Trayvon’s Tweets and Black Hate Crimes

Ilana Mercer, World Net Daily, March 30, 2012

“Hoodie on the Hill” blared the Drudge Report headline, as the street theatre playing out over the shooting death of Trayvon Martin crossed over to the House floor. There, concealed by the by-now iconic hood and “gangsta” glasses was one Bobby Rush, a Democratic representative. Rush blessed Trayvon Martin’s departed soul.

The name Trayvon is soon to be a trademark. It may yet spawn a franchise, as the youth’s grieving mother has had the presence of mind to file with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

{snip}

Other than that Martin was unarmed and that George Zimmerman has not been arrested, the facts of the case have yet to be established. Since then, the “Racism Industrial Complex (RIC)” (columnist Jack Kerwick’s coinage), has galvanized on behalf of Trayvon.

{snip}

While we’re sifting through the facts, let us have that “conversation about race” that, in its penchant for clichés, the “Racism Industrial Complex” is forever calling for. For the treatment of the Trayvon travesty masks the brutal realities of crime in the USA.

For every Trayvon victimized by a Caucasian American (to humor the hooded ones, let’s pretend Zimmerman isn’t Hispanic)—many more whites are brutalized by a black criminal class, members of which never get called out for what are crimes rooted in racial hatred.

Courtesy of Patrick Buchanan’s “Suicide of a Superpower” come the FBI’s crime figures for 2007: “Blacks committed 433,934 violent crimes against whites, eight times as many as the 55,685 that whites committed against blacks. Interracial rape is almost exclusively black-on-white, with 14,000 assaults on white women by African-American males in 2007. Not one case of white sexual assault on a black female was found in the FBI study.” (Page 243)

“In the same time period as the Trayvon Martin incident,” documents VDARE’s Peter Bradley, “a multitude of anti-white attacks by blacks occurred that remained strictly local news.”

This month, in Tulsa, Okla., Tyrone Dale David (a black youth) raped and beat to a dead pulp an 85-year-old lady, Nancy Strait. The RIC gang would probably deny that racial subjugation was an element of this abominable act. (That, presumably, leaves octogenarian sexual attraction as a motive.)

Below is Bradley’s verbatim tally of the forgotten Caucasian casualties of black hate crimes, during the months of February and March of this year. As Bradley observes, in most of these attacks “there were clear and obvious signs of racial motivation.” And, “Almost all of the black-on-white attacks involved multiple black attackers against white children, the elderly or the handicapped”:

  • In Kansas City, a 13-year-old white boy named Allen Coon was doused with gasoline and set on fire by two older blacks saying, “This is what you deserve. You get what you deserve, white boy.”
  • Haley Pettersen, a 15-year-old white girl in a leg cast in O’Fallon, Ill., was out walking her dog when she was attacked by two black girls who said, “This is our territory white girl.” One girl grabbed Haley by the hair, and the other one started hitting her in the face. The perpetrators ran off only when some neighbors came out, but the attack left Haley with a swollen left eye.
  • In Kansas City, an unnamed 50-year-old white man was left with a fractured hip and other injuries after being beaten by a group of blacks shouting racial epithets.
  • Gary Allder, a white man in San Antonio, came home to find that his house had been burglarized, ransacked and tagged with racial slurs such as “Die Whitey.”
  • Travis Eugene Winemiller, 16, a white Polk County, Fla., inmate, was beaten, choked and strangled until he was unconscious by three black inmates. They then hogtied Winemiller and said, “This is how you slave a real cracker,” and threatened to kill him.
  • Jacob Appel, a 15-year-old autistic white boy, was attacked by three blacks at his bus stop in Palm Bay, Fla. The blacks taunted, used racial slurs and chased the victim into the street where he was nearly struck by a car. The only reason the offenders were caught is that one of the attackers posted the video on his Facebook page.

An even treatment of the Trayvon travesty would recognize and dignify these victims of racial animus and aggression—and thus affirm the reality of violent crime in this country, as opposed to the fiction of black victimization.

The racial extravaganza that has been staged by the “Racism Industrial Complex” must be countered, first, by an impartial examination of the facts of this case.

On the facts, an honest conversation about race would quickly dispense with the canard that blacks are habitually persecuted by whites. They are not.

Such a dispassionate, contextualized discussion of the reality of crime in the U.S. would invariably lead to the conclusion that the alleged “white” offender in the Trayvon travesty must be regarded as a statistical anomaly.

Topics: ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Hirschibold

    For those who are fortunate enough to have never attended an inner-city public school in the 1990s, let me fill you in on the “No Limit” from which Trayvon took his online handle. “No Limit Records” was founded by Percy Miller (otherwise known as Master P) whose brother’s rap name was C-Murder. “He is currently serving life imprisonment following his conviction for a second degree murder committed in 2002.”. Another “artist” on the label, Skull Duggery “was arrested after police searched his Baton Rouge home. Authorities executing a search warrant, found several violent Child Pornography
    movies on his computer. Authorities also found a .223 caliber rifle, a
    40 caliber handgun, and marijuana in his bedroom. On April 11, 2011, he
    was sentenced to 6 years in prison.”

    I honestly don’t feel like parsing the entire roster of “talent” but you get the idea. For those who are curious about what kind of music the “victim” in this case enjoyed in his spare time, here is a catchy ditty from No Limit’s golden age, entitled “Ghetto D” (the “D” is short for dope) which gives the listener step by step instructions on how to cook cocaine and avoid capture by the police): 

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aVzhvz3S7FI

    • libertarian4339

      There is no reason to doubt the legitimacy of the tweets in the following link by the black perp and his co-horts.

      They reveal a racist, criminal attitude that I have no doubt is similar to what 95% of the black teen population have,  and they reveal an intent by this perp to go after Zimmerman. 

      If whites don’t get up in arms after reading these,  there’s no hope for them to survive as a people.  A black/white war is raging with the attacks coming only from the black side.

      http://tinyurl.com/72x9q6o

      • refocus

         Wow Saint Jesus Trayvon actually wrote that he was going to harass Zimmerman by name !

        Of course the MSM will ignore it.  They really are trying to incite a riot.

        • libertarian4339

          This post was lost somehow.  I tried to get it back and don’t know if it might show up elsewhere.  Anyway the response is to refocus.

          Too, I  just might mention for clarification that the tweet/facebook data in the above link http://tinyurl.com/72x9q6o has not been authenticated, but appears to be valid, as you will note from reading the comments by the blog owner below the tweets/facebook postings.

          The tweets/facebook postings first appeared on The Daily Caller, showing three of Martin’s accounts:

          Trayvonn Slimm Martin
          T 33ZY TAUGHT M3
          No limit nigga

          It is the first and oldest tweet/facebook postings that were made several days prior to the shooting and indicate that Martin knew Zimmerman was the neighborhod watchman in advance of the day of shooting and planned to “f… with him.”

          The first, most damaging tweets are gone, but the blog owner….americaswarchick…dowloaded them from the Daily Caller before they were deleted.

          The police surely have the black perp’s cell phone and his computer, and also the cell phones of his contacts, so all this will come out during the investigation.

          It’s my belief, however, that much needs to be revealesd right now, because there are still a bunch of silly whites who think Zimmerman hunted down the black perp and shot him.

          Now they’re even coming out and saying that the voice screaming for help is Martin and not Zimmerman, in spite of the fact that witnesses verify that Zimmerman was getting beat in the face and his head slammed against the concrete.

          This case is very much like the Jena incident where Sharpton was screaming in defense of a black criminal, that he was the object of racism after he and five others stomped an innocent kid on school grounds and would have killed him had not a teacher stopped them

  • holyflower

    “…the alleged ‘white’ offender in the Trayvon travesty must be regarded as a statistical anomaly.”

    ===

    “Statistical anomaly” is productive way think about white-on-black violence.   If editors, reporters and broadcasters, for example, infinitesimally low odds the Duke lacrosse players raped their black accuser, they might have avoided making fools of themselves. 

    What are those odds?  DOJ data from 2005:

    “In the United States in 2005, 37,460 white females were sexually assaulted or raped by a black man, while between zero and ten black females were sexually assaulted or raped by a white man.” (“The Truth of Interracial Rape in the United States,” Lawrence Auster, FrontPageMagazine.com | Thursday, May 03, 2007)

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_XIGUBTMBHJEL7CBK2J5YZA7BH4 Rocky Mountain

      If that number (rapes) is correct, then I have to correct myself from an earlier post in which I suggested that it seemed much too high.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jean-Deux/1540915347 Jean Deux

    One of the most common FBI crime stats I see is that blacks raped over 37,000 white women in 2005, while White men raped fewer than 10 black women. I find it hard to believe that this number fell by more than half in just two years, and the last time the number was as low as 14,000 was in the 90′s.  Is Buchanan’s number accurate? And regarding the number inter-racial violent crimes, if you add in the non-violent inter-racial crimes, the ratio would be even more disparate 

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_XIGUBTMBHJEL7CBK2J5YZA7BH4 Rocky Mountain

      37,000 would be just over 3,000 a month or 100 per day.  Personally, I think thats unrealistically high because we would be hearing the screams daily.

      • dmxinc

        http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/conte

        Now you’ll have to go to page 29 and multiple the total number of
        rapes by the percentage for each race.  For black men raping white women
        the figure comes to over 19,293 and, once again, zero for black women
        raped by white men in 2008.

        I ran the numbers for 2005 years ago and the 37,000 figure was
        accurate, but the DOJ website has moved to cover more recent years.

        Jared Taylor’s “Color of Crime” had the 2005 stats.

         

      • Beloved Comrade

        In the United States in 2005, 37,460 white females were sexually assaulted or raped by a black man, while between zero and ten black females were sexually assaulted or raped by a white man.What this means is that every day in the United States, over one hundred white women are raped or sexually assaulted by a black man. *Department of Justice document Criminal Victimization in the United States, 2005. (Go to the linked document, and under “Victims and Offenders” download the pdf file for 2005.)
        Lawrence Auster, The Truth of Interracial Rape in the United States, 2007

        http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=26368

        • Bon, From the Land of Babble

            Comrade:

          The link to the DOJ link to  Crime Victimization in the U.S., “Victims and Offenders”  no longer work, they’ve been taken down.  Any guesses as to why?
          I did, however, find this screen shot taken by Incogman before “someone” (probably the despicable holder) disappeared the info (see image):  

          This chart reveals that White rape of black women is statistically non-existent, while White women suffered 37,460 rapes at the hands of black men for this particular year. There is no reason not to believe the same kind of numbers occur every year.

          As Lawrence Auster writes:  What this means is that every day in the United States, over one hundred white women are raped or sexually assaulted by black men.

          Bon

    • JohnEngelman

      If you have an FBI website for that assertion, please post it. 

      • dmxinc

         Here it is John (19,293 rapes of white women by black men in 2008, zero black women raped by white men):

        http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/cvus0802.pdf

        Now you’ll have to go to page 29 and multiple the total number of rapes by the percentage for each race.  For black men raping white women the figure comes to over 19293 and, once again, zero for black women raped by white men.

        I ran the numbers for 2005 years ago and the 37,000 figure was accurate, but the DOJ website has moved to cover more recent years.

        Jared Taylor’s “Color of Crime” had the 2005 stats.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1602773080 Xin Loi

       Those stats come from the NCVS data which is an annual survey of 70 thousand  people about their personal knowledge of crimes against them or their families. Many of these crimes have not been reported so are not documented. Although the trend  on interracial rape  is correct, the actual numbers are estimates and vary wildly.

      Often they are based on a  very small sample of replies where a small number of rapes was known from the 70 thousand interviewed,  extrapolated  out  to the population at large. That is why they have such extreme variations from year to year.

      The  Uniform Crime Reports put out by the FBI, catalog   reported crimes but they dont break down interracial rape stats good enough to determine the  hate ratios . A few states do break it down with racial identifications. North Carolina and Alabama  break  down interracial forcible rapes with racial IDs of the perp and victim, in their annual compilations and  the hate ratio for  black on non Hispanic  white  forcible rape  is at least 19 to 1 in those two states.

      The hate ratio for interracial sexual homicides where the white rape victim is murdered is estimated to be even higher, 48 to 1, interracial sexual homicides of elderly white women the hate ratio is at least 99 to 1.  Unfortunately precise data on these two victim profiles are almost nonexistent because of the taboo of  honestly investigating race factors in violent crime.

      However a good estimate of the hate ratios can be made by just compiling and cataloging these  crimes as reported individually on the internet.

      301 white Americans murdered by 24 different black serial and spree killers:

      http://blackracismandracehatred.blogspot.com/2012/03/301-whites-murdered-by-24-black-serial.html

      145 white Americans murdered in their own homes by black invaders:

      http://blackracismandracehatred.blogspot.com/2012/03/145-whites-murdered-in-their-own-home.html

    • refocus

       Buchanan is a shill for Hollywood/MSM.

  • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

    Hard to believe that these words were written by someone who a dozen short years ago wanted a black woman to be Vice-President of the United States.

    • Afrikanerhart1

      Not only that, but Ms. Mercer’s  shameful behavior during a recent interview on The Political Cesspool were she basicly rejected race realism makes me wonder about were her loyalties lie. 

      That being said, her article does have many postive points.  I still don’t trust her, though…

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_XIGUBTMBHJEL7CBK2J5YZA7BH4 Rocky Mountain

      Would the black woman vice-president be committing a lot of street crimes?

    • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

       I made a mistake.  I should have written this comment in the PJB op-ed story, because I was referring to Ezola Foster.

  • tickyul

    Just saw another Phonycon on Fox…….Huxterbee. He was bleating the same line that the Liberals have been spewing about the saintly Urban American Yute from Florida……chased down, assasinated….blah, blah.

    I hate both parties…..they are sick in the head.

    • gemjunior

      You said it, one is as worthless as the next one and equally full o’ shite.  Sick in the head is a pretty good description.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_JKGCGNL6ZODMUHX55V6WF6U7WE SteveM

    By the way, it costs $11,000 to file at the Patent Trademark Office. Where did Trayvon’s mom with a net worth of $5 come up with that type of scratch? I smell NYC lamestreamers.

    • Impertinent

      Sorry but I think you’re way off.  Patent filing are usually no more than 4-500 per patent.

      Other wise…not too many new inventions or products invented by the average guy would get to market. You’re not being punished for an invention or a a patent…you’re being thanked…and possibly rewarded.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_SYKCW323HPUTQOUGE5WZPNXJOU John

       Sorry, that’s patent.  Total trademark filing fees in this case were exactly $650.  Assuming the lawyer was pro bono, that is all it would have cost Trayvon’s mom.  (Interestingly, the trademark was apparently such a rush job that they had to file an amendment correcting the spelling of Martin’s mother’s name to SYBRINA FULTON from SABRINA).  (Also the inevitable registration for the goods “hoodies” was filed by a California gentleman on Wednesday.  There are now three separate trademark registrations in play for Trayvon).

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Aunti-Occupy/100003232140389 Aunti Occupy

    In Haiti no one ever cared about crimes committed against whites.  America with the Black Obama and a Black AG is the new Haiti.  Everyone fears having their city burned to the ground just like during the Cold War when Russians could burn US cities with nukes.

    • tickyul

      Good point about Haiti.

      And how much is the United States Of Ameritard blowing on that 6th world craphole each year????

      Make no mistake about it, we are PAYING OFF Urban Americans…..well, OR ELSE.

  • Detroit_WASP

    Michigan Blacks killed by Whites, Asians, Arabs or Hispanics in 2011

    1.  Joe Bigelow (White) killed Brittany Burrell (black)

     

        Michigan 2011 Whites, Asians Hispanics and Arabs killed by Blacks

    1. Randy Lauzon (white) killed by Savante Johnson (black)

    2. Joe Lauzon (white) Killed by Savante Johson (black) 

    3. John Clements (white)  Killed by Alexander Lyons, and Lamar DeAngelo (black) 

    4.  Jay Shinn Killed (Asian) by Tanaka Wells and Ronnie Matthews (blacks)

    5.  Greg McNichols (white) killed by Freddie Young (black)

    6.  MarissaLynn Emkens (10 years old, mixed race)  killed by Rodrick Dantzler (black)

    7.  Amanda Emkens, (white) killed by rodrick dantzler (black)

    8.  Kimberlee Emkens (white) killed by rodrick dantzler (black)

    9.  Jennider m. Heeren(white) killed by rodrick dantzler (black)

    10.  Kamrie Heeren-dantzler,  (white)killed by rodick dantzler (black)

    11.  Rececca l. Heren, (white) killed by rodrick dantzler (black)

    12. Thomas s. Heeren, (white) killed by rodrick dantzler (black)

    13. James Dean Odle, (white) Killed by unknown (black) male 

    14. Juan Aguirre, (Hispanic) killed by unknown “skinny (black) male”

    15. Mohsin Jaber-Hassoun Al-Uglah (Iraqi) Killed by Antonnie Oneil Ray (black) 

    16.  Misty Kurmas (white) killed by Mark Angelo Blount (black)

    This list is probably incomplete.  This is just what I found from scanning the online papers for murders.   There were several whites murdered and I strongly suspected blacks had done it because of where it happened and other circumstances but the papers either left out a description of the suspect… or there were no witnesses.  
    For instance, Scott Groat stabbed to death by three men outside MGM Grand Casino in downtown Detroit.  No description was give of the three men.   

    The murdered Asian, Mexican and Arabic men were all store owners and were murdered during attempted robberies by black males. 

    Randy and Joe Louzon were murdered in their home by a black male that broke in to rob them. 

    John Clements was murdered by two blacks over a cell phone.  The blacks pretended to have a cell phone for sale, met Clements and murdered him is his front yard for the cash he had brought to buy the phone from them.  

    Rodrick Danzler killed his white ex-girlfriend and most of her family.

    Misty Kurmas was killed by a black dude driving a van fleeing police. She was walking home from school. 

    It’s really disgusting that Trayvon is getting all this attention and these people are nameless and faceless victims of typical Black on White crime happening EVERY DAY in America.

  • razorrare

    “Blacks committed 433,934 violent crimes against whites, eight times as many as the 55,685 that whites committed against blacks.

    Out of the 55,685 cases where Whites committed violent crimes against blacks…how many of those were committed by non-hispanic Whites? I am sure PB knows that the F.B.I stats cooks the book against Whites..if not for this the black rate would be over 100 times more than the White rate in black on White and White on black(rare)violent crime.If Non-hispanic Whites actually committed 55,000 violent crimes against blacks wouldnt you think the MSM would let you know about it?As it is,once in a few years they find a story like the one in jasper/james byrd and put it in the news for days,weeks,months and years.The SPLC wouldnt have to resort to attacking mainstream conservative organizations to raise money because they would have plenty of ammo,55,000 rounds of em,to scare the bejesus out of groups to donate money to their cause..i just cant understand that with all this black on White violent crime that a White group or even a black group dosent get together and run an organization like the SPLC..thats where the money is!!! All that gold right in front of them and they cant see it?

    Isnt it ironic it is us “haters” who are the only ones supporting and defending George Zimmerman,a minority….We truly are a passionate & supreme people.

  • razorrare

    “Blacks committed 433,934 violent crimes against whites, eight times as many as the 55,685 that whites committed against blacks.

    Out of the 55,685 cases where Whites committed violent crimes against blacks…how many of those were committed by non-hispanic Whites? I am sure PB knows that the F.B.I stats cooks the book against Whites..if not for this the black rate would be over 100 times more than the White rate in black on White and White on black(rare)violent crime.If Non-hispanic Whites actually committed 55,000 violent crimes against blacks wouldnt you think the MSM would let you know about it?As it is,once in a few years they find a story like the one in jasper/james byrd and put it in the news for days,weeks,months and years.The SPLC wouldnt have to resort to attacking mainstream conservative organizations to raise money because they would have plenty of ammo,55,000 rounds of em,to scare the bejesus out of groups to donate money to their cause..i just cant understand that with all this black on White violent crime that a White group or even a black group dosent get together and run an organization like the SPLC..thats where the money is!!! All that gold right in front of them and they cant see it?

    Isnt it ironic it is us “haters” who are the only ones supporting and defending George Zimmerman,a minority….We truly are a passionate & supreme people.

  • razorrare

    “Blacks committed 433,934 violent crimes against whites, eight times as many as the 55,685 that whites committed against blacks.

    Out of the 55,685 cases where Whites committed violent crimes against blacks…how many of those were committed by non-hispanic Whites? I am sure PB knows that the F.B.I stats cooks the book against Whites..if not for this the black rate would be over 100 times more than the White rate in black on White and White on black(rare)violent crime.If Non-hispanic Whites actually committed 55,000 violent crimes against blacks wouldnt you think the MSM would let you know about it?As it is,once in a few years they find a story like the one in jasper/james byrd and put it in the news for days,weeks,months and years.The SPLC wouldnt have to resort to attacking mainstream conservative organizations to raise money because they would have plenty of ammo,55,000 rounds of em,to scare the bejesus out of groups to donate money to their cause..i just cant understand that with all this black on White violent crime that a White group or even a black group dosent get together and run an organization like the SPLC..thats where the money is!!! All that gold right in front of them and they cant see it?

    Isnt it ironic it is us “haters” who are the only ones supporting and defending George Zimmerman,a minority….We truly are a passionate & supreme people.

  • Impertinent

    “If anything, minorities should commit less crime than the majority race if they wish to gain acceptance.”

    That opportunity, as well as a civilized and sensible duty has long passed. Look around you. There is NO desire to assimilate, educate or associate with whites by blacks. It’s been reverse segregation and discrimination since 1964. With literally thousands of black organizations from the CBC, the NAACP, SPLC, NAN, BET, Black Parenting, Jet, Ebony, “African Americans for Obama” ( with no equivalent White men and WASPS for _______ whomever that’s white, group….The NBPP…everywhere around you are the signs of racial discord, separatism and segregation. Black economic “zones”…Black colleges….AA, bussing and forced “integration”.

    We are back into an America of the pre 50′s….only we’re not supposed to notice it.

    • razorrare

      We are back into an America of the pre 50′s….i wish that was true….back then a child could walk to their neighborhood school in safety….one never had to lock the doors to their homes….not sure if carlocks were even being made then….and sports entertainment & movies were basically all White.Yep,”What a Wonderful Life.”

  • xxxtonygunsxxx

     blacks are going to riot because 1 out of the 400,000 plus whites assaulted this year by blacks had the audacity to defend himself (which by the way was a very racist thing for him to do and shows a lack of understanding of the disadvantaged black COMMUNITY )

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/DFC73YYAKSHGIE32R4T3TFAEHI No

    I have a theory about black hatred of whites being the reason for what we see happening . . .

    But you know another reason why the media ignores black on white crime?

    Occam’s Razor:  Because it isn’t n-e-w-s.   

    Liberal/progressives KNOW that blacks are violent, feral and murderous.  They know it as well as we do.

    Teena-aged white girls may innocently believe that “blacks are people too” . . . but journalists?  Editors?  Cameramen?  Photographers?  Anchors?  

    C’mon . . . are you telling me that Katie Couric, Rachel Maddow, Keith Olbermann or Bill O’Reilly don’t know what’s going on? 

    They know.  They know even better than we do because they see the feeds coming in from hundreds of stations nation-wide.  But it’s so common that it doesn’t rate a headline.

    • curri

      That doesn’t explain the absolute HYSTERIA and  hatred coming from the media.  Here’s a better explanation:
      http://www.halfsigma.com/2012/03/who-is-matt-gutman.html#comments 
      They’ve also been described as puritan progressive who loath the “wrong sort of whites” such as hillbilly southern whites and ethnic northern whites. Nothing disgusts the elite white more than lower class whites. The frightening thought that he or she could be like them fuels their hatred and vicious intolerance.

      “The frightening thought that he or she could be like them fuels their hatred and vicious intolerance.”
      precisely. the worst battles are those between cousins, because “there but for the grace of god go i…”the psychological closeness of the prole white is what sustains the SWPL’s irrational hatred. the SWPL sees a bit of himself in the prole. this is not to excuse the anti-white bigotry of the elite whites, but it does help explain it.the civil war is being played out again, this time with black, mestizos and media ink as weapons instead of guns and iron ships. that could change.

      • curri

        Even a Jewish college student is being thrown under the bus as an apparent “honorary redneck” :
        Stephanie Eisner 

      • http://profile.yahoo.com/DFC73YYAKSHGIE32R4T3TFAEHI No

        Maybe . . . but again, Occam’s Razor.  People like Rachel Maddow and Hillary Clinton don’t become the people they are because of the positions they take . . . they take those positions because that’s who they are.

        You have to be an attention whore in the first place to be either politician or newscaster.  Combine that with a fervent belief in liberalism and you’ll begin to get a little hysterical when the stupid whites (defined as any who don’t agree with you) don’t get it.

        But, I really wasn’t talking about just liberal newscaster . . . I include the silent conservatist newscasters.   NO ONE TALKS ABOUT BLACK ON WHITE CRIME!

    • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

      I have long realized this but not articulated or posted the idea, except to my wife.  I completely agree; who cares if another white has been raped, beat or murdered, it’s mundane and no one cares, unless they are white supremacists.

  • http://twitter.com/Penywisedaclown clownboy

    Maybe we should just give them their 40 acre’s and a mule?   in Iran, Iraq, or maybe Antarctica?

    • blight14

       The mule would be raped then eaten by the end of the first day……..

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_XIGUBTMBHJEL7CBK2J5YZA7BH4 Rocky Mountain

    Yeah, its one thing to look at things realistically, but its entirely another to keep drawing a line in the sand according to an ideology.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_XIGUBTMBHJEL7CBK2J5YZA7BH4 Rocky Mountain

    Not long ago on the dreaded “NPR” I heard a sociologist discuss a study whereby crime rates were looked at in terms of economics and things begin to level out.  Obviously, there are more poor blacks so they commit more crimes but – according to the study – poor whites in the same economic boat – commit crimes at a similar rate.  I haven’t read the study or seen subsequent mention of it in the MSM.  In any case, poverty does contribute to crime rates and it’s apparent in urban literature of 75-100 years ago that when crime was discussed or part of the theme it was often poor whites who were the perpetrators.  Writers in those days probably didn’t know much about blacks which doesn’t mean they weren’t committing crimes.

    • IstvanIN

      I find it hard to believe that white crime in West Virginia is similar to the black crime rate in Lousiana.  Both poor states.  I would feel much safer in WV than LA.

    • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

       There might be a good reason why the crime rate among poor whites and poor blacks in America was about the same a very long time ago.  The segregationist system kept black crime in check.

      Anyway, there is a link between poverty and crime.  It’s not so much that poverty causes crime, it’s that crime causes poverty.  Guess who agrees with that:

      http://countenance.wordpress.com/2009/07/12/president-obama-admits-its-not-that-poverty-cause-crime-its-that-crime-causes-poverty/

      • Beloved Comrade

        You too?   Your first sentence shows that you believe the garbage Rocky Mountain is publishing without so much as a scintilla of proof.  Do you really believe that poor whites and poor blacks have or had the same crime rates at any period of time?  

        Why were crime rates low during the great depression when unemployment reached approximately 25%?  Did poor whites riot, burn cities, rape, rob and assault people at the same rate that “poor” black do now?  When were white crime rates ever the same as black crime rates?

        • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

           Look at the issue in the other direction.  It’s not that white crime was ever high, it’s that the segregationist system kept black crime low.

    • Beloved Comrade

      “according to the study – poor whites in the same economic boat – commit crimes at a similar rate.”

      Another genius post where somebody  “heard something” or thought he may have “read somewhere at sometime” but can’t remember where or when about a “study” or “documentation” that no one has ever seen or heard of since offered up as “proof” of something that “shows” blacks don’t commit huge amounts of rapes, murders, tortures, assaults and robberies against whites.

      I don’t blame you, you are doing what all black supremacists and Tim Wise types do which is despicable:  defending black crime.  I blame American Renaissance for allowing garbage like your post and several others above to be published and stand as if they are factual.   No wonder I see so many good commenters who have fled this site.

        

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_XIGUBTMBHJEL7CBK2J5YZA7BH4 Rocky Mountain

    I think there is a large body of documentation on the sexual practices vis-a-vis slave owners and their black female property.  You can choose not to believe it if you want, but its there.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/John-McNeal/100000151577164 John McNeal

      Whatever the truth is let it come out. BUt I have seen the documented figures regarding inetrmixture and its very clear the main part of miscegenation occured AFTER manumission. Bet on it!

      • Beloved Comrade

        Typical troll.  Blathering about “documented figures” that you’ve “seen” without producing any documentation of course.

        Put up or shut up — better yet, go over to Black Planet where facts don’t matter and they’ll hang on your every word.

    • The_Bobster

      You’ve tried spreading that manure around here before.

      Here’s my documentation. Now let’s see your “large body of documentation”.

      http://www.vdare.com/articles/strom-thurmond-really-was-exceptional

      Let’s try some back-of-an-envelope calculations.

      Shriver’s team has found DNA evidence that the influx of white genes was fairly constant over the centuries. From that, we can roughly estimate the fraction of African-American women’s babies who were fathered by white men (assuming all the admixture was from white man-black woman matings, which isn’t true, but it’s close enough).

      If miscegenation has been going on for, say, 300 years, that’s 12 generations. If African-Americans are 18 percent white, you can divide by 12 generations to get a 1.5 percent influx of white genes per generation.

      Multiply that by two to get the male contribution, and you come up with this estimate: on average, three percent of African-American women’s babies were fathered by white men—about one out of 33. This is a very rough estimate, but it’s probably in the ballpark.

      If the ratio of whites to blacks in the South was, say, three to one, and the birthrates and death rates of blacks and whites were similar, then only about one out of 100 babies fathered by white men were with African-American mothers.

      This estimate is very rough. But the real number probably isn’t more than, say, three times greater (or smaller).

      By no means did all white Southern men, or even most of them, participate in miscegenation. But, of course, there was a cumulative effect over the centuries.

      And because the African-American population was only a fraction of the white population, the impact on individual African-Americans was about three times greater. That is to say, relatively few white men were involved in miscegenation, but that was enough to make a difference to a fair number of African-American family histories. Which contributes to the two races’ different perspectives on the magnitude of the phenomenon.

    • mikejones91

      Does that make it right? Rape that happened hundreds of years ago? Two wrongs NEVER make a right, unless that second wrong is against a WHITE. I’m not denying the slave rape as I am SURE it happened often. But that DOES NOT justify anything!

    • Beloved Comrade

      Garbage.  Put up or shut up.  

      There is no such documentation and I defy you to prove it.

  • IstvanIN

    Freud said what?  Obviously a Jewish fantasy since I doubt that in the history of white pre-civilization (cave men days) men were in any significant numbers ever raping their own mothers

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/John-McNeal/100000151577164 John McNeal

    The slaveowners didnt have to rape the female slaves. Miscegenation was a taboo in the American slave states,as opposed to Latin America,where  it was the national sport. Those owners who wished for sexual relations with the female slaves had no trouble getting their way,as sex would confer many benefits and much status among the chosen. There was relatively LITTLE interracial mixture until AFTER slavery ended.  The great mixture that reulted in so many blacks here having some white blood occured among FREE blacks and whites,usually white men with black women. Many of these were marriages;most were voluntary. Many also were based on prostitution among the poverty-stricken black female. The strong desire for a lighter-skinned child was no doubt a factor. From what I have seen in the “black studies” literature,the life if a black female slave as a never ending struggle to fend off the master and remain loyal and true to her dear beloved black male. She would often give her life rather tha suffer the indignity of a white man’s desire. These books,no doubt,are written by black males!

    • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

       It is my understanding that the first real wave of  black-white miscegenation in American history came from well paid Union occupiers buying the services of recently freed black women in the postbellum South.  Well paid soldiers from rich countries engaging in prostitution with destitute natives in poor (or temporarily impoverished) areas is as inevitable as wetness in water.

    • Beloved Comrade

      Black Studies is a psudo- science a made-up fiction like Roots, grounded in fantasy and hate-whitey.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/John-McNeal/100000151577164 John McNeal

    Freud shouldve monitored his cocaine use more carefully. Apparently he was spinning out like Lindsay Lohan!! 

  • CSThinker

    I just stumbled upon this and thought I would share it with you as it fits quite squarely your opinions.  It’s about poor Americans living in the woods.

    A Year In Tent City.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g_6MLTU8QBI&feature=related 

    Ps : I don’t know if you accept links in your comments threads but this is really worth watching.
    Ps 2 : Around 9’20. Interesting.( I’m posting from France so I can’t elaborate on that )

    • IstvanIN

      So among all the poor white people struggling to survive in the forest a black group acts like they do in the ghetto: drinking, “dirty” dancing, and being disruptive and vile.  Even in homelessness whites can build civilization and maintain a certain level of dignity.  Blacks act like blacks, reminds me of films of the natives in Africa, except for the booze.

  • WhitesRdumb

    Freud was apparently a homosexual with breast envy. He envied woman but beleived woman envied him.

  • WhitesRdumb

    They are after the ghetto race lotery.

  • razorrare

    My reasonable conjecture would be the planter aristocracy and various merchants contributed most to the black/White mixed-race gradations….from the book They Were White & They Were Slaves by Michael A. Hoffman II….A 1679 colonial census of Whites who fled slavery to scratch out an existence as subsistence and tenant farmers shows that they had to flee to the worst land where they existed in extreme poverty,forming yeoman peasant communities in the hills.It is instructive to note that this White yeomanry was mocked and scorned by both the wealthy White planter elite as well as the negroes.Rich,White plantation owners joined with the negroes in insulting White slaves and poor White people,referring to them as “poor-White earthscratching scum,” “crackers,” “redshanks,” “redlegs”(forerunner of the “redneck” racial insult current nowadays), “Hill Billys” and “Scotland Johnnies.”….”The servants were regarded by the planters as ‘White trash”(eric Williams,Capitalism and Slavery,p.17)…White slaves were taunted in the West Indies by Blacks who would chant the diddy,”Yella hair,speckly face and dey feet brick red” at them.(The epithet “redshanks” developed into the name redlegs which has since become a term for all survivors and descendants of White slaves in the Caribbean region)…..Various merchants and aristocrats of the 18th and 19th centuries despised the independence of these survivors of White slavery when they encountered them in the British West Indies.Their chief hallmark of the redlegs has been their absolute refusal to interbreed with the negroes and their independant subsistence lifestyle of fishing and gardening.Here is a typical 19th century description of them by an aristocrat: “…that lowest of all beings,the “redshanks.” The latter were miserable and degraded White men who,priding themselves on their Caucasion origin,looked woith contempt upon the African race.”(Sheppard,p.3)…”A loyalist refugee from Georgia wrote in 1793: ‘The Southern colonies are overrun with a swarm of men from the western parts of Virginia and North Carolina,distinguished by the name of Crackers.Many of these people are descended from the convicts that were transported from Great Britain to Virginia at differant times,and inherit so much profligacy from their ancestors,that they are the most abandoned set of men on earth,few of them having the least sense of religion…During the King’s Government these Crackers were very troublesome in the settlements…they also occasioned frequent disputes with the indians…”(Anthony Stokes, A View of the Constitution of the British Colonies,quoted in Ekirch,p.193).In 1654 Henry Whistler called the White slaves of Barbados “rubbish,rogues and whores”(Journal of the West India Expedition).In England they had been referred to by Edmund Burke as a “swinish multitude,” by Samuel Johnson as “rabble” and by Sir Josiah Child as “loose,vagrant…vicious…people.”….While the public articulation of such negative epithets against black people as “n***er” is regarded as a sacriligious incitement to “hate crimes,” hateful terms of abuseof White people such as “redneck” and “cracker” are gleefully recited in newspapers and television today and express the contempt which a powerful segment of our society continues to feel toward White working and poor people……Michael A. Hoffman..They Were White and They Were Slaves..the Untold History of the Enslavement of Whites in Early America.

  • The_Bobster
  • razorrare

    Anyone know why South Africa is the Rape Capitol of the World?

  • razorrare

    Anyone know why South Africa is the Rape Capitol of the World?

  • razorrare

    Anyone know why South Africa is the Rape Capitol of the World?

  • razorrare

    Anyone know why South Africa is the Rape Capitol of the World?

  • The_Bobster

    They’re already cashing in.

    http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/thousands-marchers-hit-street-protest-trayvon-martin-death-article-1.1053875

    Makeshift vendors had set up stands and some were hawking T-shirts. “Where is the justice for Trayvon?” the front of one shirt read. On the back it read “Do the right thing.”

    Others wore shirts with the hood image of Martin that read “We are all Trayvon” or “Arrest Zimmerman – he’s a cold blooded murderer.”

    “I need to stand up for justice right now instead of waiting for something like this to happen to my son,” said Marlo Warren, from Sanford.

  • razorrare

    Anyone know why South Africa is the Rape Capitol of the World?

  • razorrare

    Anyone know why South Africa is the Rape Capitol of the World?

  • razorrare

    Anyone know why South Africa is the Rape Capitol of the World?

  • razorrare

    Anyone know why South Africa is the Rape Capitol of the World?

  • razorrare

    Anyone know why South Africa is the Rape Capitol of the World?

  • razorrare

    Anyone know why South Africa is the Rape Capitol of the World?

  • razorrare

    Anyone know why South Africa is the Rape Capitol of the World?

  • razorrare

    Anyone know why South Africa is the Rape Capitol of the World?

  • razorrare

    Anyone know why South Africa is the Rape Capitol of the World?

  • razorrare

    Anyone know why South Africa is the Rape Capitol of the World?

  • mikejones91

    Heres the thing with that. I am sure white  men raped PLENTY of black women during slavery. But why? Rape is about power/dominance/superiority. Not that it was at ALL justified but they were slaves, and sadly, these white men took advantage of that. What do those stats say about black on white resentment? How much they despise us? Specifically our precious women. Two wrongs NEVER make a right, unless that second wrong is against a WHITE. (Well, you white folk can’t be mad about black on white rape because of slavery).

    • ed

      You are very wrong with your assumptions.  Are you just trying to be provocative?   Power?  Superiority?  All I have to do is to be in the same room with a black or two for me to realize all the superiority I will ever need.

    • Beloved Comrade

      “I am sure white men raped PLENTY of black women during slavery.” 

      Hey genius, how do you know, you weren’t there.

      • mikejones91

        I am just saying man. I am not anti-white. If you read any of my other comments, you would see that. I am just saying that the chance of that being true is high. Maybe I was wrong to say “plenty” though. Who knows. All I know is rape stats paint a very dark picture. Black women were slaves, so they were raped. White women are raped EVERY DAY by disgusting black men. It shows how much they ACTUALLY resent us.

    • MikeofAges

       Here’s what I think really happened, based on limited information and a my perception of human nature. The first thing you have to know is that in the ante-bellum South, and after the Civil War as well, whites and blacks grew up together and knew each other very well. Children played and “hung out” together up to about the age twelve, after which the forces of society set them on their different courses in life.

      I have read only one contemporary (slave era) account of a white man of mature adult years who went prowling around the slave quarters obtaining his sexual gratification. White men who did this were regarded as freaks and this pattern of activity presumably was regarded as what we could call a “kink”, as least to judge by the tone of the account I read.

      Some of the encounters between white men and black women I am sure involved pressure. I doubt very many were violent rapes, but that does not mean they were not facultative rapes. Other relationships may have been what we would call affairs. Others, long-term mistress relationships. Yet other may have involved young people having the kind of spontaneous relationships we are familiar with today. I am sure there also were relationships between white women and black men. When these produced pregnancy and a “mixed” child, I can only think that it would be a major problem if brought to light. The woman could claim that she was “raped”, suffered a “spell”, or was drunk or whatever was considered a tolerable explanation.

      I doubt that white women very often admitted to voluntary relationships with black men. In the event of a pregnancy to term subsequent to a voluntary interracial relationship, the woman could name a specific black man as having assaulted her, either the man with whom she had a voluntary relationship or someone totally uninvolved. Or she could say that she could not identify who assaulted her. But I doubt that the birth of a mixed child to a white woman was ever even publicized at all if it could be avoided.

      If the woman was married, people (including the woman’s husband) could be told that the child was stillborn, and the baby then passed on to another plantation. Or an adopted white baby could be put in the actual  baby’s place, again without the husbands knowledge. If the woman was not married, an unwanted pregnancy would be concealed in any case, and the baby passed on for adoption regardless of it color.

  • Zorro

    Why do you think that they want total control over the Internet? They can turn it off whenever they want.

    Get a HAM Radio, because it may be your only source of News and Communication soon.

    • Bon, From the Land of Babble

      I would add — get one that works on a hand-crank in case the electrical grid goes down.  I have one in my earthquake survival kit.

      Bon

      • xxxtonygunsxxx

         get walkie talkies with a 3 mile range for 20 bucks in case they disrupt phone, cell phone, etc other radio frequencies

    • MikeofAges

      Note, you can get HAM radio equipment even if you do not have a license. In a grave emergency, you can just use it anyway. But don’t use it otherwise. You might get a visit in from the FCC or other federal law enforcement force. Wait, this is starting to sound like fun. LOL

      CB is a good option even though the range is limited. Communication is by voice, and message and information can be relayed over long distances. Wait, this is starting to sound like fun. LOL

      You always have the right to listen, but don’t transmit unless you have to. Would help to know a little amateur radio protocol though.

      And remember, much amateur radio communication is in Morse Code, not voice.

  • Impertinent

    So far in the past 50 years…this country has spent 50,000,000,000,000 ( trillion ) of whites tax money to “level” the playing ( killing ) field….end poverty, illiteracy, crime, “discrimination”, elevate education as a choice, AA, reverse discrimination, quota hiring, gerrymandering to what end?

    To pay homage to a ghetto dwelling punk and hoodies worn by every infantile black as the new cause celebre? To accept vigilantism? To accept “Street Justice”? Flash Mobs? More riots, more looting? We don’t need any hurricanes to see that blacks use any and every excuse to run wild and crazy.

    To see more Spike Lee’s, Danny Glovers, Oprahs and Fishburnes mock us and openly hate us…while we keep seeing their stinking movies and making them millionaires?To accept a drop out rate of 50% to 75% in some cities? To be held up for more money for “schools”… years after year to see absolutely nothing gained for it?

    To see an illegitimacy rate of 75% or more? To see unqualified, illiterates hired over more qualified whites in order to satisfy the laziness and the lust of blacks for more power / control over whites?

    WE…want JUSTICE! WE want the end of this charade foisted upon us by PC and liberal loons who just continue to feed the “Snivel Rights” thieves and the RIC…Race Industry Complex as acceptable.

    • ILOVEMYRACE

      But wait — it gets worse!

      The Civil war, fought largly b/c of slavery, killed 625,000 Americans and destroyed several trillions of Dollars (in today’s money) in property.

      What did 365,000 dead and 200,000 wounded Northern Soldiers get for their sacrifice?   What did several million mothers, fathers, widows, and fatherless children get for the loss of their loved ones?  What did America get in return?  Do today’s African-Americans appreciate this?  Have you ever been thanked by an African-American for the great sacrifice of your ancestors that resulted in their freedom?  

      NO.  African-Americans don’t give a da** that 365,000 White Americans died to end slavery, because all Whites are evil racists, ya know!

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ran-Kelvin/100000674993311 Ran Kelvin

        My favorite tag line is:  imagine that it is January 1861 and somehow we are able to show both the South and North, politicians of both sides, ordinary men and women of both sides of the Mason-Dixon what America in 2012 would look like.  Would anyone want to fight the Civil War?  Would all Americans agree with Lincoln that the white man and black man could never live together in the same civilization?  Would the black man, both free and slave, be sent immediately back to Africa and the Caribbean as Lincoln planned at the end of hostilities?  Frankly, the white American would be insane in either time to not realize that the black race will eventually destroy America.  Problem is, in the Civil War era it would have been easy to fix the problem whereas the solution now escapes the majority as if we have been struck dumb.

        • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

           Actually, I have read that since the Federal government was broke and the nation in a depression due to the cost and damage of the CW, Lincoln had to change his plan from shipping free slaves to Africa to forced integration.

          • Anon12

            We all have “read” so many different accounts about that dastardly CW and  I have come away with one conclusion.  It was done to deliberately kill and destroy mostly Southerners to take them over and our murder our WHITE men!  The icing on the cake was to kill WHITE northerners also. Kill two birds with one stone, so to speak. I can still see “them” laughing at our stupidity.

            Then to add insult to injury, they FREED  the blacks onto our women and children, while at the same time took away forever their White men  and decimating the White population in our country. No progeny from those hundreds of THOUSANDS of WHITE men!

          • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

             I look at the CW are a huge white tragedy.  I had relatives on both sides, myself.  I am a genealogically documented cousin of Anna Hill Carter who married “Lighthorse Harry” Lee, the parents of General Robert E. Lee.  I see the conflict caused principally by religious zealotry, on the North’s part.  But I also see it clearly that the South was way over it’s head picking a fight, as Rhett Butler pointed out in “Gone with the Wind.”  The cost of Southern delusion and and arrogance was and has always remained, high.   But they weren’t wrong on some issues, Jim Crow being one.

      • http://profile.yahoo.com/DFC73YYAKSHGIE32R4T3TFAEHI No

        ILOVEMYRACE . . . the Southern
        states may have seceded because of slavery . . . but the WAR wasn’t fought
        because of slavery.

        The actual shooting war began
        when the former United States refused to recognize the new Confederacy and
        invaded Confederate territory.

        South Carolina seceded in December
        1860. other states followed. Northern newspapers and politicians immediately
        demanded action against the “traitors.” US troops surrendered most
        installations in the south, but continued to occupy forts controlling southern
        ports in Pensacola and Charleston harbors. When the Confederacy sent a
        delegation to Washington to negotiate the handing over of the forts, Lincoln
        refused to see them. He then ordered the re-supply of Fort Sumter and Fort
        Pickens. The North managed to save Fort Pickens, but the Confederates seized
        Fort Sumter.

        The very next day after Sumter
        fell, Lincoln then called for 75,000 militia to enlist for three months to
        suppress the “rebellion.” In July, he pushed Union General McDowell
        to attack the Confederate troops gathering in northern Virginia and the first
        major battle occurred: First Bull Run.

        Therefore . . . The actual combat that we call
        “the Civil War” was clearly the response of a new country (the CSA)
        to the aggression of another.

        So . . . big question . . .
        would Skittle Boy have been shot if the North had allowed the Confederacy to
        exist?

        No. There probably would have
        been a Hispanic named George Zimmerman. The Confederacy would very likely have
        either conquered or aligned themselves with the Caribbean and Central and South
        America. Florida would probably have become heavily Hispanic.

        But there probably would not
        have been a black teenager wandering around a mostly white housing area. The
        Confederacy would probably have ended slavery around the 1880s. Spain finally
        ended slavery in Cuba in 1886 – the last place in the hemisphere to abolish it.
        I think the CSA would have used the same basic timeline.

        But the CSA would very likely
        have booted out all blacks (probably to Mexico and Central America) or at the
        very least segregated them to a “black reservation’ far away from whites
        (probably in the southwest).

  • razorrare

    and payment of blood money to the victims of an alleged shooting of civilians in the Afghan war zone……was not privy to that….will Afghans reciprocate? Perhaps they could sell a few kilos of herion and give the proceeds to the victims who were maimed and killed by the Ft. Hood Shooter….wonder if the familys of the u.s. soldiers that were killed by the Afghan colonel will receive any like payments as well….and yes,i would like to see the hundreds of thousands of White victims familys who have been raped & murdered by blacks since they got their “civil rights” be compensated as well….but as i hear it…Obama wont even consider to take a couple minutes of his time to write a condolence letter to the parents of the Two British tourists who was killed by a 16 yr old black who could also be obama’s son.But what do you expect from a kenyan who denies his better half.

  • Bon, From the Land of Babble

    This was written by Luke:

    This, coming from the same woman who, during an appearance on The Political Cesspool radio show insisted on trying to convince Bill Rollins and Keith Alexander that any attempts to reach out to, and appeal to, our fellow Whites based on racial solidarity grounds – was a fool’s errand?

    And, that Whites needed to continue to cling to the curse of ‘individualism’ and never think, act, or behave ‘Tribally’?

    And, ignore the very real fact that every single one of our racial and ethnic ‘competitors’ think, act, vote and behave collectively and as a result of using those tactics – are kicking Whitey up and down the playing field?

    Also, she promoted and demanded the end of apartheid in SA, marched in anti-apatreid protests IN South Africa, cheered the handover of the government to black communists.

    And then immediately departed South Africa for a safer White-run country.

    She’s a hypocrite.

    Bon

  • Beloved Comrade

    Exactly.  As I stated above, crime rates FELL during The Great Depression.

    Here’s an article by James Q. Wilson, who studied police records  during the Great Depression when unemployment hit 25% and found that crime rates in many places fell: 

     http://www.city-journal.org/2011/21_3_crime-decline.html

    The Heritage Foundation:  Crime rates fell about one third between 1934 and 1938 while the nation was struggling to emerge from the Great Depression and weathering another severe economic downturn in 1937 and 1938. Surely, if the economic theory held, crime should have been soaring.   http://www.heritage.org/research/commentary/2000/11/crime-and-economy-what-connection

  • Bon, From the Land of Babble

    Imagine if there were no internet or no alternative news outlets. What if CNN was your only source of information?

    There were many wretched laws passed before the Internet gave us an alternative source of news (and long may it live!! although don’t count on it).  For example the 1965 Immigration of non-Whites Flood Bill, all the information at the time was via CNN-type of outlets touting the all the  wonderful things that would come about from this bill.

    We now know it was ALL a pack of lies, lies LIES!!  Amazing how many mainstream comment boards I’m seeing lately that appear to mirror this one — knowledge of black crime rates, low black IQ, the”other side” of the story and real photos of Sir Skittles — before they’re disappeared, of course.

    The Internet has been a life saver for us and it’s no wonder the government wants to get its greedy hands on it to censor and control the flow of information.  

    Bon

  • refocus

    Yea but that presupposes the white is interested in the subject.  Most want to go fishing.

  • squarebab

    Forgive me if someone has made this analogy before. As the media lynching of George Zimmerman rages on, it occurred to me that the liberal-left accepts black on white violence as a sort of penance for past racial injustices. This blind acceptance of their fate reminds me of the attitudes of the Eloi towards the Morlocks in H.G.Wells, “The Time Machine”.

    • robinbishop34

      You got it. White victims are just collateral damage to the jewish left.

    • Anon12

       I want all Amren posters to remember one thing.  When mentioning the liberal left etc.(which they are) as being the enemy, just take a look at ALL the neocon’s and their mouth pieces who are doing the same thing.  They are the cowards and traitors in the worst degree.  We all know the liberals are insane and hate Whitey but the conservatives are no better. In fact they are worse.

      Just look at how they NEVER bring up the outrageous amount of black on white crimes. Just look at how they are trying to cover their own behinds, since they were on the hate Zimmerman bandwagon also, calling him “white”, with the shootings in Chicago which was black on black.  They just love to mention black on black crimes thereby, making it look like they are truly concerned and NOT racists because they want to “help” the black community to stop the violence against their own kind. NEVER utter a word about telling the black community to stop their violence against US, thereby leading the White conservative listeners, to think that it is mostly black on black crime that is the real problem. 

      The majority of Whites do listen to and watch “conservative” news programs. So they are being lied to on a daily basis concerning the attacks against Whites by nonwhites.

  • SLCain

     While I can’t speak for QD, presumably he means that in 2000, Pat Buchanan wanted a black woman to be Vice-President – Ezola Foster, his running-mate in the 2000 election:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ezola_Foster

  • anarchyst

    Young “master trayvon” was armed by being younger and in considerably better physical condition giving him the advantage.  His impulsiveness did him in . . .
    I was in a similar situation (that did not result in an armed confrontation) when asking an suspicious black individual what business he had in MY neighborhood.  He muttered a somewhat unintelligible response which I let go . . . returning to my vehicle, he then confronted me by more utterances and attempting to take a swing at me. . . he did not expect my response. 
     When I got him on the ground (I had the “upper hand”) he crumbled and said that “he was just joking”.  .  . 
    When in a confrontation with blacks,  you must be aware that they very rarely confront others one-on-one. . . they have the “pack mentality” . . . “Young “master trayvon” picked the wrong “target” and lost . . .

  • Harumphty_Dumpty

    “level the playing field”

    That phrase should be understood in the sense,

    “raze the playing field”

  • libertarian4339

     
     
    I just might mention for clarification that the tweet/facebook data in the above link http://tinyurl.com/72x9q6o has not been authenticated, but appears to be valid, as you will note from reading the comments by the blog owner below the tweets/facebook postings.

    The tweets/facebook postings first appeared on The Daily Caller, showing three of Martin’s accounts:

    Trayvonn Slimm Martin
    T 33ZY TAUGHT M3
    No limit nigga

    It is the first and oldest tweet/facebook postings that were made several days prior to the shooting and indicate that Martin knew Zimmerman was the neighborhod watchman in advance of the day of shooting and planned to “f… with him.”

    The first, most damaging tweets are gone, but the blog owner….americaswarchick…dowloaded them from the Daily Caller before they were deleted.

    The police surely have the black perp’s cell phone and his computer, and also the cell phones of his contacts, so all this will come out during the investigation.

    It’s my belief, however, that much needs to be revealesd right now, because there are still a bunch of silly whites who think Zimmerman hunted down the black perp and shot him.

    Now they’re even coming out and saying that the voice screaming for help is Martin and not Zimmerman, in spite of the fact that witnesses verify that Zimmerman was getting beat in the face and his head slammed against the concrete.

    This case is very much like the Jena incident where Sharpton was screaming in defense of a black criminal, that he was the object of racism after he and five others stomped an innocent kid on school grounds and would have killed him had not a teacher stopped them
     
     
     

    • xxxtonygunsxxx

       blacks are scared. the naacp very quickly distanced itself from sharptons call to escalate civil unrest. too bad.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_YHD2U3NARCKEWPCYQXUHYIFUJU j j

    “Trayvon Martin gave his life for this cause…”

    OMFG…do you people run this crap through the bullshit filter before saying it out loud?

    Martin “gave his life” for nothing more than a FAILED opportunity to punk out a mezito. Maybe open carry would be the next logical step to keep you apes in line.

    The rest of you had better take fair warning, the next lumpy little guy you step up to and ask “you gotta f$&#ing problem?”, might answer you with a smoking hole in your chest or face.

  • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

     Zimmerman will never be able to get a fair trial.  There never will be a jury selected because no one will qualify.  Any trial will result in a mistrial.  The people who are demanding “justice” have rendered it useless in this case, and that seems like justice to me.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/DFC73YYAKSHGIE32R4T3TFAEHI No

    In response to ILOVEMYRACE and on a broader perspective . . . we need to blame Lincoln for what happened to Skittle Boy.  Here’s my reasoning. 

    Let’s start by considering the comment that the Civil War began because of slavery.

    The Southern states may have seceded because of slavery . . . but the WAR wasn’t fought because of slavery.  The actual shooting war began when the former United States refused to recognize the new Confederacy and invaded Confederate territory.
     
    South Carolina seceded in December 1860.  Other states followed. Northern newspapers and politicians immediately demanded action against the “traitors.” US troops surrendered most installations in the south, but continued to occupy forts controlling southern ports in Pensacola and Charleston harbors. When the Confederacy sent a delegation to Washington to negotiate the handing over of the forts, Lincoln refused to see them. He then ordered the re-supply of Fort Sumter and Fort Pickens. The North managed to save Fort Pickens, but the Confederates seized Fort Sumter.

    The very next day after Sumter fell, Lincoln then called for 75,000 militia to enlist for three months to suppress the “rebellion.” The CSA responded by calling up its volunteers.  In July, Lincoln pushed Union General McDowell to attack the Confederate troops gathering in northern Virginia and the first major battle occurred: First Bull Run. 

    Therefore . . . The actual combat that we call “the Civil War” was in every case instigated by the North and clearly the response of a new country (the CSA) to the aggression of another.
     
    So . . . big question . . . would Skittle Boy have been shot if the North had allowed the Confederacy to exist? 

    No.

    There probably would have been a Hispanic named George Zimmerman living in Florida and he may have been doing neighborhood watch.   The Confederacy would very likely have either conquered or aligned themselves with the Caribbean and Central and South America. Florida would probably have still become heavily Hispanic.  There could have been a high crime area near Sanford, Florida.
     
    But there probably would not have been a black teenager wandering around a mostly white housing area. The Confederacy would probably have ended slavery around the 1880s.  (Spain finally ended slavery in Cuba in 1886 – the last place in the hemisphere to abolish it. I think the CSA would have followed the same basic timeline.)

    But the CSA would very likely have booted out all blacks (probably to Mexico and Central America) or at the very least segregated them to a “black reservation” far away from whites (probably in the southwest).

    So if any white is to blame for what happened to Trayvon . . . blame Lincoln.

    • Transgressing Diversity is Hot

      Trayvon was killed in Florida because the Abolitionist-Emancipation-Affirmative Action Axis of Love up North didn’t do enough to make him feel welcome in their protected homes, gated communities, lily White country clubs, daughter’s private schools, and daughter’s dorm rooms, so he was stuck down in “gun culture Dixie,” where the “white” side of a Hispanic couldn’t contain the  racist pathology when given a chance to shoot down a beloved Diversity, a/k/a “a vibrant and enriching Son of Obama”.That’s what got Trayvon “made good,” as IrateIrishman would say, and only that.

  • Unlimited Whiteness

    Trayvon’s baby momma done be on de TV right now. Says info. is leaking out, so she expects GZ to be arrested soon.

    Lies. She’s just using the old MSM trick called “projecting momentum”. Political pundits do it all the time.

    Basically, you just say what you want to happen as though it really is happening, as though it’s the only right thing that could happen, and say it with Moral Authority because you “care for people” or “represent those who suffer injustice”.

    Then, if the thing you said was happening or was supposed to happen doesn’t happen, you can then play the “outrage card” and demand immediate action by making threats of calling “all dems Whiteys deys be raciss up ‘en heeah.”

    It’s all a formula, a scam, a shakedown.  Thanks to the Internet, Whites are catching on, and we are fed up. (That’s why the free speech on the Internet is doomed- we just can have afford such an accessible platform for hate where Whiteys might see read something that wakes them up.)

    Diversity is a vile hate crime against God’s kingdom plan for our White privilege and violates White Humanity’s ordained destiny. Anti-Racist is codeword for Anti-White.
    Read more here: http://www.macon.com/2012/04/02/1971908/suspect-in-macon-killing-identified.html#storylink=rss#wgt=rss#storylink=cpy

  • Transgressing Diversity is Hot

    You’re not a racist yet?  Dang, you need to watch more TV.”Before I started working here, I wasn’t a racist. Now I now what they mean by, ‘Under the circumstances, racism really is the best option.’ ”

    If you aren’t a racist, you just haven’t heard the news yet.Asia for Asians. Arabia for Arabians. Africa for Africans. White Countries for Everybody!

  • MikeofAges

    I am not sure what part of my thesis you are disuputing. I think it is the part about white women voluntarily having contact with black men. Obviously, this did not happen very often, but it must have occurred. How society dealt with it I imagine in actuality varied. Obviously, this would have been extremely risky for a black man, but a white family might not want to suffer the publicity associated with making the fact of such an encounter public. It could affect the marriagability and social acceptance of all family members.

    When it comes to sexual hookups, just about anything you can imagine will happen eventually. In addition to the acknowledged issue of white male-black female relations, there had to be at least a few white female-black male enocunters. Not to mention same sex relationships, both intraracial and interracial. The fact that I gave equal “ink” to each of the possibilities does not mean that I think they occurred equally. They did not, I am sure. But I do know that human nature does not change.

    Try to read a little more carefully. What I was disputing, primarily, was the idea that there was any widespread occurrance of forcible or violent rape of black women by white men during the slavery era. I do not believe there was. A white outsider who came into a farm or plantation and raped ome of the planter’s female slaves I don’t think would have been looked upon kindly.

  • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

     I agree if your God is Odin, a God for whites and whites only!

  • Formerly_Known_as_Whiteplight

     As in posts above, it appears that Anon12 and I agree that the tragic with bloodbath and the historical problems that resulted from the CW was enough, or even way too much already for the “sin” of slavery against the Negro.

  • Bon, From the Land of Babble

    Please stop using the defeatist phrase “I’m not a racist, but…”

    If you are discerning of young black males you ARE a racist, which is normal, natural and may save your life.

    Bon

  • Bon, From the Land of Babble

    Yeah, I found that out AFTER I bought the book!! The part I wrote in my comment about her demanding, agitating and marching for “change” in bad old, racist apartheid SA came from the introduction to the book.

    The book and she are the very definitions of hypocrisy.

    I believe she should be deported straight back to the SA she championed so hard to come to fruition, the SA she dreamed for and fought for, and lose her refugee status — permanently– like Brandon Huntley did recently in Canada.

    Bon

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/DFC73YYAKSHGIE32R4T3TFAEHI No

    Well, I see three ways to look at it.

    1)  PSYCHOLOGICALLY:  I’m willing to accept that he was a brilliant man . . . though a very disturbed one.  I believe he would have been classified as “clinically depressed” and hospitalized at several points throughout his life.  Couple depression with brilliance and it makes for an interesting combination.  Bottom line, he was a broken man regardless of what he was.

    2)  SOCIAL CLASS:  Lincoln was pretty much at the economic level of the Negro throughout most of his life and my experience has been that poor whites hate blacks more than rich ones.  I don’t think Lincoln identified with the Negro so much as he saw himself as the antagonist of upper-class society . . . especially the genteel Southern society of the mid-19th century.  In other words, he wanted to end slavery not because he gave a hoot about blacks . . . but because it would hurt rich whites.   

    3)  RACIALLY:  It’s pretty certain that his mother was a Melungeon.  I’ve read various definitions of that term and to me a “melungeon” is someone who is either mulatto or mestizo.  So who knows what amount he was . . . but by the One Drop Rule?  You nailed it.  Lincoln was probably mixed race.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_BHHLO2L4M3G5ZH3KJTDR6DPESA tanstaafl14

     Please do not be scared of black punks. Fear leads to paralysis. Even worse, any predator — whether it walks on four legs or two — will recognize fear and exploit it.

    I’ve learned to put blacks in the same category as rattlesnakes, scorpions and the like — inherently dangerous creatures to be avoided whenever possible. If they can’t be avoided, stay on red alert around them and be prepared to kill them if necessary. That isn’t hate or fear — it’s simply reality coupled with the survival instinct.

    If you live in a “shall issue” state, I strongly urge you to get a concealed-carry permit. Then get a gun and learn how to use it. I’m about your age, and four years ago I never even considered owning a gun. Now I own two. I also keep a small canister of pepper spray on my key chain for times when I can’t carry a gun. If I could make the transition in so short a time, anyone can. Good luck.

  • MikeofAges

    Trayvon Martin was a juvenile delinquent. Not really different from the James Dean youth of the 1950s or the troublemakers of the Studs Lonigan era. These types have a serious self-destructive streak and they always find a way to express it one way or the other. If Trayvon had succeeded in what he was trying to do, he might be on his way to an adult murder charge and a life sentence. That Martin was able to wrap himself in racial grievances does change what he was — a rebel without a cause. The type is well known. Usually lower middle class, a pompous but ultimately ineffectual father. Plenty of homies around, including older malignant role models, to mold them into dangerous losers. Nothing new under the sun. Not the American sun anyway.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Michael-Samuel/100003249520680 Michael Samuel

    It is incontestable and deplorable that Negroes have committed crimes; but they are derivative crimes. They are born of the greater crimes of the white society.
    Martin Luther King, Jr.
    “Like an unchecked cancer, hate corrodes the personality and eats away its vital unity. Hate destroys a man’s sense of values and his objectivity. It causes him to describe the beautiful as ugly and the ugly as beautiful, and to confuse the true with the false and the false with the true.” ― Martin Luther King Jr. 

    “I mourn the loss of thousands of precious lives, but I will not rejoice in the death of one, not even the enemy” ― Martin Luther King Jr. 

  • MikeofAges

     Another advantage of CB is that many units can be run on 12 volts. In a serious emergency, you can always generate 12 volts using an automotive generator or alternator run off a stationary bicycle. That can charge a 12 volt battery. Deep cycle is best.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Francis-Miville/1330628616 Francis Miville

    The reason why there are so many black on white and so few white on black rapes comes from the very nature of rape.  The very pleasure of raping is intensified as the skin’s victim is clearer, ideally milk-white, no matter the rapist’s colour, for as per Jungian symbolism  virginity is white or golden and hyper-sexuality black or red.  This is hard-wired throughout all humanity and may be much beyond our species.  Any film-maker wanting to sell out rape scenes would have a hard time selling a negress’s being forced.  An horror film about black women would rather show the negress as a kind of tempting black hole, as a kind of witch one would rather flee at all costs, or explore as a speleologist with utmost care.  When the French whites were governing the Island that was to become Haiti, they shunned all black flesh and resorted to white prostitutes or slave-girls imported from Paris or taken from enemy vessels.  The mulatto class that was to govern the black population of Haiti after the Whites were chased or killed was a Black man on White woman mixture rather than the reverse, the reason being that those white girls had sexual fantasies of being forced by not too intelligent animals.  The only way to restore White supremacy is not to attack Blacks, but sex, as did the old-time Aryan religions.  The cult of sexuality is by essence pro-Black as per the hard-wired symbolism in mankind.

  • http://www.facebook.com/dawn.goodman.73 Dawn Goodman

    I moved to NC from the North while living here I acquired a college degree as a victim of age discrimination I have been forced to take employment with people with less education. On one of these jobs I met a group of Southern Blacks in who despise Northern Blacks moving South. They say I am a criminal here to sleep with everyone’s husband and to deprive a more deserving Southerner of money by accepting employment.
    Although I left that job one of them has made an effort to track me down. He has vandalized my vehicle, tried to poison my dogs, spread nasty rumors about me on a new job to humiliate me, and has tried to use identity theft to destroy my credit. It is obvious to me that this man is pathologically jealous of my economic progress and simply wants to isolate, rob me, and frighten me out of the state with nothing. I have no witnesses and I cannot take legal action.