Conservatives Fear Discrimination Against Whites

Francis Wilkinson, Bloomberg View, March 21, 2014

“They don’t know what’s coming.” That’s what Republican pollster Bill McInturff told the Wall Street Journal this week about the demographic wave threatening to swamp his party. McInturff is enormously respected–indeed, one of the most highly regarded pollsters in U.S. politics. But in this particular instance, he’s wrong. They do know it’s coming. In fact, many think it’s already here.

In June and July, Latino Decisions conducted a national poll for the Center for American Progress and PolicyLink. The poll’s sample was especially large–2,943 adults, including 1,319 non-Hispanic whites. In one question, respondents were asked to give their “best guess” about the percentage of racial and ethnic minorities in the U.S. population.

Every racial group overestimated the size of the nonwhite population, which in reality is about 37 percent. “Asians had the most accurate estimates,” the survey report stated, “with respondents estimating an average of 43 percent–followed by whites with an average of 48 percent, Latinos with an average of 50 percent, and African Americans with an average of 53 percent.”

It’s pretty amazing that blacks, on average, think they are currently living in a nation with a nonwhite majority. {snip}

On average, whites overestimated the nation’s minority population by 11 percentage points. Digging a little deeper, the poll showed that 59 percent of conservatives estimated the minority population at 41 percent or higher, with 33 percent of conservatives believing nonwhites account for more than half of the U.S. population, a demographic milestone that is still decades away.

Keep that figure in mind as you consider this result from the same poll report: “Sixty-one percent of white conservatives and 56 percent of whites ages 65 or older agree that discrimination against whites will increase due to rising diversity.”

{snip}

Great, so who’s ready to have that conversation about how Republicans have to pass immigration reform legalizing 11 million more brown people?

Boehner? . . . Boehner? . . . Boehner?

This is the immigration vice in which Republicans find themselves. Through the birth of the Tea Party to Obama phones and Obamacare, fear of losing out to the “47 percent” has pervaded and largely defined conservative politics since President Barack Obama’s 2008 election. Much of the conservative base views demographic change as zero sum, with whites on the losing end.

{snip}

From outside the conservative bubble, the Republicans’ Caucasian march into a multiracial century looks like political malpractice–terminal short-sightedness or possibly the onset of madness. But resistance is deeply rooted in conservatism. It’s clear from House Speaker John Boehner’s repeated efforts to bring up immigration reform that he desperately wants to clear the party’s path to the future. Trouble is, that future is the stuff of conservative nightmares.

Topics: , ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Luca

    It is impossible to underestimate the threat of a “minority” majority and the effects it will have on our children and grandchildren

    • Michael Mason

      America is going to turn into Brazil, where whites live in gated communities protected from a crime-ridden mulatto jungle. And it’s not going to be a smooth transition by any standard.

      • So CAL Snowman

        We’re already there.

        • Michael Mason

          In some states.

        • NM156

          Not quite yet. Traveling outside of big metro areas to all-white or nearly all-white cities is like traveling to a parallel universe or another bubble in the multiverse in which 1965 never happened, where you don’t have to obsess about what might happen to your car or instantly assess every stranger coming toward you on the street or in a parking lot. No psychological filters are necessary to address strangers in white cities and towns before speaking. It’s a relief.

          • Nandarani

            I am increasingly aware of the reality in Hawaii, where I have been in quite a while. It is actually a slow building stress. I feel it particularly where I work, in the Department of Education, which is emphatically Japanese. Watching the mainland very closely from here and considering carefully where to land when I do return there. The fact is that when there is a multitude of races all bunched together everyone is less trusting- even I read, within races of each other, according to some research.

          • PvtCharlieSlate

            Amen and Amen and Amen.
            I have experienced just exactly what you have described. I have lived in Fairfield County, CT all my life except for college and the Army and now I’m getting ready to retire and move far away to someplace where it’s still American. I have visited northern Idaho (and some other places) over the past few years just to check things out on the ground. One day in ID I was sitting on park bench looking out over the lake when a (white) college age male just walked up to me and said “Could I borrow your cell phone?”. My immediate and instinctive gut reaction was sort of “Shields up! Red alert!” and “Who’s behind me?”. I was about to tell the kid to F**k off when I reminded my self they I wasn’t in CT and just said “Sure, no problem” and handed him my phone. He called his girl friend and told her that he at park waiting for her and then handed the phone back and thanked me. Be and I talked cor a few more minutes and then went our sepsrate ways. That experience left me actually stunned and it was nothing more than a polite, civilized exchange between two strangers.

          • Jesse James

            Just one small bit of civility but a powerfully poignant reminder of how much we have already lost. Multiply this one small act by a million and you start to understand the high cost of multi-culturalism.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            A poignant reminder indeed. White Southerners who visited or lived in the North prior to the Post-War Negro influx were accustomed to such experiences. One could have such an experience in Chicago or Milwaukee prior to the Negro influx.

          • Nevsky

            I share your frustrations in regards to Fairfield County. It sometimes feels like a powderkeg waiting to go off.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Funny you should say. A friend of mine worked for Sikorsky Aircraft. He said the carjackings got so bad at one point that Bridgeport and neighboring police departments instructed commuters to roll through stop signs instead of stopping and risking being carjacked.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            Excellent story Private Charlie. The key issue here is race, and Blacks and Mestizoes with their constant violence and always trying to “pull a fast one” on an unsuspecting victim. Negroes are a predatorial, reptilian race. They are barbarians who lack basic decency.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            I’ve had similar culture shocks over the years doing field service (I was just doing some automation field service calls in Danbury, CT the other week, BTW).
            Whenever I would travel west or south from New England I would be taken aback by a stranger striking up a conversation–then reminding myself that I wasn’t in New England and I wasn’t around those anal retentive butt squeakers any more.

          • newscomments70

            I don’t think that a sensible black person would ask to borrow a cell phone from anyone of any race. No one trusts them, collectively speaking.

          • I’ve only ever ‘trusted’ one black person. He is of an older generation, a hospital doctor, and more intelligent that average Blacks. He also resides in a non-Black area, of course, so that his family can live in peace.

          • newscomments70

            I trust my black neighbor and his family. We borrow books from each other, believe it or not. They escaped an urban jungle and have many of the same opinions we do. Furthermore, they work very hard. I have a much higher opinion of them than the drug users and homeless that live nearby.

          • Garrett Brown

            You’ll be dead soon with that thinking.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Are you behaving yourself?

          • Garrett Brown

            Got a second job, I’ve been exhausted. I miss my daily Amren.

          • newscomments70

            I realize this is the exception and not the rule. The rest of my comments make David Duke seem liberal.

          • bilderbuster

            I had a Black punk ask if he could use mine once.
            He wasn’t happy with my unpleasant response to his moronic request.

          • dd121

            I haven’t know any blacks who read.

          • bilderbuster

            I was responding to his post about Blacks wanting to use someone’s “sail foam”.

          • Sick of it

            Around here (I live in Louisiana), if you run into car trouble, some folks still stop to help you. Even if they don’t, you can walk up to someone’s house and ask for help. It’s not as good as it was when I was a child, but it hasn’t all gone away yet.

          • SoulInvictus

            Isn’t it shocking when you have those little moments where civil white society is juxtaposed against not white society.
            I had one of those epiphanies when I moved to Atlanta (which is in no way southern any longer).
            I was walking into a grocery store in a decent suburb, and I see this well dressed, little old man (who happened to be black) whose bags tear open and dump all over the parking lot in front of the store.
            He’s struggling to gather all the rogue rolling fruit and cans so
            I’m on my way over to help instinctively (because christ, that’s just what you do for elderly people) and notice Everyone just walks by.
            Afterwards a lady commented that it was a nice thing to do, to which I responded, my parents raised me better than that.

            You really don’t understand what’s been lost until you see it firsthand.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            I think that conscience gene is much stronger in Europeans. It’s the essence of western civilization. That’s why ‘white guilt’ tactics are so effective.

            Blacks seem genetically, inherently desensitized. Their frontal lobes never caught up.

          • Grantland

            There is no catching up. Their ancestors are a different species from ours. Their evolutionary trajectory is different. If they were hyper-smart, they’d probably all be serial killers.

          • newscomments70

            Growing up, we had black neighbors, a married couple from Jamaica. They were actually quite nice to everyone. When I went on my first trip abroad alone, at 17, I remember they gave me 20 dollars. For Christmas, they always gave us large fruit baskets, booze, and often invited us to dinner. They still live next to my parents after 30 years, still the same, no horror story. There are some good ones…maybe a smaller percentage, but they do exist.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            That’s why I think it’s funny islands like Jamaica are trying to shakedown the Europeans for ‘reparations’. There was more gene mixing there than in America. The only good thing they got was a European DNA booster shot. Europeans should charge Jamaicans royalties for the genes they got.

          • John R

            Hate to burst your bubble, but that is the problem: Most Whites think they can still buy their way out of the conflict by moving to safer, i.e. more White, areas. But, in the future, there will be fewer and fewer of these “Whitopias” left to hide in.

          • QuinnTheEskimo9

            When the SHTF in Kosovo, those “safe” compounds were the first ones hit by large gangs armed with military calibre weapons. It will be the same in every city with those exclusive, white enclaves as the first thing targeted. What? Do they think a few gates, cameras and one overweight guard are going to keep them safe?

          • SoulInvictus

            If S were to HTF, grocery stores, gas stations and gun shops would take a lot higher priority than stealing electronics and useless stuff from some McMansion.

          • QuinnTheEskimo9

            Shortly after, probably by the next day, the McMansions will be targeted just as they were when there was complete anarchy in Kosovo. Stores, gas stations and gun shops will be overrun and cleared out within hours, as they were in Kosovo. After that, marauding gangs of non-Whites, will come for the “useless” stuff like booze, drugs, bling and women – not electronics – and they’ll look to the “secured” McMansions for that, just as they did in Kosovo.

          • SoulInvictus

            If things get that bad, the mobs won’t be non-whites alone.
            Most whites are just as unprepared, and better armed.
            Not arguing your point at all really. But making it out to the suburbs to loot TV’s instead of ransacking the nearby Best Buy/WalMart wouldn’t make much sense.
            Food and fuel getting scarce though, it would get nasty and you’d be right to figure the nicer homes would draw attention.

          • Zaporizhian Sich

            All it takes is one EMP attack to achieve that. Whether it’s a government detonating a nuclear bomb 300 miles overhead or someone building EMP bombs or even using modern RADAR equipment to burn up sub-stations, we could lose huge number of people. Even a large solar flare that scores a direct hit on the Earth can do it. There’s any number of ways to generate an electromagnetic pulse without a nuclear explosion powerful enough to destroy transformers, which cannot withstand the massive surges of high-voltage direct current EMP induces in power lines. When they hit the coils in a transformer, they encounter an impassible barrier and that literally blows the transformer to bits. Only a few plants in the world make transformers that control the power grids globally, so any scenario that destroys all of them across a continent or even a region of a large nation will result in massive loss of life.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            One of the many protections northerners should employ in such events is switching to gas heaters that do not require electricity. Oil fired/water circulated houses are vulnerable to electricity loss.

          • SoulInvictus

            That’s the worrisome thing to me though. It doesn’t even take someone with the technical knowledge or military connections to gain access to an EMP.
            The exact same thing could be accomplished by a dozen guys with small caliber rifles or lengths of conductive chain.
            All of them acting in concert on a hot summer day, poof, cascading failure that would take a year to fix, in calm conditions. Which wouldn’t exist a few days afterwards when people get hot and hungry.

          • Sick of it

            That should not be a reason to worry so much as a tactic to be used under the appropriate circumstances.

          • SoulInvictus

            “You might well think that. I couldn’t possibly comment.”

          • Zaporizhian Sich

            EMP WILL be used here in America. There are any number of ways to put EMP bombs in cruise and ballistic missiles, as well as to build them so they can be dropped from planes. Newer RADAR sets can also be used as weapons, not just to fry electronics but to cook people alive literally. They can project a narrow and very powerful beam or microwaves at a specific target to destroy electronics and electrical circuitry, set fires and kill people. There are also small E-bombs that can be carried by a solider and thrown or dropped like grenades from helicopters or armored vehicles. Then there are weapons that Russia and China possess, such as the Iskander ballistic missile. It can carry a nuclear warhead, but there is a variant that carries a warhead that generates a massive, local EMP. These weapons can also be improvised by anyone who knows electronics and had access to shall I say, a few other materials whose availability is restricted.

          • dd121

            I’ll leave the light on.

          • PvtCharlieSlate

            That’s why I’m bringing two rifles, two pistols and a shotgun with me and why I keep adding to my supply of ammo.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Yes, you need a large, wide open perimeter and a couple melon popping Barrett .50’s for good measure.

            Also, infrared and starlite scopes. Lots of sandbags.

            …Pass the ammo…!!!…

          • QuinnTheEskimo9

            You’ll need a family group or others you trust to “go at it” with you for defensive and offensive purposes. Those who try to survive alone won’t make it.

          • me

            Exactly!

          • Bartek

            One overweight Black guard, in most cases. lol

          • me

            Too true!

          • SoulInvictus

            LOL. Outstanding.

          • newscomments70

            In Florida, they simply climb the fence and rob the snowbirds. Most of these gated communities are not San Quinten. A child could climb the fence.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            Right on the money. Too many Whites think in terms of income, and look down upon their working class brethren. They just assume that a wealthy neighborhood will be all White, and figure their working class brethren just need to work a little harder, and they will be able to move away from the rising tide of color with the greatest of ease. If only life were that simple. We Whites need a clear sense of racial solidarity that crosses economic lines such that wealthy Whites view poorer Whites as their brethren, but the non-White masses as an alien, incompatible “them”. I’ll never forget the despair I felt when Bill Clinton stood on TV and made that idiotic “There is no them, there is only us” statement. Yeah, Bill, I thought, only when us refers to Whites. When we are dealing with non-Whites, especially Negroes, to think of them as anything but a “them” is the height of naivete.

          • newscomments70

            In South Africa, there were gated communities due to the crime wave. Many of the gated communities are being forced open by the black government, because it reminds them too much of apartheid pass systems.

          • Zaporizhian Sich

            I have been to small towns away from all the large “brown towns” in my state where there’s few non-whites. However, even rural areas are filling up with blacks, Mexicans and other hostile aliens. In a decade or two, there will no longer be any all white areas left, and that is when a lead brick will be thrown on the accelerator peddle of racial Balkinization. As it is, many of these rural white communities are very suspicious of anyone who’s an outsider, especially other whites? Can you blame them? I cannot, given the damage many whites have done to other whites lives and futures by voting for liberal, read hostile alien’s causes.

          • John R

            And how long before some politician-of the Demo/publican Party, says “persons of color are now disadvantaged because whites have moved to better areas where there is less crime and better services. We need more diversity in these communities, to ensure an equitable distribution of resources for all.”

          • Bartek

            It is already happening with HUD and refugee relocations (supported by many charities such as Rotary and Kiwanis)

          • Sick of it

            Nice to see you here, Bartek. Especially since I’m banned from CCC.

          • Jesse James

            What did you do wrong over there? Spell correctly one too many times?

          • Sick of it

            Jesse, I’m really not sure. Some of my most radical comments are here or on InfoWars. Maybe I talked about those who must not be named too often.

          • me

            Yes, read Obongo’s use of HUD to move ‘his sons’ into peaceful White neighborhoods. #$%*

          • They already do that, with HUD and Section 8.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            Absolutely right on the money. Sizable cities that have few non-Whites are a different world. Very little violence, and there is a different mentality. There a few such cities remaining in the Northeast and Midwest, and they are delightful places. Small town America in the Midwest is this way, and it is the lack of Negroes and Mestizoes that makes small towns in the Midwest excellent places to live. Small towns that do have a Negro or Mestizo problem are like bigger cities, same old violence problems and a feeling of apprehension and mistrust in the air.

          • Sick of it

            Since 1965 our country has gone from fairly conservative and pro-white to…well the garbage heap in which we currently live. Hard not to notice every day.

          • me

            I don’t associate with any anti/non-Whites. I don’t go to the movies. I don’t listen to or purchase anti/non-White music, dvds, or books. I don’t vote for any anti/non-White politicians in local or national elections. I don’t put up with any anti/non-White BS from anyone. I don’t buy from any anti/non-White or anti-White business. I don’t frequent any club, church, or organization that is anti/non-White/pro-‘minority’; nor do I give to any organization that is anti/non-White/pro-‘minority’. I would stop giving the Amerikastan, enemy-occupied ‘govt’ my money, too, if I weren’t living in a prison/police state. I would disown any member of my family for marrying outside of their heritage. I will not associate with any Whites that condone this type of behavior, and I’m not afraid of telling them why. I suggest that you all put your money, time, and energy into doing the same. Life is short, and extinction is forever.

          • David Ashton

            Britain is a bit like this. The trouble is that our former English capital city and the collaborators with the Occupation set the tone for the rest of us. The black comedian was recently quoted as suggesting that television programs should consist of 51% ethnic “minorities”!

      • connorhus

        I doubt we get that far. When there are no longer enough working Whites to keep this ponzi scheme going we will break down to full Balkanization. The minorities don’t even have to become the majority for this to happen. In fact it is happening already.

          • Guest

            There’s nothing there.

          • BillMillerTime

            You didn’t type in in correctly.

          • Sick of it

            Thanks for the link. Looks interesting.

        • Michael Mason

          Our modernized infrastructure is what gives us the ability to carry so much dead weight. We’re becoming more and more of a welfare state, not only because of changing demographics, but because more and more jobs are being performed by computers and machines. We can only hope for more recessions, more federal debt, and more government attempts to infringe on our liberties. It is these things that will put a heavier and heavier tax burden on whites and make them less and less confident in the government. This contributed to the impending total inability of the Republican party to win a presidential election or secure a congressional majority will make whites ripe for racial awakening.

          • paul marchand

            The awakening MIGHT be happening.
            The impetus is a realistic fear ( IMO ) of what is coming.

        • AndrewInterrupted

          That’s what Tim Draper is trying to do in California. He’s trying to shed that tumor in the south, preserve Silicon Valley, and let the north return to European American tenets. The 6 state solution. Have you read about it?

      • Carlo Latini

        Not if you live in the three southern states of Brazil, overwhelmingly White European.

      • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

        You better believe it. The Stormfronters are going to sit fretting about Jews, and Southern Nationalists are going to fuss like little girls over which Whites are, in their humble opinion, actually Southern. With Mestizo hordes pouring across our border, setting to make us a minority in our homeland, we racial realist Whites need to band together, stake out our homeland, and move as a huge united front. If someone is a Caucasian and a racial realist who wants to further and preserve European culture, that is all that should matter.

        • Michael Mason

          Forming a new ethnostate is a ways in the future, but the best way to start is by forming ethnocentric communities where we can have schools that fulfill the purpose of teaching children Western history, heroes, and folk traditions so they can have a sense of understanding of their European roots. The current education system teaches white kids that they are in no way special and that they must mix with the third world races to atone for the fact that our race has been more successful throughout history. What this causes is moral and spiritual sickness and a sense of alienation that causes some white kids to be liberal crowd-followers, and others to be self-centered individualists who have no sense of racial identity or responsibility.

        • SoulInvictus

          Alabama is one of the few states to take a hard line on illegals.
          Even to the detriment of the agriculture industry here.
          So, some somewhat real solutions, not fretting like little girls.

          • QuinnTheEskimo9

            Alabama is overrun with blacks, it has one of the highest black populations in the entire country.

          • SoulInvictus

            Not sure what your point is. Kind of a random ejaculation there.
            Also has nothing to do with the approach the state has taken in regards to illegals.
            But yes, you’re right. There are a lot of blacks here.
            Overrun? Not any more than a lot of the rest of the country really.

        • QuinnTheEskimo9

          One look at the reality going on in South Africa where minority whites are singled out for torture, rape and murder is all anyone needs to know about what will happen to us whites and our children in ALL of our homelands in the NEAR future.

          • Sick of it

            We have guns and will shoot criminals. Big difference.

          • SoulInvictus

            That and we don’t have a shared border with an entire continent that drowns us in a deluge of black immigrants.
            Say what you will about Mexico, but nobody is headed to a Congo version of Acapulco for vacation.

          • Bartek

            The next amnesty will flood the country with Africans, who do you think the 10 million unskilled worker Visas are for?
            Rand Paul, and Ted Cruz both support the Visa provisions.

          • NordicHeritage

            Exactly and it’s these corporatists that are at the very center of all this mess.They remind me of the fictional InterGalactic Banking Clan in the star wars series.

          • SoulInvictus

            File that in the column of things I’ll never understand.
            There’s currently a fight over extending long term unemployment benefits for millions. In what world do these people live in that it’s logical to bring in even more destitute people, regardless of color.
            Cruz seems like a doofus anyway, but if Rand is pro-open borders… that’s a deal breaker for me too.

          • me

            You don’t need to leave the country to ‘experience’ Mexico….just go to Mexifornia. You want to experience the Congo? Go to Detroit. Thanks to your occupied ‘govt.’, and the ‘gifts’ of die-versity. Say what you will about comparing Mestizos and Bantus, but as far as I’m concerned, both groups SUCK!

          • SoulInvictus

            I wouldn’t mind seeing the pyramids of the sun and moon in Mexico. There’s nothing except for geographic features like Kilimanjaro and Victoria Falls that I’d like to see in Africa (I don’t really count Egyptian monuments as “African”).

          • Grantland

            Africa is exquisitely beautiful. ‘Nothing like it. Rhodesia was a paradise on earth. Was.

          • Bartek

            The SA had guns too, having guns and using them effectively are two different matters.
            Much like the USA, SA and Rhodesia allowed their police and military to be so infused and integrated with Negros they couldn’t institute rational ethnic cleansing policies that could have saved White nationhood.

          • Sick of it

            Meet with Southerners sometime. Quite a few of us were taught to shoot from the time we were small children. The Boers used to be the same way long ago.

          • me

            Don’t comply with the gun-grabbing, occupied ‘govt.’. It will save your life one day…

          • me

            That’s right. South Africa IS the future if we don’t stop this madness NOW.

          • Even if we stop the madness now, we are doomed, the nation is gone. It’s too late. Now more than ever White-Americans need segregation to preserve at least some parts of the United States as White European in demographics and culture, so that we don’t go extinct!

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Meanwhile, Charlize Theron, the white South African actress adopts a black South African baby.

            She would probably never work in Hollywood again if she had adopted one of the persecuted Afrikaner babies.

        • Bartek

          Like it or not the Jews would just turn any White nation into a mongrel mess, it is what they are hard wired to do genetically.
          The Blacks didn’t formulate Johnson’s ‘great society’ programs, and the Mexicans, Pakistanis, Iraqis, Somalis, and Asians didn’t create the Heart-Celler immigration laws.
          If you are White you are alright, and they do not consider themselves White.

          • Sick of it

            They exist, but usually because they do not know their own ethnic roots.

        • Grantland

          You are a fool if you discount the Jews. It is they who are doing this to us.

          • SoulInvictus

            Honestly, they don’t even have to anymore. So many whites have drunk the multi-cult, politically correct, crystal methodist, lefty kool-aid, that you could repatriate every member of the tribe to Israel and not even put a dent in the liberal movement.
            And that’s not even counting the black activists part of it.

          • Grantland

            You are quite wrong. They have the media.

          • SoulInvictus

            And they would be replaced by Jews in mind.
            That is the purpose of cultural marxism/judeaism.
            Reshape the people in the image you desire. Which has been accomplished. Look at the results.
            We’re now a litigious, bickering, weak, effeminate, scat humor/porn/liberal ideal/and money obsessed people. We don’t build great things, we don’t explore.
            Does any of the above sound like any European country or people of history, ever?
            The point of view you’re expressing isn’t wrong, but it’s also more correct about the Henry Ford era. You could remove the original cancer now, but it has already metastasized into the mindset of the people.

          • Grantland

            I see you are currently unable to break the Imperial conditioning; you will. Seek the truth, son. The media is behind it all.

          • SoulInvictus

            ok. 🙂
            It definitely plays its part, I’ll agree on that.
            The media spell is the easy part to break. The financial manipulation so that everyone is a debt slave. To me, that is the more difficult thing to break. Which is why everyone from Jefferson to Jackson to Kennedy tried to fight it.

          • Grantland

            It’s the media, it’s the FED, it’s the schools, Academic system, the Courts, the Government. It’s a takeover.

          • Sick of it

            If the media shut down tomorrow, there would still be millions of insane people spouting Communist ideology. I do get where you’re coming from though…it’s all quite disgusting.

          • Grantland

            Wrong. The public is in a media trance. We’d blink a few times, roll up our sleeves, and soon put an end to the craziness.

          • Sick of it

            You’re ignoring the fact that Communist ideology was disseminated in this country before television was even invented. Since the Revolutions of 1848.

          • Grantland

            The lemmings are malleable. Tradition is on our side. We defeat the core evil, and the Country is ours.

          • Jotun Hunter

            hmmm – I don’t know – if the media shut down then millions of mindless followers would be seeking someone to tell them what to think. It really boils down to that with ‘the mob’. They would be easily changed, as they always are, even amongst the best populations (white populations).

          • John R

            Thank you! I keep reading these comments here that every problem is caused by “the Jews” and I think it is childish. Was there a Jewish component in the radicalism from, say, the 1930’s to the 60’s? Yes. But since then Jews have integrated so deeply into society that there are not that many full blooded ones left, and there are also many conservative Jews around these days as well. No, the problem is the pathology of White guilt that leads us to consider every other races problems before our own. Focus on the real issue. Look at Sweden, for example: They don’t have many fricken Jews, and look how dumb they have been in allowing non-whites to invade their beautiful country. So, please, people, let’s focus on the real issues. The real problem is the White race traitors.

          • Grantland

            They have Barbara Specter.

          • SoulInvictus

            Every, no. Blameless, no either.
            Especially not in the US. Sweden’s delusions are due to lack of exposure. I imagine those attitudes are changing now. In the US, it’s purely indoctrination and we used to know better.
            I don’t underestimate their role in organization, finance, or propaganda, but they could vanish off the planet and the legacy would still remain. I’m sure there are still some slavic Russians that would opt for the Bolshevik days too.

          • Friggin’ Sweden. They’re like a bunch of naive pacifist bunny rabbits who welcome in wolves and wonder why they have so many new problems but they never make the correlation.

            I have a joke for you that, while possibly funny is also quite sad:

            Q: How do you get the Swedes to all give up their once low rape rate and eventual control of their own country to third world immigrants who will turn Stockholm into Mogadishu?

            A: Ask.

          • SoulInvictus

            I know it’s probably a tired comparison by now, but I will never understand how things evolved from brutal pragmatic colonization of the entire world into this Eloi & Morlock situation.
            Actually, that’s not even fair to Morlocks. At least they provided food, clothing and infrastructure for the Eloi.

          • Jotun Hunter

            like Romans, we became victims of our own excess – luxury was always the most mortal of sins to the ancients – and wisely so. When we lose manliness and take up soft living we’re headed for disaster.

      • John R

        Sorry. But it could be worse: At least the Whites of Brazil are not guilt-ridden and their leaders do not work against their interests. You think they have any regulations against “racial profiling” in that country, or anywhere else in Latin America? Of course not; only we “Norte Americanos” obsess over that.

        • AndrewInterrupted

          Has anyone written any books on that situation in southern Brazil? It might be a good example for North Americans to follow.

      • Laura Dilworth

        this already exists here-the gated communities and all, but sure, it will continue to deterioriate

      • Jotun Hunter

        I met a german decended guy who’s family emigrated to brazil certain dubious decades ago – he has left the place as an adult for Europe – needless to say he had nothing nice to say about the place. Nothing at all.

    • A Freespeechzone

      Make NO mistake, the ‘effects’ will be unrestrained payback, retribution and punishment for existing as a White–with the support of the multiracial government.

      It’s already started. . .

      • dukem1

        i gave you an upvote…but i hope, somehow you are wrong…i’m an old guy, with a shotgun…and i really hope i don’t live so long as to have to blast the invading hoards out of my doorway.
        White men invented the USA…end of story…any one who would give it away deserves their fate.

        • Zaporizhian Sich

          I am not an old man yet, but I am well on the way. Sooner than later, I will have little reason to fear or care what happens to me. When the invaders comes to my door, they will find out why the most feared Cossacks and Vikings were the ones who knew their end was near.

          • SoulInvictus

            Mean, old white people. 100% gristle.

          • Zaporizhian Sich

            How about having vinegar for blood?

          • SoulInvictus

            lol, ok. Well maybe 90% gristle, 5% piss and vinegar. 😉

      • paul marchand

        I believe that. Historical fallacies abound.
        Example: * FOUR THOUSAND LYNCHINGS* (over 80 yrs, 30 states).
        The reality: many were legit. There have been about or more than 500,000 murders by blacks in the USA.
        This is the tip of the iceberg of the insanities after insanities perpetrated by the US federal govt.

        • Tom B

          True, but not insane for a …Communist.
          USA has been an increasingy communist nation for decades now.
          And it’s irrevocable.

          • Zaporizhian Sich

            As long as those who practice that malignant ideology have any power here whatsoever, I am force to agree with you about the irrevocability aspect.

          • Tom B

            ‘malignant ideology’ is accurate. A malignancy that has invaded most institutions by cleverly using race, sex instead of ‘workers unite’ Probably from Frankfurt School, where they changed direction from economic to cultural marxism.

          • Grantland

            Nothing is irrevocable. The lemmings are empty vessels, who can be filled with anything you choose.
            ‘Have to cut a lot of heads, though. Excise the cancer. It can be done.

          • Zaporizhian Sich

            The U.S. is doomed to go down the way the Titanic did, in pieces and taking a lot of people down with it. However, the death of the U.S. could be the beginning of a Renaissance for all people of European heritage. Right now, it’s the greatest enemy for all whites everywhere.

          • Grantland

            Either that happens or white men with guns install a small, clean rational government; and kill anyone who gets in the way.

      • AndrewInterrupted

        I saw it firsthand at a federal contractor recently. The anti-white mgmt. that has been installed at all levels know that the (permanent) minority occupation government, that is the DOL, DOJ, EEOC, and OFCCP, gives them free reign to persecute white people in those places. Hetero, white men in particular.

        • Zaporizhian Sich

          That’s probably because they know persecuting whites will lead to whites resorting to armed rebellion, death squads and terrorism. They know the anti-white agenda will lead to war.

    • bilderbuster

      It’s more that a threat to our children & grandchildren.
      It’s a reality for all of us now!
      I’ve never been a Coulter fan but she’s right when she said “Bring on the Death Squads”!

      • paul marchand

        I am ready ” to go”.
        Now , when the bullets start flying I may hide !
        But I HATE what the US has become.

        • Sick of it

          Hiding won’t save anyone. That should be obvious.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Living in or around a major city would be a big no-no also.

      • AndrewInterrupted

        That quote is a little misunderstood. What she meant was: when the stable, nation-making group that is the European Americans loses their majority rule, from that point forward they will be casting their votes to one of several criminal, gangster organizations. “…We’d just be voting for death squads…” meant there would only be road warrior type factions & allegiances left. Maybe analogist to rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic after it hit the iceberg. Western civilization will have ended when the nation-making Europeans lose their majority vote. That’s why secession is so critical now, to get back a big majority vote in the reconstituted areas.

    • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

      You are absolutely right. We only need look at societies where our White brethren live as a minority group in a non-White country to see what this will be like. The worst case scenario, of course, are the Negroid dominated hell holes like South Africa. No self respecting White person would want to set foot in that horrible country. Mandela was a monster who, if the Brits were racial realists these days as they were in the old days, would have been another Negroid nobody appropriately looked down upon by Whites.
      While America already has our Negro dominated hell pit enclaves like Gary and East St. Louis, and even most Lefties know that these places are no go zones for Whites, it is the massive Mestizo influx that is going to make us Whites a minority group in the land of our birth. I’ll surely take Mexico and Brazil over South Africa, but that is not saying much. That is like settling for the smell of a fart that is always in the air in one’s abode, one that is vexatious, but not quite worthy of a gas mask. While settle for this?? A Mestizo dominated America is going to be a garbage pit like Mexico, and will surely not be the land we Whites grew up in and loved.
      This is why we Whites need to start planning a White homeland, and start taking secession seriously. To do so, though, all of this factionalistic B.S. such as Southern Nationalism which excludes “Yankees” needs to stop, and we need to focus on building a Pan-European, racially pure state. Pan-European but racially pure was what made the America of 1950 the greatest country on earth. White and racial realist should be common denominator.

      • Sick of it

        Indeed, we must be silent and allow our Northern betters top tell us what to do, as they are the ones who have ruined this country. Rather I figure we should gain, or regain, a full blown Southern ethnic consciousness and do what needs be done. WNs are often on the government’s payroll, so I’m more than a bit skeptical. Unity has destroyed us all everywhere. It is time to separate.

        Also, there are a LOT more Southern nationalists than white nationalists. Why should we listen to an extreme minority that doesn’t even know what it wants? We want our country back.

        • Zaporizhian Sich

          On the contrary, WN’s want the same thing Southern Nationalists want, namely their countries back. And we want the ones responsible for flooding our lands with hostile invaders expelled or otherwise removed as a threat along with these intruders. Not all WN’s are in the U.S., many more are in Europe, Russia, Canada and Australia. Whatever you are seeing in your area, is also happening abroad.

          • Sick of it

            I’ve seen WN discussions range across every possible type of government and every level of acceptance of non-whites. Southern folk know what they want, even when they have been taught to deny it.

        • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

          Southern Nationalism is great when it employs some common sense. When they say things like someone of German descent from the rural Midwest who wants to preserve European culture in America has no place in their scheme, though, as a Midwesterner of German extraction is not a “Southron”, they are just being stupid. To hate the tyrannous Government of the North is common sense. To deny racial realist, proud Whites from the North a place in building a racially pure White state in the South, though, is no better than re-igniting the Civil War. Southern Nationalists are on the right track, but need to quit fighting the Civil War, and embrace Yankees who want to join them in creating an all White racially pure homeland, and let go of the stupid prejudices against non-Anglo-Celtic Europeans. That is too much like the Civil War, brother fighting brother. Good Italian Restaurants and Polka Music would in no way hurt or destroy the Anglo-Celtic Southern culture, but try to get this through to these Southern Nationalists, and you might as well be talking to the wall. They are obsessed with this notion of “Southrons”, and act like this is the 1860’s, and all of us Whites from the North are coming to get them. This kind of inane stuff does nothing but divide us Whites, and prevents us from building ourselves a racially pure White enclave. A house divided always falls. We Whites need to be a united front against the rising tide of color.

          • Sick of it

            The house divided was people from your state coming to kill people from my state. Sorry for not being more accepting.

          • SoulInvictus

            I’d make you a deal. Work a deportation detail in the new CSA for a while and you’d be more than welcome. 😉

          • I’ve been saying all along that Southerners are their own worst enemy and that they have an identity crisis going on. I think the fact that they have British origins is apart of the reason why they are being flooded with Asians and Hispanics, moreover to eliminate old generation, English decent Americans for good from the States.

        • We are never getting it back.

          • Sick of it

            I’ll be positive and give it a 50/50 chance.

    • Nandarani

      I might have impossible to ‘overestimate the threat’ – but wish that weren’t true . . .

    • Anon

      I couldn’t disagree more as to what this means for the future. No….non-whites will not determine the nature of civilization. If that were possible, sometime within the last 5000 years someone, somewhere, on some corner of the earth would have created some legitimate parallel civilization of similar power or at least potential as created by whites. More to the point, non-whites would not be so dependent on whites. Blacks, in particular, cannot survive without whites taking care of them in a near institutional setting. Our big cities are no more than giant nursing home prisons for people who cannot feed themselves and would rather starve to death than try.
      What we are seeing here is the failure of the democratic experiment and a whole bunch of butthurt elites teaching our peoples a lesson about rebelling against their kings and taking it upon themselves to self rule.
      Collapse….followed by not a small amount of violence….mass starvation of 99% of the black population, near enslavement of other non-whites by anyone with a mind to. First a shrinking of white countries under the iron fist of clear thinking white leaders who no longer have an ounce of patience with the conceit of voting, particularly liberalism….then an mass expansion of whites as the only viable population in the world.
      In short, military dictatorship will eventually force our people to stop feeding the negro and return to honing the superiority of our race. Those who won’t cooperate will be lucky if the result is only a swift hanging. Because their genes are still valuable, a more likely response will be….re-education. With all that implies.

      • LovelyNordicHeidi

        What we are seeing here is the failure of the democratic experiment and a whole bunch of butthurt elites teaching our peoples a lesson about rebelling against their kings and taking it upon themselves to self rule.

        I for one would prefer harsh pro-White dictatorship to soft anti-White democracy, because the former would be much safer than the latter.

      • Grantland

        May it not happen. How about a pure meritocracy instead? And the rule of law. “He who doth not work; neither shall he eat.”

  • In the old south of my youth, we said blacks engaged in bloc voting–meaning they showed racial solidarity. Until whites have mastered the art of bloc voting, we will continue to be marginalized and genocided until we’re just about gone. The Republicans of today do not deserve to benefit from white bloc voting. Who does? Nobody. Right now.

    • MikeofAges

      All true. But the biggest idiots are the libertarians and free marketers who talk about issues and elections like the non-white vote doesn’t even exist. One thing is sure, if you repel your potential voters on account of the lack of a labor oriented agenda, you will have no hope of obtaining a majority of the white vote large enough to prevail against the anti-white bloc vote.

      • Daniel Schmuhl

        Libertarianism is called applied autism for a reason.

        • MikeofAges

          I see libertarianism, other forms of idealistic conservatism, and, indeed, leftism, as personal creeds for the individual. They should not be accepted as or expected to be working political agendas.

      • AutomaticSlim

        ” if you repel your potential voters on account of the lack of a labor oriented agenda”

        Depends on what you mean by labor oriented agenda.
        If you mean strongly discouraging outsourcing and off-shoring, and strongly encouraging and incentivizing the rebuilding of America’s manufacturing base, then this conservative libertarian is all for it.

        But if you mean pro-union and “tax the rich” (really means tax the hardworking) policies, then against it 100%. People should be able to keep what they earn so they can take care of themselves. And people who broke their backsides working hard in school deserve to earn more than the high school graduate blue collar union types whose fathers and uncles got them plum jobs in the unions. The highest bracket should be 10%, for everything combined, Fed, State, City, SS, Medicare. People should keep 90% of what they earn and save for their own retirement. Why should I have less so some lazy slug can have more, with a pension for life?

        • AndrewInterrupted

          Yes, if the Repugs lean protectionist/isolationist it will probably help their numbers these next couple elections. A plank for bolstering U.S. sovereignty. That would dovetail with an anti-amnesty plank.

        • SoulInvictus

          Sorry, you lose me with the don’t tax the rich stuff. I agreed with pretty much everything else, but the wealthy benefit the most from this system of ours, so let them pay for it.
          Pay for the police state, pay for the bloated military that they profit on contracts with, pay for their lobbyist corrupted politicians, pay for all of it. From medical care to the prison system, all they do is grind us into the dirt, send our jobs overseas, bring in scummy immigrants, pollute our water, and then despise the unwashed masses for the results of their endeavors.
          I have no pity for the robber barons any more.
          The sooner we make a meal of them and their lap dog congressmen, the better.

          I’d like to see another Eisenhower Republican. He knew how to balance the budget and tax the rich.

          • Sick of it

            Another Eisenhower Republican would use the military to destroy folks like you and me.

          • SoulInvictus

            Only in someone’s wildest leftist dreams would an Eisenhower, or even a Truman Democrat, be in favor of what is going on now.

          • Sick of it

            So Little Rock never happened eh?

          • SoulInvictus

            Never said I agreed with every single thing the man did. But he was better than maybe anyone that has sat in the Oval since.
            Liking his policies on budget and taxation is a far cry from me endorsing desegregation.
            I’m on this site. So how likely is it that I do?

            Plus, it was the law. He enforced it. And the Mayor of Little Rock requested he intervene in the first place.
            Unlike Obama he didn’t pick and choose what laws he would enforce.
            Also a huge credit that he warned the American public about the military industrial complex. Every President since has suckled at their teat and gotten boys killed to enrich them instead.

          • BillMillerTime

            I have a better idea: get rid of the police state and the bloated military with a thousand bases spanning the globe. I make a very comfortable living through the sweat of my brow, without lobbyists, corrupted politicians, and government contracts. I am hardly a “robber baron,” whatever that means. I am just a white nationalist who quietly supports the cause of our volk behind the scenes. So no, I’m not interested in punitive taxes on “the rich.” The state should protect people and their lawfully-acquired property, not rob from Peter to enrich Paul.

          • SoulInvictus

            “get rid of the police state and the bloated military with a thousand bases spanning the globe.”

            I’m in total agreement with you there. Massively scale back the system in its entirety. But the lower classes aren’t the ones spending billions on fighter jets and tanks and bass we don’t need.
            Or corporate welfare, or subsidies, or lobbyists… etc.
            Until the people who hold the reigns cut the spending, then yeah, they should pay for all of it.

          • AutomaticSlim

            “Saying we can’t afford to help our own poor..”

            And why (and how) should the “poor” be “helped”.
            Do you consider welfare and food stamps to be “help”?
            Do you consider a lazy loafer someone deserving of help?
            Not saying every single “poor” person is lazy, but you have to admit, the majority of under 65 welfare recipients (including food stamps, head start, school lunch, public housing, medicaid, WIC) are not exactly people of quality. Ever drive past a housing project?

            Agree with you fully though, on anti-immigration, anti-elite (left wing academic elites, I assume you mean), anti-pollution, pro-science, and pro-privacy.

          • SoulInvictus

            Take another look at the actual statistics on some of those things.
            Not just the Fox News, idle surfer guy on food stamps fluff pieces.

            1 in 7 Americans are on Food Stamps.
            As of March 7, 2014, the total is 46.8 million.
            That many of our people are so broke they qualify for food aid…
            Of food assistance recipients,
            35% are White <——

            22% are African American

            10% are Hispanic.

            I'm not saying the system is perfect by any means. But people have a lot of misconceptions about who are on food stamps and how much it cost.

            The average food stamp payment for a person is $133/month.
            In comparison, we just shipped out Another air craft carrier we don't need (for a total of 11) which cost $14 billion including research and development, and the actual cost of the carrier itself is $9 billion. The daily operating cost is estimated at $7 million.

            So no, I don't get spun up on giving someone poor enough to qualify for $133 in food. Don't even get me started on the 3,000 tanks the Army outright said, we don't want or need them, yet they were made anyway because of pork projects. They went straight to a parking lot.
            For the cost alone of what our idiot elites puked into Iraq et al. we could have given everyone lavish healthcare, put a man on Mars, restored our crumbling infrastructure, etc etc etc….

            "left wing academic elites, I assume you mean"
            No, I mean the elite wealthy. We are being crushed between global corps greed and leftist social poison. Even worse when they meet ideologically on something like immigrations, which everyone knows is why Republicans keep testing the waters on it. They like the cheap labor and that it depresses the value of an American worker even further.

          • RisingReich

            Don’t get me started on aid to isntreal.

          • SoulInvictus

            I can imagine. 😉
            Same here.

          • AutomaticSlim

            ” implement subsidized daycare for Workfare workers”
            Are you kidding???

            I would support implementing mandatory birth/population control for these types. But why should I pay for their good for nothing kids?
            If they can’t afford kids they should not have them. And if they do, I should not have to pay for them. We should go back to using orphanages. That was a way more cost effective solution.

          • SoulInvictus

            “implementing mandatory birth/population control for these types.”

            And I’m talking about things that could actually be done in the real world.
            Getting some work out of the bargain and driving people to better themselves rather than just doling out a check, meals, and home for absolutely nothing in return.

            If I had my druthers in fantasy land, I’d deport all illegals (and their anchor babies) AND slave descendants back to their homelands and put our bloated military to use locking down the borders.
            Then there’d be so much money and decent paying work that a little socialism for the remaining populace would be easily doable.

            I try to think of actionable solutions though, not fantasize about northwest homelands, resurrected dixie, or cutting off the welfare system cold turkey. Because all those things are impossibilities.
            But restructuring it into something more productive is possible.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            You are definitely speaking with a lot of common sense here. I’d like to think, though, that there is still potential for an organized White ethnostate here in America that is not trying to resurrect Civil War era grievances. The Ozark Mountains of Southern Missouri would be a great spot. Plenty of folks had ancestors on both sides of the Civil War, there are few Negroes, and there is a strong German element like in the rural Upper Midwest, but not quite so brutal a winter as the Upper Midwest. If Southern MO/Northern Arkansas could achieve secession from their parent states and form a new state of “Ozark”, I think that would lay the groundwork for a White American enclave. Only Whites and only racial realist Whites, no White Libtards or Mud People welcome.

          • SoulInvictus

            Common sense isn’t nearly as fun as inflammatory rhetoric, so I always expect to run into that problem.
            Way more stimulating to talk about mass deportations, post-apocalyptic reckonings, turning back the clock, things that won’t happen. Things there will never be public support for.
            That shipped sailed with the end of the Civil War and the headstone was society tipping over to desegregation.

            As for not resurrecting Civil War era grievances, I don’t think they ever died. We’re STILL hashing out the black problem, states’ rights, cultural conflict. Now it’s just spread out into Red, Blue and Purple states across the Union instead of solely the South.

          • Sick of it

            Public opinion is meaningless when one realizes that the majority will do nothing even when they find death squads at their door (and then act like they are surprised…maybe most folks really are that out of touch with reality?). Why do we need to persuade when we really only need to organize like-minded people? You will not persuade the stupid, the ignorant, or the ideologue.

          • SoulInvictus

            Shifting public opinion is everything barring a collapse.
            Public opinion (and mass media manipulation of it) got blacks desegregation and affirmative action.

            Preaching to the choir is fun, ranting about things that won’t happen is fun too. But a lot of people out there are on the fence even if they don’t know it. When you can frame things in a positive and good humored way, they tip over your way. Then you drive them into the harsher realities.

            Also, organizing like minded people doesn’t seem to work so well online. Outside the Amren conference (which I doubt even .5% of users here will be attending) I don’t see any type of organizational effort. I see a lot of talk about never voting Dem and the usual default voting while holding the nose on the GOP. That’s about it.

            I would like to see a lot more focus on local gatherings. Developing PACS, voting blocks, sane protests, support networks, general community building in real life. Not just online carping. Maybe that’s all people here are up for.

            All that makes me much more inclined to side with Long Live Dixie about southern nationalism. If the concepts are vague like white nationalism, it doesn’t seem to drive most people to action. All the movements with real political power in Europe are focused on their particular group/country. All that being a strong reason leftists break down local cultures.

          • Sick of it

            One of the reasons the government is getting so hot about gun control is because they realize that people like us have been organizing naturally for years (what are hunting clubs and shooting ranges really?).

            Folks do a LOT of things subconsciously/instinctively that they erroneously attribute to some sort of conscious decision. I’m not one of those people who will say that blood determines everything, but it does determine much more than people will admit. As will a centuries’ old culture and implicit, if not explicit, ethnic identity (i.e. Southrons are Southrons even when they don’t realize it, though many do in their older years).

            Public opinion is essentially a lie (usually carefully constructed propaganda). Even if the supposed public opinion on various matters were true, most people will not fight (regardless of what side of an issue they happen to agree with). I’m starting to see how certain people took power and have held it for so long…we give the average man far too much credit when one considers the entirety of history.

          • Sick of it

            Where I live, there are some white people on these programs, but we see that the vast majority are non-white. Thus the preconceived notions.

            Personally, I think we should put criminals to work like we used to and not offer them a paycheck. If they try to run away, shoot them dead. Cut back on all the spending on criminals for benefits which exceed those affordable by honest people.

            Couldn’t agree more re: wasteful military spending and bases we do not need in various third world hellholes. We need the military defending our borders with orders to shoot on sight if someone tries to sneak in.

          • SoulInvictus

            I think whites are just more ashamed of it. They’ll discretely slide their EBT card and no one is the wiser.

            There are millions of white Americans on food stamps, unemployment, etc. Higher numbers and percentages than blacks. That’s why exchanges like I had on the other thread over income inequality drive me nuts. The corporatist Republicans that are so money obsessed are every bit the problem leftists are.
            That a lot of WN’s have the delusional notion that it’s only blacks on aid programs is just plain stupid. There are even a Lot of active duty military that have families on food stamps. That’s pathetic.
            But then Republicans have a pretty good record of screwing veterans too.

          • Sick of it

            Rank and file soldiers do not make very much in the military, especially now that our money is worth so much less. I’d shed more tears if they stopped acting as attack dogs for the Federal government which despises us.

            It makes no sense to turn one’s gun against someone who is literally related to you (seriously, look up your own genealogy sometime and see how many families you’re related to in the South) rather than against some bastard, often foreign in origin (you know who I mean), who has no relation to you and believes the complete opposite of what you believe. That is how the current system is structured, however.

            I have cousins in most Southern states and I’ve only gone through a small part of my family’s genealogy. We’ve been here for centuries. As a matter of fact, I met a pretty bright guy at college who also excelled in every class. We became fast friends. Pretty sure from his family name that we are distant cousins.

          • SoulInvictus

            You should come back. You should all come back.
            Retake Birmingham and you can have it.
            It used to be a nice city.

          • Sick of it

            Yep, at least two of my family lines came from Alabama. If I come back, a lot of folks won’t want me there. You might though.

          • Higher numbers of whites than blacks receiving EBT, maybe, as a consequence of the relatively small black population. Higher percentage of whites than blacks though?

            No way.

            Show me proof.

          • SoulInvictus

            Higher number of white receiving EBT, definitely.
            You can look up the charts online.
            Percentages of EBT recipients-
            35% white
            22% black
            10% hispanic

            If you mean as a percentage of their particular ethnicity, then no, likely not. But give it time. The blacks that are in the system have been, a lot of whites are new to this poor no matter what you do or degree you get economy.

          • Yeah another thing to look for with federal statistics on race is how they classify whites and how they classify hispanics. They seem to call all hispanics, mestizo or not, as white for most purposes.

          • SoulInvictus

            I thought that too, that’s why I made sure I found numbers that included hispanics.
            They seem to do that more to distort crime stats though not social programs. On those, I think it’s more beneficial to politicians when they show how much they’re “helping” different groups.

          • BillMillerTime

            “Anti-elite”? We’re primates; there will always be hierarchies, there will always be elites.

          • SoulInvictus

            Ah, the don’t call them “rich” they’re “job creators” thing…
            Maybe for small & medium sized sole proprietorships and partnerships I would agree with you. And also perhaps more an argument for yesteryear’s Henry Ford’s when those men were patriots. Maybe that’s just wishful thinking on my part and outsourcing to asian peasant labor just wasn’t an option.

            But you’ll have to do better than that to rationalize the 580-1 and 720-1 ratios of McDonald’s and Walmart CEO pay for example.
            A line cook at McDonald’s would have to work 1,060,606 hours to make the same annual salary. By any measure, that is obscene.
            And even if you don’t find it immoral, it’s also no way to maintain a stable society.
            And those CEO’s are at least doing a tangible thing that does indeed create some jobs. Venturing into the investment and banking realm, the amounts are even more ridiculously staggering, and they’ve actively ruined innumerable lives with no penalty whatsoever. Quite the opposite as they usually land in positions of power in the government.

          • BillMillerTime

            “One of their typical employees, a line cook at McDonald’s, would have to work 1,060,606 hours …”

            So what? That’s an entry-level minimum-wage job for someone with low skills. I don’t see how it hurts him if my income is 10 times his or 100 times his or 1000 times his. How does that hurt him?

            “I guess a safety net is ok for fraudulent bankers and defense contractors, just not hungry people.”

            I guess you haven’t correctly read and understood what I have written. I’m not here to defend crony capitalists or the banking cartel.

            “Since 1980, adjusting for inflation, average wages have not increased.”

            Inflation of the money supply – and the resulting increase in prices – is a function of the Federal Reserve Bank. That’s its job description. If you think that I’m here to defend the Fed, then you’re not paying attention.

          • SoulInvictus

            {“a line cook at McDonald’s, would have to work 1,060,606 hours …”}
            “So what?”

            And that, in a nutshell, is why Republicans will continue to lose the white working class.

            ” defend(ing) crony capitalists or the banking cartel… the Fed”

            This is primarily who I’m talking about. Somehow that seems to have gotten translated as “screw small businesses into the ground with burdensome taxation”.
            Though I did stipulate, “Maybe for small & medium sized sole proprietorships and partnerships I would agree with you.”

          • BillMillerTime

            Minimum wage workers make up less than 5% of the American workforce. We’re talking about entry-level jobs suitable for teenagers and other with few marketable skills. Should Congress pass a law raising the minimum wage to $15per hour? Why stop there? How about $150 per hour? No law in the world will raise the marginal productivity of a low-skilled worker. All such laws do is create unemployment.

            And I notice that no one has yet been able to answer my question: how does my lawfully-acquired million dollar a year income hurt you? It doesn’t. You just suffer from envy, and that’s *your* problem, not mine.

          • SoulInvictus

            First, almost 8% of all US workers are in the fast food industry.
            11.6% of the total workforce is employed in retail.
            As for the misconception about it being a teen’s job, not anymore, the job market is so crappy there was a McDonald’s hiring a cashier but looking for someone with a college degree.
            Welcome to the low wage recovery.

            The problem that people that share your mindset don’t seem to get… is that treating American workers sh*tty, paying them as absolutely little as they can get by with, is going to have horrible repercussions for the hoarding wealthy.

            The self same corporatist Republicans that decry socialism, are driving hordes of desperate white working class people into it willingly.

            If they’d keep jobs stateside instead of squeezing out those extra few bucks with foreign slave labor, promote trade policy that protects American business, rebuild domestic manufacturing, and maybe tone down the insane salaries from 700+ times their workers to just, I don’t know, 100 times what their coworkers make… then the desperate masses Wouldn’t exist in the first place.

            You, and they, can maintain the “So what?” thought if you want, but it’s part of the problem every bit as much as the Dems that are offering their government oppression as a solution. And it’s the “So what?” crowd that will get gutted either financially by the Commie-lite they’ve helped propagate, or literally by the pitchfork wielding mobs.

          • BillMillerTime

            My labor figures come from the US Department of Labor. Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey,

            Characteristics of Minimum Wage Workers: 2012.

            Simply having a college degree doesn’t mean that you have highly marketable skills. If you don’t know this, then you don’t know anything.

            Government spending as a percent of GDP comes out to about 40%. Were I king, I’d bump it down to no more than 10%. This would allow people to keep more of the money which they earn. The economy would roar, unemployment would fall.

          • SoulInvictus

            In a perfect, or patriotic, or even decent world, yes.
            In the real world, that would mean the CEO would make 10 million instead of 8. and the workers would have maybe an additional 2k at the end of a year. With no food, medicaid, or other subsidies, the pay increase would be negligible or nonexistent.
            Bush already tried that approach, and the only substantive job growth was overseas as they took their money and invested elsewhere and outsourced.

            The tax payer is already subsidizing the Wal-Marts of the world.
            Look up the stats on their workers and government assistance.
            Like I said, corporate greed is one of the primary causes for American socialism to begin with.
            I don’t think wealthy corporations deserve even indirect subsidizing.
            I also don’t understand how people don’t see that is exactly what is being done.

          • kjh64

            I’ll add that the Republicans blather on about lower taxes yet want all this cheap illegal Mexican labor and to drive down wages because they’re in with big business. When you have all these Mexicans, people must pay a lot more in taxes to support it in the form of public assistance which means much higher taxes.

          • SoulInvictus

            Exactly my point. They want low taxes but then export/outsource jobs, and then the general philosophy is to pay domestic workers as little as possible by any means necessary (including the illegal and work visa tactics), then they’re shocked that the safety net bill skyrockets. Or that people demand some route to healthcare or a minimum wage increase.

            Wal-Mart alone cost taxpayers billions each year because of their low wages. And that’s not factoring the cost of them buying all their goods from Asia. Next time you’re in the store, try to find a product that isn’t food (or maybe socks) that is made in the US.

            That’s why I call it neo-feudalism. Over time, unregulated capitalism turns into exactly that. Throw in corrupt regulation and it accelerates to it even faster.
            They always want to lower the taxes for the wealthy while screwing the poor, and that’s why they lose working class whites to the Dems. They’re not much better, and their government based solution isn’t my ideal, but when you’re in hell you’ll take a glass of water from the devil.

            The wealthy want me to sympathize with them, vote with them, all the while denying a drop to drink and laughing about it saying, “so what”…I’ve got my water, I’m swimming in it in fact, and no you can’t have any. Mine!”
            Let them eat cake indeed…

            “It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God.”

            Amen.

          • SoulInvictus

            I’d add, there’s a reason the last time this movement took power, it was under National SOCIALISM and one of the first things they did was to eject or imprison the bankers and merchants that were screwing them.

            Also worth noting that this made Germany’s economy Boom while everyone else was reeling from the Depression.

          • AutomaticSlim

            Great reply. You beat me to it.
            Yes, close all foreign military bases and stop being the world’s policeman. We should then put at least 50 thousand troops on the entire length of the Mexican border, to stop the illegal aliens.

            Also in the same boat as far as work is concerned. I an an independent consultant, have been for many, many years, and I pay for my own health insurance and retirements plan. I worked very hard to get where I am, with no help from the government or anyone else. Those who put the work in should get to keep the fruits of their labor.

          • LHathaway

            I tend to disagree, while it’s true, the more educated are more likely to vote left. . the very rich, that you describe, are more likely to vote to restrict immigration, I’m guessing much, much, more likely. This thing is just out of control, for all appearances.

          • SoulInvictus

            “the very rich, that you describe, are more likely to vote to restrict immigration”
            If that were the case, you wouldn’t see Republicans endlessly testing the waters on it. Big business loves cheap labor. Illegals are slavery 2.0 and help screw working class Americans into even cheaper wages. See Ann Coulter’s recent rant on that on this very site.

          • Sick of it

            It should be noted, however, that, in the past, there were big businessmen against all of this garbage we’re being forced to swallow today. The Great Depression finished most of them off (intentionally I say).

          • SoulInvictus

            Where have you gone, Henry Ford
            Our nation turns its lonely eyes to you.
            woo oo oo.

        • MikeofAges

          I’m with you on the idea of nationalist agenda. America should be so fantastically wealthy the mind couldn’t imagine it. Anybody who can turn over a shovel should have 20 years of work lined up ahead of them. Where is all this wealth? In my estimation, not only is it misdirected. More shamefully, it isn’t even developed in the first place.

          • Sick of it

            I’d talk about who is hoarding it, but a lot of folks say it isn’t so.

          • MikeofAges

            Who, what and how are good questions. In the case of the environmentalist and anti-growth crowd (left and right branches of that) it is obvious. Why, otherwise, is a good question. Even our agricultural production is only a percentage of what it could be. And we’re outsourcing our food supply along with everything else.

          • Sick of it

            Not only are we not producing food at full capacity, there are plenty of alternatives for food production which we have never even tried. I cannot help but roll my eyes when folks talk about shortages of things we could easily produce.

    • Ed

      Whites in the South still vote by an large as a group. In Mississippi nearly 90% of Whites voted for Romney for example. Now this may change somewhat as Northern and Cali Whites flee the messes they’ve created and move to the South. Many still will vote Dem.

      The problem is that Whites in places where there are few minorities votes (NH, IA and MN) for example split their votes. Normally this isn’t bad but when you have one party that openly revels in undermining the country’s core values you need to have a united front across regions.

      • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

        Whites in places like Vermont and New Hampshire are not accustomed to thinking in terms of White racial solidarity. They have not had to. Home is a place that has always been a White enclave. Southern Whites in the lowland South have always had a sense of White Identity because they have to deal with Negroes. Whites in some of the Northern Cities have also acquired a sense of White Identity from dealing with Negroes and other non-Whites. Polish Americans on the South Side of Milwaukee, and Czech and Italian Americans in Cicero, Illinois demonstrated this in the 1960’s. Dealing with Negroes had made them into racial realists with a strong sense of White Identity and White racial solidarity. Whites in Cicero booed MLK and chased him out of town because they knew exactly what they were dealing with. White in places like Vermont tend to be naïve to what Negroes are really like, because they are not accustomed to dealing with them. If they had to deal with Blacks, Hispanics, or even large numbers of Asians, they would quickly change their minds.

    • ricpic

      It is much more important to upper-middle class and upper class whites to show separation from “them,” the dreaded lower-middle class and working class whites, than it is to join with “them” as a bloc. You simply cannot overestimate the importance to “elite” whites of showing they are in no way part of the riff-raff. It is an insurmountable barrier to the creation of white identity.

      • PvtCharlieSlate

        For the remaining Americans in CT, they’re called “Westport Stupid Yuppie Scum”.

        • astra81

          Sounds like I moved from the same area where you currently live, Pvt Charlie. We’re now in the South and for the most part, don’t miss anything about CT.

      • Zaporizhian Sich

        The elite whites are almost as dangerous an enemy as the real puppet masters because they are corrupt. They can NEVER be trusted to act in the collective interests of white Americans, but to line their pockets and run from the genocide they are creating for everyone else. When war breaks out, they will be against us, you can be sure of it.

        • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

          Absolutely correct. Bill Clinton is a prime example. He is a Ni*ger lover. Without his Negro loving Schtick, the present Negroid race hustler occupying the White House would still be in Illinois.
          My personal perception on why Bill Clinton loves Negroes is that, in the Negro culture, he finds validation for his sexual immorality. He knows that his sexual depravity is unacceptable in traditional White culture. If he tells a Negro about his exploits, they will want to high five him for “gittin’ sum pu*sy”

          • PvtCharlieSlate

            Well, isn’t he supposedly the first “black” president?

        • PvtCharlieSlate

          When war breaks out they may be against us but most of them can’t tell from which end of the tube the round comes out.

          • Zaporizhian Sich

            If you mean gunshots, THAT will be the least of their worries. There’s a LOT of whites who know how to use heavy weapons, missiles, aircraft as well as various improvised weapons. They will be a deeply hated, and hunted group.

    • paul marchand

      Unfortunately, there is solidarity in doing the bidding of the Abortion Party amongst many whites on the take, along with the minorities.
      Three groups must FORCEFULLY ( and justly) be extracted from voting:
      * illegal aliens and children
      * those who are net recipients of federal largesse
      * government employees

      • Sick of it

        The third one is key. Government employees do the bidding of the government in so many ways it is disgusting. They will cast off their so-called beliefs in exchange for a paycheck from Big Brother.

    • Petronius

      Since the 1970s, Southerners have formed the core of the Republican Party’s base. But what have the Republicans given them in return for their loyalty, votes, and money? Nothing, that’s what. Southern conservatives have been completely marginalized.

      No conservative Southerner has ever been nominated for a slot on the national ticket. None has been appointed to the Supreme Court. And with the exception of James Baker, none has held any significant cabinet post. In fact, Republican presidents have appointed more Democrats to their cabinets than Southerners.

      Even the Republican governors in the South are either Chamber of Commerce types or immigrants (Jindal, Haley) or carpetbaggers (Scott, McDonnell, McCrory).

      • itdoesnotmatter

        What about South Carolina’s Trey Gowdy? He seems like a sincere, stand-up king of man.

        • Petronius

          Yes he is, but so what? Gowdy represents a single district in South Carolina. Will he ever hold any national or even State-wide office? Will the Republican Party nominate him for President? Will they appoint him to the Supreme Court?

          In point of fact Gov. Haley had an opportunity to appoint Gowdy to the US Senate but passed him over in favor of Tim Scott. So there’s your answer.

  • MekongDelta69

    “Every racial group overestimated the size of the nonwhite population, which in reality is about 37 percent.”

    Which is about 37 percent too damn much.

    • MikeofAges

      Do the numbers. 80 percent of 37 percent plus 30 percent of 73 percent equals a bare majority. That, in a nutshell, is how a bunch of freaks who constitute a far minority of the white population, and who far and away do not even slightly represent the social conservatism of minorities and immigrants, are able to rule the nation.

      • shawnmer

        Actually, it’s 30% of 63%, not 73%, so it’s 48.5% total.

        But your point stands. Since Dems (amazingly) still get over 30% of white votes, if the actual voting electorate was in line with population breakdown the GOP would already be essentially finished as a national party.

        So long, America. You were great while you lasted.

        • MikeofAges

          Sorry for the error. But the point stands.

    • benvad

      Right on

    • AndrewInterrupted

      Yeah, you notice how Liberal ‘projection’ is also at work in this condescending drivel. The ‘projection’ being the inevitability that the 37% number will only get larger. Says who?

      How about we stop the Chicago thugs in their tracks in 2014, elect an Ann Coulter in 2016 who will sign a bill that reverses Hart-Celler 1965–>and the 37% number gets smaller.

      That is the plan. Get used to the idea, America, that the number gets reversed and we go back to 90% European. Let the deportations begin.

      • Nathanwartooth

        elect an Ann Coulter in 2016

        It’s going to be Chris Christie vs. Hilary Clinton in 2016. Calling it now. No matter who the country chooses we are screwed. There is about zero chance of getting an immigration restrictionist elected.

        • AndrewInterrupted

          As I remember, you are iPhone generation. Your comment is not unexpected for someone who runs with iPhoners. Your generation has been severely poisoned by the Marxists. The over 25 white crowd has finally awakened. It’s a matter of whether it is too late or not.

          Looking out that far: Christie 10% chance. Paul: 30%…Coulter: still keeping her ammo dry…<;-)

          Coulter will need very little start-up time. Her positions are widely known. She could announce in early 2016 if she wanted to. In the meantime she can construct her platform as a pundit. It's genius.

          • SoulInvictus

            Well, problem is that she is absolute poison for all even moderately left leaning people and a lot of independents. Probably zero minority appeal as well. ( Pluses for me, but insurmountable problems for her in a voting booth.)
            Also, unmarried, no kids, and hot. Which would likely turn off a Lot of women that would otherwise vote for a female candidate.
            I also suspect there has to be some juicy dirt to be dug up on a hot unmarried woman. I’d be incredibly surprised if there weren’t some embarrassing pictures. I could see her getting Weiner’ed half way in (pun intended).

            I think she could probably win in the right state. But a national election, no chance.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Ann has used the loss of Black jobs as the reason for this country to be anti-amnesty. 30 million unskilled meth heads pouring in from Mexico will cause Black unemployment percentages to triple. How could she not have some Black community appeal? She also said several times that civil rights laws were only meant for Blacks as reparations. Everyone else is scamming.

            The women vote would split down the middle. Hillary would get all the Libtards, Ann all the conservative women. They cancel each other out, I think. I think more and more Liberal women feel duped and only care about electing A woman President, not which side. I also think Hillary is too old and ill, and will not survive a campaign. There are persistent rumors about her health. If Hillary bailed and a male candidate filled her slot, Ann would get even more female votes.

            Ann criticized Sarah Palin BECAUSE she had kids. Ann isn’t one of those you-can-have-it-all types. She rightly believes it’s one or the other. That would be a strong plank for her campaign. Feminism has been debunked and that is one of the revelations: one or the other. Mom or President. You shouldn’t try for both. That will attract ALL conservative women.

            Plus hot looking Nordic blondes are getting top gigs. How about the Prime Minister of Denmark that O’Bummer was drooling over during Mandela’s funeral?
            .

          • SoulInvictus

            LOL…
            That Adam’s apple is a little suspicious to me too. 😉
            But for whatever she’d gain from libs, that would tank her as a conservative candidate.
            There’s no way a fiery single woman like that hasn’t done some serious naughtiness and in this day, highly unlikely the other participant(s) wouldn’t get or sneak some cell phone pics.
            If it was a Congressional race, that might even be a bump. But not in a Prez race.

            Any given comment of hers almost could be twisted to alienate blacks (again, I don’t care, but a vote is a vote). And black women would never, ever vote for a leggy blond. Especially over a Dem.

            I think the nation already proved it would take a Muslim named, inexperienced black man over a woman. Hillary couldn’t even take him in her own party with the most popular and successful ex-President in modern history backing her.
            I actually felt for her in that campaign. I don’t agree with a lot of her politics or general lack of charisma, but the knives really came out for her among the Dems (this is back when I was one prior to my awakening). A lot of it was overt skirt bashing and then they hit both Clintons with the racist garbage which I never could figure out.

            As with race topics, I trust my own eyes and experience. And my life was much better and easier financially when Bill was in office. Good times. He could have been getting hummers on the lawn for all I care and the GOP went full tard with the impeachment garbage.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            You make the presumption that Ann has to pander to the Hispanics. She actually is, in a convoluted way. Question Diversity and I were having this same discussion a few weeks ago, when he mentioned the seemingly odd election results at the southern California border. A white male Republican won.

            That could not have happened without a considerable amount of Hispanics on his side. Why did that happen? It happened because the Hispanics who have been living in the land of plenty for one or two generations don’t want any more of their stripe cutting into their slice of that American apple pie.

            Many Hispanics are trying to close the door behind them. The laser-focused Libtardian Party spotted this sea-change also. Which is why they so aggressively Maria Conchita Alonso when she started making such public comments. She was Cuban-born, then entered through Venezuela. So, she’s not the exact fit, but would have been a perfect person to enlist for the cause. And, of course, that nuance eluded the curmudgeon Repugs.

            Ann’s outspoken anti-amnesty/pro-deportation stance is enlisted enlisting more of that growing demographic. For that reason, I think Ann and Hillary would also split that overall voting block.

            If Ann dropped a bombshell, like being transgender, personally, I think the Republicans would welcome the opportunity to prove to the country and the world that they don’t care about such things –only choosing the most qualified person for the job. It would be another unexpected plus.

          • SoulInvictus

            I heard someone on the radio talking about how Cesar Chavez had that outlook. That he didn’t want illegals coming in and driving down farm workers’ pay. The irony huh…
            Don’t know how seriously I take that stuff though. On one hand there’s their pocketbook, on the other hand there’s the whole La Raza/Reconquista sentiment. Wonder which is the prevailing driver for their voting. I guess if they’re electing white guys in SoCal, that’s promising. Doesn’t seem to be affecting the left’s desire for amnesty/open borders though.

            On the Dem side, I really think Hillary is done. I wouldn’t be surprised if she ran, but less so if she retired.
            I’d like to see a return of Gen.Wesley Clark (unlikely but who knows). Always liked him. Never hated Howard Dean either but he seems happy in his leadership roll with the DNC. I always thought Clark/Dean would have made for a decent ticket and administration.
            A Clark/Warren ticket would be about the only thing that could possibly interest me in a Dem vote. If the GOP put up another clown car show like they did last time, it’d even be the preferable choice. Military experience and someone that would put some bankers in prison for life, could definitely do worse than that.
            Given their success with a brown candidate though, probably unlikely they’ll ever put up a totally white ticket again.
            Works for me as it will start to alienate more and more white voters.

            I’d like to see Ann in primaries at least. With the morons they usually throw up, she’d own the room and drive the debate towards things I like. I don’t think I’ve ever seen her say anything about political office being a desire of hers. I haven’t read her books though. Sad that someone who represents the general views of 50 years ago is now the nuclear option.
            But from your mouth to God’s ear, she’d definitely stir some sh*t as VP.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            I don’t know that Ann always (or ever) had presidential ambitions. She probably didn’t. But, she sees that 10 books later the Cultural Marxist machine is still on track to finish the white genocide coup– “…the transformation…”.

            She may do it for self preservation purposes.

            Presidential candidates like Jefferson (and many others) were good about hiding their ambition. They would usually approach the white house under the guise of being drafted. There would have to be another “…Draft Ann For President…” campaign started by various groups as part of the early process.

          • Nathanwartooth

            Ann Coulter will run for president the same day that Rush Limbaugh runs for president. These people are political commentators, not politicians.

            As I remember, you are iPhone generation. Your comment is not unexpected for someone who runs with iPhoners.

            I would be offended if I wasn’t so baffled.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Sarah Palin was a loud-mouthed, LIV, soccer mom who became the half term default Governor of Alaska. Ross Perot ran a data processing company….

            Presidential candidates don’t necessarily need to start out as first selectmen. Ann is perfectly positioned for the modern (albeit dystopian) political battlefield. Why do you think Hillary clung to Slick Willy’s coat tails all these years?

          • Nathanwartooth

            You should watch House of Cards on Netflix. The Underwoods are basically the Clintons. It’s very entertaining. Also except for a token black guy, it’s pretty much diversity free.

            While it isn’t impossible for Ann to run for president, it would be extremely rare and basically out of nowhere. For someone to go from running nothing to president is pretty much unheard of. She would be running for the House or Senate first if she was serious.

            Alex Jones and Ann Coulter some of the few personalities that are tough on immigration that I would love to see run for office. It would be a hoot to see Alex debate other politicians and Ann is just so hot and smart that it is a joy watching her do just about anything.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Did I get your age demographic right, roughly that is? We need your demographic to sniff some smelling salts and join the movement. I know you’ve come around, but what would you say about the rest of your demo?

          • Nathanwartooth

            If they went to college, they are lost. If they didn’t, they are pretty aware of whats going on.

            It is like a night and day difference hanging out with my “friends who went to college” and “friends who didn’t”.

            The colleges are very good at being indoctrination centers, that is for sure.

      • NM156

        House conservatives have been on the amnesty defensive for 20 years, so increasing mass immigration is what GOP Inc. and their clients in Congress would push for if not for those damn voters.

  • If conservatives really fear anti-white discrimination, then they better start acting like it and voting like it.

    • MikeofAges

      Many of them don’t. They are “meritocratic”, universalist, free market elitists. John Engleman, who posts in this forum, in his clunky and heavy-handed way represents this point of view.

      • You can have meritocracy and a free market and yet not permit anti-white discrimination. Just like you can like broccoli and grapefruit juice and not permit anti-white discrimination. They’re unrelated things.

        One of my grandfather’s favorite phrases, cleaned up slightly, is that people don’t go through stuff they put up with. Like the very related immigration question, we’re going to have to make it clear to the political class that good behavior gets rewarded and more importantly bad behavior gets punished. Make anti-white discrimination and immigration third rail issues.

        • MikeofAges

          The point is, Democratic Universalism has in common with Marxism that it holds that people are interchangeable. While it is true that you can have meritocracy without discrimination, the concept can be applied in different ways. If “merit” is construed as having certain credentials, and how those are obtained is manipulated, or certain credentials obviated entirely, then meritocracy indeed could be enlisted as front for some system of discrimination, if only by class.

          The meritocratic idea has flaws into no one will acknowledge. When people have no birthright, they have no protection against even the most extreme of adversities. You can see how, in a multiethnic, multicultural and multiracial society, the idea of meritocracy inevitably edges into multifarious forms of discrimination in that the meaning of the idea itself can be manipulated in many ways.

          Let me just pose a question to you: Who has more merit? Someone with good preparation who could be more valuable to an organization in the next week or the next month? Or someone who clearly with some development could do better over a long career?

          The issue could be debated, but in the system of our society today, “merit” is deemed categorically on the side of the former.

          • Sick of it

            You’ve hit the nail on the head. Everyone is too focused on the short-term rather than the long-term today. People of ability but lacking in training will always be the most valuable asset, just not the most valuable asset RIGHT NOW. Experience can be useful, but smart people can work circles around the experienced after a rather short period of time.

      • Oil Can Harry

        Mr. Engleman is not a free marketeer; he’s a welfare state liberal if not a social democrat.

        Given your advocacy for a “labor oriented agenda” your economic views may actually be quite similar to his.

        • MikeofAges

          I’ll take your pont, but I would say he is both at once. His universalism, in terms of my take on the idea, is pretty evident.

          In terms of a labor-oriented agenda, I’m not a social democrat at all. I do not like administrator and social worker heavy, capital intensive approaches to socioeconomic problems. I much prefer the idea of putting options on the table for people and letting them choose for themselves what to avail themselves of. I know this vague, but if I had the say, I would move as much as could from the channels it is in right now to other channels which directly reached people.

          I do support tax-based universal health insurance. Another example of what I would do is eliminate a lot of need-based college aid and move in favor of lower cost, and making community colleges virtually free on a national basis. Also, I would try to put in place a lot of short period job training courses leading to employment. What a novel thought. Employment.

          • Natassia

            “Tax-based universal health insurance” isn’t insurance. Why don’t you call it what it is?

        • Sick of it

          He has specifically stated that he is a Social Democrat.

          • bilderbuster

            Engleman is all of the above & worse.
            As much as it pains me to admit, his views on race & immigration are much closer to mine than any president in my lifetime.
            I would have voted for Engleman over Romney.
            We can suffer a Social Democrap’s economic policies but we can’t survive open borders & Black breeding.

          • Jotun Hunter

            nor would it be prefferrable to be infused with endless waves of asian immigration. If they are the superior race engelman claims why can’t they stay in their own countries and display their superiority from there? Did we suffer some lack of asians during all of European/North American history before the immigration waves of the post 1960’s?

          • bilderbuster

            Engleman has a yearning for the yellow without a doubt.
            He sometimes reminds me of those merchant marine types from days past reminiscing about their “Singapore Sweethearts” or the South Pacific “Hula Girls” but unless I missed it I don’t recall him pushing an open door immigration policy for Asians.
            As far as I can tell Asians were a well behaved & almost a “model minority” if there has to be a minority until the 60’s but please correct me if I’m mistaken.

          • Jotun Hunter

            well – I used to live in vancouver, where I wouldn’t exactly call them a ‘model minority’ – at least in terms of chinese – i believe the japanese are a vastly different story – though I still don’t want them to ‘take over’. The chinese may be generally low-crime (where gangs don’t enter the picture). But the city overall is destroyed utterly with them. Completely lost whatever white character it had. Their neighborhoods are generally filthy or somehow squalid, the supermarkets reek of live fish and other, stranger things, many of them don’t bother learning english any more. Wait til the larger numbers congregate for the fun to happen. They enjoy spitting in the street, they are rude and pushy, their youth act especially badly and are generally into tasteless boy racer type culture. Also they obiously nepotistic and racially aware in all the usual ways we are no longer allowed to be. most poeple i know still living there are leaving or want to leave, and openly because there are ‘too many chinese’. Engelman believes they are superior (along with jews) and they deserve whatever they want, open doors, keys to the city – whaever – because we are ‘inferior’. it’s laughable.

          • bilderbuster

            I guess I was referring to old school San Francisco China Town.
            You’re right about beautiful Vancouver because when I was there in 2000 it was getting seedy with Asians & other “Easterners”.

            I don’t know what to make of Engleman’s infatuation with his Jewish & Asian comrades.
            But unlike Romney I’ll bet if a little Engleman adopted a Black baby, Big Engleman wouldn’t send Christmas cards to them of the whole Engleman family with the Black baby Engleman perched on his lap.

      • Engleman is too conformist to see the light.

    • Sick of it

      Too many have bought into the lesser of two evils philosophy or we would have a viable third party.

  • MikeofAges

    Don’t people other than whites have some autonomy? Isn’t the conservative’s “Caucasion march into the multiracial century” in part the consequence of the decision of the minority group rank and file to join in the bloc voting model? Not like the Republican Party hasn’t run some good minority candidates or developed good leaders other minority group members could follow if they wished. They just don’t vote and they don’t join.

    Even the esteemed Condoleeza Rice fell for this one. Recently, she told conservatives they have to reach out and embrace minorities. How come she isn’t out there trying recruit minorities to the cause? Please.

    BTW, why would whites not fear discrimination? American and world society already are into the third generation of anti-white discrimination. That some portion of the white population is made exempt doesn’t mean it’s not happening.

    • Lada Belyy

      Republican will NEVER again get minority votes when they make a difference. Johnson made sure of that. Sure, they can win a few, here and there, when an election is not close. But, when votes count, nonWhites will vote Democrat. The only way Republican will win is to mobilize the conservative base that was attracted by Ronald Reagan. I’m not saying he was a great president or not; only that he WON by attracting conservative voters who largely stay home these days, because of the GOP’s lukewarm neocon candidates; progressives who are willing to sell the party platform for a deal with the other side.

      • AndrewInterrupted

        LBJ only signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for votes. The argument made by Congress and the American people was that the Constitution was sufficient as it was written. LBJ did it for the votes. He told an aide on Air Force One while talking about the bill, and that he would sign it, he said:

        “…I will have those ni**ers voting Democrat for the next 100 years…”

        • MikeofAges

          Johnson also said “We have lost the South for a generation.” But he went on to win Virginia, North Carolina, Florida, Tennessee, Kentucky, Arkansas, and Texas in the 1964 election, at a time when black voter participation was limited in most or all of those states. If the Democrats later lost the South, it was over national social issues and the infiltration and takeover of the national Democratic Party by social and political radicals, not because white Southerners now had to stand in one supermarket line with their black neighbors, and eat in the same chain restaurant. Johnson said a lot earthy things, using foul language.

          Johnson believed in what he was doing. He had a New Deal populist’s sympathy for the underdog and the common man. When it came to dealing with people who were in the game of politics, power and money, however, he had no scruples and no morality. Johnson was the last nationalist Democrat to hold the presidential office.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            I’ve read some material from people around him and his adversaries, including Goldwater. Barry Goldwater was stunned at the levels LBJ would sink to. I think LBJ was the first president of the coup.

          • PvtCharlieSlate

            You might be interested in Robert Caro’s three volume biography of Lyndon Johnson.
            He stated in the preface to the first volume that his original intention was to write the story of a man he admired and respected. As his research took him deeper and deeper into the details of Johnson’s life his opinion of Johnson turned around 180 degrees.
            The first volume became something of an angry backlash.
            The second volume was a full-steam-ahead frontal assault.
            The third volume was bit like an embarrassed retreat from the second.
            Lots of details and all of it fascinating.

          • MikeofAges

            Seriously, I don’t think I need to read the book to get it about Lyndon Johnson. Robert Caro’s work has been widely discussed. His issue is that he is too shocked at how it all really works. And no one worked it better than Johnson. The bottom line on Johnson, in my estimation, is this. When you needed someone to fight for you in the Roman arena, you hired a gladiator, not a do-gooder in a white robe.

            Caro wrote a book about Robert Moses, the New York public works czar. Caro shouldn’t have been surprised about Johnson. I will get the Moses book and read it. Although my view of Johnson is contrary, reading Caro cover-to-cover is just too much. As to Johnson, I think too much attention is given to some of the absurd inner city programs he promoted and too little to fundamentals of his reforms and initiatives. Johnson often is blamed for creating the hereditary welfare culture. I was there, and I know the issue was on the table before Johnson. The Aid for Dependent Children (ADC) program was created in the 1930 under Franklin D. Roosevelt.

  • Lada Belyy

    “…with 33 percent of conservatives believing nonwhites account for more than half of the U.S. population, a demographic milestone that is still decades away.”

    While political leaders continue work to FORCE increases in massive nonWhite immigration and assimilation “to create a blended humanity”, “to solve the race problem”, or “for the economy”; there is always a reason and it always leads to White genocide. They are PURPOSELY destroying the White majority. Changing our country from one type of people to another. Destroying a distinct group of people. That’s genocide; just like it was genocide when the Chinese flooded Tibet with non-Tibetan Asians. Genocide.

  • shmo123

    37%? That’s about 32% too high.

    • PvtCharlieSlate

      36.99%
      Don’t want to be completely intolerant.

  • DaveMed

    Every racial group overestimated the size of the nonwhite population, which in reality is about 37 percent.
    ________________________________________________________

    This number is not the relevant one. The relevant figures are the age demographics of the different races.

    A great deal of American Whites are senior citizens, or almost there. They’re not having any more children. So, the demographic wave is already poised to crash down on us.

    • Ella

      You can thank the Boomer’s lack of breeding to afford their fancy cars, Mac Mansions, and retirement at 55 attitude. They will get the rust years soon enough when they cannot entice their precious majority-minorities to pay for their pension and healthcare. Like I said before, we are the latch key and aborted generations!

      • 1stworlder

        Latrina is using my taxes to pay for 17 illegitimate crack babies.

      • IstvanIN

        I graduated HS in 1976 and am amazed how many of the classmates I still have some knowledge of never married or had children. Or only had one or two children, unlike our parents. I find it terribly odd.

        • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

          I remember actually thinking, as a naïve 80’s teen, that a low White birthrate was good, as we were smarter than the non-Whites, and figured that we would be enjoying homelands with zero population growth and also next to zero unemployment due to a shrinking population. In my youthful naivete, I actually thought that America was soon going employ forced sterilization of Blacks due to their sociopathic ways, and that we would also re-segregate them in a few years to punish them for their horrid behavior since the 1960’s. My high school was 20% Black, and I couldn’t imagine that our great country was going to tolerate much more B.S. from Negroes before there would be some drastic punishment resulting. Silly me figured that our leaders though like my Grandparents, and had had just about enough abhorrent behavior out of the Negroes, and that Northern politicians had learned that the South was right about Negroes, that they are an inferior race that cannot like amongst Whites without constant turmoil. By this point in my life, I figured I’d be living in an all White state with no non-Whites allowed other than possibly small numbers of Asians.

          • In your youthful naivety. I’m only 22 and feel wise beyond my years.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            Welcome to AmRen, Burning Flame!! Good to have you. The 80’s were a different time, as you can tell from my description. The 60’s Era was still recent, and older adults were almost universally racial realists. Baby Boomers were still young adults, and the older Generations didn’t pay their Woodstock style naïve dreams of racial integration much credence. If you were a teen, as I was, chances were you had Grandparents and older relatives who lamented the “recent” social changes in America. I had Grandparents who had voted for George Wallace, and were firmly opposed to racial integration. It was a different world back then. The typical adult over 50 was a racial realist.

          • SoulInvictus

            Instead, you have a populace so brain dead that they think race is the equivalent of a permanent tan and so, can’t figure out why things happen.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            Exactly. They think that the only difference between a Black and one of us is skin color, and wonder why Italian Americans don’t want Mestizoes moving into their neighborhoods.

          • PvtCharlieSlate

            When I was in the Army and went to Australia on R&R, whenever the subject of race came up, I had to explain that Black is not the same thing as your neighbor with a heavy suntan.

        • Nathanwartooth

          That birthrate would be fine and even preferable to a high birth rate if it wasn’t for mass immigration and the non white birth rates being so high.

        • Ella

          It is uncanny. Among neighbours and classmates, I also know a share of people who never had any children, and their Boomer parents really don’t care. If married, they chose their careers and fancy houses over children. All my numerous cousins had children, but they stopped at the two limit like me. I think we fear the economic hardships straying past two in big cities and also, lacking job security. But, I always see Muslims and Latinos with plenty of children -double that number!

      • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

        Being an older Generation X’er who grew up, and has lived, in the shadow of the Boomers, I have watched the Boomers go from young rebels to the elders. I don’t think I’ll ever get used to seeing commercials targeting health products for seniors that feature rock songs. It just seems like Sinatra and Dean Martin should be crooning when I see seniors, not CCR or some Negro Motown singer. Before I stray off topic, though, I think that the Baby Boomers have just had it too easy. Most White Boomers in the Northern and Western states grew up in suburbs and small towns with little exposure to non-Whites. Along came the media in their younger days telling them how horrible their parents were for being racial realists, and they fell prey to the media propaganda without a fight.

      • kjh64

        Actually, there is no population shortage. If we had just not passed the 1965 Immigration Act, we’d be fine.

    • Petronius

      Absolutely right, DaveMed. When you look at the electorate under age 30, where nonwhites have greater numbers, the percentages of conservatives (23%) and moderates (23%) in the entire US population shrinks to a permanent minority.

      Conservatives and moderates will continue to shrink relative to nonwhites as mass immigration continues. Unless they are willing to engage in identity politics in competition with other groups, they will, within another decade or so, become politically irrelevant and marginalized, except perhaps locally in Appalachia and the Dakota-northern Rocky Mountain States. Their only hope will be the emergence of white solidarity, which would enable them either to compete for their piece of the American pie on naked racial terms, or to establish break-away republics.

      • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

        Voting should have been laid aside for adults 30 and over decades ago. Youth with little life experience should never take the wheel politically from adults with the wisdom of living experience. The Baby Boomers were enjoying rebelling against their parents in the 60’s and 70’s, and should not have had a say in who became President. Ditto for Generation X’ers in the 90’s voting for Clinton, and White Y’ers voting for the Negroid in the last two elections.

        • Petronius

          The argument for the 26th Amendment (the vote for 18 year-olds) was that if they are old enough to fight in Vietnam they are old enough to vote. But by that reasoning, dogs should be allowed to vote, because dogs also fight.

          There are drawbacks to all systems of government, but certainly our current idiocracy is one of the most deeply flawed.

          The Founders had a vision for mixed government that combined the best aspects of monarchy, aristocracy, and democracy. Unfortunately, however, we seem to have acquired the worst aspects of each –– an imperial presidency, a Ruling Class elite, and a materialistic mobocracy of moochers, freeloaders, parasites, and looters, both foreign and domestic, who elect a new dictator once every four years.

          Personally I prefer monarchy as a system of government, but if voting is your thing then please restrict the vote to taxpayers at a certain minimum level, have property requirements as well as age requirements, and disqualify all who accept welfare from the government.

  • ncpride

    On average, whites overestimated the nation’s minority population by 11 percentage points.

    Probably a lot of Whites don’t buy the 11 million illegals number the government has repeated for a decade or more, and know it’s much higher. A LOT higher, so they are probably closer to the truth.

    • Ella

      We think it is more like 30 million in the USA.

      • AndrewInterrupted

        Question Diversity said that Newt Gingrich estimated the number at 37 million in 2007.

        • Of course since then many Americans have relocated to his moon colony.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Is that where Kate Upton was?
            She was advertising for the colony?

          • Could be. How unplugged to our celebrity culture am I? Had to look up Kate Upton. I thought she was a model or an actress or something. Turns out she is also an expert horsewoman. Maybe she will be salvageable when sanity at long last returns to our society.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Oh, sorry. She did a photo shoot in zero gravity airplane. Here it is.

          • I would now like to say the following:

            Thank you. Thank you very much. Obviously sometimes it pays to be more plugged into the celebrity culture. (Stop that! Just a figure of speech.)

          • Jotun Hunter

            ahhhhhhhhhhhhh – the obvious aesthetic superiority of white women

      • Zaporizhian Sich

        I would not be surprised if we have 50 million of them, I am seeing Asians, Muslims and Mexicans here in my cities in huge numbers that simply were not here a few years ago.

        • SoulInvictus

          My favorite response to people who trot out the “huddled masses” line to justify immigration and amnesty is:
          A. There was no social safety net for third world refugees to impact when that thought was written down.
          B. Nearly everything was made or grown domestically using intensive manual labor, so there was a bottomless demand for workers.

          and most importantly…
          C. It’s on a damn French statue, not the Constitution.

          And optional D. It was written by Sephardic Jew Emma Lazarus who was active in aiding jewish refugees immigrate to New York. So no shocker that she tainted a magnificient statue of Libertas, the Roman goddess of freedom with her little propaganda poem about opening the doors for foreign detritus.
          It’s kind of their thing to do stuff like that.

          • Yes, and I believed the words were sort of tacked on by these ne’er–do–wells and only later approved by congress.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Yeah, the French really set us for a fall with that one.

            They can have the statue back. Maybe we can change the inscription to “Come all ye Muslims, or something”.

          • SoulInvictus

            lol… maybe just an endlessly repeating audio clip of a call to prayer or Lalalalalalalala (that crazy sounding yell they do).

          • Sick of it

            It was given to us by the post-Revolution non-French “French” so yeah…expect it to have a whacked out message.

          • Who Me?

            Really…”Give me your tired, your poor,
            Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
            The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
            Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,”

            REALLY??? THAT is what we really want, the flotsam and jetsam, the “refuse”, trash even of every third-world shit-hole on earth for future citizens? Alrighty then, let me OUT of here!

    • italian guy

      I guess it has to do with Hollywood propaganda, if you take a look to any sit-com, movie or talk show that comes from the States, it looks like black people alone are 50% of the population…

      • Martel

        I have travelled through the US, i often felt blacks represented a much higher percentage of the population. Reading your comment again, I gather you are European?

        • italian guy

          Yes, as the name imply!
          I don’t go to the cinema anymore for example, way too many non-whites and “magic negroes” for my taste.

          • Martel

            There are a lot of Italian Americans who are proud of their identity so I was not sure. Italy is great, if I were you I would travel when I can to many of the places where according to the media there are many Italian ethnic nationalists. Many football fanclubs are considered “racist” in Italy.

            Good to have another European on American Renaissance.

        • Tim_in_Indiana

          There’s no doubt that blacks are vastly over-represented on television. Blacks may seem to you to represent a higher percentage of the population than they actually do because they are concentrated in the areas that matter most–the urban areas. If you restricted your travels through the small towns and rural areas, whites would seem like a higher percentage of the population.

          • Martel

            In urban areas its hard to miss them indeed.

  • kjh64

    A sizeable portion of this 37% are non-Whites who are not citizens and in this country, either legally or illegally. There are around 35-40 million, not 11 million, in this country illegally. There are millions more non-White foreigners living here legally. The census considers anyone living in America as part of the American population when in reality, only American citizens are Americans As such, what the racial breakdown of actual, real Americans is is unknown.

  • Conrad

    The browns, or darkies as I call them, do not need to be a majority to ruin a nation.

  • LovelyNordicHeidi

    It’s pretty amazing that blacks, on average, think they are currently living in a nation with a nonwhite majority.
    ——————————————————
    We know now what their dreams are. Soon they will know ours: homogeneous White nations. Let’s see whether anti-Whites call that “pretty amazing” as well!

    • LovelyNordicHeidi

      …………………………………………………………..

      • Reverend Bacon

        We don’t even need to “see.” It turns out they even smell different (see yesterday’s bit on armpits and earwax). So, like the old joke, blind people can hate them too.

        • LovelyNordicHeidi

          Our eyes are racist,
          Our ears are racist,
          Turns out our noses are racist too.

      • ricpic

        So when does he first rape her and then kill her? Or is it done already?

        • LovelyNordicHeidi

          Or is it done already?

          He might have baked an indigenous meat pie. You’d never guess the ingredients.

    • WhiteGuyInJapan

      Not so amazing to me. In my college days, I noticed black students who really lived in isolated little bubbles, completely insulated from outside news, data, big words, etc. They believed whatever they wanted and got quite angry if anyone offended them with racist stuff like FBI data. Sorry about that! 😉

      • LovelyNordicHeidi

        In my college days, I noticed black students who really lived in isolated little bubbles, completely insulated from outside news, data, big words, etc. They believed whatever they wanted and got quite angry if anyone offended them with racist stuff like FBI data.

        Are you making an analogy of White ethnostates with Blacks? Why?

        • WhiteGuyInJapan

          No, I was referring to your quote of the article: “It’s pretty amazing that blacks, on average, think they are currently living in a nation with a nonwhite majority. ” Their perception that the economy has improved since Obama was elected, despite economic evidence to the contrary, is another great example. No data, just pure unchallenged opinion.

          • LovelyNordicHeidi

            No, I was referring to your quote of the article:

            It wasn’t that clear what you were referring to. I see your message in a completely different context now. Please do not forget next time to quote what you are referring to!

  • Bossman

    Why must conservatism and republicanism be identified with whiteness?

    • AndrewInterrupted

      They are our last chance.

      • Martel

        No, white democrats are up for grabs too in the future.

    • Martel

      They propose values which are attractive to Europeans, less so to coloureds.
      Republicans and conservatives are not aware of this fact, and they awkwardly, although honestly, try to cater to coloureds. But reason the author does so, is because he wishes to brand the republics “the racist party”. Which makes little sense.

      • Bossman

        It was not always like that. The Republican party used to be a party of freedom. Abraham Lincoln freed the slaves.

        • Martel

          True, the Republicans were considered the party siding with blacks deep into the 20th century I believe.

          The Republicans didn’t suddenly become racist, the democrats figured out an excellent strategy to increase their votes, an it worked.

        • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

          Lincoln also wanted to send all of the Negroids back to Africa, because he felt strongly that they are not compatible with Whites. Quite a few were sent to what is now Liberia.

          • kikz

            y, and Liberia is shining example.. of…….

      • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

        Exactly. Being honest and hard-working, no hand-outs for lazy slackers. Slackers are abhorred in White cultures, but the norm in Negro/Mestizo culture.

  • So CAL Snowman

    I don’t fear discrimination, I fear living in Mexiafrico.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      AfriMexAsia

      • Ella

        To say it bluntly, what a screwed up mix!

        • LovelyNordicHeidi

          Any mix is screwed up. Homogeneity is our greatest strength.

      • LovelyNordicHeidi

        If Brazil is our future, I don’t want to be part of that future.

    • Einsatzgrenadier

      The only way to save America is through a resurgence of white racial consciousness and white national identity, otherwise we’ll be swimming in a sea of 3rd world feces. Let’s see if whites will wake up before the US is transformed into a Central American banana republic, only without the bananas.

      • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

        Exactly. Cold weather doesn’t stop them. Look at Detroit and Cleveland. Taking their hand-outs away would send them packing. Secession is the only answer. Secession by racial realist Whites, with our enclaves no longer part of the U.S. Government. With no handouts available and self reliance expected, Negros and Mestizos would stay out or leave.

  • slash345

    Bloc voting leads to balkanization. Especially if it’s based off ethnicity.

    If whites can unify as a singular voting bloc who votes for its own interests then we might see the union split. And we might be able to win this war.

  • Fighting_Northern_Spirit

    I first noticed this overestimation of minority numbers when posting black crime statistics on Yahoo. Most people didn’t doubt the fact of high black criminality, but they thought that blacks were much more numerous than 12.9% of the population. Obviously blacks make such a nuisance of themselves that their numbers seem larger.

  • LovelyNordicHeidi

    It’d give me the creeps to be around any non-White.

  • Ella

    I think almost ALL US cities over 1 million are majority nonwhite. I know we are a majority-minority State, and it looks it. Your commute to work can be 40-60 miles in order to live in a mostly White enclave. I really believe the US has more like 55% White and 45% nonwhite since most populations live in the cities for employment reasons. So many small towns also have gone “dry.”

    • Jesse James

      One thing that I have seen in my own small hometown is that the process where rural areas in Georgia was settled by whites and functioning areas of civilization created with proud churches, courthouses and main streets is now running in reverse. After a brief flurry of having new small manufacturing facilities open up in the 60s, 70s and 80s we slowly began losing these plants. Several years ago the last one closed leaving us nowhere to work. After a campaign of desperate begging we did get a small privatized prison. Young whites almost never remain because there simply is no work and it now cost too much to commute to Augusta or Statesboro, the nearest cities. When I went to high school (Class of 82) whites slightly outnumbered blacks. Now it looks like my home county is bound to become majority black. We also have a small population of Mexicans who moved into town at the end of our brief golden period of manufacturing when there were good jobs that allowed a person to support his family locally. Now with a few exceptions for local businessmen and farmers our county is only viable for retirees and people willing to live permanently off of welfare. This means that the core of the ongoing population is low skill/potential blacks and Mexicans. Last year I went to our annual fall festival, The Fair on the Square. Once it was a fun mostly white event. Now it is like market day in the Congo. My guess is that once my grandparent’s generation dies off local political power will be seized by the remaining blacks and the county will continue to deteriorate economically and culturally until there are almost no whites left at all. It is not something you can get the full impact of unless you have watched it over a period of decades. One by one we have lost beautiful old buildings built between the 1880s and 1920s. Buildings that showed great civic pride and hopes for the future. Now in their place if anything is built in their place it is some ugly short life metal building housing a Dollar General or one of the other corporate outposts for collecting down market consumer dollars.

      • Jesse James

        Our Court House, relic of a more hopeful time

      • Petronius

        Your story struck a chord.

        In 1864 the Yankees burned the Methodist church and the village here. The church, like hundreds of thousands of other Southern churches, schools, hospitals, homes, public buildings, and towns, was wantonly destroyed, without regard to any strategic value or military necessity.

        In 1870 the church was rebuilt with help from one of the burners, who returned from the North with a guilty conscience about the crimes he and his fellows had committed here. He afterwards became pastor of the church.

        Today the town is completely overrun by foreigners. Although the Methodist church is still there, it now has a black pastor and Mexican assistant pastor, and the town also has a Buddhist temple, synagogue, and mosque. Most of the shop signs are in foreign languages and Korean script, and the backs of the buildings are spray-painted with gang graffiti.

        It’s what they call cultural enrichment.

        • Sick of it

          Did the carpetbagger preacher share messages of tolerance and equality by chance?

          • Petronius

            Good question. Perhaps he also preached a sermon about malice toward none. Or that it is necessary to first destroy a country and its society in order to improve it. And that abuses of government power by our rulers are sometimes positive goods, sometimes even obligations. (Or was it Rev. Jeremiah Wright who said that?)

            But it probably didn’t make any difference what the preacher said, because, if modern congregations are any guide, nobody was paying the slightest attention.

  • Bossman

    You never see Latinos on TV or in commercials, but you see tons of blacks. I’ve been thinking of that lately. There are two possible answers: Most Latinos can pass for white or the Media already consider them white.

    • Tim_in_Indiana

      My thoughts exactly. Latinos don’t represent “diversity” well enough in the eyes of television producers. That is, they aren’t instantly identifiable as non-white to the average American, but when blacks are shown, it’s obvious.

      • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

        They are also not Obama’s pet race. Everything is about the Negroes with him in the White House, and garnering them every privilege he can get away with. Blacks hate Hispanics. Until Hispanics can be used to abuse us Whites or help steal from us, than the Negroes love the Chalupa Eating Mestizoes.

    • kikz

      possibly this is because they have their own tv channels to watch….most non-cable channels in my area are.. ‘spanish’……latino everything… soaps, wrestling, gameshows…

      • Bossman

        I sometimes sample those channels to get a flavor of what’s going on there. The first thing you can observe about those channels is that most of the faces on those channels are people light-skinned enough to pass for white. The most popular figure on Univision is Don Francisco who turns out to be descended from German Jews.

    • I see Latinos in commercials all the time, especially in print ads, but the real answer? Blacks will always be the favorite pets of The Powers That Be because they know that the fault line to destroying Western civilization runs exactly through there.

  • Martel

    “Keep that figure in mind as you consider this result from the same poll
    report: “Sixty-one percent of white conservatives and 56 percent of
    whites ages 65 or older agree that discrimination against whites will
    increase due to rising diversity.”

    Basically everyone’s parents or grandparents implicitly demonstrate that they have an white identity and their are concerned about the future of their fellow whites. Good, the signs of victory are everywhere.

  • John R

    I remember an old funny pages cartoon. Two Indians are sitting on the shore, and they see a ship on the horizon, approaching. One Indian says to the other: “Aw, let ’em stay for a while. After all, what harm could they do?” That pretty much sums up the White attitude toward minority immigration from 1965 to today, and why I think of us White people as the new, “Native Americans.”

    • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

      The late David Yeagley pointed this out clearly, and this is why he was a good friend of Jared Taylor. As Yeagley so wisely observed, we will suffer that same fate as his people if we allow ourselves to be swamped by non-Whites.

  • LovelyNordicHeidi

    It would be no surprise if whoever writes trash like that “RationalWiki” lives in an all-white gated community and has never really experienced the real world before.

    Any White Brazilian despises “diversity”, but our radical opponents think otherwise. The writers or RationalWiki are not as rational as they think they are.

  • Ella

    I know why exactly seniors believe in higher numbers of nonwhites. They live in older neighbourhoods with flooding illegal immigrants who buy out the deceased homes. These places change practically overnight, and they cannot afford to relocate into a posh upscale, trendy senior-living community.

    • Martel

      Reminds me of the grandmother of my best friend when I was a kid. We also played with the coloured kids, and she was always worried when we were hanging out in that street as it was basically the only known street for producing vast amounts of criminals. It makes me sad she had to live there, though it wasn’t as bad as other places, and the blacks tended to respect the neighbourhood enough to commit crimes elsewhere.

      • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

        The old folks were smart. She knew that little White kids should not play with little Negroes, because the little White kids may learn the ways of the Negro kids, and imitate their behaviors. More than a few White Meth heads and druggies got their start on the road to ruin in exactly this fashion.

  • TXCriollo

    So no one seems to think were on the path of cuba, I always here the stories when I go to miami from the old cubans, when they were kids and the gov let all the non whites in. Look what happend commie castro took over, all the whites left and that was that. Who wants that in America not me, i almost did a back flip off my roof when i got texas new demographic numbers, the real ones not the msm pushing equality ones. If people stand up we can slow the minority numbers we did it in texas, but i fear that if the rest of the nation dosent wake up it wont matter.

    • Martel

      “but i fear that if the rest of the nation dosent wake up it wont matter”
      It does matter, whites can be a besieged minority, a strong minority, or conquer their nation back. Three scenarios, in none of these scenarios can we afford apathy or even the notion that something doesn’t matter.

      • TXCriollo

        its true we can texas is the example. Whites dropped down to 46% what did we do we got more whites here conservative ones with families. My buddie works for the vital statistics office he sent me an email, non hispanics whites 53% of the population it can be done, but when we have white people fight other whites we lose

        • Martel

          Yep, we must also create a culture in which the building of large families is seen as a positive again. Part of this is “DYI”, it can be as easy as giving a “are you serious” look whenever a guy tells you he doesn’t want children and humorously hector him over it over an extended period.

    • kikz

      i’m n. of dallas, out in the exoburbs.. i’ve noticed more blacks around in the past 6 months than the entire 24 yrs i’ve been local, some are US blacks, most not.. these are recent imports, probably Nigerians from the look of them.. where are they working? where are they living? did the gov. section 8 voucher them into nearby apartments from s. dallas? they seem to have quite a bit of disposable income… at the grocery store the other day, i looked around and thought.. hmmmm, i’m not in new orleans.. where have all these dark faces come from so quickly? there aren’t that many of them out in the rural areas of the county, and this area is economically prohibitive for all but a few….so I am puzzled…

      • TXCriollo

        Ya mexicans are leaving but blacks move in, dallas county needs to get there county straight. I have a friend in dallas and he said that a lot of whites are moving to denton county or tarrent to get away from the blacks

      • AndrewInterrupted

        And Obama, Holder and the rest of the coup members will try to keep you and I puzzled. I suspect there will never be a government announcement or news report as to the impetus for the presence of these fresh-off-the-boat Africans you now observe. That would be racist.

  • ricpic

    I don’t particularly like Engelman, but I don’t regard him as “the enemy.” That will be all over in a majority minority America (which of course won’t be America any longer). There will only be “us” and “the enemy.” There will be no conversation. No compromise. No middle ground. The notion, as one of my white ancestors put it, that I may disagree with what you say but I will die for your right to say it, that notion will be as foreign as The Congo is today. And WE will be The New Congo. When I think of little white children my heart breaks.

    • Martel

      He seems to be a sociopath who is unable to feel any empathy for whites, or he is just very odd. I’m trying to figure out which in the coming time.

      • IstvanIN

        He is obsessed with Orientals. People with Autism are frequently obsessed with a particular subject.

        • Martel

          This is what I implied with him possibly being ‘odd’. He continually discusses the same topic and seems blind to any thing which requires an understanding of social relations or qualitative evidence. If his Asian friends were stereotypical timid, perpetual blank stare Asians it would explain his fascination with these people. Or, he just reacts to multicultural propaganda while not giving a cent about what happens to whites.

          • Tim_in_Indiana

            I’m sure John Engelman would be thrilled with you guys’ constant obsession with him.

          • Martel

            I learn about him and apply it to continually expose his own irrationality to him, which I have clearly done successfully. I do enjoy it, although the moderator at moments believes I am bullying him.

          • Einsatzgrenadier

            I’m pretty sure “Engelman” is kept around for the entertainment value. Same goes for “Bossman”. I suspect the mods also keep these two around because they don’t want this place to become an echo chamber.

          • Martel

            I don’t mind him in the comment section, but if Amren allows him to post another article I will decrease my promotional efforts for Amren. He has made it clear he cares not about whites, and even enjoys our demise. I much rather have a non-white who actually cares about the future of whites post articles.

            Supporting a future for whites is the bare minimum we should be able to expect from authors on amren.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            I agree. Engelman is too obtuse to see that our societies do not need to become Asianized. He thinks that, just because most Asians are non-violent people with a good sense of basic decency and a good basic intellect, that our societies might as well become Asianized. I disagree with this. I don’t want Caucasian land to become Asianized. Conformist and non-creative, quiet but boring is how I see the Oriental lands. I’ll take that over the Negro/Mestizo mayhem, of course, but why go for second best?? We should keep our blood lines pure, and maintain our heritage.

          • Zaporizhian Sich

            He’s dead wrong about Asians being non-violent, they are a VERY violent lot when given the chance to act that way without retribution against them.

          • Sick of it

            In all fairness, they are more than willing to massacre other Asians as well.

          • Zaporizhian Sich

            Of course, but they massacred the entire populations of cities from Russia all the way through Germany, Hungary, Bulgaria and Turkey. Russia and Ukraine in particular suffered repeated and total extermination of the populations of Moscow, Kiev, Novgorod and many other cities at the hands of Mongol invaders. Those that were not slain wished they were. Make no mistake, ethnic Russians as a group do not like Asians very much. Then things went from bad to worse when some converted to Islam. Asian genocide against the Russians was Ivan the Terrible’s motive for chasing the Tartars to Kazan, then storming the city and killing almost every one of them. In WW-II they were not only horrifically cruel to each other, they committed atrocities against whites such as tying POW’s to logs and using them as live test subjects for testing munitions. They were tied at intervals in a row then a bomb or whatever explosive device to be tested was detonated at one end. They were horrifically cruel to white civilians. Some of my relatives witnessed what they did, and because of that they went out of their way to kill Japanese with bayonets during WW-II. Some hated them to their last breaths.

          • Sick of it

            Everything you said is true, just consider that one Asian nation will do the exact same thing to members of another Asian nation. Think Japanese Imperial Army.

          • Jotun Hunter

            even buddhism (why in hell should I bother learning to spell that correctly?) for all its modern credentials as one of the more harmless, meditative, peace-loving religions – actually has quite the dark history of human sacrifice, demon-worship, blood cults.

          • Jotun Hunter

            that is why he is an enemy. We will not regain our homelands by nitpicking which alien race should be allowed in by the millions to outbreed us and force diversity upon us. Asians and jews all have their own places (now), they can live there and be as asian and jewish as can be and leave us to our ways.

          • Martel

            He wants whites to become a minority of equal size to as American Asians, so he is clearly hostile against a future white majority, which is the only way to safeguard the future of american whites.

          • Jotun Hunter

            the future is bleak enough without having to listen to egotistical morons like him constantly regurgitating liberal mantras. I’d have an easier time ignoring him if he didn’t come across so sure of himself, so smug in his faux intellectualism, all the while what he actually says is gibberish – BUT I AM STATING FACT is what he would say here. You could actually make a good drinking game out of his posts.

          • Martel

            The future isn’t that bleak, unlike JE triumphantly announcing that racial consciousness is declining, we actually see an increase beneath the misleading surveys and overexposed exceptions, as scientific research into this subject predicts.

            Such a drinking game would lead to alcohol poisoning, I would not recommend it. When in a tough position, he wipes his memory clean and randomly starts over, its odd and its why many people think he has an agenda, in fact, he simply has issues filtering new information, and likely lacks social skills.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            He is a racial realist if one employs The Bell Curve as a Bible of sorts for racial realism. I do not ascribe to this. Asiatics have a different set of basic strengths than us Caucasians, and a different basic temperament. Thus, the fundamental differences in the nature of Asiatic vs. Caucasian societies. I like the way Jared Taylor talks about this regarding his time in Japan. Does he respect the Oriental people? Most definitely. But he also wants their societies and racial purity to remain intact, and wants us Caucasians to refrain from miscegenation with Asiatics, so as to maintain our racial purity and our distinctive societies as well. Our societies will lose their unique flavor if Caucasian/Asian miscegenation becomes commonplace.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            If he meets Asian friends with the Oriental supremacy mindset he conveys on here, of course they will be happy to be his friend. Why wouldn’t they like a White guy who is obsessed with them being the master race?? I think Engelman has Asberger’s or mild Autism, read The Bell Curve back in the 1990’s, and became obsessed with what he read.
            While I’m also a Bell Curve fan, I realize that the I.Q. test only paints a partial picture of intelligence. More Orientals are smart, yes, but the Oriental societies do not have as advanced a musical culture, for one, as the Caucasian world. If a musician looks at the musical legacy of Europe and the Middle East, the Caucasian world stands apart from the rest of the world in the amazing musical legacy that has been created. The Classical Composers are a purely European legacy, and the complex music of Greece and the Arab world, rife with quarter tones is also not found outside of the Caucasian world. Asian symphonies can reproduce our classical music, but are not able to reproduce it with the same passion. We Caucasians, as a race, have superior genes when it comes to musical talent.

          • Ron Cheaters

            Asians rely on a 5-note pentatonic scale whereas westerners use the 8/12 scale.
            Their inability to sing is quite evident and I still don’t understand the fascination with karaoke. Perhaps its the size/shape of their skulls that inhibit resonance which makes them tone-deaf. Generally speaking.

          • Sick of it

            Karaoke can be quite fun…

          • Ron Cheaters

            Once in a while you find someone gifted. But for the most part people are either tone-deaf or don’t know how to hold a microphone properly, add to that a drunken loss of inhibition, and to a trained ear for music production it is pure agony.
            At least add a hint of auto-tune.
            After 5 minutes I want to go home, listen to my dog she can howl better and has soul.

          • Sick of it

            Ahh, you have a problem with drunken karaoke. There I agree with you.

          • Martel

            I believe science has yet to uncover, as difficult as it is under the constraints of ‘political correctness’ how different the brains of different ethnic groups have evolved. Music is an interesting choice as I can imagine it relates to how our brain may understand harmony, perhaps a corollary of our instinctual understanding of communal relations.

        • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

          I agree. He is a racial realist regarding Negroes, with a healthy disdain for them. He is obsessed, though, with Oriental supremacy. I think you are right. He is autistic, and is obsessed with The Bell Curve, and the facts therein, and is enamored by the notion of brainy Asians. He must know some brainy Asians where he lives, brainy but factual minded Asians with whom he bonds better than other Whites. I think he pictures himself living in an Asian style society, obviously not seeing that a White guy stands out as obviously not belonging in the Asian societies. People with Autism struggle to perceive subtlety, so he is probably impervious to the differences in the Asian temperament as compared to us Whites. Asians are more unemotional and dispassionate than us. They are even less given to bursts of random violence than us, but seem even more geared to ideologies, so that violence, when it does occur, is even more of an intentional and ideologically driven nature. I suspect that all of this is lost on Engelman. Asians are not likely to beat you to death all of a sudden in the street like a Negro, but Asia has also produced calculated and brutal genocides, a fate that could await non-Asians in an Asian dominated society.

        • Mr. Engelman
          is preoccupied with the notion of ‘superiority’ because he knows underneath
          that only White Gentiles have actually demonstrated it. It’s something that supremacist
          Jews desire for themselves. Jews take advantage – use and abuse to get where
          they want in their manipulative positions of power and Zionism – in nations which
          aren’t their own. They are useless by themselves, they quite literally need to be
          in the gentile world to have relevance, this means they are incompetent in one
          regard. Even the East Asian defeat Jews in this respect.

    • SoulInvictus

      “but I don’t regard him as “the enemy.”
      You haven’t read enough of his posts then.

      • Jesse James

        Most of you probably missed it but a number of months ago Engleman made a post that gave away his true essence and I have been unable to take him seriously since. It was a gloating little post about how some white husbands enjoy seeing their women cuckolded by blacks and he bragged that there was a whole category of porn dedicated to it. He is right there is a category of porn like this and it was the creation of Jewish pornographers who like nothing better than the dual humiliation of turning the blond white goyam woman they desire into degraded sluts while at the same time humiliating and emasculating their white spouse. This post didn’t last long I like to think in particular because I started posting about it to draw attention to it. He either edited or the moderators did since it seems they value his role as our Emmanual Goldstein. What I want you to understand is that for a brief moment he allowed his true essence to bubble out and if you had seen that you would realize that he is not one of us. He is the type of pervert who would hide in the shadows and laugh with malicious glee as your wife or daughter was brutally gang raped by a pack of negro savages. It no longer matters to me that he occasionally makes a point that I agree with, he is my enemy and I believe all on this site should shun him. He should be considered dead to us, his titterings should be ignored. I can understand being duped for awhile if you are the sort that believes in fair play and free intercourse of ideas but at some point if you pay attention you should realize what he is and that he has no place in our ranks.

        • SoulInvictus

          And again I say,

          “The Ashkenazim are the most superior race in existence.”
          -John Engelman

          That really tells you everything you need to know about this guy.

          • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

            Engelman is an idiot. Ashkenazim are not a race. They are Semitic Caucasians, and are White people in the Asian countries that he loves so much. As far as his fixations on sexual depravity, none of that would gain him any respect in Israel, or in traditional Jewish culture. A nice Jewish girl is expected to be a virgin on her wedding night in traditional Jewish culture. It would surely gain him acceptance in Cambodia or Thailand, though, where they train little girls to please men, and press them into prostitution. There is quite a racket in Asian massage parlors in America that are basically houses of prostitution. Maybe Engelman is spending some time at some of these parlors. I suspect that he is.

          • Jotun Hunter

            ha! yes there’s not really much more than that forthcoming is there

      • AndrewInterrupted

        Yes, he’s very disingenuous and a perpetual skipping record. He offers nothing but background noise. Typical double-dipping schemer who doesn’t have the integrity to choose whose side he’s on.

  • Pro_Whitey

    The irony is that if the Republicans pushed white solidarity and aggressively and unapologetically took control, there would be substantial elements of the blacks, browns, and Asians who would move to support the GOP to ingratiate themselves with the winners/controllers. It is the weakness projected by white concessions that promotes more alienation from whites and demands for more concessions.

    • Martel

      Exactly. Power is everything.

  • Philo Vaihinger

    I am concerned for my grandchildren, but I am more concerned that my wife and I not die of poverty in our old age.

    So I will never vote Republican so long as that party is out to destroy the social democracy we paid for all our lives and now need.

    Drop the class war against American working people and a hell of a lot more whites will vote Republican.

    Yes, I know.

    Never happen.

    • MBlanc46

      The Repubs hold the white working class in contempt. It’s not a big surprise that many of us consider them an enemy.

      • dd121

        As do Democrats. They haven’t been the part of working people for 70 years.

      • AndrewInterrupted

        They only staunch, Kool-Aid drinking pro-amnesty types are Demo-rats, though. The Repugs mostly put their toes in the water and quickly pull them out.

        • MBlanc46

          What we need is not anti-amnesty. It’s deportation of the illegals and an end to mass immigration. All anti-amnesty does is leave things as they are. I doubt that many Repubs favor that position.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            The Repugs know that they need control of all three branches to get deportations done. If the trend in 2014 toward retaking the Senate continues on its trajectory, 2 of the 3 deportation ingredients will have been supplied. As you know, mass deportation bills are just a veto away from dying. Two down (hopefully), one to go.

          • MBlanc46

            I’m not convinced that even if the Repubs controlled all three branches that there’d be serious deportation. The populist faction of the party seem to be pretty anti-immigration, but the corporate faction are for amnesty

    • toldev

      The Democrats abandoned working class whites long ago. I do not say that in defense of the Republicans, as there is a whole myriad of reasons not to vote for them. Just do not delude yourself into thinking that the Democrats care about working or middle class whites. If the Democrats could get away with it, they would gleefully take your elderly parents pension check and give it Somalian immigrants.

      • Philo Vaihinger

        Perfectly true. But they remain the lesser evil, all the same. And what does that tell you?

    • AndrewInterrupted

      There are a lot of white males who are obliged to vote Demo-rat because they are members of a union. The 18 biggest political donors are unions—>to Demo-rats.

      • ATBOTL

        Union workers are almost the only middle class private sector workers left today.

        I can tell you for 100% sure that GOP hostility to unions is one of the main factors why they can’t get more whites in the North to vote for them. I live in a wealthy, well educated suburb of NYC, but many of the professionals who are my neighbors grew up in union, blue collar households. They don’t agree at all with the GOP’s anti-union attitude, which is mainly popular with poorer, less educated people in the South.

        My neighbors see attacks on unions as attacks on the working man, they don’t want union jobs to become $8 an hour temp positions with no benefits, pensions or security. That’s a widespread view among affluent, upper middle class whites in suburbs of cities like NYC, Boston, Philadelphia, Chicago, Cleveland and Minneapolis.

  • Tim_in_Indiana

    From outside the conservative bubble, the Republicans’ Caucasian march into a multiracial century looks like political malpractice–terminal short-sightedness or possibly the onset of madness.

    Let’s see…whites — “conservatives,” no less — realize the current immigration policy means the displacement of whites and the eventual relegation of whites to a minority in their own land. What’s more, many of them agree that discrimination against whites will increase as a result of the process. And yet, they’re doing nothing to stop it, and they’re even doing what they can to hasten it. Madness, indeed.

    We should stop calling the Republicans the “stupid party” and instead call them “the insane party.” There’s no hope left when a people go collectively insane.

  • Einsatzgrenadier

    America vs. new “America”

    America refers to the geographical territory of the United States, which shares a border with Mexico in the south and Canada in the north. It can also refer to the historical
    United States, which was first colonized by white settlers. These settlers declared independence in 1776. America was founded as a Blut and Boden nation, with a white Anglo-Saxon ethnic core. Only free white men were allowed to become its citizens.

    In addition to whites, there were two other races: blacks and native Indians. The
    Indians are the aboriginal peoples. Although somewhat more competent than blacks,
    they have no place in white communities. Indians were confined to reservations. On the other hand, blacks were physically segregated from whites because they cannot function properly in a modern industrialized society. Because of their inability to internalize white normative standards of behavior, an entire body of law was devised
    especially for them, known as Jim Crow. However, blacks were more than just bad
    for business. There was the potential for widespread miscegenation which
    threatened to undermine white civilization in the United States, as it did in
    Latin America. Neither blacks nor Indians were considered American citizens.

    America is about the rights of the individual, especially the right to private property and freedom of association; America symbolizes the triumph of the free market. America is also a white man’s country. As a nation, it fostered a kinship-based racialism among
    its citizens. European immigrants were assimilated within the crucible of the
    melting pot in order to ensure that they became contributing members of the
    American ethno-racial community (the greater Anglo-Saxon race). The country was founded on the principles of classical liberalism. These worked because they were an expression of a unique white racial identity that successfully furthered the ethnic genetic interests of white men. When these same liberal principles were applied to blacks and
    3rd world immigrants, they were a total failure because their successful implementation required a certain constellation of personality traits that only whites possess.

    The new “America” emerged during the mid-sixties as part of the globalist-multicultural ideological project. It is the antithesis of the America that preceded it. The new “America” is about deracinated cosmopolitanism, crass consumerism and predatory capitalism, universal egalitarianism and multiracialism. As a society, the new “America” is not a continuation of the earlier Anglo-Saxon culture, but an entirely new culture, one that has embraced as its foundational principles the epistemological relativism of post-modernist thinking.

    The new “America” is about the subordination of the individual, stripped of all racial, ethnic and national identity, to the whims of the transnational corporations. The new “America” is a depraved and soulless civilization, permeated by a deep spiritual malaise.
    Everywhere one looks, one sees a culture in decline, with its rap music, Hollywood productions, rampant feminism, seething racial antagonism, and mass 3rd world immigration. This new “America” is without past or future, a world without meaning and hope. Its citizens are atomized individuals who are considered interchangeable pawns by its elitist rulers. They are part of a massive oversupply of professional and manual labor, forced to work for low wages on a globalized plantation.

    The racially aware white man must resist this new “America” or, more appropriately, AmeriKwa if he wishes to preserve his race, his culture and his identity. At this juncture in time, he must be prepared to use deadly force, seize power from the globalist elite and reverse the tide of cultural decadence and 3rd world barbarism that threatens to unceremoniously toss him into the dustbin of history.

    • Jesse James

      Well stated.

  • IstvanIN

    The country, as a whole, can not be much more than 50% White. So many non-Whites are counted as White, the European-American population is at the precipice. And the way we are being killed and raped and discriminated against things can only get worse. Much worse. And that is the plan.

    • kjh64

      A lot of non-whites in America, millions of them, are not citizens. These are not Americans, just foreigners residing here.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      That is true. Armenians, Ashkenazi Jews, Lebanese, Persians, Muslim Albanians are all listed as ‘white’, but neither they nor real ‘white’ people consider them ‘white’.

      ‘…White…’ used to mean western European. I would definitely agree that western Europeans have slipped to the minority.

  • MBlanc46

    You don’t have to be a conservative to see that demographic change is a zero sum process. It’s not a game. It’s deadly serious.

  • bilderbuster

    “It’s pretty amazing that Blacks, on average, think they are currently living in a nation with a nonWhite majority”.
    What’s so amazing about Blacks being so totally stupid & wrong about everything?
    So now that Barry’s president & Whites are a minority we somehow use our magic “White Privilege” to force our racism on them according to their illogical way of thinking.

  • paul marchand

    We need to hold (certified patriots only) a constitutional convention, which would result, JUSTLY, in trimming the self-serving voting constituencies…
    *
    0 Attachment

    IN ORDER TO FASHION A MORE PERFECT UNION, I WOULD HOPE THAT THE PRESENT CONSTITUTION IS AUGMENTED / CLARIFIED WITH THE FOLLOWING:

    All have freedom of contract, unless restricted by other clauses, regardless of race, gender, creed, etc. To Wit, as the 14th amendment avers, we are equal under law. Equal outcome, however, is up to the individual. There would be no favoritism due to race nor ethnicity nor other factors. No affirmative action in govt hiring or other actions.

    Abortion restriction rights are returned to the states.

    Government employees, whether federal, state, or local, would not have the right to vote in the jurisdiction of their employment, being public servants, where they derive income being 100% or more of what is considered “poverty level”.

    Any individual receiving, in essence/ de facto gratis, “welfare” from “the government”, if as a whole equals or exceeds 50% of the “poverty level” / lowest amount in order to survive, would be restricted from voting.

    Illegal aliens cannot vote, and the children of illegal aliens are NOT automatically US citizens, but each must apply for citizenship in the normal process, as limited by the Congress. Other rights as guest workers would be specified. This would be retroactive to 1970.

    Private sector employers (whether individuals, partnerships, or corporate) would have the right to hire and fire, with no forced quotas or affirmative action.

    Government employment would be by MERIT, with no favoritism for color, ethnicity, or other such factors.

    The broad NSA-type broad surveillance would be returned to the historically-restricted levels as has historically been determined by jurisprudence.

    Religious freedoms would exist as per the 1st Amendment of the Constitution, with the exception that complete monitoring / surveillance of any level considered by the Congress to be prudent, of mosques and other Islamic organizations and extensions.

  • paul marchand

    This article fails miserably in one regard:
    ” Minorities ” are more than 50 % of BIRTHS in the US.
    Up from 13% in 1950 census.

  • D.B. Cooper

    “Boehner? . . . Boehner? . . . Boehner?”
    You people in Ohio need to get rid of this problem.

  • pcmustgo

    Yeah, I keep telling people how non-white my social life in NYC was- before I began self-segregating as a means of self-preservation and irritation avoidance… it’s 80% non-white. Many of the other major cities are the same.

  • pcmustgo

    “It’s pretty amazing that blacks, on average, think they are currently living in a nation with a nonwhite majority. ”

    Not surprising. Many think america is half white and half black and don’t understand why the tv doesn’t feature more of themselves- and ditto for other minorities I met. They grow up in urban ghettos and have no concept that “the rest of america” isn’t like that. They go by what they see around them.

  • dd121

    Of course whites fear discrimination. Long ago the “civil rights” movement morphed into the punish whitey movement. When they’re in the majority do you think they will support any “civil rights” for whites?

    • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

      Fairness is an alien concept to the Negro mind.

      • Max

        I can say without exaggeration that from my experience with blacks, even those whom I have known on friendly terms for many years, for the most part they have a concept of “fairness” BUT they believe that fairness is anything that advances specifically the cause of blacks. They really do.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      That future is already here, what Peter Brimelow called the “…(permanent) minority occupation government…”

      There has been so much goodwill taking place by the European Americans with respect to AA hiring in state and federal government that a parallel, unelected government exists.

      Those women, LGBTQs, and minorities are now waging war (called “lawfare”) against the very people who let them cut to the front of the line.

      Ingrates and parasites!

  • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

    Arabs are fellow Caucasians. The bad spot of the Arab culture is the Islamic religion. The Catholic Bishop of Iraq said it best. The biggest enemy of the Arab culture is the Muslim religion. A White guy with dark hair who lets his beard grow can easily blend into the milieu in the Arab lands. Arab Christians have been coming to America for years, and are part of White America. It is the Muslim religion that is not compatible with European culture, not the racial makeup of the Arabic people, or the great music, art, and cuisine of the Arab lands.

    • Einsatzgrenadier

      The typical Arab is a low-IQ semite with some negroid ancestry, especially in the countries of north Africa, the Arabian peninsula and the Levant. The Arabs acquired their negroid genes through the Indian Ocean and trans-Saharan slave trade. They’re not fully Caucasian and definitely not white.

      • Ron Cheaters

        Arab beards are full, scraggley, curly. Most white european stock their beards are less curly, less-uniform, and tend to grow in patches on the upper cheeks.
        And white’s tend to take a moment once in a while to trim or style their facial hair.

      • Truth Teller

        Real Levantines are not mixed with a lot of SSA and not low IQ. The ones who aren’t very admixed and upper class tend to be high intelligence. I am speaking of the families who were in the elite business classes. They should not be demonized just because many happen to be different. A real Levantine family is like the Assad family.

    • jeffaral

      “Arabs are fellow Caucasians”. THANKS for the belly laugh. HAhahaha…

      • AndrewInterrupted

        Europeans aren’t Caucasians anyway. Caucasian is a misnomer. Caucasus people are the Semite race and their many sub-populations like Armenian, Persian, etc.

        wwwDOTdemocratic-republicansDOTus/neanderthals-and-semites

  • WR_the_realist

    America may be “only” 37 percent non-white but that’s quite impressive when you consider that that percentage has doubled since I was a teenager. And if whites aren’t a minority yet just wait two or at most three decades. Whites have legitimate reasons to be concerned about being discriminated against when they are a minority given that they already are being discriminated against while they are a majority, through affirmative action and numerous racial set asides set up by government. When a city goes black and elects a black government that government discriminates ruthlessly against anyone who isn’t black. Hispanics aren’t much better.

  • Malkontentus

    So then the question is what course of action do we take? How do we stand up for ourselves in the political commons? Whites in the United States have a miserable lot because we have only two political parties, and both work against White Anericans in their own ways– the Democrats with their anti-White Gramscianism on just about everything, the GOP Establishment with their disgusting kow-towing to the Chamber of Commerce, cheap-labor lobby, neocons and the Israel-firsters who dream of using our kids as cannon-fodder in Middle Eastern wars.

    Which is why IMHO the first order of business is to make sure that neither party captures all the branches of government, and that the House in particular stays under GOP control with Republican-friendly Congressional districts– so long as power is split, for example with each house of Congress under a different party, the parties will be at each other’s throats, which solves little but at least buys us some time until the inevitable collapse. A two party system is terribly inadequate to protect a nation, but for now it’s what we’ve got– the winner take it all form of our elections just about guarantees it. But with for ex. the House under Republican control, where the Reps have to answer to the people every two years, and the Senate under the Dems, where the globalist wing of the GOP has been useless anyway, we at least have the parties’ mutual hatred and jealousies to prevent major immigration or other legislation from getting through. Especially the House under the GOP– that’s where they really block dangerous legislation from getting through. The moron attempts by Lindsey Graham, Orrin Hatch, Marco Rubio, John McCain, John Boehner and the other would-be GOP sellouts have been frustrated largely because the rank-and-file Republicans, mainly in the House, don’t want to give credit to Obama, or the Democratic-led Senate, for signing a bill, and the Reps have no interest in p***off the heart of their districts. And also because they’re not stupid enough to pander to non-White voters in the fantasy that they’d win their votes.

    Republicans and Democrats both behave very differently when they’re in power vs when they’re in opposition. When the GOP was in power in the Exec and Legislative branches under George W. Bush, they launched a Mideast war against Iraq under the direction of their PNAC neocons like Feith, Wurmser, Wolfowitz and Abrams– who are disgustingly pro-mass immigration it should be added– and got tens of thousands of mostly White American kids killed or wounded. But when Obama tried to do the same thing in Syria, the Tea Party in the House rose up and swatted him down. Same with mass immigration, the h1b visa and amnesty, Bush himself tried to ram the legislation through in 2006 and 2007 with the help of traitor Senate Republicans– which at the time included Sam Brownback as well as usual suspects Graham, Hatch and McCain– but rabid House GOP opposition stopped it, and with Obama now in office, they’re even more rabidly opposed.

    Keep in mind too that Mitt Romney, doing boot-licking duty for Sheldon Adelson for all those millions in Superpac money in 2012, was ready to start a war in Iran on Adelson and the Israeli-firsters’ behalf, and he probably could have gotten Congressional Republicans to go along. But with Obama in there, any Middle Eastern war was out of the question, House Republicans weren’t about to let him do it. I don’t have anything against Israel in general, they should be respected like any other country, but I have a major problem when my tax dollars go to supporting them while the US is struggling and American kids have no jobs And even more of a problem when the Israel-firsters’ fifth column and dual loyalists in the USA try to get the US into a war against Iran with our kids as cannon-fodder– I know not all or even most Israelis are like this, but there are definitely some who look at the US military and see a big pool of millions of Gentile bodies to be tossed into a war on Israel’s behalf. I have two kids in the military and I will never allow them to be sent off in a war for Israel like that, and so long as GOP Congressional candidates like Mitt Romney– and those idiot Dominionists in the Republican base– kiss up to the Israel-firsters, they’re working against American White interests, and their Presidential candidates deserve none of our support.

    So in short it’s the House Republicans that come the closest to providing us a protective force in a divided government, and their ability to draw the Congressional districts in 2010 and 2011– thanks to their captures of state legislatures and governor’s offices– was critical for them staying in the majority. That’s why the most important elections for us will be in 2018 and 2020, to keep the House GOP in power for the next decade too upon drawing the Congressional districts, whatever happens in the Presidential election– which will likely be a Democrat the way all the big states are being flooded by mass immigration as it is. Even if you don’t vote in any other election, vote to make sure the Republicans capture governor’s offices and state legislatures in 2018 and 2020, which will allow them to draw Congressional districts in their favor and keep the House in Republican hands, Then with a likely Dem President for the full decade, the House GOP will stay virulently in opposition, which is our best protection in this broken two-party system.

    • Malkontentus

      Just to clarify, I hate the US 2-party system, but for the time being I feel like we have no choice but to work within it– trying to go 3rd party would only dilute us. I’m not a poli-science expert, but I remember from a class long ago that the way our Constitution decides elections, with a single winner who just needs more votes than any of the other candidates, it basically makes a 2-party system automatic, so trying to go 3rd party– unless they have a clear advantage before the election– is self defeating. That’s why the practical strategy in the US has got to be more a matter of making sure the winners of Republican primaries in all elections are staunch opponents of mass immigration, amnesty and the h1b cheap imported labor visa, that the House stay in GOP hands and the fed government especially stays divided. The current system is not sustainable and will collapse under its weight soon enough, this at least buys us some breathing room until then.

      Elections are run differently in Europe and that’s why they’re able to field multiple parties, including openly nationalist parties that protect their White citizens. I don’t know enough about the details but it has something to do with the way they assign vote totals. I have a lot of family scattered across Europe– Norway and Sweden, Germany, Latvia, Austria, France, Netherlands and Belgium, Switzerland, Italy and Spain (we’ve been in the fisheries and ag export biz for centuries and there’s lots of opportunity abroad). While those countries have all had their immigration issues as this site has pointed out, they’re nowhere near as calamitous as in the US (and the other White settler colonies i.e. Canada and Australia) or the UK for that matter. Heck even the French have introduced a Japan-style restrictive immigration system and are deporting large numbers every year. Scandinavia, the Germans and Swiss, Italy are over 90-95% White. More Turks and Moroccans are leaving for ex. Holland or Germany than coming in, and most of their immigration lately has been from Poland, Russia, Czech Republic Lithuania and Serbs plus growing numbers of Whites from overseas. Especially their ethnic (esp Germanic and Slavic) diasporas.

      There are a lot of reasons for this but the nationalist parties have a lot to do with it, even if they don’t win elections they keep the major parties honest by keeping the heat on the immigration and ethnicity issue, and after the collapse that’s coming in North America, we’ll need something similar here. There are other reasons for all this course. The people in these countries have millennia of connections to the land, they aren’t under the control of the banksters as much as the US or Britain so there’s more manufacturing and less debt, which is naturally attractive to Whites, as opposed to the US, Great Britain and Canada where people are expected to take on massive debt tor all kinds of things and be in hock to the banksters. But the Nationalist parties that defend their Whites deserve a lot of the credit.

      My cousin in Sweden sent me a translated pamphlet from the Swedish Dems nationalist party, and I was amazed at how forthright and determined they were about keeping Sweden White, you’d never find that in the US. Too many US conservatives say the Swedes are “ultra-liberal” but don’t understand the context– they’re social democracy yes, and economically might be liberal in some places, but when it comes to ethnic and immigration issues, the people are very determined to keep Sweden a White nation, which is why the Swedish Dems have been gaining so much traction. The Dutch and Belgians have the same kind of thing, a Flemish-based nationalist party in Belgium IIRC, the NF in France has been gaining traction, the Italians and the Norwegians the same, the Swiss and Austrians have had successful anti-immigration referenda, Hungary has a staunch nationalist party plus other legal and political protections in the other countries. And in fact there are some EU countries (Romania or Hungary I think) where Whites from Russia and Eastern Europe can slip in and naturalize before they go to other EU countries, so even more of the immigration stream is from other White countries and the nationalist parties are smart enough to encourage that. Contrast that with the US system which isn’t even really capitalist or a free-market, more like favored companies and the crooked Chamber of Commerce making money from mass immigration, and little control over our own borders. It’s worth it to say it again– after the collapse in North America, we’ll need to structure our political system to encourage the same kind of parties to protect us and our people, with the same determination and success.

      • Martel

        In the Netherlands you need 75 seats to elect a government. No party alone ever makes 75 seats so they are forced to build a coalition, this ensures that in general two out of the four biggest political parties are represented in the government, including some smaller parties to make up the rest of the seats.

      • Another possibility is that the GOP will collapse from hypocrisy and become a third party.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      You hit on the impetus behind what I call the 2nd Exodus. The fact that Obama would rather throw bad money after bad in the ghetto rather than Israel.

      Amongst Israel-Firsters, there has been a distinct shift to the Right since O’Bummer.

      Several conservative websites have been commandeered by IFs, like NRO, Breitbart, TheDC, etc.

      • ATBOTL

        Anyone seen National Review lately? It’s become a neocon ghetto. The writers are getting more and more talentless and obscure, yet a remarkably large number are Jews. It’s either neocon Jews or mindless 20-something future lobbyist types writing there now. If you though it was bad ten years ago…

        There is no difference between NR and the Weekly Standard now.

        They are running HARD with this hate Russia propaganda.

        Neocons think the Ukraine conflict is their ticket back to popularity.

        • AndrewInterrupted

          NRO is such a travesty now I hope Michael Mann buries them.

      • Sick of it

        As you should know, these people simply want to infiltrate every group and every movement so they can hijack it for their own purposes. They despise us too much to be allowed to live among us.

        • AndrewInterrupted

          There are addicted to the taste of our blood.

          • Sick of it

            +100 for a blood libel reference…

          • SoulInvictus

            + For noticing.

        • Max

          “We (also) have a right to exist” -with no apologies to a certain group.

          • Who Me?

            “We (also) have a right to exist” -with no apologies to a certain group.

            We have a right to exist with no apologies to ANYONE.

    • MBlanc46

      So long as we have representative government instead of self-government, divided government is best.

  • LHathaway

    Yes, conservatives seriously overestimate the non-white population, but isn’t someone else in the article underestimating it as well? Aren’t 5 year old white children less than 50% of that populations demographic?

    • Martel

      The most important demographic category is simply neglected, whites arw currentle destined to lose their majority position, unless young whites show an increase in birthrates.The title and the focus of the author clearly exposes his bias. White conservatives only slightly overestimate minority numbers compared to the negroe estimates, white conservatives should have been the side note in this article.

      • AndrewInterrupted

        Increasing white birth rates is just letting the enemy win. European America was built and made great through tenets such as sustainable families. Whites can increase their % by decreasing the parasite %.

        Simple steps can be taken if we can get an American in the white house. Shutting down immigration, reversing Hart-Celler 1965, closing the birthright citizenship loophole, mass deportations.

        We need to retake control and reapply our tenets, not race to the bottom with the maggots.

        • Martel

          Other measures should be taken, but the white birth rate must rise without a doubt,else Europeans will lack political power.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            Voting is about percentages, not volume.

            Paul Marchand has some good additional suggestions.

          • Martel

            Voting is only one political tool, its weakest. Its important to have ‘loyalists’ in police forces, army, throughout all social institutions including sports clubs, you need people who can demonstrate, riot and give a proper cause for opposing forces not to engage in violent activities, etc. Demographics is the most important factor in politics.

        • kikz

          is it not logical to consider, that to regain the control/choke point(s) for immigration and these other important issues, ‘bigmoney’ must be removed from the equation?

          • AndrewInterrupted

            I made a lengthy reply to your question, but it never made it out of moderation. No clue.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      A publication backed by nanny Bloomberg would have no incentive to make the non-white % appear bigger, as you allude.

  • kjh64

    A large portion of these non-Whites are not citizens. You have 35-40 million illegals and you have millions more here legally who are foreign nationals. They are foreigners residing in America, NOT Americans. Only American citizens are American. As such, nobody knows the racial breakdown of Americans because the census doesn’t count Americans only, just everyone on American soil whether they are citizens are not.

  • MartelC

    We have been discriminated against since the 1960s. and people are just realizing this now? And this is with whites still a majority and white elite in power.

    STUPID white liberal women who somehow think they are marching arm and arm against oppression. Wait until they are forced to wear hajibs.. no I take that back , they still somehow think they are fighting white privilege and ‘respecting other cultures’

    • Northerner

      It isn’t just white women (if it were, things wouldn’t be what they are today). A lot of liberal white men believe the same thing.

    • Truth Teller

      If you want to understand the mentality here it is. Liberal white women know certain voter groups vote for the leftist political no matter what even if they don’t support leftist causes themselves. In other words, the liberals will still have power no matter how illiberal the majority is because of voting blocks.

      • AndrewInterrupted

        In short, people no longer vote based on what’s best for their country as a whole. It’s all:

        “…Me-me-me–and my lobby…”

        That is how multiculturalism kills nations.

        • NoMosqueHere

          The Semite Nation doesn’t give a crap about the U.S. as a whole, they only care about themselves.

          ————————————————————–

          I disagree with this statement. Most liberal jews today intermarry with white gentiles and don’t care (anymore) about the fate of Israel.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            I use Semite to describe the people who originate from the Caucasus/Khazarian region. That would include Armenians, Persians, Albanians, the 13th tribe, etc.

            wwwDOTdemocratic-republicansDOTus/neanderthals-and-semites

        • Truth Teller

          Correct and this strategy is used to gain votes. If one little thing is given to each voting Demographic above the others, the party wins. That’s the strategy being employed.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            I guess I will have to quote O.J. Simpson to Howard Cosell.
            “You have tremendous grasp of the obvious”.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      White women have been brainwashed by members of the tribe into thinking that they are “Ending the Patriarchy”. What they really are doing is ending the white patriarchy, to be replaced by ‘Tribal’, Black, Hispanic, and Asian patriarchies–not a matriarchy.

      White women are fools and ‘useful idiots’.

      • Truth Teller

        It wouldn’t necessarily be replaced with misogyny in their minds though. Strategically, those “misogynist groups” would still vote for the liberal party, even if they hate feminism, and thus liberal causes would still be preserved. You don’t understand the concept of “voting blocks” it seems.

        • AndrewInterrupted

          I understand how certain people amaze the hell out of themselves. Even when they miss the point entirely. I know full well the concept of voting blocks, you putz. I speak frequently of the Jewish voting block, for example.
          Once the white patriarchy is dissolved by non-whites and white women, all women will find out that feminism ends–and a far less kinder, far less gentler patriarchy begins.
          You don’t understand the concept of ‘useful idiots’ it seems.

          • Truth Teller

            I don’t support misandry or misogyny. I’m not really a feminist but I don’t want to return to the days when women couldn’t vote.
            Here is what I’m saying: Political parties do what they want regardless of what the majority of their voting base thinks because they know the same people will keep voting. It’s possible for the liberal party to keep feminism as well as feminist policies and have anti feminists keep voting it in simply because it’s not “the right”.
            Feminists know these misogynists will keep voting for the liberal party and thus feminist policies even if they despise feminism themselves. Maybe the feminist women are not useful idiots. Maybe the other voting blocks I have described are the useful idiots because they will vote for the same party just to spite the other.

      • Jotun Hunter

        there is a feminist poster online somewhere that really illustrates the mindset nicely – I don’t have it nor know what to google to find it – but it shows three women standing back to back, possibly pointing guns, one of them wears the hijab, and says something along the lines ‘we all stand together or not at all’. It is appalling to think that these particular feminist white women could be so stupid, as to give islam (which puts them in sacks and kills them for being raped) a free pass in light of the much more pressing enemy that is: ‘men of their own race.’ White men who not so long ago literally delivered the world on a platter to these entitled ingrates.

    • Who Me?

      There are plenty of White women who are not liberal, not feminist, and not anti-white in any sense of the word. The problem is, they are the White women who stay-at-home, raise their children and support their White husbands 100%, They don’t have high powered, elite jobs, they are not in economics, politics, or high-profile positions. Therefore they have no real say in the running of this country. They are the REAL silent ones. Maybe I should say the silenced ones.

  • ATBOTL

    The only class war in America today is the war by the upper class against the rest of us.

    Conservative Inc. is now pushing the idea that criticism of the super rich is tantamount to Nazism. Affluent, educated whites in most parts of America laugh at that crap. That’s the real reason the GOP is struggling to get white votes, not abortion or gay marriage.

    Most whites who vote for the Democrats are not hardocre cultural leftists, they just don’t want our economy to be run solely for the benefit of Mitt Romey type oligarchs.

    • Martel

      There simply isn’t a class war, only OSW types sponsored by Soros take that notion seriously. The democrats are pro open borders, the republicans are being pushed by multinationals to join the democrats in their destructive behaviour. Demographics are far more important then any economic policy and have a much greater effect on economic prosperity then anything else orchestrated in the White House.

  • Sick of it

    Probably because Eisenhower was related to Lenin and Trotsky, if you know what I mean.

  • Sick of it

    Just taking real numbers into consideration for the Hispanics, our country is about 40% non-white. I have yet to see any real data regarding the number of Arabs, etc. thrown into the white category. It’s anyone’s guess.

  • SoulInvictus

    Not my favorite action of his for sure. But everyone was killing Germans then, it was the cool thing to do.
    Patton killed loads of them too, but I still admire him as well.

    If it had been up to me, Patton and Rommel would’ve teamed up to kill Commies all the way to the Sea of Japan.
    Unfortunately, not the case. So I settle for the imperfect men that they were and admire what was admirable about them.
    Same could be said of anyone from Charlemagne to Napoleon to George Washington.
    A lot of our leaders and honored historical figures killed lots of people, or enslaved them, or whatever your favorite misdeed is.
    I don’t fall into the liberal trap of condemning them from a different time’s perspective.

    • Zaporizhian Sich

      Were it not for Hitler, the Russians and other Slavs would have welcomed Patton as a liberator if he really came to rid the world of the Red Menace. But because of what Hitler did, Patton would have found out like Afghanistan, many an empire went to Russia to die.

      • SoulInvictus

        War in Russian winter must be hell on earth. I doubt Patton would have attempted it. Moscow probably would have taken the place in history of third place after Hiroshima and Nagasaki instead.
        Sad thing is, a nuke or two would’ve still been more humane than leaving them to Stalin.

        • Zaporizhian Sich

          The Russian winter is not Hell for Russians, it is for many home sweet home and for their enemies a graveyard. As for Stalin, it was the West who kept him and his genocidal Jewish inner circle from being hung or shot in Red Square as they should have been by vengeful Russians. My grandmother’s people have good reason to detest the Jews, and so do my father’s. Wouldn’t you if they killed tens of millions of your countrymen? That is what the poster in Latvian is all about.

  • Northerner

    Blacks and Latinos tend to live in areas that are more minority-predominant, so it’s not surprising that they would overestimate the non-white population by such a large degree. Asians are generally wealthier and have a larger distribution between white and non-white communities, leading to a more accurate estimation.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      “…so 65/35 (63/37 actual) isn’t too surprising…”

      And disturbing?

  • Lada Belyy

    It should be obvious to everyone, by now, that anti-Whites desire to destroy the White majority, because their interests stand in direct opposition to our own. If Whites were to act as a unified party and vote in our own interests, we could win. That’s why we are called racistnaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews and fiercely opposed whenever we show the smallest bit of support for White nationalism. We are already discriminated against, by our own governments!, at every opportunity, in every country founded and built by our ancestors. As anti-Whites gain more power, this oppression will only increase. As it stands, and this article states, we WILL be a minority among anti-Whites, in just a few decades. It’s past time to wake up folks.

    • SoulInvictus

      Preaching to the choir here. 🙂
      Now fine tune the message, blend in some humor to make it fun before you go for the anger button, then go start warming up some minds to your thoughts.
      Godspeed and many forum bannings to you in your endeavors. 🙂

      • wretchedwhiterabbit

        I’ve only been banned from the White Voice. go figure

        • SoulInvictus

          I was banned from Alternet. Nothing race related.
          Just some comments about the Constitution regarding gays (nothing really even that inflammatory) and poof, “You’ve been blacklisted.”
          Haven’t been back since.
          It’s pretty funny how I’d frequently point out they had an anti-America, anti-white, anti-gun owner bias but gayness was their third rail it appears.
          I’m waiting to get banned here for the truthful tribe comments, but apparently they’ve loosened up on that since it appears the majority of their users are of the same opinion. They’d have to ban half the forum participants. We’re kind of a touchy lot having to choke down so much censorship and thoughtcrime mentality everywhere else, so we’d probably abandon the site if that were to happen.

  • SoulInvictus

    I will say this, I would probably prefer to have you here, a product of miscegenation (though you can’t really fault the child for the sins of the parents), than Englebert.
    That should tell you the regard most of us hold him in.
    You also must have missed his many tirades on blacks if you think you have an ally in him. It’s like, the one group he doesn’t kneel down and felate.

  • Hedley Lamar

    Take a look at what hapened to South Africa after the blacks took over. That’s America after the whites become a minority.

    • Sick of it

      It will be far bloodier here, as there is no power to constrain them once America goes down the tubes. They would have done more in South Africa if not for the threat of our intervention. As bad as things are over there, they really could have gone worse.

      • Einsatzgrenadier

        Bloody ethnic secession is inevitable once whites are reduced to a minority. White loss of majority status will give Mexicans unfettered access to nuclear weapons. Forget South Africa. The Yugoslav Wars pumped on steroids is the future of America.

      • IstvanIN

        The US would never intervene to stop blacks from slaughtering Afrikaners.

        • Sick of it

          Not today, but in the past. Thus the “peaceful transition” supposedly born from the magnanimity of Nelson Mandela. He didn’t want to end up a corpse.

  • OHDeutscheKlezmerRebel

    Yes. The anti-German and anti-Italian sentiments in America during WWII were disgusting. That is why, though I liked what David Yeagley had to say about Whites not allowing ourselves to be dispossessed as his people were, I never trusted Yeagley. He referred to himself as being part “Kraut” when he spoke of his German ancestry, but certainly didn’t call himself an “Injun” when it came to his American Indian side. My Grandfather would have wanted to deck him if he had heard this “Kraut” business, would have called him a damnable Injun, and told him to go back to the reservation. Eisenhower was a good man, but he should have stood up for German Americans, and for our brethren in the old country. Being a German American himself, I’ll never understand how he could restrain himself from doing so.

    • PvtCharlieSlate

      In one of Stephen Ambrose’s popular histories of WWII is the story that the American soldiers, fighting their way across Europe, were surprised that, of all the different civilian populations they encountered, they most closely identified with the Germans.

      • Dave4088

        Around 30-35% of U.S. soldiers during WWII were German or of German descent. Patton, in his diaries, remarked, “The Germans are the only decent people left in Europe.” Patton soon came to see how he was manipulated to help destroy the historical champion of European man and bulwark against the East so had to be eliminated.

        • PvtCharlieSlate

          In his autobiography, Eddie Rickenbacker (born RickenbacHer) told the story of the idealistic young Americans who arrived in France ready to learn how to fly against the Hun and who found that their commanding officers were Eichelberger, Rickenbacher and Spaatz.

  • DJ

    ‘Conservatives Fear Discrimination Against Whites’
    Yeah, like discrimination hasn’t been happening since LBJ’s (kosher influenced) war on whites.
    Why should whites be fearful? Duh!!!

  • Truth Teller

    If you want to know why leftists think leftism will survive after mass migration from anti liberal countries, here is why:

    If you want to understand the mentality here it is. They know certain voter groups vote for the leftist political no matter what even if they don’t support leftist causes themselves. This is because economic liberalism and social liberalism are present within the same political party. You can support one without supporting the other but we have a two party system.

    In other words, the social liberals will still have the power no matter how anti liberal in values the majority is because of voting blocks. If we have certain segments that vote for a political party in droves no matter what, this happens. It’s also because of how social and economic issues are connected within one political party. It’s actually simple to understand if you think about it. The thought patterns make sense because there are only 2 strong political parties in America.

    • Martel

      You see many periodicals, magazines or newspapers regularly discuss demographics?

      • Truth Teller

        I have seen it on TV and in articles. However, it was talked about in a more celebratory whereas online it is discussed in a more negative fashion. Either way it promotes fear in people.

  • Truth Teller

    deleted

  • Max

    Why would not people overestimate the “minority” population? Every news channel, most advertisements, most TV shows, most movies, everything we are allowed to see and hear has one black man, one mulatto woman, one Chinese woman, one Hispanic woman, one gay man and one red-haired white woman to represent “America”.

    If you attend a company party, a ballgame or a picnic that does not have one-half to two-thirds “minorities” you must be a Klan member -or so one would think from the media. They stick a mixed-race couple in everywhere they can in these damned propaganda messages and it is a white blonde woman with a black male as often as can be. I am infuriated daily by the constant programming attempts.

    This article just demonstrates how effective the collectivists are in their effort to destroy whites.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      It is the propaganda process of ‘projection’. We are to believe that the 37% number will inevitably get larger. There is no such inevitability. It’s just the poison they are serving in the form of multi-culti Kool-Aid. We need to stem this brain-washing.

      • Max

        It needn’t be so but think that under the *current* social-political paradigm, it IS inevitable. The deck has been carefully stacked for decades, the dice are loaded and the table is tilted at the Collectivist Casino. We are still in the infowar stage until the agenda is fully matured and the reality of utterly destroying white racial conciousness and majority is achieved. At the present rate of devolution, it is not afar.

        • AndrewInterrupted

          Vote Coulter and she will reverse Hart-Celler Act of 1965.
          The 50 year termite invasion will end.
          Just keep repeating it and believing it.

    • Truth Teller

      Non millenials are not realistic about things and always seem to think the sky is falling. We millenials are used to seeing all this fear mongering so it doesn’t affect us.

    • John Ambrose

      Sometimes when I see these ads (many of them not just ‘diverse’ but blatantly anti-white) I think, “Are these people trying to sell a product or just trying to promote cultural Marxism?” After all, whites have more purchasing power than blacks and browns and we still out number them too. Due to these two facts you’d think whites would be overrepresented -not underrepresented- in ads if companies really only cared about the bottom line. The insurance commercials for State Farm and All State are especially heinous.

  • ‘The Republicans are the last bulwark of Americans as a traditional people in the classic sense of the word.’

    If true, extremely scary.

  • Steven Bannister

    Notice how they make the racial transformation of America all about “conservatives vs liberals” as in the last line “that future is the stuff of conservative nightmares”

    Becoming a racial minority is something that’s going to affect ALL whites, not just conservative whites. Liberal whites will have just as much to lose – and yet they’ve been snookered into cheering on their own demise.

    And that is the sheer, utter BRILLIANCE of political correctness- it’s an alien form of totalitarian thought control but it’s presented to liberal whites in such a way that they think it’s “their idea” – and it’s those mean, nasty conservatives who are trying to stop it! It’s the age old trick of “Divide and Conquer” and it still works to this day.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      They also use standard leftist propaganda techniques like ‘projection’. The ‘projection’ being this supposed inevitability of the 37% number getting larger.

      If the Repugs retake the Senate in November, and an actual American is voted into office in 2016, such 50 year initiatives like Hart-Celler 1965 could be reversed.

      President Coulter: “You had your 50 year invasion–enough. Now we start saving the 3 million Afrikaners trapped in South Africa. Now get out…!!!…”

  • Francis Wilkinson seems to be all over the place, but, of course, ends on the required PC mantra of Celebrate Diversity! The polls are interesting, but why is the fact that most racial groups already see the non-White population as an even greater percentage than it is today relevant to a demographic trend that will inexorable mean lower and lower and lower percentages of Whites, and whether that will mean greater and greater anti-White discrimination? Which of course it will.

    As others have pointed out, the most important factor in comparing White and non-White numbers is the difference in age demographics, a question that the Wilkinson article of course ignores. Her report is a little like some flunky of the captain’s reporting that the crystal chandelier in the Main Ballroom on the sinking Titanic is not swaying quite as violently as the silly uninformed passengers, screaming, crawling, praying, sliding hither and thither, perceive.

    Final Question: If today it is morally justifiable to discriminate against Whites who are trying to get into colleges and universities, as well as those trying to obtain jobs, why can’t the same moral justifications be used to crank up anti-White discrimination a few more notches to remove Whites from colleges and universities and from their jobs? Hence in South Africa there are now White shantytowns, some of them housing (shacking?) people holding college degrees.

  • I think White-Americans are already nearly the minority to be honest.

    • WR_the_realist

      That depends where you’re looking. If you’re a public school teacher (God help you!) you will have noticed that more than half the young children are non-white, which is indeed the case. (And which is why we are already doomed to become a minority.) If you live in almost any major American city you will have noticed that more than half the other residents of the city are non-white. But if you live where I live you might be able to fool yourself into thinking that America is still 88% white. Unfortunately that leads people here to vote as if that was still the case.

      • I’ve stopped kidding myself that we are going to be okay. I
        know we won’t be so. I’m pained and feel somewhat worn down only at the age of
        22! And I’ve got a friend who is very ill, but I’ll mention them in another post. What
        is especially worse is when you can understand how truly insidious all of this
        has been. It’s not even close to being an accident or a natural disaster of
        some kind, which is what our anti-White leaders would like us to believe. The
        only way for us to prove that we aren’t racists is to actively celebrate our
        own demise, and yes, we must prove that we aren’t as by default, we apparently
        are. You know, we are the first race on earth to face this gross psychological
        abuse. It’s unfounded in history.

  • Snazzy Snook

    “It’s pretty amazing that blacks, on average, think they are currently living in a nation with a nonwhite majority.”
    Well that certainly explains why blacks are so emboldened even before Obama was elected.. I’ll tell you, whites better wake up before it’s way too late and I think we are almost there ..

  • jeffaral

    The time for ethnic cleansing is coming; the question is who’s gona be wiped out.

  • Who Me?

    These people are going about it all wrong. A sure-fire way to get Africans to self-deport is to put up a sign offering it FREE. Africans cannot resist anything FREE. They also love KFC.

    Simply put up a sign saying: “FREE FREE FREE All expenses paid FREE cruise. FREE FREE FREE Everybody (black) welcome, FREE FREE FREE Also included: FREE KFC All You Can Eat Buffet. FREE FREE FREE Bring the whole fambly! FREE FREE FREE Doors open at Noon. FREE FREE FREE”

    Highlight all the words “FREE” in bright red. You’ll have blacks storming the gates to get on the boat before 6 am. (Plan ahead for this.)

    • AndrewInterrupted

      As is mentioned in the latest book AmRen review about Liberia, Africans don’t want the smarter ones, the mulattos, showing up and teaching them how to behave. The ones with European DNA booster shots like the Moochelles and the Baracks are nothing but trouble.

      “…Don’t need no half smart people coming here. Just the no smart ones…”

  • Ringo Lennon

    You want to know who your enemy is? Say something pro white. Whoever attacks you is your foe. Put them on a list for you will need this list pretty soon. Pretty simple logic

    • LovelyNordicHeidi

      You want to know who is anti white? Say something pro white.

      That would make a good caption for a picture!

      • Ringo Lennon

        Ideally , in time, people will want to avoid being on this list.

  • AndrewInterrupted

    ILLANA MERCER, who fled South Africa after apartheid, wrote a book about America experiencing the same fate as South Africa. The book is called: Into the Cannibals Pot.

    She’s the daughter of a Rabbi, so she gets a little agit-proppy at times. Especially in Chapter 6, but a good read/warning none the less. She fled to Canada, but lives in the U.S., I think.

    • Grantland

      “She’s the daughter of a Rabbi”.

      Ja, and I trust her as far as I can throw her.

      • AndrewInterrupted

        Well, that being said, S.A. treated her and her family as ‘white’ people. I’m sure Mr. Engelman would have been thoroughly offended by the accusation….<;-)
        If you can hold your nose through sections like Chapter 6, there are some insights/parallels.
        Are you the famous Bobster by a new name? You have that venom. Not that there's anything wrong with venom, mind you.

        • Grantland

          Nope, not the Bobster.

  • Ringo Lennon

    Watching NCAA college basketball tournament. Kentucky vs Wichita State. 10 positions on the court. 10 blacks on the court. The states of Kentucky and Kansas are something like 90% white. I would rather watch 10 mediocre white dudes than 10 blacks slam dunkin’ any day of week. Blacks are taking away white kids opportunity to play. It’s kinda hilarious that we cheer on these.

    • AndrewInterrupted

      ‘…Disparate Impact…’ only counts when it hurts Blacks.
      It was all agreed upon by the occupation government.

      • Ringo Lennon

        Don’t forget w/ 10 blacks playing you have 10 less white kids playing. 10!

        • AndrewInterrupted

          That topic came up at the link Jared supplied for that $98 million shakedown of the NYC fire department. Many of the Newsday posters said it’s time to level the racial playing fields at the NBA, MLB, NFL, etc. Most of those comments were deleted by the Newsday moderator.

    • wretchedwhiterabbit

      “we” don’t

      • Ringo Lennon

        Watch white fans in stands go bananas when a black player slam dunks.

    • Sick of it

      Despite what a lot of folks say, there are quite a few great white basketball players. I have two nephews who could become like that. But, such men are passed over in favor of non-white players for entirely political purposes.

      • Ringo Lennon

        I hear you. I would like to watch your nephews play instead of blacks.

        • LovelyNordicHeidi

          I would rather prefer international segregation in sports. Only Whites vs. Whites, Blacks vs. Blacks and Asians vs. Asians.

      • LACountyRedneck

        The NBA is full of guys that can run fast and jump high. It seems they are more into entertainment value than quality of play, so they focus on athleticism. Players today can’t shoot, pass, defend, or play team ball like those of recent decades. Their ratings are down and they think having everyone dunk a ball will be exiting to fans. To me it’s boring. The 2004 U.S. Olympic team had greater athletes than the 2004 Olympics teams from Argentina and Lithuania but those White teams were smarter and beat the U.S. team. The less athletic Lith’ team almost beat them again in 2012. Many bball folks say Steve Nash has “high basketball IQ”. He isn’t very big, fast, or a tremendous leaper, yet he has won two MVP’s. I call it high IQ, period, relative to the rest of the league. The term “high basketball IQ” is a joke.
        When asked if Steve Nash was the smartest Laker, Metta World Peace replied, “He’s White, so probably yes.”

  • Funruffian

    I just moved to an upscale gated suburb in Contra Costa County. I’m renting a room inside a mansion. I did this to avoid having to pay exorbitant fees of living in a condo or apartment in a decent area.
    Having said that, this plush and quiet community is filled with Indian and Arab immigrants. I have seen some Whites and I could not tell you what the percentage is residing here, but my guess is that they are not equally represented here.
    If I wanted to rent a one bedroom apartment in Walnut Creek, CA the lowest rate I could find was $1500 per month. That means that the median rate has to be about $1800 per month. Go figure.
    I made the best decision, because I not only pay a $999 month-to-month fee for this bedroom, I also get free utilities, free WiFi, and my own parking space. The community has security and a secured entrance monitored by a security office which only grants access to residents and their guests.

  • I know this doesn’t have anything to do with American affairs, but this British tram
    lady (Emma West) had taken more than half of the recommended dose of anti-depressants and had drunken a bottle of wine before she got on the tram. If she had been a man, you would have seen more than verbal abuse. Moreover, isn’t it obvious that
    she is, in all likelihood, is psychologically traumatized from witnessing the ethnic cleansing of her English people? You can not expect there to be no psychologically consequences of such a hopeless and helpless situation. They want to victimize Whites into cultural surrender and then attack us for feeling/expressing anguish, akin to strapping a raped woman in a chair and then slapping her when she screams.

    Needless to say, the inhuman-like and dispassionate state of non-White minds leads to twisted and gross abuse/neglect of the White race – for they think it is even their right
    to steal away our write to cry in pain.

    • LovelyNordicHeidi

      Excellent post!

      You can not expect there to be no psychologically consequences of such a hopeless and helpless situation.

      Doing something with this knowledge might help us to draw in many young folks, because they suffer a lot from the psychological consequences of this hopeless and helpless situation that our race is in.

  • Rather than preserve the majority, which is now impossible, White-Americans need to work on preserving being the largest minority group in the nation they built, and with a political voice to serve their own interests just as non-Whites currently have. This is the next crucial stage otherwise we won’t be suffering just a national American genocide, but an actual racial European one as well!

  • Natassia

    Doesn’t this all depend on how one defines “white”?

    • AndrewInterrupted

      Good point. There is a great deal of statistical subterfuge in that 63% number. Western Europeans are most certainly below 50% by now.

      • I would say White-Americans of North-West and Central European decent to be exact.

        • Martel

          Bloody Egyptians are registered as caucasian. Which they were in the days of King Tut, but no longer.

        • Truth Teller

          If someone looks white and defines themselves as white, they are white.

          • And What is looking White to you?

          • Truth Teller

            Looking like you can pass in Europe, from Sweden to Cyprus.

          • But I don’t think you can be considered White when one doesn’t carry a European haplotype. If they tested you and found a haplotype outside of Europe, they would use it against you. Whites who carry non-European haplotypes are mixed race, not purely White European. Many Jews would fit what I’m talking about.

          • AndrewInterrupted

            What? Did you hit your head or something?

    • Laika

      Nope. Would you say the same thing about Asians or Blacks or Hispanics.

      Your comment sounds like the cultural marxists, Tim Wise for example, who claims the White Race and ONLY the White race is a social construct.

      But, the government sure knows who is and isn’t white when it comes to AA, college slots, quotas and job placements.

      Suddenly, there is a VERY clear definition of who is or isn’t white.

  • Max

    After looking at the misplaced loyalties around me and giving it some thought, my response to people who don’t like my racial views is going to be: “Well, you know how you feel about (your sports team here)? THAT is how I feel my race”.

  • Nobody goes to China and tells them that they have all of this underserved privilege riding
    of the backs of European technology and stolen jobs. Nor does anyone tell the
    Chinese kids that they must face the dark side of their empirical past in the
    great, far east. They also aren’t told how they don’t exist as a worthy people
    and that’s due to the fact that they aren’t exclusively, purely, entirely Han-Chinese.

    Though if this were the case, then it would be equal to the insidious and mental illness
    of liberal logic.

  • Truth Teller

    Actually millennials have less white guilt than the other generations because they were taught of everyone is equal. If people underperform or misbehave, millennials are tougher on them and have less tolerance for it. They also don’t support affirmative action.
    What people don’t get about millenials is that they don’t necessarily care what ethnic background someone is as long as they act the same. If they don’t, no excuses are made for them.

  • thebaldchick

    That order looks familiar: Asians estimated closest to the actual numbers, followed by whites, Latinos, then blacks. It’s almost as if there’s actually something to this whole IQ thing… 😉

  • Nancy Thomas

    California is already LOST.