Sotomayor: ‘I’m Very Optimistic About The Power of Minorities . . .’

Truth Revolt, March 10, 2014

On Monday, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor stated that she believed that women and minorities had to crash the halls of power in order to “change the dialogue in this country.” She said that “money” was the obstacle to women and minorities having a say in government, adding, “we’re going to have to work the political system at the highest level.”

Sotomayor was speaking at the University of Washington, pushing her book, My Beloved Life. A student questioned if she was optimistic about the future of the country. She stated, “I’m very optimistic about the power of minorities to change the dialogue in this country.”

{snip}

Topics: , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • MekongDelta69

    More babbling from another “perpetually oppressed minority victim.”

    NoBama is a dictator and he has put into place a regime which says that if you are a straight, white, conservative, male, who is a legal American citizen/Vet, you are the ‘evil villain.’

    Half of SCOTUS is a complete travesty…

  • DaveMed

    in order to “change the dialogue in this country.”

    ________________________________________________________

    “Dialogue” is an inappropriate word, as it implies 2 (or more) parties involved in the discussion.

    The reality is that the only voice that reverberates through every aspect of American (and European) society (and, indeed, the only one allowed) is that of the anti-Whites. And if Whites could be honest about their feelings without fear of punishment, I’m not sure that dominant voice would really reflect the true vox populi.

  • Whitetrashgang

    WT doesn’t even have a say in his own government, why doesn’t she just s#@ in a upside outhouse for practice.

  • r j p

    Sotomayor shouldn’t be teaching law at a third tier law school, let alone be on SCOTUS.

    • Dr. X

      Sotomayor is not, strictly speaking, a “judge” or a lawyer working within our Constitutional framework. Sotomayor is a radical Latina activist whose goal is to destroy the Constitutional framework created by evil, heterosexual white males and impose the yoke of brown and black socialism upon what remains of productive white society.
      It absolutely terrifies me that our precious Second Amendment rights are very likely in the hands of this woman. The day is coming when we will have to literally fight to preserve our rights…

  • D.B. Cooper

    And not ONE white republican has even considered trying to get this thing removed from office.
    The GOP knew good and well back in 2008, there might be two Supreme Court vacancies.
    No opposition from the political party I now want dismantled.

    • Very true! The fact that the Republicans in Congress did little or next to nothing to oppose the two latest seats in the Supreme Court illustrates clearly how they have abandoned the majority base of their party!

      Why any genuine conservative would even want to be part of the contemporary GOP is beyond me! How much more do they need to betray us before we realize that they’re nothing more than a bunch of traitors?

      • ejXinMI

        As Bushy presided, I spat nails… then prayed the GOP would be outlawed. Traitors– the lot of them. I never imagined our country would choose to continue self-destruction. Boy was I wrong.

  • Tim_in_Indiana

    Minorities have the power to “change the dialogue in this country.”

    We know what that means! And minorities will also have the power to change the concerns, the priorities, and indeed, everything that America formerly stood for.

    Is anyone dumb enough not to be able to read between the lines here and know what this woman is really saying??

    • IstvanIN

      Kill YT?

    • Groovy

      Amoung other things it is saying “Amnesty now for minorities so they can change the dialogue in this country”

    • She is pedaling anti-Whiteness.

    • Right on! “Changing the dialogue in this country” is liberal code-word for ‘We’re gonna change the way Americans think about this nation, its founding, and what we believe and stand for.’ This isn’t about a “dialogue,” it’s about a Leftist monologue, a one-way communication of telling whites how to think and act.

  • IstvanIN

    The only change she wants is for this entire country to be one, gigantic Puerto Rico-like failure of a nation from coast to coast.

    • Einsatzgrenadier

      And when that happens, we’ll all be “equal”, which is exactly what the liberal extremists want. They can’t bring the 3rd world up to 1st world standards, so they might as well destroy the 1st world by flooding it with massive 3rd world immigration.

  • David Ashton

    What does the Nordic Episcopalian think (sic) about the implications of this statement at government level?

  • Puggg

    She loves minorities so much.

    Why doesn’t she go back to her Puerto Rico, an island full of her people? All minorities.

    She might enjoy life on food stamps.

  • Pro_Whitey

    Change the dialogue? Right, by screaming like a bunch of howler monkeys and drowning out thought and debate. No thanks.

  • Rhialto

    There was a time that judges tried to create the impression of being above politics, and only concerned with impartial adjudication. They did not give politicalized speeches. That time is long gone.

    By the way, WTF does “change the dialogue of this country” mean in normal English?

    • By the way, WTF does “change the dialogue of this country” mean in normal English?
      ________________________
      It means you and I have to shut up. Libspeak is easy. Every trite phrase means shut up if you don’t agree with me.

  • Evil woman. No one would pay her any attention if she hadn’t been given an AA slot in college, an AA law degree, an AA seat on the bench, and an AA SCOTUS seat. Now she wants every job, every position, filled with AA incompetent scum such as herself. Evil woman.

    • D.B. Cooper

      If you want to get rid of it, the first obstacle involves getting rid of greater threats:

      • Alexandra1973

        Dude, I’m tired of seeing that guy’s picture. The eyes creep me out!

        • IstvanIN

          They eyes do cut right through you. But it is the “prissy” smile that creeps me out.

          • D.B. Cooper

            I want everyone to be reminded of the personification of the GOP’s problems. I did, however, manage to find a more fitting picture of the man with no brain.

          • bilderbuster

            Does anyone remember that creepy Hale Bop cult, comet couple where everyone in it committed suicide wearing Nike sneekers?
            He looks related to them.

    • shmo123

      I realize life isn’t fair, but it really gets me that this woman sits on the Supreme Court. I can only imagine some of the brilliant legal minds–who could run circles around this woman intellectually–whose resumes were tossed aside in favor of this AA pick.

    • Yeah, but she’s such a ‘wise Latina’!

  • Spartacus

    I’m very optimistic about the power of White men to exterminate you and all the other worthless mongrels . But first they need to wake the (%&*$ up …

  • rentslave

    The next Republican President and Congress must expand the number sitting on the Court to that of a grand jury to negate Obama’s judges.

    • Bartek

      Probably the next corporate boy will just hire on some more non-Whites to sell the ‘brand’ to the up and coming demographic.
      Get over it, the “USA” is the walking dead.
      Whites need to look beyond this train wreck to a better, separate, future.

  • Alexandra1973

    She needs to brush up on her English. That’s MONOlogue. That’s where they talk, we listen or we’re eeevil racists.

  • Truthseeker

    We talk in terms of the majority and “minorities” all the time. The only thing holding these “minorities” together is that they aren’t white, and therefore feel opposed to whites on some level. If whites were no longer the majority, do you think suddenly the other “minorities” would welcome whites into their coalition and start fighting whichever group was the new majority? Somehow I doubt it. They’ve seen us as adversaries too long to acknowledge us as real people with particular interests.

    • LHathaway

      They are more obsessed with ‘changing the dialog’ the greater the place is non-white. In places like ‘Detroit’ they have the same ‘tolerance’ mission statements, and ever where there are no white at all, none, it’s about doing more for, hiring for, and respecting more people of color. lol, in my local paper the editorial recently included ‘women’ in that group which much do more for and respect, ‘people of color and women’. I suppose that’s a change in direction where before it became less and less about ‘women and people of color’ and more and more about just people of color. Perhaps the ship ‘monologue’ has began a change in direction.

  • JSS

    The only power “minorities” have in the western world is that which Whites surrender with out a fight. On their own they can’t even run water.

    • Bartek

      We know what that says about the Browns and Blacks, but what does that say about the Whites?

      • Sheik Yerbouti

        That they wait far too long for things to get way out of hand before reacting.

  • dave

    If Antonin Scalia said those same words,all hell would break lose in the media. He would be called a racist, white supremist and other names. Since it’s a hispanic female,all is ok. The double standard is sickening

  • Frank_DeScushin

    I don’t have much confidence in a Supreme Court Justice whose optimism isn’t grounded in reality.

  • Bon, From the Land of Babble

    Wow. Now I understand why Lindsay Graham and Juan McCain voted for this fair, impartial, highly qualified legal expert with a brilliant mind to sit on the highest court in the land.

    John Lott writes:

    “Not even Democrats were particularly impressed with Sotomayor…In May 2009, Harvard Law Professor Laurence Tribe wrote Obama: ‘Bluntly put, [Sotomayor is] not nearly as smart as she seems to think she is.’”

    But this is Amerikka 2014 where identity politics trumps all: it is FAR more important to have lesbians and “wise latinas” on SCOTUS than it is to have qualified jurists.

    • BillMillerTime

      That Elena Kagan is a lesbian isn’t the problem. At least it’s not a problem for me since I believe that no one picks the direction that his (or her) weather vane points. The fact that Kagan is deep in the closet about it says something. She can’t level with the American people about who she really is. And of course her totalitarian left-wing ideology is a huge problem also.

  • Nancy Thomas

    More hate from the unwise latina.

  • thomas edward

    Sad – such a poor excuse for a woman…

    • Bartek

      Even Kagan needs someone to love. Guess there really is somebody for everybody.

  • John K

    Oh, I’ll bet that hag is optimistic, because right now it looks like they’ll take over the country. I, however, am optimistic that Southern whites will take back the South and send these “minorities” up north to live with the northern whites who’ve championed their cause for so long.

    • RisingReich

      You have an inability to see many Whites in the North are diametrically opposed to dark skins, obviously.

      You should qualify your statement to call out New England. Northern Westerners are suffering just as much as Southerners are.

      • Bartek

        Whites in the North who aren’t Yankees probably should go back to Europe. We aren’t to blame for the East Coast idiocracy.
        Our lives would be better spent defending our ancestral homes than worrying about this lost territory.

      • John K

        “The North” I am talking about is the northeast panhandle extending to Michigan & Wisconsin; basically the north of the Civil War, or the war of northern aggression. This country would be far better off if Southerners were in control.

        These northerners I’m talking about have been looking down their noses at Southerners for too long, and they are largely to blame for what the darkies and other non-whites are doing to to the country.

  • DudeWheresMyCountry?

    Evil person alert. She isn’t acting like a Supreme Court Justice, her small mind is having her act as an anti-White community organizer. I wonder where she got that. Separation or civil war, either sounds better than more of this mongrel.

  • A Freespeechzone

    Make NO mistake that Sotomayor and her ilk support retribution and ‘payback’ against the majority and will use the court to make it so.

    They expect us to be complacent and ‘take it’.

    I won’t.

  • DieWulfe

    Thought Supreme Court justices represented everyone. I must be delusional to think that.

  • I have nothing against women in power. Let them take cushy jobs, get popcorn, and watch them. Marissa Mayer was given a top job in Yahoo, a job to save a company that can’t be saved. Sheryl Sandberg was given a job as Facebook’s CEO and Mark Z is still making all decisions. Looks like Sheryl is just at Facebook to promote her feminist ideology. I’m waiting to see how Microsoft will fail in the next 5 to 10 years.

  • Bartek

    I’m very optimistic about the power of a few grains of powder to keep what I have.
    More and more, it looks like the people in Crimea have the right idea.

  • Bartek

    The Court reflect the society. Its just one big joke.

    • William_JD

      No, it doesn’t. It reflects the apparatus of public opinion formation.

  • TXCriollo

    Well with the recession and the drop in minority birthrates more women seeing feminism is a load if crap shes gonna eat those words

  • Evette Coutier

    Before we all pat ourselves on the back for being white, the reality is the minorities are winning. The parasite is killing its host.

    • William_JD

      Whites are a minority.

  • ViktorNN

    She’s hispanic – of course she wants her people to have more power, and getting more power will have to come at the expense of white people.

    If you’re white then this kind of rhetoric should be alarming, even if is expected.

    Of course suicidally retarded white liberals applaud this kind of language coming from their minority pets. They’re so wrapped up in making sure that they look morally superior to conservative whites that they’re willing to sell out their own white children.

    • William_JD

      Don’t give me this “Hispanic” crap. There is no “Hispanic” people that could want or obtain more power.

      • ViktorNN

        If you know better, then by all means enlighten us.

      • itdoesnotmatter

        I think a mixture of European, African and West Indian, with family originally from Puerto Rico, though [I think] she was raised in N.Y. She self-identifies as “latino.”

  • Who Me?

    “women and minorities had to crash the halls of power” and “we’re going to have to work the political system” So says a person who has at least two AA votes, being both a woman and a minority (is she a lesbian too? or is that the other one?) At least she’s true to her roots, they are all experts at crashing things and working the system

  • itdoesnotmatter

    What is so frightening is her judicial power over Whites. A position she should never been awarded, given the blatantly race biased comment elevating herself to an enrichment of the Supreme Court as a “wise Latina.” She is not wise; her judgement is poor, yet she sits on the highest court in the land.
    But then, this administration is all about license to fearlessly utter anti-White comments, further, to enact violence against us with minimal retribution.
    I want out.

  • PouponMarks

    She was chosen because her brain is like a railroad; it can only go in one direction regardless of new facts, evidence, or information. She is very likely the least qualified candidate ever to be chosen and confirmed to the Soupcream Groat. Reliable as a robot, she will be forever beholden to her cognitive programers and system administrators.

  • LHathaway

    So. . .50 years of blaming all problems in world history, not just all problems in the united states, but all problems in any part of the globe, past, present and on into the future. . . blaming these all on white men. . . this is a ‘dialoge’ that needs changed, presumably in favor of blaming white men even more. . . presumably this is the kind of dialog she is hoping for. She’s probably not concerned about a dialoge discussing how every public and private institution in the nation, pre-school to nursing care, openly ‘prefers’ everyone but these same white heterosexual men, as do apparently, most of the women in their personal relationships. I guess that’s a dialog that has gone on too long for her already.

  • ricpic

    Most…well, many are awake. But they also have much to lose. There will have to be a precipitating event before whites reassert themselves or breakaway and form their own nation. And that precipitating event can only be economic. There will have to be an economic implosion so severe that there won’t be anything left to lose. Then and only then will whites act. It is a sad fact that until the pain is very intense most people learn to live with anything. In the case of whites being the host to parasites intent on killing the host is not yet enough to spur action.