What If Illegal Aliens Were All White People?

Pedro Gonzalez, American Thinker, February 19, 2015

What if illegal aliens were all white people, from Europe? And what if George W. Bush were still president, and wanted to give them all amnesty? How do you think Democrats and the media would react?

“Bush is giving these illegals white privilege by moving them to the head of the line in front of legal immigrants with brown and black skin,” Chris Matthews would declare.

“These people come to our country and take jobs away from hardworking citizens, especially minorities who are most heavily hit by this,” so Nancy Pelosi would speak.

“The President is acting unconstitutionally and is risking impeachment by his actions, just like President Reagan did when he armed the Contras in Nicaragua,” this from Harry Reid. “We need to hold televised hearings, a lot of them, to find out exactly what happened and determine if impeachment is appropriate.”

The media would pound away day after day with the fact that Bush is favoring foreign white people over minorities, and that Bush is acting without authority to do so and is driving this country into a constitutional crisis. And how would Republicans act to defend him?

“I think this is something that has to be looked into,” John McCain would say. “We can’t be seen to be favoring one group over another.”

“I think the President can’t act on this without Congress’s approval,” John Boehner would echo. “We’re going to put a rider into the next budget that will prevent this without explicit congressional approval.”

Now, return to reality. We have a situation where the vast majority of illegal aliens are from Latin America, and what is everyone’s reaction?

The media is silent on the extraconstitutionality of the president’s actions, while acting as a cheerleader for amnesty.

The Democrats are marching lockstep behind President Obama, refusing to vote for a homeland security bill that doesn’t permit his illegal amnesty. Not one Democrat has turned against him, either on the amnesty issue, or the issue of his violating the Constitution by granting amnesty without authority.

And Republicans have held no hearings, are afraid to call the president out for violating the Constitution, and afraid of defunding the amnesty for fear of being accused of “shutting the government down.”

Do you see how easy it is to favor one ethnic group over another when the favored group has a political party behind it who won’t back down, and the other political party will never stand up? It’s just like in Animal Farm, all the animals are equal, but some are more equal than others. We will never have true racial equality in this country as long as one party insists on favoritism and the other party is afraid to stand on principle.

Topics:

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • TomIron361

    What If Illegal Aliens Were All White People?
    _________________________________
    Then I would be all for illegal immigration

    • Sha of Communism

      I have looked into this issue more closely and I think we at AmRen maybe too pessimistic about our ability to deal with Third World immigration.

      Third World immigration is a recent matter. From the dawn of Industrial Revolution to World War II, the working class in the West didn’t live so much better than those in the Third World countries, and large scale immigration was rare and immigrants were a trace amount for any population.

      That was how our governments were not geared to effectively manage immigration. It wasn’t a big problem like today.

      Then you take into the account that governments are inherently numb and slow to respond to new situations. After World War II, the economy of the West took off, and living standards have been at an unprecedented high level. Now a massive chunk of the Third World people want to move here.

      Is it a disaster to the West? Yes. Are Westerners slow to realize it? Yes.

      However, if you recall that it was only 60 years ago when almost every immigrant without a communicative disease can get a paper at Ellis Island, and today, 60 years from that, we already have a sort-of functioning, half-assed immigration system, at least, to keep the very, very bad ones out, then this is some admirable progress, eh?

      • DonReynolds

        The problem of coolie labor is much older than you seem to suspect. After the civil war, there were extraordinary measures takes to restrict non-white immigration to the USA….most particular, the influx of Chinese and other asian coolie labor…..some of whom were used to build the railroads. But the influx in those days was rigorously limited, in particular, they were not allowed to bring their women.

        The whole war on drugs began in this country when the Chinese coolies brought opium, which was used to seduce white women for so many unattached Chinese men. It was (is?) a serious problem with no clear answer. The USA elite wanted cheap coolie labor but they did not want them to stay and raise families, so they could not bring their women. It was completely unacceptable that the Chinese coolie men would help themselves to white women (who were in short supply anyway), but there was no easy solution other than to occasionally ban Chinese from entering the USA and loosen up on the ban on asian females.

        • Sick of it

          There was an easy solution – Shoot them if they don’t leave. We used to do the same to other whites in America, so why did we play nice with foreign races? The answer is obvious when you think about it.

          • DonReynolds

            You are correct. Shooting Chinese used to be a popular sport in this country, particularly among the rednecks and cowboy types. (That is why there are no old Chinese settlements in these areas.)

            The City of Houston still has a city ordinance against shooting Chinamen from the trolley cars. Not long after getting trolley cars in Houston, they had a problem of cowboys riding the trolley and shooting the Chinese they saw as it moved through town. After the ordinance, the cowboys were required to get off the trolley in order to shoot at Chinamen.

          • Anglokraut

            Perhaps it is insensitive to laugh, but I don’t care–that last line is gold!

          • awb

            Hard to shoot from a moving platform. he he he.

          • Nancy

            What IS it with those blasted trolley cars? None of my NJ-Italian uncles has all ten of his fingers. They all say it’s because “they got in an accident with a trolley”.

            At least, that’s their official story…

      • connorhus

        Some on here agree with me, some don’t and I can see both sides but the truth is this illegal immigration problem is a Man (Liberal) Made problem and totally reliant on rabid civil rights courts losing their minds and giving immigrants special privileges and Debt based government Welfare spending. Remove either one or both of those and the immigration problem will go away. These immigrants are not made up of the right DNA to live comfortably and prosper in a temperate climate such as North America and they would be unable to afford the luxuries that allow them to stay now if it wasn’t for the welfare. Economics will force a reverse before too long. Not saying it isn’t going to manifest itself in bloodshed and misery before it’s all over but the tide will ebb and flow backwards and I am betting it will begin within the next 5 years.

        • Raymond Kidwell

          No I envy Mexican’s ability to live cheaply. They stack five or ten families into a two bedroom house. This may bother the landlord and neighbors, but not them. Then they share a single van or something. They can maintain a pretty high quality of life just on low wage jobs because they spend practically nothing. Most of them save their money and send it back home. They also really enjoy life and nearly every day is sort of like a party with music and playing chess, drinking etc.

          If white people could work together more like hispanics or Asians they would be more successful. But I really couldn’t stand the over crowding myself. That’s where I would draw the line, along with the loud noise.

          Most of them come here due to better schools, medical care, and other benefits. Cutting those out would severely decrease immigration.

          • connorhus

            Very valid points but take into consideration just how those schools, medical care, etc. are making it to the illegals. It isn’t just the direct government welfare that is keeping them here. Government spending, or more to the point over spending that it really doesn’t have, accounts for the largest chunk of our overall spending and it benefits more than 50% of the population. Without that spending there is literally nothing to keep them here. Without it we would revert back to the more traditional levels of farm v. non-farm living and there simple would be no reason for them to be here unless they actually produced on their own.

            There would no middle rich to pay them, no incentives to companies, no extra points to businesses who hire minorities, no extra cash to turn every school into a multi-media temple. These immigrants, both legal and illegal would leave rather than face that type of life.

          • Raymond Kidwell

            If you really want to go to an agrarian racial society you could gather up a few families and learn some primitive skills from the amish and perhaps buy a large swath of isolated land in south america. They still engage in primitive farming, cattle etc. down there and its relatively unpopulated in some areas. I do believe stormfront has a few ples in America that are like that too.

            In regards to the whole nation going back to that without government spending, I doubt it. Today’s world is too technological. I also don’t think people would just pack up and leave. There would be a lot of starving people and probably riots, neo-revolutionaries etc. It would be SHTF scenario. Of course you could put together a 20 year plan or something and slowly phase it out most welfare, while providing work fare. Require welfare moms to get sterilized after their first child or else get off welfare. Sterilize habitual criminals in return for reduced prison sentences. These measures would reduce the sheer numbers of ghettoites over time. Next slowly phase out welfare by cutting back benefits over time. Put together some kind of homestead program that helps people set up their own small scale sustainable farm so they can at least eat and have the very basics even if they are in relative poverty. It’s all a pipe dream but I guess it could happen over a long period.

            The main issue though is almost all welfare is related to child birth. I’m dirt poor and I qualify for nothing other than maybe a few food stamps a month. Pop out a child and you get WIC, huge amount of food stamps each month if you have enough children (which nearly all of them sell some of these), $4,000 per child yearly EIC even if you don’t work, a monthly cash check, free or reduced rent via section 8 and other programs, sometimes free cars, maybe a free house from habitat for humanity (well you might pay $250 a month for a $100,000 house so I guess not totally free, but then the government or charity might make that payment for you).

            I kind of think I screwed up in life by trying to go to college and be a productive citizen. I should have just impregnated lots of girls as a teenager and refuse to get a job. Then I’d be living a lot better right now.

            But if you just put in a sterilization program like mentioned above it would by default cut off these people’s gravy trains.

          • Nancy

            There’s a very wealthy family of restaurant moguls in Atlanta who bought up a huge bunch of land south of Atlanta in the 90s, when it was really rural down there. (I taught their oldest when she was in grade school, so I went down to the property when all that was there was their personal home.) They developed it into a liberal utopia with the idea of it being a self-sustaining agricultural community, sort-of like an upscale co-op. They got it zoned with its own zip code, got ordinances passed which requires a large percentage of the property to remain “green space”, etc. It has really nice inns, B&B’s, restaurants, art galleries, the works. (Google “Serenbe”)

            Then the ATL Olympics happened in ’96. All the project apes got Section 8 vouchers, and most of them settled south of the city. Today, their little liberal community is surrounded by blacks in the rest of the county, and as usual the blacks are now making their demands for “low income” housing in the co-op. I think it’s hysterical. I tried to get the owners to agree to an interview, or at least comment about shifting demographics and the demands for “low income space”, but they ignored the question.

            Whites can and should take the same concept and implement it in the Pacific NW to start, where they wouldn’t be overtaken by the Black Undertow anytime soon. My husband and his partners are already looking to do the same thing in Northern Utah in the future. Just add a grocery store and a gun range, and we’re in business!

          • connorhus

            Why is it that you feel things have to go from the way it is today to “Amish Level Farming” , which I assume you think of as very primitive. There is plenty of in between there trust me. I have plenty of Amish, Mennonite and in between neighbors I could ask. Too many people think the Amish are completely disassociated with their neighbors but I assure you that isn’t true and there are a number of those who are not Amish anymore as well. It happens and they end up marrying into the local community quite often creating a kind of in between family group. I know a number of them.

            Honestly it won’t take much to end all this government spending. We are just about there as it is since they have devalued the currency to almost nothing already.

            There is all types of welfare which is the real problem here. They have created just as many make work government jobs with pensions as they have EBT cards. As it stands they are already trying to find ways to back out of the commitments and do it slowly but it is picking up speed and the immigrants will leave as the free stuff disappears.

          • Raymond Kidwell

            Amish use some modern tools depending on the group. Modern American farming involves flying overhead with a plane to spray it regularly, satellites, soil samples, multi-million dollar equipment etc. It doesn’t employ many people either. So your idea of a farmer living on the land would be similar to how the amish farm or how people farm in south america.

          • Sha of Communism

            I get your idea and I agree. White people don’t have to endure very low living standards, but keeping the extended family together, work hard, and save money is always a good idea.

            If the majority of White families can keep the extended family together and be interdependent, young people will feel financially a lot more comfortable in today’s super high and ever increasing CPI environment. I’m sure the birthrate will then go up and Whites will no longer be an endangered race.

          • Nancy

            Those idiots also like to cram themselves into vehicles like clowns in a Volkswagen. Then they drive around drunk, get into collisions with insured drivers (like me), and try to flee the scene. One such car crammed with illegals almost took my husband off his Harley, since it was going the wrong way down a one-way street.

          • Who Me?

            OMG! Have you ever seen how many people they can get in one vehicle? I once watched them unload their car after it parked in front of me. I kid you not. They got TWENTY-SEVEN out of it, counting the 4 infants, none of whom were in car seats.

          • Nancy

            Oh, yes. They cram their whole extended family in one vehicle, then drive around drunk. They’re cars are like ballistic missiles on wheels, ready to take out the unsuspecting driver who has the misfortune to cross their paths. After the inevitable collision, they flee the scene. I got lucky: the accident was right in front of City Hall, and the Marshalls were there in 20 seconds.

            That day, I was wearing a t-shirt that read, “REPUBLICAN: Because not everybody can be on welfare.” The Marshall was like, “HAHAHA! These idiots hit the wrong person today, didn’t they?”

          • 1G25

            Why did Santa Anna only bring 3,000 Mexicans to the Alamo?

            He only had twelve taxis.
            .

          • Nancy

            That’s awesome. I’m stealing it.

      • mugg$

        It is not just that- it is the fact that in the past, we Americans would NOT TOLERATE anti-social behavior. We would NOT TOLERATE those who did not fit in to the status quo. We would not tolerate Marxist ideals, nor would we tolerate revolutionary tactics UNLESS it were to promote American traditions and Constitutional laws.

      • Americaandthewestshouldbewhite

        That shows you how we have degraded in enforcing our immigration laws since Ellis Island days when we allow people with communicable disease to just enter without screening them. I know for a fact that new immigrants are not expected to be checked for AIDS, but they are checked for syphilis.

    • LexiconD1

      Unless they acted the same way hispanic illegals do, then I’d say boot them too.

    • Publius Pompilius Quietus

      White criminals are still criminals.

      • HJ11

        How uhniversal of you. Perhaps you are not White?

        • Publius Pompilius Quietus

          I am English and Dutch ancestry and am certainly white!

          • HJ11

            Nope. At the end of the day, Whites are still White and that’s what we need all over this dark planet–many more Whites.

            With all due respect, you are putting something artificial–man made laws–in front of what is real and authentic and in your own self- interest–more White people.

            Always act in your own White self-interest.

          • Anglokraut

            That’s why I said just fly the Boers here. The question should never be “who is going to deport them?” The Mestizo has shown us that this is not the question. The question is in reality “Who is stupid enough to go against White People who are finally enraged?”

          • DJRicin

            Agreed. White illegals might cause trouble for a generation (Irish, Italians, Hebrews) but they assimilate quickly and contribute more than they take within several decades.

          • Sha of Communism

            I hope they assimilate quickly like you said, but, in fact, it takes a higher calling for White immigrants to assimilate. Good ol’ USA is perhaps the only instance where White immigrants assimilated.

            Look at Quebec. Look at Ireland, Scotland, Wales. And Look at the entire continental Europe. In addition, Latvia and Lithuania have pretty much the same Baltic people, both with some German blood after the Livonian Crusade, and they can’t even assimilate each other.

            So while White immigrants are certainly a lot more desirable than Third World immigrants, it really takes some very appealing common goal for them to assimilate.

          • ghettovalley

            Most Europeans who immigrated to America in the past were generally assimilated within one or two generations. Many Irish, Italians, English, Germans, and other assorted Europeans snuck into this country illegally, perhaps even one of your distant ancestors. My direct male ancestor on my father’s side snuck into America illegally during the great famine of Ireland. White people of all stripes could easily assimilate into early America, because it was a white nation. Many of our beliefs, behaviors, and customs are deeply rooted in our European heritage, and we have more in common than many seem to believe.

          • bilejones

            Hebrews of course, are ethnically Middle Eastern, unless they’ve been lying to us.

          • sddasasd

            Do you know a big reason why many opposed mass immigration from places like Ireland and southern Italy in the 19th century? Because, if you can believe it, there were segments of the Irish and southern Italian population that were crime prone and dysfunctional. This still goes on today with southern Italy what with the mafia and how it’s one of the most corrupt parts of Europe- and while Ireland isn’t much like that at all now, Irish gangs were a pretty big issue. Look them up. I’d go ahead and say we would have been better off with higher immigration standards from Europe back then.

            Even now, many nationalists and right wingers in the UK oppose mass immigration from eastern europe, because the same problems go on with them. It’s nowhere near as bad as the non-white immigration, but they’re still an issue, and despite the demographic crisis, I think they could do without them. Your “well they may be among the worst examples of white people and are pretty close to third world refuse but THEY’RE WHITE AND THAT’S ALL THAT MATTERS!!!” attitude is crazy to anyone who has familiarity or experience with the more backwards parts of Europe ending up in the better countries.

            But keep telling yourself the problems that come with albanian clan warfare and slavic street gangs are just “artificial” problems and we need to let in everybody in Europe.

  • If all illegal aliens were white, George W. Bush would have never dreamed of giving them “comprehensive reform.” He’d have them all deported before you can say “strategery.”

    • DonReynolds

      …..and their home counties would be demanding their return.
      The Brain Drain harms the home country, not the receiving country.
      The illegal aliens we get do not bring any brains and their home country does not want them returned. What does that tell you?

      Does anybody else notice the Castro brothers in Cuba demanding the return of the Cubans who fled to Florida??

  • HJ11

    If all illegal aliens were White, I’d be jumping for joy and demanding even more. I practice particularist ethics. What is good for Whites is good. Period. More White people is good for Whites.

    • Frank Pucillo

      The founding fathers had the right idea.They limited immigrants to free white persons in 1790.

      • sddasasd

        They also had immigration standards for European countries where they wouldn’t let in absolutely everybody. They didn’t go by this autistic “THEY’RE WHITE, THAT’S ALL THAT MATTERS!!!”

    • Sha of Communism

      You argument assumes that White people in Americas would have a higher birthrate than they would in Europe.

      Although the U.S. and Canada do have abundant natural resources, it also takes Whites’ willingness to breed in order for American Whites to have a higher birthrate than European Whites (and more importantly, higher birthrate than non-Whites). Only then will you and me have a good reason to feel happy about White immigration.

      • HJ11

        Our low birthrate is a different issue. To increase our birthrate we’re going to need a spiritual revival of our people. I’m not waiting for that to happen and I’m doing my best to increase the birthrate in my own family.

        And, I’m not doing it out of altruism. I realize that the more kids I have the greater is the potential for my family line to go forward as pure Whites.

  • LHathaway

    When they say opposing immigration is racism, isn’t this an admission that immigration itself has a racial component? That some races more than others are immigrating?

    • RebelliousTreecko

      Opposing illegal immigration has a “disparate impact” on Mestizos.

    • Raymond Kidwell

      To be fair, opposing them in any way is racism. If one of them is raping you and you scream for the person to get off, that would be considered racism. The term has been used so much that it just loses all meaning to me.

    • UncleSham

      Yes, they are no longer trying to hide the fact that America is turning Brown. They want us to believe that it is inevitable.

  • RebelliousTreecko

    The lefties would be likely be wringing their hands going “Oh dear, it’s Manifest Destiny all over again!!!”
    Or maybe they’d only do that if the Whites were going into Mexico.
    It seems that in their minds, no human is illegal. Except White settlers.

  • Raymond Kidwell

    Brilliant article. We need something like a white version of the tea party. Instead of being about small government be about racial justice for white people. The vanilla party.

    • Anglokraut

      Vanilla is tasty, but we want people to know not to eff with us. The Glacier Party? We move slowly, almost imperceptibly, but we change landscapes by crushing everything in our path.

      • Sick of it

        The Viking Party…will your town survive?

        • Anglokraut

          I like “Norsefire” from the graphic novel “V for Vendetta”, but there would be copyright issues.

      • Raymond Kidwell

        I like the glacier party. I actually just used that metaphor to describe my own group yesterday.

    • Sha of Communism

      Instead of a party, I want an ethnostate for the Whites, so we can geologically separate loyalist Whites from multiculturalist Whites, and after several decades, economically defeat the multiculturalist Whites as well as wipe out this insane, suicidal ideology once and for all.

      As many of the readers here have realized, our true enemy is not the non-Whites. The non-Whites are just the pets of our true enemy. And our true enemy is…

      • Raymond Kidwell

        I have no problem with multiculturalism. Variety makes things interesting. I also don’t think it is harmful economically, hear me out.. but “multiculturalism” is not what it says it is. It is a code word for anti-white. We don’t have a real attempt at a diverse society. We have massive discrimination against whites, white guilt fed to people in school and in media, we have attempts to demographically change the nation through massive immigration. I would call them self hating whites rather than multicultural whites, call it what it is.

        We also have an issue of competence. We could easily craft some sane policies that would deal with dysgenics and absurdly low I.Q.s among certain people. Like I have suggested after having one baby if you want to stay on welfare, get sterilized. If China can do it, why cant Bertha in the ghetto? Instead what we have are insane and irrational excuses and cries that we are all the same anytime a hood rat from the ghetto commits a crime or can’t pass the GED test. I just call it cultural Marxism.

        The ethno state is a good dream but one would need to take baby steps to get there. Rome isn’t built over night. Organizing into local communities (PLEs), creating a political lobby (like a white AIPAC), and other projects (like maybe a political party) would come first.

  • Luca

    “What if Illegal Aliens were All White People?”

    Well, at least we wouldn’t be headed toward genocide..

    • I heard recently on the White voice, that Jared doesn’t like the term genocide to describe the current plot of the White race. I think it is very much so.

  • Bossman

    This article is not saying anything of substance. There is a geopolitical dimension to U.S. immigration policy. Before 1965, Europeans and Latin Americans were the favored groups. But the USA was forced to give that up due to continuous pressure by way of propaganda, calling it racism, from Russia, China, the United Nations and the newly independent states of Africa and Asia.

    • LHathaway

      This may be true, Bossman but I do believe the seat of this ideology rests in the West itself. The true center of this, ‘everything whites do is bad, everything people of color do is good’ ideology is in the West itself. It’s completely understandable why they believe in it, heck, I’ve argued before that this belief in their own moral superiority has been the only thing that has civilized them. It’s harder to understand why we preach it more then anyone else.

  • MekongDelta69

    We’ve gone over this before many times on AmRen.

    In the Orwellian America we live in today, this would never happen.

    And if by some weird fluke, it did happen, they would all be deported immediately, if not sooner.

  • Sha of Communism

    The problem is not Black or White. The problem is friendly or hostile. All peoples of colour are pretty much hostile to the West. A handful of Whites (Islamic Chechens, for example) are hostile to the West as well.

    If we take in 10 million of British, French, or German White Christians, then I guess, why not? But a million of hostile Blacks from Liberia or a million of Chechens would certainly be a long-lasting disaster.

    • DonReynolds

      Why do we have to continue to “take in” any at all?
      The USA LEGALLY allows more people to come to this country than the other 190 nations of the world put together!
      In addition, the USA looks the other way while MILLIONS of foreign citizens enter the country illegally……yes, again……more than all the other nations combined.
      What other country would permit this?
      We simply do not need to admit any more…..period.

      • 1G25

        Turn the Statue of Liberty around. We don’t need and more “huddled masses.”

    • HJ11

      The problem is one of genotypes. The U.S. is being swamped with non-White genotypes at the same time that the White birthrate is low and also at the same time that the blenders are propagandizing Whites to believe that miscegenation is not only not bad, but is good. The result is that too many Whites are performing bedroom genocide on themselves and their family lines. Just look at Jeb Bush’s non-White family.

      • LHathaway

        The White birthrate in the USA and in the UK is higher that it is in most, if not all, of Europe. I do believe, when calculating the ‘white birthrate’ they only look at the race of the mother. The ‘white birth rate’ in the USA and the UK is likely artificially high because of so many non-whites and immigrants, most of whom, are male.

    • HJ11

      My reply # 2: The problem is ALWAYS Non-White or White when we talk about humans, and that’s the way of nature as the eternal gene wars (natural selection by another name) work to find the best genes for every niche. For me, I want the genes that are selected to be White genes, because I’m White and it is in my bester interests that this happen.

  • dd121

    The prez is NOT risking impeachment for anything he does. Boehnner has already given him a pass saying impeachment is off the table.

    • Jo

      Trey Gowdy answered that question with “Look who we have to replace him.” Biden.

      • Sick of it

        Because Biden won’t be held accountable for anything? I guess in this crooked country.

      • dd121

        I know, that’s pretty scary.

      • Anglokraut

        It would still be fewer than two years with Biden; I call that an acceptable trade.

        • Jo

          At least we’d be looking at a White person, not that it means much these days. Obama’s black, that is why he isn’t impeached.

          • 1G25

            EGG-zactly.

      • connorhus

        I bet Bite-Me Joe would do something within a month or two that would allow him to get the axe too.

        • Nancy

          I don’t know if I could take two years of listening to Joe Biden referring to himself in the third-person. My mother-in-law does that, and I want to stab flaming pencils in my eardrums.

  • Robert Smith

    Slightly off topic but I see Jeb is being billed as a Reagan conservative. Looks like they’ll promote Jeb and amnesty as the way of Reagan. Amnesty is racism against whites.

    • Anglokraut

      Well thank god for them internets, because unlike in the 1970s, absolutely anything that you could want to know is online–including every speech lil’ Jeb ever made about immigration, affirmative action, education, amnesty…and if the GOP is ever going to win national office again, they’ll find that last scrap of pride they have somewhere, and drop that doughy miscegenator, and make the name “Bush” anathema.

      • Sick of it

        Unfortunately, many older people don’t fact check online or seriously dig into the history of potential candidates.

        • Spikeygrrl

          Is that a checkable statistic, or an intuitive/anecdotal guesstimate?

          I’d love to see one or more legitimate citations for the political laziness of the 50+ demo, because my own intuition and anecdotes point in exactly the opposite direction:

          1) Over-50s have more time on their hands (e.g., empty nest, retired, disabled) in which to do basic candidate research.

          2) Over-50s did not grow up with social media, therefore have no reason to believe their research is done after perusing a few PROFESSIONAL, SELF-SERVING paragraphs on Facebook. They use the Internet as a tool, not as a Way of Life entire.

          3) Over-50s, by and large, remember the former greatness of this country and would like to see it restored. (Still-radical leftover hippies — “Boomers” — are admittedly a fly in that ointment…but for every one of those who still has the gumption to get out and agitate, there are many, many more who only “speak out” from the La-Z-Boy in front of the big-screen TV.)

          • Sick of it

            I know very few folks in that age range who use the internet to research potential candidates. Really just one uncle (who is an engineer). I said nothing about researching, say, medical conditions. My comment was, obviously, centered on politics.

          • Spikeygrrl

            How peculiar. I’m now an over-50 myself, and put a LOT into candidate research. Ditto my late parents, bless their hearts, back when “liberal” was an honorable political place to be. I was JUST successfully soft-pedaling some intergenerational conservatism to them when they both died. BAH!

            Just as in David Mamet’s (The Secret Knowledge), they’d been living their whole lives as activists for the “liberal” cause, yet IN THEIR PERSONAL LIVES consistently behaving like conservatives.

      • 1G25

        That’s why the anthropoid in the White House wants to “regulate” the internet.

  • Anglokraut

    Why can’t we do that? Just bring the Boers here, teach them the magic phrases that get them a courtroom date, and then just resettle them in a familiar environment that doesn’t enforce immigration laws, like the Pacific northwest, northern California, or Massachusetts? We’d be like the underground railroad 3.0! (I was going to say 2.0, but then I remembered that system of houses that sheltered drafted men fleeing to Canada–so that would be 2.0.)

    • Bossman

      The USA used to have an immigration policy that favored white people but it was forced to give that up because of pressure from the international communists during the Cold War. Blame Russia, China, the United Nations and the many third world countries of Africa and Asia.

      • connorhus

        And Democrats like Teddy (Lake Bound) Kennedy

      • ghettovalley

        I’m sure that absolutely breaks your heart. You just hate seeing America swamped with stupid, violent, useless illegal Mexican immigrants don’t you?

    • DonReynolds

      The Dutch Afrikaaners would be excellent imports, except that they are despised by the US State Department and the Democrats because they imprisoned Mandella in South Afrika. It is very difficult for them to go to any country. Nobody else seems to want them either…..the Aussies are habitual Leftists, so is the British Foreign Office, and the Netherlands (where they are from) is hopelessly Leftist and Liberal. They would probably be more welcome in Putin’s Russia than anywhere else.

      The same is true of the Unionists (Loyalist Protestants) in Northern Ireland. They used to move to Canada before the Leftists took over.

      • Anglokraut

        Oh, I never said anything about any of this being legal–more an “Act of Love” that we at Amren could do, while everyone else is focused on the Middle East.

        • connorhus

          I have often wondered if there was a way to do that myself.

          • Anglokraut

            I’m really curious as to why not: immigration law is not being enforced! Just get the Boers on the planes, and get them here. Anyone who tries to deport them, we shout down, and hold up huge banners with pictures of butchered Boers. We get loud, we get on television, and we get our way. The Mestizo has taught us all how to play this game, and they’ve been on offense long enough.

          • connorhus

            Because if the government ever officially acknowledged what was going on in SA their Multi-Cult gig is up. It was the Western governments that pushed the sanctions and brought what is going on there to happen. The Left and the very government core can no more admit what is going on in SA then they could admit openly that we have a Black problem not a gun problem.

          • Anglokraut

            The media can’t black out a pro-Boer rally, not with social media driving the news today. Just a few people with a few hundred Twitter accounts, all re-tweeting sympathetic messages and gruesome pictures to different accounts–that’s how you get a message out.

          • Raymond Kidwell

            It would cost too much. What happens now is that they round up Mexicans and then just deport them to the other side of the fence where they cross again. They can just keep trying basically unlimited times with little consequence. If you have to pay for a plane ticket every time someone gets deported, it gets expensive real fast.

            U.S. immigration law is actually pretty strict. You have to prove that you can support yourself and pass a test to get in. Or be able to prove asylum status. The main problem is the policy where once you are in you can import the rest of your family. A normal person does not import 200 of their “closest” family members. It’s the totally edge of starvation poor who look forward to food stamps and medicaid or under the table work.

            So once you give one an illegal immigrant amnesty he can import his whole family as well. Basically if you wanted to bring people in you could marry a boer, once that boer had citizenship via marriage, you could then import his relatives, who import their relatives and so on until the entire population has been granted citizenship.

            The policy is also unfair because people who are waiting in line for citizenship generally can’t get it, because relatives of Americans who live in their country get to cut in line and shipped over. Then when its your turn they already exceeded immigration limits and quotas.

            I would say the whole relative thing is the worst part of immigration reform in the 60s.

  • DonReynolds

    I am unaware that ANY past amnesty or proposed amnesty specifically targets one race to the exclusion of all the others. The same amnesty that is extended to Mexicans would also apply to illegal aliens from China, Cuba, Israel, Ireland, Canada, ……you get the idea. The same amnesty extended to browns (whatever the devil that might be) would also apply to whites, yellows, reds, and blacks. Yes, I know…..the overwhelming majority of amnesty seekers are digger Indians from Mexico and Central America. (What makes anyone think they are brown is beyond me.)
    Once again….the Liberal media sets up another straw man that does not actually exist and makes an argument that no one would rationally make in order to destroy that argument with facts, that the media usually considers “hate facts”.

    • UncleSham

      If they’re not brown then what are they?

      • DonReynolds

        The ones I have living in my area are clearly Indians, what we usually refer to as red. The white Mex seem to have it too good to leave Mexico for the USA, but the Indian underclass is what we usually see.

        • Spaniard in LA

          This past summer I spent about a month in Mexico with a cousin from Spain, exploring the place. I agree that the White Mexican has it to good. Light skin Mexican Mestizos didn’t seem to be doing to bad. I spoke to several of them and all though some were poor, I couldn’t help but notice the iPhone and designer jeans. I did notice that Mexican Indians were treated badly by both White and Mestizos. And yes the Mexican Indians are the ones that are mostly crossing the border illegally.

          Before i went on this faithful trip, I pictured Mexico as being some Sub Saharan backwards dump. I must say I was really impressed by some of their cities (Monterey and Guadalajara). I found a lot of them to be modern and highly functioning. If Mexico would inhibit the influence of their oligarchs, they would be a first world nation in no time.

          • 1G25

            Mexico and all of Central & South America inherited the Spanish/Mediterranean “Spoils System” of politics… political office is a license to steal openly, as opposed to Anglo-Saxon stealth which keeps the plunder to a low roar.
            .

          • listenupbub

            Mexico is a decent country. You are right. Many of the cities are nice.

            It is not our problem that not every Mexican citizen in Mexico is living the life.

            Most people I talk to are amazed to hear that Mexico is not a shithole like Africa. The media makes us think they are all starving and destitute.

        • UncleSham

          Alright, that makes sense. Sometimes I think of Red as being reserved for North American Indians, but it probably should include the Central and Southern ones. Brown is often used for Arabs, but it can also more vaguely refer to the various groups currently invading White countries.

  • Jo

    “The media is silent on the extraconstitutionality of the president’s actions, while acting as a cheerleader for amnesty.”

    “And Republicans have held no hearings, are afraid to call the president out for violating the Constitution, and afraid of defunding the amnesty for fear of being accused of “shutting the government down.”

    Hey, Pedro, Fox news has been very open about the unconstitutionality of the traitor’s actions. You might not like Fox, but sometimes it gets it right.

    Republicans have had hearings on it. You should watch CNN once in awhile to find out what’s going on in the country.

    Sessions, Gohmert, Cruz, Gowdy, and others have been speaking out.

    Republicans in the House did defund amnesty. Where have you been? It’s in the Senate and Democrats are blocking a hearing on it.

  • BloodofAlbion75

    “What If Illegal Aliens Were All White People?”

    We would still have the legal and moral obligation to deport all of them back to where they came from,because widespread violations of our immigration laws can never be tolerated regardless of what race the illegals are or what country they happen to be from. The law is the law.Period.

  • BloodofAlbion75

    “What If Illegal Aliens Were All White People?”

    We would still have the legal and moral obligation to deport all of them back to where they came from,because widespread violations of our immigration laws can never be tolerated regardless of what race the illegals are or what country they happen to be from. The law is the law.Period.

  • Jo

    “What if illegal aliens were all white people, from Europe?”
    That statement is actually hilarious. Whites wouldn’t sneak across a country’s border and demand welfare, the same benefits as natives, and citizenship.

  • Sick of it

    Pedro obviously got lost on his way to Mexican Thinker…

  • BloodofAlbion75

    “What If Illegal Aliens Were All White?”

    We would still have the legal and moral obligation to deport all of them back to where they came from, because widespread violations of our immigration laws can never be tolerated regardless of what race the illegals are or what country they happen to be from.And the idea that it would be okay to support illegal aliens if they happened to be White would make all of us a bunch of disingenuous hypocrites.

    The law is the law.Period.

  • Ringo Lennon

    Too bad illegal aliens aren’t white Europeans. I would turn a blind eye.

    • HJ11

      I would help them come in.

    • MBlanc46

      I wouldn’t turn a blind eye. Our immigration policy should depend on the needs of our economy (by which I do not mean cheap labor for the corporate class). If we need immigrants, import Europeans. If not, not.

      • Ringo Lennon

        What if the illegals were white South Afrikaners? You would deport them?

        • MBlanc46

          They’re not white South Africans, so that’s a moot point. If I were running things, if in fact we did require immigrants, I’d put white South Africans at the top of the list.But I’m quite skeptical about allowing people in for “humanitarian” reasons, because that almost guarantees that you’re going to get Somalis and Haitians and all sorts of others who have turned their own countries into hellholes.

        • These are Dutch. from Wiki:
          The Dutch Nederlanders occasionally referred to as Netherlanders, a term that is cognate to the Dutch word for Dutch people, “Nederlanders” are an ethnic group of Germanic people native to the Netherlands.

          Despite the small size of the Netherlands, the Dutch left behind a
          legacy in excess of their mere numbers. The Dutch people are generally
          seen as the pioneers of capitalism, and their emphasis on a modern economy, secularism, and a free market ultimately had a huge influence on the great powers of the West, especially the British Empire, its Thirteen Colonies, and ultimately the United States.

          Some Afrikaners emigrated to Florida for the safety of their families. I’ve met one as I wanted to get 1st hand info on how the blacks in Africa behave. I’d support Afrikaner immigration into the US but our Gov’t does not as they are hard working whites.

      • HJ11

        For me, the needs of our economy don’t matter. I just want many, many more Whites. I have faith in the White genotype rising to the top when we have sufficient numbers.

        • listenupbub

          I agree wholeheartedly. We have finally reached a point where the slim majority of births in America are non-white. The country will eventually be colored-majority. Stuff is going to get very shitty in many parts of this country.

          We will need some more whites (or Asians, as a second choice).

          • HJ11

            I agree except about the Asian part. If they’re not White, they’re not right.

            It takes two pure Whites to produce a new White child. Any infusion of non-White genes, be they from ANY non-Whites increases the chances that Whites will mate out.

          • listenupbub

            You are actually right about mating out. Sometimes it is easier to just tell people to stick with you race, or else it will be the next cool thing to marry outside your race. We don’t want that.

            One truly terrible thing about importing massive numbers of the highest IQ, ultra-driven Asians and Indians is that we are inadvertently creating a race-based class system—- Asians on top, whites in the middle and spread out, blacks and mexicans at the bottom. It is like a dystopia where IQ’s and salaries are stamped on your forehead for all to see, except in USA, it is just your race. This is not a good thing.

            But if we absolutely HAVE to have non-white immigrants, I would rather take some Indians. Indians seem to enjoy white culture, and in a few generations (or one?) they will assimilate. You do not get a feeling of hostility from them at all; they have a good history with white people. The women are submissive and feminine, and they are happy as clams.

        • MBlanc46

          The way to keep our relative numerical superiority is to not keep importing nonwhites.

  • WR_the_realist

    I have no doubt that if every single illegal immigrant was white every Democrat would staunchly insist that we fully enforce immigration law.

    • Ringo Lennon

      Dems are so full of s.

  • MBlanc46

    Preposterous. But interesting.

  • Raymond Kidwell

    Here is what I think would honestly happen if Mexico were primarily composed of poor white people crossing illegally- the white hating liberal groups would not care about them so much, nor would the churches. They would still “support” the effort, but the energy behind it would fizzle because they are white. There wouldn’t be a huge political lobby helping them or so many people at the border giving them water and lodging. All of these things would still exist, but just to a lesser extent than what you would see if they are non-white. Their lives simply wouldn’t have as much value, because most people in this country have an anti-white bias. All the liberal groups put first priority on helping non-whites, although they sympathize with uneducated low I.Q. white people too. You would see a huge emphasis on helping only the females that cross, because these groups have a strong bias against white males. So all the sudden you would see news articles about the poor white females who had to endure the crossing. Female only homeless shelters and such would be set up (these already exist in case you don’t know, most homeless shelters are only for females).

    At the same time I have dealt with the government and law enforcement enough to know that they are lazy and don’t like to do their job. Amnesty would probably still be on the table, along with lax enforcement that we have now. I do think a lot more energy would be put into building a wall, border security, and so forth but as a whole it wouldn’t be a whole lot different. Employers want cheap labor. Government officials/police too lazy to actually do their job, incompetent politicians who refuse to tackle the issue effectively- it would all be the same. The few cops who really do care- overwhelmed.

    When I was down in Laredo I was really shocked by the fact that there is no fence or anything on the border though. I mean you don’t even know where the U.S. ends or Mexico begins- there’s not eve a sign, not a fence, nothing. As you drive out of Laredo along the highway you have to go through a border check point, that’s it. If you were willing to brave the desert you could just walk to the U.S. without anyone stopping you. You probably wouldn’t even get stopped by any patrol people. There’s a huge expanse with just a few people patrolling it. But most people are too lazy and scared to walk the desert. You do see a lot of cars full of mexicans pulled over on the side of the road by border patrol. If you had the money you could just by an off road vehicle and drive in as well. I mean there really aren’t many obstacles which was kind of shocking because on TV they always show this huge fence. That’s only in one tiny section of the border.

    • bv

      One correction to your comment, the Don’t care about poor uneducated whites AT ALL. They’d prefer them to be on the front lines of race mixing with blacks. E.g. My name is Earl.

      • Raymond Kidwell

        Yeah I would say that is the goal, some kind of Brazilian type of universal race emerging. The only thing about Brazillians though is their native americans, while poor and low I.Q. typically, tend to be really good looking. I doubt the emerging American mixed race will be that attractive.

  • ImTellinYa

    Welcome aboard White people!! Up to a point of course.

    But unlike third-world savages who have all ruined their own countries, White people all have pretty nice countries to live in.

  • UncleSham

    Racial loyalty is not supposed to depend upon how well your ancestors treated foreigners. I don’t understand why you think that would make a difference.

  • lib1

    Illegal Germans, Poles, Austrians, Swedes and Danes? You mean the people made America the great nation it WAS pre-1965? Well, those days are long since gone.

    • bv

      Need the country club WASP leadership and thinking back in power. Before all this Michael “Meathead” Stivic the world is one nonsense.

  • OpenMindedForever .

    You fantasy “what if” is beyond absurb if for no other reason than you treat it as FACT.

    Well let’s play that fantasy another way, a more factual way!

    What if a group of oppressed white-ethnics invaded the Americas, enslaved and conquered the native inhabitants, and then for centuries enslaved other human beings to create a capitalist country, where for centuries they even denied property rights to their own members because they were poor, treated them females like subservient citizens, and then centuries later the descendants of this all this racism/sexism/classism claim they’re being reversed discriminated-against because the nation seeks to undo all this historical and persistent attribute-group privilege?

    Here’s a solution to illegal immigration … all the white-descendants of those white-ethnics whom invaded and conquered a land/nation that never belong to them … go back to their ancestral nations … all those purist-white nations they mythologize about!

    • 1G25

      Don’t talk with your mouth full of watermelon.

  • The author doesn’t go far enough:

    What if those same White Europeans were found to be abusing the system and taking away public resources and funding that was specifically set up for people that had already been here and did everything LEGALLY?

    What if they refused to assimilate to American culture and even declared that parts of America would be broken off into large, and growing, enclaves of Little Europe?

    What if they spit on, took down and burned American flags and replaced them with the French, German or Swedish flags?

    What if that massive influx of Europeans resulted in a dramatic increase in crime and gang violence?

    What if those illegals were supporting and sponsored by groups and organizations that exuberantly talked about these new immigrants transforming their host country into a more White, less black and brown country?

    What if they pushed and pushed until the language and certain customs and procedures of official federal and even local business and government were forced to cater to those who refused to assimilate? Press 1 for English.. Press 2 for Spanish.. Press 3 for French.. Press 4 for German.. Press 5 for Polish.. Press 6 to have that Scottish guy talk a little slower so you can understand what he’s saying.. etc., etc., etc.

    Racial division is going to happen whether you like it or not. But there really is a solution to all of this. You can either sit back and be amalgamated into the lie of a multiracial utopia, or you can choose to draw a racial line and refuse to budge or back down. Choose your Race and stick with it.

    • listenupbub

      Yes, yes, and yes.

      When the Italians immigrated, there was some real racism directed against them. Some italians try to make a minority out of themselves even today so they can bitch about something and escape white guilt.

      But, guess what? MAYBE the reason there was some annoyance towards the Italian immigrants is because they wouldn’t learn English, wouldn’t eat the same foods, had animosity towards WASP’s, emigrated back to the homeland more than all other groups, were loud and easily angered,

      and, of course…

      the mafia and black hand.

      This is actually an important point to make. (I am saying this as an Italian American)

      We have assimilated fairly well, when you forget for a second about guido culture, though. Many Italians actually have very high IQ’s. But the Americans had every right to be upset at the Italian immigrants in the past.

      • Ella

        It was mostly the Mafia violence and problems dominating certain industries. Italians integrated better into the communities away from larger port cities. There were jokes and remarks toward Italians, but there were also Polish, Jewish, WASP, Irish, German and other ethnic humouring based on stereo-types.

        • listenupbub

          I bet the other whites are overplaying it, though I’m sure any immigration is going to cause some people to get uneasy that their culture is in danger of unstoppable change.

          I’d argue Italians had it a little worse than most groups you mention (besides Jews). Other whites knew that Italians had Arab blood, considered them “barely white,” as 85% of Italian immigrants came from southern Italy, they looked *very* dark when they worked in the sun— enough that they were easily recognizable.

          Italians were definitely excluded from advancement in the professional world. The “regular” white Catholics made them worship in basements, you know, usual racial grievance crap, blah blah blah…

          Grieving about racism makes me sick, though. Italians earned a bad rap, and they payed for it. Period.

          Now some Italians have become capable, patriotic Americans, focusing on the commonalities between Europeans. The guidos prove that the race does indeed have Arab blood. Time to move on, Italians.

      • bv

        You guys took generations to assimilate and still have a clicking attitude. All the while complaining about foreigners.

  • mugg$

    Except the fact that (most!) white immigrants aren’t hailing from Socialist nations like El Salvador, Honduras, Guatemala. Except the fact that most white immigrants are not women with frizzy sideburns on their faces, nor wear spandex leggings over tree trunk thighs. Whites- mostly, do not leave used diapers and empty beer bottles in the parking lots. They improve areas as opposed to creating poverty zones. They are educated and have at least graduated the 6th grade of elementary schools.

  • Americaandthewestshouldbewhite

    If all illegal aliens were white the US would be an Aryan utopia.

  • Americaandthewestshouldbewhite

    It would be good for the US since more like the old America

  • Ringo Lennon

    I’m imagining if all the illegal aliens we now have were White. Man, this would be a paradise on earth.

  • Hank Richter

    Sorry but I doubt Boehner or McCain would be objecting to it if Bush did it.

  • sddasasd

    Well, I’ve got one- what you just described with what the muslim invaders isn’t what mestizos are doing. Many of them hate us, want us expelled or even wiped out and commit violence against us, but most of them are just freeloaders and social parasites. And it’s true the mexican government has long aided and abetted them, but Mexico is likewise heavily dependent on our aid and commerce and has been bogged down in their own dysfunction for, well, years and years. That drug war still goes on. They could never pose a military threat against us. And I doubt if they ever did conquer us, they’d go to the lengths the muslims did- there’s still lots and lots of white people in Mexico and elsewhere in latin america.

    Is that believable and acceptable enough for you? Or are you that paranoid and mentally ill you think mexican peasants are comparable to medieval jihadists? Mestizos are often less crime prone than blacks too you know.

    There’s realism with our situation, and there’s sociopathic, paranoid allusions to a situation radically different from our own with thinly veiled allusions to ethnic cleansing and racial genocide, but I’m starting to realize that this sentiment isn’t terribly uncommon in white racialism. I mean, this isn’t the first comment I’ve seen alluding to genocide here (and I’ve seen it explicitly called for once) or cheering on the ebola deaths in africa and such- always good to know the kind of human refuse that inhabit our movement, though.

  • bv

    The are capable of running a low level developed country something that blacks could never ever do.

  • Raymond Kidwell

    There are a lot of Eastern European immigrants here legally and a few illegally. Many of them go around saying they hate America and hate Americans etc. just like non-white immigrants do, and most of them are below average just like non-white immigrants. I’m sure there is a good amount of professional class immigrants into the United States, but it seems like we do too much of scraping the bottom of other societies and bringing them here. I understand people want opportunity, but they have the ridiculous policy where one person comes in and can bring his/her whole family, who then can bring their family ad infinitum, next think you know some group of white trash has brought all their extended relatives here to claim welfare benefits and work in construction, almost exactly the same as Mexicans. It’s the same in Mexico really there are a good number of white people there and a good number of normal civilized people. Those are not typically the ones that immigrate.

    And I don’t hate mexican immigrants or any of these groups, I just don’t understand why we have these seemingly self defeating immigration policies.