Court Blocks Stop-and-Frisk Changes for New York Police

Joseph Goldstein, New York Times, November 1, 2013

A federal appeals court on Thursday halted a sweeping set of changes to the New York Police Department’s practice of stopping and frisking people on the street, and, in strikingly personal terms, criticized the trial judge’s conduct and removed her from the case.

The Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled that the judge, Shira A. Scheindlin, “ran afoul” of the judiciary’s code of conduct by compromising the “appearance of impartiality surrounding this litigation.” The panel criticized how she had steered the lawsuit to her courtroom when it was filed nearly six years ago.

The ruling effectively puts off a battery of changes that Judge Scheindlin, of Federal District Court in Manhattan, had ordered for the Police Department. It postpones the operations of the monitor who was asked to oversee reforms of the stop-and-frisk practices, which Judge Scheindlin had said violated the constitutional rights of minorities.

{snip}

But Judge Scheindlin ruled in August that the Police Department not only had violated the Fourth Amendment’s guarantee against unreasonable searches and seizures, but had also violated the 14th Amendment by resorting to a “policy of indirect racial profiling” as the number of police stops soared in minority communities over the last decade.

The police, Judge Scheindlin found, were routinely stopping “blacks and Hispanics who would not have been stopped if they were white.”

Lawyers for the city had gone to the Second Circuit to ask for a stay of Judge Scheindlin’s ruling and of the court-ordered mandates. In granting the stay, the circuit went beyond what the city had requested and unexpectedly ordered that the stop-and-frisk lawsuit, known as the Floyd case, be randomly reassigned.

The new judge, John Koeltl, was instructed to put off “all proceedings and otherwise await further action” from the panel. The appeals court has not yet taken up whether Judge Scheindlin’s decision reached the correct constitutional conclusion regarding the police tactics.

{snip}

The panel set a schedule for the appeals process that extends into 2014, after Mr. Bloomberg leaves office. The judicial stay leaves open the question as to how the next mayor will approach the appeal, and whether he will accept or challenge the court-ordered mandates.

{snip}

Lawyers involved in the lawsuit said they would appeal the panel’s decision, which put off a number of changes Judge Scheindlin had ordered. Those included installing an outside lawyer to monitor the Police Department’s compliance with the Constitution and directing some officers to wear cameras in a pilot program to record their street interactions, and holding community meetings to solicit public comments on reforming the department’s tactics.

{snip}

Topics:

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Puggg

    But all they have to do is wait until four nights from now, their new nutjob mayor will make the whole issue moot.

    • MBlanc46

      And watch the murder rate increase. It will be interesting.

    • shawnmer

      With all due sympathy for NYC’ers with a functioning brain cell, let me pull a Kos and say, “screw ’em!” You’d rather risk ending up on a slab than not tow the cultural Marxist line? Let Darwin work his magic!

      Bleed more of your corporate HQs to Dallas and Charlotte, mine was probably just a one time visit, anyway!

      • Puggg

        There’s the other side to that coin. It means more New Yorkers moving to Texas and North Carolina and blue-ifying those states.

        • Svigor

          Am I the only one who thinks the NYC legal precedents for stop and frisk could have national implications?

          • Puggg

            If the case makes it to the Supreme Court and they say it’s okay, I’m sure many more LEAs will SQF.

          • The legal precedent was set long ago with “Terry versus Ohio”. These SQF stops are really just “Terry stops”.

    • It won’t matter because these are legal “Terry Stops.” The cops there can thus do this on their own hook, whatever the city mayor says. The United States Supreme Court has already decided this issue.

      • Puggg

        However, I’m sure the New York City city government has full control over the NYPD. Stop Question Frisk is constitutional, but there’s nothing written that any LEA is required to do it.

        • Svigor

          Well, that would be the best of both worlds, wouldn’t it?

          1. Stop and Frisk goes to the Supreme Court, which approves it, making it permissible throughout the country.

          2. NYC ends S&F in their jurisdiction voluntarily, thus justly subjecting libs to the fruits of their own efforts.

          Everybody wins!

      • Svigor

        Mike, do you know of any links that explain the legal implications of this issue? I confess not knowing much about the subject. Specifically, I’m wondering about the legal implications of the fate of S&F in NYC for the rest of the country.

        • Go on Wikipedia and look up “Terry stop”. There’s a nice, well-cited article with 18 footnotes.

    • Svigor

      As someone at Sailer’s blog pointed out, Deblasio could just wait for the courts that Bloomberg has now primed to stamp stop & frisk with their approval, then throw his hands up and say the courts have decided and he can’t do anything about it. NYC liberals have a long history of doing that sort of thing.

      • Puggg

        If you’re saying that the nutjob wants to get rid of SQF on the sly so he’ll wait and bank on a Supreme Court ruling against it, maybe you’re right. But it seems to me that he’s openly and vociferously and stridently against it so that he’ll ditch it on his own volition the first moment he can when he actually becomes mayor.

        • Svigor

          No, other way around. He might want to keep SQF but on the sly, and blame it on the courts as a fait accompli. On the other hand his mate choice implies his liberalism goes all the way to the marrow, unlike most New Yorkers’.

          • Puggg

            Your second thought is my first thought. The nutjob isn’t playing some political con game, he is a 100% tee totally thrown in committed dyed in the wool far leftist. Nobody will have to tell him to get rid of SQF.

          • Jefferson

            Stop And Frisk is the only thing that keeps New York City from turning into another Detroit.

            A police state is the only thing that keeps Mestizos, Muslims, and Bantus in check.

          • Epiminondas

            Which is why the idiocy of multiculturalism will lead to a left wing dictatorship. It will be the only way to enforce it. Along with murdering whites.

          • M&S

            It doesn’t matter how deep DeBlasio’s dementia goes.
            Shira Scheindlin is of The Tribe and so the entire business over the lawsuit and the subsequent public interviews stunt was a slam dunk means to shift voting demographics away from the sane and towards the left.
            Create controversy and you create a ‘third party’ that drops votes away from the conflict, just to be neither nor or out of real uncertainty. And where the odds are 46-49 that’s enough of a swing margin so that a massive publicity campaign can peel the onion.
            Such was /always/ the agenda and if DeBlasio want’s to remain effective and in-power he will follow it. SQF likely never mattered to these people, only the /other/ bills and amendments they need this man to sign off on.
            The entire purpose of this self inflicted race war is to assure that the only semi-purebred whites left on this planet are those who follow the Torah and Talmud’s instructions on dealing with all ‘others’.
            The rest of us will be muddy halfbreeds who have no identity, no intelligence and no morality beyond whatever hype-the-moment, Fad Of Bad, wagged dog, ‘incident’ is suggested as morally acceptable to be outraged or appreciative of.
            We will not even be sheep. Because sheep don’t bleat on command.

          • He’s openly campaigning to get rid of SQF. For your first theory to be true, he’d have to be campaigning in support of it in public.

            You had it right when you said “all the way to the marrow.”

        • There isn’t going to be a Supreme Court ruling. They ruled on Terry vs. Ohio in 1968. SCOTUS doesn’t rehear this stuff.

  • Erasmus

    Here’s hoping Schira Scheindlin, the judge, who tried to overturn stop-and-frisk, is a victim of the diversity she loves so much.

    • Sick of it

      Blacks and Hispanics couldn’t tell the difference between her and us, so it’s very possible.

      • Probably not possible. Ever since the judge was killed in Chicago they have all kinds of protections costing us billions per year, home alarm systems, car service, etc, it is out of control.

        • Stan D Mute

          Definitely not possible, especially now with the overwhelming militarization of the police – creating a new army that CAN operate inside our borders.

          The elites who have, utterly unopposed, created the destruction of the USA virtually never encounter any of the diversity they force down our throats. And now, of course, they have plundered the public treasury enough that they can ensure complete impunity for their evil by hiring their mercenary armies, backed up by “Homeland Security” shock troops guaranteeing they will never face either the diversity or the dispossessed founding stock of this failed nation.

          • Erasmus

            The moment The Idiot Prince first said the words “Department of Homeland Security” everyone than half a brain could already hear the sound of marching jackboots.

    • Garrett Brown

      By the sound of her name she is the diversity.

      • blight14

        Indeed………….

    • Marlin B. Newburn

      I don’t believe she would learn a thing if she were assaulted by a black or brown predator.

      Some idealists on the bench are extremely rigid in their beliefs since it’s the only tool they have for mental stability, and as a guide in their everyday lives. They can just cite “the law”, and be done with the business of using common sense or decency. It was the defense of Hitler’s appointed leaders at Nuremberg.

      Then there is the concept of Masochistic Altruism where the victim immediately forgives their assailants in a narcissistic attempt to elevate themselves above the rest of us. Of course, it’s sick, but that’s the profile of these enablers of violence.

      Scheindlin appears to be a liberal sock-puppet, and devoid of a rational conscience when it comes to black and brown violence. She may be shaken if assaulted, but she will be party and value-loyal if she recovers in hospital.

  • MekongDelta69

    Just wait until white hating DeBlasio wins on Tue. for NYC mayor.
    He’ll make the Dinkins era look like Joe Arpiao was the NYC mayor back then.

    • IstvanIN

      I hope Mayor DeBlasio gives New Yorkers what they so richly deserve.

      • bigone4u

        Yes, the Big Apple is rotten to the core. As I recall, Barry Goldwater said something about sawing off the East Coast and letting it float out to sea. Maybe NYC will be under 20 feet of water after Al Gore’s climate change takes hold. I wouldn’t miss any of it, from Broadway to the Statue of Liberty.

    • Fighting_Northern_Spirit

      I haven’t followed DeBlasio or the NYC mayoral race, so I just now Googled him. There’s no picture of him and his…wife…together on Wikipedia, but she has her own separate page. Whiskey Tango Foxtrot!

      • Stan D Mute

        There are plenty of photos of De Blasio with his mulatto children. At nearly every campaign appearance he was bookended by his giant Afro wearing son and his cornrow wearing daughter.

        And THAT my brothers is EXACTLY what our elites have cooked up for ALL whites unfortunate enough to be unable to escape America. No matter what our ancestors gave to create this nation from a wilderness people by Stone Age primitives, no matter the blood they left on the battlefield, it’s time to drop the sentimentality and get out. The “Greatest Generation” and the baby boomers guaranteed America would become Brazil. The demographics are now irreversible. More than half the births in America are non-white. Way more than half the population receives more from government than it pays in taxes. This cannot be rolled back. That ship sailed thirty years ago.

        If you don’t have an IQ over 130, if your children don’t have IQ’s over 130, if you don’t have great wealth, America will become a very horrific place for your kids and grandkids. With the abject hatred for all things white promulgated by media and schools

        • Not just a Democrat thing.

          Two words:

          Mia Love.

          Her husband is white. They have kids.

        • saxonsun

          His wife looks just like a voodoo doll.

        • Xerxes22

          There are rumours that DeBlasio’s children are adopted. His wife is a lesbian, so the rumours could be true.

    • Stan D Mute

      The financial district, Southern Manhattan, as well as Midtown, will remain as or perhaps even more secure. The outer boroughs will look like the set from “Escape from New York,” but where the money resides will be heavily fortified and guarded by both private mercenary “security” and “Homeland Security” storm troopers in their armored vehicles.

      NYC will become São Paulo or Rio within a decade. The rest of the nation will resemble Brazil within two decades at most.

    • Guest

      EWWWW, take a look at his beloved.

    • itdoesnotmatter

      EWWW, take a look at DeBlasio’s beloved.

      • Raydonn

        The bowels of Hades has reserved a special spot for this vile man!

        • itdoesnotmatter

          Yep. I shudder to think what is in store for NYC if this chocolate dipper fool is elected.

      • Nice Guy

        She looks like a man.

        • itdoesnotmatter

          Yikes, you are right. Though that is an insult to men.

  • Fighting_Northern_Spirit

    I’m ambivalent about SQF. The practice saves NAM lives, and annoys some of them, and Whitey gets blamed. End it, NAMs will die, the annoyance will stop, but Whitey still gets blamed. Two sides of the same coin. I’d prefer for the irritants to be removed and allowed to shape their own destinies somewhere else.

    • M&S

      You’ve got it half right anyway.
      The NAMs will not leave because this is the style of life they are used to. If they were as fed up with rejection in place and a society that doesn’t care for their presence wherever they go, they would have long since left or attempted to create exclusive black communities where they could help only each other as we have taught them.
      They know they cannot. They have only 1-2% IQs in the 115-120 range sufficient to be competent self managers and virtually none in the 140-160 range fit to be innovators. They are extremely violent with each other when no other victims are around (dominance becomes territorial when it’s not for show) and, after 300 years, they remain in a position where social setasides are more profitable for most than personal achievement.
      The only way for whites to survive as a people is through divorce. Give the NAMs all of the East Coast and West. That there be _no doubt_ that they are getting the best of the land.
      And then simply leave. Taking our armies and our nuclear weapons with us with explicit warning that we will _kill_ any who follow.
      That is what you got right. We can’t cut off the land. And we can’t forcibly deport the mess we’ve made of immigrant populations. But we can cut ourselves off from those who ruin and despoil it our nation.
      And it is the ONLY THING which will save this planet from the despotism of a failed World State leading to a megacultural meltdown that is the sole, sought, outcome for this destruction of America as a Nation State.
      In 1918, it was still three. In 1945, it was just two. In 1993, it became just one. Now they want the rest, even though all forms of political, religious and anthropological history point to such being a _very bad_ idea.

      • Fighting_Northern_Spirit

        I’m sorry, but if Whitey had the cojones to say we will _kill_ any who follow, then he would have the cojones for a more sensible solution: forcible deportations for those who refused sterilization or voluntary deportation.

        • M&S

          FNS,
          It’s not about testicular fortitude sir. It never was. It was about creating sufficient inertia that to /stop/ the horror, White Americans would have to do things which WWII and Slavery Guilt had endlessly inculcated into them as being damning sins.
          If we engage in acts equivalent to Nazi purgings of all non-whites from our lands (and it will have to be all, because there will be no
          ‘Aussweise’ checks possible) we will be involved in a civil war for which fully half or more of our own people will stand against us and _if we succeed_ we will be in a position where the whole world looks upon us a rabid and hypocritous animals. The latter being more dangerous because it seeks to justify it’s actions based on a morality it doesn’t exercise for itself.
          We would then face a condition by which nuclear weapons and trade sanctions would prevent our wrecked currency from being recognized, anywhere, as bankable in trade for resources. And did we try to take what he had to, to survive, we would be nuked in blue waters rather than have our booty reach home.
          And every one of our many enemies -counts- on this to both intimidate us from trying to forge our own destiny again. And as an excuse to crush us like bugs if we try.
          But.
          If we adopt Colonel Picken’s solution of ‘Two Aimed Shots Boys…’ on our way /out/ of the union, then any who give chase have to be actively seeking our harm to be engaged.

          • Fighting_Northern_Spirit

            We’ll have to agree to disagree. IMHO, it’s all about testicular fortitude. The civil war you fear would ensue if we tried to separate with threats to kill those who follow, too.

          • M&S

            There will only be a ‘Civil War’ along the lines of a Red Dawn against our fellow Americans if the American Government has collapsed and no one immediately moves in with OWG international forces to take over.
            That will not happen.
            In an age of info dominant control over telecomms to both monitor and deny exchanges of ideas as tactics while rapid transit by rail, road and air allows massing of forces with military capabilities, nearly instantly, there would never be a chance to logistically stage a standing or a running fight.
            Our own government would choose to destroy us rather than allow us to fight a war with the invasive cancers they have infected us with because they depend on dependence to justify their own existence.
            And that is the key to understanding that if we refuse to be a part of that sustainment mechanism, if we leave them to their own, they can be _nothing_ that we don’t support them to be.
            With this doctrine, if you assume that the starting position as the control over forces and populations has to be in place -beforehand-, under a ‘Leave us be or we will ruin you!’ modis of declared Secession with sufficient assets to crush the economy of the U.S. if they choose to fight it, you create a standoff condition of détente` by which those United States Americans who remain white and in control of our (ex) societies’ government as armed forces must come to a realization:
            That if they slaughter their own while that Rebel portion of us engages in razed earth fighting (salting their own earth) to keep what is ours from any others’ use then, _win or lose_, the residual whites will inherit a North America if not world where the blacks and browns are now the dominant population majority, still as useless as ever as thinkers and creators and effectors of a functional society as ever and still looking at at whitey to supply a standard of living which they no longer can.
            The problem race realist whites have is failing to understand the TERRIBLE vulnerability LIBERALS have created by imported ethnic wage slaves to join the already resident welfare dependent racial classes and from that realization understand that ‘he who cuts loose first, wins the philosophy debate’.
            Because those who are left will face a hostile, demanding, unhappy and _incompetent_ racial matrix of low IQ dependent, criminal, children.
            Who will kill them to take what they have as society melts down.
            This is the barrel the liberal leftists have bent us all over.
            And the reality is that only the racial realists have a chance to shove ourselves up off it because the liberals NEED THE BLACKS AND BROWNS to keep the rest of us guilt ridden about our racial preferences.
            But we do not need either of them.
            And with control over the middle of the country as the principle nuclear weapons and agro belts, we would have dominance over _who ate_ within days.
            This would break the leftists to our heels because they cannot afford to destroy us to regain control. And they cannot survive their New Electorate if we leave them to the mess they have made.
            _The Keys_ are refusal to be a part of their society, relocation to a combined white working social mass of our own and redemption of white selfbelief in the righteousness of our owned self-interests.
            Not hate. Just our own racial perspective.

          • Fighting_Northern_Spirit

            I think the collapse of the current system, government and all, is more likely to happen than any united, concerted effort on our part to save ourselves. When that happens, we must be ready to seize the moment, seize our freedom, and not beg for crumbs when we can have the whole loaf. We get nowhere by trying to be reasonable with people who want us dead. And here we come back full circle to the idea of cojones.

          • M&S

            In WWII, when you include the additive losses that the Russians lied about, somewhere between 70 and 100 million died.
            Imagine that happening in less than a week in the States. Only stopping with the absence of awareness as gasoline for conflictive parties to reach each other.
            This is what -will- occur if you remove the protection racket payoff of blacks and Hispanics as the social safety net of tossing meat to the wolf eyes standing outside the glow of our campfire.
            Now consider something else. When you wait until you’re 35-40 to have a child, you are -guaranteeing- that there will be up to a 60 year gap before you are replaced in the gene as work pool.
            This has two principle consequences:
            1. You have a lot of women who need a lot of help having kids because things like their pelvis fusing and their heart/long/kidney/liver efficiencies all decreasing.
            2. You have an abnormally high skew of the very old and the very young with a median old-middle aged population inbetween.
            If, when the lights go out and the wolf gangs start roving, looking for their meat, everyone is on one side of the Mississippi and the Rockies we have a defensible position that can be improved and protected by even old people and kids, with food as operational depth at our backs in which to maneuver as chase down river jumpers who come shy of anything but what they can swim with or carry over a 14,000ft, 20`F, peak.
            It also means we have whites as numbered mass with which to hold _what is ours_ and not end up with a condition by which, however ‘good’ we are at killing, the threat pulls us apart and defeats us in detail using local numeric supremacies of just a few or just a few hundred.
            To return again to the Russian casepoint, the Germans defeated the Russians outside the Pinks marshes northwest of Kiev, they defeated them again at Smolensk and Bryansk, they even defeated them in the worst of the early winter fighting of ’41, never moving from their initial positions, about 150km outside Moscow.
            And each time the Russians stopped being Russian and became more Asian, led by white Kommissars, the Germans bled a little more. This continued over and over again, in places like Sevastopol and Kharkov where technically, the Germans were /still winning/, as late as 1943. And yet the endgame was never in question as, despite sustaining an overall Kill:Loss ratio of 10-12:1 (and peaks of 15:1) the Germans lost the war because the Russians could bleed more and still live.
            We do not want to fall to our knees, so tired and spent, in little pockets of disjointed whiteness, that we are forced to play lambs and lions with black and Hispanic interlopers who will, as always, seek to snuggle up against us and drain our vitality as our independence from us.
            We can only avoid that problem if we are not in the position that they are, when the electricity fails, and we can stand their maximum tide-surge peak of violence before they run out of ready food and transport and begin to die in place.
            Because we stand together, while they fall apart.
            The truth of Russia was that, even with manpower reserves numbering a hundred million more than known, prewar, they could not have continued were it not for Western supplies of critical things like food and radios and ammunition and even tanks and planes at one point.
            In a ‘Civil War’ condition, none of our enemies will have that option of Lend-Lease resupply via PQ convoys.
            But we _must hold_ against a peak that could, at it’s worst, number several million lost souls in desperate wanderjar, looking for food.
            I myself would rather face this threat on condition that we become an independent nation -before- or even /without/ the lights going out. Because nations are led by men and men can deal with each other as individuals. Starvation is the rule of the mob and there is no negotiation with such a predator. They take everything in the moment and leave no seed corn for what comes next.
            If the fight is unavoidable, I would rather face this migrant peak on the borders of our lands where the operant psychology of witnessed slaughter-ahead and the choked approaches stacked with dead as dropped bridges to further slow the advance, could, perhaps, save us from having to do a great deal more killing, in detail, throughout the depths of a shattered infrastructure as crops and farms are razed as though by locusts.
            What I _do not_ want to do is wait for the end to come before whites start making plans to get together and form a viable, mutual, defense. Because numbers or no, we will be overrun and starving ourselves without any hope of organization and skilled management of resources, which is our real edge.
            You are asking for the hip deep in alligators solution, hoping for a winter freeze to kill them. But when winter thaws, if you have no friends as willing labor, who will plant the fallow fields? How will you eat?

          • M&S

            Sorry about that, Return somehow became SEND.

            Continuing on…

            Whites at that point will be terribly exposed but we will also be in a situation where, sans any blacks, Hispanics or other woebegones as _slave labor_ (that’s right, the liberal left wants slavery to continue), we can begin a real fight for our people’s souls.

            Right now, we are facing a condition where our people are cowed by false guilt and the fear that if they speak up, they will be ostracized from an already shrunken community and destroyed outside it’s limited protection.

            If being white and living our own lives is seen as something whites don’t have to be timid about being proud of, _because we are successful alone_, as we never were with a boatload of ethnic dependents, then the squeeze chart reverses. And those who are the centrists in a failing state of non-white majority economic collapse will become the outliers and the moderates who swing whichever way the wind blows will begin to look at a White America as again being the place they want to be associated with and live in.

            Use elective exclusionism not forced inclusionism of a much smaller economic body as the means to guarantee social privilege.
            And if the world calls us racists, then they also have to face the reality that we are a majority _in our own lands_, much as Saudi Arabia is a 100% muslim ruled nation. China is 93% Han Chinese, Africa is a continent of nearly 98% blacks. And Mexico is 100% non-American.
            This is an arguable point. That we are not the socialist liberal fools who ruined the United States and do no hold ourselves responsible for their population policies. And we are also not Nazis who butchered our way to regaining control over that former country which was ours to begin with.
            Rather, we instead chose to leave it.
            The carrot always beats the stick.

            Reason can defeat manipulation.
            The Will is the Elector of Fate.

  • Jesse_from_Sweden

    The police, Judge Scheindlin found, were routinely stopping “blacks and
    Hispanics who would not have been stopped if they were white.”

    Somehow, I don’t think anyone will react to the fact that the police are also routinely stopping men who would not have been stopped if they were women…..

    Or young people, who would not have been stopped had they been older.

    • NeanderthalDNA

      Or a larger percentage of Whites than commit crimes, lol…

  • JohnEngelman

    An issue like this should be decided by an area wide city referendum. Stop and frisk and race profiling have significantly reduced the crime rate in New York City. Nearly everyone who has lived in New York since 1970 knows that.

    • Fighting_Northern_Spirit

      Prop 187 (banning public services for illegals) and Prop 8 (banning sodomite marriage) in California were both overturned by activist courts. Judges don’t take too kindly to the people having actual sovereignty, and anything that touches on the rotten corpus of snivel rights law treads on very thin ice. Even Prop 209 (banning affirmative action) is under constant threat, and subverted at every turn.

      • JohnEngelman

        I am opposed to the power of judges in the United States.

        • So am I, but would you want someone like me as a replacement?

          • MBlanc46

            You’d be better than a lot of them.

      • emiledurk16

        That’s right.
        That’s the situation we’re up against.

  • Spartacus

    Most of the Whites in New York are in fact not Eskimos at all, so any step that harms them is for the better .

  • Shira A. Scheindlin will be given a Human Rights award for “suffering hostile and extremist attacks on her passionate commitment to protect vulnerable and at risk Diversity youth and teens from vile, insensitive and hatefully intolerant police tactics.”

    The Appeals Court will be added to the Hate Watch.

    • emiledurk16

      Your sarcasm is right on.
      That’s exactly how the society degrading left will describe the situation.
      I’m glad there are those of us who see through this deceptive rhetoric.

  • bigone4u

    Police Dispatcher: The suspect is a black male in his early 20s wearing a green shirt and sporting a mouth full of gold teeth.
    Cop, to Dispatcher: Tell me again how many white guys in their 50s wearing red plaid shirts I have to stop to keep Judge Scheindlin off our backs.
    Ridiculous!

  • negrolocaust

    a white george washington teacher is on life support after being attack by a black

  • willbest

    This upsets me. NYC should be forced to live by the hellish standards its elite dictate the rest of us live in. If they want a race blind, neighborhood integration, police state for the rest of us, then I want every 10th person coming out of a high rise felt up, and section 8 housing vouchers so the underprivileged can live in penthouse C.

  • mrcan

    I was in NYC in the early 80’s. I was very creepy and seedy. they have done a remarkable job turning the city around and making it livable. I cannot believe that anyone would want to go back to that. Have they not seen what happened to Detroit! The judge should have to live in the hood for a while.

    • IstvanIN

      You were creepy and seedy???? Is that a typo?

  • judenjager

    Squid judge gets hammerd. Lovin’ it. No way out but thru the jews…………………….

    • Svigor

      Your diction is crude, but the message is apt. This is what I keep trying to tell a certain stripe of white advocate; you may not want to fight the Jews, but if you want to get whites out of the mess they’re in, you’re going to.

      • Jack Burton

        As if no one ever heard of the Jewish problem before, what a self-righteous idiot.

        • Svigor

          Aw, you’re just saying that to be nice.

  • William Krapek

    Wow. A little justice. I’m not used to that.

  • judenjager

    We need to rid our country of the jewdicial system. No way out but thru the squids.

  • Marlin B. Newburn

    It is amazing, isn’t it? The majority of Jewish folks support anything pro-black, and as a group, they will defer to black demands at both the state and federal level, regardless of how ridiculous. But you’re right, blacks deeply hate Jews.

  • Hunter Morrow

    A New York Jew doing something for black and brown that hurts White.
    Who saw that coming?

  • Chasmania

    Sheindlin will probably be teaching law at Harvard very soon, or working at the DoJ, assuming she is fired that is.

    • From a career standpoint, this won’t look too good for her: overruled and removed from a case for grossly unprofessional conduct.

  • Raydonn

    In a sane nation Shira A. Scheindlin wouldn’t be allowed to vote, let alone hold public office….ours is not a sane nation.

    • What we have instead is a 3000 mile-wide, open-air lunatic asylum.

      • Aditya Vivek Barot

        I beg to differ, Mr. Scott. A lunatic asylum is a well-managed business where people in charge devote considerable time and energy to ensuring that their charges harm neither themselves nor others.

  • Disbarment would accomplish that. I’m not a lawyer, so I’m not sure where the line is for disbarment. Moral turpitude or any felony conviction will do it, but something like this probably isn’t enough.

  • Webspin

    Stop and frisk is a gross violation of personal liberty and every American should be outraged. New York city has gone so far as to dictate what foods you can legally purchase (fats and soft drink size) and I’m sure a whole host of other freedom robbing legislation I’m not aware of. The fed now can effectively strip search you at airports, how long before technology makes this available to ‘see’ into our homes? If this can be done in the name of decreasing crime, then why not video cameras in everyone’s home?

    • 1. I don’t want any government dictating that soda sizes can only be so big

      2. I don’t want to be officially molested at airports

      3. I don’t want state agents to be driving around with cameras that can see into my house without a compelling reason to look

      4. I don’t want cameras in everyone’s houses

      5. SQF is good, perfectly constitutional, and the right thing to do.

      • IstvanIN

        In a white society with reasonable entry and exit limits we could have the freedoms we were used to. In a third world country, not so much.

        • The entertaining aspect to Sheindlin’s original ruling is that by telling NYC police not to do their job, she was accidentally admitting that as a society that contains non-Asian minorities, we are a utterly failed experiment.

          Libtards sometimes tell the truth, albeit unwittingly.

          • IstvanIN

            Very true, very true. But then all we have to do is look at which societies are orderly and which are chaotic. Or, for that matter, which societies went from orderly to chaotic as the population changed.

          • Joe blow

            Judge Jewey; and the Supreme Court is one-third just like her.

    • MBlanc46

      It is. The police should never be able to interrogate you without probable cause. If the US were a completely white nation, I’d fight it tooth and nail. But the presence of a racial subculture with lower IQ , decreased long-term thinking, and deficient impulse control calls into the universal application of legal rules devised for rational adults. After all, children are subject to restrictions that would not be constitutional for adults. In many ways, blacks are like children who must be controlled to a greater extent that adults. It’s not just for our protection, it’s for theirs as well. Most of the victims of black violence are other blacks. We should certainly not be enthusiastic about SQF, but it may be a necessary weapon in the legal arsenal to impose control on those unable to control themselves.

  • Epiminondas

    That would be hard to explain away.

  • negrolocaust

    ALERT!! AT LEAST TWO towson university students robbed of phones one stabbed, by groups of blacks last night. JUST HEARD ON RADIO in BALTIMORE. BURKE avenue and aeigburth road. thank you.