Senator Calls for ‘Final Solution’ to Australia’s ‘Immigration Problem’ in Controversial Maiden Speech
The Guardian (Australia), August 14, 2018
An Australian cross-bench senator has invoked the term “the final solution” in an inflammatory speech calling for a plebiscite asking voters whether they want to end all immigration by Muslims and non-English-speaking people “from the third world”.
Fraser Anning, formerly of the far-right Pauline Hanson One Nation party, and now a member of the Katter’s Australia party, used his maiden speech in the Senate to call for “a plebiscite to allow the Australian people to decide whether they want wholesale non-English-speaking immigrants from the third world, and particularly whether they want any Muslims”.
He also invoked the white Australia policy, suggesting Australians may want “to return to the predominately European immigration policy of the pre-Whitlam consensus”. The white Australia policy, which restricted non-European immigration, ran from 1901 until it began to be dismantled in the late 1960s.
He said neither the former Labor prime minister Gough Whitlam, nor any subsequent government, had asked Australians what kind of immigration they wanted.
“What we do need a plebiscite for is to decide who comes here.”
Anning declared on Tuesday the reasons: “for ending all further Muslim immigration are both compelling and self-evident”.
“The record of Muslims who have already come to this country in terms of rates of crime, welfare dependency and terrorism are the worst of any migrant and vastly exceed another immigrant group,” he said.
“The majority of Muslims in Australia of working age do not work and exist on welfare. Muslims in New South Wales and Victoria are three times more likely than other groups to be convicted of crimes.”
“We have black African Muslim gangs terrorising Melbourne, we have ISIS-sympathising Muslims trying to go overseas to try and fight for Isis and while all Muslims are not terrorists, certainly all terrorists these days are Muslims.
“So why would anyone want to bring more of them here?”
Anning contended Australia should return to a position where immigrants were not entitled to receive welfare payments for the first five years after their arrival.
“In the days of Menzies, immigrants arriving here were not allowed to apply for welfare and that attracted exactly the right sort of hardworking people this country needed”.
“We should go back to that and ban all immigrants from receiving welfare for the first five years after they arrive,” he said.
The senator then invoked the term “final solution” in calling for his preferred plebiscite on the “immigration problem”.
“The final solution to the immigration problem, of course, is a popular vote.”
Labor’s Senate leader, Penny Wong, blasted the contribution soon after delivery on Tuesday evening.
“My parents were married in the dying days of the white Australia policy,” she said.
“We’ve rightly consigned that policy to the dustbin of history.”
With condemnation of the contribution escalating, Anning issued a statement after the speech arguing that criticism of his use of the term final solution was “an effort by the left to shut down debate”.
“Claims that the words meant anything other than the “ultimate solution” to any political question is always a popular vote are simply ridiculous,” Anning said.
“Anyone who actually reads them in context will realise this”.
“Some in the media and left wing politicians are simply afraid of the Australian people having a say on who comes here”.
“As I called for a plebiscite on the immigration mix, this baseless and ridiculous criticism is simply an effort to play the man and not the ball”.
“It is ironic that those on the left such as the Greens and some Labor who seek to criticise me are the same people who refused to support my efforts to stop Australia funding the Palestinian Authority who finance terrorist attacks against innocent Israeli women and children”.
Australia’s outgoing race discrimination commissioner, Tim Soutphommasane, has recently declared that “race politics is back” in Australia.
He criticised various Turnbull government ministers for their rhetoric on African gangs and ethnic separatism in a fiery final speech before departing his post at the Australian Human Rights Commission.
Soutphommasane said when he took the job as race discrimination commissioner five years ago he “wouldn’t have expected that the biggest threats to racial harmony would come from within our parliaments and from sections of our media”.
“Yet here we are,” he said.
“This is dangerous territory.
“When politicians resort to using race in advancing their agendas, they inevitably excite racial anxiety and stir up social division.
“They end up damaging our racial tolerance and multicultural harmony.”