Police Probe into ‘Whites Not Welcome’ Graffiti Outside London Primary School

Tara Brady, Daily Mail (London), June 5, 2014

Pupils as young as four were forced to walk over graffiti which read ‘whites not welcome’ when they arrived at school yesterday.

The message was found on the entrance path leading to Prince of Wales Primary School, in Enfield, north London.

Hundreds of children saw the words but Enfield Council has said it has since been removed.

Police are now also investigating the incident.

However, some parents claim this is not the first time graffiti on this nature has appeared at the
school.

Mother Jasmin Nathan told the Evening Standard: ‘I have two sons aged nine and six who both attend the school and my eldest immediately noticed it before I did and was very inquisitive about it, which broke my heart.

‘I’ve been worried all day about how this may affect his school day or god-forbid, any conflict in the playground as children can be unintentionally very spiteful, especially when discussing things they don’t have the mental capacity to understand.’

According to headteacher Jan Bless, other messages appeared along the same stretch of road.

He said: ‘This was part of a wider graffiti trail which stretched about a quarter of a mile.

‘We immediately contacted the police and local authority.

‘It seems the person who did this felt like they needed to say something but this has no reflection on the school.

‘Parents were very distressed and shocked. We are very disappointed. It’s not something that was
solely directed at the school.

‘In my opinion someone felt they had something to say and unfortunately the school was along the path. The message does not reflect our school.’

Other examples of graffiti along the stretch of road include messages which read ‘racist scum’ and ‘Enfield Council loves an imigrant’ (sic).

Ms Nathan said: ‘Two of the offending messages have been removed but as you can see a number of them still remain.

‘Many children and parents have been upset by this graffiti and how it still remains on the school path beggars belief, particularly when parents have been very vocal to school staff about their concerns.

‘The school is multi-cultural and this has offended pretty much everybody in some way, and the school and council have a duty of care towards our children to ensure they don’t have to see racial abuse scrawled across the school path.’

A spokeswoman from Enfield Council said: ‘We have removed this graffiti as a matter of urgency.

‘We have a large multicultural and harmonious community in Enfield which embraces its diversity.

‘Racism of any form is unwelcome in this borough. We’d like to thank the school for bringing this matter to our attention and enabling us to deal with it promptly.

‘It is very difficult to prevent graffiti, but cases of graffiti in Enfield have dropped to an all time low in recent years.

‘Our policy is to remove graffiti as rapidly as possible with a particular focus on removing offensive graffiti.

‘We have reported this matter to the police who are investigating it.’

Last week a sign appeared outside Bartlett Park in Poplar, which read: ‘Do not walk your dog here. ‘Muslims don’t like dogs. This is an Islamic area now.’

Labour Member of Parliament Jim Fitzpatrick alerted police and the local mayor about the sign after it was flagged up by one of the residents in his east London constituency.

Police say an investigation is now underway to find out who put it up.

NotWelcome

Topics: ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • D.B. Cooper

    It’s only just begun, Brits. I do NOT feel sorry for you. At least TRY to fight this! Oh I forgot, how long did Hitler run amok before you finally decided to do something?

    • IstvanIN

      The British hated the Germans and couldn’t wait to goad Hitler into a war, yet they are happy to allow muslims and Africans take over.

      • Mason Gull

        If the British had wanted a war with Germany, they could have had it many times before 1941. The war happened because Hitler violated the Munich agreement and forced the British to save face by supporting Poland.

        • IstvanIN

          Don’t be naive, the British viewed the Germans as a rival to their Empire and domination of the world economy. They, and especially Churchill, had an insane hatred of the Hun.

          • Mason Gull

            That’s why they took Hitler’s betrayal of the Munich agreement so hard. Churchill to take a hard-line on Hitler in 1938 because he knew that war was inevitable if the British wanted maintain their influence.

          • Erasmus

            Churchill wanted to maintain British influence? Yet, he succeeded in destroying the British Empire, instead. Hardly something to be proud of.

          • Singingbird1

            Blimey! The original story is about a contemporary incident in Enfield. Now I am reading History lessons about Europe and the British Empire.

          • David Ashton

            British foreign policy had traditionally opposed a dominant rival power in Europe, but there had always been an alternative view, notably expressed by Mosley, that Britain’s interest was in the Dominions and Empire, while Germany’s was in eastern Europe.

          • LHathaway

            Do you write comedy for your day job?

          • IstvanIN

            You can believe the propaganda spoon fed to you but why do you think Germany was treated so harshly after the first world war? They didn’t start the war, wanted to end it, but the British would settle for nothing less than the total humiliation of the Germans and conspired with Wilson to bring the US into the war by using the Lusitania for transporting war materiel. A unified, powerful Germany was a threat to Britain, or so they thought.

          • Mason Gull

            The British didn’t want to economically ruin Germany and David Lloyd George was often the voice of reason at the conference. The ones who wanted Germany destroyed were the French. Marshall Foch went so far as to propose that Germany be redivided into smaller states. The Treaty of Versailles was the end result of efforts to reconcile British moderation with French revanchism. It wasn’t particularly harsh for the day, either. The treaty of Brest-Litovsk was much harsher and the 1871 treaty of Versailles was at least as bad.

          • Sick of it

            Starving German civilians to death was a bit harsh.

          • archer

            Exactly, Churchill was quoted as early as 1907 saying ” Germany must be destroyed”. It was an economic war between great rivals, he even admitted after the war that Hitler had nothing to do with it.
            As been stated many times because of Churchill’s arrogance and stupidity Britain became bankrupt and lost most of it’s overseas colonies. After the war he even admitted “we killed the wrong pig”, referring to the complete takeover of eastern Europe by the commies. He was not the great man history makes him out to be.

          • David Ashton

            Yes, he said explicitly that we “lie in the grip of even greater perils”.
            Some posters on this site on this subject tend to override the multiple complications of 20th century events with sweeping simplifications.

          • propagandaoftruth

            If I were Hitler I’d have armed 200,000 European Jews and sent them to boot the Brits out of Egypt and Palestine. Keep what ya’ conquer and if you get yer hands on some oil, Jews, sell it to us cheap. Enjoy your Zion and keep the mulatto Muslims in line, and Semite and Aryan rule the Middle East and the West together and separately.

            But Hitler hated the Jews.

          • David Ashton

            Look up the Havara Agreement on Wikipedia (fairly accurate on
            this).

          • propagandaoftruth

            Thanks. Those Lehi fellows were pretty hard core. 200,000 European Jews equipped with the best arms Germany could produce would have been a lot more helpful in Africa and the ME than 500,000 Italians.

          • Sick of it

            Rommel himself stated that the Italians were wonderful infantrymen and some of the bravest around. He made good use of his Italian infantrymen.

          • David Ashton

            The English did not have “an insane hatred” of the Germans except to the extent that they were fed, and are still fed, propaganda about real or alleged atrocities.

          • Frank Morris

            The main thing holding them back was figuring out how to help Roosevelt draw the USA into the war with them.

          • Singingbird1

            Don’t you people digress from the main story.Stick to the point.

        • JSS

          The Brits did not “support Poland”. Britain and France made no move to support them ragaedless of the war guarantee. Do you know who ruled Poland at the end of the war? Hint: it wasn’t the Polish.

          • Mason Gull

            They diplomatically supported them in their territorial dispute with Germany and went to war with Germany on behalf of the Poles.

            If you want to talk about the Soviet takeover of Poland, you should remember that Germany agreed to let the Soviet Union take over Eastern Poland in the secret protocols of the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact and that the Soviets treated the Poles better than the Germans ever did, although that’s not saying much.

          • JSS

            Yeah the Soviets did take a chunk of Poland in 1939 and the Brits weren’t offended. Weren’t they supposed to be Poland’s guardian? Kinda makes you doubt the Brits integrity on the issue. Your right that the Soviets treated the Poles well. The guys in the Katyn mass graves are proof of the brotherhood shared between the Soviets and Poles.

          • Mason Gull

            The British were quite offended and they condemned the act, but there was nothing they could do.

            I don’t deny that the Soviets murdered Poles, just as the Germans did. What makes the Soviets better is that the Soviets allowed the people to keep their native culture, while the Germans made a concerted effort to destroy it.

            I can admire Hitler’s commitment to the German nation, but I can’t get on board with the Nazi cult that exists on the internet today. They tried to destroy non-German cultures just as the modern Marxists are trying to destroy Western cultures.

          • JSS

            You need to turn off inglorious bastards and the history channel. Are you really implying that the Soviet Union which suppressed native churches, murdered intellectuals and confiscated private property respected native culture? The idea behind Marxism is to destroy religion, family, the bourgeoise and the nobility. The early kosher Soviets did just that. There is no Nazi cult “on the internet” you need to worry about. Just learn some real history and worry about the modern racial equality kosher anti White cult that rules us today.

          • Mason Gull

            You seem to think that Soviet Communism and Western Marxism (Critical theory)are the same. The Eastern bloc had a lot of things wrong with it, but they celebrated the family and the Russians stayed essentially Russian. . Sure, they burned some churches and mosques, but what has Judeo-Christianity ever done for white people anyway? Don’t base your view of the Soviet Union on Nazi propaganda. A few minutes ago I posted an article by a woman who grew up in Communist Hungary in response to istvanin, but it’s pending approval by the mod. You might want to start there. Enjoy your redpill.

          • JSS

            My wife is from the Eastern bloc, I know plenty of people who grew up under the communist. My mother in Law was born in Hungary in the late 40s. So Im not overly interested in your article. I guess the Czech and Hungarian uprisings in the 50s were Nazi propaganda. The Berlin Wall that was meant to keep people in was Nazi propaganda. I agree that the Eastern Europeans are in better shape then the Westerns. That’s in spite of, not because of communism. They were spared the mass immigration and cultural filth we have had for decades. You might be happier on a Lenin and Trotsky memorial website then amren.

          • Mason Gull

            I don’t dispute that Communism kept a lot people poor. You could spit out a list of problems with Soviet Communism and I would probably agree with every point. I’m just pointing out that the Soviets did more to preserve the cultures of Europe than the Nazis or the Western governments ever did. Why do you think there was no “cultural filth” in the Eastern bloc? It’s because the Communist governments discouraged it or outright banned it.

            I’m fine on AmRen, by the way.

          • IstvanIN

            Actually the article has some good points. I read it. PS: I am still pro-freedom.

            The revolution of ’56 was more about overthrowing the ethnic group that need not be named who was ruling Hungary at that point largely through the secret police than communism per se.

          • JSS

            If you recommend it Ill give the article a chance then. I was aware that the uprising was mostly anti kosher, but its not an exaggeration to say that the first few decades of soviet communism were dominated by that group. That fact that the Russians wised up to them explains why that group hates Russia so much today.

          • David Ashton

            Yes and no. The Uprising had its Jewish supporters too.

          • JSS

            The eastern bloc was closed as a society and didnt have an immigration problem. They also stopped catering to a certain tribe in the 50s which later became our Neo cons.

          • Mason Gull

            Whatever the reason, the point is that they valued and sought preserve the culture of the people they ruled. To me, this makes Soviet Communism morally superior to National Socialism.

          • JSS

            I’m sure all the women gang raped on the red army’s march east and gulag inmates strongly agree with you. Lots of moral authority there:

          • Mason Gull

            The Soviet Gulags were no worse than the German concentration camps. Again, the difference lies in the way they dealt with the people they ruled over.

          • David Ashton

            The ex-communist Jewish writer Eugene Lyons actually cited the memoirs of survivors of both Soviet and Germans to support the contention that the former were worse. Margaret Buber-Neumann also can be quoted to that effect. However, neo-nazis will have to answer the question: is an abattoir better than a workhouse?

          • JSS

            Yes they were worse. And the fact that the eastern bloc nations couldn’t wait to break away from Russia just disproves your assertion that the workers paradise was real. Anyways we aren’t going to change each others minds so I’m done.

          • Mason Gull

            Before you go, I’d like to politely ask you not to put words in my mouth. I said nothing about a worker’s paradise, just that Soviet Communism was better than Nazism for XYZ reasons.

          • IstvanIN

            Even the Russians seemed to have wised up to them.

          • Andy

            Materially, Christianity united our lands against Arab takeover and preserved our knowledge during the centuries after Rome’s fall.

          • Sick of it

            Old school Christianity also kept a certain group of people out of power. They were not stupid.

          • David Ashton

            The Nazi cult would be regarded with contempt by the genuine article. You cannot compare the fine young men of the Wehrmacht or the scientists or musicians of the Reich with the swastika-tattooed thugs known by the acronym of World-Aryan-Nazi-Klan-Evil-Stormtroopers.

            Soviet policy was not as friendly to native cultures as suggested. The Germans managed to recruit anti-Soviet volunteers from almost every ethnic group in the USSR.

          • Sick of it

            Considering that so many skinheads would physically attack their fellow whites for paltry reasons, I’d have to agree.

          • David Ashton

            History (1914) sometimes repeats itself first as tragedy (1945) an then as farce (2014).

          • adplatt126

            That’s just simply false. They were both utterly committed to the eradication of Polish culture, and indeed organized political existence. But I do agree with your critique on the reality of German aggression towards other non-whites. It was indeed, an ugly war, but I still can’t get around aiding the Communists, rather than the Germans, who were and are natural Westerners. That I consider insane and unforgivable.

          • Sick of it

            The Germans were not aggressive. As a matter of fact, they had been abused by stronger nations for centuries. They got tired of it.

          • David Ashton

            The “Brits”? The British people did not want war with Germany a second time until they were led to believe that the island was threatened. The government is not the people, and the secret chats between Maisky and Hore-Belisha had more effect on events than the crowds that supported peace in 1938 and 1939.

          • David Ashton

            In general the Poles marginally preferred German to Russian domination, despite their persecution of the German minority and obstruction over Danzig, and treated their Jews before the war hardly better than did the Nazis. The Soviets invaded Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Romania. The death-tolls on all sides tend to be exaggerated by partisans, even scholars like Timothy Snyder, but there is no question of Soviet ill-treatment of Poles symbolized by Katyn. I knew a British officer responsible for exchanging emaciated Polish children including Jews from Soviet concentrations for oil and truck supplies at the Persian border.

          • awb

            Katyn Forrest any one?

          • IstvanIN

            The British and the US are the worst allies a nation can have. We sell everyone down the river. Defend Poland from the “Hun” and then give half of it to the Soviets and enslave them under communism. The British did NOTHING to defend the Poles. It was all anti-German.

          • David Ashton

            The Poles did something to defend Britain, however, by exemplary service in our air force. It was not a deliberate British government policy to create a Russo-German alliance, but in any even do not blame the British or American peoples for the follies of their governments. The Germans were not Heydrich, the Russians were not Beria, and the Poles were not Smigly Rydz.

          • archer

            As Pat Buchannon has stated, ” if Polish sovereignty was so crucial why didn’t the British declare war on the soviets when they partitioned Poland with Germany”

          • David Ashton

            Britain’s “guarantee” was bogus since Poland could not have been saved. May I suggest, with sincere respect, that everyone reads through Hitler’s speech to the Reichstag on 6 October 1939?

          • JSS

            That’s why the guarantee was such a cynical horrific thing in my view. England was in no place to help Poland yet made the commitment anyway. The fact that England also ignored the Soviets aggression showes that all the talk of high minded ideals was a charade and Britains policy was about containing Germany as usual. I haven’t read the speech but what did Hitler say that you would like to point out?

          • David Ashton

            It’s too long – but it makes a reasonable proposal for a European conference to iron out all the listed issues facing the nations. You can get it from the library – Adolf Hitler, “My New Order” [Speeches translated and (critically) edited, from April 12, 1922 to June 22, 1941] (Sydney/London: Angus & Robertson, 1942).

            I was struck by the following conclusion: “Only one thing is certain. In the course of world victory, there have never been two victors, but very often only losers… And let those who consider war to be the better solution reject my outstretched hand.”

          • JSS

            Thanks for that quote David, very true words when it comes to White on White warfare. Just to clarify I know that the British people wanted no part of another war, same as the American people at the time. And yes I just call you guys Brits. When I lived in England a guy that worked at the counter in the gym I went to refereed to me as “Yankee doodle” all the time.

          • David Ashton

            Relieved to hear he didn’t refer to you as a “sour” Kraut.

          • Sick of it

            Socialists were running Britain even back then. They would not have gone to war with the Soviet Union, just as we would not.

        • Sick of it

          Because saving the British face was more important than reclaiming land stolen from them in the first world war? Than punishing the Poles who murdered their people even after the war was over?

          • Mason Gull

            The land wasn’t stolen, it belonged to the Polish people. A few scattered German villages isn’t enough to justify invading the country and trying to wipe out the people.

          • Sick of it

            So before the Poles were even in some of those territories…they belonged to the Poles? And the Teutonic Knights never existed? German settlers in the East never existed, so their extermination is a non-crime, eh?

          • Mason Gull

            The Poles had been living there for centuries, and the areas in East Prussia that had a German majority stayed with Germany. The Teutonic Knights were invaders who wiped out the native religion of the Baltic people and never bothered to make the area majority German. They’re also ancient history and have no relevance to this conversation.

        • Erasmus

          The war happened because Hitler violated the Munich agreement and forced the British to save face by supporting Poland.

          Yet the Brits didn’t seem to give a rip that “Uncle” Joe Stalin joined with Herr Schickelgruber to divvy up Poland. What’s up with that? Why didn’t they take action against “Uncle” Joe?

          • David Ashton

            The bluff failed, and the government bit off more than it could chew, despite Churchill’s typically grandiose thought of defending Finland against Germany’s new unexpected “ally”.

      • dd121

        For me WWII is a puzzle. Today we have journalists on the Telly telling us how brave and wonderful those great Americans were to go fight the Hun, spawn of the Devil and evil Nazism. Hitler said they were fighting to save Western Civilization. Well, he lost and look what’s replaced the Cult of the Aryans: a PC, marxist, negrofied culture. To me it just looks like Hitler knew of what he spoke.

        • SoulInvictus

          The Greatest Story Never Told.
          Check it out.

      • David Ashton

        You confuse the majority of the people with a minority of the ruling cliques.

    • Martel

      You do not feel sorry for fellow whites?
      What are you doing here?

      • So CAL Snowman

        D.B. Cooper has lost the plot. If Hitler was so intent on wiping out the British he would have done so at Dunkirk. Instead he graciously allowed the Brits to be safely evacuated. Winston Churchill was a psychopath of the highest order

        • Psycopath Churchill ordered the firebombing of Dresden, killing a half million good white Germans. Psychopath Eisenhower starved a million German POWs to death after the war. Our leaders have been intent on killing us for a hundred years now, since at least WWI. We need different leaders and history books that tell the truth.

          • Sick of it

            We should be able to call Eisenhower a “terrible Swedish Jew” without being censored.

          • David Ashton

            Your last sentence answers some of the generalizations here against the English, the Germans, the Russians as (white) peoples, whatever we may think of the psychology of “great leaders” – especially Churchill, Hitler or Stalin.

      • LHathaway

        If it’s necessary to feel for fellow whites, it must also be necessary to feel for people of color – which is a good idea.

        • Martel

          That’s optional.

          • SoulInvictus

            That made me laugh. Thanks. 🙂

      • propagandaoftruth

        ‘In my opinion someone felt they had something to say and unfortunately the school was along the path. The message does not reflect our school.’

        What a non-statement. Eloi-quackage.

        Actually I wonder if this may have been the work of a disgruntled, displaced, White. Just saying what is obvious.

    • JSS

      Hitler would have done something about invaders spraying “Whites not welcome” on German schools.

      • DaveMed

        Hitler’s dead. Extolling his supposed virtues is kind of meaningless at this point.

        We must look for leaders who are actually breathing.

        • JSS

          Exactly. When Whites talk up Marcus Aurelius, Leonidas, Robert E Lee, Charles Martel, Jean Vallet, etc I always say “those guys are dead who cares”.

          • DaveMed

            A. I would not put Hitler on the same pedestal with those men. Never.

            B. Those names are not controversial (besides General Lee’s, but it’s fairly simple to point out that he was an honorable man by almost all accounts). My personal hero is Jan Sobieski. Whites can be easily convinced that these men had the right idea.

            Good luck convincing tens of millions of Whites that Hitler was a good model to follow.

          • JSS

            For the sake of not being overly repetitive ill just say read bigones post above. The crimes committed by the Allies were worse then anything done by Hitler. If someone goes limp wristed because the don’t want to accept their heroes Churchill and Roosevelt were scum then they aren’t worth reaching out to anyway. There’s nothing more idiotic then supposed WNs bashing Hitler in a vain hope of appearing respectable. Its like your trying to say “I’m pro White but I’m not THAT racist”.

          • DaveMed

            “If someone goes limp wristed because the don’t want to accept their heroes Churchill and Roosevelt were scum then they aren’t worth reaching out to anyway.”

            To me, this is essentially an admission of defeat. We need to attract many millions of Whites to the movement within a relatively few years. This is not, in my opinion, going to happen if they are expected to adopt a positive view of Hitler. My own opinions on the matter aside, I think that this is simply the reality.

          • JSS

            Your view that we have to bear the holocaust and Hitler cross forever to appear respectable to our enemies seems like an admission of defeat to me. Im simply sick of lies and false history. I don’t want to live in that box or work in that framework anymore.

          • DaveMed

            I don’t take the position that the Holocaust or Hitler are crosses to be born. But there’s no need to be particularly vocal on these matters, because they frankly have no bearing on whatever steps we need to take in 2014.

            Just my opinion.

          • JSS

            Unfortunately we will always have anti Whites bringing him up to insult us and some amren style WNs bringing him up to prove “they aren’t that racist”. So I’d rather just tell the truth about him on those occasions.

          • DaveMed

            What is an “Amren-style WN”? Is that an insult?

          • JSS

            I’m talking about people who make comments like the one Cooper did that started this exchange.

          • David Ashton

            The “truth” about Hitler is not quite as white and black as supposed. When “The Holocaust” is used against us – as noted, for example, by “Irmin Vinson” in “Some Thoughts on Hitler and Other Essays” (San Francisco: Counter-Currents, 2012) – the best response is not to say e.g. (1) no Jews were gassed, or (2) the Jews deserved what they got, or a mix of (1) and (2). The response should be: “Whatever really happened in WW2 makes no difference to our case, and we condemn wars and genocide of all kinds, especially when we are on the receiving end today – what are YOUR moral values?”

          • Martel

            This history does have bearing on what we do. How often are we called Nazi’s if we support white ethnic interests?

            The myth that Hitler was pure evil needs to go for this comparison to become less effective, but it certainly does not have to be replaced with us glorifying him.

          • Martel

            No need to glorify Hitler or demonize Churchill, nor the opposite,recognize the second world war for what it was. Unlike Hitler who praised Islam, Churchill condemned Islam. Unlike Hitler who invaded my country and put my family into camps, Churchill helped liberate them. Both recognized Jewish ethnic activism as an issue.

            Taking any extreme position is divisive and sets Europeans of different national backgrounds against eachother.

          • JSS

            If your implying Hitler would have championed the Islamic colonization of Europe I have to disagree. Churchills words about Islam and his deeds don’t match. Churchill and the liberators of Europe have delivered us into hell on earth. I’m not overly grateful for them. Sorry about your family but compared to what English bombs did to German families I’m not all that moved. America and a certain chosen people have done far more damage to Europe for the last 100 years then the national socialist.

          • Martel

            According to Speer, he would have. Sorry for my family but..?
            The suffering of a German family is worse then mine because you prefer Hitler over Churchill?

            How about being sorry the war took place at all, and grieve all the families and soldiers who died equally?

            I know Englishmen and Dutchmen who would hurt someone for making such comments, stop being divisive. Every white person who died for whatever political reason on whatever side was one too many.

          • JSS

            I have said on amren many many times that that war profited no one except our racial enemies. That’s still my opinion, but I find that when the chosen and WNs agree on something then the WN needs to seriously rethink his position.

            Anyway I’m just not big on “my family suffered such and such during that event so I’m an expert”. Personally I have lost close friends in Afghanistan. You can say what you want about that war, I just don’t care enough to hit you about it. I’m sure I could find some Dutch and have met Englishmen who would agree with me over you. So what. I just spoke up for murdered Germans because if I want to hear about the Nazis victims I can always turn on the history channel or Schindlers list.

          • Martel

            Anyone who makes statements trivialising the losses of either side shouldn’t be calling himself a white nationalist. I don’t care who was right in the second world war, I care about white unity. I’m sure you could find a few freaks who would agree with you, but no one we actually want to attract to this movement though. Too many ”white nationalists” actually don’t give a damn about whites, as your ”not all that moved” comment pointed out.

          • JSS

            You said they survived and were later “Iiberated” That implies they werent lost. The Germans that were firebombed are dead and unmourned for the most part because they are the official bad guys. So yes I consider the actual dead a bigger loss then people in a camp. Apparently you do care who was right because your offended enough to call me names and attribute our lack of unity to people like me.

          • Martel

            Some were liberated, where did I say all of them where?
            I don’t care who was right, I care that lives where lost and that you trivialize this because they were not as infatuated with Hitler as you are. Your ignorance about the occupation of my country or your dismissal of the experiences of my family after they were hauled of to Germany is also revolting. The lack of unity is definitely because of people like you.You can correct myths about Hitler without starting to rank casualties according to national background from ”horrible” in case of the Germans and ”not that moved” in case of the Dutch.

          • Sick of it

            When everyone you knew could have died in one day, that’s a pretty big deal.

          • JSS

            So what the chosen are doing to our race is mere ethnic activism and Im the reason Whites lack unity?

          • Martel

            Its indeed mere ethnic activism. Different ethnicities are not meant to be placed in the same territory. Do you believe they are some kind of “evil race”?

            You are indeed one of the causes. You trivialize non-German deaths over your political leanings, and you have stated that you are not interested in reaching out to those who admire Churchill or Roosevelt.

          • JSS

            I realize we are both putting words in each others mouths here but where did I trivialize non German death? I said I didn’t feel much over people being in a camp and surviving the war when so many others were killed. 2 different things. Anyway your kosher activist are not an ethnic group they are a race. And yes they are the root of the problem. If you don’t think so you are also part of the problem and it would explain your admiration for Churchill.

          • David Ashton

            The Jews are not “a race” – “I shall have words with Dr Gross about [my] mistake,” said your Beloved Fuehrer. The incremental influence and untouchability of the Zionist lobbies and related finance, since the war, have themselves been largely a “never again” consequence of Hitler’s particular form of antisemitism (fully documented) and of Nazi ruthlessness (not denied by serious revisionists), albeit exaggerated and harped upon endlessly – a self-fulfilling prophecy, but a self-defeating obsession as time goes on.

            Your last two sentences give you away, I suspect, as a “true believer” rather than a believer in truth.

          • JSS

            German anti semitism didn’t happen in a vacuum. The chosen have a habit of making people get tired of them. So you disagree that we would be much better off without them? If they really were just victims and their obnoxious behavior today were Hitlers fault they could all go to Israel to get away from us racist Goy couldn’t they?

            As for the quote I would just say he was incorrect or Im missing the context.

          • David Ashton

            Hitler’s antisemitism tragically differed in character and content from that of most others (except notably Eugen Duehring’s). It was implicitly genocidal. I shall develop my own opinion about antisemitism, as briefly as possible, and Hitler’s position, only if it is worth the trouble here.

          • Martel

            Its clear you do not care about white nationalism. I have spoken to so many admirers of Hitler, who despise anyone who disagrees with them on the most trivial matters, who make insulting comments about others whites, and who’s obsession with the Jews turns them into a caricatures.

            Do you really that English whites will suddenly admire Hitler, what planet are you living on?

            Even if I considered Hitler to be 100% in the right, which is obviously bullshit, I would despise every single one of those ”patriots” spiting on the graves of their own grandfathers. Stop being divisive or find a new hobby, because its the last thing we need.

            Thanks for the correction, Jews are a ”race” not an ”ethnic group”. And anyone who disagrees is a Jewish agent, right?

          • JSS

            I doubt your agent double O six million, but you sure sound like one. All your talk of me despising other Whites and being obsessed with your “ethnic activist”. All I said was I don’t feel anymore sorry for you then a dead German and you took that as me hating you. Very kosher. I appreciate you admitting you know lots of people like me, we aren’t that rare and seeing the matzah for what it is isn’t all that uncommon. I don’t hate your grandfather or mine. Do you see how lame you sound? Your adopting their language even.

          • He does the same thing as Engelmann, just a different flavor of it in my opinion. He and Ashton and several more act to push discussion away from such topics 100% of the time the topic comes round to that, which it does often because they rule us.

          • JSS

            I’ll give Ashton a little credit for at least being well read and knowledgable. He doesn’t just cut and paste like Engelman and I have thick skin enough to take an insult. I was joking about Martel maybe being related to ann frank but he might actually be. You tell him his relatives are no different then any other people who suffered back in the day he goes totally ADL on you.

          • Sick of it

            David will go into honest debate and provide factual information at the very least.

          • Frank Morris

            Factual information like this?

            Augur said, “This wouldn’t be happening if whites had a country of our own.”

            Ashton said, “How about Europe from Iceland to the Urals, America from Alaska to the Rio Grande, Australia and New Zealand?”

            If that’s factual on Ashton’s part, I’m King Farouk!

          • Sick of it

            He is skeptical about the foreign racial elite, but most white people are.

          • Playing the skeptic is also an argumentative technique. His pitch and Martel’s are much more moderate and intellectual than Engelmann’s. They will banter back and forth having an old school debate with you but when someone mentions the Chosenites just watch how they leap in. Just scroll through their comments to get a feel for what their politics are, if you like. It’s a pretty straightforward read.

          • Sick of it

            David has revealed the origins of a few Communist leaders who I did not realize were Jewish. But you are right re: their jumping in on the topic.

          • One or more of them may be simply behaving as conditioned, as most of us were conditioned to defend the same before we were awakened.

          • SoulInvictus

            Funny how people’s own quotes come back to bite them isn’t it…
            And from that list, only the last two are even partially true.

          • Frank Morris

            Absolutely. I don’t see how anyone could read that and feel that anyone who made such a statement is even remotely attempting to be truthful. These are formerly white countries that still happen, temporarily at least, to have a white majority.

          • Martel

            ”Then they are not worth reaching out to anyway”

            Jesus Christ. Yes, because of people like you, as I stated in my previous comment, there is lack of unity. Every white man and women is worth reaching out to regardless of their position on the second world war.

          • JSS

            Plenty of Dutch supported the Germans. SS Nederland had an admirable reputation. I didn’t know you spoke for the whole country now. Funny how now days all the Western Europeans were anti Nazis the whole time. So no you aren’t an unbiased universalist. Clearly those of us who don’t buy the Spielburg version of the war have no place in your big tent. If Im wrong here I apologize but I honestly harbor some doubts about your family being hauled off for no reason. The Germans didn’t waste resources hauling innocent civilians all over Europe for the heck of it. Im aware of the bombing of rotterdam and that the Netherlands was the scene of fierce fighting during the war. Im not making light of that. Just stop pretending your unbiased when your not. As I have said before, I trace the misery of the Western World today straight back to 1945. The mess we are in now is because the wrong side won. Whites aren’t divided because of me. It’s because they believe the lies they have been fed since 1945. Anyone who would perpetuate those lies isn’t someone I feel would be on our side through thick and thin.

          • Martel

            ”Then they are not worth reaching out to anyway”
            Stop claiming you care about uniting whites when stating the above. You cannot say you are a white nationalist while dismissing whites simply because they have a different interpretation of the second world war.

            Now you call me a liar and try to string together an argument about me being biased. First off, everyone has biases, but unlike you, I don’t allow my views on the second world war to effect my primary objective. But you do, you even go as far as calling me a liar because our experiences don’t fit your idealistic view of the Nazi occupation. I don’t mind if someone dispels myths about Hitler, but going as far as attacking those who (will always) support Churchill or making disgusting comments about non-Germans who died, especially those in my family,is another level. Its not something we need and has always been the weakness of this movement.

          • JSS

            Anyone who won’t name those we aren’t supposed to name at amren just isn’t a reliable ally for our current hard times in my book. So I stand by what I said. They will follow later but for now they aren’t going to be the difference between whether we parish or not. I care about them but the majority will always be fence sitters until the outcome is obvious.

            As for your family story I admit I’m a cynic. There appear to more “Nazi concentration camp” survivors today then in 1945.

          • David Ashton

            Jews, the Jews, Jews, the Jews, Jews…will that do?

          • Martel

            I discuss Jewish ethnic activism all the time, I promote the books of McDonald, including on Amren. The only ones who make this a difficult subject are the likes of you.

            Again, you have no issue calling me a liar, because white nationalism is only a secondary concern to you, if at all. You don’t care about the quickest road to uniting whites, you rather insult fellow whites, refuse to reach out to the majority of whites who support (and always will) Churchill over Hitler, and remain part of an insignificant movement.

          • David Ashton

            Martel is not perpetuating lies.
            And he is one of the most indefatigable “WN” contributors here and elsewhere.

            The Nazis hauled civilians, Jews and others, individually innocent of crime to camps as forced laborers for a start, and other population movements had geopolitical or ideological “reasons”. Have you any reason to question the authenticity of Hitler’s explanation to Horthy of what happens to Hungarian deportees?

          • JSS

            I realize the Nazis conscripted labor. Forced labor was nothing new to European war and many of those sent to Germany went before they were conscripted due to high unemployment in their home countries. Of Dutch laborers in Germany nearly a 3rd volunteered to go. Martel mentioned his family dieng in camps. That had me thinking he was related to Ann Frank perhaps. If he had family working as laborers in Germany then I could believe that but the Nazis werent deliberately working anyone to death like say the Allies did after the war. My point is all Europeans suffered during the war. I don’t see what makes any individual countries unique. I will stand by the Allied fire bombing and red army gang rape spree as being more criminal then anything the Germans did during the war. Apparently to you and Marty that makes me not a true WN.

          • David Ashton

            No, you are a genuine WN, though with a different and questionable opinion from others about Nazis and Jews, which is not essential to the general cause but in certain presentations could initially discourage support.

            Agreed: all Europeans suffered. The fire-bombing of German targets was largely indefensible on moral and strategic grounds. The Red Army rape and torture of German women incited by Ehrenburg were also indefensible, but SS massacres of women and children likewise. Nothing much to be gained 60 years later in an Axis-Allied balance-sheet, although it is important to emphasize that many peoples then and since have suffered from mass-murders, especially at the hands of Communists, neglected by Hollywood &c.

            Why should Martel be “related to Anne Frank”? Debating with Jews on a right-wing Zionist website, someone thought I must be “related to Catherine Ashton” at the EU. Would it matter if either of us were related? What matters is whether we can defend our arguments with fact and reason, or retract them if disproved.

          • JSS

            I actually gravitate to the view on the war that you and Martel take, it was a fratricidal catastrophe. I saw a generation identity meme the other day that had a picture of a Jerry lighting a Tommie’s cigarette with the caption “next time we fight as brothers”. That’s the attitude I advocate. I do however think the allies were duped into fighting against European mans best interest on behalf of parasites. Even Patton agreed with that assessment.

            My ann frank remark was because she was from the Netherlands and Martel seemed to be saying his family was sent to a camp to die. I was making a petty sarcastic remark. I agree with you that refighting the war on the comments section is largely meaningless and I would never claim the Germans hands were pristine. However one can hardly turn on the TV these days without seeing then demonized. That demonization is meant to keep Whites divided and guilt ridden.

          • David Ashton

            Fully agree with that last sentence. It is a vile scandal.

            As for WW2 losses my family was relatively lucky: an uncle was bombed out, but not killed, although my favorite nephew was shot down without trace by the Germans. The “bloodlands” were less lucky. I strongly resent the latest Zionist themes that the British and Americans were worse than “bystanders” because we did not try or manage to rescue all the Jews of Europe from The Holocaust, did not take their side 100% postwar against the Arabs, and then “dragged Israel” into an Anglo-French colonialist enterprise at Suez.

          • Martel

            I don’t care which party you consider more guilty then the other. I do care that you take your views to such an extreme where you are willing to offend other nationalists, because you do not see that the English, the Dutch and others have their own reasons to never even consider supporting Hitler. Should I admire a man who occupied my country?

            No one will ever accept your beliefs, but a small, politically worthless minority.

            My second issue with your ilk, is that you make it harder for me to expose Jewish ethnic activism. As predicted, you even imply i might be a jew.A few ”white nationalists” seem hellbent on verifying the Hollywood stereotype of the obsessive, paranoid white nationalist. This prevents rational Europeans from even considering my points.

            If you would care more about white unity then you care about playing the Hitlerian rebel, you would focus on developing arguments palatable to all whites, without losing sight of key objectives such as the freedom to discuss ”antisemitism” from the gentile perspective.

          • LHathaway

            “you take your views to such an extreme where you are willing to offend other nationalists. . . No one will ever accept your beliefs, but a small, politically worthless minority”.

            Apparently, those with such believes seem determined to be a majority, or present themselves as a majority, here. It would seem to be the case?

            “you make it harder for me to expose Jewish ethnic activism”

            Too funny.

          • JSS

            Good we can agree not to care about each other. Your country was never actually liberated but your whining about people like me. If you think I was serious about you being a jew then you really suck at reading sarcasm. I was just saying you have adopted their lingo and arguments. “Hate” “conspiracy theory” “outreach” “my family’s sufferink during da vore”. Whatever. Your the paranoid one. If I don’t value your family more then a Germans I hate you. If I don’t give Hitler the obligatory 2 minutes hate Im trying to convince everyone to love the Reich. If Im open about how I feel about Jews Im a paranoid Nazi. Look in the mirror. Your the one who apparently can only think in extremes and absolutes.

          • David Ashton

            I don’t know why one cannot make a balanced judgment about both Hitler and Churchill. This is not detrimental to white nationalism.

          • JSS

            For me it’s because Hitler tried over and over to avoid fighting England, and Hitler knew who our true enemies were. What good came from Churchills actions?

          • David Ashton

            Agreed. England should not have declared war on Germany. I have said I support almost everything Mosley said on this in 1939 and much of what Buchanan said recently. Once we were engaged in a battle for survival, then Churchill was fairly useful to have in charge. However, he lost the Empire he hoped to save.

          • LHathaway

            I was surprised when a British friend told me Churchill lost the election and lost power after the war and stepped down as prime minister. I wasn’t surprised he stepped down from power after the election, this is Europe after all, but I was surprised he lost the election after the war.

          • Sick of it

            Hitler targeted everyone who threatened his power within Germany as well. Think of Erwin Rommel. Also consider that he didn’t heed his generals’ wise advise regarding the war in the East and what it cost the German people.

          • JSS

            After that many near assassinations he pretty paranoid after awhile. I admit I admire the man but with him people conflate admiration for adoration. Hitler made mistakes and did shameful things like any other ruler. I just think he was better then most at the time and any today. Personally my favorite people from the era were Theodore Eicke and Kurt Student.

        • SoulInvictus

          They’re in short supply. And other than when trying to win over minds that are still stuck in the Matrix, we shouldn’t feel guilt for celebrating and being inspired by our forefathers.
          In the not too distant future, Washington and Jefferson will be every bit the villain Hitler is depicted as. Really, slave owners and native genocidal killers all, they’ll be just as reviled. It’s already happening to marginal figures like Robert E. Lee and anyone associated with the CSA.

          I choose to draw the line, at least when I’m in half way like minded company.

    • archer

      Many people are finally realizing that’s the problem, they did “do something” and now the commie control freaks are running the EU and ruining Europe or what’s left of it.

    • Moe

      Agree, only the beginning…and a portend of what is coming to America in 30+ years. Hate to say it, but in 30 years, it will be like, “hey man, you kept my people down all these years, now I’m gonna git mine.”

    • David Ashton

      We Brits would not need pity from the likes of you with your long record of contempt for your fellow-whites on this website. Two years between 1937 and 1939, and much the same time before Roosevelt took the USA into a world war. However, whether the Anglo-American war against Germany was a good thing on balance in the long run is something to decide AFTER you have studied the revisionist works by Patrick Buchanan, Joachim Hoffmann, Alan Taylor, etc.

      • LHathaway

        There are plenty of free-thinkers here, I don’t think it took Pat Buchanan to OK their alternative take on the war. What it does do is help give ‘pseudo-respectability’ to their efforts at presenting themselves as Nazis, and giving us all the good name such a connection deserves.

        No doubt, there are plenty of things the Nazi’s did right, or even things the Allies did wrong, in their societies and while fighting the war. It’s interesting that no president has ever apologized to the Italian-americans and german-americans interred during WWII. Everyone around the world has heard of the great shameful act when American’s interred Japanese American’s during WWII. No one outside of this website knows that German and Italian Americans were also interred during WWII.

  • DaveMed

    Could be a hoax.

    • D.B. Cooper

      I don’t see white people doing it, but I can very easily imagine “them” doing it because “they” will not get punished. The original Queen Elizabeth would not have tolerated their presence in her city at all.

      • Katherine McChesney

        My all time favorite ‘heroine’.

        • Einsatzgrenadier

          Mine too. If you know your history, you’ll know that Good Queen Bess wanted to rid her realm of all “negroes and blackamoors.”

    • ejXinMI

      It could be, but it doesn’t matter. What matters is resolving Islamic colonization it will be a good thing. The Brits should fight while they can still win… no point waiting until the darkest hour.

  • Einsatzgrenadier

    Time to recognize mass third world immigration for what it is: invasion and colonization by an army of foreign occupation. These arrogant, ignorant foreigners want what white people have, but do not possess the necessary mental equipment to build it themselves. With the assistance of the multikulti traitors in government, the nonwhites have seized for themselves and colonized a large portion of the white man’s territory, closed ranks and have now begun looking out for members of their own race more aggressively than ever before. It is inevitable that this “soft” genocide will become a “hard” genocide as the number of hostile foreign invaders in Britain reaches critical mass.

  • “Police probe…”

    Why? Are they going to give a medal to those that spray painted the graffiti?

    I think “Whites Not Welcome” by now is the official motto of the UK.

    • robinbishop34

      I think “Whites Not Welcome” by now is the official motto of the UK.

      … or the 1965 Immigration Act

  • IstvanIN

    I am sure the miscreant who did this will receive a punishment far less than poor Emma West or any number of people who said things even more innocuous and in turn had their lives ruined.

    • JSS

      I’m sure his welfare payments and taxpayer funded flat will not be taken. Chances are whoever did this will be Prime Minister one day.

      • IstvanIN

        And it happened at Prince of Wales School, how much more white than that can you get?

  • dd121

    So they’re saying we won’t become a beloved minority when the brown hoards become the majority? Imagine that.

    • Frank Morris

      Anyone who wants a picture of what society will be like for whites when they become a minority need only look to the prisons.

      • Whitetrashgang

        Yeah the average retard that likes diversity should spend a couple days in jail, if you don’t get it then well f you.

  • John Ambrose

    Whites being made to feel like outsiders in their own indigenous lands.

  • Everyday a little more evidence piles up showing
    what non-white’s are thinking, and in many, many
    cases of actual violence set upon whites .. It’s painfully obvious
    that the white world cannot set back on the haunches and witness
    these attacks and the foreboding of things to come ..

  • freddy_hills

    I don’t think this multi cult experiment thing is going to end well.

  • If British muzzies and hindus don’t want whites around, I’ll bet they want white money and white women and underage white girls. Hypocrisy much.

    The muzzies and hindus can go back to their thurd world nonwhite paradises in that case. And let the British lads knock some sense into them, as seen in a couple of recent videos posted on youtube. A race war would be a good thing, it it caused some of them to voluntarily leave.

    • The Final Solution

      Which videos are you referring to? I would love to see those.

      • Go to my website and use the search box to search for “the english finally wake up” posted june 4. I also posted a video of the french on june 3 “video: early stage white genocide by muslims …”
        Both of these are very inspiring.

        • The Final Solution

          That video was the most satisfying thing I’ve seen in ages. Fantastic website btw. I will be sure to check it out from time to time. Really good stuff. That Future Generation video with the Swedish women – very disturbing.

  • MekongDelta69

    “The school is multi-cultural…”
    Uh-oh. I smell groveling coming soon.

  • Conrad

    Instead of saying, “Just who in the hell do you think you are to tell us that WE are NOT welcome here in our own country, they mumble…
    “We have a large multicultural and harmonious community in Enfield which embraces its diversity…. Racism of any form is unwelcome in this borough.”
    Who knows, these anti-whites might just start cutting your heads off in your public streets. Oh wait. That already happened, AND YOU STILL HAVE YOUR HEAD IN YOUR PANTS!

  • This wouldn’t be happening if whites had a country of our own.

    • David Ashton

      How about Europe from Iceland to the Urals, America from Alaska to the Rio Grande, Australia and New Zealand?

      • Don’t be absurd. All these places you mention are owned by and run by Jews, for the benefit of Jews. You can tell by how whites are being bred into minorities in the countries you allege they themselves run.

        • Frank Morris

          Absurd is precisely the word for it. You are correct on all your points. I find it interesting he mentions the Rio Grande. You can hardly find a White person in the Rio Grande Valley due to all the Mexicans. It’s like playing Where’s Waldo!

          • David Ashton

            I think it is absurd to suppose that the Jews are the permanent owners of Europe, America and Australasia, but then I am neither a defeatist nor a nutcase.

          • Frank Morris

            No one is saying it’s permanent. That would be truly defeatist.

          • He insults me for claiming I have a defeatist attitude and yet he denies the factual basis for my reasonable assertion that these countries are not in fact actually run by whites, like he claimed. His purpose is sheltering the Chosenites. That’s his entire task.

          • Frank Morris

            Robot minds of robot slaves…

          • David Ashton

            Would you then care to reveal here any ideas for a counter-strategy if you have them and consider them desirable?

          • Frank Morris

            I see no reason to further interact with you.

          • David Ashton

            Oh well. There must be legions of whites wanting a chance to organize effectively, and I would welcome a concrete set of objectives. I shall just have to get on with putting solutions into cyberspace like a moratorium on immigration into our Anglosphere without your Texan friendship.

        • David Ashton

          So you prefer to run to some little corner somewhere rather than attempt a recovery?

          • Why then is it the case that White Rights sites fall to the alternative right at all, that white rights and white nationalism is considered demonized? If, as you claim, whites had countries from America to Australia and New Zealand and throughout Europe, then instead of P.C. propaganda like Piers Morgan, we’d have people on the TV who sounded more like William F. Buckley.

          • David Ashton

            If you have a better answer, tell us now.

          • I’m done with you, hasbara. I know what you are and what you do here.

          • David Ashton

            These countries belong historically to white people who currently form the majority. A change of TV media and academia is needed and we have the numbers to push for change if properly organised; I have previously often suggested AR as one forum towards this end. Pat Buchanan is one spokesman whose “conservative” voice has not been “”neo-conned”, but Buckley was regarded as a sell-out on racial grounds towards the end just as Coulter is moving in the opposite direction. As for the Jewish influence, the sea-change against Communism, Islam and Negro equality theory should be regarded as potential asset rather an obstruction to “white rights”.

          • The actual people I listed are immaterial. Don’t get bogged down in details. Hasbara and Chosenites have a tendency to want to deconstruct things, to pick apart minutiae, to find any tiniest little scrap of inconsistency and then yammer on about it. Buckley represents what is thought of as white on the TV in historical terms, he acts white, sounds white, and carries the torch of European civilization and thought when he speaks. Buchanan on the other hand is a white guy who isn’t kosher but who isn’t actually doing much to help either. Then there’s the best we have at the moment, Matt Hale, a man who sits in prison wrongfully railroaded for his political activities in which he was striving to secure the future for our people and a future for white children.

            Moving on, I don’t even understand what your last sentence means and reading comprehension is rarely a thing that challenges me. What sea-change against Communism? You saying Jews are against Communism now? You base that on what? Not that they’ve been behind it for the last hundred years but solely on what? On the TV talking about Russia being the U.S. State Department’s Boogeyman-du-jour? Honestly your last sentence makes no sense.

          • David Ashton

            There is merit in your description of how many Jews argue.

            There has been a noticeable shift in substantial Jewish sentiment and policy away from Russia and international socialism to Israel and international capitalism. It is not an altruistic development in general, but determined by a change in self-interest. There is much more “detail” and “actual people” available, but I hope you will believe me when I say that even to outline here an adequate answer, just for your possible benefit, here presents me with an inconvenient and wearisome, although not in principle unwelcome, task. Make start by reading Jewish writers such as Raymond Aron, Max Beloff, David Dallin, Nathanial Weyl, Murray Rothbard, Daniel Pipes, David Horowitz, Arthur Pollard, journals like the US “Commentary” and UK “Standpoint”. Of course, we cannot expect them to espouse neo-nazi racism. But one need not look the gift horse in the mouth when there is a common adversary in the leftist-jihad alliance.

          • David Ashton

            My reply has not appeared on this thread at 1 PM GMT June 12.
            I shall try again later.

  • MBlanc46

    This sort of story finds its way into the Daily Mail. If it were anti-colored graffiti, every media outlet in Britain would be up in arms about it.

  • DeMarquise Elkins

    This graffiti is culturally enriching. It’s a progressive wet dream of diversity and multiculturalism !!

  • LHathaway

    “whites not welcome”

    I stopped reading after the first sentence, for surely the sign ‘whites not welcome’ must rest over the UK.

  • Isn’t this graffiti the official stance of the British government?

  • Spikeygrrl

    Whatever happened to “sticks and stones may break my bones, but words can never hurt me”?! Whites need to develop MUCH thicker skin to successfully endure what promises to be a long and bloody battle to restore our culture. Let the whiny MultiCultist crybabies of ALL races go running back to their institutional Nannies because someone called them a nasty name. We’re stronger than that…or should be.

  • Truth Teller

    Churchill did not lose the Empire through stupidity. The colonies and the European power always had trade agreements. The colony supplied raw materials to the European power at stable prices and thus avoided the ups and downs of the market. The Europeans had a monopoly on selling their products to the colonies. Products of no other nations were allowed.
    The first concession Churchill made to Roosevelt even before we came into the war was to prevent BOAC from going into S. America and Mexico. Pan American,an American airline got the concessions. Next Churchill gave up India and Palestine. Then swiftly followed the African and Arab colonies.
    What we, America got out of it was to be able to sell our products to all those former British colonies.
    Churchill was hated by his own class, the middle class and the working class that threw him and his goverment out even before the end of the war. He was detested as a dangerous war monger and jewish puppet all through the 1930’s and he was.
    He was a master of propagandizing himself.

  • Truth Teller

    Mason Gull

    If you think the soviet occupation of Poland was so benign I suggest you read this book
    The Long Walk: The True Story of a Trek to Freedom by Slavomir Rawicz (Apr 1, 2006)

    It’s about 4 Poles who lived in the Soviet section of Poland during WW2, were sent to the gulag and escaped south, walking to India about 5,000 miles.
    The first few chapters are about the soviet occupation of Poland. He includes much information about how the Russian, (not Mongolian) soldiers were totally astounded that the Poles had furniture, dishes,pots and pans, blankets, shoes, stoves, food and heat in the winter.
    The Russians confiscated ordinary household, farm, factory and other equipment from the Poles and sent it to Russia.
    The post WW2 occupation of Poland was a communist one but not a Russian one. It was a Russian jew occupation as claimed by every Pole who lived through it.

    Why are we fighting about WW2? We have more important things to worry about.

  • Truth Teller

    Elizabeth 1 would have done or not done to Muslims in England exactly what her handlers, the Cecils father and son told her to do.

  • David Ashton

    I regard the English and Germans as cousins and in many respects similar. Like my patriotic WW1 volunteer father, I always believed in Anglo-German friendship and international co-operation instead of conflict; Joseph Chamberlain had this view for a while, and Oswald Mosley was imprisoned without charge or trial for publicly advocating it from 1932 to 1940.

    The Germanophobe Vansittart amazingly wrote a book, I think entitled “Even Now”, which turned from the Nazi to the Soviet enemy, the assumption in both cases being that Britain itself was sufficiently well-armed to achieve conclusive dominance in either case.

    However, Churchill was not the only party to the unintended consequence of Imperial and European destruction; Hitler, Stalin and Roosevelt each played their part.