Debate over ‘White Privilege’ Between Jon Stewart, Bill O’Reilly Descends into Shouting Match

Oliver Darcy, The Blaze, October 16, 2014

Fox News host Bill O’Reilly clashed with Comedy Central’s Jon Stewart Wednesday night in an intense debate over the existence of “white privilege.”

O’Reilly appeared on “The Daily Show” to promote his new book “Killing Patton,” but Stewart steered the conversation in another direction.

“Listen to me,” Stewart told O’Reilly. “Here’s all I want from you today–this is it, this is all we got to do in this conversation. I have one simple goal. I want you to admit that there is such a thing as white privilege. That’s all I want.”

O’Reilly didn’t oblige.

“OK look,” the Fox News host told Stewart. “If there is white privilege, then there has to be Asian privilege because Asians make more money than whites.”

“What?” Stewart asked, seemingly stunned.

“Oh, you didn’t know any of this, huh?” O’Reilly countered, adding that Asians on average “make more money” and have a “higher education.”

“You’re missing the point,” Stewart said.

“Sorry to confuse you with the facts,” O’Reilly quipped.

The two continued to debate each other over the topic, going back and forth over the topic.

{snip}

[Editor’s Note: Mr. O’Reilly should have prepped with our video on the subject.]

Topics:

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Lewis33

    There is only one privilege that matters in Hollywood and John Leibowitz has it.

    • TruthBeTold

      I would have asked Mr. Liebowitz one question: ‘Do you consider yourself White?’

      • Tim_in_Indiana

        Did you watch the clip? He admitted he wasn’t.

        • TruthBeTold

          Clearly I didn’t. I did read the piece but that doesn’t appear in the edited text.

          I didn’t watch the clip because I can’t stand listening to either of them.

          • gregCall

            I agree 100% with that position, Both of those are blowhard frauds.

          • propagandaoftruth

            Sure but Bill displayed more honor and restraint.

            Satanic rules 3 and 4…

            3. When in another’s lair, show them respect or else do not go there.

            4. If a guest in your lair annoys you, treat them cruelly and without mercy.

        • DonReynolds

          Jews are famous for “being white” when it is to their advantage and claiming otherwise when someone is hunting whites to beat up. We know that about Jews and it is a common observation. Notice too the rich Jewish radicals that pretend to be communists when they are stirring up hatred among the minorities against the (white) capitalists. It is classic Jewish deception, which may actually be something they learned in Germany. Neither ethnic consider deception to be in anyways dishonest or unmanly, merely a way to gain an advantage.

      • gemjunior

        I was thinking the same thing – especially when he kept saying to Bill “What do white people think etc., what do white…?” O’Reilly SHOULD have said to him “Aren’t YOU white? Why are you asking ME? Are YOU not white?” and catch this guy playing games pitting white against black, specifically as an outsider trying to engineer something that would benefit him and his people.

        • TruthBeTold

          This, of course, was a set-up.

          Before OReilly arrived, his crack team of writers tried to find THE ‘GOTCHA’ question.

          OReilly was caught off guard, believe the discussion would be about his book, not ‘white privilege’. We see the same thing with Mr. Taylor giving his college lectures. None of the blacks are listening to what he said, they’re just waiting for the QandA to ask the ‘GOTCHA’ question.

          What you always have to keep in mind when you enter enemy territory is that you’re going to be blindsided.

          OReilly wasn’t prepared and frankly, he had no reason to be asked about this.

    • TruthBeTold

      Mr. Leibowitz had the privilege of winning a few Emmys for his show.

      Here’s the privilege of his writing staff:

      • me

        Self-congratulations abound in Hollyweird. So what?

      • Caucasoid88

        Looks like a Bar Mitzvah.

      • DonReynolds

        I may never understand completely why Jews adopt Scottish names. Not only is Mr. Leibowitz a good example, we also have Mr. Donald Sterling, himself a Ukrainian Jew born in Chicago.

        • gregCall

          His middle name is Stewart he just dropped his Jewish last name to hide his ethnicity.

          • Franklin_Ryckaert

            It’s not John Stewart but Jon Stewart. Jon from Jonathan.

    • gregCall

      Well said.

    • Anna Tree

      Yes, beside saying “Asian privilege”, O’Reilly should have say “Jewish privilege” as well.

  • MekongDelta69

    Two idiots with humongous egos on the same screen.

    I didn’t watch this joke, but if I had, I would have needed a 60″ screen, because the size of their heads would have exploded any TV with a smaller screen.

    • dd121

      ORielly would more accurately be termed a populist, rather a conservative. Personally, I can’t stand to watch him. When a guest starts to make a point that may win the argument, ORielly will smother his argument by talking over him. Uggg.

      • Earl P. Holt III

        Agreed. I don’t understand why he has guests on his show, because he CLEARLY has no interest in hearing what they have to say, even if they are allies…

      • Fighting_Northern_Spirit

        If Leibowitz had any stones, he’d debate Jared Taylor.

        • 1stworlder

          He has them at time, but when he has them they are near his mouth

          • Realist

            “He has them at time, but when he has them they are near his mouth”

            ….and they are black.

        • propagandaoftruth

          Stewie would win the p-nut gallery, would begin clowning around when incapable of debating further.

          So through absurdism and humor, Stewie would “win” the debate.
          I can’t believe I was so brainwashed I liked that guy once.

          Embarrassing. I find him insufferable now. A smarmy bile pump.

      • DonReynolds

        O’Rielly is neither populist or conservative. He is an Irish-American Roman Catholic and he never veers from the position of the Roman Catholic church (for long without getting back on track). I do not know if he has a bishop or cardinal that he follows or advises him, or if it is some influential nun in one of the more radical orders. Yes, they have those.
        If you bother to check, you will find a surprising number of Roman Catholics work at FoxNews in the business of influencing (conservative) public opinion.

        • dd121

          With the Pope’s new position on homosexuality, maybe Bill will become Lutheran.

        • ATBOTL

          This is the same troll who used to post as “Tom Watson” and other things. He has been around pro-white sites for years, always with the same troll bait about Catholics.

          • DonReynolds

            Unlike so many here, I go by my own name…..which you can see is not “Tom Watson”. For many years, I posted as “Memphomaniac”, back when I spent so much time in Memphis.
            I did not invent Roman Catholicism, or the Reformation, or the troubles in Northern Ireland. That history is readily available to anyone who cares to read it.
            When an Irish Catholic and a Jewish comedian decide to talk about “white privilege” on television (which is common knowledge), they are talking about WASPs and would both deny their tribe ever had any “white privilege”.

      • WR_the_realist

        O’Reilly is so obnoxious to his guests I don’t know how anybody can stand to watch him.

      • MissaJim

        I agree as well. O’Reilly is full of it and a true blew blowhard. He’s a fan of big government as long as it does what he wants. Moron.

        • gemjunior

          He is a blowhard. And a pervert too, from what I understand – ugh, disgusting.

  • “OK look,” the Fox News host told Stewart. “If there is white privilege, then there has to be Asian privilege because Asians make more money than whites.”

    I guess Ted O’Baxter, Mr. Killing Fill-in-the-Blank, isn’t in tune with the modern zeitgeist. You would think using the precepts of common sense that Asian-Americans would totally bork the “white privilege” hobby horse. But here’s how the other side dances around that:

    By considering Asians to be honorary white people if the statistical legerdemain permits it. For instance, to prove “white racism” at Google, you add together Asian and white employees.

    • TruthBeTold

      I wonder why Mr. Reilly chose Asians to cite privilege instead of say, a different group.

      • Xerxes22

        He doesn’t want to suffer the same fate as Rick Sanchez of CNN.

    • Fighting_Northern_Spirit

      Asians consider the comparison to be racist, and they don’t like to be mentioned as an example of success in contrast to black/brown failure. No reason is given, they just don’t like it. I expect O’Reilly will be forced to apologize to them.

      • Dave West

        Not surprised, Asians, especially young ones, are increasingly jumping on the victimhood “people of color” bandwagon. The Dems have done a great jobs of convincing anyone who isn’t a WASP, heterosexual, Christian that they can be shot by the police just by stepping out their front door every morning (morning may not apply to many within a certain racial group).

        • Fighting_Northern_Spirit

          Yeah, most are fully on-board with liberalism, partly because they are quite uncritical about “education”, and so much of “education” is cultural Marxist indoctrination. But I think there’s an added dimension of cowardice: if Whites hold them up as the “model minority”, Asians know of some level that they will become targets of hatred for NAMs. They also don’t want to side with Whites because no matter how well we treat them they can never be White, never be fully accepted, and will always feel like outsiders even when they’re born here.

      • DonReynolds

        Asians like Japanese, Chinese, and Koreans are annoyed that anyone would consider them a minority, not even in a place. They would never want to be compared to blacks or hispanics in America. If they would admit to having any rivalry or comparison, it is with the dominant white culture, which they consider to have done even better than the original stock. Yes, they probably have….as far as that goes…..but it does not change their history or ours.

  • Bryce Armstrong

    Serves him right for going on his show to begin with.

  • Publius Pompilius Quietus

    If all races are equal in all ways, then any difference in race would mean that race has either been stolen from or has stolen from another race. Of course, that would mean Asians and Jews also have privilege and have stole from white people, because they are smarter than white people. The Left indeed never follows through with that logic because they wouldn’t like the conclusion. The Left would love to believe in white privilege, so to justify their many anti-white policies, but it is simply false.

    To the contrary, the more logical explanation for the difference in intelligence is it is created by genetic differences between peoples, developed by evolutionary adaption to differing surroundings.

    • Earl P. Holt III

      The NBA needs to be 70% white, in which case I would watch again…

      • phillyguy

        hockey , been watching it for almost 40 years

      • Segregation Now

        Why must a white man compete in the same arena as a negro? If, in athletic competition, a white man can defeat other whites, that ought to be enough. When a negro joins my team it is no longer my team. It is irredeemably sullied. Some might consider my sentiments racist.

        • Earl P. Holt III

          I don’t care so much about sports: I just don’t want “those people” coming anywhere NEAR our white women, so I share your segregationist sentiments.

          They’ve murdered too many already, more than 100,000 since the mid-1960s…

    • SentryattheGate

      Remember the Nobel Prize winner (in genetics/co-discoverer of DNA/Head of the Human Genome Project) James Watson, ref.Wikipedia: ‘ in 2007, Watson was compelled to retire as chancellor of the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory on New York’s Long Island and from its board of directors, after he had been quoted in The Times the previous week as saying “[I am] inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa [because] all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours—whereas all the testing says not really.” He went onto say that despite the desire that all human beings should be equal, “people who have to deal with black employees find this not true” Nobel Prize winner, with ~50 years of living with Africans, Albert Schweitzer agreed; referring to Africans as childlike and lazy.

      • DonReynolds

        The scourge of our society is fanatical egalitarianism, which is itself an article of faith not supported by experience or natural observation. Politics and policies soaked in egalitarianism are irrational and self-defeating like the Soviet or Chinese versions of Communism……a false democracy based on the idea that only enemies and the insane do not agree with the party line.

    • Stan D Mute

      HaHa! Best comment of the thread! And exactly so. Now, what does this say about the whites who are so jealous of Jews and blame Jews for all their problems?

  • Dave West

    I thought the part of the “debate” about Levittown was amusing.

    Bill O was asked if that community if he grew up in (Levittown) gave him values, he responded yes.
    Jon Stewart complained that blacks during that time were disadvantaged because they were kept out of a community that instilled “values” in children. As if certain communities just magically instill “values” in people and it has nothing to do with the actual people inhabiting those communities.

    In the previously posted article on the interview with Charles Murray; Murray stated that the educational and socioeconomic outcome for blacks and whites of the same IQ were the same, that right there invalidates most of the white privilege drivel.

    • TruthBeTold

      Jon Stewart complained that blacks during that time were disadvantaged because they were kept out of a community

      What’s their excuse now? Oh right, ‘White privilege’.

      • Stan D Mute

        They’re never asked, “why were these white communities better than the black communities”? Or, “why didn’t they build their own nice community? Did someone else build the nice white community for the whites and give it to them?”

        Again, its negro magical thinking. “If I lived in that neighborhood, I’d have all that white people stuff.” Just like, “If I had that whitey’s corner office I’d be Vice President.” I’ve seen examples in day to day life like a negro finding a discarded gift card (the preloaded credit cards) then spending half a day trying to get an ATM to dispense money. “I see them whitey’s getting money from this machine, now I gots me a card and won’t give me no money!” It is a child’s level of thinking, but then that’s really what their low IQ is, they think on the level of an 8-12 year old child.

        • thegodsofeden

          I thought I was the only one who’d seen the gift card type of thing happen. So, I’m not going crazy. WooHoo!

        • TruthBeTold

          Exactly.

          ‘Good things keep happening to White people. Bad things keep happening to black people. There must be a reason. That reason has to be something magical like ‘racism’ and ‘White Supremacy because it’s nothing black people are doing to themselves’.

          Good neighborhoods just happen for White people. Why?
          White people always seem to have money to improve their lives. Why?
          The media makes it look like blacks commit a lot more crime than Whites. Why?

          It’s a combination of magical thinking and inability to plan for the future. It’s also the problem of blacks being unwilling or incapable of taking care of themselves.

          I keep saying, instead of moving into ‘good neighborhoods’ (where Whites live) why not emulate what White people do in White neighborhoods?

          Unfortunately, this is beyond black thinking for abilities.

    • Oil Can Harry

      John Stewart Leibowitz never notices that many of the black NY neighborhoods where “they don’t teach values” were previously majority white or Jewish, and while they may have been low income towns they had nowhere near the crime or pathology of black areas.

      • Dave West

        The magical “values” just follow white people wherever we go; it must be part of white privilege. When white people gentrify a formerly minority neighborhood, crime magically goes down and the streets and sidewalks just clean themselves.

        • Stan D Mute

          For negroes, “white privilege” = white voodoo. They’re mad because it seems this white voodoo is more powerful than their negro voodoo.

          • thegodsofeden

            In my case it’s the ‘White Mojo’ that does the trick.

        • winn sutanto

          I cannot possibly agree with you more, Dave.
          Just go to West Atlantic Avenue, Delray Beach, Florida.
          In the 1980’s when Blacks lived on that area, that area was crime-ridden ghetto black low low class neighborhood.
          But on the 21st century, when White moves back to West Atlantic Avenue. White manages to turn that area into semi-fancy, semi-luxurious neighborhood.
          Gone is the crime-ridden black ghetto day

    • bilderbuster

      Appalachia, the homeland of White poverty, is never mentioned in these phony debates.

      • UncleSham

        I feel sort of guilty saying this, but the people of Appalachia are pretty much the bottom of the barrel in terms of genetic material for the future of the White race.

        • bilderbuster

          You should feel guilty because the Whites in Appalachia score the same intelligence levels as Whites nation wide and the lower violent crime rates are the same too.
          The same higher IQ’s and much lower percentages in violent crimes than Blacks of any income nation wide.

          • SentryattheGate

            Thank you! I was raised in the Ozarks, similar to Appalachia; poor, but hard-working, resourceful farm families, conservative, respectful and respectable, with few crimes, and little welfare use. I learned a lot of good things there!

          • bilderbuster

            There’s a lot of welfare use there but the welfare use is equal to the amount of poverty.

          • SentryattheGate

            Apparently that’s changed in the decades since I lived there.

          • journey

            Of course, Stewart will not beat you down about not letting in blacks in your “poor” neighborhood! No white privilege there!

          • SentryattheGate

            Good point! There were no blacks there, in the Ozarks; I was 14 before I was around blacks (having moved toward St.Louis). I was curious about them at first, but soon dismayed at their low IQ and immorality!

        • journey

          An article came out recently titled, “White Poverty Exists, Ignored”. The whites absolutely get nothing in welfare, social programs, etc. They do not even have running water but yet they make ado. The blacks get a large piece of the white tax dollars because of the delusions about slavery, etc. due to the media primarily owned by our “guests”.

          • Stan D Mute

            Really? All because of the “media”? Seems to me that this media is empowered only by those who choose to watch it. Further, these “guests” are supposedly greed driven aren’t they? So it’s hard to believe they’d fill their schedules with things people don’t want to watch..

          • journey

            Media = advertisements, movies, TV shows, printed literature, news, etc = BIG money business. The media is a very effective
            insidious mode of mind manipulation and control. Examples:
            Selling cigarettes and miscegenation as hip and cool; drugs as a cure all; fashion (even when ridiculous and impractical), of course, the blacks as innocent victims of the evil whites (big movie maker along with the Holocaust), etc.

        • gemjunior

          They are of Scots-Irish descent and Scottish men have been disproportionately responsible for many of the greatest inventions of the white Euro peoples, just off the top of my head Chuck Yeager was from Appalachia, the American pilot who first broke the sound barrier. They are very intelligent, but you can’t get blood from a stone and the land they live on gives nothing now that the coal industry is finished.

    • DonReynolds

      Both Billy O and Leibowitz seem to be reluctant to admit their basic irrationality about “white privilege”, specifically that it is something that whites are given as babes, but it can be shared with others, like candy, if only they wanted others to have some.
      No ethnic group or race is denied white values, they simply reject them, and by rejecting the values, they also reject any possible benefits that come from such values. In the meantime, whites should hand over those benefits to those who refuse to adopt the values anyway…..”because that would be fair” and because it would not involve any work or effort on their part. All part of the insanity of egalitarian nonsense about equality, which requires the elimination of freedom and private property to accomplish it.

      • mikekingjr

        Just gibsmedat.

      • SentryattheGate

        Well said! I have been saying that the word “racism” is used when “righteous indignation” is more the case. Groups who are productive and successful because of their values are becoming indignant at having to pay (through forced taxation) for other groups who adopt bad and immoral values! Like Atlas shrugged.

        • DonReynolds

          When we hang a murderer, if he is black….the liberals will say we are racist and we hate him for the color of his skin. Of course, this is not true. We hate him because he is a murderer.
          If the liberals were correct, we would hang ALL black men and ALL black women….yet there has never been any such plan.

  • CJ Haze

    I care very little for either one of these guys. I care even less about Stewart’s superficial, tedious audience. An audience that is overwhelmingly young, white and liberal.

    The reason why they applaud doesn’t bother me. The applause bothers me. It interrupts the conversation only to show loyalty. Laughter is almost always involuntary. Applause is purposeful and in this case, meant to break up the interview.

    Asian and Jewish privilege were skimmed over very quickly. And O’Reilly allowed Stewart to hurdle those two subjects. Seeing how he’s in the entertainment — not news — industry, he knows who butters his bread. He can lose the argument and keep his job, or win the argument and lose his job.

    • phillyguy

      nobody speaks of the Zionist privilege, how come? they control the News media to suit their own intentions ,they own Hollywood to change American history and hold the white man responsible for the way the blacks and the Browns live below the poverty line.

    • bilderbuster

      Asian Privilege was skimmed over very quickly.
      Jewish Privilege was never mentioned and O’Reilly is paid handsomely to make sure that it never is.

      • UncleSham

        Stewart mentioned Jewish Privilege, as a joke.

        • bilderbuster

          About his beard, but that didn’t stop Blow Reilly from continuing to refer to Stewart/Leibowitz as “White”.

    • pcmustgo

      I do a lot of online dating. Almost all the men here mention in their profile how much they love John Stewart and NPR.

      • Stan D Mute

        That’s an interesting observation. So there is a superabundance of beta males. I wonder then if alpha signaling would get a lot more attention as a result? Or are some of those doing the beta signaling doing so because they think they’ll attract females? “I hate NPR, would rather listen to Rush Limbaugh, hate Jon Stewart and rather watch NASCAR, but I’ll claim the opposite because chicks dig NPR and Stewart”?? And I wonder what the success rate of each would be?

        • thegodsofeden

          Or it could be that most Alpha males don’t use online dating sites because they have no need to do so. Being an Alpha may cause them to attract more women in the course of their day-to-day lives.

  • Dave West

    Another point Billy O should have brought up is the fact that many blacks and hispanics live in the same type of poor communities. Given that, why do hispanics, many of whom don’t speak proficient english, have marginally better educational outcomes and have lower crime rates than blacks?

    Another point to bring up is the fact that white students from low-income families do better on the SAT than black students from high-income families.

    • Earl P. Holt III

      The average I.Q. of Hispanics falls about half-way between that of whites and “you-know-who”…

      • Dave West

        I think it might even be closer to blacks than whites, I thought they had an IQ of about 89, verses 85 for blacks and 100 for whites.

        • DonReynolds

          What might be more interesting is the fact that males are more intelligent than females among whites. Whereas, among blacks the female is the more intelligent.
          I have no stats on hispanos females, but my experience and observation has been that the female side is more intelligent than the male side there too. It would make for an entirely different society if male intelligence were less than female.

        • Earl P. Holt III

          I didn’t intend to suggest that the average Hispanic I.Q. falls EXACTLY half-way between. Btw, the average for “you-know-who” falls between 79 and 85, depending on the study. Blacks may well be experiencing a decline in their average I.Q., because the dumbest are paid to breed prolifically by our traitorous elite.

          Meanwhile, different waves of Hispanic immigrants almost certainly have different average I.Q.s, and the fact that we are welcoming the dregs of the Third World bodes ill for the average American I.Q in general…

          • Stan D Mute

            The african IQ is in the neighborhood of 65-70. That’s in Africa and depends on tribe. The testing on negroes in America says around 85 and assumes that it’s due to better nutrition. So far, I haven’t seen a study that compares American negro IQ to their white admixture which averages 25%. But I’d be quite willing to wager the American negro IQ has as much or more to do with white genes as it does with better nutrition. After all, the African evolved to his native african diet. So barring any famine, he’s probably got what he needs to optimize his potential eating bushmeats and fruits and vegetables he may find. By the same token, if mesoamerican Indian IQ is around 85 as I’ve seen it reported then the common mestizo would have an IQ correspondingly higher due to his white admixture.

        • Stan D Mute

          “They” whom? I just did some digging around and found indio IQ at around 85. That would put mestizos somewhere between 85 and 100 as an admixture. Criollos would be in the 95-100 range like their Iberian cousins.

      • Stan D Mute

        What’s a “Hispanic”? A criollo? A mestizo? An indio? Because each is quite different genetically and each will have correspondingly different IQ.

        • Earl P. Holt III

          I believe I made that point, but thanks…

  • proud white

    no debate needed

    blacks are athletic and love playing ball = Major success in sports

    blacks are below average in intelligence and do not like studying = Major failure in school

    NOTE: Why does no one ever mention affirmative action

  • Jaggers

    Jon Stewart has the body language in this clip of a little girl. I don’t know if O’Reilly debated him to adeptly, but at least he’s a man for crying out loud.

  • dd121

    Mainstream “conservatives” like OReilly, Limbaugh, Hannity, et al. don’t talk about race or racial differences. It’s the one subject that will get them instantly taken off the air. Oh I forgot, can’t say anything negative about Jews or Israel, either.

    • journey

      One can tell O’Reilly was trying to contain himself. He knows the script.

      • Stan D Mute

        So does Stewart.

    • MannyR

      Yeah Maddow, Stewart, Maher, and Hartman are much more fairer toward white people. Give me a break, Limbaugh is the only one that even approaches the subject with a bit of serious examination. As for the other 2, at the very least they offer some push back against the leftist dominated MSM.

  • me

    Banned comment again. Oh, well. Shouldn’t have mentioned Jon Stewart’s ‘privilege’.

  • Earl P. Holt III

    Stewart is a member of “The Tribe.” Enough said…

    • Tim_in_Indiana

      And apparently he admits that they’re not white.

      • TruthBeTold

        That’s why I would have asked him one question, ‘do you consider yourself white’.

        No matter how he answered, he would lose in the long run.

        • LHathaway

          “do you consider yourself white”?

          Yeah, that’s the question which would have won the debate *sarcasm*

          • UncleSham

            Stewart would just answer the question with a question: “What do you mean, do I consider myself White?” (bewildered look, cue the laugh track).

            O’Reilly would have to lay it out plainly with the question: “Do Jews consider themselves White, and what comes first, Jewish or White?”

            I can’t say what it would do for the debate, but it would at least be somewhat interesting. The problem is that Jews do consider themselves White, but it doesn’t mean to them what it means to other White people.

          • LHathaway

            “Jews consider themselves white” there’s a positive statement.

            I think ‘jews’ are getting ‘revenge’ for the holocaust. At least, I think that’s what will be the ultimate idea, no matter what these phony ‘jew’ obsessed people say on here. But it’s still not productive to talk about jews in any way, whatsoever, in my opinion, while trying to promote white rights. I’m not sure what My excuse is. My excuse is that I think Everything is a conspiracy (one even white nationalists are willing to go along with, they’re already going along with supporting gays). I Know everything is a conspiracy, that is, completely made up and phony. Especially here.

      • phillyguy

        Tim watch what you say Eric Holder is the moderator on this site tonight

  • Tim_in_Indiana

    When that zombie audience hooted and cheered the first time Stewart brought up “white privilege,” I would like O’Reilly to have asked the audience, “Do YOU benefit from white privilege?” and if they said yes, asked them if they were going to give up their home, their neighborhoods and their jobs to make up for it. That’s how we have to handle these idiots: pick them out one-by-one and call them out on their hypocrisy.

    • phillyguy

      he should have called out tribe privilege

  • Andy

    The racist GOP is stoking racist white fears!

    http[colon]//www[dot]bloombergview[dot]com/articles/2014-10-16/republicans-pave-way-to-allwhite-future?cmpid=yhoo

    Can anyone add to the discussion?

    • Looks like “Bloomberg View” is yet another clickbait hovel of the internet. Only it seems to use Tumblr as its formatting and presentation scheme.

      As for the article, its background is a picture of John McCain. I would rather watch the St. Louis Cardinals get eliminated from the postseason tonight on TV by a score of 200-0 than read the paranoid screed opinion of someone who thinks that John McCain, Mr. Amnesty, is secretly packing some sort of white racialist agenda. If only, if only.

  • John Smith

    A decade or so ago Bill O’reilly (and Hannity & Colmes and FOX overall) actually had some credibility because of the way they reported some racially tinged topics.

    But the relentless tracking of every statement with the subsequent mocking and ridiculing by the Mahers, Stewarts and the Colberts of the world have eroded that away.

    Back on topic, O’reilly could have gained credibility and really rattled cages by specifically asking –

    “Hey Stewart – do you think there is Asian or Jewish privilege in this country; especially in the elite Ivy League colleges?”

    • journey

      Stewart’s script is that blacks are victims of the legacy of slavery and past discrimination and oppression which explains away their failures. Asians are different because they came here on their own free will. Blacks are smart like everyone else just that they were never allowed to live in white neighborhoods. Therefore, they are not to blame for the ghettos and culture that they themselves created. This is the standard script that is being feed to the white masses. Pretty delusional but believed with all sincerity.

      • Franklin_Ryckaert

        Yes, 100% environmentism, the standard PC “explanation”.

      • Stan D Mute

        Believed by morons. Smart people don’t believe it. Your great great grandfather’s employment situation doesn’t amount to a hill of beans for you today unless he was immensely rich and set up a trust fund. Everybody, literally everybody on the planet, has slave ancestors.

        They peddle the “legacy of” script precisely because the morons will buy it. But it’s so easily debunked as to be laughable.

    • Stan D Mute

      Let’s say Stewart/Leibowitz had admitted the truth. Suppose he had said, “You know what O’Reilly, fact is that negroes aren’t very smart. In fact, at least 25% of them aren’t even educable to the point where they’d have any employment prospects at all and they’ll never close the achievement gap.” Let’s say he admitted the truth like this. What then?

  • phillyguy

    everyone watch what they say Eric Holder is the moderator on this site tonight

  • Luca

    O’Reilly should have asked him about his Jewish privilege.

    • MannyR

      The OReilly Factor would be cancelled quick if he even thought about it.

      • Luca

        The 1st commandment in Hollywood/media: Thou shalt never speaketh ill of the chosen ones.

        • MannyR

          Big time

  • Caucasoid88

    Leibowitz lies so easily. O’Reilly brought up Asian privilege, but he should’ve brought up Jewish privilege. But there is absolutely no problem with being born more accustomed to modern civilization, like whites, Asians, and Jews are.

    The big question all white privilege peddlers need to be asked is simple: “So what?”

  • Dave West

    If white males apparently have all this un-earned privilege, then why do standards always have to be lowered so that more blacks and hispanics can be accepted in to various schools/colleges, corporations, and civil servant departments.

  • Dave West

    How many more centuries do we have to wait around for blacks to recover form the evil legacy of slavery? It seems like as more time passes since April 1865, the more blacks and mentally ill white libtards bring it up.

    • dd121

      Blaming slavery, which ended 150 years ago, will never cease being an excuse for negro dysfunction.

      • mikekingjr

        Yep, because it will always work with libtards.

    • MannyR

      Year 3000 and Mars colonists will still be debating this crap if certain Eskimos have their way.

    • Stan D Mute

      Especially so when you consider their great statesman Frederick Douglass asked only for the negro to be left alone to sink or swim on his own. When Douglass was himself once a slave, he didn’t whine about “white privilege” or “racism”. He just wanted to be left alone.

      It’s pretty hard to square that with the situation today where negroes are born with legal rights and privileges whites don’t have. And yet still they demand more and succeed less.

      • B.A_2014

        I would be laughed at for saying the great Irish Famine is the reason I failed in school and behaved like a thug in my youth right through until mt early twenties. I dare say that some of them would be so ashamed and embarrassed they would severe ties. Slavery was abolished in 1865 and the Irish famine was basically over by 1848 so there isn’t much difference. I couldn’t tell you for the life of me why such an event would effect the descendants of those people.

        • Stan D Mute

          It affects them because pathetic whites can be manipulated into giving them goodies. That and because nobody can admit the real cause of their myriad failures as a people.

      • thegodsofeden

        Douglass had it right. Then along came the Jesse Jackson/Al Sharpton of that day and won out with his talk of equality and civil rights activism.

  • journey

    O’Reilly et al. are afraid to touch on the following to avoid getting blacklisted and
    fired: Each race started with nothing. So called white privilege (working hard for the next generation) was created by whites and for whites (including the institutions). So how can
    this be white privilege?

    The question that needs to asked globally, is why are blacks so dysfunctional no matter
    where they are? Everything that the blacks touch turns into a pile of garbage (was better when they lived in a more primitive state because at least the pile of garbage degraded faster). Answer: It all goes back to inherent racial genetic differences. Blacks have greater difficulties with life due to an average IQ/intelligence of ~75 or <. So of course, relative to whites, blacks are always at the bottom of barrel to be at the mercy of other races.

    As for Stewart nothing like playing with the same old safe nice guy script that blacks are innocent victims because they were brought into this country against their will but yet blacks live in Paradise compare to their brothers in Africa, etc. And because Stewart belongs to a certain tribe, white guilt and wrong doing must always be part of that script.

    • thegodsofeden

      And definitely don’t bring up the fact that there were actually black ‘slave owners’ early in history of the US.

  • LHathaway

    This debate about ‘white privilege’ is no more useful that a debate about ‘hate crimes’ that takes if for a given that whites can’t be victims of hate crimes.

  • Adolf Verloc

    I don’t usually care for O’Reilly, but he is a god compared to supposed funnyman Stewart. Clever to strap the Asians on him.

    • Stan D Mute

      And Stewart very nearly let the cat out of the bag when O’Reilly hit him with Asians. He could have, should have, said “Asians and Jews”. Eventually we will see a marxist loon take the bait on this. Some clever guy will pin one down and the loon will admit the truth. What then?

  • RHG

    Maybe Orielly should have asked Stewart about “Jewish Privlege” in the TV industry

    • Stan D Mute

      He would have to be looking for retirement to ask that.

  • IKUredux

    How exactly do we have “White Privilege”? Because you know what? this “White Privilege” thing is just another subterfuge to screw we Whites. I swear to God, they actually have people pent up in some progressive torture chamber, until they come up with innovative ways to BLAME Whites. Seriously, “microaggressions”? What with AA, and allowing illegals into higher education establishments, where, exactly, does this mythical “White Privilege” come into play? There is NO SUCH THING! There is NO “White Privilege”. What there is is this: Whites developed civilization. We Whites, actually came up with the concept of civilization. Not only did we do that, but, we also came up with other paradigms of human structure. We Whites invented communism. Yeah, yay. We Whites invented Socialism. (Yay?). We Whites participated in “colonialism”. and “imperialism” For which we also provided the names, In point of fact, we Whites, have stupidly provided the philosophy and the means to permit the savage colored hordes to over run our civilization. Kudos to the “Endarkenment” Whites.

    • How exactly do we have “White Privilege”?

      By being alive and consuming oxygen.

      Remember QD’s Axiom #64: If, of the seven billion people on Earth, even only one of them is a gentile white heterosexual non-leftist, the other 6,999,999,999 people will be oppressed minorities.

      • DonReynolds

        A slave is a person who waits for someone else to free him.

    • MannyR

      I truthfully believe that there is nothing and I mean nothing that whites could do in this country that will in anyway stop the “blame whitey” game that’s been going on since the 1960s. Democrats have to have someway to consistently convince blacks that the fact that their race is a total failure is never their fault. This country is too invested in white guilt. Without it you’d have to come to the conclusion that multiculturalism doesn’t work.

      • IKUredux

        MannyR, there is something we can do. Many of us know that multiculti doesn’t work. Oh, by the way? I don’t have even a dime invested

    • Diana Moon Glampers

      Evolution = White privilege.

      • IKUredux

        Exactly. We won Darwin’s game.

  • MannyR

    I have a couple that I consider friends who watch this crap all the time. Always quoting something from it as if it’s actual news. Mid 20s, hip, urban, progressive liberal and absolutely clueless. They still talk about Bush like he’s relavent.

  • DonReynolds

    This unplanned mini-debate was more important than anyone seems to appreciate.
    What we have is a Roman Catholic and a Jew arguing over what to do about the WASPs…..the exact same thing as the US Supreme Court (which is nearly evenly divided between Jews and Roman Catholics, with no Protestants).
    Both represent their own tribe and it reminds me of two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for dinner.

    • Luca

      Which is why the lamb should be well armed.

      • DonReynolds

        Very good, Luca.
        And you know that arms are not enough. The lamb should be proficient in the use of arms and have the resolve to shoot first.

  • Jeff Traube

    O’Reilly is looking at economics. Of course there’s white privilege. Less so today than a century ago. Just like there was Austrian privilege in the Hapsburg, French privilege in Algeria, German privilege in the Corridor, white privilege in South Africa. But when they gave up that privilege, there were dire consequences. Is that your goal ? Not ours, so we’d rather talk about black privilege of favorable admission standards, refusing to use sidewalk, being able to flee, assault and runaway from police, enter white neighborhoods, and Hebrew privilege of monopolizing the education and media to set immigration policy and selectively report crime, and spend American blood and treasure for Israel.

  • gregCall

    And you seldom will, especially not here.

    • Sparky

      I’ve noticed the trend here that the ones constantly bringing up Jews are not regulers here. Just noticin’.

      • Stan D Mute

        You think they’re trolling? I hadn’t noticed this.

      • Mike

        I don’t see how noticing the central Jewish role in anti-white activism equates to pointing a gun at anyone.

  • Not a fan of O’Reilly but atleast someone “mainstream” is sticking up for white people (or trying too).

    I wonder if John Leibowitz lives in a “diverse” neighborhood?

    White privilege?!–obviously they haven’t heard of Affirmative Action.

  • LIBERTYSINCURSION

    I can’t stand John Leibowitz Stewart,,,,, THE END! <- I was going to write more but this guy literally makes me sick, and that brief sentence, has already got me feeling nauseous.

  • MissaJim

    White privilege my butt. What you have is unqualified blacks and Hispanics getting jobs they shouldn’t get. Plus, what kind of work ethic do blacks have? Give me a break.

  • bigbiz2

    There darn better be White priveledge in a country founded by Whites..Constitution by Whites ..Universities paid for and supported by Whites ..White form of government…yada yada yada..another mindless argument against common sense.

  • Stan D Mute

    O’Reilly cannot state the obvious. Nobody can really. Think about this in the abstract for a moment. If you have two sub-species of tigers on the same land mass where one sub-species (a) is significantly smarter than the other (b) and neither a nor b has a significant advantage in other traits, what will happen over time? Since tigers are apex predators they are hard wired to compete mercilessly for territory. Our examples a and b then cannot cohabit the same area at the same time. Since the only significant advantage goes to a in intelligence then a will drive b out of his territory. And as time progresses the land left to b will grow smaller and smaller until he’s way out on the tip of a peninsula with nothing but ocean all around him and his old enemy a forcing him to swim for it.

    So our little story above illustrates the problem we face philosophically. If we admit that Africans have a significant intellectual handicap what does that mean for us? For them? It’s either permanent affirmative action and welfare to give them an artificial boost or its bye-bye Africans. This is exactly why you will not see anyone, of any political party, admit the truth. It’s not the truth itself, but the consequences of that truth.

  • Max

    Why isn’t Stewart asking about Jewish Privilege?

  • Garrett Brown

    Again, you’re referring to the religion. Were discussing the people that insist they are a unique racial group. Your argument only exists when discussing religion, try to keep up.

  • pcmustgo

    That bastard Stewart says whites don’t have to worry about moving in to a neighborhood and getting cat-called… are you f-ing kidding me? Blacks are the kings of cat-calling and racial street harassment and rudeness. And whites don’t have to worry about being accepted when moving into a neighborhood? If they move into a black, asian or latino one, they do!

  • 4321realist

    White privilege is just another black buzz word that has been coined to cover up the fact that whites are much smarter than blacks. And to cover up for the fact that ALL other racial groups are smarter than blacks also.

    If whites were eliminated from the equation, nothing would be different. Blacks would still be in last place of all the groups in the world.

    The narrative on accomplishment and failure should be shifted to include blacks and
    Hispanics; blacks and Asians; and blacks and Indians, etc., because all of them do far better than blacks in school and the work place.

  • gemjunior

    That would be interesting. Also, what position or positions does the Roman Catholic church take that are negative or offensive at Fox News that are of any concern? The Protestant churches don’t vary much in their promotion of globalism, centralization, and pro-immigration from the Roman Catholic Church. If the bishops or cardinals are giving advice to O’Reilly how would that advice really differ from advice given by a minister to Rush Limbaugh for example? I don’t like or watch O’Reilly or Limbaugh but I can understand why they have a lot of fans who hate the leftism and culture of materialistic porn that is suffocating us all.

  • MidwestWerewolf

    What was that thing called “Jewish privilege,” Stewart was talking about?

  • brior

    Why does the Jewish persuasion ALWAYS promote the open borders of this country but not for others,. Why does the tribe ALWAYS promote the subjucation of whites in This America?

    Why do the Jews consider themselves “White” When it conveniences them?

    • Jeff Traube

      Simple tribal mentality. Most Hebrews support ethnic solidarity in Israel because that benefits their tribe as the majority, but open borders in European countries because that benefits their tribe when they are the minority. They can decry white privilege as tool to weaken Europeans, but will not decry Hebrew privilege as it would weaken them.

  • Enoch_Power

    In Israel there is significant Jew Privil

  • DonReynolds

    I do not consider Jews or Israelis to be my enemies. I volunteered for the Israeli Air Force in 1972 through the Israeli Information Committee, headed at the time by Rabbi Charles Schiffman. (My application was rejected because I was not familiar with Hebrew…..which was a requirement at the time.)
    At the same time, I do not consider them privileged or deserving of any privilege. They have their own history, just as my family has their own history. Wars and scourges and purges have been visited on many Europeans and encouraged migration to this country. Persecution is not always about religion nor has it been confined to the Jews.

  • Mike

    OMG Europeans were mean to Jews a thousand years ago? I guess it’s cool for them to have us killed off then. After all they’ve never been mean.