion of high IQ people, since such people make for the most competent leaders and innovators, and because productive and law-abiding behavior comes relatively more easily to them the more of them there are the more examples can be set for others. In this approach, no one need feel ashamed of his station or become depressed that he’s “not wanted”; nor would we expect one to feel undue pride (“supremacy” or whatever).

  • silviosilver

    I’ve never called for banning homosexuality. It’s your side that insists that I must like it. My protestations that I find it disgusting and prefer to distance myself from it fall on deaf ears. I’m ordered to view it and treat it as no different to heterosexuality – perhaps even as superior to heterosexuality, since gays make for such fantastic historical victims, and hey we all love a good victim don’t we.

    • Edruezzi

      Uh, I thought this article was about race and genetics. Why all the stuff about gays and gay power?

      • silviosilver

        It came up so I joined in. Do you think my perspective is unfair to gays? I am not the sort of person who enjoys hurting other people’s feelings at all (believe it or not) and I often regret things I type in the heat of the moment, but some things just need to be said and I can’t help saying them, even if I’m occasionally crude.

  • silviosilver

    Some proportion of those low IQ parents were born to parents who themselves had high IQ. So the grandchildren of the low IQ parents in this case could expect to have higher IQs than would be predicted by only looking at the low IQ parents/grandparents (hope you don’t get lost in this maze).

    In any case, it’s very important to remember that one’s prospects of living a happy, satisfying life are only partly influenced by IQ. A productive, law-abiding low IQ person can very, very easily lead a happier, more satisfying, more fulfilling existence than a high IQ person; the fact that the activities the low IQ person engages in from which he derives that satisfaction and fulfillment would unlikely appeal to a high IQ person is beside the point. So I don’t think it’s a case of “God help them,” because having a low IQ for any one particular individual is nowhere near the horror the invocation of God suggests it is.

  • silviosilver

    Aboriginal societies are plenty chaotic, I assure you.

  • tlk244182

    What would they say if you were part of a nationwide Gentile eugenics movement? I bet at least some of them would use the other “n” word (nazi) behind your back, if not to your face. As an experiment, ask them the question hypothetically, in a roundabout way so they dont realize they are being evaluated as potential anti-Gentile racists, and see what they say about eugenics in general.

  • Brian

    Social constructs require lots of calcium.

  • Edruezzi

    Sickle cell and the old canard about genetic dumbness, which some have been struggling for decades to “prove”. Where’s the world-changing stuff?

    • Reverend Bacon

      Yeah, and some have been struggling for decades to understand the proof, or even the fact that it’s already been proven. Could those people suffer from some form of genetic dumbness?

  • Edruezzi

    I assure you that you wouldn’t recognize a real Cultural Marxist, or at least what operationally passes for one, if one sat on your face. Real Cultural Marxists don’t have the kind of power you describe. They are too busy trying to get tenure to be plotting to turn over White European nations to low-IQ parasites.

  • Chris Granzow XI

    Anyone who still truly believes that race is just a social-construct needs to check themselves into a psyche ward.

  • Brian

    My guess would be 1880′s. The two big questions are why these pygmies are socially constructed to be so short…and how much affirmative action do they need to close The Height Gap?

  • KunTewk

    38 million have died from AIDS since it was identified. The vectors are overwhelmingly homosexuality and injecting drugs.
    This only 1 scourge linked to homosexuals. There should be enough victims to satiate the blood lust of a Leftists….for a short period of time.

  • OhWow

    What’s next? Mathematical racism? 2+2 cannot equal 4 because it’s racist.

  • JohnEngelman

    I am pleased that you are here. Keep posting.

  • JohnEngelman

    Homosexuals tend to be more intelligent than heterosexuals. I believe that homosexuality is perpetuated by genes that are dominant for higher intelligence, but recessive for homosexuality.

  • Reverend Bacon

    Thanks for that link. This article appears targeted for re-writing by the Ministry of Truth.