Violent Clashes Break Out Across France After Far-Right National Front Win Dramatic Gains in Local Elections

Peter Allen, Daily Mail (London), March 31, 2014

Fights started outside French town halls tonight as they came under the control of the far-right National Front for the first time following dramatic gains in local elections.

Exit polls suggested that the anti-immigration and anti-Europe party had roundly beaten the governing Socialists in a number of key constituencies.

‘Demonstrators are trying to get at the Front representatives and starting fights,’ said a police spokesman in Frejus, the picturesque Mediterranean town which is hugely popular with British tourists.

Frejus and nearby Beziers are now expected to have National Front (FN) mayors sworn in, along with around five other towns, following a nationwide drubbing for President Francois Hollande’s Socialists.

Riot police were also out in force in other parts of the country as anti-fascist demonstrators threatened FN candidates with violence.

It meant further humiliation for Mr Hollande, whose disastrous tax and spend policies have led to economic stagnation, so opening the electoral door to the FN, which is regularly accused of being racist, anti-Semitic, and anti-Muslim.

David Rachline, who is expected to become the FN mayor of Frejus, is a former head of the party’s youth movement, and still just 26.

Mr Rachline said: ‘The political establishment has failed the people–it has ruined the town and filled its pockets.

‘You can’t talk about a protest vote any more–the Front’s scores show that people are backing its ideas.’

In a deeply humiliating blow for the Socialist government, finance minister Pierre Moscovici was unseated from the town council in Valentigny in the Doubs department.

Mr Moscovici, who was tasked by Mr Hollande with leading the French economy out of recession, is deeply unpopular with the French people.

There were also gains for the UMP conservative opposition, as Najat Vallaud-Belkacem, the spokesman for Mr Hollande’s government, said: ‘These are bad results for the Left. Disappointing.’

The FN took 50.26 per cent of the vote in the northern town of Henin-Beaumont last Sunday, giving it an instant majority and meaning it already has its first mayor there.

As polls closed in the two round municipal elections tonight the FN said it was on track to claim 1,200 municipal council seats.

‘We have moved on to a new level,’ said Ms Le Pen. ‘There is now a third major political force in our country.’

The Socialists only consolation they have provided Paris with its first ever female mayor.

Anne Hidalgo is expected to beat her conservative rival, Nathalie Kosciusko-Morizet in the French capital.

Miss Hidalgo claimed 54.5 per cent of second round votes in the capital, comfortably beating her centre-Right rival, who won 45.5 per cent.

The Spanish-born civil servant hailed a ‘great victory’ even before the full results were announced.

Mr Hollande’s response to the expected nationwide drubbing is said to be a major reshuffle, replacing Prime Minister Jean Marc Ayrault with Interior Minister Manuel Valls.

The despairing Mr Hollande is also expected to bring his former girlfriend, Segolene Royal, back into government.

This is now possible because Mr Hollande’s ex-first lady, Valerie Trierweiler, who hates Ms Royal, has disappeared following the President’s alleged affair with the actress Julie Gayet.

Topics: , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Homo_Occidentalis

    It meant further humiliation for Mr Hollande, whose disastrous tax and
    spend policies have led to economic stagnation, so opening the electoral
    door to the FN, which is regularly accused of being racist,
    anti-Semitic, and anti-Muslim.

    If that is what being opposed to the demographic annihilation of the French people makes them, then let it be so! It is this leftist “with us or against us” mentality which ensures that anyone who is even slightly opposed to the multi-culti madness will automatically be painted as a goose-stepping neo-Nazi. Let’s hope the great national awakening keeps gaining momentum.

    • bilderbuster

      Have you ever wondered if maybe the same painters used the same brush to paint the picture of National Socialist Germany too?

  • LovelyNordicHeidi

    Riot police were also out in force in other parts of the country as anti-fascist demonstrators threatened FN candidates with violence.
    ————————————————————–
    What else would we expect anti-fascists to do? Be non-violent? No way.

    • Pro_Whitey

      Yes, I don’t recall stories about the FN fighting and setting fires after the muslims put the Socialists over the top a few years back. Perhaps it did happen, but I doubt it. Yeah, the left is tolerant and peaceful.

  • Related news, some hot air from Hot Air:

    hotair (dot) com/headlines/archives/2014/03/30/tea-party-libertarianism-sweeps-france/

    You can pretty much figure out what the article says by reading the URL. American lamer cons are trying to cite FN wins this month as an example of “tea party libertarianism” sweeping France.

    First off, while there’s a lot of crossover between the TPM and American libertarians, they’re not the same thing, and don’t see eye to eye on everything.

    Second, the FN is hardly analogous with either the TPM or libertarianism. It has some coincidental shared territory with the TPM, and hardly any with libertarianism. The FN is populist and ethnonationalist. Name me even one serious libertarian that actually wants to deport illegal and legal aliens and legally restrict immigration numbers and source countries going forward, as is the FN’s official position. And far from having “smaller government” as a central organizing precept, the FN advocates temporary state nationalization but eventual re-privitization of certain firms and industries, presumably so that a FN-run government can clear out the diversitards. Smaller government might be an accidental benefit and fall out of the design of the future FN governance of France, but it will mainly be because so many non-white welfare immigrant types will have been deported that government won’t have to spend as much on welfare nor will its law enforcement and “homeland security” mechanisms have to be as intrusive. (No more Car-B-Ques, either.) But France would still be a level of government and of menacing bureaucratic knit-picking significantly larger than the typical American conservative would be comfortable with.

    That common territory which the FN and TPM share is mainly related to immigration control, but their motivations are different: FN wants immigration control to preserve a particular people in a particular place, the TPM’s angle is preserving an abstract ideology.

    One more thing: If the FN was libertarian, then this news we read in this thread wouldn’t be happening to them right now. These kind of people, left wing extremists, don’t protest-riot to stop libertarians.

    • Freedoooom

      Read the comments, they are more hilarious.

      They don’t like it when non-Israel Firsters being called right wing. They even seemingly mix up pan-Europeanism with National Socialism, which are completely incompatible.

    • Homo_Occidentalis

      The tea party is teaming with open-borders traitors and useful idiots, whereas FN is explicitly nationalist. The two could not be more different.

      • I can’t agree with that. It’s the biggest political force that wants to stop amnesty and open borders. Which is one of the prime reasons why the Chamber Pot of Commerce wants to crush it.

        • Pro_Whitey

          I think the major issue is that there is no standard TEA Party platform, because the movement is so decentralized. I would say that if “TEA” is supposed to mean “Taxed Enough Already”, then the TPM should realize that immigration amnesty means welfare costs going through the roof (to pay for both natives and new immigrants), and more illegal immigration, with attendant fiscal costs, as the government yet again fails to control the border or reduce legal immigration. If they can’t figure out what position to take on immigration with those facts in mind, then ultimately we have to write it off. I am hoping there are enough thinkers in the movement who won’t be waylaid by the likes of Rand Paul and Paul Ryan.

          • Decentralized movement is a feature, not a bug. No single person to use Alinksyite tactics of personal target freezing and demonization upon.

            Most of the movement has at least pretty good instincts and decent to good actual policy positions on the immigration matter. My only complaint is what I said above, they’re doing it to save an ideology, not a people.

      • Long Live Dixie

        . . . FN is explicitly nationalist.

        Are you sure about that? I thought they wanted to assimilate the “moderate” immigrants.

        • Don’t forget, if you’re too nationalist in France and lots of Europe, you’re in the hoosegow. Even not counting that, there’s the matter of electability.

          I think FN has found the right balance between nationalism and electability and staying out of jail.

          • Long Live Dixie

            Maybe so, I won’t pretend to know more about the political culture of France then the French themselves know. But I do recall seeing an FN poster from a few years ago that, according to a translation, encouraged black assimilation.

  • Freedoooom

    Its always about lumping people up with some sort of murderous agenda.

    Doesn’t help when the antifa are the violent ones though.

  • MekongDelta69

    Finally – A slight piece of GOOD news…

    • This is great news. There will be no stopping our people once we decide to take our countries back from the hostile globalist aliens that currently control them. Perhaps the French will lead the way, as the Greeks did before them. Vive la France!

  • D.B. Cooper

    FN, which is regularly accused of being racist, anti-Semitic, and anti-Muslim.
    Yep. It sounds like my kind of party.

    • Pro_Whitey

      Unlike the muslims in the socialist party, no anti-semites there. I am waiting for the day that the press attaches at least anti-semite to every mention of muslims, but I won’t hold my breath.

      • bilderbuster

        Semites are Arabic peoples too.
        Anyways an anti-semite isn’t someone who hates the Jews anymore.
        Now anti-semite is a slander used against someone who the Jews hate.

        • stewball

          CRAP!

  • haroldcrews

    Anti-fascists are quite similar to brown-shirts except for dressing slovenly.

    • David Ashton

      And patriotism.

      • Bobbala

        What?!? they are extremely patriotic … just not to the host country. Kinda like a soccer game in California. Very patriotic fans.

        • David Ashton

          Not sure what you mean. My point was that the SA were patriotic as well as smartly dressed. This could not be said of their leftist opponents. However, I am not a fan of Nazi storm-troopers either.

          • Bobbala

            Patriotic … just not for the home team. It’s the whites that pretend they come for the freedom. It’s not their fault. They never pretended to come to Europe and not make it into the mess they fled. They always bring the 3rd world wherever they go. They know what side they’re on. They know what they wish to destroy. We may not. They do. At least most.

          • So CAL Snowman

            You should be, they are fans of yours.

          • David Ashton

            No fan of rubber truncheons on captives nor of “disgusting sights that met the Fuehrer”. The SA was a phenomenon of past history, from which we can learn lessons. The British Blackshirts were of a different character and caliber; I have known a number of their former members and their Leader.

          • stewball

            Good for you David!

    • So CAL Snowman

      Except for the fact that the brown – shirts were you know, fascists that hated communism with a passion.

      • Einsatzgrenadier

        Only an organization like the Brownshirts is capable of salvaging whatever is left from the wreckage of European civilization. The “far right” isn’t going to fix Europe by voting it out of this mess. What’s required is the iron will to fight back and never accept “no” for an answer.

        • Martel

          No, the national governments would not shy away from violence, murdering white nationalists would not cause an uproar,America would intervene if they become to succesful, and even Russia would come into play to promote their own boneheaded interests. Voting alone indeed is far from sufficient.

        • Zaporizhian Sich

          That is why Ukrainians fight on no matter what the odds are against them. Iron will or implacable stubbornness is indeed what is needed to succeed.

          • They sound like Scotsmen.

          • Zaporizhian Sich

            In some respects they are, but not all.

          • David Ashton

            A lot tastier than Stepan Bandera, if I may say so.

    • je suis paganisme

      NO! I have little regard for totaitarian movements, but it seems to me that the Brown Shirts arose to combat the violence of the Left (or Far Left, if you consider Nazis to be Leftists).
      The Left is a bunch of infantile jerks who must have their way; and when they do not get it, they resort to violence. They are the ones who provoke violence.
      I hope a bunch of right-wing French savate practitioners kick the asses of these violent socialists.

  • dd121

    We can take heart that white racial awareness is starting to get a small foothold.

  • Luca

    Those anti-fascists are as hypocritical as the Muslim protester holding a sign which reads: “Behead Those Who Say Islam is Violent”

    • stewball

      Lol!

  • I just hope that the FN prove to be as racist, anti-semitic, and anti-muzzie as the antifa claim they are. There’s always a temptation to sell out to hold on to the reins of power. Let this time be different.

  • Einsatzgrenadier

    It meant further humiliation for Mr Hollande, whose disastrous tax and spend policies have led to economic stagnation, so opening the electoral door to the FN, which is regularly accused of being racist, anti-Semitic, and anti-Muslim.

    ______________________________________________________

    Notice how whites are always accused of being racist, anti-Semitic and anti-Muslim for wanting to preserve their way of life and national identity? It’s diversity when it happens to whites, but cultural and demographic genocide when it happens to non-whites. According to leftists, only non-white countries have a right to preserve their ethnic and national identities, but all majority white countries must become colorful multicultural utopias because “diversity is our strength” and “mass 3rd world immigration grows the economy”.

    • It appears the people are telling leftists they don’t care what they call them anymore. If wanting to preserve our way of life makes us [insert pejorative here] in their eyes, so be it. We are still going to boot them out and take our countries back, by any means necessary.

      Why should the lion care about the protests of the ticks that have latched onto his hide?

  • BonV.Vant

    Of all the money I have donated to political sides in my lifetime, The biggest pay off was from donating to Generation Identity, which is part of the new right in France.

  • So CAL Snowman

    “Riot police were also out in force in other parts of the country as
    anti-fascist demonstrators threatened FN candidates with violence.”

    Isn’t it ironic, don’t you think?

    • BonV.Vant

      It’s like a headline out of “1984”

    • Einsatzgrenadier

      The only freedom fighters here are the white people who want to preserve French culture and civilization from the hordes of rampaging, savage blacks and Muslims, whereas the multicultural left have revealed themselves to be the brutal totalitarians they always were.

      • stewball

        What culture?

  • Where’s the hell is Charles Martel
    now that we need him again?

    • BonV.Vant

      Give him time to gather his forces.

    • Bobbala

      Re-education camp. He questioned “Diversity is our greatest strength”.

      • BonV.Vant

        apparently, so has a large portion of France.

    • So CAL Snowman

      It’s the 2014 and Charles Martel underwent a sex change operation. He/she is now Marine Le Pen.

      • BonV.Vant

        No, she has parallels with Joan of Arc and Boudicca. Let’s not get too sarcastic.

        • So CAL Snowman

          Marine Le Pen is gathering an army of native Frenchmen to repel invading Muslim hordes. Sounds like Charles Martel to me.

          • Do they take Scotsmen?

          • BonV.Vant

            You were calling her a trans sexual, I was trying to find a female equivalent. Now that I think about it, I will go with yours, Neither Joan of Arc nor Boudicca ended up on top.

    • David Ashton

      I wish you would, along with that best-selling autobiography I have frequently suggested.

  • BonV.Vant

    “National Front”, let’s start our own chapter here in the US, dump the repubs and start making changes.

  • Mason Gull

    The FN is not anti-Semitic, and they actually go out of their way to appeal to French Jews now.

    • So CAL Snowman

      I read that recently and I am EXTREMELY dismayed about the direction the party has taken. Let us hope that this is a token outreach and nothing more.

      • Martel

        It is needed to protect against the Hitler-card. Perhaps in the USA is not as used in the since, but our leaders are often compared to Hitler whenever they support deportation.

        • In the USA, the ‘Hitler card’ is used 24/7 to attack anything and everything our Overlords dislike. Thanks to mass-media conditioning, it continues to work.

          • LHathaway

            Or simply ‘racism’. Racism should be opposed, but the cry of ‘racism’ has been used to destroy every ‘good’ thing in our society and promote every ‘bad’ thing. It really does seem, anything our ‘overlords’ do not like is somehow tied to racism. And, coming from a more religious views, as I mentioned, it does seem as if everything good in our society has been tied to racism, and then eliminated.

      • Romulus

        Each and every time I point out the obvious trend of the emerging return of Christian movies and right thinking, that is obviously going to lead to an alliance with…….., *drumroll*
        My comments get overruled!
        It’s obvious that the ” right” can return as long as they include…..________!
        (fill in the blank)
        I had a chance to review the NOAH movie. It was an anti white male, feminist,PETA inspired, leftist morality take of the worst kind. There is also a nod to the “rainbow” in the last shot of the film. IMO, it was a subtle nod to the homosexuals. I also got to review Gravity. Another feminist movie, that supposed to show the power of women. Especially the darwinian scene of Bullock coming out of the water! I can smell propaganda from ten miles away.

        • Sangraal

          Who do you review for (I assume it is for a WN site and not a mainstream publication)?

          • Romulus

            *visibly smirking*
            You assume correctly.

        • saxonsun

          Hey straight man. It never fails to amuse this gay white woman when I see the real and tangible hatred your type has for women. And of course, the real stupidity of straight women is more amusing. Talk about being in spiritual, mental, emotional and intellectual darkness.

          • Grantland

            Talk about hedging your bets. Dyke.

          • Romulus

            Aaaah, the truth comes out of the closet!!! I suspected as much, thank you for the confirmation.
            On the contrary, I love WOMEN,… JUST NOT DEVIANTS.

            Here’s a fun fact!!!…… If, for millennia, homosexuals have only comprised 1 to 3% of a given nations population, then tell me praytell, who has been trying to FORCE their beliefs on whom! Did you find this piece as entertaining as I did! I can’t tell you how much it made me smile.
            Please refrain from personal attacks simply because you believe your rights should supersede mine (the majority of the world). You will NEVER convince me.

          • Grantland

            “Deviants” is maybe not the best dysphemism. The word Deviancy, after all, has a positive connotation to the thinking White individual confronted by a hopeless grey world of citizoid PC robotic conformism. “Sick” is better. Sick, sad, and twisted.

          • Romulus

            Perhaps. I never tire of defending what is the optimal paradigm for life on planet earth. While the good book is spot on in it’s opposition to homosexuals, rarely do I use it’s pages as a platform for argument. I prefer evolutionary biology. It is my goal to expose pseudo scientific nonsense that posits homosexuals are anything but an aberration.

            True to form, I also deplore heterosexual lustful fornicators. A society can’t spend 11 billion dollars a year on pornography and then claim moral high ground. In this case, I use the term deviant, as in to deviate from natures parameters. Without the existence of the male/female pairbond, life would have NEVER evolved beyond the pre-Cambrian era. Humans are NOT flowers, seahorses, earthworms, or single cell organisms.
            The backdoor is NOT for intercourse. A woman cannot become a man. That is an organism that has testes that produces spermatozoa. A man cannot become a woman. ( having a womb and gonads that produce ovum. It is not possible. A homosexual gene has never been discovered. Even as an evolutionary dead end that they represent, does not give them the right to completely alter society at their behest.
            Just contemplating the sewer our nation has become makes me physically ill.

          • Grantland

            Bisphenol A has a lot to do with it.

          • Romulus

            Synthetic chemicals,hormone disruptors,pesticides, and industrial toxins certainly play a role in contributing to birth defects,autism, disease and various other aberrant conditions. It is also true that a promiscuous society invites unnatural lusts and experimentation.
            Disease is something that occurs at the genetic level, yet as a society we do all we can to eradicate it. Should we not strive to achieve the best possible scenario for a stable society?
            The combination of feminism, homosexuality,and a lascivious nation is playing hell on the welfare of our people , the family ( the basis for all human social organization) and our numbers. In order for a return to our greatness as a people, certain behaviors must be eliminated.

          • Grantland

            Many amphibians are being born with ambiguous genitalia from the gender-bending runoff in the water. Fact. Men are being bent into metrosexuals, women into husky dyke Amazons. Yes epigenetic cultural decay exacerbates the effect.

          • Grantland

            Simpering metrosexuals and husky amazon dykes.

          • Romulus

            *laughing uncontrollably*

          • Phthalate plasticizers also function as synthetic estrogens.

          • Grantland

            Yes I shun all plastics – everything gets transferred to glass and stainless steel when it arrives. No GMOs, fluoride filters for the water, organic veg and fruit – that roundup stuff is deadly… Its a minefield out there.

    • To attempt to discuss rampant third world immigration into white countries while refusing to address the key role Jews have played in it makes as much sense as ignoring shelter and trying to discuss how not to get wet while standing outside in a thunderstorm.

      • Pro_Whitey

        I bet they’re thinking of their role, even if they don’t consider it a good time to bring that up.

      • Martel

        From a political viewpoint, you cannot address all issues as it will open you up for attack, what is important is securing their homeland from an invasion of browns and blacks.

        • Securing their homeland from an invasion of browns and blacks while ignoring the very reason those browns and blacks are displacing you, while Israel gleefully does the exact opposite on immigration? I don’t think that will work at all.

          Who wants a political party that moves toward the middle to gain support then once in power betrays some of their voters in order to enact some hidden agenda? Even those not betrayed would likely give pause.

          I think that in order to grow numbers and get electable, you have to preach the truth, which I do and it’s a shame only a tiny handful of politicians worldwide are as candid. That way when your numbers grow they’re loyal members and when you act once elected you reinforce their faith in you by keeping your promises, not undermine that faith by pulling surprises.

          The truth is contagious. Spread it.

          • Martel

            Its a must, look at the BNP, they try or tried to do it the other way. Its good you preach the truth, but politicians legitimately cannot afford it in the current environment, the media easily pushes them back in to obscurity. I don’t say this because I fear anything, its simply a strategic decision. The best you can do is to condone more extreme organizations from a distance, like Martin Luther King did, but again, he had the advantage of not being white in the post-sixties anti-european mindframe of our rulers.

          • A somewhat toned down version of nationalism, approved by the establishment and covered in the news, like UKIP, like FN, will only be of use to the cause of true nationalism if increasing their ranks leads to an overall shift in the political climate, a ratcheting of the whole political spectrum rightward. It seems though that a controlled opposition party would have the exact opposite effect though since that’s why it’s there in the first place. Griffin’s BNP has made mistakes before but his mistakes were in playing toward the middle and placating his critics. The things Griffin’s saying now are exactly the sort of things he needs to be saying if he wants to not only grow his ranks fast but to also maintain that growth and member loyalty over time.

          • Martel

            I don’t believe this, my experience in Holland tells me other wise. FN is not controlled opposition, just opposition which is able to evade their assaults.

          • It comes down to whether the party is willing to actually talk causes, or merely to complain about the symptoms. Now, UKIP recently outed themselves, to my satisfaction at least, as a controlled opposition release valve for Brits upset about being driven to minority status in their own lands. Farage condemned the ruling regime’s deportation of immigrants and also said UKIP would not push to reverse the legality of gay marriage in Britain. Both of these things are the exact opposite of what he should have said if he were for real. Likewise, FN has actually reached out to Jews and that too is the opposite of what you should do if you’re trying to fix the immigration problem.

            It’s quite simple, sir: If they’re not naming the Jew, they’re part of the problem.

          • Long Live Dixie

            If you’re not naming the Jew, you’re part of the problem.

            Let’s not forget that in parts of Europe, that’s not legal. In those cases, a neutral stance is understandable.

          • Then we in other countries will have to help them by naming their masters at every possible chance, as well as constantly pushing home the point that passing legislation to prevent people from talking about history introduces the rebuttable presumption that the history we are told is a lie.

          • Long Live Dixie

            Can’t say I disagree with that.

          • Not all cultural Marxists are Jews, and not all Jews are cultural Marxists. I think people who believe the groups are identical, with 100% overlap are being overly simplistic.

          • Martel

            I must disagree on the last paragraph. Discussing ethnic nepotism amongst Jews would destroy their chances to gain notoriety through the media. But we will see which tactic works out, my prediction is that BNP will not get anywhere. My ideology is simply “Europeans must survive”.

          • How can you expect Europeans to survive if they are unwilling to name their attacker?

            How can you defend against something you will not properly define due to political correctness?

            How can you expect to change the way things are by placating those who would see us destroyed?

            Just some parting questions to consider, sir.

          • Martel

            I simply do not consider Jews to be this all powerful movement as national socialists generally consider them, nor do I see them as 100% monolithic. They have lost quite a bit of power and influence, Israel is universally disliked, especially amongst students, and throughout Europe it is getting less physically safe for jews. From a strategical point of view, I believe shaping an ethnic identity for Europeans comes first, and I believe this is happening. All else is secondary,as you surely have read Macdonald’s works, a sense of identity determines political behaviour. And again, its simply not possible to gain a large following if the media makes a seemingly legit connection with Nazism, which the public generally dislikes.

            The proof will be in the pudding.

          • The public generally likes and dislikes whatever the media tells them to. And the Anglo-American media is almost completely in the pocket of the Chosen Ppl. Meanwhile, if you think that ‘Israel is universally disliked,’ let me introduce you to the U.S. Congress.

            Government, industry, and the media in the hands of a tiny tribe of megalomaniac religious fanatics. That’s the USA I’m describing by the way, not some Islamist regime on the far side of the globe.

          • David Ashton

            What alone makes “the Jews” 100% “monolithic” is precisely to regard them as a single evil powerful biological organised community and therefore to eliminate them as an undifferentiated entity. This is irrational and immoral, factually unsubstantiated and politically counterproductive. It is an attitude that imposes an permanent handicap among anti-immigration Gentiles who are then susceptible to the comprehensible “never again” activities by all Jews, good and bad, thus threatened, and the academic and financial resources that they have acquired after the Hitler experience and since the sea-change of sympathy from Russia to Israel. Believe me, I have studied this matter from all angles for many years.

          • Martel

            ‘This is irrational and immoral, factually unsubstantiated and politically counterproductive’

            Indeed, the fact that I, someone who clearly addresses the Jewish issue, is often called a Jew in sheepsclothing( see above) because I don’t adhere to the point of “100% monolithic & all-powerful Jews,shows how damaging this is too white nationalism. It only comes across as irrational, as there is clear evidence that Jews do not all follow the same exact agenda. This doesn’t mean there is a great tendency to do so, and that Jewish ethnic activism is not real and very effective. The danger is also that our views on this subject, are taken less seriously because of the nationalists who believe every single Jew is “evil”. I consider few Jews “evil”, they simply do what nature intended them to do, which is sticking with their own kind. This conflicts with our interests, and that is the problem.Again, none of this takes away that native Europeans across the globe are the priority.

          • Long Live Dixie

            . . . Israel is universally disliked . . ..

            You’re still saying this? Just over a week ago, I showed you half a dozen articles showing European support for Israel from Greece to Britain.

            . . . throughout Europe it is getting less physically safe for jews.

            It’s obvious you have an agenda. European women are being raped by Third Worlders at appalling rates in some areas, but here you are bemoaning a (mythical) lack of Jewish safety in Europe.

          • Martel

            Now I have an agenda. Dammit, you caught me.

            ~Paid By the Jews.

            I find it quite disgusting to tell me how I feel about the fact white women are being raped all across Europe, and I find it difficult to write anything I won’t regret later on, so I will leave it at the following. Safe to say, there are some low life scoundrels in the white nationalist movement, with no honour and no real concern for Europeans, who rather insult then support a true European nationalist when someone doesn’t stick to their paranoid worldview.

            My only concern in life is the future well being of native Europeans and Caucasian Americans, all else comes secondary.

            To claim I have an “agenda” when I am the only one who promotes the theories of Macdonald proves you are an absolute imbecile who rather carries a grudge over a conversation which you started then support what you supposedly believe in.

            I believe Ramzpaul is correct when says there are some “trolls” pretending to be nationalists out there. I don’t say you are, but you make them proud.

            I will leave it at this, and again feel confirmed that there is a clear reason why white nationalism has failed for so long. Its a shame Taylor, Macdonald and other great heroes are dragged down by such individuals. Fortunately, a new generation is standing up.

          • Long Live Dixie

            I say you have an agenda because you continue sticking up for Jewish interests. Like the professional Jewish lobbyists, you make the preposterous claim that European governments are anti-Israel. This claim has two purposes: 1) it is designed to create guilt among Europeans and bring up memories of the Holocaust ™, and 2) it is designed to deflect attention away from the anti-European policies of those governments (such as their importation of Third World rapists). You refused to retract your claim after I showed you several pieces of evidence of European governments supporting Israel. The second reason I say you have an agenda is because you continually distort anti-Jewish causes. Claiming that “Nazis” talk of “all-powerful” Jews who are “100% monolithic” or claiming that I believe that mixed-raced politician Geert Wilders is bribed by Jews (something I never said) are all make believe caricatures of the type that are often repeated by Jewish lobbyists and their supporters. These caricatures distort the anti-Jewish position in a way that is designed to make it appear comical and easy to dismiss.

            BTW, I am not a white nationalist.

          • Martel

            You did say Wilders has handlers, and never given me any evidence for it or provided any proof of their methodology. In general, the national socialists i talk with tend to believe Jews run the world, are 100% monolithic and are inherently evil. This prevents a rational discussion about the subject, and as your disgusting reaction to me proves that you have no issues lying and distorting the motivations of a white nationalist simply because I don’t accept every single part of your theory about Jews. I’m not politically correct or in denial, I simply have a different take on Jewish ethnic activism,and still you make such vile claims.

            Claiming I have “an agenda” to support the Jewish cause proves you are the paranoid imbecile I refer too.

            If you simply stuck to giving me information about the views of European leaders you would have been more convincing, but none of this takes away that actual Israel support in the Netherlands only happens occasionally, while we live in a continues Palestinian love-fest, formerly spearheaded by Van Agt. State TV often broadcasts documentaries about the Jewish Lobby in the US, and paints a one sided picture of the conflict. I speak about truth as I see it. I don’t connect dots until they tell me what I want to see.

            You are clearly not a white nationalist, you don’t even give a damn about whites who are actively trying to support a future for Europeans. Its always the same with you types. What a shame courageous men like Taylor and Macdonald have to face a hostile world, and people like you “have their back”.

          • Long Live Dixie

            You did say Wilders has handlers, and never given me any evidence for it or provided any proof of their methodology.

            I’m not privy to Israel’s state secrets, as I already told you. Common sense tells me that Wilders is too in love with Jewry and Israel to throw out the invaders by the masses. Someone does not visit Israel 40 times, live in Israel for two years, work on a kibbutz, wear yarmulkes, give speeches in synagogues, and pray at the Western Wall if he is not either: 1) a Jew 2) an agent of Israel, or 3) an ideological traitor. What part of Wilders taking cues from Israel is so far fetched to you?

            Claiming I have “an agenda” to support the Jewish cause proves you are the paranoid imbecile I refer too.

            And yet you continue to downplay the danger of submitting to Jewish interests and you continue to malign and caricature nationalists who understand the Jews far better than you do. Yes, I think you have an agenda, which is to promote acceptance of pro-Jewish elements within nationalism. What’s paranoid about that? Isn’t that exactly what you are doing here?

            . . . you don’t even give a damn about whites who are actively trying to support a future for Europeans.

            – I don’t classify part-Indonesian Geert Wilders as white and I don’t think that his submissiveness to Israel is compatible with a future for Europeans. I don’t know why we need to keep rehashing this. Wilders is simply someone who appeals to people who don’t like Muslims and his strategy is to get those people to like Jews. Real Europeans shouldn’t be in the middle of the Jewish-Muslim conflict. They should be supporting Europe, not one side or the other in a Middle Eastern quarrel.

            – I solidly support Golden Dawn and other genuinely nationalistic parties in Europe.

          • Martel

            You are not privy because there is nothing to be privy too.Its complete paranoia. Supporting those who correspond with your ideology is something entirely different from supporting the interests of Europeans. You have bothered me several times now, I am a European who is an activist strictly for European matters, and yet you have made vile and disgusting claims about me, claims I would never accept in any situation but this one in which I am forced to respond as such. My honour restricts me from engaging anyone who is legitimately concerned about the future of whites in such a way(Like Wilders), its something you lack. I despise this type of nationalist, and blame them fully for verifying the stereotypes of the media. This is not an indictment of any National Socialist, simply of those who are clearly not interested in the well being of whites.

          • Long Live Dixie

            Its complete paranoia.

            – Tell me exactly in what way it is paranoid to assume that someone who is as infatuated with Israel as much as Wilders is would listen to what Israel tells him.

            – Why is this such a major issue to you?

            – I have no idea what disgusting and vile claims you are talking about.

            – Quit worrying about the stereotypes of the media.

          • Luca

            Please Google: Who Controls America the zog. See if there is a shred of truth in it.

          • David Ashton

            It isn’t quite “simple”.

          • Long Live Dixie

            I agree. I’ve recently gained some respect for Griffin. I think he’s seen the failure of the watered-down “we’re not racist” approach.

          • Martel

            If Griffin succeeds, good for him, but I don’t see the BNP growing too much.

          • Long Live Dixie

            We’ll see. The British are notoriously liberal lately, but even they are getting fed up with being replaced.

          • Martel

            Liberty GB has my preference. I found it hard to take Griffin seriously, he accuses too many of being a Zionist, makes him look paranoid.

          • Long Live Dixie

            Since Britain is run by a Zionist PM, I don’t see that as a problem.

          • Martel

            Touché

          • Grantland

            The British (most of them) are a stolid Germanic people, most of their wild spirits fled to Africa, the US, Australia.. who will put up with almost any indignity to keep the peace. What they need is a fiery, charismatic leader talking stolid common sense.

          • David Ashton

            You are quite right to propose strategic finesse.

          • Zaporizhian Sich

            Indeed, it is as contagious as the Ebola virus, and that is what terrifies our enemies more than anything else.

          • Long Live Dixie

            I know what you mean, but I’m not sure if comparing nationalism to Ebola is the best way to make that point.

          • Zaporizhian Sich

            When people are susceptible, both Ebola and the truth can spread like wildfire being fanned by hurricane force winds. The ruling elite are setting the stage for a perfect storm, one that will turn on and destroy them because of the megalomaniacal lust for absolute power. In other words, they are starting to think they are gods, like the mad Emperor Caligula, who was brought down to Earth literally by dozens of dagger thrusts into his body from his own body guards. Like Caligula, the world elites are going to learn the hard way they are not gods.

          • DAWNOFNEWDAY

            First you have to solve the problem, getting the nonwhites out of Europe and then they can start asking questions. Like if there is a fire. The fire department will first put it out and THEN they’ll inquire as to how it was started, who started it, etc.

          • Andross

            You can probably expect all political parties to “betray some of their voters and enact a hidden agenda”. That’s how politics works in a Democracy, evidently. 😉

        • Long Live Dixie

          . . . it will open you up for attack . . ..

          If you’re not being regularly attacked by the enemies of the West, then you’re not doing a very good job.

          • Martel

            True, and both FN and the PVV are attacked daily, viciously.

        • A Dogs Tale or a tale of a dirty dog?

          The United States and Israel have been playing this game for decades.It’s called the ‘Who’s wagged who game’. Is it the United States that controls Israel’s actions or the other way round? Did the United States do 9/11 or Israel?

          Is the United States behind the Al-Qaeda attacks on US troops in Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan and elsewhere, or Israel?

          Does the dog wag the tail or the tail the dog?

          Who cares?!

          What’s the difference anyhow?

          Virtually everyone in a position of power in the United States is a Jew.

          For the Jews it makes no difference which passport they carry. It’s like a piece of clothes they change as the circumstances require.

          There is no loyalty to any particular country, only to their hip pocket and their tribe. Even their displays of loyalty to Israel are just a group ritual they perform to prove to each other that they are committed to the team. If it’s “good for the Jews” they will drop Israel without a blink.

          To blame a country for the actions of its Jewish residents is like
          blaming Australia for its venomous snakes when one of them kills a foreign visitor. Jews are vicious towards non-Jews.

          Killing, torturing, enslaving, prostituting, exploiting, robbing and deceiving them is what they are programmed to do. They believe there is nothing wrong with doing so.

          It’s their purpose in life.

          If you want to blame Americans for anything it’s that they allowed the Jews to take over their country, just like you would blame Australians if they didn’t do anything to prevent deadly snakes from infesting tourist hotels.

          This whole blame game between the United States and Israel only serves one purpose which is to confuse us.

          While the alternative media argue with each other using contradictory ‘evidence’ in support of their
          ‘conspiracy theories’, playing on our prejudices, the Jews piss
          themselves laughing and keep doing more of the same.

          Instead of wasting our time and resources arguing with each other over the nitty-gritty of the who, when and how, as if we had to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt in a court of law, we should focus on the vision of what kind of world we want to create and empower ourselves by imagining it.

          therebel. org/opinion/most-read-editorials/754336-dog-or-tail

          .

      • DAWNOFNEWDAY

        However, many whites have been so brainwashed for years now that it takes time to wake them up. For example, if you pointed out there was an agenda against whites ten years ago, I’d believed you. But if you said ‘jew’ even like, oh, two years ago, I’d called you a nazi. However, I’m awaken to the Jewish question and Jews behind it. So when I talk to other whites around me who question this PC stuff I say, “I know you’re going to think I’m a Nazi for saying this, but Jews are behind lots of these liberal agendas like third world immigration or gun control or feminism or disregarding our constitution or the EPA or countless other movements and laws that have weakened the West. Remember this, these people (Jews) have been kicked out 109 times prior to Germany 1930s. Think about that. If I told you I’d been evicted one time, you’d think I was a victim, right? But if you found out I’d been evicted 109 times, then you’d start to wonder what I’m doing wrong then, right?”

        We can awaken our white brothers and sisters if they’re already seeing a problem. If they’re flaming, emotional, knee-jerk liberal types, forget it. Not worth your time.

        • Long Live Dixie

          In some places the Jews themselves will be the best way to awaken the people to the Jewish problem. In Greece, for example, Jewish organisations and even the government of Israel have been prominent in opposing the nationalist group Golden Dawn. In cases like this, the Jews are their own worst enemy.

          Here in the West, a lot of people seem to have some vague idea that Jews are disproportionately involved in Leftist causes. I don’t think the “Nazi” label will be used as often as you think. A lot of it is a matter of approaching things correctly. To me, “I know you’re going to think I’m a Nazi . . ..” sounds like a disclaimer.

          • Zaporizhian Sich

            Indeed, they are so cocksure of themselves they’re no longer bothering to hide their role in the over-running of white nations by hostile brown, black and yellow hordes. They will indeed reap the consequences of that, and they will not be pretty.

          • David Ashton

            Please explain the political or financial interest of a dwindling world-minority of Jews in deliberately destroying “white nations” by “brown, black and yellow hordes” most of whom are also anti-Israel.

          • Grantland

            You’ve got to be kidding.

          • David Ashton

            Not a good enough answer for those who have actually studied these matters pretty thoroughly for years past.

          • Grantland

            Heh, betcha I know more than you do.

          • Martel

            It wouldn’t be as difficult convincing people that there is such a thing as Jewish politicians, financiers, and activists promoting their ethnic interests, if the stereotype of unreasonable protest against the ” all present and all powerful Jewish conspiracy” in which any nuance is mocked or evokes a accusation of having a Jewish agenda, which a certain irrational participant recently accused me off, didn’t manifest every time we discuss these issues. Too claim you know more then Ashton about this subject makes little too no sense, as he has been studying this subject since decades ago.

          • Grantland

            Not hard enough, seemingly.

          • Martel

            ^^
            I doubt this.

          • Grantland

            There’s reality; and there’s not-reality. There’s the truth, and not the truth. I don’t care if Ernst Zundel himself tells me that I’m a loon because he’s done the research. The truth is all that counts, the truth is the truth.

          • stewball

            I’m afraid I have to agree with grantland.

          • Martel

            Shame. I don’t see this mindset as politically productive.

          • Luca

            They are plundering the wealth of nations, and the destruction is the acceptable collateral damage. The ends justifies the means.

            The “hordes” keep the host nations preoccupied with race, crime, immigration, the justice system,affirmative action, racism, and all manner of social ills. Then the hordes are glorified in movies and media as victims. This keeps the population so busy fighting among themselves that they can’t see the hand in their pocket or the yoke around their neck. Give them just enough money and entertainment to keep them busy and distracted enough to not revolt.

            This is done in concert with willing, traitorous, liberal accomplices of all stripes.

            And it’s been working progressively well for the last 50 years.

          • Martel

            In my opinion, it is simply a evolutionary group strategy, led and pushed by radicals and opportunists, but dragging the rest of the Jewish community along with them because of certain psychological processes related to the nature of ethnic identity.

            The lesson we should learn from this is not “Jews are evil”, surely there exist such individuals, but the true lesson is, multi-ethnic societies end up in disaster, even when both ethnic groups exhibit a high average intelligence.

          • Luca

            The lesson I have learned is that radical Liberals come in all shapes, colors, religions and have separate, yet similar, agendas and a common enemy. Their enemy is the White-Euro, Christian, male, Capitalist, power base that created the world we live in. They want to topple that power.

            To achieve that goal, they have infiltrated Hollywood, the media, academia, finance, politics, the legal system and now even the military.

            The fact that one particular group might be over-represented or leading the pack doesn’t interest me as much as the rest of us identifying who the true enemy is.

            Call them liberals, socialists, occupiers, anarchists, cultural Marxists, communists or whatever. They are the true enemies and they have enlisted the minions of their useful idiots along with them.

            Their weapons are radical indoctrination, propaganda, multiculturalism, race-mixing, victimology, sexism, cultural destruction, moral destruction, atheism, environmentalism and racism to name a few.

          • Martel

            The most dangerous idea is that a multi-ethnic society is feasible. In terms of identifying the enemy, they are narcissist whites who chase individualistic rewards society offers for being a devout ethnomasochist, for lack of a better term, and other ethnic groups promoting their ethnic interests. Only the white radicals/acolytes can be deemed truly irrational and self-serving.

          • stewball

            Thank you. Jews are all lumped together. Are all Muslims murderers? Are all Scots tight fisted, sorry Michael, are all Catholic priests pedophiles etc.

          • Martel

            This makes it difficult for those exposing Jewish ethnic activism, and the reality of natural ethnocentrism to be taken seriously.

          • Zaporizhian Sich

            Flooding them into our nations against the will of the native population, with the goal of displacing, then exterminating them. How much more obvious can it be?

          • David Ashton

            You appear to say that it is obvious that “the Jews” – 0.2 % of the world’s population – wish to exterminate the “white” percentage. I repeat my question: what do they expect to gain politically or financially from this?

          • Zaporizhian Sich

            Jews killed 100 million people in Eastern Europe, and they wrecked my father’s homeland. That is fact, supported by reams of evidence. They want global domination, using others to do their bidding while they rule over everyone. Whites and western civilization are the two obstacles in the way. Have you ever wondered why they were expelled or massacred over 100 times since 250 A.D in every country in Europe and the Near East? You won’t have to look far to find out why.

          • David Ashton

            Thank you for this response which comes closer to an answer. I have not only “wondered” but have “looked” at this subject, and several times past outlined in summaries my own attempted explanation, open to revision from informed criticism from any direction, of the phenomenon of “antisemitism”.

            I lost only a cousin in WW2, but I have met with unrelated survivors of both Communist and Nazi mass-murders, researched and written on the subject. In 1967 I proposed and helped organize a massive multinational 50-Year Commemoration of the Victims of Communism in London’s Albert Hall, largely ignored by our media, with Ukrainians, Poles and Russians among the speakers. I also wrote a study of the numbers killed by Bolshevism, but I now believe that my estimates were too high as I also think is the case with received estimates of the death-toll of Jewish prisoners in German camps. Numerical revisions, of course, do not mitigate either horror or responsibility. I have also commented here several times on the Jewish aspects of communism and will not repeat myself unless invited (though willing) to do so; for example, on the Holodomyr.

            If one accepts your hypothesis that “the Jews” want global domination, I still cannot see how the total disappearance of the productive white race(s) would benefit such an objective in the long run. I have no objection to further discussion, moderator permitting.

          • Luca

            They don’t want to slaughter the cows, they just want them to be docile, powerless and distracted while they are continuously milked.

          • David Ashton

            My reply to this has disappeared from the thread I am reading at 12.50 GMT April 2, but I shall press my name on the Disqus archive to see if it pops up.

          • stewball

            How ignorant and stupid can one person be?

          • Long Live Dixie

            There are two answers to this:

            Firstly, Jews thrive amidst chaos and disorder. You’re looking for motive from a rational, Western standpoint. There very well may not be the type of motive that we would understand. It’s simply in their blood. This is the reason the little Jews support multi-racialism.

            Secondly, if we analyse the two possibilities: a European Europe vs. a Third World Europe, I think it’s clear which makes Jewry safer. Even if Europe were ruled by Islamists it wouldn’t matter much to the Jews. They are surrounded by Islamists already and the greatest foes they have ever faced have been Europeans, not Muslims. An Islamic Europe is far less a potential threat to Jewry than a reawakened Germanic Europe is. This is the reason the big Jews support multi-racialism.

          • FlaVet

            Jews would be content or safe around their avowed enemies?
            I don’t think so.

          • Long Live Dixie

            Let’s take Germany as an example. It should be a no-brainer to any racialist that a nationalist Germany (ruled and populated by Germans) would be 1000 times more dangerous for Jewry than a Muslim-dominated Germany would be.

            At the end of the day, the proof is in the pudding. Jews consistently oppose European nationalism. Look at the Israeli meddling in Greek affairs in regards to the selective crackdown on Golden Dawn for the most recent example. Jewish actions themselves prove that they prefer an Islamic Europe to a European Europe.

          • Grantland

            World rule. Global conquest. The wealth and the slavery of the planet. Read Isiah. The Torah is alive and well; and the Talmud.

          • David Ashton

            I have now re-read Isaiah, which has of course been given a prophetic spin by the churches. I do wonder how many Jews – especially the atheistic leftists among them – take this as seriously inspirational as do Christians.

          • Grantland

            Well it’s coming true isn’t it? Sure they believe it.

          • David Ashton

            Can we do anything about it in your view, and if so what would you suggest? What should the Arabs, Indians, Chinese and Japanese do?

          • Grantland

            Well I don’t think it’ll be up to us – they’ll try to kill us when we rebel – plague, maybe. Either they succeed or they don’t. The others don’t have a chance – not without us around.

          • Grantland

            Maybe they’ll use their US control to provoke an exchange with Russia, by, say, instigating a revolution next door, and then having the puppet government oppress the resident Russians, a Russian response, a false flag.. oh, wait a bit.

          • David Ashton

            One can learn from sci-fi fantasies but it is probably not good idea to live in them.

          • Grantland

            You see? Book-lernin’ and research can never substitute for sheer native gut ILLUMINATION! Ya SEE!!

            – just kidding doc. – I occasionally like to stir the natives.

          • David Ashton

            Maybe, maybe not. I have always thought that Hitler’s professed change from liberal democracy and disgust at the low cultural level of anti-Jewish tracts to an all-embracing anti-Jewish worldview resembled a religious conversion. I have also found that it is usually pointless to discuss historical inaccuracies in the Bible with born-agains.

          • Grantland

            Yep. They can’t see the truth, even when it’s four inches from their face.

        • Kenner

          I don’t say ‘the Jews’, I say ‘the left-wing Jewish establishment’…it’s more specific and less inflammatory.

          • Ahnenerbe

            How about Talmudic jews that want all the goyim as their slaves and worse.

            The Talmud is a sacred book of religious laws and regulations governing the life of Jews worldwide. The following excerpts shed some light on why the Jews, who are the product of such teachings, find it so hard to assimilate in their host societies:

            “The Jews are called human beings, but the non-Jews are not humans. THEY ARE BEASTS.” TALMUD: Baba Mezia, 114b (page referrals).

            “The Akum (non-Jew) is like a dog. Yes, the scripture says to honor the dog more than the non-Jew.” TALMUD:Ereget Raschi Erod, 22 30.

            “Even though God created the non-Jew they are still ANIMALS in human form. It is not becoming of a Jew to be served by an animal. Therefore he will be served by animals in human form.” TALMUD: Midrasch Talpioth, p 225, Warsaw 1855.

            “A pregnant non-Jew is no better than a pregnant ANIMAL.” TALMUD: Coschen Hamischpat 405.

            “Although the non-Jew has the same body structure as the Jew, they compare with the Jew as a monkey to a human.” TALMUD: Schene luchoth haberuth, p 250b.

            “The souls of non-Jews come from impure spirits and are called PIGS.” TALMUD: Jalkut Rubeni gadol 12b.

            “If you eat with a non-Jew it is the same as eating with a dog.” TALMUD: Tosapoth, Jebamoth 94b.

            “If a Jew has a non-Jewish servant or maid who dies, one should not express sympathy to the Jew. You should tell the Jew: “God will replace ‘your loss’, just as if one of his animals had died.”” TALMUD: Jore Dea 377.

            “Sexual intercourse between Gentiles is like intercourse between animals.” TALMUD: Sanhedrin 74b.

            “IT IS PERMITTED TO TAKE THE BODY AND LIFE OF A GENTILE.” TALMUD: Sepher Ikkarim III c 25.

            “It is the law to kill anyone who denies the Torah. The Christians belong to the denying ones of the Torah.” TALMUD: Coschen Hamischpat, Hagah 425.

            “A heretic Gentile you may kill outright with your own hands.” TALMUD: Abodah Zara, 4b.

            “Every Jew who spills the blood of the godless (non-Jews), is doing the same as making a sacrifice to God.” TALMUD: Bammidber raba c 21 & jalkut 772

          • David Ashton

            How many political Jews take this seriously, even in the original Hebrew?

          • Luca

            Most, probably do not take it literally, but I am sure it has contributed to their culture of arrogance, superiority complex, strong tribalism, disregard for non-Jews, and wanting to advance their cause at the expense of others wherever they roam.

            This, in turn, has generated negative stereotypes which causes host countries to dislike them and want to expel them.

          • David Ashton

            There is much in what you say. I have outlined my own views on the origins of various forms of “antisemitism” several times on this site, and have no time and little inclination to repeat them; and recently repeated my advice on how to tackle opposition from both Jews and Jew-haters. Another life, another book. Instead of future generations being grateful for how he “lanced the abscess”, as Hitler expected in his Final Testament, if genuinely reported, we all now live in its consequences.

          • David Ashton

            It is also closer to the demonstrable truth, but not all Jews are “left-wing” or pro-immigration.

          • LHathaway

            haha, funny? There, you’ve made your post nonoffensive?

    • Romulus

      Who do they think instigated the problems in the first place? Check the invasion patterns since the Roman empire and the arrival of particular haplo groups. It will give you the expected answer.

    • Grantland

      Ah yes, the French are not happy unless their President is a Jew.

      • Romulus

        If memory serves, there is a particular group..________.(insert appropriate name), who’s reported population is DISPROPORTIONATELY homosexual. Can you geuss whom? Lol

        • Grantland

          No idea. Greeks? “The Greek position”? err.. Catholic Bishops?

          • Romulus

            Check your other comment. 😉 If I remember correctly, the statistics were in a little known book by Edgar j. Steele. An absolute must read.

          • Grantland

            They framed him on a trumped-up charge and sentenced him to 50 years. He rots in a gulag right now.

          • Romulus

            Nah! Lol. Not that one. The one about the French ? President. 🙂
            Get it!

          • Grantland

            Well, the Jews Sarkozy and Hollande are both flamboyantly heterosexual.. but its of no real import. Jews, is it? It’s the travesty of a real patriot Edgar J. Steele rotting in a NKVD dungeon for his patriot views that irks me.

          • Romulus

            He’s in prison??!!! When did that happen?? If you have any further information it would be greatly appreciated.

          • Romulus

            Never mind. I just finished reading about it after having found the links. I suppose this could all happen to anyone of us that becomes to “visible” on the radar or internet. The noose on America is tightening.

          • Grantland

            There’s a website – g**gle his name. They framed him and gave him 50 years.

            – edit – oops – that was wrongly posted here, not there.

  • Harry Schneider

    it appears that the French are still awake and not drugged by by the leftist media yet.

    • Ella

      Drugged by their wines and wide usage of anti-depressants, the youth escape their unemployment pains and crumbling socialist system. I would drink heavy myself if I paid out 75% of taxes to the French or even, American govt.

  • Michael Mason

    Leftists go into frenzies when they loose. They really are spiritually sick, unstable people. They believe in the cult of equality, which is just as much a superstitious pipe dream as any 5000 year old book of mythology.

  • Magician

    It appears France is definitely waking up. It is now illegal for muslim women to wear veils that cover their faces. Two reasons – once they are in France they are expected to respect the French culture. And it is to prevent criminals from taking advantage of the face veils to hide from the authorities.

    If they do not like it? They are welcome to leave France.

  • Martel

    The French love a little revolution now and then. The left had theirs in the sixties, this time it will be hours.

  • FlaVet

    Update…the FN is taking 14 of 15 offices in France. I’d say it’s a rout and it’s about time the French realized their “lasiez faire” attitudes will ultimately kill them all.
    My question is…why can’t we do it here…starting in Dearborn?

  • MBlanc46

    Leave it to the French “anti-fascists” to bow to the will of the people.

    • FlaVet

      +100

  • “Riot police were also out in force in other parts of the country as anti-fascist demonstrators threatened FN candidates with violence.”

    Of course these would be your love and peace people.

  • LHathaway

    “roundly beaten the governing Socialists in a number of key constituencies”.

    Let me guess, constituencies where most voters are white, yet also near ‘diverse’ areas and becoming more ‘diverse’?

    I wouldn’t write off the blue-bloods, however. And as another poster pointed out the other day, the very intelligent among us are also a group open to questioning the saintly value of diversity.

  • LHathaway

    I think leftist actually believe this is how the Nazi’s took power in Europe, violence. Instead of learning that violence is wrong, the main message the leadership seems to have gotten is that violence works, and they intend to frighten the public into doing things their way. In this, they aren’t too far from the establishment that always punishes ‘racism’ in the media and in the employment sector, and has people afraid to go against them. We (anyone to the right of them) hasto be painted as evil and dangerous and ‘Nazi’s-like’, too, so they will think this violence is ultimately for a good cause. Some of us do sound like Nazis. . . and that’s on purpose, to defuse the real anger we feel. So it’s a never-ending leftward driving perpetual motion machine.

    Never-the-less, I suspect this overt violence may end up being counter-productive for the left.

    • Zaporizhian Sich

      At some point, violence is justified. Unprovoked violence is immoral, using as much violence as necessary to eliminate hostile aliens who are killing your people is not.

      • LHathaway

        Good point. I think that lesson was in an episode of that anti-west, well, in an episode of Another TV show from the 70’s, Kung Fu. ‘Never kill when wounding is enough, never wound when speaking is enough’. Plus, I can’t down vote a photo of Arnold Swarztenegger.

    • FlaVet

      I loathe gratuitous Nazi references as much as the next guy, but I find it more objectionable for conservatives to relinquish one of our most devastating arguments against the left — namely, that the Nazis were socialists. In fact, the word “Nazi” is an abbreviation of the German word Nationalsozialist and the full name of Hitler’s political party was the National Socialist German Workers’ Party. Anyone who reads through the Nazi party platform will quickly notice its many parallels with the obsessions of the left.

      A question I like to ask liberals when the predictable Nazis-were-conservatives claim comes up — after World War II ended, Germany was divided into halves: communist East Germany and capitalist West. The Nazis, we’re told by the left, had epitomized conservative capitalism, sometimes called corporatism. Yet of the two post-war Germanys, which more closely resembled Nazi Germany? If what liberals claim about the Nazis were true, it should have been West Germany that was the totalitarian police state — but it wasn’t, as anyone who lived through the Cold War and looks back at it honestly is aware. East Germany was a direct political and cultural descendant of the Nazi regime.

      Worth pointing out the next time a liberal parrots this most revered of their myths.

      • Long Live Dixie

        East Germany was a direct political and cultural descendant of the Nazi regime.

        That is a shockingly ignorant statement.

  • Garrett Brown

    May be moving to France soon.

    • Ella

      It would be interesting if we liberate France once again. Who will liberate America if we do not take deliberate action?

      • Garrett Brown

        I believe America will be lost as well as the UK. The liberal establishment has too strong of a foothold in our medias.

  • The French waited for too long to curb immigration from third world countries. France has too many Africans and Middle Easterners to do anything other than give them tickets back home and revoke citizenship. The same goes for Sweden, Norway, and Germany – all three have big numbers of African and Middle Eastern refugees coming in 2012 and 2013.

    • Grantland

      Never too late for stern action.

    • Ella

      I don’t think Germany has a large presence of Africans and Middle Easterners, more likely under 3-5%. These numbers have better hope than the USA with a 40% nonwhite population currently. We can see the effects in larger US cities, but it’s more dispersed across our landscape.

  • David Ashton

    The non-Europeans are more of an INTERNAL threat.

  • David Ashton

    This is the first time I have put this into writing but for the patience of readers must be VERY brief. Uniforms were worn for only four years of Mosley’s six decades of politics, and banned by government soon after the above picture was taken.

    I was born during WW2 and brought up with a love of English history, landscape and literature, and later developed an independent interest in ideas of European unity and then in the emergent problems of “colored immigration”. My patriotic father, who had attended Olympia and other huge meetings, mentioned Mosley’s outstanding oratory. As a youth at weekends I used sometimes to wander round London bookshops and came across the HQ of his postwar Movement, where I debated with former Blackshirts, including the amiable and indeed admirable Robert Row who edited its journal. At university I was a contemporary in the adjacent college of Mosley’s son Max, who one day suddenly asked if I would like to earn some vacation pocket-money by “helping Dad” with a new question-and-answer book. I took up this offer for three weeks in France with Oswald and Diana Mosley, both hospitable and quite happy to answer hard questions about fascism, Jews, Hitler, etc.

    About ten years later I was again invited to “check facts and quotes” in Mosley’s autobiography. For my pains I was violently attacked by a Marxist rag as a “key figure” in his Union Movement and the “right-wing Conservative Monday Club”, though in fact I was never at any time actually a member of either organisation. However, I agreed, and still agree, with a lot of their policies against communism and alien immigration, and for the British and European heritage. I attended a few public meetings, and also private dinners with people like Henry Williamson and Colin Wilson.

    I found Mosley an impressive personality, courteous and open to criticism, especially concise and to-the-point in utterance. I remember asking him suddenly what he thought of the Marxist theory of surplus value. He turned sideways, put one hand on his hip, paused for a mere second, and out came a detailed intelligent demolition of the theory without hesitation as if he had prepared an essay on the subject in advance. My assessment of him remains closer to Robert Skidelsky’s than Stephen Dorril’s. The fate of this country would have been a lot better if he had been PM.

    • stewball

      You mean death to the Jews? What do you think would have happened if moseley God forbid was prime minister? Seriously question needs an honest reply.

      • David Ashton

        There is no reason whatever to think Mosley (not “moseley”) would have killed Jews if he had been elected Prime Minister either as a Labour politician or as a Fascist.

        • stewball

          Don’t forget him trying to send his brown shirts into the East End. Was that going to be peaceful? No. Violent. But besides the Jews the ‘goyim’ didn’t want them there. I’m didn’t say moseley would have physically hurt the Jews but who knows what sort of laws he’d have tried to bring in.

          • David Ashton

            1. Stalin’s Comintern stooges in Britain enlisted recruits and funds from London Jews against “fascism” – see e.g. J. L. Hepwell, “Party Recruitment” in J. Frankel (ed) “Dark Times, Dire Decisions” (2004).

            2. Their illegal and violent opposition Mosley’s proposed British Union anniversary procession through London in October 1936 boosted his existing East End membership by around 2,000 – see e.g. Special Branch report, PRO Home Office 144/2106/259.

            3. These were never “brown” shirts. Given my limited time, I prefer to debate these matters with those who know what they are writing about.

            4. In 1937 municipal elections gave British Union 22% of the Bethnal Green vote, its candidates coming second in six seats in London, the householder franchise excluding younger supporters among the “goyim” (i.e. the native English).

            4.

          • stewball

            You’re so full of yourself David and love to put people down who have not had the education you’ve had. I may knot be knowledgeable like you but im entitled to express my opinions. David. Am I write Mr. Moderator?

          • David Ashton

            I believe in free speech all round, you included.

          • stewball

            I’m afraid I’ve had many unpleasantries thrown at me ie I don’t know what I’m talking about and therefore should be quiet. If that’s not personal I don’t know what is but I apologise to you for my rudeness.

          • David Ashton

            Have a nice day.

        • stewball

          Sorry. I didn’t notice the correct spelling of Mosley.

    • Sangraal

      The Colin Wilson who died recently? I didn’t know he was assosciated with Mosley. Did he share his politics?
      I’d be very interested to read the ‘question and answer’ book.
      How faithful is this communique to Mosley’s position on Jews, and did it remain so throughout his life? Given the (eternally recurring) debate elsewhere in this thread, I feel this subject is apt.

      • David Ashton

        The book is “Mosley – Right or Wrong” (Lion Books 1961). I pressed him hard on these matters and one result included his condemnation of racial and religious anti-Semitism therein. His account of Hitler is one of the best written at that time, and it is supported by that of Manstein and subsequent biographers Jewish Communists changed his attitude by initiating violent attacks on his meetings and members, and because he wanted peaceful co-existence between Britain and Germany.

        The same Colin Wilson, more a cordial acquaintance than a political adherent. He wrote a balanced tribute to Mosley in a journal called “The Twentieth Century”. However, his friend Bill Hopkins wrote a silly book about an imaginary fascist leader.

      • David Ashton

        My answer to this has not appeared on this thread.

        • Sangraal

          No problem, I saw it in my disqus notifications. I don’t understand the moderating on this site, there appears to be no rhyme or reason to it. Benign comments are deleted while inflammatory ones make it through.

  • LovelyNordicHeidi

    Everyone would prefer infighting to being wiped off of the face of the planet through assimilation and being outrageously outnumbered. Just come to think of it. If you’re really a multiracial individual, you might understand a little what I mean.

    Our unique genetic/ancestral composition is what must continue to exist. That’s what everyone in his life is fighting for implicitly or explicitly. Thinking about a future where we might fight against our own brethren is less relevant than surviving in the here and now and close and distant future.

  • No.

    I care only about results, about actually reversing the demographic trend that will put whites into minority status in all our countries in mere decades.

    Jews rely on stealth. The only way a hostile minority that’s less than 2% of the population can trick whites into allowing themselves to become minorities in their own lands is to remain unseen. Otherwise they’d be driven into the sea by an angry host population no longer willing to be parasitized.

    If you don’t shine a bright light on them you prevent people from even seeing the face of their attacker. We cannot defend against an attack if we refuse to identify the attacker.

  • You suggest that we are better off allowing them to continue to act in secrecy.
    I’m saying that secrecy’s the only way they are able to do what they do.
    They expend great energy pointing at Muslims, at blacks, at anyone and anything but themselves.
    By assisting them in remaining unseen you facilitate their goals. The only logical thing to do is to expose them, loudly.

    • Huh?

      When do “the Jews” ever name the Muslim or the black, or “allow” us to do the same? If anything, they do everything they can to keep us from naming the Muslims or the blacks. (And most certainly not themselves.)

      The only slight hole in that wall is that (neo-)conservative Jews, a severe minority among political Jews, do name the Muslims, because they’re problematic to their favorite country. Even though neocon Jews make up most of the Fox News Channel, they’re far outnumbered by the ADL type of Jews who rail against “Islamophobia” (i.e. noticing that Muslims commit a lot of terrorism.)

      • They report white-on-black crime in the media but conceal the severity of the much greater amount of black-on-white crime. This makes whites focus on blacks, when they should be focusing on the group that is actively shaping their opinions with selective reporting. When you check out the controlled opposition press, like WND, Hannity, and Rush and Beck, they all point fingers at Muslims. In the U.K. you can talk about the Islamicization of the country, the symptom, but try and address who pushes for mass immigration while doing the opposite in their own country and your posts tend to get deleted.

        The point you bring up about the left-wing ones versus the right-wing ones is important. They control both sides of the debate.

  • Zaporizhian Sich

    They are not clever, but they are unbelievably arrogant and psychopathic. They are not going to be winning much longer, because like a man standing on top of a step ladder, they are one over-reach away from a fall and a very hard landing. They are turning our societies into living Hells for more and more of us, just as they did in Germany after WW-I. They create the conditions that give rise to powerful and unstoppable opposition movements, which if they fail it is usually due to their own fatal mistakes. We all know what those were when it came to Germany. Just listen to Jews talking and you will realize they out-Nazi the Nazis. Just ask anyone who lived through the Soviet Hell.

  • Martel

    Reading the title of the Daily Mail article made my heart sink. Fortunately I will be on my merry way soon again, afters years of frustration I find it of little use to let these things get too me.

    • David Ashton

      What doesn’t destroy us at least makes us angrier.

      • Martel

        Don’t you think this comment & my comment above show I am reasonable beyond question when discussing the Jewish-Gentile conflict?

        www dot frontpagemag dot com/2014/joseph-puder/the-malevolence-of-the-zionism-unsettled-authors/#comment-1324653789

        • David Ashton

          Being reasonable is absolutely necessary, even though it may cut little ice with those who have an unreasonable belief or overwhelming interest. However, those who wish to exploit guilt, compassion or even cupidity in others to protect themselves, or to advance their own purposes, need the support of third parties who are open to persuasion, provided that this operates from a shared moral and rational high ground, and therefore undermines any appeal or control exploited against legitimate majority needs.

          • Martel

            I think its clear that even in this case, the supporters of this commentator see her or him act irrationally and myself reasonably. My interest is not in “hating Jews”, but simply to restore the confidence of Europeans in their history.

          • David Ashton

            Same here.

          • Martel

            I appreciate the compliment, especially as I consider your commentary one of the finest on this forum. I always consider our advantage over cultural relativists and those who deny the reality of race our ability to show ourselves to be much more informed and knowledgeable against our opponents who are in fact merely naysayers.