The Heretic at Heritage

Pat Buchanan, Human Events, May 14, 2013

Jason Richwine, the young conservative scholar who co-authored the Heritage Foundation report on the long-term costs of the amnesty bill backed by the “Gang of Eight,” is gone from Heritage.

He was purged after The Washington Post unearthed his doctoral dissertation at the JFK School of Government.

Richwine’s thesis:

IQ tests fairly measure mental ability. The average IQ of immigrants is well below that of white Americans. This difference in IQ is likely to persist through several generations.

And the potential consequences of this?

“A lack of socioeconomic assimilation among low IQ immigrant groups, more underclass behavior, less social trust and an increase in the proportion of unskilled workers in the American labor market.”

Richwine defended his 166-page thesis before Harvard’s George Borjas, Richard Zeckhauser and Christopher Jencks, who once edited The New Republic. But while his thesis was acceptable at Harvard—it earned Richwine a Ph.D.—it has scandalized the Potomac priesthood.

Our elites appear unanimous: Richwine’s view that intelligence is not equally distributed among ethnic and racial groups, and is partly inherited, is rankest heresy. Yet no one seems to want to prove him wrong.

Consider Richwine’s contention that differences in mental ability exist and seem to persist among racial and ethnic groups.

In The Wall Street Journal last month, Warren Kozak noted that 28,000 students in America’s citadel of diversity, New York City, took the eighth-grade exam to enter Stuyvesant, the Bronx School of Science and Brooklyn Tech, the city’s most elite high schools. Students are admitted solely on their entrance test scores.

Of the 830 students who will be entering Stuyvesant as freshmen this fall, 1 percent are black, 3 percent are Hispanic, 21 percent are white—and 75 percent are Asian.

Now, blacks and Hispanics far outnumber Asians in New York. But at Stuyvesant, Asians will outnumber blacks and Hispanics together 19-to-1.

{snip}

The 2009 Programme for International Student Assessment, PISA, which measures the academic ability of 15-year-olds worldwide, found the U.S.A. falling to 17th in reading, 23rd in science, 31st in math.

Yet, Spain aside, not one Hispanic nation, from which a plurality of our immigrants come, was among the top 40 in reading, science or math.

{snip}

Is there greater “underclass behavior” among Hispanics?

The crime rate among Hispanics is about three times that of white Americans, while the Asian crime rate is about a third that of whites.

Among white folks, the recent illegitimacy rate was 28 percent; among Hispanics, 53 percent. According to one study a few years back, Hispanics were 19 times as likely as whites to join gangs.

What about Richwine’s point regarding “social trust”?

Six years ago, in “E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the 21st Century,” Robert Putnam, author of “Bowling Alone,” wrote that after 30,000 interviews he found that ethnic and racial diversity can be devastating to communities and destructive of community values.

In racially mixed communities, Putnam wrote, not only do people not trust strangers, they do not even trust their own kind.

“People living in ethnically diverse settings appear to ‘hunker down,’ that is, to pull in like a turtle … (to) withdraw even from close friends, to expect the worst from their community and its leaders, to volunteer less, give less to charity and work on community projects less often, to register to vote less, to agitate for social reform more but have less faith they can actually make a difference, and to huddle unhappily in front of the television.”

With the immigration bill granting amnesty to 12 million illegals, an open door to their dependents and a million new immigrants each year, almost all from the Third World, America in 2040 is going to look like Los Angeles today. Yet, it was in L.A. that Putnam found social capital at its most depleted and exhausted.

If Richwine is right, America in 2040 will be a country with whites and Asians dominating the professions, and 100 million Hispanics concentrated in semiskilled work and manual labor.

The issues Richwine raises go to the question of whether we shall survive as one nation and one people.

If our huge bloc of Hispanics, already America’s largest minority at 53 million, is fed by constant new immigration, but fails for a couple of generations to reach the middle-class status that Irish, Germans, Jews, Italians and Poles attained after two generations, what becomes of our “indivisible” nation?

Rather than face this question, better to purge and silence the Harvard extremist who dared to raise it.

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • sbuffalonative

    I hope Mr. Richwine is extended an invitation to speak at the next AR Conference.

    • wattylersrevolt

      How does Richwine feel about China’s colonization of Stuyvesant HS? Pat Buchannan is apparently ok with it.

      • JohnEngelman

        So it would seem is American Renaissance, And so of course am I.

        • Diversity is BAD

          You’re wrong, and nobody cares about confused egomaniacs here.

          American Renaissance is not ok with it and has posted hundreds of articles exposing the chinese as corrupt non-White invaders (industrial spying, immigration fraud, human trafficking, academic cheating, commercial counterfeiting, environmental pollution, and on and on).

          Furthermore, Jared Taylor himself has made it quite clear that he is against diversity:

          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cL_9gy5xncA

          “Diversity is BAD for America because people of different races often don’t get along with each other, and because if this diversity keeps up IT WILL MAKE WHITE PEOPLE A MINORITY, probably a HATED MINORITY in the country their ancestors built.” (Jared Taylor, January 18, 2013)

          • Morris LeChat

            shhh, john’s inflatable asian girlfriend may hear you and get offended

          • Dea Whyte-Mansburten

            Let’s not forget that Asians are almost single-handedly responsible for the poaching of endangered species (because they believe that eating rhino ear wax will make them virile, etc.) and global pollution.

          • shmo123

            It’s true, whether it’s the oceans, forests or savannahs, the Chinese will strip bare anything that contains something they want. Their insatiable demand for ivory may soon make elephants extinct for one; shark fins, rhino horns are others, all to satisfy superstitious beliefs. An Asian environmentalist is as rare as as unicorn.

          • If yοս thiոκ Stеvе`s stοry is imрοssiblе,, 5 wееκs agο mοthеr iո-law basically brοսght hοmе  $8136 sittiոg thеrе a twеոty hοսr  wееκ iո thеir aрartmеոt aոd  thеir ոеighbοr’s mοm`s ոеighbοսr has  dοոе this fοr 10-mοոths aոd gοt рaid οvеr  $8136 рarttimе at thеrе рc. thе  stерs οո this wеb-sitе, ..Fox83.com

          • gemjunior

            Yes, and they are also responsible for the overgrowth of the tiger mollusks taking over the Hudson River and destroying the ecology of the area. Also, Chinese Fu King Stinkbugs are an epidemic in the Hudson Valley, everyone I know is complaining. Last year a few here or there, this spring 10 times more. Whatever you do – don’t step on it because it emits an odor that signals the other stinkbugs to come there. Scoop it up and throw it down the toilet or outside. Chinese again. Destroying tigers for their tiger bone wine. They don’t seem to care about conservation at all.

          • Sick of it

            The plan does not seem to be to make white people a minority, but rather to extinguish us from the earth. Genocidal racism at its worst.

        • David Ashton

          You’d be OK with “China’s colonization” period.

      • Nick Gherz

        The Chinese arguably deserve to go there.
        The alternative would be to place affirmative action recipients there.

        Ya know – persons who can’t think their way out of a paper bag
        *cough* *blacks* *cough*

        • wattylersrevolt

          The Chinese arguably deserve to be kicked out of America. How did Native Born White America ever surive without them? Very well thank you…We put 12 Alpha Native Born White American Males with advanced Aerospace Engineering degrees on the Moon..the Chinese Youth who attend Stuyvesant HS…named after a European Settler…will vote a election time to make it a certainty that this never happens again. Now go pack your bags..and off to China where you will be much happier..treasonous scum.
          Bring Back The Chinese Exclusion Act!!!

        • Diversity is BAD

          It’s not about deserving, it’s about preserving White majority in the country our ancestors built, just like that particular school. The only thing the chinese deserve is to study in their own country, especially since they are supposedly so smart *cough* *yeah right* *cough*:

          83% of College Students in China Cheat on Exams:
          http://www.theepochtimes.com/news/5-9-8/32106.html

          U.S. Program Shuttered in China over Plagiarism:
          http://chineseculture.about.com/b/2010/07/30/u-s-program-shuttered-in-china-over-plagiarism.htm

          “Conundrum”: 90 Percent of China’s Applicants Cheat:
          http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-levy/college-applicants-cheat_b_1074544.html

      • Whirlwinder

        Asians have generally higher IQ’s than white Americans, who have generally higher IQ’s than blacks and hispanics. China is colonizing nothing. They are just smarter than everybody else and really, really want a good education. Americans used to want a good education but government education is not so good for our students. Dumbs them down with socialist crap and makes them good subjects instead of thinking citizens.

      • gemjunior

        Imagine if the Asians were replaced with White at 75%? It would undoubtedly change from hard work to racist white priviledge.

        Asian, mostly Chinese and Koreans, manage to get these fantastic grades in school because they study at a pace unknown to any other people. They spend every waking hour with their head in a book, feverishly memorizing facts and cataloguing things very much like ants or bees in a hive. It’s all work, work, work, and no play, unless practicing your violin is play. It’s very unfair to have to waste your childhood and teenage years working so you can do well as an adult. You can do well as an adult without that severe kind of upbringing. The reason that they are so good with numbers is that the words and number are the same in their written language, or character, so they understand it better from a very young age. Never having to change the word forty to 40 or fifteen to 15 actually saves time and gives them an edge (or so I read in “Outliers”). Higher IQ is documented in the North Asians and along with that, a lifelong term of study will guarantee a studious habit inspiring them to take on medical school, scientific research, and many other well-paying careers.

    • Steven Bannister

      And he might as well accept the offer – because from this point on, no other organizations will invite him to speak!

    • Erasmus

      Mr. Richwine needs to capitalize on his unsought notoriety and publish a book on this topic, and in his off-time, he should do the conservative talk circuit. There are a lot of people who would buy a copy write now.

      Frustrated Americans are hungry for some truth and straight talk. After the standard lies and merde Washington and the MSM are always feeding them, they would listen to Mr. Richwine with enthusiasm.

  • Hirschibold

    Here’s some food for thought: I was recently reading Dr. Ben Bova’s book “Immortality” wherein he suggests that in less than twenty years, scientists will probably figure out how to halt cellular senescence by lengthening telomeres inside our DNA, which will increase human lifespans by hundreds (and possibly thousands) of years. For those who would laugh at Bova, it should be remembered that he correctly predicted that the Russians would put a satellite into orbit, and that the Americans would put a man on the moon, and in that order.

    Dr. Bova goes on to say that if and when we cure cancer as well as other diseases, and indefinitely prolong man’s life, it will be due primarily to the work of Nobel Laureate James Watson, a man who was driven out of polite society for saying pretty much what Charles Murray and Richwine are saying.

    To put it bluntly, the “racist” men of science have put our species closer to eradicating death and disease altogether. What has an “anti-racist” like Tim Wise done for his country lately? Wish death on older white people who have the temerity to have different political views than him? It’s pretty simple: the “racists” seek enlightenment, the “anti-racists” seek to keep us in ignorance.

    • The__Bobster

      Tim Weiss would hate us to extend our lifespans. He’s hoping we all die off soon.

      • George White

        I have a feeling that Little Timmy will probably have a short lifespan.

    • Erasmus

      When William Shockley died I was curious to see how NPR was going to do his obituary. Shockley had made himself persona non grata years before by openly stating that not all races had the same intellectual capability. I was young and naïve and actually thought that NPR would acknowledge the man who with his invention of the Shockley diode opened up the world of integrated circuits and all the technologies that ensued.

      Not a peep on Shockley’s passing. So much easier to ignore his passing even without mentioning his then controversial ideas than to acknowledge the man’s greatness.

      I think that was the first time I consciously realized how dishonest our left-wing “intelligentsia” could be.

    • Sick of it

      The main problem is the human brain and nervous tissue generally. We could relatively easily replace every other tissue type in the body, just like we could colonize other worlds and let every family be energy independent. Science isn’t fiction, except to the so-called geniuses that run modern academia.

  • joegoofinoff

    Rather than face this question, better to purge and silence the Harvard extremist who dared to raise it.
    ________________________________________________
    This is like the fable of the Dutch boy trying to plug leaks in the dike with his fingers. Once he plugged one leak, another would pop up beyond his reach. That’s what happens when anyone tries to suppress the truth over a long period of time. It just won’t go away.

  • The__Bobster

    Now, blacks and Hispanics far outnumber Asians in New York. But at Stuyvesant, Asians will outnumber blacks and Hispanics together 19-to-1.
    __________

    I’m getting out my Engelman repellent right now.

    • Manaphy

      Imagine an Asian guy going on an Asian Nationalist website and talking about how he loves white women who look better than Asian women….

      • crystalevans

        I have never heard of an Asian Nationalist website. I have heard of Asians who hate whites. But if an Asian guy likes white women, more power to him. I think a white woman is better off with an Asian than some black stud.

        • Manaphy

          And a white woman is better off with a European than some Asian stud.

          • Do it for your Race

            A sad commentary on the warped “diversity is our strength,” feminism, equality, the whole perverse lot, that we have a racial choice of mates without batting an eye-lash. The degree to which most have fallen is sickening.

            Your mate should be selected from your own race, kind, and creed. That this is even debatable is a repulsive indicator of our current state of affairs.

          • Bad_Mr_Frosty

            lol, Asian stud…

        • JohnEngelman

          Eric Hoffer probably explained why you have never heard of an Asian Nationalist website when he wrote, “The less justified a man is in claiming excellence for his own self, the more ready he is to claim all excellence for his nation, his religion, his race or his holy cause.”

          • concernedcollegekid

            If they were experiencing as much immigration into their countries as we are into white countries, something tells me they might start making Asian Nationalist websites… and I think they would have every right to.

          • Shouldn’t a man with an obvious Asian fetish be more inclined to stay on Asian Nationalist websites?

          • David Ashton

            Is this the third or fourth time you have selected this assertion for our instruction?

          • Defoe

            There are many Asian Nationalist websites. East Asians themselves are highly nationalistic.

            Stop boring us with Hoffer who was mediocre at best.

          • gemjunior

            That was made up by the same stupid lib who said “Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel”…

        • dmxinc

          Asians don’t need a Nationalist website. They already have their entire countries, unlike foolish Whites who have allowed theirs to be given away.

        • Ralph

          A White woman should be with a White man and a White man should be with a White woman. No other pairing saves our genotype.

          • Delayed Gratification

            True and sad that it even needs to be said. That should be as natural as taking your next breath. The blind still dont get it.

        • Talltrees

          See:
          Asian Nation
          Goldsea
          Hyphen
          CAAM
          AACI

          • So they don’t like us rogering the living daylights out of their women? Wow.

            Get used to it, boys.

        • One of my best friends in Australia was Chinese and only dated white women. Dr. Lao also opined that crossing Amerindian Celts with Japanese was “dangerous”.

        • heretic

          There are no Asian nationalist sites because virtually all Asians are Asian nationalists in their home countries. In any non-white group, the majority have a sense of racial consciousness and support their group’s interests. Whites are the only group where racial nationalism is a fringe position. White nationalists are demonized and are a small minority, but in other races racial solidarity is taken for granted so no “nationalism” needs to arise from the fringe. Whites are the only people who could make their own group interests a morally controversial position.

          • David Ashton

            Very true. WW2 was our watershed.

      • gemjunior

        They like those small boyish bodies and bandy legs, or bowed legs. Also there is that China Doll aspect. Love-you-long-time is what my friend and I called our Filipina manager because she barked at us and when she spoke to the guys she would lean in and giggle. I-be-your-barbie-GI-Joe….. Either the men who go with them like smallish bodies, um, or they like that sugary servile pretense at being bowled over by their muscles. You-big-muscle-man, you gimme footee dolla? OMG I just remembered this, it’s funny and kind of sad. There was an elderly woman who was really senile on our floor, and she was from Thailand and couldn’t speak any English although she was elderly. She must have had hard times when young and probably was a prostitute at some point. So she used to sit in the doorway and pull up her hospital gown and as people passed she would say “Fi-dolla, fi-dolla, fi-dolla – YOU- fi-dolla-fi-dolla-fi-dolla” like an auctioneer (five dollars) as I said it was probably a long time ago when these things were less expensive. She was around 90, who knows what went on in her life.

    • JohnEngelman

      Actually, it is your truth repellent. I am saving this column by Pat Buchanan so that I can post parts of it on this website later.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MMzd40i8TfA

      • Morris LeChat

        john, you need to find a new home, you are at odds with the aims and values of everyone on here. You are like an HIV virus that uses a protein receptor as a gateway to gain entry into the cell in order to start spreading your poison. This receptor is the “black crime statistics”. You throw out a bunch of stuff about blacks to get people to let their guard down and then you start your process of attempted demoralization. You obviously have a strong inferiority complex. You realize you are not too bright, but try to compensate for it with education and a catalogue of facts and links and other chaff. YOu actually are hostile to bright white people and your intent is to try to sabotage them I think you are motivated more by hostility towards white males than towards any other group.

        • David Ashton

          You are certainly right about the “entry receptor”, if not all the rest.

          He disregards “facts and links” that contradict him about e.g.China, and then repeats himself with quotes from Jared &c again and again.

          He calls this “debate” which he says he is “good at”.

          • JohnEngelman

            If you want to find something to justify your hostility toward Orientals you can always find something on the Internet. What matters is that on the average Orientals are more intelligent than white Gentiles, and they have lower rates of crime and illegitimacy.

            Is it really necessary for me to keep quoting Jared Taylor, Philippe Rushton, and Arthur Jensen on this?

            Thanks to the column at the top of this thread I am going to start quoting Pat Buchanan too.

          • David Ashton

            I am not “hostile” to Orientals as a race at all. I just do not want them colonizing non-Oriental countries like our own, and I think there are dangers in China’s weapons-development and foreign policy. There are many aspects of Chinese, Korean and Japanese art I particularly appreciate. I regard Mandarin as in some respects inferior to Indo-European languages, especially English. I accept the lower rates of illegitimacy among Chinese emigrant communities compared to black and some white communities, but I am also well informed about the role of Chinese sex and drug trafficking. The apprehension of white observers has been recently indicated by Beijing’s concern about their overseas tourist habits of shouting and spitting – many feel uncomfortable about the mass pack-movements of Chinese visitors (shades of their Korean infantry attacks). I think Rushton and others did not use assured IQ samples of the East Asian interior population, and he ignored my polite inquiry about this. That Chinese students are the most hard-working among immigrants in Britain I agree. The problem is not high intelligence, but the purpose to which it is put. A clever enemy is more dangerous than a stupid one.

        • JohnEngelman

          Excuse me. If my opinions are somehow unacceptable on this website, why was Pat Buchanan allowed to post this: “In The Wall Street Journal last month, Warren Kozak noted that 28,000 students in America’s citadel of diversity, New York City, took the eighth-grade exam to enter Stuyvesant, the Bronx School of Science and Brooklyn Tech, the city’s most elite high schools. Students are admitted solely on their entrance test scores.

          “Of the 830 students who will be entering Stuyvesant as freshmen this fall, 1 percent are black, 3 percent are Hispanic, 21 percent are white—and 75 percent are Asian.”

          His column is included on American Renaissance because what he said about Asians is true. What I say about them is true too.

      • gemjunior

        Ass. Go on “Chinasmack”. They will love you. You can be their syncophantic self-hating white boy.

      • David Ashton

        Thanks. We are all really looking forward to it.

  • The__Bobster

    The 2009 Programme for International Student Assessment, PISA, which measures the academic ability of 15-year-olds worldwide, found the U.S.A. falling to 17th in reading, 23rd in science, 31st in math.
    _________

    If you remove our Mestizos and Bantus from the equation, we’re in the top five for all these categories..

    • Steven Bannister

      Bobster – is that accurate or are you just throwing out a guess-timation? I am very interested in this because it’s pretty obvious that black and hispanic test scores are dragging the rest of the country down.

      Is there any accurate study which separates the American white scores from the American non-white scores? Perhaps Mr Taylor knows?

      • AllInGoodTime

        The scores are taken with all races mixed together. Black and Latino scores drag down the white scores giving a lower total American score. The Asians don’t have that little problem. Notwithstanding the pan Asianist Engleman, the fact remains that in real-world applied intelligence the White man stands alone. Asians are ready to copy what they can and adapt it. Right now, China is busy reverse-engineering American made products. Illegally.

        Too bad, so sad, Mr Engleman.

      • BonusGift

        Steve Sailer did (link from the following to the archived article): http://isteve.blogspot.fi/2010/12/pisa-school-test-scores-by-ethnicity.html
        You will see that The_Bobster is correct.

    • JohnEngelman

      In 2001 Japan and Korea were numbers one and two in mathematical literacy. Korea and Japan were numbers one and two in scientific literacy.

      http://siteselection.com/ssinsider/snapshot/sf011210.htm

      • BonusGift

        Your own link notes that Finland is ranked #1 (with the two you happen to mention); you are a deluded fool that has no business pushing your fetish based sideshow here, Also, note that the standard deviation of the three ethnic groups that tend to have slightly higher mean scores are tightly distributed relative to European ones (i.e., relatively fewer idiots but fewer geniuses). Stop pushing what amounts to a fetish based sideshow that is relatively unimportant in terms of the future of mankind (because your three preferred fetish based groups are not capable of independently progressing, i.e., without Europeans leading the way). Face it, real life only proves what we all know: the Japanese, Koreans, and Chinese (in relative pecking order of capability) are incapable of pushing the ball forward without Whitey or they wouldn’t follow Whitey around like some kind of lost dogs; they would be capable of advancing science, etc. in their own schools with their own ideas and not in our schools being fed our ideas. We all know they can take and prepare for standardized tests, but the real world isn’t a standardized test; so stop with the side show fetish stuff already the adults are trying to have a conversation.

        • JohnEngelman

          The Japanese can make better consumer goods than we can at the same prices we charge. The Chinese can produce goods as good as ours at lower prices.

          Ashkenazi Jews outperform white Gentiles at any task that requires intelligence.

          In the United States Jews and Orientals dominate the best universities because of their superior intelligence.

          • purestocles

            “Ashkenazi Jews outperform white Gentiles at any task that requires intelligence.”

            I thought they score lower on spatial intelligence. This may explain why ever since Engineering switched from visual solutions to problems via graphic methods (as used in old textbooks) to matrices–which handle equations in a more bookkeeping-like fashion not unlike spreadsheets and are therefore more “Ashkenazi friendly”–the aesthetics of our now non-representational Art and soulless Architecture have degenerated and collapsed.

          • ProWhite son of Jacob

            In my IQ test, I scored highest on the visual-spacial section. I obtained one of the highest achievable scores in that section. For reasons like this, I am better at things like Physics than Algebra and rote equations.

            However, I agree with your premise and I disagree that Ashkenazi Jews outperform White Gentiles “at any task.” The fact of the matter is that although Jews have helped economies, medicine, and general science–such as Holland from 1550-1750–Whites are responsible for White civilization and its achievements.

            Also, I have met my share of unintelligent Ashkenazi Jews. A disproportionate number of them are geniuses, but many of these do have a kind of neurosis. I have found, in my experience, hyper-intelligence sometimes leads to a strange form of eccentricity. I have met Jews that are absolute geniuses in Quantum Mechanics and Physics, and Calculus… But they sometimes lack some common sense in subjects that I would consider simple and mundane. “Savant” isn’t the word I am looking for, but maybe something more along the lines of “A Beautiful Mind.” If you have not seen that film, it depicts the life of Economics Laureate John Nash. Who is, on account of his extreme genius, slightly delusional. As the title of his film suggests, his mind was indeed beautiful, but I wouldn’t necessarily trust him in positions of political leadership.

            I see this in my own family though, where my brother has an amazing brain. He understands everything. And yet, there is so much he doesn’t truly grasp, because of his diagnosed acute paranoia. Maybe it is because I am not as intelligent as him, but I am okay with that. It seems to me that there are problems emergent in hyper-intelligence. The kind of intelligence that seems to see the world like none of us see it… That sort of intelligence is good for a respected population, but bad for positions of leadership. I think true and extreme intellect isn’t very well understood here. IQ figures and statements don’t do the reality of the situation justice, especially when we are talking about IQs beyond 130 or so.

            My brother’s IQ is 135, and recently in his Mid-Life he has developed a form of schizophrenia. He isn’t a savant, but rather understands everything as it is, from art to physics to the world… But I firmly believe that instances of high intelligence produce this. At some point, the brain isn’t advanced enough to meet what you are demanding of it. This doesn’t occur with all geniuses, and maybe this is still a temporary evolutionary quirk (nobody said evolution in terms of intelligence wasn’t a messy situation), but for the time being we should ask whether your superiority and ability to excel means you should excel.

            I ask this as an Ashkenazic man.

          • purestocles

            Wow! What a thought provoking response. Thank you.

            And I was just pulling Engelman’s chain (sorta) with that “degeneracy” stuff. I was hoping I could get him to bite and say that my sentiments recalled Hitler’s attitude towards modern Art etc etc.

          • purestocles

            I followed you all the way up to the last clause of your last sentence when you switched person and ask (I think) “whether [one’s] superiority and ability to excel means [one] should excel.”

            You raise a very provocative point in ” That sort of intelligence is good for a respected population, but bad for positions of leadership.” There does seem to be some sort of link between extreme intelligence and a psychological functional disorder–although I’m not sure that’s the right thing to call it. I can’t help but think of Nietzsche, the youngest professor at the Univ of Basel (I think it was), but simply unable to talk to humanity at the level humanity talked to itself. If extremely bright people’s minds function at higher orders of synthesis, then most of what passes for importance in everyday commerce must seem remote and alien to them. They would realize that they just “don’t get it” and, being bright people, realize that they are alone. Thinking that you’re utterly alone begets terror. Inescapable terror begets paranoia. Breakdown follows.

            Romantics romanticize the link between genius and insanity. If they had any clue of the discomfort induced by the feeling of coming unhinged they would not for an instant praise insanity. Geniuses breaking down suffer. The letters and journals of Van Gogh and Nietzsche are the best tour guides to mental dissolution in the modern West (that I’m aware of). It seems that for as long as a genius excels at that for which they deem themselves to have been put on this Earth, for as long as they follow their Muse, they can stave off madness. But, when their work meets with indifference by the broader public then their doubts (which were always there) turn to resignation. For the genius, to reject the opinion of the public is his/her natural right. But for the public to reject them, especially after they have turned themselves inside out through a lifetime of work, is unbearable.

          • Bon, From the Land of Babble

            You wrote a great post.

            I heard Dr. Laura mention once that those with “10” IQs often don’t do well in society (10 being most intelligent on a 1-10 scale).

            What you have written has been my experience as well, as a White gentile.

            I come from a very small family of professors — of chemistry, physics, math and medicine — doctors, entrepreneurs and tech specialists. We use the term “eccentric” in my family to describe those who don’t or can’t handle their IQs well.

            The smartest in my family, the top three, did not have good outcomes. The top one, deemed a math and music prodigy as a child (his mother won the Indiana state math competition) became schizophrenic as an adolescent, was impervious to all known anti-schizophrenia medication and eventually died young in an insane asylum. #2 went through several million dollar fortunes, his “get rich quick” schemes always seemed to work but he didn’t know what to do with the $$ once he got it and it slipped away as fast as he could earn it, mostly through trusting the wrong people or his own stupid choices — he’d lose everything, only to start over again.

            The last time I talked to him, he told me “everyone’s gone.” I replied, “yes, for the most part but there are still a few of us left and we need to stick together.” Next thing I knew, he’d put a bullet in his head, dead-broke financially and spiritually. The “rags to riches and back again” cycle finally got to him, I think.

            #3 is autistic, an ITT troubleshooter and only relates to computers, not humans. He’s so weird that he only “socializes” with family members because we understand him and what he is. Family joke is if you want to speak to this person, you do it through a computer, although it’s no joke because he has a terrible time communicating in a normal manner. An aimless and lost soul who’s given up on trying to fit in.

            So, unfortunately in my experience as well, the highest IQs don’t function well in society. Not one of them passed on their genes to the next generation, unfortunately.

            Bon

          • evilsandmich

            Have you seen the price of Japanese goods in Japan, crazy expensive. They can only sell that stuff more cheaply here by using various forms of government chicanery; much as how China is able to sell stuff here by keeping their people perpetually impoverished while turning their country into a toxic wasteland.

          • BonusGift

            Copying and then producing at a lower costs is not creative progress, especially if it is driven by wage arbitrage and/or currency manipulation. Correction, currently the average Ashkenazi Jews outperform the average gentile, and some gentiles outperform some Ashkenazi Jews, but no ‘Orientals’ outperform the very rightmost tails of the best Europeans. The means can be slightly different, but if the standard deviation of one distribution is greater than another than it is what it is. Also correction, most “Oriental’ groups have both a significantly lower mean and tighter distribution than Europeans (e.g., Filipinos, Thais, Vietnamese, etc.). Bottom line, one can take a sub-group of one’s choosing and say just about any inane thing one wants (which is clearly why you talk about Japanese rather than Filipinos, and Ashkenazi rather than Sephardic Jews, etc.) as you stupidly and repeatedly do, but what matters to most people on this sight isn’t that you make a fool of yourself as much as you fill up space with your inane fetish that is misguided and often , like now, just wrong and/or inaccurate at best.

          • JohnEngelman

            If I am mistaken in my admiration for Asians, why do I have such an easy time finding quotes like this on American Renaissance, “Of the 830 students who will be entering Stuyvesant as freshmen this fall, 1 percent are black, 3 percent are Hispanic, 21 percent are white—and 75 percent are Asian.

            “Now, blacks and Hispanics far outnumber Asians in New York. But at Stuyvesant, Asians will outnumber blacks and Hispanics together 19-to-1…

            “The crime rate among Hispanics is about three times that of white Americans, while the Asian crime rate is about a third that of whites.”

          • David Ashton

            Chinese cheap and prison labor, combined with western-origin technology, can produce goods conducted across frontiers by international finance, which could undercut western industries to a fatal extent; a development reversed by a national program of insulation and self-sufficiency in north America and Europe.

  • David Ashton

    How many Americans want a Mexicasia?

    Where does one get the feeling that the USA being set up as an experimental model for a Global Cosmopolis that mixes all the races of the world in one pot, though perhaps ruled by a small distinctive astute rich and astute minority?

    • Romulus

      I believe that I understand exactly whom your referring to. Im curious,however,that whenever discussions of intelligence crop up,and people allude to innate race differences, Which “white” people is Taylor and Richmond referring to? Just curious!

      • David Ashton

        I am just advancing a conjectural hypothesis which can be filled out only by careful documentation and rational analysis. The elite need not be of a single ethnic type.

        For the record, I do not believe that the “Protocols of the Elders of Zion” is authentic, and have previously given reasons for this on AmRen.

    • Romulus

      Correction: Richwine

    • Perhaps we got the idea from George Washington himself when he said
      The bosom of America is open to receive not only the Opulent and respectable Stranger, but the oppressed and persecuted of all Nations and Religions” Hmm… George Washington a member of the tribe? Man, they ARE tricky!

      • David Ashton

        Washington was misguided on this point.
        No, he wasn’t a “member of the tribe” and not all “members of the tribe” would take, or indeed have taken, that position.

      • JohnEngelman

        May the Children of the Stock of Abraham, who dwell in this land, continue to merit and enjoy the good will of the other Inhabitants; while every one shall sit under his own vine and fig tree, and there shall be none to make him afraid.

        – George Washington’s Letter to the Jews of Newport, Rhode Island
        http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/US-Israel/bigotry.html

      • Bon, From the Land of Babble

        Why do you support White genocide?

        The second session of the first Congress approved the new nation’s initial effort to codify the rules under which foreign-born persons could become U.S. citizens.

        The Naturalization Act of 1790 specified that any alien, being a free white person, could apply for citizenship, so long as he or she lived in the United States for at least two years, and in the state where the application was filed for at least a year.

        The new law also provided that “children of citizens of the United States that may be born … out of the limits of the United States shall be considered as natural born citizens.”

        Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0312/74438.html#ixzz2TSkI6gWA

        Do you understand what “for ourselves and our posterity” means?

  • Manaphy

    Why is it that the truth should be shunned out just because someones’ (namely, Hispanics’) feelings would get hurt. Every logical study as well as common sense suggest the same conclusion that Richwine came to. Hispanics (on average) do in fact have a lower IQ than whites. However, Northeast Asians have (on average) a much higher IQ than whites. Is saying that racist? of course it is not. Racist is a word solely reserved for white people of European descent who simply have the courage to admit the truth about the fundamental differences between the races.

    • wattylersrevolt

      What a fool you are. You are going to sidetrack a “debate” about race-replacement with a debate dull psychometric studies…if you can find it, go look at Donahues’ MSNBC show that Jared appeared on 12 years ago. If you don’t want the asians in our America than the case against importing Mexicans follows trivially…wth no debate about boring IQ test score psychometrics..read my comments above about Stuyvesant HS.

      • Manaphy

        “what a fool you are”

        What an excellent and thoughtful response to all the points that I made. You must surely be a professional political analyst to be able to craft such a thought-provoking and powerful rebuttal in such a short amount of time.

        By the way, I am just as much against the “Asianization” of our country as I am opposed to Hispanics and Blacks becoming the majority.

        Once again, what an excellent debater you are.

        • wattylersrevolt

          Then what is the point of having an endless debate about IQ test psychometrics..other than to have an endless debate about IQ test score psychometrics? And if you raise the issue of how to debate affirmative action..an IQ psychometric debate is irrelevant. In fact, all you have to do is read what Black Leftist Adolf Reed has written about affirmative action.
          I want to know how Pat Buchannan and Jason Richwine feel about China’s colonization of Stuyvesant HS? This is the acid test of racial loyalty.

          • rick

            If the distinct intelligence profile of whites is totally irrelevant in the debate over why we shouldn’t disappear as a genetically distinct population, then what is? Our race’s unique physical features?
            Liberals claim race differences are only skin deep so they think whites being genetically blended out of existence like the Neanderthals won’t be a big deal. You also have to keep in mind that while the overall mean IQ of Asians is slightly higher, we have more geniuses and possess greater verbal intelligence than they do. These two things (and maybe other white/oriental race differences) could account for why whites have been at the forefront of civilization advancement instead of Asians.

          • wattylersrevolt

            You’r not being serious are you? Who do you need to justifiy your existence to as a racial minority within the borders of America? The Asians? Should the White Australians have sat down with the Japanese Imperial Army during WW11 and engaged them in a deep discussion about IQ psychomtrics when it invaded Darwin?

          • rick

            The immigration act of 1965 and other laws like the HB-1 program were enacted by white politicians.. and that’s why we have Asians in our America. If you want to stop Asian immigration, you have to take on the white traitors who have allowed it, and every justification available should be utilized.

          • dmxinc

            Emanuel Celler and Jacob Javits weren’t White.

          • shmo123

            But it was the “Hart-Celler” amendment, and Hart was white.

          • You can go back further than 1965. Apparently the founding fathers where in on the plot. At the Virginia ratification convention, James Madison stated “… “… freedom arises from that multiplicity of sects which pervades America, for where there is such a variety of sects, there cannot be a majority of any one sect to oppress and persecute the rest.” Madison was probably a Jew and this left wing agenda to replace the white race is as old as the country – they just never give up.

          • Defoe

            “Sect” did not mean race.

            There are numerous writings by the founders regarding race which you have yet to quote. Try Lincoln’s writing about the blacks.

            Your attempts to have the colonial founders support integration of the races by your cherry-picked quotes is ludicrous.

          • BonusGift

            FYI, the Founders when they talked about immigrants were talking exclusively about immigration from Northwest Europe, and they assumed there wouldn’t be any from anywhere else. In addition, you don’t seem to know that they assumed any immigrants would learn the language and customs an not try to change the country. Hell, Benjamin Franklin didn’t even care for the Germans he ran into as he wasn’t so sure they would assimilate properly. In short, your comment seems to ignore who the Founders were and what they stood for with regard to the nation and its people; in fact, with respect to immigration and immigrants, your comment mocks and twists what they stood for; which I assume is your overall intent (I believe the kids these days call it being a “troll”).

          • David Ashton

            James Madison was probably NOT a Jew.

          • Bon, From the Land of Babble

            White politicians were not the driving force behind the immigration flood act of 1965 that will soon make Whites a minority in the country we Whites shed blood for, created and built.

            Which White organizations before 1966 advocated to flood this country with non-whites?

            The bill was written by two Jews, Javits and Celler and then pushed by the American Jewish Congress, the American Jewish Committee, the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith, and the American Federation of Jews from Eastern Europe.

            Read this: http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/

            Most important for the content of immigration reform [i.e., anti-restrictionism], the driving force at the core of the movement, reaching back to the 1920s, were Jewish organizations long active in opposing racial and ethnic quotas. These included the American Jewish Congress, the American Jewish Committee, the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith, and the American Federation of Jews from Eastern Europe. Jewish members of the Congress, particularly representatives from New York and Chicago, had maintained steady but largely ineffective pressure against the national origins quotas since the 1920s…. Following the shock of the Holocaust, Jewish leaders had been especially active in Washington in furthering immigration reform. To the public, the most visible evidence of the immigration reform drive.

            I wish people who post here would stop blaming Whites or Ted Kennedy (he was the FRONT man) for the 1965 Act that opened America’s borders to the Third World. Yes, I know Johnson signed the act but it was never put to a vote of the American people.

            Fortunately, the Internet has put an end to the abject misinformation pumped out by the anti-White media and anti-White politicians about “diversity” and “joys of” 3rd world immigration — both of which were designed to put an end to the White race.

            Flooding White homelands (England, Europe, America, Australia) with the sludge of the Third World is White Genocide, there is no other way to put it. And, this was done TO us not BY us.

            Bon

          • JohnEngelman

            They seem to think it is fine. Not that I am criticizing them for it.

      • potato78

        wattylersrevolt,
        Please don’t be rude.

    • crystalevans

      What I am wondering is this. Is the lower IQ true of white Hispanics such as white looking Mexicans and Cubans such as Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz?

      • George White

        I’m guessing that real Spanish/European types (the light skinned Hispanics) probably have the IQ level of other whites. The mestizos have lower IQ’s.

      • Talltrees

        The country IQ of Spain is 99. Northern Spaniards have higher IQ’s than southerners. This is a country IQ, so keep in mind tests were done by everyone eligible living in Spain. It’s not Spanish as in Spain and Portugal who have lower IQ’s (85 for Mexicans).

        Ted Cruz’s mother is Italian/Irish. His father Cuban, probably Spanish (Spain).

        Marco Rubio looks Spanish (Spain) to me.

      • rick

        Note that Buchanan says **Spain is the only Hispanic country with PISA scores in the top 40. So if most Hispanics were from Spain or of Spanish decent -like Cruz- the lower IQ angle wouldn’t apply.

      • Jefferson

        Marco Rubio does not come off as having a very high I.Q. He is dumb as a rock when it comes to the issue of amnesty.

        • RisingReich

          Or just very good at snowing the public as to his real intentions.

          None of this is “happenstance” or a “mistake” or “coincidence”.

        • BonusGift

          You are right; but keep in mind that the same group that dominates the mainstream media filters anyone that is not a RINO out of the Republican Party (especially these days at the national level). Therefore, on average, all RINOs have rather average to low general intelligence (so do Democrats for that matter). For Christ’s sake ‘Insane McCain’ was the bottom of his class, and Barry Soetoro must of been one of dumbest people to attend Harvard Law School. It’s all about the filtering before they are even presented as a ‘viable’ candidate, and Rubio is indeed an idiot. I remember that I had a friend in my undergraduate days who knew students who had interned in Washington D.C. and who told an incredulous me at the time that Congressmen were idiots. I asked how that could be? He assured me it was the case and that the interns he knew were signifcantly smarter than the Congresscritters. Filtering.

      • baltasar almudárriz

        Fully white Cubans in the US were middle- to upper-class before the country was overrun by the Marxist mafia. One would think their IQ would be comparable to that of people in the same socio-economic niche (in the US or Europe).

      • tremendouscoast

        White Hispanics have IQ’s similiar to other people of European descent.
        Latin American countries vary from being almost completely white (Argentina) to those which are predominately Amerindian (Ecuador) or mulatto (Dominican Republic). Even in the non-white countries the people running those countries tend to be white or very close to it.

    • AutomaticSlim

      I have no problems with East ASians in any way, but…

      3 to 5 points is not “much higher”.

      • BaronBaal

        I agree. Altho east asians may as a whole have an IQ a few points higher than most whites, to hear some of the people here at Amren would have you thinking that all east asians are geniuses while all whites are just so-so. I’ve lived in asia half my life and my wife is Chinese so I will say that they are no dummies but there are morons in the bunch and they have to work hard and learn just like anyone else if they want to succeed. The problem with these Amreners is that they fall for that asian model minority myth and because most of them don’t travel they don’t get to see the east asians on my side of the world.

    • Janet Yarborough

      I taught in a latino area for many years. They cannot pass algebra no matter how many times they try. And they RESENT white Americans. Send them all back.

      • Jenna Kerr

        When I attended college there were a few mestizos in my algebra class and they all wanted to be doctors. Anyway when they all failed algebra they blamed it on mathematics being racist.

      • TeutonicKnight67

        How do I reach deez keeeedz??

    • Talltrees

      Asians don’t have a MUCH higher IQ than Whites. Look up IQ’s of European countries by ethnicity, a study done by Cambridge University, excluding immigrants. IQ’s of indigenous Europeans is higher than country IQ’s. For example. Germans at 109 which is higher than Asians. Most European indigenous peoples’ IQ’s tested were over 100. Let’s not demean ourselves by including Third-World immigrants in our IQ results which is what some studies reflect.

      It’s impossible to separate European ethnicity IQ’s in the United States because of inter-ethnic childbearing; therefore we must look to European countries for IQ accuracy of Europeans. An average of all those IQ’s would equal the European IQ and it would be over 100, not 98, our country IQ, which also includes Jews. Asians (oriental) range from 104 – 106.

      See my previous post on Asian culture.

      • JohnEngelman

        According to Richard Lynn, who has spoken at American Renaissance conferences, Hong Kong, South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, and Singapore have the highest average IQs. German averages 102.

        http://www.sq.4mg.com/NationIQ.htm

        • Talltrees

          I know that’s what he says. I question the method he used to arrive at some of his scores.

          Ashkenazi Jews appear to have the highest IQ’s, maybe one point higher than Germans.

          Think you and I may have discussed this previously. Haven’t seen anything since then to change my mind.

          • Hans Kepler

            Engleman is a paper man. He gets all of his knowledge from books but never knows how to apply it. Thus for him, IQ scores are the be-all end-all.

            What really counts is what you do with your IQ. White men have done more than any other race. Period. Asians are our students.

          • Talltrees

            Yes. Regardless of IQ’s, Europeans have proven their success many times over. There’s no need to defend it. It’s so obvious.

          • BaronBaal

            I knew this one Chinese guy who worked with me when I started out selling transmissions, auxilliary transmissions, etc, years ago. Because I wanted to get into the Japanese market I had to learn all about Japanese auto-parts and that meant assembling and disassembling transmissions and other parts. It was very hard work and it took me 5 years before I mastered the thousands upon thousands of parts I had to remember so that I could sell. Again, it was hard work and you have to have excellent memory to do what I do, but what I wanted to say is that this Chinese guy was really, really smart, and he could learn the parts faster than I could and he had a better eye for detail, but in the end I won because I was more determined than him and even worked over-time to learn the parts while he went out drinking with his buddies. And after 2 years he resigned and last time I heard he was helping his dad at his dad’s grocery store while I know own successful import-export business. The moral of the story is that being a little smarter than the next guy can only help so much, and there are other factors involved when telking about success.

          • David Ashton

            Exactly. But do we want western civilization and the race that sustains it overcome by others just because they are (supposedly) more clever than we are?

          • HKwills

            Precisely. We are properly concerned with white continuity and prosperity. Kin selection theory and well documented tribal behavior makes clear that when push comes to shove, perhaps through economic stress or some other form of resource competition, whites would be subject to the tender mercies of their asian – or any other race – overlords.

            The planted axiom in Engleman’s comments is incompatible with the purpose of AmRen: we are not here to contemplate the construction of a race neutral utopia. That abject failure is all too apparent.

          • BaronBaal

            The Jews excel in the verbal part of IQ tests but in math, science, and other subjects they are only average and sometimes even less than average and their IQ is more like 107 or 108 and not 115 altho that’s what they (the Jews) would like for everybody to believe because they feel it gives them a psychological edge.

          • Talltrees

            “The underwhelming percentage of Jewish students who today achieve high scores on academic aptitude tests was totally unexpected, and very different from the impressions I had formed during my own high school and college years a generation or so ago. An examination of other available statistics seems to support my recollections and provides evidence for a dramatic recent decline in the academic performance of American Jews.”

            See “The Strange Collapse of Jewish Academic Achievement” at http://www.amren.com/news/2013/05/the-heretic-at-heritage/#comment-898032865

          • Bon, From the Land of Babble
          • David Ashton

            Engelman never changes his mind. For him Lynn on this is Holy Scripture not science that is open to change and challenge.

          • JohnEngelman

            I also like to quote this from Jared Taylor’s “Paved with Good Intentions.”Throughout this period of constant prejudice and persecution, Chinese worked hard, saved their money, and built better lives for themselves. By the time they had full, legal standing in this country, many Chinese had incomes comparable to those of nativeborn whites. By 1969, Chinese as a group outeamed Italian, German, and even Anglo-Saxon Americans.

            “During the 1960s, Chinatown was the part of San Francisco with the most unemployment and poverty, the highest rate of tuberculosis, the least education, and the most substandard housing. Nevertheless, in 1965, only five people of Chinese ancestry went to jail in the whole state of California.”
            http://lesenfantsdelazonegrise.hautetfort.com/media/00/02/1497255978.pdf

          • David Ashton

            Here we go again, the same old flash cards.
            Jared Taylor’s information on Chinatown(s) is dated and inadequate, as he would no doubt be willing to agree.
            I have referred you to many recent experts, noting that the “inscrutable” Chinese conceal their violence and other crimes from whites (as in colonial Hong Kong).
            Read the studies by Ko-lin Chin and Peter Huston just for starters.
            Or just one post-1960s news item (among scores): http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Chinatown-Gang-Branching-Out-FBI-Says-Report-2771302.php

          • Bon, From the Land of Babble

            Talltrees:

          • Talltrees

            Yes, this says it all. We have to remember this for those throwing Jewish and Asian intelligence in our faces.

        • AsianFreeAmerica

          Does it matter when only white men can put a man on the moon or invent the telephone? If we were waiting on Asians for anything we would be eating everything with two sticks. Chopsticks.

          Wake up Engleman and smell the coffee.

          • Bad_Mr_Frosty

            I hear chopstick use causes arthritis.

          • JohnEngelman

            The next time you wake smell the tea.

        • BaronBaal

          Then why is the IQ of China only 100 which is basically the same (supposedly) as whites? Because of all the dumb “minorites” that live in China? Sorry, but that’s not gonna work because China is over 90% Han Chinese so evidently the East Asians really aren’t all that. And why are you relying on data that is over 10 years old? I have actually read of Lynn and he has been accused by some scolars of cherry-picking his data which I personally believe skewed the results in favour of the East Asians somewhat. Another thing you don’t seem to understand or have overlooked is that places like Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Singapore are major urban centres of commerce and business so it’s usually the brightest and wealthiest who are attracted there and live there, Therefore, it’s only natural that the IQ average in those city states are on the high side. Go to any major European or American city that is majority white and the IQ of the people living there is gonna be higher than the national average.

          • David Ashton

            There is a consideration about the racial basis of IQ scores. These were attacked by Cultural Marxists, and their predecessors who objected to IQ tests on immigrants to the USA. Now that they seem to put Jews and Chinese above the Anglo-Saxons and Nordics, they have become more acceptable, especially to those two previously downgraded ethnic groups, whatever the scores for blacks who are no longer especially favored by Jews and Chinese. If Lynn and Rushton had come up with scores that put white Gentiles well above everyone else, they would not have got a hearing at all.

          • BaronBaal

            I see. So long as the Jews are seen as superior then it is allowed.

          • David Ashton

            Yes, I think that is so, and no-one could seriously accuse me of antisemitism.

          • JohnEngelman

            Did I imagine it, or did you say in another post that you think “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion” is authentic?

          • JohnEngelman

            China has the highest average IQ of any country with a low per capta gross domestic product. IQ is mainly determined by genes, but partially by environment. As the standard of living in China improves, so will the average IQ. Japan, Taiwan, and Korea already out score all white countries.

            http://www.sq.4mg.com/NationIQ.htm

          • BaronBaal

            I’m still not convinced, John. Your data is over 10 years old. Is that all you can find to support your opinion? At least my source is newer than yours…

            http://www.toytowngermany.com/lofi/index.php/t77178.html
            So much 3rd-world immigration has skewed the IQs of so many European countries that it’s hard to really know what the IQs of each European nation is but I suspect that the IQs of at least the Northern Europeans would be several points higher if we could find data that gives us only the IQs of native northern Europeans (which both you and I know is hard to find). Ever been to Asia, John? I’ve lived here over half my life, btw.

          • JohnEngelman

            What is the source for those findings? I could not find any.

            According to the OECD/PISA Study Korea and Japan are numbers one and two in scientific literacy. Japan and Korea are numbers one and two in mathematical literacy.

            Even the United States beats Germany in science, mathematics, and reading. Japan and Korea beat the United States in reading.

            http://siteselection.com/ssinsider/snapshot/sf011210.htm

          • BaronBaal

            http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0923110.html
            I guess it depends on where you look. Anyways, you’re not Asian so you must be stupid, Engelman. Source? I already gave you one.

          • BaronBaal

            Oh, and John? Why is Finland so high on your list?

      • BonusGift

        Bingo; also remember that Europeans have wider distributions than the three sub-groups in question.

  • wattylersrevolt

    Everyone here should understand the following:Pat Buchannan in this vdare.com post this morning has made the immigration issue an economic issue..and as a consequence, opened the door wide open for race-replacing Native Born White Americans with high achieving asians. Just go look at his comments about Stuyvesant HS. Where is the disgust from Buchannan that a New York City high School named after a Dutch Settler to North America has been colonized by China?
    So what if Hispanics become academic superstars like the asians..would race-replacement than be acceptable? If it is not acceptable to have China colonize the US educational system..and to have China’s geneline to actively participate in the destruction of thousands years of acquired scientific,medical,and engineering experience..future scientific,medical, and engineering experience that will never be developed in places such as Appalachia included…then why would it be acceptable if hispanics did the same? Some of you will respond and say that hispanics couldn’t do the same..but this is completley beside the poin.which is:race-replacement is the most powerfull and decisive case that can be made against post-1965 immigration policy…if the “debate” isn’t framed this way…but instead in terms of endless psychometric debates that completely sidetracks a discussion about race-replacement….sometime during this “exciting” psychometric debate…Native Born White Americans will become a violently persecuted racial minority in China “America”.
    Raise the issue of differences in IQ test scores among the races and it will be an endless debate about my study versus your study..and you will end up pissing of quite a few victims of the H-1 and L-1 B asian scab labor programs.
    Buchannan’s obssession with IQ test scores is a very short and direct road to racial minority status and living in an overpopulated cesspool, followed by ecological collapse which will wipe out completely the remnant White Population in Montana and Idaho.
    Jared, can you decisively destroy Pychologist Robert Sternberg in a one hour debate? Or how bout the economist Heckman? Or, how bout the economist Delong? They know the psychometric data better than you do…and they know all the problems with it. No you can’t… and neither can Buchannan. But some of the fools who post on AR will still want to continue apace with a debate that they can not decisively win…and you know what happens in the meantime.

    • crystalevans

      The reasons why Asians do well in math is because it is universal. The formulas are the same regardless of whether you learn it China or New York City. Most Asian education systems are based on memory and regurgitating that information on test day. Entrance to colleges in countries such as China, Japan, South Korea, Singapore and Hong Kong is based on top test scores on the entrance exam. Universities do not look at GPA, extracurricular activities, or whether the student will be a world changer or is a member of a minority group. They look at the test score only.

      • Japanese learn math differently: http://www.magicalmaths.org/how-japanese-kids-learn-to-multiply/
        I have my own methods for doing math … 192 times 4 is 800 minus 32.

        • Defoe

          Yes, and math is primarily memorizing a set of “rules” which must be followed precisely. That’s why computers are so good at math. No creative thinking necessary.

          Europeans stand out because of their creative thinking.

      • Beetlejuice

        Greatest mathematicians of all time:

        Isaac Newton
        Archimedes
        Carl F. Gauss
        Leonhard Euler
        Bernhard Riemann Henri Poincaré
        Joseph-Louis Lagrange
        David Hilbert
        Euclid of Alexandria
        Gottfried W. Leibniz Alexandre Grothendieck
        Pierre de Fermat
        Niels Abel
        Évariste Galois
        John von Neumann

        Hmmm. Not an Asian amongst them.

        • Defoe

          Yes again, and theoretical mathematics is quite different from the math I spoke of above which is “rule learning” math. For example, Newton and Leibnitz, an Englishman and German respectively are credited with developing Calculus simultaneously. This simultaneity occasionally happens in science. Their development (invention, if you will) of calculus is a beautiful example of the creativity in which Whites excel.

        • JohnEngelman

          Not yet.

          • Beetlejuice

            That list goes back 2,000 years and not an Asian name on it.

            –Not until they steal enough of our DNA just like they’ve stolen our technology and now want our living space and resources.
            If you want to race-replace yourself with an Asian, go for it, just don’t demand the same of the rest of us.

          • JohnEngelman

            Go to the mathematics department of any prestigious American university. You will find Oriental mathematics professors and mathematics students far out of their proportion in the U.S. population.

            During the school year of 1986 – 87 Orientals outscored whites on the mathematics part of the SAT. Since then that race gap has grown.

            http://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=171

            The United States is in decline. You can blame the decline on civil rights legislation and immigration if you want. You cannot deny the decline.

            China is rising. So are Chinese Americans. In “Paved With Good Intentions” Jared Taylor wrote: “By the time they had full, legal standing in this country, many Chinese had incomes comparable to those of nativeborn whites. By 1969, Chinese as a group outeamed Italian, German, and even Anglo-Saxon Americans.”
            http://lesenfantsdelazonegrise.hautetfort.com/media/00/02/1497255978.pdf

          • Beetlejuice

            This is because there is overt discrimination against whites at the university level both in admissions and in hiring. Good luck finding a position as a professor at ANY level in academia from the lowest community college all the way up to the Ivy League.

            This is where I work and my area of expertise do don’t even try to tell me I don’t know what I’m talking about, I do, and there is hard evidence to back it up:

            http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/the-myth-of-american-meritocracy/

          • JohnEngelman

            Instead of throwing a long article at me, excerpt the important parts.

            These are the important parts of an article that appeared on American Renaissance:

            ———–

            For years, many Asian-Americans have been convinced that it’s harder for them to gain admission to the nation’s top colleges…

            Asian students have higher average SAT scores than any other group, including whites. A study by Princeton sociologist Thomas Espenshade examined applicants to top colleges from 1997, when the maximum SAT score was 1600 (today it’s 2400). Espenshade found that Asian-Americans needed a 1550 SAT to have an equal chance of getting into an elite college as white students with a 1410 or black students with an 1100.
            http://www.amren.com/news/2011/12/some_asians_col/

          • David Ashton

            “The US is in decline…China is rising [as] are Chinese Americans.” You “do not mind” the US being dominated by Chinese and Jews.
            Why people find you out of place on this American Renaissance website is because they do not share your satisfaction with decline, and want a RENAISSANCE, an AMERICAN one.

    • JohnEngelman

      When China dominates the world, Orientals and Jews will dominate the United States. I am not gloating about it. I am simply stating what is happening as I write.

      • My forecast is that the Chinese will lose it all in a mad Pai Gow tournament – orchestrated by the Jews of course.

      • BaronBaal

        I don’t pick Jews to factor in the long run in the USA and history supports what I say.

        • Beetlejuice

          Who will send them $4b/year no questions asked, load them down with high tech weaponry and fight their wars for them when we’re gone? Who will protect them from billions of Jewish-hating Muslims?
          Asians? Mexicans? Anyone want to take a guess?

          • BaronBaal

            Hahahahaha! Point taken.

      • David Ashton

        The trouble is you don’t mind, and won’t join in any resistance to such an outcome. “…Jews will dominate the United States” – have your good friends in the ADL noticed your “hate speech”?

        • JohnEngelman

          The reason I do not mind is because I admire intelligent people with low rates of crime and illegitimacy.

          • David Ashton

            Would you have had any objection to Germans with higher intelligence and lower rates of illegitimacy dominating eastern Europe in WW2?

          • JohnEngelman

            By military conquest I would mind, not by immigration and academic and economic competition.

          • David Ashton

            So it is only the method not the outcome?
            You don’t mind being dominated by cultural aliens?

          • JohnEngelman

            Orientals are not culturally alien to me. I am fascinated by their cultures.

          • BaronBaal

            Ever been to Asia, Engelman? Why not come over and see what they are like here instead of assuming that the ones here are just like the ones you see back home?

          • David Ashton

            Fascination is not the same as being dominated.
            Living among the Chinese (who would not regard you as one of them) is quit different from admiring their aesthetics or eating their food, or making friends with westernized young girls.

          • JohnEngelman

            The only people who worry about being “dominated” by Orientals are people who cannot compete with them academically and professionally. It is a legitimate concern. Orientals tend to be very intelligent and hard working. They earn their distinctions and high incomes.

          • BaronBaal

            Maybe one day you will mind, Engelman.

      • Beetlejuice

        What makes you think Whites will survive when lorded over by “Orientals”?
        When resources are scarce, and they will be, do you think Asians will share with Whites? If you think that, then you are delusional. Everything boils down to race.

        • JohnEngelman

          You don’t seem eager to share scarce resources with Hispanics and blacks.

          • Beetlejuice

            Deflection as usual from you because you can’t answer the questions, so I’ll answer it for you.

            No, you won’t survive when Asians are your overlord. They will not share resources such as clean water, food and land with you or any other whites.
            And no, I wouldn’t share resources with Mexicans or blacks, as they wouldn’t with me. My family and then people come first, just as it does for them.
            Why should I be expected to share with them when there is no way they would share with me and in fact wish my demise.
            Geez, Engelman, you’ve got your priorities screwed up.

      • Defoe

        And you bought your crystal ball where?

    • David Ashton

      The debate, if properly permitted, CAN be won. But you are right: whatever these IQ scores, the “white” culture and its family of peoples are ours, and deserve to be preserved for our own benefit.

      • wattylersrevolt

        If, it can be won, to use a term from computer complexity theory, it would require exponential time…Native Born White Americans will be race-replaced,raped and exterminated before you could declare victory. It is just a stupid strategy. And it allows the asians in our America to get away with murder..our murder. And for this. I hate Buchannan.

  • AutomaticSlim

    Of course another great one by Pat.

    This was on townhall.com today.
    I posted a couple of comments and of course the neocons and bible thumpers over there were chomping at the bit to label me a “racist”. The Republican party does not have a very bright future. When will I ever learn…

    • Bible Thumper

      I believe Pat is himself a “bible thumper.” A proud Catholic. Lots of people here are too. Good luck with your shallow rhetoric.

      • AutomaticSlim

        I am a proud Catholic too!!!

        But I have been called a “racist” too many times at townhall, usually by evangelical lunatics who insist that “we are all the same”. Those people use the bible to avoid reality, and it is hurting this country.

        • OBSERVER

          WHO wrote the bible?

          • AutomaticSlim

            We can debate all night whether the Bible is divinely inspired, but that is not my point. There are a large portion of evangelicals who rail against any criticism of blacks and mestizos. They are very quick with the “r” word. These people are delusional and harmful. These are the same types of people who will buy into the “sainthood” of Michael King. They refuse to accept reality all in the name of piety.
            These are the types of people who will “forgive” a gang of blacks after they have raped and murdered a daughter or other loved one.

            They deserved to be called out for the naive, sanctimonious posers that they are.

          • Bad_Mr_Frosty

            Christianity has been feminized beyond all recognition. The answer to everything is prayer, forgiveness and a candlelight vigil. No action is ever to be taken.

          • Beetlejuice

            The answer (to them) is to pour more money into Africa or the poorest areas of Asia. It is never used for White causes like helping Whites in South Africa. Every Jewish function I go to has a donation box for Israel. Why can’t Christian religions help downtrodden Whites? Maybe that is why they’ve hemorrhaged members over the past 40 years.
            Why would I support a religion that uses MY hard-earned money to help Africans or Asians move here? How about using it to help White South Africans, under a death threat from murderous blacks, move to the US?
            Really, which would make better refugees? African blacks or White South Africans?
            The Christian and Catholic churches, IMO, are enemies of the White race and will remain so until they start to help Whites and not every other race.

          • TeutonicKnight67

            It is not the Churches themselves that are the enemy. They, like all bastions of European culture have been infected by the Culture Destroyer. No matter how many times some simpering milquetoast in my Church tells me I have to “welcome the new immigrants” I will NEVER change my mind. I suspect that most self-respecting white folks sit in the pew each Sunday, listen politely and quietly seethe in agreement with me.

          • Beetlejuice

            If they’re seething with resentment, why would they choose to attend, let alone fund, such a church?
            I guess there isn’t a single church left that is pro-white. I refuse to return until the church gets it’s priorities straight, meaning they support the whites who fund them. If not, they can all go out of business as far as I’m concerned and the sooner the better. Hopefully something better will arise in its place.

          • TeutonicKnight67

            The Feminist arm of The Cultural Marxists has a long reach.

          • TeutonicKnight67

            I feel your pain Slim. As a Traditional Catholic I am appalled when I see these libtard fruitcakes offering to “atone” for slavery; allowing themselves to be shackled by Blacks, encouraging miscegenation etc. The way I understand it, God wants us united in spirit, not in the flesh.

          • AutomaticSlim

            Sound good to me TK, sounds good to me.

          • Katherine McChesney

            Google your question.

        • I have no religious affiliation. I’m an atheist. I would call you a racist, but I would call you a Racist in a good way. I sure wouldn’t tell you that we are all the same.

          I don’t understand why people allow religion to become a wedge.

          • JohnEngelman

            When I make a factual assertion and someone calls me a word that has “ist” at the end, as though there is something wrong with being that word I ask, “What did I say that is not true?”

            Most of the defenders of political correctness have never heard the term “race realist.” They just should “Racist!” at me.

          • Beetlejuice

            I wish Disqus or AR had a function where I could block your posts from any thread I’m reading. Other sites have this. Your posts are one-sided, unintelligent and tiresome.

          • Defoe

            Divide and conquer. Democrat/Republican.

          • TeutonicKnight67

            The religious divide among Christian Whites must be put to rest. We can no longer afford it since our peculiar American “melting pot” has become a cesspool of bilge and our ancestral homelands are being similarly swamped. We must unite as whites, period.

            Sadly, my Catholicism has been attacked on this very site by people who should know better. Either by pagans who want to hearken back to the Viking era (Vikings weren’t particularly kind to other whites by the way), or by other sectarians who insist Catholicism is “false” or “jewish”.

            I wonder if the Klan of the 1920’s had abandoned its Anti-Papist stance, how many millions of Irish Catholics (not known for their love of the Bantu) would have swelled its ranks. How many white Catholic immigrants of all stripes would have joined to express their newfound American identity? Instead our White Nationalist Identity lies in shambles while those who would claim its banner hide in the woods burning their crosses for a dozen or so spectators.

        • Talltrees

          They have been brainwashed in churches. Intentional misinterpretations of the Bible translate into New World thinking to attact more followers.

          God separated people into ‘nations,’ and gave them their own languages. He also gave them attributes to survive in their own landscapes. This means He intentionally gave them different capabilities.

          That to me means He wanted them to stay in their own nations knowing full well they couldn’t make it in other lands and cultures. Well, they can’t in our country, so they change it to resemble their own.

          There are Christians telling me, “But, but, everyone is equal in God’s eyes.” They don’t think about what ‘equal,’ really means. Or that God separated people into nations. Yes, they have a right to be on earth and shouldn’t be mistreated, but not everyone in the Bible had the same intelligence and capabilities. It takes a certain intelligence to create and build successful nations. Something Europeans innately appear to possess.

          Now, I realize it goes against evolutionists and this isn’t an argument between creationism and evolution. I’m merely explaining how we might be able to get through to some Christians. It works for me with conservative Christians.

          • David Ashton

            Those evangelical fundamentalists, who think all human and animal populations in the world today descended from the few occupants of an “ark” about 4000 years ago, must believe in some kind of subsequent evolution to get the different races that have existed for at least 3000 years!!!!!

          • Talltrees

            I believe they do.

          • David Ashton

            St Paul reportedly made a statement about ethnic habitations similar to your own.

          • Talltrees

            God separated the people to different lands and languages to frustrate their self-destructive plans. One group wanted to stay together violating God’s request. Initially, He asked them to spread out to populate the earth, but they didn’t want to do that, so He ordered them into separate tribes (nations) with different languages for their own good.

            Below is an interesting site with reference to separate nations (ethnos [ethnicity] – Greek) and languages (glossa [tongue] – Greek) in the Bible.

            http://twelvetribes.com/articles/divided-nations

          • Beetlejuice

            The Catholic and Christian churches have been infiltrated from within to push a vision of a NWO and acceptance of (and heavy funding of) masses of poor, uneducated non-Whites from foreign countries.
            What other people/religion is THIS stupid to support those of another race who will race-replace them?

          • David Ashton

            Instead of western missionaries going overseas to convert nations to Christianity, the churches in effect prefer overseas immigrants coming into western notions to convert them from Christianity.

          • TeutonicKnight67

            Well said. Conservative Christians like myself easily see through the Neo-Modernist drivel being forced on us by short-haired women in pant suits and effeminized sissy-men.

        • You can say that again. I can’t count the number of ignorant white “conservatives” who point out that the KKK is Democrat, Democrats are liberals, and thus Klansmen are liberals — LIBERAL RACISM!! A more classic case of competitive altruism, and to our detriment, cannot be imagined. Nothing is more pathetic than a conservative who does the Left’s dirty work and yet believes himself to have “won.”

          You cannot imagine the stupidity of these Glenn Beck/Rush Limbaugh/Jonah Goldberg-worshipping, Red State Uber Alles types. It’s not just that they’re wrong. It’s their lack of anything resembling a historical perspective; it’s their coarseness of the language; and it’s their obsession with hating liberals as some sort of alien species. These backward Tea Party types really would rather have Allen West or Herman Cain as U.S. president than a true race realist.

          • Luis

            You bring up a salient point – Tea Party types nominated the likes of Sharron Angle, Richard Mourdock, Christie Whitman for political office in the last couple of elections, stupid candidates all. Heck, they even almost put in Herman Cain as the Republican nominee for president – probably to show the Democrats that they could “outnegro” the Democrats. They might have succeeded had Cain not been so stupid regarding the sexual harassment allegations.

            More and more, I’m beginning to think of the Tea Party as a masochistic lot, who will drink their own blood as they go over a cliff, not caring who they take down with them; because they need to make a political point. I honestly think that they don’t give a rat’s cajones whether their “favorite” candidate wins or not – they would rather that candidate make a bunch of noise.

          • Bad_Mr_Frosty

            The Tea Party was immediately neutralized by calling it racist. At first it existed to return to limited government, low taxes and personal responsibility. After being called racist a few hundred times, the Tea Party existed to prove it wasn’t racist and has been stuck there ever since.

      • Katherine McChesney

        An ordinary ‘proud Catholic’ isn’t a bible thumper. They ‘thump’ the books written by priests.

      • JohnEngelman

        I have read the Bible in seven English translations. Does anyone have problems with that?

        • AutomaticSlim

          I have no problem with reading the Bible.
          I have no problem with studying the Bible.
          But I do not think it should be used as the ultimate reference guide for all of life’s situations.

          Personal experience has to come into play at some point. For example, there are some evangelical types who take “turn the other cheek” to obscene levels. Self preservation is a basic human instinct, and to suppress it, especially in favor of one’s enemies, is in my opinion a mental illness.

        • David Ashton

          There’s a clever boy, telling us yet again about your private “achievement”! But what a fruitless chore, including presumably the genealogies, the regulations about mildew, the contradictory stories of the resurrection and the Apocalypse which needs an insightful commentary for the elucidation of its unusual metaphorical system.

        • Beetlejuice

          No, only with you.

        • Defoe

          Problems? No, but why would anyone do that?

    • Kblankenship7

      What is a “Bible thumper”? I see this label often, but have not seen it defined.

      • AutomaticSlim

        Well, it is an old term here in the US to describe a person who when having some sort of disagreement will open his Bible and point vigorously (thump?) on a section of scripture that seems to support his case.

        • Beetlejuice

          You mean like our enemy pounds on the Old Testament to “prove” his rights?

      • David Ashton

        It well describes the television evangelists who shout at their audiences and/or ask for “seeds” of $$$$ to save souls, bring financial fortune, and help the State of Israel.

  • APaige

    What he wrote is correct, but judged to be ‘wrong’. Liberals always push for science as their ‘God’, except when it contradicts their beliefs (feelings) then they become ‘atheists’. Conservatives lack the will to stand for ANY beliefs.

    • JohnEngelman

      Liberals condemn conservatives for being anti science, but liberals reject the finindgs of genetics.

  • IKantunderstand

    The ultimate goal is to pave the way for a one world government. How else to explain the admittance of dumb ass Mexicans, terrorist Muslims, savage Blacks, eco unfriendly Asians, ad nauseum. This unbridled immigration from anti-western civ nations, is just to provide an excuse for MORE cameras, MORE surveillance, and MORE curtailment of our constitutional rights. Well, they say, “We have to protect ourselves against crime and terrorist threats!” Yeah, right. How about not allowing any of those degenerates into our country in the first place? Huh? The governments of all White nations are doing this crap on purpose. Remove national identities, remove borders, install 24/7 surveillance cameras, feel safer? They do.Whenever I used to ask my Dad about something I found perplexing, he used to say”:Follow the money and see who benefits”. It’s not just Red Sea pedestrians, the miasma of corruption and greed, extends much further. They hate us. They hate us because we are the only obstacle left. Our people have been lulled to sleep by a rock a bye baby melody of “Government goin care for you, don’t you cry”. IT’S A LIE. IT’S A DAMN LIE. WAKE UP!

    • George White

      I agree with you. They want to do away with borders entirely and use each one of us as labor “units” and consumer “units.” The modern day Bolsheviks want our guns REALLY badly, but they will NEVER get them. Every last gun owner I know would fight to the death if they came to take the guns, knowing all too well that gun confiscation is the prep for a total takeover. Ultimately the globalists want the mexican labor to try to compete with Chinese labor, and they don’t care at all about the destruction of western societies.

      • Defoe

        “Every gun owner I know will fight to the death…”

        That may very well be “their” goal. When all the gun owners are dead, no one will stand in their way.

        I too am a gun owner, but the fight must be smart, not face to face confrontational.

        • Beetlejuice

          but the fight must be smart, not face to face confrontational.

          This is what the White race is exceptionally good at, and sets us apart from other races.

          We wouldn’t have survived this far if we’d fought “dumb.”

      • Beetlejuice

        I think they want to eliminate us. Once we face minority status and are overlorded by nonWhites, we will be slaughtered off as surplus population.
        This is already happening in South Africa without any outrage from the Western media.

        • David Ashton

          And if it’s Engelman’s Orientals, just look at Tibet.

    • ChiefDanGeorge

      I recommend the youtube video entitled “Love Your People” to all Amren readers. It mirrors many of the same points you make. A definite must watch.

      • AutomaticSlim

        Great screen name!
        Great actor!
        Little Big Man.
        Josie Wales.

    • Beetlejuice

      I sympathize with your sentiments, but I have a different take.

      The ultimate goal is to destroy the White race. It is White countries and ONLY White countries that are forced to admit dumb-ass Mexicans, terrorist Muslims, savage Blacks from Africa, eco-unfriendly Asians, etc. ALL White lands and ONLY White lands are being flooded with the 3rd world.

      This is being demanded of NO other countries except White lands. Japan has a shrinking, aging population and a horrendous colonial history (read Rape of Nanking) yet no one is insisting they take in refugees from the 3rd world to “bolster their economy,” or prop up their sagging social security system or take care of their elderly population.

      Our enemies support the genocide of the White race and ONLY the White race. When other lands are invaded or races are under threat, the UN calls it “genocide,” but looks the other way when it’s Whites that are being slaughtered. W/o a home country for Whites, there will BE no White race.

  • OBSERVER

    Buchanan is a fraud.

    He will NEVER discuss who is behind all this.

    • George White

      You could not be more wrong. Read “The Suicide of a Superpower.” Why do you think he lost his high paying TV job?

      • ChiefDanGeorge

        George, I think what OBSERVER was intimating is that Pat cannot – or will not – point the finger at the driving force behind the destruction of white America and that is the tribe. And who can blame him? He has been marginalized enough as it is. He would lose the remaining media platform that he clings to now were he to name names.

        Dr. David Duke is one of the few people with the temerity to indict the tribe, but, of course, he is locked out of the MSM altogether. The same fate awaits Pat were he to stray too far off the reservation. By the way, I read “Suicide of a Superpower” and it was a fascinating book. I agree with you: Buchanan is no fraud. He lives and works in occupied territory. There’s only so much he can do and say.

        • David Ashton

          Buchanan probably takes a similar view to mine and even the late Revilo Oliver, that “the tribe” is not the single explanation of our problems. You need to read several of Buchanan’s books for a balanced view of his balanced view.

          • Beetlejuice

            You need to re-read The Culture of Critique and then tell us we’re wrong to point out WHO is causing our destruction.

    • BaronBaal

      Yes, he seems to be afraid of the Jew word.

    • David Ashton

      He burned his fingers (and political prospects) with just one “Amen Corner” remark.

  • OBSERVER

    You know, I could not care less about all of this.

    I only care about: ARE YOU WHITE?

    That’s all. That comes FIRST. I don’t care if you are smart or dumb, rich or poor, fat or skinny. I ONLY CARE ABOUT YOU BEING WHITE.

    Therefore, this all means nothing to me.

    • JohnEngelman

      But it is important to the progress of human evolution.

      • AsianFreeAmerica

        Humans were designed in my opinion. You may be confusing adaption with macro evolution. I wonder how many of the atheists here have really submersed themselves deeply into the Design/Evolution debate and whether they have the requisite scientific background to understand it. Or are they just blindly following doctrine without question?

        • JohnEngelman

          I respect your religious faith. Here is a Christian hymn for you to listen to and think about:

          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UNRyGGSOQLQ

          • When was “all mankind” replaced with “humankind”? I think, out of habit, I will stick with the older words.

        • Defoe

          We very well may have been “designed” by a technological civilization millions of earth years ahead of us. In fact, it is likely in my opinion.

        • Beetlejuice

          You mean like Asians who are hive-like?

      • David Ashton

        Your future hybrid global “race” would bring evolutionary progress to an end.

        • JohnEngelman

          How do you figure that? When modern humans encountered Neanderthals, the Neanderthals were much less intelligent. Paleontologists know that because the frontal lobes in Neanderthal brains were smaller, their stone tool kits were more restricted, they did not practice trade, and they did not plan for the future.

          Nevertheless, everyone who is not a Negro has some Neanderthal genes. Why is that? It is because some modern humans and Neanderthals had children, and some Neanderthal genes were useful.

          The end result of miscegenation will be a species with much more genetic diversity. This will enable it to evolve faster in response to different population pressures. Miscegenation will make it less likely that the human species will become extinct.

          • Defoe

            Where did you get your training in human genetics? How can you discern “the end result of miscegenation…”

            there’s that magic crystal ball again. Where DID you get that crystal ball?

            Very little is understood yet about the mechanics of evolution, yet you can claim that “this will enable it to evolve faster…”. Another of your unfounded assertions thrown into an “argument” you will claim to have won.

          • David Ashton

            I have explained this before, without getting a response. It is quite complex.

            First, let me note that global panmixia is highly hypothetical, and comments must accordingly be hypothetical.

            Evolution acts mainly on the available phenotypes. Without special selection, the early stages of mixture would result in a hodgepodge of types previously adapted to climatic niches, etc. Sustained mixture would tend to lose the previous specialized types, including the genius end of the IQ curve, and in effect create a regression to an earlier evolutionary stage. Amalgamation without selection is also likely to produce the effect known as out-breeding depression. If some sections of the mix respond differently to environmental pressures, we would be back with different new “races”. Otherwise we get what Garrett Hardin called an “all your eggs in one basket” population, and more susceptibility to extinction.

            Evolution has meant differentiation, and successful evolution has entailed selection. Your vision has an internal contradiction. More explanation, if necessary.

    • Beetlejuice

      Again, ask “is it good for Whites” every second of every minute of every hour of every day…
      Live and breathe White.
      Just as our enemies live and breathe their own ethnic/religious/racial group.

  • OBSERVER

    Until White people own and control our own media, we will never survive.

    • BonusGift

      I fear you are correct.

  • smells_just_like

    He would still have his job today if the White community had a country of our own.

  • IstvanIN

    As much as I admire Pat Buchanan, and supported his three presidential runs, and generally agree with him, I was made a little uncomfortable with his seeming fawning over Asians. Maybe I am misinterpreting his article but, quite frankly, I do not want to be race replaced or subsumed by anybody, even if they are smarter. I want my people to survive.

    • I believe he is just trying to insulate himself from criticism that comes when you dare to mention racial differences. I don’t think it’s a capital offense to use that method, but it does highlight the problem with pro-White advocates not being able to just speak on behalf of White people for no other reason than them simply being White.

    • Nick Gherz

      I think whites can survive among Asians. Asians are doing a lot of things well, like keeping a low profile, becoming successful & staying out of jail. Asians in general are not a threat.

      It’s the groids that possess a dangerous level of stupidity.

      • IstvanIN

        Miscegenation is inevitable when two groups live either intermingled or near each other. Miscegenation leads to the end of our race. We can not afford any more miscegenation. Besides that, we deserve our own living space, we deserve the nations we built.

        • Baraby Sutton

          Thread winner. Standing ovation…

        • But I am 3/16 Amerind and pass for white. My daughter has only her epicanthic eyefolds to mark her as nonwhite, but Ariadne has Sayaka’s ivory complexion and my grey eyes and brown hair..

          • wattylersrevolt

            Many of us here are not complaning about White Americans who have North American Ameridian Ancestry in them and their children..but at the same time we don’t want to concede the Leftist slippery slope that from this…. to open borders with China and India.

          • BaronBaal

            No one cares. Did you not know?

        • Defoe

          Some of the countries we have built are gone from us forever; the task now is to find a way to build an exclusively White ethno-state. Without that in our future, I doubt we will have a future.

        • Beetlejuice

          If the lessons from the Holocaust prove that each ethnic group needs its own land where it can life safely, without fear of invasion, ,enjoy the freedom to celebrate its own unique history and culture w/o interference, and control its own borders, then this lesson applies to us too.

          We Whites demand the same border control to repel and remove invaders, by force, that Israel and Mexico have.

          Anyone who says that White nations need to become “muticultural” supports the genocide of the White race and is a mortal enemy of Whites.

      • wattylersrevolt

        If you want to live among asians..go pack your bags and go live in any number of asian nations..take your pick:china,india,korea.pakistan..but, don’t impose asia on the rest of us. Jared made a post on AR a few years back about a young white female student at USC who was viciously harrased by the asian student body because she complained about asians being to loud in the USC library..she was driven out the school. The minority White Male student population at UCSD were the target of a campus witch hunt organized by then Pakistani Student Body President over a fake hate crime.
        When Supreme Court was about to make its ruling in the Jennifer Gratz Case the obnoxious and spoiled hindu princesses on the U of Michigan Campus were agitating for a ruling against Jennifer Gratz.
        The UCSD Provost a hindu named Patel bragged about how wonderfull it was that White Male Engneering students were now a minority in the Carniege Mellon Engineering Department…he did this on the CM Engineering website. He was rewarded for this act of hindu racial aggression by being made Provost of UCSD at 450 thousand a year.
        Asians in America are actively participating in the destruction of thousands of years of acquired Native Born White American Engineering,Scientific, and Medical Experience…future generations of this kind of experience that will never be developed in places such as Appalachia included.
        Asians effectively own the “US” Congress through various highly racialized asian fifth Columns.
        Asians have set into motion the ecological destabilization of the State of Virginia’s Riparian ecosytems when they introduced various species of asian snakehead fish ino the Potomac River.
        Asians vote every four years at election time for the rapid race-replacement of the Native Born White American Majority.
        Gherz
        You are loathsome treasonous scum…go live in India if they would have you.

      • David Ashton

        Depends on their numbers (quite a lot of them, despite the Maoist culls) and their influence. Let the Chinese keep China, and North Americans keep North America.

    • OBSERVER

      Buchanan is NOT PRO WHITE.

      He may talk academically about race and IQ, but he does not put WHITE FIRST.

      Until he does that, he is a race traitor.

      • JohnEngelman

        Thomas Jefferson explained why Pat Buchanan’s column was posted on this website, “There is not a truth existing which I fear or would wish unknown unknown to the whole world.”

        • A nugget of truth doesn’t explain why even the mere mention of Asi.. brings your obvious fetish front and center. It’s like you are bringing tuna fish & pepsi to a steak & wine dinner and then scoffing at everyone because they prefer steak & wine.

          How does a Thomas Jefferson quote explain this?

          • JohnEngelman

            Race realism requires a realistic assessment of average differences between the races, even when Orientals have better averages.

            There should never be any taboos against telling the truth.

          • Race Realism is a passive voice. I take the more active road of Racism. Race-ism doesn’t require you to cling to arguments of “average differences” in order to prefer one over the other.

            Straight from AmRen’s About Us page:

            Race is an important aspect of individual and group identity. Of all the fault lines that divide society—language, religion, class, ideology—it is the most prominent and divisive.

            You still havent explained why an Asian fetish addict like yourself places himself into an arena where, as you can see from AmRen’s own wording, RACE is seen as the ultimate divide in a society. Not that IQ doesn’t matter on some level, but it’s clearly not some magical societal adhesive that keeps racial division from happening. In other words, John, even the best “high IQ” society can only tolerate so much multiracial pandering. You have to have concrete limits as far as race goes. You clearly have a lust for Asians and can’t control yourself when the topic of Asians come up. Your addiction has not limits.

            So.. what.. are.. you.. doing.. here?

          • JohnEngelman

            Why do I have to keep answering that stupid question?

            I am telling the truth about racial differences, substantiating my assertions by quoting articles I have found here and people who have spoken at American Renaissance conferences.

          • So the premise of White people preferring White people and wishing for racial autonomy is a stupid premise? Most of the negativity toward you is precisely because you keep injecting and throwing your fetish on people who are expressing a desire to see this premise to its fruition.

          • JohnEngelman

            On this issue I agree with Pat Buchanan. Those who complain about his presence here and mine are out of order.

          • David Ashton

            Hecklers who prefer the Chinese renaissance to an American renaissance are out of order here.

          • Defoe

            You have to keep answering the same question because you keep saying the same things.

            Those things you repeat over and over are known to virtually all here, and are considered irrelevant to the goals of the posters here.

            Thus, why are you here boring the rest of us with your 15 flash card responses?

          • Defoe

            No taboos, true. But tactics and strategy sometimes dictate that silence on a particular subject are best at times.

      • David Ashton

        “Race traitor” is a strong, actually erroneous and ungrateful, term for the author of books on the non-white population danger and the folly of WW2.

        The best is the enemy of the good.

    • JohnEngelman

      You are not misinterpreting his article. You are uncomfortable with the truth.

      • IstvanIN

        The truth? That we deserve to be exterminated? No sir, unlike you I do not feel that way. I just do not believe their is any justification what so ever for being race-replaced by any other peoples, even if they eidetic memories.

        • JohnEngelman

          Who said anything about exterminating whites?

    • baltasar almudárriz

      Asians may be smarter- on paper- but they have evolved other qualities which are not admirable from a creativity point of view. They are re-arrangers, not creators in the same way that Westerners are.

      • Bon, From the Land of Babble

        DID those smarter-than-White Asians create THIS? or ACHIEVE THIS?

        Case closed.

        Bon

        • wattylersrevolt

          When the Saturn Rockets were designed and built there were hardly any asians in Styuvesant High Schoo. These days, the asian “American” graduates of Stuyvesant HS go on to vote and make sure that there will never be Alpha White Males with a MIT Engineering degrees sent into space ever again.
          Pat Buchannan could have stated thisi n his book two years ago-he didn’t. I really can’t stand Buchannan.

        • JohnEngelman

          China has invested billions in improving its scientific standing. Almost every Chinese ministry has some sort of program to win a technological edge in everything from missiles to medicine. Beijing’s minister of science and technology, Wan Gang, will visit the United States in early July and is expected to showcase some of China’s successes.

          In May, for example, a supercomputer produced in China was ranked as the world’s second-fastest machine at an international conference in Germany. China is now in fourth place, tied with Germany, with the most supercomputers. China has jumped to second place — up from 14th in 1995 — behind the United States in the number of research articles published in scientific and technical journals worldwide.
          http://seattletimes.com/html/nationworld/2012239295_chinascience30.html?syndication=rss

          • Bon, From the Land of Babble

            Charles Murray writes in Human Accomplishment:

            In the sciences, 97 percent of the significant figures and events turned out to be Western. Is this merely Eurocentric bias? Of the 36 science reference books he drew upon, 28 were published after 1980, by which time historians were desperately searching for non-Westerners to praise. Only in this decade has the most advanced non-Western country, Japan, begun to win science Nobels regularly.

            Galileo is at the top in astronomy; Darwin in biology; Newton and Einstein in physics; Pasteur in medicine; Beethoven and Mozart in Western music; and, of course, Shakespeare in Western literature. Technology, Thomas Edison and James Watt.

            Professional Statistician Steve Sailer writes this about Murray’s research:

            Murray reserved eight of his 21 categories for Asians (including Arabic literature, Indian philosophy, and Chinese visual art) for non-Western arts.Murray meticulously dealt with each issue using his mastery of statistics.

            Murray, who was a Peace Corp volunteer in Thailand and has half-Asian children, began this project wanting to devote even more attention to Asian accomplishments but found he couldn’t justify his predisposition.

            Once assembled, his “inventory” of 4,002 significant figures in 21 categories … to my surprise, I can’t think of a single way to do it better than he did.

            His methods and lists should become the standards for future research.

            Feel free to pass this on.

            Bon

          • David Ashton

            Nothing for our defense people to be complacent about.

    • David Ashton

      Quite agree, as an Englishman in “England”.

  • Talltrees

    “21 percent are white—and 75 percent are Asian”

    That’s disconcerting.

    Asians may be slightly smarter than Whites overall, but there are plenty of Whites smarter than Asians. There might be a reason for this wide percentage difference. Asian culture.

    “Asian families who spoke about the exam in interviews in the past month, did not deny engaging in extensive test preparation.”

    “They cited their parents’ observance of ancient belief systems like Confucianism, a set of moral principles that emphasizes scholarship.”

    “Several students said their parents did not shy away from corporal punishment as a means of motivating them. And they said that rigorous testing was generally an accepted practice in their home countries, with the tests viewed not so much as measures of intelligence, but of industriousness.”

    “It’s all about hard work.”

    “their parents routinely plied them with motivational tales about the trials they endured back home, walking to school barefoot, struggling with hunger, being set back by floods and political unrest.”

    “Riyan spent most days at a small storefront “cram school,” memorizing surface area and volume formulas. In seventh grade, he was back there on Saturday and Sundays, unscrambling paragraphs and plowing through reading passages. The classes cost his parents $200 a month.”

    “a growing number of Asian immigrants in recent years had experienced serious adversity in their home countries. “The children hold the honor of the family in their hands,” Professor Krase said. “If they succeed, the family succeeds.””

    “some of the city’s poorest Asian immigrants had found their way into these schools, many were still being left out, for the same reason that poor blacks and Hispanics were: they do not have access to the grueling, expensive and time-consuming test preparation for the exam.”

    School’s reliance on one test for admission of which Asians prep excessively. Other factors, school grades, etc., are not considered for admittance.

    “This fall, her daughter Kassidi has spent every Tuesday afternoon and all of Saturday at the Horizon Program, a tutoring program near her house, reviewing work she has done over the past three years. Kassidi also takes a prep class on Sundays.”

    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/27/education/a-grueling-admissions-test-highlights-a-racial-divide.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

    • Bon, From the Land of Babble

      I lifted this from another AR poster, didn’t copy the handle so I can’t give him/her credit (sorry). But it’s worth repeating — and passing on.

      83% of College Students in China Cheat on Exams:

      http://www.theepochtimes.com/news/5-9-8/32106.html

      Conundrum”: 90 Percent of China’s Applicants Cheat:

      http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-levy/college-applicants-cheat_b_1074544.html

      Bon

      • Defoe

        They cheat on materials in the products they export as well. Very dangerous practice for those who use those products.

        The “best” cheater is considered the superior person throughout Asia.

      • Talltrees
        • Bon, From the Land of Babble

          Do they also brag about this?

          Fake electronic components from China have been discovered in thermal weapons sights delivered to the U.S. Army on mission computers for the Missile Defense Agency’s Terminal High Altitude Area Defense, or THAAD, missiles and on military aircraft, including several models of helicopters and the P-8A-Poseidon, according to federal investigators.

          Suspected electronic parts were found in the Forward Looking InfraRed, or FLIR, Systems being used on the Navy’s SH-60-B. The counterfeit parts were delivered by Raytheon, which alerted the Navy.

          The new evidence comes reports that the problem with faked Chinese electronic components being installed in U.S. military systems is far more widespread that originally thought.

          http://www.wnd.com/2012/06/u-s-missiles-infected-with-chinese-fakes/

          Yes, I suppose they do — laugh at stupid Whites, etc. while stealing our technology and falling all over themselves to live in White countries.

          Bon

          • Talltrees

            Both China and Japan are guilty. Japan is the ultimate copycat. China the thief; although, Japan did its share of stealing, as well.

            But, we were stupid for allowing the Japanese with their cameras open access to our technology.

            Even down to the layout of our grocery stores. I remember when living in Southern California, numerous Japanese photographing some of the nicer grocery stores. I decided, they didn’t even have the smarts to design a grocery store from the ground up.

            Of course, with Chinese manufacturing everything for us, we gave them that know how.
            I wonder how much of it is they want to live here or is it for stealing our technology and sending it back to China.

          • Talltrees

            Yes, China, the land of the fakes. It’s a huge business with them causing U.S. companies to lose millions, not to mention, serious complications and possible deaths.

          • David Ashton

            We care. Does Engelman?

  • George White

    The man simply told the truth. No good deed goes unpunished.

  • MekongDelta69

    In The Wall Street Journal last month, Warren Kozak noted that 28,000 students in America’s citadel of diversity, New York City, took the eighth-grade exam to enter Stuyvesant, the Bronx School of Science and Brooklyn Tech, the city’s most elite high schools. Students are admitted solely on their entrance test scores.

    I went to Stuyvesant a long time ago. (Scary thought!)
    I still have my Indicator (yearbook) and I looked at it a couple of weeks ago b/c an old classmate of mine got in touch with me out of the blue.

    I was reading all the things people write over their graduation picture (like in every yearbook in those days). Some were funny, some were eerily true, and some tried to be sarcastic, but ironically turned out to be more of a forecast than they were meant to be at the time (e.g. “Have a great time in Vietnam. Waste a few for me.”)

    Most importantly, I was looking at all the faces of everybody in the yearbook. I’d say (without counting), that approx. 85-90% were White; 5-10% were Oriental; ca. 3% were spanish; and ca. 2% were black. (Btw, no girls.)

    Some years after I graduated, they turned highly liberal and a few years later, they let in girls. However, the only thing that they’ve done right since those days, was keeping your entrance exam scores as the sole criteria for getting in. No affirmative action or quotas or anything else like that. Other than that, they’re a hotbed of leftism now.

    Btw, Jerry (fatboy) Nadler and Eric Hold-Em-Up also went to Stuyvesant, so even the entrance exam score can’t keep idiots out sometimes…

  • Jake

    Has anyone read his thesis? I highly doubt it. I have yet to see a an article that refutes Richwine’s findings and have it posted on AmRen. Jason should apologize only when he has been proven wrong backed up by cold, hard data.

    • wattylersrevolt

      Richwine’s thesis is 100 irrelevant to the fundamental issue facing Native Born White Americans:race-replacement…and it leads to asianphile tendencies that are on full display in Buchannan’s repellant commentary. Where does Richwine stand on asian legal immigration?

  • Dave4088

    The things that rankles me about Buchanan is he doesn’t take the white side, his own side, and writes as if he’s living on a spaceship orbiting the earth and unaffected by the trends he cites. Rather than exhort whites to oppose these changes by all means at their disposal, he seems to have resigned himself to mass third world migration and the attendant horrors it will visit on the founding white stock.

    The stench of defeatism seems to be everywhere among the conservative punditocracy these days.

    • David Ashton

      The charge of resignation against this elderly RC of the old school is better than the charge of Sinophilia, but his books provide factual ammunition for the rest of us.

  • Room101

    The telling of any truths is going to result in ‘un-pleasantness’.

  • guest

    We need a whole lot more voices such as that of Mr. Buchanan.

    • David Ashton

      Agreed. Has John “Anti-Taboo” Engelman complained to his ADL mentors about this?

  • baltasar almudárriz

    Some of my female relatives refer to them as “monkeys”.

  • humura

    Buchanan is wrong when he asserts: “Our elites appear unanimous: Richwine’s view that intelligence is not equally distributed among ethnic and racial groups, and is partly inherited, is rankest heresy.”
    I disagree. The elite know well who the intelligent groups are, and are not. That is the reason we have affirmative action and quota hiring. How else could Blacks and Hispanics be admitted to univ., receive scholarships, jobs, promotions? This is why Eleanor Holmes Norton, when she was in the EEOC under Carter changed the rules from hiring from “hiring the best qualified,” to “hiring the basically qualified.” And that with lowered standards meant that many hired and promoted were really unqualified.
    The elite know well that not all groups are equally gifted in all areas. They know that for 50 years America firms have been forced to hire “basically” qualified and basically unqualified minorities. They know this means decline for America. But the elite are not narrow Americans. They are globalists. Close the factory in America with the basically qualified workers, and move it to Mexico, China, Kazakhstan, Zimbabwe.
    The elite know about the differences among racial groups – they just never express it. And punish those who do. But it was a NJ univ. pres. some years ago who foolishly admitted it – without affirmative action and preferences, how could we admit the politically correct quota of minorities?

  • bigone4u

    I may be the only person posting here who has taught students from all ethnic backgrounds. My experiences tell me a lot about the relative practical intelligence of different groups. Here are my experiences summarized:
    #1 Jews. My classes I taught as a grad student at Tulane U. were filled with Jews. Smart and able to apply and extend what they learn so easily.
    #2 Euro Americans (whites) As smart as the Jews but easily distracted by beer, broads, and sports.
    #3 Chinese, Koreans, Japanese. Work hard but unable to apply and extend what they learn. Into rote memorization more than thinking.
    #4 “White” Hispanics Smart, but even more into beer, broads, and sports than Euros. These distractions hold them back.
    #5 Other asians. A fair number of them cannot do college work. The Vietnamese were very polite but dumb as doggie do.
    #6 Mestizos. Many can do college work, but many just don’t have it upstairs.
    #7 Blacks. What can I say you haven’t already heard.
    ?Middle Easteners. My turkish students took the initiative and were likeable and reasonably smart, but the rest I have not enough experience with.
    My best student ever? A white male from Sweden!! Perhaps not as smart book wise as the best Jews, but pleasant, took the initiative, and had much common sense.

    • BonusGift

      For what it’s worth, I have taught a few university level courses myself and would mirror your rankings/comments.

    • BaronBaal

      Sounds about right but I disagree with what you said about Vietnamese. From my experience, they are just as smart as the Chinese.

    • Bon, From the Land of Babble

      My dad taught math and physics at the university level.
      He said Asians made great physicists and engineers — but they simply could not think outside of the box.

      And thinking ‘outside of the box’ (sorry for the cliche, I couldn’t come up with anything else that fit so well) is what got us to the moon, created the high tech industry, modern medical innovations and moves civilization ahead.

      Bon

    • David Ashton

      This graduate ex-teacher in Britain agrees with you (with the curious one exception of a truly gifted black female student).

    • Funruffian

      That’s a great analysis, Bigone4u. I would say you hit the nail on the head. Don’t forget that Vietnamese, like many southeast Asians, are similar in intelligence to Thai, Cambodians, Laotians, Filippinos, etc. I think the average IQ is around 90.

  • Carlos Geary

    Mr. Reinwain statement is wrong because he assumes that “Hispanics” are a genetically
    homogenous. He should take a book and read about Latin America demographic
    composition. Hispanics are not a racially or genetically homogenous group. The inhabitants of Latin America are of a variety of ancestries, ethnic groups, and races, making the region one of the most diverse in the world. The specific composition varies from country to country, but they include individuals whose ancestors are from different parts of Europe (including North West Europe), Africa or Indian and also mixed race people. Is wrong to assume people are Hispanic or Latino because they “look like it”. Looks can no longer solely define someone’s origin.
    The majority of “Hispanics” do not look like the Hispanic stereotype. Most of the times, when we refer about “Hispanics,” we are referring to Mexicans, Cubans, Central Americans and Puerto Ricans. But, the term “Hispanic” includes people from South America. Most Hispanics consider that South Americans are very competitive, independent and have “big egos” or “High self-esteem”, which serve as a natural buffer against racism.

    • BonusGift

      I get your point, but I’m not sure either of you are wrong. I think he was especially focused on the largest ‘Hispanic’ group in the U.S. (i.e., what I would call Central American Indians and Central American Mestizos), and, as a very general rule he is probably approximately right. You are very correct to point out that ‘Hispanic’ is a rather nebulous if not downright silly term that lacks much descriptive power for what is arguably one of the most diverse groups on the planet (i.e., outside of what the U.S. has become through the cultural Marxist inspired invasion).

    • MBlanc46

      If the Latin American immigrants that were entering the US were Argentine Germans, I’d be a lot less concerned about it. I’d still be concerned, but my level of concern would be a good order of magnitude less. But most of the Latin American immigrants that enter the US are Mexican and Guatemalan mestizos. Not only do we not need more immigrants with 7.5% official unemployment, we certainly don’t need millions more Mexicans, who show little inclination to assimilate, flooding the labor market. When I say “we”, I’m clearly not including the employer class, who do think they do need millions more Mexicans to drive down wages and increase their profits.

  • Whirlwinder

    This Hispanic immigration and the resulting split in the American cultural scene plays right into the world dominating plan of Islam. Divide and conquer is a technique that Islam has used for some 1400 years now and seems to work every time for them. Divide the cultural units with diversity and multilculturalism and gobble up the individual parts until there is nothing left but dhimmis bending to the will of Islam. The new America brought about by your friendly socialist, progressive, democrat elite leaders.

    • That’s not a tactic of Islam. They are much too one-dimensional and numerous to believe that they need to hide their intentions through calls of diversity and multiculturalism.

      • David Ashton

        True, up to a point, but in Europe they exploit the “multicultural” postures of the leftist secular establishment to insert themselves and increase control. They also share with the “progressives” a hostility to Israel. It is all quite complicated. The core white interest has opponents on all fronts, and we should try to divide our enemies among themselves, rather than unite them against by foolish words and actions.

      • MikeofAges

        According to what I have heard and read, infiltration was established early as a tactic for Islamification. The stages are well known.

        Most of Islamic South Asia, notably the Islamic republics of the former Soviet Union, were taken over exactly in that way. Again, so I have heard.

      • Whirlwinder

        They do not make calls on diversity and multiculti but they take advantage of the splits. Europe and America used to be inseparable allies but Islam has driven a wedge between the two and have both entities paying muslim led nations and entities!

  • David Ashton

    What troubles me about some of the posts is their savage attack on Patrick Buchanan for his supposed ideological imperfection. Walter Williams and Melanie Phillips, of course, cannot change their genetic spots, and so criticizing them for failure to echo David Duke, for instance, is a bit empty. But Buchanan, even more than Coulter, is more helpful than harmful; and mutual support would be a better strategy than moaning about this or that heretical divergence. As for something he said that so delighted a Mr John Engelman, readers should consult what Buchanan thinks about China on his own website and on his Wikipedia biography.
    “Pat Buchanan: Sexist, Racist, Nazi Sympathizer” complains a different internet site, demanding “This guy shouldn’t even be allowed on the airwaves….”

  • Frank

    I did not need to read his dissertation to know his results. But, he has learned that you must be politically correct even at a conservative think tank!