Posted on October 10, 2023

Polish Daily Newspaper Rzeczpospolita in the Service of Chaos After Soros Takeover

Rafał A. Ziemkiewicz,, October 3, 2023

The acquisition by Pluralis B.V. of full control over Rzeczpospolita, still one of Poland’s most influential newspapers, just a month and a half before the parliamentary elections could not have been seen as a pure business transaction even if that company had been a normal profit-oriented business operating in the interests of shareholders. And that is not what it is. Pluralis B.V., formally a Netherlands-based investment fund, is owned by George Soros, and is one of the tools with which he has carried on political activity for many decades, consistently supporting what Douglas Murray called in his recent book the “War on the West”: the destruction of the values and principles on which European civilization was built, in the name of ever more extreme demands of the progressivists, referred to collectively in recent years as “woke.”

So if Soros is taking over another Polish media outlet (he already has a large stake in Agora, which owns Gazeta Wyborcza and TOK FM, and in the company Eurozet, which controls Radio Zet – in this case he also has a separate shareholding as SFS Ventures, and according to stock exchange analysts commenting on the transaction he was the initiator and essential backer of the station’s takeover), then it is certainly not because he has noticed an opportunity to increase his profits.


George Soros has ambitions as far-sighted as the “global reset” and “new world order” projects put forward at discussions and lectures in Davos. {snip}

Of course, Soros’ activities over the years never had anything to do with “philanthropy,” as left-liberal propaganda constantly foists on the minds of its victims. Philanthropy means funding nurseries, care homes, or meal centers for the homeless, and not media, street fights, or ideological centers for training political activists and ordinary participants in the socialist “long march through the institutions.” Were this not the case, the greatest philanthropist of modern times would have to be the Soviet KGB, which during the Cold War spent billions to fund “peace movements”, “environmentalists” and terrorists in capitalist states. Persistently calling Soros a “billionaire philanthropist” serves to misrepresent the true nature of his activities, although the use of that term makes it easy to identify the media having some kind of link with the wide network of foundations, funds, firms and organizations that make up the global “open society” web.

It is possible to uncover and observe that web and to point out the mutual links and financial streams – many books have already been written showing how the Lenin of Finance operates in America, although those authors have presumably not been able to discover everything. The world of finance and links between corporations is increasingly opaque even to journalists specializing in the field, and this is the case even when corporations forgo such refined means of concealment as the Scottish “limited partnership” or Swiss “bearer share” companies (interested readers will find much telling information on these matters in Bullough’s Money Land and Butler to the World and in The World for Sale by Blas and Farchy). However, we are told something about the influence of Soros’ money on the West today by the genuine panic with which the Western European left reacted to the declaration by Soros Junior that he would be redirecting funding from the EU to countries further east.

Harder still than teasing out the threads of the spider’s web that Soros has been weaving for decades, hidden under obscure firms, special-purpose companies and other corporate covers, is discovering what the idea of an “open society” really is. This is a paradox not readily admitted by Soros’ supporters and devotees. All of this huge organizational effort and uncountable sums of money serve to promote something, but it is not clear exactly what. Soros’ money has turned up in the hands of feminists, as well as their bitterest enemies today, trans campaigners. He funds violent actions like the burning of American cities by antifa and BLM groups, as well as peace movements preaching a philosophy of non-violence. He gives money for LGBTQIA+, for “saving the planet”, for antiglobalism, for fighting nuclear energy, for “gender”, “depopulation”, aggressive veganism and all other types of “woke” activity. However, like the Lenins and Maos of the past, he has not presented any positive vision of how this “magnificent new world” would be organized.

It is no accident that I borrow the above quote from Valeurs Actuelles – incidentally from a story published in February 2020 that revealed the links of numerous CJEU and ECHR judges to Soros’ web, which should have left the European Union in shock, but in fact had no practical consequences, just like other pieces of evidence of huge corruption within community bodies. In fact, “making a mess of the world,” as the French weekly described it, is the only common denominator of Soros’ progressive actions. His money appears wherever something is being destroyed: the law, public order, or the values on which civilization and culture are based, just as fundamental as the division between yin and yang, between the male and female elements. What is gained by this destruction, which is carried out, like all revolutions, under the pretense of “defending” or “liberating”? Neither Open Society nor any of Soros’ activist cells has attempted to explain this in any official documents. To find out anything on this subject, we need to refer to the output of the Davos globalists, headed by Klaus Schwab and his ideologist Yuval Harari.


The holy scriptures tell us to judge people “by their fruit.” And the fruit of the revolution promoted by Soros and many other similar but less well-known sponsors is the complete pacification of the threats that the world oligarchy and big corporations might face from antiglobalist movements and other social rebellions. No longer does anyone want to impose a “Tobin tax” on the oligarchs or to “occupy” Wall Street. The rights of women have been trolled and invalidated by the rights of trans people, zealously tracking and destroying the “terfism” of the old feminism. Care for the natural environment has been drowned out by the climate hysteria that lets the rich grow richer at an unprecedented rate, safe from any complaints that they are destroying whole countries, societies and continents while plundering the resources needed for “environmentally friendly” technologies.


This is something unprecedented in world history – conquest and the imposition of a totalitarian ideology not through violence, but by way of “hostile takeover” and the exploitation of financial advantage. Soros here is of course only a symbol, the best known of these operators, but the scale of his activity, of which the takeover of Polish media and their drafting into the orchestra of world revolution is only a tiny fraction, will assure him of a place in future history textbooks. And it will not be a place among the philanthropists, or indeed any people deserving of respect.