U.S. Whites More Solidly Republican in Recent Years

Jeffrey M. Jones, Gallup, March 24, 2014

Whites and nonwhites have long shown differing political party preferences, with nonwhites widely favoring the Democratic Party and whites typically favoring the Republican Party by at least a small margin. In recent years, however, the margins in favor of the Republican Party among whites have been some of the largest.

Gallup

The results are based on yearly aggregates of Gallup poll data since 1995, the first full year that Gallup regularly measured Hispanic ethnicity. For this analysis, Gallup defines whites as non-Hispanic whites, and nonwhites as blacks, Hispanics, Asians, and all other races combined.

The net Democratic advantage represents the percentage of each racial/ethnic group identifying as Democratic minus the percentage identifying as Republican. Positive scores indicate that a group is more Democratic than Republican; negative scores indicate the reverse. {snip}

{snip}

In recent years, party preferences have been more polarized than was the case in the 1990s and most of the 2000s. For example, in 2010, nonwhites’ net party identification and leanings showed a 49-point Democratic advantage, and whites were 12 percentage points more Republican than Democratic. The resulting 61-point racial and ethnic gap in party preferences is the largest Gallup has measured in the last 20 years. Since 2008, the racial gaps in party preferences have been 55 points or higher each year; prior to 2008, the gaps reached as high as 55 points only in 1997 and 2000.

{snip}

Over the last two decades, whites have tended to favor the Republican Party and nonwhites have overwhelmingly favored the Democratic Party. During the last few years, those racial and ethnic divisions have grown, mostly because whites have drifted more toward the GOP. Thus, party preferences by race during the Obama years, though similar in nature to the past, have seen some movement that has resulted in slightly greater racial polarization than before.

{snip}

Topics:

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • joesolargenius

    The amount needs to increase dramatically or we will have to go to plan B and siphon off the moderate Democrats into a third party that will not attract many moderates republicans.

    • Puggg

      Before any of that, that party which we all vote for actually needs to show us some results.

    • JohnEngelman

      Right now Republicans seem more divided than Democrats. There are different constituencies within the Democratic Party, but there are not serious divisions.

      Immigration is one issue that really divides the Republican Party. The business class, which has always dominated the GOP, wants more immigrants to lower wages. White blue collar Republicans want fewer or no immigrants for the same reason.

      The Republican Party is making a serious mistake trying to win the votes of Hispanics. It would make more sense to try to win the votes of Jews and Orientals. A large minority of whites will always vote Democrat.

      • bilderbuster

        The Jewish vote is a miniscule 2.5% of voters.
        The Jewish money is where they have all their influence & seeing how Jews are the largest contributors to both parties it’s hard to imagine that their interests aren’t being served by both parties & Jewish interests are usually the polar opposite of those of Whites.

  • D.B. Cooper

    It’s good that more whites are becoming racially aware, but they have traded in one sell out political party for another. I will not vote for any republican until HE is out of there!

    • CelestiaQuesta

      Boehner is a sad sellout to his party. A cry baby with political power.
      Speaker of Obamas a-hole.

    • Martel

      Voting democrat is being an accessory to white extinction though.

    • Alexandra1973

      C’mon, at least use a picture that’s easier on the eyes!

  • Luca

    In the absence of a meaningful third party, the best strategy is to vote Republic simply as the lesser of two evils, then purge the RINO’s. The message will be clear.

    Political parties have historically shifted their platforms and changed because of popular opinion. When they see who is getting elected and why, they will get the message.

    If not, then a meaningful third party must emerge.

    • Bobbala

      You know Lucy keeps moving the football, Charlie Brown …

    • Rhialto

      I will not vote for any candidate of a political party that supports massive immigration, such as Democrats, Libertarians, or Republicans.

    • Max

      Sad, but true and there is some (faint) hope for this at the state level. Many state/local politicians are not given airtime but there are plenty of states yet which have conservative state politics which is why Barry&Co. keep pressuring state legislatures to do what he cannot achieve at the national level. National politics is pretty much lost at this point but if the conservatives at the state level begin to remove the dead wood these will become the choices at the national level…eventually…if it’s not too late already.

      I’ll likely get flamed by the people who keep posting “segregation now” or “race-war” but they are delusional, confusing their warrior fantasies with plausible outcomes.

      • Sick of it

        Max, public anger is starting to boil over. Surely you’ve noticed. It will likely only take one spark, one horrific situation that makes people go to war in the streets. No idea what it will be, but it’s becoming inevitable. It’s hard to find a peaceful solution when every single person in power eventually sells out. That closes all doors to a peaceful resolution. These people have been proven to be no more than paid liars. Traitors. Murderers. They will get their due and it will be soon.

      • M&S

        Max,
        Look at Arizona and tell me ‘act local’ makes a difference when federal law provides all authority to the national government with respect to controlling our borders and moderating immigration.
        If you fire every Republican on the ticket, the big businesses as globalist intent which backs all political parties will simply put a single party into government which will pass law after law which would only be repealable if candidates in the next election had ‘learned their lesson’ about Immigration and vowed to roll back everything.
        Unfortunately, we don’t control the funding for campaigns.
        And so the only lesson that Republican-after-next will learn is that they are as owned by their money bags as they are rejected by their own party.
        Forget who paid for your campaign and don’t get elected.
        Add to this the almost certain, wide scale, MASSIVE, voter fraud going on and the fantasy:reality skew is 180` diametrically opposite what you suggest- Failing to save our country for ourselves will lead to genocide.
        Ours.
        Whites who have no homeland will have no race. History tells us this. The Han Chinese and the Saudis and the Israelis and and and ALL show that the natural state of affairs which brings stability is one of genetic as cultural isolation.

  • thomas edward

    “Republican”
    _________________________
    None of us here should worry about these stupid columns written by these stupid writers. The die is caste and nothing can stop the coming race war,

    • slash345

      I don’t see a race war happening.

      What I do see is young white males and females socializing and befriending blacks and browns when I go out in public.

      • M&S

        Those who have no power empathize with those like themselves. Those in a position to lose power isolate themselves from a necessary battle to win the loyalty and understanding of their own.
        Until you can tell a white child: “Stick with us and your life status will be assured _at this level_.” You have no hope.
        Because, by the time that child hits middle age and the wisdom pool of cumulative knowledge reaches a boil of understanding that he is not only never going to match his/her parents but likely _fall short of them_, by a considerable SES and career path difference, the majority of middle aged or older whites today who could have said “See, I told’ya so, now let’s work on this, together.” will be in the grave or close to it.
        And U.S. population mass, as the ultimate in ‘democratic rule’ will be less than and older than the Hispanics and Blacks who will, in no way act as honorably as we have in ‘share and share alike’ distributing jobs and social equivalency.
        Anymore than they will leave our women alone.
        This is why I believe we have but one chance. And that is to _buy in_ our children to whites-only privatization of the all business and property exchange. So that youth has a power polar around which they can orient themselves.
        White kids aren’t stupid. They are just brainwashed and timid because of all the crap they are exposed to everyday. Take away the Kumbaya social egalitarianism and _instinct_ will kick in: “Stay with the ones who help you out.”

      • thomas edward

        Yes, that’s what you see now. But when the blacks finally go completely stark raving mad and start chasing the Whites down in the street and killing them, there’ll be no choice. It’ll be kill, or be killed. Only the sorriest Whites will allow themselves to be murdered (not necessarily a bad thing). The rest will finally settle accounts with the blacks, once and for all.

      • John R

        Don’t fret. We did too, at their age, before we got our racial education. Let’s hope that it doesn’t take the younger generation as long as it did our generation. Probably not; unlike us, today’s young Whites have fewer sanctuaries in which to hide.

  • Bobbala

    Look at what Bush accomplished with 2 years of GOP majorities in the house and senate … He appeased the left and congress was lost.

    Look at what Obama accomplished with 2 years of Dem majorities in the house and senate …
    He appeased the left and congress was lost.

    • JohnEngelman

      Starting two expensive wars while cutting taxes for the rich is not appeasing the left.

      • Bobbala

        Who was he appeasing when he, not Obama, “saved” GM?

        Democrats love starting expensive wars … some of them have gotten Nobel Peace prizes for it.

        Republicans only cut taxes because they need to increase revenue to spend more. Democrats have never figured this out. They bitch about the audacity of tax cuts for the tax payers but still cash the checks … ungratefully.

  • dd121

    I don’t think the Republicans are smart enough to exploit this trend.

    • So CAL Snowman

      Judging by the actions of Christie, Rand Paul, and D.B. Cooper’s favorite homeboy, you might be on to something.

    • Max

      They do seem to have an unmatched skill at avoiding obvious conclusions.

      “If 2/3 of Hispanics vote against Republicans, maybe we can make up the deficiency in volume by bringing in more of them”.

      • willbest

        Unfortunately 20% of whites have been so thoroughly indoctrinated that they can get beat half to death by youths, watch their sister murdered, etc. and still come away thinking aligning with those same groups is the way for a better tomorrow.

  • Nothing much will change no matter who is elected. Whites will continue to be beaten by black mobs, our purses will be robbed to pay for lazy black welfare queens to breed, the invasion by Mexicans and other mud peoples will continue, with only minor adjustment at best. The blood of traitors will have to flow in the streets before things change. Since that’s unlikely to happen without a major precipating event, get used to life in Amurkistan. Prep as best as you can but don’t expect the pols to save you.

    • Buzzbw2

      Thank you bigone! this is one of very few links I clicked where a few other ppl actually get it. NOTHING of any real significance will change whether we all vote Repub or not. Republicans are just as guilty if not more of selling out our country much less Whites with increased immigration legal and illegal (cheap workforce) but especially with legislation to make it easier for corporations to take jobs overseas with laws & loopholes, even tax incentives to do so! Essentially killing the middle class in the process. BOTH parties! Sure a few Reps have pushed anti-immigration laws (mostly in border states like Arizona) but overall it’s the same BS they just tell you what you want to hear. Just because the label says something other than coolaid doesn’t mean it’s ok to drink.

      • SoulInvictus

        Change significantly no. Worsen at a faster rate under another Obama, yes.
        Political and legislative aspects aside, Obama and Holder have emboldened anti-white sentiment and violence.

        • Jotun Hunter

          so, do you mean you feel we’re better off with them, the enemy in full expsoure? HIllary will be possibly worse – I believe she might be genuinely insane.

          • SoulInvictus

            At this point, I honestly have no idea anymore.
            I know I sound like a broken record on this, but we’re being crushed between the greed of global corporations(largely represented by Republicans) and the social/racial poison of leftists(most Dems).

            So pick your poison. Slow death by economic strangulation or slow death by minority and cultural toxicity. I don’t see Hillary being any worse than Mitt really, who seems to be testing the waters again as much as I’m seeing him on TV lately. …yay.
            If you’re wealthy, then the Republicans would be the better choice for your pocket book, but that’s about the closest thing to an endorsement I could ever give them. If you’re one of the 35% of food stamp recipients that are white, then not so much.

          • Geo1metric

            Establishment = repubs + dems.

          • SoulInvictus

            A much more spartan, succinct way of saying exactly what I was trying to impart.
            Sometimes it’s difficult fighting that urge to elaborate in case someone is less familiar with a subject.

            Could have gone another route with it and merely said:

            “Going to the candidates’ debate,
            Laugh about it,
            Shout about it,
            When you’ve got to choose,
            Every way you look at it you lose.”

      • JohnEngelman

        The Republican Party exists in order to advance the economic interests of the richest ten percent of the country. Keep that in mind, and you will never be surprised by what Republican politicians do after they are elected.

        • dmxinc

          John, you have a huge blind spot when it comes to politics.

          You actually believe the democrat politicians care about anyone but themselves?

        • WR_the_realist

          The Democratic Party exists in order to advance the interests of blacks, Hispanics, homosexuals, and the super rich people in Hollywood and Wall Street who fund them. Keep that in mind, and you will never be surprised by what Democratic politicians do after they are elected.

    • ricpic

      Only precipitating event I can think of is the massive economic implosion which comes eventually to all buried in debt societies, like ours. I see breakup as possible, not guaranteed by a long shot, but possible under the conditions of extreme stress created by such an implosion. Maybe, just maybe a white state will be salvaged from part of the breakup of the United States.

    • SouthronKittie

      Are you married? How old are you?

      • SoulInvictus

        Got to love it when there’s an Amren love connection. 😉

      • Not married and older than dirt.

        • SouthronKittie

          Can’t be

      • dd121

        Memo to new posters: all the long-time posters on the male side are fat old men. The very people our enemies are waiting to die.

        • Triarius

          I’ve been reading and posting here for over 6 years and I am not old, fat, or married, but I am a man.

          • SouthronKittie

            How old?

          • Triarius

            30

          • SouthronKittie

            You’re prime marriage material. A good decent white girl will be lucky to get you. Hurry up now.

        • Who Me?

          I am neither fat nor a man–but I am married and I am old.

        • SouthronKittie

          That’s mean

          • dd121

            See, that’s what I get for making generalizations. My bad.

          • SouthronKittie

            It’s okay I think you were trying to be funny or ironic.

        • SoulInvictus

          Speak for yourself,
          “Not me, I’m in my prime.” 😉

          https://wwwDOTyoutubeDOTcom/watch?v=GGNdnlCbfMs

  • So CAL Snowman

    Because voting Republican has worked out so well in the past. Damn Americans are stupid AND insane.

    • Martel

      Its the only party which considers discarding amnesty, its exactly what whites need to do.

      • So CAL Snowman

        Right, like stopping amnesty is going to turn this thing around. The point of no return has passed, amnesty or not. Legal immigrants have swamped us to the point where demographic change is a mathematical certainty. the only thing that stops our descent into hell is a full scale revolution or secession/civil war.

        • Martel

          No, studies have shown they tend to move back when they reach a certain age, Richwine was fired over his excellent report if you recall. Stopping amnesty is vital to keep the US from motiving even more Mexicans to make the jump. If that happens, your revolution is going to be near impossible.

          • So CAL Snowman

            How much longer do you think we have? We don’t have the luxury of time to wait for all of these mexicans to move back mexico. Furthermore that is a laughable and ludicrous assertion to assume that mexicans are going to move back to mexico en masse at some point. All demographic trends point to a hispanic majority by 2050, amnesty or not.

          • Martel

            Its not a ludicrous assertion, it has been demonstrated by the competent Jason Richwine. They prefer taking their dollars to Mexico after a certain period. This is one of his arguments against amnesty. An Amnesty would ensure they stay, and it would motivate a new legion of Mexixans. Current demographic trends point to a hispanic majority, but it can be a small majority or a majority to large to ever recover from.

            Assisting NumbersUSA, and ensuring repubs stand on the right side of amnesty is not a game, its vital to the security of future whites.

          • So CAL Snowman

            Oh but it is a game, it’s a huge game. Ok let’s say we stop amnesty, what then? The illegal alien invaders are not going anywhere, and legal immigration is still allowing a million or so non Whites into the country. The Fed Gov won’t do a damn thing to deport illegals from the interior and the Republicans won’t do a damn thing to stop legal non White immigration. The only way to secure the future of the White race is a White Homeland. I live in Mexico Norte, if significant numbers of Mexicans are leaving for Mexico I have not noticed in the slightest.

          • Martel

            Research tells us they will move back. Amnesty will ensure more come. That is what matters. A white Homeland is impossible if whites are completely overrun, instead of being a large minority. There is no sensible argument for not stopping amnesty, its seriously playing with the future of whites in America. The greater portion of the inhabitants of North America, the better the outcome for whites regardless of future events.

          • Hal K

            Don’t let amnesty be turned into a Sword of Damocles that forces you and like-minded whites to keep voting for more of the same. That is what got us to where we are now. This has been the choice offered to whites for decades: bad or worse. The GOP shuns white identity politics. It avoids the issue of anti-white racial preferences. It has done nothing about legal immigration. Our best hope is that it soon becomes unable to control any of the branches of government in our winner-take-all system and then collapses.

            Whites need explicit white identity politics for their group interests to be represented. That will always be the case, whether they are a demographic majority or not, and the GOP stands in the way of that.

          • Martel

            That is no excuse to allow amnesty to be passed and have half of mexico running over the border in celebration. You can organize everything you want while assisting organizations resisting Amnesty, until you have a better alternative to the GOP.

          • Hal K

            There are better alternatives to the GOP already. Voting for an explicitly pro-white party (like the American Freedom Party) is a way to send the message to the conservative establishment that race-neutral ideology with nonwhite outreach is a dead end.

            It is fine to oppose amnesty, and I support NumbersUSA and call my representatives. Voting for the GOP is another matter, however. If you want to promote the acceptance of explicit white identity politics in the mainstream, then voting for the GOP is a bad idea..

            Also, it will always seem imperative to block amnesty. This has been going on for years. Don’t you get the feeling that you are being strung along? If you feel like you have to keep voting for the GOP to prevent amnesty, then there is no logical end to it, and we know where this leads anyway, since legal immigration is already making whites a minority.

          • Martel

            I personally don’t vote because I’m not an American citizen, I live in the Netherlands. I agree with voting for alternatives, even though the damages to the GOP are too minimal for them to alter their strategy, and if you support NumbersSA and call reps then I am happy.

          • Hal K

            damages to the GOP are too minimal for them to alter their strategy

            But you can make a similar argument about voting for any candidate in any election. If enough people vote for explicitly pro-white candidates, the conservative establishment will take notice, especially if it starts costing them elections here and there.

          • Martel

            Sure but in the transition period you need to ensure they push against amnesty, can’t just drop the ball. Currently pro white candidates are not even remotely a threat.

          • Hal K

            Things are going to get much much worse before they start getting better. The transition period is the period where the GOP gradually loses its ability to control any of the branches of government. Many white conservatives will think the answer is to move to the left to appease nonwhites. They will insist that white identity politics is the exact wrong approach. They are already doing this, in fact. It will be a slow, painful learning process for most whites to realize that they have been wrong all this time. Tremendous damage will be done to their civilization in the meantime. There is no way around it.

          • M&S

            You’re wrong.
            Whites have 1.83 kids per woman with a 30 year generational interval at the moment. Hispanics have 2.8-3.2 kids per woman, beginning at 19.
            Whites want nothing to do with Hispanics.
            Which means that you aren’t ‘marrying in’ to redistribute economic pie slices.
            Do you _honestly_ think that a white entering the job market every 50 years is going to conserve the _economy_ on which white society is based?
            Societies are racial constructs, not the other way around.
            If there are a dominant majority of Hispanics having twice as many kids, 30% more often, they will move into every facet of our economy and Mexify it.
            You know, Mexico, land of the oligarchic casta system? Where corruption and power gaming causes /Presidential/ candidates to be murdered and the DTOs are so powerful they hold Survivor Olympics to see which kidnap victim off a bus gets to ram a VBIED into the competitor’s villa ‘Or your family dies too’?
            Sitting still and waiting for ‘partial’ majority will not buy us a thing.

          • Martel

            More whites as a % of population is better then less whites as a % of the population. This is not negotionable, none of your argument alters the fact that amnesty would bring over more Hispanics, making it even harder to survive in the future. I’m not trying to win an argument, there is simply no other way to look at this. You can pursue all other activities while supporting protests against numbersusa, you argument about ”sitting still” has no relevance in this discussion.

            Numbers matter:done.

          • M&S

            Martel,

            You’re twisting your words to sound more patriotic but this is not ‘done’ because what you _said_ was-

            >>
            Research tells us they will move back.
            >>

            Not unless they have a forever minority presence in governance which leads to them being unable to effect policy decisions. And Democrats use mob-dependence tactics to force coalition empowerment which basically ensures that Hispanics are elevated, even before they are a true majority (which will happen by the end of this Century).

            Which means that if a _small_ percentage of Whites votes for socialist rule, on Democratic lines, they and the Hispanics and the blacks will all end up owning our outcome, no matter what the ‘majority minority’ levels are. Because of block voting.

            And Hispanics will not leave a condition where their birth rates show them owning the land, outright, inside a century. They are patient and they are used to thinking in terms of socialist group empowerment.

            This is the mistake the Dems make in failing to acknowledge that for them to beat the Republicans is _The Same Outcomes_ as fif they lost power and faced extinction on their own. Because a Hispanic country is inevitable at present birth rates. And a Hispanic country will neither elect nor support white minority rule.

            This is the vulnerability of Race Blindness in that the majority can only ensure their dominance while they are a majority.

            DO. YOU. HEAR. ME?!

            BEATING AMNESTY IS NOT ENOUGH!

            >>
            Amnesty will ensure more come. That is what matters.
            >>

            Amnesty, like any other idea, is an immortal proposition. It will always come back so long as the people it represents: Democrats, see a benefit to their own empowerment struggles.
            They will destroy this nation as the race that built it to get what they want. And as such they must _already_ be considered:
            No Longer White.
            If they are no longer one of us, then we need to be rid of them as much as any black, Hispanic or Asian.
            The way you do that is to cut them out of a white homeland. Not to accommodate them as a cancerous entity that just keeps metastasizing.
            If we are free of Demon Rule we can begin to raise our own children to look on the ruin of America and make their own judgment as to whether they want the eternal promise of egality and multiculturalism as a lie that is not achievable.
            Or if they want a stable, self-contained, _beautiful_ world that requires only that they are loyal to other whites.

            >>
            A white Homeland is impossible if whites are completely overrun, instead of being a large minority.
            >>
            This is _inevitable_ so long as America remains unpartitioned. Hispanics breed like gutter rats whenever the resources are available. In Mexico, the average TFR is 2.4. Here it’s around 3.2. When Reagan issued his Amnesty it went to 4.4.
            The difference is that Hispanics don’t breed where they are have no resources to back them.
            Where they are intermingled among whites, they have those resources. Whites cannot breed like Hispanics do without ruining the levels of education and achievement which we depend on to create our societies and thus we have to **exclude** them from our midst.
            It is not that white society cannot succeed in a modern world it is the hybrid society which cannot. Because one group overruns and decapabilizes the other with their lower IQs and massive birth rates on a short generational interval.
            >>
            There is no sensible argument for not stopping amnesty, its seriously playing with the future of whites in America. The greater portion of white inhabitants of North America, the better the outcome for whites regardless of future events.
            >>
            Democratic rule is already the rule of the Hispanic majority. If you take half of whites and all of Hispanics, you have the reason why the America is Mexifying.
            We can waste our time fighting a losing battle against a numeric majority which, ‘by democratic rules’, has the right to have the determinative say.
            Or we can muster our resources, separating into large conservative white communities and prepare to separate from the nation. Daring them to try and kill us after all the Balkanization partition which the U.S. has endorsed elsewhere (Kosovo, CIS, Iraq).
            If we remain functionally connected to a white population which is _Suicidally Committed_ to the end of our race, we are dead anyway. If we withdraw all commercial and political support to white Demon Rule, refusing to participate in a society which no longer represents our interests, we have options.
            First, to disempower half of the political system, leaving a void which raises the option of real White Interests followon.
            Second, we create a condition by which our presence in their system can become as much of an irritation and shame to their own actions and Agenda as they pretend we are.
            I am talking about mass withdrawals of children from public schools and the institution of a private school system, neighborhood by neighborhood, to which Whites _do not allow_ the ‘social experiment’ entrance.
            I am talking about block refusal to pay taxes on ANY State or local Proposition which makes whites subject to supporting other ethnies welfare, to include housing and improvements to transport and infrastructure necessary to expand municipal bond issuances.
            I am talking about refusing to use toll roads. I am talking about making Health Care a combative subject where whites refuse to register and take our health care to internal white community clinics and HMOs run completely outside the national health care system.
            I am talking about a revolution in place, all of which is sponsored by and set up using funds and planning groups based in a new White Political Party. Much like Hezbollah funds clinics and distributes food and even rebuilds communities hit by Israeli terror strikes, we must become an extra-governmental force which acts to the benefit of our own people.
            All the while, maintaining the semblance of legality by trying to participate in ways that make it clear that We Want Out. Such as legislation which allows whites to refuse to pay school taxes if their children are not in those schools. Legislation which requires ‘ethnic specific’ teaching for different groups so that whites can get the full benefit of Eurocentric studies which the Hispanics get only the false pride of a history of barbarism and losing.
            The important element of which is this:
            The sooner we disestablish the Republican Party, the sooner Amnesty passes. The sooner Amnesty passes, the more total whites there are to fight back by refusing to be taxed for the support of other ethnies.
            And when that leads to open warfare as global civil disobedience, the Demons will fall. Because they will not be able to set up enough FEMA camps to kill us all.
            Before we kill them and take control.
            Kill the brain which has the twisted idea (Amnesty) and the idea dies with it. Separate from those whose warped pursuit of power is that of the Weak allying with The Weak to make us ALL
            ‘equally’ wretched and the brains which _matter_ (white children) get to see the outcome of selling out to non-white populations.
            It’s the Aikido of white rule. That, rather than fighting an enemy to our front while our ‘friends’ stab us in the back, we concentrate on sorting ourselves out, internally, by expelling those Nihilists who wish only faith-love-annihilation.
            And THEN turn on the entirety of our enemy. And dare them to either eradicate us or watch us leave their little parody of democratic rule. Because once the Effectors of society are gone, and Demon Rule has only the poor dumb ethnies on whom to rely, I guarantee you, they _will fall_.
            I am not against defeating Amnesty sir.
            I am for defeating the stupid belief system which engenders it as an ideal worth pursuing.
            That cannot happen without a White Political Party which serves our interests both in and outside of Washington DC. And indeed, _proves itself_, continually, by gathering up whites and using our focused donations and expertise, to create separate communities for them.
            To get a WPP, we need to kill the GOP and force whites to CHOOSE whether they are Demonic or Racist.
            Because you cannot love your race and all the benefits that accrue from being White, and not despise the Demons who would take from us all that we are and own.
            Our Genes. Our Destiny. Our Hope for a Better Future for Whites Alone.

          • Martel

            I never said stopping Amnesty is enough.

          • M&S

            How many millions are you talking about that you consider a ‘small’ majority to be a winning hand? If you fight ‘the majority’ you fight _the people_.
            The question at this point is whether you do it in the streets, mano a hombre`, or as a function of enforcing a legally binding law on a large enough GROUP of white states that international intervention becomes meaningless.

          • Hal K

            No, whites can always decide to stand up for themselves as a group, even after they become a minority, and they will become a minority regardless of whether amnesty happens.

          • Martel

            Strategically, it does matter to what degree whites are overwhelmed. Any political solution is easier to achieve if you are 50% of pop instead of 30%. It makes no sense to not support the fight against amnesty.

          • M&S

            Martel, we are only 63% of the population now with well over half due to be dead before 2042 when the change is made real.
            That will leave us at 35% or less of the population, even if the Hispanic numbers don’t increase and are being accurately reported. Neither of which is likely to be true.

          • Martel

            You can be 35% or 25%. 35% is better.

          • Hal K

            Martel: You are missing the point. If whites don’t have explicit white identity politics then their group interests will not be represented regardless of what percentage of the population they have. We can’t put off explicit white identity politics to keep blocking amnesty year after year.

            The only way to get nonwhites to respect white group interests is for whites to stand up for their group explicitly. More race-neutral GOP-style politics will never get us anywhere. You are chasing a mirage if you think nonwhites will come around to this eventually.

            I do oppose amnesty, but not at the cost of having to vote for the GOP.

          • Martel

            You don’t have to vote for the GOP, but it is in your best interest to push swing voters to the GOP instead of democrats as long as a legit alternative doesn’t exist. its in your interest supporting republicans who do push back at amnesty.

            What I propose is a short term solution to protect American whites from being decimated in the future, which necessarily is complimented with a long term solution in breaking free from both the GOP and democrats. But without a doubt, democrats are the more harmful party. Don’t put all your eggs in one basket.

          • Hal K

            without a doubt, democrats are the more harmful party

            There is another way of looking at this. In my opinion, the crux of the problem is that white identity politics is kept out of the mainstream. This blockage occurs in the mainstream right, i.e. the GOP, so in that sense the GOP is more harmful. The best thing to do right now is to send that message by voting explicitly pro-white, not to keep voting for the GOP.

    • Luca

      The Republican party is split. Not all candidates agree on all the issues, which is why the party needs weeding out.

      Democrats, on the other hand, march in virtual lockstep to the commands of the dear leader and hardly deviate at all.

      The bad news is, there is no meaningful 3rd party.

      • Jesse James

        Luca I agree with you, the system is designed to prevent the emergence of a third party. What has to happen is that the Republican party must be forced to become the explicitly pro-white party. The logic of demographic change combined with the existence of a government driven racial spoils system will force a change in the Republican Party. It may take a few election cycles of whites staying home by the tens of millions to force the Republicans to start representing us. It is not like they will have any choice if they want to continue winning any elections, non-whites will not vote for them because they are perceived as the “white party”. Sooner or later they will be forced by the political and social situation to actually become what they have so long been accused of being – or they will cease to exist like the Whig party.

        • Einsatzgrenadier

          Forget an explicitly pro-white party. We need an explicitly pro-white revolution.

          • Jesse James

            Revolution and political parties go together. Like the National Liberation Front and the Viet Cong. Like Sinn Fein and the IRA. Like the Soviets of the October Revolution and the Bolsheviks. Heck look at the shabby business going on in the Ukraine. Paradigm shifting political change always advances on a multitude of fronts: social, economic, political and sometimes through organized violent action.

        • M&S

          And when they become the White Party, what chance will they have of repealing the laws which saw them ‘sit out’ a sufficiently large percentage of elections that they essentially handed over law writing permission to the Democrats?
          Further to this, how will it matter if Globalists and Race Mixers drive both sides of the aisle, so long as when they ‘stage a comeback’ the bureaucracy of the GOP remains the lash of an external agenda?
          What this comes down to is simple: Whites need resources, Social, Material and Financial. We have reached a point where we are evolutionarily different than other peoples and they cannot keep up with us because they have R-Bred to stupidity.
          We can ‘share and share alike’ and accelerate the depletion of global resources to the point where we ALL fall back to entropy. Or we can be selfish and appoint for ourselves a separate destiny which doesn’t require other nations to be like us.
          Contrary to popular belief, whites are better stewards of these resources than the other races. Using less, with a smaller population.
          By 2100, with 14 billion screaming lives on this planet, such will not matter if we are intermingled amongst non-white populations who breed like rabbits.
          Resources from oil to water to food will be fought over by ravening populations, rabid for more, and Capitalism whose success is based on funding inefficiency as a consumer market will no longer function because the resources which power it’s industrial engine will be non-existent, compared to the monumental demand.
          That is the only truth we need to plan for and we can only do so if we set up our own society to exist independently of the other states and populations.

          • Jesse James

            Yes? I think most of us are aware of the long term problem of unsustainable increases in competing global populations exacerbated by resource exhaustion and pollution. I like the vision of independent white nations and city states which is basically a version of European Archeo-futurism. What is clear to me is that you don’t get there from here without first creating an explicitly pro-white political party. Now how to start finding solutions?

            One method is to look at our history and find useful parallels of situations where people have found themselves being ruled by outsiders with hostile agendas. The biggest and most controversial of these is still post WWI Germany. Under the Weimar Republic Germans were tormented by hyper-inflation, communist insurrection strong enough to seize and hold whole cities and regions, economic stagnation, ruinous war reparations, destruction of traditional culture by a hostile socialist counter-culture directed by an alien Jewish and gay ethos, loss of territory, population and resources as a result of the Treaty of Versailles and hostile financial manipulation from the globalist financial power based in London.

            I believe this period in time represents the closest parallel to where we are now. We really must study hard the lessons of the attempt to make Germany for Germans – both what worked and what didn’t. Also it is a stark reminder of what happens if you gamble for your freedom and lose.

          • M&S

            Most people forget that Germany was a regional collective of principalities, almost up to the 20th century.
            Because of the high culture as Herrenvolk who grew up there with a definitive understanding of the Gesselschaft/Gemeinschaft concept of what we would now call a social contract, they were able to do great things, from removal of corporal punishment to provision of the right to vote to compulsory education. They were among the first states to allow the commoners to participate in the judiciate and to severely curtail (through the appointment) the power of the Church.
            That said, they were also kicked around and stomped on by virtually every greater power from the French to the Swedes to the Hapsburgs as Frederick spent much of his life dashing about between his fragmented states trying to keep from losing /too much/ of any give one to any one interested party.
            This continuing up through the early Industrial Period just prior to WWI where the French and British shamelessly stole patents and undercut German colonial interests, wherever they could.
            Such would likely be the endgame for a fragmented white nation in a browned America and losing our women to The Horde would not be something we could get back ‘next campaign season’.
            Guns and Automobiles an Radio Telecomms changes the mindset of sheering sheep to owning the herd and all the land and property it owns. Before someone else beats you to it.
            Whites who had the gift of organization and residual tech leverage would be instant marks for envious exogroups.
            OTOH, if you want to talk about the post 1918 environment, sure! Let’s start with the fact that of the states which Hitler whirlwind toured, none was strong enough, locally, to avoid the fallout of things like Locarno which essentially devaluated the Mark to nothing and turned Germany’s population into a slave manufacturing state, similar to China today.
            This inability to control their own destiny cropped up again, when Hitler did his whistlestop speeches before the maddened crowds as Bormann talked to all the Hohers (mayors) of local municipalities which were effectively at that time independent economic engines, like a combine and brought them onboard what would become the shadow government that stood up Gauleiters across Germany as soon as Hindenburg ‘made it official’.
            Prior to that, with a loaf of bread essentially worth whatever fuel it took to bring baker and flour together from the countryside because paper money was worthless and a barter economy of sorts ruled, the only common folk who owned a damn thing were the Jews whose overwhelming interest in banking and real estate allowed them to sit out the worst of Germany’s depression in the early 20s.
            Since most Americans don’t have the kinds of cash or contacts to functionally exist as an isolate unto themselves that way (and those wealth class individuals who do will undoubtedly become just as unpopular as the German Jews were seen as exploitationally being), what you are doing is arguing for a politicization of a people who will have nothing to offer in the way of purchasable influence.
            By all means, take the Jewish route. But do so out of church so that when you are faced with laws which suddenly start to mandated ‘equivalency of outcome’ from existing, real, property rather than by taxed (worthless) paper money income, there is no wishy washy “But I thought you were our friends!?!?” moment of re-alignment after massive betrayals.
            The only way whites will survive is by dealing exclusively with other whites who feel the same way and the only way that that can be made workable, even as a private database networking system, will be if it occurs completely outside the scope of public knowledge.
            The browns and blacks want to see White Privilege under every tree, rock and bush.
            It’s time Middle Class America gave it to them.
            Through an investment system whose PRIMARY GOAL is to amalgamate properties and businesses in an interlocking hedgehog of restrictive access. By which we purchase back the loyalty of our children.
            Such an action, which sees whites collectivizing under tight bond group associations, will _never_ be functionally endorsed by our present, genocidal, government.
            Ever.
            And thus what we do must be undertaken without ‘political permission’, covertly, as the sole and certain means to ensure we survive /after/ the government collapses.

          • Jesse James

            Just to get down in the weeds a bit, the barter economy is a great place for us to start, not in the least because so many of us already participate in it. Buying or trading for things second hand is great for white independence and community building: 1) Recycles existing goods, 2) Avoids paying money to the globalist corporations who have moved our industrial base and jobs while still expecting us to buy from them, 3) Starves the Beast, 4) Sharpens your bartering/negotiation skills, and 5) Creates a personal network of friends and contacts who have valuable skills and resources.

          • M&S

            Jesse,
            If the U.S. is reduced to a barter economy, we will lose everything. China already exists in a world of 100mbps internet, everywhere in the country, for free. Of Communalist externalism of identity. Of working your behind off for /nothing/ in a sweatshop factory condition and then being expected to take your 75 dollar severance check and board a train to go home to mom and pop’s farm and transition to a dirt under fingernail subsistence agro provider as walking farm implement.
            And still they are ultra-nationalist. Which means that they will take what they think _China_ deserves as displacement for their own lost wealth.
            They recently did a list of ‘top ten things the Chinese People most wanted’ and the kinds of things you saw were:
            Aircraft Carriers
            Atomic Powerplants
            Genetic Research
            Economic Parity
            An Uncoupled RMB
            World Respect
            Those are not the kinds of people who will have any sympathy for a nation that is leaderless, directionless, sinking into entropy and _unable to pay it’s loans_, against which, large tracts of land as Real Property have been traded.
            They will look on us trying to relive the 19th Century from a pseudo Amish perspective and they will laugh at our perverse desire to return to barbarism.
            There are 310 million people in this nation, if the lights went out tomorrow, less than 10% of them would have the brains or the bargainer’s composure to haggle and even if they did, a scrounger’s market would quickly turn supply-side to one of insufficient workproduct decay at which point _everyone_ would indeed compete.
            In the Combat Olympics.
            My biggest hope is that whites will put serious thought into what they want their kids to think of them when they are gone and provide the basis of a lifestyle which is permanent and -attached- to something which has sufficient material value as to be worth fighting for.
            The obvious option here being a house.
            Look at your kid and say: “Okay, maybe he’s not college material. What can I do to secure his life in the coming Trials of man kind?”
            The first thing is to make sure that that kid knows he will be taken care of, “No matter what, you will have a place to stay.”
            And then make it clear that, in exchange for this, you want to have him learn a trade: electrician, plumber, whatever. And go to night class with him. I don’t care if he’s 14 or 25.
            There are not a lot of people who can do that right now, as increasing numbers of us don’t even have homes.
            Which is where the principles of collectivization have to come into play. If ten people work for a year to give one of them the down payment to buy 80% of a mortgage defaulted home for a hundred grand on the basis of a 15,000 dollar a year take home, that’s still 50,000 dollar for food and groceries.
            Which is doable, if you buy at commercial outlets in generic bulk.
            If, in their third year they buy another house on the basis of their existing equity in the first, they can, in four years, have enough money to buy THREE more homes, at much lower down requirements.
            At which point, you sell or rent at reduced rate, two to two more couples who are willing to buy into the scheme.
            And you sell or rent upmarket. To people in the 35-45,000 dollar a year salary range. People right out of college.
            And, after taxes, your lower class couples still have dominant financial control but they now have 70% of their yearly takehome as scalable income.

            In five years you have five homes, two of which are paid off, with 12 couples as working capital income earners.
            If you are smart, at least a few of those people will be older so that, if they pass the mortgage insurance in their name pays off the house to an heir.
            And you just keep scaling from there.
            There is nothing wrong with using money, while it has value, to attain property whose value is innate.
            And our children need, more than anything, to be weaned off this ‘success, success, all or nothing, success!’ trip which modern life instills in them as impossible dreams (White average IQ = 100, not 120)
            Without going the other way towards social welfare dependence which they are already going to be conditioned to, _from 5_ as a function of societal control over their daily lives.
            Once you get past the most basic, biggest, debt incurrences as house and college, everything you accumulate from there is basically only limited by a floor of how much you need to eat and a ceiling of how much you _have the opportunity_ to work.
            And I trust our genes to do their job in providing our children with a work ethic that reflects a reasonably immediate Pay:Reward process. Of doing things for other whites, on a daily basis, which earns them a living wage.
            It’s always the hump of secondary requirements which inhibits building a wealth base. Of brute survivalism. Of finding a place to stay. Many kids these days don’t want that. They see what it cost their parents. They see what it means to the end of a lifestyle they’ve enjoyed as children. And they reject the sudden loss of status as capability to enjoy life. We can either lose those children to rejection and unhappiness. Or we can rescue them from a socialist government that encourages their weakening. And bring them into our cause.
            This too is doable, if you say: “Give me five years, and this house is yours.”
            If you forget the sum of the nation of white people, you forget the army at your back when this country folds and we are alone in the dark with populations both inside and outside our borders, that see their gold opportunity.
            In the property we own. And the fecklessness of our youth.

          • Jesse James

            It all depends on where you live. I went to High School in a South Georgia county that was decent place to live until every single manufacturing plant we had was shut down and moved out of the country or just closed down. Thompson Company (pants), Jockey (underwear), Look Products (aluminum doors and windows), and Brigadier (House Trailers). All that was left was a few farmers and some struggling businesses in the county seat. We finally got a small private prison, after much begging and lobbying. Now unless you are retired or on welfare there isn’t much future.

            My brother moved to a county in North Georgia that is 85% white and mostly rural. I moved up that way to be near him after a time in the Army and another 8 years working in a factory in the Atlanta metro area. What I like about the area where I live is that I am surrounded by people who are mostly skilled tradesmen: carpenters, electricians, plumbers, surveyors, masons, farmers and small business people. Most are practicing Christians and we help each other out. If things ever get really out of hand these are the type of people who will be deputized by the local sheriff and who will defend our homes and families from criminals.

            Barter has always been a way of life in rural areas. Now there is not a damned thing I can do about the fact that a traitorous global elite off shored our industrial manufacturing base to China and other countries. What I can do is invest time and effort making my local community more livable and self sufficient. Every dollar that I manage to avoid spending on crap made by Chinese slave labor is the equivalent to spitting in the eye of the globalist who have done their best to wreck our economy and our independence.

      • Sick of it

        The problem is that so much of the Republican leadership marches lockstep with the Democrats. Again I say this shuts off all avenues for a peaceful resolution.

      • M&S

        Why do you assume that the GOP is not the artificer of policy which favors Amnesty and all the rest?
        What we need more than anything is a system which absolutely forbids all candidates from receiving any but a Federally mandated campaign fund while having to put forward _individual_ not party platforms which they defend in a set number of debates, so that whites can pick candidates based on who we feel their votes are likely to fall.
        Remove GOP, remove campaign funding assistance.
        Tot which I would add that if a candidate is found to be voting against his/her stated campaign positions, they should be challengeable on referendum based on probationary period evaluation and then recall.

        • Luca

          The Democrats have been stabbing us in the back for 50 years now. The GOP has hemmed and hawed and not done enough to curtail the Leftist juggernaut.

          You have to have your priorities straight. Yo have to see who is stabbing you before you go after the guy who didn’t do enough to stop it.

  • Truthseeker

    Do they factor in how many whites lean conservative but are fed up with the Republican establishment which is just liberalism lite? They’d probably show an even bigger divide.

  • WR_the_realist

    The Democrats have long since proven their anti-white positions (just watch their own TV channel, MSNBC, if you need convincing). Now when are Republicans ever going to be pro-white?

    • M&S

      WRTR,
      Politicians are dependent for their psychological sense of well being on being ‘popular’.
      LEADERS do what must be done, for the good of all.
      With this as a given, even considering white elitists only really listen to each other:
      If fifty percent of whites vote democrat and 80% of blacks and Hispanics do, a politician will treat any thought of white racial consciousness as being an act of such extreme risk to their ‘popularity’ as to shun it, whether it is the right thing to do or not.

  • DaveMed

    If the Republicans win the Senate in November, they may actually do something about the border, solidify a White middle-class base, and start to represent us.

    I’m not optimistic about this, but I know one thing: the more control Democrats have, the more non-Whites will flood into the country. Period. And this makes it even harder for us to craft the type of society so many of us wish for.

    • I agree. We absolutely must, without fail, win the Senate and the Presidency. If we don’t, I really think we’ve lost and have to start seriously considering “radical” plan Bs, like secession or moving to some other country (but I don’t know where that would be…).

    • M&S

      Done it before did they? In all the years since Hart Celler?

      Number of Senate Democrats who voted for/against the 1965 Act: 52:14. 27% against.
      Number of Republicans who voted for/against the Act: 24:3 12% against.

      Number of House Democrats who voted for/against the 1965 Act: 202:60. 29% against.

      Number of Republicans: 117:10. 8% against.

      Who signed in Amnesty?

      Who was in the White House when Amnesty-1 was nearly sneak-thieved in?

      Republicans. Every time.

  • Max

    They forgot : “Limp-wristed, guilt-ridden, union and disloyal, sycophantic whites remain solidly Democrat”.

  • Jesse James

    Give us another twenty years on this trajectory of white displacement, racial spoils wealth redistribution and destruction of our quality of life and any white who dares drive around with a Democratic bumper sticker will have their windshields bashed in by other whites.

    • Max

      A couple more decades on the present trajectory and the event you describe will result in a federal “Political Hate-Crime” death penalty.

      • Jesse James

        Max I don’t think we are going to “middle class nice” out of this problem. If we are pushed enough and have less and less to lose then we will have no choice but to adjust our political practices.

        • Max

          I agree. I just have a sinking feeling about the future. WE will be the Jews of the progressive thousand-year reich.

          • IstvanIN

            Actually we will be the Afrikaners of the next thousand years.

          • Jesse James

            I don’t know maybe I am just grooving too much on this fruit juice I’m drinking tonight but I am more optimistic about the future. Though just in case you are right we must all remember one thing and pledge to each other to NEVER voluntarily or peacefully give up our right to bear arms. The farm murders in S. Africa only started to get out of hand after the new Rainbow government disbanded the local militia response groups and disarmed the whites. This must be our line in the sand as it is the only thing that keeps the savages from running wild worse than they already are now. We must stay armed, this must be our first principle.

          • SoulInvictus

            That must be some exceptionally good “fruit juice”. 😉

          • You mean the next hundred years.

  • JohnEngelman

    Low income white Republicans vote for economic policies that will not benefit them, and will probably hurt them. They do not benefit from tax cuts for the rich. Since 1980 they should have learned that.

    • Max

      Well, you see that is one of the differences in the philosophies. Everything for Repuplican voters doesn’t revolve around gibsmedats.

    • MikeofAges

      Mr. Engleman, you are about as morally tone deaf as a human being can be.

      • JohnEngelman

        How do tax cuts for the rich benefit the white working poor?

        • Martel

          How do tax hikes benefit the working poor?

          Will the democrats save the white working poor like they saved the black community?

          Like they have saved the inhabitants of the ten poorest cities in the USA?

          • JohnEngelman

            Answer my question before I answer yours. That question once again: how do tax cuts for the rich benefit the working poor?

          • Martel

            It is similar for me to ask how supporting democrat welfare-policies benefits the white working poor, its nonsensical. Furthermore, your question was aimed at Mike who may answer for himself, I simply started a new discussion.

          • MikeofAges

            A coherent tax system might reduce social discord. Having excessive rates and then giving people ways to get out of paying them is not coherent.

            What I support is a mandatory income tax. You play, you pay. That means, you make a certain amount, you pay a certain amount. No deduction, no exemptions. Excessive rate cannot be part of a mandatory tax system. As far as I am concerned, anything above around 30 percent on very high incomes is confiscatory. I do not have a high income either.

            “You play, you pay” is the world ordinary people live in as far as taxation is concerned. High income earners should have it the same. But not at a
            confiscatory rate.

            But tax rates are not the biggest issue. You seem to think that people should sell out everything else for a lower tax bill. People today more and more vote their values. Figure it out.

          • JohnEngelman

            Since 1980 Christian conservatives have been an important Republican constituency. Republican electoral victories have depended on the support of the religious right. Nevertheless, the GOP has not advanced the values of the religious right. It has not really tried.

          • MikeofAges

            People get tired of trying to chase you around as you constantly change the subject. The Christian right is not the only constituency of “values voters”. They are not a majority even of the Republican Party and never will be. Politics is the art of the possible. Some constituencies do not understand that, that is true. Left and right, there are those who think they are an incipient majority when they clearly are a social minority, sometimes an outright fringe.

          • JohnEngelman

            In one area I do appreciate what the GOP has done. Since 1980 the prison population has tripled. The crime rate has declined by one third.

            Name another “values” constituency, and explain how the Republican Party has advanced their concerns.

          • MikeofAges

            Politics work on a primitive level. It is about “rewarding your friends and punishing your enemies”. That’s not from me. That’s from The Republic of Plato, where some of the persons of the dialogue discuss what they think the concept of justice means.

            The Republican Party, even though it has failed to promote a nationalist agenda, has helped its “values constituencies” to the extent that it has thwarted the efforts of the other party to dictate to working class and lower middle class voter particularly what their issues are supposed to be. People do not want to be told that their major interests are supposed be getting a tiny tax cut, experiencing the vicarious enjoyment of seeing the rich get soaked, and having more means-tested social benefits meted out to them.

            You may think you are following the Socratic method, but all you are doing is being discursive and trying to avoid meeting the same standards of accountability you want to hold others too in these discussions.

            For starters, why don’t you go back my observations on what might constitute a coherent tax system and give us your spin on the topic, including the idea of confiscatory taxation.

    • Martel

      Republican policies may not benefit everyone, but democrat policies hurt all. The ten poorest cities in the US are democrat enclaves, and have been for decades.

      • JohnEngelman

        Most cities are Democrat, including rich cities like San Francisco and New York.

        • Martel

          New York had Republican mayors(Guilliani/Bloomberg), then a independent mayor(bloomberg), and now an incompetent Marxist buffoon with ties to shady black nationalists and loony leftists. The ten poorest cities in the US actually have elected democrats as mayors non stop.

    • For however long you’ve been here, you should have learnt by now that nationalists are emotional and compassionate people, which means you are a stranger among them.

    • Luca

      You forgot the part about Jews and Orientals having higher IQ’s.

      • Jotun Hunter

        wait… the SAT’s ….the patents… and the coup de grace: the identical same J. Taylor quote admiring asian IQ that he’s posted about 10k times now. His message is —- just breaking through!

    • Geo1metric

      This site is about White advocacy.

      • JohnEngelman

        What attracts me to this site is race realism. That is the belief that race is an important biological classification, that the different races differ in average ability levels and behavior, and that these differences are genetic, and caused by evolving in response to different population pressures.

      • JohnEngelman

        How have white blue collar workers benefited from tax cuts for the rich?

  • JSS

    Voting Republican won’t solve anything at all. How can anyone honestly think this system can be reformed? The idea of a 3rd party is appealing but if one made any significant progress it would be banned and it’s leaders imprisoned like Golden Dawn. So unless eventually going underground were part of the plane we need to realize simply voting in a rigged anti White circus wont save us.

    • Hal K

      It is better to vote for a pro-white candidate than to stay home. We need to find a way to get the message to the white conservative elite that white identity politics is the future of conservatism, and race-neutral ideologies got us to where we are now, which is not a good place.

      • willbest

        I think you have to go back to Goldwater for a pro white candidate. The GOP is just generally speaking not openly hostile to whites.

  • Alexandra1973

    As if there’s a real difference between R and D anymore.

    • Jesse James

      No but we have a need for there to be a difference between the parties.

      • With all due respect, what is your plan? Ask them to change? Ask them really really nicely? They’re bought-and-paid-for whores. They are owned by the same globalist interests as their Democrat fellow travelers. Not only is there no difference, but there can’t be a difference, because they serve the same masters.

        We need a reset if we want to see things change. Funneling more White energy into propping up the GOP is madness or worse.

        • Martel

          The data on Republican vs Democrat votes on amnesty show the GOP still serves a purpose. The plan is to organize nationally as whites, and ensuring America is not overrun by mexican illegals by simply casting a vote for Repubs and supporting initiatives like NumbersUSA.

          Apathy isn’t a virtue.

          • Hal K

            The US is already being overrun by Third Worlders, and the GOP allowed it to happen. Blocking amnesty won’t save anything. The important thing now is to change the culture so white identity politics can get into the mainstream. Pro-white people need to find explicitly pro-white parties and candidates to vote for. If that helps the GOP collapse sooner rather than later, then all the better.

          • Martel

            It will save something, it will make sure you have a significant portion of US population instead of an irrelevant portion. You can organize pro-white parties while supporting the fight against amnesty.

          • Nor is apathy the only other option besides electing more of the same old, same old.

          • Martel

            True, but in the meantime, Amnesty may completely destroy a white future. You need numbers on your side regardless of what political activities you support to protect whites. Demographics is always the number one factor.

          • They will get their amnesty either by law or de facto through refusing to enforce our existing or future immigration and border control laws. Begging the fox to keep the wolf out of the henhouse is weak and self-defeating. It only encourages both predators to collaborate.

            I agree that demography is destiny. But demography can be changed, and quickly. All that is really needed is the will to do it.

          • Martel

            I find your position to be self-defeating, there is no strategic value in not discouraging amnesty amongst republicans and through initiatives such as numbersusa. Your distaste for repubs clouds your vision, people like Soros win because they assist whatever party may support them, as should we.. Repubs tend to vote against amnesty, there is absolutely no reason to not convince them they should continue to do so to maintain their votes, regardless if you actually vote for them.

          • My distaste is for a fraudulent electoral process that is clearly designed to maintain the status quo while giving the illusion of popular control. I do not see even a single difference between the two controlling parties, in practice, though some of their candidates pretend to be enemies and of course they do have different names. Realistically, whoever is installed will keep working to destroy the West and further disenfranchise Whites in the countries their ancestors built for them. You’re free to keep cooperating with Leviathan but I maintain that not only is it a waste of your valuable time and efforts, but it’s collectively harming the rest of us because it lends legitimacy to a system that is clearly illegitimate, corrupted, and entirely controlled by hostile, alien elites.

            There is no difference. I could pull that voting lever blindly every time and still predict with complete accuracy that whoever wins, we lose.

          • Martel

            I don’t cooperate, I push them in the right direction while promoting the notion that whites should become more indepedent from the political process. If Republicans are inclined to vote against Amnesty, its essential to convince them to keep doing so.

        • Jesse James

          Stop voting for them then. My point is that either the Republicans will start explicitly promoting white interests or they will cease to exist. There is no other option for them. I believe once they try everything else and see their white base abandon them to just sit out elections they will have to make a radical change in direction or they will cease to exist as a national party leaving room for a new pro-white party to emerge. There are still too many of us whites, we won’t go without some better form of political representation forever. It just seems that way now because things are still too relatively normal. As the economy gets worse and if the government continues to treat us as third class citizens more and more whites will abandon the system until someone starts to actually represent us. Just read history, anyone’s history. Political representation abhors a vacuum.

          • Republicans ceasing to exist would be the best thing that could happen to our people. Well, maybe not the best, but good. Better yet, we need the GOP to concede total defeat and openly merge with the Democrats. They already promote nearly identical platforms so why not?

            The sooner we destroy the illusion of a two-party state, the better. And it couldn’t happen to a more deserving passel of traitorous swine.

        • SoulInvictus

          “They’re bought-and-paid-for whores.”

          The mouth on you, I like it. 🙂

          • Jotun Hunter

            there’s nothing like a spirited woman

          • Geo1metric

            Is that gorgeous lass a Frazetta?

          • Jotun Hunter

            don’t think so – not sure the artist – one of those 70’s fantasist masters

          • Max

            Those black gals in Mc Donald’s whose Mc Nuggets are taking too long have a misdemeanor to felony amount of spirit.

          • Jotun Hunter

            spirited white girls I should say

          • Yes, please forgive the vulgarity but “prostitute” sounded way too charitable.

  • MikeofAges

    If people classified as white by the Commerce Department, and presumably the pollsters, who were not of European descent moved into the erroneously named non-white category, the number would be even more stark. The mainstream media, of course, is going to attribute this spread to the Republican Party’s alienation of minority voters. More likely, minority voters have made the autonomous decision to vote as a bloc. If minority voters did not themselves seek the balance of power by playing the game of racial politics, the electorate might coalesce around other issues. As is it, whites at present have little choice but to either acquiesce or vote their color.

    A little known fact is, outside of New England and the Pacific Northwest, the Obama-Biden ticket did not carry the white vote in any state. Even in the much-vaunted blue-state bastions of New York, Illinois and California, 52 percent of whites voted Republican. That total might include people classified as white who are not of European descent, notably South Asian nationalities.

  • Johnny Clay

    One problem with Republicans is that too many either sit home or vote third party if the candidate they supported in the primaries doesn’t get the nomination. This is how Obama won re-election. The Democrats always rally around their nominee, no matter who it is. Republicans have mastered the fine art of cutting their own throats.

  • borogirl54

    What has fascinated me is that many blacks actually support the same social issues as the Republicans do but they will not vote Republican because Republican is considered a dirty word among them but the Republicans were actually more sympathtetic to civil rights than th Southern Democrats were.

    • benvad

      That was our problem! Guilt followed by compassion resulting in altruism equals our downfall.

    • IstvanIN

      The only social issue that blacks are “conservative” on is what, being against gay marriage? Every other social issue they are either hypocrites on or the primary reason we even need to have major public discussions about, like illegitimacy, crime, stupidity, sloth, etc..

    • dd121

      I’ve heard the same argument said of Mexicans. They’re all social conservatives chompin’ at the bit to vote Republican. That’s either wishful thinking or deliberate propaganda meant to get our guard down.

  • benvad

    Got to start reproducing like the FLDS dudes. We ought to follow the Sister Wives model from Kody Brown.

    That form of Mormonism allows booze, coffee and multiple wives. Frankly, I don’t see the downside of that arrangement. Lots of kids, good for the country.

    • IstvanIN

      Polygamy? Doesn’t sit quite right with me, and I am sure a lot of other Americans. Too much like multiple baby mammas. And don’t they drive off the adult male children because the old goats wants multiple women? And what happens when the population becomes too inter-related (half brothers and sisters everywhere), I’ll tell you what: devolution. Which is probably why blacks are regressing so quickly in this country: they’re all related.

      • r j p

        FLDS wives are almost all on welfare as there is only one official wife.
        Elders drive the young males from the village to remove competition.
        Not a good model for a healthy society.

  • Northerner

    More Whites may be voting for the GOP overall, but unless the – vast majority – do, we won’t see a Republican President for a while.

    • D.B. Cooper

      Like a republican president really matters? Look at what both Bushes have done. Were they really any different from Clinton and Obama? for the past 25 years, I saw one illegal alien after the other enter this country literally by the minute, and economic refugees granted asylum by the minute. Affirmative Action gets worse each year, and the GOP’s solution was McCain and Romney?
      No thanks. I’m voting democrat from now on because I want to hurry up and get it done with. The earlier it all crashes and burns, the easier it will be to clean up the mess.

  • PROUD TO BE WHITE

    What does one have to do to get you people to wake up? Resurrect
    the great William Luther Pierce or Revilo Oliver or George Lincoln Rockwell. It
    does not matter which side of politics is in power they still obey without
    question the dictates of their key Jewish masters who own and control the world’s
    money and most of the world’s mass media. Look at the billions in foreign aid
    going to Israel. Why? Israel as many of you should know was behind the Lavon
    Affair and the attack on the USS Liberty, and there is strong evidence
    implicating Israel in the 2001 attack on the World Trade Centre. In other words
    your friends (parasites) in the middle-east, “poor and innocent” little Israel
    has committed terrorist attacks against the USA. They spit in your face and you
    call it rain. The founding fathers of the USA are indeed “turning over” in
    their graves. Israel’s interests are not the USA’s interests – they are Israel’s
    and Israel’s only. Their fellow tribes men in the USA are responsible for all
    the woes now afflicting America – mass immigration, destruction of schools and
    universities, destruction of our European identity, gay marriage, gay agenda,
    libertarian madness and other sociological abominations – you name it and they
    are behind it. So forget about the Republicans coming to your aid. They are
    just as diligent in licking Jewish anus as the Democrats. When you wake up to
    this fact American can be returned to the people who created it – people of
    European descent.

  • Alpin Thueson

    I remember the banned SNL skit depicting George Soros (born Schwartz) as the ‘Owner’ of the Democratic Party.

  • MekongDelta69

    And non-whites remain solidly Democratic

    Shocker – Gibsmedat

  • The hidden story here is that non-whites favor democrat politicians because democrat politicians buy votes via a slew of free stuff such as Obamaphones, free food, etc. You just can’t beat FREE!

  • Geo1metric

    This web site is about White advocacy.

  • MikeofAges

    The tax system already is progressive enough. The top rate is a hair short of 40 percent. If you eliminated deductions and exemptions, the rates would have be lowered, not rates. Apart from the income tax, the American tax system is extremely regressive. There should be no federal income tax whatsoever on the first $35,000.