Britain First ‘Invade’ Crayford Mosque Demanding Removal of ‘Sexist’ Signs in Bizarre Video

Charlotte Meredith, Huffington Post UK, July 15, 2014

Members of the far-right, pseudo-militia group Britain First have “invaded” a mosque in south east London in protest at the building’s separate entrances.

A bizarre video, overlaid with some very dramatic music, sees the paramilitary-clothed activists “inform the Imams that they have exactly 7 days to remove sexist, segregationist signs from outside their building, or we will”.

Like most mosques, Orthodox Jewish synagogues and Sikh gurdwaras, the North West Kent Muslim Association conducts acts of worship on the basis of gender separation.

But, the Britain First “Kent battalion activists” can be seen forcefully telling one elderly man at the mosque that they “object” to the signs.

“In this country we have equality,” one member says, as the Muslim man protests over the group refusing to take off their shoes in the place of worship.

“When you respect women, we’ll respect your mosques,” they argue.

They then demand the mosque “cover up” a cross on the front of the building, saying “it’s offensive to Christians . . . you don’t believe in Jesus.”

A statement on the group’s website under the headline “Britain First Activists invade Crayford mosque”, said: “Islam treats and views women as second class citizens.

“Britain First will not allow Islam to drag our standards back to the 7th Century.”

The controversial group is led by a former BNP councillor, Paul Golding, while their political guru, Jim Dowson–a hardline evangelical anti-abortion activist–was previously in charge of BNP finances.

{snip}

Britain First is the most active far-right group to emerge from the collapse of the BNP and EDL over the last year.

The group’s Facebook page has more than 350,000 “likes”–making it more popular than the Conservatives, Labour and Liberal Democrats, and arguably making it the UK’s biggest political Facebook site.

Files released by the Hope Not Hate group suggest that as many as 2 million people could be interacting with Britain First content online each day.

{snip}

Topics: , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • MekongDelta69

    Forget ‘separate entrances’ and all that nonsense.

    How about they start a larger movement to kick ALL of them out of their country.

    • Oil Can Harry

      Exactly. This silly protest sounds like something that would be organized zany, topless FemiNUTS.

      • Ngati Pakeha

        Dead right. I’m sorry to say this is a case of my enemy’s enemy is still my enemy!

      • LHathaway

        It may as well have been, reading the article.

    • Brady

      Forget dieting and excercise and all that nonsense. How about just starting a larger movement to get thin.

      Any such movement has to start somewhere.

    • propagandaoftruth

      Where does it start? Perhaps some of the absurdity is calculated?

      Does a group in heavily censored Englistan SSR start by demanding big or small? By speaking and acting entirely transparently or by impishly tweaking at first, poking, prodding?

  • Truthseeker

    How about we let them keep their culture…provided that they practice it outside of Europe.

    • Spikeygrrl

      That dog won’t hunt. Jihad for the sole purpose of bringing about a WORLDWIDE Muslim Caliphate is a central and essential tenet of their toxic religion/legal system/social structure.

  • Einsatzgrenadier

    Time to end Muslim immigration and begin Muslim deportation.

  • Long Live Dixie

    England is overrun with foreigners, and these people are worried about the foreigners being ‘sexist’? Unreal.

  • me

    Throw the sand n#$gers out! They will destroy Britain!

  • I am not at all cool with the idea of trying to sell nationalism with universalist and egalitarian rhetoric. (“Sexist,” “Segregationist,” “Equality,” etc.) It only confuses our people, and as you can read at the end, it does not fool our enemies for even one second. Worst of all, it implicitly endorses our enemies’ project.

    • Brady

      Treating women better than Muslims do is our enemies’ project? Really?

      • Person of Whiteness

        Having separate entrances for men and women is hardly an example of treating women poorly (no more than it treats men poorly). Of course muslims treat women poorly, but this isn’t an example of such.

        • IstvanIN

          It is still stupid. Treating women like pariahs.

          • Oil Can Harry

            Hopefully Muslims will decide to really treat women like pariahs by not breeding with them.

          • Spikeygrrl

            Not if they start to breed with White women instead.

    • Spikeygrrl

      How sad that you think “our people” are so easily confused. Unless/until they become un-confused, they are NOT “our people.”

      • All the time people who were not ethnic nationalists and who were not racial realists come over to our side. We are converting non-believers now and I think it’s necessary that we have large numbers who do believe as we do because with a controlled press hostile to our goals we need to somehow force the issue into the spotlight ourselves with sheer numbers. The message is appealing and it is consistent with natural law. We need a domain, a space, a place where we can grow. These other races flooding white countries now already have their own countries back home, but they want ours too, collectively amongst them, under kosher control of course. Whites require homelands. Property rights are nothing without the right to exclude. It’s an appealing message.

        • Juggernaut3000

          This is exactly why the Internet must be kept free from government control. It is the only outlet we have left to spread the message about the White genocide being waged against our people.

          The London-Marxist platform in 1847 was “to abolish private property.” The American Revolution was based in private property rights. Marxist societies confiscate wealth and promise to “re-distribute it equally.”

          America promised everyone they could keep and control what was the product of their own labor. Modern Marxist adherents openly claim they will “rebuild the world,” (remember Obama’s promise to “remake America?”) and they train activist “community organizers” and NGOs to openly support overthrowing the legitimate governments of the world.

          Since their inception, Marxist agent provocateurs can be linked to every anarchist assassination and student uprising that caused chaos to the established European civilization throughout the 18th and 19th centuries.

          Modern Americans have been brainwashed to believe whatever the propaganda media tell them, oblivious to the planned genocide and loss of living space being carried out against them

          Such lies as : Muslims attack us because they “hate our freedom,” diversity is a strength, multiculturalism is desirable.

        • Spikeygrrl

          Way to avoid the issue to which you’re allegedly “responding.” If you want another session on your soapbox, JUST TAKE IT; where’s the sense in pretending to be having a dialogue?

          • Question Diversity lamented that the use of the other side’s loaded terminology confuses “our people”, which I believe he meant as white people. You replied to him that if they’re confused, they’re not our people, which I took to mean that you were saying people not ideologically on the same page as ethnic nationalists are not our allies. I thumbed you up because I agreed with you, as with him, and replied because I wanted to voice my opinion that an approach that seeks to convert these as yet racially unaware whites is still in our best interests at this time.

          • Spikeygrrl

            Thanks for “unpacking” your prior post. I wasn’t grokking the linkages as you leaped from peak to peak with no indication that there were valleys between them. Which should be a lesson to me, since I clearly remember a prof back in grad school who chastised me quite a few times for doing exactly the same thing. 😉

          • I removed a six-word or so phrase that sounded a little haughty. What is your major malfunction?

          • Spikeygrrl

            Specifically, no. Generally, you betcha!

    • LHathaway

      Exactly. Why don’t they hold their next protest at McDonanlds for having separate public bathrooms for men and women?

    • neshobanakni

      They’re forcing the politically correct, multi-cult crowd to follow their own oft stated logic. Enough of these demos and the P.C. overseers’ heads will soon explode, a la “Scanners.”

  • Hahahaha!

    “In the name of freedom and equal rights we demand that you worship your God exactly the same way that we do.”

    Jesus.

  • Steven Barr

    Britain First are hard to figure out. Their website states “we are opposed to becoming a minority in our historic homeland” yet they also claim to be “anti-racist” and “open to all”. Trying to appeal to everybody it looks like.

    • UncleSham

      They are not trying to appeal to everybody. Those statements are what appeals to most White people at this moment in history. Most Whites are disgusted by the thought of being pro-White.

    • propagandaoftruth

      Or blaring out flak and doing something. Remember UK’s censorship rules.

  • You don’t fix a cancer by putting a band aid on it. You cure it by cutting it out. Muzzies are a cancer. You don’t ever respect their mosques, which are concrete manifestations of hatred of non-muzzies. You shut them down. Shut down the mosques, kick the muzzies back to their sand dunes. Only answer. Anything else is just mental masturbation.

    • bilderbuster

      As it’s being torn down brick by brick tell them that these they are British bricks and are not to be used to build foreign outposts but rather to be used against the skulls of foreign invaders!

      • Juggernaut3000

        I’m with you but saying as much in Britain in the current reign of PC terror will land one in jail.

  • Zimriel

    An attention-grabbing stunt, and I don’t know what they’re hoping to accomplish other than to recruit silly girls to the organisa-

    Oh.

    This crew is starting to ping my “Jim Jones” radar.

  • jayvbellis

    I like it. No nonsense White Brits telling invaded non White Muslims it’s our way or the highway.

    Very similar to successful French Nationalists taunting prostrate praying Algerian Muslims with Frnch wine and sausages.

  • MBlanc46

    Silly, perhaps, but it is always worth pointing out the hypocrisy of the Neo-Stalinists occasioned by their Islamophilia.

  • Tim_in_Indiana

    A bizarre video…

    Notice the very patronizing tone of this Huffington Post article, larded up with scare quotes, plus an obligatory attempt to link these protesters with “far right” groups in an effort to discredit them.

    Normally a group campaigning for “women’s rights” is normally expected to be championed by the left, but when women’s rights conflicts with multiculturalism, multiculturalism wins, women’s rights loses. That’s the leftist pecking order.

    “Women’s rights” is used to browbeat males, but multiculturalism undermines all whites, so of course multiculturalism is more important.

  • Paleoconn

    This outfit stinks of false flag. I mean their outrage is from the fact the Muslims have separate entrances for the two sexes at their mosques? Bush league. There should be no mosques, period, in the UK. There should be one exit from Britain that they all take.

    • watling

      I don’t believe for a second that the separate entrances issue is what really motivates Britain First. But that’s all they can legally complain about.

      I’m sure that – like me and probably most patriots – Britain First would much prefer that the seventh century death cult that is Islam be completely removed from civilization and restricted to the sun-scorched desert wastelands of the Arabian Peninsular where it belongs. If Muslim men want to marry six year-old girls and beat them up they’re welcome to do it among the camel dung in the desert so normal people won’t have to hear about it.

  • Padrig

    I think video will surely reveal the culprits; I have no doubt that John Cleese and Michael Palin would show up as the “right wingers.”

  • IKUredux

    First of all, you pick a chink in their armor. Whoops! Did I say “chink”? Damn right I did. Once upon a time, in a land (really faraway) we were allowed to say words that meant something totally different then they do today. We used to be gay!(happy heterosexuals). The left has not only abrogated our rights vis a vis the Bill of Rights, but in every other way possible. Western civilization does not owe any other race ANYTHING! We owe them NOTHING! Hey A-Holes! Sink or swim! We had to. We Whites survived brutal weather and feudal conditions in Europe. We survived and thrived. NO ONE helped us. Why do we have to help you? WHY? Obviously, it is because you are inferior. In every way that counts when it comes to establishing and maintaining a civilization. muslims are the worst of all. They are stupid, violent, and on a unholy mission. These dumb asses want to establish a “caliphate”. Here is what I want to say to my fellow Whites:All the other races of the world are either stupid, dumbed down by tradition and superstition, or both. There is nothing we are obligated to do for them. If we elect to ignore them, we can do so. There is NO power that exists in this world that can physically force White people to do ANYTHING they don’t want to. We Whites need to start flexing our muscles, and tell the rest of the inferior world that they are on their own. What the hell? How long is the White Man’s burden supposed to last? Enough already! They are never going to change! Kick all their stupid brown asses out of White countries! You asses are on your own. Deal with it. Just remember: Race is a social construct, we are all equal.

  • I think it should be obvious to all here that Britain First is only a “patriotic” organisation in Britain. Queen, Country, blah blah blah. Not nationalists.

    On this, they are much like the poor souls who were involved with the English Defence League. It seems Britain First are similarly going the same route of upholding cultural Marxist / liberal values in the name of “protecting Britain”. “We want Islam out to protect the gays”…..”We want equal rights for women”….. etc, where Muslims are the threat to those “British values”…..

    Paul Golding and Jim Dowson are patriotic Christians – and I genuinely believe they believe what they are saying and fighting for. On this basis, they are perhaps quite successful. They allegedly have quite a bit of support, and Jim certainly knows how to both pull in the money needed and create a publicity stunt…… which is mostly what it is all about I suspect.

    I have no need to tell anybody here how deluded it is to be taking this route if you care about race and nation, but there you go.

    Despite this, I am not going to knock Jim and Paul though, because they are out there doing something and have the balls to step up to the plate – but it is perhaps sad that it is the wrong plate they step up to. For them, it must be the right plate….. but it is not ours.

    As for “treating women with respect” – and I really hate having to say this – having separate entrances is hardly not showing respect, particularly when the women involved who follow the Koran expect to separated from the men.

    Again, it pains me to say it, but these kinds of arguments are easily undermined….for example, how is having (a probably mutually agreed) separation in the Mosque, worse than the complete lack of respect many drunken men have of women on Friday and Saturday nights in towns and cities all over Britain?

    The objectification, the lewd sexual suggestions….. the wider populace of modern Britain are hardly all like the bumbling Hugh Grant in ‘Four Weddings and a Funeral” or some Darcy character from the late 19th century.

    Muslim men remain patriarchal, a little sexist, a little controlling of their womenfolk, be it wives or daughters…….and in general, it works for them.

    You do not see Muslim girls smashed out of their heads on drink and drugs with their knickers around their ankles taking a pee in the high street, you don’t often see them dating whites or blacks, you see them raising large families and enjoying community life – which is unlike the way our folk are going.

    I am in my thirties, and my old junior school had a playground at the front which was engraved with a stone brick “Girls” and “Girls Entrance”…..and similar with “Boys” and “Boys Entrance” around the other side of the building. We did not always play together, sometimes in the further back past we were taught separately in classes.

    Going down these lines of argument over the racial and religious transformation of the country are not very solid at all. However, it is generating a lot of heat and following for Britain First, and it is only hoped it is a “conveyor belt” to a better understanding of what the issues actually are.

  • LHathaway

    Yes, Muslims must feel insane too. By the words used by these activists, I’m guessing that is what they are going for.

  • You’re saying if all of us go and bash up mosques, the Jews will all go away from our lands? I don’t see the connection.

  • I am wolf

    Anti-aborton activist? Maybe he oughta rethink that when it comes to high-breeding immigrants like Muslims and Sikhs.

    This looks like a good way to raise awareness over Muslim intolerance of British/Western culture. Hey, if they can throw stupid protests over, say, a long-standing restaurant that continues to serve pork and wine after a mosque is built next door or whatever, then as far as I’m concerned, let anyone with the nads go and protest THEM from a Western point of view. ANY Western PoV.

    I wish the feminazis WOULD get on Muslim arse, and realize white men aren’t the baddies of the world!