UN Pushes for Migrants to Be Called Refugees

Alberto Arce and Michael Weissenstein, Big Story, July 8, 2014

United Nations officials are pushing for many of the Central Americans fleeing to the U.S. to be treated as refugees displaced by armed conflict, a designation meant to increase pressure on the United States and Mexico to accept tens of thousands of people currently ineligible for asylum.

Officials with the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees say they hope to see movement toward a regional agreement on that status Thursday when migration and interior department representatives from the U.S., Mexico, and Central America meet in Nicaragua. The group will discuss updating a 30-year-old declaration regarding the obligations nations have to aid refugees.

While such a resolution would lack any legal weight, the agency said it believes “the U.S. and Mexico should recognize that this is a refugee situation, which implies that they shouldn’t be automatically sent to their home countries but rather receive international protection.”

Most of the people widely considered to be refugees by the international community are fleeing more traditional political or ethnic conflicts like those in Syria or the Sudan. Central Americans would be among the first modern migrants considered refugees because they are fleeing violence and extortion at the hands of criminal gangs.

“They are leaving for some reason. Let’s not send them back in a mechanical way, but rather evaluate the reasons they left their country,” Fernando Protti, regional representative for the U.N. refugee agency, told The Associated Press.

Even though the agreement would not be legally binding on the countries that sign it, advocates say it would help create international consensus to help the migrants.

Those actions could include emergency aid and social services for internally displaced people inside Honduras, Guatemala and El Salvador.

{snip}

Both Congressional Republicans and the Obama administration have called for action to reverse the trend. Among other changes, the administration wants to end a 2008 law allowing child migrants to automatically appear before an immigration judge. Instead, Border Patrol agents could decide whether to deport them or allow them an additional hearing.

Asked Monday whether the Obama administration viewed the situation at the border as a refugee crisis, White House spokesman Josh Earnest said it was “a humanitarian situation that requires urgent attention.”

The administration, he said, wanted to ensure child migrants were housed in “humane conditions” while authorities worked quickly to determine whether they should be allowed to remain in the U.S. If not, he said, the Homeland Security secretary should be allowed “to exercise his discretion about repatriating.”

Many Congressional Republicans attribute the increased immigration to a failure to secure the border and recent immigration policy changes that led many to believe child migrants would be allowed to stay.

Many of the migrants, in fact, stay for years as their cases wend through overloaded migration courts. Those who say they are fleeing criminal violence generally are not eligible for political asylum, which is reserved for groups persecuted for their beliefs or identities. U.N. officials say there is no way of forcing the U.S. and Mexico to accept Central Americans as refugees, but a broad-based change in terminology could bring pressure on the two countries to do more.

“Unaccompanied children and families who fear for their lives and freedoms must not be forcibly returned without access to proper asylum procedures,” UNHCR official Leslie Velez said in testimony submitted to the House Judiciary Committee late last month.

{snip} Honduras, a primary transit point for U.S.-bound cocaine, has the world’s highest homicide rate for a nation that is not at war. In El Salvador, the end of a truce between street gangs has led to a steep rise in homicides this year.

Violence by criminal organizations spread in recent decades after members of California street gangs were deported to Honduras, Guatemala and El Salvador, where they overwhelmed weak and corrupt police forces and seized control of large sections of the countries.

Salvadorans heading north through Mexico who were interviewed by The Associated Press last month said there also was fear of the “Sombra Negra,” or “Black Shadow”—groups of masked men in civilian clothes who are believed responsible for extrajudicial killings of teens in gang-controlled neighborhoods. The Salvadoran government denies any involvement in death squads, but says it is investigating the reports.

In El Salvador, at least 135,000 people, or 2.1 percent of the population, have been forced to leave their homes, the vast majority due to gang extortion and violence, according to U.N. figures. {snip}

{snip}

Topics: , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • MekongDelta69

    Of course the far-left, America hating U.N. is going to say that.

    So – let’s take all the illegal aliens, put them on buses, and bring them to the United Nations in NYC and send them through their front door. Those who don’t fit can be bussed to the White House and dropped off over the gate.

    Even better – let the ‘vaunted’ U.N. take all of them and distribute them around the world.

    • Dale McNamee

      Not only should they be dropped at the White House… They should be dropped at Democrat Senate & Congressional offices at the Capitol and at the Guatemalan,Mexican,El Salvadoran, and Honduran embassies in DC !

      • propagandaoftruth

        Except that since the prezzy refuses to enforce immigration laws so the dems (browns and blacks) will be forever in place to soak achievers…

        Heck Mr. Obama – don’t look now but…there’s a bunch of em in your very office! Hey…I’ll call the INS while you continue to distract them…

        Oh…

  • Truthseeker

    Where will we go for refuge when our country gets trashed by these “refugees”?

    • Einsatzgrenadier

      It looks like whites are going to have to stand and literally fight if they want to have a country worth living in for future generations of white people.

      • ElComadreja

        The time to stop this crap was in the 1970’s when it started to spin out of control.

        • propagandaoftruth

          Death Race 2000, “minority privilege”.

          We do need some organization that advocates and organizes. One form of organization needs to be self defense training and networking.

    • Lewis33

      Whites could take ten years to build a fully functioning state thriving in the middle of Greenland and blacks would be drowning each other to get on the slave ships over there.

  • Frank_DeScushin

    Please, these “asylum seekers” risk no political recourse against them if they return home. This is merely Obama and the UN trying to swamp the US with non-whites, and place the US further under UN control. All according to plan.

    • John R

      Talk about double standards. At the end of World War Two, the allies forcibly repatriated thousands of captured Soviet POW’s held by the Germans to certain death when handed over to Stalin, under the theory that any Russian soldier who surrendered was automatically a traitor. Now, any mestizo who doesn’t like his/her country can be considered a “refugee.”

  • TruthBeTold

    Illegal aliens. Migrants. Immigrants. Refugees.

    You can change the name but they’re still undesirables.

    • Diversity Fatigue

      Future democrats.

      • Cecil Broomsted

        Wards of the state.

      • Einsatzgrenadier

        Future soldiers in the low level race war against whites.

        • ElComadreja

          I don’t even know how low-level it is anymore.

    • propagandaoftruth

      The UN is just a brown/black advocacy farce that wants to invade civilized countries through “refugee” migration and conquest.

      • JDInSanD

        The question is, “WHY?”

        Why is it so important to destroy us? Is it really because those in power are threatened by us? Is it just to keep the third world from feeling inferior? Is it really just because otherwise we’d just leave everyone else behind? Is it really because we’re so evil?

        And why don’t our own people see the obvious? Why aren’t our own people enraged?

        • IstvanIN

          Why is it so important to destroy us? Two words: Never Again (even though we were the one’s who saved them).

        • GeneticsareDestiny

          Our people can’t see the obvious because they’re extremely outbred. This makes them psychologically incapable of understanding the threat third worlders pose to their own genetic interests. They no longer have any psychological concept of “us vs. them,” so they’re very easy to manipulate into doing pathologically altruistic things.

          You can read more about the effect of extreme outbreeding on whites at HBDChick’s blog.

    • RisingReich

      Refuse

    • DonReynolds

      Call them anything but “immigrants”. By law, those in the immigration system, who are in the country legally……are the ONLY immigrants.
      Otherwise, they are drug mules, cartel hitmen, prostitutes, disease vectors, thieves, murderers, welfare cheats, rapists, smugglers and scam artists.

  • AmericanCitizen

    If these people are fleeing central America they can stop and stay in Mexico, right?

    • ElComadreja

      And why hasn’t Mexico been held accountable?

  • Diversity Fatigue

    Who cares what the UN says. That den of leftist miscreants wouldn’t even exist if not for US white men fighting and dying in WWII. Obama probably urged them to say something about the situation. Still, the republicans are AWOL. There is no meaningful opposition.

    .

  • NoMosqueHere

    The UN functions to advance the muslim agenda. Its two main priorities are condemning Israel and whitewashing muslim atrocities. It just isn’t inclined to address the criminal organizations that have taken over much of central america.

    • Long Live Dixie

      How many times do Israelis need to condemn nationalism in Europe before you get a clue?

      • NoMosqueHere

        The Europeans are self destructing on their own. They don’t need, and don’t receive, any help from Israel.

        • Long Live Dixie

          I didn’t say anything about help from Israel (though there are many examples of Israel working against nationalism in Europe). I said Israelis are condemning nationalism in Europe. Do you deny that? Did you read Israeli newspaper editorials after the EU elections or Netanyahu’s comments after the crackdown on Golden Dawn? Expanding this further to Jews worldwide, can you find any mainstream Jewish organisations that agree with you that “no mosques [should be] here”? Why don’t you ask Abraham Foxman, Mark Potok, and Barbara Spectre what their thoughts on mosques in Europe and the West are?

          • NoMosqueHere

            I prefer Goldie Hawn (a nice jewish girl) to Golden Dawn.

            I don’t read Israel’s newspapers and I don’t have any jewish affiliations. But I support Israel, especially vis a vis the muslim menace.

          • Long Live Dixie

            But I support Israel, especially vis a vis the muslim menace.

            You support Israel’s stance of foisting the Muslim menace on Europe?

          • NoMosqueHere

            Israel is not in a position to “foist” anything on Europe. It has enough problems just trying to survive.

          • Long Live Dixie

            Give it a rest. Israel is firmly opposed to nationalism in Europe. Anyone who isn’t dumber than a box of rocks can see the obvious.

          • Martel

            You are amongst a ”unique elite” then, not even one millionth of the European/US population shares your aggressive stance on the ”omnipotent and omnipresent Jew”, they are all dumber then a box of rocks. And they still somehow manage to scrape by, build advanced technology, send satellites into space, cure diseases and raise the living standards of all populations worldwide. Imagine what they could do if they would be more like you! As long as people like you pollute the airwaves, we can never expose Jewish political influence and provide alternatives without looking like paranoid sociopaths. Thanks.

            Ps: Have you already tracked down Wilders ”handlers” who play him like a puppet. I mean obviously they do, no one can be pro-israel without being dumber then a box of rocks.

          • NoMosqueHere

            Many christians support israel.

          • Martel

            Its a one sided love affair, yes. Israelis tend to be quite prejudiced against European gentiles, and as Taylor pointed out, many pro-Israeli Jews support an Israeli ethnostate while opposing gentile ethnostates. The strong support for Israel amongst Christian conservatives is due to the fact that Jews are overrepresented amongst the ”conservative elite” as donors and organisers.

            I have no issues with Israel, but I would be foolish to actually support them as long as they do not support our political objectives, promote a false historical narrative or use the ”holocaust-card” to extort us Europeans.

          • Alexandra1973

            This Christian supports the *nation* of Israel, not the *state* of Israel. That’s the difference.

            I support the right of the Jews to their land.

            I don’t deny that there are Jews involved in this whole conspiracy thing, but they’re not the true power behind it. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain and all that….

          • paul marchand

            Dicksie: yeah. Like Israel is going to have enough stroke to be the determining factor. The determining factor of some weird dream of yours, that nobody else is familiar with, except from some obscure publication/site.

          • Long Live Dixie

            It has enough problems just trying to survive.

            It must be tough “trying to survive” when the world’s greatest superpower has your back.

          • NoMosqueHere

            And the muslim in the white house is just peachy, huh?

          • paul marchand

            ^ ^ news to me (taken with grain of salt)

          • Long Live Dixie

            Does anyone else remember when Israel broke off ties with Austria from 2000 till 2003 after the very moderate anti-immigration Freedom Party entered the Austrian government?

            “Israel cannot remain silent in the face of the rise of extremist right-wing parties, in particular in those countries which played a role in the events which brought about the eradication of a third of the Jewish people in the Holocaust,” said a foreign ministry statement at the time.

            However, relations between the two countries have warmed following Austria’s offer of compensation for Holocaust survivors and their descendants, as well as the Freedom Party’s slide in popular support at last year’s elections.

            news[DOT]bbc[DOT]co[DOT]uk/2/hi/middle_east/3107373[DOT]stm

          • NoMosqueHere

            Austria and Germany were lucky WWII (the big one) ended in Europe before the US perfected the A bomb. The Japs weren’t so lucky.

          • IstvanIN

            Two atomic bombs, one on Berlin and one on Moscow, would have saved several generations of Germans, Soviets and Eastern Europeans the torture of communism. Perhaps a third on Peking would have saved the Chinese from Mao. And with the USSR dead and the nationalists in charge of China maybe the US would have remained the only atomic power.

          • paul marchand

            And had the “red-baiters” been adhered to, the Soviets would not have acquired nukes.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            The H-Bomb and the A-bomb will be making a comeback, which could trigger a chaos opportunity for European-America to exploit–if yuh know whatta mean? <;-D

          • IstvanIN

            The Israelis hated Jörg Haider.

          • John

            Do the following and you’ll change your tune in a hurry. Enter “Anthony Lawson” into your favorite search engine. Click on the link for “Anthony Lawson on Vimeo”. Watch his most recent video “What Does It Mean to be a Friend of Israel?”. Done? Then go to YouTube and do a search for the video “When Israel is Mighty”. Watch it. “part of an extended interview with writer Yossi Gurvitz transcribed & translated from Hebrew to English by Dena Shunra”. There you go. Jewology 101 is less than an hour. Now you’re starting to wake up.

          • NoMosqueHere

            I suggest you listen to Pat Condell’s recent video entitled Why I Support Israel. Hopefully that will help you out.

          • Long Live Dixie

            A mere 5 seconds into it and he’s already shown himself to be either an idiot or a liar: “The Jews want peace.” Lol!

          • RisingReich

            More proof that no mosque here really means “replace this mosque here with a synagogue “

          • NoMosqueHere

            Not true. But I would prefer a synagogue to a vicious mosque any day of the week and twice on sunday.

          • NoMosqueHere

            Jewology, whatever that means, in less than an hour? That’s pretty brief for an ancient people with a 4000 year history.

          • paul marchand

            If you were Jewish, living in Israel, or sympathetic to it, you would also be trying to have some influence in it’s favor. That is some new phenomenon to you?

          • IstvanIN

            Why can’t you support both Israel and Greece? Don’t the Greeks have just as much right to their tiny, rocky little piece of land as the Israelis do?

          • NoMosqueHere

            Greece exists today, does it not? Golden Dawn may or may not be beneficial to Greek survival — I don’t know them well enough to say — but Greece will somehow survive, unless the muslims devour it.

          • IstvanIN

            Golden Dawn fights for the survival of Greece as a Greek state for Greeks. Greece belongs to the Evil Union and as such has been inundated with “migrants” they can ill afford.

          • Long Live Dixie

            Greece exists today, does it not?

            Slightly under half of it. The rest is occupied by the Turks who are supported by Israel.

          • NoMosqueHere

            The turks are supported by israel? That’s quite funny.

          • paul marchand

            Be real. The Greeks have a little more space from the Muslims, and they aren’t targeted in the “holy” quran as the Israelis are.

          • Fidel Cashflow

            As a Jew I agree this is quite regrettable. Israel understands the benefit of ethnic nationalism yet refuses to support it in Europe. It’s hypocritical. They lose out on a real potential friend, an alliance of racially-realistic nation-states.

          • IstvanIN

            Despite any past bad blood the only real friends the Jews have are the Europeans, the Commonwealth realms and the US and it is incredibly stupid to undermine them.

            PS: love that name!

          • Fidel Cashflow

            That’s very true. I wish my fellow Jews recognized how the Anglo world has helped them. I respect white European culture and hate to see it fall apart. I hope you similarly can appreciate my ethno-nationalistic defense of Jews. A shame more Israelis don’t agree.

            And glad you enjoy the name. Gave me a chuckle.

          • Long Live Dixie

            A parasite will always undermine its host.

          • NoMosqueHere

            The nazis are the parasites of germany, not the jews. Hitler almost completely destroyed germany, and but for the marshall plan and the generosity of the americans he would have succeeded.

          • Martel

            Realistic ethnonationalist Jews are in short supply. A European-Jewish alliance would be mutually beneficial, and neither is likely to survive current political trends. The problem is that ethnonationalist Jews are either because of their own prejudices or due to fears stemming from historical experiences unable to tolerate similar ethnonationalist tendencies amongst gentile Europeans. Though I disagree with the biased narrative concerning Jewish-European relations throughout European history, stereotyping gentile whites as incorrigible ”antisemites” and Jews as unsuspecting victims, I do consider some of those fears to be understandable. This is not to say those fears are legitimate. Those who read more critical works on ”antisemitism”, find that this misnomer simply represents ”ethnic conflict”, and ”antisemitism” is therefore rooted in similar sources as any other ethnic conflict. Ethnoconflicts between relatively similar peoples can be prevented if its clearly understood.This provides a basis for cooperation, though its difficult finding Jews who do not only recognise hypocrisy in terms of supporting Jewish ethnonationalism while dismissing gentile ethno nationalism, but are willing to look critically at their own history, as European gentiles have done. I do not see a basis for cooperation if ethnonationalist Jews hold on to the incorrect belief that ”antisemitism” in Europe was solely a result of activism by immorale gentiles.

  • David Ashton

    This nonsense will go on for ever if not stopped now. It is time for the drawbridge to close completely. It is not a matter of a few genuine escapees fearing life and limb who can be temporarily settled, but millions upon millions of people from the “third world” seeking to get into a comparatively prosperous west rather than coping with their own problems, such as an irrepressible birth-rate, with free advice from us take it or leave it. Lifeboats are not Titanic in size, and of this goes on much longer, we shall all the swamped in an ocean of global misery.

    • Einsatzgrenadier

      But of course, this must go on. The internationalization of capitalism is an inexorable process and will not be terminated until all men have been stripped of their own ethnic and national particularities. Even the Jewish economist Karl Marx was fully cognizant of the internationalizing tendencies of global capital, although he wrongly believed that socialism would be the final stage in the dialectical transformation of capitalism from a relatively protectionist to an internationalist economic system. Instead, the end of capitalist internationalization is the world market and the world economy. The globalist vision is of an easily manipulated, but deracinated slave race. The sole purpose of these slave laborers will be to consume and produce the commodities of the multinational corporations. Economic man and biological man must make way for global man, the multicultural citizen who is at home in all world cultures. The globalist NWO is a vision of pure nihilist destruction.

      • David Ashton

        I agree with much of this analysis or at any rate its drift. From “Paleface” to “Cosmic ‘Man'” to use a Wyndham Lewis nutshell. Ethnic rebellions against global commodification are occurring all over the world. What is needed is OUR rebellion.

      • DonReynolds

        Karl Marx earned his doctorate in History, not Economics.
        Among economists, Marx is considered a “minor Ricardian”, since his nonsense is borrowed from texts at the time, primarily David Ricardo.

  • Alexandra1973

    Refugees from WHAT? The mess THEY created?

  • Luca

    If they are seeking asylum, they and all their liberal puppet masters should be incarcerated in an asylum somewhere in Mexico.

    • Who Me?

      And deport the UN Reps while we are at it. Repurpose that lovely building for something else, and never let the UN darken our shore again!

    • rightrightright

      The UN knows full well that refugees are required to seek refuge in the first safe country they get into – not hop into a country five or six nations away. But the UN keeps quiet about that. So in England we have third world tat from Afghanistan, Pakistan, Nigeria, Yemen etc. The UN is all about lies.

      • David Ashton

        Also, the UNHCR used to say that repatriation as soon as possible was the best outcome for all concerned, but the “philosophy” has changed, since this universal northward and westward “transhumance” suits the revolutionary left and the financial right, and the bureaucratic center.

  • These mestizos are the racial kinsmen of the Messicans. Let Mexico grant them asylum. But the Mexicans would kick their butts, seeing as how Mexicans are violent and provincial.

    Thus, their goal is the USA. My great hope is that the Mexicans decommission as many of them as possible before they hit the US border and the welcoming arms of Nancy Pelosi, et. al.

  • Korean guy

    Good evening. I just wanted to say a thing or two not related to race issues….

    At the moment the entire nation of Japan is about to suffer a natural disaster, caused by “Typhoon Neoguri.”

    I paid a visit to Japan twice in my life, and I had a wonderful, very memorable time in both occasions, and it would be endless if I list the things I liked during my visit in Japan.

    At the moment flights are cancelled and 100K people have been evacuated.

    Neoguri is a Korean word, which means “raccoon”. One of the most popular and historical food companies in South Korea produces a type of a noodle named “Neoguri”

    The reason they gave the typhoon a Korean name even before the typhoon started travelling through Japan is, it already was named “Typhoon Neoguri” even before it was born. The typhoon just happened to be travelling through Japan.

    • Alexandra1973

      I’d lay odds that after that storm blows through Japan won’t even remotely resemble post-Katrina New Orleans.

      • Magician

        Well, what do you think it will look like in Japan in a few weeks?

        • Kenner

          People working together to restore what they can. Stores not looted. You know, the usual zany Japanese stuff.

          • IstvanIN

            Those crazy Japanese, not shooting each other and looting shoe and liquor stores.

    • Mason Gull

      I heard. Ever since the big earthquake it seems like Japan is being constantly hit by disasters. I know they’ll pull through it alright, but it makes me sad nonetheless.

      Anyway, I wish the best of luck to the people of Japan.

    • Dave West

      Well good thing Japan doesn’t have any black people, sometimes they do more damage than the storm itself!

    • IstvanIN

      Sorry to hear that but the Japanese are well known for working together and pulling through anything. They will survive.

  • dd121

    Refugees from what? They’re invaders.

    • Einsatzgrenadier

      Exactly. If they were refugees, they would be trying to go back to whatever third world hellhole they came from. Needless to say, there are no refugees in western countries, just the usual third world parasites looking for free handouts in the form of jobs and welfare.

      • DonReynolds

        Just how many countries did the Somalians fly over to get to the USA, so they could bees refugees??? Refugee status requires them to apply at the nearest country, not the richest country.

    • Bon, From the Land of Babble

      They are criminal invaders.

      The UN definition on refugees:

      “A person who owing to a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion, is outside the country of his nationality…”

      I don’t see anything in there about fleeing armed conflict or drug gangs, do you?

      Refugees are supposed to prove that they are being persecuted.

      The government wants them classified as refugees to make it impossible to get rid of them and allow them to immediately access all government welfare programs.

    • Chasmania

      They’re not invading, they’re merely exporting a 3rd world lifestyle and bringing it to the main market which pays for their product, America !

    • Dr. Cramden

      These diseased hordes were given support by the Kenyan devil and the UN to come here for soul reason to change the racial composition of this nation to a non white nation.
      These literate invaders were given instructions and support in coming here by Hussein O Bozo, and three former presidents who made deals with Former Mexican president Vicente Fox, they are no refugees but invited invading army.
      Its time for action, of which I cannot post or it will be censored.

  • Bon, From the Land of Babble

    The U.S. takes more than twice as many refugees as all countries from the rest of the industrialized world combined…Refugee access to welfare on the same basis as a U.S. citizen has made the program a global magnet.

    —refugee resettlement watch

    Why doesn’t the UN address the violence, armed conflicts and human rights violations in the home countries of the invaders?

    Notice how the other side of the issue is NEVER discussed: The impact of tens of thousands of destitute, unemployed, diseased illegal aliens has on the citizens of the United States.

    The communists and international socialists who run the United Nations from cushy offices in New York are genocidal criminals. They should be treated as mortal enemies of the United States and driven back to their 4th world hell holes from the UN building by force. The UN building should then be burned to the ground and whatever’s left razed into rubble, salted and spiked so nothing rises in its place.

    The group will discuss updating a 30-year-old declaration regarding the obligations nations have to aid refugees future violent MS-13 gang members.

    Fixed. They are NOT refugees.

  • Magician

    Yeah sure we will gladly call them refugees. But U.N. should never ever tell us not to send them back to where they came from!

  • WR_the_realist

    Please send the asylum seekers from Central America to Somalia.

  • MBlanc46

    The UN can just kiss my coat-tails about illegal mass immigration and everything else. It’s long past time that that bloviating shop for Third World bureaucrats be wound up.

    • Dr. Cramden

      The UN needs to be removed!!

  • IKUredux

    Let’s call them “Redskins”. There you go, poof, BANNED. Or, we could call them wahoos, same outcome, BANNED. If fleeing from crime and criminal gangs now constitutes legitimate refugee status, then, all the Naggers from Chicago, Detroit, Baltimore, Newark, Gary, ad nauseum qualify! Where could they go? Beverly Hills? Greenwich? Upper easstside/westside of Manhattan? How about Costa Rica? Belize? Panama? Gee, why exactly are there NO illegal alien invaders from those last three Central American countries? And, why don’t the Salvadorans, Guatemalans, and Nicaraguans flee to those countries that are virtually right next door? Huh? Why? Because, boys and girls, this new “humanitarian crisis” has nothing to do with what is real, or, realistic. It has nothing to do with whether we pass “Amnesty” or we don’t. The die has been cast. TBTB have decided that ALL White countries must be reduced to third world status. After all, it’s only fair. Do you not understand that under this fabulous egalitarian umbrella, the fact that you were born White means nothing more than that you won the genetic sweepstakes? And, the fact that you were born in the U.S., means nothing more than that YOU won the geographical sweepstakes! That’s right, boys and girls, NOTHING that any of your ancestors suffered through, no wars, no plagues, no oppression, no hunger or famine, nothing counts anymore, today, in our egalitarian world. You are no better than anyone else. All you white privileged boys and girls did nothing but win the highest prize in the sweepstakes of life. Now, TPTB have decided to revoke your winnings. It’s because you got caught counting cards in the “new and improved ” casino of life , bitches.

  • Puggg

    Stemming the tide of refugees.

    You should visit Earl of Taint often if you don’t already.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      Nice tip, Puggg. Added it to my favorites.

    • Alexandra1973

      Same show, different players!

  • John R

    So they are refugees because their countries are so screwed up? By that definition most of the people living in non-white countries could be considered “refugees.” Note the implication: So we should only accept people from failed societies. Yeah, good for the US, huh? Whatever happened to accepting people because the immigrant would be a good addition to THIS country? Why can’t the United States have an immigration policy that benefits the….(drum roll, please..) United States?!

  • Ella

    That’s right UN. Whites really want more violent thugs in America because we don’t have enough death squads to keep our undermanned police force challenged.

    • DonReynolds

      He He…..don’t you know? The solution to violence in Central America is to move the violent population to the USA. Makes total sense to me too.

  • AndrewInterrupted

    Moving the U.N. Building off the North American continent should be the next president’s priority—->leaving the U.N., the next.

  • ElComadreja

    The title of this piece is indicative of the problem. These are not “migrants”.

  • Anti

    Not surprising. The UN lives for a good refugee crisis because it is completely impotent at stopping them before they start.

  • paul marchand

    Yeah. I know. Off-subject. But due to content in the discussion below…..
    I find it disheartening that this discussion has descended from legitimate discussions of how whites in the US are put at disadvantage by the US government ( in this case concerning illegal immigrants) to Jew-hatred by many. To compare the “Jewish threat” to the Islamic threat is weird. The main “Jewish threat” is due to their financial expertise, and profits made due to idiotic economic policies by the likes of the US government (debt). I hardly feel threatened by Israel having nukes. Unlike how I feel about Pakistan, Iran, and the next Islamic power having them.

    • Martel

      Any ethnic group which doesn’t define itself as European, or cannot be defined as European, will develop different political interests then the European majority, whether this takes place in North America or the old continent. Jewish intellectuals and financiers, have historically pursued political objectives opposed to the interests of native Europeans, this is well documented. Anti-Jewish riots where sparked in postwar Britain as British Jews financed and participated in violent actions against the British in Palestine, too name example. Those who developed and promoted the ideologies which sprouted the ”politically correct” tendencies we are succumbing to today have also generally been Jewish. It is a relevant topic, though its unfortunate that some take their views to an extreme. This is somewhat understandable given that the ”Jews” are considered off limits even in the most self professed ”politically incorrect” circles, which gives the appearance of all powerful Jews smothering all serious discussion. On the other hand, such extreme views do not do any good either. The Jewish Question remains relevant though, Jews tend to be overrepresented in all political movements, run/own most major media corporations and are amongst the most influential political donors. Naturally their political views are colored by their ethnic identity, though in varying degrees. Unfortunately, any serious discussion is stifled by extremists on both sides, something I believe can be solved, but not by banning this topic altogether.

      • David Ashton

        The paradox is that the combined effects of never-again “defense” activity and pro-Israel lobbying have “conspired” (sic) to revive the prewar fantasy of an organized World Jewish Plot with greater plausibility- a self-fulling prophecy. An interesting aspect are the numbers of books attributing The Holocaust to the New Testament, despite the support for Israel from Christian Zionists, and/or accusing the Allied countries of WW2 of facilitating the WW2 Crucifixion of G’d’s Chosen People and preventing their full Resurrection in their exclusive Holy Land from 1946 to the present.

        • Martel

          The activities of Jewish activists have always led to unexpected side-effects. The rise of an Islamic caliphate, protected from criticism because of the ideological values Jewish intellectuals developed and promoted in the fifties and sixties, has ensured that for at least thirty years ”antisemitic” propaganda has been financed by petrodollars. William Grimstad, author of ”The Six Million reconsidered” aparantly recieved some funds from the Saudis to promote his book, there are quite of such examples. The gentile left, forced to chose between the outraged Muslim immigrants and the Jewish minority, have opted to support the former where possible. Harry van Bommel of the Dutch Socialist Party happily marched along in a Muslim demonstration in the Netherlands shouting ”Hamas, Hamas, Gas the Jews!”, it has not harmed his career. The Dutch state channels tend to be overly critical of Israel and little critical of organisations like Hamas and Fatah, and we remember the Norwegian island Utoya not only for Breivik’s foolish actions but for the yearly presence of Hamas representatives at the youth camps of the Norwegian labour party. I also noticed in my own surroundings that Jew hatred is popular amongst whites who havebefriended Muslims.

          All of this is a consequence of their own activities in the past.

          • David Ashton

            The situation is now complicated, with multiple yet different threats to European civilization whose defense and promotion must be our primary and legitimate concern. We need calm, thorough information, accurate analysis and moral integrity. There is a human tendency to “take sides” too easily as if we are dealing with football teams.

          • Martel

            Polarisation is also a legitimate political strategy when its suitable to do so. The left is all powerful not because it values accurate analysis and moral integrity, but because they demonize opponents and lie about their intentions.

            Our political position tends to attract individuals who value moral integrity and truthfulness because its those values alone who allow someone to question PC falsehoods and those values provide the motivation to overcome the many hurdles places in front of us. Still, I rather emulate the left and win, then stick to defending complicated truths and watch my country burn down. Fortunately, the truth is on our side.

          • David Ashton

            I do not oppose alliances with those who lack either our ideas or perfect purity, if they are likely to achieve a desirable outcome. One has to draw the line somewhere, e.g. Stalin’s successive alliances with Hitler, Churchill and Roosevelt. But today is today, and tomorrow is tomorrow.

  • Bob

    The useless organization called the UN can go **** itself.

  • Anon

    White people need to figure out something about what a refugee is. Put two heinously evil rapist, murderer, cannibals in a room and they will both try to entertain themselves by doing horrific things to the other.
    The weaker of the two becomes a refugee.

  • Albert

    Agreed. Mexico is in dire need of more diversity.

  • What ever happened to that very fine film genre prominent in the 1950s showing breathtaking panoramic scenes of flying saucers crashing into the United Nations?

  • DonReynolds

    I wish they would treat them as refugees. They would all be stuck in Mexico and not the USA. Refugees are permitted to enter the NEAREST country, not the RICHEST country. They traveled 900 miles through a country that should have extended to them refugee status to get to south Texas.