Darwin’s Unexploded Bomb

Ed West, Spectator, May 6, 2014

‘This book is an attempt to understand the world as it is, not as it ought to be.’ So writes Nicholas Wade, the British-born science editor of the New York Times, in his new book A Troublesome Inheritance.

For some time the post-War view of human nature as being largely culturally-formed has been under attack just as surely as the biblical explanation of mankind’s creation began to face pressure in the early 19th century. What Steven Pinker called the blank slate view of our species, whereby humans are products of social conditions and therefore possible to mould and to perfect through reform, has been undermined by scientific discoveries in various areas.

But the most sensitive, and potentially troubling to the modern psyche, is the difference between human population groups that have evolved over the past 50,000 years. As Wade writes: ‘The fact that human evolution has been recent, copious, and regional is not widely recognized, even though it has now been reported by many articles in the literature of genetics. The reason is in part that the knowledge is so new and in part because it raises awkward challenges to deeply held conventional wisdom.’

The political objections are a reaction to the horrific things done in the name of race in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, culminating in the Final Solution, after which the UN’s Ashley Montagu made the influential declaration that race was to all intents and purposes a fiction. Before that, anthropologist Franz Boas had popularised the idea that we are entirely products of culture.

This has remained the conventional view, indeed the only one that academics could safely hold; yet a number of inconsistencies have begun to crack away at this noble idea.

Among them is the recent knowledge that evolution can take place far quicker than people once thought. Greg Cochran and Henry Harpending, in their book The 10,000 Year Explosion, argued that human evolution had sped up since the advent of the first cities. The drastic changes in our ancestors’ environment created new evolutionary pressures; among them were selection for qualities that were beneficial in our larger communities, such as lower levels of aggression, deferred gratification (vital for farmers), a greater willingness to trust people outside of close kin group, and the qualities required for craftsmanship, finance and various other complex skills. Thus civilisation had increased the rate of evolution, and was continuing to do so.

Their research was solid, yet as Wade says, ‘Scientific inquiry thus runs into potential conflict with the public policy interest of not generating possibly invidious comparisons that might foment racism’.

Among the areas explored by Cochran and Harpending, along with another academic, Jason Hardy, has been Ashkenazi intelligence, and yet a previous paper, despite being considered ‘fascinating’ by editors, could not be published in the United States.

It is obviously understandable why Jewish intelligence and success, the subject of extreme and violent jealousies through the ages, makes people nervous. But the outsized contribution of Jews to almost all fields must surely interest all but the dullest of minds: just 0.2 per cent of the world population, Jews accounted for 29 per cent of Nobel Prizes in the late 20th century, and 32 per cent so far in 21st century. That tiny, remarkable country Israel recently won its fifth Chemistry Prize in a decade.

One can admire Jewish culture and the Jewish work ethic, but the idea that this enormous level of achievement is purely cultural, while possible, certainly does not pass the Occam’s razor test. As Wade says, ‘People are highly imitative, and if the Jewish advantage were purely cultural, such as hectoring mothers or a special devotion to education, there would be little to prevent others from copying it.’ They haven’t.

The same is true of the Chinese, who across Asia and now the rest of the world have formed highly successful business communities and, like the Jews, have suffered attacks from jealous neighbours: ‘If Chinese business success were purely cultural, everyone should find it easy to adopt the same methods. This is not the case because social behavior, of Chinese and others, is genetically shaped.’

As he says: ‘New evidence strongly suggests that the very different kinds of society seen in the various races and in the world’s great civilizations differ not just because of their received culture–in other words, in what is learned from birth–but also because of variations in the social behavior of their members, carried down in their genes.’

The implications of this will trouble many people, seeing as it suggests that certain traits differ on average among population groups. He cites the MAO-A enzyme; people with only 2 copies (rather than 3, 4 or 5) have a much higher level of delinquency. And ‘if individuals can differ in the genetic structure of their MAO-A gene and its controls, is the same also true of races and ethnicities? The answer is yes.’ A team in Haifa looked at people from seven ethnicities and found 41 variations in the portions of the genes they decoded, with ‘substantial differentiation between populations’.

So why do so many people confidently argue that there is no such thing as race, because there are ‘no clear distinct racial boundaries’. This he calls ‘verbal subterfuge’, arguing: ‘When a distinct boundary develops between races, they are no longer races but separate species. So to say there are no precise boundaries between races is like saying there are no square circles.’

Wade is critical of leading biologists, economists and psychologists who have simply dismissed possible non-cultural explanations as racist, or who pin their hopes in geographic determinism, or shy away from recent evolution because of the political implications. This, he says, has nothing to do with its scientific validity but the ‘political dangers’ that researchers face in ‘pursuing the truth too far’.

The political dangers are very real; various academics have lost their jobs or faced quite extreme harassment for voicing the belief that differences in group IQ scores are partly hereditary, despite there being solid evidence that intelligence is under genetic control.

And yet these ‘accusations of racism against anyone who suggests that cognitive capacities might differ between human populations groups . . . are shaped by leftist and Marxist political dogma, not by science.’ He says: ‘The common sense conclusion–that race is both a biological reality and a politically fraught idea with sometimes pernicious consequences–has also eluded’ much of academia.

This book’s ideas are indeed fraught but beyond carefully explaining the dangers of misusing science, the consequences are not for scientists to ponder, but rather lawmakers and others of influence; they can choose either to consider the evidence and make things work as best as they can, using what knowledge we have, or they can continue to ignore the ticking of Darwin’s unexploded bomb, punishing anyone who raises the subject.

This hostility faced by those with troublesome ideas is, of course, itself explained by evolution. As Wade mentions earlier on, we are social creatures, and we have evolved behaviours to live as such: ‘One is a tendency to criticize, and if necessary punish, those who do not follow the agreed norms.’ That is partly why, as a species, we find it easier to talk about how the world should be, rather than how it is.

Topics: , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • David Ashton

    So long as “the Jews” and “the Chinese” are regarded as the “racially” most intelligent, then “racialism” is OK – is that it?

    • anew

      Notice that what little attention the mainstream gives to racial intelligence differences focuses on that, when the white/black gap is much, much more firmly supported by the evidence?

      In any case, we white nationalists should not get too excited about this book. Notice the opening sentence of this article: “This book is an attempt to understand the world as it is, not as it ought to be.” This attitude that it would be great if everyone were the same, but they’re not, so we’ll have to go our separate ways, is wrong and is not helpful to white nationalism.

      Pat Buchanan is right when he says that the politics follows the culture; we have to win the culture. And there is no short-cut to doing that; we have to put the work in, and do it the old-fashioned way, and that is through art and moral philosophy. Same as it’s always been.

      Books like this may move the needle a bit towards race realism, but they do next to nothing for ethno-nationalism (confirmation of genetic relatedness helps a little, but who honesty did not already know that whites are more closely related to one another than they are to others?). Likewise, most people already know about inherited mental and physical racial differences. But there has been no stampede to white nationalism because we haven’t put in the work yet of constructing an idealistic moral argument.

      • David Ashton

        Race realism undermines one argument by our enemies, but not others. Necessary, but not sufficient. Moral idealism: invasion and occupation are not right because we white people are the victims.

        • anew

          In a vacuum, race realism is no help to white nationalism. It needs to be put in context, and also be integrated into a package of ideas about the relationship of the citizen to his state, before it can be much help to our cause.

          • Anon

            When, in all of human history, has the side with the better, more rational argument won or even been popular. These are issue of power. I could argue that blacks had to be ethically cleansed from the US because my cat told me and millions of people would enthusiastically get behind me if I already had an army and was merrily slaughtering my way through occupied Dixie.
            Put another way. Who here pricked their thumbs and voted for Ron Paul in their own blood? No one? How many did that for Sadam Hussein knowing full well about his recreational torture/rape rooms. A huge number.
            Race realism is a joke. It’s basically a few people trying to convince others that race is real and by gosh there are actual differences based on race. In the face of all the victims….the millions of white victims….the whole thing is just sad.

          • FeuerSalamander

            very very very true. People bend to whatever power is in charge. Everyone is concerned, foremost, with his own self interest. The problem for whites is that they bend today to appease the powerful and they appease a plan which will eliminate them tomorrow. This must be stopped.

      • So CAL Snowman

        There has been no stampede to White nationalism because of “Muh Holocaust” Before World War 2, White nationalism was a normal, rational mind set for the White men and women of the Western world.

        • anew

          Yeah, white nationalism reigned in the past, but only because it was unchallenged, especially in Europe, where everyone was white anyways. As the values of the Enlightenment Universalism gained steam, we were caught flat-footed. Racial science stepped-in to try to counter this, but it was not enough, especially after ww II gave the other side so much ammo. Which demonstrates my point.

          • LovelyNordicHeidi

            We need to ensure that we do not give any ammo to our enemies this time, so that we can establish our ideology for millenia to come. We need to think about our public image, and about the consequences of our deeds and sayings for our public image. If we give ammo like WWII to our enemies again, we are doomed to fail. And I do mean, doomed to fail. We have to work hard on our public image, so that we can reach those who are willing to listen.

          • JSS

            Most of the “Neo Nazis” you see on TV are fake. A good example are the Right Sector clowns in Ukraine. As far as image goes we are damned if we do and damned if we don’t. The media will never give us a fair hearing so there is no use trying to appeal to them. I understand not giving them ammo but if we don’t give them any they will just make something up. As for the WW2 thing the point isn’t to dress up and goose step but to stop apologizing for it. It’s to say no, the wrong side won and we were manipulated into fighting against our own best interest. The Holocaust story is a milestone around our neck that’s drowning us. It’s time to shake that off. No more guilt and groveling.

          • LovelyNordicHeidi

            I know that it is of no use to try to appeal to the media, because what you say about them is true. If they cannot find a stick to beat us with, they will make up an imaginary one to beat us with. What we must do is appeal to the people. We are in public when we are online. We need to make sure that we appeal to the people (or “guests” if you will) who read our comments, and we need to keep an eye on those who are in the movement, as social control will ensure that we upkeep a good public image.

          • JSS

            I think the crux of the matter is that no matter what we will always have a bad public image because those who shape the narrative and popular opinion hate us. Whites are the only people for whom the establishment promotes guilt by association. And it has to be pointed out, the ones who make us look the worst are fake. The bottom line is I’ve never met an awake white who wasn’t intelligent and normal. Chances are anyone who finds themselves amongst people like us have already had the seeds of doubt planted by just having the ability to think critically instead of acceptably. I don’t think reaching out should be our priority but rather organizing.

          • Dr. Möbias

            No, we don’t. It’s one minute to midnight and any White who isn’t aware by now isn’t worth saving. The information is out there, the empirical evidence is clear for all to see. Some of our worst enemies are other Whites who act as useful idiots. They need to be cut loose so they won’t pull the rest of us down with them. I’m through trying to “get the message out,” I’ve tried for 10 years now and have made little progress except with my own close family members.

            More important, far more important, is securing a homeland and resources for the future of our race. Again, not all Whites are worth saving.

          • Sloppo

            How do you know that your comments haven’t helped people you don’t know about? And those people may have influenced others. I suppose we will probably never know how far our influence goes.

          • Dr. Möbias

            Isn’t that why we’re here?

          • That’s the only reason I’m here.

          • Anna Tree

            Amren and comments of Amreners have helped me recognize the truth (that was always there).

            Not all Whites are worth saving: indeed you cannot spend years on one who doesn’t want to see, but reaching to those who just need a nudge towards the truth, by reading a few books/articles or listening to a few videos, and who after will continue their journey by themselves, is worth, maybe essential:

            A few dozens thousands individuals can recreate the white race, it had happened in the past in a couple of population bottlenecks, due to natural disasters.

            In our case, it could also be called a Founder effect: a population bottleneck because of lower demographics, miscegenation, mass-immigration and later war but also a founder effect because of the will of the mentally fit White to separate and restart better. But today we need more than a few dozens thousands because it is not only about reproduction but about physically defending our lives and our genes. We will not only need wombs but soldiers this time…

          • jane johnson

            I’ve been thinking that maybe we can make this “diversity is our strength” meme work for us rather than against us by hijacking the slogan with the reply, “No, diversity is OUR strength, European diversity, that is.” And we can begin to make it so by becoming more active in organizations like the Sons of Italy, Sons of Norway, Hibernians, etc. Seems like we’d find plenty of receptive people there, and as far as I know, there isn’t any animosity between these types of groups, and they are all White. Most started as mutual aid societies to help European immigrants find jobs and assimilate, and I don’t think it would take much persuasion to unite these groups under the umbrella of White solidarity. Just a thought.

          • Jacobite2

            “55 Days at Peking” was kind of inspirational.

          • Dr. Möbias

            I am ever suspicious of “neo-Nazis” because so many of them have turned out to be FBI plants to “root out” White supremacists.

            Not one piece of info out of the Ukraine can be trusted, especially anything the American media report.

          • I used to be a WW-2 battle reenactor. We ran around in the hills in full kit shooting blanks at on another at 9000 feet elevation, and went home exhausted. I was part of a friend’s group, and we all did Waffen SS. A bunch of guys from Denver who played as British said they had never seen anyone as aggressive as us. We always had a good time.

            Two guys went with us once, and their conversation was weird. They were all about racial politics, rather than battle-reenactment and that was not what the hobby is about. They were feds and later said so.

            They try to get into everything.

          • Every time I turn around, Hitler is taken off the shelf, dusted off and portrayed ad naseum in cinema. It’s not so much Nazi-bashing as it is White-bashing.

          • Sick of it

            I said as much when I saw the trailer for the latest Holocaust flick…very much annoyed me.

          • Dr. Möbias

            The enemies we are dealing with have no use for talk or ideology, our words and pleas to them mean nothing to them because they consider our lives as not worth bothering with. They are dead set and firm in their goal of White genocide and facts, reason, logic or common sense is useless as a defense. Some Whites will be left behind, too brainwashed to fight against their own demise.

            The only solution is complete separation for ourselves from non-Whites. We owe no one an explanation as to why a homeland is important for the future of our people. If other racial or ethnic groups demand a homeland for themselves, such as Asians, Jews, Africans or Hispanics, then this applies to us Whites as well.

          • So CAL Snowman

            White nationalism was challenged after the Civil War during the time of Southern Reconstruction. That ended with White men reaffirming White nationalism via Jim Crow laws. The problem is not our narrative or idealistic moral argument (the liberals make our arguments for us by protecting every OTHER race’s culture and heredity), the problem is that we have no main stream media platform from which to disseminate our views. The internet is a huge boon to us, but translating our online finger tapping to physical boots on the streets is proving to be almost impossible. Establishing the science behind racial differences is important but without vast public exposure and acceptance it is basically meaningless. It would be far easier to have the revolution and then AFTER we win, we could point to the science behind racial differences and say, “THAT’S why we fought.”

          • Geo1metric

            I agree about us not having an effective media outlet. I think that one fact is the most important reason Whites are losing ground around the world.

            While the internet gives us an outlet, the information available on the net seems not to resonate on main street as you point out.

            The importance of an effective media cannot be overstated. I will go so far as to posit that our cause will never “get legs” until we can formulate an effective media strategy.

          • Jacobite2

            Not everyone in Europe was white. Jews have been there since before the Diaspora (at least the forced one in 77 B.C., or whenever it was). Almost alone, the Jews were rabidly anti-Hellenistic. Right there, they demonstrated that they were ‘different’, and that this difference was related to an anti-Western/anti-European culture. Ever since, Jews have been openly or secretly supportive of every anti-European/anti-Christian movement in the West. It was swimming upstream until they latched onto the Enlightenment, and the Enlightenment’s spawn — Freemasonry and Leftism. Not just Spinoza with the Enlightenment, but most Jews were enthusiastic Freemasons (a purely anti-clerical and anti-monarchical secret organization) and rabid supporters and leaders of every Leftist movement around. As the Communists used to say, it is no coincidence that the leaders of Communism (beginning with Marx, and through Trotsky, Luxemburg, and George Soros) were Jews. The mention of Race Science is important. Observation demonstrated that Jews were actively hostile towards whites; Race Science demonstrates how this instinct (i.e., Human Nature) works among men. But Jews have managed to convince many whites that their own experience is false and science is meaningless. Who’re ya gonna believe, me or your lyin’ eyes? That’s what being more intelligent can mean in a struggle for dominance. Well, if your enemy is smarter than you are, I suggest that you not choose debate as your form of duel. Rather, settle the matter on the battlefield or in the streets. Go with your strength.

      • Jacobite2

        The old-fashioned way of ‘winning the culture’ was to operate on the basis of the Eskimo scrimshaw carver — to carve a seal, take a block of ivory and REMOVE everything that isn’t a seal. In a Kulturkampf, like every other war, one side is going to win by eliminating the other side. Dominance is a perfect zero-sum game — one side wins everything; the other side disappears (fast or slow, but ultimately gone).

    • JohnEngelman

      That depends on what you mean by “racialism.” Race realism has political implications. Nevertheless, it is a scientific theory, rather than a movement. It is not the same as white nationalism or white supremacy.

      An honest race realist acknowledges the higher average IQ’s of Jews and Orientals.

      • So CAL Snowman

        Not ALL Orientals Mr. Engelman, only a select few East Asian varieties. I really would like to see the data on the Chinese though. As I have often posited, I would be very curious to see the average IQ scores for the hundreds of millions of rural Chinese peasants.

        • Daniel Schmuhl

          I do think some East Asian populations have higher average IQs but Engelman seems to think its all East Asians. Hmong likely have a lower average IQ than do white Europeans.

          • Sick of it

            The Japanese make the Chinese look like village idiots in comparison. Koreans can be fairly intelligent as well. Look at them sometime and then really consider why such a difference exists amongst various Asian peoples. The answer is obvious.

          • JohnEngelman

            What I mean by Orientals are Chinese, Koreans, and Japanese.

          • cstung

            I tend to agree with that statement, but actually i believe southern chinese and vietnamese also have high average IQs, (higher than northern chinese and mongolians, for example)…

        • FeuerSalamander

          many of them are illiterate, contrary to the claims of the government. They will not be tested. Only the brightest get picked pout and educated and then the brightest of those sent to the cites. The tests scores are from those people.

    • JSS

      Funny how the non Eskimos can be either a race or a religion depending on what’s convenient at the moment.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      Those comments were thrown in to keep Heidi Beirich off his trail.

    • Daniel Schmuhl

      There is an interesting article about Jared Diamond on race, Google Jared Diamond+ Zionist. Jared Diamond is famous for saying that the hereditarian stuff is racust but wrote a paper titled “Jewish Lysosomes”, in which he speculated on the superior IQ of the Ashkenazi.

      He also wrote an article criticizing the concept of race, while elsewhere he wrote favorably of Israel using DNA testing to determine who is a Jew.

      Steven Pinker is actually almost as bad, read Jared Taylor’s review of The Blank Slate.

      • Dr. Möbias

        Jared Diamond is an anti-white author who claims Papua New Guineans are the smartest people on Earth.

        • Daniel Schmuhl

          I’ve read most of Diamond’s books and a dozen or so papers by him, so I’m aware of his biases.

          I’m just posting this because some people are unaware of just how duplicitous the man is.

        • ShermanTMcCoy

          “Must be all that long pork they ingest.

    • Sick of it

      Amazing that their achievements do not match up with the hype, yes?

    • Anna Tree

      Jews and Chinese, I think, are used as a shield.

      The same way that it is easier for me to defend white men or criticize the lewd behavior of female students in universities, because I am a woman. The same way it is easier for homosexuals to criticize adoption or marriage of homosexuals. The same way it is easier for a black to attack illegal immigration or affirmative action. The same way it is easier for Ayaan Hirsi Ali, the Somalian ex-muslim woman, to denounce islam and muslims.
      Indeed it is a pity (and wrong, crazy, illogic and dangerous) but nothing new or only particular to our movement.

      Let’s use the Chinese and Jews and defend racialism! The diversity liberal feminist and pro-gay crowd doesn’t warry to use anything to attack us…
      The goal doesn’t justify the means. But that mean (of using Chinese and Jews to prove or legitimize racialism) is okay in my opinion.

      Do I miss any dangerous or contra-productive consequence?

      • David Ashton

        No, a reasonable strategy in so far as one is dealing with fairly reasonable people, but only as preliminary spadework. During pre-WW2 immigration controversies, it was suggested that Ostjuden were lower in IQ than Nordics (albeit perhaps more “cunning”), but subsequent realization that Jews achieve extremely well intellectually has undermined their earlier attachment to egalitarianism and environmentalism. Of course, many “liberals” pride themselves on a rationality they actually lack.

        • Anna Tree

          – Yes a preliminary spadework.
          – Indeed yes about liberal leftists priding themselves on a rationality they actually lack (this baffles my mind, that they deride religious people but don’t think that blind faith doesn’t revolve only around a god, that their own ideology is also a blind faith with wishful thinking dogmas)

          I apologize but I am not sure I understand your “but subsequent realization that Jews achieve extremely well intellectually has undermined their earlier attachment to egalitarianism and environmentalism”. Just to be sure, who is “their”? I think it is the Jews, but then I don’t get why it bothered the pre-ww2 immigration lawmakers.
          And I still wonder what could be the dangerous or contra-productive consequences. Do you mean that realizing the Jews had higher IQs brought the pre-ww2 immigration lawmakers to accept the Jews? (and that brought our desmise as many Jews, too many, are cultural marxists, pro-diversity, anti-white etc?). So in the same way, you think that the legitimation of racialism through Chinese and Jews examples could eventually harm whites? But this is would only work for racialists like John Engelman, not for most white racialists who don’t care about IQs per se, but just want their own country, “to be left alone”.

          Thank you for your time.

          • David Ashton

            All I meant was that some Jewish intellectuals are more comfortable than their early 20th century predecessors with the notion of gene-determined intelligence because of the accumulation of evidence that Jews themselves score highly on IQ tests, exam results and Nobel Prize lists. To be sure, many Jews have used their brains to promote politics that are not beneficial to those Engelman calls “white Gentiles”. If there is some point you think I have missed, please ask again.

    • Jacobite2

      Eastern European Jews and East Asians do have higher IQs. So what? I cheered for my high school because it was MY high school, not because I thought we had more National Merit Finalists.

  • Ive seen some of the papper, and no it is not. I don’t blame him not wanting to put this out, it is a very dangerious paper, and as they say the truth can hurt. Soon as it if ever becomes fully published, there will be people who out right will not believe in his findings, as well there will be many faciest and serpremisist how will say, we told you so. Like most great findings in sciens it will be used preversly to suit ones political needs.

    • rasher223

      Yep.

      Politics is a disease if you ask me.

    • Dr. Möbias

      I am sure that Nicholas Wade knows exactly what happened to James Watson.

      • Anna Tree

        Sometimes one can not hold the truth more… One will say “Eppur si muove!” even knowing the consequences, even when one is a liberal leftist (or has been?) like Nicholas Wade or Robert Puttnam.

        Does something here know that the treatment of those is different? Seems to me they loose (or could loose) pretty quick their liberal label, am I wrong?

        • Grantland

          No upvote, only because you mis-said “lose”.

          • Anna Tree

            But my Italian wasn’t so bad LOL!

            I apologize for mispelling “lose” (this is a recurrent mistake I fear, it’s because I read in my head when I write, and I read with a French accent lol
            Maybe you don’t know that English is not my mother tongue 😉 No worries and by the way, I appreciate when my writing is corrected.

            (Are you saying that the other posts, that were much longer, didn’t have any mistakes?!?)

          • Dr. Möbias

            I haven’t seen you make any mistakes. Keep up the good work, I enjoy reading your posts even when I don’t agree with them. Spartacus also had impeccable English and his native language was Romanian.

          • Anna Tree

            Thank you Doctor 🙂

  • Geo1metric

    “The implications of this will trouble many people,…”

    It will trouble them only because they are living with delusions. The truth will not be denied. The problem is that as it gets revealed, many people can get hurt.

    • Hubbub

      Are not many people being hurt now by the policy makers and academics who stubbornly refuse, indeed, adamantly deny, that racial differences do in fact exist? Who does the real harm, Nicholas wade or the “I can’t hear you” crowd”

      • Geo1metric

        You are so right. I should have also acknowledged that. thanks.

  • Luca

    The sad chapter in human evolution relates to those civilized genes that have allowed a certain portion of the the White population to have over-developed senses of empathy, sympathy and altruism to where it is now a detriment to our society. In simple terms, the bleeding-heart Liberals have totally abandoned common sense, logic and reasoning and now pass judgement and make decisions based on emotions rather than facts.

    And the sad fact is that so many Liberals are so easily swayed by emotions and the more clever of that group hold too much political power.

    • I’m not so sure this is an evolutionary response in whites or a function of the religion that the Euros adopted or had forced on them. “Turn the other cheek” and all that.

    • JohnEngelman

      Many white liberals have become too civilized for their own good. They have difficulty understanding the mentalities of individuals who are less evolved than they are.

    • Sick of it

      There is nothing wrong with our DNA, the more intelligent are simply heavily outnumbered by the less intelligent and therefore, in modern societies, they have less say. 1 man, 1 vote means bread and circuses. Corruption abounds. Not even the Founders believed in that garbage.

    • dukem1

      Policy based on sentiment.
      Worst possible case scenario.

  • Ahnenerbe

    Yeah jews are slick, 9/11 told me all I need to know. Also Lavon Affair, USS liberty, Beirut Barracks

    • Ahnenerbe

      Oh I forgot the Chinese, their lunar rover didn’t last one month on the Moons surface.

      • Longer than some of the Chinese made junk for sale at WalMart, which breaks in a week.

        • Ahnenerbe

          Japanese are a better breed of Asians

          • LovelyNordicHeidi

            Yet Western civilisation does not seem to have good effects on their psyche. Could it be that the mirroring and adoption of Western civilisation was too great of a step forward for them so that they are now tripping over their own feet?

          • Ahnenerbe

            Most of the corruption of societies comes from TV

          • Ahnenerbe

            The modern devices of idolatry

          • FeuerSalamander

            and that is created and controlled by you know who.

          • FeuerSalamander

            I have said the same thing. The Japanese have replicated western cities and western technology, but they have not replicated western spirit. Their own spirit is dying. A good number of their young people no longer have a will to even have sexual relations, let alone families.

          • Sloppo

            “Unlike China, Japan managed to replicate Western civilisation, but it goes so much against their inborn nature that they are losing their will to live.”

            I wonder about that phenomenon. Maybe it’s the conspiracy theorist in me, but I wonder if they’re not being attacked or poisoned in some covert way which causes most of that problem. Successful civilizations are the biggest obstacle for the globalist agenda you know.

          • kikz2

            very reverent and polite, unless they are en masse as tourists…frm my experiences… although TEPCO i fear has ruined us all……and i really can’t stomach their dolphin/whale killings.

    • kikz2

      i had a childhood friend who was w/the 82nd AB – Peace Keepers in Sinai when the barracks bombing occurred…. it sure rattled them….. as they’d been out playing, pissing on camel bones and making friends w/the Bedouin.

      • Geo1metric

        I was with the MFO and in the Sinai when the bombing of the barracks occurred. Your friend must have been at South Camp; I was at North Camp but went to South Camp often usually via helo. Spent four years with MFO. Was one of the first 35 civilians with them.

        • kikz2

          sorry i have no idea, it was around ’82 or 83? all i remb was that he was w/the 82nd , they were there w/the 1-0’deuce’ as he called it…..
          he wrote me from time to time, told me of R/R in Cairo, and a snorkel trip to Dead/Red? Sea…

          at that time.. it was patrols and tactical exercises for him, i don’t remb his telling me of any real ‘action’ (for lack of a better term)

          still have some of the pics he sent me 🙂 we’d grown up together…childhood friend. i think he’s been back to the ME, since the first gulf war as a contractor, i’d guess he’s too old for merc work.

          MFO? i have no reference ….(shrugz)?

          • Geo1metric

            Multinational Force and Observers (MFO). It has an interesting web site. It was the organization formed to oversee the Camp David Accords, and is still in the Sinai. Something akin to a miniature UN since the Israelis would not allow the UN to oversee the Accords.

            You’re right there was not much “action” other than a few Bedouin sniping at us occasionally.

            I’ve been back to the M.E. many times since then myself to include Iraq; Always as a civilian.

  • So CAL Snowman

    “So why do so many people confidently argue that there is no such thing as race?”

    Most people in the Western World argue there is no such thing as race because they can’t be bothered to turn off the TV.

    • Luca

      They create their own facts to fit their agendas. Saying, race does not exist, is merely a lie that is being sold to the gullible public.

      • Geo1metric

        Progressives have no relationship with truth. Never the twain have met.

      • LovelyNordicHeidi

        It mostly has to do with social pressure and wishful thinking, as far as I have seen. Social pressure and wishful thinking are the great forces that can keep alive a religion like liberalism for a very long time.

        • Luca

          I prefer to think of Liberalism as a cult.

          A religion is generally foolish, nonsensical and sometimes harmful, but it can be a force for good in society.

          But a cult is downright evil, destructive, extreme and malicious.

        • FeuerSalamander

          correct, liberalism is nothing but wishcraft

    • Dr. Möbias

      Funny how people can’t figure out who is white and who isn’t, except when it comes to AA, quotas, the r-word, slavery and colonialism. THEN, whites are clearly defined.

      • JSS

        Exactly. Classic 1984 double think, Whites don’t exist, White privilege exists, White don’t exist, I check White on my job application, Whites don’t exist, Whites are over represented in this or that profession, race is a social construct, racism is real, race is a social construct, racial disparities exist, blah blah ad nasuem…

        • kikz2

          …. classic SOP from the marxist/psychopathic playbook, through choke points of authority, gaslight target into state of cognitive dissonance through the ‘delegitimization’ (they love that word) of their identity and even their very existence. just think of the old ’44 movie Gaslight, Boyer ‘gas-lighted’ Bergman to the point of physical illness, mental madness, and near suicide.

  • My uneducated, but not stupid, Southern ancestors were more committed to truth than the entire body of intellectuals put together. The real question in my mind is why they are so afraid of the truth. I suspect it’s because they know that the truth will lead to segregation and separation. The truth will deny them their “diverse” student bodies and government money, which they need to remain employed in the ivory towers. The lies allow them their comfortable lifestyles and their six-figure salaries.

    Since my field as a prof was economics, maybe I overemphasize the role of money, but a big lie like egalatarianism is subconsciously driven by money–the diversity industry. The cost to the white race is seen in low white birth rates. Whites can’t afford to have children because diversity is having way too many of the rugrats.

    • Sick of it

      Our region was once the most literate part of the country. Are you sure your ancestors were uneducated?

  • Simonetta

    There is the possibility, however slight, that modern Jewish achievement is partially a result from the holocaust that led to about 2/3rds of the world’s Jewish population being murdered by the Germans in the years 1941-1945.

    Any Jewish family smart or savvy enough to realize that the Germans had gone insane and were about to embark on the mother of all pogroms got out of German (or Soviet) controlled territory. This basically split the bell curve of Jewish intelligence in half with the smartest 1/3rd (the right of center of the curve) surviving the holocaust. Plus 50 years earlier, the smartest Jewish families emigrated to the USA from the ghettos of Eastern Europe.

    It doesn’t take too many centuries to become the highest IQ group on earth when every 100 years or so your neighbors kill off the slowest 20% of your ethnic group.

    I apologize to any of my readers who find this comment offensive and insensitive. I’m not anti-Semitic, nor do I kill people or advocate doing it. This is a forum for ‘brutal’ speech: but not general ethnic insults or callousness. If reasonable scientific people can show that my comments are absurd, then I will stand corrected and will not put forth such arguments any longer in public debate forums like this one.

    • Ahnenerbe

      2/3? LOL

    • LovelyNordicHeidi

      Your story does make sense, as “superiority” (for lack of a better word) is not static and can be significantly influenced by eugenic or dysgenic intervention. I do, however, not appreciate that you accuse “the Germans”, as if all Germans were psychopathic mass murderers. I have seen others making similar arguments, like “all Europeans are guilty of the Holocaust” or “all Whites are guilty of the Holocaust.” You are not nuanced if you accuse a whole race or ethnic group. Most of the Germans were not aware of the atrocities committed by the German government, nor are many Americans aware today of the atrocities committed by the Allies. Try to stay rational, and do not blame whole races or ethnicities for what they are not guilty of.

      • Medizin

        We like Germans. There are close to 50,000,000 Germans in the U.S.

        • kikz2

          file: things that make ya go hmmmmmmmmm….
          makes ya wonder how ‘they’ ever felt/feel safe here, kind of like all those other oppressed endangered folks here w/ Evil Whitey…..:) i mean, since twsnbn obviously exhibit powers of prophesy due to their jackedup IQ? why would they want to come live in a country filled w/so many evil oppressive Germans and other Whites who have oppressed them since time immemorial?

          • Medizin

            “makes ya wonder how ‘they’ ever felt/feel safe here, kind of like all those other oppressed endangered folks here w/ Evil Whitey”

            Interesting thought. Might be one of the reasons why they are so paranoid, in this country, anyway.

          • kikz2

            obviously any paranoia on their part, hasn’t served as a deterrent to their immigrating here……….now has it?

          • Medizin

            No doubt in my mind many don’t have paranoia considering their Holocaust industry. But, as I said, it’s just one issue contributing to their behavior.

            I might be wrong, but didn’t most come during the same time many Germans came? In the late 1800’s and early 1900’s and post World War II. Germans already here wouldn’t have been a threat because World War II hadn’t occurred; although, they were on the outs with Germans before the war.

            Following World War II, most of the Jews wanted to go to England, but were refused, so they came here. High population of Germans in the U.S. might have been a reason for wanting to go to England. Don’t know.

      • ricpic

        “…most of the Germans were not aware of the atrocities committed by the German government…”

        Same holds for the German Jews and later the Polish and Russian Jews. Until the door is knocked down “It just can’t be, this is a civilized country, why my best friend is Heidi.” In other words the notion put forth by Simonetta that the smartest Jews “knew” that a legitimate German regime, hostile but legitimate, would commit mass murder of Jews, that notion is a canard.

        • FeuerSalamander

          “….that the smartest Jews “knew” that a legitimate German regime, hostile but legitimate, would commit mass murder of Jews, that notion is a canard…….”

          Yes, when put that way, it is a canard. Let’s put it THIS way though. “The more successful ones had the means to emigrate”.This would mean that the factory owner, the business owner, the lawyers etc would have had the means to “git while the gitting was good”.Even so, those were were successful but complacent, or too comfortable to think about leaving waited until it was too late. A year earlier they could have managed it, a year later, their wealth was confiscated or used up after being banned from business and vocations. From what I understand about the jews in shtettles though, many of them were not the brightest, and I would venture to say that this segment of the population made up the majority of the victims.

    • watson800

      2/3rds? Is that what they teach now? There is a lot of propaganda surrounding the Holocaust. Finkelstein (Jewish professor) makes that point. There are some interesting videos on youtube concerning Holocaust revisionism (practically the only place were counter opinions are still allowed).

      • Geo1metric

        IIRC, the number of victims purported to have been dispatched at Auschwitz has been reduced by more than half in the last few years. So there seems to be questions about the overall number of victims.

    • Medizin

      It’s been said that the most intelligent Jews went to England and the U.S. If we took the same percentage of Europeans with the highest IQ’s, they would be on the same level as Jews, maybe higher.

      It’s more accurate to include IQ’s of ALL Jews all over the world, not just Ashkenazim in the U.S. Compare that score with Europeans. The average would be equal or less than Europeans. It’s more accurate to compare European ethnicities to Ashkenazim. English, German, Dutch, etc. IMO, Ashkenazim should not be compared to Europeans as a group. It presents a false picture.

      Also, several thought European DNA contributed to their intelligence. Most came here from Germany.

      Not sure I believe that many Jews were murdered. Consider most of it grossly exaggerated. Some think about 900,000 – 1,000,000, not 6 million.

      • Geo1metric

        Wasn’t the 6 million number tried after wwI? No takers.

    • kenfrombayside

      Us jews have high IQs because of eugenics. When choosing spouses, Jews tend to pick those who are the smartest. For a Jewish girl, she will overlook postal worker and go after a doctor or a learned rabbi. Those that don’t fit the bill generally fade away from the Jewish community.

      • Brian

        The rabbi’s son married the merchant’s daughter– smart. Unfortunately the Christians shoved their best and brightest, the literate in an age of illiteracy, in to the (celibate) priesthood– not smart.

      • ShermanTMcCoy

        Not to quibble, but isn’t it “We Jews” and not “Us Jews?”

      • Geo1metric

        When I was a university student, there were three Jews there who repeatedly challenged me to chess games to try to beat me. They never did. I’m Swiss/German/Swedish.

    • Dr. Möbias

      “but not general ethnic insults or callousness”

      Unless it’s against Germans, right?

      “the holocaust that led to about 2/3rds of the world’s Jewish population”

      I defy you to provide hard evidence or proof of this.

      • kikz2

        i stopped reading after the first sentence, as i also have read the numbers are in dispute, and rebound numbers of their populations worldwide following WWII, don’t match up to the notion 2/3rds were wiped out.

  • dd121

    I have a feeling these ideas aren’t going to catch on with liberals.

    • willbest

      I don’t know. I suspect the liberal elites speak about this sort of thing in the privacy of the country club all the time in their quest to bring back eugenics. As for it catching on with the useful idiots, not so much.

      • Sick of it

        Sadly they hate poor people and embrace other wealthy folks, often regardless of color. I’ve seen it firsthand.

      • dd121

        Bring back eugenics? Are you kidding? They’ll call you a Nazi for even suggesting it.

        • Geo1metric

          It works with horses, dogs, and cattle. Breed the best.

          • kikz2

            i think Monsanto, owned by (twmnbn) is taking care of that .. for all of us, slow kill… and twmnbn are working on DNA specific bio weapons.

  • Romulus

    “evolutionary pressures from cities resulted in less (?) Aggression!”

    Bull!!! The massive slaughter of last century was less aggression?

    This review seems like a chinese-jewish lovefest. Im sick and tired of hearing about chinese and jewish intellect! The ancient Greeks and Romans weren’t jewish or chinese and managed to create what is known the world over as western civilization, all w/out the other two’s help.
    Lets hear about that intellect.

    • LovelyNordicHeidi

      The Germans didn’t need Chinese intellect either in the 19th century, yet German scientists were very dominant in Western science.

      • Romulus

        Quite right Miss Heidi!
        The Germanic people are remarkable. They gave my ancestors a massive headache! Lol. (rightly deserved, I might add)

        P.s.- I have no way of knowing whether M.B. Is J.E.. I only read that from a few links a a couple of years old

        • LovelyNordicHeidi

          The Germanic people are remarkable. They gave my ancestors a massive headache! Lol. (rightly deserved, I might add)

          The Germanic peoples are indeed extraordinary, and they are certainly not the Barbarians that the Romans had mistaken them for. You are an honest person to acknowledge this. <;-)

          I have no way of knowing whether M.B. Is J.E.

          You have lost me for a moment. Who is M.B.?

          • Romulus

            He has apparently been an amren participant from Brooklyn for quite some time.
            From the website jewschool a review of Mr. Taylor included M. Berman in the context of being more inclusive to “them” and exclusionary to FAAAAR right people after the falling out between a one Mr.Hart and Mr. Duke at the ’06 conference.

          • Geo1metric

            Hasn’t J.E. said that he uses his “real” name on this site?

      • Bossman

        East Asians are good learners because they don’t get excited about anything. They are cool, calm, inscutable…and boring

        • LovelyNordicHeidi

          Germans also do not get excited about what they are learning. They are also cool, calm, inscrutable… and quite often outright boring. However, the anti-school sentiments, that are pervasive in the West and enforced by the Western media, are also spreading in Asia. I have heard from quite a few people already that students of Hong Kong universities have become quite lazy and undisciplined, and quite anti-school. Doesn’t that sound familiar?

        • FeuerSalamander

          Not really any asian comedians are there? Margaret cho could hardly be called a comedian and she is the only one I can think of .

    • Rosenmops

      Yes, but it safer to discuss the success of the Jews and Chinese rather than the spectacular failure of the Africans. He is skating around the Africans, but leaving an unspoken implication.

      • Romulus

        *sigh* Your right, of course.
        I know that including some into the movements future is inevitable but the constant gushing makes me nauseous.
        The few at the conference were very amicable. I suppose I’m extraordinarily wary.

        • Dr. Möbias

          Then why do you upvote him?

          • ShermanTMcCoy

            I up voted him because what he said is true. Easier to get away with praising one group than it is to state the obvious about another if it makes your point.

            Me, i never skate around the issue.

          • Romulus

            Choices are limited.

          • Dr. Möbias

            Yes, they’re limited to upvote or flag for removal. The choice is easy.

    • Ahnenerbe

      Eratosthenes of Ancient Alexandria was almost calculating the exact circumference of the Earth when rabbi hebes were preoccupied with circumcision and sucking the infants genitals afterwards

  • watson800

    I think Jews and the Chinese are very ethnocentric. They also apply themselves in academics more than the other races. IQ of Israel is only 96 and the IQ of the Chinese is about 104. So despite Jews and the Chinese being more ethnocentric and in spite of their elevated study habits, they really have about the same level of IQ as whites, at least in those nations.

    • David Ashton

      I don’t think the samples of Mongolid average IQs are necessarily representative. Rushton never replied to my questions on this, nor on those about the Sanids and Australids.

      • Martel

        Technically its difficult to obtain representative samples from these groups.

        • FeuerSalamander

          Have they been cherry picking then, to validate a theory?

          • Martel

            Not intentionally, simply from lacking better sources. There is no evidence for this claim though.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      Well, the reviewer speaks of the “Jewish and Chinese work ethic”. That’s one ethic. They lack severely in the others.

      That’s why Rabbi Engelman forever beat the IQ drum, to distract and redirect past the inconvenient truth of being incomplete in the nation-making areas, such as generosity, compassion, conscience, etc. The western Europeans have higher evolved frontal lobes.

      Translation: those two demographics tend to be nation-takers, not nation-makers.

      • Sick of it

        Not sure re: Chinese, but Jewish work ethic? Wow I have seen so many examples to the contrary. They like to take what other people work hard for. The Khazars did the same.

      • FeuerSalamander

        Their lack of other “ethics” seriously casts doubt on their IQ claims as well. It boils down to maybe one test, of fifteen individuals that gave the highest average IQ that is claimed for ALL tests of ashkenazim. They dither and say, “well testing of this population has consistently shown a higher IQ average” , yet they do not give details about those tests, that they too are of a sample size so small as to be meaningless. They also fail to mention that the results of some of these handful of test have an average that is considerably lower than that one highest test.

    • Look_A_Squirrel

      Israel had a substantial population of Arabs (about 30% if I recall). The Jewish IQ has consistently tested higher than whites.

      According to the Bell Curve by Murray and Hernstein and corroborated by Rushton and Jared Taylor, Jews are slightly higher than northern asians (Japan, Korea, China) which are higher than caucasians, followed by hispanics and then blacks.

      • FeuerSalamander

        Those “consistent tests’ have been a few tests using a very small sample size, something around fifteen individuals. The results of such shopping around for test subjects do not lead to a valid conclusion about jewish IQ. Jews will say though that it does, that several tests of the ashkenazi population always show a slightly higher result, yet those tests are always rigged, with few individuals who are not chosen at random. There have never been tests of large numbers of ashkenazim. suggesting that the tests consistently show something, but failing to reveal the details about those tests is dishonest. It gives the impression that a large enough sample to be meaningful has been repeatedly chosen and repeatedly shown the results you claim. That just has not happened, it has never been done.

        • Grantland

          I’m inclined to believe it. The Jew evil is diabolically complex, thorough, sophisticated.

    • DudeWheresMyCountry?

      Israel’s median number I suspect has many Arabic people bringing it down a few numbers and China’s is inflated as their government keeps the rural, uneducated people out of the tests bringing up the median.

  • Dr. Möbias

    “yet a number of inconsistencies have begun to crack away at this noble idea.”

    The “inconsistencies” and outright lies, not a one of them “noble,” pushed by Boas and Ashley Montagu (what kind of pretentious name is that? Why doesn’t he use his real name? Israel Ehrenberg?) have been known for decades but the PC commissars made sure to punish anyone who dares to challenge the “race is a social construct” doctrine.

    It is way past time to put an end to the completely silly tenants that we’ve had to kowtow to as the only acceptable ideology allowed.

    When the left is challenged, though, they work to pass hate speech laws so anyone questioning what is set dogma will be harshly punished, fined and tossed in jail.

    • Geo1metric

      If my name were Israel Ehrenberg, I would change it also.

  • Anon

    This book is a joke. Or rather it’s a subtle form of manipulation targeting specific group to (us) to render us impotent by mixing common sense observation with junk science and pure fantasy. Anything but take a realistic, goal focused, pro-white view. After all, that would result in power, change and racial self-determination….can’t have any of that now.
    Race and blacks. This where things are common sense…..easily observable every day reality. White people have a problem with that. We have raised idealism to the level of delusion and expend no small amount of effort to prevent ourselves from having to experience the real world. In the real world (outside your 99% white neighborhood and TV), black people are heinously evil. Over half of black males commit a serious, victim based felony over their lifetimes….rape, robbery, murder or vicious assault. More blacks than aren’t are violent criminals. A tiny handful of exceptional individuals are normal, decent people. Everyone else is vile scum, well deserving of a hanging based on what they have already done, nevermind what they intend to do, given an opportunity. This issue, more than any other makes books like “Troublesome Inheritance”, idiotic, at best. Newsflash. This issue isn’t hidden and its not unique to us. Every black population on the planet is like this, no matter their history, no matter their situation. Not a single exception. Not a single exception in recorded history. The number of red herrings offered to avoid stating this obvious fact, openly, let alone demanding something be done about it…is breathtaking.
    Evolution. Does not happen. That is a blunt statement that I dare anyone to seriously contradict. Evolution is the main foil used by anti-Christians. VERY evil people with ALOT of money and power. Despite generations of scientific inquiry across multiple disciplines, the theory just fails. These days no serious scientific arguments are made for it. The issue is treated like religion, complete with the burning of heretics for denial. It would be EXTREMELY useful to these people were you to come up with something remotely proving evolution. They would make you a rockstar millionaire for such. Any takers? No. Then let’s stop playing the liberal game of assuming evolution is in any way scientific at this point, let alone true. Anything you base on this pseudo science, at this point, is instantly suspect, if not outright absurd. By the way, that is what the idea of races “descending” out of Africa is…..absurd. More to the point, it is meant to degrade you. White people have a divine heritage and no small access to holy, supernatural elements. Blacks, are basically monsters. Not just evil but not even evil by choice. Raise a black child among goodly whites and 9 times out of 10, the result will be just another monster.
    Holocaust. Another joke. There is a reason why if you say anything true about the holocaust that isn’t 100% kosher, you will go directly to jail in most countries. There was a holocaust. But it was tens of millions of innocent whites who were murdered by Bolshevik jews. This was well documented in the soviet archives, now a matter of public record complete with the locations of hundreds of mass graves and the names of the jews who murdered them. Back when it seemed their power would last forever, they were quite fond of gloating about the whole thing, in print, especially Stalin. Of course, those who fell out of favor, were not just murdered by their existence literally stricken from the record. Who knows what anonymous (now) fiends there were from that time who were literally “rubbed out” of pictures take with their equally murderous friends. Equally a matter of public record was the fact that every jewish concentration camp was monitored by the international red cross. Records, even film from that time period can be found and in no way, jives with the “jews as victims” fairy story told to this day. In fact, no record of mass executions exists. There are no mass graves (although, if there were, it would be nonstop, 24/7 propaganda). Not a one. The soviets are quite open about the fact that they built most of those camps 20 years and more after the war. More to the point, the official story of what happened is just not physically possible. Firstly, Zyklon B could not be used to kill anyone, not if the entire supply in all Europe was used to try and kill one person, let alone millions….an inconvenient truth is it is basically non-toxic. Secondly, were all the fuel in Europe, at the time, devoted solely to burning bodies, it still would not be enough to destroy a large number. About a million jews did die on German soil, during WWII. They were wearing soviet uniforms and murdering German citizens. A goodly number of them were committing treason. Which is the reason for the concentration camps….both in Germany and in the US. Any time you read a book like this, written today and it cites “the holocaust”, ask yourself why. Why is a modern text singling out an event that hasn’t been relevant for two generations and is not only not a particularly large scale example of the crime of genocide (assuming its true which it quite obviously, at this point in history, is not), but the so called “victims” are on the record as committing far worse atrocities, and STILL ARE. Not for any legitimate reason. Pure propaganda.
    Political objections. Here is where it gets good. The author would have you believe that the current attitudes, philosophies and beliefs are a reaction to “The Final Solution”. The truth is VERY far from that. Nazism was basically a copy of what was going on in America the previous generation…..Americanism. For that reason, Hitler was VERY popular in this country. Almost no one wanted anything to do with that war, even after Pearl Harbor (a proven false flag). Newspapers, at the time, were not, as they are today, jewish controlled and the headlines from that time period make for some interesting reading. The US government basically took control of the media to keep this country from exploding into civil war over entry into a war nobody wanted any part of, even thought we were on the wrong side of. At best, it was a morally ambiguous situation, and HEAVY handed propaganda was used to keep the average citizens shut over the matter. Even after three generations of out and out brain washing, most whites still understand the truth about race. We are just impotent to do anything about it. Make no mistake….no we are not governed by people reflective of our attitudes on race. We are governed without our consent…shamed, blamed and tricked into thinking we are alone when MOST “get it” on one level or another. Outside the US, overt force and persecution are used. Political? Hardly. Slaves don’t have political views. They do what they are told.
    One thing the book will not mention is who does the punishing. If we are slaves, whose hand holds the leash. To my mind, that is a FAR more important race issue than blacks, psychopathy and IQ.

    • Interesting post. Do you have any sources for further reading? I know I’m not the only one intrigued by some of your points and assertions.

      • Geo1metric

        A rather mild suggestion for starters would be Buchanan’s CHURCHILL, HITLER, AND THE UNNECESSARY WAR unless you’ve already read it of course.

        I can also highly recommend books by David Irving. He is considered a revisionist historian, however I think he documents better than most contemporary historians and also think he is the premier historian about WWII.

    • Grantland

      Ok, I want the money. What I’m gonna do is have a colony of 1000 fruitflies. I’m gonna introduce radiation/toxin that kills some but leaves a few alive. Then those few breed to a thousand and I turn up the radiation stronger. A few survivors are bred … a number of times…

      Voila! Significant genetic difference. What do they look like? Who knows. Can they interbreed with regular fruit-flies? After long enough, no.

      QED

  • Budd Smith

    I wonder about the Nobel Prize. The Peace Prize is certainly biased and politically motivated. What about the other prizes? How many Jews sit on the selection boards? How many of the Prize winners eventually produce something useful? Thomas Edison never won a Nobel Prize, neither did the Wright brothers, but I’ll bet their inventions are worth more than all the Nobel prize “breakthroughs” over the last 20 years.

    • Budd Smith

      I’ll amend that to say their inventions are worth more than all the Jewish Nobel prize “breakthroughs” over the last 40 years.

      • FeuerSalamander

        Let us not forget that the “great” einstein was nothing but an incorrigible plagiarist.

        • Look_A_Squirrel

          Who did Einstein copy when he proved that time and space were not fixed? Whose equation did he steal when he determined the exact proportion of energy contained in a given quantity of mass?

          A NASA probe recently confirmed another of Einstein’s theories about gravity with amazing accuracy – who did he steal that from?

          How sad that you feel the need to diminish one of humanity’s greatest thinkers with no offer of proof, just a slanderous comment.

          • Dr. Möbias

            Since you asked and are obviously ill informed about Einstein’s plagiarism, http(colon)//home(dot)comcast(dot)net/~xtxinc/einstein(dot)htm

            Here’s an excerpt from Einstein the Incorrigible Plagiarist:

            “A scholarly documentation of Albert Einstein’s plagiarism of the theory of relativity, Albert Einstein: The Incorrigible Plagiarist discloses Einstein’s method for manipulating credit for the work of his contemporaries, reprints the prior works he parroted, and demonstrates through formal logical argument that Albert Einstein could not have drawn the conclusions he drew without prior knowledge of the works he copied, but failed to reference. Numerous republished quotations from Einstein’s contemporaries prove that they were aware of his plagiarism. The book includes 567 endnotes, countless references and an index.”

            “In 1997, noted Einstein scholars Leo Corry, Juergen Renn and John Stachel attempted to rewrite the history of the gravitational field equations of the general theory of relativity. Their radical revisionism was largely based on a set of printer’s proofs of an important paper by the world-famous mathematician David Hilbert, in which Hilbert published the field equations of general relativity five days before Einstein copied them from Hilbert. Corry, Renn and Stachel claimed that these printer’s proofs of Hilbert’s paper did not contain the equations which appeared in Hilbert’s final published paper. However, in their 1997 article in the journal Science, “Belated Decision in the Hilbert-Einstein Priority Dispute,” Corry, Renn and Stachel failed to disclose the fact that these printer’s proofs were mutilated, and are missing a critical part–the very part which contained the equations Corry, Renn and Stachel claimed Hilbert did not know. Anticipations of Einstein in the General Theory of Relativity refutes the baseless historical revisionism of Corry, Renn and Stachel, and proves that Einstein did not originate any of the major concepts of the general theory of relativity by comparing the original source material by Einstein and his predecessors. Einstein even fudged his equations in order to achieve the results others had published long before him.”

            “Of even greater interest is the fact that the scientific doubters are often childishly ridiculed, but never openly debated.”

            http(colon)//www(dot)tomatobubble(dot)com/einstein(dot)html

          • FeuerSalamander

            Thank you , I was away and you did all the leg work, a good job too.

          • wailofseparation

            You quote an obscure, self published book by an obscure author on the fringes best known for extreme views.

            If you can bring more than one person’s opinion to refute decades of a renowned scientists work I’m open minded. Otherwise, I consider the source.

          • Dr. Möbias

            That is your OPINION. You are not open minded. You use a typical lefty deflection, false argument and psy-ops to divert attention away from truths YOU don’t like. That’s why I posted the final line:

            “Of even greater interest is the fact that the scientific doubters are often childishly ridiculed, but never openly debated.”

            Insulting intelligence or ideas (deflection) – This can be either an attack on the messenger or an attack on the ideas themselves by trying to make them appear stupid, unpopular, foolish, crazy, insane, etc. The purpose of these insults and belittling comments is to make observers think that the topic is unworthy of their consideration or investigation.

            If you’d like to point out exactly where the author is wrong and how “567 endnotes, countless references and an index” are faked or false, I’m all ears.

          • FeuerSalamander

            YEs, , he claims the book is “obscure” and this is supposed to invalidate everything in the book. The book though is well documented and footnoted. It says nothing that isn’t readily verifiable.

          • Dr. Möbias

            Yeah, he gave a typical leftoid response. If you don’t like what some White is saying and have no debate or rebuttal to prove him wrong, because he’s not, scream racist or Nazi at him to get him to shut up.

            If that doesn’t work, threaten to go after his livelihood, business or career.

            The vile, non-White Heidi Bierich of the SPLC has made it her life’s goal to destroy Whites who dare to violate her genocidal, anti-White policies by going after their jobs.

          • FeuerSalamander

            So you don’t like what is printed in a book and you label it as “obscure” in an effort to discredit it. I guess if you can not defeat the premise of the book then you try to discrete the whole thing.

          • Geo1metric

            Extreme does not mean wrong.

            “In times of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.”

          • Geo1metric

            Poincare for one. Years ahead of Einstein.

    • Look_A_Squirrel

      You are ignoring the evidence. Look around you and you’ll see contributions from Jews – from blue jeans to your tv’s remote control, polio vaccines, color photography, video tape, ball point pens, the birth control pill and vaccines to prevent cholera and the bubonic plague.

      Do a little research and you’ll find that the tiny percentage of the world’s population that is Ashkenazi Jew has contributed far more to the world in every area than any other group.

      I am not Jewish but I am an admirer of talent used to its fullest for mankind’s benefit.

      • Sick of it

        Compare the resources they take to what little they offer and you’ll find the exchange wanting.

        • Pilgrim786

          You like cellphones? Instant messaging? SatNav? MRIs? Open Heart Surgery?

          • FeuerSalamander

            Cell phones were not invented on a blank slate. They are part of the white mans technology. There were countless of things that needed to be invented first, and there are likely quite a number of individuals who applied for similar patents. The same with medicine and other fields. jews have been riding our wave of progress and sometimes participated in it, they did not create that wave.

          • Pilgrim786

            So, absolutely no charity? None whatsoever? Will you only be happy once they are all eliminated and “their name and memory erased?”

            They are part of your culture. They were in Europe before there was a Europe. Surely, you can create a world where the best they have to offer is harnessed and the worst mitigated.

          • FeuerSalamander

            SO now you smear me as someone who wants genocide? So in your world, our whole way of life is brought to us by the jews, and if we do not accept this fiction then we are genocidal? They have not been necessary for the advancement of European civilization, no matter how many times and how loudly they profess this. They also have been guilty of tremendous subterfuge and treachery regarding that civilization. You talk about cell phones but you probably deny the roles of jews in bolshevism and the holodomor. You probably deny their role in the various marxist groups that did so much harm to this country.A group that has been treacherous and that can not be trusted should just be kicked out or have their fields of influence severely limited if they remain. That is not genocide, that is exactly what Israel does, it is exactly what Japan does.It simply is not my responsibility to create a world for someone else, especially when they, no matter what, do not consider themselves as part of the larger culture, but against it. Let them go create their own world. I DO NOT LIVE FOR OTHERS! So go call someone else a murderer, it just means you lost the argument.

          • Pilgrim786

            Try to read the whole response before you get hysterical.

            I do not assign collective responsibility in the absence of evidence. I don’t hold all Englishmen responsible for the Cromwell’s Irish massacres and I don’t hold all Georgians responsible for the massacre of “kulaks.”

            Your refusal to acknowledge any good in the Jewish tribe is uncharitable. I have much faith in the white tribe and I believe them to be large-hearted men capable of greater charity.

            I also believe them capable to managing a small tribe without too much difficulty.

          • FeuerSalamander

            There you go again, saying I refuse to acknowledge any “good”, But I have acknowledge that jews have invented things. My point is that they did these things in an atmosphere and time when many people were working on the same things and would have gotten there anyways. You seem to want to present this fairy tale that they are the benevolent over beings that bestow gifts on us mere mortals. Nothing could be further from the truth! I think you verge on hysteria every time the myth of the indispensable jew is challenged. They are not indispensable. They are tangentially responsible for some things , that is all. Have all the charity you want concerning them. They have none for you in Israel, Why the double standard? Do you think Israelis would let Roman Catholics control their media and their press? Do you think they would let reborn Christians do the same? NO But out of “Chaaarrrrrrrrrrrihhhhhhhhhtyyyyyy” you give them control over our nations media, financial institutions, courts etc, and then you wonder why our country is being dismantled. I guess I am just being uncharitable again huh?

          • Pilgrim786

            “Charity” is the opposite of control.

            Charity means nothing more than that: it doesn’t translate into “giving control.”

            WASP society, in the UK and the US, represent, to the best of my knowledge, the only group that has actually surrendered power and privilege at the very height of the same.

            That makes them crazy, not charitable.

            WASP elites are either psychotic or evil. In either case, they need to be culled if this civilization is to continue because it isn’t anonymous AmRen commentators who turned over the media and the government to Those Who Cannot Be Named and to Those Who Cannot Ever Be Named.

            It was WASPS. And no one is more fanatic about this nonsense than WASPS.

          • curri

            “WASPs”

            Learn about Madison Grant, Lothrop Stoddard, Carleton Putnam and even Kingman Brewster, Sr. The WASP ruling class surrendered to Jewish leadership and is now effectively extinct. See
            Kaumann’s The Rise and Fall of Anglo-America for a liberal Jewish perspective.

          • wailofseparation

            Some would say that’s Darwin’s evolution at work – survival of the fittest.

          • curri

            Could be, but it’s hardly proven. Evolution may be self-evident, but the Darwinian theory is not. Anyway, the phrase “survival of the fittest” was an invention of social Darwinism.

          • Dr. Möbias

            It’s not over yet. Not by a long shot. The Bolsheviks thought they had won for all time in Russia. Cultures built on packs of lies and denial of human nature, like the Soviet Union, cannot stand and eventually implode. Unfortunately by the time the evil empire fell (and Reagan was right, it WAS evil).

          • Grantland

            The Bolsheviks got away with it, chuckling hideously, as they moved on with their bulging carpet-bags, to Washington DC.

          • Geo1metric

            Some of them went to Russia from NYC earlier, around 1917.

          • kikz2

            and into every dusty corner of american academia as well….

          • Dr. Möbias

            They are not evil, crazy or psychotic; they are bought off, threatened or blackmailed.

          • kikz2

            you forget cryptos…… but there again, it was xtian mic hubris that underestimated the ideology of kol nidre against its te deums.

          • Dr. Möbias

            They are not part of the European culture. They choose to set themselves apart from us while living in societies we Whites created for ourselves. We were gracious and generous to allow them to live in our countries and how do they repay us? By destroying our societies from within and telling us our White nations should welcome hordes from the third world- while demanding a homeland for themselves ONLY where they kick out that same third world.

            So if we are not supposed to hate enemies who seek our genocide, exactly how should we feel towards them?

      • DudeWheresMyCountry?

        Engleman? I bet you use chopsticks at Panda Express just to seem cultured.

        • Look_A_Squirrel

          You sound like a liberal, attacking me personally rather than addressing the facts.

          • Guest

            he has a history of doing that

        • benvad

          It is a skill, after all!

        • Geo1metric

          He was pretty squirrelly, no?

      • They certainly have done good things, but they have done worse bad things.

    • TZ

      Those with European descent win the majority of the prices. This topic reminded me that I have seen one person look on them earlier:

      Nobel part 1 – http://semiticcontroversies.blogspot[DOT]com/2012/12/jews-and-nobel-prize-fantasy-versus.html
      Nobel part 2 – http://semiticcontroversies.blogspot[DOT]com/2013/01/jews-and-nobel-prize-fantasy-versus.html
      Nobel part 3 – http://semiticcontroversies.blogspot[DOT]com/2013/01/jews-and-nobel-prize-fantasy-versus_5.html

      Fields Medal – http://semiticcontroversies.blogspot[DOT]com/2013/01/jews-and-fields-medal.html

      “Now this means that Europeans are; as with the Nobel Prizes, out-competing jews by a factor more than three, which would thus have to mean;
      using J-Info’s reasoning, that that the Europeans are significantly more intelligent and have contributed significantly more than the jews.”

      ACM Turin Award – http://semiticcontroversies.blogspot[DOT]com/2013/01/jews-and-acm-turing-award.html
      Schock Prize – http://semiticcontroversies.blogspot[DOT]com/2013/01/jews-and-schock-prize.html
      Kyoto Prize – http://semiticcontroversies.blogspot[DOT]com/2013/01/jews-and-kyoto-prize.html
      Balzan Prize – http://semiticcontroversies.blogspot[DOT]com/2013/01/jews-and-balzan-prize.html
      Abel Price – http://semiticcontroversies.blogspot[DOT]com/2013/01/jews-and-abel-prize.html
      Morgan Price – http://semiticcontroversies.blogspot[DOT]com/2013/01/the-morgan-prize-and-jews.html
      Adams Price – http://semiticcontroversies.blogspot[DOT]com/2013/03/jews-and-adams-prize.html

      http://semiticcontroversies.blogspot[DOT]com/2013/02/why-jewish-achievement-lists-are.html

      ” consider something more fundamental about these lists than just the fact that jews and their supporters tend to massage and misrepresent
      the figures outrageously. That something is very simply the applicability or perhaps pointedly the fundamental utility of such lists as
      something more than a rhetorical device.

      Said claim is commonly repeated by historians and popular writers on the subject of the jews and jewish history to the point where we are
      confronted by a narrative of jewish history dominated by three poles: the persecution of the jews, the innocence of the jews and the genius
      of the jews. These combine to form a modern belief system that has been of significant and lasting assistance to both the Zionist cause and
      jewish influence more broadly. The lay Catholic historian Paul Johnson summed up this view; which he himself professed, rather simply when
      he referred to jewish history as being written ‘from the viewpoint of a learned and intelligent victim.'”

    • Geo1metric

      Money will buy anything.

    • WR_the_realist

      The physics and chemistry prizes are not about producing something useful. They are about discovering something that is true (and not obvious). That said, many of the discoveries for which physics and chemistry prizes have been awarded have had profound practical importance, but of a kind that seeps into a culture over decades, usually there isn’t some new gadget you can buy the next year. I would say that everyone who has won those prizes deserved to, but of course there are plenty of people who deserved the prize but didn’t get it, because only a few people can receive it each year.

      The Nobel Peace Prize has long been a joke. You generally have to murder a lot of people to get it.

  • Evette Coutier

    I’d point out Obama won a Nobel prize for doing nothing. Making the Nobel prize argument has lost all its value.

    • rightrightright

      Your point is affirmed by the EU being awarded the Peace Prize for meddling. Their current plotting with Obama against Ukraine is peaceful?

      • Evette Coutier

        This is what happens when politics replaces merit.

    • The Nobel Peace Prize lost it’s meaning many years before Obama was given his for doing nothing. It was also given to terrorist leaders Yassir Arafat and Nelson Mandela. In my mind, that undermined it even more than did Obama’s.

      • Dr. Möbias

        The Peace Prize lost its meaning when Henry Kissenger won.

      • Evette Coutier

        True.

      • NoMosqueHere

        But arafat and mandela killed jews and whites, so the sick leftist europeans approved of them.

        I don’t object to monetary prizes awarded for scientific discoveries, but the Nobel peace prize should be routinely denigrated and boycotted.

  • fgbrunner3

    Genetics explains the success of Western Civilization and many of the difficulties of the Third World. Unfortunately, while hardship improves the breed, prosperity weakens it. Thus we are plagued by modern liberalism.

    • DudeWheresMyCountry?

      Yes, I often tell liberal thinkers that their children will not have the luxury of being liberal, they will be trying to navigate a third-world existence created by those who did have that luxury.

  • FeuerSalamander

    I think it is unfortunate for liberals that this stuff is hitting the proverbial fan before white people were reduced to insignificant numbers. WE still have a fighting chance.

  • crockadoodle6

    Twenty-six years ago an undereducated, Las Vegas bookie was fired for stating essentially the same concept….Jimmy the Greek. RIP.

  • NoMosqueHere

    ‘This book is an attempt to understand the world as it is, not as it ought to be.’ So writes Nicholas Wade…..

    ——————————————————————

    Wow. What a novel idea.

  • Jacobite2

    Throughout history, Europeans have ben hostile to Jews. This is not envy of high Jewish IQs, but jealousy over Jewish success in obtaining the resources of Europe. In 1930s Germany, the Jewish 1% of the population controlled almost 30%of the economy. At all other locales at all other times, the percentages differed, but the effects were the same. Having lent money to the aristocrats, Jews leveraged these debts into special privileges (freedom from fees and taxes, appointment as tax-collectors, special legal status), which resulted in this ‘nation within a nation’ becoming a higher-class of subject than ordinary native populations. Now, ordinary folks tolerate aristocracies fairly well, when the aristos are people like themselves (i.e., French, Polish, Italian) but when they see aliens assuming superior status, this sets off social-animal behavior — i.e., hostility towards the out-group. As an alien race, living parasitically on native Europeans, one can see why Jews are out front in the attempt to convince people that there is no such thing as ‘race’ so — no problema, amigos. Someone once said that the Devil’s greatest triumph was in convincing so many people that he didn’t exist. As all admit, Jews are supremely intelligent. Arguing with them seldom advances your cause. So don’t.

    • Grantland

      No it is rather the beastly Jew urge to dominate, kill and enslave the cattle goyim that has been the problem.

      • Jacobite2

        We’re all Canaanites now. I see no evidence that Jews want to kill us Goyim. They are way too subtle for that, or slavery. The history is that they simply get a death-grip on existing wealth and then leverage that into a dominant position, legally and economically. Their problem up until now has been that once most people noticed that Jews (who are an alien people everywhere except Israel) were running everything from behind the curtain, they took care of business. As recently as the 1960s in Iron Curtain countries, Jews (who typically were the heart and soul of every country’s Communist Party), were installed as commissars. But they ground the Christians so hard that revolt became a real danger, so they had to be replaced by native Communists. As intelligent as Jews are, I wonder if they’ve worked out some variation in the case of the USA.

        • kikz2

          shabbos/shabbat goy…..is the term.

          • Jacobite2

            Hmmmm. Not gonna be easy to use that term three times today.

        • Dr. Möbias

          Jews are responsible for opening up the borders of America in 1965 to massive, non-White, 3rd world immigration so they could “feel safe” in a White-dominated society.

          This may be “good for the Jews” but it has been devastating for Whites in White homelands as we become a small, hated minority overwhelmed and surrounded by fecund, hostile, destitute non-Whites.

          What bothers me the most is Jews demand a homeland for themselves and ONLY themselves, using DNA, concentration camps and outright expulsion of non-Jews, while DEMANDING that White countries and ONLY White countries keep our borders wide open to all non-Whites.

          There is no other word for it except genocide. Genocide does not have to mean outright killing; it can mean to bring about conditions that bring a demise of a race of people:

          5) Section C of the 1948 United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide:

          ( c ) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

          Section C applies to what anti-whites are doing to my race:
          Flooding our countries with non-whites, force integrating our communities, encouraging us to blend ourselves out of existence and attacking anyone who opposes these things are imposing conditions of life calculated to bring about the physical destruction of my race.

          It’s genocide.

  • Viking_61

    Equality is a social construct.

  • Dr. Möbias

    Well summed up and elegantly stated.

  • Jacobite2

    Tesla was a Serb, no?